About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Wonders | ELA
ELA K-2
The instructional materials for Grades K, 1, and 2 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. Most texts are of high quality and include rigorous reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language practice. Students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge building. Supports for teachers to implement the materials with fidelity are clear and include guidance for differentiation to authentically grow students’ skills.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
ELA 3-5
The instructional materials for Grades 3, 4, and 5 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. Most texts are of high quality and include rigorous reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language practice. Students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge building. Supports for teachers to implement the materials with fidelity are clear and include guidance for differentiation to authentically grow students’ skills.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 2nd Grade
Alignment Summary
The Wonders Grade 2 materials meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.
2nd Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials include high-quality anchor texts that are worthy of careful reading, consider a range of student interests, contain rich language, engage students, and include texts that are culturally diverse, with multi-dimensional characters. The materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Overall there are 54 literary texts and 34 informational texts, which does not reflect the 50/50 split required by the standards. The majority of anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade band. Throughout the year, the complexity of the texts increases, which supports students’ literacy growth over time. While the complexity of the associated tasks ranges from slightly complex to moderately complex throughout the year, students are expected to show increased independence as the year progresses. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a variety of texts, including a range of topics and diverse cultures and opinions. Throughout the materials, students have many opportunities to answer both text-specific and text-dependent questions and complete tasks that are grounded in the text to help them make sense of the texts being studied. Students also complete written responses and engage in small group and partner discussions of text-dependent and text-specific questions. The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a detailed section on Collaborative Conversations, a broad protocol for speaking and listening, including what it looks like, why teachers should do it, the research to support it, and the criteria for success. Materials contain numerous opportunities for students to engage in grade-appropriate writing that includes both on-demand and process writing. On-demand writing occurs throughout the year while students are reading since questions are asked in the margin of Shared Read to support comprehension and after reading each text in the Reading/Writing Companion. Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to learn and apply evidence-based writing and to watch the teacher model thinking about and collecting evidence prior to doing it independently. Materials include teacher guidance for instructional routines for vocabulary development and strategies for teaching vocabulary. Materials provide opportunities for the teacher to teach most grammar standards explicitly. Students have opportunities over the course of the year to apply newly learned skills both in and out of context. Materials provide students with systematic and explicit instruction in phonics.Materials delineate a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills.Lessons are explicitly and systematically taught through explicit instruction with teacher modeling and include student-guided practice. Materials provide multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to purposefully read on-level text during interactive read-alouds, shared reading, and differentiated instruction lessons, and students have multiple opportunities to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading. The scope and sequence provides direct correlations of the phonics, high-frequency words, and spelling lessons linking to the decodable text opportunities providing students with immediate opportunities for the application of skills and concepts taught. Materials include ongoing and frequent assessments to determine students’ mastery of foundational skills.The Assessment Handbook guides teachers’ use of the assessment data by giving key recommendations on how to use the data to group students, provide intervention for students, and reteach skills for students as appropriate. Materials provide ample support for speakers of languages other than English, special populations, and students beyond their current grade level to learn, use strategies, and receive support to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Materials include high-quality anchor texts that are worthy of careful reading, consider a range of student interests, contain rich language, engage students, and include texts that are culturally diverse, with multi-dimensional characters. The images and illustrations extend the meaning of the text and support academic vocabulary. The materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Materials include a variety of genres, including biographies, myths, fables, and expository texts. Overall there are 54 literary texts and 34 informational texts, which does not reflect the 50/50 split required by the standards. The majority of anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade band. The program includes an Explore the Text resource, which provides the quantitative and qualitative measures of each text. This resource also includes Reader and Task considerations; however, the materials do not include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Throughout the year, the complexity of the texts increases, which supports students’ literacy growth over time. While the complexity of the associated tasks ranges from slightly complex to moderately complex throughout the year, students are expected to show increased independence as the year progresses. The Teacher Edition provides suggestions for teacher prompts and appropriate scaffolds to build background knowledge and facilitate depth of knowledge. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a variety of texts, including a range of topics and diverse cultures and opinions. During small group instruction, students complete independent work, including self-selected reading tasks. Resources in the Teacher Tools section provide recommendations for allotting additional time for daily independent reading, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
The materials include high-quality anchor texts that are worthy of careful reading. The texts consider a range of student interests, contain rich language, and engage students. The materials include texts that are culturally diverse with multi-dimensional characters. The images and illustrations extend the meaning of the text and support academic vocabulary.
Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, students listen to Baby Bears by Bobbie Kalman. The text describes how baby bears are like their parents and includes many text features, including photos with captions and a diagram with labels. Bobbie Kalman is an award-winning author of more than 400 non-fiction books.
In Unit 3, Week 1, students listen to the text, Biblioburro: A True Story from Columbia, by Jeaneette Winter. The narrative nonfiction teaches students about a library in a Colombian community.
In Unit 4, Week 3, students listen to the poem “April Rain Song” by multi-award winning-author Langston Hughes. The poem uses repetition and sensory words to help the students understand and visualize the poem.
In Unit 6, Week 1, students listen to Big Red Lollipop by Rukhsana Khan, which provides information about how different cultures celebrate their birthdays, specifically in Pakistan.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. *This does not include decodable. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
While the materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards, materials do not reflect the balance of informational and literary texts required by the standards. Materials include a variety of genres, including biographies, myths, fables, and expository texts. Overall there are 54 literary texts and 34 informational texts, which does not reflect the 50/50 split required by the standards.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students listen to and read several fantasy texts such as “Little Flap Learns to Fly” (author not cited) and HELP! A Story of Friendship by Holly Keller in Unit 1, Week 2.
Students listen to and read several biographies such as Brave Bessie by Eric Velasquez and “Cesar Chavez (author not cited) in Unit 5, Week 1.
Students listen to and read several realistic fiction stories such as “Maria Celebrates Brazil”(author not cited) in Unit 1, Week 1 and Grace for President by Kelly DiPucchio in Unit 5, Week 2
Students listen to and read several science texts such as Volcanoes by Sandra Markle and “Into the Sea” (author not cited) in Unit 4, Week 2.
Students listen to several poems such as “Gray Goose” by Julie Lantos in Unit 2, Week 3, and “Helicopters” by Sylvia Cassedy in Unit 4, Week 3.
Students listen to and read several social studies texts such as “A Look at Families” (author not cited) in Unit 1, Week 1 and Families Working Together by TIME for Kids in Unit 1, Week 3.
Materials do not reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the materials, there are 88 texts. There are 54 literary texts, which make up 61% of all texts in the program, and 34 informational texts, which make up 39% of all texts.
In Unit 1, there are 12 texts, with 67% being literary and 33% being informational.
In Unit 2, there are 16 texts, with 69% being literary and 31% being informational.
In Unit 3, there are 12 texts, with 25% being literary and 75% being informational.
In Unit 4, there are 18 texts, with 72% being literary and 28% being informational.
In Unit 5, there are 12 texts, with 33% being literary and 67% being informational.
In Unit 6, there are 18 texts, with 83% being literary and 17% being informational.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1c.
The majority of anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade band. The read-aloud texts are complex, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The associated task is appropriate for the grade. The program includes an Explore the Text resource, which provides the quantitative and qualitative measures of each text. This resource also includes Reader and Task considerations; however, the materials do not include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, students read the text Baby Bears by Bobbie Kalman, which has a Lexile of 590 and is qualitatively moderately complex. The associated task is for students to discuss the question, “Why do baby bears need to stay with their mothers?” and use evidence from the text to support their response.
In Unit 4, Week 3, students read Volcanoes by Sandra Markle, which has a Lexile of 680 and is considered very complex based on organization and vocabulary and moderately complex knowledge demands. The associated task is appropriate for the grade, as students write a response to the question, “What were the effects of the ash from the volcanic eruption in Iceland?”
In Unit 5, Week 2, students read Grace for President by Kelly DiPucchio, which has a Lexile of 580 and is within the grade band stretch. The text has a qualitative complexity of very complex, with highly complex language skills. The students answer the question, “What is your opinion about who will make a better president in the story?” using evidence from the text to support their opinion.
In Unit 6, Week 1, students read Money Madness by David A. Adler, which has a Lexile of 780 and is considered moderately complex with highly complex language structures. The associated task is for students to answer the question, “Do you think bartering or using paper money is a better way for people to get things they need?” and to use evidence from the text to support their answer.
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation does not include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials include the Explore the Texts resource, which provides an overview of the qualitative and quantitative measures of the texts in the materials. It also includes Reader and Task considerations.
The Teacher Edition provides an overview of the texts that are selected in the Wonders and Science of Reading section. It explains that the lessons are “built around a high-quality collection of complex literary and information texts, focused on both the natural and social worlds.” However, there is no information about the educational purpose and placement of the individual texts.
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics. The accuracy of the provided associated task measures was verified using grade-level standards.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1d.
Throughout the year, the complexity of the texts that students read increases, supporting students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. At the beginning of the year, the quantitative range of texts is 390L–640L, and by the end of the year, the range increases to 600L–910L. The qualitative features of the texts slightly increase, with the majority at the beginning of the year being slightly complex. By the end of the year, the majority of the texts are moderately complex. In Unit 1, six of the 12 texts are slightly complex, and the remaining are moderately complex. By Unit 6, two of the 18 texts are slightly complex, but 16 of the 28 texts are moderately complex. While the complexity of the associated tasks ranges from slightly complex to moderately complex throughout the year, students are expected to show increased independence as the year progresses. The Teacher Edition provides suggestions for teacher prompts and appropriate scaffolds to build background knowledge and facilitate depth of knowledge.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the quantitative measures range from 390L–640L, with six texts being slightly complex and 13 being moderately complex qualitatively. In Unit 1, Week 1, students listen to “Dinner at Alejandro’s” (author not cited), which has a Lexile of 570L. The associated task requires students to discuss how Alejandro’s family is the same and different from their own family, which is a low complexity task. Students also practice retelling with their peers. For example, in Unit 1, Week 1, students use the shared reading text, “Maria Celebrates Brazil” (author not cited), to work with a partner and retell the selection orally.
In Unit 5, the quantitative measure ranges from 510L–820L, with qualitative features ranging from slightly complex (two texts) to very complex (one text). Many of the associated tasks meet expectations for complexity. For example, students listen to “A Hero On and Off the Skis” (author not cited) in Week 1, which has a Lexile of 820L and is appropriate for a read-aloud. The associated task requires students to discuss why people consider Diana Golden a hero.
In Unit 6, the quantitative measures increase slightly to 600L–910L, with the majority of the texts being moderately complex (16). The read-alouds continue to be below the Lexile stretch band for the grade. In Week 1, students listen to “Keep the Change!” (author not cited), which has a Lexile of 700. Students continue to practice retelling, a lower complexity skill. In Unit 6, Week 1, students use King Midas and the Golden Touch (author not cited) and work with a partner to retell the story.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in Teacher Edition (i.e., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Manual, boxes are included throughout the units to help teachers make complex texts accessible to students. The Access Complex Text boxes include scaffolded instruction for seven elements that may make a text complex.
In the Teacher’s Manual, the materials indicate to the teacher when to use the Scaffolded Shared Read routine, though the routine remains the same throughout the year.
The Close Reading Routine remains the same throughout the year to help students access complex texts, though students are expected to show more independence as the year progresses. The routine begins with reading the text, identifying important ideas and details, and retelling. Then students reread and discuss craft and structure. Lastly, students make text-to-text connections and engage in a Show Your Knowledge task.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1e.
The materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a variety of texts including a range of topics and diverse cultures and opinions. Units are organized around three text sets. Set 1 covers weeks one and two, Set 2 covers weeks three and four, and Set 3 is completed in week 5. Each two-week cycle is focused on a genre study with an essential question. During small group instruction, students complete independent work, including self-selected reading tasks. Resources in the Teacher Tools section provide recommendations for allotting additional time for daily independent reading, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter. Teacher resources provide instruction to help students develop skills to monitor learning and check progress. Throughout each week, students read and listen to anchor texts, paired texts, decodables, leveled readers, and shared reading. Students engage with literary and informational texts, including myths, fables, drama, poems, biographies, science, and history texts. The program includes a clear routine for independent reading with accountability.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in reading a variety of texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Text Set 2, students read the Anchor Text, HELP! A Story of Friendship by Holly Keller, a fantasy text. Students also read several other fantasy texts and a folktale in this unit.
In Unit 3, students read and listen to a variety of texts, including narrative poetry, realistic fiction, biography, fantasy, folktale, and informational texts. In Text Set 1, students read the Anchor Text, Biblioburro: A True Story from Colombia by Jeanette Winter, a narrative nonfiction text.
In Unit 5, students read a variety of texts, including a biography, a fairy tale, realistic fiction, an opinion piece, narrative nonfiction, and informational texts. In Week 4, students read the paired text, “Meet the Insects” (author not cited).
In Unit 6, Text Set 2, students read the Anchor Text, The Contest of Athena and Poseidon by Pamela Walker, which is a drama and myth. Students also read another play and two other myths.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students engage with Interactive Read Alouds, Paired Selections, and Anchor Texts over the course of nine texts organized into three text sets spanning 30 lessons. Students also read leveled readers and listen to read-alouds that align with the topic.
In Unit 3, students read and listen to nine texts organized into three different text sets spanning 30 lessons through the use of Interactive Read Alouds, Paired Selections, and Anchor Texts. There is also a Classroom Library Read Aloud selection and additional texts that the teacher can use in the unit.
In Unit 6, students read and listen to Interactive Read Alouds, Paired Selections, and Anchor Texts in 13 texts organized into three text sets spanning 30 lessons. There are also leveled readers, read-alouds, and a bibliography of additional readings that are appropriate for the teacher to use or for the students to read in the unit.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers.(eg. Proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading, independent reading procedures are included in the lessons.) Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes routines for independent reading and recommends 10 - 20 minutes a day for students in Grade 2. It suggests that independent reading be a part of the center rotation. The Handbook also prompts teachers to teach the routine so students can choose books and read independently while the teacher works with small groups.
The Independent Reading Routine, found in the Instructional Routines Handbook, includes selecting a book that is interesting, reading the book during independent reading time, recording what they read on the provided reading log at the end of each session, sharing opinions of the text with a friend or writing a review when finished with a book, and beginning again.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a list of resources to support independent reading. These include independent reading selections in the Literature Anthology, TIME for Kids online digital articles, leveled readers, and classroom library trade books with online lessons and activities for each text.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a procedure for conferencing around independent reading. The procedure is not specific but gives information such as, “Make a positive observation about the student’s reading or book choice” and “Regularly conferring with students about their independent reading is a great way to informally assess their progress, model social-emotional learning skills, build your classroom culture, and instill habits of learning.”
Independent reading guidance is also found in the Differentiated Instruction section of the units. The guidelines are relatively similar across each unit and level. For example, in Unit 6, Week 2, the guidance includes “help children select an illustrated fiction story for independent reading. Encourage them to read for twelve minutes … ”
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Throughout the materials, students have many opportunities to answer both text-specific and text-dependent questions and complete tasks that are grounded in the text to help them make sense of the texts being studied. This occurs for all texts, including Anchor texts, Shared Reading, and even decodable readers that are independently read during the fourth and fifth day of the week. Students also complete written responses and engage in small group and partner discussions of text-dependent and text-specific questions. The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a detailed section on Collaborative Conversations, a broad protocol for speaking and listening, including what it looks like, why teachers should do it, the research to support it, and the criteria for success. Throughout the program, students engage in various Collaborative Conversations such as “Turn and Talk,” “Ask and Answer Questions,” and “Add New Ideas.” Collaborative Conversations are found throughout the program and help students with agreed-upon rules for discussions and presentations. Students present and converse with partners, small groups, and the class. Materials contain numerous opportunities for students to engage in grade-appropriate writing that includes both on-demand and process writing. On-demand writing occurs throughout the year while students are reading since questions are asked in the margin of Shared Read to support comprehension and after reading each text in the Reading/Writing Companion. Each unit also has two extended writing projects that span anywhere from ten lessons to 20 lessons. Students have opportunities to engage in narrative, expository, and opinion writing. In each unit, students write two process writing pieces. Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to learn and apply evidence-based writing and to watch the teacher model thinking about and collecting evidence prior to doing it independently. Materials include teacher guidance for instructional routines for vocabulary development and strategies for teaching vocabulary. Oral vocabulary is repeated through discussions guided by the essential question. These vocabulary words are not repeated across multiple texts; however, the Words in Context academic vocabulary words are taught across the text set and found in multiple texts. Materials provide opportunities for the teacher to teach most grammar standards explicitly. Students have opportunities over the course of the year to apply newly learned skills both in and out of context. Instructional materials provide explicit instruction and application for students in the use of apostrophes in contractions, the use of adjectives and adverbs, capitalization of holidays, and the use of irregular plural nouns through teacher-led grammar lessons throughout the program. Explicit instruction related to comparing formal and informal use of language was not found in the materials; however, materials include one lesson on formal uses of English.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1f.
Throughout the materials, students have many opportunities to answer both text-specific and text-dependent questions and complete tasks that are grounded in the text to help them make sense of the texts being studied. This occurs for all texts, including Anchor texts, Shared Reading, and even decodable readers that are independently read during the fourth and fifth day of the week. Prompts are found throughout the student readers to help students find text evidence to answer text-dependent and text-specific questions, and graphic organizers are provided for students to collect evidence when discussing literary items such as perspective. Students also complete written responses and engage in small group and partner discussions of text-dependent and text-specific questions.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 2, students reread “Maria Celebrates Brazil” (author not cited) and all of the questions are text-specific and text-dependent. When teaching plot structure, the teacher asks, “What problem does Maria have at the beginning of the story?” Then the students work with a partner to find text evidence about how Maria’s feelings change in the middle and end of the story. Guiding questions include, “How does Maria feel about practice after her father talks with her? How does Maria feel about practice when she’s in the parade?” Students also work on craft and structure and are asked questions such as “Why does the author use Portuguese words in the story?” and “Why does the author describe Maria’s thoughts?” At the end of the lesson, students write about how Maria’s parents help her to make a good decision and do the right thing.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 2, students reread “Eagles and Eaglets” (author not cited). When teaching about craft and structure, the teacher asks, “What evidence shows the author is using description on page 13? How does the author help you picture the size of the eagle’s nest?” and “How does the author point out an important detail in the illustration?” At the end of the lesson, students write about why eagles need to take care of the offspring and analyze text evidence in their writing.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 1, students read “Starry Night” (author not cited) in shared reading. While reading aloud, the teacher asks text-dependent questions such as “Who are the characters?” and “What new event happens?” After reading, students work in pairs and reread page 44 and describe what people can see through a telescope. Then students focus on character perspectives and are asked questions such as, “Read the first paragraph. Look for clues about Ling’s perspective. What does she say? What does the narrator say she is thinking about?” Finally, students talk about the sequence of events of the story and use a graphic organizer to record what happens in sequential order in the story.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 2, students reread “Happy New Year!” (author not cited) in shared reading. The teacher asks questions such as “What is one custom the girl and her family celebrate on New Year’s Eve at Grandma’s house?” and “What do the dancers who are wearing this costume do?” At the end of the lesson, students write in response to the question, “Why does the author show that people in China and the United States celebrate the Year Year differently?”
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 3, students read the decodable reader “Stay Out of Trouble” (author not cited). After students read the text, there are several comprehension questions asked of students, including “What do the boy’s mom and dad tell him to do?”, “What does the boy say about trouble?”, and “What does the boy say about his parents at the end of the story?”
In Unit 6, Weeks 3, Lesson 2, students reread “The Starry Asters” (author not cited) in shared reading. The teacher asks questions such as, “What do we know about Aster so far?” and “How does the author use stage directions to help you visualize the characters?” At the end of the lesson, students write in response to the prompt, “How does the theme of the play develop from the diagnosis of the characters?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
There are several graphic organizers that support the implementation of text-based questions and tasks. For example, there is a character perspective graphic organizer, where the student writes the character name, the clue (evidence from the text), and then the perspective. In addition, in Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 2, students identify the central idea and relevant details of the shared reading text “Eagles and Eaglets” (author not cited) by filling in a graphic organizer with details that connect to provided topics. Similarly, in Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 2, after rereading “Happy New Year!” (author not cited), students use a graphic organizer to determine the similarities and differences between how New Year is celebrated in the United States and China.
In Unit 1, Week 6, there is a Connect to Content section. Students first take notes while reading “Taking Care of Freddy” and “Busy Bees” (authors not cited), and then students fill in a chart to cite evidence with the details that describe what people and animals do in both texts.
While engaging in the Shared Reading, there are opportunities for students to pause and underline evidence to support answers to text-dependent questions. For example, in Unit 3, Week 3, on page 45 of the student book, it tells students to “Circle what Josie’s dad says the girls can do now.” Then students answer the question, “What do the girls want to do?”
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a Finding Text Evidence Routine. First, the teacher explains the routine and what text evidence means. Then the teacher models locating text evidence. The teacher then engages in guided practice with the students before they work independently or in small groups to identify and cite text evidence.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a Response to the Text Routine to help students answer rigorous questions about the text. The routine includes reading the question and talking about it with a partner before going back into the selection of the text, rereading, and finding evidence to support thoughts and ideas. Then the students use a graphic organizer to record their responses.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1g.
There are several protocols to support students in their speaking and listening. The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a detailed section on Collaborative Conversations, a broad protocol for speaking and listening, including what it looks like, why teachers should do it, the research to support it, and the criteria for success. Throughout the program, students engage in various Collaborative Conversations such as “Turn and Talk,” “Ask and Answer Questions,” and “Add New Ideas.” The program also includes brief and practical reminders about being an active listener. Students are also provided with support by orally retelling stories throughout the entire program.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is a protocol called Collaborative Conversations, which are “rich, structured conversations around grade-level topics and texts.” Collaborative conversations occur at the beginning of the week when the essential question is introduced, every time students engage in the Close Reading Routine, during guided and independent practice, when students respond to texts they are reading, and when students write about text.
Students are reminded of discussion rules throughout the program, which include focusing on the topic, listening to others carefully, asking and answering questions, and speaking when recognized.
The “Take Turns Routine” occurs during partner, small-group, or whole-group discussions. The rules are to wait for a person to finish before they speak, quietly raise their hand when they want to speak, and ask others to share their ideas and opinions.
The “Add New Ideas” protocol helps students add knowledge to an anchor chart. Whether students are working in partners, small groups, or in a whole group discussion, students are reminded to stay focused on the topic, build on the ideas of others, and connect their personal experiences to the conversation.
The “Be Open to All Ideas” protocol, which is a Collaborative Conversation, has students respect the opinions of others, ask questions if something is unclear, and offer opinions, even if they are different.
Students are also reminded of the rules to “Listen Carefully,” which include waiting for the person to finish speaking before they speak, not speaking over others, and repeating others’ ideas to check for understanding.
The “Ask and Answer Questions” protocol encourages students to ask questions about ideas that are unclear, wait a few seconds after asking a question to give others time to respond, and answer questions using sentences.
Students engage in retelling a story throughout the program. The routine for this includes introducing students to concept of retelling by displaying the Interactive Read Aloud cards; using the retell questions to guide children to recall the basic events and contents of the text; using words like beginning, middle, and end to help guide students’ retelling; and asking higher-level questions that prompt students to summarize story concepts.
There are Oral Language Sentence Frames to support students in expressing information and ideas, asking and answering questions, persuading others, evaluating language choices, and engaging in dialogue. For example, the “Asking and Answering Questions” sentence stem includes, “How do you ______? I know ______ because ______”.
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional support for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Collaborative Conversation Routine begins with the teacher introducing the topic they will discuss and then reviewing any relevant guidelines to support student participation. Then the teacher gives specific information on what students should be doing, such as how much time they have to discuss, who they are talking with (i.e., partner, small group, whole group), and what the teacher expects them to do as a result of the conversation (i.e., take notes, write a reflection, share with the larger group). Then the teacher monitors student conversations and provides corrective feedback if necessary. To close out the conversation and routine, the teacher highlights positive behaviors and contributions.
There is a Collaborative Conversations logo in the Teacher’s Edition each time a collaborative conversation is recommended. There is instructional support on the “Talk About It” page at the start of each genre study or week and on the Peer Conferencing pages.
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is a section that explains what successful Collaborative Conversations look like including being “able to make statements and ask questions related to the focus.”
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there are additional strategies for teaching collaborative conversations including role-playing a collaborative conversation to model the routine. There are also sentence starters such as “I’m wondering” and “Can you point to text evidence that shows?”
There is a Collaborative Conversations Video to help with the facilitation. The handbook suggests that the teacher stop at certain points and use a checklist to discuss how the teacher helps the group prepare for their collaborative conversation. At the end of the video, the students work with a partner and discuss what they see students doing and what they could be doing better.
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is an anchor chart for the teacher to display on “How to Have a Collaborative Conversation.”
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is a section on how to provide corrective feedback during discussions. Teachers are encouraged to point out what students are doing right, redirect discussions that may have gotten off track by suggesting statements or questions that will refocus the discussion, and encourage students to build on one another’s exchanges.
Indicator 1H
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading (or read aloud) and researching (shared projects) with relevant follow-up questions and support.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1h.
Students have many opportunities to listen to a text and answer questions. Collaborative Conversations are found throughout the program and help students with agreed-upon rules for discussions and presentations. Students present and converse with partners, small groups, and the class. Students also have the opportunity to evaluate their presentations, and peers are prompted to ask for clarification and further explanation.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., gaining the floor in respectful ways, listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 1, students are reminded to follow discussion rules as they share information. The rules are to focus on the topic, listen to others carefully, ask and answer questions, and speak when recognized.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 1, students review the expectations for asking and answering questions. These expectations include “Ask questions about ideas that are unclear. Wait a few seconds after asking a question to give others time to respond. Answer questions using sentences, not one-word responses.”
The Instructional Routines Handbook outlines expectations for listening to a presentation. This includes listening actively, thinking about the presentation, and sharing feedback with the presenter.
The Instructional Routines Handbook outlines expectations for Collaborative Conversations. A video shows students how to participate and engage in a group discussion.
Create audio recordings of stories or poems; add drawings or other visual displays to stories or recounts of experiences when appropriate to clarify ideas, thoughts, and feelings. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 1, Week 1, students create a picture book to show the knowledge built about how young animals change and become adults. Students add drawings or other visual displays to help clarify ideas, thoughts, and feelings.
In Unit 3, students write a personal narrative. Students then present it to the class. They can include illustrations or other visuals in their published work.
Online materials provide an Audio Recording Tool that can be used for students to record their reading.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Build on others' talk in conversations by linking their comments to the remarks of others. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Reading and Writing Companion, students talk with a partner about vocabulary words from the text and answer questions together, utilizing text evidence.
In Unit 6, Reading and Writing Companion, students talk with a partner about vocabulary words from the text and answer the questions together, utilizing text evidence.
Ask for clarification and further explanation as needed about the topics and texts under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In writing, students ask questions during peer review. The steps for that include listening carefully and asking questions that will help better understand anything that is unclear. The sentence starter is, “I have a question about...”
Recount or describe key ideas or details from a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 1, students build knowledge using the essential question, “How are offspring like their parents?” Students watch a video and then discuss with a partner how the lion cub and baby penguin are similar to their parents.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 2, after reading and listening to “Cesar Chavez” (author not cited), students work in pairs to summarize the text. They discuss with a partner before writing the summary.
Ask and answer questions about what a speaker says in order to clarify comprehension, gather additional information, or deepen understanding of a topic or issue. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, the Reading/Writing Companion, students review their writing draft during a peer conference. Partners share what they like about the draft and utilize sentence starters to discuss their partner’s writing. One of the sentence starters is “I have a question about...”
Tell a story or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking audibly in coherent sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lessons 3 -6, after listening to Brave Bessie by Eric Velasquez, students retell the selection orally, using their notes and charts to recount in their own words the central idea and relevant details.
The Retelling Routine asks students to describe people, places, things, and events from the story.
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process, grade-appropriate writing (e.g., grade-appropriate revision and editing) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1i.
Materials contain numerous opportunities for students to engage in grade-appropriate writing that includes both on-demand and process writing. On-demand writing occurs throughout the year while students are reading since questions are asked in the margin of Shared Read to support comprehension and after reading each text in the Reading/Writing Companion. Each unit also has two extended writing projects that span anywhere from ten lessons to 20 lessons. Each writing project walks students through the steps of the writing process with explicit lessons and includes opportunities for revising and editing. The Extended Writing section includes digital resources, like models, graphic organizers, and videos, to enhance instruction.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 2, students write about the shared read after reading “Eagles and Eaglets” (author not cited). The prompt asks, “Why do eagles need to take care of their offspring?” Students work with a partner, using their notes and text evidence to discuss the prompt before writing their response.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 6, students write about the anchor text, Biblioburro: A True Story from Colombia, by Jeanette Winter. In their Reading/Writing Companion, students respond to the question, “Why is it important for Luis to travel to faraway villages each week?
In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 2, students write about the shared reading after reading “Happy New Year!” (author not cited). The prompt asks, “Why does the author show that people in China and the United States celebrate the New Year differently?” Students work with a partner, using the sentence starters in the Reading/Writing Companion to write about the differences between the two celebrations.
In Unit 6, Weeks 1–2, Lesson 2, students write about the shared reading after reading“The Life of a Dollar Bill” (author not cited). The prompt asks, “How does the selection help you understand the life of a dollar bill?” Students work with a partner, using the sentence starters in the Reading/Writing Companion to focus on how the author organizes information to help readers understand the life of a dollar bill.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students spend up to 20 lessons writing a realistic fiction story about a family. Lessons 1–10 include mini-lessons on writing craft, sequence, and details. Lessons 11–20 have lessons on revising for strong openings, peer conferencing, editing, and publishing. There is a bank of lessons for teachers to choose from based on the pace and needs of the class.
In Unit 3, students spend up to two weeks writing an expository essay that tells about the music of a musical instrument. Lessons include looking at a model text, drafting, revising to make strong openings, peer conferencing, editing, and publishing.
In Unit 5, students spend several weeks writing an opinion essay that explains whether second graders should volunteer in the community. Students begin by analyzing the prompt, planning their essays, and drafting with relevant evidence. Then students spend several days revising, including with a peer and publishing.
In Unit 6, students spend up to two weeks writing an expository text that combines information from three sources. Throughout the lessons, students analyze the rubric, student model, prompt, and sources and plan and draft with a focus on academic vocabulary. Students revise with peers and work on writing a conclusion.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit 1 Writing Project 1 suggests that students publish their writing in print or digitally, and students can illustrate their stories or record an audio/video presentation of their writing.
In Unit 3, digital resources include digital graphic organizers, videos on different writing types, a video on how to write for your audience, a video on how to create a story map, model student writing samples, and digital copies of a peer conferencing checklist.
In Unit 4, Weeks 1–2, Lesson 1, students retell the story “Happy New Year!” orally, then write a retelling in their reader’s notebooks. The Teacher’s Edition states that “Children may decide to digitally record presentations of retellings.”
In Unit 5, there are several video resources that the teacher can share with students, including one on the revision checklist, one on peer conferencing, and one on the peer conferencing checklist.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing (year-long) that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1j.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative, expository, and opinion writing throughout the Grade 2 materials. In each unit, students write two process writing pieces. In Unit 1, students write a realistic fiction piece and an expository essay. In Unit 2, students write a research report and a rhyming poem. In Unit 3, students write a personal narrative and an expository essay. In Unit 4, students write a realistic fiction piece and a free verse poem. In Unit 5, students write two opinion essays. In Unit 6, students write two expository essays. It is important to note that opinion writing only takes place in Unit 5.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. For example:
Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:
17% of process writing opportunities are opinion writing. Opinion writing only takes place in Unit 5.
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:
58% of process writing opportunities are informative. Informative writing takes place in all units except unit 5.
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:
25% of process writing opportunities are narrative. Narrative writing takes place in Units 1–4.
Explicit instruction in opinion writing:
The Unit 5 materials include mini-lessons to support students in writing opinion pieces. Lessons include using facts, reasons, and quotes to support an opinion, how to write a strong introduction, and how to restate the opinion in the conclusion.
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
The Unit 1 materials include mini-lessons to support students in writing informative pieces. Lessons include how to ask the 5W and how questions, how to add facts, and how to use quotations, definitions, and examples in writing.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
The Unit 1 materials include mini-lessons to support students in writing narrative pieces. Lessons include how to focus on an event, how to use a third-person point of view, how to describe a setting, how to combine sentences, and how to add dialogue.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. For example:
Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing.
Write opinion pieces in which they introduce the topic or book they are writing about, state an opinion, supply reasons that support the opinion, use linking words (e.g., because, and, also) to connect opinion and reasons, and provide a concluding statement or section.
In Unit 5, Project 1, students write an opinion essay about whether second graders should volunteer in the community. Instruction focuses on providing a clear opinion statement, relevant evidence, and reasons to support the opinion and has a conclusion.
In Unit 5, Project 2, students write another opinion essay, but this time combining information from two sources. Lessons also focus on using transitional words.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. For example:
Write informative/explanatory texts in which they introduce a topic, use facts and definitions to develop points, and provide a concluding statement or section.
In Unit 1, Project 2, students write an expository essay about workers. They tell facts about the jobs to help readers understand what workers do to help the community. Instruction focuses on text features, details, and a clear ending.
In Unit 3, Project 2, students write an expository essay about a favorite kind of music or musical instrument. Lessons focus on evaluating sources, writing paragraphs, and using strong openings.
In Unit 6, Project 1, students write an expository essay using information from three sources. Students write an essay that explains why agriculture, or farming, is an important business.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. For example:
Write narratives in which they recount a well-elaborated event or short sequence of events, include details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings, use temporal words to signal event order, and provide a sense of closure.
In Unit 1, Project 1, students write a realistic fiction story. Instruction focuses on characters’ actions and words; words that indicate sequence; a beginning, middle, and end; and how the characters solve a problem.
In Unit 3, Project 1, students write a personal narrative. Lessons focus on sequencing and concluding.
In Unit 4, Project 1, students write a realistic fiction story about a character who has visited two places.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). For example:
In Unit 1, Text Set 3, after reading the Shared Reading, “Families Work!” (author not cited), students respond to the prompt, “How does the Young family decide how to spend their money?”
In Unit 4, Text Set 3, students use the poems “April Rain Song” by Langston Hughes and “Rain Poem” by Elizabeth Coatsworth to write about how the poets feel about the rain.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 5, students write an opinion piece after reading “The Problem with Plastic Bags” (TIME for Kids). Students write about whether plastic bags should be banned.
Indicator 1K
Materials include regular opportunities for evidence-based writing to support recall of information, opinions with reasons, and relevant information appropriate for the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the expectations of Indicator 1k.
Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to learn and apply evidence-based writing. Students have the opportunity to watch the teacher model thinking about and collecting evidence prior to doing it independently. During direct instruction, the teacher often tells students where to find the evidence and asks guiding questions to help students use evidence effectively in their responses.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 6, after reading the anchor text, HELP! A Story of Friendship by Holly Keller, students respond to the question, “What does Mouse learn about listening to gossip?” The teacher asks numerous guiding questions to help students find text evidence, including pointing out which page to find the answer to the question.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Lesson 6, after reading the anchor text, Baby Bears by Bobbie Kalman, students answer the question, “Why do baby bears need to stay with their mothers?” The teacher helps students by asking them to turn to specific pages and asks guiding questions such as, “What details here can help you explain why baby bears stay with their mothers?”
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 1, students read “The Life of a Dollar Bill” (author not cited) and summarize the text. The teacher begins by directly teaching how to summarize a nonfiction text. The teacher explains that students should first identify the most important details and goes over how to identify if the detail is the most important. The teacher then models how to summarize one page of the text before students work in partners to summarize another page of the text.
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 2, after reading the Shared Read, “Little Flap Learns to Fly'' (author not cited), students answer the question, “Why does Little Flap share the worm with his friends at the end?”
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 6, after listening to the Anchor Text, Biblioburro: A True Story from Colombia by Jeanette Winter, students answer the question, “Why is it important for Louis to travel to faraway villages each week?”
In Unit 5, Week 2, Lesson 6, after listening to and reading Brave Bessie by Eric Velasquez, students respond to the question, “How does Bessie’s story show what it means to be a hero?”
In Unit 6, Week 5, Lesson 1, while reading the poem, “What Story is This?” by Trevor Renyolds, the margin of the text asks students to underline what the speaker says you can do with crayons and then asks students, “Why does the speaker say, ‘None of us are us today?’”
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for 1l.
Materials provide opportunities for the teacher to teach most grammar standards explicitly. Guided practice is also included as part of the instructional plan. The materials include multiple opportunities for students to practice new skills independently. Students have opportunities over the course of the year to apply newly learned skills both in and out of context. Instructional materials provide explicit instruction and application for students in the use of apostrophes in contractions, the use of adjectives and adverbs, capitalization of holidays, and the use of irregular plural nouns through teacher-led grammar lessons throughout the program. There are opportunities for students to generalize spelling patterns taught through word work and writing activities. Explicit instruction related to comparing formal and informal use of language was not found in the materials; however, materials include one lesson on formal uses of English.
Materials include explicit instruction of the majority of grammar and conventions standards for the grade level; however, explicit instruction on compare formal and informal uses of English was not found. For example:
Use collective nouns (e.g., group).
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher explains that a collective noun names a group of people, animals, or things. The materials direct the teacher to display and read aloud: herd of deer, class of second graders, pile of rocks. The teacher says, “Herd, class, and pile are collective nouns. They are not capitalized.” The teacher displays the sentences and guides students to identify proper nouns, common nouns, and collective nouns.
Form and use frequently occurring irregular plural nouns (e.g., feet, children, teeth, mice, fish).
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 6, the teacher reminds students that a plural noun names more than one person, place, or thing, and a regular plural noun is formed by adding -s or -es to the end of a singular noun; for example, one frog, two frogs. The teacher explains In some irregular plural nouns, the spelling changes, such as one mouse, two mice. In other irregular plural nouns, the spelling does not change; for example, one deer, two deer. The teacher displays sentences and asks partners to identify each noun and tell if it is singular or plural.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher reminds students that a plural noun names more than one person, place, or thing. Explain that most nouns are made plural by adding -s or -es to the end. The teacher explains that some nouns are irregular and have special plural forms and do not follow this rule, such as child and mouse, because they are irregular. The words change spelling in the plural. The teacher displays sentences with the words mice, child, men, mouse, man, foot, feet, and children and asks students to read the words and identify whether each noun is singular or plural.
Use reflexive pronouns (e.g., myself, ourselves).
In Unit 5, Week 4, Day 7, the teacher explains that reflexive pronouns refer to the subject of a sentence. The teacher tells students, “a reflexive pronoun ends in -self if the subject is singular or -selves if the subject is plural. The teacher displays and reads sentences, and students add the correct ending to the pronoun.
Form and use the past tense of frequently occurring irregular verbs (e.g., sat, hid, told).
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher reminds students that a linking verb connects the subject to the rest of the sentence but does not show action. The teacher reviews linking verbs am, is, and are. The teacher tells students the past tense form of am is was, past tense form of is is was, and the past tense form of are is were. The teacher writes sentences on the board, underlines the past tense verb, and models how to use the subject to identify the present tense form.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher introduces the irregular verbs say, tell, see, and make. The teacher writes the words on the board and tells students these are irregular words. The teacher displays sentences on the board and guides students to match the present-tense verbs to the underlined past-tense verb.
Use adjectives and adverbs, and choose between them depending on what is to be modified.
Materials include explicit instruction on using adjectives and adverbs but do not include choosing between them depending on what is to be modified.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher explains that an adjective is a word that describes a noun and can tell what kind or how many. The teacher models identifying adjectives that tell what kind. The teacher presents sentences and asks students which words are adjectives.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher tells students that an adverb is a word that tells more about a verb. Some adverbs tell when an action takes place. The teacher displays the sentence below, underlines the verb and the adverb, and models identifying the adverb: “Joe will leave tonight.” The teacher asks, “What action is Joe going to do? (leave) When is he leaving? (tonight) Which is the adverb? (tonight) How do you know that tonight is the adverb? (It tells when Joe is leaving.)”
Produce, expand, and rearrange complete simple and compound sentences (e.g., The boy watched the movie; The little boy watched the movie; The action movie was watched by the little boy).
In Unit 1, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher tells students that expanding sentences helps make writing more interesting and that when you expand a sentence, you add simple modifiers or details. The teacher models expanding sentences by adding information about the subject or predicate.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher presents that a compound sentence is two simple sentences joined with a comma and a conjunction, such as and, but, or so. The teacher displays the following sentences: “Max buys lunch. Ben brings lunch.” The teacher tells the students they can combine simple sentences into a compound sentence using a comma and a conjunction. The teacher models the following sentence: “Max buys lunch, but Ben brings lunch.”
Capitalize holidays, product names, and geographic names.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher tells students that common nouns name people, places, and things. The teacher explains that a proper noun names a particular person, place, or thing and begins with a capital letter. The teacher displays the sentence: “Ava went to Dallas.” Then the teacher explains that Ava is a proper name and Dallas is a particular city.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher reminds students that a proper noun begins with a capital letter. The days of the week, months, and holidays are proper nouns. People’s names, specific locations, and product names are proper nouns, too.
Use commas in greetings and closings of letters.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher tells students letters have special punctuation. The teacher states, “The greeting (beginning of a letter) and the closing (end of a letter) both began with a capital letter.” The teacher tells students that a comma is used after the greeting and closing. The teacher guides students on where to use capital letters and commas. Additional practice can also be found in student practice books on page 191 or in their online Practice Books.
Use an apostrophe to form contractions and frequently occurring possessives.
In Unit 1, Week 5, Day 4, the teacher models by writing bride/bride’s, bike/bike’s, Lin/Lin’s, pig/pig’s and tells students that the first word in the pair is a noun and the second is a possessive noun. The teacher explains that possessive nouns show who or what owns or has something and that the apostrophe and s at the end of the possessive noun mean something belongs to it. The teacher presents several sentences, and students help fill in the correct possessive noun in each sentence.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher writes the words should, not, and shouldn’t on the board. The teacher reads the word and tells students that shouldn't is a contraction. The teacher reminds students that the apostrophe replaces the letter o in not. The teacher helps students blend and read the words wouldn’t, didn’t, wasn’t, couldn’t, and isn’t. The teacher asks students to name the two words that make up each contraction.
Generalize learned spelling patterns when writing words (e.g., cage → badge; boy → boil).
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 2, students create different forms of targeted words by adding, changing, or removing affixes. The teacher and students discuss the words scurries, scurry, and scurrying and their meanings. The teacher points out how the singular present tense is formed. Then students share sentences using the words. The class repeats the process with the words invited, plead, share, cultures, and language.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 6, the teacher reviews spelling words, pointing out the long i sound in tie. The teacher draws a line under ie and explains that not all words with the long i sound are spelled in the same way. The teacher sorts the spelling words under the keywords tie, light, mind, and cry. Students sort words under the appropriate categories.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 6, the teacher reviews spelling words, pointing out the r-controlled sound /ur/ in clerk. The teacher draws a line under and explains that not all words with r-controlled vowel sound /ur/ are spelled in the same way. The teacher points out the spellings er, ir, ur, and or. After demonstrating how to sort spelling words under the keywords clerk, first, churn, and work, students work in partners to continue sorting.
Consult reference materials, including beginning dictionaries, as needed to check and correct spellings.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 4, students write sentences using target vocabulary. Students are prompted to use a print or digital dictionary to check their spelling. While dictionary use is part of the lesson plan, no explicit instruction is included.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 7, the teacher models using a glossary. The teacher tells students that a glossary is a list of words in alphabetical order at the end of a text and that it gives definitions of words. The teacher models how to look up the word in the glossary. Students work with partners to look up mammal in the glossary.
Materials did not include explicit instruction on compare formal and informal uses of English; however, materials do include one lesson on formal uses of English.
In Unit 1, Week 6, Day 1, the teacher reminds children that they read an expository text and a realistic fiction text to get information about people who help in their communities. Partners choose an idea to write about to the principal. The teacher provides instruction on the components of a formal letter: heading, greeting, body, and closing on Reading/Writing Companion page 117.
Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher reviews the reading of “Lightning Lives” and “Landing on Your Feet” (authors not cited), and students begin writing a personal narrative about a time when they helped others. The Reading/Writing Companion includes Grammar Connections that direct students to use past-tense action verbs. Students will demonstrate application by adding -ed to verbs to form the past tense in their writing.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 6, students respond to a shared reading of a Greek Myth by writing to address how the theme of the play develops from the dialogue of the characters. The Reading/Writing Companion includes Grammar Connections that direct students to use apostrophes. Students will demonstrate application of using apostrophes in their writing.
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1m.
Materials include teacher guidance for instructional routines for vocabulary development and strategies for teaching vocabulary. Oral vocabulary is repeated through discussions guided by the essential question. These vocabulary words are not repeated across multiple texts; however, the Words in Context academic vocabulary words are taught across the text set and found in multiple texts. Vocabulary words are marked clearly in texts.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Instructional Routines Handbook states, “The vocabulary lessons in Wonders focus on high-frequency words for early elementary students and include direct instruction on low-frequency words to support all students on the path to acquiring reading strength. Students at all grade levels have multiple encounters with new words. In Grade 2, there are direct instruction vocabulary mini-lessons.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes additional strategies for teaching vocabulary. The materials provide guidance for choosing words for instruction, building oral vocabulary, making the most of the Build Your Word List, and using word squares.
After each Shared Reading, students find interesting and important words and keep track of them in a dedicated vocabulary or writing notebook. Students follow the routine, Make the Most of the Build Your Word List, including collecting the words, recording the word and sentence, separating the word into bases and affixes, thinking of related words, and studying the word using a dictionary.
The Instructional Routines handbook includes a section on Teaching Academic Vocabulary. The handbook states that “Vocabulary is linked to concept development. Vocabulary is learned in context. Vocabulary is not about teaching just words. Vocabulary instruction is deep and generative. Vocabulary instruction involves the study of morphology, the structure of words.” However, little evidence was found on morphology.
There is a vocabulary pre- and post-test for each unit. The assessments list questions for students containing the vocabulary for each week and require an understanding of the vocabulary word to respond appropriately.
Teacher resources include visual vocabulary cards for each unit.
Each lesson focuses on a key vocabulary strategy, such as context clues, prefixes, suffixes, or root words.
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each text set has a Words in Context section that introduces the students to the academic vocabulary words that will help them understand and discuss the text set. These words are found throughout the text set.
Materials provide students with practice worksheets for vocabulary and digital resources.
In Unit 2, Week 1, students are given the essential question, “How are offspring like their parents?” and are taught oral vocabulary words to use when discussing the answer to that question. The words are guide, leader, protect, provide, and separate. As students read texts, they add words related to parents and offspring in the Build Knowledge pages in their notebooks.
In Unit 3, Week 5, Day 1, academic vocabulary is presented in the Expand Vocabulary: Connect to Words lesson. The words include adventure, delighted, dreamed, enjoyed, grumbled, moonlight, neighbor, and nighttime. The word grumbled is also taught in the previous text set. Students respond to questions using the target vocabulary words. Then the teacher analyzes the suffixes in each word.
In Unit 4, Week 1, the vocabulary words are highlighted across multiple contexts, including the Building Background section, Shared Read, the Anchor Text, the Paired Selection, and Show Your Knowledge. The vocabulary words are common, costume, customs, favorite, parades, surrounded, travels, and wonder.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Weeks 1 and 2, the vocabulary words adult, alive, covered, fur, giant, groom, mammal, and offspring are essential to understanding the texts in the text set.
In Unit 4, Weeks 1 and 2, the vocabulary words students need to understand texts in the text set are common, costume, customs, favorite, parades, surrounded, travels, and wonder.
In Unit 6, Weeks 1 and 2, the essential vocabulary words for the text set are invented, money, prices, purchase, record, system, value, and worth.
Criterion 1.3: Foundational Skills
Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.
Materials provide students with systematic and explicit instruction in phonics. The Teacher Edition provides weekly and daily phonics lessons throughout ten units of study and includes a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of grade-level phonics. Materials delineate a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills. Materials include multiple opportunities for students to decode and encode common vowel teams over the course of the year. The Teacher Edition contains weekly and daily phonics and spelling lessons throughout each unit. Lessons are explicitly and systematically taught through explicit instruction with teacher modeling and include student-guided practice using various materials. Materials include frequent, adequate lessons and tasks/questions about the organization of print concepts. Students have opportunities to learn concepts of print, text features, and structures through whole-group shared reading, paired reading, and differentiated small-group reading. Materials provide multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to purposefully read on-level text during interactive read-alouds, shared reading, and differentiated instruction lessons. Multiple opportunities are provided in materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading. Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words and include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words to support students’ development of automaticity. Materials provide frequent opportunities for students to read high-frequency words in connected text and tasks. Lessons and activities provide students with opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding in context and decoding words in connected text and tasks. The scope and sequence provides direct correlations of the phonics, high-frequency words, and spelling lessons linking to the decodable text opportunities providing students with immediate opportunities for the application of skills and concepts taught. Materials include ongoing and frequent assessments to determine students’ mastery of foundational skills. Assessments include unit tests, diagnostic assessments, progress monitoring assessments, and lesson assessments. The skills tested are outlined for each assessment, along with suggested responses to guide teachers in scoring. The Assessment Handbook guides teachers’ use of the assessment data by giving key recommendations on how to use the data to group students, provide intervention for students, and reteach skills for students as appropriate. Materials provide ample support for speakers of languages other than English, special populations, and students beyond their current grade level to learn, use strategies, and receive support to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
Indicator 1N
Materials, questions, and tasks directly teach foundational skills to build reading acquisition by providing systematic and explicit instruction in the alphabetic principle, letter-sound relationships, phonemic awareness, and phonics that demonstrate a transparent and research-based progression for application both in and out of context.
Indicator 1N.i
Explicit instruction in phonological awareness (K-1) and phonics (K-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1n.i.
Materials provide teachers with systematic and explicit instruction in phonics. The lessons within the materials often use an I do, We do, You do sequence. Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. The lessons provide modeling using a variety of materials, including word-building cards, sound/spelling cards, phonics/fluency practice charts, and practice books. Students are provided explicit instruction in phonics through lessons in Phonics and Structural Analysis.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of all grade-level phonics standards. For example:
Distinguish long and short vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words:
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 6, the teacher teaches the long u spelling using the words cube and mule. The teacher tells students the middle sound in cube is /u/, which can be spelled with the letters u_e, but the e is silent. The u and e work together to make the long u sound. Students practice connecting the letters u_e to the long u sound through writing. The teacher models blending sounds to read the word fun.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 7, the teacher models how substituting a new sound for the medial or final vowel sound in a word can form a new word. Students listen to the sounds in the word pie. Students listen as the teacher substitutes, or changes, the vowel sound in pie from long i to long a, forming the new word pay. The teacher continues changing the medial or final sound in these pairs: sleigh/sly, tray/try, mend/mind, and low/ lie.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 8, students listen to some words that have one sound that is different. The teacher displays Word-Building Cards for diphthongs /oi/ spelled oi and oy, as well as for short e; long o spelled o, oz-e, ow; long a spelled a_e, ai, ay; and diphthong /ou/ spelled ow. The teacher reviews and says each vowel sound, pointing to the letter or letters that can represent it.
Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 6, the teacher displays the five Sound-Spelling Cards. The teacher tells students the long i sound is spelled i as in idea; y as in fly, igh as in high, and ie as in pie. The teacher reviews that long i can be spelled i, y, ie, or ight. Students practice connecting the letters i, y,igh, and ie to the long i sound by writing them. The teacher models, and then students practice blending words with various spellings of long i. Students read words with long i spellings from the Phonics/Fluency Practice chart Students read sentences with long i words.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher introduces the /u/ sound spelled oo as in the word spoon. The teacher uses the words flu, tune, grew, blue, you, juice to show the different ways to spell the u sound. Students practice reading words with oo, u, u_e, ew, ui, and out for the sound.
Decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels:
In Unit 1, Week 5, Day 3, the teacher models blending the word like. The teacher reminds students that the e is silent and the i and e act as a team. The teacher models with the words size, time, lid, fin, and mix.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher models reading the word exit, reminding students that words can be divided into syllables and that each syllable must have a vowel sound. The teacher claps the syllables in the word, drawing a line between the syllables, and underlining the first syllable. The teacher tells students when a syllable ends in a consonant, the vowel sound is usually short. The teacher presents the word tiger, divides the word, and tells students when a syllable ends in a vowel, the vowel is usually long. Students practice decoding open and closed syllables with words: inspect, tennis, habit, ticket, defend, secret, and token. Students write the words and draw lines between syllables. Students practice reading open and closed-syllable words using the Phonics/Fluency Practice Chart.
Decode words with common prefixes and suffixes:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 6, the teacher writes and reads the words pick and picked, underlining the ed. The teacher tells students that adding -ed to a verb makes it tell about something that has already happened. The teacher reads the words add/added, blame/blamed. The teacher presents the words pick and picking, explaining that adding -ing to a verb makes the verb tell about something that is happening right now, in the present. Students read the following word cards: camp, hand, last, ask, spill, and help. Students practice adding -ing and -ed to the word and using the word in a sentence.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher writes the words repack, unhappy, and disobey and underlines the prefix in each word. The teacher explains that a prefix can be added to the beginning of a word to make a new word. The prefix re-means “again,” the prefix un- means “not,” and the prefix dis- means “opposite of.” The teacher models how to define repack, unhappy, and disobey based on each prefix and base word. The teacher uses the same procedure with the words hopeful and spotless to discuss the suffixes -ful (full of) and -less (without). The teacher writes the following words: useful, unmade, painless, disagree, rewrap, and asks students to read each word, identify the prefix or suffix, and tell the meaning of each word.
Identify words with inconsistent but common spelling-sound correspondences:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher presents the words bacon, train, play, tame, weight, prey, and break. Students read and say the words. The teacher reminds students to segment the word and blend sounds together. Students follow the Word Building Routine to read the words steak, stay, stray, tray, trail, nail, neigh, way, hay, hey, and they. Students then write the words.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 6, the teacher displays the Shirt Sound-Spelling Card. The teacher teaches the /ûr/ spelled ir. The teacher says, “This is the Shirt Sound-Spelling Card. The sound is /ûr/. The /ûr/ sound can be spelled with the letters ir. I’ll say /ûr/ as I write the letters several times. Listen: /ûr/. The sound in the middle of the word shirt is /ûr/.” The teacher repeats for the /ûr/ spelled er, ur, and or using er in the word fern, ur in turn, and or in worm.
Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. For example:
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher writes the words: stage, face, rice, badge, and bulge. Students read and say the words. Students then follow the Word-Building Routine with the Word-Building Cards to build dance, range, mice, page, digit, grace, since, and huge. When students have built the words, the teacher dictates the words to students, and they write the words.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher writes the words: pro, boat, own, and woe Students read and say the words Students follow the Word-Building Routine with the Word-Building Cards to build so, sow, sown, grown, grow, row, road, toad, toast, coast, coat, and boat When students have built the words, the teacher dictates the words to students, and they write the words.
Indicator 1N.ii
Phonological awareness based on a research-based continuum (K-1).
Indicator 1N.iii
Phonics demonstrated with a research-based progression of skills (K-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1n.iii.
Materials provide students with systematic and explicit instruction in phonics. The Teacher Edition shares weekly and daily phonics lessons throughout ten units of study and includes a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of grade-level phonics. The methods and materials used to teach phonics include Sound-spelling cards, Photo cards, Response boards, Word building letters, Practice books, Videos, and decodable readers. There is a clear research-based scope and sequence of phonics skills presented throughout the program. The materials clearly delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills. Materials also include Leveled Readers, which may distract from the use of decodable readers, as small group lessons include the use of Leveled Readers.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode (phonemes, onset and rime, and/or syllables) phonetically spelled words.
Decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 6, students read words with CVCe Syllables. The words include confine, combine, ignite, incline, dictate, unlike, and episode.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 6, students read words with CVCe Syllables. The words include: excite, excuse, describe, vibrate, confide, stampede, inflate, and compute.
Decode words with common prefixes and suffixes.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, students read words with prefixes and suffixes re-, dis-, un-, -less, and -ful. The words include joyful, unsold, childless, dislike, and reread.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 6, students decode words with prefixes re-, un-, dis-, and suffixes -ful, -less. Students work with a partner to read and write the words: unsafe, replay, dislike, thankful, and harmless.
Identify words with inconsistent but common spelling-sound correspondences.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 6, students use the shirt Sound-Spelling Card and practice connecting the letters er, ir, ur, and or to the /ûr/ sound by writing them. Students repeat the letters er in fern, ur in turn, and or in worm and practice reading words with /ûr/er, ir, ur, or using Practice Book page 243.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 4, students blend and decode words with variant vowels. Students read the following words: flu, stew, moonbeam, truthful, groups, fruit, good, could, and pull, as well as toothpaste, youthful, news, unglued, cruel, suit, and butcher.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to read complete words by saying the entire word as a unit using newly taught phonics skills.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 6, students practice the newly taught short u and long u_e sound spellings to blend sounds and read complete words. The words include run, use, cube, cute, mute, flake, us, puff, mole, and fuse.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 1, students practice the newly taught sound spelling/ar/ spelled are as in stare. Students blend sounds to read the whole words dare, square, aware, rare, and share.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode words in a sentence.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 1, students read words with long o spelled o, oa, ow, and oe. Students read the following sentences: Moe ate toast and oats. The coach told Joan she made a goal! Joe put on his coat to go out in the cold snow.
In Unit 6, Week 5, Day 1, students read words with ar spelled ar. Students read the following sentences: “The waiter put the carton on the counter. Marcus is a cartoon artist. I got a purple parcel with a curly ribbon for my birthday.”
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to build/manipulate/spell and encode words using common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 7, students use the Word Building Cards to build words with long e: e, ee, ea, ie, y, ey,e_e. Students spell the word me and replace the m with w and repeat with we and then change w to sh and repeat with she. Students continue to build, manipulate, and spell with the following word sets: sheet, sheep, sleep; deep, peep, peel; field, yield, shield, shriek; chief, thief, grief, brief, belief, relief. Students read the words, write the words, and check their spelling with a partner.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 7, students use Word Building Cards to build the word amuse and then replace the u with a and s with z and repeat with amaze. Students continue to build, manipulate, and spell with recite, reside, inside, invite, invade; homework, homesick; compute, compete, concrete, confuse. Students read the words, write the words, and check their spelling with a partner.
Materials contain a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of previously taught grade-level phonics.
In Grade 2, the teacher uses variety of methods to explicitly teach and opportunities to practice phonics skills. The methods and materials to teach phonics include:
Sound-spelling cards
Photo cards
Response boards
Word building letters
Practice books
Videos
Materials clearly delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward application of skills.
In Wonders “Grade 2 Foundational Skills Scope and Sequence”, Phonics scope and sequence includes:
Unit 1: short o; short i; two letter blends: r blends (br, cr, dr, fr, gr); s blends (sc, sk, sl, sm, sn, sp, st, sw); t blends (tr, tw, nt); l blends (bl, cl, fl, gl, pl, lk, lt); short i; long i - i_e
Unit 2: short o, long o - o_e; words with soft c and g; three letter blends: scr, spr, str, the, spl, shr.
Unit 3: long a - a, ai, ay, ea, ei, eight, ey; long o - o, oa, ow, oe; long i - i, y igh, ie; long e - e, ee, ea, ie, y, ey e_e; long u - u_e, ue, u, ew.
Unit 4: silent letters wr, kn, gn, mb, sc; r controlled vowels - er, ir, ur, or, ore, oar, ar, are, air, ear, ere, eer.
Unit 5: Diphthongs ou, ow, oy, oi; variant vowels oo, u, u_e, ew, ue, ou, ui, oo, ou, u; Short vowel digraphs ea, ou, y.
Unit 6: open and closed syllables; words with CVCe syllables; final stable syllables le, el, al; vowel team syllables; words with r-controlled vowel syllables.
Materials have a clear research-based explanation for the order of the phonics sequence.
In the Wonders Research Base Alignment document, the materials include information to address: What is phonics? What is systematic and explicit phonics? Why is phonics instruction important? Who benefits from Phonics Instruction? Example Phonics Milestones by Grade level; Research recommendations and Wonders alignment;
In the Wonders Research Base Alignment document, research cited includes Duff & Clarke, 2011; McGuinnes, 2004; NICHHD, 2000, pp. 2-11; Treiman, 2018, Ehri, Nunes, Stahl, & Willows, 2001; Stuebing, et al., 2008; Henbest & Apel, 2017; International Literacy Association, 2018; White, 2017; Berninger, Abbott, Nagy, & Carlisle, 2009; Suggate, 2010; National Literacy Panel, 2006; Slavin et al., 2011.
The Wonders Research Base Alignment document states that well-designed phonics instruction is a necessary component of effective reading programs (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000; Slavin et al., 2011). In Wonders, Grade 2 phonics instruction follows a systematic scope and sequence intended to build students’ skills, so they build automaticity in decoding and word recognition. Wonders phonics instruction builds on and extends what students have learned about sound-spelling relationships in Kindergarten and Grade 1.
Materials provide sufficient opportunities for students to develop orthographic and phonological processing.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, students practice connecting the letters ai to the sound /ā/. Students write the letters ai as they say the /ā/ sound. Students repeat the same for the sound spellings a, ay, ea, and ei. Students independently practice long a: a, ai, ay, ea, ei using Practice Book page 153.
In Unit 6, Week 5, Day 1, students listen as the teacher blends each syllable and then blends the syllables to form the words: morning, further, and thirsty. The teacher shows the Phonics/Fluency Practice chart and reads each word with students, blending sounds. Students blend each word with the teacher. Students read the text, sounding out the decodable words. Practice words include thorny, market, carton, purchase, cartoon, artist, and waiter.
Indicator 1N.iv
Decode and encode common and additional vowel teams (Grade 2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1.n.iv.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to decode and encode common vowel teams over the course of the year. The Teacher Edition contains weekly and daily phonics and spelling lessons throughout each unit. Lessons are explicitly and systematically taught through explicit instruction with teacher modeling and include student-guided practice using various materials. Students decode and encode long and short vowel sounds when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words and decode and encode additional common vowel teams.
Materials include multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to decode and encode common vowel teams.
Distinguish long and short vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 10, students use Word-Building Cards to practice blending and reading words with short a and long a: a_e. Students blend the sounds of the words fat, fate; Sam, same; tap, tape; van, vane. Students repeat the blending routine with the words: flag, take, yam, grasp, flake, pant, jazz, daze, flame, grape, fast, and crafted, and distinguish the short and long vowel sounds.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 4, students practice blending words with short o and long o: o-e using Word Building Cards. Students blend not and then add the e to the end of the word and read note. Students repeat the blending routine and distinguish long and short vowels when reading the words: rob, robe, cod, code, rod, rode.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 3, students contrast Vowel Sounds using Word-Building Cards for short and long vowels. Students blend the words: knock, neck, note, knight, knob, nap, write, wrote, knot, net, and distinguish the short and long vowel sounds.
Materials include multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to decode and encode additional vowel teams.
Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 5, students review words spelled with long a: ai, ay, ea, ei, eigh, ey and use Word Building Cards to build and read the words: steak, stay, stray, tray, trail, nail, neigh, weight, way, hay, hey they. The teacher dictates words, and students write them.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 5, students read and say rebound, amongst, growling, and shower. Students follow the Word-Building Routine with Word-Building Cards to build and read the word scout, shout, pout, pound, hound, bounce, pounce, power, powder, chowder. The teacher dictates words, and students write the words.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 6, students blend and decode words with vowel team syllables: daydream, poison, galley, withdraw. Students practice blending, reading, and writing additional words with vowel-team syllables. Students independently practice writing vowel-team syllables with the words window, outlaw, toenail, raincoat, beaver, pillow using Practice Book page 423.
Materials include opportunities for students to review previously learned common and additional vowel teams.
In Unit 1, Week 5, Day 2, students review the sound short i makes using the words six and big and the sound long i makes using the word five. The students practice connecting the letter to the sounds and write the letter as they say it. Students play Concentration using words featuring three or more sound patterns.
In Unit 3, week 5, Day 2, students review the long u sound /ū/ spelled u_e, and ue using the words cute and cues. Students practice connecting the letters and sounds. The students play Concentration with a partner, placing all the cards facedown, then taking turns choosing two cards at a time to collect pairs with the same sound-spelling pattern.
Indicator 1O
Materials, questions, and tasks provide explicit instruction for and regular practice to address the acquisition of print concepts, including alphabetic knowledge, directionality, and function (K-1), structures and features of text (1-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1o.
Materials include frequent, adequate lessons and tasks/questions about the organization of print concepts. Students have opportunities to identify text structures and text features. Students have opportunities to learn concepts of print, text features, and structures through whole-group shared reading, paired reading, and differentiated small-group reading.
Students have frequent and adequate opportunities to identify text structures (e.g., main idea and details, sequence of events, problem and solution, compare and contrast, cause and effect).
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, students find the central idea and identify the relevant details of the text “Opossums” (author not cited). Students engage in a facilitated discussion about how each paragraph has its own topic related to the main topic of the text. The students identify relevant details in the rest of the text and complete the online Central Idea and Relevant Details Graphic Organizer.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher has the students recall that expository texts give facts and information about a topic. The teacher reminds students that authors can show causes and effects to explain why or how something happens. Students identify characteristics of expository text. Students look for characteristics of expository texts as they read “Earthquakes” (author not cited).
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 2, students work in pairs to identify the beginning, middle, and end of the story “A Difficult Decision” (author not cited) after the teacher reviews characteristics of realistic fiction, including that the text has a beginning, middle, and end and the events in each part help readers understand the characters.
Materials include frequent and adequate lessons and activities about text features (e.g., title, byline, headings, table of contents, glossary, pictures, illustrations).
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 2, students identify the genre of “Little Flap Learns to Fly” (author not cited). The teacher says, “I can tell this story is fantasy because things happen that do not happen in real life. For example, the birds in the story talk to each other. In real life, birds do not talk to each other.” The teacher focuses on the illustrations and says, “What does the illustration show that is like real life? What does the illustration show that could not happen in real life? How does the illustration help you know that the story is a fantasy story?” The teacher has the students add information to the Fantasy anchor chart.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 2, students work in pairs to discuss and write about the information they learned about bald eagles by looking at the diagram and reading the labels. The teacher reviews characteristics of expository text, including “text features that help readers learn additional information about a topic. Text features common to expository text include photo, captions, headings, and diagrams with labels.” The teacher models identifying and using text features on page 15 of “Eagles and Eaglets” (author not cited). The teacher points out the diagram of the bald eagle and explains that “diagrams help give a picture of what something is, what features something has, or how something works.” The teacher explains that labels “explain important information shown in a diagram.”
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 8, students use the titles and headings in “To the Rescue” (author not cited) on pages 348-349 of the Literature Anthology to identify the topic and details. Students work together to find details for the second heading, “Animal Rescues,” and record them on the chart.
Indicator 1P
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity and sight-based recognition of high-frequency words. This includes reading fluency in oral reading beginning in mid-Grade 1 and through Grade 2.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1p.
Materials provide multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to purposefully read on-level text during interactive read-alouds, shared reading, and differentiated instruction lessons. Multiple opportunities are provided in materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading. Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words and include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words to support students’ development of automaticity.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to purposefully read on-level text.
Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 1, students read the text, Maria Celebrates Brazil (author not cited), to understand how families around the world are the same and different. Students engage in a teacher-led Think Aloud about the character Maria, the problem, and life in Brazil. Students reread and discuss the text with partners and then gather text evidence to answer the essential question.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 3, students read the text, The Food Crew (author not cited), to understand the Essential Question, “What do Good Citizens Do?” Students use the Character Perspective Graphic Organizer 9 as they read to note how characters feel about the main events in the story. After reading, students answer the Analytical Writing prompt using textual evidence to show their understanding of the perspectives of the characters Ben and Sonja in relation to the food drive.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 2, students read the text, How to Be a Smart Shopper (author not cited). Students use a copy of the online Topic and Relevant Details Graphic Organizer 4 as they read to record the central idea of the selection and relevant details that support the central idea.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading with on-level text and grade-level decodable words.
Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 11, the teacher models reading the text, A Bicycle Built for Two (author not cited), focusing on reading with intonation by changing the tone of voice when they read to show the meaning of words and to reflect punctuation in a story. Partners reread the pages and meet with the teacher for oral reading fluency progress monitoring to demonstrate reading with accuracy, rate, and expression.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 9, the teacher models reading the text, Dear Primo: A Letter to My Cousin by Duncan Tonatiuh, and focuses on the rate, the speed of words read and how that can vary from slowing down at a sad part or speeding up for an exciting part. Partners reread the pages with expression to bring the story to life and show the characters' emotions. The teacher observes and provides feedback on reading with accuracy, rate, and expression.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 9, the teacher models reading the text, Money Madness by David A. Adler, and focuses on fluency and phrasing to convey a sense of what the words and sentences mean. Partners reread the pages with natural and correct phrasing as the teacher observes and provides feedback on reading with accuracy, rate, and expression.
Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 9, students listen as the teacher models fluent reading of the text, Helping Out in the Community (author not cited), using appropriate expression. The teacher models changing rate and using proper intonation.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, students listen as the teacher models reading character dialogue with appropriate intonation in the text, Giving Thanks Two Times (author not cited). The teacher points out that quotation marks tell the reader the words the characters say and how to change the rate when you read with good intonation.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher guides students to read the high-frequency words: boy, by, girl, he, here, she, small, want, were, what. The teacher models using the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach each word and points out irregularities in the sound-spellings.
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 6, the teacher guides students to read high-frequency words: again, behind, eyes, gone, happened, house, inside, neither, stood, and young. The teacher models using the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach each word and points out irregularities in the sound-spellings.
Students have opportunities to practice and read irregularly spelled words in isolation.
Recognize and read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 8, students read the High-Frequency Word Cards: change, cheer, fall, five, look, open, their, won, and yes.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 5, students read the High-Frequency Word Cards: answer, been, body, build, head, heard, minutes, myself, pretty, pushed.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words for students to make reading progress.
High Frequency words taught in Grade 2 include:
Unit 1: could, find, funny, green, how, little, one, or, see, sounds, another, done, into, move, now, show, too, water, year, your, all, any, goes, new, number, other, right, says, understand
Unit 2: because, cold, family, friends, have, know, off, picture, school, took, change, cheer, fall, five, look, open, should, their, won, yes, almost, buy, food, out, pull, saw, sky, straight, under, wash, baby, early, eight, isn’t, learn, seven, start, these, try, walk, bird, for, field, flower, grow, leaves, light, orange, ready, until
Unit 3: about, around, good, great, idea, often, part, second, two, world, also, apart, begin, either, hundred, over, places, those, which, without, better, group, long, more, only, started, three, who, won’t, after, before, every, few, first, hear, hurt, old, special, would, America, beautiful, began, climbed, come, country, didn’t, give, live, turned
Unit 4: below, colors, don’t, down, eat, many, morning, sleep, through, very, animal, away, building, found, from, Saturday, thought, today, toward, watch, ago, carry, certain, everyone, heavy, outside, people, problem, together, warm, again, behind, eyes, gone, happened, house, inside, neither, stood, young, among, bought, knew, never, once, soon, sorry, talk, touch, upon
Unit 5: answer, been, body, build, head, heard, minutes, myself, pretty, pushed, brought, busy, else, happy, I’ll, laugh, love, maybe, please, several, air, along, always, draw, during, ever, meant, nothing, story, strong, city, father, mother, o’clock, own, questions, read, searching, sure, though, anything, children, everybody, instead, paper, person, voice, whole, woman, words
Unit 6: door, front, order, probably, remember, someone, tomorrow, what’s, worry, yesterday, alone, became, beside, four, hello, large, notice, round, suppose, surprised, above, brother, follow, listen, month, soft, something, song, who’s wind, against, anymore, complete, enough, river, rough, sometimes, stranger, terrible, window, afternoon, ahead, anyone, everything, pretended, scientist, somehow, trouble, wherever
Indicator 1Q
Materials, questions, and tasks provide systematic and explicit instruction in and practice of word recognition and analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1q.
Materials provide frequent opportunities for students to read high-frequency words in connected text and tasks. Lessons and activities provide students with opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding in context and decoding words in connected text and tasks. The scope and sequence provides direct correlations of the phonics, high-frequency words, and spelling lessons linking to the decodable text opportunities providing students with immediate opportunities for the application of skills and concepts taught.
Materials support students’ development to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills (e.g. apply spelling-sound relationship on common words, decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels, decode words with common prefixes and suffixes) in connected text and tasks.
Distinguish long and short vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words.
In Unit 1, Week 5, Day 4, students read the decodable reader, “A Site on Vine Lane,” which includes words with short i and long i: i_e.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 4, students read the decodable reader, “At Home in a Pond,” which includes words with short o and long o: o_e.
Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, students read the decodable reader, “Ray Saves the Play,” which includes long a words spelled with a, ai, ay, ea, and ei.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 1, students read the decodable reader, “Out of String Beans!” which includes diphthongs ou and ow.
Decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 7, students read the decodable reader, “High in the Sky,” which includes two-syllable words with long vowels.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 2, students read the decodable reader, “The Caring King’s Fair Wish,” which includes two-syllable words with long vowels.
Decode words with common prefixes and suffixes.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 1, students reread the decodable reader, “A Difficult Decision,” which includes words with the suffixes -tion and -sion.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher models adding the prefixes re-, un-, and dis- to the beginning of a word and determining the meaning of each word. Students add the prefixes re-, un-, and dis- to a list of words. Students read each new word and use it in a sentence. Students independently practice reading and writing words with the prefixes re-, un-, and dis- using Practice Book page 110. Students read sentences and match each sentence to a word with a prefix.
Materials provide frequent opportunities to read irregularly spelled words in connected text and tasks.
Recognize and read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 2, week 2, Day 6, the teacher displays the High-Frequency Word Cards and uses the Read/ Spell/Write routine to teach each word. The teacher points out sound spellings students have already learned as well as any irregular sound- spellings, such as /u/ spelled o in the word won. The students identify the high-frequency words in connected text and blend the decodable words.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 1, students read the decodable reader, “Three Goats and a Troll,” which includes high-frequency words better, group, long, more, only, our, started, three, who, and won’t.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 1, students read the decodable reader, “Soon the North Wind Blew,” which includes high-frequency words air, along, draw, during, ever, meant, nothing, story, strong.
Lessons and activities provide students many opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding (writing) in context and decoding words (reading) in connected text and tasks.
In Unit 2, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher models using the Word-Building Cards to display the word spring. The teacher explains, “This is the word spring. When the consonants s, p, and r come together in a word, their sounds blend together.” The teacher writes the blends scr, spr, str, points to each three-letter blend, and blends the sounds: /skr/, /spr/, /str/. The teacher uses the Read/Spell/Write routine. Students use the Read/Spell/ Write routine to write the words five times to practice encoding. The teacher introduces the decodable text, “Mrs. Sprig’s Spring Flowers,” and students sound out the decodable words and read the high-frequency words quickly.
In Unit 6, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher displays the High-Frequency Word Cards and uses the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach each word: afternoon, ahead, anyone, everything, pretended, scientist, somehow, throughout, trouble, and wherever. Students use the Read/Spell/Write routine to write the words on their Response Boards. The teacher introduces the decodable folktale, “How Bird Was Lured Away from Fire.” Students sound out the decodable words and read the high-frequency words quickly.
Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level phonics skills aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 6, students read the decodable reader, “Shirl and Her Tern,” which includes words with r-controlled vowels.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 1, students read the decodable reader, “Out of String Beans!” which includes words with diphthongs ou and ow.
Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level high-frequency/irregularly spelled words aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 6, students read the decodable reader, “Let’s Join Joy’s Show!” which includes the high-frequency words: brought, busy, else, happy, I’ll, laugh, love, maybe, please, and several.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, students read the decodable reader, “Clever Doggy,” which includes the high-frequency words: door, front, order, probably, remember, someone, tomorrow, what’s, worry, and yesterday.
Indicator 1R
Materials support ongoing and frequent assessment to determine student mastery and inform meaningful differentiation of foundational skills, including a clear and specific protocol as to how students performing below standard on these assessments will be supported.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for 1r.
Materials include ongoing and frequent assessments to determine students’ mastery of foundational skills. Assessments include unit tests, diagnostic assessments, progress monitoring assessments, and lesson assessments. The skills tested are outlined for each assessment, along with suggested responses to guide teachers in scoring. The Assessment Handbook guides teachers’ use of the assessment data by giving key recommendations on how to use the data to group students, provide intervention for students, and reteach skills for students as appropriate.
Multiple assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of foundational skills.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics and decoding.
In Unit 4, Assessment, the materials include five phonics questions about silent letters and r-controlled vowels.
In Unit 6, Assessment, the materials include five phonics questions: open and closed syllables, CVCe syllables, final stable syllables, vowel team syllables, and r-Controlled vowel syllables.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis.
In Grade 2 Benchmark Assessments, Overview, the materials include two benchmark assessments. Benchmark Assessment 1 focuses on skills taught in Units 1-3, and Benchmark Assessment 2 focuses on the entire year. Each Benchmark assessment includes five multiple-choice items assessing high-frequency words, five multiple-choice questions assessing vocabulary, and four multiple-choice questions assessing structural analysis.
The Fluency Assessment Book includes a sight word fluency assessment. Students are given a list of words. The teacher asks the student to read as many of the words on the list as possible in one minute. Students receive a point for each correct word.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of fluency.
The Grade 2 assessments include an Oral Reading Fluency Application. The Oral Reading Fluency Application can be used to administer oral reading fluency assessments in person or asynchronously. It provides a quick and easy way to capture students’ scores for words per minute (WPM) and accuracy (number of errors).
In the Foundational Skills Assessment booklet for Grades 2-3, the Oral Reading Fluency assessments can be found. These assessments allow the teacher to have students read passages and determine student words correct per minute, word reading accuracy, and data on student prosody. On pages 196-243, there are 22 reading passages that include narrative and expository text for students to read and the teacher to use to gather data on fluency.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current skills/level of understanding.
The Benchmark Assessments component reports on the outcome of students’ learning. The results of the Benchmark Assessments serve as a summative assessment by providing a way to measure students’ progress through the curriculum. The results of the assessments can be used to inform subsequent instruction, aid in making leveling and grouping decisions, and point toward areas needing reteaching or remediation. The focus of the Benchmark Assessments is on key areas of English Language Arts—comprehension of literary and informational text, phonics and decoding skills, and recognition of high-frequency words.
In the Assessment Handbook, Unit Assessments (K-5), the text states, “these assessments provide information to make instructional decisions and to place students into small skills-based groups.” Information on interpreting the scores is also included, “The goal of each unit assessment is to evaluate student mastery of previously-taught material. The expectation is for students to score 80% or higher on the assessment as a whole. Within this score, the expectation is for students to score 75% or higher on each section of the assessment.”
Materials support teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery in foundational skills.
The use of Progress Monitoring Assessments uses the assessment results in conjunction with observations to gather the formative information to better understand each student’s performance and help guide decisions about individualized instructional and intervention needs. The expectation is for students to score 80% or higher on each assessment. For students who do not meet this benchmark, the teacher must assign appropriate lessons from the relevant Tier 2 online PDFs. The teacher refers to the Progress Monitoring pages that follow each text set in the Teacher’s Editions for specific lessons. Information gathered by evaluating the results of these tests also can be used to diagnose students’ specific strengths and weaknesses.
In the Assessment Handbook: Using Assessment to Guide Instruction booklet, pages 36-48, provide teachers with guidance on how to use the assessment screening data to make instructional adjustments for students. The handbook provides suggestions for teachers on how to group students for instruction, address student strengths and weaknesses on skill development, modify instruction, and review and reteach concepts.
In every unit, week, and day, there are Small Group Differentiated Instruction lessons for students placed in Approaching Level, On Level, and Beyond Level and English Language Learners for phonemic awareness, phonics, and high-frequency words.
Indicator 1S
Materials, questions, and tasks provide high-quality lessons and activities that allow for differentiation of foundational skills, so all students achieve mastery of foundational skills.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1s.
Materials provide ample support for speakers of languages other than English, special populations, and students beyond their current grade level to learn, use strategies, and receive support to meet or exceed grade-level standards. The materials include lessons with differentiated instruction options for students approaching grade level, at grade level, beyond grade level, and English Language learners. Differentiated instruction addresses phonemic awareness, phonics, high-frequency words, comprehension, and writing. Decodable readers are also included to support the varying needs and levels of students. Within the Differentiated Instruction lessons in the Teacher Edition are lessons specifically identified for English language learners. These lessons intentionally foster oral language and background knowledge before having students engage in reading text, using phonological awareness and phonics skills and writing. The teacher is cued to use visuals, gestures, modeling, and questioning to support student learning.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
The Wonders K-6 Instructional Routines Handbook describes several ways that teachers can give MLLs multiple opportunities to speak in the classroom that will “motivate English language learners to participate in class discussions and build oral proficiency. These basic teaching strategies will encourage whole class and small group discussions for all English language learners.” They include repetition, elaboration, wait time, etc.
The Wonders K-6 Instructional Routines Handbook provides a chart that supplies sentence frames so that MLLs can participate more fully in Collaborative Conversations: “The chart provides prompt and response frames that will help students at different language proficiency levels interact with each other in meaningful ways in partner, small group, and class discussions.”
The Wonders K-6 Instructional Routines Handbook supports teachers to see first language as an asset: “These English language learners are not ‘blank slates.’ Their oral language proficiency and literacy in their first languages can be used to facilitate literacy development in English. Systematic, explicit, and appropriately scaffolded instruction and sufficient time help English language learners attain English proficiency and meet high standards in core academic subjects.”
The materials include a separate Language Transfers Handbook, which provides cross-linguistic transfer analysis to help teachers understand the language of the learners: “The Sounds and Phonics and the Grammar Transfers Charts in the Language Transfer Handbook, are designed to help you anticipate possible transfer errors in pronouncing or perceiving English sounds, and in speaking and writing in standard English.”
The materials include poems, rhymes, or songs. Each is connected to the theme of the week. A visual chart is provided, as is an audiotrack. For example, in Unit 2, the read-aloud is “Grey Goose,” a poem by Julia Larios. Students learn about rhythm and rhyme and later write their own poems.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level foundational skills and to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
In Unit 1, Week 5, Day 4, the lesson plan includes a differentiated instruction option for Approaching Level students. One section addresses phonemic awareness with a focus on phoneme categorization. The teacher explains that they will be categorizing phonemes and models how to categorize them. The teacher says three words and asks students to identify the word that does not belong.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 3, the lesson plan includes a differentiated instruction option for Approaching Level students. One section addresses structural analysis with a focus on contractions. The teacher writes and reads would not and wouldn’t, telling students that wouldn’t is a contraction for would not. The teacher reviews what a contraction is. The teacher writes the words could not and invites students to read the words aloud. The teacher prompts students to shorten the words to form the contraction couldn’t. Students work with partners to write contractions for should not. The students use the contractions wouldn’t, couldn’t, and shouldn’t in sentences.
Materials regularly provide extensions and/or advanced opportunities to engage with foundational skills at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 7, the lesson plan includes a differentiated instruction option for Beyond Level students. One section addresses comprehension with a focus on theme. The teacher reviews the theme with students and models identifying the theme using the first few sentences of “A Bicycle Built for Two” (author not cited). Students identify clues to the theme in the rest of the passage as they independently fill in a theme graphic organizer. Students work with partners to explain the theme of the story.
In Unit 5, Week 4, Day 6, the lesson plan includes a differentiated instruction option for Beyond Level students. One section addresses comprehension with a focus on character perspectives. The teacher reminds students to identify the characters’ perspectives while reading fiction. Students read page B1 of “The Lost Kitten” (author not cited) in the Beyond Level: Differentiated Genre Passages. The teacher asks open-ended questions to facilitate discussion. Students identify characters’ perspectives as they complete the character perspectives graphic organizer.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Each unit provides students with the opportunity to read and listen to texts while simultaneously building knowledge. While unit topics are broad, each week is guided by an essential question related to the unit topic, which contributes to students’ knowledge-building of the overall unit topic. Students also have opportunities to compare information regularly through tasks that prompt them to work with a partner to analyze information across multiple texts. At the end of each week, students engage in a Show Your Knowledge activity. This culminating task requires students to integrate what they learned from the week’s texts, Build Knowledge Anchor Chart, and vocabulary words. Students take knowledge from the various texts and tasks and integrate it to draw and/or write in response to a prompt. Throughout the year, materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency. In addition to regularly responding to a text with the teacher, a partner, or independently, students receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and expository writing through extended process writing lessons; lessons also address editing and revising writing. Students engage in a Research and Inquiry project in the fourth lesson of every week. In the materials, students learn, engage, and are assessed in reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Foundational skills are also addressed each day. Materials include explicit instruction that spends the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction. The units include opportunities to revisit these standards across the year. Instruction is also coherently sequenced, preparing students to respond to standards-aligned, analytical questions and tasks based on complex texts. The program materials include a pacing guide for 120 minutes of instruction daily, with a breakdown of time for reading, writing, and small group instruction. There are 180 lessons over the course of 10 units with no alternative implementation schedule provided.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
Each unit provides students with the opportunity to read and listen to texts while simultaneously building knowledge. While unit topics are broad, each week is guided by an essential question related to the unit topic, which contributes to students’ knowledge-building of the overall unit topic. Throughout the materials, while reading or listening to a text, and after reading or listening to a text, students respond to questions that require them to analyze key ideas and details and/or craft and structure. Materials ask students a series of questions after each text that help build knowledge within individual texts and across multiple texts. In Lesson 3 of every week, students compare two texts to integrate knowledge and ideas. When students initially listen to the texts, the teacher asks questions that support students in comparing a text. Students also have opportunities to compare information regularly through tasks that prompt them to work with a partner to analyze information across multiple texts. At the end of each week, students engage in a Show Your Knowledge activity. This culminating task requires students to integrate what they learned from the week’s texts, Build Knowledge Anchor Chart, and vocabulary words. Students take knowledge from the various texts and tasks and integrate it to draw and/or write in response to a prompt. Throughout the year, materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency. Students have numerous opportunities to learn and practice various writing skills. In addition to regularly responding to a text with the teacher, a partner, or independently, students receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and expository writing through extended process writing lessons; lessons also address editing and revising writing. Students engage in a Research and Inquiry project in the fourth lesson of every week. Each project follows the same five steps. For each lesson, the teacher begins by modeling and reviewing each of the steps before students complete the project on their own. The teacher is available to assist students, especially with finding information. Each project takes one day.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2a.
The texts are connected by a topic. Each text set provides students with the opportunity to read and listen to texts while simultaneously building knowledge. While unit topics are broad, each week is guided by an essential question related to the unit topic, which contributes to students’ knowledge-building of the overall unit topic. It is important to note that in some units, texts are connected each week, but weekly topics loosely connect to the overall topic of the unit. While knowledge is built each week in these units, knowledge is not built across the entire unit.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read/listen and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, there are three text sets. Text Set 1 is about families around the world, Text Set 2 is about friends helping friends, and Text Set 3 is about families working together. The essential question in Text Set 1 is, “How are families around the world the same and different?” Students read and listen to texts about this topic, including “Dinner at Alejandro’s” (author not cited), “Maria Celebrates Brazil” (author not cited), Big Red Lollipop by Rukhsana Kahn, and “A Look at Families” (author not cited). Leveled Readers in Unit 1 also connect to the topic such as Music in my Family, Happy New Year! and I’m Down Under (authors not cited).
In Unit 3, students read three text sets. Text Set 1 is about ways people help, Text Set 2 is about looking at the sky, and Text Set 3 is about expressing yourself. Text Set 1 has an essential question, “How can people help out their community?”. Texts to build knowledge toward this question include “Lighting Lives” (author not cited), Biblioburro: A True Story from Colombia by Jeanette Winter, and “Landing on Your Feet” (author not cited).
In Unit 4, students engage with three text sets about our world. Text Set 1 is about how culture makes us special, Text Set 2 is about how Earth changes, and Text Set 3 is about poems in nature. Text Set 1 builds knowledge around how culture makes people special. Students read and listen to texts to answer the essential question, “How are kids around the world different?” Texts include “My New School” (author not cited), “Happy New Year” (author not cited), Dear Primo: A Letter to My Cousin by Duncan Tonatiuh, and “Games Around the World” (author not cited). Leveled Readers also build knowledge around this topic and include, Sharing Cultures, A New Life in India, and Akita and Carlo (authors not cited).
In Unit 5, students engage with three social studies text sets. Text Set 1 is about being a hero. Text Set 2 builds knowledge about being a good citizen, and Text Set 3 builds knowledge about rights and rules. In Text Set 3, students’ knowledge builds to answer the essential question, “why are rules important?” Texts include “Towns Need Rules!” (author not cited), “The Problem with Plastic Bags” (TIME for Kids), A Call to Compost (TIME for Kids), and “Should Students Wear Uniforms? (TIME for Kids). Students read Do People Need Rules? for Leveled Readers, which come at above level, on level, below level, and a text for ELL.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2b.
Throughout the materials, while students are reading or listening to a text, and after reading or listening to a text, students respond to questions that require them to analyze key ideas and details and/or craft and structure. Texts focus on various skills, including analyzing craft and instruction on identifying text details.
For most texts (read-aloud texts K–1 and anchor texts Grade 2), students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). For example:
In Unit 1, Week 5, Lesson 2, students reread “Families Work!” (author not cited) and focus on the topic and relevant details. Students find details with a partner about the topic and complete a graphic organizer while rereading the text.
In Unit 4, Text Set 3, Week 1, Lesson 3, students read “Rain Poem” by Elizabeth Coatsworth. Students evaluate information while reading, analyzing key ideas and details through questions such as, “What do you see on the windowsill? What does this tell you about the mouse and the rain? How does the poet feel about the rain?” Later in the lesson, students compare and contrast the details in “April Rain Song” and “Rain Poem” by responding to the question, “What is similar about the way the poets present details in the poems? What is different?”
In Unit 6, Text Set 1, Week 1, Lesson 1, students read “The Life of a Dollar Bill” (author not cited) and analyze key ideas and details through questions such as, “Why does the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing replace the old bill?” Students then discuss what might happen if there weren’t enough bills for everyone who wants them.
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). For example:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lessons 3–6, students read the anchor text Help! A Story of Friendship by Holly Keller, and students answer questions about craft, such as “What does the dialogue tell readers about Mouse and Hedgehog? How does the author show Mouse’s feelings after he is rescued?” and “How does dialogue and an illustration show that Mouse is thankful and no longer afraid?”
In Unit 3, Week 4, Lessons 3–6, students read the anchor text Mr. Putter & Tabby See the Stars by Cynthia Rylant and respond to questions about craft, such as, “How does the repetition of the word she on page 247 help you understand how Tabby feels about the night?” and “Why does the author end the story with a new note on a new day?”
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 2, students read the Shared Read, “Cesar Chavez” (author not cited). They then reread the text to learn how the author wrote the selection. Questions asked include, “Reread the first paragraph on page 13... What kind of sentence is the first question? What is the question? Who does the author describe immediately after? To whom is he a hero?” Additional questions include, “How does the timeline help you understand Cesar’s work and accomplishments?” and “Why does the author ask a question at the conclusion, the end, of the biography?”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2c.
Materials ask students a series of questions after each text that help build knowledge within individual texts and across multiple texts. In Lesson 3 of every week, students compare two texts to integrate knowledge and ideas. When students initially listen to or read the texts, teachers ask questions that support students in comparing the two texts and ask guiding questions to support students with the comparison.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lessons 3–6, students read Baby Bears by Bobbie Kalman. Students answer questions to build knowledge, such as, “How does the author use photographs and captions to help you understand bear families? What do mothers teach cubs? What did we learn about bears who live in cold places?” and “Why do baby bears need to stay with their mothers?”
In Unit 4, Weeks 3–4, Lessons 3–6, students read Volcanoes by Sandra Markle. Students answer questions to build knowledge, such as, “Why does the author use a quotation to help you understand a volcanic eruption? What did the farmer’s wife see, hear, feel, and think? How does the author use text features to help you understand the effects of a volcanic eruption?” and “What two shapes are volcanoes?”
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 1, students read “Cesar Chavez” (author not cited) and build knowledge about the leader through questions such as “What did Cesar Chavez’s family teach him?” What happened to Cesar at school?” and “What happened when the landowners lost money?”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, Lessons 3–6, after reading the anchor text, Big Red Lollipop by Rukhsana Khan, students compare what they learned about families from the anchor text and “Maria Celebrates Brazil” (author not cited). Students compare how the characters interact with their families. Before this, students are asked questions to help them analyze the two texts. While reading Big Red Lollipop, students respond to questions about the family dynamic, such as, “How does the author show the way Rubina feels when Sana and Ami do not understand her problem?” and “When Sana east Rubina’s lollipop, Rubina reacts with anger. She says Sana is greedy. How does Ami react differently?” When reading “Maria Celebrates Brazil,” students respond to questions such as, “Why does Pai say Maria can see Ana anytime?”
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 5, students compare what they learned about animals and their offspring in the texts Baby Bears by Bobbie Kalman and “Eagles and Eaglets” (author not cited). Students work with a partner to discuss the similarities in how the adult animals help and teach their offspring.
In Unit 6, Weeks 1–2, Lesson 5, students compare texts using the prompt, “What is similar about the way information is presented in ‘The Life of a Dollar Bill’ and Money Madness? What is different between the two selections?”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2d.
At the end of each week, students engage in a Show Your Knowledge activity. This culminating task requires students to integrate what they learned from the week’s texts, Build Knowledge Anchor Chart, and vocabulary words. Students begin by discussing the topic of the week and reviewing their notes on the topic. Then students engage in an independent or partner writing task about the topic. Each writing task must include text evidence and vocabulary from the week. The writing tasks vary and include picture books, text-to-self connections, and an article. The materials include a Show Your Knowledge Rubric. Rubric information includes how many texts a student should synthesize knowledge from, how many vocabulary words must be included, and whether they should include text evidence.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 2, Lesson 10, students integrate their knowledge across the text set by making a picture book that shows how young animals become adults. Students discuss the prompt with a partner, and then students create a picture book that describes how three young animals learn and grow. Students include drawings or photographs of each animal with captions. Students use new vocabulary from the text set and examples from at least three texts.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 10, students show how they built knowledge across the text set by writing an article that explains how people help out in their community. After discussing the knowledge from the unit, students write an article that tells how three people they read about in the text set help out in their community. Students must use vocabulary words in their articles and include a title and illustrations. The materials suggest that partners share their articles when finished.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Lesson 10, students integrate their knowledge across the text set by writing journal entries describing how they feel about the lessons the characters learned in the myths they read. Students discuss the prompt with a partner, then write a journal entry about three of the myths they read, focusing on the lessons the characters learned. Students use new words they’ve learned from reading and examples from at least three texts.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2e.
Throughout the year, materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency. Students have numerous opportunities to learn and practice various writing skills. In addition to regularly responding to a text with the teacher, a partner, or independently, students also receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and expository writing through one- or two-week process writing lessons; lessons also address editing and revising writing, and students have the opportunity to share and evaluate their writing. The materials include a variety of mini-lessons for the teacher to choose from to meet the needs of students. In addition, there are rubrics and checklists for each type of writing, and students can view student examples as they learn.
Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
According to the Instructional Handbook, students have weekly opportunities to write in response to what they read, engage in research and inquiry, learn about and practice genre writing, and write to multiple sources.
Throughout the year, students engage in various one- or two-week process writing tasks. Students learn to analyze an expert model and examine the specific genre characteristics. There are a variety of mini-lessons provided to support them as they engage in planning, drafting, and revision.
According to the Instructional Handbook, students “write about what they read. They read texts closely and use text evidence to support their ideas and conclusions about the text.”
Students receive explicit instruction on the three types of writing; however, most explicit instruction is for expository writing, and one unit focuses on opinion writing.
Each unit includes daily writing lessons that follow a similar model of drafting, revising, peer conferencing, editing and proofreading, publishing, presenting, and then evaluating. Examples include:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 6, students use the Literature Anthology text, “Landing on Your Feet” (author not cited), to help them learn how to write a personal narrative. Then in Lesson 7, students use a sequence chart to plan their ideas sequentially. Then in Lessons 8–10, the teacher uses the text to model a writing skill that students implement in their writing.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 3, students analyze a rubric and use it to evaluate a student model. In Lesson 4, students receive direct instruction on ensuring their expository writing has a central idea. By the end of the unit, students write two expository essays.
Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed lesson plans, models, and protocols for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
There are a variety of digital tools to support students in writing, such as graphic organizers, student models, checklists for editing and peer conferencing, and videos for writing skills.
Students write in response to what they read regularly. There is an Analytical Writing Routine to support students with this. Students begin by analyzing the prompt, then they discuss the prompt and use sentence starters, if appropriate, to create a topic or opinion. Students then go back into the text to find evidence to support their ideas.
For each writing process assignment, the materials include a rubric. Teachers are expected to review the rubric and use a student model or an anchor paper to analyze the rubric. Then students use the rubric and student model or anchor paper while drafting, editing, and revising their pieces. Lastly, the teacher uses the rubric to evaluate student writing.
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of research skills that guide shared research and writing projects to develop students' knowledge using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2f.
Students engage in a Research and Inquiry project in the second lesson of every text set. Each project follows the same five steps. First, the students set a goal and identify sources. Then, students find and record information before they organize and combine information. Finally, they create and present. In the earlier units, there is more direct instruction, such as teaching students how to use keywords in an online search. Each research project occurs over two weeks, and many are done in partnerships.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a question.
In Unit 2, Week 5, Lesson 2, the teacher models how to generate questions and use formal and/or informal inquiry to gather information, using digital and print resources, including books, websites, magazines, and newspapers.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Lesson 2, the teacher models how to write a list of questions about the water cycle and decide on research questions, then students gather information from books, websites, magazines, and newspapers.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 2, the teacher models how to generate research questions, then students choose a hero and decide what information they want to know about the hero.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 2, students use the research process to create a poster about food brought to America by people from another country. Students decide on a food or dish for their poster and then use keywords in an internet search to find facts and details about the food.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 2, students use the research process to create a history picture book. Students complete research on an important person and the history of their town or state over two weeks.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 2, students work with a partner to research what a certain type of government leader does in office. Students can choose a city mayor, state governor, or US president.
Materials include shared research projects to help develop students’ research skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Participate in shared research and writing projects (e.g., read a number of books on a single topic to produce a report; record science observations).
In Unit 1, Week 5, Lesson 2, students use the research process to conduct an interview. The teacher first explains what an interview is and discusses the importance of taking careful notes to record the answers. Then the teacher supports partners through each step in the research process.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 2, students use the research process to write a report about seasonal weather. Students spend two weeks researching. At the start, the teacher models how to use keywords when searching for information. Students work with partners to complete the project.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 2, students use the research process to make a recycling chart. They work with a partner to find information about what items in their home can be recycled. The teacher gives the students a Research Roadmap as a guide.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
In the materials, students learn, engage, and are assessed in reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Foundational skills are also addressed each day. Materials include explicit instruction that spends the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction. The majority of lessons in reading, writing, and small group instruction address a large number of the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards. The units include opportunities to revisit these standards across the year. Instruction is also coherently sequenced, preparing students to respond to standards-aligned, analytical questions and tasks based on complex texts. The program materials include a pacing guide for 120 minutes of instruction daily, with a breakdown of time for reading, writing, and small group instruction. There are 180 lessons over the course of 10 units with no alternative implementation schedule provided. Because of this, it may not be realistic for a teacher to complete the entire curriculum in a year, given typical disruptions in a school year, such as special guests, field trips, testing, and inclement weather. Without alternative implementation schedules, teachers will not be able to complete all of the components of reading, writing, and small group instruction.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2g.
In the materials, students learn, engage, and are assessed in reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Foundational skills are also addressed each day. Materials include explicit instruction that spends the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction. The majority of lessons in reading, writing, and small group instruction address a large number of the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards. The units include opportunities to revisit these standards across the year. Instruction is also coherently sequenced, preparing students to respond to standards-aligned, analytical questions and tasks based on complex texts. Questions and tasks align to the standards and are coherently sequenced to prepare students to demonstrate their learning through the Share Your Knowledge culminating activities.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The CCSS ELA Standards Correlation document illustrates the coverage of each standard strand. In the Teacher’s Edition, Reading/Writing Companion, and ELL Small Group Guide, materials address the majority of Reading: Literature, Reading: Informational Text, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language standards. The document identifies specifically where each standard is covered.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
As students closely read and analyze complex texts, they respond to standards-aligned, text-based questions. Questions and tasks require students to cite textual evidence and draw upon the text to infer what is not explicitly stated. Questions and tasks build to and prepare students for the end-of-week Share Your Knowledge activity. The Essential Question for each text, which is revisited regularly, helps students to build knowledge while addressing the grade-level standard.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments, writing samples, and Share Your Knowledge activities align to grade-level standards. Each lesson includes standards-aligned explicit instruction, as well as questions and tasks, that prepare students for the corresponding assessment.
By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each lesson in the week follows a systematic approach to addressing the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards. Each lesson and unit addresses many of the Reading: Literature and Informational Text, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language standards. The pacing guide outlines 120 minutes of instruction, focusing on the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards that are repeatedly addressed.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2h.
The program materials include a pacing guide for 120 minutes of instruction daily, with a breakdown of time for reading, writing, and small group instruction. There are 180 lessons over the course of six units with no alternative implementation schedule provided. Because of this, it may be unrealistic for a teacher to complete the entire curriculum in a year, given typical disruptions in a school year, such as special guests, field trips, testing, and inclement weather. In addition, having a 120-minute literacy block may not be feasible for all school districts. Without alternative implementation schedules, teachers may be unable to complete all of the components of reading, writing, and small group instruction. The materials include optional activities that support the core instruction, including timing information for each activity. However, these activities are in addition to the 120 minutes of daily literacy instruction.
Suggested implementation schedules schedules align to core learning and objectives; however, materials do not offer alternative implementation schedules aligned to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following
In Lesson 1 of each week, students spend 115 minutes reading, with time for building knowledge, an interactive read-aloud, word work, the shared read, and vocabulary. Then, students get 20 minutes for writing, including 10 minutes for an extended writing project, 5 minutes for grammar, and 5 minutes for spelling. Students then have 25 minutes in small groups, with 15 minutes for ELL students and 10 minutes for students approaching level. In Lesson 1, the following Reading activities are optional: Word Work - Structural Analysis, Preteach Vocabulary, and Expand Vocabulary. The Writing Activity, Grammar Lesson Bank “Talk About It” Tasks are also optional. These optional tasks add additional time to the lesson, extending past the 120 minutes allotted for the literacy block.
In Lesson 2 of each week, students spend 110 minutes reading, with time for the shared read, word work, responding to reading in writing, and the research and inquiry project. Then students get 20 minutes for writing, including grammar and the extended writing project. Lastly, students have 30 minutes for small group instruction with the teacher meeting with ELL students and students approaching level. In Lesson 2, the following Reading activities are optional: Word Work - Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, High-Frequency Words Review, Decodable Reader; Fluency; and Expand Vocabulary. The following Writing activities are optional: Grammar Lesson Bank “Talk About It” Tasks and Spelling Lesson Bank. These optional tasks add additional time to the lesson, extending past the 120 minutes allotted for the literacy block.
In Lesson 3 of each week, students receive 60 minutes of reading instruction with time for word work and reading the anchor text. Then students have 30 minutes of writing instruction, including the writing project, grammar, and time with vocabulary. Lastly, there are 15 minutes for the teacher to meet with ELL students and 15 minutes for the teacher to meet with students approaching level.
In Lesson 4 of each week, students spend 50 minutes in reading instruction, with 10 for phonics and 40 for reading the anchor text. There are then 40 minutes devoted to writing instruction, including 30 minutes with the writing prompt and 10 minutes for a minilesson. Lastly, the teacher has 30 minutes with ELL and approaching-level students during small group time.
In Lesson 5 of each week, students get 40 minutes of reading instruction focusing on the anchor text and 30 minutes of writing instruction, including a spelling lesson and a craft mini-lesson. Lastly, the teacher engages in 50 minutes of small group instruction and meets with every student.
Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Wonders Program includes a Flexible Pacing Guide, which suggests pacing for the core path of instruction. In Grade 2, it is suggested that the literacy block takes 120 minutes. While it states that the pacing guide can be used flexibly to meet the needs of all classrooms, it does not provide suggestions on how to do that while also including all instruction.
Completing the entire curriculum in a school year may be difficult, considering that there are 180 days of instruction included. This does not leave room for lessons that may take longer, state testing requirements, local assessments, reteaching, and other general interruptions that schools experience.
Optional materials and tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Wonders Pacing Guide provides the suggested pacing of 120 minutes for Grade 2 and identifies optional activities that fit into each lesson. However, the optional activities are in addition to the 120 minutes of literacy instruction.
Optional materials and tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Lesson 1 of each text set, optional activities include word work around structural analysis, pre-teaching vocabulary, and a writing activity.
In Lesson 2 of each text set, optional activities include work with phonemic awareness, decodable reading, and grammar lessons.
In Lesson 3 of each text set, optional activities include grammar lessons, spelling lessons, and structural analysis work.
In Lesson 4 of each text set, optional activities include work with high-frequency words, decodable reading, and expanding vocabulary.
In lesson 5 of each text set, optional activities include work with high-frequency words, expanding vocabulary, and grammar lessons.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The teacher resources included in the program provide guidance to support the implementation of the curriculum and to enhance teacher understanding of the content. Wonders offers a variety of professional development resources for teachers to develop their knowledge of grade-level content, including Learn to Use Wonders, Ready-to-Teach Workshops, Research Base and Whitepapers, Science of Reading, Instructional Routines, Assessment & Data, Educational Equity, and Administrator Resources. Each unit, lesson, and center activity includes standards correlation information. The Teacher Edition includes a weekly planner, which also includes the Common Core standards that each lesson is aligned to, and the Teacher Resources include a video explanation of the English Language standards by Dr. Jana Echevarria; however, the materials do not include the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials include information about the program for students, parents, and caregivers through weekly letters that describe what students will experience at home and school. Materials include explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and the identification of research-based strategies. Materials include necessary classroom resources to support teachers in preparing instructional activities, including a presentation resource, which provides the text that will be read during the lesson and classroom materials needed for the lesson. Materials include a comprehensive assessment handbook, which includes information about various assessment options, a guide for providing instruction, and a list of forms to use while assessing students. The instructional materials offer multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate learning. Teachers can find these resources in the Assessment Handbook, Feedback videos, and the notes section in the daily lesson plans. The Assessment Handbook provides details and suggestions on how to interpret student performance. Materials include a variety of assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of the grade-level standards and shifts. Assessments are both informal and formal and in a variety of modalities, including formal assessments, writing prompts, and discussions. The instructional materials provide multiple accommodations to ensure students can access assessments and demonstrate knowledge without changing assessment content. Materials provide learning strategies and supports for students in special populations. The instructional materials regularly provide extensions to engage in literacy content and concepts at a greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Across the school year, materials provide exposure and access to challenging texts and tasks to increase critical reading skills, such as interpreting and analyzing texts. Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks, as well as variety in how students demonstrate their learning and monitor their performance. Materials provide a variety of grouping strategies throughout each unit and lesson across the school year. Students can engage in pairs or small groups to discuss, read, write, present, peer evaluate, and play games. Materials provide strategies, support, and multiple opportunities for English Language Learners to participate in grade-level activities. Materials provide a balance of drawings and realistic images representing different demographic and physical characteristics of the characters. Across the year, positive representations of all individuals are found in the illustrations and avoid stereotypes and biases toward underrepresented groups or individuals.Materials guide teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning and provide guidance and support across the year to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The program integrates technology in various ways that provide opportunities for engagement, support, and customization. Interactive technology tools can be found that encourage a more engaging and supportive learning environment, such as the option for texts to be read aloud, games, and the ability to customize assignments.Materials include digital opportunities for teachers and students to collaborate with each other.The instructional materials provide a visual design to support students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The teacher’s edition is organized the same way in each unit, week, and lesson. The student edition is easy to navigate and has titles to help students navigate the curriculum.The instructional materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The teacher resources included in the program provide guidance to support the implementation of the curriculum and to enhance teacher understanding of the content. Scaffolds for teaching and growing literacy development include many tools, such as videos and annotations, to support all students’ literacy skills. Instructional materials offer a variety of professional development resources for teachers to develop their knowledge of grade-level content, including Learn to Use Wonders, Ready-to-Teach Workshops, Research Base and Whitepapers, Science of Reading, Instructional Routines, Assessment & Data, Educational Equity, and Administrator Resources. Materials include a publisher alignment document of the standards. In addition, each unit, lesson, and center activity includes standards correlation information. The Teacher Edition includes a weekly planner, which also includes the Common Core standards that each lesson is aligned to, and the Teacher Resources include a video explanation of the English Language standards by Dr. Jana Echevarria; however, the materials do not include the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials include information about the program for students, parents, and caregivers. Weekly letters describe what students will experience at home and school. These letters have suggestions and activities on ways to support students at home as well. While the letters come in English, there is an ability to translate them into many languages, including Arabic, Russian, and Chinese. The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and the identification of research-based strategies. A Start Smart guide is provided and includes explanations of the instructional routines found in the program. An Eight Step Implementation Support guide is included and provides information to support instruction, including lesson planning, foundational skill instruction, and differentiation. In addition, there is an Instructional Routine Handbook that explains key instructional routines such as “Collaborative Conversations,” “Close Reading,” and “Check-In,” as well as research that supports each teaching routine. The instructional materials include necessary classroom resources to support teachers in preparing instructional activities. Each lesson has a list of resources. The support includes a presentation resource, which provides the text that will be read during the lesson and classroom materials needed for the lesson. The classroom materials include ELL resources, graphic organizers about the author, and information on responding to the text.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The teacher resources included in the program provide guidance to support the implementation of the curriculum and to enhance teacher understanding of the content. Scaffolds for teaching and growing literacy development include many tools, such as videos and annotations, to support all students’ literacy skills. The teacher materials include suggestions on Culturally Responsive Teaching, Teaching the Whole Child, Equity and Access, and The Science of Reading. Explanations and descriptions of how these components are integrated into each lesson are provided. The Teacher Edition also includes information on the scope and sequence, as well as the standards and objectives of each lesson.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Edition materials explain the overall instructional model in a section called Start Smart Overview, which includes information to access the Teacher Workspace and other resources that support understanding of the instructional elements of the program.
The Teacher Edition includes a component called Access Complex Text (ACT), which includes scaffolded instructional guidance to support students with the various elements that make a text complex.
In the Teacher Edition, there is a section called Every Step of the Way that includes detailed information on the professional learning teachers should engage in before delivering the curriculum to students.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 1, students engage in a Shared Read of Lighting Lives (no author cited) with the goal of reading and understanding narrative nonfiction. After the teacher reads aloud, there is language for a think-aloud about how the teacher knows it is narrative nonfiction.
In Unit 6, Weeks 3–4, Lesson 2, students read the drama “The Starry Asters” (no author cited), and there are suggestions on how to identify and explain the theme of a text. For example, the Teacher Edition states, “Model identifying important details or clues, about Aster in the text on page 39... These details seem to point to a message about making difficult decisions.” The learning goal is to “read and understand myth and drama texts by identifying and explaining the theme.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
Instructional materials offer a variety of professional development resources for teachers to develop their knowledge of grade-level content. Professional development topics include: Learn to Use Wonders, Ready-to-Teach Workshops, Research Base and Whitepapers, Science of Reading, Instructional Routines, Assessment & Data, Educational Equity, and Administrator Resources. Author and Coach videos include presentations that support instruction, such as applying foundational skills to reading and multisyllabic and decodable text words routine. Response to Intervention videos explain how to use assessments to maximize learning and teaching. Additionally, videos are available to support planning, social emotional learning, English Language Learners, and ways to use leveled readers. The materials also include close-reading and small-group instruction workshops that offer self-paced modules for teachers.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources Tab, the Professional Development section provides Ready to Teach Workshops. The Close Reading Workshop is a four-session, video-based module that supports teachers in delivering effective instruction for close reading of complex texts. The Small-Group Instruction Workshop is a four-session, video-based module that supports teachers in organizing, managing, and delivering small-group instruction.
In the Resources tab, the Assessment and Data section provides manuals and guides detailing assessment components, the assessment handbook, placement and diagnostic assessment, assessment administration, assessment reports, and online assessment preparation.
In the Resources Tab, the Educational Equity section supports teachers with manuals and guides regarding culturally responsive teaching, social-emotional learning, supporting ELL students, universal design for learning, and equitable access to instruction.
In the Administrator Resources section, manuals and guides are available to support teachers with family involvement, observation tools, and coaching.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources tab, the Professional Development section provides instructional information supported by research and whitepapers. Titles include but are not limited to “Academic Vocabulary Study: Embedded, Deep, and Generative Practices” by Dr. Donald R. Bear, “Improving Literacy for English Learners: What Teachers Need to Know” by Dr. Jana Echevarria, “Straight Talk on the Science of Reading” by Tim Shanahan, and “Guiding Principles for Supporting English Learners.”
The Instructional Routines Handbook offers step-by-step guides to instructional practices embedded in the program, such as “Managing Small Groups: A How-to Guide” by Vicki Gibson and Doug Fisher.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
Materials include a publisher alignment document of the standards. In addition, each unit, lesson, and center activity includes standards correlation information. The Teacher Edition includes a weekly planner, which also includes the Common Core standards that each lesson is aligned to, and the Teacher Resources include a video explanation of the English Language standards by Dr. Jana Echevarria; however, the materials do not include the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 5, Lesson 2, Research and Inquiry, students work on creating a job description sheet to share with others. Standards associated with this task are W.2.7, “Participate in shared research and writing projects;” W.2.8, “Recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a question;” SL.2.1a, Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions;” and SL.2.1b, Build on others’ talk in conversations by linking their comments to the remarks of others.”
In Unit 2, Week 2, Lesson 6, Writing, Research Report, students begin by brainstorming ideas about their research reports. This task is connected to standards W.2.2, “Write informative/explanatory text in which they introduce a topic, use facts and definitions to develop points, and provide a concluding statement;” W.2.5, “With guidance and support from adults and peers, focus on a topic and strengthen writing as needed by revising and editing.”
In Unit 6, Week 5, Lesson 3, during Word Work, students read, spell, and write high-frequency words during Guided Practice and then independently practice high-frequency words using the Practice Book on page 411. The standards connected include RF.2.3f, “Recognize and read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words” and L2.2c, “Use an apostrophe to firm contractions and frequently occurring possessives.”
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series.
No evidence found
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials include information about the program for students, parents, and caregivers. Weekly letters describe what students will experience at home and school. These letters have suggestions and activities on ways to support students at home as well. The program also includes a letter that explains how to support students in a remote setting. While the letters come in English, there is an ability to translate them into many languages, including Arabic, Russian, and Chinese. All the materials for the various shareholders can easily be found in the Student Center Dashboard, which provides resources for students, parents and/or caregivers.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Student Center Dashboard includes the school to home tab, which contains letters and messages from the teacher.
The Student Center Dashboard includes resources for students, such as the weekly vocabulary words and writing assignments.
The program includes a family letter for each week in each unit. The letter provides information about the genre students will read about, learning goals, word work, and comprehension standards each week. For example, in Unit 2, Week 4, the letter informs families that the “class will study the genre of fables. We will be focusing on what animals in stories can tell us. Your child will be meeting animal characters in many types of stories.”
In the Administrator Resources section, found in the Professional Development tab, there is a customizable letter that can be sent to families about the Wonders curriculum that can be sent at the beginning of the year. The letter contains information on what students will experience in class and what students will experience at home.
In the Administrator Resources section, there is a PowerPoint presentation that teachers can use to explain the curriculum to families on a Back to School or Curriculum night.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Student Center Dashboard, there is a weekly letter that informs parents or caregivers on what the students are working on that week and ways to support them at home. For example, in Unit 6, Week 1, the letter suggests that families and children “make up sentences using the list words to tell about shopping for a gift for a friend’s birthday.”
The program provides parents with differentiated spelling lists for students approaching grade level, on-grade level, and beyond grade level. The spelling lists include activities that students can complete to practice the spelling words at home.
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and the identification of research-based strategies. A Start Smart guide is provided and includes explanations of the instructional routines found in the program. An Eight Step Implementation Support guide is included and provides information to support instruction, including lesson planning, foundational skill instruction, and differentiation. In addition, there is an Instructional Routine Handbook that explains key instructional routines such as “Collaborative Conversations,” “Close Reading,” and “Check-In,” as well as research that supports each teaching routine. Lastly, some videos contain professional development on instructional routines, such as the multisyllabic word routine and the decodable text routine.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Start Smart guide includes details on how to introduce and teach students about “collaborative conversations.” For example, it instructs teachers to tell students to “Add New Ideas- Stay on topic. Connect your ideas to what your peers have said. Provide evidence or reasons for your ideas. Connect your own experience or prior knowledge to the conversation.”
The Eight-Step Implementation Guide includes information about instructional approaches, such as small group differentiation, which can be located throughout the materials. The guide states, “The ‘Teach in Small Group’ sidebars in whole group instruction highlight further opportunities for small group teaching and offer suggestions that can be used to reinforce—or replace—whole group lessons.”
In the Resources section, there is a section called “Author & Coach Videos” that contains short professional development videos for teachers on various instructional approaches, including close reading, academic vocabulary, writing, assessment, planning and digital support, and access to complex text.
In the Instructional Routine Handbook, there is a detailed explanation for each routine, such as the “Sentence Segmentation Routine.” The explanation includes, “Read aloud a short text all the way through. Then model how to count the words you hear in a line.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Instructional Routine Handbook includes research on “Collaborative Conversations.” The handbook states, “Discussion-based practices improve student’s thinking skills and comprehension of a text (Murphy, Wilkinson, Soter, Hennessey, & Alexander, 2009). In effective schools, classroom conversations about how, why, and what students read are important parts of the literacy curriculum (Applebee, 1996: Schoenbach, Greenleaf, Cziko & Hurwitz, 1999).”
The Instructional Routine Handbook includes research on foundational skills instruction. The handbook states, “Research indicates that the most critical phonemic awareness skills are blending and segmenting, since they are most closely associated with early reading and writing growth (NICHHD, 2001). Phonemic awareness has a positive overall effect on reading and spelling and leads to lasting reading improvement. Phonological processing problems are a significant factor in students experiencing reading difficulties, including dyslexia (International Dyslexia Association, 2017). Phonemic awareness instruction can be effectively carried out by teachers. It doesn’t take a great deal of time to bring many children’s phonemic awareness abilities up to a level at which phonics instruction begins to make sense.”
The Instructional Routine Handbook includes research on “High- frequency words.” The handbook states, “High-frequency words make up a significant portion of the words students need to read and write. In fact, 25% of all words and print come from this set of thirteen words: a, and, for, he, is, in, it, of, that, the, to, was, you (Johns, 1981). And about 50% of words students will read and write come from a set of 100 words (Fry, Fountoukidis, & Polk, 1985). Many high-frequency words do not follow common sound-spelling patterns, so they need to be learned by sight and require explicit instruction.”
In the Overview of the Resources section, there is a tab called “Research Base and Whitepapers,” which contains several different research-based articles on the approaches of the program. Some of these articles include “Academic Vocabulary Study: Embedded, Deep, and Generative Practices” by Donald Bear and “Close Reading in Elementary Classrooms” by Douglas Fisher.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The instructional materials include necessary classroom resources to support teachers in preparing instructional activities. Each lesson has a list of resources. The support includes a presentation resource, which provides the text that will be read during the lesson and classroom materials needed for the lesson. The classroom materials include ELL resources, graphic organizers about the author, and information on responding to the text. In addition to including lists, teachers can access the resources directly from the lesson dashboards.
Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 3, in the differentiated instruction with the On-Level-Reading group section, the resources listed are A New Life in India by Christopher Herrara, plot graphic organizer, what makes the text complex lesson plan, and retelling cards of A New Life in India by Christopher Herrara.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 4, students read Grace for President by Kelly DiPucchio and respond using the included graphic organizer, analyze the graphic organizer, and the ELL Newcomer teacher’s guide.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
Materials include a comprehensive assessment handbook, which includes information about various assessment options, a guide for providing instruction, and a list of forms to use while assessing students. Formal assessments are included in the program, such as Universal Screeners, Placement & Diagnostic Assessments, Fluency Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Benchmark Assessments. The instructional materials offer multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate learning. Teachers can find these resources in the Assessment Handbook, Feedback videos, and the notes section in the daily lesson plans. The Assessment Handbook provides details and suggestions on how to interpret student performance. Feedback videos and notes in the lesson plans offer recommendations for supporting students as they complete each assessment. Materials include a variety of assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of the grade-level standards and shifts. Assessments are both informal and formal and in a variety of modalities, including formal assessments, writing prompts, and discussions. Each lesson culminates with a check-in routine, which allows students to reflect on their new knowledge or share what they have learned with a partner. The instructional materials provide multiple accommodations to ensure students can access assessments and demonstrate knowledge without changing assessment content. Teachers can find support in the Equitable Access to Instruction Handbook, the Assessment Handbook, and within daily lessons.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include a comprehensive assessment handbook, which includes information about various assessment options, a guide for providing instruction, and a list of forms to use while assessing students. Formal assessments included in the program, such as Universal Screeners, Placement & Diagnostic Assessments, Fluency Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Benchmark Assessments. Materials do not always include standards that are being assessed. The Unit and Benchmark Assessments available in the Online Assessment Center include question-level standard alignment information, but this does not exist for printable versions of those assessments. Informal assessments within lessons include standards for the lesson but do not include specific standards for the tasks being assessed.
Materials do not consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 10, students publish and present their realistic fiction stories. The standards listed for the day include speaking and listening and language standards, though the rubric associated with the task assesses narrative writing standards.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Lesson 10, students publish and present their personal narratives. The standards for the day include writing, speaking and listening, and language, though the rubric provided in the materials assesses the writing standard.
In the Online Assessment Center, teachers can access the Unit and Benchmark Assessments, which include question-level standards alignment. For example, in the Unit Assessment, Grade 2, U6, Question 5 is aligned to standard RL.2.2. Each question is also aligned to a skill and DOK level.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The instructional materials offer multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate learning. Teachers can find these resources in the Assessment Handbook, Feedback videos, and the notes section in the daily lesson plans. The Assessment Handbook provides details and suggestions on how to interpret student performance. Feedback videos and notes in the lesson plans offer recommendations for supporting students as they complete each assessment. Daily lessons present students with multiple ways to demonstrate their learning using Formative Assessments.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Assessment Handbook, teachers are provided with guidance on interpreting student results for all assessments listed in the handbook. For The Standard Version of the Phonics Survey, the handbook explains how to interpret the data by stating, “count the number of correct responses for each individual task and record the percentage of correct responses. A score of 80% in any section indicates mastery of that skill. The scores in each section are not combined to calculate a total score.”
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 8, students read The Enormous Turnip Folktale. After reading the folktale, students are asked to retell the events in the story using important details and complete pages 58–60 to assist with retelling. Once students complete the retelling activity, students are asked to use the Check-In procedure with a partner to share their retelling, share their responses to pages 58–60, and reflect on their responses as a formative assessment.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials provide multiple assessment opportunities. At the beginning of the school year, each student completes a Universal Screener. Based on the results, students take a placement assessment or a diagnostic assessment. Both assessments are used to determine strengths and areas for growth. Teachers can use progress monitoring assessments to determine if students are making progress. Teachers can give formative assessments at the end of lessons to determine if students learned the skills and strategies taught. Unit Assessments are given at the end of each unit, and benchmark assessments are given at the middle or end of the school year.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 9, students read Biblioburro by Jeanette Winter and echo read the text with the teacher. After participating in the echo read, students complete the following task as a formative assessment to assess their fluency: “Children read ‘Helping Out in the Community’ fluently. Then have partners reflect using the Check-In routine.”
In the Resource Library, the videos titled Corrective Feedback 1 & 2 show examples of how to provide corrective feedback while teaching a lesson.
The Assessment Handbook includes suggestions for providing student feedback. The Assessment Handbook states, “Using corrective feedback as an assessment tool: Feedback should help students see how they can improve their work. The most useful feedback is a specific comment describing the strengths and weaknesses of individual work, with useful suggestions for improvement. To be useful and motivating, feedback needs to be: delivered in the form of praise, modeled for the student, practiced by the student, and used continually over time.”
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
Materials include a variety of assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of the grade-level standards and shifts. Assessments are both informal and formal and in a variety of modalities, including formal assessments, writing prompts, and discussions. Each lesson culminates with a check-in routine, which allows students to reflect on their new knowledge or share what they have learned with a partner. The Assessment Handbook also includes information on student portfolios. Students collect work that supports progress as a reader and provides “formative information” in a Developmental portfolio.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials include an Assessment Handbook that details all of the formative and summative assessment options available in the program, including universal screeners, placement and diagnostic assessments, fluency assessments, progress monitoring assessments, unit assessments, and benchmark assessments. A table indicates which assessments are available for each of these purposes, the reading component measured, the grade levels, the type of test, when to give the assessment, and how to administer the assessment.
In the Assessment Handbook, the materials indicate that teachers can have students develop portfolios of their work over the year to show both development and their best work. A development portfolio “contains examples of the writing process and samples from the beginning, middle, and end of the year.” A portfolio used to showcase a student’s best work shows what a student has learned. Portfolios can also be used to “connect students’ learning from unit to unit. Students are able to choose certain pieces of work from the previous unit, and then reflect on them.”
Across the year, the materials provide a unit assessment in every unit, along with twice-yearly benchmark assessments with questions aligned to the standards. Both the unit and benchmark assessments contain primarily multiple-choice type questions. For example, in the Unit 1 assessment, question 5 asks students to respond to the multiple choice question, “What does the picture show about Rico?” This question is aligned to standard RL.2.7: “Use information gained from the illustrations and words in a print or digital text to demonstrate understanding of its characters, setting, or plot.”
In Unit 2, Week 4, Extended Writing 1, students finalize and present a research report. The accompanying rubric assesses students’ knowledge of grade-level appropriate informative/explanatory writing and speaking and listening skills and is aligned to the standards listed for the lesson.
In Unit 2, Week 5, Lesson 2, the materials direct teachers to do a formative assessment of student learning by having students read a text fluently, then having partners reflect using the Check-In routine.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The instructional materials provide multiple accommodations to ensure students can access assessments and demonstrate knowledge without changing assessment content. Teachers can find support in the Equitable Access to Instruction Handbook, the Assessment Handbook, and within daily lessons. The Assessment Handbook includes general accommodation information and suggestions for how much and what type of assistance to provide during assessments. The Equitable Access to Instruction guide contains information for ELL support and visual and audio enhancements for students who struggle or have learning disabilities and require alternative options to reflect understanding.
Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Digital assessments allow students to use an electronic highlighter, notepad, line reader, and text-to-speech features.
The Resource Library contains both downloadable Unit Assessments and ELL Unit Assessments, allowing English Language Learners to demonstrate their knowledge without changing the content of the assessment.
Teachers can print assessments or have students view them digitally and use screen readers or increase the font size without changing the content.
Digital assessments have an audio option for students to listen to the directions. For example, in the Student Edition, Reading/Writing Companion Unit 1, page 10, students can click the audio icon, and the directions will play.
Digital assessments have a zoom button on the top menu bar so students can increase or decrease the text size.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Section, Equitable Access to Instruction Handbook, there is a section titled Multiple Methods of Demonstration. Here teachers can find various suggestions to accommodate students of different ability levels as they complete the curriculum.
Teachers are provided with notes in the daily lessons which explain how to provide accommodations to students who are approaching the standard, on-grade level, beyond grade level, and English Language Learners.
The Assessment Handbook assists in managing multiple assessments in the classroom, interpreting results, and implementing classroom-based instruction in the areas of need. For example, on page 7, there is a definition of a diagnostic assessment and examples to support story sequencing when a student is having difficulty.
In the Resource Library, the English Language Learner Assessment Handbook contains performance indicators for three proficiency levels used in rubrics for assessing students at various levels.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
Materials provide learning strategies and supports for students in special populations. In each lesson, there is a Differentiated Reading sidebar, which provides suggested supports to help students approaching level, on-level, and beyond-level access to the grade-level text. In addition, the Differentiated Reading sidebar includes ways to help English Language Learners access grade-level content and standards. The instructional materials regularly provide extensions to engage in literacy content and concepts at a greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Across the school year, materials provide exposure and access to challenging texts and tasks to increase critical reading skills, such as interpreting and analyzing texts. Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks, as well as variety in how students demonstrate their learning and monitor their performance. Throughout the year, students learn and demonstrate their learning through discussions, writing, and completing written pages. Materials provide a variety of grouping strategies throughout each unit and lesson across the school year. Students can engage in pairs or small groups to discuss, read, write, present, peer evaluate, and play games. Specific teacher guidance is found in lesson segments and details how and when to use specific grouping strategies. Materials provide strategies, support, and multiple opportunities for English Language Learners to participate in grade-level activities. In addition to the “Dual Language” section in the Resources Library, materials provide lesson-specific scaffolding daily to help ELL students meet or exceed grade-level standards. Materials provide a balance of drawings and realistic images representing different demographic and physical characteristics of the characters. Across the year, positive representations of all individuals are found in the illustrations and avoid stereotypes and biases toward underrepresented groups or individuals. The content supports strengthening a student’s sense of identity and promoting equity and inclusion while engaging students in learning. Materials guide teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The Language Transfers Handbook includes a sound transfer chart, a grammar transfer chart, and examples of cognates. This handbook also provides background knowledge and suggestions for teachers to help students as they learn another language. Materials provide guidance and support across the year to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The Resource Library contains three resources, the Language Transfers Handbook, a Culturally Responsive Teacher Guidance document, and the Equitable Access to Instruction guide. The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with assistance to make linguistic connections that support students increasing their knowledge of English.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials provide learning strategies and supports for students in special populations. In each lesson, there is a Differentiated Reading sidebar, which provides suggested supports to help students approaching level, on-level, and beyond level access to the grade-level text. In addition, the Differentiated Reading sidebar also includes ways to help English Language Learners access grade-level content and standards.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Lesson Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 5, students read Biblioburro: A True Story from Colombia by Jeanette Winter. In the Differentiated Reading section, the materials provide strategies for differentiating instruction. For example, those approaching level should listen to the selection summary first. For students on level or beyond, they should work in pairs or independently to complete the Reread prompts in the Reading/Writing Companion on pages 26–28. Students who are English Language Learners should listen to the selection summary, which is available in many languages.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Lesson 6, students read The Contest of Athena and Poseidon by Pamela Walker. In the Differentiated Reading section, the materials provide strategies for differentiating instruction. For example, those approaching level should listen to the selection summary before working in small groups to answer the prompts. For students on level or beyond, they should work in pairs or independently to complete the Reread prompts in the Reading/Writing Companion, pages 50–52. Students who are English Language Learners should listen to the selection summary, which is available in many languages.
Under the Resource Tab in the Professional Development section, the Equitable Access to Instruction Guide provides strategies to support teachers as they differentiate instruction for students. The overview states, “Equity in the classroom is crucial to the success of all students, particularly those who struggle or have disabilities. The resources in this module help teachers meet the needs of students with disabilities. The videos and PDFs detail strategies for implementing differentiated instruction, and they explain how to use technology to adapt the curriculum to suit the individual learner. Several of these resources focus on identifying classroom accommodations for students with targeted instructional needs. Included are strategies for providing explicit explanations and setting realistic expectations, thus accelerating student performance.”
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The instructional materials regularly provide extensions to engage in literacy content and concepts at a greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Across the school year, materials provide exposure and access to challenging texts and tasks to increase critical reading skills such as interpretation and
analysis of texts. Students can access differentiated spelling lists, leveled readers, and differentiated assignments. Literacy tasks are based on higher-order questions and actively involve students in speaking, listening, discussing, and writing about complex texts. The Teacher Edition includes Differentiated Reading and Writing Boxes and guidance on how to use whole-group lessons to support beyond-level students.
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 2, beyond-level students read City Communities by Madhula Chopra. Students “recall that in narrative nonfiction a narrator tells about a real person, place, or thing. Prompt children to name key characteristics of narrative nonfiction. Then tell them to look for these characteristics as they read City Communities.”
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 1, beyond-level students use the Visual Vocabulary Cards to review the meaning of Earth and properties. The teacher writes erosion and seawalls on the board and discusses the meanings with the students. Students then write sentences using these words.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 3, beyond-level students read, Do People Need Rules? by Anton Wilson. The teacher “reminds children that a persuasive article is a kind of opinion text. The author states an opinion about a topic and includes facts and examples to support the opinion. The author uses strong language to persuade readers to agree with the opinion. The author may also include text features, such as a chart.”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Materials provide students with multiple opportunities to question, investigate, and problem-solve with various multi-modal opportunities. For example, students engage in discussions, complete writing assignments, read and act out plays, and share new ideas or thinking using the Build Knowledge anchor chart. Students can use checklists and peer reviews to self-reflect and improve their work, as well as engage in the Check-In Routine to monitor and reflect on their learning.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Text Set 3, Lesson 1, students build knowledge about the Essential Question, “How do you express yourself?” Students watch a video, talk about the video, write about the video in their reader’s notebooks, and add information related to the topic to an anchor chart.
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 3, students read Mr. Putter and Tabby See the Stars by Cynthia Rylant. After reading Mr. Putter and Tabby See the Stars, students add new ideas to the Build Knowledge Anchor Chart.
Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 10, after reading several different fables, students show how they “built knowledge across the text set by creating a poster that shows what they learned from the animals in the fables.”
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 4, Lesson 9, students edit personal narratives using the Editing Checklist in the Reading/Writing Companion to identify mistakes in their drafts. Students work in pairs to continue editing using the Editing Checklist.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 1, students follow the Check-in Routine to reflect on their learning after reading Cesar Chavez (author not cited). According to the Teacher’s Edition, the Check-In Routine consists of the following steps:
“Review the lesson learning goal.
Reflect on the activity.
Self-Assess by
circling the hands in the Reading/Writing Companion
showing thumbs up, sideways, or down.
Share with your teacher.”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Materials provide a variety of grouping strategies throughout each unit and lesson across the school year. Students can engage in pairs or small groups to discuss, read, write, present, peer evaluate, and play games. Specific teacher guidance is found in lesson segments and details how and when to use specific grouping strategies. The Instructional Routines Handbook provides guidance on grouping students in various formats during activities such as Collaborative Conversations, Shared Read Routine, Literature Circles, Peer Conferences, Author Study, and Book Club Chat. The “Managing Small Groups: A How-To Guide” handbook supports teachers by explaining how to group students using data.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 6, Lesson 1, students work in pairs to “read their poems aloud to each other as they work on them. Children should check with each other about how the poems make them feel. If a poem does not create the desired feeling, they should decide on the types of changes that would help. Circulate and provide assistance, as needed.”
In Unit 4, Week 5, Lesson 3, students work with a partner to discuss the Essential Question: What excites us about nature?
In Unit 6, Week 2, Lesson 6, students work with a partner to compare the three sources. Students use their notes and their writer’s notebook to answer the question, “How did Tom develop his central idea by combining information from all three sources?”
Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources Section, there is a handbook titled “Managing Small Groups: A How-To Guide.: Teachers are provided with suggestions on how to form heterogenous and homogenous groups, group assignments, and group sizes. The guide states, “at the beginning of the academic year, it is often easier to assign group memberships that are more homogenous or similar in skill proficiency and needs.” The guide suggests that students can work in mixed-skills and flexible groups based on teacher observations.
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, Peer Conferences section, teachers are instructed to pair two or three students. Materials suggest grouping students reading the same text(s) on the same topic or theme.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
Materials provide strategies, support, and multiple opportunities for English Language Learners to participate in grade-level activities. In addition to the “Dual Language” section in the Resources Library, materials provide lesson-specific scaffolding daily to help ELL students meet or exceed grade-level standards. Depending on English proficiency levels, support might include using pictures students can point to, sentence stems, or partner text discussions. Teachers are encouraged to explicitly model how to think deeply about a text, define key terms, and ask questions to elicit deeper understanding of texts read in class.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources Library, a section titled “Dual Language” contains 42 resources for teachers to support English Language Learners. Information is in various languages (i.e., Arabic, Chinese, French, Haitian-Creole, Hmong, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, Urdu, and Vietnamese) to aid English Language Learners during classroom activities. Teachers can find resources such as language development cards, language development practice, a language transfers handbook, visual vocabulary cards, multilingual glossaries, oral language sentence frames, and sound spelling cards.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 10, students read Big Red Lollipop by Rukhsana Khan and answer the following prompt, “Why is learning about how families are the same and different important?” Additional ELL guidance states, “Provide sentence frames for support. Possible answers are shown: Learning about how families are the same and different is important because it helps you feel connected to other kids. In ‘Maria Celebrates Brazil,’ Maria’s family helps her make a good decision. In Big Red Lollipop, Rubina’s mother makes her do something she doesn’t want to. My parents help me make good decisions, too. But sometimes they make me do things I don’t want to.”
In Unit 3, Week 6, Lesson 1, students read “Antarctica-Bound” from TIME for Kids. Teacher guidance for ELL students states, “Craft and Structure Focus on the question: What text structure does the author use to organize the information? Use prompts to help children answer. How does the first paragraph look different from the rest of the article? (the type is different) Which sentence tells the reader what they will read, or introduces the topic of the article? (Here, Claire tells about her experience...) What do the words we, I, and us tell you the author? (It’s written in first person; Claire is the author.) With a partner, find all the chronology signal words and phrases you can. (First, From there, for two days, once we arrived, On day three, After landing, Then we finally, First, Then, two days) Reinforce meaning, as needed, to help children understand that the author narrates her experience by telling the events in order.”
In Unit 5, Week 4, Lesson 10, students write a Public Service Announcement Pamphlet. Teacher guidance for ELL students provides sentence frames to help children share knowledge such as, “One way to be a good citizen is to,” “In the story,” “We read about,” “She is a good citizen because,” “Another trait of a good citizen is,” “In the text,” “We read about,” “He is a good citizen because,” “Another trait of a good citizen is,” and “Two characters who showed this trait are ___ and ___.”
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Materials provide a balance of drawings and realistic images representing different demographic and physical characteristics of the characters. Across the year, positive representations of all individuals are found in the illustrations and avoid stereotypes and biases toward underrepresented groups or individuals. The content supports strengthening a student’s sense of identity and promoting equity and inclusion while engaging students in learning. Students have a variety of opportunities to demonstrate success and understanding.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 1, students read My Puppy Poetry by Aileen Fisher. The poem includes an illustration of a girl in a wheelchair.
In Unit 3, Week 5, Lesson 1, digital tools are available for the teacher to use with students, including an image and a video. Both the image and video depict students of varying skin tones expressing themselves differently, which is connected to the unit’s Essential Question.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Weeks 3–4, Lessons 7–8, students read “Cinderella and Friends” and “A Tale from China” (authors not cited). Both stories present positive portrayals of the main characters from different cultures’ Cinderella-type stories.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 3, students read Grace for President by Kelly Dipucchio. The story depicts various students running for class president, including girls and boys with various skin tones.
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 0, Week 1, Lesson 1, students watch a video called We Belong Together, created by the Sesame Workshop. This music video depicts several girls and boys of different skin tones working together to build and support the community, school, Pet Planet Crew, and family.
In Unit 4, Weeks 1-2, Lessons 3–6, students read Dear Primo: A Letter to My Cousin by Duncan Tonotiuh. The illustrations in the text depict a student of Mexican descent writing, studying, and participating in other activities found in daily life.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
Materials guide teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The Language Transfers Handbook includes a sound transfer chart, a grammar transfer chart, and examples of cognates. This handbook also provides background knowledge and suggestions for teachers to help students as they learn another language. In addition, the program also includes a Bridge to English section, which connects students’ English skills with Spanish. Each section provides examples of transferable and non-transferable language skills students can use as they acquire English. It provides students of varying English proficiency levels opportunities to interact as they develop their English language skills in reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Lastly, in the differentiated section of each lesson, teachers are provided with cognates of vocabulary words in the ELL Academic Lessons section to help students understand the pronunciation and meaning of new words.
Materials provide suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, the Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with a sample lesson on cognates to help students use their native language to identify words.
In the Resource Library, Bridge to English, Unit 1, Week 5, the Language Transfer section provides guidance to teachers about skills that are transferable and non-transferable between English and Spanish. The transferable skills include how to create compound sentences using conjunctions. The non-transferable skills relate to vowel sounds and how commas are used with conjunctions.
In the Resource Library, Bridge to English, Unit 6, Weeks 1–2, the Language Transfer section provides guidance to teachers about skills that are transferable and non-transferable between English and Spanish. The transferable skills include the sounds p, t, and k. The non-transferable skills include English modals and the subjunctive form in Spanish.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 1, during Differentiated Instruction, students are taught vocabulary words such as details, and the Spanish cognate detalles is provided.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, but students are not explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with strategies for supporting students as they learn English orthography. This handbook contains charts for phonemes that may cause a problem for speakers of specific languages. For example, the Sound Transfer Chart identifies the transferable and non-transferable sounds between English and Spanish, Cantonese, Vietnamese, Hmong, Korean, Tagalog, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, Hatian-Creole, and French.
The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with strategies for supporting students as they learn English syntax. The handbook suggests that teachers highlight the transferable skills if the group of students all speak the same native language.
In the Resource Library, there are a variety of videos that promote using the students’ home language, including “Bridging Lessons: Transferring Learning Between Languages” with Peggy Cerna and “Building First Language Proficiency” with Dr. Josefina Tinajero.
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
Materials provide guidance and support across the year to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The Resource Library contains three resources, the Language Transfers Handbook, a Culturally Responsive Teacher Guidance document, and the Equitable Access to Instruction guide. The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with assistance to make linguistic connections that support students increasing their knowledge of English. The Culturally Responsive Teacher Guidance document cultivates critical thinking and problem- solving skills. Teachers are supported with equity guidance through the Equitable Access to Instruction guide which includes options for student choice during independent work time. Opportunities for students to share personal home experiences to enhance their understanding of various concepts are present in the materials.
Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources section, the Language Transfers Handbook includes information about sound transfers in a variety of languages including Spanish, Cantonese, Vietnamese, Hmong, Korean, Tagalog, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, Haitian-Creole, Portuguese, and French.
In Unit 3, Week 5, Lesson 1, Differentiated Instruction, English Language Learner section, ELA Academic Language including central idea, relevant details, ask and answer questions, and prefix are present. The materials provide teachers with the cognates for some of the phrases, like idea central, detalles relevantes, and prefijo.
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources section, Becoming a Culturally Responsive Teacher includes a selection of resources to help teachers achieve the goals listed in the document, including “respect my students’ preferences and honor their experiences, provide rigorous instruction that invites critical thinking, acknowledge bias and privilege, own my own learning, communicate positive intentions, avoid assumptions, reject color blindness, consider context, be open to being wrong, get comfortable with discomfort, and create a classroom that offers the opportunity to achieve academic excellence to all.”
In the Resources section, the Becoming a Culturally Responsive Teacher includes a model lesson section teachers can apply to lessons throughout. This scaffolded lesson plan includes suggestions regarding a culturally-responsive essential question, objectives, sensitivities, key vocabulary, building background knowledge, introducing the concept before reading, and optional activities extending the concept after reading. In addition, this lesson format includes teacher tips, extending your classroom library, and resources. The document also includes suggestions on how to use these model lessons, namely as supplements, to provide historical and cultural background, and to explore identity and social justice.
Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources section, the Equitable Access to Instruction guide provides teachers information about creating an “equitable learning environment for all students.” This guide includes information about using audio and video in the classroom, peer tutor implementation, the use of graphic organizers, the use of multiple methods of demonstration, and the use of classroom routines.
Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Glossaries for students are provided in several languages, specifically an English-French glossary, an English-Hmong glossary, an English-Korean glossary, an English-Arabic glossary, an English-Portuguese glossary, an English-Spanish glossary, an English-Chinese glossary, an English-Urdu glossary, an English-Russian glossary, an English-Vietnamese glossary, an English-Tagalog glossary, and an English-Haitian Creole glossary.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 5, Lesson 1, students build knowledge about the Essential Question, “What happens when families work together?” Students participate in a Collaborative Conversation where they discuss how families pay for the things they need and want and complete chores.
In Unit 4, Weeks 1 and 2, Lesson 1, students build knowledge by watching a video related to the Essential Question, “How are kids around the world different?” With a partner, students then discuss how customs around the world are alike and different.
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The program integrates technology in various ways that provide opportunities for engagement, support, and customization. Interactive technology tools can be found that encourage a more engaging and supportive learning environment, such as the option for texts to be read aloud, games, and the ability to customize assignments. Age-appropriate digital tools are found throughout the materials to help students access the content and master the standards. Materials include digital opportunities for teachers and students to collaborate with each other. The materials allow the teacher to post assignments, projects, weekly learning goals, and messages. Students can view current and past messages posted by the teacher and respond to the teacher. The instructional materials provide a visual design to support students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The teacher’s edition is organized the same way in each unit, week, and lesson. The student edition is easy to navigate and has titles to help students navigate the curriculum. The visual design is age-appropriate and includes both realistic photographs as well as illustrations to support student learning. The instructional materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Technology is used in a variety of purposeful ways. The materials include guidance to integrate technology to increase engagement and maximize student learning.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The program integrates technology in a variety of ways that provide opportunities for engagement, support, and customization. Interactive technology tools can be found that encourage a more engaging and supportive learning environment, such as the option for texts to be read aloud, games, and the ability to customize assignments. Age-appropriate digital tools are found throughout the materials to help students access the content and master the standards.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Reading/Writing Companion digital version, students can select a thumbs down, a sideways thumb, or a thumbs up for each check-in throughout the course.
Students can learn the weekly vocabulary words in the “Words to Know” digital tool. The tool introduces the vocabulary word, provides a definition, gives an example, and asks a question with the word contained within the question. This tool allows students to listen to each of the components of the tool.
There are Build Knowledge videos provided to help students learn about the topic of the unit.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 6, students read Big Read Lollipop by Rukhsana Khan. Students can use the digital tool to listen to the story read aloud to them. There is also a bookmark feature that allows students to save a specific page in the story.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, there are a variety of interactive graphic organizers. When the interactive version of the graphic organizer is selected, students can use the pencil tool to write on the graphic organizer.
In the Resource Library, there is a Response Board/Sound Spelling Workboard where the top contains white space, and the bottom has lined rows for writing. Students can use the pencil icon to write on the board.
There are various digital games for students to engage in throughout the materials. For example, in Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 4, students can complete a phonemic segmentation interactive activity. Students listen to the sounds in a word and move a red marker to represent each sound they hear.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
By selecting “Manage and Assign” from the menu, teachers can select “Make an Assignment” to create a new assignment for a select group of students or an entire class. Teachers have the option to add a title, directions, and resources such as ebooks, interactive games, and graphic organizers.
In the Online Assessment Center, teachers can either modify an existing assessment or create a new one. There are a variety of question types that teachers can choose from, including multiple-choice, short answer, fill-in-the-blank, and essay.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials include digital opportunities for teachers and students to collaborate with each other. The materials allow the teacher to post assignments, projects, weekly learning goals, and messages. Students can view current and past messages posted by the teacher and respond to the teacher.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Student Dashboard provides students with the opportunity to collaborate with the teacher using the My Binder section. Here, students can view assignments and assessments that the teacher posts.
The Student Dashboard includes a “To Do” section, which lists specific tasks that students should practice and/or complete. There is a “Note to Teacher” box, which allows students to communicate directly with the teacher.
The Student Dashboard allows students to collaborate with the teacher in the Writing and Research section. Students can view topics and projects assigned by the teacher. The teacher can also pose questions, and students can respond to the question, see the responses of their classmates, and respond to their peers’ comments.
The Student Dashboard includes a Home to School Section where students and families can view messages, word activities, learning goals, and spelling lists the teacher posts.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The instructional materials provide a visual design to support students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The teacher’s edition is organized the same way in each unit, week, and lesson. The student edition is easy to navigate and has titles to help students navigate the curriculum. The visual design is age-appropriate and includes both realistic photographs as well as illustrations to support student learning. Text boxes provide additional information for students to help them understand the topics, content, and texts. The table of contents, glossary, and table headers are all easy to understand and navigate.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Text Set 1, students read Big Red Lollipop by Rukhsana Khan. On the first page of the story, the Essential Question is located at the bottom of the page.
In Unit 4, Week 2, students read Dear Primo: A Letter to my Cousin by Duncan Tonatiuh. Various illustrations are labeled with words in Spanish to show students the names of common items in Spanish.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, Teacher Resources are PDF copies of each unit for teachers divided by weeks. For example, there is a PDF file for Unit 5 Overview and Week 1, another file for Unit 5, Week 2, and another for Unit 5, Week 3, etc. The Table of Contents for each unit includes Unit Planning, Reading/Writing, and Program Information. Information about texts for each week and lessons is included within this document using different colors, text boxes, and other visual elements to make it not only consistent but also efficient in finding the necessary information.
The Reading/Writing Companion for students follows this sequence: Build Knowledge, My Goals, Read and Respond to the Big Book, Topic and Details, Analyze the Text (e.g., shared reads and paired selections,) Research and Inquiry, Make Connections, and Show Your Knowledge.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Resources tab contains a glossary. The glossary includes words such as “celebrate,” where the word and definition are spoken when the video’s play button is clicked. In addition, there is a definition of the word along with a picture and a section entitled Routine that offers opportunities for students to use this word.
The Table of Contents in the student textbook includes images, text, and colors to help all students access the necessary materials. For example, “To Do” includes a paper with a checkmark and is contained within a green circle. The text is visible when a student hovers over the icon.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The instructional materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Technology is used in a variety of purposeful ways. The materials include guidance to integrate technology to increase engagement and maximize student learning. Technology resources to support student learning include but are not limited to presentations, games, and videos.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher’s Online Dashboard includes daily presentations with resources that can be displayed on a whiteboard or other tool.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 1, the Essential Question is, “How are families around the world the same and different?” Teacher guidance states, “Watch the Video, play the video without sound first. Have partners narrate what they see. Then replay the video with sound as children listen. Talk About the Video, have partners discuss how families around the world are the same and different. Write About the Video, have children add their ideas to their Build Knowledge pages of their reader’s notebooks.”
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 1, the Essential Question is, “What do heroes do?” Teacher guidance states, “Watch the Video, play the video without sound first. Have partners narrate what they see. Then replay the video with sound as children listen. Talk About the Video, have partners discuss how heroes can be brave and make a difference through their actions and words. Write About the Video, have children add their ideas to the Build Knowledge pages of their reader’s notebooks.”