About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Wonders | ELA
ELA K-2
The instructional materials for Grades K, 1, and 2 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. Most texts are of high quality and include rigorous reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language practice. Students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge building. Supports for teachers to implement the materials with fidelity are clear and include guidance for differentiation to authentically grow students’ skills.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
ELA 3-5
The instructional materials for Grades 3, 4, and 5 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. Most texts are of high quality and include rigorous reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language practice. Students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge building. Supports for teachers to implement the materials with fidelity are clear and include guidance for differentiation to authentically grow students’ skills.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 1st Grade
Alignment Summary
The Wonders Grade 1 materials meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.
1st Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials include high-quality anchor texts that are worthy of careful reading, consider a range of student interests, contain rich language, engage students, and include texts that are culturally diverse, with multi-dimensional characters and also reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The majority of anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade band. Throughout the year, the complexity of the texts increases, which supports students’ literacy growth over time. While the complexity of the associated tasks ranges from slightly complex to moderately complex throughout the year, students are expected to show increased independence as the year progresses. During small group instruction, students complete independent work, including self-selected reading tasks. Throughout the materials, students have many opportunities to engage with text-dependent and text-specific questions both during and after reading. Students complete written responses and engage in small group and partner discussions. Scaffolds are provided, such as graphic organizers and charts, to help students complete text-specific tasks like identifying the sequence of events or analyzing the author’s purpose. The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a detailed section on Collaborative Conversations, a broad protocol for speaking and listening, including what it looks like, why teachers should do it, the research to support it, and the criteria for success. Students have opportunities to engage in various speaking and listening activities about what they read and listened to throughout the program. Materials contain numerous opportunities for students to engage in grade-appropriate writing that includes both on-demand and process writing. On-demand writing occurs throughout the year while students are reading since questions are asked in the margin of texts to support comprehension and after reading in the Reading/Writing Companion. Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to engage in opinion, informative, and narrative writing and to learn and apply evidence-based writing. Materials include teacher guidance for instructional vocabulary routines for vocabulary development and strategies. Materials provide opportunities for the teacher to teach most grammar standards explicitly, and the materials provide explicit instruction and application for students to print many upper and lowercase letters and address specific grammar concepts (ex: nouns, verbs, adjectives, use of commas, types of sentences) through teacher-led grammar lessons throughout the program. Materials provide teachers with systematic and explicit instruction in phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics. Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy for teaching phonological awareness skills and a research-based scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills. Students have opportunities to learn concepts of print, text features, and structures through whole-group shared reading, paired reading, and differentiated small-group reading. Materials provide multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to purposefully read on-level text during interactive read-alouds, shared reading, and differentiated instruction lessons. Multiple opportunities are provided in materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading. Lessons and activities provide students with opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding in context and decoding words in connected text and tasks. The scope and sequence provides direct correlations of the phonics, high-frequency words, and spelling lessons linking to the decodable text opportunities providing students with immediate opportunities for the application of skills and concepts taught. Materials include ongoing and frequent assessments to determine students’ mastery of foundational skills. The Assessment Handbook guides teachers’ use of the assessment data by giving key recommendations on how to use the data to group students, provide intervention for students, and reteach skills for students as appropriate. Materials provide ample support for speakers of languages other than English, special populations, and students beyond their current grade level to learn, use strategies, and receive support to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Materials include high-quality anchor texts that are worthy of careful reading, consider a range of student interests, contain rich language, engage students, and include texts that are culturally diverse, with multi-dimensional characters. The images and illustrations extend the meaning of the text and support academic vocabulary. The materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Materials include a variety of genres, including biographies, realistic fiction, fables, and how-to texts. Overall there are 65 literary texts and 70 informational texts, reflecting the 50/50 split required by the standards. The majority of anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade band. The program includes an Explore the Text resource, which provides the quantitative and qualitative measures of each text. This resource also includes Reader and Task considerations; however, the materials do not include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Throughout the year, the complexity of the texts increases, which supports students’ literacy growth over time. While the complexity of the associated tasks ranges from slightly complex to moderately complex throughout the year, students are expected to show increased independence as the year progresses. The Teacher Edition provides suggestions for teacher prompts and appropriate scaffolds to build background knowledge and facilitate depth of knowledge. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a variety of texts, including a range of topics and diverse cultures and opinions. During small group instruction, students complete independent work, including self-selected reading tasks. Resources in the Teacher Tools section provide recommendations for allotting additional time for dailyindependent reading, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
The materials include high-quality anchor texts that are worthy of careful reading. The texts consider a range of student interests, contain rich language, and engage students. The materials include texts that are culturally diverse with multi-dimensional characters. The images and illustrations extend the meaning of the text and support academic vocabulary.
Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, students listen to Alicia’s Happy Day by Meg Starr, a well-crafted realistic fiction story with rich language. The text features a Latinx neighborhood and includes beautiful portraits of the characters.
In Unit 3, Week 3, students listen to Interrupting Chicken by David Ezra Stein, which is a New York Times bestseller and won the Randolph Caldecott Medal in 2011. The story provides humor for students and incorporates fairy tales that students may be familiar with in a novel way.
In Unit 4, Week 1, students engage in the shared read of the folktale “Snail and Frog Race” (author not cited). The illustrations are visually appealing and support the meaning of the text.
In Unit 6, Week 5, students listen to Happy Birthday, U.S.A.! (author not cited), a nonfiction article from Time for Kids. The photos support the text and build students’ knowledge of the unit’s topic.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. *This does not include decodable. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
The materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Materials include a variety of genres, including biographies, realistic fiction, fables, and how-to texts. Overall there are 65 literary texts and 70 informational texts, reflecting the 50/50 split required by the standards. The genres and text types are varied and include a mix of informational and literary texts.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students listen to and read several fantasy texts such as “Six Kids” (author not cited) in Unit 1, Week 2, and The Three Little Dassies by Jan Brett in Unit 2, Week 2.
Students listen to and read several biographies such as The Story of Martin Luther King Jr, by Johnny Ray Moore in Unit 2, Week 4, and “The Story of a Robot Inventor” (author not cited) in Unit 5, Week 3.
Students listen to and read several realistic fiction stories such as Whistle for Willie by Ezra Jack Keats in Unit 5, Week 4 and Rain School by James Rumford in Unit 6, Week 3.
Students listen to and read several folktales including “The Monkey’s Fiddle” by Courtney A. Martin in Unit 1, Week 5, and The Great Big Gigantic Turnip, a Russian folktale in Unit 3, Week 2.
Students listen to several dramas including The Big Yuca Plant by Magaly Morales and “Time to Plant” (author not cited) in Unit 3, Week 2.
Students listen to and read some how-to books including, “Shake! Strike! Strum!” (author not cited), in Unit 5, Week 4 and “Making Paper Shapes” (author not cited) in Unit 6, Week 4.
Students listen to and read several informational social studies texts such as Long Ago and Now by Minda Novek in Unit 3, Week 4 and “Be a Volunteer!” (author not cited) in Unit 6, Week 1.
Materials reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the materials, there are 135 texts. There are 65 literary texts, which make up 48% of all texts in the program, and 70 informational texts, which make up 52% of all texts.
In Unit 1, there are 25 texts, with 48% being literary and 52% being informational.
In Unit 2, there are 25 texts, with 44% being literary and 56% being informational.
In Unit 3, there are 25 texts, with 56% being literary and 44% being informational.
In Unit 4, there are 20 texts, with 35% being literary and 65% being informational.
In Unit 5, there are 20 texts, with 55% being literary and 45% being informational.
In Unit 6, there are 20 texts, with 50% being literary and 50% being informational.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1c.
The majority of anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade band. The read-aloud texts are complex, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The associated task is appropriate for the grade. The program includes an Explore the Text resource, which provides the quantitative and qualitative measures of each text. This resource also includes Reader and Task considerations; however, the materials do not include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, students listen to “City Mouse, Country Mouse,” an Aesop fable. The Lexile is 820, and the qualitative measures for meaning are highly complex, but the overall complexity is considered slightly complex. The associated task is for students to respond to the read-aloud by using pictures to retell the story.
In Unit 4, Week 3, students listen to Animals in Winter (author not cited). The Lexile is 790, and the overall complexity is very complex due to the vocabulary, knowledge demands, and graphics. However, the reader and task are low complexity as students retell the story using pictures.
In Unit 5, Week 3, students listen to Thomas Edison, Inventor by David Al Adler, which has a Lexile of 510 and is within the grade band stretch. The text is appropriate for an anchor text with a qualitative complexity of very complex, as the text has moderate knowledge demands and structure ratings and high ratings for purpose. The associated task meets reader and task levels for rigor as students respond to the question, “What made Thomas Edison a good inventor?” in writing.
In Unit 6, Week 4, students listen to Lissy’s Friends by Grace Lin, which has a Lexile of 450 and is considered moderately complex with highly complex meaning and moderate organization. The associated task is for students to write a letter from Lissy to her paper friends, telling them about how things are going now.
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation does not include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials include the Explore the Texts resource, which provides an overview of the qualitative and quantitative measures of the texts in the materials. It also includes Reader and Task considerations.
The Teacher Edition provides an overview of the texts that are selected in the Wonders and Science of Reading section. It explains that the lessons are “built around a high-quality collection of complex literary and information texts, focused on both the natural and social worlds.” However, there is no information about the educational purpose and placement of the individual texts.
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics. The accuracy of the provided associated task measures was verified using grade-level standards.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1d.
Throughout the year, the complexity of the texts increases, which supports students’ literacy growth over time. At the beginning of the year, the quantitative range of texts is 30L–820L; by the end of the year, the range increases to 320L–950L. There is a slight increase in the qualitative complexity. For example, in Unit 1, 18 of the 25 texts are slightly complex, six are moderately complex, and one is very complex. By the end of the year, eight of the 20 texts are slightly complex, 11 of the 20 texts are moderately complex, and one is very complex. While the complexity of the associated tasks ranges from slightly complex to moderately complex throughout the year, students are expected to show increased independence as the year progresses. The Teacher Edition provides suggestions for teacher prompts and appropriate scaffolds to build background knowledge and facilitate depth of knowledge.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the quantitative measures range from 30L–820L, and the qualitative features range from slightly complex (18 texts) to very complex (one text). Some of the associated tasks are not complex. For example, in Unit 1, Week 4, students listen to Games Long Ago (author not cited), which has a Lexile of 620L, but the task requires students to discuss how the games in the text are the same as or different from the games they play with their friends. In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 1, students are introduced to retelling during the text The School Year will be the Best! by Kay Winters. The teacher models retelling sections while reading aloud and then models retelling the entire selection of the story at the end of the story. Students then practice retelling a page or two with a partner.
In Unit 3, the quantitative measures range from 270L–770L with 16 slightly complex texts and two very complex texts. Many of the tasks are appropriately complex. For example, in Unit 3, Week 1, students listen to Measuring Time (author not cited), which has a Lexile of 630L. One task requires students to discuss how clocks, days, months, years, calendars, and seasons help people measure time. Retelling remains the same in Unit 3 as in previous units. For example, in Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 1, while listening to the story Interrupting Chicken by David Ezra Stein, the teacher continues to pause to retell portions of the selection by telling events correctly. The students also practice retelling a page or two with a partner.
In Unit 5, the quantitative measures remain relatively the same, with texts ranging from 210L–730L. Eight of the texts are slightly complex, and two are very complex. The associated tasks continue to be mostly complex. For example, in Unit 5, Week 2, students listen to Why the Sun and Moon are in the Sky (author not cited), which has a Lexile of 730L. One of the tasks requires students to discuss what they see in the sky based on what happens in the story.
In Unit 6, the quantitative measures increase slightly with Lexiles ranging from 320L–950L, but the qualitative features remain relatively the same with eight slightly complex texts and one very complex text. The associated tasks remain appropriately complex. For example, in Unit 6, Week 3, students listen to “Paul Bunyan and the Popcorn Blizzard” (author not cited), which has a Lexile of 850L. One of the tasks is for students to discuss how weather affects the characters in the story.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in Teacher Edition (i.e., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Manual, boxes are included throughout the units to help teachers make complex texts accessible to students. The Access Complex Text boxes include scaffolded instruction for seven elements that may make a text complex.
In the Teacher’s Manual, the materials indicate to the teacher when to use the Scaffolded Shared Read routine, though the routine remains the same throughout the year.
The Close Reading Routine remains the same throughout the year to help students access complex texts, though students are expected to show more independence as the year progresses. The routine begins with reading the text, identifying important ideas and details, and retelling. Then students reread and discuss craft and structure. Lastly, students make text-to-text connections and engage in a Show Your Knowledge task.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1e.
The materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a variety of texts including a range of topics and diverse cultures and opinions. Units are organized around three text sets. Set 1 covers weeks one and two, Set 2 covers weeks three and four, and Set 3 is completed in week five. Each two-week cycle is focused on a genre study with an essential question. During small group instruction, students complete independent work, including self-selected reading tasks. Resources in the Teacher Tools section provide recommendations for allotting additional time for daily independent reading, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter. Teacher resources provide instruction to help students develop skills to monitor learning and check progress. Throughout each week, students read and listen to literature big books, anchor texts, decodables, leveled readers, and shared reading. Students engage with literary and informational texts, including fantasy, drama, realistic fiction, how-to books, and biographical texts. The program includes a clear routine for independent reading with accountability.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in reading a variety of texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, students read the Anchor Text, Flip by Ezra R. Ranaka, a fantasy text. Students also read and listen to two fantasy texts in the Literature Big Book and the Reading/Writing Companion and two informational texts in the Literature Anthology and Interactive Read Aloud.
In Unit 2, students read a variety of texts including narrative poetry, realistic fiction, biography, fantasy, folktale, and informational texts. For example, in Week 2, the anchor text is 3 Little Daisies by Jan Brett, a fantasy text.
In Unit 3, Week 2, students read the paired selection, “How Plants Grow” (author not cited), an informational text. Students also read and listen to a folktale, an informational text, two plays, and realistic fiction in this unit.
In Unit 4, students read a variety of texts, including poetry, folktales, fantasy, opinion pieces, and informational texts. For example, in Week 4, the paired text is “Meet the Insects” (author not cited), an informational science text.
In Unit 6, Week 4, students read the paired selection, “Making Paper Shapes” (author not cited), a how-to text. Students also read and listen to several informational and realistic fiction texts.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students engage with an Interactive Read Aloud, a Paired Selection, the Literature Big Book, Shared Reads, and an Anchor text each week. There are six weeks of lessons, for a total of 30 lessons and 24 texts. Additional texts in Unit 1 include independent reading and read-alouds and additional texts that are of the same genre at various levels.
In Unit 5, there are a total of 19 texts spanning 30 lessons, and each week students read or listen to the Interactive Read Aloud, Shared Read, Paired Selection, and Anchor Text. Additional texts include independent reading and read-alouds, as well as a bibliography for additional texts for students to interact with from this unit.
In Unit 6, students read and listen to interactive Read Alouds, paired selections, and an Anchor Text each week for a total of 6 weeks spanning 30 lessons. Additional texts are available for read-alouds and independent reading that align with the topics and genres in this unit.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers.(eg. Proposed schedule, racking system for independent reading, independent reading procedures are included in the lessons.) Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes routines for independent reading and recommends 10–20 minutes a day for Grade 1 students. It suggests that independent reading be a part of the center rotation. The Handbook also prompts teachers to teach the routine so students can choose books and read independently while the teacher works with small groups.
The Independent Reading Routine, found in the Instructional Routines Handbook, includes selecting a book that is interesting, reading the book during independent reading time, recording what they read on the provided reading log at the end of each session, sharing opinions of the text with a friend or writing a review when finished with a book, and beginning again.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a list of resources to support independent reading. These include independent reading selections in the Literature Anthology, TIME for Kids online digital articles, leveled readers, and classroom library trade books with online lessons and activities for each text.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a procedure for conferencing around independent reading. The procedure is not specific but gives information such as, “Make a positive observation about the student’s reading or book choice” and “Regularly conferring with students about their independent reading is a great way to informally assess their progress, model social-emotional learning skills, build your classroom culture, and instill habits of learning.”
Independent reading guidance is also found in the Differentiated Instruction section of the units. The guidelines are relatively similar across each unit and level. For example, the guidance includes helping students pick an appropriate text and having them read for a specific amount of time.
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Throughout the materials, students have many opportunities to engage with text-dependent and text-specific questions both during and after reading. During Shared Reading, Interactive Read Alouds, and Anchor Texts, the teacher pauses to ask students text-dependent questions to help students better comprehend the text. Students complete written responses and engage in small group and partner discussions. Scaffolds are provided, such as graphic organizers and charts, to help students complete text-specific tasks like identifying the sequence of events or analyzing the author’s purpose. Materials also begin to teach students to provide textual evidence to support their responses. The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a detailed section on Collaborative Conversations, a broad protocol for speaking and listening, including what it looks like, why teachers should do it, the research to support it, and the criteria for success. Throughout the program, students engage in various Collaborative Conversations such as “Turn and Talk,” “Ask and Answer Questions,” and “Add New Ideas.” Students have opportunities to engage in various speaking and listening activities about what they read and listened to throughout the program. Students engage in Collaborative Conversations, which have agreed-upon rules for discussions and presentations. Materials contain numerous opportunities for students to engage in grade-appropriate writing that includes both on-demand and process writing. On-demand writing occurs throughout the year while students are reading since questions are asked in the margin of texts to support comprehension and after reading in the Reading/Writing Companion. Each unit also has two extended writing projects that span anywhere from ten lessons to 20 lessons. Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to engage in opinion, informative, and narrative writing. Students complete a total of 40 process writing pieces during the six units. Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to learn and apply evidence-based writing. Students have the opportunity to watch the teacher model thinking about and collecting evidence prior to doing it independently and have opportunities to write paragraphs about texts they listen to and read. Materials include teacher guidance for instructional vocabulary routines for vocabulary development and strategies. Each week, five oral vocabulary words are taught that tie to the essential question and topic of the week but are not necessarily found in texts. Materials provide opportunities for the teacher to teach most grammar standards explicitly, and the materials provide explicit instruction and application for students to print many upper and lowercase letters and address specific grammar concepts (ex: nouns, verbs, adjectives, use of commas, types of sentences) through teacher-led grammar lessons throughout the program.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1f.
Throughout the materials, students have many opportunities to engage with text-dependent and text-specific questions both during and after reading. During Shared Reading, Interactive Read Alouds, and Anchor Texts, the teacher pauses to ask students text-dependent questions to help students better comprehend the text. Students also have the opportunity to answer questions after reading during the lessons. Students complete written responses and engage in small group and partner discussions. Scaffolds are provided, such as graphic organizers and charts, to help students complete text-specific tasks like identifying the sequence of events or analyzing the author’s purpose. Materials also begin to teach students to provide textual evidence to support their responses.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 3, the teacher rereads Cool Dog, School Dog by Deborah Heiligman and stops throughout to ask questions such as, “How does the author use language to help us understand the focus of the story?” and “How do the illustrations help us visualize what is happening with Tinka in the classroom?”
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 2, students read “Good Job, Ben” (author not cited) during shared reading. The teacher asks text-specific questions like, “Who helps Mom and Ben cross? How?” and “Who helps Jet?”
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 2, students reread the play “Time to Plant” (author not cited). The teacher models analyzing the dialogue in the play. The students are then asked to describe what they learned about Mike from his dialogue and add the information to the graphic organizer. After, students work with the teacher to write down the sequence of events from the story. The teacher supports students by asking, “What is the next main event?”
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 1, students read “Go Wild!” (author not cited) during shared reading. The teacher has children ask questions they have about the text and read to find the answers. The teacher also has partners talk about the big cat and asks, “How does it hunt?” After reading, partners discuss what the animals in the selection eat in the wild.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 3, students listen to the anchor text, A Lost Button, by Arnold Lobel. While reading, the teacher asks questions such as, “How does the author show that Frog is a good friend?” and “How does the author help you understand how Toad is a good friend?” After reading, students work with partners to discuss how Frog and Toad categorize and classify the buttons in the story.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 1, students read “Wrapped in Ice” (author not cited) during shared reading. After reading, the teacher engages in Modeled Writing. The teacher asks, “How do people in the town react to the weather during the story?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Resources include graphic organizers that will help students answer text-specific questions. For example, one graphic organizer is a ten events cause and effect graphic organizer. There is also a character, setting, and events graphic organizer. For example, in Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 2, students reread “Good Job, Ben!” (author not cited) and fill in a graphic organizer to study the characteristics of realistic fiction. Students use the graphic organizer to determine what could be real and what could really happen. In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 2, students reread “Go Wild!” (author not cited) and use information from the text to complete a graphic organizer that lists the animals and how they find their food.
In the margin of the Shared Reading texts throughout the materials, there are questions to help students find evidence to answer text-specific questions. For example, in Unit 3, Week 3, students read “Life at Home” (author not cited). After reading one page, students are prompted to talk about helping out at home long ago and today and discuss which is easier.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a Finding Text Evidence Routine. First, the teacher explains the routine and what text evidence means. Then the teacher models locating text evidence. The teacher then engages in guided practice with the students before they work independently or in small groups to identify and cite text evidence.
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a Response to the Text Routine to help students answer rigorous questions about the text. The routine includes reading the question and talking about it with a partner before going back into the selection of the text, rereading, and finding evidence to support thoughts and ideas. Students then use a graphic organizer to record their responses.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1g.
There are several protocols to support students in their speaking and listening. The Instructional Routines Handbook includes a detailed section on Collaborative Conversations, a broad protocol for speaking and listening, including what it looks like, why teachers should do it, the research to support it, and the criteria for success. Throughout the program, students engage in various Collaborative Conversations such as “Turn and Talk,” “Ask and Answer Questions,” and “Add New Ideas.” The program also includes brief and practical reminders about being an active listener. Students are also provided with support by orally retelling stories throughout the entire program.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is a protocol called Collaborative Conversations, which are “rich, structured conversations around grade-level topics and texts.” Collaborative conversations occur at the beginning of the week when the essential question is introduced, every time students engage in the Close Reading Routine, during guided and independent practice, when students respond to texts they are reading, and when students write about text.
One Collaborative Conversation is “Turn and Talk.” The protocol includes modeling the routine and sentence stems.
Students also engage in the “Add New Ideas” Collaborative Conversation protocol, where students engage in partner, small-group, and whole-group discussions and stay on topic, connect their own idea to the comments of others, and respond to comments and ideas.
“Ask and Answer Questions” is another Collaborative Conversation protocol, which encourages students to ask questions about ideas they do not understand, give others a chance to think after asking a question, and write down questions they want to ask the teacher for the whole class.
“In the Take Turns Talking” protocol, students are encouraged to take turns talking and not speaking over others, raise their hand if they want to speak, and ask others to share their ideas and opinions.
Throughout the Teacher Edition, there are Collaborative Conversation boxes with reminders to support evidence-based discussions. Some of these reminders include “always look at the speaker,” “respect others by not interrupting them,” and “repeat others’ ideas to check understanding.”
Students engage in retelling a story after each time they listen or read it. The routine for this includes introducing students to concept of retelling by displaying the Interactive Read Aloud cards, using the retell questions to guide children to recall the basic events and contents of the text; using words like beginning, middle, and end to help guide students’ retelling; and asking higher-level questions that prompt students to summarize story concepts.
There are Oral Language Sentence Frames to support students in expressing information and ideas, asking and answering questions, persuading others, evaluating language choices, and engaging in dialogue. For example, for expressing information and ideas, the frame is, “In the story, ______ did _____. I learned ______ about _____.”
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional support for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Collaborative Conversation Routine begins with the teacher introducing the topic they will discuss and then reviewing any relevant guidelines to support student participation. Then the teacher gives specific information on what students should be doing, such as how much time they have to discuss, who they are talking with (i.e., partner, small group, whole group), and what the teacher expects them to do as a result of the conversation (i.e., take notes, write a reflection, share with the larger group). Then the teacher monitors student conversations and provides corrective feedback if necessary. To close out the conversation and routine, the teacher highlights positive behaviors and contributions.
There is a Collaborative Conversations logo in the Teacher’s Edition each time a Collaborative Conversation is recommended. There is instructional support on the “Talk About It” page at the start of each genre study or week and on the Peer Conferencing pages.
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is a section that explains what successful Collaborative Conversations look like including “able to make statements and ask questions related to the focus.”
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there are additional strategies for teaching collaborative conversations, including role-playing a collaborative conversation to model the routine. There are also sentence starters such as “I’m wondering” and “Can you point to text evidence that shows?”
There is a Collaborative Conversations Video to help with the facilitation. The handbook suggests that the teacher stop at certain points to ask students what they notice the students in the video doing and to discuss how the teacher helps the group review the rules. At the end of the video, the teacher asks the students again what they notice the children doing and what they could be doing better.
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, there is an anchor chart for the teacher to display on “How to Have a Collaborative Conversation.”
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes information on how to provide corrective feedback to students during collaborative conversations. This includes pointing out what students are doing right, redirecting discussions that may have gotten off track by suggesting statements or questions that will refocus the discussion and encouraging students to build on one another’s exchanges.
Indicator 1H
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading (or read aloud) and researching (shared projects) with relevant follow-up questions and support.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1h.
Students have opportunities to engage in various speaking and listening activities about what they read and listened to throughout the program. Students engage in Collaborative Conversations, which have agreed-upon rules for discussions and presentations. Students also self-evaluate their presentation skills. When presenting, students present to a partner, small groups, and the entire class.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials provide a Speaking and Listening expectation checklist. For example, in Unit 4, the expectations include, “I listened carefully to my classmates. I paid attention to the tone of my piece. I spoke loudly and clearly. I used complete sentences.”
In Unit 3, Week 4, Lesson 1, the teacher reviews how to listen actively. The reminders include “Always look at the speaker, respect others by not interrupting them, and repeat others’ ideas to check understanding.”
The Instructional Routines Handbook outlines expectations for listening to a presentation. This includes listening actively, thinking about the presentation, and sharing feedback with the presenter.
The Instructional Routines Handbook outlines expectations for Collaborative Conversations. A video shows students how to participate and engage in a group discussion.
Add drawings or other visual displays to descriptions when appropriate to clarify ideas, thoughts, and feelings. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, the Reading/Writing Companion has students talk about characters for a fantasy story and then draw ideas for the characters and their actions.
In Unit 5, Week 4, Lesson 4, students create a presentation after completing an experiment on sound. They can either present their findings by creating a video showing the experiment, creating a graph, or writing a report.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Build on others' talk in conversations by responding to the comments of others through multiple exchanges. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 1, the materials provide support for Collaborative Conversations. As students engage with a partner, they are reminded to repeat others’ ideas to check to understand.
Ask questions to clear up any confusion about the topics and texts under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 1, during the read-aloud of Friends All Around by Miela Ford, the teacher reads and models asking and answering questions while reading. Then the teacher has the students ask questions before the read-aloud begins and look for answers as they listen.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 4, students write about the anchor text and present their writing to a peer. The peer asks questions about the writing.
Ask and answer questions about key details in a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 3, students listen to the anchor text, Flip, by Ezra Tanaka. The teacher stops to ask questions about details in the story, such as, “What are the girl and Flip doing? Why does the girl tell Flip to be good?” and “Why did Miss Black change her mind about Flip?”
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 2, students read and listen to “Animals Working Together” (author not cited). The teacher reminds students to ask questions before, during, and after reading. The teacher models asking a question and models looking for the answer. Then the teacher continues reading and pauses and asks students, “What question do you have about dolphins?”
Ask and answer questions about what a speaker says in order to gather additional information or clarify something that is not understood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 5, students ask questions about a peer’s writing. Students share their final drafts with a peer. The students can ask and answer questions about each other’s work.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 1, the teacher reviews the turn and talk routine before partners discuss the question, “How would you describe one of Tomotaka Tahahaskis’ intentions?” after reading “The Story of a Robot Inventor” (author not cited). Students hold up a speech bubble that says, “Can you say that in a different way?” when they need the student to provide additional information.
Describe people, places, things, and events with relevant details, expressing ideas and feelings clearly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 5, students are introduced to a map. With a partner, students discuss how the map can help them.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 3, the teacher reads aloud The Big Yuca Planti by Magaly Morales. The teacher explains what the order of events is and then, while reading aloud, stops to write down the events. The teacher asks questions such as, “Think about what has already happened. What main event happens next?” and takes students’ oral responses and writes them on an anchor chart.
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process, grade-appropriate writing (e.g., grade-appropriate revision and editing) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1i.
Materials contain numerous opportunities for students to engage in grade-appropriate writing that includes both on-demand and process writing. On-demand writing occurs throughout the year while students are reading since questions are asked in the margin of texts to support comprehension and after reading in the Reading/Writing Companion. Each unit also has two extended writing projects that span anywhere from ten lessons to 20 lessons. Each writing project walks students through the steps of the writing process with explicit lessons and includes opportunities for revising and editing. The Extended Writing section includes digital resources, like models, graphic organizers, and videos, to enhance instruction.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 1, after students read the Shared Reading text, “Six Kids” (author not cited), students write about what they do for fun with friends after the teacher models how to write in response to the question, “What do the six kids do?”
In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 3, students read The Gingerbread Man by Wiley Blevins. Students write a new ending to the story as if the Gingerbread Man had chosen to go around the lake.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 2, students engage in interactive writing after listening to “A Team of Fish” (author not cited). The prompt asks, “In your opinion, what are some good and bad things about being a little fish?” Students share the pen to respond to the prompt as a class on the anchor chart.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 2, students engage in interactive writing after listening to “Super Tools” (author not cited). The prompt says, “Write a letter from the writing tools to Lucy at the end of the story.” Students share the pen to respond to the prompt as a class on the anchor chart.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students write a personal narrative about an important event in their lives. Students spend two weeks on this writing opportunity. The suggested pacing includes one day for looking at examples, one day for planning, three days for drafting, three days for revising and editing, and two days for publishing.
In Unit 3, students write a nonfiction text over ten days. They begin by analyzing a model text, then plan and draft in the first week. In the second week, students revise and edit for three days before publishing.
In Unit 4, Week 1, students answer the prompt “Which Animal team do you think is most interesting? Why?” after reading Animal Teams by Rachel Mann. Students review their writing with partners in Lesson 4, taking notes about what they like most, questions they have for the author, and additional ideas the author could include. Students then revise their work and edit, checking to make sure they spell high-frequency words correctly and have correct capitalization and end punctuation.
In Unit 6, Week 1, students answer the prompt, “Imagine that the farmer wouldn’t give the ducks a diving board. Write a letter he might receive from the animals after he says no” after reading Click, Clack, Moo: Cows That Type by Doreen Cronin. Students review their writing with partners in Lesson 4, taking notes about what they like most, questions they have for the author, and additional ideas the author could include. Students then revise their work and edit, checking to make sure they spell high-frequency words correctly and have correct capitalization and end punctuation.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, some digital resources include digital copies of the writer’s checklist and videos to support students on how to give presentations.
In Unit 3, when students are ready to write their final draft of their expository text, the materials suggest that teachers “guide them to explore a variety of digital tools to produce and publish their writing. You may want to have children complete the online keyboarding activity.”
In Unit 5, to support students with editing and revising, there is a digital copy of the writer’s checklist and proofreading marks.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 4, students write a final draft and present it to a partner, then share their final draft with the class. It is suggested that children be recorded as they share so they can self-evaluate.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing (year-long) that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1j.
Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to engage in opinion, informative, and narrative writing. Students complete a total of 40 process writing pieces during the six units. Teachers are provided with a bank of mini lessons to choose from to provide direct instruction based on students’ individual needs. Students have opportunities to write in multiple text types within each unit.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. For example:
Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:
20% of the process writing opportunities are opinion writing. Opinion writing takes place in Units 2–6.
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:
48% of the process writing opportunities are informative writing. Informative writing takes place in all six units.
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:
32% of the process writing opportunities are narrative writing. Narrative writing takes place in all six units.
Explicit instruction in opinion writing:
The Unit 6 materials include several mini-lessons to help teachers provide explicit instruction on opinion writing. Lessons include how to include a main idea, how to include reasons based on a source, how to incorporate descriptive words, and how to add a concluding statement.
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
The Unit 3 materials include several mini-lessons to help teachers provide direct instruction in expository writing. Some of these lessons include how to focus on a topic, how to include facts based on a source, how to include text features, and how to write a concluding statement.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
The Unit 1 materials include several mini-lessons to help the teacher provide direct instruction in narrative writing. These lessons include how to focus on a topic, how to include relative details, how to write with a sequence of events, and how to provide a concluding statement.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. For example:
Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing.
Write opinion pieces in which they introduce the topic or name the book they are writing about, state an opinion, supply a reason for the opinion, and provide some sense of closure.
In Unit 6, Week 5, students learn how to write an opinion piece over the course of two weeks. Students choose a helper job they might like to have and include at least two reasons for their opinion.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. For example:
Write informative/explanatory texts in which they name a topic, supply some facts about the topic, and provide some sense of closure.
In Unit 3, Week 5, students engage in the writing process to write an expository text over two weeks. Students can choose any topic they want to write about. The teacher models selecting a topic and supplying details about the topic.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. For example:
Write narratives in which they recount two or more appropriately sequenced events, include some details regarding what happened, use temporal words to signal event order, and provide some sense of closure.
In Unit 2, Week 5, students engage in the writing process to write a fantasy story over two weeks. Students focus on including characters. In the revision lessons, students learn how to include concluding statements.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). For example:
In Unit 4, Week 2, after listening to the anchor text Animal Teams by Charlotte Milner, students write about which animal team they think is most interesting.
In Unit 5, Week 4, students read the shared text, “Now, What’s That Sound?” (author not cited), and write about the problem and solution.
In Unit 6, students use the text “Be a Volunteer” (author not cited) to discuss helpers and write their opinion of what helper they want to be.
Indicator 1K
Materials include regular opportunities for evidence-based writing to support recall of information, opinions with reasons, and relevant information appropriate for the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 1k.
Throughout the program, students have the opportunity to learn and apply evidence-based writing. Students have the opportunity to watch the teacher model thinking about and collecting evidence prior to doing it independently. Students have opportunities to write paragraphs about texts they listen to and read. During direct instruction, the teacher often tells students where to find the evidence and asks guiding questions to help students use evidence effectively in their response.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 3, students listen to the text Friends by Nina Crews and respond to the question, “Why is Pam a good friend to Jill?” Directions state that the teacher tells students to find clues in the text and photographs to help them respond to the prompt.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Lesson 3, after reading “The Pigs, the Wolf, and the Mud'' by Ellen Tarlow, students respond to the prompt, “Should the pigs be worried that the wolf will come back to them? Why or why not? Use text evidence.” Students turn and talk with a partner, and then the teacher prompts students to find text evidence. The teacher directs students to a specific page and then asks guiding questions to help students locate the text evidence.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 2, students reread “Time to Plant” (author not cited). The teacher begins modeling by rereading and discussing a character and what the dialogue teaches us. Then the teacher writes, and students practice independently about another character in the story.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 2, after rereading “The Joy of a Ship” (author not cited), students write down each subheading in the nonfiction text and then write down information from that heading. The teacher begins by modeling with the first heading, and students complete the rest with a partner.
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 2, students reread “A Pig for Cliff” (author not cited) and talk with a partner about the characters, setting, and events, then write down what they discussed.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Lesson 2, students respond to the question, “Based on ‘Life at Home,’ do you think home life is better now, or was it better in the past? Why?” Students use evidence from the text to answer the question. The teacher helps guide the students to find evidence.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 3, after reading “Animal Teams” by Rachel Mann, students write about the most interesting animal in the text and explain why using text evidence.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Lesson 2, after reading “A Bird Named Fern” (author not cited), students answer the question, “How does the author show that Fern is curious?” The teacher guides students to find text evidence to respond to the prompt.
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1l.
Materials provide opportunities for the teacher to teach most grammar standards explicitly. Instructional materials provide explicit instruction and application for students to print many upper and lowercase letters and address specific grammar concepts (ex: nouns, verbs, adjectives, use of commas, types of sentences) through teacher-led grammar lessons throughout the program. Guided practice is also included as part of the instructional plan. The materials also include multiple opportunities for students to practice new skills independently. Students have opportunities over the course of the year to apply newly learned skills both in and out of context.
Materials include explicit instruction of all grammar and conventions standards for the grade level. For example:
Print all upper- and lowercase letters.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher models writing uppercase and lowercase letters Ee using online Handwriting models. Students practice writing Ee using their Practice Book.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher displays the Sound-Spelling Card for umbrella. The teacher models writing the letter u using the provided handwriting models. Students practice connecting the letter u to the sound /u/ by writing it.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher teaches uppercase and lowercase letters Dd using the online Handwriting models. The teacher models writing the letters, and students practice using Practice Book page 168.
Use common, proper, and possessive nouns.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher explains that a common noun names a person, place, or thing and begins with a lowercase letter. In contrast, a proper noun names a particular person, pet, place, or thing and begins with a capital letter. The teacher displays the sentence, “Seth had a Drum and My dog Bing runs fast.” The teacher points out that Seth and Bing are proper nouns, and drum and dog are common nouns. The teacher reads sentences to students, and students identify the proper nouns and the common nouns. Students generate sentences with common and proper nouns.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher reviews what possessive nouns are and how they are used. The teacher writes sentences on the board and asks students to identify the possessive noun. The teacher asks students how they know if a word is a possessive noun. The teacher writes sentences missing a possessive noun, and students work in pairs to complete each sentence with a possessive noun. The teacher reminds students that writers add an apostrophe followed by the letter s to form a singular possessive noun and an apostrophe after the s to form a plural possessive noun. The teacher presents students with sentences, and students fix the sentence by adding an apostrophe to show possession.
Use singular and plural nouns with matching verbs in basic sentences (e.g., He hops; We hop).
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher reviews that a verb is an action word and explains that a present-tense verb tells about an action happening now. The teacher displays and reads: “Spike hikes up the hill.” The teacher states, “When a present-tense verb tells about one noun, it ends in -s.” Then displays the sentences: “Jan and Dave wipe off the plates. I ride my bike. You ride your bike.” The teacher explains when a present-tense verb tells about more than one noun, like Jan and Dave, it does not end in -s. When the naming word is I or you, the present tense verb does not end in -s. The teacher provides practice and writes and reads aloud these sentences to guide students to identify present-tense verbs and explain why they do or do not have an -s at the end.
They swim in the lake. (swim; they is more than one)
Ike thumps the drum. (thumps; Ike is one)
The kids wave on the bus. (wave; kids is more than one)
Use personal, possessive, and indefinite pronouns (e.g., I, me, my; they, them, their, anyone, everything).
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher reviews that pronouns are words that replace nouns and explains that a possessive pronoun shows who or what has or owns something. Some possessive pronouns are used before nouns. The teacher displays the following sentences: “My house is blue. Your mother just called. His coat is too small. Julie lost her tooth. The jar lost its lid. Gran stayed at our house. They put their spelling tests in the basket.”
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 2, the teacher reminds students that a pronoun is a word that takes the place of a noun and that if the noun being replaced comes after a verb or preposition, such as for, at, or, with, to, or between, we use the pronouns me, you, him, her, it, us, and them. The teacher displays and reads sentences, highlights the pronouns, and explains which pronouns are used and why. The teacher presents students with several sentence frames, and students fill in the blanks with the appropriate pronoun.
Use verbs to convey a sense of past, present, and future (e.g., Yesterday I walked home; Today I walk home; Tomorrow I will walk home).
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher reminds students that present-tense verbs tell about an action that is happening right now and that present-tense verbs tell about one noun, it ends in -s. When it tells about more than one noun or I or you, it does not end in -s. The teacher reads and writes sample sentences, “Jane hides in the bush” and “Nate eats lunch.” Partners circle each verb. Students change the sentences to use the word(s) in parentheses (I, Nate, and Tess).
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher reminds students that past-tense verbs tell about an action that has already happened, and future-tense verbs tell about something that is going to happen. The teacher guides students to identify past-and future-tense verbs as they read sentences: “Yesterday Bob raced Lance down the track. I will brush my dog on Monday. I rested on a nics cot.” Students work in pairs to edit the past-tense sentences to future tense and the future-tense sentences to past tense.
Use frequently occurring adjectives.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher tells the students an adjective is a word that describes a noun and explains that adjectives tell number, color, size, or shape. They also tell how things look, sound, feel, smell, or taste. The teacher displays the following sentences: “A big crow floated in the sky. I feel the hot sun on my face.” The teacher explains that big and hot are adjectives and points out that big describes size and hot tells how something feels. The teacher displays and reads aloud these sentences and has partners work together to identify the adjectives.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher tells students we add -er to most adjectives to compare two people, places, or things. We add -est to most adjectives to compare three or more people, places, or things. The teacher displays the following sentences: “Curt is a fast runner. Sheena is a faster runner than Curt. Jen is the fastest runner of all!” The teacher explains that faster and fastest are adjectives that compare: “Circle the -er and -est endings, and point out that faster is comparing two people, and fastest is comparing three people.” The teacher writes and reads aloud the sentences and has students identify the adjectives that compare.
Use frequently occurring conjunctions (e.g., and, but, or, so, because).
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher tells students that two complete sentences can be joined together with a joining word and explains that the words and, but, and or are used to put two sentences together, separated by a comma. The teacher displays these sentences: “You march to the top of the hill. You look for the barn. You march to the top of the hill, and you look for the barn. Walk by the lake. Do not go in the water. Walk by the lake, but do not go in the water.” The teacher circles the joining words and explains to students the difference in meanings of and, but, and or. The teacher writes the sentences below and reads them aloud, having students identify the joining word.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher reviews that so and because are used to join two sentences when there is a cause and effect. The teacher guides students to identify the joining words in sentences presented. The teacher displays sentences, and students complete sentences using so or because. Students work with partners to generate questions orally with so and because.
Use determiners (e.g., articles, demonstratives).
In Unit 5, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher tells the students the words a and an are special adjectives called articles. The teacher displays the following sentences: “A hound sniffs the ground. An ape grabbed my cap!” The teacher explains that we use a before a word that begins with a consonant sound (a hound). We use an before a word that begins with a vowel sound (an ape). The teacher writes the sentences and reads them aloud, then has the students identify the articles.
Use frequently occurring prepositions (e.g., during, beyond, toward).
In Unit 5, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher displays the following sentence: “The brown mole is in the ground.” The teacher explains that the word in connects the words the brown mole is and the phrase that tells where the mole is—the ground. The teacher explains that a preposition helps tell where something or someone is or when something is happening: “A prepositional phrase begins with a preposition and ends with a noun or pronoun.” The teacher displays and reads these sentences and then prompts students to reread them with the teacher chorally. The teacher has partners identify the preposition in each sentence.
Produce and expand complete simple and compound declarative, interrogative, imperative, and exclamatory sentences in response to prompts.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher says: “A statement is a sentence that tells something.” Display this statement: “The cat plays with a ball.” The teacher points out that it begins with a capital letter and ends with a period. The teacher says: “A question asks something and ends with a question mark.” The teacher displays and reads these sentences: “Rob can hop. Can Rob hop?” The teacher identifies the statement and question and points out the word order. The teacher displays and reads sentences aloud and guides students to add proper punctuation.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher says: “An exclamation shows strong feeling or excitement and ends with an exclamation mark.” The teacher says, “Rob can hop!” Teacher reads it with enthusiasm. Then says: “A command can end with an exclamation mark too. A command tells someone to do something.” And reads: “Hop with Rob! Say: An interjection is a word or group of words that expresses feeling. Add: Wow! Rob can hop! Teacher says: The word wow shows surprise.” The teacher displays and reads sentences and guides students to add proper punctuation.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 3, the teacher reminds students that an exclamation expresses “a strong feeling and ends with an exclamation mark. A command can end with an exclamation mark too.” The teacher writes sentences on the board, and students identify which punctuation mark they would put at the end of the sentence. Students write one sentence expressing strong feelings, one interjection, and one command about how friends play together.
Capitalize dates and names of people.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 3, the teacher reminds students that a proper noun always begins with a capital letter. The teacher displays the sentence, “My cat Dot likes to play,” and points out the proper noun and the common noun. The teacher presents two sentences for students to correct capitalization of the first letter and names of people.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher asks students to say the days of the week and explains that the days of the week are proper nouns. Students say the months of the year, and the teacher tells students months are also proper nouns. The teacher reminds students that proper nouns begin with a capital letter. The teacher prompts students to identify the days of the week and months of the year in sentences and rewrite the words with correct capitalization.
Use end punctuation for sentences.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher reminds students that a sentence is a group of words that tells a whole and begins with an uppercase letter called a capital letter. It ends with a punctuation mark called a period. The materials direct teachers to write the following sentences: “Max ran to the cat. The van can go.” The teacher reads the sentences aloud and guides students to see that these are complete sentences because they each tell a whole idea. The teacher has a volunteer point to the capital letters and periods and writes each group of words asking students: “Is this a sentence? Why or why not?” and “Pam has a pal. A map.” The teacher guides students to identify the complete sentence. Once students identify the complete sentence, they copy it, starting with a capital letter and ending with a period.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 4, the teacher reminds students that each sentence begins with a capital letter and ends with a period, question mark, or exclamation mark. The teacher displays sentences with capitalization and punctuation errors, and students work with a partner to fix each sentence.
Use commas in dates and to separate single words in a series.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher reminds students that when there are three or more nouns in a list, a comma is used after each noun except for the last one. The teacher writes the following sentences and reads each aloud. The teacher has the students fix the following sentences: “Gran set hot dogs, ribs and ham on the grill. (Gran set hot dogs, ribs, and ham on the grill.) Bev uses bricks blocks and clips to make a deck. (Bev uses bricks, blocks, and clips to make a deck.) Mom grins at Mack Todd, and Bill. (Mom grins at Mack, Todd, and Bill).”
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 5, the teacher reminds students that in a date, commas separate the day and date number and the date number and the year. The teacher writes and reads aloud two sentences, and students correct the comma usage in the sentences: “Dave got a new bike on Friday March 27, 20____; We are going to France on Thursday, June 30 20___.”
Use conventional spelling for words with common spelling patterns and for frequently occurring irregular words.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher displays index cards for -end, -ast, and -ink and blends sounds with students. The teacher holds up the Spelling Word card for lend, pronounces each sound, and blends the sounds. The students identify which category the word fits under. Students say and spell words with -end, -ast, and -ink.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher displays the online Spelling Word Cards. The teacher has students read each word, listening for /är/. Using the cards with the endings -art, -arn, and -arm, the teacher creates a three-column chart. The teacher models sorting part, darn, and charm. The teacher says each word and pronounces the sounds, then asks students to spell each word. The teacher asks students to sort and place each Spelling Word Card in the column with the word containing the same ar spelling pattern.
Spell untaught words phonetically, drawing on phonemic awareness and spelling conventions.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher models with the Spelling Word Cards for the week. Students read each word, listening for the /ar/. The teacher creates a 3-column chart with -art, -arn, and -arm and models sorting part, darn, and charm, saying each word, and pronouncing the sounds. Students spell each word after the teacher pronounces it. Students sort and place their Spelling Word Cards in the column of the spelling pattern they match. Students chorally spell the word to check its placement.
Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. For example:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 5, students revise their response to the prompt about Nells’ Books by Miriam Cohen: “extend the story to tell what Nell might do next.” In their revisions, they confirm that they have organized their story with a beginning, middle, and end, as well as ensuring they have ended sentences with a punctuation mark and used common and proper nouns correctly.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 4, the teacher rereads the prompt about Thomas Edison, Inventor by David Al Adler: “What Makes Edison a Good inventor?” The teacher guides students to review the online proofreading marks and edit their writing to spell high-frequency words and capitalize proper nouns appropriately correctly.
In Unit 5, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher reviews a page from the selection “Shake! Strike! Strum!” and points out the author’s use of words that provide precise detail. The teacher points out that the author added a preposition to make the directions more clear. Students return to their writing to edit and proofread for appropriate use of articles and prepositions.
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1m.
Materials include teacher guidance for instructional vocabulary routines for vocabulary development and strategies. Each week, five oral vocabulary words are taught that tie to the essential question and topic of the week but are not necessarily found in texts. The words relate most to the Literature Big Book but not the anchor text, paired selection, or shared reading. On Day 2 of many weeks, the teacher models using context clues to determine the meaning of unknown words, but the words are not revisited. Additionally, on Day 4 of each week, it says to review the previous week’s vocabulary but does not specify how. Academic vocabulary words are taught in the moment during the anchor text but not revisited.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Instructional Routines Handbook states, “The vocabulary lessons in Wonders focus on high-frequency words for early elementary students and include direct instruction on low-frequency words to support all students on the path to acquiring reading strength. Students at all grade levels have multiple encounters with new words. In Grades K and 1, there is direct instruction of oral vocabulary.”
The Instructional Routines Handbook includes additional strategies for teaching vocabulary. The materials provide guidance for choosing words for instruction, building oral vocabulary, making the most of the Build Your Word List, and using word squares.
After each Shared Reading, students find interesting and important words and keep track of them in a dedicated vocabulary or writing notebook. Students follow the routine, Make the Most of the Build Your Word List, including collecting the words, recording the word and sentence, separating the word into bases and affixes, thinking of related words, and studying the word using a dictionary.
The Instructional Routines handbook includes a section on Teaching Academic Vocabulary. The handbook states that “Vocabulary is linked to concept development. Vocabulary is learned in context. Vocabulary is not about teaching just words. Vocabulary instruction is deep and generative. Vocabulary instruction involves the study of morphology, the structure of words.” However, morphology instruction is limited in Grade 1.
There is a vocabulary pre- and post-test for each unit. The assessments list questions for students containing the vocabulary for each week and require an understanding of the vocabulary word to respond appropriately.
Teacher resources include visual vocabulary cards for each unit.
Each week, two oral vocabulary words are presented on Day 1 in the Build Knowledge section. The teacher uses the Define/Example/Ask routine to introduce the words. On Day 2, the words are reviewed using the same Define/Example/Ask routine. On Day 3, students are prompted to use the words in a sentence. Then three new words are taught using the Define/Example/Ask routine. On Day 4, the words are reviewed, and the students use them in sentences.
Vocabulary is not regularly repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 1, students are presented with the essential question, “How do we measure time?” The Oral vocabulary words immediately and schedule are presented using the Define/Example/Ask routine. Students use the words to discuss the meaning of time and write about it later in the lesson. However, the words are not found in the texts, including the Literature Big Book, A Second is a Hiccup by Hazel Hutchins.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 2, students review the essential question, “How can we classify and categorize things?” and review the words classify, distinguish, entire, organize, and startled. Students use the words to answer questions such as, “How could you classify pens and pencils?” but the words are not found in the texts.
In Unit 6, Week 5, Day 2, students review the words display, price, purpose, and represent and use them to discuss the essential question, “Why do we celebrate holidays?” The words are not found in the texts.
Few words are repeated across multiple units. For example, the words connections, routes, grab and wish are found across multiple lessons.
Attention is always paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text or high-value academic words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the anchor text, vocabulary that is essential to understanding the text is highlighted and addressed in the moment. For example, in Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 3, the words shelf, clang, bang, and wish are addressed while students engage with the anchor text.
In Unit 3, Week 4, the essential vocabulary for the text set are century, past, present, future, and entertainment.
In Unit 6, Week 5, the essential vocabulary for the text set are design, display, pride, purpose, represent, nation, and unite.
Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development K-2
Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.
Materials provide teachers with systematic and explicit instruction in phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics. Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. Materials include a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ application of the skills. Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy for teaching phonological awareness skills. Materials provide students with systematic and explicit instruction in phonics. The Teacher Edition provides weekly and daily phonics lessons throughout ten units of study and includes a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of grade-level phonics. Materials delineate a clear research-based scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills. Materials include frequent, adequate lessons and tasks/questions about the organization of print concepts. Students have opportunities to identify text structures and text features. Students have opportunities to learn concepts of print, text features, and structures through whole-group shared reading, paired reading, and differentiated small-group reading. Materials provide multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to purposefully read on-level text during interactive read-alouds, shared reading, and differentiated instruction lessons. Multiple opportunities are provided in materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading. Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words and include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words to support students’ development of automaticity. Materials provide frequent opportunities for students to read high-frequency words in connected text and tasks. Lessons and activities provide students with opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding in context and decoding words in connected text and tasks. The scope and sequence provides direct correlations of the phonics, high-frequency words, and spelling lessons linking to the decodable text opportunities providing students with immediate opportunities for the application of skills and concepts taught. Materials include ongoing and frequent assessments to determine students’ mastery of foundational skills. Assessments include unit tests, diagnostic assessments, progress monitoring assessments, and lesson assessments. The skills tested are outlined for each assessment, along with suggested responses to guide teachers in scoring. The Assessment Handbook guides teachers’ use of the assessment data by giving key recommendations on how to use the data to group students, provide intervention for students, and reteach skills for students as appropriate. Materials provide ample support for speakers of languages other than English, special populations, and students beyond their current grade level to learn, use strategies, and receive support to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
Indicator 1N
Materials, questions, and tasks directly teach foundational skills to build reading acquisition by providing systematic and explicit instruction in the alphabetic principle, letter-sound relationships, phonemic awareness, and phonological awareness (K-1), and phonics (K-2) that demonstrate a transparent and research-based progression for application both in and out of context.
Indicator 1N.i
Explicit instruction in phonological awareness (K-1) and phonics (K-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1n.i.
Materials provide teachers with systematic and explicit instruction in phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics. The lessons within the materials often use an I do, We do, You do sequence. Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. The lessons also provide modeling using a variety of materials, including songs, photo cards, sound cards, word lists, decodable books, and practice books.
Materials provide the teacher with systematic, explicit modeling for instruction in syllables, sounds (phonemes), and spoken words. For example:
Distinguish long from short vowel sounds in spoken single-syllable words:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher shows students how to categorize words by contrasting long and short vowel sounds. The teacher says three words–rain, pail, and mat–and tells students two words have the long a sound while mat has the short a sound, so mat does not belong.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher tells students they can categorize words by whether they have short or long vowel sounds. The teacher models using the words bait, cake, and hand and asks students which word doesn’t belong. Students practice identifying the word that is not in the same category as the other words.
Orally produce single-syllable words by blending sounds (phonemes), including consonant blends:
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 5, the teacher guides students in reviewing how to blend phonemes to form words. Students listen as the teacher says a group of sounds, then students blend these sounds to form a word: /r/ /o/ /z/, /b/ /r/ o/ /k/, /f/ /u/n/, /n/ /o/t/
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher models blending phonemes to form new words. The teacher models saying sounds and blending them together. Students practice with the following words: chain, wait, stay, grains, planes, fate, vase, and brands.
Isolate and pronounce initial, medial vowel, and final sounds (phonemes) in spoken single-syllable words:
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher models placing markers on the Response Board to represent sounds. The teacher says, “I’m going to put one marker in each box as I say each sound. Then I will blend the sounds to form a word.” The teacher places a marker for each sound spoken: “/p/ /i/ /k/. This word has three sounds: /p/ /i/ /k/. Listen as I blend these sounds to form a word: /piiik/, pick. The word is pick. Let’s do some together.” The teacher places a marker for each sound they hear. They say one sound at a time, then blend the initial, medial, and final sounds to say a word.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher tells students to listen for the middle sound in a word. The teacher models identifying the middle sound in the word set. Students practice isolating phonemes and identifying the medial sounds in the following words: men, fell, list, red, map, fed, hot, head, wreck, sit, get, bath, leg, beg, and tot.
Segment spoken single-syllable words into their complete sequence of individual sounds (phonemes):
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher reviews segmenting phonemes in words. The teacher says the word, students say the word, and students say each sound in the word. Words to segment include lap, slap, clap, class, cliff, lip, flip, and clip.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 2, the teacher has students listen as they say the word strap. The teacher asks students, “How many sounds are in the word strap, and which sounds are they?” The teacher continues to model with words: scroll, shred, and throw. The teacher guides students in segmenting words into their complete sequence of sounds, and then students segment independently.
Materials provide the teacher with examples for instruction in syllables, sounds (phonemes), and spoken words called for in grade-level standards. For example:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 2, the teacher is provided with scripting and modeling in the lesson. The teacher writes and reads aloud the word cabin. The teacher says the word slowly, clapping for each syllable, then has the students repeat the process. The teacher points out that cabin has two syllables, or word parts, and draws a line between the two syllables: cab/in. The teacher explains that when a syllable ends in a consonant and has one vowel, the vowel sound is usually short. The teacher tells students that cab ends with b and has one vowel letter, so the vowel sound in cab is /a/, the short a sound.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 3, the lesson provides modeling and scripting in the lesson. Students listen as the teacher says the sounds in a word: /s/ /i/ /t/ /e/. The teacher blends the sounds together and says the word: /sssiiiteee/. The students and teacher say the word together: city. Students practice blending phonemes. The teacher says some words, sound by sound, and blends the sounds together. Practice words include: /f//e/ /l/ /z/, /c/ /r/ /e/ /k/ /s/, /t/ /r/ /e/ /t/.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of all grade-level phonics standards. For example:
Know the spelling-sound correspondences for common consonant digraphs:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher models and displays the humb Sound-Spelling Card. The teacher provides students both sounds of /th/ using thank and them. The teacher models writing the letters th using the handwriting models provided. The teacher says, “This is the Thumb Sound-Spelling Card. The beginning sound of the word thumb is /th/. The /th/ sound is spelled with the letters th. This is the sound at the beginning of the word thumb. Listen: thumb. I’ll say /th/ as I write the letters t and h several times.” The teacher repeats the procedure for digraphs sh and -ng. The teacher uses the shell and sing Sound-Spelling Cards. The teacher has the students practice connecting the letters t and h to the sound /th/ by writing them: “Say /th/ as I write t and h. Students write the letters t and h five times as they say /th/.” The students repeat the practice for sh and -ng.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher displays the Sound Spelling Card cheese, pointing to the letters ch. The teacher asks, “What are the letters? What are the sounds? What is the word?”
Decode regularly spelled one-syllable words:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 5, Teachers Guide, the teacher has children read and say the words: like, bite, smile, shine, and while. The teacher has students follow the word-building routine with Word-Building Cards to build: side, tide, tile, mile, pile, pipe, pip, rip, ripe, gripe, wipe, wise, rise, ride, rid, hid, hide. Word Automaticity Helps children practice word automaticity. Display decodable words and point to each word as children chorally read. Students then read the words in the decodable reader “A Fine Plant” and “Plants Take Time to Grow.”
In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 2, Teacher Guide, the teacher has children read and say the words: paint, tray, and April. The teacher has students follow the word-building routine with Word Building Cards to build: nail, pay, wait, sway, hay, tail, clay, waist, and snail. The teacher displays decodable words and points to each word as students chorally read. Students then read the words in the decodable reader “Snail Mail.”
Know final -e and common vowel team conventions for representing long vowel sounds:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher displays the five Sound-Spelling Cards. The teacher tells students that long i is spelled i_e using ride and bike. The teacher introduces the long i sound. The teacher models using the word rid with a short i and adding an e to the end of the word to say ride. The teacher tells students, “the letters i and e act together to make the long i sound.” Students practice connecting the letters i_e to the long i sound to write and read words.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 1, the teacher displays the boat Sound-Spelling Card and teaches the /ō/ spelled o_e, using hop and hope. The teacher models writing the word hop and adding an e to make hope. The teacher says, “This is the Boat Sound-Spelling Card. The sound is /ō /. Today we will learn one of the spellings for /ō/. Look at this word: hop. This word has the /o/ sound. I’ll add an e to the end. The letters o and e act together to make the long o sound: /ō/. Listen: /hōp/, hope. I’ll say /ō/ as I write the letters o_e several times.” The teacher repeats with the Cube and Tree Sound-Spelling Cards.
Use knowledge that every syllable must have a vowel sound to determine the number of syllables in a printed word:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 3, the teacher models reading closed-syllable words. The teacher tells students to draw a line between two syllables and that when a syllable ends in a consonant and one vowel, the vowel sound is usually short. The teacher models reading the word rabbit. Students divide thinking, pocket and finish into syllables and identify the vowel in each syllable. Students determine if the vowel is long or short and read the word.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 2, the teacher models reading CVCe Syllables. The teacher writes and reads aloud awake. Students identify how many syllables are in the word, and the teacher draws a line between the syllables. The teacher underlines a and e in wake and reminds students that the letters a_e work together to make the long a sound. The teacher repeats the process with the word explode. Students practice reading the words bathrobe, inside, cupcake, awoke, and complete by dividing the word into syllables.
Decode two-syllable words following basic patterns by breaking the words into syllables:
In Unit 5, Week 5, Day 2, the teacher writes and reads aloud table and simple. The teacher says each word, clapping for each syllable, and students repeat. The teacher draws a line between syllables: ta/ble, sim/ple. The teacher explains that we see le at the end of a word, and there is a consonant before the letters, they make the sound /el/. The consonant plus le are all in the same final syllable. The teacher tells students this is called a final-stable syllable. The teacher helps students pronounce the final-stable syllables: ble (/bel/) and (/pel/). The teacher writes the following words: candle, apple, title, puddle, and marble. The teacher helps students divide each word into syllables and blend the syllables to read the words. Students then use each word in a sentence.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher models reading words with vowel team syllables. The teacher writes and reads down, underlining the -ow. The teacher points out that ow acts as a team and stays together in the same syllable using the word downtown as an example. The teacher divides the word into syllables and blends the syllables to read the word. Students practice using the words rainbow, drawing, and boathouse by dividing each word into syllables, blending the syllables, and reading the words.
Read words with inflectional endings:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher writes and reads aloud the words bike and bikes, underlining the inflectional ending -s. The teacher tells students that adding -s to a noun makes the noun tell about more than one. The teacher models reading words with the -s ending using the words bite, bites, bike, bikes, hive, hives, case, and cases. The teacher writes the following words on the board, and students practice adding the -s ending and reading each word: dime, cape, kite, lake, vine, snake, and plate.
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 2, the teacher writes and reads aloud cry, cries, cried. The teacher underlines -y, -ies, and -ied and explains that when a word ends in y, you change the y to i before adding the -es or -ed endings. The teacher writes and reads aloud cry and crying and underlines -y, and -ing. The teacher explains that you do not change the y when you add -ing. For guided practice, the teacher writes the following words on the board: fry, try, dry, and spy, and has the students add -es, -ed, and -ing to each word and then use each word in a sentence.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher uses the Visual Vocabulary Cards to review demand and emergency. The teacher reminds students that words have different forms. The teacher explains that nouns have forms meaning “one” and “more than one,” and verbs have forms telling whether something is happening now or happened in the past. The teacher writes inflectional endings: -ed, -ing, -s, and -es. The teacher then reviews the definition of each. The teacher models using a two-column chart to add an ending to emergency. The teacher writes emergency, then writes emergencies in the next column. The teacher reads the words. The teacher points out that you change y to i before adding -es. The teacher discusses how the ending changed the meaning of emergency.
Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. For example:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 5, the teacher writes the words selfish and ringing on the board and divides them into syllables. The teacher reads the words with the students. The teacher reminds students that when a syllable has only one vowel and ends with a consonant, the vowel sound is usually short and tells students this is called a closed syllable. The teacher asks students to explain why they are closed. Students are reminded that they may have two approximate sounds to read some multisyllabic words correctly. The teacher gives students the following words: dentist, wishing, mitten, rabbit, and thinking. The teacher has students work in pairs to write and spell the words. Partners divide the words and pronounce them. Students then write sentences with these words.
In Unit 3, Week 5, Day 2, the teacher writes and reads aloud: tag, tagged, and tagging and underlines the inflectional endings -ed and -ing. The teacher says, “We know we can add the endings -ed and -ing to verbs to change when something is happening. The ending -ed means the action happens in the past. The ending -ing means the action is happening right now, in the present. Note the double g in tagged and tagging.” The teacher explains that when a word has a short vowel and ends in a consonant, you double the consonant before adding -ed or -ing. The teacher says tag and tagged again and has the students listen for the /d/ sound at the end of tagged. The teacher writes and says stop and stopped and points out that the letters -ed can also stand for the /t/ sound, as in stopped. The teacher writes and says tag, tagging and points out that adding the letters -ing at the end of a word adds a syllable or word part. The teacher uses each word in a sentence. For guided practice, the teacher writes the following words on the board: fit, tap, clap, jog, and has the students add -ed and -ing to each word and then use each word in a sentence.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher teaches that long e can be spelled with the letter e and the vowel digraphs ee, ea, and ie using the words tree, she, meat, and field. Students practice connecting the letter e and the vowel digraphs ee, ea, and ie to the long e sound by writing the letter combinations. Students practice blending and reading words with the long e sound.
Indicator 1N.ii
Phonological awareness based on a research-based continuum (K-1).
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1n.ii.
Materials include a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ application of the skills. Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy for teaching phonological awareness skills. Materials include a variety of activities for phonological awareness with frequent opportunities for students to practice phonological awareness concepts on a daily and weekly basis throughout all of the units of study in the program. Materials provide ample opportunities for students to practice each new sound and sound pattern.
Materials have a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ application of the skills.
In the Grade 1 Scope and Sequence, the Phonemic Awareness sequence is listed for each unit:
Smart Start: Phoneme Isolation, Phoneme Identity, Phoneme Blending, Phoneme Segmentation, Onset and Rime, Syllable Segmentation, Rhyme.
Unit 1: Phoneme Isolation, Phoneme Blending, Phoneme Segmentation, Phoneme Categorization, Phoneme Substitution, Phoneme Deletion, Contrast Vowel Sounds, Alliteration, Identify and Produce Rhyme.
Unit 2: Phoneme Blending, Phoneme Isolation, Phoneme Segmentation, Identify and Produce Rhyme, Phoneme Identity, Phoneme Segmentation, Phoneme Categorization, Phoneme Segmentation, Phoneme Addition.
Unit 3: Phoneme Identity, Phoneme Addition, Phoneme Substitution, Phoneme Blending, Phoneme Segmentation, Alliteration, Phoneme Deletion, Identify and Produce Rhyme.
Unit 4: Identify and Produce Rhyme, Phoneme Categorization, Phoneme Blending, Phoneme Segmentation, Phoneme Identity, Phoneme Segmentation, Contrast Vowel Sounds, Phoneme Substitution, Phoneme Addition.
Unit 5: Contrast Vowel Sounds, Phoneme Categorization, Phoneme Blending, Phoneme Segmentation, Identify and Produce Rhyme, Phoneme Substitution, Phoneme Deletion, Phoneme Addition.
Unit 6: Phoneme Identity, Phoneme Segmentation, Identify and Produce Rhyme, Syllable Deletion, Phoneme Substitution, Phoneme Categorization, Phoneme Reversal, Syllable Addition.
Materials contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy for teaching phonological awareness skills.
The Wonders Research Base Alignment Document, Phonological Awareness, page 44, addresses what phonological awareness is, why phonological awareness is important, who benefits from phonological awareness instruction, components of phonological awareness instruction, example phonological awareness milestones by grade, and research recommendations.
The Wonders Research Base Alignment Document, Phonological Awareness section includes research citations from Gillon (2017), NICHHD (2000), Lonigan, Burgess, & Anthony (2000), Armbruster, Lehr, & Osborn (2003), Gillon (2017), Perfetti (2017), Torgesen, et al. (1997), Lerner & Lonigan (2016), Coleman & Pimentel (2011), National Early Literacy Panel (2008), Bryant & Goswami (2016), Armbruster (2010), Branum-Martin, Tao, & Garnaat (2015), Cisero & Royer (1995), Lin, Cheng, & Wang (2018), Chard & Dickson (1999), Shaywitz & Shaywitz (2016), Wanzek, Wexler, Vaughn, & Ciullo (2010).
Materials include a variety of activities for phonological awareness.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 3, after the teacher models using markers on the Response Board to represent sounds, students place a marker on their boards for each sound they hear. After placing markers, students blend the sounds to say the word. The teacher provides corrective feedback as needed.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 1, students practice categorizing phonemes by long and short vowel sounds by telling the teacher which word does not belong and why using the practice words; keys, beet, mess; rail, paid, jazz; hat, bake, shave; and bug, mute, flute. The teacher provides corrective feedback as needed.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Day 5, students learn how to add a sound to the beginning of a word to make a new word by adding /b/ to at to create the word bat. The teacher provides guided practice by having children add initial sounds to words to form new words. The teacher guides practice and provides corrective feedback. Practice words include tick, /t/ ick; stick, /s/ tick; clap, /k/ lap; and flap /f/ lap.
There are frequent opportunities for students to practice phonological awareness.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher shows students how to orally substitute initial phonemes. The teacher says pig, then changes the /p to /f/ to make a new word, fig. The teacher has students say the word fig with them. Students practice creating new words by substituting initial phonemes. Practice sets include jig, pig, dig, fig; fit, flit, slit; and slip, flip, clip.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher models and says, “Listen as I say three words: mud, cub, fun. I hear the same sound in the middle of mud, cub, and fun. Listen: /muuud/, /kuuub/, /fuuun/. The middle sound is /u/.” Students practice listening to three words and identifying the same sound in a group of words. Practice sets include sub, yum, fuss; bus, nut, huff; yes, fell, bed; back, can, dash; hot, log, sock; play, fake, and mate.
Materials provide ample opportunities for students to practice each new sound and sound pattern.
Distinguish long from short vowel sounds in spoken single-syllable words.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher says three words and tells students one sound will be the same in all three words: late, make, and gave. The teacher tells the students the middle sound is /a/, long a. Students say the sound with the teacher: /aaa/. Students practice identifying the middle sound in words. Students listen as the teacher says three words and tells the teacher the middle sound they hear in all three words.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher shows students how to categorize words by contrasting long and short vowel sounds. Students practice categorizing phonemes by contrasting long and short vowel sounds. The teacher says three words, and students identify which word does not belong and identify why.
Orally produce single-syllable words by blending sounds (phonemes), including consonant blends.
In Unit 1, week 2, Day 1, the teacher tells students they will put a marker in each box as they say a sound and then blend the sounds to form a word. The teacher models with the word pick, /p/ /i/ /k/. The teacher then has students listen as they blend the sounds to form the word /p/ /i/ /c/, pick.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 3, Teacher Edition, students listen as the teacher says the sounds in shell, /sh/ /e/ /l/. The teacher then blends the sounds and says shell. The teacher repeats this routine with additional words. Students then blend the sounds to say the word thin. Students continue the routine with practice words.
Isolate and pronounce initial, medial vowel, and final sounds (phonemes) in spoken single-syllable words.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 4, students listen carefully as the teacher says: /mmmaaat/, mat. Students share what sound they hear in the middle of the word. Students practice isolating medial vowel phonemes. Students say the sound they hear in the middle of each word the teacher says. Students practice isolating the sounds in the remaining words: sat, sit, lap, lip, ran, mad, map, mop, big, and bag.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 5, the teacher models segmenting phonemes in words. The teacher says each sound in the word. Students segment the following words: it, add, sit, list, him, bug, bat, pack, sick, mitt.
Segment spoken single-syllable words into their complete sequence of individual sounds (phonemes).
In Unit 2, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher models using the Response Board to show students how to segment a word into individual phonemes. The teacher has students listen as they say chin and segment it, telling students /ch/ is the first sound, /i/ is the middle sound, and /n/ is the last sound. Students practice segmenting words and place a marker in a box for each sound they hear and tell how many sounds they hear in each word.
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 4, the teacher models segmenting words into individual phonemes. The teacher has students listen as they say light and segment it telling students /l/ /i/ /t/. For guided practice, the teacher and students segment words into sounds together, and the teacher provides corrective feedback as needed.
Indicator 1N.iii
Phonics demonstrated with a research-based progression of skills (K-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1n.iii.
Materials provide students with systematic and explicit instruction in phonics. The Teacher Edition shares weekly and daily phonics lessons throughout ten units of study and includes a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of grade-level phonics. The methods and materials used to teach phonics include Sound-Spelling cards, Photo cards, Response boards, Word building letters, Practice Books, Videos, and decodable readers. There is a clear research-based scope and sequence of phonics skills presented throughout the program. The materials clearly delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills. Materials also include Leveled Readers, which may distract from the use of decodable readers, as small group lessons include the use of Leveled Readers.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode (phonemes, onset and rime, and/or syllables) phonetically spelled words.
Know the spelling-sound correspondences for common consonant digraphs.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 1, students read and build words with digraphs th, sh. Students use the Word-Building Cards to build the words shop and than. Students identify and read words with consonant digraphs in the decodable reader, “Dash Has a Wish” and “Help in a Flash.”
In Unit 2, Week 5, Day 1, students read and build words with digraphs wh, ch, ph. Students read words from rows 2-7 in Phonics Practice Activity. Some words include whiz, chop, much, pitch, and graph.
Decode regularly spelled one-syllable words.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 1, students use Word-Building Cards p, o, and t, blend the sounds, and say the word pot. Students read the “Bob Is a Fun Pal” and “Dog and Fox” decodable books and decode one-syllable words with /o/ in connected text.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 3, students use Word Building Cards to make and decode words with the long /a/ sound. Students read the decodable reader “Dave Was Late” to practice decoding one-syllable words long /a/ words in connected text.
Know final -e and common vowel team conventions for representing long vowel sounds.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 4, students use Word Building Cards to make and decode words with long a: a_e. Students review that long a sound can be represented by the letters a_e and practice changing sounds to make new words. Students practice building, dictating, and color coding the a_e pattern in the words pave, pale, tale, tame, same, shame, lake, and flake on their response boards.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, students review the five Sound-Spelling Cards, including the / ī/ spelled i_e using ride and bike. Students practice connecting the letters i_e to the sound /ī/ by writing rid and bit and adding an e to the end to make ride and bite.
Use knowledge that every syllable must have a vowel sound to determine the number of syllables in a printed word.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 2, students write and read the word cabin, clapping for each syllable. Students identify that cabin has two syllables, or word parts, and draws a line between the two syllables: cab/in. The teacher explains that when a syllable ends in a consonant and has one vowel, the vowel sound is usually short and explains what a closed syllable is. Students divide the words napkin, dentist, mitten, rabbit, picnic, helping, and wishing into syllables and read the words.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 4, students review CVCe syllables and listen for the vowel sound in each syllable. Students work in pairs to count and divide the syllables in the words excite, escape, reptile, and hopeful.
Decode two-syllable words following basic patterns by breaking the words into syllables.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 5, students read the word pocket and divide it into syllables. Students identify the vowel sounds and explain why the syllables are closed syllables. Students practice writing and reading more words with closed syllables, such as basket, finish, helping, fishing, and jumping.
In Unit 5, week 5, Day 2, students read aloud the word middle and clap to divide the word into syllables. Students draw a line between the syllables and learn that when they see the consonant plus le at the end of a word, it is a final-stable syllable. Students divide and read the words little, uncle, eagle, fable, and jungle and practice dividing two-syllable words into syllables in the online activity.
Read words with inflectional endings.
In Unit 5, Week 4, Day 3, students practice blending and reading words with inflectional endings -er and -est. Students blend and read sharp, sharper, sharpest, slow, slower, slowest, safe, safer, safest, mad, madder, and maddest.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 3, students practice blending and reading words with inflectional endings -ed and -ing. Students blend and read scratch, scratching, scratched, knit, knitted, knitting, spruce, spruced, and sprucing.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to read complete words by saying the entire word as a unit using newly taught phonics skills.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 4, students build and read words with short i. Students build and read the words: sit, six, fix, fin, win, pin, pill, will, hill, and him.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 2, students build and read words with long e: y and ey. Students build and read the words: luck, lick, stick, sticky, icky, picky, pick, Rick, rock, and rocky.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode words in a sentence.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 1, students read the decodable books “Bob Is a Fun Pal” and “Dog and Fox” and read words with the short /o/ sound.
In Unit 5, week 5, Day 4, the students read “Joy’s Birdhouse” and “Beavers Make Noise” and read words with diphthongs oi and oy.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to build/manipulate/spell and encode words using common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 2, students use Word-Building Cards to build, manipulate, read, and write words with /ar/ spelled ar, including the words: sharp, shark, park, part, cart, chart, charm, harm, farm, far, bar, car, scar, and scarf.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Day 2, students use Word-Building Cards to build, manipulate, read, and write words with silent letters: wr, kn, gn, including the words: wrong, gnome, knob, wrist, knock, wrap, sign, knee, and wrench.
Materials contain a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of previously taught grade-level phonics.
In Grade 1, the teacher uses variety of methods to explicitly teach and opportunities to practice phonics skills. The methods and materials to teach phonics include:
Sound-spelling cards
Photo cards
Response boards
Word building letters
Practice books
Videos
Materials clearly delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward application of skills.
In Wonders “Grade 1 Foundational Skills Scope and Sequence,” the Phonics scope and sequence includes:
Smart Start: Identifying and Blending letters.
Unit 1: Short a, short i, beginning consonant blends; short o; beginning consonant blends and s-blends.
Unit 2: Short e spelled e and ea; Short u; ending consonant blends: st, sk, mp, nd, nk, nt; consonant digraphs sh, th -ng; consonant digraphs wh, ph, ch, trigraphs -tch.
Unit 3: Long a spelled a_e; long i spelled i_e; soft c, soft g, dge, long o spelled o_e, long u spelled u_e; long e spellede_e variant vowel spellings with digraphs oo, u.
Unit 4: long a spelled a, ai, ay; long e spelled e, ee, ea, ie; long o spelled o, oa, ow, oe; long i spelled i, igh, y, ie; long e spelled y, ey
Unit 5: r controlled Vowels: or, ir, ur, er, ore, oar; Diphthongs ou, ow, oi, oy.
Unit 6: variant vowel spellings oo, ou, u_e, ew, iu, ue, u, au, aw, a, augh, ai; silent letters wr, kn, gn; three-letter consonant blends: scr, spl, spr, str, thr, shr; r controlled vowels air, are, ear.
Materials have a clear research-based explanation for the order of the phonics sequence.
In the Wonders Research Base Alignment document, the materials include information to address: What is phonics? What is systematic and explicit phonics? Why is phonics instruction important? Who benefits from Phonics Instruction? Example Phonics Milestones by Grade level; Research recommendations and Wonders alignment.
In the Wonders Research Base Alignment document, research cited includes Duff & Clarke, 2011; McGuinnes, 2004; NICHHD, 2000, pp. 2-11; Treiman, 2018, Ehri, Nunes, Stahl, & Willows, 2001; Stuebing, et al., 2008; Henbest & Apel, 2017; International Literacy Association, 2018; White, 2017; Berninger, Abbott, Nagy, & Carlisle, 2009; Suggate, 2010; National Literacy Panel, 2006; Slavin et al., 2011.
In the Research Base Alignment document in the Wonders program, phonics instruction teaches students to convert letters into sounds and blend sounds to form recognizable words. The sequence of phonics instruction in Grade 1 progresses into more sophisticated sound-spelling patterns and more complex words, including multi-syllabic words.
Materials provide sufficient opportunities for students to develop orthographic and phonological processing.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, students use the Egg Sound-Spelling Card to say /e/ spelled e. Students practice writing the letter e using the handwriting models provided and practice connecting the letter e to the sound /e/ by saying the sound and writing the letter e.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 1, students use the Star Sound-Spelling Card and write /ar/ spelled ar. Students practice writing the letters ar using the handwriting models provided and practice connecting the letters ar to the sound /ar/ by saying and writing the letters ar.
Indicator 1N.iv
Decode and encode common and additional vowel teams (Grade 2).
Indicator 1O
Materials, questions, and tasks provide explicit instruction for and regular practice to address the acquisition of print concepts, including alphabetic knowledge, directionality, and function (K-1), structures, and features of text (1-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1o,
Materials include frequent, adequate lessons and tasks/questions about the organization of print concepts. Students have opportunities to identify text structures and text features. Students have opportunities to learn concepts of print, text features, and structures through whole-group shared reading, paired reading, and differentiated small-group reading.
Materials include frequent, adequate lessons and tasks/questions about the organization of print concepts (e.g., recognizing features of a sentence).
Recognize the distinguishing features of a sentence (e.g., first word, capitalization, ending punctuation).
In Unit 0, Week 1, Day 4, students name each capital letter in the sentence. The teacher tells students that sentences ask questions and use a question mark for ending punctuation. The students circle the initial capital letters and underline the end punctuation. The teacher tells students that spaces separate words in a sentence. Students circle the spaces between the words.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 3, the teacher reiterates that sentences always end with a punctuation mark and sentences end with a period. The teacher writes and reads the following sentences: “I can pat the cat, and Sam ran down a hill” and has students correct them, making sure they end with a period.
Students have frequent and adequate opportunities to identify text structures (e.g., main idea and details, sequence of events, problem and solution, compare and contrast, cause and effect).
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 2, students practice identifying the important events and adding them to the beginning, middle, and end sections of the anchor chart. The teacher tells students, “Events are the most important things that happen in a story. Events take place in the beginning, middle, and end of the story. We read the text to find the most important events.”
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 2, students practice finding the main idea of the selection and identify the topic for the graphic organizer. The teacher shares the important details about the identified topic and adds the details to the graphic organizer. Students find the relevant details on the next two pages of the text and tell why the details are important.
In Unit 5, Week 4, Day 2, the teacher uses the Problem and Solution anchor chart and tells students, “A problem is something a person wants to solve, change, or find out. Events can happen that help a person try and solve the problem. The way a person finally solves a problem is called the solution.” The teacher models identifying the problem in the text and adds it to the chart. Students talk about how the character(s) solve the problem as the teacher asks, “What do they do?” The teacher adds the other steps Gilbert and Marta take to solve the problem, adding to the graphic organizer.
Materials include frequent and adequate lessons and activities about text features (e.g., title, byline, headings, table of contents, glossary, pictures, illustrations).
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 4, students use nonfiction selections to find facts and details. The teacher reminds students they have learned that the photographs and illustrations in nonfiction include important details. The teacher tells students that photographs and illustrations often have labels, words, or phrases that name the things in them. The teacher displays the Online Teaching Chart for Text Features: Labels. The teacher tells students, “The labels help us understand what the photographs show.” The teacher points to the cook’s hat and apron and reads the labels, “tall hat and apron.” Students look for labels when continuing to read.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 4, students look for captions as they read nonfiction selections. The teacher reminds students that informational text often has photographs, and these photographs often have captions—short descriptions giving information about the photograph. The teacher displays the Online Teaching Chart for Text Features: Captions and reads the first caption: Tall buildings are called skyscrapers. The teacher says, “This caption gives information about the photograph. The caption tells us what the buildings in the photograph are called. This is information that we could not learn from the photograph itself.”
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 4, students look for bold print in nonfiction selections they read. The teacher reminds students that they can use nonfiction texts to find facts about time. The teacher models identifying bold print in the text, telling students that the word is darker than the other words and that the “author may have put the word night in bold print to show us it is the most important idea of the illustrations and the text.” The teacher and students read the text under the first illustration, and the teacher guides students to identify the word in bold print, asking, “Why did the author put this word in bold print? What is the most important idea?”
Indicator 1P
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity and sight-based recognition of high-frequency words. This includes reading fluency in oral reading beginning in mid-Grade 1 and through Grade 2.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1p.
Materials provide multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to purposefully read on-level text during interactive read-alouds, shared reading, and differentiated instruction lessons. Multiple opportunities are provided in materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading. Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words and include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words to support students’ development of automaticity.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to purposefully read on-level text.
Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 1, students read the text, Schools Then and Now (author not cited). The teacher provides the purpose for reading: “Let’s read to see how schools were the same and different long ago and now.” Students read the text independently or with a partner. Students complete a graphic organizer to determine how schools today are alike, different, and the same as schools long ago.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 3, students read the text, Plop! (author not cited). The teacher sets a purpose for reading: “Read to find out about the animals in the story.” Students read the text independently or with a partner, placing sticky notes next to difficult words.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, students read the text, “Maria Mouse’s Good Idea” (author not cited). The teacher reads the essential question: “How can we work together to make our lives better?” The teacher models reading-aloud and completes a theme chart. Students read the text and work in pairs to discuss how the animals in the story work together to make their lives better.
Materials support students’ development of automaticity and accuracy of grade-level decodable words over the course of the year.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 4, students review the high-frequency words: could, live, one, then, and three and the short letter u sound. Students read the decodable readers, “Can You Stop Bug?” and “It’s Up to Us.” Students reread the decodable readers with a partner, focusing on automaticity, accuracy, and rate.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 4, students read words with long e: e, ee, ea, ie and the high-frequency words: because, blue, into, or, other, and small. Students read the decodable readers, “The Green Eel” and “Clean Up the Team” with a partner, focusing on automaticity, accuracy, and rate.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, students read words with variant vowel /u/ and read the decodable readers “Rooster and Goose” and “Choose a Room” with a partner, focusing on accuracy, automaticity, and expression.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading with on-level text and decodable words.
Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Day 5, the teacher models reading with expression using the Shared Reading text, From Puppy to Guide Dog (author not cited).. Students read aloud a few pages of the Shared Reading text, focusing on letting their voices rise and fall as they read out loud to show the meaning of what they are reading. Partners reread, working on intonation and fluency.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 5, the teacher models reading with rate and expression using the Shared Reading text, A Bird Named Fern (author not cited). Students read aloud a few pages of the Shared Reading text, focusing on exclamation marks and reading for fluency. Partners reread the pages and meet with the teacher for oral reading fluency progress monitoring to demonstrate reading with accuracy, rate, and expression.
In Unit 6, Week 5, Day 5, the teacher models reading with rate and expression using the Shared Reading Text, Share the Harvest and Give Thanks (author not cited). Students read aloud a few pages of the Shared Reading text, focusing on pausing briefly when coming to a comma and reading for fluency. Partners reread the pages and meet with the teacher for oral reading fluency progress monitoring to demonstrate reading with accuracy, rate, and expression.
Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, students listen as the teacher models fluent reading of the grade-level text Pet Show (author not cited) with accuracy, rate, and expression.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 2, students listen as the teacher models fluent reading of the grade-level text The Sun Queen (author not cited) with accuracy, rate, and expression.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher guides students to read each high-frequency word: does, not, school, and what. The teacher models using the Read/Spell/Write routine and points out irregularities in sound-spellings, such as the /ä/ sound for a in what.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher guides students to read each high-frequency word: again, help, new, there, and use. The teacher models using the Read/Spell/Write it routine and points out irregularities in sound-spellings, such as the u_e spelling for the long u in use.
Students have opportunities to practice and read irregularly spelled words in isolation.
Recognize and read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 3, students use High-Frequency Word Cards to practice reading the words: about, animal, carry eight, give, and our.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 3, students use High-frequency Word Cards to practice reading the words: answer, brought, busy, door, enough, and eyes.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words for students to make reading progress.
High-frequency words covered in grade 1 include:
Smart Start: Review of the following words: a, can, do, go, has, the, I, like, to, you, this, is, my, look, little, where, here, play, the, we, one, me, she, with, for, and, have, said, see, was
Unit 1: does, not, school, what, down, out, up, very, be, come, good, pull, fun, make, they, too, jump, move, run, two
Unit 2: again, help, new, there, use, could, live, one, then, three, eat, no, of, under, who, all, call, day, her, want, around, by, many, place, walk
Unit 3: away, now, some, today, way, why, green, grow, pretty, should, together, water, any, from, happy, once, so, upon, ago, boy, girl, how, old, people, after, buy, done, every, soon, work
Unit 4: about, animal, carry, eight, give, our, because, blue, into, or, other, small, find, food, more, over, start, warm, caught, flew, know, laugh, listen, were, found, hard, near, woman, would, write
Unit 5: four, large, none, only, put, round, another, climb, full, great, poor, through, began, better, guess, learn, right, sure, color, early, instead, nothing, oh, thought, above, build, fall, knew, money, toward
Unit 6: answer, brought, busy, door, enough, eyes, brother, father, friend, love, mother, picture, been, children, month, question, their, year, before, front, heard, push, tomorrow, your, favorite, few, gone, surprise, wonder, young
Indicator 1Q
Materials, questions, and tasks provide systematic and explicit instruction in and practice of word recognition and analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1q.
Materials provide frequent opportunities for students to read high-frequency words in connected text and tasks. Lessons and activities provide students with opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding in context and decoding words in connected text and tasks. The scope and sequence provides direct correlations of the phonics, high-frequency words, and spelling lessons linking to the decodable text opportunities providing students with immediate opportunities for the application of skills and concepts taught.
Materials support students’ development learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills (e.g. spelling-sound correspondences of digraphs, decode one-syllable words, syllable and vowel relationship, decode two-syllable words, read words with inflectional endings) in connected text and tasks.
Know the spelling-sound correspondences for common consonant digraphs.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 1, students read and build words with consonant digraphs and ending blends by reading the decodable reader “In a Land of Grass” and “Stomp and Romp.”
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 3, the teacher displays Word-Building Cards s, t, i, n, and g and models blending the sounds. The teacher models and students practice blending the letter sounds to read each word: /sh/, /i/, /p/; /shiiip/, ship. Students read the connected text, sounding out the decodable words.
Decode regularly spelled one-syllable words.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher reviews high-frequency words, the letter l in consonant blends, and how to blend one-syllable words like new and pet. Students read “A Pig for Cliff” (author not cited) to practice decoding regularly spelled one-syllable words in context.
In Unit 2, Week 4, Day 5, students blend Words with th, sh, -ng, using the decodable reader. Students decode regularly spelled one-syllable words and review the high-frequency words all, call, day, her, and want and the consonant digraphs th, sh, -ng.
Know final –e and common vowel team conventions for representing long vowel sounds.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, students build and read words with long i: i_e and read the decodable readers “A Fine Plant” and “Plants Take Time to Grow.”
In Phonics/Word Study Intervention, BLM 61, after students read words with final e (o_e), they read sentences with final e (o_e), including “The roses are red. We rode home on our bikes. What shape is a globe? The note is under the stone.”
Use knowledge that every syllable must have a vowel sound to determine the number of syllables in a printed word.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 4, students complete Practice Book page 286 by reading sentences with open syllables aloud and circling the open syllable in each sentence. Students use circled words to write their own sentences.
In Phonics/Word Study Intervention, Section 9, Lesson 108, the teacher reminds students that every syllable has a vowel. The teacher introduces closed syllables and models reading words with closed syllables. Students read closed-syllable words in isolation and in sentences. Sentences include: “Mom got the picnic basket. This melon is rotten. We can visit my pet rabbit. There is a lemon in the salad.”
Decode two-syllable words following basic patterns by breaking the words into syllables.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Day 4, students read final stable syllables as they complete Practice Book page 412. Students read words and sentences with words with final stable syllables.
In Unit 6, Week 2, students read vowel team syllable words as they complete Practice Book page 448. Students read words and sentences with words with vowel team syllables.
Read words with inflectional endings.
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 4, students read words with inflectional endings -es, -ed, and -ing. Students practice reading additional words and sentences with inflectional endings as they complete Practice Book page 304.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 4, students review words with inflectional endings -ed and -ing. Students practice reading words with inflectional endings -ed and -ing in isolation and in sentences as they complete Practice Book page 484.
Materials provide frequent opportunities to read irregularly spelled words in connected text and tasks.
Recognize and read grade-level appropriate irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 3, Week 5, Day 1, the teacher uses the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach the high-frequency words: after, every, buy, soon, done, work. Students read the following sentences and identify the high-frequency words in connected text and blend the decodable words: “We can play after school. What did you buy? When will the food be done? Every kid got a book. We can go home soon. This is so much work!”
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher uses the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach the high-frequency words: four, large, none, only, put, and round. Students read sentences using the high-frequency words in connected texts. For the remaining words, the teacher is directed to point out sound-spellings students have already learned, as well as any irregular sound spellings, such as the /u/ sound spelled o_e in the word none.
Lessons and activities provide students many opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding (writing) in context and decoding words (reading) in connected text and tasks.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher uses the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach the high-frequency words again, there, help, use, new. Students use the Read/Spell/ Write routine to write the words five times to practice encoding. Students read the following sentences and identify the high-frequency words in connected text and blend the decodable words: “Rex fell down again. Can you help fix this mess? Will you help the new kid? There is my red pen! Tell Ben to use a net.”
In Unit 6, Week 4, Day 4, the teacher uses the Read/Spell/Write routine to teach three-letter blends. Students use the Read/Spell/ Write routine to write the words five times to practice encoding. Students read the decodable reader “A Thrilling Dance” to practice decoding words with three-letter blends in connected text.
Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level phonics skills aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
In Unit 2, Week 5, Day 1, students build and read words with -ch, -tch, wh, ph. Students read the decodable readers, “A Map Match,” “A Fun Chest,” “Phil and Steph Get Lost,” and “Maps and Graphs.”
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 1, students build and read words with long i: i, y, igh, ie. Students read the decodable readers, “Jay Takes Flight,” “Be Kind to Bugs,” “Why Hope Flies,” and “Glowing Bugs Fly By.”
Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level high-frequency/ irregularly spelled words aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 4, students read the decodable texts “Can Bud Stop Bug?” and “It’s Up to Us.” The decodable texts include the high-frequency words could, live, one, then, and three, which are part of the week’s high-frequency word lessons and are in the scope and sequence. Students identify the high-frequency words within the text and read for accuracy and fluency.
In Unit 4, Week 4, Day 1, students read the decodable texts “Jay Takes Flight,” “Be Kind to Bugs,” “Why Hope Flies,” and “Glowing Bugs Fly By.” Students identify the high-frequency words caught, flew, know, laugh, listen, and were that the teacher introduces in the high-frequency word lesson for the week and that are listed in the scope and sequence.
Indicator 1R
Materials support ongoing and frequent assessment to determine student mastery and inform meaningful differentiation of foundational skills, including a clear and specific protocol as to how students performing below standard on these assessments will be supported.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1r.
Materials include ongoing and frequent assessments to determine students’ mastery of foundational skills. Assessments include unit tests, diagnostic assessments, progress monitoring assessments, and lesson assessments. The skills tested are outlined for each assessment, along with suggested responses to guide teachers in scoring. The Assessment Handbook guides teachers’ use of the assessment data by giving key recommendations on how to use the data to group students, provide intervention for students, and reteach skills for students as appropriate.
Multiple assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of foundational skills.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of print concepts.
In Unit 0, Week 1, Day 2, teachers are advised to enter observational data related to concepts of print directionality into the My Notes section to track progress.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonological awareness.
The Fluency Assessment Book includes phoneme segmentation fluency assessment. The teacher says a word, and the student responds with the sounds heard in the word. The student receives a point for each correct part of the word. Data is entered into the My Notes section to track progress.
In the Assessment Handbook, Phonemic Awareness Assessments, the materials include information on phonological awareness subtests (K-1) and phonemic awareness subtests (K-3):
Phonological Awareness Subtests (K-1): This section consists of 5 subtests. A score of 4 or higher on each 5-item assessment/section indicates proficiency with the skill: Recognizing rhyming words, producing rhyming words, segmenting and counting syllables, blending syllables, and blending and segmenting onset and rimes.
Phonemic Awareness Subtests (K-3): This section consists of 9 subtests. A score of 4 or higher on each 5-item assessment/section indicates proficiency with the skill: count phonemes, isolate and pronounce phonemes, match phonemes, blend phonemes to produce words, segment words into phonemes, CORE phoneme deletion test, add phonemes to make new words, substitute phonemes to make new words, distinguish long from short vowels.
In Progress Monitoring Assessments, Unit 1, Week 1, Phonological/Phonemic Awareness, the teacher says, “Look at number 8. I will say a word in parts: /k/ /a/ /t/. What word do you make when you blend these sounds together? Listen to these answer choices: cup, cap, cat. Fill in the bubble next to the picture that has the same sounds as /k/ /a/ /t/.” Data is entered into the My Notes section to track progress.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics and decoding.
In Grade 1 Benchmark Assessments, Overview, the materials include two benchmark assessments. Benchmark Assessment 1 focuses on skills taught in Units 1-3, and Benchmark Assessment 2 focuses on the entire year. Each Benchmark assessment includes six multiple-choice items assessing phonics. Data is entered into the My Notes section to track progress.
In Progress Monitoring Assessments, Unit 1, Week 1, Phonics, the teacher says, “Look at Number 11. I will say the name of the picture: rat. Read the three answer choices. Then fill in the bubble next to the word that names the picture.” Data is entered into the My Notes section to track progress.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis.
In Grade 1 Benchmark Assessments, Overview, the materials include two benchmark assessments. Benchmark Assessment 1 focuses on skills taught in Units 1-3, and Benchmark Assessment 2 focuses on the entire year. Each Benchmark assessment includes five multiple-choice items assessing high-frequency words, five multiple-choice questions assessing vocabulary, and four multiple-choice questions assessing structural analysis. Data is entered into the My Notes section to track progress.
The Fluency Assessment Book includes a sight word fluency assessment. Students are given a list of words. The teacher asks the student to read as many of the words on the list as possible in one minute. Students receive a point for each correct word. Data is entered into the My Notes section to track progress.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of fluency.
The Fluency Assessment Book includes oral reading fluency assessments. Students are asked to read a passage aloud. The teacher records the words read correctly and determines the accuracy percentage by taking the words correct per minute divided by the total words read. The teacher also notes prosody by indicating phrasing, pace, syntax, self-correction, and intonation.
The Informal Reading Inventory (IRI), found in the Placement and Diagnostic Assessment booklet, is used by the teacher to assess reading fluency and accuracy to get a reading level and diagnostic reading data. The IRI (Informal Reading Inventory) is used as needed by the teacher to get data on fluency and accuracy and to determine current reading levels.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current skills/level of understanding.
The Progress Monitoring Assessments component offers the opportunity to monitor students’ progress in a steady and structured manner while providing formative assessment data. As students complete each week, they are assessed on their understanding of key instructional content. The results of the assessments can be used to inform subsequent instruction and to provide a status of current achievement in relation to students’ progress through the curriculum. Each assessment is administered once the instruction for the specific week is completed.
The Informal Reading Inventory (IRI), found in the Placement and Diagnostic Assessment booklet, is used by the teacher to assess reading fluency and accuracy to get a reading level and diagnostic reading data. It is an individually-administered diagnostic tool that assesses a student’s reading comprehension and accuracy. The IRI measures three reading levels: independent, instructional, and frustration. On the teacher recording sheet, there is a table for each oral reading passage to help identify the student’s reading level. This level is based on a combined score of comprehension points and word recognition errors.
Materials support teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery in foundational skills.
The Assessment Handbook: Using Assessment to Guide Instruction booklet, pages 36-48, provides teachers guidance on how to use the assessment screening data to make instructional adjustments for students. The handbook provides suggestions for teachers on how to:
Group students for instruction
Address student strengths and weaknesses on skill development
Modify instruction
Review and Reteach concepts
How to interpret, guide and use assessments data to guide instruction for students
How to give feedback as a means of assessment
In every unit, week, and day, there are Small Group Differentiated Instruction lessons for students placed in Approaching Level, On Level, and Beyond Level and English Language Learners for phonemic awareness, phonics, and high-frequency words.
Indicator 1S
Materials, questions, and tasks provide high-quality lessons and activities that allow for differentiation of foundational skills, so all students achieve mastery of foundational skills.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for 1s.
Materials provide ample support for speakers of languages other than English, special populations, and students beyond their current grade level to learn, use strategies, and receive support to meet or exceed grade-level standards. The materials include lessons with differentiated instruction options for students approaching grade level, at grade level, beyond grade level, and English Language learners. Differentiated instruction addresses phonemic awareness, phonics, high-frequency words, comprehension, and writing. Decodable readers are also included to support the varying needs and levels of students. Within the Differentiated Instruction lessons in the Teacher Edition are lessons specifically identified for English language learners. These lessons intentionally foster oral language and background knowledge before having students engage in reading text, using phonological awareness and phonics skills and writing. The teacher is cued to use visuals, gestures, modeling, and questioning to support student learning.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
The Wonders K-6 Instructional Routines Handbook describes several ways that teachers can give MLLs multiple opportunities to speak in the classroom that will “motivate English language learners to participate in class discussions and build oral proficiency. These basic teaching strategies will encourage whole class and small group discussions for all English language learners.” They include repetition, elaboration, wait time, etc.
The Wonders K-6 Instructional Routines Handbook provides a chart that supplies sentence frames so that MLLs can participate more fully in Collaborative Conversations: “The chart provides prompt and response frames that will help students at different language proficiency levels interact with each other in meaningful ways in partner, small group, and class discussions.”
The Wonders K-6 Instructional Routines Handbook supports teachers to see first language as an asset: “These English language learners are not ‘blank slates.’ Their oral language proficiency and literacy in their first languages can be used to facilitate literacy development in English. Systematic, explicit, and appropriately scaffolded instruction and sufficient time help English language learners attain English proficiency and meet high standards in core academic subjects.”
The materials include a separate Language Transfers Handbook, which provides cross-linguistic transfer analysis to help teachers understand the language of the learners: “The Sounds and Phonics and the Grammar Transfers Charts in the Language Transfer Handbook, are designed to help you anticipate possible transfer errors in pronouncing or perceiving English sounds, and in speaking and writing in standard English.”
The materials include poems, rhymes, or songs. Each is connected to the theme of the week. A visual chart is provided, as is an audiotrack. For example, in Unit 3, Week 3, the grammar segment uses a song, “Then and Now,” to reinforce the idea of past and present.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level foundational skills and to meet or exceed grade-level standards.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 1, the lesson plan includes an option for differentiation to support Approaching Level students. One section addresses phonological awareness and recognizing alliteration. The teacher explains to students that they will listen for words that begin with the same sound. The teacher models identifying words that begin with the same sound. The teacher says words and helps students to recognize that two of the words start with the same sound. Students repeat the alliteration routine with additional short i words.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Day 1, the lesson plan includes an option for differentiation to support Approaching Level students. One section addresses phonics, focusing on connecting long o, u, and e to o_e, u_e, and e_e. The teacher displays word-building cards o_e by tracing the letters and saying the letters and sounds, repeating with u_e and e_e. The students trace the lowercase o_e with the teacher while saying the sounds. Students connect the letters o_e to the long o sound by tracing o_e with their fingers while saying the long o sound. Students trace the paper, writing the letters o_e while saying long o. The teacher provides feedback as needed. The teacher connects the spellings with their respective long vowel sounds throughout the week.
Materials regularly provide extensions and/or advanced opportunities to engage with foundational skills at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
In Unit 1, Week 4, Day 3, the lesson plan includes an option for differentiation to support Beyond Level students. The Teacher reads the title and the author and illustrator’s names after students have pointed to them. Students preview the title page and photographs. Students then discuss what they predict the book will be about. Students then create questions about the text based on looking at the cover and hearing/reading the title.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, the lesson plan includes an option for differentiation to support Beyond Level students. The lesson includes a leveled reader using the paired read Peter Seeger. Students preview the title page, and the teacher prompts students to identify the genre. The teacher follows the compare texts direction in the leveled reader. After reading, partners discuss the information in “Pete Seeger” and Beware of the Lion! (authors not cited). The teacher asks students to make connections by comparing and contrasting how characters help others in each selection. The teacher helps students build knowledge by making connections. Students talk about and write about the text.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Each unit provides students with the opportunity to read and listen to texts while simultaneously building knowledge. While unit topics are broad, each week is guided by an essential question related to the unit topic, which contributes to students’ knowledge-building of the overall unit topic. Students also have opportunities to compare information regularly through tasks that prompt them to work with a partner to analyze information across multiple texts. At the end of each week, students engage in a Show Your Knowledge activity. This culminating task requires students to integrate what they learned from the week’s texts, Build Knowledge Anchor Chart, and vocabulary words. Students take knowledge from the various texts and tasks and integrate it to draw and/or write in response to a prompt. Throughout the year, materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency. In addition to regularly responding to a text with the teacher, a partner, or independently, students receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and expository writing through extended process writing lessons; lessons also address editing and revising writing. Students engage in a Research and Inquiry project in the fourth lesson of every week. In the materials, students learn, engage, and are assessed in reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Foundational skills are also addressed each day. Materials include explicit instruction that spends the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction.The units include opportunities to revisit these standards across the year. Instruction is also coherently sequenced, preparing students to respond to standards-aligned, analytical questions and tasks based on complex texts. The program materials include a pacing guide for 120 minutes of instruction daily, with a breakdown of time for reading, writing, and small group instruction. There are 180 lessons over the course of 10 units with no alternative implementation schedule provided.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
Each unit provides students with the opportunity to read and listen to texts while simultaneously building knowledge. While unit topics are broad, each week is guided by an essential question related to the unit topic, which contributes to students’ knowledge-building of the overall unit topic. Throughout the materials, while reading or listening to a text, and after reading or listening to a text, students respond to questions that require them to analyze key ideas and details and/or craft and structure. Materials ask students a series of questions after each text that help build knowledge within individual texts and across multiple texts. In Lesson 3 of every week, students compare two texts to integrate knowledge and ideas. When students initially listen to the texts, the teacher asks questions that support students in comparing a text. Students also have opportunities to compare information regularly through tasks that prompt them to work with a partner to analyze information across multiple texts. At the end of each week, students engage in a Show Your Knowledge activity. This culminating task requires students to integrate what they learned from the week’s texts, Build Knowledge Anchor Chart, and vocabulary words. Students take knowledge from the various texts and tasks and integrate it to draw and/or write in response to a prompt. Throughout the year, materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency. Students have numerous opportunities to learn and practice various writing skills. In addition to regularly responding to a text with the teacher, a partner, or independently, students receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and expository writing through extended process writing lessons; lessons also address editing and revising writing. Students engage in a Research and Inquiry project in the fourth lesson of every week. Each project follows the same five steps. For each lesson, the teacher begins by modeling and reviewing each of the steps before students complete the project on their own. The teacher is available to assist students, especially with finding information. Each project takes one day.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2a.
The texts are connected by a topic. Each unit provides students with the opportunity to read and listen to texts while simultaneously building knowledge. While unit topics are broad, each week is guided by an essential question related to the unit topic, which contributes to students’ knowledge-building of the overall unit topic. It is important to note that in some units, texts are connected each week, but weekly topics loosely connect to the overall topic of the unit. While knowledge is built each week in these units, knowledge is not built across the entire unit.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read/listen and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students read and listen to texts around the topic of “Getting to Know Us.” In Week 1, students read and listen to texts that answer the essential question, “What do you do at your school?” Texts include, This School Year Will be the Best! by Kay Winters, “School Around the World” (author not cited), “Rules at School” (author not cited), and Nat and Sam by Pat Cummings. Leveled Readers also are connected to this topic and include A Fun Day, We Like to Share, and Class Party (authors not cited).
In Unit 3, students read and listen to texts around the topic of “Changes Over Time.” The Big Idea is “what can happen over time.” In Week 1, students read texts to answer the essential question, “How do we measure time?” Texts connected to this topic include “Nate the Snake is Late” (author not cited), On My Way to School by Wong Herbert Yee, and “It’s About Time” (author not cited).
In Unit 5, students read about the broad topic “figure it out,” and each week presents a different idea about ways to figure things out. However, while texts each week are cohesive and build knowledge, the texts across the three weeks do not build knowledge of a single topic. In Week 1, texts are all about sorting, and in Week 2, texts are all about things you can see in the sky. In Week 3, texts are about inventions.
In Unit 6, students read and listen to texts around the topic of “Together We Can.” In the unit, students read and listen to texts to help answer the essential question, “How can we work together to make our lives better?” Texts in the unit include “The Cat’s Bell” (author not cited), “Super Tools” (author not cited), Click, Clack, Moo: Cows that Type (author not cited), and “Be a Volunteer!” (author not cited). Leveled Readers that connect to the topic include, Two Hungry Elephants, What a Feast! and Beware of the Lion (no authors cited).
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2b.
Throughout the materials, while students are reading or listening to a text, and after reading or listening to a text, students respond to questions that require them to analyze key ideas and details and/or craft and structure.
For most texts (read-aloud texts K–1 and anchor texts Grade 2), students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). For example:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 2, students reread “Toss! Kick! Hop!” (author not cited) and discuss the key ideas and details. The teacher explains what a topic is and then writes the topic in a graphic organizer. Then, students work with a partner to identify the details. The teacher asks guiding questions such as, “What is a relevant detail about what kids are doing?” on page 133.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 2, students reread “Go Wild!” (author not cited) and fill in the Topic and Relevant Details anchor chart. The teacher models adding information in the detail box. Students then work with a partner to analyze page 91 and discuss the question, “What do frogs eat?” Students add this information to the chart, then analyze pages 94–95 to determine what bears eat and include it on the chart. Students tell why this detail is important.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Lesson 3, students read Kitten’s First Full Moon by Kevin Henkes and focus on the cause and effect by analyzing the important ideas and details in the story. The teacher asks guiding questions such as, “On page 164, we read that Kitten thinks the full moon is a bowl of milk. Why does she want it?” and “What happens now? The moon is still there. What does this cause Kitten to do?”
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). For example:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 4, students read “Kids Can Help?” (author not cited) and analyze the author’s craft in the Reading/Writing Companion on page 139. Students identify the words that tell what kids can do to help in the neighborhood. Then, students work with a partner on the question in the text. They discuss the question, “Why does the author ask this question?”
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 4, students read “How Plants Grow” (author not cited) and respond to questions about the author’s craft, such as “What word in the selection helps you understand what blossoms are? What words in the selection tell what flowers do?” and “Why do you think the author included them on this page?”
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 3, students read Vulture View by April Pulley Sayre and analyze the author’s craft with a partner. Partners discuss the illustration on pages 90-91 and write clues about how it feels inside and outside the mouse’s house. Students respond to questions such as, “How does the illustration help you understand the poem’s setting? (Talk with a partner about the beats in the poem. Clap the rhythm you hear in lines 1 and 2, and write the beats.) How does the rhythm make you feel? How do you know the poet cares about the mouse?”
In Unit 6, Week 2, Lesson 4, students read “Abuelita’s Lap” (author not cited) and analyze the author’s craft. Students are asked questions such as, “Why does the poet repeat words in the poem? Why does the poet use rhyming words? How does the use of sense words help you know how the speaker feels?”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2c.
Materials ask students a series of questions after each text that help build knowledge within individual texts and across multiple texts. In Lesson 3 of every week, students compare two texts to integrate knowledge and ideas. When students initially listen to the texts, teachers ask questions that support students in comparing the two texts and also ask guiding questions to support students with the comparison.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 3, students read the At a Pond by Nancy Finton. Students answer questions to build knowledge, such as, “What do frogs do at the pond?” What do frogs eat? What do the photos show? What did you learn from the text? Who is in the eggs?” and “Why does the fish come up?”
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 3, students read Animal Teams by Rachel Mann. Students answer questions to build knowledge, such as, “How do the text and photos help you understand how the animals work as a team? Why does the author show many different animal teams? What does the anemone do to the fish that get too close?” and “Why does the anemone leave the clown fish alone?”
In Unit 6, Week 5, Lesson 3, students read “Happy Birthday, U.S.A.!” (author not cited). Students answer questions to build knowledge, such as, “Does a nation have a birthday?”How did the king react? What does the Declaration of Independence declare people should be? Why does the author use dates in the text? Why did the colonies want to split away from England?” and “How did the people in the colonies let the king know what they wanted?”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 3, students compare and contrast two stories across the week. The teacher begins by thinking aloud about what life is like for one character in the city and how another character experiences life on the farm from “Six Kids” (author not cited). Then, the students identify other ways that Pip in Go Pip! by Tomek Bogacki and the chick’s experiences are the same or different. Students discuss the individual characters and where they live before comparing and contrasting the two characters.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 3, students read the paired selection “How Plants Grow” (author not cited). Before reading, students “think about how these plants are like the yuca in The Big Yuca Plant.” Before answering this question, students talk about how the plant in each play changes as it grows.
In Unit 6, Week 5, Lesson 3, students compare celebrations for each holiday using the prompt, “How are the Fourth of July celebrations in Happy Birthday, U.S.A.! the same or different from Thanksgiving celebrations in ‘Share the Harvest and Give Thanks’?” Students work with a partner to discuss the celebrations. Students may use a Venn diagram to show the similarities and differences.
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2d.
At the end of each week, students engage in a Show Your Knowledge activity. This culminating task requires students to integrate what they learned from the week’s texts, Build Knowledge Anchor Chart, and vocabulary words. Students begin by discussing the topic of the week and reviewing their notes on the topic. Then students engage in an independent writing task about the topic. Each writing task must include text evidence and vocabulary from the week. The writing tasks vary and include opinion pieces, advice to characters, and describing activities done with partners about the topic from the week. The materials include a Show Your Knowledge Rubric. For students to receive a 4/4, they must synthesize ideas from two or more texts, fully support their ideas with text evidence, and correctly use two or more words from the Word Bank.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 2, Lesson 5, students integrate what they have learned throughout the week about buildings. Students review their reader’s notebooks and discuss with a partner what they learned about different buildings. Students choose two buildings they read about and write what they are made of, making sure to use text evidence and two vocabulary words from the Word Bank. Students draw a picture to support their writing.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 5, students integrate what they have learned about how animals survive in nature to write a science article and create a diagram telling how three animals they learned about survived in nature. Students are to use text evidence and two vocabulary words from the Word Bank.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 5, students integrate what they have learned about weather to create a safety weather chart. Students choose two types of weather they read about and write about how to stay safe in each type of weather. Students are to use text evidence and two vocabulary words from the Word Bank.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2e.
Throughout the year, materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency. Students have numerous opportunities to learn and practice various writing skills. In addition to regularly responding to a text with the teacher, a partner, or independently, students receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and expository writing through process writing lessons; lessons also address editing and revising writing, and students have the opportunity to share and evaluate their writing. The materials include a variety of mini-lessons for the teacher to choose from to meet the needs of students. In addition, there are rubrics and checklists for each type of writing, and students can see student exemplars as they are learning.
Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
According to the Instructional Handbook, students have weekly opportunities to write in response to what they read, engage in research and inquiry, learn about and practice genre writing, and write to multiple sources.
Throughout the year, students engage in various one- or two-week process writing tasks. Students learn to analyze an expert model and examine the specific genre characteristics. There are a variety of mini-lessons provided for the teacher to support them as they engage in planning, drafting, and revision.
According to the Instructional Handbook, students “write about what they read. They read texts closely and use text evidence to support their ideas and conclusions about the text.”
Students receive explicit instruction in narrative, opinion, and instructional writing; however, most of that instruction is in narrative writing, with one unit focused on expository writing and one unit focused on opinion writing.
Each week of writing instruction follows a similar model. On Day 1, the teacher models, and on Day 2, students engage in interactive writing. On Day 3, students engage in independent writing before revising on Day 4. On Day 5, students can self-select a writing activity. For example:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 1, students watch the teacher model using the Literature Big Book “Good Job Ben!” (author not cited) to respond to a prompt and use evidence from the text to tell if they would recommend the story to a friend. Then in Lesson 3, students write about the Shared Read text, The Red Hat by Eva Torres, and focus on finding text evidence to include in their draft. In Lesson 4, the students revise their writing, complete a peer review with a partner, edit, and write a final draft.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 1, the teacher models writing about the Big Book, and in Lesson 2, the students and teacher complete an interactive writing activity about the Shared Read by writing a letter to a character at the end of the story. In Lesson 3, students write a letter to one of the characters from the anchor text. In Lesson 4, students review their work and publish before Lesson 5, where they can choose between letter writing, comic strip, book review, or using digital tools.
Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed lesson plans, models, and protocols for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
There are a variety of digital tools to support students in writing, such as graphic organizers, student models, checklists for editing and peer conferencing, and videos for writing skills.
Students write in response to what they read regularly. There is an Analytical Writing Routine to support students with this. Students begin by analyzing the prompt, then they discuss the prompt and use sentence starters, if appropriate, to create a topic or opinion. Students then go back into the text to find evidence to support their ideas.
For each writing process assignment, the materials include a rubric. Teachers are expected to review the rubric and use a student model or an anchor paper to analyze the rubric. Then students use the rubric and student model or anchor paper while drafting, editing, and revising their pieces. Lastly, the teacher uses the rubric to evaluate student writing.
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of research skills that guide shared research and writing projects to develop students' knowledge using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2f.
Students engage in a Research and Inquiry project in the fourth lesson of every week. Each project follows the same five steps. The first step is to choose a topic and then write a question. Next, students find information before drawing what they learned. Finally, students choose a way to present their research. For each lesson, the teacher begins by modeling and reviewing each of the steps before students complete the project on their own. The teacher is available to assist students, especially with finding information. Each project takes one day. The materials also include a Research Process Checklist to help students decide whether they have completed all the necessary parts of the research process.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
With guidance and support from adults, recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a question.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 4, the teacher models the five steps of the interview process: selecting a person to interview, writing three questions, interviewing the individual, writing what they learned, and selecting how to present the information.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 4, the teacher models how to create a research plan on pages 78–79 in the Reading/Writing Companion.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 4, the teacher models how students can gather information by polling classmates about their favorite way to help make their school or classroom better.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 2, Lesson 4, students research buildings. First, students select a type of building to research, and then they identify questions they need to answer through their research. Students research using books in the classroom and use the Table of Contents or index to find the information they are looking for. Students write and draw what they have learned and present their work.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 4, students research an animal team. First, students choose a team of animals to research. Then, students find information using books in the classroom or the library. Students write and draw what they have learned and present their work.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 4, students research the weather in their state. First, students determine what they want to know about the weather in their state. Then, students find information using books and the internet to research the weather in their state. Text features, such as the table of contents, should be utilized. Students write and draw what they have learned and present their work.
Materials include shared research projects to help develop students’ research skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Participate in shared research and writing projects (e.g., explore a number of “how-to” books on a given topic and use them to write a sequence of instructions).
In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 4, students take a poll to gather information about school. The teacher first models filling in the steps of the research process before students complete it. The teacher guides students on how they are going to poll their classmates. Then students work with a partner to discuss what they learned. The teacher also helps students use the Research Process Checklist.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 4, students interview classmates to gather information about their day. The teacher begins by modeling the steps of the research process. They first pick a classmate to interview and then write a question. Then, the teacher interviews the person and writes down in the provided chart what they learned about the student. Then the teacher models choosing how to present the information before students complete the project on their own. The teacher guides students through the process as they complete it independently.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Lesson 4, students work with a partner to research family traditions. The partners interview each other about one of their family traditions. Students determine questions to help them learn about a specific tradition and interview their partner. Students write and draw what they have learned and present their work.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
In the materials, students learn, engage, and are assessed in reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Foundational skills are also addressed each day. Materials include explicit instruction that spends the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction. The majority of lessons in reading, writing, and small group instruction address a large number of the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards. The units include opportunities to revisit these standards across the year. Instruction is also coherently sequenced, preparing students to respond to standards-aligned, analytical questions and tasks based on complex texts. The program materials include a pacing guide for 120 minutes of instruction daily, with a breakdown of time for reading, writing, and small group instruction. There are 180 lessons over the course of 10 units with no alternative implementation schedule provided. Because of this, it may not be realistic for a teacher to complete the entire curriculum in a year, given typical disruptions in a school year, such as special guests, field trips, testing, and inclement weather. Without alternative implementation schedules, teachers will not be able to complete all of the components of reading, writing, and small group instruction.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria of Indicator 2g.
In the materials, students learn, engage, and are assessed in reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Foundational skills are also addressed each day. Materials include explicit instruction that spends the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction. The majority of lessons in reading, writing, and small group instruction address a large number of the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards. The units include opportunities to revisit these standards across the year. Instruction is also coherently sequenced, preparing students to respond to standards-aligned, analytical questions and tasks based on complex texts. Questions and tasks align to the standards and are coherently sequenced to prepare students to demonstrate their learning through the Share Your Knowledge culminating activities.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The CCSS ELA Standards Correlation document illustrates the coverage of each standard strand. In the Teacher’s Edition, Reading/Writing Companion, and ELL Small Group Guide, materials address the majority of Reading: Literature, Reading: Informational Text, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language standards. The document identifies specifically where each standard is covered.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
As students closely read and analyze complex texts, they respond to standards-aligned, text-based questions. Questions and tasks require students to cite textual evidence and draw upon the text to infer what is not explicitly stated. Questions and tasks build to and prepare students for the end-of-week Share Your Knowledge activity. The Essential Question for each text, which is revisited regularly, helps students to build knowledge while addressing the grade-level standard.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments, writing samples, and Share Your Knowledge activities align to grade-level standards. Each lesson includes standards-aligned explicit instruction, as well as questions and tasks, that prepare students for the corresponding assessment.
By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each lesson in the week follows a systematic approach to addressing the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards. Each lesson and unit addresses many of the Reading: Literature and Informational Text, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language standards. The pacing guide outlines 120 minutes of instruction, focusing on the reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards that are repeatedly addressed.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2h.
The program materials include a pacing guide for 120 minutes of instruction daily, with a breakdown of time for reading, writing, and small group instruction. There are 180 lessons over the course of six units with no alternative implementation schedule provided. Because of this, it may be unrealistic for a teacher to complete the entire curriculum in a year, given typical disruptions in a school year, such as special guests, field trips, testing, and inclement weather. In addition, having a 120-minute literacy block is not feasible for all school districts. Without alternative implementation schedules, teachers may be unable to complete all of the components of reading, writing, and small group instruction. The materials include optional activities that support the core instruction, including timing information for each activity; however, optional tasks are in addition to the 120 minutes of instruction.
Suggested implementation schedules schedules align to core learning and objectives; however, materials do not offer alternative implementation schedules aligned to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Lesson 1 of each week, students spend 45 minutes reading, including 5 minutes on vocabulary, 10 with the Literature Big Book, 20 in word work, and 10 on the shared read. Only 10 minutes on this day are spent writing, including 5 minutes for modeled writing. Lastly, there are 65 minutes designated for small group instruction, including 20 for ELL students and 15 for all the other groups.
In Lesson 2 of each week, students spend 50 minutes reading, including vocabulary, word work, and engaging in a reread of the shared reading. Students get another 10 minutes for writing, including 5 for interactive writing and 60 for small group instruction, including 15 for both students approaching level and those on level.
In Lesson 3 of each week, students spend 50 minutes reading, including vocabulary, reading the anchor text, and word work. Students get another 10 minutes for drafting and grammar work and then 50 minutes in small group instruction, with 20 minutes for ELL students and 15 for both those approaching level and those on level.
In Lesson 4 of each week, students spend 60 minutes reading, including time to focus on text features or literary elements, word work, and research and inquiry. Students get another 10 minutes for writing, with five minutes for revision and a five-minute grammar lesson. Then, students get 50 minutes for small group instruction.
In Lesson 5 of each week, students get 50 minutes for reading, including 30 minutes of word work. Then students get 10 minutes of writing instruction and 60 minutes of small group instruction for each group.
Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Wonders Program includes a Flexible Pacing Guide, which suggests pacing for the core path of instruction. In Grade 1, it is suggested that the literacy block takes 120 minutes. While it states that the timing can be flexible, support is not provided on how to get all components of the lesson done with an alternate schedule.
Completing the entire curriculum in a school year may be difficult, considering that there are 180 days of instruction included. This does not leave room for lessons that may take longer, state testing requirements, local assessments, reteaching, and other general interruptions that schools experience.
Optional materials and tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Flexible Pacing Guide provides optional tasks that align with the core instruction for each lesson of the week. These tasks are in addition to the core instruction.
Optional materials and tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Lesson 2 of each week, optional reading tasks include rereading the interactive read-aloud and word work that focuses on phonemic awareness and high-frequency words.
In Lesson 3 of each week, optional reading tasks include comprehension work, vocabulary, and word work focusing on phonics and spelling.
In Lesson 4 of each week, optional reading tasks include word work focusing on phonemic awareness and high-frequency words.
In Lesson 5 of each week, optional reading tasks include reviewing the oral vocabulary words and grammar and mechanics work.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The teacher resources included in the program provide guidance to support the implementation of the curriculum and to enhance teacher understanding of the content. Wonders offers a variety of professional development resources for teachers to develop their knowledge of grade-level content, including Learn to Use Wonders, Ready-to-Teach Workshops, Research Base and Whitepapers, Science of Reading, Instructional Routines, Assessment & Data, Educational Equity, and Administrator Resources. Each unit, lesson, and center activity includes standards correlation information. The Teacher Edition includes a weekly planner, which also includes the Common Core standards that each lesson is aligned to, and the Teacher Resources include a video explanation of the English Language standards by Dr. Jana Echevarria; however, the materials do not include the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials include information about the program for students, parents, and caregivers through weekly letters that describe what students will experience at home and school. Materials include explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and the identification of research-based strategies. Materials include necessary classroom resources to support teachers in preparing instructional activities, including a presentation resource, which provides the text that will be read during the lesson and classroom materials needed for the lesson. Materials include a comprehensive assessment handbook, which includes information about various assessment options, a guide for providing instruction, and a list of forms to use while assessing students. The instructional materials offer multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate learning. Teachers can find these resources in the Assessment Handbook, Feedback videos, and the notes section in the daily lesson plans. The Assessment Handbook provides details and suggestions on how to interpret student performance. Materials include a variety of assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of the grade-level standards and shifts. Assessments are both informal and formal and in a variety of modalities, including formal assessments, writing prompts, and discussions. The instructional materials provide multiple accommodations to ensure students can access assessments and demonstrate knowledge without changing assessment content. Materials provide learning strategies and supports for students in special populations. The instructional materials regularly provide extensions to engage in literacy content and concepts at a greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Across the school year, materials provide exposure and access to challenging texts and tasks to increase critical reading skills, such as interpreting and analyzing texts. Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks, as well as variety in how students demonstrate their learning and monitor their performance. Materials provide a variety of grouping strategies throughout each unit and lesson across the school year. Students can engage in pairs or small groups to discuss, read, write, present, peer evaluate, and play games. Materials provide strategies, support, and multiple opportunities for English Language Learners to participate in grade-level activities. Materials provide a balance of drawings and realistic images representing different demographic and physical characteristics of the characters. Across the year, positive representations of all individuals are found in the illustrations and avoid stereotypes and biases toward underrepresented groups or individuals.Materials guide teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning and provide guidance and support across the year to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The program integrates technology in various ways that provide opportunities for engagement, support, and customization. Interactive technology tools can be found that encourage a more engaging and supportive learning environment, such as the option for texts to be read aloud, games, and the ability to customize assignments.Materials include digital opportunities for teachers and students to collaborate with each other.The instructional materials provide a visual design to support students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The teacher’s edition is organized the same way in each unit, week, and lesson. The student edition is easy to navigate and has titles to help students navigate the curriculum.The instructional materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The teacher resources included in the program provide guidance to support the implementation of the curriculum and to enhance teacher understanding of the content. Scaffolds for teaching and growing literacy development include many tools, such as videos and annotations, to support all students’ literacy skills. Instructional materials offer a variety of professional development resources for teachers to develop their knowledge of grade-level content, including Learn to Use Wonders, Ready-to-Teach Workshops, Research Base and Whitepapers, Science of Reading, Instructional Routines, Assessment & Data, Educational Equity, and Administrator Resources. Materials include a publisher alignment document of the standards. In addition, each unit, lesson, and center activity includes standards correlation information. The Teacher Edition includes a weekly planner, which also includes the Common Core standards that each lesson is aligned to, and the Teacher Resources include a video explanation of the English Language standards by Dr. Jana Echevarria; however, the materials do not include the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials include information about the program for students, parents, and caregivers. Weekly letters describe what students will experience at home and school. These letters have suggestions and activities on ways to support students at home as well. While the letters come in English, there is an ability to translate them into many languages, including Arabic, Russian, and Chinese. The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and the identification of research-based strategies. A Start Smart guide is provided and includes explanations of the instructional routines found in the program. An Eight Step Implementation Support guide is included and provides information to support instruction, including lesson planning, foundational skill instruction, and differentiation. In addition, there is an Instructional Routine Handbook that explains key instructional routines such as “Collaborative Conversations,” “Close Reading,” and “Check-In,” as well as research that supports each teaching routine. The instructional materials include necessary classroom resources to support teachers in preparing instructional activities. Each lesson has a list of resources. The support includes a presentation resource, which provides the text that will be read during the lesson and classroom materials needed for the lesson. The classroom materials include ELL resources, graphic organizers about the author, and information on responding to the text.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The teacher resources included in the program provide guidance to support the implementation of the curriculum and to enhance teacher understanding of the content. Scaffolds for teaching and growing literacy development include many tools, such as videos and annotations, to support all students’ literacy skills. The teacher materials include suggestions on Culturally Responsive Teaching, Teaching the Whole Child, Equity and Access, and The Science of Reading. Explanations and descriptions of how these components are integrated into each lesson are provided. The Teacher Edition also includes information on the scope and sequence, as well as the standards and objectives of each lesson.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Edition materials explain the overall instructional model in a section called Start Smart Overview which includes information to access the Teacher Workspace and other resources that support understanding of the instructional elements of the program.
The Teacher Edition includes a component called Access Complex Text (ACT), which includes scaffolded instructional guidance to support students with the various elements that make a text complex.
In the Teacher Edition, there is a section called Every Step of the Way that includes detailed information on the professional learning teachers should engage in before delivering the curriculum to students.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 3, students listen to Go, Pip! by Tomek Bogacki and work toward understanding the important ideas and details in a story. During this lesson, students collectively complete a character graphic organizer. The materials include teacher think-alouds to help students complete the graphic organizer.
In Unit 5, Week 4, Lesson 3, the students are working toward understanding important ideas and details in the story Whistle for Willie by Ezra Jack Keats. In the Access Complex Text sections, there are suggestions such as “Point out that the story follows the course of Peter’s afternoon as he plays on his own” and “Make sure children understand that Peter is now going home, and he is still trying to whistle.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
Instructional materials offer a variety of professional development resources for teachers to develop their knowledge of grade-level content. Professional development topics include: Learn to Use Wonders, Ready-to-Teach Workshops, Research Base and Whitepapers, Science of Reading, Instructional Routines, Assessment & Data, Educational Equity, and Administrator Resources. Author and Coach videos include presentations that support instruction, such as applying foundational skills to reading and multisyllabic and decodable text words routine. Response to Intervention videos explain how to use assessments to maximize learning and teaching. Additionally, videos are available to support planning, social emotional learning, English Language Learners, and ways to use leveled readers. The materials also include close-reading and small-group instruction workshops that offer self-paced modules for teachers.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources Tab, the Professional Development section provides Ready to Teach Workshops. The Close Reading Workshop is a four-session, video-based module that supports teachers in delivering effective instruction for close reading of complex texts. The Small-Group Instruction Workshop is a four-session, video-based module that supports teachers in organizing, managing, and delivering small-group instruction.
In the Resources tab, the Assessment and Data section provides manuals and guides detailing assessment components, the assessment handbook, placement and diagnostic assessment, assessment administration, assessment reports, and online assessment preparation.
In the Resources Tab, the Educational Equity section supports teachers with manuals and guides regarding culturally responsive teaching, social-emotional learning, supporting ELL students, universal design for learning, and equitable access to instruction.
In the Administrator Resources section, manuals and guides are available to support teachers with family involvement, observation tools, and coaching.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources tab, the Professional Development section provides instructional information supported by research and whitepapers. Titles include but are not limited to “Academic Vocabulary Study: Embedded, Deep, and Generative Practices” by Dr. Donald R. Bear, “Improving Literacy for English Learners: What Teachers Need to Know” by Dr. Jana Echevarria, “Straight Talk on the Science of Reading” by Tim Shanahan, and “Guiding Principles for Supporting English Learners.”
The Instructional Routines Handbook offers step-by-step guides to instructional practices embedded in the program, such as “Managing Small Groups: A How-to Guide” by Vicki Gibson and Doug Fisher.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
Materials include a publisher alignment document of the standards. In addition, each unit, lesson, and center activity includes standards correlation information. The Teacher Edition includes a weekly planner, which also includes the Common Core standards that each lesson is aligned to, and the Teacher Resources include a video explanation of the English Language standards by Dr. Jana Echevarria; however, the materials do not include the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 3, students build oral language by discussing the essential question, “What do friends do together?” This task addresses standard L.1.5c, “Identify real-life connections between words and their use.”
In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson, during the Interactive Read-Aloud, the purpose is to read to find out how the elephant got its trunk using the story and Think Aloud Cloud. The standards associated with this activity are SL.1.1, “Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about topics and texts with peers and adults in small or large groups” and SL.1.2, “Ask and answer questions about key details in text read aloud or information presented orally or through other material.”
In Unit 6, Week 5, Lesson 4, during Independent Writing, students revise, peer review, edit/proofread, write the final draft, and share their writing about the anchor text. Standards associated with this lesson are W.1.5, “With guidance and support from adults, focus on a topic, respond to questions and suggestions from peers, and add details to strengthen writing as needed;” SL.1.2, “Ask and answer questions about key details in a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media;” and L.1.2, “Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing.”
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series.
No evidence found
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials include information about the program for students, parents, and caregivers. Weekly letters describe what students will experience at home and school. These letters have suggestions and activities on ways to support students at home as well. The program also includes a letter that explains how to support students in a remote setting. While the letters come in English, there is an ability to translate them into many languages, including Arabic, Russian, and Chinese. All the materials for the various shareholders can easily be found in the Student Center Dashboard, which provides resources for students, parents and/or caregivers.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Student Center Dashboard includes the school to home tab, which contains letters and messages from the teacher.
The Student Center Dashboard includes resources for students, such as the weekly vocabulary words and writing assignments.
The program includes a family letter for each week in each unit. The letter provides information about the genre students will read about, learning goals, word work, and comprehension standards each week. For example, in Unit 2, Week 2, the letter informs families that the class “will be focusing on different kinds of buildings. Your child will discuss what the buildings are made of and the importance of these buildings.”
In the Administrator Resources section, found in the Professional Development tab, there is a customizable letter that can be sent to families about the Wonders curriculum that can be sent at the beginning of the year. The letter contains information on what students will experience in class and what students will experience at home.
In the Administrator Resources section, there is a PowerPoint presentation that teachers can use to explain the curriculum to families on a Back to School or Curriculum night.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Student Center Dashboard, there is a weekly letter that informs parents or caregivers on what the students are working on that week and ways to support them at home. For example, in Unit 5, Week 5, students learn the diphthongs oy and oi. The letter suggests that families help their child “write the words in the air and then on paper. This week’s phonics skill is diphthongs oy and oi, as in boy and coin.”
The program provides parents with differentiated spelling lists for students approaching grade level, on-grade level, and beyond grade level. The spelling lists include activities that students can complete to practice the spelling words at home.
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and the identification of research-based strategies. A Start Smart guide is provided and includes explanations of the instructional routines found in the program. An Eight Step Implementation Support guide is included and provides information to support instruction, including lesson planning, foundational skill instruction, and differentiation. In addition, there is an Instructional Routine Handbook that explains key instructional routines such as “Collaborative Conversations,” “Close Reading,” and “Check-In,” as well as research that supports each teaching routine. Lastly, some videos contain professional development on the instructional routines, such as the multisyllabic word routine and the decodable text routine.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Start Smart guide includes details on how to introduce and teach students about “collaborative conversations.” For example, it instructs teachers to tell students to “Add New Ideas- Stay on topic. Connect your ideas to what your peers have said. Provide evidence or reasons for your ideas. Connect your own experience or prior knowledge to the conversation.”
The Eight-Step Implementation Guide includes information about instructional approaches, such as small group differentiation, which can be located throughout the materials. The guide states, “The ‘Teach in Small Group’ sidebars in whole group instruction highlight further opportunities for small group teaching and offer suggestions that can be used to reinforce—or replace—whole group lessons.”
In the Resources section, there is a section called “Author & Coach Videos” that contains short professional development videos for teachers on various instructional approaches, including close reading, academic vocabulary, writing, assessment, planning and digital support, and access to complex text.
In the Instructional Routine Handbook, there is a detailed explanation for each routine, such as the “Sentence Segmentation Routine.” The explanation includes, “Read aloud a short text all the way through. Then model how to count the words you hear in a line.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Instructional Routine Handbook includes research on “Collaborative Conversations.” The handbook states, “Discussion-based practices improve student’s thinking skills and comprehension of a text (Murphy, Wilkinson, Soter, Hennessey, & Alexander, 2009). In effective schools, classroom conversations about how, why, and what students read are important parts of the literacy curriculum (Applebee, 1996: Schoenbach, Greenleaf, Cziko & Hurwitz, 1999).”
The Instructional Routine Handbook includes research on foundational skills instruction. The handbook states, “Research indicates that the most critical phonemic awareness skills are blending and segmenting, since they are most closely associated with early reading and writing growth (NICHHD, 2001). Phonemic awareness has a positive overall effect on reading and spelling and leads to lasting reading improvement. Phonological processing problems are a significant factor in students experiencing reading difficulties, including dyslexia (International Dyslexia Association, 2017). Phonemic awareness instruction can be effectively carried out by teachers. It doesn’t take a great deal of time to bring many children’s phonemic awareness abilities up to a level at which phonics instruction begins to make sense.”
The Instructional Routine Handbook includes research on “High- frequency words.” The handbook states, “High-frequency words make up a significant portion of the words students need to read and write. In fact, 25% of all words and print come from this set of thirteen words: a, and, for, he, is, in, it, of, that, the, to, was, you (Johns, 1981). And about 50% of words students will read and write come from a set of 100 words (Fry, Fountoukidis, & Polk, 1985). Many high-frequency words do not follow common sound-spelling patterns, so they need to be learned by sight and require explicit instruction.”
In the Overview of the Resources section, there is a tab called “Research Base and Whitepapers,” which contains several different research-based articles on the approaches of the program. Some of these articles include “Academic Vocabulary Study: Embedded, Deep, and Generative Practices” by Donald Bear and “Close Reading in Elementary Classrooms” by Douglas Fisher.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The instructional materials include necessary classroom resources to support teachers in preparing instructional activities. Each lesson has a list of resources. The support includes a presentation resource, which provides the text that will be read during the lesson and classroom materials needed for the lesson. The classroom materials include ELL resources, graphic organizers about the author, and information on responding to the text. In addition to including lists, teachers can access the resources directly from the lesson dashboards.
Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 0, Week 2, Lesson 1, teachers have a link to “Weekly Printables” that includes one worksheet for the students to complete.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 1, there is a section entitled “Lesson Resources” that contains Visual Vocabulary Cards, which can be printed or used digitally. In the lesson, these Visual Vocabulary Cards introduce the oral vocabulary words communicate, superior, and wilderness.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 1, there is a section entitled “Lesson Resources” that contains a Weekly Opener Video about the weather. As a part of this lesson, students share one detail they learned from the video about weather.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
Materials include a comprehensive assessment handbook, which includes information about various assessment options, a guide for providing instruction, and a list of forms to use while assessing students. Formal assessments are included in the program, such as Universal Screeners, Placement & Diagnostic Assessments, Fluency Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Benchmark Assessments. The instructional materials offer multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate learning. Teachers can find these resources in the Assessment Handbook, Feedback videos, and the notes section in the daily lesson plans. The Assessment Handbook provides details and suggestions on how to interpret student performance. Feedback videos and notes in the lesson plans offer recommendations for supporting students as they complete each assessment. Materials include a variety of assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of the grade-level standards and shifts. Assessments are both informal and formal and in a variety of modalities, including formal assessments, writing prompts, and discussions. Each lesson culminates with a check-in routine, which allows students to reflect on their new knowledge or share what they have learned with a partner. The instructional materials provide multiple accommodations to ensure students can access assessments and demonstrate knowledge without changing assessment content. Teachers can find support in the Equitable Access to Instruction Handbook, the Assessment Handbook, and within daily lessons.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include a comprehensive assessment handbook, which includes information about various assessment options, a guide for providing instruction, and a list of forms to use while assessing students. Formal assessments included in the program, such as Universal Screeners, Placement & Diagnostic Assessments, Fluency Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Benchmark Assessments. Materials do not always include standards that are being assessed. The Unit and Benchmark Assessments available in the Online Assessment Center include question-level standard alignment information, but this does not exist for printable versions of those assessments. Informal assessments within lessons include standards for the lesson but do not include specific standards for the tasks being assessed.
Materials do not consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 5, the two standards identified are SL.1.1b and SL.1.5. The lesson contains a rubric for the assessment, but the rubric does not include either of these standards. The assessment requires students to synthesize ideas from two or more texts and does not require students to engage in speaking and listening since the assessment is a written assignment.
In Unit 3, Week 4, Lesson 5, students are assessed on their ability to synthesize ideas from two or more texts. They must use evidence from the text and words correctly from the Word Bank. The two standards listed in the lesson are SL.1.4 (describe people, places, things, and events with relevant details...) and L.1.6 (use words and phrases acquired through conversations, reading and being read to, and responding to texts...). While L.1.6 is informally assessed through the writing assignment, neither standard is directly measured by the rubric for the assessment.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Lesson 5, students complete a writing assignment about two texts, which is assessed on a rubric; however, the rubric does not directly measure the two standards identified for this lesson, which are SL.1.4 and L.1.6.
In the Online Assessment Center, teachers can access the Unit and Benchmark Assessments, which include question-level standards alignment. For example, in the Unit Assessment, Grade 1, U2, Question 15 is aligned to standard RI.1.6. Each question is also aligned to a skill and DOK level.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The instructional materials offer multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate learning. Teachers can find these resources in the Assessment Handbook, Feedback videos, and the notes section in the daily lesson plans. The Assessment Handbook provides details and suggestions on how to interpret student performance. Feedback videos and notes in the lesson plans offer recommendations for supporting students as they complete each assessment. Daily lessons present students with multiple ways to demonstrate their learning using formative assessments.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 0, Week 3, Lesson 5, students listen to the Interactive Read Alouds, “Work, Play, and Learn Together” and “How Do We Get Around?” (authors not cited) and use a two-column chart during a Think Aloud session to help students see how the texts are similar. If students get stuck, the teacher reminds them they are sharing how the selections are similar, and later, partners can discuss the similarities between the texts.
In Unit 1, Week 5, Lesson 1, students brainstorm ideas for a personal narrative. Teachers instruct students to turn to page 190 in the Reading/Writing Companion, and after discussing Marisol’s plan for her personal narrative, students begin brainstorming ideas for their personal narrative topic. The Teacher’s Guide suggests students draw or write about events that are important to them, and teachers can use the Quick Tip box to support them as they think of ideas.
In Unit 4, Week 6, Lesson 4, students read “Fooba Wooba John,” an American folk song, reminding students to talk slowly and that if someone makes a mistake, they should continue reading. Students can be divided into groups to share how well they read their lines and reflect on the experience using the Check-In routine.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 4, students research a plant. Teachers ask students to turn to pages 74–75 in their Reading/Writing Companion and talk about their chosen plant with a partner. Teachers guide students in thinking of research questions. The Teacher’s Guide suggests if students are unsure about where to research, the teacher can help them collect print or online books that would have information and show them how to use the table of contents or index to quickly find needed information. After sharing what they learned with a partner and drawing their plant, students complete the Research Process Checklist to ensure they have completed all parts of the research process.
In Unit 5, Week 6, Lesson 4, students read “Supper with the Queen” by Sally Jarvis to practice reading fluency. The Teacher’s Guide suggests students highlight their parts and echo-read and practice their parts each day. Teachers ensure fluent readers are paired with those who need to build reading fluency. Teachers work with less fluent readers, guiding them to read like normal speech. Teachers also model using emotion and expression.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Lesson 4, students work in pairs and research their partner’s traditions. To present their research, students can write a newspaper article, create a diorama, or create an advertisement. The Teacher’s Guide suggests teachers help students prepare and gather materials by encouraging them to ask questions and evaluate their presentations using the Presentation Checklist. The Teacher’s Guide also suggests that teachers may have students collaborate on projects.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
Materials include a variety of assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of the grade-level standards and shifts. Assessments are both informal and formal and in a variety of modalities, including formal assessments, writing prompts, and discussions. Each lesson culminates with a check-in routine, which allows students to reflect on their new knowledge or share what they have learned with a partner. The Assessment Handbook also includes information on student portfolios. Students collect work that supports progress as a reader and provides “formative information” in a Developmental portfolio.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials include an Assessment Handbook that details all of the formative and summative assessment options available in the program, including universal screeners, placement and diagnostic assessments, fluency assessments, progress monitoring assessments, unit assessments, and benchmark assessments. A table indicates which assessments are available for each of these purposes, the reading component measured, the grade levels, the type of test, when to give the assessment, and how to administer the assessment.
In the Assessment Handbook, the materials indicate that teachers can have students develop portfolios of their work over the year to show both development and their best work. A development portfolio “contains examples of the writing process and samples from the beginning, middle, and end of the year.” A portfolio used to showcase a student’s best work shows what a student has learned. Portfolios can also be used to “connect students’ learning from unit to unit. Students are able to choose certain pieces of work from the previous unit, and then reflect on them.”
Across the year, the materials provide a unit assessment in every unit, along with twice-yearly benchmark assessments with questions aligned to the standards. Both the unit and benchmark assessments contain primarily multiple-choice type questions, but also short answer questions. For example, in the Unit 3 assessment, question 3 asks students to respond with a short answer to “What happens at the end of the story?” This question is aligned to standard RL.1.3: “Describe characters, settings, and major events in a story, using key details.”
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 1, the materials direct teachers to do a formative assessment where students work in partners to tell one thing they have learned about animals and share a word with an inflectional ending. The teacher then directs students to reflect using the Check-In routine.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 5, students finalize and present their opinion writing piece. An accompanying rubric assesses students’ knowledge of grade-level appropriate opinion writing and speaking, and listening skills and is aligned to the standards listed for the lesson.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The instructional materials provide multiple accommodations to ensure students can access assessments and demonstrate knowledge without changing assessment content. Teachers can find support in the Equitable Access to Instruction Handbook, the Assessment Handbook, and within daily lessons. The Assessment Handbook includes general accommodation information and suggestions for how much and what type of assistance to provide during assessments. The Equitable Access to Instruction guide contains information for ELL support and visual and audio enhancements for students who struggle or have learning disabilities and require alternative options to reflect understanding.
Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Digital assessments allow students to use an electronic highlighter, notepad, line reader, and text-to-speech features.
The Resource Library contains both downloadable Unit Assessments and ELL Unit Assessments, allowing English Language Learners to demonstrate their knowledge without changing the content of the assessment.
Teachers can print assessments or have students view them digitally and use screen readers or increase the font size without changing the content.
Digital assessments have an audio option for students to listen to the directions. For example, in the Student Edition, Reading/Writing Companion Unit 1, page 10, students can click the audio icon, and the directions will play.
Digital assessments have a zoom button on the top menu bar so students can increase or decrease the text size.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Section, Equitable Access to Instruction Handbook, there is a section titled Multiple Methods of Demonstration. Here teachers can find various suggestions to accommodate students of different ability levels as they complete the curriculum.
Teachers are provided with notes in the daily lessons which explain how to provide accommodations to students who are approaching the standard, on-grade level, beyond grade level, and English Language Learners.
The Assessment Handbook assists in managing multiple assessments in the classroom, interpreting results, and implementing classroom-based instruction in the areas of need. For example, on page 7, there is a definition of a diagnostic assessment and examples to support story sequencing when a student is having difficulty.
In the Resource Library, the English Language Learner Assessment Handbook contains performance indicators for three proficiency levels used in rubrics for assessing students at various levels.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
Materials provide learning strategies and supports for students in special populations. In each lesson, there is a Differentiated Reading sidebar, which provides suggested supports to help students approaching level, on-level, and beyond-level access to the grade-level text. In addition, the Differentiated Reading sidebar includes ways to help English Language Learners access grade-level content and standards. The instructional materials regularly provide extensions to engage in literacy content and concepts at a greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Across the school year, materials provide exposure and access to challenging texts and tasks to increase critical reading skills, such as interpreting and analyzing texts. Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks, as well as variety in how students demonstrate their learning and monitor their performance. Throughout the year, students learn and demonstrate their learning through discussions, writing, and completing written pages. Materials provide a variety of grouping strategies throughout each unit and lesson across the school year. Students can engage in pairs or small groups to discuss, read, write, present, peer evaluate, and play games. Specific teacher guidance is found in lesson segments and details how and when to use specific grouping strategies. Materials provide strategies, support, and multiple opportunities for English Language Learners to participate in grade-level activities. In addition to the “Dual Language” section in the Resources Library, materials provide lesson-specific scaffolding daily to help ELL students meet or exceed grade-level standards. Materials provide a balance of drawings and realistic images representing different demographic and physical characteristics of the characters. Across the year, positive representations of all individuals are found in the illustrations and avoid stereotypes and biases toward underrepresented groups or individuals. The content supports strengthening a student’s sense of identity and promoting equity and inclusion while engaging students in learning. Materials guide teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The Language Transfers Handbook includes a sound transfer chart, a grammar transfer chart, and examples of cognates. This handbook also provides background knowledge and suggestions for teachers to help students as they learn another language. Materials provide guidance and support across the year to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The Resource Library contains three resources, the Language Transfers Handbook, a Culturally Responsive Teacher Guidance document, and the Equitable Access to Instruction guide. The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with assistance to make linguistic connections that support students increasing their knowledge of English.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials provide learning strategies and supports for students in special populations. In each lesson, there is a Differentiated Reading sidebar, which provides suggested supports to help students approaching level, on-level, and beyond level access to the grade-level text. In addition, the Differentiated Reading sidebar includes ways to help English Language Learners access grade-level content and standards.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 2, students participate in a shared read of “The Best Spot” (author not cited). The materials provide teachers with guidance for differentiating instruction in the “Teach in Small Group” sidebar. For example, students approaching level should work together to complete the chart. Those on level and beyond should write their responses independently and discuss them.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 3, students read What is a Yurt? by Lily Ryan. Students approaching grade level learn about phonemic awareness, phonics, and structural analysis, and focus on identifying two relevant details. Those on grade level and beyond review details with a focus on cause and effect.
Under the Resource Tab in the Professional Development section, the Equitable Access to Instruction Guide provides strategies to support teachers as they differentiate instruction for students. The overview states, “Equity in the classroom is crucial to the success of all students, particularly those who struggle or have disabilities. The resources in this module help teachers meet the needs of students with disabilities. The videos and PDFs detail strategies for implementing differentiated instruction, and they explain how to use technology to adapt the curriculum to suit the individual learner. Several of these resources focus on identifying classroom accommodations for students with targeted instructional needs. Included are strategies for providing explicit explanations and setting realistic expectations, thus accelerating student performance.”
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The instructional materials regularly provide extensions to engage in literacy content and concepts at a greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Across the school year, materials provide exposure and access to challenging texts and tasks to increase critical reading skills, such as interpreting and analyzing texts. Students can access differentiated spelling lists, leveled readers, and differentiated assignments. Literacy tasks are based on higher-order questions and actively involve students in speaking, listening, discussing, and writing about complex texts. The Teacher Edition includes Differentiated Reading and Writing Boxes and guidance on how to use whole-group lessons to support beyond-level students.
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 1, the materials provide differentiated spelling lists. Students approaching level have the words ship, shop, sing, and with. Students beyond grade level have the words fish, sang, ship, shop, sixth, thick, thing, and with.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 1, beyond-level students read Go, Gator! by Diane Furuichi and work on synonyms for their vocabulary words.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 2, beyond-level students read Beware of the Lion! by Vita Jimenez and work on antonyms for their vocabulary words.
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Materials provide a variety of opportunities for students to demonstrate and monitor their learning. Students demonstrate their learning through discussions, writing opportunities, and even games. Throughout the year, students receive teacher feedback and engage in opportunities to monitor their learning by reflecting and using the Check-Iin Routine.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 1, students practice reading and spelling high-frequency words. With a partner, the student says the high--frequency word, uses it in a sentence, and then the partner writes it down on a paper plate. Then all of the students stand in a circle, passing the plate face down while music plays. When the music stops, the child holding the plate turns it over and reads the word.
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 3, students listen to The Story of Martin Luther King, Jr by Johnny Ray Moore. The teacher begins by sharing the cover, which has a drawing of Martin Luther King, Jr as an adult, and then the teacher shows pages 6–7 of the book, which shows him as a child. The teacher then asks, “How do the author and illustrator change the image of Martin we might have in our heads before we read this book?”
Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 1, students work on building vocabulary about animals by first discussing the “words for ways animals help each other,” then by writing the words, and finally by creating a word bank.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 4, students research a pet. The teacher helps students complete the Research Process Checklist, which helps students decide if they have completed all of the steps of the research process.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 6, Lesson 5, students reflect on how well they compared information across texts using the Check-in Routine. According to the Teacher’s Edition, the Check-In Routine consists of the following steps:
“Review the lesson learning goal.
Reflect on the activity.
Self-Assess by
circling the hands in the Reading/Writing Companion
showing thumbs up, sideways, or down.
Share with your teacher.”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Materials provide a variety of grouping strategies throughout each unit and lesson across the school year. Students can engage in pairs or small groups to discuss, read, write, present, peer evaluate, and play games. Specific teacher guidance is found in lesson segments and details how and when to use specific grouping strategies. The Instructional Routines Handbook provides guidance on grouping students in various formats during activities such as Collaborative Conversations, Shared Read Routine, Literature Circles, Peer Conferences, Author Study, and Book Club Chat. The “Managing Small Groups: A How-To Guide” handbook supports teachers by explaining how to group students using data.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, teacher guidance for Speed Drills states students work in small groups to read high-frequency word cards and are challenged to beat the time.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 1, students read “A Pig for Cliff” (author not cited) with a partner. The students reread multiple times to focus on pronouncing each word correctly and reading the story as if they were speaking.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 2, students work with a partner, taking turns saying sentences using the words “has” and “have” and explaining why each word was used.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 1, students work with a partner to talk about ways people work together to make their lives better.
Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Instructional Routines Handbook, Peer Conferences section, teachers are instructed to pair two or three students. Materials suggest grouping students reading the same text(s) on the same topic or theme.
In the Resources Section, there is a handbook titled “Managing Small Groups: A How-To Guide.” Teachers are provided with suggestions on how to form heterogenous and homogenous groups, group assignments, and group sizes. The guide states, “at the beginning of the academic year, it is often easier to assign group memberships that are more homogenous or similar in skill proficiency and needs.” The guide suggests that students can work in mixed-skills and flexible groups based on teacher observations.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 1 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
Materials provide strategies, support, and multiple opportunities for English Language Learners to participate in grade-level activities. In addition to the “Dual Language” section in the Resources Library, materials provide lesson-specific scaffolding daily to help ELL students meet or exceed grade-level standards. Depending on English proficiency levels, support might include using pictures students can point to, sentence stems, or partner text discussions. Teachers are encouraged to explicitly model how to think deeply about a text, define key terms, and ask questions to elicit deeper understanding of texts read in class.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources Library, a section titled “Dual Language” contains 44 resources for teachers to support English Language Learners. Information is in various languages (i.e., Arabic, Chinese, French, Haitian-Creole, Hmong, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, Urdu, and Vietnamese) to aid English Language Learners during classroom activities. Teachers can find resources such as language development cards, language development practice, a language transfers handbook, visual vocabulary cards, multilingual glossaries, oral language sentence frames, and sound spelling cards.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 3, English Language Learner students read “At a Pond” by Nancy Finton. To build background knowledge, the teacher points to the ducks, the flower, and the water, saying each of the words and having the students repeat those words. The teacher uses Visual Vocabulary Cards to review high-frequency and oral vocabulary words while using gestures and pantomime to help students understand.
In Unit 4, Week 5, Lesson 1, students read a TIME for Kids article, “From Puppy to Guide Dog.” The teacher pairs students of mixed proficiencies to pretend they are guide dog trainers. Partners discuss the prompt, “You just got a new puppy! It will be a guide dog someday. How can you train the dog?” The pairs brainstorm ideas to share with the larger group.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 4, students read “Heat Wave” by Donna Loughran. The teacher reads pages 10–11, modeling intonation to help English Language Learners build fluency. The teacher reads the passage, and students repeat. For additional practice, students can read the passage and select their best recording.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Materials provide a balance of drawings and realistic images representing different demographic and physical characteristics of the characters. Across the year, positive representations of all individuals are found in the illustrations and avoid stereotypes and biases toward underrepresented groups or individuals. The content supports strengthening a student’s sense of identity and promoting equity and inclusion while engaging students in learning. Students have a variety of opportunities to demonstrate success and understanding.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 1, students read Friends All Around by Miela Ford. The cover of the text depicts students with various skin tones gathered in a circle, laughing and smiling.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 1, the materials provide Visual Vocabulary Cards as part of an Oral Language Routine. One of the cards shows a group of students with various skin tones and physical features.
In Unit 6, Week 4, Lesson 1, the materials provide Visual Vocabulary Cards as part of an Oral Language Routine. The cards represent people of different ages, skin tones, and physical features.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 4, Lesson 1, students watch a video entitled “Picture Day” from “Electric Company” (owned and licensed by “The Sesame Workshop”). This video depicts two young boys, one darker-skinned and one lighter-skinned, named Marcus and Jackson. The boys decide to have a picture day for adoptable pets and work together to make that happen.
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 3, students read “Small Joy” in TIME for Kids. This article focuses on Dee, an adult who lives in a tiny home on wheels.
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 4, Lesson 1, students read “Weekly Opener” (author not cited). Two boys and one girl plant a garden, depicting how people can help in the community. The children have a variety of skin tones and hairstyles.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 5, in the Reading/Writing Companion, on one side of the page, there is a girl alongside a “What I Know Now” chart. On the other side of the page, there is a boy alongside a “What I Learned” chart used by students to fill in their feelings.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
Materials guide teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The Language Transfers Handbook includes a sound transfer chart, a grammar transfer chart, and examples of cognates. This handbook also provides background knowledge and suggestions for teachers to help students as they learn another language. In addition, the program also includes a Bridge to English section, which connects students’ English skills with Spanish. Each section provides examples of transferable and non-transferable language skills students can use as they acquire English. It provides students of varying English proficiency levels opportunities to interact as they develop their English language skills in reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Lastly, in the differentiated section of each lesson, teachers are provided with cognates of vocabulary words in the ELL Academic Lessons section to help students understand the pronunciation and meaning of new words.
Materials provide suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, the Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with a sample lesson on cognates to help students use their native language to identify words.
In the Resource Library, Bridge to English, Unit 5, the materials identify the language objectives for ELL students, such as learning key words and learning about the hard and soft g sounds.
In the Resource Library, Bridge to English, Unit 6, the materials identify the language objectives for ELL students, including learning about /sh/ and /ch/ and retelling the fable “The Cat’s Bell” (author not cited).
In Unit 2, Week 6, Lesson 2, in the Differentiated Instruction section, the materials provide the Spanish cognates of the vocabulary words nonfiction, facts, information, and description.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, but students are not explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with strategies for supporting students as they learn English orthography. This handbook contains charts for phonemes that may cause a problem for speakers of specific languages. For example, the Sound Transfer Chart identifies the transferable and non-transferable sounds between English and Spanish, Cantonese, Vietnamese, Hmong, Korean, Tagalog, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, Hatian-Creole, and French.
The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with strategies for supporting students as they learn English syntax. The handbook suggests that teachers highlight the transferable skills if the group of students all speak the same native language.
In the Resource Library, there are a variety of videos that promote using the students’ home language, including “Bridging Lessons: Transferring Learning Between Languages” with Peggy Cerna and “Building First Language Proficiency” with Dr. Josefina Tinajero.
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
Materials provide guidance and support across the year to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The Resource Library contains three resources, the Language Transfers Handbook, a Culturally Responsive Teacher Guidance document, and the Equitable Access to Instruction guide. The Language Transfers Handbook provides teachers with assistance to make linguistic connections that support students increasing their knowledge of English. The Culturally Responsive Teacher Guidance document cultivates critical thinking and problem- solving skills. Teachers are supported with equity guidance through the Equitable Access to Instruction guide which includes options for student choice during independent work time. Opportunities for students to share personal home experiences to enhance their understanding of various concepts are present in the materials.
Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources section, the Language Transfers Handbook includes information about sound transfers in a variety of languages including Spanish, Cantonese, Vietnamese, Hmong, Korean, Tagalog, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, Haitian-Creole, Portuguese, and French.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 3, ELL students read “At a Pond” by Nancy Finton. In the ELA Academic Language section, teachers are provided with the Spanish cognate detalles when talking about the academic vocabulary word, details.
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources section, Becoming a Culturally Responsive Teacher includes a selection of resources to help teachers achieve the goals listed in the document, including “respect my students’ preferences and honor their experiences, provide rigorous instruction that invites critical thinking, acknowledge bias and privilege, own my own learning, communicate positive intentions, avoid assumptions, reject color blindness, consider context, be open to being wrong, get comfortable with discomfort, and create a classroom that offers the opportunity to achieve academic excellence to all.”
In the Resources section, the Becoming a Culturally Responsive Teacher includes a model lesson section teachers can apply to lessons throughout. This scaffolded lesson plan includes suggestions regarding a culturally-responsive essential question, objectives, sensitivities, key vocabulary, building background knowledge, introducing the concept before reading, and optional activities extending the concept after reading. In addition, this lesson format includes teacher tips, extending your classroom library, and resources. The document also includes suggestions on how to use these model lessons, namely as supplements, to provide historical and cultural background, and to explore identity and social justice.
In the Resources section, a model culturally-responsive lesson for Unit 6, Week 4 explores the Essential Question “What traditions do you know about?” through reflection, storytelling, wonder, and observation.
Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resources section, the Equitable Access to Instruction guide provides teachers information about creating an “equitable learning environment for all students.” This guide includes information about using audio and video in the classroom, peer tutor implementation, the use of graphic organizers, the use of multiple methods of demonstration, and the use of classroom routines.
Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Glossaries for students are provided in several languages, specifically an English-French glossary, an English-Hmong glossary, an English-Korean glossary, an English-Arabic glossary, an English-Portuguese glossary, an English-Spanish glossary, an English-Chinese glossary, an English-Urdu glossary, an English-Russian glossary, an English-Vietnamese glossary, an English-Tagalog glossary, and an English-Haitian Creole glossary.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 1, ELL students read Mystery Vine by Cathryn Falwell. Prior to reading, teachers show students the outside cover, explaining that this is a story about a family’s garden. Students draw their favorite vegetable and tell what it is. The teacher asks if the student’s family has a garden at home and, if so, what is grown in the garden.
In Unit 4, Week 4, Lesson 1, prior to reading a book about insects, ELL students look at insect pictures in the text and discuss if any are visible at the child’s home or playground. They can also share if they like insects or not.
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The program integrates technology in various ways that provide opportunities for engagement, support, and customization. Interactive technology tools can be found that encourage a more engaging and supportive learning environment, such as the option for texts to be read aloud, games, and the ability to customize assignments. Age-appropriate digital tools are found throughout the materials to help students access the content and master the standards. Materials include digital opportunities for teachers and students to collaborate with each other. The materials allow the teacher to post assignments, projects, weekly learning goals, and messages. Students can view current and past messages posted by the teacher and respond to the teacher. The instructional materials provide a visual design to support students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The teacher’s edition is organized the same way in each unit, week, and lesson. The student edition is easy to navigate and has titles to help students navigate the curriculum. The visual design is age-appropriate and includes both realistic photographs as well as illustrations to support student learning. The instructional materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Technology is used in a variety of purposeful ways. The materials include guidance to integrate technology to increase engagement and maximize student learning.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The program integrates technology in various ways that provide opportunities for engagement, support, and customization. Interactive technology tools can be found that encourage a more engaging and supportive learning environment, such as the option for texts to be read aloud, games, and the ability to customize assignments. Age-appropriate digital tools are found throughout the materials to help students access the content and master the standards.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Reading/Writing Companion digital version, students can select a thumbs down, a sideways thumb, or a thumbs up for each check-in throughout the course.
Students can learn the weekly vocabulary words in the “Words to Know” digital tool. The tool introduces the vocabulary word, provides a definition, gives an example, and asks a question with the word contained within the question. This tool allows students to listen to each of the components of the tool.
There are Build Knowledge videos provided to help students learn about the topic of the unit.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 1, students read “Go Wild!” (author not cited). Students can have the text read to them by clicking on the audio icon and can add bookmarks.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, there are a variety of interactive graphic organizers. When the interactive version of the graphic organizer is selected, students can use the pencil tool to write on the graphic organizer.
In the Resource Library, there is a Response Board/Sound Spelling Workboard where the top contains white space, and the bottom has lined rows for writing. Students can use the pencil icon to write on the board.
In Unit 2, Week 3, 35 games and activities are available to help students with comprehension, grammar, high-frequency words, phonemic awareness, phonics, spelling, and structural analysis.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
By selecting “Manage and Assign” from the menu, teachers can select “Make an Assignment” to create a new assignment for a select group of students or an entire class. Teachers have the option to add a title, directions, and resources such as ebooks, interactive games, and graphic organizers.
In the Online Assessment Center, teachers can either modify an existing assessment or create a new one. There are a variety of question types that teachers can choose from, including multiple-choice, short answer, fill-in-the-blank, and essay.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials include digital opportunities for teachers and students to collaborate with each other. The materials allow the teacher to post assignments, projects, weekly learning goals, and messages. Students can view current and past messages posted by the teacher and respond to the teacher.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Student Dashboard provides students with the opportunity to collaborate with the teacher using the My Binder section. Here, students can view assignments and assessments that the teacher posts.
The Student Dashboard includes a “To Do” section, which lists specific tasks that students should practice and/or complete. There is a “Note to Teacher” box, which allows students to communicate directly with the teacher.
The Student Dashboard allows students to collaborate with the teacher in the Writing and Research section. Students can view topics and projects assigned by the teacher. The teacher can also pose questions, and students can respond to the question, see the responses of their classmates, and respond to their peers’ comments.
The Student Dashboard includes a Home to School Section where students and families can view messages, word activities, learning goals, and spelling lists the teacher posts.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The instructional materials provide a visual design to support students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The teacher’s edition is organized the same way in each unit, week, and lesson. The student edition is easy to navigate and has titles to help students navigate the curriculum. The visual design is age-appropriate and includes both realistic photographs as well as illustrations to support student learning. Text boxes provide additional information for students to help them understand the topics, content, and texts. The table of contents, glossary, and table headers are all easy to understand and navigate.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 4, students read “Life at Home” (author not cited). Students can view two photographs. One is a black and white photograph of a home with a fireplace and kitchen table, and one in color of a home with a large family, some playing a board game on the floor and others sitting on a couch behind them. These images match the captions, the first being, “Long ago, many families cooked, worked, and slept in one room,” and the second being, “Today, families can live in large homes that have lots of space.”
In Unit 5, Week 5, Lesson 1, students complete “Brainstorm and Plan” in the Reading/Writing companion to help prepare for their process essay. On the planner, there is a space for students to draw their ideas and a crayon icon next to the box to provide a visual notation of what should occur there. When students need to write their ideas, there is a pencil icon, and there are lined spaces as well.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, Teacher Resources are PDF copies of each unit for teachers divided by weeks. For example, there is a PDF file for Unit 5 Overview and Week 1, another file for Unit 5, Week 2, and another for Unit 5, Week 3, etc. The Table of Contents for each unit includes Unit Planning, Reading/Writing, and Program Information. Information about texts for each week and lessons is included within this document using different colors, text boxes, and other visual elements to make it not only consistent but also efficient in finding the necessary information.
The Reading/Writing Companion for students follows this sequence: Build Knowledge, My Goals, Read and Respond to the Big Book, Topic and Details, Analyze the Text (e.g., shared reads and paired selections,) Research and Inquiry, Make Connections, and Show Your Knowledge.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Resources tab contains a glossary. The glossary includes words such as “celebrate,” where the word and definition are spoken when the video’s play button is clicked. In addition, there is a definition of the word along with a picture and a section entitled Routine that offers opportunities for students to use this word.
The Table of Contents in the student textbook includes images, text, and colors to help all students access the necessary materials. For example, “To Do” includes a paper with a checkmark and is contained within a green circle. The text is visible when a student hovers over the icon.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The instructional materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Technology is used in a variety of purposeful ways. The materials include guidance to integrate technology to increase engagement and maximize student learning. Technology resources to support student learning include but are not limited to presentations, games, and videos.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher’s Online Dashboard includes daily presentations with resources that teachers can display on a whiteboard or other tool.
In Unit 1, Week 6, Lesson 1, after reading an article entitled “World Games” (author not cited), teachers and students brainstorm other games that children can learn more about and have them choose a subject to research. Teacher guidance states, “Discuss cyber safety with the children. Explain the following rules. Go only to websites that adults have told you are okay to visit. Never give out any personal information when you are online. Do not tell anyone your name, phone number, or password. Never agree to meet someone in person. Tell your parents or teacher if anything you see online makes you feel scared or uncomfortable.” During Independent Study, teachers can have students conduct an internet search using a user-friendly URL and entering keywords to find information that answers the research question.