About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: MyPerspectives | ELA
ELA 6-8
The instructional materials for myPerspectives 6-8 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. The materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around topics/themes to grow students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.
There is sufficient support provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. The materials also include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
ELA High School
The instructional materials for myPerspectives 9-12 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. The materials include opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Units are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.
There is sufficient support provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. The materials also include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations.
9th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
10th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
11th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
12th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 8th Grade
Alignment Summary
The grade 8 myPerspectives materials meet the expectations for alignment. The materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence.
Throughout the program, there are multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge about what they are reading and learning through speaking and listening tasks. Students also have many opportunities to practice their writing both in on-demand and process writing tasks. While students engage in informative or expository, argumentative, and narrative writing, the opportunities do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. In addition, well-designed explicit writing instruction guidance is inconsistent or lacking in some areas. While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary in a systematic way, the explicit instruction of some grammar and usage standards is inconsistent or, in some cases, lacking.
The materials are grouped around topics/themes to grow students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. There are high-quality questions and tasks that are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and require students to use textual evidence. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.
The pacing for the five units in the program is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.
8th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 22 informational texts and 14 literary texts resulting in a 61/39 balance, which exceeds the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards. Throughout the program, there are opportunities for students to read a variety of texts at various levels of complexity throughout each unit and throughout the school year.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as the relationship to their associated student task. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence.
The program provides varied protocols to support students’ speaking and listening skills across the year’s scope of instructional materials. There are multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge about what they are reading and learning through speaking and listening tasks.
Throughout the program, there are various on-demand and process writing opportunities. There is a year-long writing program consisting of a 38/43/19 balance of argumentative, informative, or explanatory, and narrative writing activities, which does not reflect the 35/35/30 distribution required by the standards. While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary in a systematic way, the explicit instruction of some grammar and usage standards is inconsistent or, in some cases, lacking.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary. Texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards, including, but not limited to, poetry, science fiction stories, argumentative essays, and historical accounts. Over the course of the school year, materials include 22 informational texts and 14 literary texts resulting in a 61/39 balance, which exceeds the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for the anchor and series of texts, the explicit analysis of the complexity of the associated reader and task is not provided.
Throughout the program, there are opportunities for students to read a variety of texts at various levels of complexity throughout each unit and throughout the school year. Each unit consists of complex texts that, when paired with literacy activities, promote literacy skills and reading independence over time. Students read 36 texts during Whole-Class and Small-Group learning. Students are provided with Independent reading tasks centered around the topics and themes provided for each unit. Students have opportunities to read text types and genres such as, but not limited to, historical fiction, poetry, memoirs, dramas, and opinions.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
Anchor texts are well-crafted and content rich. The texts are rich in language and academic vocabulary. The combination of short stories, argumentative essays, classic dramas, scientific articles, and videos offer rich diversity which should appeal to a variety of student interests.
Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read "The Medicine Bag" by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and learn about an important milestone in a young Native American boy’s life. Students gain understanding of milestones such as family traditions and loss of a loved one while reading this story to best respond to the essential question, “What are some milestones on the path to growing up?” The text is well-crafted as students gain understanding of aging, cultural traditions, and different perceptions throughout the entirety of the text.
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from the graphic novel Maus by Art Spiegelman. This excerpt examines the plight of Jews in Nazi Germany. Art Spiegelman created this account based on his father who lived and survived the Holocaust as a Polish Jew. This excerpt has complex layers of meaning and complex characterization. It also invites students to learn about the terrible consequences suffered by those wishing to escape Nazi-controlled countries during the Holocaust.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All?” by Vicky Baez. Through this biography, students learn about a man whose name is often misassociated with the contemporary vehicle but, in fact, should be as famous as that of Thomas Edison. The text allows students a look into the world of science and invention.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1b.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards including, but not limited to, poetry, science fiction stories, argumentative essays, and historical accounts. Over the course of the school year, materials include 22 informational texts and 14 literary texts resulting in a 61/39 balance, which exceeds the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small Group Learning, students read “Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize” by Elie Wiesel. In this speech, the author shares his experience in a concentration camp during WWll, and calls for an end to injustice in our world.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly. In this opinion piece, the author argues that social health policies may require people to give up freedoms, but are necessary to change people’s health status.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, which is a classic short story.
Materials reflect a balance of informational and literary texts that support the 55/45 balance required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, students read eight core texts. In this unit, 25% of the texts are informational and 75% of the texts are literary.
In Unit 2, Holocaust, students read six core texts. In this unit, 67% of the texts are informational and 33% of the texts are literary.
In Unit 3, What Matters, students read eight core texts. In this unit, 100% of the texts are informational and 0% of the texts are literary.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, students read seven core texts. In this unit, 43% of the texts are informational and 57% of the texts are literary.
Throughout the year students read 36 texts, 22 or 69% of which are informational texts and 14 or 31% of which are literary texts.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, as well as the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for the anchor and series of texts, the explicit analysis of the complexity of the associated reader and task is not provided. In the Teacher’s Edition Planning section for each unit, a Text Complexity Rubric offers a quantitative and qualitative analysis for each text in the unit. Quantitative measures include a Lexile score and word count for each text. The qualitative analysis measures the following: knowledge demands, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and levels of meaning and purpose. The texts have a Lexile range from 560L to 1420L, and have been rated from slightly complex to very complex. For those texts that fall below grade level they are rated moderately complex due to the relationship between the qualitative measures and the associated student task. Prior to the Text Complexity Rubric, each text includes a Summary, Insight, Connection to Essential Question, and Connection to Performance Tasks. The Planning pages provide suggestions for different ways teachers can help students connect to the text and associated tasks.
Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read "The Setting Sun and the Rolling World" by Charles Mungoshi, which has an overall level of complexity of Moderate. The text has a Lexile of 800, which is below grade level. The qualitative measure is Moderately Complex and the approximate Reader and Task level is Meets. For the task, students conduct research and complete a group informational report. Students will engage with more than one storyline and encounter complex sentences and fairly complex language.
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read “from Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl” by Anne Frank, which has an overall level of complexity of Complex. The text has a level of 1010 which is on grade level. The qualitative measure is Slightly Complex. The letters are broken up with dates, which makes it easier to track what is happening and naturally chunks the text. The text is conversational and easy to follow. Among other tasks, students engage in a text-based discussion. The approximate reader and task levels is Meets.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read from Blue Nines and Red Words from Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet, which has an overall level of Very Complex. The text has a level of 1200 which is above grade level. The qualitative measure is Moderately Complex. The text contains topics, especially related to math, that may be unfamiliar to students, however, the structure is straightforward. Among other tasks, students engage and develop an analysis of the text. The approximate reader and task levels is Meets.
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level; however, there is no complexity analysis for the associated task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a “Reading Support” section located in the Teachers Edition for the unit that provides the quantitative and qualitative score, with a description and teaching guidance for supporting students.
Although there is not an explicit rationale clearly stated for each text, there is an explicitly stated connection to the unit topic, essential question, and task for each text.
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.
The materials support the development of students’ literacy over the course of the school year. The materials provide an opportunity for students to read a variety of texts at various levels of complexity throughout each unit and throughout the school year. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 560L to 1420L, and the qualitative measures are Slightly Complex to Very Complex. Each unit consists of complex texts that, when paired with literacy activities, promote literacy skills and reading independence over time. Through appropriate scaffolds and support materials located in the Teacher’s Edition, the program supports the literacy growth of all students. Teachers are provided with resources to build background knowledge, guide language demands, and help students identify the meaning of each text.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The quantitative and qualitative complexity of texts in each unit is as follows:
Unit 1, 560L to 920L, Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex
Unit 2, 770L to 990L, Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex
Unit 3, 830L to 1250L, Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex
Unit 4, 1120L to 1200L, Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex
Unit 5, 850L to 1420L, Slightly Complex to Very Complex
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve (920L). Although the quantitative measure of this text is below grade level, the qualitative measure is Moderately Complex. Overall, this Moderately Complex text provides students with the opportunity to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to the characters, setting, and plot, providing an objective summary of the text. After answering four questions that help students recall important details from the story, they write a “three-sentence summary” in their notebooks. The Teacher’s Edition provides support for this activity by prompting students to include details such as: “Martin is initially embarrassed by Grandpa; Grandpa has come to give Martin his medicine bag; Martin doesn’t want the medicine bag; and Martin is given the medicine bag and comes to accept his Native American heritage.” Students began to understand this rite of passage as a central idea of the text. During the Close Read and final activities, students see the development of this idea throughout the text. Also, in Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read the poems “Hanging Fire” by Audre Lorde and “Translating Grandfather’s House” by E.J. Vega. Since these are poems, they do not have an assigned quantitative measure or overall level of complexity. Students determine a theme or central idea of these texts. Before students begin the reading, the teacher suggests several questions that support students in analyzing the important connections within the poems. After students read the poems, they compare them to consider what they have learned about growing up. There is a class discussion on the theme of this text. In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. There is no quantitative measure assigned because it is considered Non-Prose (NP); however, due to its literary complexity, the text is Moderately Complex qualitatively, and the associated task meets grade-level expectations. After completing the reading, students engage in Analyzing Craft and Structure. For this activity, students answer several questions about the theme of the story and the central message that it conveys about life. The teacher explains to students “that the theme of a piece of literature is not the same as its topic.” The teacher guides students’ understanding of the theme by explaining that it is what the author has to say about a topic and involves insights and ideas. Since the theme of this story is implied, students must use their knowledge of the setting, characters, and plot to determine the message the author is trying to convey. Students respond to five questions that examine the point of view used in the story to the use of allusions to determine the possible theme suggested by Charlie’s experience. As the units progress, tasks associated with the theme and central idea increase in complexity.
In Unit 2, Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read “Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize'' by Elie Wiesel (770L). Although the reading level is Below Grade Level, students still have to sift through Moderately Complex contexts to make meaning from the text. Overall, this is a Moderately complex text. One of the tasks students complete with this text supports their vocabulary development. Before students begin reading, they practice using a dictionary and thesaurus to compare entries for the following words: humiliation, persecuted, and traumatized. After they finish reading, they determine why the three words are related, and then they add another word to the category of words that has a similar meaning. Students then confirm their understanding of the words by correctly using each word in a sentence. In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly (1180L). The quantitative level of this text is Above Grade Level. The qualitative level of this text is Moderately Complex. Overall, this text is considered Very Complex. Before reading, students rank the words impose, rational, justifiable, principle, and status quo according to their own level of familiarity with the words. When they finish the reading, the concept words help the author discuss rules and laws. Students answer two questions about the words, such as: “How is each concept vocabulary word related to the author’s argument about the new law in New York?” and “What other words in the selection connect to rules or laws?” Students also use each concept vocabulary word in a sentence that shows their understanding of the word. Then students find a synonym or word with a similar meaning. In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from The Invention of Everything Else by Samantha Hunt (880L). They complete a study of the concept vocabulary words (deficiencies, triumph, and revolutionized) before and after reading. However, the complexity of this lesson is found in the Word Study section, which emphasizes Denotation and Connotation. In order to demonstrate their understanding of denotation, students find a synonym for each of the concept vocabulary words and discuss the connotations of each pair of words. The teacher can provide more support for teaching denotation and connotation by providing a Concept Vocabulary and Word Study worksheet. As the units progress, the complexity of vocabulary tasks, increases.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Introduction, Launch Text, students read “Red Roses” by Dina McClellan (560L), which is below the Lexile stretch band. This Slightly Complex quantitative text has an overall rating of Moderate and is positioned early in the unit, so that students can work towards mastery of independent reading. This text also serves as a model for nonfiction narrative writing that students can refer to as they complete the performance tasks throughout the unit. The Teacher’s Edition prompts teachers to have “students pay attention to the way the narrator’s attitude changes as the story goes on.” As they read the nonfiction narrative, the teacher asks questions to help students consider the narrator’s reactions and the descriptive details that the author uses to tell the story. After reading, the teacher supports students as they write a summary of the text. They provide students with the following tips for writing a summary:
“Write in the present tense.
Make sure to include the title of the work.
Be concise: a summary should not be equal in length to the original text.
If you need to quote the words of the author, use quotation marks.
Don’t put your own opinion into the summary. The purpose of writing a summary is to accurately represent what the author says, not to provide a critique.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from Blue Nines and Red Words from Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet (1200L). In this Above Level text, students are exposed to a Moderately Complex qualitative reading experience, including challenging concepts, such as the author’s unique perspective on daily interactions. Overall this Very Complex text is challenging and requires the teacher to provide scaffolds and background knowledge to support the meaning of the text. For those that need Strategic Support, the teacher prompts students to read the background information from the text. Students determine the knowledge they already have about autism and Asperger’s syndrome. The teacher helps students understand that these conditions may give people special abilities, and that is what this text is about. The teacher has students understand the higher-level perspective provided by Tammet by recording examples of what he sees or experiences when he experiences different numbers, people, places, problems, and emotions. By tracing the patterns, students can gain insight into his perceptions.
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Uncle Marcos” from The House of Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin (1420L). The text contains long, complex sentences, challenging vocabulary, mystical references (divines, amulet), and figurative language. As students conduct a Close Read, the teacher is given notes to guide the learning. As students read paragraph five, they are introduced to a crystal ball that seems magical, yet it is also an ordinary object because it served as a buoy from a fishing boat. The teacher points this out to students to see if they think the author included this detail to show that there are two ways to see a crystal ball—“as a source of insight or as a tool of deception and fraud.” Students analyze this detail and decide how it develops the character traits of Uncle Marcos, and adds an element of humor to the story. This supports students when they have to write a critical review of Uncle Marcos’s character in Writing to Sources. In order to set students up to Analyze an Argument, the teacher has them conduct a WriteNow activity to Analyze and Interpret pieces of the text that will eventually help them state a claim regarding Uncle Marcos as an inventor or an eccentric man with crazy ideas. In this activity, students brainstorm evidence to support each side of the argument. They write these down in a two-column chart. Once they solidify the evidence to support their claim, they will then have counterarguments to use in their writing for the critical review of the text.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.
The materials clearly identify opportunities for students to engage in reading a wide variety of text types and genres. Students read 36 texts during Whole-Class and Small-Group learning. Students are provided with Independent reading tasks that are centered around the topics and themes provided for each unit. Students have opportunities to read text types and genres such as, but not limited to, historical fiction, poetry, memoirs, dramas, and opinions. Students are provided with graphic organizers, note-catchers, and evidence logs to support their independent reading. The teacher’s edition provides sufficient guidance to foster independence in reading, including, but not limited to, prompts and scaffolds such as a reading plan. Guidance is also provided to help teachers support students with independent reading choices such as, but not limited to, guiding questions and text complexity charts.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, students read eight texts in all, six literary and two informational texts. Texts are tied to the theme, Rites of Passage, and students reflect and respond throughout the anchor and supporting texts to the essential question, “What are some milestones on the path to growing up?”
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, students read The Diary of Anne Frank, Acts l and ll by Anne Frank. One of the unit goals is to “read nonfiction narratives and arguments to better understand the ways writers express ideas.” After reading, students write an argument that evaluates the quality of the piece to “inspire readers to take action, or discourage action.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, includes Whole-Group Learning with two versions of Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes and David Rogers. Students compare the short story by Keyes to the adapted drama by Rogers in a compare/contrast essay.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, and the Teacher’s Edition for each unit, the time for students to engage with texts during the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class learning, Small-Group learning, and Independent Learning is similar. There is one day for the Launch Text during the Unit Introduction, 12 days for Whole-Class Learning, 11 days for Small-Group Learning, and two days for Independent Learning. In the Teacher’s Edition, a text box in the margin notes, “Each day in this pacing calendar represents a 40–50 minute class period. Teachers using block scheduling may combine days to reflect their class schedule.” These opportunities to engage with multiple texts and a volume of reading are consistent across the school year.
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read two texts over 12 classes or six blocks. In Small-Group Learning, students read four texts over 11 regular classes or five blocks. Students end the unit by reading one independent choice text over two classes or one block before the final performance task. The Teacher’s Edition provides a pacing guide for each unit and suggests ideas for supporting the needs of various students in the wrap-around materials.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit has Independent Reading that is connected to the topics and themes presented in the main texts. Teachers instruct students to preview the choices for independent reading and choose one title. Prompts such as, “Think about what you have already studied. What more do you want to know about the topic of imagination?” help students decide which text to read. After selecting a book, students create a schedule, practice strategies from Whole-Class and Small-Group lessons, and take notes. Each independent text includes a Text Complexity Rubric as well. Graphic organizers are provided for first and close reads. Teacher materials also provide a guide for students to share their independent learning.
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The materials include tasks, questions, and assignments that connect to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence.
The program provides varied protocols to support students’ speaking and listening skills across the year’s scope of instructional materials. Students engage in discussion throughout each unit through classroom discussions, small group discussions, and culminating discussions. There are multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge about what they are reading and learning through speaking and listening tasks.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include various types of essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. There is a year-long writing program consisting of a 38/43/19 balance of argumentative, informative, or explanatory, and narrative writing activities, which does not reflect the 35/35/30 distribution required by the standards. Throughout the year, the students receive writing instruction and opportunities to write in each mode. There are frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing while using evidence.
While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary in a systematic way, the explicit instruction of some grammar and usage standards is inconsistent or, in some cases, lacking.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.
The tasks, questions, and assignments connect to the text students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Every unit includes a section for a Model Annotation and an Evidence Log. There are sections to help students conduct an analysis of a text, a close reading of the text, and an analysis of the language used in the text. Students provide textual evidence to support their responses to questions for every story in every unit. There are multiple opportunities for teachers to model annotating the text and for students to practice this skill in a small group setting. During independent learning, students complete tasks that require text-based evidence for completion. At the end of each unit, students use their Evidence Log to complete a Performance-Based Assessment based on the Essential Question for the unit.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read "The Setting Sun and the Rolling World" by Charles Mungoshi. During a close read, the students are asked to “...mark details in paragraph 26 that use figurative language to describe the conflict between the father and son.” After reading, students use a graphic organizer to compare and contrast the point of view of the father and son. Then students write an answer for the following prompt, “Use the details in your chart to identify key differences in the points of view of Old Musoni and Nhamo. How do these differences develop the plot?”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read "Soda’s a Problem, But..." by Karin Klein. Students complete a close read and answer the question. In paragraph 4, “Why do you think the author repeats this term?” Students complete questions to analyze the text, such as, “Make inferences in paragraph 3 of ‘Ban the Ban!,’ What does the author mean by the phrase “a very slippery slope?” Support: Which details in the text support your thinking?”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Group Learning, students read the short story, “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. In addition to students completing the Close Read protocol of Notice, Annotate, Connect, Respond, students also answer text-specific questions in the Comprehension Check. At the conclusion of the first read analysis and discussion, students engage in deeply analyzing Craft and Structure by determining the point of view, theme and developing claims about specific paragraphs from the text.
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a Decide and Plan section for teachers that provides guidance on how to provide support for all students using appropriate scaffolds, modeling, and enrichment all based around text analysis.
Units all contain teacher notes throughout that include places in the texts students may need additional vocabulary or comprehension support, scaffolded questions, and support for all learners. The Teacher’s Edition supports the system for annotating, noticing, and connecting by highlighting the key places in the text to show where students should look for answers.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read "Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All?" by Vicky Baez. Teachers are given the following guidance: “If needed, model close reading by using the Annotation Highlights in the interactive Teacher’s Edition. Remind students to use Accountable Talk in their discussions and to support one another as they complete the close read. You might want to print copies of the Close Read Guide: Nonfiction for students to use.”
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ speaking and listening skills across the year’s scope of instructional materials. Students engage in discussion throughout the unit through classroom discussions, small group discussions, and culminating discussions. Students are provided with a variety of structures to support their text-based discussions including, but not limited to, goal setting, graphic organizers, and reflection. Teachers are provided with speaking and listening guidance for most discussions with structure including, but not limited to, instructional videos, completed graphic organizers, prompts, and sentence starters for struggling students. Teachers facilitate discussions throughout each unit and over the course of the school year.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Conversation and Discussion guide for middle school. This web-based tool gives specific guidelines and directions on discussions such as:
Leading a Group Discussion
Formal Group Discussion Guidelines
Informal Group Discussion Guidelines
Debates
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for leading a group discussion: “Here are some guidelines for leading a group discussion:
Introduce the topic and purpose of the discussion.
Lay out any rules for the discussion.
Make sure that no one talks so much that others don’t get a fair turn. Invite and encourage contributions from all participants.
Try to keep speakers from going off into topics that aren’t related to the subject of the discussion.
At the end of the discussion, give a summary of the results of the discussion and any decisions that were made.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Formal Group discussion guidelines: “Here are some tips for successful discussions in a formal setting:
Limit your use of informal (everyday, casual) speech in a formal discussion. Informal speech is also called colloquial speech or language.
Manners are important in any discussion. Make sure you allow others to speak, and do not interrupt.
Avoid using too much exclamatory language, or dramatic language. A little goes a long way.
Diction, or the use of proper vocabulary related to the topic of the discussion, is an important element of a discussion.
Stay focused on the subject under discussion. Avoid jumping in with different issues or unrelated remarks or stories.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Informal Group discussion guidelines: “An informal discussion is open-ended. Participants are free to speak in a more conversational manner, but most rules still apply.
Speech may be more informal but should still maintain a polite code of conduct.
Dramatic and exclamatory remarks help emphasize your point of view, but if you use them too much, they become less effective.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Practices that make for good Debates: “During the debate, be sure to follow these practices:
Be courteous and listen to your opponent's point of view; allow others the opportunity to speak.
If you are debating as a team, support your team members.
Speak only when it is your turn, and follow the moderator's instructions.
Speak clearly, slowly, and loudly enough to be heard and understood by the audience.
Speak with spirit, enthusiasm, and conviction.”
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a PDF download for monitoring speaking and listening standards. This resource defines a group, provides a graphic organizer for preparing for discussion, and a graphic organizer for students to keep track of who and what ideas were presented and discussed in the group.
Materials include teacher support in Annotating the Text and Participating in Discussion. This video shows a teacher and a group of students discussing texts. The video focuses more on how and what to annotate in the text. The video also has students telling the benefits of discussion for them as learners.
Materials include support in Facilitating Peer-Group Learning. This video shows students working in a group to fill out a chart. The teacher gives directions to a group including roles, and focus of discussion. Teachers refer to charts and checklists to monitor group discussions. Teachers model taking anecdotal notes during discussion including giving specific feedback to students.
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read "from Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl" by Anne Frank and teachers facilitate a collaborative group discussion. Teachers guide students to draft questions for the group discussion in which they do not have firm opinions. Teachers are guided to remind students, “that the purpose of the discussion is as much to learn from others as it is to contribute one’s own ideas.”
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.
The materials provide multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge about what they are reading and learning through speaking and listening tasks. Students practice these skills during tasks through discussions with partners, small groups, and the whole class. The tasks require students to connect to evidence from texts, build on others’ ideas, and present information to an audience. Students synthesize and analyze evidence from texts to create presentation products. Opportunities to practice presentation skills such as eye contact, volume, and use of multimedia resources are also available. In addition, students are given opportunities to evaluate and incorporate multimedia resources.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Come to discussions prepared, having read or researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read the poems “Hanging Fire” by Audre Lorde and “Translating Grandfather’s House” by E. J. Vega. Students prepare for a group discussion about the poems, drawing from the texts to explore the following questions:
“Explore the aspects of growing up that are descriptive in each poem. Are these experiences specific to the speakers or more universal in nature? Support your ideas with details from the poems and your own experience.
Compare and contrast the speakers in the two poems. In what ways are they similar? How do they differ? Would the two become friends if they were to meet? Use details from the prime to support your analysis.”
Students use a chart to “Identify examples from the text that support [their] ideas. Record the examples in the chart, and write notes and ideas related to the discussion topic. Then, join with others in your group and compare notes.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students watch an autobiographical video, “The Moth Presents Aleeza Kazmi.” Students prepare for the discussion by finding text-based examples that support one of the following questions:
“How does Kazmi’s story support the idea that it is important to stand up for yourself and your beliefs?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of sharing hobbies and interests with family or friends?”
Then they are instructed to “Listen to the ideas of other members of your [their] group and consider the ways in which they are similar to and different from your own. To connect your own ideas with the ideas of other group members, ask questions that help to clarify the relationship between the different ideas expressed. Use your notes to support your ideas when responding to questions from other group members. Don’t be afraid to change your ideas or views if another group member offers new thoughts or information you agree with.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from the novel The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende. After reading “Uncle Marcos,” students prepare for a class discussion about the episode involving Uncle Marcos and his mechanical bird. A chart is available in the Student Edition to help peers review each other during the discussion. It includes the following criteria and asks students to “Rate each statement on a scale of 1 (not demonstrated) to a 5 (demonstrated):
The participants were prepared for the discussion.
The participants cited specific passages and examples from the texts to support ideas.
The participants built on one another’s ideas and expressed their own clearly.
The participants posed questions that connected ideas.
The participants responded to questions and comments with relevant evidence, observations, and ideas.”
Follow rules for collegial discussions and decision-making, track progress toward specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read "Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize" by Elie Wiesel. The students conduct a discussion on one of two quotes expressed by Wiesel in his Acceptance Speech. Students assign roles such as notetaker, timekeeper, and group leader to keep the discussion flowing. The Teacher’s Edition provides discussion guidance for the students, such as “Emphasize that students should not seek to dominate the discussion by talking the longest or by dismissing the ideas of others.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, students deliver a multimedia presentation for the End of Unit Performance Task and respond to “How does each selection highlight a different way to be intelligent?” During this presentation, the Teacher Guide encourages students, “As students provide feedback to the presenting group, remind them that they should be polite and respectful when offering suggestions.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Overview, Small-Group Learning, students learn several strategies that support Working as a Team. The Student Edition provides directions for Working on Group Projects: “As your group works together, you’ll find it more effective if each person has a specific role. Different projects require different roles. Before beginning a project, discuss the necessary roles and choose one for each group member. Here are some possible roles:
Project Manager: monitors the schedule and keeps everyone on task
Researcher: organizes research activities, and
Recorder: takes notes during group meetings.”
Integrate multimedia and visual displays into presentations to clarify information, strengthen claims and evidence, and add interest. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read You Are the Electric Boogaloo-Just Be Yourself! by Geoff Herback and Stephanie Pellgrin. In small groups, students are asked to “conduct research for a visual presentation” on one of two possible topics related to the text. Both options include the creation of an illustrated medium that focuses on break-dancing, the main topic of the text. The group is asked to plan the task and organize their thinking before creating the medium. They conduct independent research before meeting as a group to organize ideas and assign tasks to each member of the group.
In Unit 2, Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students create and present an explanatory multimedia presentation about the ways one of the texts helps contribute to the reader’s understanding of the Holocaust and the ways that people remember the past. While developing the presentation, the text box at the bottom of page 242 in the Teacher’s Edition provides four tips on using media and visuals strategically:
“Students should ensure that each piece of media has a specific purpose and is not mere ‘filler.’
Encourage students to let the content of the presentation drive their decisions about which media support to include rather than finding appealing media and trying to force fit into a presentation where it might not work.
Remind groups that although media and visuals can enhance a presentation, the content of what students say during the presentation is most important.
Ultimately, the presentation should be able to stand alone without media support and still make sense”
The presentations are evaluated for Content, Use of Media, and Presentation Techniques. The use of media criteria includes: “The use of photographs, illustrations, and other still images supports the presentation, and Videos, recorded interviews, and other multimedia enhance and clarify the presentation.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative speech. The text states that one of the criteria for an effective informative speech or text is the inclusion of “headings, charts, tables, other graphics, or multimedia elements to help illustrate ideas related to the topic.” The informative essay is evaluated on Focus and Organization, Evidence and Elaboration, and Conventions. One of the Focus and Organization components includes: “Organize supporting information and explanations in a way that is easy to understand, possibly including graphical or multimedia elements.”
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Pose questions that connect the ideas of several speakers and respond to others’ questions and comments with relevant evidence, observations, and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, End of Unit, Performance Task, students present a multimedia presentation. Students are encouraged to listen and evaluate group presentations based on their understanding of the texts. The Teacher’s Edition provides questions for students to consider before the presentations begin. For example, “What information does the group present that tells how people fought back against Nazi rule?” Students are guided to be prepared to ask questions after the presentation.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students watch the video “The Moth Presents: Aleeza Kazmi.” In the margin of the Teacher’s Edition, the text suggests providing support for the students as they discuss. The teacher explains that the students can “use the notes that they have taken so that they can support their points with evidence from the video. As they pose questions to each other about different points, encourage them to try to stay on topic, always keeping the discussion prompt in mind.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver a multimedia presentation. The presentation is a response to the following question: “How does each selection highlight a different way to be intelligent?” As students prepare, they must gather media examples such as “charts, graphs, photos, video, or other visuals” to engage the audience. Before beginning the presentations, the Teacher’s Edition has suggestions to help the audience learn:
“What claim about each selection did the group make?
What were some of the supporting ideas?
Which multimedia worked best to support the ideas?”
Acknowledge new information expressed by others, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, the students read diary entries from Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank. To practice Effective Expression, the teacher has the students reread the excerpt to engage in a collaborative group discussion. During the Discussion, the students consider the following: “Think about new ideas or information expressed by others, and consider the ways in which these ideas and information confirm your view or change your perspective.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students watch the video “The Moth Presents: Aleeza Kazmi” by Aleeza Kazmi. After taking notes focused on the “details in the video that explain how and why Aleeza Kazmi takes a stand.” After viewing the video and gathering ideas, the students participate in a group discussion. Using sections of the video that address specific central ideas, inferences, descriptive details, direct quotes, and places of emphasis, students analyze Kazmi’s speech. During the discussion, the students address both the internal and external conflicts and the ways in which she resolves them. Students are encouraged to use their notes in the discussion. The Teacher’s Edition provides the following guidance to develop the discussions: “As they pose questions to each other about different points, encourage them to try to stay on topic, always keeping the discussion prompt in mind.” Students are also reminded that they should not be “afraid to change [their] ideas or views if another group member offers new thought or information that [they] agree with, provided that the ideas are well supported with evidence.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Launch Text, students read the argumentative text “Inspiration is Overrated!'' by an anonymous author. When they conclude the reading, they complete a Four-Corner Debate in response to the following statement: “Inventing takes one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.” Students decide if they Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree with the statement. Then they join their classmates that think about the statement the same way they do. One person shares a summary of the group’s beliefs and examples with the entire class. After the debate, students decide if their opinion has changed. If it has, they go to the corner that represents their new opinion and visit with their new group about the position.
Analyze the purpose of information presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and evaluate the motives (e.g., social, commercial, political) behind its presentation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read "Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize” by Elie Wiesel and conduct a discussion on one of two quotes expressed by Wiesel in the speech. Students evaluate Wiesel’s written speech and determine the meaning behind his words influenced by his experiences during the Holocaust. Students analyze a quote from paragraph eight in the speech, “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” by National Geographic. After reading the magazine article, students watch the video “Barrington Irving: Got 30 Dollars in My Pocket.” In Digital Perspectives, Illuminating the text, the students are asked to discuss their impressions of Barrington Irving compared with the article. Students also discuss their feelings about Irving that they got from the video but not from reading the article.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read "The Theory of Multiple Intelligences Infographic" by Howard Gardner. Students learn that people have different ways of learning, processing, and demonstrating intelligence. After reading, students are asked to Analyze the Media. Students are required to use “specific examples to support [their] response” to questions. Examples of these questions are:
“How do the captions and labels in the infographic enhance your understanding of the different ways in which people can be intelligent?
What are the advantages of presenting the information about multiple intelligences in an infographic?
What has this infographic taught you about the different ways people can be intelligent?”
Delineate a speaker's argument and specific claims, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and relevance and sufficiency of the evidence and identifying when irrelevant evidence is introduced. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, Launch Text, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot and Educator” by National Geographic. Students are asked to create and deliver a “persuasive presentation that highlights the benefits of [an] organization or program” mentioned in the article. There are a series of questions provided by the teacher that students must consider as they make their claim and support their argument to the class.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read "Retort," a poem by Paul Laurence Dunbar. Students deliver a multimedia presentation as part of the Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus. They review their analysis and notes to decide what type of intelligence is featured in the poem. In groups, students write a script developed using media cues. The group member that presents this poem will be evaluated by the teacher and the audience on the following questions:
“What claim did the group make?
What were the supporting ideas?
What multimedia worked best to support the ideas?”
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read “25 Years Later, Hubble Sees Beyond Troubled Start” by Dennis Overbye. To practice Effective Expression, students engage in a debate where they respond to one of the following propositions:
“Proposition 1: Learning about the universe with a space telescope, such as Hubble, is a worthwhile pursuit that should be endorsed and well funded.
Proposition 2: The Hubble’s flaws prevent it from providing humans with accurate and useful information about the universe.”
When students prepare for the debate, they “Analyze [their] evidence, and note specific details that support [their] proposition. Based on these notes, [they] make logical connections between the evidence and [their] proposition.”
Present claims and findings, emphasizing salient points in a focused, coherent manner with relevant evidence, sound valid reasoning, and well-chosen details; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, students present a multimedia presentation for the End of Unit Performance Task. They present their research that respond to the prompt, “How do the selections contribute to your understanding of the Holocaust and the ways in which we remember the past?” Students organize their ideas by using a chart that requires them to find evidence that supports the places and people affected in each text and how they are remembered today. Students are evaluated on the following presentation techniques: “Each member uses a formal tone, appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read several selections that present the stories of people who took a stand against something they believed was wrong. In the Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus, groups prepare and deliver an oral presentation that uses the text from this section to answer the question: “When you take a stand, how much does winning matter?” Students use a checklist to evaluate their presentation before they present the final version to the class. The checklist provides several Presentation Techniques that the students are evaluated on by the audience and the teacher:
“Each speaker presents with energy, enthusiasm, and expression.
Speakers do not rush through the presentation, nor do they speak too slowly.
Speakers behave with an appropriate level of formality.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, students deliver a multimedia presentation for the End of Unit Performance Task and respond to “How does each selection highlight a different way to be intelligent?” Students ensure they present claims and findings as well as present in a way that engages their audience. Students create a script for each group member to follow, using relevant evidence represented in one of the texts. The script also shows that the presentation is organized. Under Brush Up On Your Presentations Techniques, students are to “Make sure that [their] script includes only formal English, such as academic vocabulary and complete sentences. Avoid slang, idioms, contractions, run-on sentences, and sentence fragments. Practice delivering your presentation using a formal tone and proper English.”
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include various types of essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. Students are provided step-by-step guidance for each task and a checklist or peer review process. At the end of each Whole-Class Learning section, students complete a writing Performance Task over the course of two days. A Performance-Based Assessment writing task is at the end of each unit with a Unit Reflection. Materials include digital resources where appropriate. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance on how to model each type of writing, including the use of a Launch Text at the opening of the unit that functions as a model for the student’s Performance-Based Assessment. The Teacher’s Edition also includes Digital Perspectives boxes in each unit that often suggest digital resources but do not provide the resource or links to the resources.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, Launch Text, students read “Red Roses” by Dina McClellan. After the first read of the text, students are instructed to produce a QuickWrite about a rite of passage that has been significant in their life. A model Quickwrite is available to help students gather ideas. Students then review their QuickWrite to produce an entry in their Evidence Log. They record text-based details from “Red Roses” that connect to the ideas they produced in their writing sample.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington. In the activities following the reading, the teacher guides the students to discover how the author incorporates sensory details, points of view, and mood to help the reader understand the text. In the margin of the Teacher’s Edition, there is the Make It Interactive section. The teacher instructs the students to “think of a recent event in their lives that they found interesting or exciting. Next, have them write a few sentences about the event in a matter-of-fact way and then with descriptive, lively words.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read Uncle Marcos from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin. After reading the text, students practice Writing to Sources in the section on Effective Expression. They write a critical review of the character, Uncle Marcos, from the story. The review entails an answer to the following question, “In your view, is Uncle Marcos a dreamer, a crackpot, an innovator, a phony, just an unusual person, or something else?” They must state their position, provide an explanation of how the author depicts Uncle Marcos, add evidence that supports the claim, and choose reasons to show why the claim is valid.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, students engage in process writing during the Performance Task: Writing Focus and write a nonfiction narrative that responds to the prompt, “What event changed your understanding of yourself, or that of someone you know?” Students have opportunities for revision and editing during the writing process. One example of practice in revision entails focusing on the conclusion of the essay. For example, “Strengthen your conclusion by reflecting on this relationship and sharing any insights you have gained from making these connections.” One editing focus is on dialogue as the materials prompt students, “As you proofread, make sure that any dialogue—the actual words spoken by people—is enclosed in quotation marks.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task: Writing Focus, after reading the story Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, students are to imagine themselves as Charlie after the intellectual transformation. They use the research and details from the text to produce an Informative Speech that responds to the question, “What has happened to you so far as a result of the experiment, and what do you predict will happen to you as time progresses?” After reviewing the elements of an Informative Speech, students should return to the Launch Text, “The Human Brain,” to review the structure of a text that gives them the opportunity to identify elements of a successful informative text. Students practice Prewriting and Planning by deciding the topic for the speech and preparing several central ideas. They gather ideas and connect to the Anchor Texts. They draft their speech. Once the draft is complete, students complete a lesson on subject-verb agreement. They use this knowledge to revise their speech, making sure the “subjects and verbs agree.” Students are also guided to choose precise, formal words and provide a strong introductory statement to improve the focus and organization of their speech. They receive instructions for adding transitions to improve evidence and elaboration.
In Unit 5, Invention, End of Unit, Performance-Based Assessment, students practice Writing to Sources by developing an argument. They develop a claim about the invention from the unit that has had the biggest impact on humanity. After taking a position, they must use examples from the selections to support their ideas. They also are to write using a formal tone. Once the first draft is completed, students match their work to the rubric. The notes in the margin of the Teacher’s Edition help the students use the rubric to strengthen their writing, “Students should pay attention to the differences between an argument that contains all of the required elements (a score of 3) and one that is comprehensive, engaging, and progresses in a logical and thoughtful manner (a score of 4).” They are instructed to strengthen areas of their writing that may not be meeting the standards for focus and organization, evidence and elaboration, and conventions. They will use the writing task to produce a three- to five-minute speech that introduces their claims.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read the graphic novel Maus by Art Spiegelman. After reading, the teacher guides them to effective research by assigning an informative report. Students are to investigate newspapers, magazines, and websites to learn more about Art Spiegelman. The margin of the Teacher’s Edition suggests using keywords during searches on the Internet, like cartoonist, graphic novels, and Holocaust history, to find more information. They then write a brief informative report in which they discuss how Spiegelman’s personal experiences are reflected in his graphic novel.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Introduction, Current Perspectives, the margin of the Teacher’s Editions suggests showing two videos: “Severn Suzuki at Rio Summit (We Canada” and “Michael Garcia, Waiter who Defended Boy with Special Needs Gives Donations Away” (Huffington Post) prior to engaging in the lessons for this unit. Before starting the unit, the videos will provide ideas about what really matters to people.
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read Uncle Marcos from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin. In the Teacher’s Edition, Author’s Perspective textbox, Elfrieda Hiebert writes about using Digital Tools to enhance vocabulary. After reviewing the Concept Vocabulary and completing the Word Study, the teacher provides the following information, “As students develop and expand their Word Networks, remind them of the digital tools available and of their value. Explain what digital tools offer–pronunciation, audio, word families, definitions, links to synonyms and antonyms, interactive levels of complexity of synonyms and antonyms, and words in context sentences. Using digital tools to access word families is especially helpful in a cross-cultural context. A word family for science, for instance, might include the words botanist, chemist, geneticist, neurologist, nutritionist, physicist, and zoologist, as they all end with the suffix -ist. A word family for westward expansion might be organized around the common concept and so include the words settler, heritage, mission, and manifest destiny. To conclude, help students understand that digital tools also have drawbacks. For instance, the word family feature doesn’t show how the words are related in meaning, only in sound.” However, the links or suggestions on accessing sites that provide word networks or word families are not available in the materials.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.
The materials include a year-long writing program consisting of a 38/43/19 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing activities, which does not reflect the 35/35/30 distribution required by the standards. Throughout the year, the students receive writing instruction and opportunities to write in each mode. The materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year to write in response to tasks that are directly related to the texts and essential questions for each unit.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Two units address argumentative writing. 38% of writing opportunities over five units are argumentative.
Unit 1: There are no opportunities to practice argumentative writing.
Unit 2: There are no opportunities to practice argumentative writing.
Unit 3: There are four opportunities to practice argumentative writing.
Unit 4: There are no opportunities to practice argumentative writing.
Unit 5: There are four opportunities to practice argumentative writing.
Four units address informative/explanatory writing. 43% of writing opportunities over five units are informative/explanatory.
Unit 1: There is one opportunity to practice informative/explanatory writing.
Unit 2: There are four opportunities to practice informative/explanatory writing.
Unit 3: There are no opportunities to practice informative/explanatory writing.
Unit 4: There are three opportunities to practice informative/explanatory writing.
Unit 5: There is one opportunity to practice informative/explanatory writing.
Two units address narrative writing. 19% of writing opportunities over five units are narrative.
Unit 1: There are three opportunities to practice narrative writing.
Unit 2: There are no opportunities to practice narrative writing.
Unit 3: There is one opportunity to practice narrative writing.
Unit 4: There are no opportunities to practice narrative writing.
Unit 5: There are no opportunities to practice narrative writing.
Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:
The Writing and Research Center includes minilessons for argumentative writing, including explicit teaching of claim, reason, evidence, counterclaim, and structure. Skill videos are available, including, but not limited to, asserting importance, eliminating faulty logic, using numerical data for evidence, and selecting a suitable tone for the audience. These can be used for whole-class, small-group, or individual support.
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
The Writing and Research Center includes minilessons for informative/explanatory writing, including explicit teaching of how-to writing, comparison writing, and problem-solution writing. Skill videos are available, including, but not limited to, adding citations, balancing researched information with your own ideas, and using primary and secondary sources. These can be used for whole-class, small-group, or individual support.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
The Writing and Research Center includes minilessons for narrative writing, including explicit teaching of character and setting, plot and theme, and dialogue and language. Skill videos are available, including, but not limited to, writing a strong beginning, building conflict, and using precise word choice. These can be used for whole-class, small-group, or individual support.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce claim(s), acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the reasons and evidence logically. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” by National Geographic. They watch a video with Barrington Irving titled “Got 30 Dollars in My Pocket.” After the reading and video, students write an argumentative essay. They state a claim in response to the following statement: “Having a passion for a subject is more important than having knowledge about it.” Students select evidence from the reading or video to support their claim. The Teacher’s Edition states that “A successful argument contains evidence to support the claim and perhaps to discount any counterclaims, which are claims that disagree with your claim.”
Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant evidence, using accurate, credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Uncle Marcos” from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin, and “To Fly” from Space Chronicles by Neil deGrasse Tyson. After reading both texts, students write an argumentative essay, and they make a claim that answers this question: “Which text-–’Uncle Marcos’ or ‘To Fly’--best describes the dream or fantasy of human flight?” Students clearly state their position and support it with logical reasoning and evidence from the texts. A list of elements that make a successful argument is available in the student text.
Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” by National Geographic, “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly, “Ban the Ban” by SidneyAnne Stone, and “Soda’s a Problem, but Bloomberg Doesn’t Have the Solution” by Karin Klein. Since these texts focus on problems and solutions, students write a problem-and-solution essay that answers the following question: “What is a problem you think needs to be solved? How would you solve it?” As students organize their ideas and evidence, they are instructed to create an outline. The outline consists of an introduction, supporting reasons and evidence organized in a logical order, transition words and phrases that make clear connections between the parts of the essay, and a conclusion that restates the claim. The Teacher’s Edition suggests that they begin with the “strongest, most compelling piece of evidence” to begin their essay.
Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Invention, End of Unit, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argument where they “State and defend a claim about the following question: Which invention described in this unit has had the biggest impact on humanity?” One of the requirements in the assignment is that the students write “using an appropriately formal tone.” In order to earn the highest score of four for this part of the essay, the rubric states that the tone of the argument must be both formal and objective.
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” by National Geographic. After reading, they practice writing an argumentative essay in which they respond to the following statement: “Having a passion for a subject is more important than having knowledge about it.” The text instructs the students to “end with a conclusion that states your claim in a different way.”
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce a topic clearly, previewing what is to follow; organize ideas, concepts, and information into broader categories; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Whole-Group Learning, students read the play Anne Frank, Acts 1 and II by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, and the “Frank Family and World War II Timeline.” Then students write a compare-and-contrast essay in which they “explain similar and different information” that they learned from the texts. They also explain “how each text might be useful for different reading purposes.” During Planning and Prewriting, students compare the techniques used for each text. They fill out a chart where they find information from each text about historical events, the causes of the events, and the effects of the events. Students use this chart to draft an outline of their paper using the block organization structure. They develop their initial ideas, choose strong examples related to the play or the timeline, and write a clear conclusion that explains the value of each medium.”
Develop the topic with relevant, well-chosen facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Setting Sun and Rolling World” by Charles Mungoshi. To deepen their understanding of the story, they are to write an informational report on Zimbabwean healers or traditional family life in Zimbabwe. The students begin by researching encyclopedia articles to get an overview of the topic. Then they look for primary sources or first-hand original accounts of events or happenings such as interviews, transcripts, or letters. As they research, they are to seek out credible sources to obtain facts and other information to show an expansion of their knowledge about Zimbabwe.
Use appropriate and varied transitions to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, the students read “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All?” by Viky Baez and an excerpt from The Invention of Everything Else by Samantha Hunt. Students compose a compare-and-contrast essay that analyzes the way each text reveals aspects of Nikola Tesla’s life and personality. As they organize their draft, the text provides transitional words and phrases such as regardless, despite, and for this reason, which helps writers create cohesion in the essay. The transitions help students connect claims, reasons, and evidence so that the writing is clear. Students then create a cohesive piece of writing that goes through several drafts.
Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keys and a script for the play, “Flowers for Algernon” by David Rogers. For the Performance Task, Writing Focus, students imagine that they are Charlie from the story and write an informative speech. The speech should be one that Charlie would present that explains what has happened up to this point and what he predicts will happen to him in the future. In the list that follows the prompt, students are reminded that “a formal style and precise word choices'' are elements of an informative speech. The Teacher’s Edition has the teacher prompt students to provide “vivid details for describing how Charlie may present this speech” while revising their essay. The Teacher’s Edition also prompts the teacher to inform students that they should “review their notes on the text and the video” to find scientific words that Charlie would use in his speech. Students are also reminded that informational texts usually have definitions when confusing words that are specific to the topic are added. For clarity, it is suggested that students define words in their essays that might be difficult for the reader to understand.
Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, the students read from Anne Frank: The Diary of Anne Frank by Anne Frank, the Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, and Maus by Art Spiegelman. For the Performance Task, Speaking and Listening Focus, students write and present an explanatory multimedia presentation that answers the question: “How do the selections contribute to your understanding of the Holocaust and the ways in which we remember the past?” During the time that students rehearse the presentation, they are reminded to use both a formal tone and formal English when speaking to the class.
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Whole-Group Learning, students read the play Anne Frank, Acts 1 and II by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, and the “Frank Family and World War II Timeline.” For the Performance Task, Writing Focus, the students use both sources to write an explanatory essay on the following question: “How are historical events reflected in the play The Diary of Anne Frank?” Students learn that one of the elements of an explanatory essay is a logical organization pattern and an effective conclusion. In order to build an effective conclusion, students must make a judgment about how well the authors of the play show the influence of large historical events in the outside world on the interior world of the attic. The conclusion must follow logically from the information presented in the essay.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Engage and orient the reader by establishing a context and point of view and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. They write a retelling of the story “from Grandpa’s point of view.” Students should include “details, thoughts, feeling[s], and insights from Grandpa’s point of view. After students consider options for their creation, the teacher reminds them that “when they rewrite the story from Grandpa’s point of view, they will express and write about only what Grandpa sees and thinks.”
Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, the students read “The Setting Sun and the Rolling World” by Charles Mungoshi. In the Teacher’s Edition, Introduction, Personalize for Learning, Reading Support offers a Challenge exercise for students. The Written Response gives students a chance to practice writing the dialogue of a conflict between two modern characters. It corresponds with the story because the conflict should be between a parent and a teenager.
Use a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence, signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another, and show the relationships among experiences and events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and “Apache Girl’s Rite of Passage” by National Geographic. For the Performance Task, Writing Focus, students write a “nonfiction narrative that answers this question: What event changed your understanding of yourself, or that of someone you know?” The Student’s Edition provides an instructional sequence to help students create cohesion by using transitions. It begins with examples of sentences from the Launch Text that use transitions. There is a chart containing the choices of transitions that an author might use to improve cohesion and clarity among ideas in a piece of writing. Students can choose transitions that match what they would like to convey in their writing. For example, if a student wanted to “list or add ideas, you [they] should consider using first of all, second, next, last, or in addition. After the lesson, the Teacher’s Edition suggests that students revise their drafts, using transitions to improve the clarity and cohesion of their narratives.
Use precise words and phrases, relevant descriptive details, and sensory language to capture the action and convey experiences and events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington. While analyzing the craft and structure of the story, the Teacher’s Edition provides support for English Language Learners when finding and using sensory details in writing. For Emerging learners, students write three sentences about an excerpt that they choose that includes sensory details. In their sentences, they address the senses that the author appeals to. Expanding learners write a paragraph with a partner where they share their opinion about why the author chose to use those sensory details. Bridging Learners write a few paragraphs that describe their excerpt and then discuss the reasons they think the author describes the events as she does. The teacher encourages these students to present their essays to the class. Discovering the details will help students write the fictional retelling from another character’s perspective when they get to the Writing to Sources activity.
Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on the narrated experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “You are the Electric Boogaloo” by Geoff Herbach, “Just Be Yourself!” by Stephanie Pellegrin, “Hanging Fire” by Audre Lorde, “Translating Grandfather’s House” by E. J. Vega, and “The Setting Sun and Rolling World” by Charles Mungosshi. Before presenting their Performance Task for Speaking and Listening, student groups write a series of nonfiction narratives that answer the question: “What defines an event or experience in a young person’s life as a milestone or rite of passage?” As they draft and organize their presentation, they are reminded to make sure their draft “has an introduction, a clear sequence of events, and a meaningful conclusion.”
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read "The Medicine Bag" by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. Students complete a Write Now task to write a paragraph “…predicting Martin’s behavior when he returns to Iowa.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, students write argumentative essays regarding the persuasiveness of the texts they read. The prompt guides students to use evidence directly found in these texts. For example, “Write an argumentative essay in which you state a claim about which of the three arguments you found most convincing. To support your claim, analyze the facts and other information the three authors include. Consider these questions:
What facts do all three authors include?
Do they use any conflicting information—facts that are not the same? If so, what are they, and why are they conflicting?
Is one author’s conclusion or interpretation of the facts more convincing than the others? If so, why? Include evidence from all three opinion pieces to support your ideas.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read “Blue Nines and Red Words” from Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet. After reading, students complete a Write Now task to write one page about an event in their own life, including reflections like Tammet used in the text.
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students develop and deliver an informative presentation on one of the historic flying feats or scientific principles that Neil deGrasse Tyson discusses in the text “To Fly” from Space Chronicles. In addition to using this text, students also engage in research by choosing a science-related topic mentioned in the text to add to their presentation.
Indicator 1K
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.
The materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing while using evidence. The materials provide opportunities for students to practice writing that is focused on claims developed from reading closely, as well as frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing while using evidence. During Whole-Class Learning, most units end with a writing task that involves explicit instruction in the skills needed to complete the task. The Teacher’s Edition includes expert instruction with support in the form of modeling and graphic organizers. During Small-Group Learning, students work collaboratively to complete writing projects that lead to speaking and listening components. At the end of each unit, the students complete an End of Unit Assessment, applying their evidence-gathering skills to write longer pieces that answer the unit’s Essential Question.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Introduction, Launch Text, students read “Red Roses (author not cited). After reading, students write a summary of the text. The teacher is instructed to provide students with the following guidance for their summary paragraphs:
“Write in the the present tense.
Be concise: a summary should not be equal in length to the original text.
If you need to quote the author, use quotation marks.
Don’t put your own opinions, ideas, or interpretations into the summary. The purpose of writing a summary is to accurately represent what the author says, not to provide a critique.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” by Barrington Irving. They write an argumentative essay using evidence from the text to support their response to the following prompt, “Having passion for a subject is more important than having knowledge about it.” Directions guide students to use evidence to “explain[s] reasons for that position, and use[s] evidence to show why the reasons make[s] sense.” As students write, the teacher gives students feedback on the strength of their claims and evidence. Teachers are provided with the following guidance as they give students feedback on their writing:
“Remind students that when they write an argumentative essay, it is not enough to simply make a claim. A claim without any support is not a strong claim and can be easily discounted. A successful argument contains evidence to support the claim and perhaps to discount any counterclaims, which are claims that disagree with your claim.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read from “The Invention of Everything Else” by Samantha Hunt and “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All?” by Vicky Baez. Students then draft a compare-and-contrast essay where [they] “analyze the ways in which each text reveals an aspect of Tesla’s life and personality.” In their prewriting, students complete a graphic organizer where they hunt details from both texts in the following 4 sections “events from Tesla’s life, Tesla’s character and personality traits, Details about important places in Tesla’s life, [and] details about Tesla’s accomplishments.” Teachers support students in using these details from the graphic organizer, to “make an outline before they begin drafting.” The teacher gives students feedback on their evidence and “if students struggle to provide specific examples and details, [the teacher] asks them to skim the selections again with specific questions in mind.”
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Performance-Based Assessment, students “Write an explanatory essay in response to the following question: How can literature help us remember and honor the victims of the Holocaust?” Students are asked to “[c]onsider how the various texts in the unit illuminate the experiences of different types of people in a wide variety of places. Support your explanation with relevant details, quotations, and examples from the texts.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly, “Soda’s a Problem, But...” by Karin KleinIn, and "Ban the Ban!" by SidneyAnne Stone. Students write an argument about which article they found most convincing. During Planning and Prewriting, students evaluate the facts presented by the authors. They evaluate their arguments using these questions:
What facts do all three authors include?
Do they use any conflicting information—facts that are not the same? If so, what are they, and why are they conflicting?
Is one author’s conclusion or interpretation of the facts more convincing than the others? If so, why?
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read the “Theory of Multiple Intelligences” infographic by Howard Gardner. They engage in evidence-based activities, such as responding in writing to text-dependent comprehension questions and discussions following their first review of the infographic. They use the evidence from the questions and the discussion to deliver a multimedia presentation where they use examples from this text to “...highlight a different way to be intelligent.” Students begin by completing a chart that has examples of the “Types of Intelligence Featured” in the unit’s texts.
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
The materials provide some opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of grade-level grammar and usage skills during writing tasks throughout the school year. The explicit instruction of some grammar and usage standards is inconsistent or, in some cases, lacking. Some standards are addressed but have limited practice or are not outlined thoroughly, such as spelling. Students apply grammar skills during Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning, though the opportunities are not always connected to the text or writing prompt. Grammar lessons and tasks are connected to anchor texts and topics for each unit and include several opportunities to practice using pronouns correctly. In order to practice grammar skills and conventions, students complete Language Development tasks, such as those found in the Concept Vocabulary, Word Study, Conventions, and Author’s Style sections. However, some grade-level language standards are not addressed. The End Matter of the Teacher’s Edition provides a Grammar Handbook that defines grammar terms and provides examples of various grammar concepts; however, there are limited plans to scaffold and support student learning of grammar concepts.
Materials include explicit instruction of some of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Poetry Collection, Small-Group Learning, students read the poems “Retort” by Paul Laurence Dunbar and from “The People, Yes” by Carl Sandberg. In the Facilitating section, students analyze the poems and practice developing their language through a Conventions section. During this learning, the Teacher provides examples of participial and infinitive phrases. Then, the teacher prompts students to come up with their own participial phrases and infinitive phrases while writing. The assignment includes marking participial phrases in sentences and identifying the word it modifies.
In Unit 5, Inventions, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Uncle Marcos” from The House of Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin. For the Performance Task, students write an argumentative essay in which they make a claim that answers this question: “Which text— ‘Uncle Marcos’ or ‘To Fly’—best describes the dream or fantasy of human flight?” Before they begin writing, they learn that “error-free grammar, including correct use of gerunds and participles,” are elements of a successful argument. In order to make sure the gerunds and participles are taught during the writing process, the teacher produces a lesson on Revising to Combine Sentences Using Gerunds and Participles from the Language Development, Conventions section. After students produce their first draft, they read the explanations for the function of gerunds and participles and how they are used to fix choppy sentences. Students practice this skill by rereading their draft and combining choppy or repetitive phrases using gerunds or participial phrases.
Students have opportunities to form and use verbs in the active and passive voice. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Hawk Sneve. They review the definitions and examples of sentences that use the active and passive voice. Students practice writing sentences in the active and passive voice so that they can see the difference between who or what is conducting the action. During the Write It activity, students revise three sentences to include active voice, which “stresses the performer of the action.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes and read a script for the play written by David Rogers. For the Performance Task, students write an informative speech from Charlie’s perspective that answers the following question: “What has happened to you so far as a result of the experiment, and what do you predict will happen to you as time progresses?” After students complete their draft, the teacher provides a lesson on Subject-Verb Agreement in the Language Development section. A Tip to the side of the main text in the student’s edition provides examples of sentences in the active and passive voice. The information suggests that student writers “Use mainly active verbs in [their] writing to emphasize the actor, not the action, of a sentence.” Students also learn that writing with an active voice creates “livelier, more precise, and more dynamic” writing.
Students have opportunities to form and use verbs in the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Setting Sun and the Rolling World” by Charles Mungoshi. In the Language Development section, students practice using a variety of verb moods in short pieces of writing. A chart for interrogative, imperative, indicative, conditional, and subjunctive moods helps students understand why the writers choose these different moods. The chart also provides an example of a sentence showing the way the author might write a sentence to convey specific moods. Students revise two sentences that were written in the indicative mood. They practice using the subjunctive mood instead to show a condition that is contrary to the fact or expresses a request, demand, or proposal.
Students have opportunities to recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in verb voice and mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “You Are the Electric Boogaloo” by Geoff Herbach. In this letter, students learn about the way verbs can express different moods. Writers use verbs to express their attitude toward their subject. The student edition has a chart that provides a definition and example of the indicative, imperative, and interrogative moods of verbs. Students practice reading and finding a sentence from the text that provides an example of each type of verb. During the Write It activity, students are reminded that when “writers and speakers shift between indicative and imperative moods,” it can be confusing. Students practice correcting two sentences that have improper mood shifts.
Students have opportunities to use punctuation (comma, ellipsis, dash) to indicate a pause or break. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read “25 Years Later, Hubble Sees Beyond Troubled Start” by Dennis Overbye. In the Language Development, Conventions section, students learn about using dashes and ellipses to show a pause, interruption, or sudden break in thought or speech. Students use the chart provided to see examples of common reasons writers use ellipses and dashes. The teacher provides examples of sentences from the text that use ellipses and dashes so that students understand how to write a sentence using an ellipsis or dash. Students examine sentences from the text and determine why the writer used dashes. Then, students write a paragraph about the Hubble Space Telescope ensuring the correct use of ellipsis and dashes.
Students have opportunities to use an ellipsis to indicate an omission. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read “25 Years Later, Hubble Sees Beyond Troubled Start” by Dennis Overbye. In the Language Development, Conventions section, students learn about using an ellipsis to indicate an omission. They are given a chart that states that students should use an ellipsis when they want “to show the reader that [they] have chosen to leave out a word or words from a quoted passage.” They read the example and practice using an ellipsis to omit a portion of two quotations without altering the meaning. The Teacher’s Edition provides some possible responses that students could produce.
Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, the students watch the “Apache Girl’s Rite of Passage” by National Geographic. They write a compare-and-contrast essay in which they compare the rites of passage in the video to the rites of passage of the young Lakotas. As they review, revise, and edit their draft, students are to “proofread to ensure [their] essay [are] free from errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” by National Geographic. In the Language Development, Conventions section, students learn that the “spelling of nouns and pronouns are key to clear writing.” They are reminded in the student text to remember that possessive pronouns with words that sound the same, such as: “Your and you’re, it’s and its, and their and they’re,” must be written correctly to help the reader understand their writing. In the Write It activity, students read and revise a paragraph, making sure that proper nouns are capitalized and the possessive pronouns are spelled correctly.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. In the Teacher’s Edition, personalize for Learning, the teacher can support English Language Learners by providing support for reading through the spelling errors in the main character’s writing. The teacher prompts students to read through and identify the spelling errors in paragraph two. Students continue to do this throughout the story because the main character’s writing can pose a significant challenge to readers who are not proficient with the vocabulary of this story.
Students have opportunities to use verbs in the active and passive voice and in the conditional and subjunctive mood to achieve particular effects (e.g., emphasizing the actor or the action, expressing uncertainty, or describing a state contrary to fact). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. In the Language Development, Conventions section, students learn about writing verbs in active and passive voice. They are provided with the definitions of both and are given a chart to see the difference between sentences written in the active versus passive voice. Students read and identify the voice in several sentences. They also review the text to find examples of sentences written in the active and passive voice. There is a writing activity provided that requires students to revise sentences that are written in the passive voice, which allows the teacher to assess student learning with respect to this concept. There is no reference to writing in the conditional and subjunctive mood during this lesson.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers For Algernon” by Daniel Keyes and an excerpt from a script for Flowers for Algernon by David Rogers, based on the novel by Daniel Keyes. In the Performance Task, students write an informative speech from the main character’s point of view. They answer the question, “What has happened to you so far as a result of the experiment, and what do you predict will happen to you as time progresses?” After completing their draft, students work through a Language Development section on Subject-Verb agreement. While they don’t take time to practice writing in the active voice versus the passive voice, they are reminded that livelier, more precise, and dynamic writing is in the active voice. There is no reference to writing in the conditional and subjunctive mood during this lesson.
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.
The materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary in a systematic way. Materials include lessons and activities for vocabulary development critical to understanding the text, the overall concept of the unit, and the genre of writing for each unit. Academic vocabulary is highlighted at the beginning of each unit in the introduction. Concept or Media Vocabulary specific to the text or media that students review is emphasized at the beginning of each reading and throughout the lesson. Activities for demonstrating understanding of the Concept Vocabulary become more complex as the year progresses. Vocabulary is associated with the writing focus of the Performance Tasks, and students can incorporate vocabulary in authentic ways during the Performance Tasks and from their Word Networks during the Performance-Based Assessment. Content vocabulary is repeated over the school year and includes, but is not limited to, symbols, symbolism, and context. Stand-alone vocabulary assessments include a pretest, mid-year assessment, and end-of-year assessment. There is additional independent student practice in the Vocabulary Center and guidance and resources for the teacher in the Program Resources, Teacher’s Edition, and Professional Development Center. Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive vocabulary development component.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials include a section on Standards Correlation. It includes the Key Features of the Standards and how each section of the unit fits into the larger picture of teaching the standards. The Language Standard is complete for teaching Conventions, Effective Use, and Vocabulary. The text states, “The vocabulary standards focus on understanding words and phrases, their relationships, and their nuances and on acquiring new vocabulary, particularly general academic and domain-specific words, and phrases.” In order to teach the Language standards for vocabulary, each unit includes Vocabulary/Word Study. The Unit at a Glance section in the Teacher’s Edition and Resources includes Vocabulary and Word Study concepts that will be introduced during each reading. Each unit offers information in the Introduction regarding the Academic Vocabulary for teacher guidance, such as lessons that help with learning the vocabulary and offering possible student responses to questions that reiterate the vocabulary words. The materials offer Language Development in each of the Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning sections with Word Networks. The students are encouraged to annotate vocabulary when close reading. The Teacher’s Edition End Matter also includes a Glossary: Academic Concept Vocabulary and the academic vocabulary appears in blue font. The Index also offers a list of the academic vocabulary and concept vocabulary with corresponding page numbers.
In the Teacher’s Edition during the Launch text of each unit, the Vocabulary Development box provides teachers with additional Academic Vocabulary Reinforcement activities.
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, academic and concept vocabulary are embedded throughout. In each unit Introduction, students view a chart with academic vocabulary for the unit, read mentor sentences with the words, and complete a chart for the predicted meaning and related words. Each text Introduction includes a Concept Vocabulary section where students rank words from least familiar to most familiar. All words are defined in the footnotes of the text. After reading, the Concept Vocabulary section includes activities with words from the introduction and the Word Study section. The structure of the vocabulary lessons remains consistent throughout the year.
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “Hanging Fire” by Audre Lorde and “Translating Grandfather’s House” by E.J. Vega. During the Introduction, students begin a Word Network to collect words that are related to the unit topic, Rites of Passage. They are encouraged to review the story for words that relate to the topic. After reading, they are provided with the tip to “add interesting words related to rites of passage from the text to your [their] Word Network.” The Teacher’s Edition provides possible words, graduation and awakenings, to help get the students started. They continue to add to the Word Network. As students read the texts in the unit, they find words that will help vary their word choice in Part 1 of the Performance-Based Assessment, where they write a nonfiction narrative in which they respond to the following prompt: “What rite of passage has held the most significance for you or a person you know well?”
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and consider the use of symbolism in the text. Teacher materials say, “Remind students that a symbol is something that stands for or represents something else.” Then students go to specific paragraphs to analyze the symbols being used. In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read The Diary of Anne Frank, Acts I & II by Albert Hackett & Frances Goodrich. During the close reading, students are directed to paragraphs 94–107 to examine why the writer included the symbol of the yellow star, which is an important symbol for Jewish people. In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Theory of Multiple Intelligences Infographic” by Howard Gardner. Students engage in learning about media vocabulary such as icons which are defined as “symbols or graphic representation…”
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 8, Domain-Specific Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It, Part 1 and 2. In Part 1, some examples of terms include, but are not limited to: commerce, element, immunity, inertia, recession, and spreadsheet. The Interactive lessons include the following student activity within the Try It tab: “Drag each word into the correct subject area column.” Students apply their learning by taking a six-question quiz in the Apply it section that asks questions pertaining to the vocabulary, such as:
In which sentence is immunity used correctly?
Because she had immunity, Dr. Bashir was able to treat the victims of the disease.
Because she had immunity, it would have been dangerous for Dr. Bashir to treat the victims of the disease.
In which sentence is recession used correctly?
During a recession, it is easy to find well-paying jobs.
During a recession, it is hard to find well-paying jobs.
In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 8, General Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It, Part 1 and 2. In Part 1, some examples of terms include, but are not limited to: assimilate, declaration, impartial, pronounce, rectify, and sustain. The Interactive lessons include the following student activity within the Try It tab: “Drag each word in the left-hand column to match it with the vocabulary word in the right-hand column that has the same root.” For example, students would match the new word, similarity from the right-hand column with the word assimilate (-sim-) in the left-hand column. The students apply their learning by reading a passage and filling in the correct vocabulary word. For example, “Students Upholding Print Literature (SUPL) are (attributes, opponents, or citations) of the all-out digital rush.”
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Introduction, the materials include academic vocabulary terms that “help you read, write, and speak with more precision.” Here are five academic words that will be useful to you in this unit as you analyze and write explanatory texts.” Students complete a chart to predict meaning and write at least two related words for the following: theorize, sustain, declaration, pronounce, and enumerate.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Blue Nines and Red Words from Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet. The materials provide the Concept Vocabulary that relates to discussing the story, symmetrical, spiral, and aesthetic. The words are Tier II, or high-frequency, academic words.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
The materials are grouped around topics/themes to grow students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. There are high-quality questions and tasks that are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. Throughout the program, there are opportunities for students to complete research to learn more about or expand their knowledge on topics. The culminating tasks in the program require students to show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit. While the materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards, well-designed explicit instruction guidance is inconsistent or lacking in some areas.
The materials spend instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards, and by the end of the academic year, every standard is addressed. The pacing for the five units in the program is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
The materials are grouped around topics/themes to grow students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Texts within units are connected and arranged by topics/themes around an essential question.
The materials include high-quality questions and tasks in which students analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. There are culminating tasks that require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. The program also provides multiple opportunities for students to engage in research. In each unit, there are opportunities for students to conduct both shorter and longer research tasks to build knowledge on topics and synthesize their learning.
While the materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards, well-designed explicit instruction guidance is lacking in some areas.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
The materials are grouped around topics/themes to grow students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of texts around these topics/themes helps students to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Texts within units are connected and arranged by topics around an essential question.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, students are asked to consider the Essential Question, “How do we remember the past?” The unit begins with an Explanatory essay, Launch Text, “The Grand Mosque of Paris” by Michael Garcia. Through this unit, students read examples of explanatory texts and practice writing and presenting them. The Whole-Class Learning Anchor Text is The Diary of Anne Frank Acts I and II by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. This text, as well as the “Frank Family and World War II Timeline,” offer students a chance to examine factual information provided throughout each lesson. Students learn about the holidays of Hanukkah and St. Nicholas’ Day through the Cross-Curricular Perspectives with Social Studies, the background on the Allied landing at Normandy from Digital Perspectives, and the timeline that connects the Timeline of the Frank Family to the Timeline of the World War II Events from the final text in the first part of the unit. Students use examples from these works to write an explanatory essay that addresses the following question, “How are historical events reflected in the play The Diary of Anne Frank?”
In Unit 3, What Matters, students are asked to consider the Essential Question, “When is it right to take a stand?” The unit begins with an Argument Model Launch Text, “Freedom of the Press?” by Elfrieda Hiebert. Throughout this unit, students read examples of arguments and practice writing and presenting them. The Whole-Class Learning Anchor Texts offer students a chance to study the craft and structure of opinion pieces. Small-Group texts offer a variety of perspectives on different arguments. They read Words Do Not Pay by Chief Joseph and watch a video called The Moth Presents: Aleeza Kazmi. Following the reading, students are asked to present an argument.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, students read the Launch Text, “The Human Brain” (author not cited), which models a format of informational writing. Students use this reading and other texts to respond to the essential question, “In what different ways can people be intelligent?” Students read the short story “Flowers for Algernon” to learn the reasons the main character, Charlie Gordon, undergoes surgery to increase his intelligence. Students compare the story to the script for the movie adaptation Charly, released in 1968. They read an excerpt from Daniel Tammet’s memoir Born on a Blue Day. From this excerpt, students learn about savant syndrome, which allows people to complete math calculations with large numbers. Students learn that although someone may not be able to understand one’s emotions, they can have super intelligence in a subject like complex math.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.
The materials include high-quality questions and tasks in which students analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts. The materials are organized in a consistent pattern across all units with multiple after-reading activities. Each unit is divided into five main parts: The Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and the End Of Unit (Assessment, Reflection, and Test). Before beginning each reading, the students engage in a First Read, which requires them to note what they notice, annotate the key vocabulary and passages, connect ideas with other selections, and respond by writing a brief summary. The Close Read notes in the Teacher’s Edition help support student analysis of key ideas, details, craft, and structure as the students read. After reading, the students work through activities to ensure their understanding of the key ideas in the reading. The Comprehension Check, Close Read of the Text, Analyze the Text, and Analyze Craft and Structure questions require students to revisit the text and use specific text evidence in their answers. In the Teacher’s Edition, the sample answers also include the depth of knowledge levels for some questions; most are at DOK 2 or 3. For some texts, the questions lead to the subsequent Writing or Speaking and Listening activities. These questions also build toward the various Performance Tasks embedded after Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and at the End of the Unit. Throughout each unit, students keep an Evidence Log and notebook to record responses and help them prepare for the culminating tasks.
For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Diary of Anne Frank, Act l by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. During the First Read, students respond to the questions in the Comprehension Check. These questions help students analyze the key ideas and details that they read in the text. The questions are:
In Scene 1, what year is it?
How does the time period change in Scene 2?
Why must the Franks and the Van Daans be quiet during the day?
Why does Mr. Dusssel join the group in the attic?
What happens to interrupt the Hanukkah celebration?
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington. In the Analyze the Text section, students review and clarify the important information about the three girls in the story. They refer to paragraph 17 of the selection to find evidence to support their answers. They also take turns sharing passages from the text that they found especially important. Students discuss what they noticed about the text and what questions they still had about the text. Lastly, they finalize their analysis by addressing any new conclusions they reached during the discussion.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read “Retort” by Paul Laurence Dunbar and “The People, Yes” by Carl Sandburg. Students analyze the texts by answering three questions. They are instructed to cite textual evidence from the poems to support their answers. The first question asks the students to identify the two fools in the poem. Students use the text to explain why they are both fools and how each of the fools might have a different type of intelligence. The second question has the students share lines from the poems that they found important. They take turns sharing ideas and discussing any new conclusions that they reach. The final question asks the students to connect to the unit’s essential question: “In what different ways can people be intelligent?”
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read from Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank. In the section of lessons called Analyze Craft and Structure, students review how “Informational texts are often organized according to a central idea and supporting details.” The Teacher’s Edition explains how to identify the central idea, whether it is stated or implied. Students discuss how the role of inference plays a part in our ability to identify an implied central idea. Students use a chart to identify details found in the text and how they contribute to the central idea.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students view an infographic, “The Theory of Multiple Intelligences” by Howard Gardner. Instead of Analyzing the Text, the students answer three questions where they Analyze the Media. They must cite textual evidence from the infographic to support their answers. For the first question, the students explain how the captions and labels in the infographic enhance their understanding of the different ways people can be intelligent. The second question has the students explain what the advantages and disadvantages of presenting information about multiple intelligences in an infographic could be. The final question requires that students explain their understanding of the infographic and how it connects to the essential question by detailing the different ways that people can be intelligent.
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Uncle Marcos” from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin. Students Analyze the Craft and Structure as they compare events in the text and determine similarities and differences. Students revisit an event at the beginning of the text and compare it to an event at the conclusion to determine how they fit together. For example, “In what ways is the barrel organ incident similar to and different from the incident with the mechanical bird?”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.
The materials include multiple opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts and across multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. The materials provide related questions as students comprehend and analyze texts and complete culminating tasks. Most sets of questions and tasks require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across the unit to build knowledge around a topic/theme and the essential question. In some instances, the materials pair two or more texts, and students practice the same skills across all texts. Multiple texts connect to the essential question in preparation for the end-of-unit assessment. In this assessment, students synthesize ideas based on various text-dependent prompts that align with grade-level standards.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Launch Text, students read “The Grand Mosque of Paris” by Michael Garcia. They complete a QuickWrite to show their knowledge and ideas from their own experiences and from the text to show ways that literature can help people remember and honor the victims of the Holocaust.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly. Students complete activities in the Close Read the Text section. First, students identify questions that appear in the text that the author does not answer. They respond to the following questions, “Why might the author have begun the article with several unanswered questions? What effect do these questions have on the reader?” Then the students identify “types of bias, or judgment and prejudice” in paragraphs eight through ten and respond to these questions: “Why does the author include these explanations of different biases? How does this information affect the persuasiveness of her argument?”
Finally, students find an example in paragraph fourteen that shows the author’s support of her claim. They answer the following questions: “Why might the author have chosen this specific example as support? How does the inclusion of this example affect the author’s argument?”
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Uncle Marcos” from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin. Students identify phrases used to describe the main character’s uncle and answer the following questions: “Why does the author use these descriptive details? What is the effect of these details?” Students also “mark the sentence in the latter part of paragraph two that suggests how Antonieta reacts to Marcos’s barrel-organ music” and respond to the following questions: “Why does the author provide so little description of her reaction? What is the effect of this choice to suggest but not describe Anonieta’s reaction?”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students review “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and “Apache Girl’s Rite of Passage” by National Geographic. They use their knowledge about the rites of passage from two different tribes to write a compare-and-contrast essay. They use a chart to identify what they learned from each and analyze how details in each text contributed to the overall meaning. Students analyze the text to answer the following questions: “In what ways are the two rites of passage most similar? In what ways are they most different? How does seeing the Apache rite of passage on video help you to understand it more fully?” They use their answers to supplement the main ideas in their essay.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes and read from the play Flowers for Algernon by David Rogers. Students respond to the following prompt to express the differences between the way a story is conveyed, “Analyze the extent to which a filmed or live production of a story or drama stays faithful to or departs from the text or script, evaluating the choices made by the director or actors.” They also determine the unique characteristics of a story and a script in order to explain how those characteristics influence the way a writer tells a story.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All?” by Vicky Baez and an excerpt from The Invention of Everything Else by Samantha Hunt. In the lesson section called Effective Expression, students write a “compare-and-contrast essay in which [they] analyze the ways in which each text reveals an aspect of Tesla’s life and personality.” Small groups identify details from both texts that address Tesla’s life, character traits, important places, and accomplishments. They respond to the following questions: “Which did you enjoy reading more? Which text more effectively portrays Tesla? Which text provides more biographical detail?”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
The materials include three culminating tasks that require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. Each unit across the grade level includes an essential question connecting to a topic/theme. The units include Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning opportunities. Students build knowledge on the topic/theme by reading texts or watching videos. They complete writing tasks and engage in speaking and listening with peers. The Whole-Group Learning Performance Tasks assess writing, and the Small-Group Learning Performance Tasks assess speaking and listening skills. Throughout the unit, brief writing tasks follow each reading and provide practice opportunities for multiple skills. Teachers provide feedback during writing exercises to move students toward mastery by the end of the unit. The Teacher Resources includes an Assessment section that provides culminating online and PDF versions of selection tests, extension selection tests, unit tests, and extension unit tests. Each culminating exam includes multiple choice and short answer questions testing various standards.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, each Introduction for the unit includes information about the Unit Goals, including goals related to Reading, Writing, Research, Language, and Speaking and Listening. The Teacher’s Edition states, “These unit goals were backward designed from the Performance-Based Assessment at the end of the unit and the Whole-Class and Small Group Performance Tasks. Students will practice and become proficient in many more standards over the course of this unit.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students complete a culminating task with a Writing to Sources activity that asks them to “write a fictional retelling of the excerpts from Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington. Students demonstrate mastery of narrative writing skills through the development of a main idea, characters, and context. They utilize dialogue and appropriate pacing for the text they create. In small groups, they share their work and compare texts to find similarities and differences in their point of view.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus, students work in small groups to prepare for and conduct a debate that addresses the essential question for the unit: “Are inventions realized through inspiration or perspiration?” In the planning phase of this task, students demonstrate mastery of standards related to text comprehension and synthesis and “[u]se the evidence to begin planning the argument [they] will make in the debate.” The group discusses their ideas for the debate and “identify specific examples from the selections to support [their] group’s position.” Students need to delineate their argument and make a specific claim which supports speaking and listening standards.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.
The materials provide writing instruction that partially aligns with the standards. Informative or explanatory writing, argumentative, and narrative writing are somewhat developed throughout the year; however, the distribution of writing types practiced throughout the year does not meet the distribution outlined by the standards. Each unit contains some instructional materials that support students as they practice the skills that help yield success on the End of Unit Performance-Based Writing Assessment. The Teacher’s Edition includes some guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. There is limited information relating to a year-long writing plan. Mentor texts are provided for students to reference and learn techniques to apply in their own writing. Some guidance is provided for students as they practice and apply writing standards, mostly in reminders to teachers rather than explicit instruction and modeling. While all standards are tagged as a part of the instruction and tasks, a number of standards do not have explicit instruction; rather, students are told to address the skill indicated in the standard. While there are some interactive and minilessons available in the resources, the materials do not consistently outline where these resources may be helpful to teachers and students. Those resources that are available for students and teachers to access are generic resources that are not specific to each text, writing, task, or unit.
Materials include writing instruction that partially aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read three texts, “Soda’s a Problem, But...” by Karin Klein, “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly, and “Ban the Ban'' by Sydney Anne Stone. They write an argumentative essay comparing the claims presented by the authors in these texts. The teacher’s instructions for the students include, “Review the texts and identify facts each author uses, conclusions each author draws, and personal opinions each author expresses.” Students record the evidence from the text that supports their ideas. They use a chart during the prewriting steps to complete the draft of their essay.
In Unit 4, The People and the Planet, Small-Group Learning, students read He-y, Come On Ou-t! By Shinichi Hoshi. Students write “an alternative ending in which you [they] explore what might happen after the story ends.” The teacher guides a discussion in preparation for this group task and uses prompting questions provided in the Student’s Edition. Students also have access to an example chart they can use to help track their thinking and develop ideas. The Student’s Edition includes other strategies to develop the task, including a section to “develop character through dialogue” and “develop description through sensory language.” Teachers are directed to help students by suggesting they “work together to decide the mood they want their ending to convey” and to “spend time working on a plan for the story.” Teacher guidance is present throughout this activity, and there are several supplemental resources available for student use to assist with the task. However, throughout the school year, students do not have enough practice with narrative writing.
In Unit 5, Invention, students write an argumentative essay for the Performance Task: Write an Argument that supports the grade level standard: Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Instruction guides students on the elements found in an effective argument. Students are instructed on the use of direct quotation and paraphrasing, “When you write about literature, include textual details that show the accuracy of your interpretation. You may use direct quotations or paraphrases.” Students also are provided directions in shortening a direct paraphrase, “shorter direct quotations appear within a sentence or paragraph. They are preceded by a comma or a colon. The page number on which the quotation appears is indicated in parentheses.”
Instructional materials include some well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passages, students use the Launch Text, “Red Roses” by Dina McClellanas as a model for their nonfiction narrative. Students engage in learning about the elements of a nonfiction narrative and find these elements in the Launch Text:
“characterizations of people who play different roles in the event
a description of the impact of the event on the different people involved
a clear sequence of events that unfolds naturally and logically
narrative techniques such as dialogue, description, and pacing that effectively build the action
a variety of transitional words, phrases, and clauses
precise words, well-chosen quotations, vivid descriptive details, and powerful sensory language
a conclusion reflecting on the experiences in the narrative”
While there is general teacher guidance provided, there is no explicit instruction.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, there are instructional supports for the teacher about students writing an informative or explanatory essay. During this unit, students write a compare-and-contrast essay in which they analyze the short story “Flowers for Algernon'' by Daniel Keyes and the play version by David Rogers. The Teacher’s Edition includes rubrics for students to evaluate their writing, informative handouts, and specific guidance. For example, students are provided a compare/contrast chart. The Teacher’s Edition has a key and additional guidance for assisting students in developing an essay based on textual evidence. However, these supports do not guide teachers toward providing explicit instruction as much as they are simply handouts teachers might provide students.
In Unit 5, Invention, students write an argumentative essay for the Performance Task: Write an Argument. The instructional materials guide teachers in monitoring students through the writing process. For example, students are provided direct instruction relating to direct quotations and paraphrasing. Teachers are provided additional instruction not included in the student text, for example, “Remind students, as needed, that a direct quotation uses exact words to emphasize a point and that a paraphrase restates the author’s words.”
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
The materials provide multiple opportunities for students to engage in research. Short text-specific research opportunities connect to each text through Research to Clarify and Research to Explore tasks. Throughout each unit, there are opportunities for students to conduct brief research to build knowledge about the topic of the text and/or unit, including, but not limited to, Cross-Curricular tasks and Challenge tasks. Materials provide for longer research tasks that require students to synthesize and analyze tasks connected to the unit topics. Materials include teaching around research standards such as avoiding plagiarism and correctly citing sources. Research tasks build mastery over the school year and connect to research standards.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Setting Sun and the Rolling World” by Charles Mungoshi. They engage in research relating to Zimbabwe healers or traditions found in Zimbabwe families. Students focus on the credibility of sources and gathering information from multiple print and digital sources. Once students gather their evidence, they correctly add this information to their research paper. For example, they are asked to “paraphrase information and properly credit [their] sources to avoid plagiarism. Follow a standard format to cite your sources.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read from “Blue Nines and Red Words” from Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet. They research an “unfamiliar point that Daniel Tammet makes about intelligence.” Students consider how “the information [they] learned shed light on an aspect of the memoir.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students view “Sounds of a Glass Armonica” (author not cited). The research and present information on an instrument of choice. Students receive guidance on how to conduct this research. For example, “Since the presentation is about a musical instrument, [they] will need to include some audio components.” Students are required to use digital sources. Then they consider the types of multimedia that will best help your audience visualize and understand how the instrument works and sounds.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Resources, a Plagiarism Checker is provided for teachers to access via Safe Assign, which offers guidance for implementation, including Video Tutorials: “SafeAssign is effective as both a deterrent and an educational tool. Use SafeAssign to review assignment submissions for originality and create opportunities to help students identify how to properly attribute sources rather than paraphrase.” The tool will assist educators when assigning research projects.
The materials offer Research Minilessons and a Writing and Research Center with a Research Writing PowerPoint Presentation that introduces research writing and provides prewriting tips to assist students in formulating a research question and making a Research Plan, such as “Once you have written your major research question, you are ready to make a research plan. As part of your plan, you will create a timeline for finishing your report. You also will find and evaluate sources of information.” The PowerPoint Presentation includes guidance relating to how to organize a research report and revise and edit the draft. A grammar minilesson follows, and student instructions for publishing the piece state: “When you’ve finished your final draft, publish it. Use this chart to identify a way to publish your informational research report for the appropriate audience.” The Teacher’s Edition: End Matter, Tool Kit: Research includes detailed guidance for Conducting Research, Reviewing Research Findings, and Incorporating Research Into Writing.
Materials provide many opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process.
Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read from Maus by Art Spiegelman and write an “informative report in which [they] discuss the ways in which Spiegelman’s personal experiences are reflected in his graphic novel.” Students work in small groups to collect information from “multiple print and digital sources” that will help develop their report. They are reminded to check the credibility of sources and answer prompts, which help focus their work. Students must also include a works-cited list.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Performance Task, students conduct research to add supporting detail to an informative speech that weaves fictional accounts and factual elements. Students are guided to start with information from the story and research related topics. Students use a note catcher to gather evidence and how or why this information is important.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students create a research-based multimedia presentation that highlights a homemade or unusual musical instrument. As part of this research, students research how the instrument works, its origins, notable musicians who play the instrument, and other pertinent details.
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters Whole-Class Learning, students draw evidence from the three opinion pieces they read while addressing whether soda should be banned or not. They use that evidence to support their claim in an argumentative essay that states which of the three arguments they found most convincing. In order to support their claims, students must analyze each fact they cite and consider how the facts each author cites are interpreted in a particular way and which does the best job of proving their claim.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an informative essay that responds to the Essential Question for the unit, “In what ways can people be intelligent?” This task asks students to “integrate relevant quotations, facts, and examples” from the texts in the unit to support their ideas. This is an assessed area of the written task and is reflected in the rubric.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students compose a compare-and-contrast essay in which they compare the biographical work “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All?” by Vicky Baez and In The Invention of Everything Else by Samantha Hunt, a historical fiction account in which the author, Samantha Hunt, uses her imagination in combination with historical facts to develop the character of Nikola Tesla. As part of the writing and editing of this essay, students review and revise the evidence they have drawn upon and analyzed to successfully compose a well-written compare-and-contrast essay about Nikola Tesla.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
The materials spend instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards, with opportunities for explicit instruction. By the end of the academic year, every standard is addressed, and there are multiple opportunities for students to revisit standards to promote mastery.
The program is organized into five units, and the culminating task for each unit is a Performance-Based Assessment. The pacing for the units is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.
The materials spend instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards, with opportunities for explicit instruction. By the end of the academic year, every standard is addressed, and there are multiple opportunities for students to revisit standards to promote mastery. Some standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Students have opportunities in each grade-level standard to build skills in a logical sequence over the course of the year.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, the Unit at a Glance section lists the standards for each student activity in one of three columns: Analyze Craft and Structure, Conventions/Author’s Style, and Composition/Research/Speaking and Listening. The Teacher’s Edition: End Matter PDF includes an Index of Skills where page number references are provided. In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents, and Frontmatter PDF, the materials provide the Standards Correlation to myPerspectives® English Language Arts document with page numbers: “The following correlation shows points at which focused standards instruction is provided in the Student Edition. The Teacher’s Edition provides further opportunity to address standards through Personalize for Learning notes and additional resources available only in the Teacher’s Edition.”
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and watch the video “Apache Girl’s Rite of Passage” by National Geographic. After watching the video, students “deepen [their] analysis of the two selections and express [their] observations in writing.” They “write a compare-and-contrast essay in which [they] compare the rites of passage in the two selections about young Native Americans.” This task contains instruction on W.8.2, “Write informative/ explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas, concepts, and information through the selection, organization, and analysis of relevant content,” and W.8.2.a “Introduce a topic clearly, previewing what is to follow; organize ideas, concepts, and information into broader categories; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.” The first activity includes gathering evidence about what they learned from the short story and the video. Then they compare the text to the video. As they draft, they structure the body of their essay following the provided outline. To practice the skill of writing an introduction, students are provided with instructions from the Teacher’s Edition, “Remind students not to overload their introduction with too much information. Introductions should focus on a thesis statement plus a few sentences outlining the support, as well as a hook.” Students are to introduce and engage the reader by thinking of an image or a piece of information that they can use to “hook” the reader. According to the Standards Correlation chart, there are fourteen specific instances across the school year when the students have an opportunity to address standard W.8.2. Students have seven opportunities to address standard W.8.2a.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Barrington Irving: Pilot and Educator” by National Geographic. Students address the standard RI.8.1: “Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly, as well as inferences drawn from the text.” The Standards Correlation document states: “Students will address this standard in Analyze the Text features which appear with every informational text selection.” When students complete the Analyze the Text questions for this text, they answer the questions:
“Paraphrase Reread paragraph 3. Then, paraphrase how Barrington Irving discovered his life’s calling.
Make a Judgment The author states that Irving’s life is his “most compelling educational tool.” Do you agree? Explain your thinking.
Essential Question: When is it right to take a stand? What have you learned about when and how to take action from reading this article?”
The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance for formative assessment as students analyze the text, including but not limited to: “If students fail to cite evidence, then remind them to support their ideas with specific information. If students struggle to paraphrase how Irving became inspired to follow his dream, then review the steps need[ed] to paraphrase a text and provide examples. According to the Standards Correlation chart, there are four specific instances across the school year when the students have an opportunity to address standard RI.8.1, and teachers can engage in explicit instruction.
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from The House of Spirits, “Uncle Marcos” by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin, and “To Fly” from Space Chronicles by Neil deGrasse Tyson. For the Performance Task, students write an argumentative essay and engage in Editing and Proofreading as part of the writing process. Student instructions state, “Reread your draft for accuracy and consistency. Correct errors in grammar and word usage. Make sure you have correctly combined sentences using gerunds and participles.” The Teacher’s Edition includes some guidance: “As students edit, remind them to identify sentences that could be combined using gerunds and participles.”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, a Whole-Class Learning Performance Task with a writing focus and a Small-Group Learning Performance Task with a speaking and listening focus is included consistently across the school year. Shorter tasks follow the reading of text selections. The questions throughout the Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning connect to the Essential Question of each unit and help prepare students for the successful completion of the performance tasks.
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Diary of Anne Frank, Act I by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. In the Analyze the Text activity, the questions align to RL.8.1 and are of high quality, being rated with a DOK 2 or DOK 3. Examples of questions include:
“Compare and Contrast: How is Anne’s response to her confinement different from her sister’s?
Make a Judgment: Many of the adults in the play became frustrated with Anne’s behavior. Do you think they are being unfair? Explain.
Draw Conclusions: What insights does the Hanukkah scene suggest about the different ways in which people deal with crises?
Essential Question: What has this selection taught you about how people remember the past?”
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from The House of Spirits, “Uncle Marcos” by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin, and “To Fly” from Space Chronicles by Neil deGrasse Tyson. For the Performance Task, students write an argumentative essay that has them make a claim that answers this question: “Which text— ‘Uncle Marcos’ or ‘To Fly’ —-best describes the dream or fantasy of human flight?” This task aligns with standard W.8.1: “Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or text, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.” Students collect ideas in their Evidence Log and use the information to write a working claim. They also identify the types of supporting details they will use to support their claim. A chart has them locate two possible counterclaims with supporting evidence so that they can acknowledge them in the essay.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read an infographic, “The Theory of Multiple Intelligences Infographic” by Howard Gardner. After reading, they complete a Speaking and Listening task that is aligned with SL8.1: “Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence.” Students take part in a group discussion, choosing from the following topics:
Analyze the nine types of intelligence. Focus on four types of intelligence, and find a well-known person who demonstrates that type of intelligence in a strong way.
Analyze the nine types of intelligence. Focus on four types of intelligence, and find a fictional person who demonstrates that type of intelligence in a strong way.
Students will present their ideas to diverse partners. They practice building on each others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, a Performance-Based Assessment is included, and the unit activities are backward-designed to the Performance-Based Assessment. The materials offer Selection Tests, Extension Selections Tests, Unit Tests, Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests, Next Generation Practice Tests, Next Generation Performance Tasks, and Customizable Test Prep Banks. In the online Teacher’s Materials under Assessment, there is an Interpretation Guide for each Unit Test and an Answer Key for each Selection Test, which indicates the standard that is assessed for each question. All questions on all tests are aligned to one or more standards.
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, students complete Performance-Based Assessment by writing an Explanatory Essay that answers the following question: “How can literature help us remember and honor the victims of the Holocaust?” This aligns with Standards W.8.2 and W.8.10. The rubric for this assessment measures Focus and Organization, Evidence and Elaboration, and Language Conventions.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, students complete a Performance-Based Assessment by writing an Informative Essay that answers the following question: “In what different ways can people be intelligent?” This task aligns with Standards W.8.2, W.8.9, and W.8.10. The rubric for this assessment measures Focus and Organization, Evidence and Elaboration, and Language Conventions.
In Unit 5, Invention, students take a unit assessment that measures their proficiency on standards taught throughout the unit. The assessment includes 35 questions and measures proficiency in Reading for Information, Reading for Literature, Language, and Writing standards. RI.8.3 and RI.8.5 assess understanding of biographical writing and the author’s purpose.
By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter PDF are available. The Standards Correlation document provides the Standard in the first column, and where those standards appear in the Print and Interactive Editions in the second column with corresponding page numbers. The materials address standards multiple times across a school year to ensure students can reach mastery. For example, standard RL.8.10 is thoroughly addressed across all units. The Standards Correlation document lists the following texts and page numbers for this standard: “The Medicine Bag, 12; Hanging Fire/Translating Grandfather’s House, 54; The Setting Sun and the Rolling World, 66; First-Read Guide, Unit 1: 80, Unit 2: 246, Unit 3: 332, Unit 4: 430, Unit 5: 528; Close-Read Guide, Unit 1: 81, Unit 2: 247, Unit 3: 333, Unit 4: 431, Unit 5: 529; The Diary of Anne Frank, Act I, 100; The Diary of Anne Frank, Act II, 156; Maus, 230; Flowers for Algernon, 350; Flowers for Algernon (video), 384; Retort/ The People, Yes, 416; Uncle Marcos, 448; The Invention of Everything Else, 494.”
The Frontmatter document in the Teacher Edition online explains that each unit is backward aligned to the Performance-Based Assessments. This helps to ensure that instructional and academic tasks are standards-aligned and repeated in support of this performance task. In addition, at the end of the Frontmatter document, there is a list of the standards assessed in each text and task under the section “Standards Correlation.” For example, in Grade 8, there is a heavy emphasis on analyzing evidence and arguments, as well as composing arguments. The standards that mostly align with this focus, RI.8.1, RI.8.6, RI.8.8, and W.8.1, are repeatedly assessed through multiple tasks and activities, as shown in the Standards Correlation chart. Additionally, many of these supporting standards, such as standards RI.6-8.1 and RI/RL.6-8.2, are repeated in each unit for different purposes utilizing different text types.
In Unit 3, What Matters, and Unit 5, Invention, argumentative writing standards are repeatedly addressed. Standards W.8.1., W.8.1.a, W.8.1.b, W.8.1.c, W.8.1.d, W.8.1.e are instructed, practiced, and assessed in short writing tasks, performance tasks, and Performance Based Assessments.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.
The materials are organized into five units, and the culminating task for each unit is a Performance-Based Assessment. The pacing for the units is generally reasonable. Implementation and pacing for each unit can be found in the introduction and also in the Unit at a Glance. In the introduction of each unit, a pacing plan is provided for the whole group text–breaking implementation of the material day by day with assigned texts or tasks to be completed. The pacing plan for implementation of Small Group and Independent Reading texts is broken out day by day, text by text, leading into the Performance Based Assessment. The Unit at a Glance resource provides a table view breakout with text, pacing/# of days, along with other key information. The pacing guide is built on a 40 to 50-minute daily class. Trade book integration provides alternative implementations, which can be found in the Teacher Edition Table of Contents and Front Matter for each unit.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, the pacing guide covers 36 total days and includes whole-class, small-group, and independent learning. Alternative trade book options are available that include Rules of the Road by Joan Bauer, The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros, and All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque. The Teacher’s Edition provides a pacing guide for reading the trade books either in lieu of lessons included in the unit or in addition to the lessons. Teachers are advised: “However you choose to integrate trade books, the Pacing Guide below offers suggestions for aligning the trade books with this unit.” Trade book lesson plans are available in the program supplement called myPerspectives+. In addition to trade books, Unit 1 includes Hook and Inspire activities that would extend the unit introduction. This unit includes materials that supplement “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and include additional videos, articles, and image galleries that can be reviewed to help build background knowledge and provide interest.
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read from Maus by Art Spiegelman. The text and tasks associated with from Maus align with core learning and objectives. Students apply reading, speaking, language, and writing standards. For example, as students write a brief research report on “the ways in which Spiegelman’s personal experiences are reflected in his graphic novel,” students apply eighth-grade level standards to conduct short research projects to answer a question. One alternative implementation is reading the novel The Devil’s Arithmetic by Jane Yolen. If the novel is used as a supplement, which is one suggestion, this choice will guarantee alignment with core learning and objectives.
In Unit 5, Invention,the pacing guide covers 36 total days and includes whole-class, small-group, and independent learning. Alternative trade book options are available that include, The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne, and Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl. The Teacher’s Edition provides a pacing guide for reading the trade books either in lieu of lessons included in the unit or in addition to the lessons. Teachers are advised: “However you choose to integrate trade books, the Pacing Guide below offers suggestions for aligning the trade books with this unit.” Trade book lesson plans are available in the program supplement called myPerspectives+. In addition to trade books, Unit 5 includes Hook and Inspire activities that would extend the unit introduction. This unit includes materials that supplement The Invention of Everything Else by Samantha Hunt and include additional videos, articles, and image galleries that can be reviewed to help build background knowledge and provide interest.
Suggested implementation schedules can be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
There is a Grade 8 Unit Planning Guide in the Program resources that is available in Microsoft Word format that reviews each unit’s topic, essential question, unit overview, unit goals, selections and media listed by Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning. It also reviews the Performance-Based Assessment and Unit Reflection. Lastly, it provides a day-to-day plan that reviews each day’s focus, referenced pages in the Student Edition, Unit Goals, Academic Vocabulary, Home Connection Letters, Standards, Tasks, Text Selection Titles, and ELL Supports. This unit guide implies teachers will be following the lessons exactly, which contradicts what is embedded in the Teacher Edition, suggesting leaving time for reteaching, enrichment, and use of trade books and optional tasks.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read “Words Do Not Pay” by Chief Joseph. The teacher materials list text to be completed in lessons 20-24. Student materials are organized around Making Meaning and Effective Expression. During the Making Meaning section, students go over the concept vocabulary, conduct a first read, answer questions and annotate, complete a comprehension check, conduct a close review, and analyze the text. In the last section, Effective Expression, students conduct research, gather information and then write a research report. This is an adequate amount of work for students to complete over the course of five days.
In Unit 5, Inventions, Performance Task, students are allotted two days to complete the tasks. Students begin by engaging in Assessment Prep, where they discuss the prompt, review their evidence, evaluate their evidence, and then students write the argumentative essay. Then using the final essay as their foundation, they craft a speech and present it. Then students complete a unit reflection. Even with the knowledge that their evidence would already be collected throughout the unit, two days may not be enough time to complete this task without tight routines.
Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, trade books can be used in a variety of ways. For example, teachers can have students “form literature circles” and read one of the selections throughout the unit. Teachers could also “replace unit selections with a trade book” or “[e]xtend the unit by replacing independent reading selections with one of the trade books.” Each of the trade books has an appropriate Lexile range for the grade, and the teacher has access to activities and worksheets for the books online in myPerspectives+.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read from Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington. There are opportunities for optional tasks for support and enrichment. For example, there is a Personalized for Learning English Language Support task that prompts students to work with the idiom in paragraph 26. There is also a How Language Works section calling attention to the adjectives and adverbs in paragraph 34.
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Uncle Marcos” from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin. There are opportunities for optional tasks for support and enrichment. For example, there is a Personalized for Learning, Strategic Support to help understand a passage that has very long sentences by conducting a choral read. There is also a How Language Works section calling attention to the linking verbs and how they are used in paragraph 5.
Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Small-Group Learning, students read from Maus by Art Spiegelman. One optional task requires students to complete a Digital Perspectives task The task requires students to watch a video of an interview from 1991 of the author Art Spiegelman, “The Holocaust Through the Eyes of a Maus.” This video enhances students’ understanding of the excerpt as they learn about the author’s thoughts behind his work.
In Unit 5, the trade books all relate to the overarching topic of the unit: Invention. The Essential Question for this unit is the following: “Are inventions realized through inspiration or perspiration?” The trade book The Time Machine by H.G. Wells recounts a man’s attempt to invent a time machine, which takes a long time. In the story, ‘[t]here are plenty of hidden steps between the Time Traveler’s insights into the fourth dimension and the completion of the machine.” As students consider the Essential Question for the unit, this process provides insight into a possible response to the question.
In the myPerspectives optional resources, teachers have access to Listenwise Currents Events, which provide audio features on topics connected to the topics of each unit. For example, there is an audio recording of “Debate: Are Deliveries by Robots a Good Idea?” from NPR that relates to the topics in Unit 5, Invention.
In the myPerspectives optional resources, teachers have access to additional skill-based resources, including the Grammar Center, Writing and Research Center, Collaboration Center, Speaking and Listening Center, and Vocabulary Center. These “Centers” contain lessons, worksheets, videos, and other resources to support students. For example, in the Collaboration Center, there is a video for students to “Build Consensus.” In the “Vocabulary Center,” there are worksheets for word study, including but not limited to prefixes, suffixes, and homophones.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The materials meet the expectations for usability. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. In addition, the materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies.
There is a clear assessment system that provides multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. The standards assessed in each assessment are indicated, and the materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills.
The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. They regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level and strategies for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content.
The program includes a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included.
The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. The visual design in both the print and digital editions supports student learning and makes the organizational structure clear.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. In addition, the materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist the teacher in presenting the materials. The Teacher Resources provide a Unit at a Glance for each unit, providing information on implementing the materials and an expected pacing guide. Unit Goals and Academic vocabulary are listed at the beginning of each unit. The teacher wrap provides learning goals for each unit, suggestions to implement and model parts of the curriculum, and possible student responses. The Getting Started section provides overviews on the program’s structure for the teacher in either video or PDF format.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Resources section contains a section titled Unit at a Glance. This resource includes a list of texts used for whole group, small group, and independent learning, with Lexile and genres. The pacing for each component in the unit and the performance task are included.
The Getting Started section includes a Program Overview section. This resource includes videos and documents that provide a program overview and information on the student-centered unit structure, program components, digital resources, and program assessments.
The Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter provide teacher details on all the unit components and how to use the materials.
The Introduction page of each unit provides a Pacing Plan to show how many days to focus on whole group texts, small group learning, and performance tasks.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher’s Edition lists Unit Goals in the Introduction section of each unit. Reading Goals, Writing and Research Goals, Language Goals, and Speaking and Listening Goals are listed.
The Teacher’s Edition lists academic vocabulary at the beginning of each unit. Directions on how to incorporate the vocabulary, as well as possible student responses, are provided.
In Unit 2, The Holacaust, Whole-Class Learning, students read Act I of The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. In the Teacher’s Edition, Teaching, the teacher is provided with questions to help the students understand the Historical Perspectives on The Holocaust, The Nazi Rise to Power, Nazi Ideology, and The Final Solution.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, the materials provide information in the teacher wrap to help students analyze stage directions while reading “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes: “Students may have noticed during their first read that Charlie is not on stage during this scene, although his voice can be heard on a tape recording. This provides readers with the opportunity to observe how other characters talk and feel about Charlie when he is not present. Encourage students to talk about what they noted. You may want to model a close read with the class.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials provide adult-level explanations and examples for the teacher. The Planning section before each text gives rationales for text quality and connections to the Essential Question and the culminating Performance Tasks. The Professional Development Center online includes videos on various topics. The Teacher’s Edition provides notes in the margins that explain grade level and outside grade level concepts and strategies. Support materials are found in the digital platform and in the Front and End Matter of the Teacher’s Edition that provide information subjects such as English Language Learning, grammar terms, and close reading steps.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Professional Development Center provides teacher support videos on topics such as assessment, differentiation, engagement, text complexity, and vocabulary. WIthin each topic there are a variety of videos. For example, under Engagement, a teacher support video discusses Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education.
The Unit Introduction for each unit includes academic vocabulary from the unit with an explanation for use: “Complete pronunciations, parts of speech, and definitions are provided for you. Students are only expected to provide the definition.” The word, part of speech, pronunciation, meaning, and related words are all listed in the margin.
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, the students read “The Medicine Bag '' by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. The Teacher’s Edition states the following about the connection this story has to the unit’s essential question: “Point out that one way authors drive plot is to use character (or characters) to manipulate other characters and their actions. Shakespeare uses the witches and their prophecy that Macbeth will become king to trigger his ambitions and bring out his true character.”
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Digital Resources in the online platform contain a range of support to deepen teacher knowledge, such as: Teacher Support Videos, English Language Support Lessons, and English Language Learning literacy strategies.
The Teacher’s Edition Endmatter contains a Tool Kit and a Glossary. Teachers can use the Toolkit for guidance on how to teach skills like close-reading writing, research, etc. The Glossary contains the definitions of Academic Vocabulary words.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials provide correlation information for the ELA standards throughout the units. The Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter contains a correlation chart for each grade that lists the standards for literature, informational text, writing, speaking and listening, and language and where the standards are addressed in each unit. Standards are labeled throughout the Teacher’s Edition in multiple places. The Unit at a Glance shows the standards addressed throughout each unit. The Planning and Personalize for Learning pages preceding each text list standards for each lesson and suggest scaffolds and extensions. The Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle lists instructional standards addressed with each text and a flow chart on how to teach and assess the standards. The editable Unit Planning Guide displays standards day by day. Standards are included without numbers in the Student Edition, with each text and activity at the bottom of the page.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Frontmatter, a correlation chart lists the standards for literature, informational text, writing, speaking and listening, and language. Standards are listed by number and written out. The location of where those standards are addressed in the print and online editions is stated on the chart.
In the Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, the standards are included for each text, along with an explanation of how to support students in reaching the standards. The chart provides information on how to decide and plan, teach, analyze and revise, and identify needs. The chart also shows the standards addressed for the current grade level and how to help students with a “catching up” section and a “looking forward” section.
In the Unit at a Glance, standards are addressed throughout the sections of the unit. For example, Whole-Class Learning shows Vocabulary/Word Study, Analyze Craft and Structure, Conventions/Author’s Style, and Composition/Research/Speaking and Listening. The materials list the standards for each component on the chart.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit Planning Guide, Getting Started, a downloadable Word document is available online that lays out lessons and activities in a grid format, day by day for the entire year, with standards for each day listed. These tags match the Teacher’s Edition correlations.
In the Planning: Lesson Resources, the list of texts includes the associated standards for each lesson (Making Meaning, Language Development, and/or Effective Expression).
In the Program Level Resources, the First Read Guide: Generic and the Close-Read Guide state: “Anchor Reading Standard 10: Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.” These guides are meant for student use.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials provide information for students and families to support learning. Students interact with the Unit Introduction activities at the beginning of each unit to understand the Essential Question, Unit Goals, and Academic Vocabulary. A downloadable Home Connection letter is available to inform parents and caregivers about the program in both English and Spanish.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit includes a Home Connection letter that briefly explains the unit’s theme; the Essential Question; all texts, authors, and genres; performance tasks and performance-based assessments; and the standards addressed in the unit. The letter also includes a Talk it Over With Your Student section that includes questions parents/guardians can ask their student about the Essential Question, texts they can read together, and the texts students are reading at school.
The Program Overview includes a document with Distance Learning Tips for Parents/Guardians, which provides helpful tips, such as designating a learning space, establishing a daily routine, and setting clear learning expectations.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, the Home Connection letter includes questions for parents/guardians to ask students. The questions include, but are not limited to: “What do the texts say about the Holocaust? How do people deal with the knowledge that something terrible happened? Why do you think the Holocaust is so often featured in the media and in books and films?”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies. The Getting Started section provides information regarding research-based strategies and practices. The Professional Development Center provides videos and White Papers with experts discussing the importance of various components of the program and research-based practices. The videos include assessment, differentiations, engagement, text complexity, and vocabulary. The Student Resource section includes many research-based practices, such as worksheets or graphic organizers.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, Welcome!, page T3, teachers are presented with the instructional approaches that will connect various texts throughout units: “myPerspectives is a student-centered English Language Arts program that embraces culturally responsive learning through the diverse representation of literature, authors, characters, cultures, and themes.” Students are encouraged, based on the approach of the “polyvocal classroom” to “[b]ring knowledge from their different backgrounds and cultures to enrich critical literacy in the classroom” and “[p]erform research in response to a prompt or task of their choosing and complete project-based tasks in a format of their choosing.”
In the Getting Started, Student-Centered Unit Structure, Collins and O’Brien are referenced as experts: “When student-centered learning opportunities are implemented properly, students experience a multitude of positive outcomes including increased motivation, deeper retention of knowledge, greater understanding, and improved attitudes towards the subject being taught.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Professional Development Center, Differentiation, White Papers, “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners” by Jim Cummins and “Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction: The Central Role of Literacy Engagement" by Jim Cummins. Cummins includes several research-based strategies in both of these white papers with an extensive list of references. In addition, there are white papers in Vocabulary, Writing, and Text Complexity written by experts in the field about research-based strategies in each of the three areas, with references listed at the end of each.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, Welcome!, Experts’ Perspective, research-based strategies are introduced: “myPerspectives is informed by a team of respected experts…[o]ur authors bring new ideas, innovations, and strategies that transform teaching.” For example, expert Jim Cummins, Ph.D., is quoted: “Research focuses on literacy development in school contexts characterized by cultural and linguistic diversity.”
Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, sidebars and text boxes contain notes from the authors of the program. The Author’s Perspective provides context and support for student activities.
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. On page 12, there is an author’s perspective box at the bottom of the page written by Kelly Gallagher, M. Ed., one of the authors of the program. He provides suggestions about “Teacher as the Best Reader in the Class Rather than being the wizard behind the curtain, use modeling to do the work of reading in front of students. When students see that even good readers wrestle with difficult text, they gain confidence.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Small-Group Learning, students read “Words Do Not Pay” by Chief Joseph. On page 306, Jim Cummins, Ph.D., discusses Critical Literacies. He states, “Recent research shows that even early-stage English learners can use higher-order thinking skills and engage with complex social issues with the appropriate instructional support.” He goes on to provide questions that illustrate how teachers can support the development of critical thinking.
In the online materials, the Getting Started section leads to training materials on MySavvasTraining.com. Video tutorials and printable handouts are organized into the sections Getting Started, Ready for Instruction, Assessments and Reporting, and Additional Resources.
The Getting Started, Student-Centered Unit Structure describes the Word Network routine to launch each unit: “With Word Networks, students learn a generative approach to vocabulary. A Word Network is a collection of words related to a topic. As students read the selections in each unit, they will identify words related to the Unit Concept and add them to their Word Networks.”
The Getting Started, Writing for the Purpose of Learning section explains the program’s approach to aspects of writing, such as Writing to Learn, Writing to Sources, Writing Modes, Writing Process, and Writing for Assessment. For example, Writing to Learn strategies include “QuickWrites, Evidence Log, Research to Clarify and Research to Explore [and] First Read prompts. These activities encourage students to jot down ideas and evidence. Students write to confirm what they know and uncover what they don’t know.”
The Ready for Instruction Small-Group Learning Strategies section prepares teachers for this second part of each unit. The training states, “The teacher’s role during Small-Group Learning is to serve as a facilitator as opposed to lecturer and let students learn in a collaborative way from each other. This approach allows them to take ownership of their own learning.” It goes on to preview some of the specific strategies, such as Accountable Talk: “Remind students that groups should communicate politely. You can post these Accountable Talk suggestions and encourage students to add their own. Students should remember to: Ask clarifying questions. Explain your thinking. Build on the ideas of others.”
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The materials provide a list of supplemental resources to accompany each text needed to support instruction. The Planning: Lesson Resources page in the Teacher’s Edition before each text lists related Student Resources and Teacher Resources, including optional extra support, extension, or accommodations for the lessons. These same resources are listed in the context in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition and online. Symbols are next to each resource to specify if they are an audio resource, video, document, annotation highlight, or online assessment.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition, Lesson Resources are listed at the beginning of each lesson, which includes both Student Resources and Teacher Resources. Examples of Student Resources include selection audio, word network, and evidence log, which are “available online in the interactive Student Edition or Unit Resources.” Examples of Teacher Resources include Selection Resources, Reteach/Practice, Assessment, My Resources, annotation highlights, accessible leveled text, concept vocabulary, and word study, which are “available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.”
In the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, suggested trade books are listed. The title and author of the text are listed. Trade book lesson plans are available online at myPerspectives+.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Current Perspectives, news stories, and interesting media are listed. The materials list the name of the media and where it can be found.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The materials provide a clear assessment system that provides multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. Teachers can monitor learning and interpret student performance in various assessments as students work toward the culminating tasks, such as unit tests, selection tests, performance-based tasks, and writing tasks. The assessments include a variety of modalities and types across the year and opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge of the grade-level reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards. The standards assessed in each assessment are indicated. In addition, the materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials identify the standards addressed with each assessment. Assessments are listed throughout the materials in multiple locations. Performance-based tasks and assessments, with their related standards, are listed in the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition, Unit At A Glance. Standards for activities, tasks, and assessments in each unit correlate directly to the Performance Task as well as the End Of Unit Performance Based Assessment and Unit Test. The online materials include an Assessment tab, which lists all the assessments used throughout the materials. The reading test associated with each text includes an answer key that includes the objective and standard for each question. In the unit tests, the student view shows the assessed skills with each question.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the online Assessment tab, the standards for the Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests are listed. The standards, listed on the top of the page, are hyperlinked so that a separate text box opens when clicked on. This text box lists the standards addressed in the standards.
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Performance Task: Writing Focus, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve and watch a video about a coming-of-age ritual for an Apache woman. The students learn about the changes that the young people in each feature go through. They also learn about heritage and traditions. Students write a nonfiction narrative that answers this question: “What event changed your understanding of yourself or that of someone you know?” The assessed standards include: “Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, relevant descriptive details, and well-structured event sequences. Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Use a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence, signal shifts from one-time frame or setting to another, and show the relationships among experiences and events.” A scoring rubric is included in the Student Edition.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials provide multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. Teachers can monitor learning and interpret student performance with various assessments as they work toward the culminating tasks, such as unit tests, selection tests, performance-based tasks, and writing tasks. Support materials include rubrics, answer keys, comprehension questions, graphic organizers, and class discussions. Opportunities for teachers to provide feedback, both formal and informal, are available throughout units, such as discussion, research based on self-selected texts, and evidence logs. Each unit test contains an interpretation guide that lists the standards, depth of knowledge, and remediation options. Skills practice pages and standard support are included. The Common Core Companion Workbook provides extra practice based on Common Core State Standards. Sufficient guidance and suggestions are included to help teachers follow up with students.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit from the Table of Contents is complete with an Answer Key for the texts and assignments. The Unit Answer Key provides answers with key details that are related to the texts, possible responses students might provide during discussions, and Comprehension Checks.
In the Table of Contents, Assessments include Selection Tests, Extension Selection Tests, Unit Tests, Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests, and Extension Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests. Teachers can locate the Answer Keys for each test, along with short response answers that state the important information for students to include in their writing.
In the Table of Contents, myPerspectives+, teachers have access to graphic organizers and writing rubrics to support student success. Both the Graphic Organizers and the Rubrics are provided in DOC and PDF formats. Organizers include, but are not limited to, Comic Strip Organizers, Inference Maps, and a Vocabulary Square. Rubrics include, but are not limited to, Generic (Holistic) Writing, Multimedia Reports, Poems, Informative/Explanatory Writing, and Narrative Evaluation Charts.
In each unit, Quickwrite activities provide opportunities to assess writing skills and student understanding in response to a prompt.
In each unit, Analyze the Text activities offer opportunities for students to demonstrate overall text comprehension. The tasks require students to cite textual evidence as they respond to specific text-based questions.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit offers a pre- and post-informal assessment of student improvement as students revisit their goals toward the end of the unit.
In each unit, students answer Comprehension Check questions that show students' understanding of the texts and complete Research to Clarify activities to learn more about a specific detail from the text and respond. Students complete Prepare to Share activities where they share ideas with peers about their self-selected text as part of the Independent Learning task.
In each Unit Test, the Interpretation Guide provides information on remediation resources: “As warranted by student results on this assessment, you may wish to assign the remediation resources indicated in the chart. Resources include skills practice and extended standards support, and you can choose to use whichever resource is appropriate for your students.” The Interpretation Guide includes the objective instructional standards, depth of knowledge, skills practice pages, and standard support.
The Common Core Companion Workbook provides explanations, examples, and academic vocabulary, related to the Common Core Standards. Practice worksheets are included in the Workbook.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials have assessments that include a variety of modalities and types across the year. The assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge of the grade-level reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards. Within a unit, students complete formative comprehension and skill checks, synthesize their learning through writing and speaking performance tasks, revising, editing, and presenting their work.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Beginning-of-Year and Mid-Year benchmark tests are used to assess most grade-level reading and language standards.
Formative Assessments include Evidence Logs, Selection Tests, Comprehension Checks, and Unit Reflections.
According to the Standards Correlation chart in the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, Writing, and Speaking and Listening standards are formally assessed through a Performance Task or Performance-Based Assessments.
Students complete a Performance Task: Writing Focus after reading all Whole-Class Learning texts. After all the texts in a unit are read, students complete a final two-part Writing, and Speaking and Listening Performance-Based Assessment.
Following the Performance-Based Assessment, teachers are instructed to administer the Unit Test, Selected Response, and Performance Task “to apply standards and skills taught in the unit to a fresh, cold-read passage.”
At the end of each unit, students take the Unit Test. In the test’s Selected and Short Response part, students answer multiple-choice questions about new passages and perform a writing task.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills. Under the Assessment tab, the various types of assessments have a brief overview to explain each option. The Interactive Student Edition includes a link to the performance task that students can utilize. The Academic Vocabulary section will read the vocabulary to the student. Otherwise, there are no clear text-to-speech accommodations included in the materials. Different types of assessments are provided, and most of them are available online, as a PDF, or in a print version. When printed, assessments often download into Microsoft Word. The print can be enlarged by zooming on a computer screen or placing texts in Microsoft Word and enlarging or changing the font. In the PDF version, students may annotate the text and mark it up with the tools provided.
Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Many of the assessments can be downloaded into Microsoft Word in order to print. This would allow the teacher to increase the size of the font for the students before printing the test.
For assessments referring directly to previously-read texts, audio versions of the texts are available in the Interactive Student Edition.
The materials include customizable test prep banks for reading, language and editing, and writing. The materials provide multiple test banks from each section for teachers to choose from.
Unit-level and Performance-Based Assessments may be assigned to students as PDFs online, where teachers or students may add highlighting or notes.
In the Interactive Student Edition, students can click on a link to the performance-based assessment for each unit. Students can zoom in and out using their mouse or fingers. The materials will read aloud the academic vocabulary and definitions. Students can also open the rubrics and print them if needed.
Examview is available for teachers to set up on the computers, which allow them to create their own assessments. Teachers can modify or adapt assessments for students who struggle.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Selection tests can be assigned online, as a PDF, and printed. The materials provide information under each option for the teacher. For example, under the PDF version, it states, “PDF format allows students to use the Interactive PDF Tool to annotate and complete the assignment.”
In the Getting Started section, the materials provide a Customize Worksheet and Assessments document. This document shows step-by-step directions for the teacher on how to edit and assign assessments.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. They regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level and strategies for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. The program includes varied approaches to learning tasks over time and a variety of ways that students are expected to demonstrate their understanding. There is guidance for grouping students in a variety of ways across each unit. Units follow the structure of Whole-Class Learning, with some informal peer groupings, Small-Group Learning entirely focused on collaborative work, and Independent Learning, which concludes with a “Learn From Your Classmates” discussion.
The materials include a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included. In addition, there is some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students’ home language to facilitate learning and guidance for teachers to facilitate learning and content that support linguistically and culturally diverse students.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. Program-level resources explain best practices for scaffolding and differentiating access to literacy learning. Text-specific suggestions provide educators with support for addressing needs before, during, and after reading the text. Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning boxes are found in the margins. At the beginning of each unit, the Personalize for Learning section provides the text complexity rubric and a Decide and Plan flowchart. The flowchart includes Strategic Support that offers strategies for all students, including special populations. The materials also provide support guidance according to students’ performance on formative assessments. This may include other resources provided in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, the Teacher’s Edition provides a Personalize For Learning section for the excerpt from Blue Nines and Red Words by Daniel Tammet. This section includes the text complexity rubric and a Decide and Plan chart. The Challenge box contains suggestions for students that need to be challenged when Analyzing Text. The Teacher’s Edition suggests, “Ask students to examine how the author’s unique perspective impacts his daily experiences and interactions. Ask them to cite examples from the text and talk about both advantages and disadvantages of their condition. To challenge learners to provide an in-depth written response, the Teacher’s Edition suggests, “Ask students to write about the advantages and disadvantages of having a special skill or trait. Have them use examples from the selection and also their own experiences or about themselves or others in their lives. Have them also comment on why it is important to look at what a person can do and not just what they are unable to do.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Small-Group Learning, the students review the media selection “Sounds of a Glass Armonica” by musician William Zeitler. The Teacher’s Edition provides a guide for formative assessment in the margin on page 522. The materials state, “If students struggle to close review the video, then provide the Sounds of a Glass Armonica Media Questions available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Answers and DOK levels are also available. If students struggle with Media Vocabulary the Teacher’s Edition suggests, “If students don’t use the media vocabulary accurately, then have them reread the definition and practice using the terms in sentences.”
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. In the Teacher’s Edition, at the beginning of each text, the Personalize for Learning section contains a text-complexity chart and a Decide and Plan flowchart. Throughout the materials and in the flowchart, ideas to challenge students are provided that relate to reading, writing, and research and take the form of discussions, written work, or brief presentations. These suggestions are usually balanced by other modifications for language learners or students who need more support rather than extra work for early finishers.
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read the magazine article “Barrington Irving, Pilot, and Educator” from National Geographic. In the Personalize for Learning section, Decide and Plan flowchart, the Challenge section provides ideas relating to text analysis and written response. The Challenge section provides ideas relating to text analysis and written responses. The text analysis idea states: “Ask students to work in pairs. Ask them to read the section about Irving’s message to kids (paragraph 2) and to list qualities Irving says kids need in order to achieve great things. Then have them find examples of how Irving showed these qualities in his life. For example, he showed determination by continuing to look for sponsorship for his solo flight, even when faced with many rejections.” The written response idea states: “Ask students to write about something in their own life (or the life of a close friend or family member)that shows determination or passion or that requires hard work in order to pursue a dream.”
In Unit 4, A Starry Home, Small-Group Learning, students read the poem “Retort” by Paul Laurence Dunbar and “The People, Yes” by Carl Sandberg. In the Personalize for Learning, Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, teachers determine which students can engage with standards in greater depth: “If students have done well on the Beginning-of-Year Assessment, then challenge them to keep progressing and learning by giving them opportunities to practice the skills in depth.” The Looking Forward column gives ideas for extension tasks: “Work with students to identify metaphors or similes they notice in the selections” and “Ask students to use multimedia in a way that enhances the topic rather than reiterates the ideas they are saying. (i.e., make it interactive).”
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, students complete the readings by Writing an Argument. In the Teacher’s Edition, there are text boxes in the margins that provide options for differentiating assignments. The Challenge text box provides the following suggestion: “Write an Argument: Ask students to suggest a current topic that has opposing viewpoints and have them write a brief argument related to the topic. Remind students to use what they have learned in this unit to construct an effective argument. Be sure they include claims, reasoning, and evidence, as well as a strong introduction and conclusion. Ask volunteers to share their arguments with the class.” This prompt follows the lesson activities for Write an Argument, so it is not extra work.
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and a variety of ways that students are expected to demonstrate their understanding. The materials include a large number of teacher prompts and questions in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition. Students are provided with the opportunity to answer comprehension questions and complete research, writing, and speaking and listening tasks on the texts they read throughout the unit. During writing exercises, students are expected to complete peer and self-reflection for writing samples. Each unit contains unit goals that the student rates themselves on at the beginning and the end of the unit. An evidence log is also included to allow students to connect their learning and provide evidence of learning.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
At the end of most Whole-Group learning texts, students complete a Comprehension Check provided in the Student Edition. This comprehension check includes Research to Clarify and Research to Explore prompts to help them expand their thinking and knowledge based on the text.
Throughout each unit, the Teacher’s Edition provides questions and prompts for the teacher to use to incorporate and facilitate whole-group and small-group discussions.
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials contain an Evidence Log for students to fill out during the units. The Evidence Log asks students to make connections to the text and provide evidence from the text and any additional notes or ideas. Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, the materials will prompt the teacher to ask the student to add evidence to their Evidence Log.
Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The reading assignments follow a similar pattern for teaching the text. However, a variety of literacy skills are taught over the course of each unit. During Whole-Group Learning, students complete lessons for Making Meaning and Language Development. Making Meaning includes a first read, a close read, an analysis of the text, and craft and structure. Language Development includes concept vocabulary, word study, and conventions.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Small-Group Learning, students may write about the texts they have read. The materials contain a “Reviewing and Revising” section during the writing process. This section gives students a checklist to help peers review each other’s work.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Introduction contains Unit Goals. This section includes but is not limited to, reading, writing, research, language, and speaking and listening goals. Students rate themselves on a scale from 1 to 5 to determine how well they already meet the goal.
The end of each unit contains a Unit Reflection. This reflection includes prompts such as “Look back at the goals at the beginning of the unit. Use a different colored pen to rate yourself again. Then, think about the reading and activities that contributed the most to the growth of your understanding. Record your thoughts.”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide guidance for grouping students in a variety of ways across each unit. Units follow the structure of Whole-Class Learning, with some informal peer groupings; Small-Group Learning entirely focused on collaborative work; and Independent Learning, which concludes with a “Learn From Your Classmates” discussion. Teachers receive optional suggestions for student-to-student interaction in the Teacher’s Edition and general guidance on how to form small groups.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening, Deliver a Multimedia Presentation, students are prompted to “Plan With Your Group” by analyzing text and taking notes: “With your group, analyze how each selection contributes to your understanding of the Holocaust. Use this chart to organize your ideas.”
In Unit 2, The Holocaust, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read The Diary of Anne Frank, Act I by Albert Hackett & Frances Goodrich and complete a Concept Vocabulary task: “1. Write a paragraph about this part of the play, using as many of the concept words as possible. 2. Work with a partner. Take turns listing synonyms, or words with similar meanings, for each concept word. When you have finished, take turns listing antonyms, or words with opposite meanings, for each concept word.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read “To Fly” from Space Chronicles by Neil deGrasse Tyson and complete a Speaking and Listening task: “Work with a partner to create and deliver an informative presentation on one of the historic flying feats or scientific principles that Neil deGrasse Tyson discusses in the text.”
A “Share Your Independent Learning” section concludes this part of the unit with three tasks: “Prepare to Share: Even when you read something independently, your understanding continues to grow when you share what you have learned with others. Reflect on the text you explored independently and write notes about its connection to the unit. In your notes, consider why this text belongs in this unit”; “Learn From Your Classmates: Discuss It: Share your ideas about the text you explored on your own. As you talk with your classmates, jot down ideas that you learn from them”; “Reflect: Review your notes, and underline the most important insight you gained from these writing and discussion activities. Explain how this idea adds to your understanding of the topic.”
Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
A box in the Teacher’s Edition at the start of Small-Group Learning notes, “Forming Groups: You may wish to form groups for Small-Group Learning so that each consists of students with different learning abilities. Some students may be adept at organizing information, whereas others may have strengths related to generating or synthesizing information. A good mix of abilities can make the experience of Small-Group Learning dynamic and productive.”
Personalize for Learning boxes appear in the margin of the Teacher’s Edition with suggestions, as in this example from Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, “Uncle Marcos” from The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende, translated by Magda Bogin: “Choral Reading: Call student attention to paragraph 7. Throughout this story, the author uses very long sentences to help create the story’s mood. She does this again in paragraph 7 by describing Uncle Marcos’s final, real demise. Do a choral reading of the final paragraph. Have pairs of students read each sentence slowly and deliberately to create the mood the narrator is trying to evoke here. Ask students to discuss how the read-aloud differed from their original first read of the paragraph.”
After students complete their First Read of their chosen Independent Learning tasks, teachers have a note to “Make It Interactive” for a Close Read: “Group students according to their chosen selection. Then, have students meet to discuss the selection in-depth. Their discussions should be guided by their insights and questions.”
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide strategies and support for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. In the Teacher’s Edition, general accommodations, strategies, and suggestions are provided to assist teachers with each text. Personalize for Learning suggestions are before and during many reading, writing, vocabulary, language, as well as speaking and listening activities. Before each text, a Decide and Plan flow chart on the Personalize for Learning page provides strategies for teachers to use with English Language Learners.
Materials consistently provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Introduction, Academic Vocabulary: Nonfiction Narrative, students predict the meaning of and find words related to vocabulary that students will learn during the Unit. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, the English Language Support box includes support for understanding Cognates “Many of the academic words have Spanish cognates. Use these cognates with students whose home language is Spanish:
attribute - atributo
gratifying - gratificante
persistent - persistente
notable - notable
inspire - inspirar.”
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Class Learning, students read an opinion piece, “Three Cheers for the Nanny State'' by Sarah Conly. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, the English Language Support box includes support for Using Independent and Dependent Clauses. The suggested supports are broken into three levels: Emerging: Ask students to write a brief summary of the selection. Have students include at least two dependent clauses in at least three sentences; Expanding : Have students use at least three dependent clauses and encourage them to use at least one noun clause. Remind them that these clauses typically begin with what, whatever, when, where, why, or how. Bridging: Ask students to write about the central idea of the selection and include three supporting details. Tell them to include three supporting details. Tell them to include at least three dependent clauses, and encourage them to include an adverb clause in their writing.”
In Unit 5, Invention, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task: Writing Focus, students write an argument. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, the English Language Support box includes support for understanding Transitions. All levels of ELLs are to complete the same task: “Writing complex sentences that are not run-ons can be a challenge. Practice combining sentences will help students improve their writing. Provide students with a list of transition words. You can use the examples in this lesson or add others. Provide them with several short sentences on index cards or presented on a screen.”
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials include a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in both images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included. In the About the Author section for each text, important background information for authors of a variety of race and/or ethnicities are provided. People of various demographics are depicted in a positive light, without any obvious or blatant stereotypes. The texts are written by authors of different backgrounds and feature protagonists of diverse races, ethnicities, countries of origin, gender expressions, and people with developmental disabilities. The materials balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics and avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Notes in the Teacher’s Edition provide ways to highlight positive portrayals in texts.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. As students read, they use details from this story to support their answer to the Unit’s Essential Question: “What are some milestones on the path to growing up?” In this story, a grandfather from the Lakota tribe comes to live with his family. In Lakota tradition, the “passing of a medicine bag symbolizes maturity.” In the Teacher Edition, the Insight box describes “The Medicine Bag as a thoughtful and humane story about cultural understanding. Martin’s friends are impressed by his grandfather even though he doesn’t look like TV images of Native Americans. His grandfather understands that it wouldn’t be appropriate for Martin to wear the medicine bag everywhere.” During this reading, students may see that “Martin’s responses to the events in the story are critical to the way he understands himself.”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. The Teacher Edition Planning pages state that this is a short story told from the perspective of Charlie, who “has a disability that affects his intelligence.” A doctor provides him with “an operation intended to make him smarter,” which it does. However, because of the operation, Charlie learns that his ability to outperform others in “math and languages to literature and science” creates a barrier to building relationships. Charlie worries that the change may not be sustainable, and he may return to his former level of intelligence.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Setting Sun and the Rolling World'' by Zimbabwean writer Charles Mungoshi. In this short story, the students research an aspect of Zimbabwean culture to write an informational report. In the Research section, students connect elements of the story with Zimbabwean healers or traditional family life in Zimbabwe. Both assignments help students reflect on the Rites of Passage of youth and family traditions in Zimbabwe.
In Unit 3, What Matters, Unit Introduction, the teacher is encouraged to show a video to support Current Perspectives that pertain to the Essential Question: “When is it right to take a stand?” In the video “Michael Garcia, Waiter Who Defended Boy With Special Needs, Gives Donations Away” by the Huffington Post, a waiter stands up for a five-year-old with Down Syndrome. Teachers are encouraged to show this to increase student engagement regarding “the kinds of things that matter to people.”
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Whole-Group Learning, students read “Barrington Irving: Pilot and Educator,” a National Geographic article. At age 23, Irving became the youngest person—and only African American—ever to fly solo around the world. In the Teacher’s Edition, the Insight box states that Barrington Irving’s story shows that no matter how or where you were raised, you are capable of doing great things when you put your heart into them.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials provide some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students’ home language to facilitate learning. The Professional Development Center contains multiple short videos and documents regarding differentiation. In many of the videos and documents, the importance of understanding a student’s identity and using their home language is conveyed. General resources in the online platform, such as Every Teacher’s Toolkit by Karen Kawaguchi, provide teacher tips for enhancing cultural responsiveness and home-language validation. In the Teacher’s Edition, a few Personalize for Learning boxes suggest connections between Spanish and English cognates. Spanish is the only language offered in supplemental materials, like the online Spanish Resources library, with texts translated into Spanish.
Materials provide suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Professional Development Center contains a section for engagement. In this section, a video titled “Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education” provides support for teachers using the program. Jim Cummings, Ph.D. suggests that “we need to tap into that knowledge [students’ first language], and enable them or help them to transfer that knowledge to English.” He also suggests that many English Language Learners can use their artistic talent to work in groups. He suggests that “by operating within the group and talking with the group and looking at the issues of the tasks that have been assigned, as a group, their talents can come in, even though their knowledge of English may not have been sufficient enough to enable them to do this by themselves.” Teachers that use multiple modalities of learning can tap into their students’ talents and abilities.
The online materials contain a myPerspectives+: English Learner Support section that includes the digital text, Every Teacher’s Toolkit by Karen Kawaguchi. The text includes strategies for language learners, including definitions and suggestions for two areas: “Culturally and linguistically responsive teaching” and “Validate Home Languages.” Both sections include details on how to help strengthen student skills in areas such as academic vocabulary, grammar, and presentation skills.
The online materials for Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Spanish Resources section includes an Introduction video, “Dear Graduates–A Message From Kid President,” that is translated into Spanish. The resources also include the Spanish translations of the Small-Group texts: “You Are the Electric Boogaloo,” “Just Be Yourself,” and “The Setting Sun and the Rolling World.”
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the online materials, the Spanish Resources Library contains Spanish versions of texts for use in Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning. A video introduction to the unit in Spanish and stand-alone Spanish grammar and writing worksheets are also included. Teacher Resources in this section include an answer guide for the grammar worksheets.
In the Professional Development Center, a white paper titled “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners” is a resource that teachers can access. One suggestion states, “Encourage students to draw on their multilingual repertoires as a stepping stone to English (e.g., initial writing or note-taking in L1 as a means of transferring knowledge and skills from L1 to English).”
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from Blue Nines and Red Words from Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet. In the Personalize for Learning, English Language Support box, teachers are offered support for using Domain-Specific Vocabulary and Word Families to understand the context of the story The instruction suggests that teachers “Review paragraphs 21 and 22 with students. The domain-specific vocabulary that appears in the excerpt from Blue Nines and Red Words may present a challenge to English learners. Support them in finding familiar base words, familiar related words, or words that have already been defined in the story. For example, if students recognize that calendrical (paragraph 21) is related to the familiar word calendar, they can probably figure out that calendrical means “having to do with calendars.”
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials include teacher guidance to facilitate learning and content that support linguistically and culturally diverse students. The FrontMatter highlights the importance of allowing students to use their personal experiences when completing tasks: “Students are encouraged to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural backgrounds.” The Professional Development Center also includes information to help teachers engage with culturally diverse students. Some unit topics and texts allow for open-ended, relevant personal connections. Before each text in Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning, the Jumpstart box offers suggestions for discussion topics related to the text. Other texts or activities include teacher notes that explain how to offer instruction to a range of students. Spanish language tools for some Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning texts are available in student materials. A home-school connection letter is available in English and Spanish. No other languages are available.
Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, the materials state, “The texts, Essential Questions, and learning tasks encourage discussions that allow students to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural background. This active learning environment brings students together as they develop intercultural competence, learn from each other, and gain the confidence that allows them to be agents of change.”
The Frontmatter pages at the start of the Teacher’s Edition describe the program’s culturally responsive foundation: “Ernest Morrell, Ph.D., helped inform the development of myPerspectives to ensure the program fosters a polyvocal classroom that encourages students to talk with each other, learn from each other, and more importantly, bring knowledge from their different backgrounds and cultures to enrich critical literacy in the classroom. The texts, Essential Questions, and learning tasks encourage discussions that allow students to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural backgrounds.”
In Unit 1, Rites of Passage, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Setting Sun and Rolling World” by Charles Mungoshi. In the Planning section of the Teacher’s Edition, the Summary states, “Old Musoni has been a farmer in rural Zimbabwe his whole life, and the land is very difficult to manage. His son Nhamo wants to leave home and pursue a new life.” This argument between a father and son helps students understand the cultural context that is presented in the story. Since the “Names are not identified in the dialogue, the story might be difficult to follow. However, in the Decide and Plan section, the teacher can guide those that need English Language Support by asking the students to mark lines spoken by each character and to identify whose thoughts are shown in different paragraphs in the text.
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Center, Engagement, the video “Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education” provides information on the importance of supporting other cultures in the classroom. Jim Cummins, Ph.D., discusses how “when we tap into students’ cultural backgrounds, we’re tapping into their knowledge base.”
In the Professional Development Center, myPerspectives in Action, the video, “Facilitating Small Group Learning with Diverse Learners,” provides information about how two teachers, an ELA teacher, and a Special Education teacher, encourage and support all students to engage in small group discussions about a poem they are reading.
In Unit 4, Human Intelligence, Performance Task: Writing Focus, an Author’s Perspective box in the Teacher’s Edition gives guidance for teaching writing: “Transfer of First Language: English learners’ home languages are valuable cognitive tools that can be tapped to help them improve the quality of their first drafts. Having students write in their home language often produces higher quality writing than when students write only in English because it helps them capture, express, and organize their ideas. Translation software can be useful as a starting point to help students move from their home language draft to an English draft. Obviously, the machine-translated draft will require editing, but this can be done collaboratively with help from the teacher and/or the student’s classmates. After students have produced their initial drafts in English, teachers can work with them on the revision process, focusing on such key areas as organization, paragraph formation, and coherence. As students revise with teacher input, teachers should encourage them to pay special attention to cognates and genre rules.”
Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Center, the document “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners” by Jim Cummins, Ph.D., is provided. The document states four essential instructional strategies. One of the strategies is Connect to Students’ Lives and Affirm their Identities: “Connecting instruction to students’ lives by evoking personal and intellectual responses to texts represents not only a form of differentiation but also affirms students’ identities. Students who feel that their voices are heard, and their culture and identity validated in the classroom are much more likely to engage academically than those who feel ignored or devalued.”
Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Spanish language resources are available for teachers. Translations are provided for Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning reading selections. Audio summaries of texts are provided in the digital materials. The Teacher’s Edition notes, “Audio summaries are available online in both English and Spanish in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Assigning these summaries prior to reading the selection may help students build additional background knowledge and set a context for their first read.” Spanish grammar and Spanish writing worksheets are also available for students, though they are not available in other languages.
In the online Interactive Student Edition, students can highlight any word or words and view a translation in one of 104 languages, such as Pashto, Hmong, Haitian Creole, or Filipino. Thirty-five languages (including Portuguese, Slovak, Afrikaans, and Arabic) have the additional layer of that text being read aloud in the target language. Some audio translations do not have the speaker speaking the language correctly.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to solve personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, What Matters, Unit Introduction, students participate in a Jump Start discussion using the following question: “Ask students to think about something in their lives that really matters to them. It may be something they are willing to work hard for and never give up on. What would they be willing to do to achieve it? Have several volunteers briefly share their responses. Then engage the class in a discussion of whether people should expect to make sacrifices to achieve what matters most to them.”
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. The program includes digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with their teachers and peers. The Interactive Student Edition prompts students to discuss tasks with classmates and record their collective notes in the digital notebook. Students save their work through the online assignments, and teachers review and provide feedback to students. The materials also include a discussion board that teachers and students allow for digital conversations.
The materials incorporate a visual design in print and digital editions that support student learning, make the organizational structure clear, and communicate clearly. The four sections (Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance Based Assessments) are color-coded and match the color coding in the Teacher Edition.
There are several layers of support for teachers to understand and use the program’s embedded technology, such as high-level training videos and handouts.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. Students highlight, annotate, and translate the text into a variety of languages, many of which can also be read aloud to them in that language. Students respond to prompts by typing in text boxes or charts. Students navigate the Interactive Student Edition by clicking on labeled tabs that take them to various sections of the textbook. Digital tools allow teachers to view and respond to student responses and customize the materials to meet the needs of students. Teachers can assign work through the online platform and access other digital resources like the Hook and Inspire pages for anchor texts, which have links to supplemental videos and texts.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Interactive Student Edition, students adjust the font size using a button at the top of the page. Students search for different topics or words by using the magnifying glass at the top of the page.
In the Interactive Student Edition, students read and listen to the texts, type their responses to questions, and plan their writing. Students submit their work via this platform, allowing teachers to see all student responses immediately.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Interactive Student Edition contains clear links to the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, and Unit Reflection. A drop-down menu provides access to the table of contents, bookmarks, annotations, and highlights, notebook, and glossary.
In each Unit Performance-Based Assessment, students can click on a notebook icon to open a text box to write ideas they are going to use for their multimedia presentation.
In the Interactive Student Edition, materials are organized to keep students on track and to support their work. For example, a header bar shows where students are in the lesson and unit. Comprehension Checks are displayed in the right-hand column, keeping the text center for reference.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Table of Contents can be customized for a variety of purposes in both the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition: “You can customize the program by rearranging the Table of Contents, creating your own tests, and uploading your own resources to match your curriculum.” Students may customize the table of contents by clicking on the three vertical dots next to the table of contents. Teachers may then move items, remove items, or add files, links, titles, or notes for students.
In the Interactive Student Edition, students can select any text and make personal customizations, such as translating the words, highlighting in one of four colors, circling the text, underlining it, or adding a note.
In the Hook and Inspire section, teachers can choose from various resources, such as videos, articles, and extension activities that can be customized. The landing page includes ways teachers can support students’ learning “Into,” “Through,” and “Beyond” the Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Anchor Texts. The page states, “Hook and inspire your students with these ideas. Build your own Playlist of media, short texts, novel connections, and extension activities to enrich your teaching.” In Unit 3, What Matters, “Words Do Not Pay” by Chief Joseph, the following “Beyond” resources are provided, but are not limited to: “Quotation from Chief Joseph,” Use this quotation from Chief Joseph to prompt discussion about one of his speech’s key ideas—the power or the ineffectiveness of words: “It does not require many words to speak the truth.” Ask students how this statement relates to the speech they just read. Did speaking the truth help Chief Joseph’s cause?; “Nez Perce Tribe Overview,” Use this webpage from the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission to provide information about the Nez Percé, past and present. How does the misnomer “Nez Percé” relate to your class discussion about the power of words?;” “Q’orianka Kilcher Reads Chief Joseph” (youtube.com), “Play this video of actress Q’orianka Kilcher reading the entirety of Chief Josephs’s 1879 speech to Congress; “Chief Joseph’s Ceasefire Speech in Nimipuutímt,” “Share this video of poet Sarah Hennessey, a member of the Nez Percé tribe, reading Chief Joseph’s most famous speech in his native language.”
In the Interactive Student Edition, the Small-Group Learning section includes a chart of learning strategies. Each section of the chart includes a box where students can add their own ideas. For example, the Support Others section includes the following chart topics: “Build off ideas from others in your group. Invite others who have not yet spoken to do so.” A blank Support Others box is available for students to type further ideas.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials include digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with their teachers and peers. The Interactive Student Edition prompts students to discuss tasks with classmates and record their collective notes in the digital notebook. Students save their work through the online assignments, and teachers review and provide feedback to students. The materials also include a discussion board that teachers and students allow for digital conversations. The connected Savvas Realize platform allows tasks to be assigned, completed, scored, and tracked digitally by teachers. Teachers provide feedback to students while they work on assignments. The Collaboration Center includes videos referencing how students can collaborate with email, text messaging, and shared documents.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Savvas Realize platform, MyPerspectives, connects to Google Classroom so that tasks can be assigned and completed. Students can annotate PDFs or attach separate files to their work. Teachers can view completion rates, score tasks, and see the students’ mastery of the standards. Teachers can also select assignments for individual students or sub-groups of the class.
The Interactive Student Edition is an online platform that allows the teacher the opportunity to assign activities. The “Student work is saved, and teachers may review it at any time. If work is completed offline, work will sync up when online again.”
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Program Overview a tab for Digital Resources is available. The On-Demand Training page includes a Digital Tour handout and a video. Digital Tools in a Discussion Board “facilitate collaboration and real-time peer-to-peer sharing of ideas.” In addition, there is an EssayScorer that allows teachers to provide immediate feedback to students for revising and editing.
In the Collaboration Center, videos are provided that model how to collaborate. Some videos reference online tools students can use for collaboration. For example, the Build Consensus video discusses collaboration using shared documents, text messaging, and email. The teacher can assign these videos to students.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The materials incorporate a visual design in both the print and digital editions that support student learning, make the organizational structure clear, and communicate clearly. Each of the four sections (Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance Based Assessments) are color-coded and match the color coding in the Teacher Edition. Charts, diagrams, photos, illustrations, and icons are included thoughtfully on the pages. The table of contents, glossary, index, and other resources are clearly labeled and easy to find. The layout for each selection is consistent so students can find the information they need.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Interactive Student Edition, the pages typically have a colored band at the top that contains a heading and any pictures or illustrations that accompany the text. The stories typically do not contain any illustrations or pictures other than what is on the colored band at the top of the page.
The Interactive Student Edition has clearly labeled links that are included for information about the author, background, and standards addressed with each text. These are clearly labeled above the text.
In the print/PDF Student Edition, pictures are typically at the top of the first page of text, without many additional pictures or illustrations throughout each passage. The PDF has wide margins and sometimes provides additional information for the students in the margins. Icons in the margins refer students to external tools they can use, such as a pencil and paper icon to represent Evidence Log and a spiral-bound book icon for the Notebook.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each edition, all units follow the same order of sections that are clearly color-coded: Whole-Class Learning is blue, Small-Group Learning is turquoise, Independent Learning is purple, and Performance-Based Assessment is orange. The opening page of each unit contains clearly labeled links to the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, and Unit Reflection. The links are color-coded to match the section colors and are consistent across the materials. There is a photo on the left side of the page that connects to the unit theme.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Introduction of each unit, a Pacing Plan is provided at the bottom of the pages with a timeline for the entire unit, a numbered square for each day, a blue, turquoise, purple, or orange line denoting the section of the unit, and the names of the texts or tasks associated with the section.
In the Teacher’s Edition, each text displays the same four Planning pages that include a summary of the text, Lesson Resources (a table laying out the text’s Making Meaning, Language Development, and Effective Expression tasks), Reading Support (a text complexity rubric), and Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, which details a cycle of Identify Needs, Decide and Plan, Teach, and Analyze and Revise.
In the Interactive Student Edition in Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning, at the top of the first page of each text, links are clearly labeled and include information about the author, background, and standards addressed in each text. A sidebar contains links to the table of contents, bookmarks, annotation and highlights, notebook, and glossary. They are clearly labeled and accessed the same way throughout the materials.
In the Interactive Student Edition, the Performance-Based Assessments have clearly labeled parts, including links to the Academic Vocabulary, Word Network, and Rubric sections.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the print Student Edition, the header on most pages (except for pages with texts) includes the unit Essential Question.
The Interactive Student Edition contains clickable nested links showing navigation within the unit (e.g., Unit 1 Rites of Passage > Whole-Class Learning > The Medicine Bag), and the right side of the screen has an expandable menu to navigate within the text (e.g., Making Meaning, Language Development, Effective Expression).
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials include several layers of support for teachers to understand and use the program’s embedded technology. The Getting Started with myPerspectives digital page contains links to two resources: MySavvasTraining.com and Savvas Realize. The website, MySavvasTraining.com, presents high-level videos and handouts on topics such as accessing student data, downloading assignments in order to modify them and creating playlists of learning material. The Savvas Realize section focuses on the technical aspects of the assignment platform, such as demonstrating how to assign content to students, managing discussion boards, and using the Realize Reader digital textbook. The video and/or printable handout, Digital Resources, explains the embedded technology available to teachers and students. The documents almost always contain step-by-step directions and screenshots/images to help the teacher use technology with this program.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, teachers can access videos and PowerPoint presentations about the different aspects of the program, such as the Table of Contents, the Student Edition, and assessments. One of the Program Overview videos in Digital Resources is a 12-minute video with information about how to utilize and navigate the online program, customize instruction, save time with digital tools, and engage students. A printable handout with the same information is available.
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Teacher How-To Resources, a document is provided to understand how to use the resources, such as Google classroom assignments, customize worksheets and assessments, share playlists, and ExamView: Getting Started. The documents provide step-by-step directions for teachers to utilize online materials and technology.
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Savvas Realize is the online platform for managing classes, assigning and turning in tasks, and examining data. The Savvas Realize training site provides technical support to teachers in the following categories:
Assignments > Realize Reader Assignments: “Savvas Realize Reader gives you access to digital textbooks and assignments in an engaging, interactive learning environment. Realize Reader content can also include video, interactive charts, graphs, drag-and-drop activities, and a notebook service, in addition to basic features, such as annotations, highlights, and bookmarks.” Directions follow for accessing the Realize Reader content through Realize, via the Realize Reader app, or downloading for offline use.
Discussions > Manage Active Discussions: “Discussions enable you to facilitate class and group discussions on important academic and social topics. Students can reflect on learning, share ideas and opinions, or ask and answer questions. You can create, monitor, and reply to discussions, and students can participate in discussions you create. In addition, you can choose whether or not to score discussions.” Directions follow, showing teachers how to select a discussion and then add a comment, attach a file, or edit comments.
Data > Results by Assignment: “The Results by Assignment page includes data for class and individual student test scores, progress, and usage.” Directions follow on how to “View Class Results by Assignment,” including Scores Data, Progress Data, and Usage Data.
In the Table of Contents, MySavvasTraining.com provides different sections for program-level overviews of structure and features and includes video tutorials with accompanying handouts. The categories include:
Getting Started > Digital Tour: Technological features are highlighted, including the Discussion Board feature (“to facilitate collaboration and real-time peer-to-peer sharing of ideas”), the EssayScorer tool (“provides immediate feedback to students for revising and improving their writing, giving them additional practice and saving you time”), and content creation tools (“you can customize the program by rearranging the Table of Contents, creating your own tests, and uploading your own resources to match your curriculum.”
Assessments and Reporting > Assessments: This video describes assessments overall, including those with embedded technology: Next Generation Practice Tests and Performance Tasks “give students the opportunity to practice formats like drag and drop so that they are prepared for online interactive testing,” and the Data tab on Savvas Realize organizes “student and class data that shows standards mastery on assessments and online activities, as well as overall progress. You can dig deeper with additional data points to reveal more detailed information on student mastery, progress, and usage. You can also view data for individual students from the class assignment list.”
Additional Resources > Revision Assistant for Teachers: A 24-page guide shows teachers how to set up, launch, and use Revision Assistant, which is “an online revision tool that helps students to improve their writing. It provides instant, differentiated feedback aligned to genre-specific rubrics and allows students to share their work and revisions with their teacher.”