MyPerspectives
2022

MyPerspectives

Publisher
Savvas Learning Company
Subject
ELA
Grades
6-12
Report Release
05/01/2023
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
66/72
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report for 12th Grade

Alignment Summary

The grade 12 myPerspectives materials meet the expectations for alignment. The materials include opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. There are high-quality questions and tasks sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.

Throughout the program, there are varied opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge about what they are reading and learning through speaking and listening tasks. Students also have many opportunities to practice their writing both in on-demand and process writing tasks. Students engage in informative or expository, argumentative, and narrative writing at the distribution required by the standards, however, well-designed explicit instruction guidance is inconsistent or lacking in some areas.

While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary in a systematic way, the explicit instruction of some grammar and usage standards is inconsistent or, in some cases, lacking. 

The materials are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.

The pacing for the six units in the program is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.

12th Grade
Gateway 1

Text Quality

29/32
0
15
28
32
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25
Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. There are a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 41/59 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day required by the standards. The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band, which support students’ literacy growth.

The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.

There are varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. There are multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks. 

The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities, and there are frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. There is a yearlong writing plan provided that reflects the distribution of writing types of the standards and some guidance for teachers on explicit writing instruction.

While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

12/14

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

aterials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Materials provide six units across the grade level with different themes and multiple texts to engage students. There are a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 41/59 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day required by the standards. 

The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purposes for the anchor and series of texts, a complexity analysis of the relationship to the associated student task is not provided. 

The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band, which support students’ literacy growth. The complexity is mixed throughout the units. Six units offer a variety of texts for whole-class, small-group, and independent reading that encourage independent reading goals.

Indicator 1A
04/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1a. 

Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Materials provide six units across the grade level with different themes and multiple texts to engage students.

Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, an epic poem canonized as one of the oldest literary works in Old English. In Small-Group Learning, students read “How Did Harry Patch Become an Unlikely WWI Hero?” from BBC iWonder, which gives students a primary account of historical events pertinent to the literary works that students read. 

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill. The inclusion of topics such as wealth, competition, and social class should make this an engaging text for students. Students also view “The Prologue From the Canterbury Tales: The Remix” by Patience Agbabi, a spoken word poem performed by the author which interprets the original piece into modern times using the common contemporary language found in a modern poetry slam. 

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act I by William Shakespeare, a renowned writer and one of the most well-known tragedies.

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. The thought-provoking nature of this satire makes it worth reading. Students also read a poetry collection of John Donne, including “A Valediction” by John Donne. The collection is the first of four poetry collections in this unit. Donne’s poetry is considered one the best representations of the Metaphysical poets. 

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, a well-known canonized text, written by a woman and one of the first modern science fiction novels. In Small-Group Learning, students listen to “When Memories Never Fade, the Past Can Poison the Present,” heard on All Things Considered by Alix Spiegel. The audio text shares stories of people with perfect memory and its effect on relationships.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, which recounts an experience Orwell had as a police officer in Burma, India, that required him to kill an aggressive elephant. Often regarded as metaphorical for the negative impacts of colonialism, the story pushes readers to examine their own beliefs.

Indicator 1B
Read

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the year. Materials include a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 41/59 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards. Text types include, but are not limited to, allegory, graphic novel, realistic fiction, satire, drama, poetry, argument, essays, historical accounts, and memoir. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from the epic poem, Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, and from the graphic novel, Beowulf by Gareth Hinds. In Small-Group Learning, students read the interactive website, “How Did Harry Patch Become an Unlikely WWI Hero?” from BBC iWonder. 

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students view the multimedia text, “The Prologue From the Canterbury Tales: The Remix” by Patience Agbabi. In Small-Group Learning, students read the personal essay, “On Seeing England for the First Time” by Jamaica Kincaid.

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth by William Shakespeare. In Small-Group Learning, students read from the literary analysis, “The Naked Babe and the Cloak of Manliness” by Cleanth Brooks.

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “The Second Coming” by W.B. Yeats and “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell.

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Ode to a Nightingale” by John Keats and an excerpt from Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf. Later in Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Madeleine” from Remembrance of Things Past by Marcel Proust.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy. In Small-Group Learning, students read from the historical account, “A History of the English Church and People” by Bede, translated by Leo Sherley-Price.

Materials do not reflect a balance of informational and literary texts that support the 70/30 balance required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Over the course of the year, 31 or 41% of the texts read are informational and 44 or 59% of the texts read are literary.

  • Unit 1 contains nine core texts with 33% being informational and 67% being literary.

  • Unit 2 contains nine core texts with 78% being informational and 22% being literary.

  • Unit 3 contains 17 core texts with 41% being informational and 59% being literary.

  • Unit 4 contains 15 core texts with 27% being informational and 73% being literary.  

  • Unit 5 contains 14 core texts with 29% being informational and 71% being literary.  

  • Unit 6 contains 11 core texts with 55% being informational and 45% being literary. 

Indicator 1C
02/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1c. 

The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose for the anchor and series of texts, a complexity analysis of the relationship to the associated student task is not provided. In the Teacher’s Edition Planning section for each unit, a Text Complexity Rubric provides quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative measures include Lexile score and word count. Qualitative measures are scored and explained by the following categories: knowledge demands, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and levels of meaning/purpose, including notes explaining the reason for the score in the category. All texts are rated as moderately complex, complex, or very complex based on the provided qualitative and quantitative measures. Texts that quantitatively fall below the grade level remain moderately complex due to their qualitative nature and student tasks. While no explanation of the relationship to their associated student task is provided, the Planning section provides a rationale for the selection of each text in the Summary and Insight sections. The text selection rationale is divided into different categories: Launch Text, Whole-Class Learning texts, and Small-Group Learning texts. The Connection to Performance Tasks explains how texts are associated with Performance Tasks with a focus on writing or speaking and listening; however, there is no explanation for other tasks in the units.

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task.  Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds, which has no Lexile level, and is appropriate for a shared learning experience. The text is very qualitatively complex, and the Teacher’s Edition, Planning section shares, “Selection contains formal language, figurative language including metaphorical descriptions (kennings, i.e., ring giver = king), alliterative language.” The text connects to a Performance Task: Writing Focus when students write an argument that addresses the question: “Which counts more–taking a stand or winning?”

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society, Small-Group Learning, students read “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf, which has an overall level of moderate. The quantitative measure is 1120L, and the qualitative measure is moderately complex. The associated student task level is meets. In Analyze the Text, students engage in a small group discussion about the difference in perceptions between the author Virginia Woolf and the Bishop from Canterbury Tales, the comparison or contrast Woolf draws between Shakespeare and his imaginary sister, Judith, and finally the Essential Question, “How do people come to have different views of society?” 

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay'' by Andrea Levy, which has an overall level of complexity of moderate. The quantitative measure is 900L, and the qualitative measure is slightly complex. The associated student task level is meets. In Author’s Craft and Structure, students complete a graphic organizer analyzing author's point of view and answer: “Judging from the details you have studied above, what might be the author’s main purpose for writing this essay? Support your response with text evidence.”

Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level; however, there is no complexity analysis for the associated task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, every text includes a Text Complexity rubric for both quantitiave and qualitative measures. For example, in Unit 2, Reflecting on Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read "The Prologue from the Canterbury Tales" by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill; an overall level of complexity is not available because it is a translation. The quantitative measure is not available since it is a translation and in verse. The qualitative measure is exceedingly complex. The associated student task level is exceeds. The Text Complexity Rubric provides a score for the qualitative elements and a rationale for that score. The text scored a four out of five in language conventionality and clarity and levels of meaning/purpose. It scored a three out of five in knowledge demands and a two out of five in structure. The rationales state the text is allegorical and contains symbolism and irony, which may be difficult to grasp in language conventionality and clarity and levels of meaning/purpose. For knowledge demands the rationale states the cultural and historical background of the middle ages needed to understand the allegorical elements is challenging. In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, which has a Lexile level of 1040L. A Text Complexity Rubric is available, including Insight into the selection: “The theme of social alienation addressed in the text might require some preliminary discussion. Students should understand that they are reading about a fictional character and that the action takes place in the distant past when attitudes toward things or people who did not conform to a norm were different than ours.” The Connection to the Essential Question, “How do we define ourselves?” shares, “The first chapter focuses on the effects of experience on the creature’s sense of self. The second chapter concentrates on Dr. Frankenstein and how his concept of self changes as he agrees to the Creature’s request for a female companion.”

  • Although there is not an explicit rationale clearly stated for each text, there is an explicitly stated connection to the unit topic, essential question, and performance task for each text.

  • The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.

Indicator 1D
04/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.  

The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band which support students’ literacy growth. The complexity is mixed throughout the units. Overall, the quantitative measures generally increase across the year, and the qualitative measures are moderately complex throughout the year. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 780L–1450L. Over the course of the year, 72% of texts lack quantitative ratings. Specifically, the qualitative measures increase through the first five units, though they decrease in the last unit. While this decrease in qualitative and quantitative data suggests a level decrease, the student tasks all meet or exceed the standards. All units consistently provide an opportunity for students to grow their skills with additional support during Whole-Class Learning activities as they engage in reading and writing in relation to the Essential Question. In Small-Group Learning, students have opportunities for repeated reading of texts accessible for the grade level. Students also have opportunities to read and analyze texts independently. In all activities, students have access to models of literacy skills which help them complete tasks that require appropriate application of depth of knowledge and work toward the speaking and listening performance task and Performance-Based Assessment. The text pairings work together to scaffold the student tasks with the scaffolding suggestions provided in the Teacher’s Edition. The students read and annotate the texts while teachers guide them with text-specific scaffolding options throughout the units. The scaffolding suggestions are found in clearly identified locations and are consistent, including providing specific suggestions for various student populations, such as English Language Learners, below level learners, on level learners, and above level learners. While the general scaffolding options remain static throughout units, the Teacher’s Edition provides specific options related to the texts. 

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, the Lexile measure is 1050 with numerous non-prose (NP) texts. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 2, the Lexile range is 1030L–1380L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 3, the Lexile range is 950L–1130L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex.  In Unit 4, the Lexile range is 940L–1200L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 5, The Lexile range is 780L–1450L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex.  In Unit 6, the Lexile range is 900L–1280L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 780L–1450L. The overall qualitative range across the year is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. 

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen and “The Song of the Mud” by Mary Borden. Students analyze craft and structure, and the activity allows students to “analyze a case in which grasping point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant.” In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act IV, by William Shakespeare. Students complete a Read It activity when they reread Scene iii and note situations when exclamation marks indicate possible exclamatory phrases. Students complete a Write It activity: “Write some lines of verse that contain exclamatory phrases. Experiment with using iambic pentameter. Your verse may be original or retell a moment from the play from a different character’s point of view.” In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Madeleine” from Remembrance of Things Past by Marcel Proust (1450L). Students complete a Writing to Sources activity in which they write a narrative as a group, choosing from one of three options including, “Write a narrative retelling of the event of ‘The Madeleine’ from another point of view. Create a third-person omniscient narrator—or one who knows the thoughts and feelings of all the characters in your story—and describe what happens when Proust’s narrator has tea with his mother. Include dialogue that reveals the narrator’s thoughts and his mother's reactions.” As the units progress, the tasks connected to analyzing craft and structure increase in complexity.

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students read the allegory “The Prologue” from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill (NP). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the question, “Judging from the descriptions of the Friar and the Parson, what does Chaucer think can cause a religious person to fail in his or her duty?” In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift (1200L). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the question, “Fearing that the author would be charged with treason, the original publisher of Gulliver’s Travels censored the novel. Why would the novel have been so controversial in the early 1700s?” In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read the personal essay “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell (1700L). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the question, “Orwell speaks of the British Empire as being in a state of decay. How true does Orwell’s statement prove to be?” As the units progress, the tasks connected to analyizing an argument increase in complexity.

As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero, Launch Text, students read "A World of Heros" (author not cited). The Teacher’s Edition suggests the teacher explain the nuance of the figurative language in the phrase “larger than life” for English Language Learners. This explanation is intended to build a knowledge base of common idioms. 

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read “Araby” by James Joyce. In the Teacher’s Edition, page 540b, a chart shows the available resources and supports available for the text, such as English and Spanish versions of an audio, first read extension questions, a worksheet on analyzing craft and structure: narrative structure, and an accessible leveled text. On page 540c, there is a text complexity rubric and a graphic organizer providing suggestions for support based on the text’s rubric scores. On page 540d, a flow chart assists teachers in identifying the standards being taught and what supports to use for students below and above the standard.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read from “A History of the English Church and People” by Bede, translated by Leo Sherley-Price. In the Teacher’s Edition, page 730b, a chart shows the available resources and supports available for the text, such as English and Spanish versions of an audio, first read extension questions, a worksheet on analyzing craft and structure: elements of historical writing, and an accessible leveled text. On page 730c, there is a text complexity rubric and a graphic organizer providing suggestions for support based on the text’s rubric scores. On page 730d, a flow chart assists teachers in identifying the standards being taught and what supports to use for students below and above the standard.

Indicator 1E
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e. 

The materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading, including accountability structures of independent reading. Six units offer a variety of texts for whole-class, small-group, and independent reading that encourage independent reading goals. Texts connect to a common topic or theme and Essential Question for the unit. Teacher lesson plans include selection resources and explain the connections of the text to the Essential Question and to the performance task. Throughout the year, students engage with texts of a variety of types and genres, and the consistent structure of the materials provides support for students as they grow their skills and ability to read grade level texts. Each unit starts with a launch text which models a specific type of writing, followed by whole group reading and activities, small group reading and activities, and independent reading. There is sufficient guidance to foster independence for all readers, including independent reading procedures and texts for students to read independently. The Frontmatter also provides a selection of trade books with suggestions for how to incorporate them in each unit. Lesson plans for the trade books can be found on myPerspectives+. 

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read four texts, including an historical account “The Worms of the Earth Against the Lions” from A Distant Mirror by Barbara W. Tuchman, an essay “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf, poetry, and “Passenger Manifest for the MV Empire Windrush,” a public document. There are also eight independent reading selections available from which to choose.

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read a personal narrative, poetry collections, a historical perspective article, and a novel excerpt. In Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, novel excerpts, a science journal article and listen to a radio broadcast. Students choose between newspaper articles, an essay, and a novel excerpt tied to the unit’s theme in the independent reading section.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter and each Teacher’s Edition for each unit, the time for students to engage with texts during the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class learning, Small-Group learning, and Independent Learning is similar. There is one day for the Launch Text during the Unit Introduction, 14 days for the Whole Class Learning, 11 days for Small-Group Learning, and two days for independent learning. The Teacher’s Edition for each unit also notes, “Pacing is suggested for a 40- to 50-minute class period. If you use block scheduling, you may combine days to meet your schedule needs.” These opportunities to engage with multiple texts and a volume of reading are consistent across the school year. 

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, students read three texts over 12 regular classes or six block classes. In Small-Group Learning, students read three texts over nine regular classes or four and a half block classes. Students end the unit by reading one independent text choice over two classes or one block before the final performance task. The Teacher’s Edition provides a pacing guide for each unit and suggests supports for various student needs in the wrap-around materials.

There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter state: “Students self-select a text to explore an aspect of the unit topic and share their learning with the class.” Each unit includes options for students to choose an independent reading selection via the Interactive Student Edition, and the activity takes place over two days. Independent Learning strategies are available in the Teacher’s Edition, including a video. Students can use the “Create a schedule” strategy to track completion and “Assess whether you need to adapt your plan to meet all your goals and deadlines.” 

  • In each unit, independent reading selections are listed at the end of the unit. The section provides guidance for students to pick an independent text. In the “Look Back” section, students review the texts already read in the unit for topics of interest, “Look Ahead” includes titles to see which is of interest, and “Look Inside” allows students to scan the selection they choose to be sure it meets their needs. A graphic organizer helps students plan their reading and study of the text. First Read and Close Read guides are included for students during reading to prepare for sharing with the class at the end of the independent reading.

  • In Unit 4,  Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Independent Learning, students can choose to read “Kubla Khan” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Resources such as text questions, audio summaries, and a selection test are available. The materials include the Connection to the Essential Question: “This poem will help students reflect on the essential question, ‘Why are vision and disillusion necessary?’ In ‘Kubla Khan,’ Coleridge is relating his vision of both Kubla Khan’s palace and the city of Xanadu. The power of imagination and poetic ‘vision’ are central to the poem and vital to its creation.”

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

17/18

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.

The materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions to support student skills and growth, which includes a standard protocol for working in groups and developing presentations and various prompts and strategies to assist growth in both the content and the speaking and listening skills. Speaking and listening instruction for teachers includes facilitation, monitoring, evaluation guides, rubrics, and support. There are multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks. 

The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. There is a yearlong writing plan consisting of a 36/42/22 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing, which mostly reflects the 40/40/20 distribution of writing modes as required by the standards. The Teacher’s Edition offers some guidance and includes explicit instruction within argumentative, informative, and narrative writing tasks. There are frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. 

While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f. 

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions using the cited evidence to support their responses to questions with every story in each unit. The uniform structure includes comprehension check questions, research prompts based on the anchor and exemplar texts, close reading tasks, analysis of craft and structure tasks and questions, vocabulary tasks and questions, author style analysis tasks, writing tasks that ask students to draw on their understanding of the texts, and core writing or speaking assessments that center around understanding from multiple texts in the unit. The questions following each text align with unit Essential Questions and text-specific guiding questions.

The Teacher’s Edition for each unit includes a list of Lesson Resources that include guidance for Making Meaning. The teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-specific and/or text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments. Guides are provided for choosing appropriate supports and additional text-based questions for students who need scaffolding to access the grade-level material or challenges to go beyond the grade-level material. 

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds and answer questions after a First Read: “1. What does Beowulf order his smiths to do at the beginning of the excerpt?; 3. By what other word or name does Beowulf refer to the dragon?; 5. How does the excerpt end?”

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “A Valediction” by John Donne, and answer the following text-based questions: “What two points about sleep does the speaker make in ‘Holy Sonnet 10’? What point about death does the speaker make with these comparisons?”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy and answer questions: “What is the status of the author’s parents when they were living in Jamaica? How did that status change when they got to England? Why is Levy now happy to be called a black British Writer - and to write about her Caribbean heritage?”

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, the Teacher’s Edition wrap-around material for “On Seeing England for the First Time” by Jamaica Kincaid and “XXIII” from Midsummer by Derek Walcott under Formative Assessments - Analyze the Text,  includes the directions, “If students struggle to close read the text, then provide the On Seeing England,  XXIII from Midsummer: Text Questions available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Answers and DOK levels are also available.”

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection including “Apostrophe to the Ocean” by George Gordon, Lord Byron. The Teacher’s Edition includes a Jump Start for the First Read: “How can reading poetry help us discover ourselves? Engage students in a discussion about how writing and reading poetry can help people pose and answer questions about the self. Discuss with students how song lyrics are a type of poetry and ask students to discuss how songs explore self-discovery.” The Jump Start will prepare students for reading the poetry and when they Analyze the Text: “3. Essential Question: How do we define ourselves? What have these poems taught you about how people define themselves? Discuss with your group.”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, the Teacher’s Edition wrap-around materials for “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell include under Jump Start- Close Read the following directions: “Use these prompts to engage students in a discussion about how people’s actions in one situation might be quite different from their actions when faced with similar circumstances in another situation. What influences your decisions and actions? How does the situation you are in affect the kinds of decisions you make?”

Indicator 1G
02/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.  

The materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions to support student skills and growth, which includes a standard protocol for working in groups and developing presentations and various prompts and strategies to assist growth in both the content and the speaking and listening skills. Speaking and listening instruction for teachers includes facilitation, monitoring, evaluation guides, rubrics, and support.

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a Conversation and Discussion guide for high school. This web-based tool gives specific guidelines and directions on discussions such as:

    • Leading a Group Discussion

    • Formal Group Discussion Guidelines

    • Informal Group Discussion Guidelines

    • Debates

  • In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for leading a group discussion: “Here are some guidelines for leading a group discussion: 

    • Introduce the topic and purpose of the discussion.

    • Lay out any ground rules for the discussion.

    • Be objective when summarizing the group’s discussion.

    • Make sure that no one dominates the discussion. Invite and encourage contributions from all participants.

  • In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Formal Group discussion guidelines: “Here are tips for successful discussions and an exchange of ideas in a structured setting

    • Do not use an excessive amount of informal or colloquial speech in a formal discussion.

    • Manners are important in any discussion; make sure you allow others to speak, and do not interrupt.

    • Use exclamatory language, or dramatic language, sparingly; a little goes a long way.

    • Diction, or the proper use of vocabulary related to the topic of the discussion, is an important element of any discussion.

    • Stay focused on the subject under discussion.”

  • In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Informal Group discussion guidelines: “Informal discussion is open-ended and participants are free to speak in a more conversational manner, but most rules still apply.

    • Speech may be more colloquial but should still maintain a professional code of conduct.

    • Dramatic and exclamatory remarks help emphasize one's point of view, but overuse weakens their effectiveness.”

  • In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Practices that make for good Debates: “During the debate, be sure to adhere to these practices:

    • Be courteous and listen to your opponent's point of view; allow others the opportunity to speak.

    • If you are debating as a team, support your team members.

    • Speak only when it is your turn, and follow the moderator's instructions.

    • Speak clearly, slowly, and loudly enough to be heard and understood by the audience.

    • Speak with spirit, enthusiasm, and conviction.”

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Worms of the Earth Against the Lions” from A Distant Mirror by Barbara W. Tuchman and “have a group discussion about the issues of social justice and social order raised by the selection.” In the Teacher’s Edition, scaffolds are provided: “Point out to students that if they choose to hold a debate, they will be making a claim and supporting it with evidence from the text. A panel discussion is more open-ended, but by the end of the discussion, students should be able to make a claim and support it.” 

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “A Valediction” by John Donne. In the Teacher’s Edition wrap material for the Speaking and Listening activity, teachers are told for the Prepare Your Recitation section, “Remind students of the importance of practice with any speaking assignment. Encourage students to practice their poem several times. They might want to practice in front of a mirror first and then with another student, friend, or family member. Students might use the Presentation Evaluation Guide to help them prepare their reading.”

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present a personal narrative with a speaking and listening focus. In the Teacher’s Edition, facilitating notes are available with details to assist students as they prepare to present a personal narrative, plan and rehearse with their group, and present and evaluate other groups. Teacher support includes, but is not limited to, “Before groups begin work on their projects, have them clearly differentiate the role each group member will play. Remind groups to consult the schedule for Small-Group Learning to guide their work during the Performance Task. Students should complete the assignment using presentation software to take advantage of text, graphics, and sound features.”

Indicator 1H
02/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

The materials provide multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks. While not all sub-standards for speaking and listening are explicitly outlined in the Teacher’s Edition, varied opportunities are included to collaborate and synthesize ideas as a group. Opportunities are present during speaking and listening work for students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Students regularly engage in speaking and listening in Whole-Group Learning and Small-Group Learning with activities such as small-group discussions, oral presentations, and collaborative dramatic interpretations. Speaking and Listening activities are varied and included as a recurring component in the after-reading activities throughout the units. Small-Group Learning uses informal student discussions for each selection. There are protocols for students to establish norms and roles within the small group. When completing activities, students draw evidence and information from the texts they read and their prior knowledge or research. Each unit includes a speaking and listening-based Performance Task as a part of Small-Group Learning. The Teacher’s Edition includes suggestions for supporting students in successfully participating in these activities, such as guidance on incorporating structure to meet the requirements of the tasks and facilitate the successful demonstration of standards. 

Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero, Small-Group Learning, students read “To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars” by Richard Lovelace and “The Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred Lord Tennyson. In the Close Read the Text section, student instructions state: “With your group, revisit the text you marked during your first read.” In the Analyze the Text section, students complete three activities, two of them state: “Review and Clarify: With your group, discuss how lines 11-12 of ‘To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars’ and lines 50-55 of ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ reveal each poet’s attitude toward war. Present and Discuss: Now, work with your group to share the passages from the two poems that you found especially important…Discuss what details you noticed, what questions you asked, and what conclusions you reached.”

    • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act I by William Shakespeare, and engage in a speaking and listening assignment by performing a soliloquy. Students draw on evidence from the text to Create Your Character who will either support or discourage the murder of King Duncan. Examples of questions students consider include but are not limited to: “What is my motive in arguing for or against the murder? Do I have anything to gain?

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus, students participate in a panel discussion after reading multiple poems: “You have read a variety of texts in which a sense of place is key. Work with your group to hold an informative panel discussion on this question: What makes a place important enough to write about?” One step in the Plan With Your Group section is to Analyze the Text, where students choose three texts from a provided list and individually “analyze how each writer conveys a strong sense of place.” In the provided chart, they gather details and descriptions to build their analysis. The next step is gathering evidence and examples: “Reconvene with your group to share your analysis and identify the strongest ideas. Combine your ideas.” When students complete the panel discussion, one group member will be the moderator, and the others respond to the moderator’s questions.

  • Work with peers to promote civil, democratic discussions and decision-making, set clear goals and deadlines, and establish individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • All units begin Small-Group Learning with an overview of how to work as a small group. Students practice taking a position on a question, sharing their views, and listening to others’ perspectives. Students then decide on group rules, apply the rules to a discussion of their prior learning on the topic, give their group a name, create a group communication plan, make a schedule for reading the texts, and assign roles for the culminating project.

    • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Worms of the Earth Against the Lions” from A Distant Mirror by Barbara W. Tuchman, after which students conduct a group discussion on the following topic that addresses the unit’s Essential Question: “Have a group discussion about the issues of social justice and social order raised by the selection.” In the task, students decide what format to discuss: debate, panel discussion, or role-play. The standards listed next to the assignment include the substandard, but there is no instruction on how students would do that.

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read from Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf and create an oral presentation. The materials include requirements for holding a panel discussion, staging a debate, or presenting a response to literature, such as “begin by assigning roles. Choose who will serve as moderator and who will participate as panelists. Work together to come up with discussion questions, and then work individually to find textual evidence and developer answers.”

  • Make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present an argument in which they organize visuals for their group presentations. They plan with the group, including gathering evidence and media examples: “work with group members to locate online photographs, artwork, or video clips that illustrate your claim.” Students organize, practice, and fine-tune the content of the presentation, improve the timing of the media, and practice their presentation techniques. 

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Escape from the Old Country” by Adrienne Su, and work collaboratively to create a podcast. This is a multimedia presentation in which students must evaluate and develop different perspectives to present their findings. 

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative perspectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero, Independent Learning, students read a variety of text that focuses on the theme for the unit. Once they have completed analysis tasks related to their independent reading, they are asked to consider how the reading contributes to their overall understanding of the topic. They take notes on their thoughts and ideas and share this information with their classmates. As they share, they are encouraged to ask clarifying questions and politely challenge each other’s thinking. Afterward, they are asked to reflect on the discussion and consider ways in which the ideas of others may or may not have impacted their own.

    • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning Overview, in the Working as a Team section, students are instructed to hold a discussion of the question, “In what ways is growing up a process of finding your own vision?” Next, they set rules for the group, followed by practicing the rules by having a discussion of what they have already learned about visionaries and skeptics. The provided rules include “Everyone should participate,” and the Teacher’s Edition gives suggested reminders to provide students for Accountable Talk, such as, “Remember to ask clarifying questions, which sounds like I think you said ____. Did I understand you correctly?”

  • Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives; synthesize comments, claims, and evidence made on all sides of an issue; resolve contradictions when possible; and determine what additional information or research is required to deepen the investigation or complete the task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present an argument that involves analyzing the text with a group, discussing the personality traits that apply to the heroes of each selection and then noting any discrepancies or differences among them. Students must agree on a claim and work effectively as a group to present their findings. As students fine-tune the content, they can “replace slides with visuals that better support” their claims and create a balanced presentation.

    • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, the Launch Activity is “Give one - Get one.” Students consider the question, “What are three aspects of society today that I would like to reform, improve, or change?” They write their three aspects on three different sticky notes. Next, they circulate through the room, talking to individual students to give their ideas and get the other students' ideas. Students are reminded, “As you trade, talk to each classmate about how your responses differ and why you made the choices you did.” Students choose an idea from another student to share in a whole-class discussion, including “Try to explain your classmate’s reasoning to the rest of the class.”

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection and create a podcast. One of the steps to complete the task is to Conduct Research. Student instructions state: “Once your group has agreed on a focus…begin to gather details that will provide clear and distinct perspectives on your topic.”

  • Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make informed decisions and solve problems, evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source and noting any discrepancies among the data. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, and “prepare a research presentation focusing on one aspect of the culture that told and retold the story of Beowulf—the Anglo-Saxons of the eighth to eleventh centuries. Enrich your presentation with digital media that you find online. Deliver your presentation to the class.” The instructions provide a checklist to evaluate the credibility and accuracy of each source, considering questions including but not limited to: “Is the source reputable? Is it known to provide solid information? Is the source transparent or open about its  information-gathering practices? Does the source avoid bias or a political agenda? Is the content thorough and well-written? Does the source accurately cite other sources?” 

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley and create a research presentation that surveys the range of adaptations. The materials require students to “locate multiple adaptations of Frankenstein. Choose three very different versions of the story. Make sure at least one of your adaptations is a film, video, or television show.” Students must also incorporate “digital media, such as photos, video clips, or audio.”

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Escape from the Old Country” by Adrienne Su. The Speaking and Listening assignment is to create an informative podcast, choosing from three modes: contribute to an informative presentation, descriptive analysis about the development of poetry, or roundtable discussion about the ocean as a metaphor. One step to complete the task is Conduct Research. Students’ instructions state: “Work together to integrate information from each person’s sources into a cohesive podcast.” The Teacher’s Edition states: “Remind students to use only credible sources, ones that have been created within the last five years by either educational institutions or governmental agencies or academic, peer-reviewed journals and other resources. Writers should avoid popular and collective websites, open-source encyclopedias, or material based solely on opinion.”

  • Evaluate a speaker's point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, assessing the stance, premises, links among ideas, word choice, points of emphasis, and tone used. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act III by William Shakespeare and prepare and deliver an oral recitation of a speech from this act in which either Macbeth or Lady Macbeth argues for a particular course of action: “Make sure your recitation reflects your insights into the character’s purpose and personality.” The materials provide instructions to analyze the speech, including: “point of view—think about how the character’s point of view affects the delivery of his or her speech; reasoning—consider how the character’s reasoning is reflected in the speech; word choice—what words are particularly effective in revealing the character’s state of mind?; emphasis—what is the main emphasis in the speech?; links between ideas—how does the character connect his or her ideas? Are the connections logical and realistic?”

  • Present information, findings, and supporting evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present a personal narrative. As students practice with their groups, the materials provide a checklist to evaluate effectiveness, focusing on content, collaboration, and presentation techniques. Content is evaluated by considering whether the narrative “clearly responds to the question asked in the prompt” and “incorporates examples and details from the text.” Student group collaboration is evaluated by considering whether “Presenters work together to form a cohesive narrative with a clear sequence of events” and “build on each other’s ideas in a clear and engaging way.” Presentation techniques are evaluated by considering whether “Presenters speak clearly and respond to one another” and “presenters seem confident and well prepared.” Students are not required to address opposing perspectives.

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present a panel discussion on what makes a place important enough to write about. Students begin by choosing three texts from the Small-Group Learning to analyze. After discussing their analysis and choosing the strongest examples, the group organizes the panel discussion with a moderator to direct specific questions for other members to answer using the examples chosen by the group as the most effective. The presentation is recorded, then the group reviews it and makes changes, including finding more text-based evidence, before recording the final panel discussion. Students are not required to address opposing perspectives.

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include various types of essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. Students are provided step-by-step guidance for each task and a checklist or peer review process. At the end of each Whole-Class Learning section, students complete a writing Performance Task over the course of two days. A Performance-Based Assessment writing task is at the end of each unit with a Unit Reflection. Materials include digital resources where appropriate. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance on how to model each type of writing, including a launch text to start the unit that functions as a model for the Performance-Based Assessment. The Teacher’s Edition also includes Digital Perspectives boxes in each unit that often suggest digital resources but do not provide the resource or links to the resources. 

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf translated by Burton Raffel. In the Teacher’s Edition, the WriteNow Analyze and Interpret box states: “Instruct students to reread lines 30–40 and then write what is happening, rephrasing it in modern English. Encourage them to describe the settings, such as the quiet banquet hall and the night outside as Grendel returns to his lair.”

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill. After reading, students complete the on-demand task: “Write a response to criticism in which you agree or disagree with Condren’s take on Chaucer.” 

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Ode to the West Wind” by Percy Bysshe Shelley, and complete an on-demand WriteNow activity considering the point of view: “Review lines 57–70 of the poem and help students see that the speaker directs a request to the West Wind. Changing the perspective in a poem or story adds a different level of interest and complexity. Encourage students to write poems in which the West Wind replies to Shelley. Have students divide their poems into five parts, like Shelley’s poem, and make sure that each part is a response to the corresponding section of Shelley’s work.”

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument over the course of two days as they consider the question, “In what ways does Macbeth attempt to control the future and to bury the past?” The Teacher’s Edition provides Revision guidance, including but not limited to: “1. Display your first draft on the screen. Use think-alouds as you use RADaR strategies for revision: REPLACE, ADD, DELETE; REORDER. For each change you implement, mark the type of change you made.” Students complete a full writing process, including editing for conventions and proofreading for accuracy.

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “A Valediction” by John Donne; read from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift; and write a reflective narrative over the topic: “When do we need a new vision of things?” The materials provide information on building an informative essay and provide the protocol for the writing process, including prewriting and planning activities which include narration development tasks, drafting activities, a language development process focused on varying sentence structure, a revision process that includes evaluating the draft based on a provided rubric and focus on sophistication of narrative technique, evaluation through the peer review process, proofreading and editing, publishing the work by presenting to the class, and finally reflecting on the learning and writing process.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell and “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy. In the Write to Compare section, directions state: “Write a comparison-and-contrast essay in which you analyze the two works. Focus on the authors’ voices and the structures of the stories they tell. Draw conclusions about what each essay does particularly well.” The activity includes prewriting, drafting, reviewing, revising, and editing steps. The Teacher’s Edition provides additional information to help teachers guide students through the writing process.

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • All units include interactive digital components such as a reader’s notebook for answering specific questions and making notes about selections, audio summaries, video and audio selections, online annotations, and online assessments. 

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argument in the form of a response to literature that answers the question: “What is the relationship of human beings to time?” Then, students present their response to literature as a TV commentary that might appear on a talk show about books and literature. In the Teacher’s Edition, the Digital Perspectives box suggests teachers assist students in preparing for the assignment: “Show the class examples of an engaging TV commentary. After viewing the examples, have students discuss whether they found the commentary engaging and why. To help them integrate this information and prepare for their own presentations, have them rate these examples using the TV Commentary Rubric. Discuss their ratings, as well as the reasons for them.”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read The Seafarer, translated by Burton Raffel. After the text, the Media Connection box includes a video clip of “The Seafarer.” The Teacher’s Edition states to play the video and then have students write in their interactive notebooks their answer to the question, “In what ways is the cellist’s relationship to the cello similar to or different from the sailor’s relationship to the sea in The Seafarer?”

Indicator 1J
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1j. 

The materials reflect a 36/42/22 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing, which mostly reflects the 40/40/20 distribution of writing modes as required by the standards. The Teacher’s Edition offers some guidance and includes explicit instruction within argumentative, informative, and narrative writing tasks. Where appropriate, writing opportunities are often connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). 

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing. Materials include an appropriate distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 36% argumentative, 42% informative, and 22% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is 12 argumentative, 15  informative, and eight narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for argumentative writing: five units address argumentative writing. 36% of writing opportunities over six units are argumentative.

Unit 1: 3

Unit 2: 3

Unit 3: 4

Unit 4: 2

Unit 5: 1

Unit 6: 0

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing: six units address informative/explanatory writing. 42% of writing opportunities over six units are informative/explanatory.

Unit 1: 3

Unit 2: 3

Unit 3: 2

Unit 4: 1

Unit 5: 1

Unit 6: 5

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing: two units address narrative writing. 22% of writing opportunities over six units are narrative.

Unit 1: 0

Unit 2: 0

Unit 3: 0

Unit 4: 4

Unit 5: 4

Unit 6: 0

  • Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:

    • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth by William Shakespeare and write an argument on the prompt, “In what ways does Macbeth attempt to control the future and to bury the past?” The text guides students through a standard writing process that includes prewriting, drafting, a step focusing on style (formal tone in voice), revision, and peer review. Each stage of the writing process uses graphic organizers, checklists, models, and explanations to support the writing process. The Teacher’s Edition also provides suggestions that include ways to make the process interactive in the model example for transitions and examples of reflecting back to the text to pull evidence.

  • Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an explanatory essay. The task reads, “Write a brief explanatory essay in which you discuss this question: How does Chaucer find humor in the difference between the ideal and the real in the characters that populate The Canterbury Tales?” Students receive explicit instruction for each stage of the writing process. Students are walked through all steps of the writing process with specific directions and support, starting with a review of the parts of the explanatory essay and a model essay for students to use while writing. In prewriting, students develop their thesis statement and complete an organizer for their evidence. This section includes having students choose evidence, add to their evidence with research, and organize their essays. Students then receive additional explicit instruction in drafting, revising, editing, and publishing the essay. In each step, the Teacher’s Edition wrap-around material provides the teacher with additional information to use while instructing students.

  • Explicit instruction in narrative writing:

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self, students read Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and write a personal narrative i,”n which [they] describe events that led to [their] achieving insight on [their] own identity or self-awareness of [their] place in the world. Connect the story [they] recount to the experiences  of Frankenstein’s creature.”Teachers explain to students that “a personal narrative not only recounts an event that was important to the narrator bu also includes reflection about that event. Then point out that just like a news story, their narrative should contain these five essential elements: who the story is about, what happened, when it happened, where it happened, why it happened, and how it affected them.” After students write, teachers prompt them to reflect on their writing through questions like “How did writing your own narrative change your understanding of the Creature in Frankenstein?” 

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. 

    • Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds and write an argument. As a part of the writing process, student instructions state to introduce the claim but do not give explicit instruction. However, the text provides a brainstorming activity to help students develop their claim. The activity requires research and considering reservations. Guided organizational options are provided for the essay. 

    • Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf. In Writing to Sources, students write an argument choosing from one of three tasks to answer the prompt: “With your group, prepare to write an argument defending a claim and responding to a counterclaim.” The Teacher’s Edition states: “Remind students that arguments can use either inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning. With inductive reasoning, the writer begins with specific evidence and then arrives at a general claim based on that evidence. With deductive reasoning, the writer begins with a general claim and then supports it with specific evidence.” Further instructions state: “If students have difficulty…suggest that they read newspaper editorials as models to identify the claim and any counterclaims.” No models are provided.

    • Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V by William Shakespeare, and write an argument. The text guides students through the process of “sophisticated cohesion” by providing model writing and practice: “Read over your first draft. Are the connections between ideas and from paragraph to paragraph clear? Could you vary the beginnings of sentences by adding a word, a phrase, or a clause that clarifies the links between your examples or your evidence and your claim?; Take notes on your draft and write your new ideas for rewording [on the provided graphic organizer].” 

    • Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds and write an argument. As a part of the writing process, the text tells students to ensure they are using formal style and tone, as well as provides exemplars for integrating citations. 

    • Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V by William Shakespeare, and write an argument. Student instructions state to include a conclusion that reinforces the argument but do not provide explicit instruction for providing and developing the conclusion. The other unit that addresses this standard also does not provide explicit instruction for concluding statements in arguments. 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars” by Richard Lovelace and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen. In the section Writing to Compare, students are told to “Write a compare-and-contrast essay in which you analyze the diction and tone of Lovelace’s and Tennyson’s poems and the diction and tone of Borden’s and Owen’s poems.” Students begin prewriting by analyzing the words and phrases and the effects of diction on the poems’ tone before drawing conclusions about the poems’ themes. During drafting, students work on choosing the best pieces of evidence and method of organization to support their thesis. When reviewing, students are told to “Ask for feedback about the clarity of your thesis, the integrity of your organization, the strength of your evidence, and the effectiveness of your conclusion.” 

    • Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay to answer the question, “How did British colonialism complicate the idea of home?” In the prewriting/planning stage, students receive instruction on gathering evidence through the research process. Students learn about print and electronic sources, vetting websites, and using primary sources and media sources. In the drafting stage, students are reminded to “use a variety of evidence, details, quotations, and examples to support your ideas.” 

    • Use appropriate and varied transitions and syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students listen to audio performances of The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V, Scene I by L.A. Theatre Works and The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V, Scene I by LibriVox. In the section Writing to Compare students write a comparison-and-contrast essay for the two works. In the review, revise, edit section, students are reminded to “Make sure your transitions from sentence to sentence and from paragraph to paragraph are clear and logical.”

    • Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary, and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay. Within the drafting step is a lesson titled “Create a Coherent Whole: Use Transitions.” Students receive explicit instruction on picking the transitions that best serve their purpose while writing, using a variety of transitions, and how to connect and show relationships between ideas with transitions. 

      • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Lines Composed a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey” by William Wordsworth, and a poetry collection including “Ode to a Nightingale” by John Keats. Students write an informative essay comparing the historical context and setting of early and later Romantic poems. In the section review, revise, and, edit students are reminded to “Make sure you use appropriate literary terms such as setting, theme, image, and symbol.”

    • Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “The Widow at Windsor” by Rudyard Kipling. In the section Writing to Compare, students write a formal analysis of the key features of dramatic monologues. Within the directions, it says, “As you write, maintain an appropriately formal academic style and tone.” In the review and revise section, students are told: “proofread your analysis to ensure it is free from errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.”

    • Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy and “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. In the Writing to Compare activity, students write a comparison-and-contrast essay to analyze the two authors’ voices and structures. In the review, revise, and edit section, students are told to focus on the conclusion and ask themselves, “Does your conclusion state what each essay does particularly well?”

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Engage and orient the reader by setting out a problem, situation, or observation and its significance, establishing one or multiple point(s) of view, and introducing a narrator and/or characters; create a smooth progression of experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. In Writing to Sources, students write a satiric narrative. The student instructions state: “Use Gulliver as your main character, and place him in a twenty-first-century version of Lilliput.” Students choose one of four options to complete and are instructed: “Make sure your narrative is consistent with the characters and situations presented in Swift’s satire.” The Teacher’s Edition states: “Remind students that when writing a satiric narrative, it is important to explain why the practice or person is wrong and how people can make things right.” 

    • Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, and multiple plot lines, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection including poems by John Donne and “A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning '' by Anne Donne. In Writing to Sources, the assignment states: “Write a narrative scene presenting the discussion between John and Anne Donne as they consider the issue of his leaving on his journey. Base your narrative on the information in the poem ‘A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning.’” Students choose from two questions and use the following elements in the narrative: “dialogue for both characters, details and examples drawn from the poem, and a resolution that resolves the conflict between the characters.” The Vocabulary and Conventions Connection section states: “In your scene, consider using several of the concept vocabulary words. Also, consider including one or more periodic sentences to arouse curiosity or to create suspense.” Six vocabulary terms are provided. No further instructions are provided on periodic sentences or creating suspense. 

    • Use a variety of techniques to sequence events so that they build on one another to create a coherent whole and build toward a particular tone and outcome (e.g., a sense of mystery, suspense, growth, or resolution). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, Write a Reflective Narrative, students address the prompt: “When do we need a new vision of things?” Students’ instructions state: “Start by recalling an incident from your life that presented a difficult challenge. Develop that memory into a narrative, sequencing events so that they reveal how you used that experience to develop and grow and see things differently.” Students can use the Launch Text, “The Assignment of My Life” by Ruth Gruber as a Model Reflective Narrative. The Teacher’s Edition states: “Encourage students to think about the elements of a plot as they begin to write. Their narrative can have exposition, rising action, a climax, falling action, and a resolution.” The Student Edition states: “It is easy to write about events in order. That is something you have done since childhood. It is harder to ‘shape’ events so that they tell a story worth telling.”A chart is provided to help students organize their event using “Before, Event, After” sections to help shape their story. In the Sentence Variety: Varying Syntax section, the Teacher’s Edition states: “Remind students that varying their sentence lengths also adds interest to their writing.” A section in the Student Edition shares that the “writer may use a variety of narrative techniques to connect events over time” and offers several suggestions for accomplishing this.

    • Use precise words and phrases, telling details, and sensory language to convey a vivid picture of the experiences, events, setting, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Madeleine” from Remembrance of Things Past by Marcel Proust. In Writing to Sources, the assignment states: “Write a narrative based on ‘The Madeleine.’ Keep in mind that a strong narrative includes well-drawn characters, a clear sequence of events, and effective use of narrative techniques, such as dialogue, description, and sensory language.” Students work in groups to choose from one of three options: narrative retelling, a fictional diary entry, or an extension of a scene. The Teacher’s Edition states: “Remind groups that…the options will require them to use their imaginations and make up certain details about the characters and plot.” Students create a t-chart graphic organizer to plan how they will adapt “The Madeleine”; on the left, they write passages from the text, and on the right, how they will adapt the text. 

    • Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on what is experienced, observed, or resolved over the course of the narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write a personal narrative that answers the question, “How does the world around us contribute to our sense of self?” This narrative must include “a conclusion that reflects on an experience and the insights gained from it.” During the draft process, students are reminded: “Provide a conclusion that explains what you learned from the events you have described. Summarize your insights and connect them to broader ideas about how the world contributes to one’s sense of self.”

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argument in the form of a response to literature to answer the question, “What is the relationship of human beings to time?” The student instructions state: “Use examples and evidence from the diverse texts in the unit to justify a claim that you make. State your assertions with specific evidence from several of the texts.”

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. In Writing to Sources, students write a satiric narrative modeled on the excerpt from the text: “Use Gulliver as your main character, and place him in a twenty-first-century version of Lilliput…Make sure your narrative is consistent with the characters and situations presented in Swift’s satire.”

Indicator 1K
02/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support sophisticated analysis, argumentation, and synthesis.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Writing opportunities are focused around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. The writing opportunities include shorter specific writing aligned with a specific text or texts, longer process writing in the performance tasks, writing as a preparation for a speaking task, and short, informal written responses to questions. During Whole-Class Learning, most units end with a writing task that involves explicit instruction in the skills needed to complete the task. During Small-Group Learning, students work collaboratively to complete research assignments and other writing projects that reference the text and often require support from the text or other credible sources. Graphic organizers are available to help students organize textual evidence to support a claim. Students are required to go outside the texts and conduct research to add additional evidence for some activities. All units have multiple opportunities to write using evidence, although it is more limited in Unit 6, which focuses on students doing narrative writing. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to assist students when completing writing tasks and can offer additional support in the form of modeling and graphic organizers. 

Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument addressing the question, “Which counts more–taking a stand or winning?” The materials ask students to “take a clear position on the question. Incorporate your analysis of the Beowulf texts to support your ideas. You may also cite incidents from history or from your own experience or observations to support your claim.” The Teacher’s Edition provides te following guidance for teachers as they give students feedback on their essay planning “Remind students to avoid making emotional judgments about claims with which they disagree. Instead point out the importance of developing a counterclaim that is based on evidence or reasoning.” 

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act II by William Shakespeare. In the Writing to Sources activity, students write a psychological report as if they are a psychologist who has just met with either Macbeth or Lady Macbeth. Students consider what the patient has done, said, and their motivations for how they think, feel, and behave as they write an explanation of their patient’s behavior, including evidence from the play to support their claims. The  Teacher’s Edition provides te following guidance for teachers as they give students feedback on their psychological reports “Make sure that students make connections between their statements and evidence. Evidence that Macbeth suffers from guilt might include his hallucination of the dagger; Lady Macbeth’s cool indifference to Duncan’s murder suggests she is in denial of the action.”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read Back to My Own Country: An Essay by Andrea Levy an Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. After reading, students complete an informative essay in which conduct research and use these two texts to answer “How did British colonialism complicate the idea of home?” The  Teacher’s Edition provides te following guidance for teachers as they give students feedback on their essay planning, “[tell students that] they should not “rely simply on a single source of information, or a single type of information.” 

Writing opportunities are focused around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill. After the reading, students write a critical essay for the prompt: “Read the following quotation from the literary critic Edward I. Condren’s book Chaucer and the Energy of Creation. Now, write a response to criticism in which you agree or disagree with Condren’s take on Chaucer. In your response, address this question: Do you agree that the poet’s main intent is to capture life in all of its glory, or do you suspect that he has an agenda of reform or censure? Include these elements in your essay: a clear introduction that includes a precise claim, an evaluation of Condren’s quote and your own claim regarding Chaucer’s purpose, valid reasoning backed up with relevant and sufficient evidence, such as specific details, examples, and quotations from the Prologue, and a conclusion that sums up your argument.”

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New, Small-Group Learning, students read Araby by James Joyce and write a compare-and-contrast essay selecting one of three options. Each option asks students to compare Araby to another piece of classic literature. As students develop their ideas, they are reminded to identify evidence from the sources to support their ideas. A Venn diagram is recommended to help students organize their thinking and develop their ideas. The Teacher’s Edition also directs students to several examples of the different writing styles one can use for this writing type. Students are reminded to cite their text accurately. 

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “The Widow at Windsor” by Rudyard Kipling. In the Writing to Sources activity, students “write a formal analysis of the key features of dramatic monologues, and consider what makes the form powerful or effective.” In addition to the poems in the collection, students may use other poems with dramatic monologues for supporting examples. Students choose one of the following three topics as their focus: “an overview of the most important features of dramatic monologues, an explanation of how the use of dialect in dramatic monologues contributes to the development of character, musicality, and meaning, or a compare-and-contrast analysis of Kipling’s and Berry’s poems, highlighting key similarities and differences between them.”

Indicator 1L
01/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l. 

The materials include opportunities to demonstrate the application of grammar and convention skills in context in writing tasks; however, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking. Some grammar substandards include explicit instruction but have limited practice or are not outlined thoroughly, such as spelling and using a style manual. Some substandards are included when the explicit instruction is about a grammatical element connected to the substandard. Students apply grammar skills in context in Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning, though the opportunities are not always authentic. Students complete Language Development tasks that connect to a text they are reading; the tasks include a teaching component with sections for Language Development, such as Concept Vocabulary, Word Study, Conventions, and Author’s Style. The materials offer other practice opportunities in a Grammar Center that includes workbooks and tutorials for each grade level. The End Matter of the Teacher’s Edition provides a Grammar Handbook consistent for each grade level that provides a structure for teachers to scaffold grammar instruction. 

Materials include explicit instruction of some of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf. The Conventions and Style activity focuses on changing usage. Students discuss information about the meaning of usage and how writers, grammarians, educators, and the general public might push back when conventions on correct usage begin to change. They research the history of three concept vocabulary words for the story, specifically understanding the history and meaning of the words as used when the text was written. Students paraphrase a sentence from the text with modern usage that shows they understand the original meaning allowing them to apply their understanding of how usage is a matter of convention, changes over time, and can be contested.

    • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell and complete a Word Study relating to Changing Usage. The student materials include: “Many English words have multiple possible usages. A word’s most common usage may change over time.” An example from the text is available for students: “Marvell uses the word sport as a verb. This usage has grown less common since the seventeenth century, and the word is now primarily used as a noun, meaning ‘physical activity done for enjoyment.’” The student materials ask, “find these familiar words: state (line 19), try (line 27), transpire (line 35), instant (line 36). Infer from context clues how each word is being used, and write a probable definition. Then, use a dictionary or text aids, such as footnotes, to verify the words’ meanings.” The Teacher’s Edition includes possible student responses.

  • Students have opportunities to resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g., Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf and complete a Conventions and Style task relating to changing usage. Student instructions state: “Issues of usage are settled by convention or agreed-upon practice. Conventions, however, change with the times. It is no longer common practice, for example, to use the word wit to mean ‘intellect’ or ‘reason’—the way it was in the eighteenth century. Today, wit is used to mean ‘humor’ or ‘cleverness.’” Students complete a Read It activity: “1. Using a dictionary, as well as specialized reference tools, such as an etymological dictionary or a dictionary of usage, research the histories and meanings of gifted, taste, and fancy. Record your findings in the chart.” The Teacher’s Edition includes possible responses. Students complete a Write It activity by paraphrasing a sentence from the essay and considering “each word’s usage at the time that Woolf was writing. Consult a specialized reference tool if necessary.”

    • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell. In the Word Study activity, students read how the meanings of words can change over time and view an example from the text. Then, students analyze various given words and note variations in definitions. Student instructions state: “Infer from context clues how each word is being used and write a probable definition. Then, use a dictionary or text aids, such as footnotes, to verify the words’ meanings.”

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy. In the Word Study activity in the Concept Vocabulary, students learn about the etymology and usage of the word myriad. Then they rewrite a sentence from the text, changing the usage of myriad from a noun to an adjective and research to find out which usage of the word is contested. The research will involve consulting references considered authorities on usage.

  • Students have opportunities to observe hyphenation conventions. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an explanatory essay and focus on hyphenations for formal writing. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance: “Remind students to use a hyphen if dividing a word at the end of a line; in that situation, they should always divide the word between syllables. Of course, a one-syllable word cannot be divided. If students are uncertain about a word’s syllabication, they should consult a dictionary.” The student materials include three uses for hyphens with examples from the launch text: including but not limited to: “to spell a compound word, when it is listed that way in the dictionary (‘The archbishop sought to negotiate a short-term peace.’)” The student materials ask students to “use hyphens when needed to punctuate and spell correctly” and a chart is available to show three additional uses for hyphens. 

    • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V by William Shakespeare. In the Conventions and Style activity, students correct the hyphenation of compound adjectives. After a discussion of when and how to use a hyphen to create a compound adjective, students reread Act V and find two examples of a hyphenated adjective and explain how they impact the reader’s opinion of the character being described. They explain the meaning of the two examples and write three compound adjectives using different patterns from the chart in the discussion. 

  • Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, for Units 2, 5, and 6, the Editing and Proofreading step includes “Read your draft carefully, looking for errors in spelling and punctuation.” There is no explicit instruction provided on this skill.

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds. In the Writing to Compare activity, the review, revise, edit step of writing states that students correct any errors in spelling. There is no explicit instruction provided on this skill.

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell and “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy, and they write a comparison-and-contrast essay. Students review, revise, and edit during the writing process. The student materials include the following instructions: “After you fine-tune the content of your essay, carefully edit for grammatical accuracy, and then proofread to eliminate errors in spelling and mechanics.” There is no explicit instruction provided on this skill.

  • Vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed; apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading.

    • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. The Conventions and Style activity focuses on participle and gerund phrases. Students learn how these phrases can be used to combine sentences to vary the syntax in a text. After practicing identifying participle and gerund phrases in the text, students write a paragraph using phrases to vary the sentence structure in their writing. 

    • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time” by Robert Herrick and “Youth’s the Season Made for Joys” by John Gay and complete a Conventions and Style task relating to Varying Syntax: Balanced Sentences. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance: “Point out that parallelism, also known as parallel structure, is used in poetry, speeches, and in other types of writing to emphasize, link, and balance related ideas—or to juxtapose contrasting ones. Poets, particularly those writing in free verse, often use parallelism to create a memorable rhythm. For more support, see Conventions and Style: Varying Syntax: Balanced Sentences.” The materials provide a sample of a balanced sentence from the text. Students complete a Read It activity: “Identify another example of a balanced sentence” in one of the poems. Students then complete a Write It activity: “Write a balanced sentence about reading poetry. Try to include parallelism in the sentence.”

Indicator 1M
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

The materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way. Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Materials include lessons and activities for vocabulary critical to understanding the text, the overall concept of the unit, and the genre of writing for each unit. Vocabulary is repeated in various contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Units systematically build vocabulary, as each unit includes academic vocabulary instruction before reading texts in the Introduction and builds during the reading of individual texts. Students rank their familiarity with the words before reading and, after reading, think about the connection between the words and practice using the words and Greek and Latin roots in the Word Study and Concept Vocabulary sections. Concept Vocabulary is found in Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning activities for the texts in each unit. Activities for demonstrating understanding of the Concept Vocabulary become more complex as the year progresses. Vocabulary is associated with the writing focus of the Performance Tasks, and students can incorporate vocabulary in authentic ways during the Performance Tasks and from their Word Networks during the Performance-Based Assessment. Stand-alone vocabulary assessments include a pre-test, mid-year assessment, and end-of-year assessment. The Vocabulary Center includes supplemental practice resources for students to work with common general academic and domain-specific words using Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Word Study Worksheets, Domain-Specific Academic Vocabulary lessons, and General Academic Vocabulary lessons. Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive vocabulary development component. 

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials include a Standards Correlation, including Language: Conventions, Effective Use, and Vocabulary: “The vocabulary standards focus on understanding words and phrases, their relationships, and their nuances and on acquiring new vocabulary, particularly general academic and domain-specific words, and phrases.” Each unit includes Vocabulary/Word Study, and the Unit at a Glance includes the academic vocabulary, concept vocabulary, and word study, such as the following: Latin Prefix, Latin Root, Cognates, Connotation and Denotation, and Multiple-Meaning Words. The materials include a consistent approach for students to interact with word relationships and build academic vocabulary regularly. Each unit offers information in the Introduction regarding the Academic Vocabulary for students to interact with and with teacher guidance, such as offering possible student responses. The materials offer Language Development consistently in the Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning sections with Word Networks and through annotations when close reading. The Teacher’s Edition End Matter also includes a Glossary: Academic Concept Vocabulary and the academic vocabulary appears in blue type. The Index also offers a list of the academic vocabulary and concept vocabulary with corresponding page numbers.

  • In the Teacher’s Edition during the Launch text of each unit, the Vocabulary Development box provides teachers with additional Academic Vocabulary Reinforcement activities. 

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, academic and concept vocabulary are embedded throughout. In each unit Introduction, students view a chart with academic vocabulary for the unit, read mentor sentences with the words, and complete a chart for the predicted meaning and related words. Each text Introduction includes a Concept Vocabulary section where students rank words from least familiar to most familiar. All words are defined in the footnotes of the text. After reading, the Concept Vocabulary section includes activities with words from the Introduction, and the Word Study section includes practice with Latin and Greek word parts. The structure of the vocabulary lessons remains consistent throughout the year.

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf translated by Burton RaffelI. In the Making Meaning section, students rank the concept vocabulary words in order from most familiar (1) to least familiar (6) before they read the text. An example is writhing: “...That trip to Herot/Was a miserable journey for the writhing monster!”

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Focus Period 1485–1625: Renaissance and Reformation: A Changing England” (author not cited) and encounter the vocabulary word allegiance: “Religious affiliation and allegiance to the king were suddenly united.” Later, during Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act II by William Shakespeare and encounter allegiance again: “My bosom franchised and allegiance clear.'' During Language development, students consider why the vocabulary words are chosen: “These concept words relate to the ideas of loyalty and betrayal. For example, Banquo swears his allegiance to Macbeth, as long as that allegiance or devotion does not violate his conscience.” As students complete a Writing to Sources task following the reading, they consider including the vocabulary words in their writing, providing a list that includes allegiance.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. The Concept Vocabulary words are imperialism, supplant, despotic, conventionalized, resolute, and pretext. Students rank their familiarity with the words prior to reading the text. In the Teacher’s Edition, the teacher’s instructions state to review the meaning of the suffix -ism and have students guess the meaning of imperialism and then check their guess while reading. In the Concept Vocabulary activity, students learn the words all have to do with political struggle and answer how the words sharpen the depiction of political conflict in the essay. Students create fill-in-the-blank sentences for each word, including context clues for the meaning. Students exchange papers with a partner and fill in each other’s sentences. The Word Study section focuses on word origins and connotations. The Teacher’s Edition suggests that if students are still struggling with the meaning of the words, have them create graphic organizers with the definition, a sample sentence, synonyms, and antonyms. While students engage with the words several times within the story, they are not included in concept vocabulary for any other text in this or other units.

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 11–12 General Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It sections. Examples of Vocabulary Terms include, but are not limited to: anachronism, epiphany, immutable, tenacious, engender, and theoretical. The Interactive lessons include the following student activity: “Drag each vocabulary word in the left-hand column to match it with the vocabulary word in the right-hand column that has the same root.”  

  • In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 11–12 Domain-Specific Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It sections. Examples of Vocabulary Terms include, but are not limited to: absolutism, entropy, gigabyte, chromosome, correlate, exponent, invest, and vicious. The Interactive lessons include the following student activity: “Identify the domain of each vocabulary word. Drag each word into the correct subject area column.” 

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars” by Richard Lovelace. The materials provide instruction on the following Concept Vocabulary: embrace, adore, and honor. These are high-frequency words important to the concepts in the anchor texts. 

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Focus Period 1798–1832: An Era of Change” (author not cited). The materials provide instruction on the following academic vocabulary: inanimate, infuse, anachronism, repercussion, and revelation. These words are Tier II words relevant and referenced for the Whole Group performance task assessment.

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

The materials are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. There are high-quality questions and tasks  sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. Throughout the program, there are opportunities for students to complete research to learn more about or expand their knowledge on topics. The multi-faceted culminating tasks require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. While the materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and include different types of writing tasks that connect with texts, well-designed guidance is lacking to help teachers implement and monitor student growth.

The materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards, and by the end of the academic year, every standard is addressed. The pacing for the six units in the program is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

22/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

The materials are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Each text builds knowledge in either the topic, literary skill, or historical time period the text represents. Historical, biographical, cultural, or textual references are included to build and support student comprehension of the anchor texts. 

The materials include high-quality questions and tasks in which students analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. There are multi-faceted culminating tasks that require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. The program also provides research and writing activities and projects that are sequenced and encourage students to develop knowledge and understand different aspects of a topic. In each unit, there are opportunities for students to conduct both shorter and longer research tasks to build knowledge on topics and synthesize their learning.

While the materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and include different types of writing tasks that connect with the text, well-designed guidance is lacking to help teachers implement and monitor student growth.

Indicator 2A
04/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s)/theme(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a. 

The materials are organized around a cohesive topic(s)/theme(s) that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The materials include six units, each focusing on a topic related to the Essential Question, which can be found in the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter. Each section has a guiding question that builds to an answer for the unit Essential Question; texts are tied to these questions through a unifying theme. Students complete readings during Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning. A variety of texts are provided with varying levels of complexity to build students’ knowledge and ability to navigate complex text independently and proficiently by the end of the year. Each text builds knowledge in either the topic, literary skill, or historical time period the text represents. Historical, biographical, cultural, or textual references are included to build and support student comprehension of the anchor texts. The Teacher’s Edition notes several areas of support for background knowledge and scaffolding support in vocabulary and knowledge acquisition, close reading annotations, and discussions. Texts are followed by a set of questions and activities divided into consistent sections: Before Reading includes Concept Vocabulary and First Read Strategies; After Reading includes Comprehension Check, Research, Close Read the Text, Analyze the Text, Analyze Craft and Structure, Concept Vocabulary, and Author’s Style. 

Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials consistently share how students engage with text around each unit topic. A Launch Text “introduces a perspective on the unit topic.” During Whole-Class Learning, teachers are directed to “lead the shared reading experience providing modeling and support, as students begin exploring perspectives on the unit topic.” The next step is for students to “encounter diverse perspectives on the unit topic, working in collaborative teams.” Finally, during Independent Learning, students choose “a text to explore an aspect of the unit topic and share their learning with the class.”

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, the Essential Question is “How do people come to have different views of society?” and students read multiple texts that connect to the topic, such as a Launch Text, “Standing Up to Absolute Power” (author not cited), “The Prologue” from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, from “The Worms of the Earth Against the Lions” by Barbara W. Tuchman, and “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf.

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past, Shakespeare Extended Study, the Essential Question is “How do our attitudes toward the past and future shape our actions?” and students read multiple texts that connect to the topic, such as a poetry collection, including “Sonnet 12,” “Sonnet 60,” and “Sonnet 73” by William Shakespeare; from “The Naked Babe and the Cloak of Manliness” by Cleanth Brooks; and Macbeth by William Shakespeare.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, the Essential Question is “What does it mean to call a place home?” and students read multiple texts that connect to the topic, such as a Launch Text, “Home Away From Home” (author not cited); a Whole-Class Learning text, “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy; a Small-Group Learning text, “History of Jamaica” by Encyclopedia Britannica; and, an Independent Learning text, “My Old Home” by Lu Hsun.

Indicator 2B
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b. 

The materials include high-quality questions and tasks in which students analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts. The materials are organized in a consistent pattern across all units with multiple after-reading activities. The First-Read Guide requires students to note what they notice, annotate the text, connect ideas with other selections, and respond by writing a brief summary. The Close-Read Guide provides students with reminders to revisit sections and annotate what they notice. The Close-Read Guide includes the Analyze the Text and Analyze Craft and Structure sections in which they analyze key ideas and details as well as consider the author’s choices of patterns, structure, and techniques. All of the activities require students to revisit the text and use specific text evidence in their answers. In the Teacher’s Edition, the sample answers also include the depth of knowledge levels for questions; most are at DOK 2 or 3. For some texts, the questions lead to the subsequent Writing or Speaking and Listening activities. These questions also build toward the various Performance Tasks embedded after Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and at the end of the unit. Students keep an evidence log and notebook throughout each unit to record responses and help them prepare for the culminating tasks. 

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, and analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama. In Analyze for Meaning, students annotate the text. The Teacher’s Edition provides teacher guidance: “Guide students to consider what these details might tell them. Ask what the reader can infer about the significance of the words ‘final’ and ‘last’ with respect to the coming battle, and accept student responses…Help students to formulate conclusions about the importance of these details. Ask why the author might have included these details…Remind students when they close read to analyze meaning, they look at the words the writer has chosen, and they question how these words convey meaning.” As students complete a Close Read, they annotate lines of the text and answer questions, such as “How do these contrasting details help the reader better understand Beowulf’s dilemma?”

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Small-Group Learning, students read from “The Naked Babe and the Cloak of Manliness” by Cleanth Brooks and the excerpt from “Macbeth” by Frank Kermode. Students analyze key ideas and details, determining two or more central ideas of a text and analyzing their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to produce a complex analysis. Students complete a chart to analyze the arguments that both authors make, including the central ideas and supporting events. Students answer questions in their notebooks, including: “1. Do you find Brooks’s support for his central idea convincing? Why or why not? 2. (a) In your own words, explain Kermode’s idea that the language of Macbeth is rich in a ‘peculiar ambiguous, doubling manner.’ (b) Do you find his support for this idea convincing? Explain.”

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. In Analyze the Text, students answer questions labeled with the analysis skill and use text evidence:  

    • “Make inferences: What can you infer about Gulliver’s relationship with the Lilliputians, based on the way he walks around their city?

    • Cause and Effect: Based on what Reldresal says about Gulliver’s size, why does the emperor seek Gulliver’s aid against Blefuscu? 

    • Connect: What is Swift suggesting about political disputes through the reasons for the conflict between the Big-endians and the Little-endians?

    • Historical Perspectives: Fearing that the author would be charged with treason, the original publisher of Gulliver’s Travels censored the novel. Why would the novel have been so controversial in the early 1700s? 

    • Essential Question: Why are both vision and disillusion necessary? What have you learned about vision and disillusion by reading this excerpt from Gulliver’s Travels?”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. In Analyze the Text, students examine the author’s main ideas and how it develops over the course of the narrative essay. Students answer multiple questions: “Orwell describes several ways in which the Burmese disrespect him. Does he blame them for treating him this way? Explain. How does Orwell feel about the British Empire and imperialism? How do Orwell’s feelings about the Empire affect his feelings about himself as a police officer?” 

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf. In Analyze Craft and Structure, students review the interaction and development of ideas in an argument essay and learn that the essay is a thought experiment that starts with the author asking, “What if?” In small groups, students “fill in details about how William Shakespeare’s life, as described by Woolf, differed from that of his imaginary sister. Then, state Woolf’s conclusion, inferring her position from the details she presents.” The Teacher’s Edition reminds teachers to discuss with students the advantages of using this what-if format, such as using imaginative narrative, logical reasoning, and creative techniques. The supplementary resource, Analyze Craft and Structure: Interaction and Development of Ideas, is available.

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Sonnet 12,” “Sonnet 60,” and “Sonnet 73” by William Shakespeare, “Sonnet 32” by Mary Wroth, and “Sonnet 75” by Edmund Spenser. In Analyze Craft and Structure, students analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning and its aesthetic impact: “Each of these poems is a sonnet, a fourteen-line lyric poem with a single theme. Most traditional sonnets are written in rhymed iambic pentameter—five groups of two syllables, each with the accent on the second syllable. There are two main types of sonnets: English, or Shakespearean, and Italian, or Petrarchan. The sonnets in this collection are Shakespearean. However, Sonnet 75 by Edmund Spenser represents a Spenserian sonnet, a variation on the English sonnet.” Students analyze how the structure of a sonnet they have read from the collection helps to develop the theme: “Consider how each quatrain explores a different aspect of the theme and how the octuplet offers a surprising comment.” Students also choose another sonnet from the collection and in their notebooks, they “analyze how the poet uses the sonnet structure to develop the theme.”

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Most Forgetful Man in the World” by Joshua Foe. In Analyze Craft and Structure, students determine the author’s point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is particularly effective. Students complete a chart analyzing how the author fulfills various purposes for writing the text and answer questions in their notebooks, such as “1. (a) What is Foer’s general purpose for writing this text? (b) What is his specific purpose? Explain. Technical writing techniques can include definition, simile, and metaphor.” The Teacher’s Edition includes guidance: “These informative texts are primarily composed of literal language for the sake of clarity and directness. However, figures of speech, especially comparisons, effectively gain the reader’s attention. They can also develop images in the mind of the reader, which is important for comprehension.” Students complete a chart identifying the author’s use of these techniques and how they help the author to “convey complex technical ideas to a general audience.”

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c. 

The materials include multiple opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts and across multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. The materials provide related questions as students comprehend and analyze texts and complete culminating tasks. Most sets of questions and tasks require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across the unit to build knowledge around a topic/theme and the essential question. In some instances, the materials pair two or more texts, and students practice the same skills across all texts. Multiple texts connect to the essential question in preparation for the end-of-unit assessment. In this assessment, students synthesize ideas based on various text-dependent prompts that align with grade-level standards. 

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, and from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds. In Writing to Sources, students analyze multiple interpretations of the text to evaluate the interpretation in the graphic novel version and answer the following prompt: “Write a critical evaluation of the excerpt from the graphic novel Beowulf. In your essay, make a claim about the graphic novel as a storytelling medium. As you craft your claim, consider these questions: How effective is the graphic novel excerpt as an adaptation of ‘The Last Battle?’ What are the strengths and weaknesses of the graphic novel medium? To support your claim, cite evidence from both the graphic novel and the epic poem. Include at least one counterclaim and present an argument in response to it.”  

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students view “The Prologue From the Canterbury Tales: The Remix” by Patience Agbabi and analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem, evaluating how each version interprets the source text: “You have read the Prologue from the Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer and viewed an adaptation of that work by poet and performer Patience Agbabi. Now, deepen your understanding of both works by analyzing and comparing them in writing.” Students write an argumentative essay relating to one of the following conclusions: “1. Great literature should be reinterpreted and reimagined for new generations. 2. Great literature is diminished when it is changed to suit modern tastes.” As students read and analyze the texts, they analyze similarities and differences between a segment of Agabaie’s remix and a segment of the Prologue that corresponds. The materials provide a chart for students to record their observations. Students respond to questions in their notebooks, such as “What does Agbabie’s remix say or suggest about Chaucer’s work? How? Do you agree with Agbabi that The Canterbury Tales is an ‘unfinished business?’ Explain.” During the Close Review and analysis of the media, students answer questions such as, “How do you think Chaucer would react to Agbabi’s ‘remix’ if he were in the audience? Explain. How do people come to have different views of society? How is Agbabie’s view of society different than Chaucer’s? How is it the same?”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. During reading, students complete Close Read activities: “Annotate: In paragraph 1, mark words Orwell uses to describe the way Burmese people feel about Europeans. Question: What does Orwell’s word choice reveal about the situation and setting? Conclude: Why do you think Orwell chooses to begin the essay with this information?” Later in the text, the Close Read states: “In paragraph 7, mark adjectives that Orwell uses to describe his mission. How do these adjectives reflect the way Orwell seems to feel about his role? Why does Orwell seem to lack firm conviction regarding any action he might take?”

Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V by William Shakespeare and listen to audio performances of The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V, Scene I by L.A. Theatre Works and The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act V, Scene I by LibriVox. In the Writing to Compare Assignment, students write an essay to answer the following prompt: “Write a compare-and-contrast essay in which you analyze the interpretations of Act V, Scene I, of Macbeth, presented in the two audio performances.” Students discuss two items: “elements of the text that are stressed or muted in each version” and “ways in which each version affects the listener’s experience of the text.” The materials ask students to “Support [their] ideas with references to the audio versions and the original text. [Their] references may take the form of quotations, descriptions, or paraphrases.”

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning” and “Holy Sonnet 10” by John Donne, and students demonstrate knowledge of these works, which later inspired other early-American poets, including how texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics. Both works connect to the essential question for the unit: “Why are both vision and disillusion necessary?” As students analyze the text, they answer questions in their notebooks, such as, “How does the purpose of ‘A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning’ differ from that of ‘Holy Sonnet 10?’ Donne’s poetry is again admired by scholars after having fallen out of favor earlier. What elements in Donne’s poetry may have sparked a renewed interest in his work? Why are both vision and disillusion necessary? What have you learned about vision and disillusion from reading these poems?” After analyzing the two poems, students choose two poems to compare: “The work of Anne Bradstreet and Edward Taylor—two early American poets—shares certain qualities, notably the use of conceits and paradoxes, with that of John Donne and other English metaphysical poets. Choose a poem by either Bradstreet or Taylor, and compare it with a poem by John Donne from this collection.”

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from “A History of the English Church and People'' by Bede, translated by Leo Sherley-Price, and an excerpt from “History of Jamaica” by Encyclopaedia Britannica. Both texts connect to the essential question of the unit: “What does it mean to call a place home?” Students integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in different media or formats as well as in words in order to address a question or solve a problem. The materials ask students to “Deepen [their] understanding of the historical writing by comparing and contrasting the texts and expressing [their] ideas in writing.” As students consider how Bede’s history of English and the “History of Jamaica'' are similar and different, the task asks students to focus their analysis on the differences using the following questions: “What accounts for them? What do they reveal about the writers’—or the readers’—values and worldviews? What do they say about the era in which each text was produced?” Students answer questions in their notebooks, including “What do the texts’ differences suggest about their eras and audiences? What kinds of information or reading experiences might a member of each audience expect? What underlying values or worldviews are suggested by your answer to question 1?”

Indicator 2D
04/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s)/theme(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d. 

The materials include multi-faceted culminating tasks that require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. Each unit across the grade level includes an essential question connecting to a topic/theme. The units include Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning opportunities. Students build knowledge of the topic/theme under study by reading various texts, completing writing tasks, and engaging in speaking and listening with peers. The Whole-Class Learning Performance Task, Small-Group Learning Performance Task, and Performance-Based Assessments in each unit provide students with an opportunity to demonstrate comprehension and knowledge of the topic/theme through various means addressing several different standards. The Whole-Group Learning Performance Tasks assess writing, and the Small-Group Learning Performance Tasks assess speaking and listening skills. Throughout the unit, shorter culminating tasks following each reading also provide practice opportunities for multiple skills. Teachers can provide feedback to support students with mastery by the end of the unit. The Teacher Resources includes an Assessment section that provides online and PDF versions of selection tests, extension selection tests, unit tests, extension unit tests, and beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year tests. Each exam includes multiple choice and short answer questions testing various standards.

Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, each Introduction for the unit includes information about the Unit Goals, including goals for Reading, Writing, Research, Language, and Speaking and Listening. The Teacher’s Edition states, “These unit goals were backward designed from the Performance-Based Assessment at the end of the unit and the Whole-Class and Small Group Performance Tasks. Students will practice and become proficient in many more standards over the course of this unit.”

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an explanatory essay after reading three selections, connecting to the essential question: “How do people come to have different views of society?” The Teacher’s Edition includes guidance: “Explain to students that after they have finished reading the selections, they will write an explanatory essay about the ways that our views of society can be shaped by tensions between our ideals and reality. To help them prepare, encourage students to think about the topic as they progress through the selections and as they participate in the Whole-Class Learning experience.” When students engage in the writing task, they use their knowledge from their reading to consider the relationship between social ideals and realities as they write an explanatory essay around the question: “How does Chaucer find humor in the difference between the ideal and the real in the characters that populate The Canterbury Tales?” The task addresses reading, writing, language, and speaking and listening standards.

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present an argument. After reading a series of sonnets and literary criticism, students take a position answering the question, “Should literature of the past be rewritten in present-day language for today’s readers?” In a small group, students analyze the texts and reach a consensus on a yes or no answer to the question. Then each group member focuses on one sonnet to gather evidence and present it to the class. Group members decide on the order of their presentation before practicing, using the checklist to evaluate themselves. After practicing, students can revise before presenting to the class. The task addresses reading and speaking and listening standards.

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students view a clip from Gulliver’s Travels Among the Lilliputians and the Giants by Georges Méliès. In the Performance Task, students write a reflective narrative based on the prompt: “When do we need a new vision of things?” The task addresses reading and writing standards.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Performance-Based Assessment, students respond to a related prompt, “In what ways is home both a place and a state of mind?,” that connects to the Essential Question of the entire unit: “What does it mean to call a place home?” Students complete an Evidence Log throughout the unit when reading selections to prepare for the Performance-Based Assessment, which is completed independently. The Teacher’s Edition does provide the following guidance: “Prior to beginning the Assessment, have students think about the essays that they reviewed in class and how they were retrospective in nature. Point out that reviewing the past allows writers to gain a new and enlightened view of these experiences of home. Remind students that people also gain a new perception of past events through subsequent experience and detachment.” Students can refer to their previous work throughout the unit, including the Evidence Log and Word Network, as they write an informative essay. The task addresses writing standards and speaking and listening standards.

Indicator 2E
02/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e. 

The materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and include different types of writing tasks that connect with texts; however, well-designed guidance is lacking to help teachers implement and monitor student growth. The materials follow a consistent pattern in each unit that includes a variety of writing tasks. Argumentative, informative, and narrative writing activities are offered across the year in the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections of each unit. Students can practice for the writing Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments with the writing activities in the section and unit leading up to each task. Since units focus on a specific type of writing, the program is cyclical in building skills toward the performance task in each unit versus over the course of the year. The Teacher’s Edition includes some guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. There is limited information relating to a year-long writing plan. Mentor texts are provided for students to reference and learn techniques to apply in their own writing. Some guidance is provided for students as they practice and apply writing standards, mostly in reminders to teachers rather than explicit instruction and modeling. While all standards are tagged as a part of the instruction and tasks, a number of standards do not have explicit instruction; rather, students are told to address the skill indicated in the standard. While there are some interactive and minilessons available in the resources, the materials do not consistently outline where these resources may be helpful to teachers and students. Those resources that are available for students and teachers to access are generic resources that are not specific to each text, writing, task, or unit. 

Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit provides a Launch Text to model the mode of writing that will be used in the Performance-Based Assessments. Throughout Whole-Class Learning, the teacher will “lead the shared reading experience, providing modeling and support, as students begin exploring perspectives on the unit topic.” Writing tasks connect with the texts students read. The Performance Task assists students in building toward proficiency with the Unit Performance-Based Assessment. Students draw on evidence, notes, and previous writing instruction during the Unit Performance-Based Assessment.

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society, Unit Introduction, students read the Launch Text “Standing Up to Absolute Power?” (author not cited), an explanatory text. Students consider “why the writer has chosen the example of the English barons to illustrate the thesis.” The Teacher’s Edition shares, “The Launch Text provides a common introduction to the unit theme for all students…In addition, students can use ‘Standing Up to Absolute Power’ as a model when they complete the Performance-Based Assessment at the end of the unit.” Students also reference the Model Explanatory Essay when completing the Performance Task and writing an explanatory essay. In Whole-Class Learning, students view “The Prologue From the Canterbury Tales: The Remix” by Patience Agbabi. In the Writing to Sources activity, students write a short argumentative essay for the prompt: “Write an argumentative essay in which you use Chaucer’s Prologue and Agbabi’s ‘remix’ as the basis for one of these two conclusions: 1. Great literature should be reinterpreted and reimagined for new generations. OR 2. Great literature is diminished when it is changed to suit modern tastes. Support your conclusion with details from both poems and from your own experience or prior knowledge.” Students use a graphic organizer to brainstorm and draft their ideas outlining their claim, evidence from the texts, and personal experience and knowledge. 

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “A Valediction” by John Donne, and write a narrative “presenting the discussion between John and Anne Donne as they consider the issue of his leaving on his journey.” Students reflect on their writing, answering questions such as “How did writing this scene increase your understanding of the poem?” They record what they have learned in their evidence logs for future reference.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay for the prompt: “Think about how Andrea Levy and George Orwell both define and wrestle with their relationships to Britain. Conduct research to write an informative essay in response to this question: How did British colonialism complicate the idea of home?” Students complete the steps in process writing and use guiding questions and graphic organizers to support the process. In the prewriting/planning stage, students review gathering evidence while researching by thinking about what additional information they need to answer the question. There is direct instruction on identifying research sources and note cards as well as citing sources within an essay. During the drafting stage, there is guidance for developing a thesis, choosing an organizational structure, writing a strong introduction and conclusion, and an activity on using effective transitions. In the revision step, students are guided to focus on internal logic, thesis support, precise language, and tone. Leading up to the Whole-Group Learning Performance task are activities after the unit texts. One example is after students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy, the Analyze Craft and Structure activity requires students to analyze a writer’s point of view along with the ideas, opinions, and emotional tone to discover the purpose or purposes of the essay. Students complete a graphic organizer analyzing several specific passages, then answer the question, “Judging from the details you have studied above, what might be the author’s main purpose for writing this essay? Support your response with text evidence.” While drafting, students are guided to write a thesis, create an outline, and use clear transitions. 

Instructional materials include some well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Writing and Research Center includes the following minilessons: Informative/Explanatory Writing, Narrative Writing, and Argumentative Writing. A minilesson relating to the Writing Process, Research Writing, Integrating Research Elements, Citing Sources, Sources and Evidence, EssayScorer Writing Prompts, and Writing and Research PowerPoint Presentations are accessible for teachers to assign and offer additional support.

  • The Professional Development Center offers the option to access Teacher Support videos, including but not limited to: “Become a Better Writer, Feedback, Sequencing Your Ideas, and Time Shifts in Your Writing.” A White Paper is also available entitled “New Perspectives in Building Readers and Writers” by Kelly Gallagher, M.Ed, with information to inform teachers, including but not limited to: “Teachers should be encouraged to write in front of their students, and to share their thinking as they work their way through the writing process. Modeling is also key in helping to sharpen students’ reading skills.” 

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell. In the Writing to Sources activity, students write a critical essay evaluating the different styles of poems and how they approach a similar theme. The Teacher’s Edition provides some support for this task, such as the following suggestion: “Discuss with students what factors to consider as they compare the three poems. They may ask themselves, How does the poem make me feel when I read it? What images come to mind? Does the poem make me happy, sad, or indifferent? Does the tone of the poem suggest a positive or negative feeling? Students may want to also consider how meter, balanced sentences, and parallel structure contribute to the similarities and differences among the poems.” While these suggestions may help focus the students’ writing, there are other supports that are missing, such as support for analyzing the effect of meter in poetry.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, the Teacher’s Edition provides support and guidance for each step of the writing process, such as when reviewing the prompt: “Suggest that students review the assignment and consider how both texts presented writers who lived somewhat outside the mainstream culture of their communities.” During the prewriting step, the Teacher’s Edition states: “Ask students these leading questions: How did Levy and Orwell come to understand their perceptions? Did their view evolve or remain constant as they reviewed their situations? Explain that sometimes the story is presented as an evolution of thought.” There is a link to paragraphs 5 and 6 from the Launch Text with the suggestion to project it and engage the students in activities to reinforce key ideas and skills. Other reminders include using the Teacher’s Toolkit student model of an informative essay. For activities with the texts leading up to the Performance Task, teachers are provided with the same suggestions and guidance for teaching the various skills, as well as links to materials for reteaching and suggestions for stretching a student. 

Indicator 2F
04/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2f. 

The materials include research and writing activities and projects that are sequenced and encourage students to develop knowledge and understand different aspects of a topic. Materials provide opportunities for students to complete research activities tied to topics as a part of the research process to build mastery of the grade-level standards. The language of the standards is present in the student materials and often referenced in the directions for assignments to allow students to make connections to their learning. Research is integrated throughout the curriculum in regular short research activities associated with specific texts. Students synthesize multiple texts and source materials to gain knowledge and understanding of the topic. Regular features in the after-reading activities are Research to Clarify and Research to Explore tasks that allow students to practice research skills related to the texts or topic. The final Performance Task in most units requires that students use knowledge from the selections and their research to answer the prompt. The Reflection task in each unit addresses student research goals and understanding. Materials support teachers in employing projects, including a research toolkit. Guidance is available in the Teacher’s Edition, connecting with the topics and suggesting ways to assist students during the research process. Additional resources are available for teachers in the Research and Writing Center, including mini-lessons and a research PowerPoint. 

Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, students read “How Did Harry Patch Become an Unlikely WWI Hero?” by BBC iWonder and complete a Writing to Sources task in which they create a critical analysis of the site. During the research, student instructions state: “Use print and online sources and summarize what you have learned in a research overview, listing three to five main conclusions with supporting references. Assess the strengths and limitations of each source you chose.” The materials also remind students to “use advanced search techniques to locate the targeted information.” These include Quotation Marks, “Or” Search, and Asterisk Search.

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Apostrophe to the Ocean” by George Gordon and Lord Byron. In the Research practice task, students create a report based on the following prompt: “Conduct a historical investigative research report that relates historical events of the period to the three poems you have read.” Student instructions state: “Gather information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources. Authoritative sources are those that are widely acknowledged for their accuracy and reliability. They provide well-written and error-free content, and they openly cite their own sources. If they present ideas on which opinions differ, they say so. As you research, make sure to collect the information you will need to cite sources correctly using a standard format.”

    • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write to the prompt: “Write an informative essay in response to this question: How did British colonialism complicate the idea of home?” Students conduct research that includes print and electronic sources, assuring they are reliable. It is suggested that they use resources that end in .gov or .edu and, when possible, “use primary sources-firsthand or original accounts, such as diaries, journals, or newspaper articles.” Students track source information with a system such as note cards so they can create a citation page.

Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Resources, a Plagiarism Checker is provided for teachers to access via Safe Assign, which offers guidance for implementation, including Video Tutorials: “SafeAssign is effective as both a deterrent and an educational tool. Use SafeAssign to review assignment submissions for originality and create opportunities to help students identify how to properly attribute sources rather than paraphrase.” The tool will assist educators when assigning research projects and connects to W.12.8 when students avoid plagiarism.

  • The materials offer Research Minilessons and a Writing and Research Center with a Research Writing PowerPoint Presentation that introduces research writing and provides prewriting tips to assist students in formulating a research question and making a Research Plan, such as “Once you have written your major research question, you are ready to make a research plan. As part of your plan, you will create a timeline for finishing your report. You also will find and evaluate sources of information.” The PowerPoint Presentation includes guidance relating to how to organize a research report and revise and edit the draft. A grammar mini-lesson follows, and student instructions for publishing the piece state: “When you’ve finished your final draft, publish it. Use this chart to identify a way to publish your informational research report for the appropriate audience.” The Teacher’s Edition: End Matter, Tool Kit: Research includes detailed guidance for Conducting Research, Reviewing Research Findings, and Incorporating Research Into Writing.

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars” by Richard Lovelace and “The Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Teachers facilitate the Comprehension Check, and guidance is available to assist students during Research to Clarify and Research to Explore, such as “If groups struggle to narrow these broad topics, you may want to suggest one of these narrower topics: the Ottoman Empire, Nicholas I of Russia, Napoleon III, or Omar Pasha.”

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act I by William Shakespeare. In the Teacher’s Edition, teacher instructions state: “Suggest that students research the paintings of Henry Fuseli, Alexander Johnston, John Wootton, or John Singer Sargent.” 

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. In the Speaking and Listening activity, students research the range of adaptations of Frankenstein. Students pick three to focus on in their presentation; one must be a film or television version. The presentation must include a summary of the adaptation and a comparison to Shelly’s version in terms of characters, plot, and format. The Teacher’s Edition suggests teachers use the ancillary resource Speaking and Listening: Research Presentation to support students. 

Materials provide many opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel. In the Research activity, students answer a Research to Clarify question: “Choose at least one unfamiliar detail from the text. Briefly research that detail. In what way does the information you learned shed light on an aspect of the epic.” They also create a question about something from the text they want to learn more about under Research to Explore. 

    • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Small-Group Learning, students read “Passenger Manifest for the MV Empire Windrush” and conduct research to clarify unfamiliar details from the text and explore ideas generated from reading the document. In addition, in the Effective Expression section, students “create a profile of a typical passenger on the famous 1948 voyage of the Empire Windrush from Kingston, Jamaica, to London, England.” Students work independently and use research sources, such as “Sources of information provided in unit selections, author biographies, background notes, and footnotes.” They synthesize the information and create their profiles.

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection including “Apostrophe to the Ocean” by George Gordon and Lord Byron, “The World Is Too Much With Us” by William Wordsworth, and “London, 1802” by William Wordsworth, and students conduct a historical investigative research report. The research report relates “historical events of the period to the three poems you have read.” Students can choose from three options for the research project, such as “Plan and write a report that analyzes Wordsworth’s profound disappointment with French revolutionary politics, as explored in ‘London, 1802.’” Students gather information from both print and digital sources for the project. 

  • Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf translated by Burton Raffel, and from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds, and students complete a Writing to Compare task. Students write a critical evaluation of the excerpt from the graphic novel, considering these questions: “How effective is the graphic novel excerpt as an adaptation of ‘The Last Battle’? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the graphic novel medium?” Students apply grades 11-12 Reading standards to literature: “Identify segments of the epic poem and the graphic novel that correspond with each other. Decide how the segments are similar and different.” Students take notes using a chart.

    • “In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Performance-Based Assessment, Part 1, students write an argument to answer the question, “What is the relationship of human beings to time? In this argument, you will use examples and evidence from the diverse texts in the unit to justify a claim that you make. State your assertions with specific evidence from several of the texts.” 

    • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Apostrophe to the Ocean” by George Gordon and Lord Byron. In the Research activity, student instructions state: “Conduct a historical investigative research report that relates historical events of the period to the three poems you have read.” Each poem has further directions for the research report. Students use authoritative literary sources and collect the necessary information for their citations while doing the research. The Teacher’s Edition suggests that students look at examples of the different types of report structures and work together to generate research questions. It also suggests providing students with the ancillary resource Research: Historical Investigation Research Report. 

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

08/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

The materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards; however, not all instruction is aligned to grade-level standards with opportunities for explicit instruction. By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard.

The materials provide a suggested implementation schedule and alternative implementation schedule that aligns with core learning objectives. The pacing for the units is reasonable and offers a systematic layout that allows multiple days for reading the texts and completing after-reading activities and a one-day Independent Learning choice text with more limited after-reading activities.

Indicator 2G
04/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.

The materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards; however, not all instruction is aligned to grade-level standards with opportunities for explicit instruction. By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Most speaking and listening standards and most writing standards are covered in the Frontmatter of the Teacher’s Edition, but the student tasks do not always adequately address the full intent of the standard.

Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, the Unit at a Glance section lists the standards for each student activity in one of three columns: Analyze Craft and Structure, Conventions/Author’s Style, and Composition/Research/Speaking and Listening. Page numbers are not listed next to these entries, though the Teacher’s Edition: End Matter PDF includes an Index of Skills where page numbers are provided. In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter PDF, the materials provide the Correlation to myPerspectives® English Language Arts document with page numbers: “The following correlation shows points at which focused standards instruction is provided in the Student Edition. The Teacher’s Edition provides further opportunity to address standards through Personalize for Learning notes and additional resources available only in the Teacher’s Edition.” The materials do not always provide explicit instruction on the grade-level standards. 

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf by Gareth Hinds. In the Writing to Compare activity, in the drafting section, students learn about structuring an argument, such as creating claims and reasons, supporting the reasons with examples, acknowledging and responding to the counterclaims, and strengthening the argument with rhetoric. This instruction aligns with W.11-12.1, W.11-12.1.b, and W.11-12.1.c. After instruction, students write their first draft. 

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift and address the standard RL.11-12.1: “Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.” The Correlation document states: “Students will address this standard in Analyze the Text features which appear with every literature selection.” Students answer Analyze the Text questions, such as “Make Inferences: What can you infer about Gulliver’s relationship with the Lilliputians, based on the way he walks around their city?” The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance for formative assessment as students analyze the text, including but not limited to: “If students fail to cite evidence, then remind them to support their ideas with specific information from the text. If students struggle to infer meaning, then discuss how to make an inference and illustrate with examples.” There are seven instances across the school year when the students have an opportunity to address the standard, and teachers can engage in explicit instruction.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell and “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy and write a comparison-and-contrast essay. Students review, revise, and edit during the writing process. The student materials include the following instructions: “After you fine-tune the content of your essay, carefully edit for grammatical accuracy, and then proofread to eliminate errors in spelling and mechanics.” Explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards is limited.

Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, a Whole-Class Learning Performance Task with a writing focus and a Small-Group Learning Performance Task with a speaking and listening focus are included consistently across the school year, and shorter tasks follow the reading of text selections. The questions throughout the Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning connect to the Essential Question of each unit and help prepare students to complete the performance tasks.

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an explanatory essay aligning with standard W.11-12.2: “Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.” Student instructions state: “The Whole-Class readings come from a time in British history when tensions between ideals and reality shaped views of society. After reading, you will write an explanatory essay on a social conflict in which ideals and reality conflict.”

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present a reflective narrative, aligning with standard SL.11-12.4: “Present information, findings, and supporting evidence conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can following the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks.” Student instructions state: “The Small-Group readings feature people writing about having grand visions and losing them. After reading, your group will plan and deliver a reflective narrative about the ways in which our visions of the world can help us grow or hold us back.”

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. In the Concept Vocabulary activity, students answer the following questions: “

    • Under what conditions might a person despair? 

    • Explain the difference between two dogs—one that is malicious and one that is not. 

    • What is something you might find in the refrigerator that you would call odious? 

    • Name a character in a story, movie, television show, or video game that you would describe as hideous. 

    • When might you experience a sense of dread about an upcoming event? 

    • When watching your team play an important game, what kind of event would bring on a sense of consternation?” 

The questions address standards L.11-12.4.c and L.11-12.4.d. 

Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, a Performance-Based Assessment is included, and the unit activities are backward-designed to the Performance-Based Assessment. The materials offer Selection Tests, Extension Selections Tests, Unit Tests, Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests, Next Generation Practice Tests, Next Generation Performance Tasks, and Customizable Test Prep Banks. In the online Teacher’s Materials under Assessment, there is an Interpretation Guide for each Unit Test and an Answer Key for each Selection Test, which indicates the standard that is assessed for each question. All questions on all tests are aligned to one or more standards.  

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act I by William Shakespeare. On the selection test, four questions align with RL.11-12.2, and nine questions align with RL.11-12.3. 

  • In Unit 4: Grit and Grandeur, Performance-Based Assessment, students write a reflective narrative that addresses standard W.11-12.10: “Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.” Students answer the question: “When can the way we look at things lead to growth–and when can it hold us back?” The prompt connects to the Essential Question of the unit: “Why are both vision and disillusion necessary?” 

  • In Unit 6, Ordinary Lives, Extraordinary Tales, Assessments, Unit 6 Test, students complete a Selected and Short Response, analyzing craft and structure. Students answer questions such as the following: “Briefly explain how situational irony is created in this dramatic monologue. Include quotations to support your statements.”

By the end of the academic year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter PDF is available. The Standards Correlation document provides the Standard in the first column, and where those standards appear in the Print and Interactive Editions in the second column with corresponding page numbers. At times, the materials address standards multiple times across a school year to ensure students can reach mastery. For example, the standard W.11-12.1 is addressed in the following texts and tasks: “from Beowulf/from Beowulf (graphic novel), 60; The Prologue From The Canterbury Tales, 158; The Prologue From The Canterbury Tales/The Prologue From The Canterbury Tales: The Remix, 164; Shakespeare’s Sister, 197; The Tragedy of Macbeth, 295, 352; Gulliver’s Travels Among the Lilliputians and the Giants/Cover Art, 458; To His Coy Mistress/To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time/Youth’s the Season Made for Joys, 489; The Most Forgetful Man in the World/When Memories Never Fade, the Past Can Poison the Present, 663; Whole-Class Performance Task: Unit 1, 62; Unit 3, 360; Performance-Based Assessment: Unit 1, 108, Unit 3, 408.” However, there are instances when specific standards appear rarely or are not addressed fully to ensure sufficient opportunities to practice and reach mastery by the end of the year. For example, the research standard W.11-12.8 is addressed in the following texts and tasks: “How Did Harry Patch Become an Unlikely WWI Hero?, 99; Apostrophe to the Ocean/The World Is Too Much With Us/ London,1802, 635; Whole-Class Performance Task: Unit 2, 168; Unit 6, 720. Standard RI 11-12.6 is addressed in limited ways: On Seeing England for the First Time/XXIII from Midsummer, 214; The Most Forgetful Man in the World, 656; Back to My Own Country, An Essay, 700, 702; Shooting an Elephant, 714.”

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill, and address the standard RL.11-12.5: “Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text (e.g., the choice of where to begin or end a story, the choice to provide a comedic or tragic resolution) contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.” Students consider Chaucer’s use of the heroic couplet and complete the task: “Explain how Chaucer used these techniques to create his style and make his poetry fluid, memorable, and clear.” The Standards Correlation document lists nineteen opportunities to address the standard across the grade level with a variety of texts.

Indicator 2H
04/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h. 

The materials provide a suggested implementation schedule and alternative implementation schedule that aligns with core learning and objectives. The pacing for the units is reasonable and offers a systematic layout that allows multiple days for reading the texts and completing after-reading activities and a one-day Independent Learning choice text with more limited after-reading activities. Each unit is planned for 30 days in a 40-50 minute class resulting in 180 class periods of instruction but does not provide a cushion for optional activities, enrichment, or re-teaching for English Language Learners, special education students, or underperforming students. Teachers on a block schedule are guided to combine days to fit the length of their classes. The Pacing Guide appears in the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter. It consistently appears in the Unit Introduction, the Whole-Class Learning Overview, the Small-Group Learning Overview, and the Independent Learning Overview. The pacing allows students an opportunity to master content by the end of the year. The suggested implementation schedules can be completed in the time allotted; however, teacher discretion may be required to determine what materials to include considering the testing requirements of individual districts and states. Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. The optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. The Teacher’s Edition provides several options in the Hook & Inspire section to draw students into texts through visual representations, connections to ideas outside of the literature, extension activities, and Book Talk ideas. The Pacing Guide also offers suggestions when teaching with trade books, including being advised to look at the standards being taught in the unit or the texts being replaced and choose activities and tests from the trade book lesson plans which teach the same standards. Trade books align with the main topic and Essential Question. They do not distract from the primary focus of the unit and can be used in lieu of the provided texts.

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials provide guidance when integrating trade books with the program. The trade books can be chosen to supplement a unit: “Form literature circles and have the students read one of the trade books throughout the course of the unit as a supplement to the selections and activities.” The trade books can be chosen to substitute for unit selections: “If you replace unit selections with a trade book, review the standards taught with those selections. Teacher Resources that provide practice with all standards are available.” The trade books can be chosen to extend independent learning: “Extend the unit by replacing independent reading selections with one of these trade books.” 

Suggested implementation schedules can be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, the Teacher’s Edition provides guidance: “Each day in this pacing calendar represents a 40–50 minute class period. Teachers using block scheduling may combine days to reflect their class schedule. In addition, teachers may revise pacing to differentiate and support core instruction by integrating components and resources as students require.” The pacing calendar uses a 30-day schedule that includes one day to introduce the unit, one day to introduce Whole-Class Learning, 11 days of Whole-Class Learning, two days of Performance Task for Whole-Class Learning, one day to introduce Small-Group Learning, nine days of Small-Group Learning, one day for the Performance Task for Small-Group Learning, one day to introduce Independent Learning, one day of Independent Learning, and two days for the final Performance Task. Whole-Group learning has three texts, Small-Group Learning has four texts, and students choose one of five texts for Independent Learning. The Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter includes an implementation guide for A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court by Mark Twain, The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde, and Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. The Frontmatter explains how to implement the novels in place of the entire unit, parts of the unit, or as an independent, additional unit. The same structure and guidance are used for each unit across the grade level. There are six units, and each unit covers a period of 30 instructional days, for a total of 180 days, which is the minimum requirement for an average U.S. school year.

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Whole-Class Learning, students view a clip from Gulliver’s Travels Among the Lilliputians and the Giants by Georges Méliès and review an image gallery of covers for Gulliver’s Travels. The pacing guide gives two days for students to view the texts and complete the after-reading activities. There are seven Comprehension questions, one Research question, a Close Review for students to revisit their notes and rewatch the video or review the covers as needed, five Analyze the Media questions, a Media Vocabulary activity, and writing a critical evaluation in the Writing to Compare activity. The critical evaluation is a process writing task from prewriting to editing and submitting the final draft. 

Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Sonnet 12,” “Sonnet 60,” and “Sonnet 73” by William Shakespeare, “Sonnet 32” from Pamphilia to Amphilanthus by Mary Wroth, and “Sonnet 75” by Edmund Spenser. The Teacher’s Edition provides Extension Questions that can be used in lieu of the Comprehension Check, such as the following: “Mary Wroth uses a simile in the third quatrain and final couplet of Sonnet 32. What does the simile compare? What message does this simile impart about the passage of time?” The grade-level standards are listed with the questions.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “The Seafarer,” translated by Burton Raffel. At the end of the poem is a Media Box with a video of a cellist playing. After watching the video, students discuss, “In what ways is the cellist’s relationship to the cello similar to or different from the sailor’s relationship to the sea in ‘The Seafarer’?”

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read from Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance relating to adding an optional research activity: “Encourage interested students to search online for literary criticism of Mrs. Dalloway and to choose one analysis to read and discuss in their groups. Ask students to discuss whether they agree with the analysis they read and to identify important points the analysis brought up that they had not previously thought about. Finally, ask students to discuss how the author of the analysis supported his or her ideas and theories.” The optional task enhances learning and is personalized to challenge students.

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “The Widow at Windsor” by Rudyard Kipling. In the Teacher’s Edition, a Vocabulary Development box reviews how to reinforce the concept vocabulary. Students write “show you know” sentences using two partially complete sentences.

Overview of Gateway 3

Usability

The materials meet the expectations for usability. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. In addition, the materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies. 

There is a clear assessment system that provides multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. The standards assessed in each assessment are indicated, and the materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills.

The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. They regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level and strategies for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. 

The program includes a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included.

The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. The visual design in both the print and digital editions supports student learning and makes the organizational structure clear.

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

09/09

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. In addition, the materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies. 

Indicator 3A
02/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a. 

The materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist the teacher in presenting the materials. The Teacher Resources provide a Unit at a Glance for each unit, providing information on implementing the materials and an expected pacing guide. Unit Goals and Academic vocabulary are listed at the beginning of each unit. The margins provide teachers with suggestions on how to implement aspects of the curriculum. This includes possible student answers and learning goals for each unit. The Getting Started section provides program overviews of the program’s structure for the teacher in either video or PDF format. 

Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Resources section, a Unit at a Glance is provided for each unit that includes a list of texts used for whole group, small group, and independent learning, with Lexile and genres. The pacing for each component in the unit and the performance task are included. 

  • In the Getting Started section, a Program Overview is provided that includes videos and documents that provide a program overview and information on the student-centered unit structure, program components, digital resources, and program assessments.  

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, the Table of Contents and Frontmatter provide teacher details on all the unit components and how to use the materials. 

  • In the Introduction page of each unit, a Pacing Plan is provided to show how many days to focus on whole group texts, small group learning, and performance tasks. 

Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, the Unit Goals are listed in the Introduction section of each unit. Reading Goals, Writing and Research Goals, Language Goals, and Speaking and Listening Goals are listed. 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, academic vocabulary is listed at the beginning of each unit. Directions on how to incorporate the vocabulary, as well as possible student responses, are provided. 

  • In Unit 6, Finding A Home, Whole Group Learning, the materials provide information on how to launch the text in the margins of the teacher wrap: “Remind students that an author will often introduce a thesis within the first few paragraphs of a text, but that it may not appear as one succinct statement. Students may want to rephrase the thesis from the first paragraph in their own words.” 

Indicator 3B
02/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b. 

The materials provide adult-level explanations and examples for the teacher. The Planning section before each text gives rationales for text quality and connections to the Essential Question and the culminating Performance Tasks. The Professional Development Center online includes videos on various topics. The Teacher’s Edition provides notes in the margins that explain grade-level and outside-grade-level concepts and strategies. Support materials are found in the digital platform and in the front and end matter of the Teacher’s Edition that provides information on subjects such as English Language Learning, grammar terms, and close reading steps.

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Professional Development Center, teacher support videos are provided on topics such as assessment, differentiation, engagement, text complexity, and vocabulary. Within each topic, there are a variety of videos. For example, under Engagement, a teacher support video discusses Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education. 

  • In the Unit Introduction for each unit, academic vocabulary from the unit is included with an explanation for use: “Complete pronunciations, parts of speech, and definitions are provided for you. Students are only expected to provide the definition.” The word, part of speech, pronunciation, meaning, and related words are all listed in the margin. 

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act I by William Shakespeare. The Teacher’s Edition states the following about examining characters: “Point out that one way authors drive the plot is to use the character (or characters) to manipulate other characters and their actions. Shakespeare uses the witches and their prophecy that Macbeth will become king to trigger his ambitions and bring out his true character.” 

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill. In the Teacher’s Edition, Reading Support, Decide and Plan, Challenge, the following suggestion is provided: “Remind students that a poem is allegorical, which means the author is trying to make a larger point, typically a moral or political one. Have students choose a pilgrim and use text evidence to explain how Chaucer feels about that pilgrim.” 

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Focus Period 1798–1832: An Era of Change.” The Teacher’s Edition provides the following background information: “The Romantic period was essentially a reaction to domestic, social, and political upheavals. The established order had been shaken, and commentators, novelists, and poets responded accordingly.” 

Indicator 3C
02/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c. 

The materials provide correlation information for the ELA standards throughout the units. The Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter contains a correlation chart for each grade that lists the standards for literature, informational text, writing, speaking and listening, and language and where the standards are addressed in each unit. Standards are labeled throughout the Teacher’s Edition in multiple places. The Unit at a Glance shows the standards addressed throughout each unit. The Planning and Personalize for Learning pages preceding each text list standards for each lesson and suggest scaffolds and extensions. The Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle lists instructional standards addressed with each text and a flow chart on how to teach and assess the standards. The editable Unit Planning Guide displays standards day by day. Standards are included without numbers in the Student Edition, with each text and activity at the bottom of the page.

Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Frontmatter, a correlation chart lists the standards for literature, informational text, writing, speaking and listening, and language. Standards are listed by number and written out. The location of where those standards are addressed in the print and online editions is stated on the chart. 

  • In the Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, the standards are included for each text, along with an explanation of how to support students in reaching the standards. The chart provides information on how to decide and plan, teach, analyze and revise, and identify needs. The chart also shows the standards addressed for the current grade level, as well as how to help students with a “catching up” section and a “looking forward” section. 

  • In the Unit at a Glance, standards are addressed throughout the sections of the unit. For example, Whole-Class Learning shows Vocabulary/Word Study, Analyze Craft and Structure, Conventions/Author’s Style, and Composition/Research/Speaking and Listening. The materials list the standards for each component on the chart. 

Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit Planning Guide, Getting Started, a downloadable Word document is available online that lays out lessons and activities in a grid format, day by day for the entire year, with standards for each day listed. These tags match the Teacher’s Edition correlations.

  • In the Planning: Lesson Resources, the list of texts includes the associated standards for each lesson (Making Meaning, Language Development, and/or Effective Expression). 

  • In the Program Level Resources, the First Read Guide: Generic and the Close-Read Guide: Generic state: “Anchor Reading Standard 10: Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.” These guides are meant for student use. 

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

The materials provide information for students and families to support learning. Students interact with the Unit Introduction activities at the beginning of each unit to understand the Essential Question, Unit Goals, and Academic Vocabulary. A downloadable Home Connection letter is available to inform parents and caregivers about the program in both English and Spanish. 

Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit includes a Home Connection letter that briefly explains the unit’s theme; the Essential Question; all texts, authors, and genres; performance tasks and performance-based assessments; and the standards addressed in the unit. The letter also includes a Talk it Over With Your Student section that includes questions parents/guardians can ask their student about the Essential Question, texts they can read together, and the texts students are reading at school. 

  • In the Program Overview, the document, Distance Learning Tips for Parents/Guardians, is included, which provides helpful tips, such as designating a learning space, establishing a daily routine, and setting clear learning expectations. 

Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self, the Home Connection letter includes questions for parents/guardians to ask students: “What are some of the ways you could answer the question How do we define ourselves? Why do you think stories about self-discovery are so popular in the media and in books and film?”

Indicator 3E
02/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e. 

The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies. The Getting Started section provides information regarding research-based strategies and practices. The Professional Development Center provides videos and White Papers with experts discussing the importance of various components of the program and research-based practices. The videos include assessment, differentiations, engagement, text complexity, and vocabulary. The Student Resource section includes many research-based practices, such as worksheets or graphic organizers.

Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, Welcome!, page T3, teachers are presented with the instructional approaches that will connect various texts throughout units: “myPerspectives is a student-centered English Language Arts program that embraces culturally responsive learning through diverse representation of literature, authors, characters, cultures, and themes.” Students are encouraged, based on the approach of the “polyvocal classroom” to “[b]ring knowledge from their different backgrounds and cultures to enrich critical literacy in the classroom” and “[p]erform research in response to a prompt or task of their choosing and complete project-based tasks in a format of their choosing.” 

  • In the Getting Started, Student-Centered Unit Structure, Collins and O’Brien are referenced as experts: “When student-centered learning opportunities are implemented properly, students experience a multitude of positive outcomes including increased motivation, deeper retention of knowledge, greater understanding, and improved attitudes towards the subject being taught.”

Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Getting Started section includes a program overview with information regarding student-centered unit instruction, backward design, and Performance-Based Assessments.

  • In the Professional Development Center, Differentiation, White Papers, “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners” by Jim Cummins and “Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction: The Central Role of Literacy Engagement" by Jim Cummins. Cummins includes several research-based strategies with a list of references. White papers are also included in Vocabulary, Writing, and Text Complexity, written by experts in the field about research-based strategies in each of the three areas, with references listed at the end of each. 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, Welcome!, Experts’ Perspective, research-based strategies are introduced: “myPerspectives is informed by a team of respected experts…[o]ur authors bring new ideas, innovations, and strategies that transform teaching.” For example, expert Jim Cummins, Ph.D., is quoted: “Research focuses on literacy development in school contexts characterized by cultural and linguistic diversity.” At the unit level, specific strategies such as goal-setting and vocabulary practices are referenced and explained.

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, Introduction, students read “Standing Up to Absolute Power.” In the Teacher’s Edition, a text box provides strategies for generative vocabulary from Elfrieda Hiebert, Ph.D.: “Rare words are the words that typically account for only 10 percent of all the words in a text, compared to the more common vocabulary words that students know better. Generative vocabulary strategies can help students build their rare vocabulary.” 

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay. In the Teacher’s Edition, a text box provides research about drafting from Kelly Gallagher, M.Ed.: “Like reading, writing is not a ‘one and done’ activity. Teachers can use a surfing metaphor to reinforce the importance of drafting, of evaluating ideas to find the best ones. Explain that ideas come in sets of waves.”

Indicator 3F
01/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f. 

The materials provide a list of supplemental resources to accompany each text needed to support instruction. The Planning: Lesson Resources page in the Teacher’s Edition before each text lists related Student Resources and Teacher Resources, including optional extra support, extension, or accommodations for the lessons. These same resources are listed in the context in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition and online. Symbols are next to each resource to specify if they are an audio resource, video, document, annotation highlight, or online assessment. 

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition, Lesson Resources are listed at the beginning of each lesson, which includes both Student Resources and Teacher Resources. Examples of Student Resources include selection audio, word network, and evidence log, which are “available online in the interactive Student Edition or Unit Resources.” Examples of Teacher Resources include Selection Resources, Reteach/Practice, Assessment, My Resources, annotation highlights, accessible leveled text, concept vocabulary, and word study, which are “available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.” 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, suggested trade books are listed. The title and author of the text are listed. Trade book lesson plans are available online at myPerspectives+. 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, Current Perspectives, news stories, and interesting media are listed. The materials list the name of the media and where it can be found.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

10/10

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

The materials provide a clear assessment system that provides multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. Teachers can monitor learning and interpret student performance in various assessments as students work toward the culminating tasks, such as unit tests, selection tests, performance-based tasks, and writing tasks. The assessments include a variety of modalities and types across the year and opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge of the grade-level reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards. The standards assessed in each assessment are indicated. In addition, the materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills.

Indicator 3I
02/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i. 

The materials identify the standards addressed with each assessment. Assessments are listed throughout the materials in multiple locations. Performance-based tasks and assessments, with their related standards, are listed in the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition, Unit At A Glance. Standards for activities, tasks, and assessments in each unit correlate directly to the Performance Task as well as the End Of Unit Performance Based Assessment and Unit Test. The online materials include an Assessment tab, which lists all the assessments used throughout the materials. The reading test associated with each text includes an answer key that includes the objective and standard for each question. In the unit tests, the student view shows the assessed skills with each question.  

Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The online Assessment tab lists the standards for the Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests. The standards, listed on the top of the page, are hyperlinked so that a separate text box opens when clicked on. This text box lists the standards addressed in the standards. 

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past, Performance-Based Assessment, Part 1, Writing to Sources: Argument, students respond to the prompt: “Write an argument in the form of a response to literature that answers this question: What is the relationship of human beings to time?” The writing standards assessed, including, but not limited to, “Write an argument to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.”

Indicator 3J
04/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j. 

The materials provide multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. Teachers can monitor learning and interpret student performance with various assessments as they work toward the culminating tasks, such as unit tests, selection tests, performance-based tasks, and writing tasks. Support materials include rubrics, answer keys, comprehension questions, graphic organizers, and class discussions. Opportunities for teachers to provide feedback, both formal and informal, are available throughout units, such as discussion, research based on self-selected texts, and evidence logs. Each unit test contains an interpretation guide that lists the standards, depth of knowledge, and remediation options. Skills practice pages and standard support are included. The Common Core Companion Workbook provides extra practice based on Common Core State Standards. Sufficient guidance and suggestions are included to help teachers follow up with students.

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Assessments include Selected and Short Response, Performance Tasks, Unit Tests, Selection Tests, Extension Selection Tests, and Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests. 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, Teacher Support, and Practice link, teachers have access to answer keys, writing rubrics, and graphic organizers to interpret student success. Also, each Unit Test Answer Key provides answers for the teacher. The short response answers state the important information for students to include in their answers. Writing rubrics are provided using a four-point scale. Rubrics include, but are not limited to, Generic (Holistic) Writing, Multimedia Reports, Poems, Informative/Explanatory Writing, and Narrative Evaluation Charts. 

  • In each unit, Quickwrite activities provide opportunities to assess writing skills and student understanding in response to a prompt.

  • In each unit, Analyze the Text activities offer opportunities for students to demonstrate overall text comprehension. The tasks require students to cite textual evidence as they respond to specific text-based questions.

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, goals offer pre- and post-informal assessment of student improvement as students revisit their goals toward the end of the unit. 

  • In each unit, students answer Comprehension Check questions that show students’ understanding of the texts and complete Research to Clarify activities to learn more about a specific detail from the text and respond. Students complete Prepare to Share activities where they share ideas with peers about their self-selected text as part of the Independent Learning task.

  • In each Unit Test, the Interpretation Guide provides information on remediation resources: “As warranted by student results on this assessment, you may wish to assign the remediation resources indicated in the chart. Resources include both skills practice, and extended standards support, and you can choose to use whichever resource is appropriate for your students.” The Interpretation Guide includes the objective instructional standards, depth of knowledge, skills practice pages, and standard support.

  • The Common Core Companion Workbook provides explanations, examples, and academic vocabulary, related to the Common Core Standards. Practice worksheets are included in the Workbook.

Indicator 3K
04/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k. 

The materials include assessments that provide a variety of modalities and types across the year. The assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge of the grade-level reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards. Within a unit, students complete formative comprehension and skill checks, synthesize their learning through writing and speaking performance tasks, revising, editing, and presenting their work. 

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Beginning-of-Year and Mid-Year benchmark tests are used to assess most grade-level reading and language standards.

  • Formative Assessments include Evidence Logs, Selection Tests, Comprehension Checks, and Unit Reflections. 

  • According to the Standards Correlation chart in the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, both Writing, and Speaking and Listening standards are formally assessed through a Performance Task or Performance-Based Assessments.

  • Students complete a Performance Task: Writing Focus after reading all Whole-Class Learning texts. After all Small-Group Learning texts, they complete a Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus. After all the texts in a unit are read, students complete a final two-part Writing, and Speaking and Listening Performance-Based Assessment.

  • Following the Performance-Based Assessment, teachers administer the Unit Test, Selected Response, and Performance Task “to apply standards and skills taught in the unit to a fresh, cold-read passage.” 

  • At the end of each unit, students take the Unit Test. In the test's Selected and Short Response part, students answer multiple-choice questions about new passages and perform a writing task. 

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

The materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills; however, a clear, comprehensive list of possible accommodations is not provided for the teacher. In the Assessment tab, the assessments have a brief overview to explain each option. The Interactive Student Edition includes a link to the performance task. While the Academic Vocabulary section will read the vocabulary and definitions to the student, no clear text-to-speech accommodations are included in the materials. Different types of assessments are provided, and most of them are available online, as a PDF, or in a print version. When printed, assessments download into Microsoft Word. The print can be enlarged by zooming on a computer screen, placing texts in Microsoft Word, or enlarging or changing the font. In the PDF version, students may mark and annotate the text with the tools provided.

Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Many of the assessments can be downloaded into Microsoft Word in order to print. For example, Selection Tests, Extension Selection Tests, Unit Tests, and other beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year tests are available for download with printing as an option. Teachers may increase the size of the font for the students before printing the test. Next-Generation Practice Tests and Next Generation Performance Tasks can be completed online.

  • Some assessments refer directly to previously-read texts. In those assessments, audio versions of the texts are available in the Interactive Student Edition. 

  • Customizable test prep banks are available for reading, language, editing, and writing. Teachers may choose to use questions from a provided multiple-test bank from each section.

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, students click on a link to the Performance-Based Assessment for each unit. Students can zoom in and out using their mouse or fingers. Students can also open and print rubrics for different tasks. 

  • Examview is available for teachers to set up on computers, allowing them to create their own assessments. Teachers can modify or adapt assessments for students who struggle. 

Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Assessments can be assigned online, as a PDF, or printed. The materials provide information for each option for the teacher. For example, the PDF version states: “PDF format allows students to use the Interactive PDF Tool to annotate and complete the assignment.” 

  • In the Getting Started section, a video and accompanying handout (Customize Worksheet and Assessments) are provided with step-by-step directions to customize assessments: “Now, let’s look at the flexible and customizable assessments. You can administer the assessments in print and online via Savvas Realize. All assessments are in editable Microsoft® Word format as well as in ExamView and Realize TestNav for even more customization options. You can also create assessments from scratch to meet your needs.”

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

06/06

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. They regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level and strategies for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. The program includes varied approaches to learning tasks over time and a variety of ways that students are expected to demonstrate their understanding. There is guidance for grouping students in a variety of ways across each unit. Units follow the structure of Whole-Class Learning, with some informal peer groupings, Small-Group Learning entirely focused on collaborative work, and Independent Learning, which concludes with a “Learn From Your Classmates” discussion. 

The materials include a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in both images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included. In addition, there is some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students’ home language to facilitate learning and guidance for teachers to facilitate learning and content that support linguistically and culturally diverse students. 

Indicator 3M
02/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m. 

The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. Program-level resources explain best practices for scaffolding and differentiating access to literacy learning. Text-specific suggestions provide educators with support for addressing needs before, during, and after reading the text. Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning boxes are found in the margins. At the beginning of each unit, the Personalize for Learning section provides the text complexity rubric and a Decide and Plan flowchart. The flowchart includes Strategic Support that offers strategies for all students, including special populations. The materials also provide support guidance according to students’ performance on formative assessments. This may include other resources provided in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.

Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflection on Society, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, translated by Nevill Coghill. The Teacher’s Edition provides a Personalize For Learning section that includes the text complexity rubric and a “decide and plan” chart. The Strategic Support box contains language and levels of meaning/purpose. The Levels of Meaning/Purpose section states, “Students will likely have difficulty with the allegorical nature of the pilgrims. Encourage students to create a character chart in which they keep track of each pilgrim, their class, and their characteristics. As they review their charts, ask them to consider what the author was trying to say about social class, religion, and politics.” 

  • In Unit 4, Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics, Small-Group Learning, students read “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell. The Teacher’s Edition provides a guide for formative assessment. Under Word Study, the materials state, “If students are not able to determine the meaning of the words in context, then remind them that in some words, there are several meanings and to look for the meaning that most directly applies to the phrase in the poem. For Reteach and Practice, see Word Study: Multiple-Meaning Words.” 

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. In the Teacher’s Edition, a Personalize for Learning box provides Strategic Support. The box states, “Students may struggle to understand the flow of the story and the decisions that Orwell made as opposed to those he just considered. Have them use flowcharts to track Orwell’s decisions throughout the essay. Students can use different colored pens or pencils to show the flow of events that actually occurred through each decision he made.”

Indicator 3N
02/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n. 

The materials regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. In the Teacher’s Edition, at the beginning of each text, the Personalize for Learning section contains a text-complexity chart and a Decide and Plan flowchart. Throughout the materials and in the flowchart, ideas to challenge students are provided that relate to reading, writing, and research and take the form of discussions, written work, or brief presentations. These suggestions are usually balanced by other modifications (for language learners or students who need more support) rather than extra work for early finishers.

Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders, Whole-Class Learning, students read from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, Reading Support includes a text-complexity rubric and a Decide and Plan flow chart. The Challenge section of the chart provides ideas to challenge students relating to text analysis and written responses. The text analysis states: “Have students discuss the religious references in the selection. Point out lines 525-530 He’d have traveled to the bottom of the earth, [525] Edgetho’s son and died there if that shining Woven metal had not helped--and Holy God, who sent him victory, gave judgment For truth and right, Ruler of the Heavens. Ask them to discuss the theme of good versus evil in the selection.”  

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act II by William Shakespeare. In the Teacher’s Editions, Personalize for Learning, the Challenge box provides activities on symbolism: “Review Scene I lines 6064. Point out to students the symbols Shakespeare uses to indicate that Duncan is about to die: the bell tolling and the owl shrieking. The tolling bell is a signal that an execution is about to take place. Owls are nocturnal birds of prey and have symbolic meanings in many cultures. In some cultures, they symbolize wisdom. In others, the appearance of an owl is thought to portend a death. Invite students to share their thoughts about what the owl might symbolize. Then ask students to list other symbols of death or destruction from their own culture or other cultures.”

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Most Forgetful Man in the World” by Joshua Foer. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, the Challenging box states: “Encourage interested students to address the philosophical conundrum discussed in paragraph 52: If someone goes through a painful or traumatic ordeal, but has no memory of it, does what happened really matter? Have students outline an argument to support their response. Encourage students to share their arguments with their groups.”

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.

The materials provide a variety of approaches to learning tasks over time and a variety of ways that students are expected to demonstrate their understanding. The materials include teacher prompts and questions in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition. For all texts in each unit, students interact with texts in multiple ways, including comprehension questions, various writing tasks, small-group discussions, individual research, and group projects. Students complete peer- and self-reflections during writing tasks for culminating writing drafts. Students rate themselves on unit goals at each unit’s beginning and end. An Evidence Log is also included in which students connect their learning on each text, examine their changing perspectives, and provide evidence of learning. 

Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, teachers are provided questions and prompts throughout each unit to incorporate into and facilitate whole-group and small-group discussions.

  • In the Student Edition, at the end of most Whole-Group Learning texts, students complete a Comprehension Check that includes Research to Clarify and Research to Explore prompts to expand their thinking and knowledge based on the text. Student instructions state: “Research to Clarify: Choose at least one unfamiliar detail from the text. Briefly research that detail. In what way does the information you learned shed light on an aspect of the story? Research to Explore: Choose something from the text that interests you, and formulate a research question. Write your question here.”  

  • During Small-Group Learning, students participate in structured Analyze the Text discussions to process their understanding after reading a text. 

  • In each Small-Group Learning section, the last task is a group Research assignment. 

Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, students use the Evidence Log to make connections to the text and provide evidence from the text and any additional notes or ideas. Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, teacher instructions prompt students to add evidence to the Evidence Log. Sections of the log include “My Initial Position,” “Connection to the Prompt,” “Evidence from the Text,” “Additional Notes/Ideas,” “How does this text change or add to my thinking?” and “My position.” Student Edition directions are open-ended. 

Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Most texts follow a similar pattern that uses a variety of learning formats and methods. While reading most Whole-Class or Small-Group text, students use the following modes of analyzing the text: Making Meaning may include First Read, Close Read, Analyzing the Text, and a specific text-analysis skill; Language Development may include Concept Vocabulary, Word Study, and a specific language skill; and Effective Expression may include Writing to Sources, Speaking and Listening, and Research.

Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:  

  • The Teacher’s Edition directions for the Evidence Log state: “Support students in completing their Evidence Log. This paced activity will help prepare them for the Performance-Based Assessment at the end of the unit.”

  • In Small-Group Learning, students may write about the texts they have read. During the writing process, in the Reviewing and Revising section, students use a checklist to peer review. Also, a Peer Review is included in each Performance Task: Writing Focus. Student Edition directions state: “Exchange essays with a classmate. Use the checklist to evaluate your classmate’s [writing].” 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, the margins provide review and practice activities suggestions. 

Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Student Edition, Unit Introduction, Unit Goals are included in Reading, Writing and Research, Language, and Speaking and Listening. Students rate themselves on a scale from one to five to determine how well they already meet the goal. Examples of Unit Goals include, but are not limited to: “Reading: Evaluate written arguments by analyzing how authors state and support their claims. Writing and Research: Write an argumentative essay in which you effectively incorporate the key elements of an argument.”

  • In the Student Edition, Unit Reflection, students respond to prompts about their learning, such as, “Reflect on the Learning Strategies: Write a reflection on whether you were able to improve your learning based on your Action Plans. Think about what worked, what didn’t, and what you might do to keep working on these strategies. Record your ideas before a class discussion.”

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

The materials provide guidance for grouping students in a variety of ways across each unit. Units follow the structure of Whole-Class Learning, with some informal peer groupings; Small-Group Learning entirely focused on collaborative work; and Independent Learning, which concludes with the Learn From Your Classmates discussion. Teachers receive optional suggestions for student-to-student interaction in the Teacher’s Edition and general guidance on forming small groups. 

Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past, Whole Group Learning, students complete Select and Support for the Launch Activity. The materials state, “Form a group with like-minded students. Discuss with each other the reasons that guided your choice. Try to develop one solid example that supports your point of view.” 

  • In Unit 6, Finding A Home, Performance Task, students work in partners to peer review each other’s writing. The materials state, “After students review their own drafts, have them pair up and review each other’s essays. Have students mark the checklist items they could not find in the essay being reviewed. Remind students that this peer review can be used to critically test for the required elements of the easy and provide a less biased assessment of the work.” A peer review checklist is also included in the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition. 

Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, a box at the start of Small-Group Learning states: “Forming Groups: You may wish to form groups for Small-Group Learning so that each consists of students with different learning abilities. Some students may be adept at organizing information, whereas others may have strengths related to generating or synthesizing information. A good mix of abilities can make the experience of Small-Group Learning dynamic and productive.” 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, a note is provided in the Make It Interactive section for the Close Read of students’ Independent Learning task: “Group students according to the selection they have chosen. Then, have students meet to discuss the selection in-depth. Their discussions should be guided by their insights and questions.”

  • In the Student-Centered Unit Structure handout, the material list how students process the text during Whole-Class learning. Students process the text “through effective expression activities where students work in groups, communicating their own ideas and listening to the ideas of others.” 

Indicator 3Q
02/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q. 

The materials provide strategies and support for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. In the Teacher’s Edition, general accommodations, strategies, and suggestions are provided to assist teachers with each text. Personalize for Learning suggestions are provided before and during many reading, writing, vocabulary, language, as well as speaking and listening activities. Before each text, a Decide and Plan flow chart on the Personalize for Learning page provides strategies for teachers to use with English Language Learners. 

Materials consistently provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Forging a Hero, Small-Group Learning, students read “How Did Harry Patch Become an Unlikely World War II Hero?” by BBC iWonder. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, the English Language Support box includes background information before viewing the video to describe the location. Instructions state: “Analyzing visual composition provides English Learners with an opportunity to practice using “location” terms, such as ‘in front of,’ ‘behind,’ ‘to the left/right,’ ‘next to,’ and so on. Encourage students working in their small groups to make a glossary of these terms as they and their peers use them. They can use the glossary when they analyze other visual images until they feel more confident using the terms.”  This support is marked for all levels. 

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task: Writing Focus, the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, English Language Support box provides scaffolds on cliches: “Students may experience difficulty distinguishing a cliche from an idiom. Cliches are overused expressions. As a result, cliches are trite and have lost their impact. By comparison, an idiom is an expression that is unique to a given language. Students can find lists of cliches online. Ask partners to work together to write a paragraph with as many cliches as possible. Then they should write the paragraph with more precise language.” This support is for all levels.

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Whole-Class Learning, Students read from Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. The Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, Decide and Plan flow chart includes the English Language Support box to scaffold knowledge demands. Instructions state: “Gothic novels will not be new to most readers, but many examples of archaic vocabulary will stretch some English Language Learners. Discuss stories, characters, or films students are familiar with in the Gothic genre. Ask what stories or characters have in common.”

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

The materials include a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included. In the About the Author section for each text, important background information for authors of a variety of race and/or ethnicities are provided. People of various demographics are depicted positively, without obvious or blatant stereotypes. The texts are written by authors of different backgrounds and feature protagonists of diverse races, ethnicities, countries of origin, gender expressions, and people with developmental disabilities. The materials balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics and avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Notes in the Teacher’s Editions provide ways to highlight positive portrayals in texts. 

Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 3, Facing the Future, Confronting the Past: Shakespeare Extended Study, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Sonnet 32” by Mary Wroth. In the About the Poets section, the materials state the following about Mary Wroth: “She was well educated and a fixture of the social life of London. Her poems were widely circulated among the elites of her time. She fell out of favor with polite society after the publication of her romance, The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania, and lived the rest of her life in obscurity.” 

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Escape from the Old Country” by Adrienne Su. The Background for the text states, “It is about being the child of parents who immigrated to the United States from China. Like much of Su’s work, the poem illuminates what it means to be a member of a community, whether it be a family, a neighborhood, or an ethnic group.”

Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 6, Finding a Home: Nation, Exile, and Dominion, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy. The materials provide the following prompt for teachers regarding the text, “Andrea Levy uses light and joyful adjectives to describe the Caribbean man’s mannerisms. She portrays the man as an engaging and open person who is trying hard to fit into a situation that is probably very uncomfortable for him. She used the words talkative, smiling, and politely to suggest a nonthreatening engaging individual. To show contrast, Levy uses the phrases ‘looking at him askance’ and ‘nothing to do with him’ to describe the rest of the riders on the bus.” 

Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society: Argument, Satire, and Reform, Whole-Class Learning, students view “The Prologue From the Canterbury Tales: The Remix” by Patience Agbabi. The Background section states, “In this performance, the poet Patience Agbabi reinterprets Chaucer’s Prologue for the twenty-first century, carrying on a tradition Chaucer himself innovated- showcasing the people’s language. She uses a style that echoes that of poetry ‘slams,’ competitive spoken-word events that began in the United States during the 1980s. Many slam poets are influenced by hip-hop music. Most challenge the idea that there is only one right way to be literary or to use language.” 

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

The materials provide some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students’ home language to facilitate learning. The Professional Development Center contains multiple short videos and documents regarding differentiation. In many of the videos and documents, the importance of understanding a student’s identity and using their home language is conveyed, and a few strategies are suggested. General resources in the online platform, such as Every Teacher’s Toolkit by Karen Kawaguchi, provide teacher tips for enhancing cultural responsiveness and home-language validation. In the Teacher’s Edition, a few Personalize for Learning boxes suggest connections between Spanish and English cognates. Spanish is the only language offered in supplemental materials, like the online Spanish Resources library, with texts translated into Spanish. 

Materials provide suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Professional Development Center contains a section for differentiation. In this section, a video titled “How to Differentiate Learning for English Learners” with Jim Cummins is included that suggests strategies for scaffolding, such as using graphic organizers, visuals, and rephrasing to help students better understand. This video discusses how important it is that educators understand each student’s identity. Another video titled “Leveled Texts for ELLs” with Elfrieda “Freddy” Hiebert suggests strategies for scaffolding grade-leveled texts for ELL students instead of providing an alternate text. 

  • The online materials contain a myPerspectives+: English Learner Support section that includes the digital text, Every Teacher’s Toolkit by Karen Kawaguchi, that includes strategies for language learners, including definitions and suggestions for two areas: “Culturally and linguistically responsive teaching” and “Validate Home Languages.” Both sections include details on how to help strengthen student skills in areas such as academic vocabulary, grammar, and presentation skills.

Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the online materials, the Spanish Resources Library contains Spanish versions of texts for use in Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning for each unit. A video introduction to the unit in Spanish and stand-alone Spanish grammar and writing worksheets are also included. Teacher Resources in this section include an answer guide for the grammar worksheets. 

  • In the Professional Development Center, a section for differentiation is included in the document “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners.” One suggestion states, “Encourage students to draw on their multilingual repertoires as a stepping stone to English (e.g., initial writing or note-taking in L1 as a means of transferring knowledge and skills from L1 to English).” 

  • In Unit 2, Reflecting on Society, Introduction, Personalize for Learning, the English Language Support box offers support for cognates. Instruction states: “Many of the academic words have Spanish cognates. Use these cognates with students whose home language is Spanish. annotation – anotación / theoretical – teorético/a, téorico/a / prescribe – prescribir / conviction – convicción / tenacious – tenaz. Not all English learners will recognize and use these cognates automatically. Help students build their cognate awareness by pointing out that these cognates share the same root in both English and Spanish.”

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

Thematerials include teacher guidance to facilitate learning and content that support linguistically and culturally diverse students. The FrontMatter highlights the importance of allowing students to use their personal experiences when completing tasks: “Students are encouraged to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural backgrounds.” The Professional Development Center also includes information to help teachers engage with culturally diverse students. Some unit topics and texts allow for open-ended, relevant personal connections. Before each text in Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning, the Jumpstart box offers suggestions for discussion topics related to the text. Other texts or activities include teacher notes that explain how to offer instruction to a range of students. Spanish language tools for some Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning texts are available in student materials. A home-school connection letter is available in English and Spanish. No evidence was found of prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use the information to solve personal problems.

Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Frontmatter pages at the start of the Teacher’s Edition describe the program’s culturally responsive foundation: “Ernest Morrell, Ph.D., helped inform the development of myPerspectives to ensure the program fosters a polyvocal classroom that encourages students to talk with each other, learn from each other, and more importantly, bring knowledge from their different backgrounds and cultures to enrich critical literacy in the classroom. The texts, essential questions, and learning tasks encourage discussions that allow students to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural backgrounds.”

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Apostrophe to the Ocean” by George Gordon, Lord Byron. In the Jumpstart box at the beginning of the selection, teacher instructions state: “Engage students in a discussion about their own views of nature. Use this prompt: Do you find peace in nature? Why is it calming to some people?”

Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Professional Development Center, Engagement, the video “Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education” provides information on the importance of supporting other cultures in the classroom. Jim Cummins, Ph.D., discusses how “when we tap into students’ cultural backgrounds, we’re tapping into their knowledge base.”

  • In the Professional Development Center, myPerspectives in Action, the video, “Facilitating Small Group Learning with Diverse Learners,” provides information about how two teachers, an ELA teacher, and a Special Education teacher, encourage and support all students to engage in small group discussions about a poem they are reading.

  • In Unit 5, Discovering the Self, Performance Task: Writing, Teacher’s Edition, an Author’s Perspective box gives guidance for teaching writing: “There is an important sense in which the development of academic expertise on the part of ELLs is a process of socialization rather than simply instruction. As a result, English writing development will be enhanced when students can work in pairs to create texts to share with others. That’s because the process of collaboration and communication entails social interaction, which fosters language development. First, teachers can partner with students to read, discuss, and react to a reading in the unit. Select a text, such as a nonfiction article, poem, or narrative. Have partners discuss the text, make notes about their ideas, and together write a response that highlights what they found important or responds to a prompt teachers provide. Encourage students to include specific details from the text in their drafts. Then, teachers can invite partners to share their writing with the whole class. Guide students to explain how working together helped them express their ideas more effectively than working alone.”

Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Professional Development Center, the materials provide a document titled Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners by Jim Cummins, Ph.D. The document provides four essential instructional strategies. One of the strategies is “Connect to Students’ Lives and Affirm their Identities.” The materials state, “Connecting instruction to students’ lives by evoking personal and intellectual responses to texts represents not only a form of differentiation but also affirms students’ identities. Students who feel that their voices are heard, and their culture and identity validated in the classroom are much more likely to engage academically than those who feel ignored or devalued.”

Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages, such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Spanish language resources are available for teachers. Translations are provided for Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning reading selections. Audio summaries of texts are provided in the digital materials. The Teacher’s Edition notes, “Audio summaries are available online in both English and Spanish in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Assigning these summaries prior to reading the selection may help students build additional background knowledge and set a context for their first read.” Spanish grammar and writing worksheets are also available for students, though they are not available in other languages.

  • In the online Interactive Student Edition, students can highlight any word or words and view a translation in one of 104 languages, such as Pashto, Hmong, Haitian Creole, or Filipino. Thirty-five languages (including Portuguese, Slovak, Afrikaans, and Arabic) have the additional layer of that text being read aloud in the target language. Some audio translations do not have the speaker speaking the language correctly.

Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to solve personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

Read

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. The program includes digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with their teachers and peers. The Interactive Student Edition prompts students to discuss tasks with classmates and record their collective notes in the digital notebook. Students save their work through the online assignments, and teachers review and provide feedback to students. The materials also include a discussion board that teachers and students allow for digital conversations. 

The materials incorporate a visual design in print and digital editions that support student learning, make the organizational structure clear, and communicate clearly. The four sections (Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance Based Assessments) are color-coded and match the color coding in the Teacher Edition. 

There are several layers of support for teachers to understand and use the program’s embedded technology, such as high-level training videos and handouts.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. Students can access all the materials through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains various interactive tools. Students can highlight, annotate, and translate the text into various languages, many of which can also be read aloud to them in that language. Students can respond to prompts by typing in text boxes or charts. Students navigate the Interactive Student Edition by clicking on labeled tabs that take them to various sections of the textbook. Digital tools are available that allow teachers to view and respond to student responses and customize the materials to meet the needs of students. Teachers can assign work through the online platform and access other digital resources like the Hook and Inspire pages for anchor texts, which have links to supplemental videos and texts.

Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools, are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, students can adjust the font size using a button at the top of the page. Students may also search using the magnifying glass at the top of the page. 

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, students can read and listen to the texts, type their responses to questions, and plan their writing. Students can submit their work via this platform, allowing teachers to see all student responses immediately. 

Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Interactive Student Edition contains clear links to the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, and Unit Reflection. A drop-down menu provides access to the table of contents, bookmarks, annotations, highlights, notebook, and glossary. 

  • In each unit Performance-Based Assessment, students can click on a notebook icon to open a text box to write ideas they are going to use for their multimedia presentation. 

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, materials are organized to keep students on track and to support their work. For example, a header bar shows where students are in the lesson and unit. Comprehension Checks are displayed in the right-hand column, keeping the text center for reference.

Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Table of Contents can be customized for various purposes in both the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition: “You can customize the program by rearranging the Table of Contents, creating your own tests, and uploading your own resources to match your curriculum.” Students may customize the table of contents by clicking on the three vertical dots next to the table of contents. Teachers may then move items, remove items, or add files, links, titles, or notes for students. 

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, students can select any text and make personal customizations, such as translating the words, highlighting in one of four colors, circling the text, underlining it, or adding a note.

  • In the Hook and Inspire section, teachers can choose from various resources, such as videos, articles, and extension activities that can be customized. The landing page includes ways teachers can support students’ learning “into,” “through,” and “beyond” the Whole Class Learning Anchor Texts. The page states, “Hook and inspire your students with these ideas. Build your own Playlist of media, short texts, novel connections, and extension activities to enrich your teaching.” For Unit 4, Seeing Things New, Whole-Class Learning, Anchor Text, excerpt from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift, three “into” resources are provided: “‘Gulliver’s Travels—The Great American Read:’ Use this video to provide useful background information and context; ‘8 Words Coined and Popularized’ by Jonathan Swift: Give students a sense of the breadth of Swift’s imagination and influence with this article; ‘The Lilliput That’s Now Just Kaput:’ Engage students' curiosity with this image gallery of an abandoned Japanese theme park based on the story of Gulliver.”

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, the Small-Group Learning section includes a chart of learning strategies. Each section of the chart includes a box where students can add their own ideas. For example, the Support Others section includes the following chart topics: “Build off ideas from others in your group. Invite others who have not yet spoken to do so.” A blank Support Others box is available for students to type further ideas. 

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

The materials include digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with their teachers and peers. The Interactive Student Edition prompts students to discuss tasks with classmates and record their collective notes in the digital notebook. Students can save their work on the online assignments, and teachers can review and provide feedback to students. The materials also include a discussion board that teachers and students allow for digital conversations. The connected Savvas Realize platform allows tasks to be assigned, completed, scored, and tracked digitally by teachers. Teachers can provide feedback to students while they are working on assignments. Teachers can also use Google Classroom for student assignments, allowing another opportunity to provide feedback and collaborate to students. The Collaboration Center includes videos referencing how students can collaborate with email, text messaging, and shared documents.  

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Savvas Realize platform, MyPerspectives connects to Google Classroom to allow tasks to be assigned and completed. Students can annotate PDFs or attach separate files. Teachers can view completion rates, score tasks, and see standards mastery for students. Teachers can also select assignments for individual students or sub-groups of the class.

  • Teachers may assign activities through the online platform. The materials state, “A direct link to the Interactive Student Edition. Student work is saved, and teachers may review it at any time. If work is completed offline, work will sync up when online again.”

  • In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Program Overview, a tab for Digital Resources is available. The On-Demand Training page includes a Digital Tour handout and a video. Digital Tools in a Discussion Board  “facilitate collaboration and real-time peer-to-peer sharing of ideas.” In addition, there is an EssayScorer that allows teachers to provide immediate feedback to students for revising and editing.  

  • In the Collaboration Center, videos are provided that model how to collaborate. Some videos reference online tools students can use for collaboration. For example, the Build Consensus video discusses collaboration using shared documents, text messaging, and email. The teacher can assign these videos to students. 

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

The materials incorporate a visual design in print and digital editions that support student learning, make the organizational structure clear, and communicate clearly. Each of the four sections (Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance Based Assessments) are color-coded and match the color coding in the Teacher Edition. Charts, diagrams, photos, illustrations, and icons are included thoughtfully on the pages. The table of contents, glossary, index, and other resources are clearly labeled and easy to find. The layout for each selection is consistent so students can find the information they need. 

Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, the pages have a colored band at the top containing a heading and any pictures or illustrations accompanying the text. The stories typically do not contain any illustrations or pictures, other than what is on the colored band at the top of the page. Each text is represented with an image that repeats at the top of the text itself, in tables of contents, and alongside activities referring to that text.

  • In the print/PDF Student Edition, pictures are typically at the top of the first page of text, without many additional pictures or illustrations throughout each passage. The PDF has wide margins and sometimes provides additional information in the margins. Icons in the margins refer students to external tools they can use, such as a pencil and paper icon to represent Evidence Log and a spiral-bound book icon for Notebook. 

Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each edition, all units follow the same order of sections that are clearly color-coded: Whole-Class Learning is blue, Small-Group Learning is turquoise, Independent Learning is purple, and Performance-Based Assessment is orange. The opening page of each unit contains clearly labeled links to the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, and Unit Reflection. The links are color-coded to match the section colors and are consistent across the materials. There is a photo on the left side of the page that connects to the unit theme. 

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, Introduction of each unit, a Pacing Plan is provided at the bottom of the pages with a timeline for the entire unit, a numbered square for each day, a blue, turquoise, purple, or orange line denoting the section of the unit, and the names of the texts or tasks associated with the section.

  • In the Teacher’s Edition, each text displays the same four Planning pages that include a summary of the text, Lesson Resources (a table laying out the text’s Making Meaning, Language Development, and Effective Expression tasks), Reading Support (a text complexity rubric), and Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, which details a cycle of Identify Needs, Decide and Plan, Teach, and Analyze and Revise.

  • In the Interactive Student Edition in Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning, at the top of the first page of each text, links are clearly labeled and include information about the author, background, and standards addressed in each text. A sidebar contains links to the table of contents, bookmarks, annotation and highlights, notebook, and glossary. They are clearly labeled and accessed the same way throughout the materials. 

  • In the Interactive Student Edition, the Performance-Based Assessments have clearly labeled parts, including links to the Academic Vocabulary, Word Network, and Rubric sections.

Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the print Student Edition, the header on most pages (except for pages with texts) includes the unit Essential Question.

  • The Interactive Student Edition contains clickable nested links showing navigation within the unit (e.g., Unit 4 Seeing Things New > Whole-Class Learning > Gulliver’s Travels), and the right side of the screen has an expandable menu to navigate within the text (e.g., Making Meaning, Language Development, Effective Expression).

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.

The materials include several layers of support for teachers to understand and use the program’s embedded technology. The Getting Started with myPerspectives digital page contains links to two resources: MySavvasTraining.com and Savvas Realize. The website, MySavvasTraining.com, presents high-level videos and handouts on topics such as accessing student data, downloading assignments in order to modify them, and creating playlists of learning material. The Savvas Realize section focuses on the technical aspects of the assignment platform, such as demonstrating how to assign content to students, managing discussion boards, and using the Realize Reader digital textbook. The video and/or printable handout, Digital Resources, explains the embedded technology available to teachers and students. The documents almost always contain step-by-step directions and screenshots/images to help the teacher use technology with this program. 

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, teachers can access videos and PowerPoint presentations about the different aspects of the program, such as the Table of Contents, the Student Edition, and assessments. One of the Program Overview videos in Digital Resources is a 12-minute video with information about how to utilize and navigate the online program, customize instruction, save time with digital tools, and engage students. A printable handout with the same information is available.

  • In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Teacher How-To Resources, a document is provided to understand how to use the resources, such as Google classroom assignments, customize worksheets and assessments, share playlists, and ExamView: Getting Started. The documents provide step-by-step directions for teachers to utilize online materials and technology. 

  • In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Savvas Realize is the online platform for managing classes, assigning and turning in tasks, and examining data. The Savvas Realize training site provides technical support to teachers in the following categories: 

    • Assignments > Realize Reader Assignments: “Savvas Realize Reader gives you access to digital textbooks and assignments in an engaging, interactive learning environment. Realize Reader content can also include video, interactive charts, graphs, drag-and-drop activities, and a notebook service, in addition to basic features, such as annotations, highlights, and bookmarks.” Directions follow for accessing the Realize Reader content through Realize, via the Realize Reader app, or downloading for offline use.

    • Discussions > Manage Active Discussions: “Discussions enable you to facilitate class and group discussions on important academic and social topics. Students can reflect on learning, share ideas and opinions, or ask and answer questions. You can create, monitor, and reply to discussions, and students can participate in discussions you create. In addition, you can choose whether or not to score discussions.” Directions follow, showing teachers how to select a discussion and then add a comment, attach a file, or edit comments.

    • Data > Results by Assignment: “The Results by Assignment page includes data for class and individual student test scores, progress, and usage.” Directions follow on how to “View Class Results by Assignment,” including Scores Data, Progress Data, and Usage Data.

  • In the Table of Contents, MySavvasTraining.com provides different sections for program-level overviews of structure and features and includes video tutorials with accompanying handouts. The categories include:

    • Getting Started > Digital Tour: Technological features are highlighted, including the Discussion Board feature (“to facilitate collaboration and real-time peer-to-peer sharing of ideas”), the EssayScorer tool (“provides immediate feedback to students for revising and improving their writing, giving them additional practice and saving you time”), and content creation tools (“you can customize the program by rearranging the Table of Contents, creating your own tests, and uploading your own resources to match your curriculum.”

    • Assessments and Reporting > Assessments: This video describes assessments overall, including those with embedded technology: Next Generation Practice Tests and Performance Tasks “give students the opportunity to practice formats like drag and drop so that they are prepared for online interactive testing,” and the Data tab on Savvas Realize organizes “student and class data that shows standards mastery on assessments and online activities, as well as overall progress. You can dig deeper with additional data points to reveal more detailed information on student mastery, progress, and usage. You can also view data for individual students from the class assignment list.”

    • Additional Resources > Revision Assistant for Teachers: A 24-page guide shows teachers how to set up, launch, and use Revision Assistant, which is “an online revision tool that helps students to improve their writing. It provides instant, differentiated feedback aligned to genre-specific rubrics and allows students to share their work and revisions with their teacher.”