About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: MyPerspectives | ELA
ELA 6-8
The instructional materials for myPerspectives 6-8 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. The materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around topics/themes to grow students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.
There is sufficient support provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. The materials also include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
ELA High School
The instructional materials for myPerspectives 9-12 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. The materials include opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Units are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.
There is sufficient support provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. The materials also include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations.
9th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
10th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
11th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
12th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 10th Grade
Alignment Summary
The grade 10 myPerspectives materials meet the expectations for alignment. The materials include opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. There are high-quality questions and tasks sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.
Throughout the program, there are varied opportunities for students to demonstrate knowledge about what they are reading and learning through speaking and listening tasks. Students also have many opportunities to practice their writing both in on-demand and process writing tasks. While students engage in informative or expository, argumentative, and narrative writing, the opportunities do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. In addition, well-designed explicit instruction guidance is inconsistent or lacking in some areas. While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary in a systematic way, the explicit instruction of some grammar and usage standards is inconsistent or, in some cases, lacking.
The materials are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Throughout the program, there are culminating tasks and research opportunities that require students to expand and show their knowledge and understanding of the topics/themes in each unit.
The pacing for the six units in the program is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.
10th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. There are a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 42/58 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day required by the standards. The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band, which support students’ literacy growth.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.
There are varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. There are multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities, and there are frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. There is a yearlong writing plan provided that does not reflect the distribution of writing types of the standards and some guidance for teachers on explicit writing instruction.
While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Materials provide six units across the grade level with different themes and multiple texts to engage students. There are a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 42/58 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purposes for the anchor and series of texts, a complexity analysis of the relationship to the associated student task is not provided.
The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band, which support students’ literacy growth. The complexity is mixed throughout the units. Six units offer a variety of texts for whole-class, small-group, and independent reading that encourage independent reading goals.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1a.
Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Materials provide six units across the grade level with different themes and multiple texts to engage students.
Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe, a short story rich in language and incorporating gothic elements by one of American literature’s central figures in horror and science fiction. In Small-Group Learning, students view photographs from The Dream Collector by Arthur Tress, multimedia that supports the unit theme.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, which is part of the literary canon, and view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” from the BBC. Students consider the effects of personal and societal change. In Small-Group Learning, students read “The Doll’s House” by Katherine Mansfield, which is about a group of girls hateful in their pursuit of popularity and is set in late 1800s New Zealand.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai, delivered when she was sixteen, advocating for every child to have equal access to education. Students should be engaged by the topic and relate to the age of the author.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe, the father of modern African literature in English. Students learn about Nigeria and the effects of the Bifranian Civil War as they consider themes of family and survival.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez, a well-crafted monologue offering a unique perspective of Caliban. Students also read The Tempest, Act I by William Shakespeare, an established work in the literary canon.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Blind” by Fatima Naoot, translated by Kees Nijland, which includes complex and challenging information and the discovery of new meaning. Students also read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller to gain perspective on how someone without “sight” can still “see” by tapping into other senses.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the year. Materials include a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 42/58 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards. Text types include, but are not limited to, historical fiction, myth, realistic fiction, satire, science fiction, drama, poetry, argument, essays, memoir, and speeches. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read the classic short story, “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe, an excerpt from the informational graphic, How to Tell You’re Reading a Gothic Novel—In Pictures by Adam Frost and Zhenia Vasiliev, and view photographs from The Dream Collector by Arthur Tress.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read the classic short story, “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt and read and view the “Inaugural Address” by John F. Kennedy. In Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai and view “Diane Sawyer Interviews Malala Yousafzai” from ABC News.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read the magazine article, “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith, and a poetry collection, including “Avarice” by Yusef Komunyakaa.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read Act 1 of The Tempest by William Shakespeare. In Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Under a Certain Little Star” by Wislawa Szymborska, translated by Joanna Trzeciak.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read a memoir, “The Neglected Senses” from For the Benefit of Those Who See by Rosemary Mahoney, and a letter, “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller.
Materials do not reflect a balance of informational and literary texts that support the 70/30 balance required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Over the course of the year, 26 or 42% of the texts read are informational and 36 or 58% of the texts read are literary.
Unit 1 contains ten core texts with 40% being informational and 60% being literary.
Unit 2 contains nine core texts with 44% being informational and 56% being literary.
Unit 3 contains ten core texts with 70% being informational and 30% being literary.
Unit 4 contains 11 core texts with 36% being informational and 64% being literary.
Unit 5 contains 12 core texts with 25% being informational and 75% being literary.
Unit 6 contains ten core texts with 40% being informational and 60% being literary.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose for the anchor and series of texts, a complexity analysis of the relationship to the associated student task is not provided. In the Teacher’s Edition Planning section for each unit, a Text Complexity Rubric provides quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative measures include Lexile score and word count. Qualitative measures are scored and explained by the following categories: knowledge demands, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and levels of meaning/purpose, including notes explaining the reason for the score in the category. All texts are rated as moderately complex, complex, or very complex based on the provided qualitative and quantitative measures. Texts that quantitatively fall below the grade level remain moderately complex due to their qualitative nature and student tasks. While no explanation of the relationship to their associated student task is provided, the Planning section provides a rationale for the selection of each text in the Summary and Insight sections. The text selection rationale is divided into different categories: Launch Text, Whole-Class Learning texts, and Small-Group Learning texts. The Connection to Performance Tasks explains how texts are associated with Performance Tasks with a focus on writing or speaking and listening; however, there is no explanation for other tasks in the units.
Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe, which has a Lexile level of 1410L, appropriate for a shared learning experience. The text is exceedingly qualitatively complex, and the Teacher’s Edition, Planning section states: “Multiple levels of meaning and symbolism may be difficult to grasp. Concepts and meanings are not clearly explained.” The text connects to a Performance Task: Writing Focus which is an explanatory essay for the prompt: “How and when does imagination overcome reason?”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu, which has an overall level of complex. The quantitative measure is 1100L, and the qualitative measure is moderately complex. The associated student task level is meets. In Effective Expression: Research, students create a research-based multimedia presentation that “incorporate text, images, and if possible, audio or video to express your ideas.” They choose one of three different options and include quotations and examples from the speech by Tutu.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall, which does not have an overall complexity level or a Lexile level. The qualitative measure is very complex. The associated student task level is exceeds. The student tasks include additional embedded instruction to support students. In Analyze Craft and Structure, a short description is provided of the structure of a Greek Plays followed by a graphic organizer to use while analyzing the structure.
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level; however, there is no complexity analysis for the associated task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, every text includes a Text Complexity rubric for both quantitiave and qualitative measures. For example, in Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Metamorphosis translated by Ian Johnston, which has an overall level of complex. The quantitative measure is 1310L, and the qualitative measure is moderately complex. The associated student task level is meets. On page 136c, The Text Complexity Rubric provides a score for the qualitative elements along with a rationale for that score. The text scored a four out of five in the following criteria on the rubric: knowledge demands, language conventionality and clarity, and levels of meaning/purpose. Structure scored a three out of five. The rationales include the exploration of complex, abstract themes through a metaphorical situation in knowledge demands, the use of complex language with archaic syntax in language conventionality, and to understand the story students must uncover multiple levels of meaning, interrupt the metaphorical situation, and understand challenging language. In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read the “Inaugural Address” by John F. Kennedy, which has a Lexile level of 1410L. A Text Complexity Rubric is available, including Insight on selection of the text: “This influential speech shows how patriotism is compatible with care for the world at large. Kennedy’s call for freedom internationally has become an important part of American rhetoric and has influenced many subsequent presidents.” The Connection to the Essential Question, “What is the relationship between power and freedom?” shares, “Kennedy emphasizes the value of cooperation and sharing for achievement goals. In his account, one nation’s power may not be sufficient to help all of humanity; international cooperation is necessary.”
Although there is not an explicit rationale clearly stated for each text, there is an explicitly stated connection to the unit topic, essential question, and performance task for each text.
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.
The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band which support students’ literacy growth. The complexity is mixed throughout the units. Overall, the quantitative measures generally increase across the year, and the qualitative measures are moderately complex throughout the year. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 740L–1410L. Over the course of the year, 56% of texts lack quantitative ratings. Specifically, the qualitative measures increase through the first five units, though they decrease in the last unit. While this decrease in qualitative and quantitative data suggests a level decrease, the student tasks all meet or exceed the standards. All units consistently provide an opportunity for students to grow their skills with additional support during Whole-Class Learning activities as they engage in reading and writing in relation to the Essential Question. In Small-Group Learning, students have opportunities for repeated reading of texts accessible for the grade level. Students also have opportunities to read and analyze texts independently. In all activities, students have access to models of literacy skills which help them complete tasks that require appropriate application of depth of knowledge and work toward the speaking and listening performance task and Performance-Based Assessment. The text pairings work together to scaffold the student tasks with the scaffolding suggestions provided in the Teacher’s Edition. Students read and annotate the texts while teachers guide them with text-specific scaffolding options throughout the units. The scaffolding suggestions are found in clearly identified locations and are consistent, including providing specific suggestions for various student populations, such as English Language Learners, below level learners, on level learners, and above level learners. While the general scaffolding options remain static throughout units, the Teacher’s Edition provides specific options related to the texts.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the Lexile range is 900L–1410L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 2, the Lexile range is 740L–1310L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 3, the Lexile range is 870L–1410L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 4, the Lexile range is 820L–1410L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 5, The Lexile range is 1000L-1100L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 6, the Lexile range is 970L to 1170L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 740L-1410L. The overall qualitative range across the year is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar (1030L), and students analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature with a first read, close read, and analysis of the text with teacher guidance. In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou and “Some Advice to Those Who Will Serve Time in Prison" by Nazim Hikmet, translated by Randy Blasing and Mutlu Konukstudents. Students complete a writing assignment individually by writing an original poem based on one of the poems, with the optional prompt: “Imagine that the speaker of ‘Some Advice to Those Who Will Serve Time in Prison’ is set free after many years of unjust imprisonment. Using the poem as a model, write another poem of advice from the speaker’s point of view about a first day of freedom.” In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argumentative essay to the question: “Can justice and forgiveness go hand in hand?” Instructions include, but are not limited to, “Articulate the reasons that support your point of view.” As the units progress, the tasks connected to tracing and presenting point of view increase in complexity.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read the short story “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston (1310L). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the questions, “Describe how Gregor’s insect-like body changes from the opening of the story to the ending. How do these physical changes reflect Gregor’s evolving emotional state?” In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read the short story “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe (820L). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the questions, “What are the ‘five inestimable blessings’ for which Jonathan is grateful? What does Jonathan’s attitude toward these blessings show you about the nature of the Nigerian civil war?” In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read the drama Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall (NP). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the questions, “Why does Oedipus feel he is the person most affected by the plague that has stricken Thebes? How does this fact affect Oedipus’ reception of Creon when Creon returns from Apollo’s oracle?” As the units progress, the tasks connected to character development increase in complexity.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe (1410L), which has an overall complexity level of highly complex. The Teacher’s Edition suggests teachers ensure English Language Learners notice and understand personification to apply that understanding to the effect on the mood and tone of the story.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith. In the Teacher’s Edition, page 470b, a chart shows the available resources and supports available for the text, such as English and Spanish versions of an audio, first read extension questions, and an accessible leveled text. On page 470c, there is a text complexity rubric and a graphic organizer providing suggestions for support based on the text’s rubric scores. On page 470d, a flow chart assists teachers in identifying the standards being taught and what supports to use for students below and above the standard.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Neglected Senses” from For the Benefit of Those Who See by Rosemary Mahoney. In the Teacher’s Edition, page 786b, a chart shows the available resources and supports available for the text, such as English and Spanish versions of an audio, first read extension questions, and an accessible leveled text. On page 786c, there is a text complexity rubric and a graphic organizer providing suggestions for support based on the text’s rubric scores. On page 786d, a flow chart assists teachers in identifying the standards being taught and what supports to use for students below and above the standard.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.
The materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading, including accountability structures of independent reading. Six units offer a variety of texts for whole-class, small-group, and independent reading that encourage independent reading goals. Texts connect to a common topic or theme and Essential Question for the unit. Teacher lesson plans include selection resources and explain the connections of the text to the Essential Question and to the performance task. Throughout the year, students engage with texts of a variety of types and genres, and the consistent structure of the materials provides support for students as they grow their skills and ability to read grade level texts. Each unit starts with a launch text which models a specific type of writing, followed by whole group reading and activities, small group reading and activities, and independent reading. There is sufficient guidance to foster independence for all readers, including independent reading procedures and texts for students to read independently. The Frontmatter also provides a selection of trade books with suggestions for how to incorporate them in each unit. Lesson plans for the trade books can be found on myPerpectives+.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read an informational essay, short stories, and an informational graphic. In Small-Group Learning, students read a short story, photo gallery, interview, and poetry collection. The students choose between a criticism, an explanatory nonfiction, a short story, and a newspaper article tied to the unit’s theme in the independent reading section.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read five texts, including “In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness” by Marie Arana, a short story “The Golden Touch” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, a magazine article “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith, and various poems. There are also five independent reading selections available from which to choose.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter and each Teacher’s Edition for each unit, the time for students to engage with texts during the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class learning, Small-Group learning, and Independent Learning is similar. There is one day for the Launch Text during the Unit Introduction, 14 days for the Whole Class Learning, 11 days for Small-Group Learning, and two days for independent learning. The Teacher’s Edition for each unit also notes, “Pacing is suggested for a 40- to 50-minute class period. If you use block scheduling, you may combine days to meet your schedule needs.” These opportunities to engage with multiple texts and a volume of reading are consistent across the school year.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read four texts over twelve regular classes or six block classes. In the Small-Group Learning, students read two texts over nine regular classes or four and a half block classes. Students end the unit by reading one independent text choice over two classes or one block before the final performance task. The Teacher’s Edition provides a pacing guide for each unit along with suggested supports for various student needs in the wrap-around materials.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter state: “Students self-select a text to explore an aspect of the unit topic and share their learning with the class.” Each unit includes options for students to choose an independent reading selection via the Interactive Student Edition, and the activity takes place over two days. Independent Learning strategies are available in the Teacher’s Edition, including a video. Students can use the “Create a schedule” strategy to track completion and “Assess whether you need to adapt your plan to meet all your goals and deadlines.”
In each unit, independent reading selections are listed at the end of the unit. The section provides guidance for students to pick an independent text. In the “Look Back” section, students review the texts already read in the unit for topics of interest, “Look Ahead” includes titles to see which is of interest, and “Look Inside” allows students to scan the selection they choose to be sure it meets their needs. A graphic organizer helps students plan their reading and study of the text. First Read and Close Read guides are included for students during reading to prepare for sharing with the class at the end of the independent reading.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Independent Learning, students can choose to read “Visual Neuroscience: Look and Learn” by Apoorva Mandavilli. Resources such as text questions, audio summaries, and a selection test are available. The materials include the connection to the Essential Question, including, “This selection will help students respond to the Essential Question, ‘What does it mean to see?’ Students may note that seeing is a matter of degree. To a person who has had no sight since birth, even partial vision offers new and vital experiences of the world.”
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.
The materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions to support student skills and growth, which includes a standard protocol for working in groups and developing presentations and various prompts and strategies to assist growth in both the content and the speaking and listening skills. Speaking and listening instruction for teachers includes facilitation, monitoring, evaluation guides, rubrics, and support. There are multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. There is a yearlong writing plan consisting of a 28/41/31 balance of argumentative, informative, explanatory, and narrative writing, which does not fully reflect the 40/40/20 distribution of writing modes as required by the standards. The Teacher’s Edition offers some guidance and includes explicit instruction within argumentative, informative, and narrative writing tasks. There are frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence.
While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions using the cited evidence to support their responses to questions with every story in each unit. The uniform structure includes comprehension check questions, research prompts based on the anchor and exemplar texts, close reading tasks, analysis of craft and structure tasks and questions, vocabulary tasks and questions, author style analysis tasks, writing tasks that ask students to draw on their understanding of the texts, and core writing or speaking assessments that center around understanding from multiple texts in the unit. The questions following each text align with unit Essential Questions and text-specific guiding questions.
The Teacher’s Edition for each unit includes a list of Lesson Resources that include guidance for Making Meaning. The teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-specific and/or text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments. Guides are provided for choosing appropriate supports and additional text-based questions for students who need scaffolding to access the grade-level material or challenges to go beyond the grade-level material.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Revenge of the Geeks” by Alexandra Robbins. In Analyze the Text section, students answer questions: “Reread the first five paragraphs of the selection. Where does the author state her claim, or main idea, in this argument? Restate the claim in your own words. What three examples does Robbins cite in this section of the text to support this claim?”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou, and answer questions following the First Read: “1. According to the speaker, what are three things the free bird does?; 4. How does the free bird regard the sky?”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Close Read section, students answer the questions: “Reread lines 347–351 in the argument between Teiresias and Oedipus. Mark the nouns. What word is repeated? What is the effect of that repetition?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, the Teacher’s Edition wrap-around material for “Encountering the Other: The Challenge for the 21st Century” by Ryszard Kapuscinski, includes information under the section, Formative Assessment: “If students struggle to close read the text, then provide the Encountering the Other: Text Questions available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Answers and DOK levels are also available.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, the Teacher’s Edition section, Writing to Sources wrap-around for “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe, provides teacher instructions: “Guide students in a discussion about what makes Jonathan do the things he does. What is he afraid of? What has he lost? And finally, what will his future look like with these traits?”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. The Teacher’s Edition includes additional guidance before beginning the text collection by posing questions: “How do inner feelings of hatred and resentment affect the outward actions of a person? Modeling the questions readers might ask as they read ‘En el Jardin de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection’ and ‘Caliban’ brings the text alive for students and connects it to the Small-Group Performance Task assignment.”
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.
The materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions to support student skills and growth, which includes a standard protocol for working in groups and developing presentations and various prompts and strategies to assist growth in both the content and the speaking and listening skills. Speaking and listening instruction for teachers includes facilitation, monitoring, evaluation guides, rubrics, and support.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Conversation and Discussion guide for high school. This web-based tool gives specific guidelines and directions on discussions such as:
Leading a Group Discussion
Formal Group Discussion Guidelines
Informal Group Discussion Guidelines
Debates
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for leading a group discussion: “Here are some guidelines for leading a group discussion:
Introduce the topic and purpose of the discussion.
Lay out any ground rules for the discussion.
Be objective when summarizing the group’s discussion.
Make sure that no one dominates the discussion. Invite and encourage contributions from all participants.
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Formal Group discussion guidelines: “Here are tips for successful discussions and an exchange of ideas in a structured setting
Do not use an excessive amount of informal or colloquial speech in a formal discussion.
Manners are important in any discussion; make sure you allow others to speak, and do not interrupt.
Use exclamatory language, or dramatic language, sparingly; a little goes a long way.
Diction, or the proper use of vocabulary related to the topic of the discussion, is an important element of any discussion.
Stay focused on the subject under discussion.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Informal Group discussion guidelines: “Informal discussion is open-ended and participants are free to speak in a more conversational manner, but most rules still apply.
Speech may be more colloquial but should still maintain a professional code of conduct.
Dramatic and exclamatory remarks help emphasize one's point of view, but overuse weakens their effectiveness.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Practices that make for good Debates: “During the debate, be sure to adhere to these practices:
Be courteous and listen to your opponent's point of view; allow others the opportunity to speak.
If you are debating as a team, support your team members.
Speak only when it is your turn, and follow the moderator's instructions.
Speak clearly, slowly, and loudly enough to be heard and understood by the audience.
Speak with spirit, enthusiasm, and conviction.”
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Introduction, the Teacher’s Edition provides Unit Goals for Speaking and Listening with instructions for the teacher: “Explain to students that they will work together to build on one another’s ideas, develop consensus, and communicate with one another. They will also learn to incorporate audio, visuals, and text in presentations.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith, after which students deliver a multimedia presentation answering the question, "In what ways can material possessions create both a sense of comfort and a sense of anxiety?” The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions for the scaffolded tasks that guide students in building the presentation: “Gather Evidence and Media Examples: Suggest that groups brainstorm what to look for as they search for media to represent wealth and the impact it has: a large home with a person looking lonely and worried, a family enjoying themselves on vacation, a person working in an office late at night, a wealthy benefactor who has given a significant sum of money to a charity.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Country of the Blind” by H.G. Wells. In the Teacher’s Edition, the wrap-around material for the Close Reading section states: “Remind students to use Accountable Talk in their discussions and to support one another as they complete the close read.”
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.
The materials provide multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks. While not all sub-standards for speaking and listening are explicitly outlined in the Teacher’s Edition, varied opportunities are included to collaborate and synthesize ideas as a group. Opportunities are present during speaking and listening work for students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Students regularly engage in speaking and listening in Whole-Group Learning and Small-Group Learning with activities such as small-group discussions, oral presentations, and collaborative dramatic interpretations. Speaking and Listening activities are varied and included as a recurring component in the after-reading activities throughout the units. Small-Group Learning uses informal student discussions for each selection. There are protocols for students to establish norms and roles within the small group. When completing activities, students draw evidence and information from the texts they read and their prior knowledge or research. Each unit includes a speaking and listening-based Performance Task as a part of Small-Group Learning. The Teacher’s Edition includes suggestions for supporting students in successfully participating in these activities, such as guidance on incorporating structure to meet the requirements of the tasks and facilitate the successful demonstration of standards.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus, students work in a group to create a multimedia presentation to answer the question, “When, if ever, are limits on freedom necessary?” Students identify details from the texts in the unit that support their response to the question. They work collaboratively to organize their ideas and present them in a media format of their choice. The assessment is graded on “Content,” “Use of Media,” and “Presentation Techniques.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase'' by Margie Goldsmith. In the Speaking and Listening activity, students participate in a group debate. After choosing one of three provided questions, group members complete the following task independently: “Identify at least three specific reasons for your position as well as passages from Goldsmith’s article that you could use to illustrate your points.” After preparing independently, students share their positions and “Take turns discussing and analyzing one another’s positions. Ask questions, and clarify your responses. Work together to reach a conclusion that identifies the strongest argument. This may draw on points from several group members. Summarize your conclusion, and then share it with the class as a whole.”
Work with peers to set rules for collegial discussions and decision-making (e.g., informal consensus, taking votes on key issues, presentation of alternate views), clear goals and deadlines, and individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All units begin Small-Group Learning with an overview of how to work as a small group. Students practice taking a position on a question, sharing their views, and listening to others’ perspectives. Students then decide on group rules, apply the rules to a discussion of their prior learning on the topic, give their group a name, create a group communication plan, make a schedule for reading the texts, and assign roles for the culminating project. A Collaboration Checklist is provided for many activities.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver a multimedia presentation. The Teacher’s Edition directions for the activity state, “Before groups begin work on their projects, have them clearly differentiate the role each group member will play.” Students are also directed to use the Small-Group Learning schedule and allow all students to share their ideas.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith and deliver a multimedia presentation. The presentation process student instructions state: “Make a list of the tasks you will need to complete to finish your project. Then, assign individual group members to each task. Finally, determine how you will make decisions about choices of images, text, and design elements.”
Make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, students view photographs from The Dream Collector by Arthur Tress and create a visual presentation incorporating both text and images. The Teacher’s Edition provides additional guidance for Illuminating the Standards: “To help students understand what an effective visual presentation looks and sounds like, find video examples of multimedia presentations on the Internet. After previewing the videos, play them for the class and have students note the elements of an effective visual presentation. Point out details such as the ratio of text to images and the use of transitions between images. Encourage students to think about how they can use oral and written aspects in their presentations to support the visual materials without overshadowing it.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present an oral retelling. In the planning process, student instructions state: “Consider including photographs, illustrations, music, charts, graphs, or video clips to add interest and depth to your retelling. Allow each group member to make suggestions.”
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that relate the current discussion to broader themes or larger ideas; actively incorporate others into the discussion; and clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Launch, students form small groups to discuss the question, “Why might exceptionally talented people be considered odd?” Directions state: “Consider similarities in your points of view and work to clarify differences. Support your ideas with examples from texts you have read or your own observations.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith and complete a speaking and listening task in the form of a debate. The materials ask students to Debate the Question and provide instructions for the speaking and listening task: “Gather with your group and invite each group member to present his or her response and evidence. Take turns discussing and analyzing one another’s positions. Ask questions, and clarify your responses. Work together to reach a conclusion that identifies the strongest argument. This may draw on points from several group members. Summarize your conclusion, and then share it with the class as a whole."
Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives, summarize points of agreement and disagreement, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views and understanding and make new connections in light of the evidence and reasoning presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, the Launch activity is to have a Four-Corner Debate on the statement, “Seeing is believing.” Students choose a corner depending on their level of agreement with the statement and then, “Discuss questions such as “What details from the text or your own experience lead you to take this position?” Then a representative of each group shares the corner’s primary evidence. After hearing all corners’ positions, students may choose to change corners. If they change, students need to explain what evidence changed their minds.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall, and complete a speaking and listening task relating to a brief critique of the audio performance included with Part II of the play. The materials provide instructions for students to Share and Discuss. The Teacher’s Edition includes additional guidance: “Although students may disagree about the quality of the performance, remind students to help their classmates to produce a strong critique. Peers can suggest edits or additional details to improve the writing. Encourage students to use the Evaluation guide to help them focus their comments.”
Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally), evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Revenge of the Geeks” by Alexandra Robbins. In the Analyze Craft and Structure-activity after reading, student instructions about Reasoning and Evidence are provided. It specifically provides an explanation of “Credibility: Evidence should be drawn from reliable, authoritative sources. A credible source may present a distinct perspective, but it should not display bias, unfounded judgments, or sweeping generalizations.” In the Practice section, students complete a chart explaining how the author supports her claim with credible and relevant evidence. While this is attached to a reading assignment, not speaking or listening, it does provide direct instruction and practice on the credibility of sources. Later in Unit 2, the Performance-Based Assessment, Speaking and Listening: Oral Presentation, students present the argumentative essay they wrote in the writing portion of the assessment for the prompt: “Is the experience of being an outsider universal?” Students must use “credible evidence from at least three of the selections you read and researched.” In the Speaking and Listening section, student instructions state: “Students should annotate their written arguments based on feedback they have received from readers as well as their own evaluation of effective reasons and evidence. Remind students that the effectiveness of an oral argument relies on how the speaker establishes credibility with his or her audience. Emphasizing points that readers found effective will build credibility into the oral argument.” In the provided “Oral Presentation Rubric,” one criterion for “3” under “Content” states: “Presentation has strong valid reasons and evidence that supports the claim while clearly acknowledging counterclaims.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller. The Research section activity is to research, prepare, and deliver a group presentation on one of three options. Each of the options requires that students use different formats in the sources, such as photographs, illustrations, and audio clips. However, there is no formal instruction on evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source.
Evaluate a speaker's point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC and complete a speaking and listening task in the form of a debate about whether to place Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” on a school’s required reading list. Students take a position, organize ideas and evidence, anticipate counterarguments, and write an opening statement: “With your partner, discuss the arguments in favor of your position. Consider the literary merit of the story, its significance in literary history, and other qualities that you find important. Refer to the text as you work. Use the chart to gather your ideas and evidence.” One of the standards this assignment assesses is SL.3: “Evaluate speaker’s point of view…identifying any fallacious reasoning…”; however, neither student nor teacher instructions explicitly teach how to do this.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith and participate in a debate. As a part of the assessment protocol, students draw conclusions: “Gather with your group and invite each group member to present his or her response and evidence. Take turns discussing and analyzing one another’s positions. Ask questions, and clarify your responses. Work together to reach a conclusion that identifies the strongest argument.”
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening, students deliver a group multimedia presentation to answer the question, “In what ways can material possessions create both a sense of comfort and a sense of anxiety?” Groups follow steps to prepare. They identify evidence from the unit texts to answer the question, write a thesis statement, and find additional evidence to support the thesis. Once the evidence is collected, the group collaborates to identify their strongest examples and organize them into a presentation. In the “Rehearse With Your Group” section, a checklist is provided for students to evaluate their content, use of media, and presentation techniques. One item on the checklist for presentation techniques states: “The speaker uses voice and gestures effectively.” The items for content states: “The presentation presents a clear thesis. Main ideas are supported with evidence from the texts…. The presentation conveys information coherently.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu and create an argumentative group presentation that addresses the question: “Does forgiveness first require an apology?” Students plan with a group to analyze the text, choose roles, gather evidence, and choose order and format. The materials include instructions, such as: “Model your presentation on talk shows you’ve seen. For instance, some shows invite guests out one by one but then have them interact with one another as well as the host. Select the format of the show and the order in which the guests will appear.”
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include various types of essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. Students are provided step-by-step guidance for each task and a checklist or peer review process. At the end of each Whole-Class Learning section, students complete a writing Performance Task over the course of two days. A Performance-Based Assessment writing task is at the end of each unit with a Unit Reflection. Materials include digital resources where appropriate. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance on how to model each type of writing, including a launch text to start the unit that functions as a model for the Performance-Based Assessment. The Teacher’s Edition also includes Digital Perspectives boxes in each unit that often suggest digital resources but do not provide the resource or links to the resources.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, the activities with the Launch Text include a Quickwrite: “Consider class discussions, presentations, the video, and the Launch Text as you think about the prompt. Prompt: In what ways does transformation play a role in stories meant to scare us?”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt. In the Teacher’s Edition, the WriteNow Express and Reflect states: “As students read and interpret the excerpt from Roosevelt’s ‘Four Freedoms’ speech, ask them to identify the other nations that are involved in the effort to stop the threat of invasion. Have students write a speech for the leader of one of those nations to its people responding to Roosevelt’s call to action by the United States. Ask students to consider the point of view from one of the other countries and how the message would be received by its citizens.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest, Act II by William Shakespeare and complete a WriteNow on-demand activity in which they express and reflect when imagining utopias: “Have students close read Gonzalo’s vision of his utopia, or perfect world, in lines 144–153. Explain to students that in 1551, the English version of Thomas More’s Utopia was published. The book depicts a ‘perfect’ society and its political, social, and religious culture and customs. Since then, writers and philosophers have imagined their own utopias, as Gonzalo does in The Tempest. Have each student write a short essay describing his or her version of a utopia. Then have them share their work with the class.”
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, and view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC. In the Performance Task, students write an argument to the question, “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” The materials provide information on building an informative essay and provide the protocol for the writing process, including prewriting and planning activities, drafting activities, a language development process focused on creating cohesive writing through transitions, a revision process that includes evaluating the draft based on a provided rubric, evaluation through the peer review process, proofreading and editing, publishing the work by presenting to the class, and reflecting on the learning and writing process.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay over the course of two days as they consider the question, “What can one person do to defend the rights of all people?” The Teacher’s Edition provides Revision guidance, including but not limited to: “1. Display your first draft on the screen. Use think-alouds as you use RADaR strategies for revision: REPLACE, ADD, DELETE, REORDER. For each change you implement, mark the type of change you made.” Students engage in a full writing process, including editing for conventions and proofreading for accuracy.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative. As a part of the performance task, students follow the writing protocol provided by the text. These include prewriting and planning activities, a drafting organizer, a language development process focused on varied sentence structure, a revision process that includes evaluating the draft based on a provided rubric, evaluation through a peer review process, proofreading and editing, publishing the work by presenting to the class and finally reflecting on the learning and writing process.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All units include interactive digital components such as a reader’s notebook for answering specific questions and making notes about selections, audio summaries, video and audio selections, online annotations, and online assessments.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read from “Freedom of the Press Report 2015” by Freedom House and research the issue of freedom of the press to create an infographic. In the Teacher’s Edition, a Digital Perspectives box suggests teachers prepare students for the assignment: “To help students better understand how to prepare an infographic, provide other examples on the Internet on the other topics. Project the examples for the class (after previewing them yourself) and have students note the different kinds of elements they include and how trends have been presented.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. At the end of the selection, a box is provided with a link to the audio of a performance of the play and states: “How does listening to this audio performance, by L. A. Theatre Works, enhance your understanding of the characters and events featured in Oedipus the King?”
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.
The materials reflect a 28/41/31 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing, which does not fully reflect the 40/40/20 distribution of writing modes as required by the standards. The Teacher’s Edition offers some guidance and includes explicit instruction within argumentative, informative, and narrative writing tasks. Where appropriate, writing opportunities are often connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports).
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing. Materials include an uneven distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 28% argumentative, 41% informative, and 31% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is eight argumentative, 12 informative, and nine narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Percentage or number of opportunities for argumentative writing: three units address argumentative writing. 28% of writing opportunities over six units are argumentative.
Unit 1: 0
Unit 2: 4
Unit 3: 0
Unit 4: 0
Unit 5: 3
Unit 6: 1
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing: five units address informative/explanatory writing. 41% of writing opportunities over six units are informative/explanatory.
Unit 1: 3
Unit 2: 1
Unit 3: 4
Unit 4: 3
Unit 5: 1
Unit 6: 0
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing: four units address informative writing. 31% of writing opportunities over six units are narrative.
Unit 1: 2
Unit 2: 0
Unit 3: 1
Unit 4: 2
Unit 5: 0
Unit 6: 4
Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, then view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC, and write an argument to answer the prompt: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” Before writing, teachers prompt students to review the elements of the argument and a model text. During pre-writing, teachers prompt students to focus on narrowing the topic through the use of a chart. During drafting, the focus is on writing clear introductions that clearly state the claim. The teacher is instructed to “point out to students that their claim or main idea, is needed before they move on to sequence their ideas logically. Point out that it’s normal for writers’ claims to change as writers dig deeper into their ideas, evidence, and counterarguments. They must be careful to make sure their claims and their conclusions agree with each other as they complete their first drafts.” During revision, teachers Help students conduct an honest evaluation of their first drafts by suggesting that they adopt the attitude of a reader from outside of class.”
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC and write a visual analysis in a Writing to Sources assignment. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to support students: “Explain to students that when they are evaluating video, they should consider not only whether images are presented in black and white, but also focus on which images are presented in black and white versus color. Remind students to consider the music that accompanies the images, as film producers rely on these color and sound choices to set the mood and evoke feelings from viewers.” Teachers can also use a Writing to Sources: Visual Analysis support document.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, students read Where is Here? by Joyce Carol Oates and complete the Writing to Sources task where they work as a group to write a narrative that “extends the scope of ‘Where is Here?’” Prior to writing, the teacher provides a chart to help plan the narrative with columns addressing action and the goal of each paragraph. Teachers review the qualities of each writing genre with the class and encourage students to “take notes or create a brief outline to address the prompt for the topic they have chosen.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall, and complete a Writing to Sources task, which is to write a dialogue. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to support students, including: “Explain the strategy ‘show, don’t tell’ to students so that they understand that much can be said without directly stating it. For example, the question of whether Oedipus deserved his punishment can be answered by characters expressing either disgust or pity of the king’s punishment, commenting on negative or redeeming characteristics of the king, or expressing their wishes for a different outcome.”
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare, a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. Then, they write an argument answering the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” As a part of the writing process, students develop a claim based on the text and other sources while guided to consider valid points from other sides. In the “Prewriting/Planning” section, students develop a working thesis statement as well as explore counterclaims by completing sentence stems.
Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level and concerns. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, then view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC, and write an argument based on the prompt: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” As a part of the writing process, students draw evidence from multiple types of sources, including the anchor texts. The Teacher’s Edition suggests: “Encourage students to make sure they have various types of evidence, such as those listed on the student page. If they have only one type of evidence, they may need to gather more varied types of evidence. Ask if they have verified the truthfulness of their evidence, explaining that a misrepresentation of the facts will weaken their argument.”
Use words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare, a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez, and write an argument answering the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” As students draft their essays, the text provides instruction on transitions between ideas and source information: “As you draft your argument, use appropriate transitions and punctuation to smoothly incorporate quotations and paraphrases into your writing.”
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, then view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC, and write an argument based on the prompt: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” Student instructions related to maintaining formal language appropriate to the context of the argument and purpose state: “Use a formal, objective tone or attitude. Use precise words. Avoid slang, contractions, and other elements of casual language that are inappropriate for academic writing” and “make sure that you have used an appropriately formal style that includes precise and vivid language, accurate use of academic terms, and transitions that establish clear relationships among your ideas.”
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare, a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. Then, they write an argument answering the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” In the revision process, the Student Edition provides rhetorical questions to develop an effective conclusion: “Are [the ideas] presented in a logical order? Have you made the connections between your ideas, exact quotations, and paraphrases clear? Does your conclusion follow naturally from the claim and evidence that you presented, and does it end your essay memorably?”
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information to make important connections and distinctions; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. In Writing to Compare, students compare this text to “Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allen Poe in terms of Gothic Style and the use of Magical Realism. Students are guided to plan/prewrite by focusing on the setting in each story and how it shows Gothic style and Magical Realism. In the drafting stage, students are given sentence starters to help them develop their essays and guidance in developing their evidence. Finally, students review, revise, and edit their final drafts.
Develop the topic with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an explanatory essay. After reading several Gothic texts, students write an explanatory essay answering the question, “How and when does imagination overcome reason?” During the drafting stage, students receive instruction in identifying and choosing evidence and support from the text to support their analysis. The Teacher’s Edition includes support for discussing how to use personal experience along with text-based evidence in supporting a thesis or main point in an essay.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai and view “Diane Sawyer Interviews Malala Yousafzai” by ABC News. In Writing to Compare, students write an explanatory essay to explain “why Yousafzai has been able to attract supporters from all over the world.” In the prewriting stage, students are instructed to look at details from the speech and interview that mirror one another and consider how they are presented in each text and how they represent Malala’s story. In the drafting stage, students are given a sentence stem for the thesis focusing on how the details show why Malala is a compelling figure. There is also explicit instruction for finding a variety of types of evidence, including exact quotes, paraphrases, and examples.
Use appropriate and varied transitions to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. In Writing to Sources, students write a character analysis for Johnathan, the main character. The directions state: “Link supporting details to your main idea using phrases such as for example. Include transition words such as instead to connect ideas.” In the Reflecting on Your Writing section, students answer which transition words they used to move readers from idea to idea. The Teacher’s Edition suggests teachers help students brainstorm other transitions if they are using the same one multiple times.
Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay for the prompt: “What makes something valuable? What makes something a treasure?” In the drafting stage, students receive explicit instruction in creating cohesion by using conjunctive adverbs to show logical relationships between ideas. In the revising stage, the checklist reminds students to look for “words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationship between ideas.”
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver an explanatory presentation. To start, students write an explanatory essay for the prompt, “What does it mean to be free?” The additional instructions state: “Use a formal tone and an objective tone, and follow the conventions of standard English.” The assignment rubric includes a category on maintaining a formal style and an objective tone throughout the essay to score at the highest level.
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver a multimedia presentation after writing an informative essay answering the questions, “How do we decide what we want versus what we need? What can result from an imbalance between want and need?” Student directions state to review the elements of an informative essay by looking at the rubric prior to writing. A conclusion that summarizes the ideas and readdresses the thesis is included on the rubric. The Teacher’s Edition advises teachers to remind students to include a memorable conclusion.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Engage and orient the reader by setting out a problem, situation, or observation, establishing one or multiple point(s) of view, and introducing a narrator and/or characters; create a smooth progression of experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Performance-Based Assessment, students write a nonfiction narrative for the prompt: “Is there a difference between seeing and knowing?” Student instructions are to “present both clearly delineated characters - the people who are involved in the action of the story- and settings.” There is an expectation for a “logically sequenced series of events that show the choices people make and their reasons for making them.” Once completed, students share their narratives with the class in a “storytelling session.”
Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, and multiple plot lines, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read The Country of the Blind by H.G. Wells and complete a Writing to Sources task: “Write a response to the story” and choose from three options: a retelling, character description, or dialogue. Once the group decides on a writing style, they review notes they took during reading and analysis of the text to clarify and focus their ideas. Students work independently to create a written piece based on one of the three options and share them with the group. The retelling option asks students to “rewrite a portion of the story as a flashback.” The character description asks students to “write a description of Nunez from another character’s point of view.” The dialogue directs students to “write a dialogue in which Nunez describes his experiences…to an outsider.”
Use a variety of techniques to sequence events so that they build on one another to create a coherent whole. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection and complete a group Writing To Sources task to “plan and write a short story that answers a question left open by one of the poems.” Students choose from three options and use a graphic organizer to “brainstorm for ideas about the setting and characters” of the story. As a group, they “determine how the conflict will begin, develop, and resolve.” Students are encouraged to “plan the direction the story will take before beginning to write.” There is a focus on prewriting strategies that will help the group create a cohesive story.
Use precise words and phrases, telling details, and sensory language to convey a vivid picture of the experiences, events, setting, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative for the prompt: “Can we see ourselves as clearly as others see us?” In the Prewriting/Planning section, students Gather Evidence: “Before you draft, collect ideas for descriptions you want to include in your narrative.” The bulleted list includes “sensory details, words that appeal to the senses of sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing.” Students’ instructions state: “Using vivid details adds interest and depth to your writing” and gives an example of sensory details from the Launch Text.
Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on what is experienced, observed, or resolved over the course of the narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant, translated by Andrew MacAndrew, and complete a Writing To Sources task: “Adopt the perspective of Mathilde Loisel, and write a diary entry in which you explain how your life changed after the party.” Students are reminded that a diary entry “describes the writer’s own experiences and expresses his or her thoughts, feelings, and observations.” Students also have access to supplemental resources that help organize the introspective thoughts of the narrator of the diary entry.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe and “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar and complete a Writing to Compare task connecting to the texts. Students write an explanatory essay comparing and contrasting the Gothic style and Magical Realism as seen in the stories. Students use a chart to gather details relating to the setting and later complete an evidence log in which they record what they have learned from “House Taken Over.”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an informative essay for the prompt: “What does it mean to be free?” The task requires students to “develop the topic with facts, details, quotations, examples, and other evidence from at least three of the selections you read.”
Indicator 1K
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support sophisticated analysis, argumentation, and synthesis.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.
The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Writing opportunities are focused on students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. The writing opportunities include shorter specific writing aligned with a specific text or texts, longer process writing in the performance tasks, writing as a preparation for a speaking task, and short, informal written responses to questions. During Whole-Class Learning, most units end with a writing task that involves explicit instruction in the skills needed to complete the task. During Small-Group Learning, students work collaboratively to complete research assignments and other writing projects that reference the text and often require support from the text or other credible sources. Graphic organizers are available to help students organize textual evidence to support a claim. Students are required to go outside the texts and conduct research to add additional evidence for some activities. All units have multiple opportunities to write using evidence, although it is more limited in Unit 6, which focuses on students doing narrative writing. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to assist students when completing writing tasks and can offer additional support in the form of modeling and graphic organizers.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “My Introduction to Gothic Literature” (author not cited). After reading, students write a summary of the text. The teacher is instructed to provide students with the following guidance for their summary paragraphs:
“Write in the the present tense.
Make sure to include a title of the work.
Be concise: a summary should not be equal in length to the original text.
If you need to quote the words of the author, use quotation marks.
Don’t put your own opinions, ideas, or interpretations into the summary. The purpose of writing a summary is to accurately represent what the author says, not to provide a critique.”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston and watch a video “Franz Kafka and the Metamorphsosis” by BBC. Afterward, students write an argumentative essay onthe question “Are outsiders simply those that are misjudged or misunderstood?” Students are first presented with the elements of an argument and a model argumentative essay. As students begin planning their essay, the teacher prompts students to use varied types of evidence. The teacher has “students review the facts they listed in their Evidence Log.” Then, the teacher encourages “students to make sure they have various types of evidence, such as those listed on the student page. If they have only one type of evidence, they may need to gather more varied types of evidence.” The teacher also “Ask[s] if they have verified the truthfulness of their evidence, explaining that a misrepresentation of the facts will weaken their argument.” Lastly, the teacher reminds students “to use reliable sources and to be wary of the many factual errors found on the Internet.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Group Learning, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare and En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection by Virgil Suarez.After reading, students write an argumentative essay in which they state their position on the question “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue?” Students are first presented with the elements of an argument and a model argumentative essay. The Teacher Edition prompts teachers to note that “Students might be accustomed to making an argument based on nonfiction texts” therefore the teacher “Remind[s students] that argumentative text focusing oninterpretations of literature should contain all the same elements and be well-organized and use tone and word choice to create authoritativeness.” As students begin to plan their writing and collect evidence, the teacher reminds them that “their argument will become stronger with each additional source they cite in their essay. Explain that one or two pieces ofevidence will fail to convince readers, since one or two data points may be insufficient to draw a reasonable conclusion. As the data points build, it becomes more difficult for a reader to dismiss the examples as exceptions to the rule”
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai and watch her interview with Diane Sawyer; following the reading and viewing, students write an explanatory essay. The materials ask students to “Consider which details are emphasized in the speech and the interview, as well as the effect these details have on your understanding of Yousafzai, her experience, and her activism. Cite evidence from both texts in your essay.” A graphic organizer is available to assist students in analyzing the text.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. Students write a character analysis of Jonathan. The text provides students with prompts and suggestions to look for supporting evidence, including but not limited to: “First, review the story to analyze Jonathan in detail. Using a two-column chart, list his strengths and weaknesses; [then] identify specific examples in the story that demonstrate each trait.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argumentative essay responding to the following question: “Can justice and forgiveness go hand in hand?” The materials ask students to “Use credible evidence from at least three of the selections you read and researched in this unit to support your claim.”
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
The materials include opportunities to demonstrate the application of grammar and convention skills in context in writing tasks; however, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking. Some grammar substandards include explicit instruction but have limited practice or are not outlined thoroughly, such as spelling and using a style manual. Some substandards are included when the explicit instruction is about a grammatical element connected to the substandard. Students apply grammar skills in context in Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning, though the opportunities are not always authentic. Students complete Language Development tasks that connect to a text they are reading; the tasks include a teaching component with sections for Language Development, such as Concept Vocabulary, Word Study, Conventions, and Author’s Style. The materials offer other practice opportunities in a Grammar Center that includes workbooks and tutorials for each grade level. The End Matter of the Teacher’s Edition provides a Grammar Handbook consistent for each grade level that provides a structure for teachers to scaffold grammar instruction.
Materials include some explicit instruction of some of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include some authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to use parallel structure. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Revenge of the Geeks” by Alexandra Robbins and complete an Author’s Style task around parallel structure. Students read examples of nonparallel and parallel structure and “Mark the parallel sentence elements in each of these passages from ‘Revenge of the Geeks.’ Parallel elements may appear in a single sentence or in multiple sentences.” The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to facilitate and check student work. One example includes “3. Research shows that they are more likely . . . to conform, which can also mean they’re less likely to innovate.” To conclude the task, students complete a Write It activity by writing a paragraph about the text: “Include at least one example of parallel structure. Mark your examples.”
Students have opportunities to use various types of phrases (noun, verb, adjectival, adverbial, participial, prepositional, absolute) and clauses (independent, dependent; noun, relative, adverbial) to convey specific meanings and add variety and interest to writing or presentations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. The Conventions activity focuses on understanding how independent and dependent clauses create a variety of sentence structures. After looking at examples from the story of the four basic sentence structures, students reread two paragraphs from the story and identify all the types of sentence structures. They turn two simple sentences into a compound sentence, a complex sentence, and a compound-complex sentence. Later in Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. The Conventions activity focuses on prepositional phrases. After reviewing examples of prepositional phrases from the story, students analyze three sentences by marking the prepositions and their objects. They edit a paragraph by adding prepositions to make it more interesting and detailed.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt and complete the Conventions task focusing on types of phrases. The student materials provide examples of noun phrases. Students mark the noun phrases and head nouns in sentences from the speech. One example includes “c. Our national policy in foreign affairs has been based on a decent respect for all nations, large and small.” The Teacher’s Edition provides answers. To conclude the task, students complete a Write It activity: “In the example, the original sentence has been revised to include another noun phrase. Following the example, rewrite each sentence below by adding a noun phrase. Mark the noun phrase you added, as well as its head noun.” The Teacher’s Edition provides possible student responses.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller. The Conventions activity focuses on prepositional phrases that act as adverbial phrases. After looking at examples, students identify adverbial phrases in three sentences and then write a paragraph using at least three adverbial phrases.
Students have opportunities to use a semicolon (and perhaps a conjunctive adverb) to link two or more closely related independent clauses. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. While the Teacher’s Edition front matter indicates the sub-standard for semicolons is taught, the activity does not include any practice or examples using a semicolon. It does say that a semicolon can be used to join sentences in a chart of how to form various sentence structures, but it does not give an example or ask students to practice it.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, translated by Andrew MacAndrew, and complete the Conventions task about the use of semicolons to “join two closely related independent clauses that are not already joined by a coordinating conjunction.” Students read examples of correct use of semicolons, with and without a conjunctive adverb or transitional phrase: “Mark where a semicolon should be inserted in each of the following sentences based on ‘The Necklace.’” An example includes “d. The necklace turns out to have been much less valuable than Madame Loisel thought in fact, it was merely a cheap costume jewelry.” The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to Make It Interactive: “Have students write sentences that use semicolons to join independent clauses. Then, have them underline the subjects and verbs of each independent clause to illustrate the fact that there is a complete sentence on each side of the semicolon.” To conclude the task, students complete a Write It activity by writing “three sentences of your own to describe Madame Loisel—her character, her dreams, and her experiences in the story. Use a semicolon in each sentence.”
Students have opportunities to use a colon to introduce a list or quotation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument and complete a Language Development: Conventions task. The Student Edition provides a Tip for punctuation: “Use a colon to introduce longer quotations.” As students draft their arguments, examples are available to assist students to “smoothly incorporate quotations and paraphrases into [their] writing.” For example, “Introduce the longer quotation, then use a colon. Note that a block quotation does not have quotation marks surrounding it.” Teacher instructions state: “Remind students that proper language, grammar, and punctuation help improve the readability of their argument. Consider reviewing examples of correct use of language and punctuation from the launch text.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument. As a part of the drafting process in writing, the text provides explicit instruction on incorporating quotations from the anchor texts and proper punctuation; one of the punctuation options is a colon. Students view models of different ways to punctuate quotations and how to use a colon appropriately to introduce lists or quotations. The Teacher’s Edition suggests reviewing the launch text to provide more examples of properly punctuated quotations.
Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, during the review, revise, edit step in the Proofread for Accuracy section, students are told to read carefully and look for errors in spelling and punctuation. There is no explicit instruction provided on this skill.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. In the Author’s Style section, students examine the effect of nonstandard spelling in dialect on a piece of writing. The text provides an explanation of what dialectical writing is and an analysis through a comparison of standard form and stylized form of the language. After the comparative study, students reflect on the impact of the nonstandard language choices on the text. The Teacher’s Edition provides the suggestion to point out how the variations give clues to readers about characterization in particular. Students complete a writing task: “Write a brief paragraph in which you describe your morning routine. Use standard English. Then, write another paragraph on the same topic. Use nonstandard language variations with which you are familiar.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative. During revision, students use the checklist, Focus and Organization, Development of Ideas/Elaboration, and Conventions, to revise. One of the checklist items states: “Consulted a dictionary to check correct spelling and meaning.” As students complete Editing and Proofreading, student instructions state: “Read your draft carefully, looking for errors in spelling and punctuation.” The Teacher’s Materials include guidance: “As students proofread, they should check for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Remind them that they should not rely on word processing programs to find all mistakes, as they can sometimes miss some errors. For example, spell checkers will not recognize that the wrong form of a homonym was used. They should also be aware that it’s easy to misspell names of people and places.”
Write and edit work so that it conforms to the guidelines in a style manual (e.g., MLA Handbook, Turabian’s Manual for Writers) appropriate for the discipline and writing type. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, End Matter, Tool Kit: Research, guidance is provided for Formats for Citing Sources: “In the body of your paper, provide a footnote, an endnote, or a parenthetical citation, identifying the sources of facts, opinions, or quotations. At the end of your paper, provide a bibliography or a Works Cited list, a list of all the sources referred to in your research. Follow an established format, such as Modern Language Association (MLA) style.” Additional information is available with sample parenthetical citations and instructions on creating a Works Cited list with an MLA (8th Edition) Style for Listing Sources.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument. In the prewriting/planning step, students find various types of evidence to use in their argument. Student instructions state: “Consult an online or print style manual to confirm how to incorporate quotations or paraphrases into your essay correctly.” There are no additional instructions or examples for students to use.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay. During Editing and Proofreading, student instructions state: “Use a style guide if you need help crediting your sources correctly.”
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.
The materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way. Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Materials include lessons and activities for vocabulary critical to understanding the text, the overall concept of the unit, and the genre of writing for each unit. Vocabulary is repeated in various contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Units systematically build vocabulary, as each unit includes academic vocabulary instruction before reading texts in the Introduction and builds during the reading of individual texts. Students rank their familiarity with the words before reading and, after reading, think about the connection between the words and practice using the words and Greek and Latin roots in the Word Study and Concept Vocabulary sections. Concept Vocabulary is found in Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning activities for the texts in each unit. Activities for demonstrating understanding of the Concept Vocabulary become more complex as the year progresses. Vocabulary is associated with the writing focus of the Performance Tasks, and students can incorporate vocabulary in authentic ways during the Performance Tasks and from their Word Networks during the Performance-Based Assessment. Stand-alone vocabulary assessments include a pre-test, mid-year assessment, and end-of-year assessment. The Vocabulary Center includes supplemental practice resources for students to work with common general academic and domain-specific words using Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Word Study Worksheets, Domain-Specific Academic Vocabulary lessons, and General Academic Vocabulary lessons. Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive vocabulary development component.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials include a Standards Correlation, including Language: Conventions, Effective Use, and Vocabulary: “The vocabulary standards focus on understanding words and phrases, their relationships, and their nuances and on acquiring new vocabulary, particularly general academic and domain-specific words, and phrases.” Each unit includes Vocabulary/Word Study, and the Unit at a Glance includes the academic vocabulary, concept vocabulary, and word study, such as the following: Latin Prefix, Latin Root, Cognates, Connotation and Denotation, and Multiple-Meaning Words. The materials include a consistent approach for students to interact with word relationships and build academic vocabulary regularly. Each unit offers information in the Introduction regarding the Academic Vocabulary for students to interact with and with teacher guidance, such as offering possible student responses. The materials offer Language Development consistently in the Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning sections with Word Networks and through annotations when close reading. The Teacher’s Edition End Matter also includes a Glossary: Academic Concept Vocabulary and the academic vocabulary appears in blue type. The Index also offers a list of the academic vocabulary and concept vocabulary with corresponding page numbers.
In the Teacher’s Edition during the Launch text of each unit, the Vocabulary Development box provides teachers with additional Academic Vocabulary Reinforcement activities.
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, academic and concept vocabulary are embedded throughout. In each unit Introduction, students view a chart with academic vocabulary for the unit, read mentor sentences with the words, and complete a chart for the predicted meaning and related words. Each text Introduction includes a Concept Vocabulary section where students rank words from least familiar to most familiar. All words are defined in the footnotes of the text. After reading, the Concept Vocabulary section includes activities with words from the Introduction, and the Word Study section includes practice with Latin and Greek word parts. The structure of the vocabulary lessons remains consistent throughout the year.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. In the Making Meaning section, students rank the Concept Vocabulary words in order from most familiar (1) to least familiar (6) before they read the text. An example is vestibule, appearing multiple times in the text: “One entered the house through a vestibule with enameled tiles, and a wrought-iron grated door opened onto the living room. You had to come in through the vestibule and open the gate to go into the living room…”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Introduction, in the Academic Vocabulary: Argument activity, the word contradict is included. It is also used again in the Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, where students are encouraged to use the academic vocabulary in the argumentative essay. In the end of unit Performance-Based Assessment, students are reminded they will need to know the meaning of the academic vocabulary to complete the final assessment successfully. While academic vocabulary is included in three activities in Unit 2, it is not formally revisited in other units.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai. Before reading, students view the words and learn strategies for recognizing parts of the words: “Separating a word into its parts can often help you identify its meaning. Those parts might include base words, roots, or affixes,” Examples include:
“Unfamiliar Word: unidirectional Familiar Base Word: direction, meaning‘point toward which something faces or moves
Familiar Affixes: the prefix uni-, meaning ‘one’; the suffix -al, which forms adjectives
Conclusion: Unidirectional may mean moving in only one direction, or toward only one point.”
After reading, students practice with the following task: “The three concept vocabulary words are related. With your group, determine what the words have in common. Write your ideas, and add another word that fits the category.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest, Act V by William Shakespeare, and encounter the vocabulary word pardon. During Making Meaning before the reading, students rank their familiarity with the word pardon. Following the reading, students consider why vocabulary was selected, including pardon. Later in Unit 5, Small-Group Learning, students encounter the same vocabulary word pardon when reading “Under a Certain Little Star” by Wislawa Szymborska, translated by Joanna Trzeciak: “Pardon me, hounded hope, for laughing sometimes/Pardon me, deserts, for not rushing in with a spoonful of water.” The word pardon appears again later in the unit during Small-Group Learning when students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu. During that reading, in the Teacher’s Edition, a Vocabulary Development activity asks teachers to “Draw students’ attention to paragraph 11. Have students fill out a word map for the word amnesty.” Synonyms in the chart include pardon and forgiveness.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 9–10 General Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It sections. Examples of Vocabulary Terms include, but are not limited to: allusion, empathy, hypothesis, suspense, chronicle, and integral. The Interactive lessons include an activity in which students “Drag each vocabulary word in the left-hand column to match it with the word in the right-hand column that has the same root as the vocabulary word.”
In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 9–10 Domain-Specific Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It sections. Examples of Vocabulary Terms include, but are not limited to: ideology, sovereignty, catalyst, monochrome, genetic mutation, local area network, and tangent. The Interactive lessons include an activity in which students “Identify the domain of each vocabulary word. Drag each word into the correct subject area column.”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Introduction, the materials include academic terms that “appear in all subjects and can help you read, write, and discuss with more precision. Here are five academic words that will be useful to you in this unit as you analyze and write informative texts.” Students complete a chart to predict meaning and write at least two related words for the following: attribute, hierarchy, demarcate, fundamental, and democracy.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read the “Historical Context of The Tempest” (author not cited), which includes the Tier II academic words and Tier II domain-specific words: allusion, articulate, contentious, vehement, and tolerate.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
The materials are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. There are high-quality questions and tasks sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. Throughout the program, there are opportunities for students to complete research to learn more about or expand their knowledge on topics. The multi-faceted culminating tasks require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. While the materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and include different types of writing tasks that connect with texts, well-designed guidance is lacking to help teachers implement and monitor student growth.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards, and by the end of the academic year, every standard is addressed. The pacing for the six units in the program is generally reasonable, and the suggested implementation schedule can be reasonably completed in one school year.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
The materials are organized around cohesive topics/themes that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Each text builds knowledge in either the topic, literary skill, or historical time period the text represents. Historical, biographical, cultural, or textual references are included to build and support student comprehension of the anchor texts.
The materials include high-quality questions and tasks in which students analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. There are multi-faceted culminating tasks that require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. The program also provides research and writing activities and projects that are sequenced and encourage students to develop knowledge and understand different aspects of a topic. In each unit, there are opportunities for students to conduct both shorter and longer research tasks to build knowledge on topics and synthesize their learning.
While the materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and include different types of writing tasks that connect with texts, well-designed guidance is lacking to help teachers implement and monitor student growth.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s)/theme(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
The materials are organized around a cohesive topic(s)/theme(s) that build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The materials include six units, each focusing on a topic related to the Essential Question, which can be found in the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter. Each section has a guiding question that builds to an answer for the unit Essential Question; texts are tied to these questions through a unifying theme. Students complete readings during Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning. A variety of texts are provided with varying levels of complexity to build students’ knowledge and ability to navigate complex text independently and proficiently by the end of the year. Each text builds knowledge in either the topic, literary skill, or historical time period the text represents. Historical, biographical, cultural, or textual references are included to build and support student comprehension of the anchor texts. The Teacher’s Edition notes several areas of support for background knowledge and scaffolding support in vocabulary and knowledge acquisition, close reading annotations, and discussions. Texts are followed by a set of questions and activities divided into consistent sections: Before Reading includes Concept Vocabulary and First Read Strategies; After Reading includes Comprehension Check, Research, Close Read the Text, Analyze the Text, Analyze Craft and Structure, Concept Vocabulary, and Author’s Style.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials consistently share how students engage with text around each unit topic. A Launch Text “introduces a perspective on the unit topic.” During Whole-Class Learning, teachers are directed to “lead the shared reading experience providing modeling and support, as students begin exploring perspectives on the unit topic.” The next step is for students to “encounter diverse perspectives on the unit topic, working in collaborative teams.” Finally, during Independent Learning, students choose “a text to explore an aspect of the unit topic and share their learning with the class.”
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, the Essential Question is “What is the allure of fear?” and students read multiple texts in Whole-Class Learning that connect to the topic, such as “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe, “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar, and an excerpt from “How to Tell You’re Reading a Gothic Novel—In Pictures” by Adam Frost and Zhenia Vasiliev.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, the Essential Question is, “What is the relationship between power and freedom?” Students read multiple texts that connect to the topic. For example, in Small-Group Learning, students read “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou; in Whole-Class Learning, students read “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt and the “Inaugural Address” by John F. Kennedy.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, the Essential Question is, “What does it mean to see?” and students read multiple texts that connect, such as the Launch Text, “Just Six Dots” (author not cited); a Whole-Class Learning text, Oedipus the King by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall; a Small-Group Learning text, “The Country of the Blind” by H.G. Wells; and, an Independent Learning text selection, such as a novel excerpt from Blindness by José Saramago, translated by Giovanni Pontiero.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.
The materials include high-quality questions and tasks in which students analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts. The materials are organized in a consistent pattern across all units with multiple after-reading activities. The First-Read Guide requires students to note what they notice, annotate the text, connect ideas with other selections, and respond by writing a brief summary. The Close-Read Guide provides students with reminders to revisit sections and annotate what they notice. The Close-Read Guide includes the Analyze the Text and Analyze Craft and Structure sections in which they analyze key ideas and details as well as consider the author’s choices of patterns, structure, and techniques. All of the activities require students to revisit the text and use specific text evidence in their answers. In the Teacher’s Edition, the sample answers also include the depth of knowledge levels for questions; most are at DOK 2 or 3. For some texts, the questions lead to the subsequent Writing or Speaking and Listening activities. These questions also build toward the various Performance Tasks embedded after Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and at the end of the unit. Students keep an evidence log and notebook throughout each unit to record responses and help them prepare for the culminating tasks.
For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “beware: do not read this poem” by Ishmael Reed, “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe, and “Windigo” by Louis Erdrich. Students consider the Essential Question, “What is the allure of fear?” A follow-up question prepares students for the task: “In literature, how does a sense of uncertainty help to create an atmosphere of fear?” During each reading, students consider key ideas and details, drawing conclusions about why the author would include those in the text. After reading, students practice by considering how the speaker’s tone and the poem’s imagery reveal the theme in each work. Students also complete the following tasks: “1. Choose one of the poems, and identify another theme it expresses. 2. List details that suggest this theme and explain your interpretation.”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston. In Analyze the Text, students answer questions with the analysis skill used in answering them and use specific text evidence:
“Compare and Contrast: Describe how Gregor’s insect-like body changes from the opening of the story to the ending.
Interpret: How do these physical changes reflect Gregor’s evolving emotional state?
Make a Judgment: In what ways, if any, are the family members responsible for Gregor’s tragic outcome? Consider their actions at the end of the story before you answer.
Hypothesize: Would Gregor’s fate have been different if he had been transformed into a different kind of animal? Explain.
Essential Question: Do people need to belong? What have you learned about the condition of being an outsider by reading this story?”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Blind” by Fatima Naoot, translated by Kees Nijland. In Analyze the Text, small groups answer questions, such as “Review and Clarify: With your group, reread the final stanza of ‘The Blind Seer of Ambon.’ Why is the shell so important to the speaker? Essential Question: What does it mean to see? What has this selection taught you about the meaning of seeing? Discuss with your group.” The Essential Question is connected to the final Performance Assessment: “Write a nonfiction narrative in which you tell a true story related to the following question: Is there a difference between seeing and knowing?”
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Sonnet, With Bird” by Sherman Alexie. In Analyze Craft and Structure, students review poetic structures of free verse, such as end-stopped lines, enjambed lines, and lack of line breaks that look like prose. Students answer the following questions:
“In ‘Fences,’ which lines are end-stopped and which are enjambed? Explain how the different types of lines emphasize meaning or affect how a reader hears and understands the poem.
What type of poem is ‘Elliptical’? Explain. In what ways does the choice of form affect how the reader experiences the poem?
Rewrite the poem, adding line breaks that make sense to you. Compare with the original. What is lost, and what is gained by the poet’s choice of form?
What poetic techniques does ‘Sonnet With Bird’ use that makes it a poem rather than prose? How does the combination of poetic and prose-like elements affect its meaning.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness” by Marie Arana. In Author’s Style, students analyze the author’s use of imagery and its impact on the ideas presented in the essay: “Find examples of imagery in the article. Identify the senses to which each example appeals, and explain how it improves your understanding of the text.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest, Act III by William Shakespeare and analyze the dramatic structure: “Playwrights often use plot and subplot to explore thematic ideas from different perspectives and to reveal complexities of character.” Students note events in a chart at different points of the plot/subplot and answer questions in their notebooks, such as the following: “3. Which conspirators are more dangerous, Sebastian and Antonio or Caliban and Stephano? Explain your answer using evidence from the subplots. 4 Considering all the subplots, do you think Prospero wants to harm other characters, help them, or do something else? Explain.” Students analyze dramatic structure again when reading Act IV of the same selection and identify the type of dramatic speech that appears in the listed passages: an aside, monologue, or soliloquy. They identify the intended audience for the speech with the following questions: “2. (a) How does Prospero’s role throughout the play make asides a natural choice for his character? (b) In what ways does Ariel’s role also lend itself to the use of asides? Explain.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Country of the Blind” by H.G. Wells. In Author’s Style, students learn about how pacing is created and how it contributes to the mood. The instructions state: “Work individually. Read each passage in the chart, and describe its pacing. Make notes about the characteristics of the passage that contribute to its pacing. Discuss your responses with your group. During your discussion, support your ideas by including examples from other parts of the story, as well.” After discussing, students complete a writing task: “Write two sections of a narrative. In one section, describe the setting. In the other, describe the action. Use techniques, such as longer or shorter sentences, to vary the pacing in the two sections. Then, explain how your choices created specific effects.”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.
The materials include multiple opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts and across multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. The materials provide related questions as students comprehend and analyze texts and complete culminating tasks. Most sets of questions and tasks require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across the unit to build knowledge around a topic/theme and the essential question. In some instances, the materials pair two or more texts, and students practice the same skills across all texts. Multiple texts connect to the essential question in preparation for the end-of-unit assessment. In this assessment, students synthesize ideas based on various text-dependent prompts that align with grade-level standards.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston. While reading, students mark the text and answer questions in Close Read activities: “In paragraph 10, mark words and phrases that describe how Gregory is moving. What do these details suggest about Gregor’s ability to control his new body? What is the effect of this word choice?” Later in another Close Read, student instructions state, “In paragraph 57, mark the parts of the sentence that are set off by parentheses. Why does the author separate out this information? What is the effect of setting these sections apart in this way?” Another Close Read instructions state: “Mark the sentences in paragraph 73 that are five words long or shorter. How are these sentences different from Kafka’s usual sentences? What is the effect of this sentence variation?”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt. In Analyze the Text, students identify and evaluate how Roosevelt supported his claims and answer the following questions: “How does Roosevelt link his assertion that this speech occurs at an unprecedented moment to his later claim that this speech ‘is unique in our history’? What language does Roosevelt use to emphasize the unique circumstances surrounding the speech? How effectively does Roosevelt’s discussion of domestic issues help him build his case for helping other countries? Use examples from the speech to support your evaluation.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. Students analyze how the author’s choices concerning how to structure the text create an emotional effect: “The events in Greek tragedies came as no surprise to their first audiences. Greek audiences knew the myths on which the plays were based. The result was dramatic irony, a contradiction between what a character thinks and what the audience knows to be true. Dramatic irony engages an audience emotionally.” Students answer questions in their notebooks: “In what ways does Oedipus fit the definition of a tragic hero? How does the dramatic irony of the play build as Oedipus learns about his past? Some scholars have stated that Oedipus’ tragic flaw is anger, whereas others suggest it is excessive pride. Do you think Oedipus has a tragic flaw? If so, explain whether you believe it to be anger, excessive pride, or another quality. If you do not think he has a specific tragic flaw, explain your reasoning. Support your answer with text evidence.”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Sonnet, With Bird” by Sherman Alexie, “Elliptical” by Harryette Mullen, and “Fences” by Pat Mora. Each selection connects to the Essential Question: “Do people need to belong?” Students analyze the texts and answer questions, such as “Do people need to belong? What have these poems taught you about being an outsider? Discuss with your group.” Students analyze how an author draws on and transforms source material: “In ‘Sonnet, With Bird,’ Sherman Alexie uses the sonnet form as a starting point, then changes it drastically.” Students record in a chart how the author “reimagines the Shakespearean sonnet.” Students write a paragraph in their notebooks to “explain how Alexie experiments with the Shakespearean sonnet to create a prose poem.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Golden Touch'' by Nathaniel Hawthorne and an excerpt from “King Midas” by Howard Moss and analyze the representation of a subject or key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment. In the Writing to Compare assignment, instructions state: “Write a compare-and-contrast essay in which you analyze the portrayals of the characters in the two retellings of the Midas myth. Consider how the form of each text shapes the information the writer includes and contributes to readers’ understanding of the characters and their conflicts.” As students analyze the text, they identify details about characters that appear in both and those that appear in only one text. Students answer questions such as, “How has your understanding of King Midas changed as you read the two texts? In which work do you learn more about what Midas feels and thinks? Explain. What does the princess symbolize in the two texts? Does her character have the same meaning in the story that it does in the poem? Explain.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. In the Writing to Compare assignment, students demonstrate their understanding of the play and evaluate the way the source material is used and transformed into new works. They write an essay to answer the prompt, “Write a comparison-and-contrast essay in which you analyze Caliban’s character as portrayed in the play and in one of the poems. In addition, express a judgment about the value of reading new works based on old characters. To do so, consider these questions: Does the poem show Caliban in a new way while remaining true to the play? Alternatively, is the change so profound that Caliban is now a different character? Does the poem have a deeper or different message about oppressed people than the play? Does the poem help you see the play in a fresh way? Support your analysis with evidence from both the play and the poem.”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s)/theme(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
The materials include multi-faceted culminating tasks that require students to show their knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated literacy skills. Each unit across the grade level includes an essential question connecting to a topic/theme. The units include Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning opportunities. Students build knowledge of the topic/theme under study by reading various texts, completing writing tasks, and engaging in speaking and listening with peers. The Whole-Class Learning Performance Task, Small-Group Learning Performance Task, and Performance-Based Assessments in each unit provide students with an opportunity to demonstrate comprehension and knowledge of the topic/theme through various means addressing several different standards. The Whole-Group Learning Performance Tasks assess writing, and the Small-Group Learning Performance Tasks assess speaking and listening skills. Throughout the unit, shorter culminating tasks following each reading also provide practice opportunities for multiple skills. Teachers can provide feedback to support students with mastery by the end of the unit. The Teacher Resources includes an Assessment section that provides online and PDF versions of selection tests, extension selection tests, unit tests, extension unit tests, and beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year tests. Each exam includes multiple choice and short answer questions testing various standards.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, each Introduction for the unit includes information about the Unit Goals, including goals for Reading, Writing, Research, Language, and Speaking and Listening. The Teacher’s Edition states, “These unit goals were backward designed from the Performance-Based Assessment at the end of the unit and the Whole-Class and Small Group Performance Tasks. Students will practice and become proficient in many more standards over the course of this unit.”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument after reading two selections, connecting to the essential question: “Do people need to belong?” The Teacher’s Edition includes guidance: “Explain to students that after they have finished reading the selections, they will write an argument about whether outsiders are simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood. To help them prepare, encourage students to think about the topic as they progress through the selections and as they participate in the Whole-Class Learning Experience.” When students engage in the writing task, they use their own experience, analysis of the text, and their understanding of the video to answer the question: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” The task addresses reading, writing, language, and speaking and listening standards.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver a multimedia presentation after reading selections connecting to the essential question, “What do our possessions reveal about us?” The Teacher’s Edition offers guidance: “Give groups time to read about and briefly discuss that the Small-Group readings explore how the human quest for material objects and wealth can make people both happy and miserable. After reading, groups will plan and deliver a multimedia presentation about these concepts. Encourage students to do some preliminary thinking about the types of media they may want to use. This may help focus their subsequent reading and group discussion.” When students complete the task, they draw on their learning from the selections to address the following question: “In what ways can material possessions create both a sense of comfort and a sense of anxiety?” The Performance Task addresses reading and speaking and listening standards.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe and view the photo essay “Fit for a King: Treasures of Tutankhamun” by Marie Arana. After reading “Civil Peace,” in the Writing to Sources activity, students write a character analysis on the main character, Jonathan, discussing the character’s motivations and how his traits helped him overcome obstacles. In the Performance Task, students write an informative essay based on the prompt: “What makes something valuable? What makes something a treasure?” Students must demonstrate an understanding of character motivation. Teachers check for understanding in the anchor text practice and provide feedback on pulling evidence from the text and providing explanations prior to the Performance Task. The tasks address reading and writing standards.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present an argument. Students work in small groups to create a talk show segment presenting an argument to answer the question, “Does forgiveness first require an apology?” Working in their small group, students analyze the three texts in the section to decide how the speaker in each one would answer the question. Next, they choose roles for the presentation and write the script. Once they have a script, groups complete a dry run of their talk show segment and receive feedback from a peer outside their group. Groups should then revise based on the feedback. Lastly, they present to the whole class. The task addresses reading, writing, and speaking and listening standards.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Performance-Based Assessment, students respond to a related prompt: “Is there a difference between seeing and knowing?” that connects to the Essential Question of the entire unit: “What does it mean to see?” Students complete an Evidence Log throughout the unit when reading selections to prepare for the Performance-Based Assessment, which is completed independently. The Teacher’s Edition provides the following guidance: “Prior to beginning the Assessment, ask students to think about a time they thought they saw something that on later reflection turned out not to have happened.” Students can refer to their previous work throughout the unit, including the Evidence Log and Word Network, as they write a nonfiction narrative. The task addresses writing standards and speaking and listening standards.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and include different types of writing tasks that connect with texts; however, well-designed guidance is lacking to help teachers implement and monitor student growth. The materials follow a consistent pattern in each unit that includes a variety of writing tasks. Argumentative, informative, and narrative writing activities are offered across the year in the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections of each unit. Students can practice for the writing Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments with the writing activities in the section and unit leading up to each task. Since units focus on a specific type of writing, the program is cyclical in building skills toward the performance task in each unit versus over the course of the year. The Teacher’s Edition includes some guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. There is limited information relating to a year-long writing plan. Mentor texts are provided for students to reference and learn techniques to apply in their own writing. Some guidance is provided for students as they practice and apply writing standards, mostly in reminders to teachers rather than explicit instruction and modeling. While all standards are tagged as a part of the instruction and tasks, a number of standards do not have explicit instruction; rather, students are told to address the skill indicated in the standard. While there are some interactive and minilessons available in the resources, the materials do not consistently outline where these resources may be helpful to teachers and students. Those resources that are available for students and teachers to access are generic resources that are not specific to each text, writing, task, or unit.
Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit provides a Launch Text to model the mode of writing that will be used in the Performance-Based Assessments. Throughout Whole-Class Learning, the teacher will “lead the shared reading experience, providing modeling and support, as students begin exploring perspectives on the unit topic.” Writing tasks connect with the texts students read. The Performance Task assists students in building toward proficiency with the Unit Performance-Based Assessment. Students draw on evidence, notes, and previous writing instruction during the Unit Performance-Based Assessment.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Unit Introduction, students read the argumentative Launch Text “Isn’t Everyone a Little Bit Weird?” (author not cited) and consider how the writer builds a case. The Teacher’s Edition states, “The Launch Text provides students with a common starting point to address the unit topic…Additionally, ‘Isn’t Everyone a Little Bit Weird?’ provides a writing model for the Performance-Based Assessment students complete at the end of the unit.” Students also reference the Model Argument when completing the Performance Task and writing an argument.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay to answer the prompt “What makes something valuable? What makes something a treasure?” Students complete process writing steps with support such as guiding questions and graphic organizers. To prepare for the writing task, students complete activities after each text. After students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe, students analyze elements of a fiction story to discover the theme, such as setting, character development, plot, and description, like the juxtaposition of two types of characters. In the Writing to Compare activity, student directions state: “Write a brief character analysis of Jonathan. In your analysis, identify Jonathan’s main character traits, including his strengths and weaknesses. Then, explain how these traits help Jonathan overcome obstacles.” Students are reminded to use details from the story to support the trait and how it helps Jonathan. The skills of identifying themes, analyzing character traits, and deciding how dialect impacts the story support the students in writing an informational essay using the short stories as sources in the Performance Task.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument based on the prompt, “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” Students complete process writing tasks of planning, drafting, writing, and a focused writing skill to improve writing, revising peer editing, and reflection. While the text provides the reflection prompt, there is little structure and interaction with the reflection. The Teacher’s Edition does not reference the reflection, and goal-setting activities included earlier in the unit or in previous units.
Instructional materials include some well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Writing and Research Center includes the following minilessons: Informative/Explanatory Writing, Narrative Writing, and Argumentative Writing. A minilesson relating to the Writing Process, Research Writing, Integrating Research Elements, Citing Sources, Sources and Evidence, EssayScorer Writing Prompts, and Writing and Research PowerPoint Presentations are accessible for teachers to assign and offer additional support.
The Professional Development Center offers the option to access Teacher Support videos, including but not limited to: “Become a Better Writer, Feedback, Sequencing Your Ideas, and Time Shifts in Your Writing.” A White Paper is also available entitled “New Perspectives in Building Readers and Writers” by Kelly Gallagher, M.Ed, with information to inform teachers, including but not limited to: “Teachers should be encouraged to write in front of their students, and to share their thinking as they work their way through the writing process. Modeling is also key in helping to sharpen students’ reading skills.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Avarice” by Yusef Komunyakaa, and write a “short story that answers a question left open by one of the poems.” The Student Edition provides three options for this writing task. Students work in small groups to plan this project, brainstorming ideas about setting and character, with the teacher providing a chart to help capture and organize notes. The Student Edition also includes details for the process of completing the writing task and includes specific directions for drafting and revising the text. Teacher directions state: “Explain to students that when writing a short story, it is best to plan the direction the story will take before beginning to write. Remind students that it is important to use these prewriting strategies to help draft the story and then to revise the story.” Students create an outline of the plot details prior to beginning to write.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Speaking and Listening practice task, students write a critique of an audio performance. Checklists and reminders are provided rather than explicit instruction for the task. The Teacher’s Edition includes a generic digital resource for the task. A chart is provided that outlines key elements of an audio performance and provides guiding questions, such as “Do the actors use their voices well?” Explicit examples of what is “good” and what is “bad” for the critique are not provided. Later in the Performance Task, students write a “nonfiction narrative about a time when one person’s self-perception was unclear or incomplete, but someone else saw him or her clearly.” Students participate in a collaborative Jump Start activity to generate thinking and develop ideas for the prompt. Teacher directions state: “Ask students to think about how Oedipus’s view of himself changed over the course of Oedipus the King.” Students discuss their ideas and take the thinking into the activity found in EssayScorer. This activity is followed by teacher-led work to review the Launch Text as a model. Students identify components of a successful nonfiction narrative found in the Launch Text and are provided with an annotated copy. The supplemental teacher support is provided by Kelly Gallagher, M.Ed, focusing on the drafting process. Teachers use the analogy of surfing to “reinforce the importance of drafting, of evaluating ideas to find the best ones.” In addition to these instructional materials, the Teacher’s Edition provides practice with adverbial clauses, organization, and subordinating conjunctions.
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
The materials include research and writing activities and projects that are sequenced and encourage students to develop knowledge and understand different aspects of a topic. Materials provide opportunities for students to complete research activities tied to topics as a part of the research process to build mastery of the grade-level standards. The language of the standards is present in the student materials and often referenced in the directions for assignments to allow students to make connections to their learning. Research is integrated throughout the curriculum in regular short research activities associated with specific texts. Students synthesize multiple texts and source materials to gain knowledge and understanding of the topic. Regular features in the after-reading activities are Research to Clarify and Research to Explore tasks that allow students to practice research skills related to the texts or topic. The final Performance Task in most units requires that students use knowledge from the selections and their research to answer the prompt. The Reflection task in each unit addresses student research goals and understanding. Materials support teachers in employing projects, including a research toolkit. Guidance is available in the Teacher’s Edition, connecting with the topics and suggesting ways to assist students during the research process. Additional resources are available for teachers in the Research and Writing Center, including mini-lessons and a research PowerPoint.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Encountering the Other: The Challenge for the 21st Century” by Ryszard Kapuscinski. In the Making Meaning section, students research an unfamiliar detail from the text and consider how it adds to their understanding of the lecture: “Choose something that interested you from the text and formulate a research question.” They research to explore other topics related to those addresses in the text. In the Effective Expression section, student instructions state: “Research, write, and deliver a digital presentation about one of the cultures Kapuscinski mentions in the lecture.” Students have the option to create a timeline with illustrations, a slide show, or a video for this task.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay in which they conduct research around the question: “What can one person do to defend the human rights of all people?” Students use several sources for the short research project, such as “primary and secondary sources in print or online. You can conduct original research as well, through surveys or personal interviews.” Students Gather Evidence and Connect Across Texts: “Take notes as you find and connect relevant information from multiple sources, and keep a reference list of every source you use. Create a notecard that includes each source’s author, title, publisher, city, and date of publication, along with the fact or idea you discovered.” As students are drafting, the materials remind them to “keep track of [their] sources and include appropriate citations to avoid plagiarism or the presentation of another’s work as [their] own.” A chart is available to assist students in tracking information.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Resources, a Plagiarism Checker is provided for teachers to access via Safe Assign, which offers guidance for implementation, including Video Tutorials: “SafeAssign is effective as both a deterrent and an educational tool. Use SafeAssign to review assignment submissions for originality and create opportunities to help students identify how to properly attribute sources rather than paraphrase.” The tool will assist educators when assigning research projects and connects to W.10.8 when students avoid plagiarism.
The materials offer Research Minilessons and a Writing and Research Center with a Research Writing PowerPoint Presentation that introduces research writing and provides prewriting tips to assist students in formulating a research question and making a Research Plan, such as “Once you have written your major research question, you are ready to make a research plan. As part of your plan, you will create a timeline for finishing your report. You also will find and evaluate sources of information.” The PowerPoint Presentation includes guidance relating to how to organize a research report and revise and edit the draft. A grammar mini-lesson follows, and student instructions for publishing the piece state: “When you’ve finished your final draft, publish it. Use this chart to identify a way to publish your informational research report for the appropriate audience.” The Teacher’s Edition: End Matter, Tool Kit: Research includes detailed guidance for Conducting Research, Reviewing Research Findings, and Incorporating Research Into Writing.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from How to Tell You’re Reading a Gothic Novel—In Pictures by Adam Frost and Zhenia Vasiliev. Teachers facilitate the Comprehension Check, and guidance is available to assist students during Research to Clarify and Research to Explore: “If students struggle to come up with a detail to research, suggest they focus on one of the following topics: Gothic origins or eighteenth-century literature.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness” by Marie Arana. In the Making Meaning section, students research unfamiliar details and a topic they find interesting. Suggestions are provided. The teacher is directed to assist students who struggle to find a topic by making additional suggestions. There are options available to teachers to alter the assignment to assist with understanding and success. As students use a chart to organize their thinking and keep track of sources, teacher suggestions state: “Model for students, or remind them that search terms that are too general will produce results that are too broad.”
Materials provide many opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, students read “Why Do Some Brains Enjoy Fear?” by Allegra Ringo. In the after-reading Research activity, the small group conducts research into “cultural dimensions of the ways in which people experience and express fear.” The Teacher’s Edition reminds teachers to check that students are using reliable sources in their research. Teachers can use the ancillary Research: Group Presentation handout to support students in this project.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu, and students research when creating a multimedia presentation in which they “incorporate texts, images, and, if possible, audio or video to express and support your ideas.” Students can choose from three options for the research project, such as “Create an informational slideshow that explains the conditions of life for both blacks and whites under apartheid in South Africa: What rights did each group have under apartheid? How did each group view the system?”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller and conduct research to clarify unfamiliar details in the text and answer the question, “What way does the information you learned shed light on an aspect of the letter?” In the Research section of Effective Expression, students also work with a small group to “research, prepare, and deliver a group presentation on one of three possible projects.” The projects include a photo essay with designated criteria, a digital presentation explaining an allusion in the text, and a radio interview based on the text.
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Performance-Based Assessment, the prompt states: “Write an argumentative essay in which you state and defend a claim about the following question: Is the experience of being an outsider universal? Use credible evidence from at least three of the selections you read and researched in this unit.” Students must consider possible counterclaims. The rubric assesses the standard directly.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Performance-Based Assessment, Part 1, students write an informative essay. The instructions state: “Develop the topic with facts, details, quotations, examples, and other evidence from at least three of the selections you read. Select the most relevant ideas about fundamental human freedoms and democracy from the texts, and organize these ideas logically using appropriate and varied transitions.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument essay answering the question, “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” During the prewriting/planning step, students’ instructions state: “You can also do a limited amount of research to find ideas and quotations from credible sources that support your ideas. Keep your purpose in mind, as well as the background of your intended audience, while selecting source materials and forming your argument.” During the drafting step, students review how to correctly incorporate direct quotes and paraphrases.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards; however, not all instruction is aligned to grade-level standards with opportunities for explicit instruction. By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard.
The materials provide a suggested implementation schedule and alternative implementation schedule that aligns with core learning objectives. The pacing for the units is reasonable and offers a systematic layout that allows multiple days for reading the texts and completing after-reading activities and a one-day Independent Learning choice text with more limited after-reading activities.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments. Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions, tasks, and assessments are aligned to grade-level standards; however, not all instruction is aligned to grade-level standards with opportunities for explicit instruction. By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Most speaking and listening standards and most writing standards are covered in the Frontmatter of the Teacher’s Edition, but the student tasks do not always adequately address the full intent of the standard.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, the Unit at a Glance section lists the standards for each student activity in one of three columns: Analyze Craft and Structure, Conventions/Author’s Style, and Composition/Research/Speaking and Listening. Page numbers are not listed next to these entries, though the Teacher’s Edition: End Matter PDF includes an Index of Skills where page numbers are provided. In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter PDF, the materials provide the Correlation to myPerspectives® English Language Arts document with page numbers: “The following correlation shows points at which focused standards instruction is provided in the Student Edition. The Teacher’s Edition provides further opportunity to address standards through Personalize for Learning notes and additional resources available only in the Teacher’s Edition.” The materials do not always provide explicit instruction on the grade-level standards.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt. In the Analyze Craft and Structure section, instruction is provided on making persuasive appeals in a seminal U.S. document which is aligned to two standards, RI.9-10.8 “Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning” and RI.9-10.9 “Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance including how they address related themes and concepts.” Students read about the three types of appeals and how Roosevelt used them in his speech and answer the following questions:
“Review paragraphs 2–10, and identify closely related words and phrases that Roosevelt repeats.
Does this use of repetition represent an appeal to logic, to emotions, to his own authority, or to a combination of these? Explain. Use the chart to link Roosevelt’s reasoning to his central idea. First, identify the central idea of the speech. Then, give three examples of appeals to logic in the speech, and note how each example shapes or refines the central idea.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe; students address the standard RL.9-10.1: “Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.” The Correlation document states, “Students will address this standard in Analyze the Text features which appear with every literature selection.” Students complete Analyze the Text questions, such as: “Infer: After the robbery, Jonathan says, ‘Or is it greater than other things that went with the war?’ To what is he referring? Explain.” The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance: “If students fail to cite evidence, then remind them to support their ideas with specific information. If students struggle to find similarities in the events of the story, then remind them of the foreshadowing at the beginning of the story. How does the bicycle relate to Jonathan’s loss?” There are six instances across the school year when the students have an opportunity to address the standard, and teachers can provide explicit instruction.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative. During revision, a checklist is available: Focus and Organization, Development of Ideas/Elaboration, and Conventions. One of the items to check includes “Consult a dictionary to check correct spelling and meaning.” As students complete Editing and Proofreading, instructions state: “Read your draft carefully, looking for errors in spelling and punctuation.” The Teacher’s Materials include guidance: “As students proofread, they should check for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Remind them that they should not rely on word processing programs to find all mistakes, as they can sometimes miss some errors. For example, spell checkers will not recognize that the wrong form of a homonym was used. They should also be aware that it’s easy to misspell names of people and places.” Explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards is limited.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, a Whole-Class Learning Performance Task with a writing focus and a Small-Group Learning Performance Task with a speaking and listening focus is included consistently across the school year. Shorter tasks follow the reading of text selections. The questions throughout the Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning connect to the Essential Question of each unit and help prepare students to complete the performance tasks.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. In the Conventions activity, students learn about prepositional phrases and then complete two practice activities: “Mark all of the prepositional phrases in each sentence. Then, label each preposition and its object. Reread paragraph 24 of the story. Mark the prepositional phrases, and tell how these phrases help to clarify the action.” Tasks are aligned to L.9-10.1.b: “Use various types of phrases (noun, verb, adjectival, adverbial, participial,
prepositional, absolute) and clauses (independent, dependent; noun,
relative, adverbial) to convey specific meanings and add variety and interest
to writing or presentations.”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument, aligning with standard W.9-10.1: “Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or text, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.” The prompt states: “After reading Kafka’s ‘The Metamorphosis’ and watching the video, you will write an argument on the topic of outsiders and outcasts.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Blind” by Fatima Naoot, translated by Kees Nijland. In the Speaking and Listening activity, students work in their groups to create and deliver an oral presentation. Student instructions state: “While other groups are performing their presentations, pay close attention to the ideas expressed. Evaluate the use of evidence, and ask follow-up questions to clarify the speakers’ reasoning. Carry out a final classroom discussion in which you discuss the group presentations. Make sure that all group members get a chance to voice their views.” Delivering the presentation and providing a peer evaluation are aligned with SL.9-10.4 and SL.9-10.3, respectively.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, a Performance-Based Assessment is included, and the unit activities are backward-designed to the Performance-Based Assessment. The materials offer Selection Tests, Extension Selections Tests, Unit Tests, Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests, Next Generation Practice Tests, Next Generation Performance Tasks, and Customizable Test Prep Banks. In the online Teacher’s Materials under Assessment, there is an Interpretation Guide for each Unit Test and an Answer Key for each Selection Test, which indicates the standard that is assessed for each question. All questions on all tests are aligned to one or more standards.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, the Test Interpretation Guide in the Analyze Text and Structure section states that there are six questions that evaluate RI.9-10.6, two questions that evaluate RL.9-10.6, and four questions that evaluate other standards.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an informative essay that aligns with standard W.9-10.10: “Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.” Students respond to the following prompt: “Could a person be happy if he or she possessed only what was absolutely necessary to live and nothing more?” The prompt connects to the Essential Question of the unit: “What do our possessions reveal about us?”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Assessments, Unit 6 Test, students complete a Selected and Short Response, analyzing craft and structure. Students answer questions such as “Which of these aspects of the scene is a defining characteristic of Greek tragedy?”
By the end of the academic year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter PDF are available. The Standards Correlation document provides the Standard in the first column, and where those standards appear in the Print and Interactive Editions in the second column with corresponding page numbers. At times, the materials address standards multiple times across a school year to ensure students can reach mastery. For example, standard SL.9-10.4 is addressed in the following texts: “How to Tell You’re Reading a Graphic Novel—In Pictures, 56; Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis, 189; Sonnet, With Bird/Elliptical/Fences, 222; Revenge of the Geeks, 231; Freedom of the Press Report 2015, 349; The Necklace, 386; Civil Peace, 400; In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness, 429; The Tempest, 571; Blind/The Blind Seer of Ambon/On His Blindness, 757; The Neglected Senses, 801.” The following Small Group Performance Tasks: “Unit 1,114–115; Unit 2, 246–247; Unit 3, 350–351, Unit 4, 480–481, Unit 5, 644, Unit 6, 802. The following Performance-Based Assessments: Unit 1, 124; Unit 2, 257; Unit 3, 360; Unit 4, 490; Unit 5, 654.” However, there are instances when specific standards appear rarely or are not addressed fully to ensure sufficient opportunities to practice and reach mastery by the end of the year. For example, the standard W.9-10.7 is in the following texts: “Why Do Some Brains Enjoy Fear? 98; Whole Class Performance Task, Unit 3: 298; Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive, 643; View From the Empire State Building, 745. Standard RI.9-10.5 has limited opportunities in two texts: Encountering the Other, 242; In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness, 428.”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, and address standard RL.9-10.5: “Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, flashbacks) create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise.” In the Analyze Craft and Structure task, students answer questions, such as
“Compare and Contrast Describe how Gregor’s insect-like body changes from the opening of the story to the ending.
Interpret: How do these physical changes reflect Greogor’s evolving emotional state?”
The Standards Correlation document lists over twenty opportunities to address the standard across the grade level with a variety of texts.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.
The materials provide a suggested implementation schedule and alternative implementation schedule that aligns with core learning and objectives. The pacing for the units is reasonable and offers a systematic layout that allows multiple days for reading the texts and completing after-reading activities and a one-day Independent Learning choice text with more limited after-reading activities. Each unit is planned for 30 days in a 40-50 minute class resulting in 180 class periods of instruction but does not provide a cushion for optional activities, enrichment, or re-teaching for English Language Learners, special education students, or underperforming students. Teachers on a block schedule are guided to combine days to fit the length of their classes. The Pacing Guide appears in the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter. It consistently appears in the Unit Introduction, the Whole-Class Learning Overview, the Small-Group Learning Overview, and the Independent Learning Overview. The pacing allows students an opportunity to master content by the end of the year. The suggested implementation schedules can be completed in the time allotted; however, teacher discretion may be required to determine what materials to include considering the testing requirements of individual districts and states. Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. The optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. The Teacher’s Edition provides several options in the Hook & Inspire section to draw students into texts through visual representations, connections to ideas outside of the literature, extension activities, and Book Talk ideas. The Pacing Guide also offers suggestions when teaching with trade books, including being advised to look at the standards being taught in the unit or the texts being replaced and choose activities and tests from the trade book lesson plans which teach the same standards. Trade books align with the main topic and Essential Question. They do not distract from the primary focus of the unit and can be used in lieu of the provided texts.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials provide guidance when integrating trade books with the program. The trade books can be chosen to supplement a unit: “Form literature circles and have the students read one of the trade books throughout the course of the unit as a supplement to the selections and activities.” The trade books can be chosen to substitute for unit selections: “If you replace unit selections with a trade book, review the standards taught with those selections. Teacher Resources that provide practice with all standards are available.” The trade books can be chosen to extend independent learning: “Extend the unit by replacing independent reading selections with one of these trade books.”
Suggested implementation schedules can be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argumentative essay. The unit plan gives two days for the students to complete the essay for the prompt, “Are outsiders simply those who are misunderstood or misjudged?” Over two days, students complete a typical writing process from prewriting to editing, revising, submitting essays, and reflecting on their learning.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, the Teacher’s Edition provides guidance: “Each day in this pacing calendar represents a 40–50 minute class period. Teachers using block scheduling may combine days to reflect their class schedule. In addition, teachers may revise pacing to differentiate and support core instruction by integrating components and resources as students require.” The pacing calendar uses a 30-day schedule that includes one day to introduce the unit, one day to introduce Whole-Class Learning, 11 days of Whole-Class Learning, two days of Performance Task for Whole-Class Learning, one day to introduce Small-Group Learning, nine days of Small-Group Learning, one day for the Performance Task for Small-Group Learning, one day to introduce Independent Learning, one day of Independent Learning, and two days for the final Performance Task. Students read three texts in Whole-Group learning, five texts in Small-Group Learning, and choose one of five texts for Independent Learning. The Teacher’s Edition front matter includes an implementation guide for The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Great Expectations by Charles Dickens, and Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson. The Frontmatter explains how to implement the novels in place of the entire unit, parts of the unit, or as an independent, additional unit. The same structure and guidance are used for each unit across the grade level. There are six units, and each unit covers a period of 30 instructional days, for a total of 180 days, which is the minimum requirement for an average U.S. school year.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Blind” by Fatima Naoot, translated by Kees Nijland. The pacing guide allows two days for reading the collection consisting of three short poems with one set of after-reading activities. The after-reading activities include six Comprehension questions, one short research activity, three questions in Analyze the Text, a discussion question for the Concept Vocabulary, two questions for Word Study, an activity with four questions in Analyze Craft and Structure, two questions in Author’s Style, and a group oral presentation for Speaking and Listening.
Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read the “Inaugural Address” by John F. Kennedy. The materials provide Extension Questions that can be used in lieu of the other comprehension questions after students complete a first read, such as the following: “Explain what the text says explicitly. In paragraph 3 of ‘Inaugural Address,’ what does President Kennedy suggest about the world he and his audience are living in? Cite textual evidence to support your answer.” The grade-level standards are listed with the sets of questions.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, translated by Andrew MacAndrew. In the Teacher’s Edition, a Write Now box, Analyze and Interpret, states: “The narrator’s description of Mathilde makes her character come alive. Based on what they know of her personality and reactions to the events that have already taken place, have students write a one-page description of how they believe Mathilde will react to Madame Forestier’s revelation that the necklace was not made of real diamonds. Remind students to include details about how the character might feel as well as what she might say or do.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Teacher’s Edition, a box, How Language Works, focuses on ellipses. It suggests that if students are struggling to read the lines that include ellipses to explain the origin of the word is the Greek word élleipsis, which means omission. Teachers can explain that, in this case, the omission is to indicate there might be more to the idea and the speaker paused or hesitated.
Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston. In the Teacher’s Edition, a Write Now box, Express and Reflect, includes an activity on interior monologues: “The description of Gregor’s interaction with his sister (paragraph 49) and his new food preferences creates a vivid picture of the ways in which Gregor’s life has drastically changed. Have students write a short interior monologue that expresses their observations and how they might feel if placed in Gregor’s situation. Encourage them to include details that reveal Gregor’s feelings about these things rather than just explaining what happened.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance relating to adding an optional research activity: “Instruct students to research another important figure in the anti-apartheid movement. Encourage them to learn more about this portion of history and ask themselves who the main contributors were to bringing peace to South Africa. Have students write a short summary describing the ways in which the person they researched fits into the history of apartheid and explain why he or she was important.” The optional task enhances learning and is personalized to challenge students as they build knowledge relating to the topic of study.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The materials meet the expectations for usability. The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. In addition, the materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies.
There is a clear assessment system that provides multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. The standards assessed in each assessment are indicated, and the materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills.
The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. They regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level and strategies for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content.
The program includes a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included.
The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. The visual design in both the print and digital editions supports student learning and makes the organizational structure clear.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance, correlation information to the ELA standards, information for students and families to support learning, and a list of supplemental resources in order to support the teacher with instruction. In addition, the materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist the teacher in presenting the materials. The Teacher Resources provide a Unit at a Glance for each unit, providing information on implementing the materials and an expected pacing guide. Unit Goals and Academic vocabulary are listed at the beginning of each unit. The teacher wrap provides learning goals for each unit, suggestions to implement and model parts of the curriculum, and possible student responses. The Getting Started section provides overviews of the program’s structure for the teacher in either video or PDF format.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Resources section, a Unit at a Glance is provided for each unit that includes a list of texts used for whole group, small group, and independent learning, with Lexile and genres. The pacing for each component in the unit and the performance task are included.
In the Getting Started section, a Program Overview is provided that includes videos and documents that provide a program overview and information on the student-centered unit structure, program components, digital resources, and program assessments.
In the Teacher’s Edition, the Table of Contents and Frontmatter provide teacher details on all the unit components and how to use the materials.
In the Introduction page of each unit, a Pacing Plan is provided to show how many days to focus on whole group texts, small group learning, and performance tasks.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, the Unit Goals are listed in the Introduction section of each unit. Reading Goals, Writing and Research Goals, Language Goals, and Speaking and Listening Goals are listed.
In the Teacher’s Edition, academic vocabulary is listed at the beginning of each unit. Directions on how to incorporate the vocabulary, as well as possible student responses, are provided.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole Group Learning, the materials provide information on how to launch the text in the teacher wrap: “Have students pay attention to the author’s use of descriptive language. They should note the elements of Gothic literature that the author mentions, such as vivid descriptions that evoke feeling and that place the reader in the narrative.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials provide adult-level explanations and examples for the teacher. The Planning section before each text gives rationales for text quality and connections to the Essential Question and the culminating Performance Tasks. The Professional Development Center online includes videos on various topics. The Teacher’s Edition provides notes in the margins that explain grade-level and outside-grade-level concepts and strategies. Support materials are found in the digital platform and in the front and end matter of the Teacher’s Edition that provides information on subjects such as English Language Learning, grammar terms, and close reading steps.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Center, teacher support videos are provided on topics such as assessment, differentiation, engagement, text complexity, and vocabulary. Within each topic, there are a variety of videos. For example, under Engagement, a teacher support video discusses Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education.
In the Unit Introduction for each unit, academic vocabulary from the unit is included with an explanation for use: “Complete pronunciations, parts of speech, and definitions are provided for you. Students are only expected to provide the definition.” The word, part of speech, pronunciation, meaning, and related words are all listed in the margin.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole Group Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston. The Teacher’s Edition states the following regarding Analyzing Craft and Structure: “Discuss with students why an author might choose to utilize the techniques of ambiguity and inclusion of fantastic dreamlike elements in writing a story. Have them think about how intentionally leaving certain facts unexplained or details hazy adds to the drama of the story.”
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. In the Teacher’s Edition, Reading Support, Decide and Plan, Challenge, the following suggestion is provided: “For students that grasp the symbolic nature of the author’s work, have them identify several symbolic elements, for example, the fungus on the decaying mansion representing the sickness of the Usher Family.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read the Historical Context of The Tempest. The Teacher’s Edition states additional information regarding The Renaissance: “It was during the Renaissance that astronomers Copernicus and Galileo questioned long-held beliefs to prove that the world was round and that it circled the sun.”
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials provide correlation information for the ELA standards throughout the units. The Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter contains a correlation chart for each grade that lists the standards for literature, informational text, writing, speaking and listening, and language and where the standards are addressed in each unit. Standards are labeled throughout the Teacher’s Edition in multiple places. The Unit at a Glance shows the standards addressed throughout each unit. The Planning and Personalize for Learning pages preceding each text list standards for each lesson and suggest scaffolds and extensions. The Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle lists instructional standards addressed with each text and a flow chart on how to teach and assess the standards. The editable Unit Planning Guide displays standards day by day. Standards are included without numbers in the Student Edition, with each text and activity at the bottom of the page.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Frontmatter, a correlation chart lists the standards for literature, informational text, writing, speaking and listening, and language. Standards are listed by number and written out. The location of where those standards are addressed in the print and online editions is stated on the chart.
In the Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, the standards are included for each text, along with an explanation of how to support students in reaching the standards. The chart provides information on how to decide and plan, teach, analyze and revise, and identify needs. The chart also shows the standards addressed for the current grade level and how to help students with a “catching up” section and a “looking forward” section.
In the Unit at a Glance, standards are addressed throughout the sections of the unit. For example, Whole-Class Learning shows Vocabulary/Word Study, Analyze Craft and Structure, Conventions/Author’s Style, and Composition/Research/Speaking and Listening. The materials list the standards for each component on the chart.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit Planning Guide, Getting Started, a downloadable Word document is available online that lays out lessons and activities in a grid format, day by day for the entire year, with standards for each day listed. These tags match the Teacher’s Edition correlations.
In the Planning: Lesson Resources, the list of texts includes the associated standards for each lesson (Making Meaning, Language Development, and/or Effective Expression).
In the Program Level Resources, the First Read Guide: Generic and the Close-Read Guide state: “Anchor Reading Standard 10: Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.” These guides are meant for student use.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials provide information for students and families to support learning. Students interact with the Unit Introduction activities at the beginning of each unit to understand the Essential Question, Unit Goals, and Academic Vocabulary. A downloadable Home Connection letter is available to inform parents and caregivers about the program in both English and Spanish.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit includes a Home Connection letter that briefly explains the unit’s theme; the Essential Question; all texts, authors, and genres; performance tasks and performance-based assessments; and the standards addressed in the unit. The letter also includes a Talk it Over With Your Student section that includes questions parents/guardians can ask their student about the Essential Question, texts they can read together, and the texts students are reading at school.
In the Program Overview, the document, Distance Learning Tips for Parents/Guardians, is included, which provides helpful tips, such as designating a learning space, establishing a daily routine, and setting clear learning expectations.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, the Home Connection letter includes questions for parents/guardians to ask students: “What are some ways you could answer the question Do people need to belong? Why do you think stories about outsiders and outcasts are so popular in the media and in books and film?”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials include explanations of the instructional approaches and include and reference research-based strategies. The Getting Started section provides information regarding research-based strategies and practices. The Professional Development Center provides videos and White Papers with experts discussing the importance of various components of the program and research-based practices. The videos include assessment, differentiations, engagement, text complexity, and vocabulary. The Student Resource section includes many research-based practices, such as worksheets or graphic organizers.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, Welcome!, page T3, teachers are presented with the instructional approaches that will connect various texts throughout units: “myPerspectives is a student-centered English Language Arts program that embraces culturally responsive learning through diverse representation of literature, authors, characters, cultures, and themes.” Students are encouraged, based on the approach of the “polyvocal classroom” to “[b]ring knowledge from their different backgrounds and cultures to enrich critical literacy in the classroom” and “[p]erform research in response to a prompt or task of their choosing and complete project-based tasks in a format of their choosing.”
In the Getting Started, Student-Centered Unit Structure, Collins and O’Brien are referenced as experts: “When student-centered learning opportunities are implemented properly, students experience a multitude of positive outcomes including increased motivation, deeper retention of knowledge, greater understanding, and improved attitudes towards the subject being taught.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Getting Started section includes a program overview with information regarding student-centered unit instruction, backward design, and Performance-Based Assessments.
In the Professional Development Center, Differentiation, White Papers, “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners” by Jim Cummins and “Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction: The Central Role of Literacy Engagement" by Jim Cummins. Cummins includes several research-based strategies with a list of references. White papers are also included in Vocabulary, Writing, and Text Complexity, written by experts in the field about research-based strategies in each of the three areas, with references listed at the end of each.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Table of Contents and Frontmatter, Welcome!, Experts’ Perspective, research-based strategies are introduced: “myPerspectives is informed by a team of respected experts…[o]ur authors bring new ideas, innovations, and strategies that transform teaching.” For example, expert Jim Cummins, Ph.D., is quoted: “Research focuses on literacy development in school contexts characterized by cultural and linguistic diversity.” At the unit level, specific strategies such as goal-setting and vocabulary practices are referenced and explained.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Isn’t Everyone a Little Bit Weird” in the introduction. In the Teacher’s Edition, a text box provides a suggestion and an example on word networks from Elfrieda Hiebert, Ph.D.: “Vocabulary word networks enable students to learn a large number of words related to a particular concept. Using a word network helps to draw students’ attention to worlds and helps students understand the essential attributes, qualities, or characteristics of a word’s meaning.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest, Act I,by William Shakespeare. In the Teacher’s Edition, a text box provides a suggestion on reading reasons from Kelly Gallagher, M.Ed.: “Building reading motivation is complex, as there isn’t a single correct motivational tool, but together many of these techniques send the message that reading is rewarding.” Four suggestions are provided to help motivate student reading.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The materials provide a list of supplemental resources to accompany each text needed to support instruction. The Planning: Lesson Resources page in the Teacher’s Edition before each text lists related Student Resources and Teacher Resources, including optional extra support, extension, or accommodations for the lessons. These same resources are listed in the context in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition and online. Symbols are next to each resource to specify if they are an audio resource, video, document, annotation highlight, or online assessment.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition, Lesson Resources are listed at the beginning of each lesson, which includes both Student Resources and Teacher Resources. Examples of Student Resources include selection audio, word network, and evidence log, which are “available online in the interactive Student Edition or Unit Resources.” Examples of Teacher Resources include Selection Resources, Reteach/Practice, Assessment, My Resources, annotation highlights, accessible leveled text, concept vocabulary, and word study, which are “available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.”
In the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, suggested trade books are listed. The title and author of the text are listed. Trade book lesson plans are available online at myPerspectives+.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Current Perspectives, news stories, and interesting media are listed. The materials list the name of the media and where it can be found.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The materials provide a clear assessment system that provides multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. Teachers can monitor learning and interpret student performance in various assessments as students work toward the culminating tasks, such as unit tests, selection tests, performance-based tasks, and writing tasks. The assessments include a variety of modalities and types across the year and opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge of the grade-level reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards. The standards assessed in each assessment are indicated. In addition, the materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials identify the standards addressed with each assessment. Assessments are listed throughout the materials in multiple locations. Performance-based tasks and assessments, with their related standards, are listed in the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition, Unit At A Glance. Standards for activities, tasks, and assessments in each unit correlate directly to the Performance Task as well as the End Of Unit Performance Based Assessment and Unit Test. The online materials include an Assessment tab, which lists all the assessments used throughout the materials. The reading test associated with each text includes an answer key that includes the objective and standard for each question. In the unit tests, the student view shows the assessed skills with each question.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The online Assessment tab lists the standards for the Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests. The standards, listed on the top of the page, are hyperlinked so that a separate text box opens when clicked on. This text box lists the standards addressed in the standards.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Performance-Based Assessment, Part 1, Writing to Sources: Explanatory Essay, students respond to the prompt: “Write an explanatory essay on the following topic: In what ways does transformation play a role in stories meant to scare us?” The materials list writing standards assessed, including, but not limited to, “Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.”
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials provide multiple assessment opportunities to determine students’ learning. Teachers can monitor learning and interpret student performance with various assessments as they work toward the culminating tasks, such as unit tests, selection tests, performance-based tasks, and writing tasks. Support materials include rubrics, answer keys, comprehension questions, graphic organizers, and class discussions. Opportunities for teachers to provide feedback, both formal and informal, are available throughout units, such as discussion, research based on self-selected texts, and evidence logs. Each unit test contains an interpretation guide that lists the standards, depth of knowledge, and remediation options. Skills practice pages and standard support are included. The Common Core Companion Workbook provides extra practice based on Common Core State Standards. Sufficient guidance and suggestions are included to help teachers follow up with students.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments include Selected and Short Response, Performance Tasks, Unit Tests, Selection Tests, Extension Selection Tests, and Beginning-, Middle-, and End-of-Year Tests.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Teacher Support, and Practice link, teachers have access to answer keys, writing rubrics, and graphic organizers to interpret student success. Also, each Unit Test Answer Key provides answers for the teacher. The short response answers state the important information for students to include in their answers. Writing rubrics are provided using a four-point scale. Rubrics include, but are not limited to, Generic (Holistic) Writing, Multimedia Reports, Poems, Informative/Explanatory Writing, and Narrative Evaluation Charts.
In each unit, Quickwrite activities provide opportunities to assess writing skills and student understanding in response to a prompt.
In each unit, Analyze the Text activities offer opportunities for students to demonstrate overall text comprehension. The tasks require students to cite textual evidence as they respond to specific text-based questions.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, goals offer pre- and post-informal assessment of student improvement as students revisit their goals toward the end of the unit.
In each unit, students answer Comprehension Check questions that show students’ understanding of the texts and complete Research to Clarify activities to learn more about a specific detail from the text and respond. Students complete Prepare to Share activities where they share ideas with peers about their self-selected text as part of the Independent Learning task.
In each Unit Test, the Interpretation Guide provides information on remediation resources: “As warranted by student results on this assessment, you may wish to assign the remediation resources indicated in the chart. Resources include skills practice and extended standards support, and you can choose to use whichever resource is appropriate for your students.” The Interpretation Guide includes the objective instructional standards, depth of knowledge, skills practice pages, and standard support.
The Common Core Companion Workbook provides explanations, examples, and academic vocabulary, related to the Common Core Standards. Practice worksheets are included in the Workbook.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials include assessments that provide a variety of modalities and types across the year. The assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge of the grade-level reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards. Within a unit, students complete formative comprehension and skill checks, synthesize their learning through writing and speaking performance tasks, revising, editing, and presenting their work.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Beginning-of-Year and Mid-Year benchmark tests are used to assess most grade-level reading and language standards.
Formative Assessments include Evidence Logs, Selection Tests, Comprehension Checks, and Unit Reflections.
According to the Standards Correlation chart in the Teacher’s Edition Frontmatter, both Writing, and Speaking and Listening standards are formally assessed through a Performance Task or Performance-Based Assessments.
Students complete a Performance Task: Writing Focus after reading all Whole-Class Learning texts. After all Small-Group Learning texts, they complete a Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus. After all the texts in a unit are read, students complete a final two-part Writing, and Speaking and Listening Performance-Based Assessment.
Following the Performance-Based Assessment, teachers administer the Unit Test, Selected Response, and Performance Task “to apply standards and skills taught in the unit to a fresh, cold-read passage.”
At the end of each unit, students take the Unit Test. In the test's Selected and Short Response part, students answer multiple-choice questions about new passages and perform a writing task.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials offer accommodations for assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills; however, a clear, comprehensive list of possible accommodations is not provided for the teacher. In the Assessment tab, the assessments have a brief overview to explain each option. The Interactive Student Edition includes a link to the performance task. While the Academic Vocabulary section will read the vocabulary and definitions to the student, no clear text-to-speech accommodations are included in the materials. Different types of assessments are provided, and most of them are available online, as a PDF, or in a print version. When printed, assessments download into Microsoft Word. The print can be enlarged by zooming on a computer screen, placing texts in Microsoft Word, or enlarging or changing the font. In the PDF version, students may mark and annotate the text with the tools provided.
Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Many of the assessments can be downloaded into Microsoft Word in order to print. For example, Selection Tests, Extension Selection Tests, Unit Tests, and other beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year tests are available for download with printing as an option. Teachers may increase the size of the font for the students before printing the test. Next-Generation Practice Tests and Next-Generation Performance Tasks can be completed online.
Some assessments refer directly to previously-read texts. In those assessments, audio versions of the texts are available in the Interactive Student Edition.
Customizable test prep banks are available for reading, language, editing, and writing. Teachers may choose to use questions from a provided multiple-test bank from each section.
In the Interactive Student Edition, students click on a link to the Performance-Based Assessment for each unit. Students can zoom in and out using their mouse or fingers. Students can also open and print rubrics for different tasks.
Examview is available for teachers to set up on computers, allowing them to create their own assessments. Teachers can modify or adapt assessments for students who struggle.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments can be assigned online, as a PDF, or printed. The materials provide information for each option for the teacher. For example, the PDF version states: “PDF format allows students to use the Interactive PDF Tool to annotate and complete the assignment.”
In the Getting Started section, a video and accompanying handout (Customize Worksheet and Assessments) are provided with step-by-step directions to customize assessments: “Now, let’s look at the flexible and customizable assessments. You can administer the assessments in print and online via Savvas Realize. All assessments are in editable Microsoft® Word format as well as in ExamView and Realize TestNav for even more customization options. You can also create assessments from scratch to meet your needs.”
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. They regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level and strategies for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. The program includes varied approaches to learning tasks over time and a variety of ways that students are expected to demonstrate their understanding. There is guidance for grouping students in a variety of ways across each unit. Units follow the structure of Whole-Class Learning, with some informal peer groupings, Small-Group Learning entirely focused on collaborative work, and Independent Learning, which concludes with a “Learn From Your Classmates” discussion.
The materials include a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included. In addition, there is some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students’ home language to facilitate learning and guidance for teachers to facilitate learning and content that support linguistically and culturally diverse students.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials include strategies, supports, and resources for diverse learners to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level expectations. Program-level resources explain best practices for scaffolding and differentiating access to literacy learning. Text-specific suggestions provide educators with support for addressing needs before, during, and after reading the text. Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning boxes are found in the margins. At the beginning of each unit, the Personalize for Learning section provides the text complexity rubric and a Decide and Plan flowchart. The flowchart includes Strategic Support that offers strategies for all students, including special populations. The materials also provide support guidance according to students’ performance on formative assessments. This may include other resources provided in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Performance Task: Write an Argument, students prewrite for an argumentative essay. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, Strategic Support provides guidance for students who struggle with counterclaims: “Some students may have difficulty thinking of counterarguments. Pair students and encourage them to discuss the questions and brainstorm potential counterclaims. Explain that sometimes it helps to talk about a topic with someone else since it stimulates the brain. Have students take notes as they’re talking, writing down all the counterclaims they think of. Encourage them to note any counterclaims they find particularly compelling so they can make sure they address these in their arguments.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, translated by Andrew MacAndrew. The Teacher’s Edition provides a Personalize For Learning section that includes the text complexity rubric and a “decide and plan” chart. The Strategic Support box contains knowledge demands and language. The Knowledge Demands states, “Use the background information to discuss the selection. Determine students’ prior knowledge and experience with the desire for wealth and the need to ‘save face’ or maintain pride in an embarrassing situation.” Under Language, the materials state, “If students have difficulty with complex sentences, work together to break down sentences into smaller chunks in order to understand their meaning. Ask students to highlight words or phrases that they don’t understand. As a group, work to define some of the terms they find difficult.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller. The Teacher’s Edition includes a guide for formative assessment in the margins that states, “If students struggle to read the text, then provide the View from the Empire State Building: Text Questions available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources.”
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials regularly provide opportunities to extend and deepen learning for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. In the Teacher’s Edition, at the beginning of each text, the Personalize for Learning section contains a text-complexity chart and a Decide and Plan flowchart. Throughout the materials and in the flowchart, ideas to challenge students are provided that relate to reading, writing, and research and take the form of discussions, written work, or brief presentations. These suggestions are usually balanced by other modifications (for language learners or students who need more support) rather than extra work for early finishers.
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. In the Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, Reading Support includes a text-complexity rubric and a Decide and Plan flowchart. The Challenge section of the flowchart provides ideas to challenge students relating to text analysis and written responses. The text analysis idea states: “For students that grasp the symbolic nature of the author’s work, have them identify several symbolic elements, for example, the fungus on the decaying mansion representing the sickness of the Usher family.”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Censors” by Luisa Valenzuela, translated by David Unger. In the Teacher’s Edition, Comprehension Check, the Personalize for Learning Challenge box states, “Encourage interested students to learn more about current or past censorship in one or two other countries. During their research, have students consider the following questions: How is censorship enforced? What kinds of materials are censored? How does censorship impact daily life in that country? How have citizens responded to censorship? Students can write a one-page, magazine-style article to present their findings.” This activity could take the place of another research task that teachers may assign to the class.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Teacher’s Edition, the Personalize for Learning Challenge box suggests that students discuss a text-to-world connection by looking at qualities that could be both good or bad: “Have students consider other human characteristics that a person might possess that could be either good or bad depending on the extent or circumstances.”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide a variety of approaches to learning tasks over time and a variety of ways that students are expected to demonstrate their understanding. The materials include teacher prompts and questions in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition. For all texts in each unit, students interact with texts in multiple ways, including comprehension questions, various writing tasks, small-group discussions, individual research, and group projects. Students complete peer- and self-reflections during writing tasks for culminating writing drafts. Students rate themselves on unit goals at each unit’s beginning and end. An Evidence Log is also included in which students connect their learning on each text, examine their changing perspectives, and provide evidence of learning.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, teachers are provided questions and prompts throughout each unit to incorporate into and facilitate whole-group and small-group discussions.
In the Student Edition, at the end of most Whole-Group Learning texts, students complete a Comprehension Check that includes Research to Clarify and Research to Explore prompts to expand their thinking and knowledge based on the text. Student instructions state: “Research to Clarify: Choose at least one unfamiliar detail from the text. Briefly research that detail. In what way does the information you learned shed light on an aspect of the story? Research to Explore: Choose something from the text that interests you, and formulate a research question. Write your question here.”
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, students use the Evidence Log to make connections to the text and provide evidence from the text and any additional notes or ideas. Throughout the Teacher’s Edition, teacher instructions prompt students to add evidence to the Evidence Log. Sections of the log include “My Initial Position,” “Connection to the Prompt,” “Evidence from the Text,” “Additional Notes/Ideas,” “How does this text change or add to my thinking?” and “My position.” Student Edition directions are open-ended.
Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Most texts follow a similar pattern that uses a variety of learning formats and methods. While reading most Whole-Class or Small-Group text, students use the following modes of analyzing the text: Making Meaning may include First Read, Close Read, Analyzing the Text, and a specific text-analysis skill; Language Development may include Concept Vocabulary, Word Study, and a specific language skill; and Effective Expression may include Writing to Sources, Speaking and Listening, and Research.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher’s Edition directions for the Evidence Log state: “Support students in completing their Evidence Log. This paced activity will help prepare them for the Performance-Based Assessment at the end of the unit.”
In Small-Group Learning, students may write about the texts they have read. During the writing process, in the Reviewing and Revising section, students use a checklist to peer review. Also, a Peer Review is included in each Performance Task: Writing Focus. Student Edition directions state: “Exchange essays with a classmate. Use the checklist to evaluate your classmate’s [writing].”
In the Teacher’s Edition, the margins provide review and practice activities suggestions.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Student Edition, Unit Introduction, Unit Goals are included in Reading, Writing and Research, Language, and Speaking and Listening. Students rate themselves on a scale from one to five to determine how well they already meet the goal. Examples of Unit Goals include, but are not limited to: “Reading: Evaluate written arguments by analyzing how authors state and support their claims. Writing and Research: Write an argumentative essay in which you effectively incorporate the key elements of an argument.”
In the Student Edition, Unit Reflection, students respond to prompts about their learning, such as, “Reflect on the Learning Strategies: Write a reflection on whether you were able to improve your learning based on your Action Plans. Think about what worked, what didn’t, and what you might do to keep working on these strategies. Record your ideas before a class discussion.”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide guidance for grouping students in a variety of ways across each unit. Units follow the structure of Whole-Class Learning, with some informal peer groupings; Small-Group Learning entirely focused on collaborative work; and Independent Learning, which concludes with the Learn From Your Classmates discussion. Teachers receive optional suggestions for student-to-student interaction in the Teacher’s Edition and general guidance on forming small groups.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole Group Learning, students participate in a Four-Corner Debate for a Launch Activity. The materials state, “Form a group with like-minded students in one corner of the classroom. Discuss questions such as, ‘What examples from literature, movies, history, or your own observations of life lead you to take this position.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Performance Tasks, students work in partners to peer review each other’s writing. The materials state, “Before they begin their peer review, remind students that they are reviewing their classmate’s narrative for its success at telling the story, not whether the writer should have chosen to tell that story.” A peer review checklist is also included in the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition.
Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, a box at the start of Small-Group Learning states: “Forming Groups: You may wish to form groups for Small-Group Learning so that each consists of students with different learning abilities. Some students may be adept at organizing information, whereas others may have strengths related to generating or synthesizing information. A good mix of abilities can make the experience of Small-Group Learning dynamic and productive.”
In the Teacher’s Edition, a note is provided in the Make It Interactive section for the Close Read of students’ Independent Learning task: “Group students according to the selection they have chosen. Then, have students meet to discuss the selection in-depth. Their discussions should be guided by their insights and questions.”
In the Student-Centered Unit Structure handout, the material list how students process the text during Whole-Class learning. Students process the text “through effective expression activities where students work in groups, communicating their own ideas and listening to the ideas of others.”
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide strategies and support for English Language Learners as they work with grade-level content. In the Teacher’s Edition, general accommodations, strategies, and suggestions are provided to assist teachers with each text. Personalize for Learning suggestions are provided before and during many reading, writing, vocabulary, language, as well as speaking and listening activities. Before each text, a Decide and Plan flow chart on the Personalize for Learning page provides strategies for teachers to use with English Language Learners.
Materials consistently provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka. The Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, Decide and Plan flow chart includes the English Language Support box to scaffold the knowledge demands. Instructions state: “Discuss the word metamorphosis, and find out if students have knowledge of the meaning of this word in science. Preview the premise of the story: a man wakes up to find he has been changed into a large bug. Make sure students understand other basic situations and characters: he is a traveling salesman; he is in a room while his family and boss are outside and have not yet seen how he has changed.”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection that includes “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou. The Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, English Language Support box after finishing the poem provides support on figurative language: “Explain to students that the poem ‘Caged Bird’ uses symbolism, a type of figurative language where an object, person, animal, place, or image is used to represent something else. Draw students’ attention to lines 8-14. The author appears to be describing the difference between a free bird and a caged bird, but is actually making a fundamental point about freedom…To help students understand the symbol, ask them to think of a situation in which a person might feel like a ‘caged bird’.” This support is marked for all levels.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task: Writing Focus, students write an argumentative essay to the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness).” The Teacher’s Edition, Personalize for Learning, English Language Support box on the “Create Cohesion” page provides support for syntax: “Help students compare grammar and usage in informative text, drama, and poetry. Review the definitions of grammar terms such as an adjective, participles, noun phrases, independent clauses, and parallel structures. Then ask students to choose one or two terms and go on a grammar scavenger hunt. Students should review the selections they read and identify one or more instances of their grammar terms in each.” This support is marked for all levels.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials include a balance of representations of people with various demographics and physical characteristics in images and information. A variety of texts with authors from a variety of genders, races, and ethnicities are included. In the About the Author section for each text, important background information for authors of a variety of race and/or ethnicities are provided. People of various demographics are depicted positively, without obvious or blatant stereotypes. The texts are written by authors of different backgrounds and feature protagonists of diverse races, ethnicities, countries of origin, gender expressions, and people with developmental disabilities. The materials balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics and avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Notes in the Teacher’s Editions provide ways to highlight positive portrayals in texts.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Sonnet, With Bird” by Sherman Alexie. The Determine Theme section provides the teachers with prompts to support discussions, such as, “Ask what a reader can infer from the speaker’s statements about being a Native American in England and accept student responses.” The materials provide the possible response: “He’s proud and amazed- and lonely- at the thought of being the only Native American in England.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. The About the Author section states, “Chinua Achebe is renowned for novels and stories that explore the conflicts of modern Africa. He was born into the Nigerian Igbo tribe and publicly supported the independence of the Igbo-dominate Biafra region from Nigeria.”
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. The background for the text states: “Young people, including Cortázar, were critical of a conservative element in the government that had refused to join the Allied cause against Adolf Hitler until late in the war, by which time communications with Europe had all but stopped. The young author left Buenos Aires five years after writing this story in protest against the policies of Juan Peron, who was increasingly dominating Argentinian politics.”
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai. This text is accompanied by images of Yousafzai in the United Nation and provides a context where a young woman stands up against political law.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials provide some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students’ home language to facilitate learning. The Professional Development Center contains multiple short videos and documents regarding differentiation. In many of the videos and documents, the importance of understanding a student’s identity and using their home language is conveyed, and a few strategies are suggested. General resources in the online platform, such as Every Teacher’s Toolkit by Karen Kawaguchi, provide teacher tips for enhancing cultural responsiveness and home-language validation. In the Teacher’s Edition, a few Personalize for Learning boxes suggest connections between Spanish and English cognates. Spanish is the only language offered in supplemental materials, like the online Spanish Resources library, with texts translated into Spanish.
Materials provide suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Professional Development Center contains a section for differentiation. In this section, a video titled “How to Differentiate Learning for English Learners” with Jim Cummins is included that suggests strategies for scaffolding, such as using graphic organizers, visuals, and rephrasing to help students better understand. This video discusses how important it is that educators understand each student’s identity. Another video titled “Leveled Texts for ELLs” with Elfrieda “Freddy” Hiebert suggests strategies for scaffolding grade-leveled texts for ELL students instead of providing an alternate text.
The online materials contain a myPerspectives+: English Learner Support section that includes the digital text, Every Teacher’s Toolkit by Karen Kawaguchi, that includes strategies for language learners, including definitions and suggestions for two areas: “Culturally and linguistically responsive teaching” and “Validate Home Languages.” Both sections include details on how to help strengthen student skills in areas such as academic vocabulary, grammar, and presentation skills.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the online materials, the Spanish Resources Library contains Spanish versions of texts for use in Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning for each unit. A video introduction to the unit in Spanish and stand-alone Spanish grammar and writing worksheets are also included. Teacher Resources in this section include an answer guide for the grammar worksheets.
In the Professional Development Center, a section for differentiation is included in the document “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners.” One suggestion states, “Encourage students to draw on their multilingual repertoires as a stepping stone to English (e.g., initial writing or note-taking in L1 as a means of transferring knowledge and skills from L1 to English).”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Introduction, Personalize for Learning, the English Language Support box offers support for cognates. Instruction states: “ Many of the academic words have Spanish cognates. Use these cognates with students whose home language is Spanish. integrate – integración / vivid – vivído / delineate – delinear / altercation – altercado / volition – voluntad. Not all English learners will recognize and use these cognates automatically. Help students build their cognate awareness by pointing out that these cognates share the same root in both English and Spanish.”
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials include teacher guidance to facilitate learning and content that support linguistically and culturally diverse students. The FrontMatter highlights the importance of allowing students to use their personal experiences when completing tasks: “Students are encouraged to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural backgrounds.” The Professional Development Center also includes information to help teachers engage with culturally diverse students. Some unit topics and texts allow for open-ended, relevant personal connections. Before each text in Whole-Class Learning and Small-Group Learning, the Jumpstart box offers suggestions for discussion topics related to the text. Other texts or activities include teacher notes that explain how to offer instruction to a range of students. Spanish language tools for some Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning texts are available in student materials. A home-school connection letter is available in English and Spanish. No evidence was found of prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use the information to solve personal problems.
Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Frontmatter pages at the start of the Teacher’s Edition describe the program’s culturally responsive foundation: “Ernest Morrell, Ph.D., helped inform the development of perspectives to ensure the program fosters a polyvocal classroom that encourages students to talk with each other, learn from each other, and more importantly, bring knowledge from their different backgrounds and cultures to enrich critical literacy in the classroom. The texts, essential questions, and learning tasks encourage discussions that allow students to draw upon their prior experiences, diverse identities, varied experiences, and the richness of their cultural backgrounds.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Unit Introduction, students read “I Came, I Saw, I Shopped.” Teacher instructions state: “Tell students that they can fill in the Word Network as they read texts in the unit, or they can record the words elsewhere and add them later. Point out to students that people may have personal associations with some words. A word that one student thinks is related to materialism might not be a word another student would pick. However, students should feel free to add any word they personally think is relevant to their Word Network. Each person’s Word Network will be unique.”
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Center, Engagement, the video “Multiliteracies and Multicultural Education” provides information on the importance of supporting other cultures in the classroom. Jim Cummins, Ph.D., discusses how “when we tap into students’ cultural backgrounds, we’re tapping into their knowledge base.”
In the Professional Development Center, myPerspectives in Action, the video, “Facilitating Small Group Learning with Diverse Learners,” provides information about how two teachers, an ELA teacher, and a Special Education teacher, encourage and support all students to engage in small group discussions about a poem they are reading.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Performance Task: Writing, Teacher’s Edition, an Author’s Perspective box gives guidance for teaching writing: “Second-language learners need abundant opportunities to write for varied audiences and purposes to determine what they do and do not know. Frequent writing can be accomplished through a combination of low-stakes (informal, ungraded) and high-stakes (formal, revised, graded) writing. Using this approach allows the teacher to nurture writing without needing to grade everything.”
Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Professional Development Center, the document “Differentiation in Middle School: Teaching English to Diverse Learners” by Jim Cummins, Ph.D., is provided. The document states four essential instructional strategies. One of the strategies is Connect to Students’ Lives and Affirm their Identities: “Connecting instruction to students’ lives by evoking personal and intellectual responses to texts represents not only a form of differentiation but also affirms students’ identities. Students who feel that their voices are heard, and their culture and identity validated in the classroom are much more likely to engage academically than those who feel ignored or devalued.”
Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages, such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Spanish language resources are available for teachers. Translations are provided for Small-Group Learning and Independent Learning reading selections. Audio summaries of texts are provided in the digital materials. The Teacher’s Edition notes, “Audio summaries are available online in both English and Spanish in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Assigning these summaries prior to reading the selection may help students build additional background knowledge and set a context for their first read.” Spanish grammar and writing worksheets are also available for students, though they are not available in other languages.
In the online Interactive Student Edition, students can highlight any word or words and view a translation in one of 104 languages, such as Pashto, Hmong, Haitian Creole, or Filipino. Thirty-five languages (including Portuguese, Slovak, Afrikaans, and Arabic) have the additional layer of that text being read aloud in the target language. Some audio translations do not have the speaker speaking the language correctly.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to solve personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. All of the materials are through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains a variety of interactive tools. The program includes digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with their teachers and peers. The Interactive Student Edition prompts students to discuss tasks with classmates and record their collective notes in the digital notebook. Students save their work through the online assignments, and teachers review and provide feedback to students. The materials also include a discussion board that teachers and students allow for digital conversations.
The materials incorporate a visual design in print and digital editions that support student learning, make the organizational structure clear, and communicate clearly. The four sections (Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance Based Assessments) are color-coded and match the color coding in the Teacher Edition.
There are several layers of support for teachers to understand and use the program’s embedded technology, such as high-level training videos and handouts.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials integrate technology in ways that engage students in grade-level standards. Students can access all the materials through the online Interactive Student Edition, which contains various interactive tools. Students can highlight, annotate, and translate the text into various languages, many of which can also be read aloud to them in that language. Students can respond to prompts by typing in text boxes or charts. Students navigate the Interactive Student Edition by clicking on labeled tabs that take them to various sections of the textbook. Digital tools are available that allow teachers to view and respond to student responses and customize the materials to meet the needs of students. Teachers can assign work through the online platform and access other digital resources like the Hook and Inspire pages for anchor texts, which have links to supplemental videos and texts.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools, are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Interactive Student Edition, students can adjust the font size using a button at the top of the page. Students may also search using the magnifying glass at the top of the page.
In the Interactive Student Edition, students can read and listen to the texts, type their responses to questions, and plan their writing. Students can submit their work via this platform, allowing teachers to see all student responses immediately.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Interactive Student Edition contains clear links to the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, and Unit Reflection. A drop-down menu provides access to the table of contents, bookmarks, annotations, highlights, notebook, and glossary.
In each unit Performance-Based Assessment, students can click on a notebook icon to open a text box to write ideas they are going to use for their multimedia presentation.
In the Interactive Student Edition, materials are organized to keep students on track and to support their work. For example, a header bar shows where students are in the lesson and unit. Comprehension Checks are displayed in the right-hand column, keeping the text center for reference.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Table of Contents can be customized for various purposes in both the Teacher’s Edition and Student Edition: “You can customize the program by rearranging the Table of Contents, creating your own tests, and uploading your own resources to match your curriculum.” Students may customize the table of contents by clicking on the three vertical dots next to the table of contents. Teachers may then move items, remove items, or add files, links, titles, or notes for students.
In the Interactive Student Edition, students can select any text and make personal customizations, such as translating the words, highlighting in one of four colors, circling the text, underlining it, or adding a note.
In the Hook and Inspire section, teachers can choose from various resources, such as videos, articles, and extension activities that can be customized. The landing page includes ways teachers can support students’ learning “into,” “through,” and “beyond” the Whole Class Learning Anchor Texts. The page states, “Hook and inspire your students with these ideas. Build your own Playlist of media, short texts, novel connections, and extension activities to enrich your teaching.” For Unit 4, All That Glitters, “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe, three “into” resources are provided: “Nigeria’s Civil War Explained: Use this news clip from the BBC to provide background information about the Nigerian Civil War, the context in which the story takes place; “Don’t Worry Be Happy,” Song by Bobby McFerrin: Play this song to prompt discussion about whether it’s possible to remain hopeful and resilient in the face of true hardship—a central concept the story explores; Chinua Achebe Google Doodle: Give students information about Chinua Achebe with this Google Doodle—as well as the accompanying text and draft “doodles”—created to celebrate the author’s legacy.”
In the Interactive Student Edition, the Small-Group Learning section includes a chart of learning strategies. Each section of the chart includes a box where students can add their own ideas. For example, the Support Others section includes the following chart topics: “Build off ideas from others in your group. Invite others who have not yet spoken to do so.” A blank Support Others box is available for students to type further ideas.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials include digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with their teachers and peers. The Interactive Student Edition prompts students to discuss tasks with classmates and record their collective notes in the digital notebook. Students can save their work on the online assignments, and teachers can review and provide feedback to students. The materials also include a discussion board that teachers and students allow for digital conversations. The connected Savvas Realize platform allows tasks to be assigned, completed, scored, and tracked digitally by teachers. Teachers can provide feedback to students while they are working on assignments. Teachers can also use Google Classroom for student assignments, allowing another opportunity to provide feedback and collaborate to students. The Collaboration Center includes videos referencing how students can collaborate with email, text messaging, and shared documents.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Savvas Realize platform, MyPerspectives connects to Google Classroom to allow tasks to be assigned and completed. Students can annotate PDFs or attach separate files. Teachers can view completion rates, score tasks, and see standards mastery for students. Teachers can also select assignments for individual students or sub-groups of the class.
Teachers may assign activities through the online platform. The materials state, “A direct link to the Interactive Student Edition. Student work is saved, and teachers may review it at any time. If work is completed offline, work will sync up when online again.”
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Program Overview, a tab for Digital Resources is available. The On-Demand Training page includes a Digital Tour handout and a video. Digital Tools in a Discussion Board “facilitate collaboration and real-time peer-to-peer sharing of ideas.” In addition, there is an EssayScorer that allows teachers to provide immediate feedback to students for revising and editing.
In the Collaboration Center, videos are provided that model how to collaborate. Some videos reference online tools students can use for collaboration. For example, the Build Consensus video discusses collaboration using shared documents, text messaging, and email. The teacher can assign these videos to students.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The materials incorporate a visual design in print and digital editions that support student learning, make the organizational structure clear, and communicate clearly. Each of the four sections (Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance Based Assessments) are color-coded and match the color coding in the Teacher Edition. Charts, diagrams, photos, illustrations, and icons are included thoughtfully on the pages. The table of contents, glossary, index, and other resources are clearly labeled and easy to find. The layout for each selection is consistent so students can find the information they need.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Interactive Student Edition, the pages have a colored band at the top containing a heading and any pictures or illustrations accompanying the text. The stories typically do not contain any illustrations or pictures other than what is on the colored band at the top of the page. Each text is represented with an image that repeats at the top of the text itself, in tables of contents, and alongside activities referring to that text.
In the print/PDF Student Edition, pictures are typically at the top of the first page of text, without many additional pictures or illustrations throughout each passage. The PDF has wide margins and sometimes provides additional information in the margins. Icons in the margins refer students to external tools they can use, such as a pencil and paper icon to represent Evidence Log and a spiral-bound book icon for Notebook.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each edition, all units follow the same order of sections that are clearly color-coded: Whole-Class Learning is blue, Small-Group Learning is turquoise, Independent Learning is purple, and Performance-Based Assessment is orange. The opening page of each unit contains clearly labeled links to the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, Independent Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, and Unit Reflection. The links are color-coded to match the section colors and are consistent across the materials. There is a photo on the left side of the page that connects to the unit theme.
In the Teacher’s Edition, Introduction of each unit, a Pacing Plan is provided at the bottom of the pages with a timeline for the entire unit, a numbered square for each day, a blue, turquoise, purple, or orange line denoting the section of the unit, and the names of the texts or tasks associated with the section.
In the Teacher’s Edition, each text displays the same four Planning pages that include a summary of the text, Lesson Resources (a table laying out the text’s Making Meaning, Language Development, and Effective Expression tasks), Reading Support (a text complexity rubric), and Standards Support Through Teaching and Learning Cycle, which details a cycle of Identify Needs, Decide and Plan, Teach, and Analyze and Revise.
In the Interactive Student Edition in Whole-Class Learning, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Learning, at the top of the first page of each text, links are clearly labeled and include information about the author, background, and standards addressed in each text. A sidebar contains links to the table of contents, bookmarks, annotation and highlights, notebook, and glossary. They are clearly labeled and accessed the same way throughout the materials.
In the Interactive Student Edition, the Performance-Based Assessments have clearly labeled parts, including links to the Academic Vocabulary, Word Network, and Rubric sections.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the print Student Edition, the header on most pages (except for pages with texts) includes the unit Essential Question.
The Interactive Student Edition contains clickable nested links showing navigation within the unit (e.g., Unit 5 Virtue and Vengeance > Whole-Class Learning > The Tempest Act 1), and the right side of the screen has an expandable menu to navigate within the text (e.g., Making Meaning, Language Development, Effective Expression).
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials include several layers of support for teachers to understand and use the program’s embedded technology. The Getting Started with myPerspectives digital page contains links to two resources: MySavvasTraining.com and Savvas Realize. The website, MySavvasTraining.com, presents high-level videos and handouts on topics such as accessing student data, downloading assignments in order to modify them and creating playlists of learning material. The Savvas Realize section focuses on the technical aspects of the assignment platform, such as demonstrating how to assign content to students, managing discussion boards, and using the Realize Reader digital textbook. The video and/or printable handout, Digital Resources, explains the embedded technology available to teachers and students. The documents almost always contain step-by-step directions and screenshots/images to help the teacher use technology with this program.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, teachers can access videos and PowerPoint presentations about the different aspects of the program, such as the Table of Contents, the Student Edition, and assessments. One of the Program Overview videos in Digital Resources is a 12-minute video with information about how to utilize and navigate the online program, customize instruction, save time with digital tools, and engage students. A printable handout with the same information is available.
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Teacher How-To Resources, a document is provided to understand how to use the resources, such as Google classroom assignments, customize worksheets and assessments, share playlists, and ExamView: Getting Started. The documents provide step-by-step directions for teachers to utilize online materials and technology.
In the Table of Contents, Getting Started, Savvas Realize is the online platform for managing classes, assigning and turning in tasks, and examining data. The Savvas Realize training site provides technical support to teachers in the following categories:
Assignments > Realize Reader Assignments: “Savvas Realize Reader gives you access to digital textbooks and assignments in an engaging, interactive learning environment. Realize Reader content can also include video, interactive charts, graphs, drag-and-drop activities, and a notebook service, in addition to basic features, such as annotations, highlights, and bookmarks.” Directions follow for accessing the Realize Reader content through Realize, via the Realize Reader app, or downloading for offline use.
Discussions > Manage Active Discussions: “Discussions enable you to facilitate class and group discussions on important academic and social topics. Students can reflect on learning, share ideas and opinions, or ask and answer questions. You can create, monitor, and reply to discussions, and students can participate in discussions you create. In addition, you can choose whether or not to score discussions.” Directions follow, showing teachers how to select a discussion and then add a comment, attach a file, or edit comments.
Data > Results by Assignment: “The Results by Assignment page includes data for class and individual student test scores, progress, and usage.” Directions follow on how to “View Class Results by Assignment,” including Scores Data, Progress Data, and Usage Data.
In the Table of Contents, MySavvasTraining.com provides different sections for program-level overviews of structure and features and includes video tutorials with accompanying handouts. The categories include:
Getting Started > Digital Tour: Technological features are highlighted, including the Discussion Board feature (“to facilitate collaboration and real-time peer-to-peer sharing of ideas”), the EssayScorer tool (“provides immediate feedback to students for revising and improving their writing, giving them additional practice and saving you time”), and content creation tools (“you can customize the program by rearranging the Table of Contents, creating your own tests, and uploading your own resources to match your curriculum.”
Assessments and Reporting > Assessments: This video describes assessments overall, including those with embedded technology: Next Generation Practice Tests and Performance Tasks “give students the opportunity to practice formats like drag and drop so that they are prepared for online interactive testing,” and the Data tab on Savvas Realize organizes “student and class data that shows standards mastery on assessments and online activities, as well as overall progress. You can dig deeper with additional data points to reveal more detailed information on student mastery, progress, and usage. You can also view data for individual students from the class assignment list.”
Additional Resources > Revision Assistant for Teachers: A 24-page guide shows teachers how to set up, launch, and use Revision Assistant, which is “an online revision tool that helps students to improve their writing. It provides instant, differentiated feedback aligned to genre-specific rubrics and allows students to share their work and revisions with their teacher.”