2023

ThinkCERCA Core Curriculum for English Language Arts and Reading

Publisher
ThinkCERCA
Subject
ELA
Grades
6-12
Report Release
03/20/2025
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
66/72
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report Overview

Summary of Alignment & Usability: ThinkCERCA Core Curriculum for English Language Arts and Reading | ELA

ELA 6-8

The grade 6-8 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment and usability.

Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. While the program includes research activities, opportunities for practice are generally limited to one particular unit. 

Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.

The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View.

The program includes reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each module. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.

The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content. They also provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations

ELA High School

The grade 9-12 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment and usability.

Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. While the program includes research activities, opportunities for practice are generally limited to one particular unit. 

Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.

The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View.

The program includes reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each module. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.

The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content. They also provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.

Gateway 1

Text Quality

30/32
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
10th Grade
View Full Report
Gateway 1

Text Quality

30/32
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
11th Grade
View Full Report
Gateway 1

Text Quality

30/32
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
12th Grade
View Full Report
Gateway 1

Text Quality

30/32
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations