About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: ThinkCERCA Core Curriculum for English Language Arts and Reading | ELA
ELA 6-8
The grade 6-8 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment and usability.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. While the program includes research activities, opportunities for practice are generally limited to one particular unit.
Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View.
The program includes reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each module. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content. They also provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
ELA High School
The grade 9-12 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment and usability.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. While the program includes research activities, opportunities for practice are generally limited to one particular unit.
Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View.
The program includes reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each module. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content. They also provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
9th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
10th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
11th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
12th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 12th Grade
Alignment Summary
The grade 12 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks.
The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction. Although the materials include research activities, they generally occur in one designated unit.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing.
Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.
12th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 31 informational texts and 26 literary texts, resulting in a 54/46 balance of informational and literary texts, which should support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
The materials contain 57 core unit texts across the seven units spanning various text types and genres. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Text complexity is mixed throughout the units. The quantitative measures range from 610L-1800L and generally increase throughout the year, and the qualitative measures range from slightly complex to very complex. Scaffolding suggestions often remain the same throughout the year, regardless of each text’s complexity level.
The materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options” for the Unit. Materials provide students with four independent reading options in every unit, each thematically linked to the unit’s content.
Throughout the program, there are on-demand and process writing opportunities. The materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different genres of writing. The writing genre distribution is 33.3% argumentative, 41.7% informational/explanatory, and 25% narrative, which aligns with the grade-level writing distribution of 40/40/20 required by the standards. There are frequent opportunities across the school year for students to practice and apply writing using evidence.
The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 31 informational texts and 26 literary texts, resulting in a 54/46 balance of informational and literary texts, which supports achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day required by the standards.
The materials contain 57 core unit texts across the seven units spanning various text types and genres. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Text complexity is mixed throughout the units. The quantitative measures range from 610L to 1800L, and the qualitative measures range from slightly complex to very complex. Scaffolding suggestions often remain the same throughout the year, regardless of each text’s complexity level. Some scaffolding suggestions are present, but require teachers to complete additional research or preparation to implement.
The materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options.” Students are provided with four independent reading options for each unit, each thematically linked to the content in that unit.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1a.
The materials include publishable texts featuring engaging characters, universal topics, and themes that should appeal to students. Across the year, literary anchor texts are written by a broad range of well-known authors that feature characters from multiple cultures and rich language. Informational texts are grade-appropriate and published in popular news and magazine sources.
Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “The Silence,” a short story by Haruki Murakami. The text uses simple language and is told in the first-person point of view. The narrator reflects on past events, but most action occurs in the present. The narrator draws on many prose conventions, such as dialogue and paragraph format. Students reflect on whether silence is helpful or harmful when they are not getting along with someone.
In Unit 5, Modules 1–3, students read the play Antigone by Sophocles. This classic Greek tragedy is middle to end of the year appropriate for Grade 12. Antigone is frequently used as a high-interest late high school exposure to more ancient Greek drama, mythology, language, and structure.
In Unit 7, Module 3, students read two poems by Emily Dickinson; “I dwell in Possibility” and “Tell all the truth but tell it slant.” Structural elements used add to the complexity of the poems. Students connect by considering “a time when you or someone you know made a choice to be different and why it was important for you to make that choice.”
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
Narrative evidence only
Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the school year. The balance of informational texts to literary texts reflects a 54/46 balance, which supports achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day required by the standards. Text types include, but are not limited to, argument, drama, poetry, autobiography, memoir, speech, scientific account, opinion, and personal essay. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students read a personal narrative, “On the Rainy River,” by Tim O’Brien; a personal narrative, “Prom,” by Hasan Minhaj; an essay, “Where I Lived and What I Lived For” by Henry David Thoreau; and a poem, “We Are Many” by Pablo Neruda.
In Unit 2, students read an opinion text, “The Robots Are Coming. Prepare for Trouble” by David Deming; an informational text, “The Past Present and Future of Robotic Surgery” by James Gaines; and a visual text, “He Used AI to Win a Fine-Arts Competition. Was It Cheating?” by Drew Harwell.
In Unit 3, students read a short story, “The Silence” by Haruki Murakami; a short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. LeGuin; a poem, “Two Versions of “The Chimney Sweeper” by William Blake; and an informational text, “The Awesome Importance of Imagination” by David Brooks.
In Unit 4, students read seven informational articles about sustainable living, including “What is a Carbon Footprint—And How to Measure Yours” by Kieran Mulvaney, “A 105-Mile-Long City Will Snake Through the Saudi Desert. Is That a Good Idea?” by Bill Chappell, and “Students Tackle 21st Century Sustainability Challenges on the Navajo Nation” by Emily Litvack.
In Unit 5, students read the play Antigone by Sophocles. They also read two informational texts, “Rise to Prominence” by Rosalie F. Backer and “The Healing Power of Greek Tragedy” by Jeff MacGregor.
In Unit 6, students read a speech, “Conan O’Brien Commencement Address” by Conan O’Brien, and several magazine articles such as “Contrary to What Everyone Thinks, College Costs Less These Days” by Derek Newton, “How to Pay for College Using Overlooked Strategies” by Emma Kerr and Sarah Wood, and “The Five Different Paths that People Take Before They Feel Like Official Adults” by Mike Vuolo.
In Unit 7, students read the poem “Phenomenal Woman” by Maya Angelou, an informational text, Letters from an American Farmer: Excerpt from Letter Three by J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur, and a short story “Rip Van Winkle” by Washington Irving.
Materials reflect a 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Across the year, 31 or 54% of the texts read are informational, and 26 or 46% are literary.
Unit 1 contains eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.
Unit 2 contains eight core texts, with 100% being informational.
Unit 3 contains eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.
Unit 4 contains eight core texts, with 88% being informational and 12% literary.
Unit 5 contains six core texts, 33% Informational and 67% literary.
Unit 6 contains eight core texts, with 100% being informational.
Unit 7 contains 11 core texts, with 18% being informational and 82% literary.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.
The materials include texts that have the appropriate level of complexity according to qualitative and quantitative analysis and relation to their associated student task. Each Teacher Unit Guide includes a rationale for the purpose of each unit in the curriculum, and Each Teacher Module Guide includes a connection of each text to the unit. According to review analysis, anchor texts have the appropriate complexity in relationship to associated student tasks and unit themes. Of the 57 texts analyzed for Grade 12, 27 are within the suggested Lexile bands, 12 are below, and six are above (12 have no Lexile level because they are Non-Prose). When texts are below the quantitative level, qualitative measures such as knowledge demands, language, or structure make them more complex. The Teacher’s Guide, Module Preview, and Connection to Unit briefly describe student tasks associated with the texts. Student tasks are found to be grade-level appropriate, with necessary scaffolding for more complex tasks. The materials include a linked spreadsheet in each Unit-At-A-Glance, which provides quantitative and qualitative data for each text in the curriculum and an associated reader and task analysis of each text.
Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 3, students read the informational text, “Now That Computers Connect Us All, For Better and Worse, What’s Next?” by Matthew Hutson online. The publisher-provided quantitative measure is 1010L-1200L, while the verified measure is 1210L, and the qualitative measure is moderately complex. This text has the appropriate complexity for student tasks. After reading, students complete five comprehension questions and two Pause and Reflect questions online. Next, students complete the Analyze section online to highlight sentences that support them in answering the writing prompt. Students then complete the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning task to determine and trace a central idea through details, which can be completed individually, in pairs, or in small groups. During the Write section, students summarize the text online and use the Student Guide, Appreciate the Author’s Craft graphic organizer to use part of the writing rubric to find examples from the text that meet the Advanced level. Next, students use the Share Your Argument Builder to share their argument builder with a partner, listen to peers, and record valuable ideas. Lastly, students use prior work to answer the writing prompt, “Why does the author use evidence, such as details about AI and popular culture, to raise issues about the future of AI?” This writing task is completed online.
In Unit 6, Module 3, students read “How to Pay for College Using Overlooked Strategies.” This text has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1410-1600L and a verified measure of 1510L, which is above the suggested Lexile band for Grade 12. However, the qualitative measure is moderately complex. After reading, students complete five comprehension questions and two Pause and Reflect questions online. Students discuss their responses and use the Student Guide, Share Your Reflections graphic organizer to record Pause and Reflect answers and discuss reflections. Next, students complete the Analyze section online to highlight sentences that support them in answering the writing prompt, “How do the authors use specific techniques (language, structural, etc.) to emphasize what they see as the most overlooked strategies for financing college?” Students then complete an Apply Your Learning task using the Student Guide. This task is focused on understanding the impact of an author’s choices of words and images. They answer questions such as, “In the first paragraph, how do the word choices of the authors illustrate how appeals work differently from the typical financial aid process? Identify multiple words that have a negative connotation. How do these words emphasize the circumstances under which appeals are granted?” During the Write section online, students summarize the text and use the Student Guide, Share Your Argument Builder graphic organizer to share their argument builder with a partner, listen to peers, and record valuable ideas. Lastly, students use prior work to answer the writing online prompt.
In Unit 7, Module 5, Read Across Genres, students read a series of poems related to the unit themes, including “Borderlands” by Gloria Anzaldua. Because this is a set of poems, there is no quantitative measure (NP). This text is rated as qualitatively moderately complex. Students read the text and answer five multiple-choice comprehension questions. In the Student Guide, Analyze a Poem’s Structure and Theme, students’ instructions state: “Imagine you are the actual speaker of each of the poems. Use your voice to savor the sensory details and images. Use the guiding questions below to help you explore each aspect of the poetry. You may also revisit SOAPSTone as a strategy for understanding the poem. Then share Your findings with a partner.” Additionally, they compare this poem to another poem, “Phenomenal Woman,” with the prompt, “Compare the forms of ‘Phenomenal Woman’ and ‘To Live in the Borderlands.’ Explain the poetic form each poet uses and explain how the use of rhyme and rhythm supports the meaning of each poem. Include examples that support your analysis.”
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Guide for each module provides a Module Preview with how the selection connects to the unit and the knowledge and skills focus for the text. The Unit-At-a-Glance provides a link to “Detailed Text Complexity Analysis,” which includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of each text and reader and task considerations. This spreadsheet includes the following columns:
Lesson Title and ThinkCERCA Platform Link
Citation or Publisher Permissions Line
Author Bio and Awards
Grade Level
Unit
Unit Name
Anchor or Read Across Genres Text
Lesson Primary CCSS Reading Standard
Certified Lexile
ATOS
Flesch-Kincaid
Ease Score
Qualitative Measures
Structure
Language Conventionality and Clarity
Knowledge Demands
Purpose/Meaning of the Text
Quantitative Measures
Reader and Task Considerations
Recommended Placement
Info vs. Lit Text
Portfolio Writing Genre
Formative and Summative Tasks
In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Artificial Intelligence Is Now Used to Predict Crime. But Is It Biased?” by Smithsonian Magazine. The Detailed Text Complexity Analysis Spreadsheet includes the following information under Reader and Task Considerations for the educational purpose of this text: “‘Artificial Intelligence Is Now Used to Predict Crime. But Is It Biased?’ was chosen as a anchor text because it is an excellent example of an argumentative text of the unit theme, ‘Designing Our Communities,’ which asks students to explore the question: ‘Should robots and other forms of artificial intelligence be used to perform important tasks in our communities?’” The Recommended Placement Section states, “While the Flesch-Kincaid Ease and Grade level scores are slightly high for Grade 12, the Lexile and ATOS scores are solidly within range for Grade 12 text complexity. These latter scores along with ThinkCERCA's platform supports that provide scaffolds make this text suitable for all Grade 12 readers.”
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “The Silence” by Haruki Murakami. The Detailed Text Complexity Analysis Spreadsheet includes the following information under Reader and Task Considerations for the educational purpose of this text: “‘The Silence’ was chosen as a anchor text because it is an excellent example of the unit theme, ‘Developing a Purpose’ which asks students to explore the question: ‘How can stories help us reexamine our lives and our role in the lives of others?’” The Recommended Placement Section states, “Various quantitative measurements place "The Silence" into lower text complexity bands than is appropriate; the qualitative analysis would indicate that there are enough complex features to warrant its placement in the 12th grade.”
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.
The materials include texts that range in complexity below, within, and above the grade band to support literacy growth. Each unit includes texts that fall in the range of 610L-1800L. Quantitative levels across Grade 12 texts (of texts with Lexile data) include 12 below, 27 at, and six above grade level. Much of the student learning occurs by reading slideshows and completing online multiple-choice quizzes.After reading texts, students answer five multiple-choice questions. The sentence frames students can use to respond to prompts or write summaries are redundant. The materials provide some scaffolds in student work and in the Teacher Guide to support different populations of students; some of these scaffolds and guidance are repetitive or broad, while some are specific suggestions to support English Language Learners, Students with Exceptional Needs, and Exploration and Extension. Scaffolds are offered before and during the reading of each text. Scaffolds are, at times, suggestions, such as an idea of background information teachers could provide about the text, and are often general and repetitive. Specific vocabulary scaffolds are provided in the Topic Overview of almost every text for struggling readers; the word(s) is always relevant to the specific text. As students read, consistent scaffolds provided throughout all texts include audio read-aloud support and interactive vocabulary definitions in the online text. During writing tasks associated with reading, some specific scaffolds are provided. Many scaffold suggestions remain the same throughout the year, offering little or no guidance to increase students’ ability to engage with increasingly complex text.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:g
The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 610L–1800L. The overall qualitative range across the year is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 1, the Lexile range is 810L–1400L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 2, the Lexile range is 1010L–1800L. The qualitative range for all texts is Moderately Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 3, the Lexile range is 610L–1400L. The qualitative range for all texts is Moderately Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 4, the Lexile range is 810L–1800L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 5, The Lexile range is 810L–1200L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 6, The Lexile range is 940L–1600L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 7, The Lexile range is 610L–1400L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Very Complex.
In Unit 1, students read “Prom” by Hasan Minhaj (810L-1000L) and analyze imagery by examining sensory language and figurative language and noting how imagery affects the overall tone. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slideshow, Analyzing Imagery in a Personal Narrative, students learn about how authors incorporate imagery and why connotations of words are important. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, they analyze different types of imagery from the text. In Unit 4, students read “What is a Carbon Footprint - And How to Measure Yours” by Kieran Mulvaney (1210L-1400L) and determine the meanings of words and phrases by reflecting on the connotation and denotation of words. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slideshow, Determining the Meaning of Words and Phrases, students learn about the impact of an author’s tone and word choice on meaning. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, students reread the passage and determine how the connotation of words reflects how serious and alarming climate change is. They identify words that hold a negative connotation and convey urgency. In Unit 5, students read Antigone (NP) by Sophocles, translated by Watling. The text is qualitatively very complex. Prior to reading, students are presented with information about the language in the play, which, though originally written in 468-406 BCE, has been translated to allow modern readers to understand. They note that some of the words and phrases are outdated, but themes are still valid today. Students read passages from the play and, in small groups, rewrite the passage in their own words.
In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “The Party” by Ava Kadishson Schieber (810L-1000L) and analyze the theme/central message. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slide deck, Determining Theme and Author’s Message in a Personal Narrative, students learn how to cite evidence to understand the theme and author’s message. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, students determine what the author learned about herself through her experiences surrounding the party and support with text evidence. In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “The Silence” by Haruki Murakami (610L-800L) and analyze the theme/central message. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slide deck, Determining Themes in Literature, students learn how the plot and the conflicts an author chooses to include in the narrative help convey themes. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning. Students explain how character interactions help determine a theme and support it with text evidence. In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Conan O’Brien Commencement Address” by Conan O’Brien (940L) and analyze the theme/central message. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slide deck, Using Examples and Anecdotes to Explain Ideas, students learn how examples explain interactions between ideas. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, students read a passage and pay attention to how O’Brien uses humor and anecdotes to convey his central idea about failure and success. To close, students reflect on their biggest takeaways from analyzing how the author used examples and anecdotes to explain ideas.
In Unit 2, Module 8, Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection, students read “Deep in the Uncanny Valley” and “Eyes in the Skies.” After reading the texts, students answer 15 multiple-choice questions; six questions concern the authors’ claims and the best evidence to support the claim. This is the only unit and module in the curriculum that practices and/or assesses RI.9-10.8.
As texts become more complex, some appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Before students read each text, a Topic Overview is provided. Directions state, "Read the topic overview to build background knowledge. Preview the vocabulary before reading.” The Topic Overview section includes a brief introduction to the text with a few vocabulary words hyperlinked in blue. Students can click the vocabulary words to find the part of speech and definition.
In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “The Party” by Ava Kadishson Schieber (810L-1000L). The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slideshow, Determining Theme and Author’s Message in a Personal Narrative, students read the slides and answer five questions. Support and scaffolds available for students as they read include audio read-aloud support and interactive vocabulary definitions in the online text. Teachers have opportunities to scaffold student learning using prompts and notes found in the Teacher Guide. In the Topic Overview, teacher directions state to complete an Anticipation discussion and if time allows they can do a quick internet search to learn more about the topic. This section, also includes a Background Knowledge scaffold for struggling readers: “The passage is set during World War II, particularly in 1943, in a region affected by German occupation. Understanding the historical backdrop of the war, including its impact on individuals and communities, is essential for grasping the narrator’s challenges.” In the Teacher Guide, the Vocabulary section includes a scaffold for struggling readers: “Key Academic Vocabulary Scaffold: Internal monologue. The passage offers insight into the narrator’s thoughts and emotions, providing a deeper understanding of their psyche and inner struggles. Through the narrator’s internal monologue, readers gain empathy and insight into the complexities of their experiences during wartime.” In the Student Guide, the Apply Your Learning section provides scaffolds for Multilingual/English Learners for translations of specific words: experiences, surrounding, interactions, influenced, experiences, and impact. Additionally, teachers are provided with a Teacher Flex Activity in the Read section: “Select a ThinkCERCA Best Practices Activity to enhance students’ engagement with the text: Storyboarding, Contextual Reading, Ensemble Performance, Choral/ Dramatic Reading, Pantomime, Tableau.” In the Develop/Share Your Plan section there is an adjusted version of the planner for students with exceptional needs.
In Unit 4, Module 2, students read “A 105-Mile Long City Will Snake Through the Saudi Desert. Is That a Good Idea” by Bill Chappell (1210L-1400L). The text is qualitatively very complex. Support and scaffolds available for students as they read include audio read-aloud support, interactive vocabulary definitions in the online text, and pause and reflect questions in seven places within the text. The Teacher Guide states to instruct the students to do a first read of the passage for basic comprehension. In the second read, students complete pause and reflect questions and five multiple-choice comprehension questions. Teachers have opportunities to scaffold student learning using prompts and notes found in the teacher materials. In the Teacher Guide, Topic Overview section, instructions state: “Preview the text with students by displaying the six bullet points in the introduction of the text. Read these aloud with students and ask students to visualize this space. Discuss whether based on this description, students would want to live in this city. Then introduce the futuristic city that is intended to be a high-tech, sustainable city. It’s part of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 initiative, aiming to diversify the country’s economy away from oil. NEOM is envisioned as a hub for innovation, technology, tourism, and a model for sustainable living.” In the Vocabulary section, the Teacher Guides includes the following scaffold for struggling readers: “ Key Academic Vocabulary Scaffold: Dystopian. Dystopian refers to a type of society depicted in literature or movies where conditions are undesirable, often characterized by oppression, suffering, and a lack of freedom. It’s the opposite of a utopia, which is an idealized, perfect society. In dystopian worlds, there’s usually some form of government control or social order that leads to injustice, inequality, or suffering for the people living there. Why do you think the author would use this term in the text?” In the Read section, support for Multilingual/English Language Learners states to allow students to use bilingual glossaries and translation devices. The Support for Students with Exceptional Needs states. “Encourage students to listen to the selection and use technology-enabled tools for reading support.” In the Summarize section there is a Teacher Flex Activity to have students “..compare summaries before writing a combined summary that captures the main ideas.” In the Analyze section, after students read and annotate the text, the teacher is instructed to go over the “...highlighting and annotation prompts with students…” before students reread the text.
In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Conan O’Brien Commencement Address” by Conan O’Brien (940L). The text is qualitatively moderately complex. In the online slide deck, Using Examples and Anecdotes to Explain Ideas, students navigate through the slides and answer five check questions. Support and scaffolds available for students as they read include audio read-aloud support and interactive vocabulary definitions in the online text.Teachers have opportunities to scaffold student learning using prompts and notes found in the Teacher Guide. In the Quick Journal section, an adjusted version is available for students with exceptional needs that includes sentence starters. Additionally, in this section, student scaffolds are provided for Multilingual/English Learners to provide translations for specific words: unfair, options, forward, reflect,dealt, disappointment, alternative, course of action, and consider. In the Read section, the Support for Struggling Readers guidance states, “Chunking text is a method of taking difficult, dense text and making it more accessible. It is a scaffolding strategy that teaches students the process of text analysis at the word level.” While this general strategy is provided, there is no further text specific guidance for the teacher on how to chunk this text. Additionally, the Teacher Flex Activity instructs teachers to put students into groups with specific assigned roles. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, students read the provided passage and notice how O’Brien uses humor and anecdotes to convey his central idea about failure and success. Students may work individually, in pairs, or in small groups to answer the three questions. In the Teacher Guide for this section, teachers are provided with a Model Your Thinking script to support students in completing this task: “I read the prompt and I know that I am exploring how Conan O’Brien uses anecdotes and examples. First, I will look at O’Brien’s analogy and explain how it demonstrates his experiences. Then, I will examine the anecdotes in the 3rd and 4th paragraph and determine what they illustrate about the speaker’s life. Finally, I will explain how O’Brien’s personal anecdotes are an effective way to convey his central idea about failure and success.” Support for Students with Exceptional Needs includes an adjusted version of the activities in the Diverse Learners Guide.
While the materials provide some scaffolds in student work and Teacher Guidance on Supporting different populations of students, some of these scaffolds and guidance are repetitive or broad. In the Draft and Review section across the materials, the following repetitive and broad scaffolds for Multi-Lingual/English Language Learners are included: “Allow for the use of bilingual glossaries, options for recording responses, and translation devices. Support student spelling and mechanics through automatic spelling and grammar checks and predictive spelling.” For Diverse Learners, the following broad scaffold is included: “Support students’ writing with predictive spelling, speech-to-text, voice typing, or dictation. Encourage students to expand each paragraph/section in the copy-and-paste outline from the previous step as needed.” Some of the teacher models for specific strategies are explained and examples provided; some only direct teachers to model or encourage a strategy or scaffold without providing an example in the materials. For example, teachers are provided with some directives on how to alter student work for students who need more support. One example of this is the suggestion to use the chunking strategy with a complex text. The Diverse Learner Guide includes modified graphic organizers and worksheets that provide the students with definitions, sentence starters, or shortened versions of the activity.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.
The materials identify opportunities for students to engage in reading a wide variety of text types and genres to support the achievement of grade-level expectations across the school year; however, the materials do not provide teacher guidance to foster independent reading, such as accountability procedures, schedules, or tracking evidence. Students read 57 texts during lessons labeled as individual, small group, pairs, or Whole-Class learning. Students generally engage with about eight texts in each of the seven units across the school year. These texts represent various text types and genres, including fiction, poetry, informational texts, myths, speeches, opinions, and memoirs. Materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 4, students read the essay “Where I Lived and What I Lived For” by Henry David Thoreau. Students build vocabulary, reflect on factors that inform identities and critical influences that shape who people become, analyze how Thoreau uses personal experiences to convey ideas and make inferences about the author’s point of view.
In Unit 3, Module 3, students read a philosophical fiction short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. LeGuin. Students explore how authors layer different types of conflict throughout a story to reveal themes about serious social issues and moral dilemmas.
In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Conan O’Brien Commencement Address.” This speech was presented to the 2011 graduates of Dartmouth College. Students identify how an author uses humor, anecdotes, and direct quotes to convey a message.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit planner includes a pacing guide for 50-minute class periods. The 50-minute guide includes 22-26 days of lessons. These include one day to preview the unit and set personal goals, one day to explore the theme, approximately three days for each of the four close reading texts, two days for the five Read Across Genres texts, two days for Debate or Socratic Discussion, five days for the portfolio writing assignment, and one day to reflect on learning. Most units consist of three to four close-reading texts and five Read Across Genres of texts.
In Unit 5, students read one play. Each text is read over three days for a total of twelve days. Students can complete these lessons individually, in pairs, in small groups, or as a whole class. On Days 1 and 2, students preview the unit theme and journal response to a guiding question, complete a vocabulary map, and make a personal connection to the text. On Day 3, students complete a Before You Read The Play lesson. On Days 4–13, students read Antigone by Sophocles and complete the Before You Read, Read and Analyze, and Write tasks, repeating the pattern for the play’s three parts. On Days 14–16, students engage in the Read Across Genres: Compare Texts and Multimedia and Read Across Genres: Informational Texts activities for two days. Lessons in each unit follow this pattern in a similar way using different texts.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a section on independent reading opportunities. For example, the Unit 1 Unit-At-a-Glance includes the following teacher guidance:
“Reserve one to two days for introducing the protocols for student choice during the first month of school:
Introduce best practices for choosing appropriately challenging reading by showing the overview video.
Allow students to brainstorm topics and types of books they may find interesting.
Provide the suggested titles book list but also assure students that they need not restrict their choices only to those titles.
Visit the library and let students select books based on the strategies introduced in the introductory video.
Provide a class period or more for students to ‘get hooked on their book’ of choice while you conduct 1:1 conferences with students to understand their S.M.A.R.T. goals and progress.
Model your expectations of how to complete reading logs and share submission and grading expectations.”
The Unit 2 Unit-At-a-Glance includes the following guidance:
“Select model book logs that demonstrate the expectations of the independent reading protocol and remove student names. Share digital copies of the exemplar work and review its exemplar qualities with the class.”
Under Resources, Curriculum Resources, Grade 12, Reading, Implementing Independent Reading, slide 8, the materials include a blank reading log with sentence stems to support students in writing about texts.
Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options” for the Unit. There are four independent reading options provided to students for each unit. Each of the options is thematically linked to the content in each unit. The materials include a summary of each text to support students in making a selection based on their individual interests (student choice structure). The materials present teachers with several independent reading structures in the Implementing Independent Reading Guide. In addition to this “student choice” structure, teachers could choose to implement book clubs in two different structures: “one longer work, small groups” or “multiple longer works, small groups.” The materials include the pros and cons of all three structures for independent reading so that teachers can make the right choice for their students.
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The materials provide students with opportunities to respond to text-specific and text-dependent questions that require students to engage with the text directly.
The materials provide a variety of protocols to support students in speaking and listening skills. Throughout the course of the year, students participate in Socratic discussions, panel discussions, debate games, pitch decks, and performances. The materials provide opportunities across a variety of speaking and listening skills for students to demonstrate knowledge of what they are reading.
The materials include on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks, including Quick Journals and Responses to Text, are varied and frequent. Process writing is included in each unit and varies throughout the year in type, including research writing, opinion essays, narrative writing, and personal statements. The materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different genres of writing. The writing genre distribution is 33.3% argumentative, 41.7% informational/explanatory, and 25% narrative, which aligns with the grade-level writing distribution of 40/40/20 required by the standards. There are frequent opportunities across the school year for students to practice and apply writing using evidence.
The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include some direct, explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.
The materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments requiring students to engage with the text directly. Students read texts multiple times to demonstrate comprehension and complete tasks that require textual evidence to support what is explicitly stated and make valid inferences. The materials follow a specific pattern across all units where students read texts with embedded pauses and reflection questions. They complete the Check step, where they answer five text-specific multiple-choice questions. In the next step, Analyze, they highlight details that will help them provide evidence for a text-dependent writing prompt. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for each step of the lesson; however, this guidance is often general and restates the information found in the Student Guide. Direct instruction and teacher modeling are not always directly related to each text. Guidance is often not specific to text-dependent questions and tasks of each lesson, and they are the same for Grades 9–12. The Resources tab contains training, on-demand videos, and Teacher Toolkit materials to support general planning and implementation.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 4, students read an excerpt from Where I Lived and What I Lived For by Henry David Thoreau and answer five multiple-choice questions. After answering the questions, students answer the prompt: “Using specific evidence from the text, what can readers infer about Thoreau’s views on society and human independence from this essay? Consider what views Thoreau explicitly states versus those that he implies in your response.”
In Unit 3, Module 4, students read “A Brief and Fearful Star” by Carmen Maria Machado. During the Analyze step, students highlight the text to mark sentences that will help them answer the writing prompt, “Analyze how the post-apocalypse has impacted the narrator and their family. How does the history of the monsters contribute to their point of view? How does their mother’s death force the narrator to face their fears of leaving home and going out into the world?”
In Unit 4 Module 2, students read “A 105-Mile-Long City Will Snake through the Saudi Desert. Is That a Good Idea?” by Bill Chappell. In the Check step, students answer five multiple-choice questions:
“What is the impact of the author’s use of descriptive language at the start of the article?
Read the sentence from the article: ‘The designs revealed today for the city's vertically layered communities will challenge the traditional flat, horizontal cities and create a model for nature preservation and enhanced human livability…’ Which word most closely matches the meaning of preservation as it is used in the sentence?
How does the author’s use of headings support the central idea of the article?
How do the visuals support the Saudi Arabian leaders’ claim that the new city will be a ‘model for nature preservation and enhanced human livability’?
Which evidence from the text best supports the idea that The Line could create unforeseen ecological harm while solving existing concerns?”
After the Check step, students begin to analyze by highlighting specific information in the text and summarizing to answer the prompt, “How does the author use sections, bullet points, photos, and videos to help readers understand the main idea in the article?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Guide provides general guidance for each lesson step in each unit.
In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Artificial Intelligence is Now Used to Predict Crime. But Is It Biased?” by Randy Rieland. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for the Share Your Reflections section. Guidance states,
“Assist students in switching between the Pause and Reflect questions online and recording their responses in the Student Guide.
Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses.
Remind them to record their discussion reflections in the Student Guide.”
In Unit 4, Module 2, students read “A 105-Mile-Long City Will Snake through the Saudi Desert. Is That a Good Idea?” by Bill Chappell. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for the Share Your Reflections section. Guidance states,
“Assist students in switching between the Pause and Reflect questions online and recording their responses in the Student Guide.
Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses.
Remind them to record their discussion reflections in the Student Guide.”
In Unit 7, Module 4, students read “The Yellow Wallpaper” and “The Hacienda” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. In the Develop section, students plan an argument using the prompt, “Compare and contrast the women who are wives and the stories’ narrators in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ and ‘The Hacienda.’ How do the texts establish their narrators as protagonists?” The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for this section:
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence, and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.”
In the Resources tab, Training Courses, materials provide video training modules for teachers, including “Establishing Literacy Routines with CERCA Slides, Direct Instruction Lessons, Skill Practice Lessons, and Six Steps for Close Reading and Writing Lessons.” The On-Demand Video Library contains on-demand training videos, such as “Must Moments in Literacy” videos, demonstrating the conditions needed for successful implementation and the common challenges. The Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, Graphic Organizers to Support Close Reading, Effective Writing, and Critical Thinking provides teachers with graphic organizers for reading texts.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.
The materials provide frequent and varied opportunities and protocols to support students’ speaking and listening skills across the year. In each unit, students have opportunities for evidence-based partner, small group, and whole class discussions using formal protocols, such as Socratic Discussions, Debates, Panel Discussions, and Performances. The materials provide direct instruction and skills practice lessons around each speaking and listening protocol in a tab at the top of every unit. These lessons are the same across Grades 9–12. The student guide includes worksheets to help students prepare for more formal speaking and listening activities. Each unit incorporates various speaking opportunities for students to react to and reflect on the unit content. The materials provide teacher guidance to help the teacher support students throughout the lesson. The guidance provides lesson rationale, Lesson snapshots, Lesson Roadmap, Support for English Language Development, Support for Students with Exceptional Needs, and Support for Further Exploration and Thinking. In the Resources tab, teachers can access materials to support implementation, such as training courses, on-demand videos, the Help Center, the ThinkCERCA Blog, and rubrics.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Direct Instruction and Skills Practice slideshow lessons in each unit include instructions for performing each speaking and listening task. Topics and protocols include:
Rules for Discussion
Be prepared.
Define goals and roles.
Participate in a respectful way.
Ask and respond to questions.
Reflect on ideas.
How to Deliver an Oral Presentation
Keys to a strong oral presentation
Types of oral presentations
Organization
Tips for writing note cards
Presentation language - formal and informal
Appropriate use of voice, props, and gestures.
Socratic Discussions
What is a Socratic Discussion?
Steps to answer the Socratic Question
Prepare Reasoning for the Discussion
Create your argument and forming a counterargument
Respectful speaking and listening rules including expressing ideas civilly, questioning members to bring in all viewpoints, making eye contact to show active listening.
Sentence frames provided for questions and statements to build effective discussion
Panel Discussion
What is a panel discussion?
Panel members - each bringing a different type of expertise or point of view on the topic
The Moderator and audience roles
Format - brief introduction by each panel member, questions from the moderator, questions from the audience, and brief closing by each panel member
How to prepare
Respectful speaking and listening rules including expressing ideas civilly, questioning members to bring in all viewpoints, making eye contact to show active listening.
Sentence frames provided for questions and statements to build effective discussion
Pitch Deck
Definition of Pitch Deck
How to prepare for the pitch
How to prepare reasoning
Characteristics of a great pitch deck
Listening rules of the audience
Debate Game
Preparing reasoning and evidence for the discussion
Forming a counterargument
How to speak and listen in a Socratic Discussion
Speaking and listening rules
Questions and statements to build effective discussion
Performance
Prepare
Perform
Be a Respectful Audience Member
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains one module focused on a speaking and listening activity. The Teacher Guide for this module includes guidance for all parts of the activity.
Under Resources, Speaking and Listening, Speaking and Listening Toolkit- Grade 12, materials include a toolkit for teachers and students. This toolkit includes observation tools and guidance for each Speaking and Listening activity type in the curriculum.
In Unit 3, Module 2, Share Your Reflections, the Teacher Guide states: “Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses.”
In Unit 6, Module 6, students create a Pitch Deck. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for teachers to lead students through the step-by-step process of building a Pitch Deck. Teachers “Conduct the Poll Again” activity and Reflect on the Pitch Deck presentations in their groups by answering questions such as “What did people do well? and What could we improve?” Afterward, the teacher prompts students to answer the following questions from the Student Guide:
“What were the strongest arguments, ideas, and evidence presented?
Did your ideas about the topic change?
Did you learn more about the topic?”
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.
The materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching. Materials provide multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks. Unit tasks include Socratic Discussions, Debates, Performances, and Pitch Decks. They all require students to synthesize information from the unit texts and include text evidence in their speaking and listening tasks. Texts build knowledge, and tasks require students to use evidence to support their thinking and research. Materials include multiple opportunities for pair, small group, and class discussions. Direct Instruction lessons include Speaking and Listening protocols, and the protocols include formats for peer feedback and reflection. Materials provide teacher guidance for speaking and listening opportunities.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion on the Essential Question, “How can stories help us reexamine our lives and our roles in the lives of others?” Students reflect on the Essential Question, then prepare for the discussion by making a claim and supporting it with three reasons and evidence from the texts. They also make notes on the counterargument.
Work with peers to promote civil, democratic discussions and decision-making, set clear goals and deadlines, and establish individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion on the question, “How do the expectations of society influence the decisions you make?” In the Student Guide, students are presented with the guidelines for participating in the lesson: “Prepare observations about the texts you have read, and be ready to share your evidence and explain your reasoning effectively. The goal is not to just share your point of view or ‘win’ but to explore a text together, so good listening is important. Take notes. Speak respectfully. You might not agree with everything your peers share about the topic or text, but you can still express your ideas civilly. Consider a Socratic discussion an opportunity to expand the circle to include all points of view on complex topics so that regardless of whether or not people agree, they have considered many aspects of the issues deeply and are truly well-informed when they take a position. This kind of collaboration is an important skill for success in school, the workplace, civic life, and in your personal life.”
Make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, students create a Pitch Deck using what they have learned from unit texts and their own retrospection. Students create a set of recorded slides that accompany a presentation. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for the activity before, during, and closing, focused on the Essential Question, “What are the risks and rewards of various post-secondary choices?” Using the template in the Student Guide, students create a Pitch Deck using text selections from the unit and other sources. The template includes Title Page, Defining a Career Pathway, My Interests, My Career Pathway Options, Possible Careers, Possible Challenges, Pitch Your Top Career Path, Explanation of Career Pathway Selected, Post-Secondary Plan, and Closing Page.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative perspectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Explore the Theme, Preview the Essential Question, Knowledge, Understanding, and Skills lesson, students explore the Essential Question, “Should robots and other forms of artificial intelligence be used to perform important tasks in our communities?” In a class discussion, the teacher asks several related questions, giving students an opportunity to brainstorm their initial thoughts, including, “Does artificial intelligence do more harm than good for communities and wider society? Is AI a force for community safety or a harmful step in the wrong direction? Should communities use AI in the healthcare sector? Is AI that is used for instruction and grading ethical?”
In Unit 6, Explore the Theme Overview, Facilitation Notes, the Essential Question is, “What are the risks and rewards of various post-secondary choices?” During the lesson, the teacher asks the following guiding questions, “Do you have a plan for financing your post-secondary path? When life seems unfair, what are the best options to move forward? How do we balance the cost of college with the benefits of education? How can various strategies help us achieve our goals? How do you know when you are an adult?” There was no evidence found of students posing questions.
Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives; synthesize comments, claims, and evidence made on all sides of an issue; resolve contradictions when possible; and determine what additional information or research is required to deepen the investigation or complete the task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, the Student Guide includes instructions for planning and taking part in a Panel Discussion. Student instructions state to plan for the following parts: “an opening statement, opportunities to answer 3-5 questions from the moderator and the audience, and a closing statement.” Guidance is provided for students during the discussion: “Listen Respectfully: During the panel discussion, it is important to listen to others so your answers to questions can add new information to the discussion. While all of you are looking at similar topics, you will also use evidence differently. It is important to listen to your peers closely so that you can answer appropriately.”
Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make informed decisions and solve problems, evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source and noting any discrepancies among the data. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, students prepare for and conduct a debate on the Essential Question, “Should robots and other forms of artificial intelligence be used to perform important tasks in our communities?” Students review four informational articles, a video, two opinion texts, and two visual texts. Students take notes on each source as they prepare for the debate. There was no evidence found for evaluating the credibility and accuracy of sources.
Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, assessing the stance, premises, links among ideas, word choice, points of emphasis, and tone used. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, students build a claim and write an argument to the prompt, “Using evidence from the text, which do you see having a greater influence on the narrator’s identity: his sense of self, societal expectations, duty, or an understanding stranger?” After writing their argument, students conduct a peer review. The peer reviewer uses the Student Checklist for Peer and Self Editing, which includes statements such as, “Takes a clear stance based on the question, States an alternative or opposing viewpoint, Explains why the alternative viewpoint is not as strong as the claim, Includes three or more clear facts or examples that support the claim and reasons, etc.” After students receive feedback from their peers, they complete a feedback loop worksheet answering questions, “From the feedback provided, what is one thing you agree with? From the feedback provided, what’s one thing you’ll improve before you complete the next assignment? And from the feedback you received, what is one question you have?”
In Unit 7, Module 2, students summarize “What Redburn Saw at Launcelott’s-Hey” by Herman Melville and “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Students share their summaries with a partner. Students become familiar with the online Share Your Argument Builder to build a claim using the prompt, “How are symbols and/or motifs used in ‘The Minister’s Black Veil’ and ‘What Redburn Saw at Launcelott’s-Hey’ to communicate the duties and responsibilities that individual citizens have when living collectively in a society?” Students share their arguments in small groups and use the Student Checklist for Peer and Self Editing. As students receive peer feedback, they take notes in the student guide. The ThinkCERCA Feedback Loop Example is another resource to help students reflect on the feedback they receive. There was no evidence found for identifying fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence.
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, students prepare for and conduct a debate on the Essential Question, “Should robots and other forms of artificial intelligence be used to perform important tasks in our communities?” Students prepare for a whole-class Debate Game in which the class is divided into two teams, each with one to four speakers. The remaining team members participate by helping to develop arguments, plan rebuttals, and write closing arguments. Teams take turns presenting their arguments to each other, develop rebuttals or counterarguments, and then state their objections to the opposing argument. Students are encouraged to listen carefully and take notes while the opposing team presents. At the end of the debate, the class answers a reflection question: “What side were you first leaning toward in the debate? Has it changed? What role did your peers have in your learning?” Then they discuss as a class, “Which arguments were the strongest on both sides during the debate?”
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i.
The materials include a variety of on-demand, process writing, and short-focused project opportunities across the school year. Digital resources are incorporated since the materials are accessed in the publisher’s online platform. Learning opportunities are available for full class, small group, pairs, or individual work. On-demand writing tasks include goal setting, unit preview analysis, Quick Journal, Topic Overview, Connect, Write to Impress, Reflect on Your Learning, and Text Summaries. The Your Portfolio section includes Process writing tasks at the end of each unit, which are connected to the unit in theme and writing tasks. The tasks include personal narrative, argumentative essay, short story, research paper, cause and effect essay, and literary analysis. Other process writing tasks include the Develop step online, Share Your Argument Builder in the Student Guide, and Research Big Ideas. The process writing tasks are expected to be completed over three to five days. The Student Guide provides guidance for each step of the writing process. The online lesson interface also provides guidance for students through sentence frames, graphic organizers, and peer editing checklists. Because the materials are mainly accessed digitally, students have many opportunities to incorporate digital resources while composing written work online. The Teacher Guide provides a Lesson Snapshot and Lesson Roadmap. Support for English Language Learners, Students with Exceptional Needs, and Further Exploration and Thinking are also provided.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “The Party” by Ava Kadishson Schieber. After reading about the topic in the Overview, students think about related experiences and respond in writing using the prompt, “Describe a time when you felt uncomfortable or out of place in a particular situation. Use vivid sensory details to describe how you felt, what you were thinking, and what actions you took as a result?” Using a Think-Pair-Share, students share their reflections.
In Unit 3, Module 4, prior to reading “A Brief and Fearful Star” by Carmen Maria Machado, students complete the following on-demand task: “Write a very brief response based on your personal experience. There is no right or wrong answer. What parts of your identity are most important to you? How do you think your identity would be different without any knowledge about your past?”
In Unit 5, Module 1, prior to reading Antigone Part 1 by Sophocles, students answer a Quick Journal: “Think of what your own family, chosen family, or an important community that you are part of considers its most deeply held values and beliefs. Why are these values so important to the group? When have you felt compelled to uphold these values? When have you felt conflicted about them? Then answer the following question: What is our responsibility to uphold our family values?” Students share their writing in pairs or small groups.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, students write a short story for the prompt, “Think about the ways in which people are affected by their relationships. Write a short story in which characters have a profound effect on the people that they know, care about, or interact with.” In the 50-minute class pacing guide, students write the story in five days, and the process includes one day for pre-writing, two days for drafting, one day for editing and revising, and one day for sharing and reflecting. The Student Guide includes a checklist with relevant skills lessons for each writing process step, a final narrative rubric, a graphic organizer to map the narrative, a peer editing checklist, a worksheet on “show, don’t tell,” and a reflection page. A student exemplar is included for students to read and answer questions about as part of the online lessons. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for each step of the writing process.
In Unit 4, students write an informative essay for the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the issues and solutions around how a community lives sustainably? ” In the 50-minute class pacing guide, students write the essay in five days, and the process includes one day for pre-writing, two days for drafting, one day for editing and revising, and one day to share and reflect. The Student Guide includes a checklist with relevant skills lessons for each step of the writing process, a final narrative rubric, a graphic organizer to map each cause and effect showing the play's tensions and conflicts, a peer editing checklist, and a reflection page. A student exemplar is included for students to read and answer questions about as part of the online lessons. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for each step of the writing process.
In Unit 7, students write a literary analysis essay for the prompt, “Using the stories, poetry, and other texts from this unit, write a comparative analysis to compare and contrast the messages two or more works of American literature present about the ways community shapes and is shaped by the people within it. Use evidence from two texts and others in the unit to support your answer.” In the 50-minute class pacing guide, students write the essay in five days, and the process includes one day for pre-writing, two days for drafting, one day for editing and revising, and one day to share and reflect. The Student Guide includes a checklist with relevant skills lessons for each step of the writing process, a final argumentative rubric, graphic organizers to map the similarities and differences between the texts, a graphic organizer for organizing the essay, a peer editing checklist, and a reflection page. A student exemplar is included for students to read and answer questions about as part of the online lessons. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for each step of the writing process.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All units include interactive digital components such as video/slideshow skills lessons, online reading of texts including audio and multiple choice comprehension questions, guided writing lessons which include digital highlighting and note taking on the texts as a prewriting step, sentence frames, and instruction for each step in the writing process, and interactive rubric checklists.
In Unit 2, students write an argumentative essay for the following prompt: “Based on your readings, what is the best way to design and utilize AI to help, not harm, communities?” Students write the essay in the online lesson, Portfolio: Writing Your Argumentative Essay, which includes multiple typing steps. In the Develop step, students draft a claim with reasoning, evidence, and a counterargument. In the Create step, students write a draft, including an introduction and conclusion. The digital interface provides help if students click a “Need help getting started” link, which opens up general instructions about structure, instructions, body, conclusion, and audience.
In Unit 3, students view a website during Read Across the Genres and complete an on-demand writing. Instructions include: “Interact with and read the UN Sustainable Development Goals by the United Nations website. Summarize why the United Nations might have created these expectations for peace and prosperity by 2030. Do you think the timeline is achievable? Then answer, Who bears the responsibility for improving the quality of life, peace, and prosperity? Is it the individual, the government, or both?”
In Unit 6, students create a Pitch Deck on the online platform. They use knowledge from unit texts and their own retrospection to create the presentation on the Essential Question, “What are the risks and rewards of various post-secondary choices?” Students insert required information using a template that includes the following topics: Title Page, The Importance of Activities, My Interests, My Current Activities, My Extracurricular Path Options, Possible Challenges, Pitch Your Top Activity, Explanation of Activity Selected, Postsecondary Plan, and Closing Page.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.
The materials provide opportunities for students to address different types of writing. The materials focus on argumentative writing skills; the CERCA acronym stands for Claims, Evidence, Reasoning, Counterarguments, and Audience. In each unit, the first four modules include multiple writing lessons connected to an argumentative or informative/explanatory prompt related to unit texts. For this reason, the distribution of writing types across all tasks is 33.3% argumentative, 41.7% informational/explanatory, and 25% narrative, which reflects the 40/40/20 writing distribution requirement. At each grade level, the Portfolio writing tasks are personal narrative, argumentative essay, short story, research paper, cause-and-effect essay, personal statement, and literary analysis. Some writing instruction is included throughout the materials through a series of slide decks that present guidance for students in planning, drafting, and revising. The Teacher Guide includes extra writing instruction guidance in Show and Tell, and Teach Academic Writing Skills boxes. Rubrics included require students to implement the elements of writing as required by the standards.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing, that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Percentage or number of opportunities for argumentative writing: Two units address argumentative writing. Portfolio writing assignments include an argumentative essay in Unit 2 and a literary analysis in Unit 7. Four (33.3%) of writing opportunities over six units are argumentative.
Unit 1: 0
Unit 2: 2
Unit 3: 0
Unit 4: 0
Unit 5: 0
Unit 6: 0
Unit 7: 2
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing: Two units address informative/explanatory writing. Portfolio writing assignments include a research paper in Unit 4, and the other is a cause-and-effect essay in Unit 5. Five (41.7%) of writing opportunities over seven units are informative/explanatory.
Unit 1: 0
Unit 2: 0
Unit 3: 0
Unit 4: 2
Unit 5: 2
Unit 6: 1
Unit 7: 0
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing: Three units address narrative writing. Portfolio writing assignments include a personal narrative in Unit 1, a short story in Unit 3, and a personal statement in Unit 6. Three (9%) of writing opportunities are narrative.
Unit 1: 1
Unit 2: 0
Unit 3: 1
Unit 4: 0
Unit 5: 0
Unit 6: 1
Unit 7: 0
Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay for the prompt, “Based on your readings, what is the best way to design and utilize AI to help, not harm, communities?” Students use online modules, graphic organizers, and direct instruction to write an argumentative essay in an estimated three to five days. In the Student Guide, students use the Choose Your Argument guide and the Map Your Argument graphic organizer. During the Draft, students navigate online to the Portfolio: Writing Your Argumentative Essay to complete the Develop and Draft section. In the final section, Edit, students revise and edit the draft. In this section, students navigate online to Portfolio: Writing the Argumentative Essay and review the revising and editing sections. Next, students pair and use the Make It Powerful graphic organizer in the Student Guide to find the most important appeal sections and look for neutral words that can be improved upon. Students then navigate to the Portfolio: Writing Your Argumentative Essay, Review step and use the Share Your Argument graphic organizer in the Student Guide to work with a partner to read and listen to the argument to locate major parts that need more development. In the Portfolio: Writing Your Argument Essay, students complete the Review step and then complete the Share Your Argument in the Student Guide. In this step, students work with a partner to complete a graphic organizer answering the following questions: “What is your claim? What evidence do you have to support it? Do you have a counterargument?” The Read and Analyze step within Portfolio: Writing Your Argumentative Essay is completed next. In the Student Guide, students edit their drafts with a partner according to the Edit the Draft Together guide. A Student Checklist for Peer and Self Editing Argumentative Writing is available as needed. Students write a brief reflection of their experience. In closing the lesson, this reflection may take the form of a quick-write, exit ticket, or turn and talk.
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a cause-and-effect essay for the prompt, “Choose a character from Antigone and explain how their internal conflicts shape their actions and reveal Sophocles’ commentary on a particular aspect of being human. Consider the characters’ competing desires, ambitions, obligations, and influences in your response.” Direct instruction is provided in a self-paced digital lesson, Writing the Cause and Effect Essay, including slides defining a cause and effect essay, how to organize the essay, what should be included in the introduction, examples of reasons and evidence in a cause-and-effect essay, using transitions and figurative language, and conclusion tips. A five-question quiz follows the slide show to check for understanding. In the Student Guide, a checklist of tasks is included for the pre-writing, drafting, and revising steps, as well as an informative rubric. A graphic organizer is provided with prompts and guidance for students to make “because” and “as a result” statements. Students complete writing online in the Portfolio: Writing Your Cause and Effect Essay Writing Lesson and are guided through each step with sentence frames and organizing features, including plan, outline, draft, and review. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for the pre-writing, drafting, and editing stages. These notes include rationale, lesson snapshot and roadmap, and support for English language Development and students with exceptional needs.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Unit 3, Module 7, students compose a short story for the prompt, “Think about the ways in which people are affected by their relationships. Write a short story in which characters have a profound effect on the people that they know, care about, or interact with.” Students read four short stories as anchors for the task. In Module 7, Portfolio: Writing the Short Story, students read Direct Instruction, Writing the Short Story, and answer five multiple-choice questions. Before writing, students read the Narrative Writing Rubric. The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for this section “Show and Tell—Endings in Narrative: Begin the lesson with an activity on different types of narrative endings, such as implicit, surprise, and ambiguous resolutions. An implicit resolution subtly hints at the outcome without explicitly stating it; a surprise resolution introduces an unexpected twist or revelation; an ambiguous resolution leaves the conclusion uncertain or open to interpretation. Discuss as a class how authors and creators craft these various types of conclusions to create ambiguity and different narrative experiences. Use an escape room experience and discuss three possible escapes: discovering a hidden passage behind a bookshelf, deciphering a complex puzzle to unlock a secret door, or unraveling a series of clues to reveal a hidden key. In groups of three, students will create a setting from which a character must escape (such as Rapunzel in the tower). Students will then write three different endings for it: an implicit resolution, a surprise resolution, and an ambiguous resolution. After completing their endings, groups will exchange their scenarios and provide feedback on which ending they find most effective.” Students read a Student Exemplar and begin writing the short story. Students complete the two steps, Think: Develop and Create: Draft and Review. The Teacher Guide includes guidancefor pre-writing, drafting, revising, and editing, which correspond to short story development in the Student Guide.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing.
Introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students complete online lessons and pre-writing activities and write an argumentative essay. In the Student Guide, Map Your Argument, students complete graphic organizers to develop a Hook, Claim/Counterclaim, Evidence, and Rhetorical Appeals. Students answer the questions, “What opinion do you have about the issue? What opposing viewpoint might critics have?”
Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience's knowledge level and concerns. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, Develop, students plan an argument by filling in various boxes. They enter their claim in one box and click to enter information into the following additional boxes: Add Another Reason, Add Another Evidence, Add Another Reasoning, and Add Another Counterargument. In Share Your Argument, when the initial draft is complete, students pair with a partner and ask questions to help strengthen each other’s argument using greater detail. Students ask the following questions: “What is your claim? What evidence do you have to support it? Do you have a counterargument?” The graphic organizer has a Share and Listen column for students to complete. In the Share column, students list three major parts of the person’s argument that need development, and in the Listen column, students list major parts of their own argument that needs development.
Use words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Module 7, Use Transition Sentences, when the initial literary analysis draft is complete, students partner to look for sentences in the essay that need transitions and determine how to choose words that transition from one idea to the next. When completed, students reflect on whether or not the revisions reinforced the relationships between ideas in the essay and if there are opportunities to revise to develop those ideas further.
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, Teacher’s Guide, Student Learning Description, Writing the Argumentative Essay, students view slides to learn components of an argumentative essay. In the Check section, one slide is included that references tone and style, which reminds students to maintain a formal style and objective tone and also provides examples of what to avoid. No evidence was found that supports students during the writing process to establish and maintain an objective tone and formal style. In the Review section, students can edit their text and review their work, including punctuation and spelling, before clicking the submit box.
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Module 7, Teacher’s Guide, Student Learning Description, Writing a Literary Analysis, students view slides to learn components of a Literary Analysis. In the Check section, two slides are related to the conclusion. One provides a definition, and the second is an example. In the Student Guide, Organize Your Essay, a graphic organizer has a space for students to write a conclusion.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a cause-and-effect essay for the prompt, “Choose a character from Antigone and explain how their internal conflicts shape their actions and reveal Sophocles’ commentary on a particular aspect of being human. Consider the characters’ competing desires, ambitions, obligations, and influences in your response.” In the Student Guide, a graphic organizer is provided for students to map out each cause and effect they will highlight in their essay. No other formatting support was found.
Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience's knowledge of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper for the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the issues and solutions around how a community lives sustainably?” A graphic organizer, Write It and Cite It, is provided in the Student Guide for the revising stage. They review the online lesson, Citing and Documenting Sources, and then instructions state: “Look for places in their paper where they have not introduced, summarized, or provided a concluding sentence for their evidence.” In the graphic organizer, Map your Research Paper, student directions state: “As you read the texts and sources, you collected evidence that supports your solution. In this space, select at least three pieces of evidence that will be the basis for your three body paragraphs. Be sure to note which sources you used.”
Use appropriate and varied transitions and syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a cause-and-effect essay for the prompt, “Choose a character from Antigone and explain how their internal conflicts shape their actions and reveal Sophocles’ commentary on a particular aspect of being human. Consider the characters’ competing desires, ambitions, obligations, and influences in your response.” In the Student Guide, students pair with another student and look for sentences in the essay that need transitions. Then, they determine how to choose words that transition from one idea to the next. Example transition words and revision steps are provided.
Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary, and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper based on the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the issues and solutions around how a community lives sustainably?” The rubric for this assignment includes checklist items, “Uses precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic.” No further instruction is found in the Student or Teacher Guide.
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper for the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the issues and solutions around how a community lives sustainably?” The rubric for this assignment includes checklist items, “Writer establishes and maintains a formal style and objective tone throughout this longer research project. The style of writing is appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.” No further instruction is found in the Student or Teacher Guide.
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper for the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the issues and solutions around how a community lives sustainably? ” In the Student Guide, the graphic organizer, Map Your Research Paper, the guidance includes, “In your conclusion, you will want to restate your claim, summarize the problem, and then use your solution to motivate readers. What is your call to action? What do you want readers to remember?”
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Engage and orient the reader by setting out a problem, situation, or observation and its significance, establishing one or multiple point(s) of view, and introducing a narrator and/or characters; create a smooth progression of experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Module 7, students write a personal narrative for the prompt: “Where do you see yourself ten years from now? How will you get there? What will you need to achieve your goals?” In Map Your Plan, students complete a chart with four categories: Hook, Building a Plan, Making Your Plan a Reality, and Postsecondary Plan and Conclusion. In the Hook section, the following instruction is provided: “In this paragraph, you will paint a picture of your future plan. Specifically, you should hook your reader by explaining where you want to be in ten years. You should state this clearly and concisely in a way that excites readers about your plan.” In the Hook box, students answer the question, “How will you tell your reader about your plan?”
Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, and multiple plot lines, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 7, Student Guide, Show, Don’t Tell, students instructions state: “When you have finished an initial draft, pair with another writer and ask each other to find a character, description of the setting, and an event in each other’s stories. Then determine how you might show, not tell, by using descriptions for each.” A chart is provided with four categories: Character, Setting, and Event. An example of character description is included: “Experiment with ways to describe your character by showing what they feel rather than telling the reader what they feel. Instead of saying, ‘She was very surprised,’ have the character do or say something that shows surprise. ‘Her eyes grew wide, and when she opened her mouth to speak, nothing came out.’”
Use a variety of techniques to sequence events so that they build on one another to create a coherent whole. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 7, Student Guide, Map Your Story, students complete a graphic organizer with the following instruction: “[Write] as many descriptive details as you can about your character, setting, and events in your story. Organize your writing with a clear beginning, middle, and end.” In the Middle box, instructions state: “Write about the events in the story that comprise the Rising Action, leading up to the turning point, or Climax. What is the Climax, the most exciting part?”
Use precise words and phrases, telling details, and sensory language to convey a vivid picture of the experiences, events, setting, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 7, Student Guide, Show, Don’t Tell, students instructions state: “When you have finished an initial draft, pair with another writer and ask each other to find a character, description of the setting, and an event in each other’s stories. Then determine how you might show, not tell, by using descriptions for each.” A chart is provided with four categories: Character, Setting, and Event. An example of character description is included: “Experiment with ways to describe your character by showing what they feel rather than telling the reader what they feel. Instead of saying, ‘She was very surprised,’ have the character do or say something that shows surprise. ‘Her eyes grew wide, and when she opened her mouth to speak, nothing came out.’”
Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on what is experienced, observed, or resolved over the course of the narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 7, Student Guide, Map Your Story, students complete a table with the following instructions: “Organize your writing with a clear beginning, middle, and end.” Additional questions are provided: “What are the events that comprise the story’s Falling Action? How do the events in the Falling Action resolve the conflicts? This is your Resolution.”
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Modules 1-3, students read Antigone and write a cause-and-effect essay for the prompt, “Choose a character from Antigone and explain how their internal conflicts shape their actions and reveal Sophocles’ commentary on a particular aspect of being human. Consider the characters’ competing desires, ambitions, obligations, and influences in your response.” Students use their reflections on the various causes and effects of conflicts driven by the setting, characters, and language to answer the prompt and write their essays. This pattern is followed in all units.
Indicator 1K
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support sophisticated analysis, argumentation, and synthesis.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.
The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to complete evidence-based writing tasks across the school year. The Teacher Guide provides a Module Overview, which identifies the evidence-based writing prompt and genre. Writing opportunities are largely focused on developing and planning an argument, though analysis and synthesis are also included. Each unit includes opportunities to write claims about the text and support the claim with reasons and evidence from the text. In each unit module, the Write section includes tasks such as summarizing the selection, developing and building an argument, completing a draft, and reviewing the draft. Students work with a peer to complete graphic organizers or obtain feedback that occurs frequently during writing. When drafting, students can use an Automated Feedback feature for grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling, but the tool does not provide support for strengthening the argument. However, not all of the drafting tasks are required assignments throughout the program. While some of the module's writing pieces are essential for completion, most are optional. During the Closing of the Lessons, students reflect and share progress as a whole class. At the end of each unit, Your Portfolio writing tasks provide opportunities to write a short story, research paper, literary analysis, personal narrative, cause and effect essay, and argumentative essay. These are closely tied to the texts in their respective units and often require the synthesis of multiple texts. The Student Guide provides several graphic organizers to help students organize their thoughts and text evidence to support their claims. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for specific writing instruction throughout the materials, including reasons for the writing instruction focus, what students should be able to do, and what to focus on to grow as a writer. There is direct instruction guidance for teachers to implement. Teachers and students have access to slideshow lessons and support in the Student Guide. The materials include scaffolds for students in the Student and Teacher Guides.
Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Artificial Intelligence Is Now Used to Predict Crime. But Is It Biased?” by Randy Rieland and write an argument to the prompt, “As the author selects and arranges evidence, how does he build a case for or against using AI in crime prevention? Does he provide sufficient evidence for his position?” In the Write section, Develop, students use an interactive argument builder to make a claim and add reasons and evidence from the text to support their claim. Students may click the “Need help getting started?” link that provides sentence frames to guide students in making their claims, adding reasons and evidence, and writing a counterargument. The Teacher Guide includes guidance such as
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence, and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.”
The Student Guide includes a graphic organizer to assist students in organizing their claims and evidence. Direct Instruction slideshows are available on topics such as Citing Evidence to Support Analysis in Informational Texts and Integrating Evidence Effectively. As students Draft their responses, the Teacher Guide includes the following guidance:
“A Have students drop their drafts into the drafting space and develop their CERCAs.
Feedback Focus: Encourage students to share different aspects of their CERCA drafts to ensure they have included a strong claim, supportive reasons, and evidence.”
Teachers may click on the ThinkCERCA Argumentative Writing Feedback Bank provided in the Writing Resources in the Feedback Guidance document to find examples of writing feedback they can give students based on how well they perform on certain skills against the rubric. For example, if a student performs at a 3 out of 5, the teacher can say: “Stellar effort with your evidence! Reread your claim and then your evidence. Choose another quotation to ensure that the evidence you have is adequate enough to develop your claim and counterclaim.” In the Teacher Guide, Preview Key Concepts and Skills section, teacher guidance states, “Show and Tell - Supporting Arguments: Before presenting the Direct Instruction lesson, ask students to share a thumbs up or down on how many have written and received feedback on more than one argument about a text in the past 12 months. The class may be familiar with many concepts related to Supporting Claims with Evidence, so the brief review of some of these concepts may be done independently or as a class depending on familiarity. After the Key Academic Terms have been introduced or reviewed, have students form groups of 4 students. Assign the topic based on the image in the unit overview or the statement, ‘We live out the roles others assign to us.’ Give each group two minutes to craft a paragraph including a claim, reason, evidence, and reasoning. Ask for volunteers and discuss a few sample paragraphs, noting strengths and areas for improvement as a class. Repeat with a new topic. Finally, gauge student comfort with understanding how to support arguments effectively. Repeat as warm-up until mastered.” Additional Direct instruction is found in the Teacher Guide in the Draft and Review section: “Show and Tell - Making Claims: Ask students to create claim statements based on the prompt. Have 2-3 students offer to workshop their claims. Have students record the prompt separately on a piece of paper. Then have them circle the main question they must answer, draw a box around the specific aspects of the main question they must address, breaking the question down into as many parts as necessary. In pairs, have students list all the questions or tasks outlined in the prompt, then review them as a class. Model the checklist with several of the claims. Then have students revise their claims and continue to develop.”
In Unit 4, Module 1, students read “What Is a Carbon Footprint - And How to Measure Yours” by Kieran Mulvaney and plan a response for the prompt, “How does the author help readers understand and use the idea of a carbon footprint?” Students include a claim, reasons and evidence, reasoning, and a counterargument. Sentence frames are provided for each of the required components. The Rubric tab provides evaluation criteria. The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance:
“ Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.”
As students draft their CERCA paragraphs, The Teacher Guide includes guidance such as:
“Have students drop their drafts into the drafting space and develop their CERCAs.
Feedback Focus: Encourage students to share different aspects of their CERCA drafts to ensure they have included a strong claim, supportive reasons, and evidence.”
In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “What Redburn Saw at Launcelott's-Hey” by Herman Melville and “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Then, students write a CERCA response to the prompt, “How are symbols and/or motifs used in "The Minister's Black Veil" and "What Redburn Saw at Launcelott’s-Hey" to comment on the duties and responsibilities that individual citizens have when living collectively in a society?” As students plan their arguments, the Teacher Guide includes guidance such as:
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.”
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, students read informational news articles, opinion articles, and visual texts about artificial intelligence. In Module 7, they write an argument for the prompt, “Based on your readings, what is the best way to design and utilize AI to help, not harm, communities?” Student directions state to add evidence from the unit texts. The Student Guide provides a Map Your Argument worksheet with the following instructions: “As you read the texts, the writers used strong and credible evidence in the form of summaries, quotations, and examples that supported the arguments and issues. What evidence have you evaluated from your readings that supports your claim and allows you to further support your argument with reasoning?”
In Unit 6, students read a speech and three magazine articles. In Module 7, students write a personal statement for the prompt, “Where do you see yourself ten years from now? How will you get there? What will you need to achieve your goals?” In the Student Guide, Plan Your Future, students’ instructions state: “Use your previous classwork to reflect on your ideas in order to determine what you want to write about.”
In Unit 7, Module 7, students develop a comparative analysis for the prompt, “How do foundational works of American literature depict the role of community in shaping culture? Using the stories, poetry, and other texts from this unit, write a comparative analysis about the ways community shapes and is shaped by the people within it. Use evidence from two texts and others in the unit to support your answer.” Students complete online lessons to support their writing and complete pre-writing activities. During Pre-Write, students complete three online lessons: Writing the Literary Analysis, Portfolio: Writing Your Literary Analysis, and analyzing an exemplar. In the Student Guide, students select texts for comparison, Compare Similarities, Analyze Differences, and Finalize Your Analysis. Students develop and draft their writing on the ThinkCERCA platform. Students complete the Writing the Literary Analysis module and answer five Check questions at the end. The Portfolio: Writing Your Literary Analysis section takes students through the process of drafting, reviewing, and submitting their essays.
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
The materials provide explicit instruction on grammar and usage standards, and opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of grammar skills in context are available. The materials include a Language and Styles Best Practices Toolkit, which is presented as a resource “for teachers and students to improve audience outcomes on writing rubrics.” This toolkit provides key definitions, generic examples, and a strategy for that particular skill, including capitalization and spelling, punctuation, end punctuation, subjects and predicates, subject-verb agreement, tense, commas, varied sentence structures, redundancy, clarification, modifiers, parallelism, formal and objective style, active and passive language, and style. The materials also include direct, explicit instruction that scaffolds instruction of grammar and usage standards, especially for how students apply the skills in larger writing contexts. The Direct Instruction slideshows include 26 grammar topics. Students practice grade-level grammar standard lessons through a mix of online lessons and corresponding tasks in the Student Guide. Teachers facilitate learning by helping students move to the next online module, moving students into pairs or small groups, having students read or share aloud, having students reflect on takeaways at the close of the module, and monitoring learning progress. Illuminating Key Concepts sections in the Teacher Guides provide additional teacher guidance on teaching specific grammar and usage skills throughout the lessons. The lessons are connected to reading a text and answering questions in the Write to Impress, Build Vocabulary, Citing Evidence, Understanding Author’s Craft, or Sharpen Your Sentences tasks. These opportunities to practice grammar skills give a brief explanation of the standard with examples, general instructions that tell students to experiment with the skill and apply it to writing, and a chart to complete with single-sentence responses to prompts. While there is evidence of focused work for spelling, it is not present throughout the modules. Using quotations and correct citations is addressed by reminding students to review an online MLA Style Manual. In essay writing, grading rubrics state students should follow standard conventions, and teachers are to use the Language and Style Guide for instruction of specific skills during Module 7, Your Portfolio.
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Understand Inconsistent Usage and How Conventions Change, students read a passage from “On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien; instructions state: “Observe the phrase back-to-the-stone-age hawk, which is not typical for formal writing, and the way the author intentionally uses the derogatory word, jingo.” Students complete a chart with two passages from the text: “Experiment with rewriting the following sentences from O’Brien’s narrative. Change the conventional language and usage that might be contested by modern usage standards. Then apply your learning to your writing.” The Teacher Guide, Usage and Conventions section includes guidance for how to go over this concept with students. The guide states, “The term jingo is a dated, derogatory term referring to people who are particularly in favor of war, especially in the name of patriotism. Ask students to reflect on what other terms appear in the text that are similar or if they can think of what has replaced this dated term. Additionally, the sample passage highlights the informal language used by the author. If desired, ask students to find additional examples in the text. Following this, review the instructions and have students complete the activity. After, students should share some of their favorite sentences, identifying the types of phrases and clauses they used.”
Students have opportunities to resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g., Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 2, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Resolve Issues in Usage, students read an excerpt from “The Party” by Ava Kardishson Schrieber with the instructions, “Notice how she uses nonessential phrases, descriptive clauses, and numerous commas to create reader interest.” Students complete a chart with one provided example and two boxes to complete; instructions state: “Read the following examples of the author’s complex language usage. Resolve the contested language usage by rewriting the sentences with more clarity. Consult reference materials such as Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary as needed. Then apply your learning to your writing.” The Teacher Guide, Usage section includes guidance on how to go over this concept with students. The guide states, “ In this activity, students are asked to resolve issues with complex language usage and nonessential phrases and clauses. Review the sample passage with students, asking students to note nonessential phrases and descriptive clauses. Additional sentences from the passage or text may be used if required. Review the instructions and have students complete the activity. Emphasize that they should consult reference materials as necessary. Once the activity has been completed, have students share their sentences and discuss their changes and the effects.”
In Unit 4, Module 2, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Consult Reference Materials, students’ instructions state: “Review the Using Reference Materials lesson in ‘A 105-Mile-Long City Will Snake Through the Saudi Desert. Is That a Good Idea?’ author Bill Chappell discusses the prospect of renewable energy in the Middle East. By examining the author’s language usage and consulting specialized reference materials, readers will be able to utilize these resources in their writing.” Five sentences are provided with bold-faced words. Students complete a chart: “Consult a dictionary, a thesaurus, or a glossary and identify the following information about the words in the chart below: precise meaning, part of speech, pronunciation, etymology, a synonym, and standard usage. Indicate the resource you used and your rationale for using it.” Students choose between monolithic or bankrolled, dystopian or diversify. The Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar—Using Reference Materials section includes guidance on how to go over this concept with students. The guide states, “Explain to students that reference materials are resources that provide definitions or basic explanations of a topic, including dictionaries, encyclopedias, glossaries, and thesauruses. After completing the Direct Instruction, have students summarize the three major types of reference materials in small groups. Then, have students look at the Write to Impress Student Guide lesson. Have students discuss the meaning of the passage, especially considering context clues. As a class, discuss how the word “teeming” is used in this short passage. Look up “teeming” in both a dictionary and a thesaurus. Facilitate a class discussion on how the different definitions might change the meaning of the sentence and how context helps narrow the meaning. Then, have students complete the chart. “
Students have opportunities to observe hyphenation conventions. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Module 1, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Use Punctuation, students review six hyphenation rules with bold examples from the unit text, “Conan O’Brien’s Commencement Address.” One example includes, “After a prefix for clarity: ...your perceived failure can become a catalyst for profound re-invention.” Students complete a chart with three specific rules of hyphenation; directions state: “Respond to the writing prompt using three hyphen conventions. Writing Prompt: How does Conan O’Brien use humor, anecdotes, and quotes to convey the message that failure happens on the path to success?” One example is provided. This is the only lesson in the curriculum on hyphens. The Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar—Punctuation section includes guidance on how to go over this concept with students. The guide states, “Punctuation serves a number of functions in writing, including denoting the manner in which text is meant to be read or showing relationships between ideas. Prior to having students complete this activity, review with them the function and usage of hyphens. Hyphens can be used for any of the following: in a compound adjective before a noun, a compound adjective when used as a noun, a compound adjective when being used as both a compound adjective and noun, compound numbers consisting of two words (from 21 to 99), and after a prefix to enhance clarity. Hyphens are NOT used with the suffix -ly and after the noun being described. When reviewing the rules in the activity, discuss with students the function and form of each hyphenation convention. Have students identify some of these hyphenation conventions in the text and review them together to ensure understanding. Then review the instructions with the students. Once students have completed the activity, have students share which hyphenation convention they found the most challenging and why.”
Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, Read the Final Argumentative Rubric, in the Audience Appeal section, one of the bullets is, “This piece of writing is strengthened by a skillful command of the conventions of standard English grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling and has very few errors.” This is carried out during peer feedback tasks using graphic organizers in the Student Guide, such as during Practice Feedback using the exemplar and during Edit the Draft Together using their own piece of writing.
In Unit 3, Module 1, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Spell Correctly, instructions state: “As you write, pay careful attention to common spelling errors in these words. Proofread your sentences carefully to avoid these three common spelling mistakes.” Common mistakes are provided along with an example: “If a word can have -ly added to its adjective form, add to form an adverb. If an adjective ends in an -l, add -ly to form an adverb. If a word ends in -y, change the -y to -i before adding -ly.” Students complete a chart with the following instructions: “Read through the rules. Then, choose a word and write a sentence about the author’s message in ‘The Silence.’” The Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts In Language And Grammar—Spelling section includes guidance on how to go over this concept with students. The guide states, “Spelling correctly helps accurately represent and communicate ideas. This activity has students practice spelling words correctly and changing adjectives to adverbs. After completing the Direct Instruction, review the activity’s sample sentences with the students. Discuss how to change adjectives to adverbs. Adding -ly to an adjective forms an adverb. Adjectives that end in -l should have -ly added to them, the resulting word being spelled with two l’s. If an adjective ends in -y, change the -y to an -i- before adding the suffix -ly. After reviewing the instructions of the activity, students should complete the activity. Emphasize that students’ sentences should answer the prompt in the instructions. Have students share their work to ensure understanding.”
Students have opportunities to vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed, and apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 1, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Vary Syntax for Effect, students read examples of simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences with their part of sentence explanation. Students complete a graphic organizer with the instructions, “Using the chart below, experiment writing a variety of sentences as you respond to the prompt. Then, apply your learning to your writing. Writing Prompt: How does the author use evidence such as details about AI and popular culture to appeal to the audience in this text about the future of AI?” Students answer the question using one of each type of sentence: compound, complex, and compound-complex. This is the only lesson in the curriculum on varying syntax. The Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar—Syntax section includes guidance for teachers on how to go over this concept with students. The guide states, “. Review the sample sentences and structures. Simple sentences consist of a subject and verb, while compound sentences are two sentences joined by a comma and coordinating conjunction. Complex sentences are sentences that include a subordinate (or dependent) clause in addition to a subject and verb. Compound-complex sentences are compound sentences that also include a subordinate (or dependent) clause. Instruct students to identify the different parts (subordinate clause, subject, verb, and coordinating conjunction) of each of the sample sentences. Review students’ answers together before reviewing the instructions. Emphasize that the sentences they write should address the prompt in the instructions. Once students have completed the activity, review their sentences and discuss what effects the different types of syntax had on their writing.”
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.
The materials include a way for students to interact with and build text-specific vocabulary in the texts. The materials include a scope and sequence with the vocabulary tasks for each unit. Vocabulary facilitates students’ understanding of what they are reading. In each module, in the Student Guide, the Build Your Vocabulary activities provide one to four words that appear in the text for students to work with. While reading the text online, vocabulary words are blue so that students can click on them for a definition. Vocabulary support is also built into the online lessons through a glossary of terms. Some vocabulary words were repeated within a unit or across a unit. The year-long vocabulary plan is included in the Unit Planning Tools document for explicitly teaching vocabulary strategies and debriefing vocabulary words. The Build Your Vocabulary activities are listed as essential, and the materials also include online direct instruction, student guide tasks, and some additional offline resources. The Unit Planning Tool includes teacher guidance to support vocabulary instruction, including explicit vocabulary instruction strategies that differentiate between academic vocabulary terms and CERCA words, and a vocabulary presentation resource that provides the vocabulary terms and definitions organized by unit.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Planning Tools document provides a Vocabulary Instruction Guidance document for each unit. This document includes definitions of Key Academic Terms, CERCA words, and Focus Words (words from the reading selections). Throughout the program, the following 17 word learning strategies with guidance are provided for teachers: Morphology, Word Relationships, Prefixes, Synonyms, Frayer Model, Context Clues, Map a Word, Antonyms, Shades of Meaning, Compare and Contrast, Word Analysis, Concept Map, Word Study, Roots Words, Word Web, Analogy Chart, and Etymology of Words. Each Unit focuses on two to four of these strategies. For Unit 1, four explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instructions are presented with key strategies: “Frayer Model -Analyzing words using characteristics, examples and non-examples, Word Relationships - finding common ideas or relationships with groups of words, Map a Word - Populating a graphic organizer with meaningful aspects of new words, [and] Word Analysis - Breaking apart words to discover their meaning.” There is a link to additional guidance, including establishing vocabulary notebooks and routines. An additional link to twenty-two Vocabulary Best Practice lessons.
Unit Planning Tools include a Key Vocabulary document for each unit. This document includes a link to a slideshow of Explicit Vocabulary Instruction Resources. The slideshow includes how to set up a Vocabulary Notebook, and slides on all of the vocabulary routines provided in the materials. This document includes key academic terms and CERCA words for the unit, as well as a slide show of the Focus words and their definitions for each module. ThinkCERCA defines these different types of vocabulary words as follows and provides the following high-level teacher guidance for each type:
“Key Academic Terms include high-value vocabulary introduced in class and reviewed in the unit’s Direct Instruction. After leading students through the presentation, provide instruction to support understanding of the key concepts and skills they represent and have students record new terms. (See unit Direct Instruction for resources.)
CERCA Words found in the Build Your Vocabulary sections of the student guide deepen key conceptual understandings and enable the expression of reasoning. (The word may not appear in the text, but it captures a key concept for interpreting the text.) Use the Explicit Vocabulary Instruction in the Teacher’s Guide to provide students with explicit support for vocabulary skill development prior to facilitating the collaborative learning experience.
Focus Words are a subset of words from reading selections. They enrich grade level readings and often appear in assessments. (After teaching the Focus Words using the slide show and modeling the vocabulary strategies, use Best Practices Facilitation Resources in the Teacher’s Guide to help students develop strategies for vocabulary using engaging tasks.)”
Throughout the Teacher Guides, general Vocabulary Explicit Strategy Instruction Guidance is provided. For example, in Unit 1, Module 1, Teacher Guide, for the Build Your Vocabulary Activity, teachers have the following guidance: “Explicit Vocabulary Instruction—Use the Frayer Model: Use the Explicit Vocabulary Instruction resources to help students build vocabulary and deepen understanding of key concepts in a reading, Have students analyze 2-3 essential terms, using the graphic organizer to define the word, list characteristics and examples, and even non-examples. This process encourages discussion and collaboration as students work individually or in groups to complete the model, ultimately leading to a shared understanding of the key terms.”
The Student Guide provides one Build Your Vocabulary worksheet per module, including Map a Word, Word Analysis, Word Web, and Analogy Chart. The worksheets often include two to three vocabulary terms. In Map a Word, students write the word and definition, part of speech, root word or origin, picture of the word, synonym, antonym, and sentence using the word. In Word Analysis, students write the word, give an example, a definition or explanation, and respond to “makes me think of/connotation. In Word Web, students name words or phrases that are synonyms or closely related to the center word. In the Analogy Chart, students list a familiar concept, the new concept (word), similarities, differences, relationship categories, and what they now understand about the new concept. Other Student Guide activities that may include vocabulary practice include Raise Your Score and Write to Impress, where students practice using context clues to determine word meaning. A glossary of vocabulary terms is included with each text, and those terms are highlighted within the text so that students may click on them to see the definitions. Some general guidance is found in the Unit Planning Tools Document.
In Unit 5, Module 1, Teacher Guide, Build Your Vocabulary, teacher guidance states:
“Introduce the Build Your Vocabulary task and review the example provided.
Organize students into small groups and assign them one or more words per group.
Assist each group in sharing their findings with the entire class.”
Additional guidance states: “Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction—Context Clues: Use the Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction resources to introduce or review context clues. Use the terms in the task and provide student-friendly definitions. Illustrate the word with examples and ask students to generate their own examples. Model the process by sharing an example, such as resolute. Since we later hear a the same character described as steadfast, we might be able to guess that this suggests this character is firm on their beliefs. Have students develop additional examples of how these three relatively familiar words might mean slightly different things in different contexts. Then have students write a sentence using a new word that shows two different contexts in which the word might have slightly different meanings.”
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Your Portfolio: Writing Your Personal Narrative, 12 vocabulary words are listed, which are the same for Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12, including cohesive, concrete, eliminate, enhance, enthralling, envision, mechanics, omniscient, simultaneously, speech patterns, vital, and weave.
In Unit 1, Module 2, the words elusive and emigrated are listed as vocabulary words, and both words are found again in Module 3.
In Unit 5, Module 3, Student Guide, omnipotent and inexorable appear in a word analysis chart. Both terms are found in the glossary and the text, and inexorable is used in the topic overview. They are not found in the quiz or writing prompt.
In Unit 6, Module 1, Student Guide, Build Your Vocabulary - Map a Word, students complete a chart for the term fairness. Students read “Conan O’Brien Commencement Address,” which includes a glossary list of vocabulary terms and definitions that students will encounter in the text. The word fairness does not appear in this list. There is no instruction around the term before reading the text. As students read the text, the vocabulary terms appear in blue font, and students may click on the term to see a definition. Five multiple-choice questions are presented in the Check step after reading the text. None of these questions address vocabulary terms from the text. Fairness does not come up in the rest of the lesson for Module 1.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 3, the Teachers Guide lists Key Vocabulary Words such as bias, cardiologist, catalog, corsage, crucified, dainty, elusive, emigrated, forsake, immigrant, institutions, lukewarm, mandatory, notions, persona, racism, ridicule, self-worth, semblance, social hierarchy, tumultuous, and vulnerable. In the Student Guide, Build Your Vocabulary - students complete a Map a Word activity before reading the module text; instructions state: “Analyzing vocabulary will help you better understand, discuss, and write about a text. Complete the analysis of vocabulary terms for the selection. Use a dictionary if necessary. Fill in as many parts as you can.” Students fill in one chart for the words persona, vulnerable, and social hierarchy. Sections to map include definition, part of speech, root word or origin, picture, synonym, antonym, and sentence using the word. The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for this part of the lesson: “Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction—Map a Word: Working in groups, assign words to students. Explain that a good way to learn words is to take a deep dive to explore all aspects of a word, not just the definition. Hand out the Map a Word practice sheet and have student pairs complete the sheet with the words you assign. (words: persona, vulnerable, social hierarchy).” Students read “Prom” by Hasan Minhaj, which includes a vocabulary list with 71 words. There were no differences between the two vocabulary word lists. When reading online, all 71 vocabulary words are blue, and students can click on them for the definition.
In Unit 3, vocabulary words are provided for four anchor texts, ranging from approximately 30 to 60 words for the stories. The following words are listed to use in their vocabulary lessons for each story: “The Silence” by Haruki Murakami - adversity, deliberation, physiological; “Ride” by Linda Nagata - sedately, autonomous, degenerate; “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Linda Nagata - decorous, imperious, utopian; “A Brief and Fearful Star” by Maria Machado - post-apocalyptic, precipice, prophetic. Learning these words is meant to support students in understanding, discussing, and writing about each text.
In Unit 7, Module 1, Student Guide, Write to Impress - Acquire New Vocabulary, student instructions state: “Using the context of the surrounding language, determine the definitions of the words from the selection. Next, verify the definitions using a dictionary or glossary. Then use the words to write sentences that describe how the plot events or a character demonstrate a theme from this story.” They are presented with the terms pliant, malleable, tribulation, and curtain from “Rip Van Winkle.” These academic, domain-specific words are tied to Puritanical values. Teacher Guidance for this part of the lesson states, “Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Vocabulary: Acquire New Vocabulary: There are many ways to ascertain the meaning of unfamiliar or new words, including using context clues and consulting reference materials (such as a dictionary). Encourage students to try to use context clues first when determining the meaning of unfamiliar words before they consult a dictionary. This way, the definitive source acts as a confirmation. Review the passage in the activity with the students. Select some words that are not already a part of the activity from this passage. Confirm the definition of these words by showing students the definition in a dictionary or other relevant source. Following this, review the instructions of the activity, emphasizing that students use context clues before then confirming the definition in the dictionary. Additionally, remind them to create a sentence for each word that answers the prompt mentioned in the final sentence of the instructions. After the activity is completed, have students share their sentences and discuss.”
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level, and the materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks.
The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. The program allows students to conduct some research activities connected to the unit topics as a part of the research process. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards. The Teacher Guide includes guidance and resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units.
The implementation schedules align with the core learning. The materials include lesson-specific task timing guidance and implementation schedules can generally be completed in the allotted time. Optional tasks are meaningful and should not distract from core learning. The materials contain seven units, with each unit taking 22 to 26 days to complete, assuming 50 minutes of instruction a day.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The program includes opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials include multiple opportunities for students to read and analyze individual texts as well as multiple texts. Tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks.
The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge. Student tasks are Socratic discussions, pitch decks, performances, debate games, and panel discussions.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. Materials allow students to conduct some research activities connected to the unit topics as a part of the research process. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s)/theme(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
The materials include texts that are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive theme or topic. In each unit, the first lesson, Explore the Theme Overview, introduces the theme or topic. This one-day lesson includes instruction where students set goals, preview and analyze the theme or topic, and review the Essential Question. They may also engage in a poll, create a concept map, and analyze art, images, or quotations related to the theme or topic. Texts build knowledge and the ability to comprehend and analyze complex texts across a school year. While students engage with the texts in each unit to explore the theme’s or topic’s Essential Question, they also build skills in vocabulary and standards-based reading analysis of craft and structure and author’s style. Texts at various complexity levels help build comprehension across the school year.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each of the seven units includes a variety of texts to illustrate and develop the theme and Essential Question. Themes include: “Where Are You Going Next?,” “How Do Robots Help Us?,” “What Can We Do to Become Better Global Citizens?,” “How Do We Live Sustainably?,” “What Happens When Civic Duty and Values Collide?,” “How Can You Afford the Life You Want to Live?,” and “How does Our Community shape Values?” Each unit contains seven to nine grade-appropriate modules connected by a cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry.
In Unit 1, the theme is “Where Are You Going Next?” and the Essential Question is “How do the expectations of society influence the decisions you make?” Students read four texts, three personal narratives, and one essay, all related to the theme. In “On the Rainy River'' by Tim O’Brien, students reflect on the author’s experience with the military draft and think about how situations out of our control can help us learn who we might become. In Ava Kadiishson Schieber’s “The Party,” students explore how an individual may struggle because of a situation but in the end, may learn more about who they will become. While reading “Prom” by Hasan Minhaj, students explore how bias and fear can impact our perceptions of others and how this can impact one’s sense of self. In “Where I Lived and What I Lived for” by Henry David Thoreau, students explore the idea that struggle can bring a stronger identity. Additional selections are available in the Read Across Genres section, including two informational texts, two poems, and a TED Talk, “My Identity is My Superpower” by America Ferrera. As students watch, they complete a journal entry answering the prompt, “How do you ‘own’ who you are?”
In Unit 3, the topic is “What Can We Do to Become Better Global Citizens?” and the Essential Question is, “How can stories help us reexamine our lives and our roles in the lives of others?” Students read four short stories related to the topic. In “The Silence” by Haruki Murakami, students journal, determine themes, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. In “Ride” by Linda Nagata, students journal, analyze story elements, appreciate the author’s narrative techniques and organization craft, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. In “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. LeGuin, students journal, examine types of conflict, appreciate the author’s craft of establishing character, setting, and theme, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. In “A Brief and Fearful Star” by Carmen Maria Machado, students journal, examine points of view, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. Four additional texts related to the theme are available in the Read Across Genre section.
In Unit 7, the topic is “How Does Our Community Shape Values?” and the Essential Question is, “What are the opportunities and challenges of being a member of a community?” Students read four texts related to the theme. In the short stories “Rip Van Winkle” by Washington Irving and “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, students examine how authors use real places to create settings in fiction, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. In the novel excerpt and short story “What Redburn Saw at Launcelott’s-Hey” by Herman Melville and “The Minister’s Black Veil'' by Nathaniel Hawthorne, students journal, examine standard literary devices within and across texts, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. In the poems “I dwell in Possibility” (#657) and “Tell all the truth but tell it slant” (#1263) by Emily Dickinson, students journal, examine common themes, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. In the short stories “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins and “The Hacienda” by Isabel Canas, students journal, examine familiar characters, draft a paragraph, and build vocabulary. Six additional texts related to the theme are available in the Read Across Genres section.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.
The materials include opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within texts, though opportunities across multiple texts are limited. The questions and tasks are sequenced and sufficient to help students analyze, though they follow a similar pattern across all units and grade levels. In each unit, as students read the texts in Modules 1-4, they complete the Student Guide worksheet, Apply Your Learning, where they practice either a key ideas and details task or a craft and structure task. These tasks include a Direct Instruction slideshow lesson on the standard, often an informational or literary reading passage from the text, and questions tied to the standard being addressed. The questions and tasks support students in understanding the content of the texts and prepare them to complete the culminating Your Portfolio writing task.
For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 4, students read “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For” by Henry David Thoreau. Students read the online slideshow, Making Inferences in Literary Texts, and read the text. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Making Inferences in Literary Texts, students discuss, “What ideas about society and humanity does Thoreau explicitly express, and what ideas about these themes does he imply?” They take notes for the prompt, “Thoreau provides readers with many examples from his own life as well as history to support his themes of society and human independence. What inferences can you make about his views from the evidence that he provides?” Then they answer questions, such as “What inferences can you make from the text about Thoreau’s views on modern society? What evidence from the text helped you form these inferences? What inferences can you make from the text about Thoreau’s views on what makes for a fulfilling life? What evidence from the text helped you form these inferences?”
In Unit 3, Module 3, students read “The Silence” by Haruki Murakami. Students read the online slideshow, Determining Themes in Literature, and read an excerpt where the author reveals Ozawa’s tension with his classmate Aoki through the story of his past as he ponders the nature of hatred, pride, and relationships. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Determining Themes in Literature, students answer the following questions in a chart: “What details from the text best illustrate how Ozawa feels about Aoki, as compared to the rest of his classmates? Describe the setting. How does the school setting impact Azawa, and what does it reveal about him as a character? What is the main conflict? What inference can you make about a theme?”
In Unit 5, Module 2, students read Antigone, Part II by Sophocles. Students read the online slideshow, Analyzing Direct and Indirect Characterization, to understand authors' choices when introducing characters. In the Student Guide, Analyzing Direct and Indirect Characterization, students are reminded of Sophocles’ techniques, “In these scenes, Sophocles highlights how the main characters react to challenging and even unjust situations, and how their reactions reflect their personal strengths and flaws.” Students take notes in a chart on the stage direction and dialogue related to Creon and Antigone to answer the question, “How do Creon and Antigone react in the face of conflict and injustice?”
In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “Rip Van Winkle” by Washington Irving and “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Students read the online slideshow, How Authors Use Real Places to Create Settings in Fiction. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, How Authors Use Real Places to Create Settings in Fiction, students use the following prompts to describe the settings of each text and any background knowledge they have about the time, place, culture, and history of the stories:
“What details does the text provide about the setting?
In each story, there is a shift in the setting. Describe both locations in each text.
What do you know about the time periods, locations, cultures, or histories of these settings?
Based on the descriptions of the setting and your own knowledge, what inferences can you form about the characters in these stories?”
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 4, students read “From Admissions to Teaching to Grading, AI Is Infiltrating Higher Education” by Derek Newton. Students read the online slideshow, Analyzing Issues and Appeals, and learn how writers and speakers use rhetorical appeals to build a well-rounded argument. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Analyzing Issues and Appeals, students complete a chart by answering questions related to how the author arranged his argument at the beginning, middle, and end of the article. At the bottom of the chart, students answer the question, “Now that you understand the ethical issues surrounding AI in higher education, do you feel that AI is ethical to utilize in grading and college admissions? Why or why not?”
In Unit 4, Module 1, students read “What Is a Carbon Footprint - And How to Measure Yours” by Kieran Mulvaney. Students read the online slideshow, Determining the Meanings of Words Using Connotations, and read a passage from the text that describes the public’s increasing awareness and concern for climate change alongside the challenge to take action on such a large-scale problem. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Determining the Meanings of Words Using Connotation, student instructions state, “Reread the passage and determine the denotation and connotation of words in the passage using context clues. How does the connotation of words reflect how serious and alarming climate change is?” Students complete a chart with three sections answering the following questions:
“Identify words that hold a negative connotation and convey a sense of urgency about the climate crisis. What feelings do these words activate in the reader regarding climate change?
What is the connotation of the word ‘traction?’ Why do you think the author chose this word, and what does it convey about the public’s response?
Identify words that illustrate how people are responding to information about the climate crisis. What connotation do they have, and how do they capture the struggle to take action in the face of large challenges?”
In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “What Redburn Saw at Launcelott’s-Hey” by Herman Melville and “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Common Literary Devices Within and Across Texts, students use a graphic organizer to analyze symbols and motifs in the texts. They answer the following questions about both texts,
“Think about the objects, ideas, and meanings that are repeated in each story or that are used to carry deeper meanings. Identify one symbol or motif in each story. Explain why it functions as a symbol or a motif.
Describe one instance when your motif or symbol appears in the story. How does it affect the characters or the plot? Provide evidence from the text to support your answer.
Describe a second instance when the symbol or motif appears. Does it create the same reaction or effect? Provide evidence from the text in your answer.”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.
The materials provide opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts and sometimes across multiple texts. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning task, standards related to Integration of Knowledge are practiced with a focused lesson using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks. Students use the questions and tasks to analyze the content of the text(s) and to prepare for the completion of the Your Portfolio writing task; however, there are limited opportunities for students to practice analysis. The questions and tasks are similar across units and grade levels. Students analyze these standards across multiple texts in each unit’s Read Across Genre module.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 5, students examine two informational articles with photos, “A GPS Guided Robot Paints a Community Mural at CAB” by Jeff Link and “He Used AI to Win a Fine-Arts Competition. Was It Cheating?” by Drew Harwell. Students review the online slideshow, Understanding Visual Sources. In the Student Guide, Visualize Information, students are instructed to “take notes, describing what you notice about both texts, as well as what you can infer about the arguments as well as the ideas you challenge. Think about: What do I notice in the details? What does this make me think about? What argument is the text trying to make?” Students complete a chart to answer the questions about each source.
In Unit 4, Module 3, students read “What Does Sustainable Living Look Like? Maybe Like Uruguay” by Noah Gallager Shannon. Students review the online slideshow, Point of View and Purpose in Informational Texts. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Point of View and Purpose in Informational Texts, students answer questions about how the author shapes the argument with evidence, including:
“What do Shannon’s words and phrases reveal about his perspective on Uruguay’s efforts?
Why do you think Shannon concludes with numerous facts and details about both the strengths and challenges of Uruguay’s measures?
What was Shannon most likely seeking to emphasize?
What is Shannon’s tone in this final paragraph, and how does he convey this tone through his language? What is the impact of this tone on readers’ feelings toward Uruguay’s conservation efforts as a model?”
In the Student Guide, Write to Impress, students verify the definition of the words collective, concentration, and inequalities in relation to the passage and provide rationales for their choices. In the Student Guide, Share Your Argument Builder, students answer the prompt, “How does the example of a sustainable community in Uruguay give purpose to this article?” Students document the claim, evidence, examples, reasoning, elaboration, and analysis explaining why they chose the evidence.
In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “What Redburn Saw at Launcelott’s-Hey” by Herman Melville and “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Students review the online slideshow, Common Literary Devices Within and Across Texts. In the Student Guide, Quick Journal, students answer the question, “How do relationships change when people know others’ faults, mistakes, and backgrounds?” As a written response, they summarize, develop, and share their argument and then draft and review their response using an understanding of both texts.
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 6, Socratic Discussion, Spark Courageous Thinking, students use a variety of texts to analyze and discuss to answer the Essential Question, “How do the expectations of society influence the decisions you make?” Students read “On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien, “The Party” by Ava Kadishson Schieber, “Prom” by Hasan Minhaj, and “Where I Lived and What I Lived For” by Henry David Thoreau. Students also read poetry selections, “We Are Many” by Pablo Neruda and “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” by Wallace Stevens. Students also read multimedia “My Identity Is My Superpower” by America Ferrera and informational Texts, “How People Learn to Become Resilient” by Maria Konnikova and “Teenagers, Anxiety Can Be Your Friend” by Lisa Damour. In the Student Guide, Prepare for the Discussion, students complete the chart with a response to the Essential Question using reasons, evidence, and counterargument notes.
In Unit 5, Module 4, students compare the written text to the National Theater’s production of Antigone: Creon and Antigone after reading Antigone by Sophocles. They begin by reviewing the online slideshow, Compare and Contrast Literature in Different Mediums, and watch a clip from the theater production, with an updated modern setting, the 1970s. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Compare and Contrast Literature in Different Mediums, the student instructions state, “Use the guiding questions below to compare elements in the text that the playwright intended with the choices that the actors, directors, and designers made in the film production.” Students complete a chart with the topic, including but not limited to,
“Characters - Consider who the characters are and how they are directed to interact by the playwright. Do the characters in the film production appear and interact as you visualized them in the text?
Setting - What is the setting of the scene as intended by the playwright? How is it different from the set in the film production?”
Students complete another chart with the instructions, “After discussing the text and the multimedia, find at least two pieces of evidence to explain how the elements that are unique to each genre affect the meaning.” They include evidence and reasoning from both the text and film versions to answer the questions, “How do the details and interactions in the play illustrate the characters’ relationships, setting, and events in this scene? How do the actors’ choices (movement, delivery) and the film’s production elements (lighting, props, sound) convey the characters’ relationships, setting, and events?”
In Unit 7, Module 3, students read “I dwell in Possibility” (#657) and “Tell all the truth but tell it slant” (#1263) by Emily Dickinson. Students review the online slideshow, Common Themes Within and Across Texts, and then students read the poems. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Common Themes Within and Across Texts, students complete a chart, making notes about the themes and evidence that connect to each text. After completing those notes, students answer the question, “In what ways are the themes of ‘I dwell in Possibility’ (#657) and ‘Tell all the truth but tell it slant’ (#1129) similar? What broad ideas do they both share? Look closely at the themes you identified to find similarities.”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s)/theme(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. The materials include culminating tasks that integrate the topic/theme and readings from each unit in a process writing task at the end of each unit. Each unit includes a Your Portfolio module as the culminating writing task. Across the year, Your Portfolio tasks are varied, including personal narrative, short story, cause and effect essay, argument essay, personal statement, research paper, and literary analysis essay. Speaking and listening activities within these writing tasks are demonstrated through peer review of the essay during the writing process. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge. Student tasks are Socratic discussions, pitch decks, performances, debate games, and panel discussions.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Modules 1-6, students read four informational texts. The Essential Question is, “Should robots and other forms of artificial intelligence be used to perform important tasks in our communities?” In Module 7, Your Portfolio, students process-write an argumentative essay for the prompt, “Based on your readings, what is the best way to design and utilize AI to help, not harm, communities?” In preceding lessons, students preview the informative writing rubric, read a sample exemplar of the essay, and use the rubric to score it, as well as practice giving feedback by filling out a worksheet noting areas of success and areas that need growth in the exemplar. Guidance is provided for prewriting, including a graphic organizer to map the essay. After writing the first draft of the essay, students meet with a peer and look for transitions in each other’s essays. They also meet with another peer to share and listen to each other about what parts of the essay need more development. Next, they work with a peer to edit each other’s draft before submitting the essay. Finally, they reflect on their writing.
In Unit 4, Module 7, students participate in a Panel Discussion. They begin by independently reviewing the Panel Discussion direct instruction slick deck. Then, they look at a list of texts they read throughout the unit that should be considered in their discussion. They use a few handouts in the Student Guide to prepare for discussion, including the Reflect on the Essential Question handout and the Plan Your Points graphic organizer. In both these handouts, students consider their claims with supporting evidence from the unit’s texts to answer the essential question, “How does a community live sustainably?” After preparing, students move into the discussion. They may use sentence starters on the Build Knowledge Together handout if they need help. Once the discussion is over, teachers Conduct the Poll Again activity to see if students changed their minds throughout the discussion. Lastly, students answer questions to reflect on their discussion.
In Unit 5, Module 6, students participate in a Performance. Students begin by independently reviewing the Performance direct instruction slick deck. Then, students look at a list of texts they read throughout the unit, which should be used in their performances. They use a few handouts in the Student Guide to prepare for discussion, including the Reflect on the Essential Question handout and the Prepare for the Performance graphic organizer. In the first handout, students consider their claims with supporting evidence from the unit’s texts to answer the essential question, “What happens when our beliefs and values conflict with those who hold power over us?” In the second handout, students use the texts from the unit to prepare their performances. Next, students perform in groups. After the performances, they reflect on their classmates’ performances and their own individual performances. Lastly, teachers Conduct the Poll Again activity to see if students changed their minds about the essential question.
In Unit 6, Modules 1-6, students read four texts. In Module 7, Your Portfolio, students write a personal statement for the prompt, “Where do you see yourself ten years from now? How will you get there? What will you need to achieve your goals?” In preceding lessons, students preview the writing rubric, read a sample exemplar of the statement and use the rubric to score it, and practice giving feedback by filling out a worksheet noting areas of success and areas that need growth in the exemplar. Guidance is provided for prewriting, including a graphic organizer to map the statement. After writing the first draft, students meet with a peer and look for transitions in each other’s statements. They also meet with another peer to share and listen to each other about what parts of the statement need more development. Next, they work with a peer to edit each other’s draft before submitting. Finally, they reflect on their writing.
In Unit 7, Modules 1-5, students read a collection of texts related to the theme of the unit. The Essential Question is, “What are the opportunities and challenges of being a member of a community?” In Module 7, Your Portfolio, students process-write a literary analysis essay to the prompt, “How do foundational works of American literature depict the role of community in shaping culture? Using the stories, poetry, and other texts from this unit, write a comparative analysis to compare and contrast the messages two or more works of American literature present about the ways community shapes and is shaped by the people within it. Use evidence from two texts and others in the unit to support your answer.” In preceding lessons, students preview the informative writing rubric, read a sample exemplar of the essay, and use the rubric to score it. Then, they practice giving feedback by filling out a worksheet noting areas of success and areas that need growth. Guidance is provided for prewriting, including graphic organizers to compare similarities and differences between the two texts they chose, finalize their claims, and organize their essays. Students are instructed to meet with a peer and look for transitions in each one’s essay. They then meet with another peer to share and listen to each other about what parts of the essay need more development. Next, they work with a peer to edit each other’s draft. Lastly, they reflect on their writing.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. Each unit includes lessons and activities that follow a consistent pattern for developing students’ writing. The modules provide guidance and protocols for students to practice writing summaries and argumentative paragraphs with respect to the readings. Over the school year, students focus on writing an argumentative paragraph for the modules within each unit. Still, they also write full-length essays in the form of a personal narrative, an argument, a short story, a research paper, a cause-and-effect essay, a personal statement, and a literary analysis. Within each instruction unit, students have opportunities to engage in direct instruction slide decks focused on composition skills related to the culminating writing task for the unit. The Student Guide allows students to complete graphic organizers to develop and organize ideas, analyze student examples, and participate in revising and editing tasks to improve writing. Each unit provides mentor texts that emphasize different writing techniques for students to reference and learn techniques to apply in their writing. Guidance is provided for students as they practice and apply writing standards. The standards can be located in each Unit-At-a-Glance, Scope and Sequence, and Teacher Guide. The Teacher Guide includes Teach Academic Writing Skills, Show and Tell, and Model Your Thinking strategies to support the tasks, and additional materials found in the Resources tab of the platform provide guidance for implementing and monitoring students’ writing development. Each culminating writing assignment includes a final rubric to evaluate student writing.
Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Units 2 and 7, argumentative writing is the culminating task in the Your Portfolio section. Students write an argumentative essay and a literary analysis essay, respectively.
In Units 4 and 5, informational/explanatory writing is the culminating task in the Your Portfolio section. Students write a research paper and a cause-and-effect essay, respectively.
In Units 1, 3, and 6, narrative writing is the culminating task in the Your Portfolio section. Students write a personal narrative, short story, and personal statement.
In all units, the Student Guide offers support in the form of a prewriting, drafting, and revising checklist, an informative writing rubric, a student model that students score using the rubric, and a worksheet to practice giving feedback to peers. The Student Guide includes a page with specific guidance for the writing task with instructions, the writing prompt, and notes on either collecting research or planning the writing task. Graphic organizers are provided to complete various tasks, such as goal-setting, mapping the task, gathering evidence, and proofreading evidence for mistakes and inconsistencies. For argumentative and informative/explanatory writing, the lesson, “Citing and Documenting Sources,” reviews citing sources, avoiding plagiarism, summarizing, paraphrasing, bibliography, and citation generators and style (MLA or APA). Lessons are provided to teach students how to use appropriate transitions, and then students are directed to pair with another writer to look for sentences that need transitions. Students share, edit, and reflect on their writing following guidance from additional worksheets in the Student Guide.
In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay for the prompt, “Based on your readings, what is the best way to design and utilize AI to help, not harm, communities?” Students start the unit by setting a Personal SMART goal using the graphic organizer in the Student Guide. Students Explore the Theme, Essential Questions, review the purpose of Arguments, and review the rubric for the final portfolio task of writing an argumentative essay. In the first four Modules of the unit, students journal in the Before You Read section using a prompt in the Quick Journal graphic organizer in the Student Guide. In the Analyze section, students use the Write to Impress graphic organizer to respond to the writing prompt using text evidence. In the Write section, students use graphic organizers in the Student Guide to summarize the anchor text, Appreciate the Author’s Craft, and Share Your Argument Builder. Students work online during the Develop step to plan an argument that answers the writing prompt. During the Draft section, students use their Argument Builder and notes from peer collaborations to write a CERCA paragraph that answers the writing prompt. In Module 5, students Read Across Genres. Using graphic organizers in the Student Guide, students Quick Journal about “What goals do you think engineers should focus on as they build AI for the future?” Students read and analyze two arguments in the Student Guide using graphic organizers. In Module 6, students participate in a Debate, and in Module 7, students complete the essay using pre-writing, writing, and revision steps in the Student Guide and online. Teacher materials provide a Show and Tell lesson on writing a conclusion. Teachers are instructed to model a summary conclusion, a call to action conclusion, and a main point focus conclusion. Examples of each are provided in the teacher materials.
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write an informational/explanatory research paper related to multiple texts on food’s impact on the environment for the prompt: “Based on the readings and other research, what are the issues and solutions around how a community lives sustainably?” Students start the unit by setting a Personal SMART goal using the graphic organizer in the Student Guide. Students explore the theme, key issues, and essential questions, review the purpose of research writing, and review the final portfolio rubric. In the first four modules of the unit, students read four informational texts and journals in the Before You Read section using a prompt in the Quick Journal graphic organizer in the Student Guide. In the Analyze section, students use the Share Your Argument Builder graphic organizer to answer the question, “Based on evidence from the text, respond to the following prompt: How does the author help readers understand and use the idea of a carbon footprint?” In the Write section, students use graphic organizers in the Student Guide to summarize the anchor text, Share Your Argument Builder. Students work online during the Develop step to plan an argument that answers the writing prompt. During the Draft step, students use their Argument Builder and notes from peer collaborations to write a CERCA paragraph that answers the writing prompt. In Module 5, students Read Across Genres. Using graphic organizers in the Student Guide, students Quick Journal for the question, “Based on the animation in the video, what can you do as an individual to offset your carbon emissions?” and evaluate informational texts using Understanding a Topic through Multiple Texts graphic organizer. Teacher materials provide a Show and Tell for evaluating evidence. The teacher materials state “As students discuss the quality of evidence, ask them to research one-to-two brief trial summaries, closing statements, or case studies that present various pieces of evidence to support a point. Ask students to evaluate if the evidence is strong enough and effective in achieving the intended outcome.” In Module 6, students Research Big ideas and complete multiple graphic organizers to Plan Your Research, including one to Create a Thesis Statement. The Direct Instruction section guides teachers through giving ideas for how to conference with students, and In Module 7, students write the essay using pre-writing, writing, and revision tasks in the Student Guide and online.
In Unit 6, Module 7, students write a personal statement for the prompt, “Where do you see yourself ten years from now? How will you get there? What will you need to achieve your goals?” In the first four modules, students read four informational texts. In the online platform, students complete Direct Instruction learning tasks: Using Examples and Anecdotes to Explain Ideas, The Impact of an Author’s Choices: Selecting and Arranging Details, Connotation, and Denotation, The Impact of an Author’s Choices: Words and Images, and Analyzing Connections within Informational Texts. In Module 7, teacher materials provide some direct instruction on what a personal statement is and what type of information to include. A model is provided for teachers. Then, students Read the Final Rubric that includes but is not limited to the following guidelines: “This narrative clearly sets out a problem, situation, or observation and its significance, establishes one or multiple point(s) of view, and introduces a narrator and/or characters/people. This piece of writing includes a variety of narrative techniques such as engaging dialogue, strategic pacing, vivid descriptions, reflection, and multiple plot lines that develop and advance the story.” In the Score the Example graphic organizer, students give points for categories such as Establishing Setting, Point of View, Characters, and Narrative Techniques. In Narrative Techniques, the scoring criteria include points for “Dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, or multiple plot lines. Precise words, telling details, and sensory language.” Students complete Plan Your Future and Map Your Plan graphic organizers in the prewriting step, then complete drafting, revising, and editing steps to complete the personal statement.
Each Student Guide in the materials provides students with scaffolds and structures for writing practice. The Teacher Guide includes Teach Academic Writing Skills, Show and Tell, and Model Your Thinking strategies for the writing tasks, which provides teachers with support for modeling and scaffolding.
Instructional materials include well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Assessments tab, Writing Benchmarks are included for the beginning, middle, and end of the year. The stated purpose is “to personalize instruction for your students and track progress throughout the year.” Each benchmark test includes a text to read, ten multiple-choice questions to answer, and an argumentative writing prompt. Teacher directions state: “Assign lessons to introduce the CERCA framework and gain insight into student writing readiness. Evaluate completed student work and review results. Assign each student a personal growth focus.” In the Resources tab, training course videos show how to enter the rubric score. Benchmark summary reports in the Reports tab include performance by class, rubric category score, growth focus distribution by class, and individual student data.
In the Resources tab, implementation resources are available for teachers. Links are provided to Training Courses, the Help Center, the On-Demand Video Library, and a ThinkCERCA Blog. These links provide support from setup to assessment.
The Writing section has three sections in the Direct Instruction and Skills Practice tab, including 50 Argument and 20 Narrative slideshows. The third section is Informative Texts. There are no slideshows for informational/explanatory writing. The Direct Instruction slideshows cover various writing topics, including comprehension questions at the end, and are referenced in the Teacher Guide in multiple lessons when appropriate to the writing task. Topics include but are not limited to The Purpose of Arguments, Identifying Parts of Written Arguments, The Impact of an Author’s Choices: Words, Integrating Evidence, Tone, Characteristics of Formal Style, Characters in Narrative Writing, Developing Events in Narrative Writing, Using Time as a Storytelling Tool, Transitions and Linking words in a Narrative, Dialogue in Writing, Summarizing Informational Texts, Informative and Explanatory Writing, Developing Effective Paragraphs, and Research Skills. Some of the slideshows are identical in Grades 6-12. The Skills Practice lessons offer various writing topics and lessons in interactive slideshows. The lessons are assigned online and include a mix of instructional slides and practice for the student, including matching definitions, highlighting text, and answering multiple-choice questions. Some of the topics include but are not limited to Organizing Arguments, Introductions in Arguments, Supporting Claims with Evidence, Conclusions in Arguments, Summarizing Informational Texts, and Citing Evidence to Support Analysis in Informational Texts.
Under the Resources tab, Curriculum Resources, Writing, the materials include guidance documents on the following topics (not limited to): Feedback Guidance, Writing Revisions Strategies Toolkit, and Best Practices: Compare Writing.
The Feedback Guidance document includes general guidance for using ThinkCERCA’s provided writing feedback banks across the three core writing types: argumentative, informational, and narrative. This document also links each feedback bank.
The Writing Revision Strategies Toolkit document includes general guidance for teachers to provide student feedback on their writing. It links parts of the CERCA process and how teachers can respond to each student depending on their learning gap. The document also links a Personalized Growth Plan Document, which outlines and provides general guidance on the different settings teachers can use to give feedback (1:1, small group, whole class). This document also includes links to other resources for supporting students with specific action steps based on data from benchmark writing assessments.
The Best Practices: Compare Writing document provides general guidance for a strategy teachers can use to support students in comparing two pieces of writing to analyze and evaluate the “techniques employed by writers.”
In the Teacher Guide of each unit, guidance includes Support for English Language Learners, Support for Students with Exceptional Needs, and Support for Further Exploration and Thinking.
In Unit 6, Module 7, Teacher Guide, instructional resources for personal narrative writing development are available. The Teacher Guide Pre-Writing guidance states:
“Explain that the personal statement is useful for applying for programs, scholarships, jobs, and leadership positions. While it is a narrative, it has a persuasive and informational purpose. Like most writing in the real world, this is a text that brings all aspects of the writing together.
Instruct students to review the evaluation criteria for ‘Your Portfolio.’
Instruct students to complete the reading ‘Spartan Spirit” by Joseph Cote and answer the Check questions.
Explain that students will practice giving feedback about the Student Exemplar.
Guide students in sharing one area of growth, a success, or an insight about the Student Exemplar draft.”
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
The materials provide some opportunities across the school year for students to conduct research that develops knowledge and synthesizes and analyzes content related to the unit themes. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units. In Unit 4, at all grade levels, students write a research paper related to the theme of the unit. This is the only opportunity for students to develop a research question. Students develop knowledge on the given topic by confronting and analyzing multiple provided texts related to a topic or theme. Students are instructed to find information from outside sources, but there is limited instruction and guidance on selecting sources, including using advanced searches effectively. In other units, students gather information, evaluate resources, avoid plagiarism by correctly citing sources, and adhere to MLA formatting. While these areas are addressed, instruction is limited. The materials also include a “Student Research Toolkit,” which includes independent guidance for students on several parts of the research process, such as evaluating sources for credibility. This Toolkit is the same across all grades in the program. Much of the instruction is to refer students to documents that explain research or to Research Skills and Strategies slideshows, not guidance on direct instruction of the skills.
Research projects are somewhat sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 6, after synthesizing information and ideas from prior module texts and tasks, students develop their research question and thesis statement and complete the research. Students review an online slideshow, Understanding the Research Process, and learn about primary and secondary sources, reliable sources, and identifying reliable evidence. There are four Plan Your Research steps in the Student Guide: Explore the Topic, Find Reliable Sources, Collect Relevant and Reliable Evidence, and Create a Thesis Statement. Students find three unit sources and two outside resources to address their research question. Next, students collect five pieces of evidence that address their question and can be found in at least two sources.
No evidence was found for using advanced searches effectively to find sources.
No evidence was found for selectively integrating information into the text to maintain the flow of ideas.
Materials somewhat support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 5, students complete an inquiry-driven research project based on the essential question of the unit. The Teacher Guide includes a Show and Tell Strategy which provides support for teachers to introduce the project: “Introduce or Review the Research Toolkit. Help students build on their foundation of research skills by practicing the process of refining research questions and asking a research question about one of the authors or topics in the first unit. As students begin research, they should focus on moving from inquiry to deeper research. Their goal will be to find three valid and reliable sources that illuminate something about the biographies of these American authors, the topics they write about, or the influence they have had on American literature as a result of their achievements. Remind students to cite sources for their research. Then, have students prepare a brief, informal 2-3 slide presentation about the author of their choice, which will be added to a timeline of authors from various periods in American Literature over the course of the year. For this project, they will need to evaluate a text written by the author and share a perspective on the text contextualized within historical or biographical research.”
In Unit 3, Module 5, students research a current example of a global citizen connecting different cultures. Teacher guidance states, “Ask students: How did the citizen you are researching affect the cultures involved? What was the greatest challenge for this person? What was their impact? Use these responses to facilitate a discussion around the impact of global citizenry. Guide students to find additional resources using questions to direct their search and facilitate whole class or small-group discussion around topics.”
In various units, Direct Instruction and Skills lessons include research topics, such as Selecting and Evaluating Evidence in Informative Writing, Citing and Documenting Sources, Understanding the Research Process, Research Skills, Reference Materials, Synthesizing Information from Sources, and Understanding a Topic through Multiple Texts.
Each unit includes a Unit-At-a-Glance states that students will engage in a research activity. For example, the Teacher Guide for Unit 2 states that “Through teacher-led instruction, students will be introduced to research strategies in the Research Toolkit and will gain practice with the inquiry-driven research process, refining research questions, and sharing research with citations. For their inquiry-driven research project, students will research an author’s biography and refine questions based on their initial findings. Students will learn when to summarize, paraphrase, and use direct quotations through a Documenting Sources Activity.
Materials provide some opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper by developing their own research questions. In Module 6, students review the online slideshow, Understanding the Research Process and Synthesizing Information from Sources. In the Student Guide, they plan their research by using the 3-2-1 strategy to explore three things they know about the topic, two things they’ve learned that they want to learn more about, and one question they have about sustainability. They complete a chart with the instructions “Review Step 2 of the ‘Understanding the Research Process’ lesson. Find five sources with evidence to address your research question. Summarize your findings and carefully cite each source.” Students list each text’s title, author, source, summary, and citation. Next, they collect relevant and reliable evidence using a chart with the instructions, “Review Step 3 of the ‘Understanding the Research Process’ lesson. Then, find pieces of evidence that address your question and that can be found in at least two sources. Record your direct citations to use as you draft your essay.” They list paraphrased evidence as well as direct quotes. In Module 8, students write the research paper. They review the online slideshow, Writing the Research Paper, and Citing and Documenting Sources. Guidance is found in the Student Guide and the online slideshows.
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 6, Socratic Discussion, Spark Courageous Thinking, students prepare for a Socratic Discussion based on the question, “How can stories help us reexamine our lives and our roles in the lives of others?” Students complete Texts to Analyze and Discuss in the Student Guide to prepare. The four mentor texts, one multimedia selection, two poems, and two informational texts are listed. Students complete the chart citing reasons, evidence from at least one mentor text, reasoning, and counterargument notes.
In Unit 6, Module 5, Read Across Genres, Student Guide, Compare Pathways, students use articles from the unit to analyze each part of the pathway that the writer makes about each interviewee. Students record observations and evidence in each category and discuss findings with peers. Next, students create a Pitch Deck using mentor texts to answer the Essential Question, “What are the risks and rewards of various post-secondary choices?” The Pitch Deck is a structured presentation of an idea backed with evidence from various sources. Students determine their topic, research question, and best solution.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards. The Teacher Guide includes guidance and resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units. Assessment questions are multiple-choice and only include reading standards.
The implementation schedules align with the core learning. The materials include lesson-specific task timing guidance and implementation schedules can generally be completed in the allotted time. Optional tasks are meaningful and should not distract from core learning. The materials contain seven units, with each unit taking 22 to 26 days to complete, assuming 50 minutes of instruction a day.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards, including instruction delivered through online slideshows that students complete at their own pace, followed by short multiple-choice quizzes and PDF worksheets. Teachers have access to the Unit Planning Tools that provide support for guidance, planning, and explicit instruction for each unit, as well as a Teacher Guide for each unit. These include clarification of directions and notes to direct students into the online program or Student Guide, suggestions for teacher modeling of aspects of lessons, and opportunities to conduct think-alouds. Assessment questions are multiple-choice and only include reading standards. In other parts of the program, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across the units to ensure students have multiple opportunities to demonstrate mastery of the standard; however, some standards are covered only once.
Over the course of each unit, most instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit of instruction includes a Unit-At-a-Glance, a Teacher Guide, a Student Guide, a Diverse Learners Guide, and an Answer Key. While each module in the online portal is labeled with the primary standard focus, the explicit instruction is primarily provided as an independent lesson for students to complete, with guidance for teachers to provide follow-up support and/or connect the independent direct instruction lesson to other tasks within the module. The Unit-At-a-Glance overviews the skills addressed with key standards identified. The Teacher Guide includes a Skills Students Will Know, Understand, and Apply Section listing some of the unit's key standards. The units consistently include close reading and academic writing, which are facilitated through an online slide deck presentation labeled Direct Instruction. In the Student Guide, students have various activities aligned to the standards, but the connection to the standard is not directly labeled. Each module in the Student Guide contains the following lessons: Apply Your Learning, Appreciate the Author’s Craft, Draft Your Argument, Building Vocabulary, and Write to Impress; however, the standards are not identified with each activity.
In Unit 2, Module 1, Apply Your Learning, Student Guide, students review the Direct Instruction slideshow, Determining and Tracing a Central Idea Through Details, then apply their learning to the task. Slides include the definition of the central idea, the difference between a topic and a central idea, where to find the central idea, how to look for evidence of the central idea, how to find evidence an author uses, and why it matters. In the five-question quiz, students read a passage and answer questions where they determine the central idea or evidence about the text. This assignment is aligned with standard RI.11-12.2. This same slideshow and quiz is used in Grade 11. In the Teacher Guide, the module overview states that “Teachers facilitate the Direct Instruction lesson, and students complete the assessment.” The teacher guidance states,
“Lead students through the Direct Instruction presentations prior to having students review them on their own and complete the assessments. A list of key academic terms for the unit is available in the Student Guide. Students may also record key definitions in their Vocabulary Notebooks.
Explain that understanding central ideas helps students grasp the key messages, which is essential for comprehension.
Guide students in identifying details that support the central idea and distinguish between relevant and irrelevant information by analyzing text structure to engage more deeply with text and draw informed and accurate conclusions.
Explain that students will learn how to introduce an argument effectively by understanding introductory methods, and how the inclusion of background information establishes context or relevance for the reader.
Explain that understanding the relationship between dependent and independent clauses and various sentence structures, such as simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences, allows students to express their ideas with precision and sophistication.”
In Unit 5, students read Antigone by Sophocles. Students read and complete the five multiple-choice questions for these Direct Instruction Slide Shows, such as How Playwrights Introduce Dramatic Action through Scenes (RL.11-12.5), Analyzing Direct and Indirect Characterization (RL.11-12.3), and Determining Themes in Drama (RL.11-12.2). Then, students complete these tasks without direct instruction from the teacher. For example, in Module 4, students independently complete the Direct Instruction Slide Show for Compare and Contrast Literature in Different Mediums. The Teacher Guide includes the following information for teachers:
“Explain that authors make decisions about how to present stories through different mediums, as well as how they might adapt a previously told story into something new. This allows readers to compare and contrast different versions of a story and how it is told in different mediums to gain new insights and greater understandings.
Explain that understanding the historical details behind a drama builds necessary and important human context that creates a deeper sense of engagement and empathy for audiences.
Lead students through the Direct Instruction presentations prior to having students review them on their own and complete the assessments. A list of key academic terms for the unit is available in the Student Guide. Students may also record key definitions in their Vocabulary Notebooks.”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students complete tasks around citing evidence to write about literary texts, analyzing imagery in a personal narrative, making inferences in literary texts, determining the author’s message, using the writing process to map, draft, revise, peer edit, and publish a personal narrative, edit citations, map vocabulary words, and hold a Socratic Discussion. In Module 1, publisher materials list RI.11-12.2 and W.11-12.1 as focus standards. In Apply Your Learning, students complete key ideas and details tasks. Students review the Direct Instruction slideshow, Citing Evidence to Write About Literary Texts. Then, students read a passage and complete a graphic organizer to answer the prompt, “In this passage, O’Brien gives several clues in this passage that reveal the conflict he feels between his responsibility to others and his sense of self. As you read, identify specific words and details that you can use as evidence to support your ideas.” (RL.11-12.1) Students complete this task by finding evidence to answer the questions, “What specific details show that he is, at least in part, motivated to make a decision by his fear of ridicule from his town? How do O’Brien’s word choices serve as evidence that O’Brien is struggling between his personal beliefs and his sense of duty? What do these details reveal about the kind of person O’Brien was as a young adult? What inference can you make about what is motivating his choices?” (RL.11-12.1) In Module 2, publisher materials list RI.11-12.2 and W.11-12.1 as focus standards. In Apply Your Learning, Determining Theme and Author’s Message in a Personal Narrative, students review the Direction Instruction slideshow, Determining Theme and Author’s Message in a Personal Narrative, then discuss as a group, “What does Schieber learn about herself through her experiences surrounding the party?” (RL.11-12.2) Then, students answer the following questions:
“How does Schieber describe her life before the party and before her time in hiding? What details have stayed with you the most? How does Schieber describe her interactions with others at the party? Why might she have had mixed feelings?
How are Schieber’s actions and behaviors during the party influenced by her experiences of the war, in general?
Throughout this memoir excerpt, what does Schieber reveal about how difficult experiences can impact our lives and the ways in which we react to new experiences?
Personal Reflection: ’Think of a time in your own life when you felt like you were on the outside looking in on an experience that seemed foreign to you. What can be learned about ourselves and others in such situations?’”
In Unit 4, Module 2, publisher materials list RI.11-12.5 and W.11-12.2 as focus standards. In Apply Your Learning, students use the article “A 105-Mile-Long City Will Snake Through the Saudi Desert. Is That a Good Idea?” by Bill Chappell to analyze structure in informational texts. Students answer the following questions, “How does Chappell’s use of images and videos capture the possibilities and advantages of the city’s design? Why do you think Chappell lists details about the city in a bulleted list? What do they illustrate about the city’s design? How does Chappell contrast the perspective of supporters with critics? What are their primary concerns and critiques? How did the text’s structure help you understand both perspectives on this city’s design? Are you more convinced by either perspective and would you want to live there?” (RI.11-12.5) In Module 3, publisher materials list RI.11-12.6 and W.11-12.2 as focus standards. In Apply Your Learning, students use the article “Living Look Like? Maybe Like Uruguay” by Noah Gallager Shannon to analyze the point of view and purpose in informational texts. After reading a passage, students respond to the following questions, “The author provides many details and facts regarding Uruguay’s energy conservation efforts. What do Shannon’s words and phrases reveal about his perspective on Uruguay’s efforts? Why do you think Shannon concludes with numerous facts and details about both the strengths and challenges of Uruguay’s measures? What was Shannon most likely seeking to emphasize? What is Shannon’s tone in this final paragraph, and how does he convey this tone through his language? What is the impact of this tone on readers’ feelings toward Uruguay’s conservation efforts as a model?” (RI.11-12.6)
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include Writing Benchmark Assessments. Writing benchmarks are intended for the beginning, middle, and end of the school year. However, they are not referenced in the Teacher Guide. These benchmarks include two reading passages. Students are given a highlighter tool and instructed to “Use blue to mark sentences that help you in this assessment.” After reading, they answer eight multiple-choice questions about the passages. Then, they are prompted to write an argumentative essay responding to the reading passages: “Be sure your response includes a clear and precisely articulated argumentative claim supported by evidence from the texts and acknowledges opposing or alternate viewpoints. It should be logically organized and articulate clear relationships among the claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Use well-chosen language and be sure to apply appropriate grammar conventions (punctuation, spelling, etc.).”
In Unit 2, Module 8, students take the Unit 1 Core Assessment online. Students read two passages, “Deep in the Uncanny Valley” by Kristina Heitkamp and “Eyes in the Skies” by Nathalie Alonso. After reading, students answer 15 multiple-choice questions aligned to grade-level standards. Questions require students to determine the central ideas, important details for a text summary, analyze figurative language, select evidence to support the author’s argument, and identify the meaning of words and phrases. Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed.
In Unit 4, Module 9, Unit 4 Core Assessment, students read “Corn: Food, Fuel, and Now…Fiber Too?” by the US Department of Agriculture and ”Powered by the Sun” by Barbara Lerman-Golomb. After reading, students answer 15 multiple-choice questions. The questions require students to identify the central idea, determine the meaning of words and phrases, consider text structure, and match evidence to a claim. Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed.
By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Standard W.11-12.1 is addressed multiple times in the program. In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “The Party” by Ava Kadishson Schieber to write a CERCA paragraph for the prompt, “Using specific evidence from the text, what are the most important themes and messages conveyed through the narrator’s experiences surrounding the party?” Students state a claim, add reasons, evidence, reasoning, and a counterargument during this writing task. In Unit 3, Module 4, students read “A Brief and Fearful Star?” by Carmen Maria Machado and answer the prompt, “Analyze how the post-apocalypse has impacted the narrator and their family. How does the history of the monsters contribute to their point of view? How does their mother’s death force the narrator to face their fears of leaving home and going out into the world?” In Unit 7, Module 4, students read “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and “The Hacienda” by Isabel Canas and answer the prompt, “Compare and contrast the women who are wives and the stories’ narrators in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ and ‘The Hacienda.’ How do the texts establish their narrators as protagonists?”
Standard RL.11-12.3 is addressed multiple times in the program. In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “Ride” by Linda Nagata. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Analyzing Story Elements task, students review the Direct Instruction slideshow, Analyzing Story Elements, and answer the following questions, “Nagata uses character details, such as dialogue, actions, and physical descriptions, to describe Jasmine. What do Jasmine’s actions reveal about her motivations? What values and beliefs does she have? Nagata’s physical descriptions of Trevor create a first impression that becomes more complex throughout the story. What details does Nagata provide about him? What do we learn about him as the story progresses? What do we learn about Jasmine through the pivotal event when she uses the emergency stop button and the Easter egg to let the refugees into the taxi? How do the responses of the taxi, her mother, and her workplace communicate a commentary about society’s values?” In Unit 5, Module 2, students read Antigone Part II by Sophocles. In the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning, Analyzing Direct and Indirect Characterization, students view the online Direct Instruction slideshow, Analyzing Direct and Indirect Characterization, and take notes as they read how the “main characters react to challenging and even unjust situations, and how their reactions reflect their personal strengths and flaws.” Students answer the question, “How do Creon and Antigone react in the face of conflict and injustice?” Students complete a graphic organizer listing dialogue and stage directions that demonstrate each character’s reactions, then reflect on the question, ”In your opinion, were these characters’ reactions appropriate to their situations? What do these reactions reveal about their respective personal character flaws and strengths?”
Other standards that are repeated at least two times in the program are RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.3, RL.11-12.4, RI.11-12.4, RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.6, RI.11-12.6, RL.11-12.7, RI.11-12.7, RI.11-12.8, W.11-12.1, W.11-12.2, W.11-12.3, W.11-12.4, W.11-12.8, W.11-12.9, W.11-12.10, L.11-12.2, L.11-12.3, L.11-12.4, L.11-12.5, L.11-12.6, SL.11-12.1, and SL.11-12.4.
Standards only addressed one time are L.11-12.4.A, L.11-12.4.B, L.11-12.4.C, and L.11-12.5.A.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.
Each unit and module is accompanied by a Unit At-a-Glance that includes high-level pacing guides for a 50-minute or 90-minute class session. The pacing guides can also work with an online or a blended model. Task-specific timing guidance is found in the Teacher Guides. Tasks that are deemed essential are starred in the Unit-at-a-Glance document as well as the Teacher Guide. Most units are designed to be completed within 22-26 instructional days, so the seven units can reasonably be completed within a school year. Each unit includes complementary writing tasks that teachers can use to provide students with additional writing practice. The materials also provide Longer Works units, which are novel-centered and can be used to enhance units within the core curriculum. The provided optional Longer Work of Fiction novel study units are meaningful and follow the same pacing as a core unit. The publisher recommends these as optional units of study during a regular weekly choice period as independent exploration time, schoolwide WIN time, silent sustained reading, or at home independent reading.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit At-a-Glance includes a 50-minute Class Pacing Guide and a 90-minute Class Pacing Guide. The 50-minute Class Pacing Guide for one unit covers 22-26 days or blocks per unit, which would account for up to 182 school days to complete seven units. The 50-minute Class Pacing Guides include:
One block for previewing the unit theme and setting personal goals.
One block to explore the theme.
12 to 16 blocks to read and analyze the texts for the unit. Individual core texts take three instructional blocks: Before you Read, Read and Analyze, and Write to a prompt.
Three to four blocks to read across genres.
One to two blocks for an integrated speaking and listening activity, such as Socratic discussion, debate, etc.
Three to five blocks for the Your Portfolio process writing task.
One to two blocks for assessment and reflection.
The Teacher Guide provides timing for each part of the lesson. Parts of lessons are labeled as “essential” in the Unit-At-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, and Module-At-a-Glance.
Novel study units are optional choices and include a Unit Planner with 50-minute and 90-minute pacing guides. The 50-minute class schedule covers 31 blocks, and the 90-minute block schedule covers 18 blocks.
Suggested implementation schedules can be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, the Unit-At-a-Glance and Module at a Glance lays out the recommended schedule for the unit and identifies which lesson components are essential.
In Unit 2, Module 1, the Module-At-a-Glance states the estimated time is three to four 50-minute sessions (one to two 90-minute sessions). Students complete a quick journal and vocabulary activity. Then, they read “Now That Computers Connect Us All, For Better or Worse, What’s Next?” by Matthew Hutson. Next, they complete the Analyze section, Apply Your Learning, and Write to Impress activities. Then, students summarize the text. Lastly, students plan and draft a CERCA response. The suggested timing guidance for all tasks in the Teacher Guide totals 185 minutes; therefore, this module could be reasonably completed in four 50-minute sessions or two 90-minute sessions.
In Unit 7, Module 7, the Module-At-a-Glance states the estimated time is three to four 50-minute sessions (one to two 90-minute sessions). First, students complete pre-writing activities, which include online lessons about writing an argumentative essay, reading the rubric, practicing giving peer feedback, choosing their argument, and mapping their argument. Then, students draft their arguments and essay drafts, complete a Make it Powerful activity, and a peer review. Last, students complete Review, Revise, and Share activities, which include reviewing the draft, editing, and reflecting on their writing. The suggested timing guidance for all tasks in the Teacher Guide totals 140 minutes; therefore, this module could be reasonably completed in three 50-minute sessions or about two 90-minute sessions.
As an added resource, the publisher provides teachers with a Class Planner and Pacing Calculator, which includes the following guidance:
“In the sheets that follow, you will find calculators that help you gauge the time it takes for your students to complete certain tasks.
We know each of the opportunities for learning that we provide takes time, and we want to empower you to make the most of your time by planning for your students’ needs efficiently and realistically.
Simply adjust the number of minutes per session and start recording your estimates or actual minutes spent on given tasks to gauge how long it takes your students to complete them. As they gain experience and practice, they will need less time, so consider adjusting throughout the year so you can plan carefully to meet your students’ needs.”
Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit Planning Tool, additional complementary writing prompts are provided as “practice options as students progress through the curriculum prior to the portfolio piece for each unit.” These prompts are aligned texts read in the unit. The Planning Tool includes student worksheets and graphic organizers to plan their writing as well as reflect on writing. There are no direct instruction notes for the teacher for these prompts. The teacher guidance says, “Make planning decisions based on schedule, your program, and your students’ needs. Use the complementary prompts to ensure appropriate levels of standards coverage in student experiences with the process of writing.”
Optional Longer Works of Fiction novel studies for Grades 11 and 12 include Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald. These units include a Unit-at-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, Student Guide, and Diverse Learner Guide in the same format as the Core ELAR.
The publisher provides the Longer Works Units with some guidance on incorporating these units into the curriculum as part of the unit of instruction, independent reading, at-home enrichment, or schoolwide reading programs.
In each module throughout the program, there are “recommended” and “essential” tasks for each lesson. While the publisher suggests completing all activities in a lesson, the “recommended” tasks could be optional and cut when teachers are short on instructional time; however, cutting material repeatedly could affect the delivery of instruction essential to achieving grade-level standards.
Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, complementary writing prompts are provided. Teachers are able to use these prompts to give students extra practice with different types of writing and standards.
Optional Longer Works of Fiction novel studies include similar tasks as core units. The novel studies are not intended to enhance core instruction but are not a replacement for core instruction. The materials for Frankenstein by Mary Shelley include eight modules that follow the same format as the Core ELAR units. In Module 1, The Story of Prometheus, students learn about common themes within and across texts as they read “The Story of Prometheus” by James Baldwin and answer the prompt, “What does the message of Prometheus’s myth reveal about ancient Greek society, and how is this message still relevant in society today?” In Modules 2-5, students read the anchor text and complete Direct Instruction and Writing Lessons that follow a similar format as the Core ELAR units. In Module 6, Read Across Genres, students read and analyze poetry and informational texts about Frankenstein and Mary Shelley. In Module 7, Socratic Discussion, students learn about and prepare to participate in a Socratic discussion for the prompt, “What qualities differentiate a human being from a monster?” In Module 8, Your Portfolio, students write a literary analysis essay for the prompt, “Who is the real monster of the novel? Write an argument that supports the true monster of Frankenstein based on Shelley’s messages about humanity, nature vs. nurture, and scientific advancement.” Module 9, Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection, which is found in the Core ELAR units, is not available in this unit.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. In addition, the materials include family letters for each unit in English and Spanish that inform parents and caregivers about the program and student learning throughout the curriculum. Supporting documentation on the ThinkCERCA website outlines how the program works and the program's research-based strategies.
The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Teachers can use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. The program provides some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse.
The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher.
The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program; however, implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. In addition, the materials include family letters for each unit in English and Spanish that inform parents and caregivers about the program and student learning throughout the curriculum. Supporting documentation on the ThinkCERCA website outlines how the program works and the program's research-based strategies.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The materials for each unit include a Unit At-a-Glance, a Teacher Guide, and Unit Planning Tools. The Unit At-a-Glance document is also included in the first pages of the Teacher Guide. It includes a unit snapshot, rationale, and breakdown of the skills that will be addressed in the unit. The essential question is presented, along with the timings of each section of the unit. A Unit Assessment Blueprint is found here as well as a document on the progression of scaffolds for independent learning. The Teacher Guides include instructions for implementing the program. Lesson summaries and objectives are found for each module. Teacher tips, support for students with exceptional needs, support for multilingual/English Language Learners, as well as gifted and talented enrichment opportunities are found. Unit Planning Tools include a Comprehensive Scope and Sequence and Planning Guidance document, Vocabulary Instruction Guidance, Key Vocabulary, Resources for Volume Reading, Resources for Students, and a Family Letter in English and Spanish.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Frontmatter Overview of Program document provides an overview of the program and highlights implementation, scaffolding, grouping students, distribution of writing, implementing the program without 1:1 device access, and time routines.
Each Unit At-a-Glance includes the essential question, unit snapshot, rationale, list of student skills and standards addressed, timing for modules/sessions, lists of anchor texts and suggested longer works and independent reading opportunities, unit planning tools, writing prompts, and assessment blueprints.
Unit Planning Tools document includes a comprehensive scope and sequence, vocabulary instruction guidance, key vocabulary terms, resources for volume reading, resources for students, family letters in English and Spanish, and state standard crosswalks.
Each Teacher Guide includes lesson summaries, learning objectives, suggested timing for each part of the lesson, module planning tool, direct instruction guidance with teacher tips and “teacher will”/”student will” statements, scripting for some direction instruction, think-alouds, support for students with exceptional needs and multilingual and EL learners, links to toolkits, answer keys for Student Guide worksheets, and feedback focus.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 1, Share your Reflections activity, the teacher presents five comprehension questions about the text “Now That Computers Connect Us All, For Better and Worse, What Next?” by Matthew Hutson. These questions are labeled with DOK. In the Teacher Guide, guidance is presented for “Reading Conferences.” Guidance states,
“Hold one-on-one meetings with students to discuss their reading habits, preferences, and challenges.
Intervention: Use these conversations to identify specific areas for improvement and set individualized reading goals.
Fitting It In: Dedicate a few minutes each day to meet with individual students, rotating through the class over a week or two.
Effectiveness: One-on-one conferences provide personalized feedback and allow teachers to understand each student’s unique reading challenges and strengths.
Importance: Personalized interactions foster a deeper understanding of student needs and build stronger teacher-student relationships.”
Further guidance is listed as “Teacher will:
Assist students in switching between the Pause and Reflect questions online and recording their responses in the Student Guide
Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses
Remind them to record their discussion reflections in the Student Guide.”
In Unit 2, Module 7, - Edit the Draft Together - Peer Edit: Give and Get Feedback lesson, students use a rubric to suggest final edits and proofreading. The Teacher Guide directs the teacher to give information on subjects and predicates, “Use the Subjects and Predicates slide linked in the Toolkit to teach complete sentence structure. Explain that a complete sentence includes a subject (who or what the sentence is about) and a predicate (what the subject is doing or being). For example, My sister (subject) wakes up for school at 7 am (predicate). Model sentences on the board, using different colors for subjects and predicates, and have students identify them. Explain fragments (incomplete sentences) with an example such as Breakfast tasted, and run-ons (sentences with too many subjects and predicates, with the example Breakfast was good and it was amazing and it was so tasty and lunch was too.” In addition, guidance for subject-verb agreement is presented: “Refer to the Subject-Verb Agreement slide in the Toolkit to explain basic rules. Create an anchor chart for your classroom to reinforce the concept that verbs must agree in number with nouns in the sentence. Teach about verb moods—indicative (factual; The car is fast.), imperative (command; Don’t eat my lunch!), interrogative (question; Are you coming with us?), conditional (future possibility; When it snows, we will go sledding.), and subjunctive (wish or hypothetical; I hope you have an excellent day.). Use student writing excerpts to model revising for these skills and remind students to use their Toolkit checklist for additional revision steps learned in the Edit the Draft Together stage in Unit 1.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials include a Resources section that consists of Curriculum Resources, a Help Center, an On-Demand Video Library, and the ThinkCERCA Blog. The Curriculum Resources Tab directs to best practices documents on a variety of topics in writing, reading comprehension, close reading, vocabulary, background knowledge and culture, community, and collaboration. Each of the documents includes suggested time for the activity/strategy, rationale/research base, before, during, and after instructions, and suggested scaffolds and supports. These pages include some grade-level specific Toolkits in writing, speaking and listening, language and grammar, and vocabulary that the teacher or students can use. Materials also include suggested independent reading titles. The Help Center includes product support, an Admin Toolkit, and a Teacher Toolkit. The Teacher Toolkit includes guidance documents for Getting Started, Implementing ThinkCERCA, and Providing Feedback. Each Unit Teacher Guide includes a section titled “Core Unit Progression,” which provides teachers with how the unit fits in the progression of previous and future units within and across grade levels.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Front Matter Focus: Reading document outlines the rationale for the unit components, including anchor texts, close reading and writing tasks, and scaffolding. It also provides information about text complexity in the program.
The Best Practices Document: Establishing Vocabulary Notebooks and Routines is found in the Curriculum Resources Tab for 12th grade. It includes a rationale, a list of student tasks, instructions for before, during, and after the lesson, and scaffolds and supports.
The Best Practices Document: The Teacher Research Toolkit includes guidelines for informal and formal research. It includes a rationale/research base, optimal application notes for before, during, and after lessons, and suggested scope and sequence. The toolkit also includes graphic organizers that can be used by both teachers and students.
The Curriculum Resources tab includes a document titled “Implementing Independent Reading,” which provides suggested routines, a rationale, and instructions for integrating volume reading and independent reading pacing.
In the Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, Implementing ThinkCERCA, there is a document titled “Implementing a Writing Lesson with Engagement Strategies.” It outlines the steps of the writing lesson and links to detailed instructions for strategies at each step.
The Teacher Guide for each unit includes summaries of what students learn throughout the unit in the different literacy strands (Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Grammar, and Research). Teachers can use these notes to deepen their knowledge of what students are learning in the course.
While the materials include toolkits that teachers and students can use across different parts of literacy, they are the same for each grade level. The following toolkits are available and are the same across grades 6-12: Research, Speaking and Listening, Revision Strategies, and Language and Style Toolkits.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Teacher Guide includes a section titled “Core Unit Progression.” This section provides teachers with explanations of how the unit fits in the progression of previous and future units within and across grade levels. These explanations are tailored to Reading and Writing skills, separately.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials provide standard correlation resources at the grade level, Unit, Module, and lesson level. The Unit At-a-Glance and Module-at-a-Glance materials provide teachers with the standards correlated to classroom instruction. There is additional information about the alignment of the CCSS for the writing and assessments of each Unit and Module. Additionally, there is a Grade 12 Planning Tool, Pacing Calculator and Assessment Blueprint Document, and a Scope and Sequence by Strand document that provides a comprehensive view of the CCSS alignment. The Teacher Guide does not include the CCSS, but the teacher has access to the Unit At-a Glance, the Unit Planning Tools, and the Scope and Sequence documents.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit Planning Tools, there is a Grade 12 Planning Tool, Pacing Calculator and Assessment Blueprint Document that outlines the CCSS by Unit and Module. There is a comprehensive breakdown for the entire program and a more in-depth breakdown for each Unit. Additionally, there is a Scope and Sequence by Strand document that provides a comprehensive view of Curriculum and Instruction, Practice and Feedback, Assessments, and CCSS for vocabulary, writing, research, reading, speaking and Listening, and grammar.
In each Unit At-a-Glance document, the CCSS are listed in a grid formation at the top of the document. For Unit 1, the CCSS are listed for Reading and Multimedia Literacy Skills (RL.11-12.1, RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.4)), Writing skills (W.11-12.1; W.11-12.2; W.11-12.3), Vocabulary/Language Skills (L.11-12.4; L.11-12.4.d; L.11-12.6), Speaking and Listening (SL.11-12.1) Executive Function skills (W.11-12.8; W.11-12.9), and Foundational Reading and Linguistic Skills (RF.2, RF.3), Underneath each category is a bulleted list of a description of the task-related to the standard such as for Reading and Multimedia Literacy skills:
“Evaluate the ways an author develops the setting, point of view, and characters and uses narrative techniques
Analyze imagery in a personal narrative
Identify examples of theme development and audience-appropriate language
Make inferences in literary texts
Determine the theme and author’s message in a personal narrative
Use the SOAPSTone technique to analyze poems
Compare poetry details and imagery
Ask questions about informational texts.”
In each Unit At-a-Glance document, the Unit Writing Prompts are listed with the corresponding CCSS.
The Unit Assessment Blueprint lists each assessment for the unit with the primary CCSS and the CCSS item standards in each Unit At-a-Glance document.
In each Module At-a-Glance, there is a breakdown of the module, which includes the corresponding CCSS for each part of the lesson.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit At-a-Glance documents, the CCSS are listed in a grid formation at the top of the document. Then, each document is coded for each module that matches the grid that connects each module task to the CCSS listed in the grid. For example, in Unit 1, Module 2, ‘The Party’ by Ava Kadishson Schieberthe, online direct instruction, Determining Theme and Author’s Message in a Personal Narrative, has a blue circle with the letter R next to it indicating that it connects to the standards listed in the section for Reading and Multimedia Literacy Skills (RL.11-12.1, RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.4).
The Teacher Guides contain multiple areas to guide teachers to the learning that is correlated to CCSS, including, but not limited to, Lesson Objectives, Purpose, Teacher Will, and Feedback Focus. The Teacher Guide does not list the CCSS, but the CCSS language is included. The CCSS can be located in each Unit At-a Glance, the Unit Planning Tools, and the Scope and Sequence documents.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials include a Family Letter for each unit located in the Unit Planning Tools. The letter includes the name, essential question, text titles, overview of the learning, and two suggestions for activities at home. The letter is available in English and Spanish. The family letter provides the rationale for the unit that connects the essential question to the broad ideas of the unit. This could provide families with areas of home discussion, but it is not explicitly framed as such. The two suggested activities are the same for every unit and every grade level and include how to gain access to the online platform and reading tools available there and a broad suggestion to connect the essential question to “...movies, television shows, and song lyrics.”
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Planning Tool includes a Family Letter in both English and Spanish. Parents can use this letter to orient themselves to what students are learning in each unit.
The Unit 2 Planning Tools include a family letter that includes the unit name, How Do Robots Help Us?, as well as the essential questions for the unit, “Should robots and other forms of artificial intelligence be used to perform important tasks in our communities?” The letter informs families how students will explore the ideas of “... the increasing dependence on robots in a community.” The family letter also includes the reading selection for the unit, including, but not limited to, “Now That Computers Connect Us All, For Better and Worse, What’s Next?” by Matthew Hutson and “He Used AI to Win a Fine-Arts Competition. Was It Cheating?” by Drew Harwell. This letter is available in English and in Spanish. Additionally, the family letter provides an overview of the learning for the unit including a debate, writing an argumentative essay, and understanding syntax.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Planning Tool includes a section for Suggested Activities for Home that includes how to access ThinkCERCA from home, a list of available reading tools on their platform, and a prompt to “...encourage students to discuss the essential question as it applies to movies, television shows, and song lyrics.”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches and identification of the research-based strategies. On the publisher’s website, a How it Works section outlines the components of the program. This page includes video demonstrations on topics such as using the program within your daily routine, giving students choice and voice, and using station-based rotations. An overview of the program document is included with the core curriculum at each grade level. In the resources section, core resources by grade are found that offer additional guidance for implementing various routines in the program, including writing, reading comprehension, close reading, vocabulary, culture and community, and background knowledge. In addition, there are Overview of Our Research Base documents for each component of the program (Reading, Writing, Grammar, Speaking & Listening, Research, Assessment & Reporting, MLLs, and Gifted & Talented) are included in the resource materials.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program.
The How it Works provides a high-level overview of the program, outlining six steps to the program:
“Step 1: Teacher assigns differentiated lessons to students
Step 2: Students read an engaging, authentic text
Step 3: Students leverage CERCA to develop their essays
Step 4: Peer-to-peer discussion and debate infused along the way
Step 5: Teacher provides actionable feedback for growth
Step 6: District and school leaders monitor progress”
The Overview of the Program document provides a more detailed look at the program’s instructional approach. It outlines topics such as implementation strategies, scaffolding for diverse learners, distribution of writing, time for speaking, listening, and writing, working the program without 1:1 device access, and maximizing student engagement with routines.
The Core Resources for grade 12 include best practices documents for a variety of literacy strategies, including (but not limited to)
Compare Writing
Choral Reading
Paired Reading and Review
Choral/Dramatic Reading
Partner Restatement
Frayer Model
Root Word Challenge
Socratic Discussion
Quick Journal
Materials include and reference research-based strategies.
For each strand, an Overview of Our Research Base document is provided, as well as documents for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Grammar, and Vocabulary.
Reading: This document includes a research base for unit components, anchor texts, scaffolded close reading, and writing-related tasks. It also discusses reading across genres, the purpose of anchor texts and reading across genres activities, integrated literacy, text complexity, and AI-enabled scaffolding access to grade-level texts.
Writing: This document includes the program’s approach to writing instruction, time for speaking, listening, and writing, and distribution of writing.
Speaking and Listening: This document includes an overview of research for the program components, formal speaking and listening, and routines,
Grammar: This section includes an overview of research on explicit and integrated grammar instruction, grammar instruction in context, and conventions routines.
Vocabulary: This document This section includes an overview of research on explicit and integrated vocabulary instruction, establishing routines, selecting vocabulary, best practices, repetition and integration, vocabulary instruction and in-context vocabulary routines, and vocabulary acquisition.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Students mainly need access to the online program and a paper or electronic copy of the Student Guide to successfully access the program components. The Unit At-a-Glance Document and Teacher Guides outline which online direct instruction and additional offline resources are used in each module. These are clearly labeled to show when students need access to a computer and when they are working offline.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit At-a-Glance document lists the online direct instruction lessons for each module as well as additional offline resources. These are all tagged with a color-coded circle to indicate the strand, reading, writing, vocabulary, speaking and listening or executive function, as well as a star for essential tasks.
The Teacher Guide includes a one-page graphic for each module that includes a map of the module with images of the Student Guide pages. Like in the Unit At-a-Glance document, these are all tagged with a color-coded circle to indicate the strand, reading, writing, vocabulary, speaking and listening, or executive function, as well as a star for essential tasks. Additional graphics to indicate whether the activity is teacher-led, individual, paired, small group, online or offline.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. Additionally, each unit consists of a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a summative and formative assessment. The Module At-a-Glance document for each Reading Assessment module provides the primary and item standards for this assessment.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit At-a-Glance document includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides primary standards for each assessment for each Module in that Unit. The Selection Reading Assessment also lists item standards.
In Unit 4, Module 2, Students Tackle 21st Century Sustainability Challenges on the Navajo Nation, the Selection Reading Assessment lists CCSS.RI.11-12.2 as the primary standard and CCSS.RI.11-12.1; RI.11-12.2, CCSS.RI.11-12.5, and CSS.RI.11-12.4, as item standards. The Selection Vocabulary Quiz lists CCSS.L.11-12.4 as the primary standard. The Formative Writing Practice: Evidence-Based Writing— Informative lists CCSS.W.11-12.2 as the primary standard.
At the end of each Unit, there is a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a formative and summative assessment opportunity. The primary and item standards are listed in the Unit At-a-Glance and Module At-a-Glance documents for this assessment.
In Unit 4, Module 9, Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection, the primary standard is CCSS.RI.11-12.5. In the Unit At-a-Glance, the primary standards are listed as CCSS.RI.11-12.5, CCSS.RI.11-12.6, and CCSS.RI.11-12.4. The item standards are CCSS.RI.11-12.2, CCSS.RI.11-12.3, CCSS.RI.11-12.4, CCSS.RI.11-12.5 and CCSS.RI.11-12.6.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments. There is a system that provides data reporting for teachers, administration, and districts to review student achievement and growth. In the daily lessons, teachers are provided with a Feedback Focus section that provides some language and/or look-fors for the lesson’s specific tasks. Throughout teacher guides, there is some guidance for teachers to use when students do not show mastery. Writing Portfolio pieces are accompanied by rubrics, and teachers may use the Feedback Guidance located in the program’s Resources to provide students with individualized feedback based on the genre of the assignment. The program includes a direct instruction and skills lesson library that teachers can use to supplement student writing instruction based on this feedback.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The ThinkCERCA Front Matter resources provide an overview document on the assessment focus for the program. The Overview presents how the assessments are a blend of self-assessment and automated assessments that assess students’ reading, writing, vocabulary, and language skills. Formative assessments are available to “...inform instruction, unit assessments, culminating tasks, quarterly college placement practice opportunities, and benchmark assessments create summative assessments to gauge student progress toward outcomes and overall achievement.” Unit assessments provide teachers with data for skill transfer of reading and a culminating writing assessment. Additionally, benchmark and college placement practices provide opportunities to assess state assessments.
Assessments are available in multiple formats, and teachers have multiple options to assess students’ progress, including pre- and post-assessments for foundational skills, lesson assessments, benchmark writing assessments, informal writing and speaking assessments, unit reading assessments, culminating tasks, and personal reflection.
ThinkCERCA provides a data dashboard that teachers, administration, and district staff can use to “...understand how students are performing across a grade level or across a department…”
Each unit includes an assessment at the end of each module that includes a Selection Reading Assessment, a Selection Vocabulary Quiz, and a Formative Writing Assessment. At the end of every unit is a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a unit assessment aligned with standards. This assessment serves as a formative and summative assessment. There is a beginning, middle, and end-of-year Benchmark assessment scheduled in Units 1, 4, and 7, respectively.
Throughout each module, teachers have opportunities to check for student understanding that is embedded in the lessons that are a combination of anecdotal, written, or speaking assessments.
Writing Portfolio pieces are accompanied by rubrics, and teachers may use the Feedback Guidance located in the program’s Resources to provide students with individualized feedback based on the genre of the assignment and the writing skill.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Reports Portfolio slide deck, ThinkCERCA provides examples of data reports available including Operational Reports, Instructional Reports, and Benchmark Reports. While all reports provide a level of student performance data and student growth data, none of the reports provide any direct paths to reteaching or supporting students. Rather, general advice is given, such as “Use the class summary to review course-specific data” and “Use this data to see students’ performance categories and future growth focus.” Teachers can, however, use student data to group students by reteaching, if desired.
Throughout the Teacher Guides are Feedback Focus sections that guide the teacher on what to look for in each task. For example, in Unit 3, Module 1, students analyze a theme. The teacher Feedback Focus section states, “Circulate to spot-check student work and make note of challenging prompts for students to review as a class.” There is no further guidance provided.
The program includes a direct instruction and skills lesson library that teachers can use to supplement student writing instruction based on feedback to their Portfolio Writing pieces. Teacher Guides provide the following guidance: “Search by standard in the Skills Library for personalized lessons to reteach as needed.”
Throughout the teacher guides, some assignments include “Respond and Reteach” guidance. This guidance prompts the teacher with scaffolds for students who are still struggling with certain tasks or concepts.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials provide multiple opportunities for student assessments through multiple-choice questions and/or written responses. Throughout the program, the materials provide formative and summative assessments that align with the standards for each grade level.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials provide Unit assessments aligned to the standards, including, but not limited to, Selection Reading Assessments, Selection Vocabulary Quizzes, Formative Writing Practice, Formative Reading Assessments, Unit Speaking and Listening Assessments, Research Assessments, Culminating Task: Writing Portfolio Assessments, and Unit Reading Assessments. The specific assessments and correlating standards are provided in the Unit-at-a-Glance documentation. These assessments build over the unit from practice to the culminating writing task and the unit reading assessment at the end of each unit.
Baseline Writing Assessments/Benchmark Assessments are provided. Students are assigned a grade-level reading passage. After reading, they answer eight multiple-choice questions. Then, they write an essay that includes text evidence from the reading passage. This assessment is given at the beginning, middle, and end of the year to personalize and track student progress throughout the year. ThinkCERCA reporting tools provide a Benchmark Summary, Benchmark Rubric Category, and Benchmark Item Analysis report.
A Reading Leveling Assessment is provided to measure student reading levels. Students are automatically assigned a short reading passage at, below, and above grade level. Each passage has eight multiple-choice questions to complete. Teachers may adjust the reading passage level as needed. The Leveling Assessment report provides teachers with a Student Report by Lessons report. This report posts Background Knowledge and Applied Knowledge scores. The time suggested for this assessment is 40-60 minutes.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials include assessments that provide tools that increase accessibility for reading texts, prompts, questions, and answers, such as Immersive Reader and AI-Enabled Reading Support. This includes the ability for students, including, read-aloud, increased font, and line focus. These universal tools are available for all assessments except the Baseline Writing assessment. Writing assessments do not have a speech-to-text feature built in, but it is mentioned as an accommodation that could be used. The materials also provide some scaffolded materials in the Diverse Learning Guide to support self-assessments and reflections. The materials provide teachers with general guidance on the use of accommodations.
Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
ThinkCERCA accessibility tools include an Immersive Reader and an AI-enabled reading Support tool, which provides a read-aloud option, increased text size, increased spacing, font choice, and background colors. Students can choose to break apart words into syllables and color code parts of speech. Another tab provides line focus, a picture dictionary, and a translation function. These tools are available on all the assessments except the Baseline Writing assessments.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit At-a-Glance document includes a section titled “Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs” that provides brief and general suggestions, such as using the embedded tools or reading the Diverse Learners Guide.
Within each module is a Diverse Learners Guide that provides students with a more scaffolded version of the Student Guide. For example, the guide may have sentence starters for the Assessment Reflection.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Teachers can use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. The program provides some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Teachers can consult guidance in lesson support resources such as the Unit At-a-Glance, Unit Scaffolds Plan for Striving Readers, and Teacher Guide. For each unit, a Diverse Learner Guide is provided, which mirrors the Student Guide but includes additional prompts, graphic organizers, sentence frames, and models for diverse learners.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Scaffolds Plan for Striving Readers document outlines lesson supports for struggling readers. It includes the research base and curriculum design for the program, platform, unit, and lesson scaffolds. Lesson scaffolds are described and include background knowledge, key academic vocabulary, pre-reading, during-reading, after-reading, decoding, and fluency strategies.
The Unit At-a-Glance documents reference online differentiated supports on several of the pages. The documents state, “Online differentiated supports enable access to grade-level texts for English Language Learners, Diverse Learners, and students who may benefit from additional support.” In the Unit Overview section, there is a paragraph titled “Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs” that says, “As needed, students with diverse learning needs may benefit from pre-teaching lessons that are paired with anchor texts. Additional support for students with Diverse Learning Needs can be found in the Guide for Students with Diverse Learning Needs. These modifications can also be used with multilingual learners as they continue the acquisition of English.”
Each Unit At-a-Glance document also includes an “Excellence and Opportunity for All" section that references engaging culturally diverse learners. It includes guidance on making personal connections to the materials through Quick Journals, Explore Key Concepts, Connect Steps, and Share your Personal Connection part of each lesson.
The Teacher Guides include guidance for the teacher in the margin with suggested strategies for supporting students with exceptional needs, struggling readers, and/or gifted and talented enrichment opportunities.
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. A Unit Scaffolds Plan for Gifted and Talented document provides general suggestions and guidelines for challenging gifted students. In the Teacher Guide, modules include at least one instance per lesson with guidance for teachers labeled “Gifted and Talented Enrichment Opportunity.”
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Scaffolds Plan for Gifted and Talented document is a one-page guide that includes the approach and “why” for scaffolding lessons for this group of students. It states this about the core program, “Throughout each unit, students will experience problem-solving challenges, independent research studies, collaboration opportunities, and critical thinking exercises.” Then, it lists five ways to increase rigor:
“Encourage metacognition - Prompt students to showcase their cognitive thought processes by annotating using metacognitive markers, engaging in a post-reading metacognitive reflection, or participating in partner think-aloud activities.
Productive struggle—By challenging students with advanced tasks, although still in their Zone of Proximal Development, teachers can inspire perseverance and stamina while also allowing students to think more flexibly rather than correctly.
Convergent and divergent thinking includes using open-ended questions and responses, giving students an opportunity to explore new thinking,
Depth of understanding - rather than memorization or rote learning
Leverage the heavy lifting– Remember that sometimes less is more. Instead of adding more support, consider removing scaffolds to promote independence.”
In the Teacher Guides, modules provide guidance for teachers labeled “Gifted and Talented Enrichment Opportunity.” For example, in Unit 7, Module 2, the guide states, “Explore the Essential Question through the longer work Girl with a Pearl Earring. See the Guide to Using ThinkCERCA’s Longer Works on the ThinkCERCA platform.”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Units begin with goal-setting and end with reflections and celebration. Speaking and listening tasks and discussions allow students to share their thinking in various ways. Quick Journal activities allow students to connect to themes and build background knowledge. Peer review is built into writing tasks.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit includes multi-modal opportunities through whole class, small group, partner, and individual activities. Units consist of modules that follow a pattern of 1-2 sessions of personal goal setting and exploring the theme, 3-5 sessions of close reading and academic writing, 3-4 sessions of reading across genres, 2-3 sessions of “Spark Courageous Thinking” which is a formal, evidence-based discussion, 4-5 sessions of Portfolio writing, and 1-2 sessions of reading assessment and reflection.
Students use interactive online resources for guided close reading and argument writing. AI-assisted real-time Feedback is provided to students. Direct instruction video slide lessons on English Language Arts skills are provided. A Student Guide with unit resources and graphic organizers is provided that can be used for digital or paper/pencil work.
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
At the beginning of each unit, when students preview the theme, they take a poll of their peers to answer a question about the theme. They answer the question themselves, poll some of their peers, pair, and share, and then volunteer to share their rationales with the whole class. At the end of the unit, they return to the question and see if their thoughts have changed.
As students explore the theme and essential question for each unit, they apply their understanding in various contexts. These include responding to literature through close reading and comprehension questions, writing arguments using text evidence to answer prompts related to the theme, reading across genres, including multimedia, poetry, and informational texts, a variety of speaking and listening activities, and portfolio writing.
Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students explore themes through close reading, comparing literature, writing evidence-based claims, process writing, discussion, and reflection.
Across units, a variety of speaking/discussion tasks, including Debate, Socratic Discussion, Panel Discussion, Performance, and Pitch Decks, allow students to deepen their understanding and apply literacy ideas. After these activities, students conduct polls and reflect on the discussion using graphic organizers from the Student Guide and further class discussion.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Peer and self-review are present in Module 7 or 8 writing activities. Graphic organizers are provided to guide the peer and self-review process including Share your Personal Narrative, Edit the Draft Together, and Reflect on your Writing. Writing rubrics help guide the peer review process.
At the end of each unit, students complete Reflect on Your Success and Celebrate with Others lessons. In Reflect on Your Success, students write a description of what they are most proud of, whether they feel like a more effective learner than when they began the unit, what their best learning conditions are, obstacles presented and strategies tried, and what they want adults to understand about them as a learner. They are asked to share one successful strategy they used during the unit to overcome a challenge. In Celebrate With Others, students use a 3-2-1 strategy and record 3 parts of the unit they enjoyed, 2 ways they improved their skills, and 1 area of growth they still have. They are asked to share one larger theme about their learning that emerges.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
At the beginning of each unit, one to two sessions are dedicated to personal goal setting and exploring the theme. Students set a personal SMART goal for the unit.
At the end of each unit, students reflect on their SMART goal in a Quick Journal activity. They are asked to answer these questions:
“What can you celebrate?
Were you able to do the action you planned?
Was it specific, measurable, and realistic? If not, how would you change it?
Was it achievable in the given time frame? If not, how would you change it?
How might you revise your planning process for the next set of goals?”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies. In the Overview of Program Document, the program philosophy of grouping students is outlined under the heading, “Grouping Guidance: Grouping Students Based on Growth Focus and Learning Objectives.” Grouping Guidance is also provided in the Unit At-a-Glance document, which outlines the philosophy of grouping in heterogeneous learning groups. It is recommended that teachers group students based on learning focus rather than readiness levels. Inclusivity is stressed in the guidance, recommending that students in special populations actively participate in class.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit At-a-Glance document, there is a section titled “Grouping Guidance.” This document includes some general guidance about grouping students and suggestions for grouping within the program.
The materials suggest grouping in pairs, small groups, or larger groups depending on the activity and learning focus.
Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The guidance states, “We highly recommend that teachers group students based on the learning focus and avoid grouping students by readiness level. The ThinkCERCA reports provide ample data points to drive instructional groupings. When engaging in reteaching or pre-teaching moments, regardless of student ‘level,’ teachers can group all students who have the same personalized growth focus area together for an immediate teaching opportunity. For example, a teacher may choose to focus on students with the personalized growth focus area of ‘evidence.’ This may mean that a student with 6th-grade readiness may be in the same group as a student with 8th-grade readiness.”
Guidance is provided for grouping in pairs, small groups, or larger groups: “Large group learning is best when all students need the instruction or information and students at all ranges of abilities are able to engage. Small groups foster discussion and collaboration and provide teachers with the opportunity to instruct students based on personalized data, while partner and individual work allow for deepened engagement and focused thinking about a topic.”
In the Teacher Guide, icons indicate whether a lesson is intended for individual, paired, or small-group learning.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 12 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide teachers and students with scaffolds and tools to support students’ participation in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Teachers are provided with general tips for the specific vocabulary that may need translations, as well as reminders to use the online tools and the Diverse Learning Guide for scaffolds. There is an additional English Language Learners Guide that teachers can use to provide multilingual learners with scaffolds depending on their English language proficiency level. The online platform has a wide variety of language choices for written translation and read-aloud features.
Materials consistently provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Teacher Guide provides guidance in the margin notes for Support for English Language Learners, which provides teachers with specific words to consider for translation. The margins also indicate additional suggestions, including, but not limited to, when to provide tools such as a bilingual dictionary, translation, or digital tools. These tips can be found for most of the specific sections of the module or unit.
The ThinkCERCA materials include a document on their “Approach to Supporting Multilingual English Language Learners” that provides an overview of possible scaffolds aligned to WIDA supports, including, but not limited to, graphic organizers, distinct task chunking, and modified rubrics. There is also a Unit Scaffold Plan for Striving Readers that lists platform, unit, and lesson scaffolds.
Student materials can be translated into many different languages in writing or read aloud. Languages include, but are not limited to, three forms of Spanish, Thai, Urdu, and Zulu. The online platform has a wide variety of language choices for written translation and read-aloud features.
The Teacher Guide provides general tips for translating specific vocabulary and reminders to use the online tools and the Diverse Learning Guide as scaffolds.
There is an English Language Learner Guide provided for each unit, which links to different guides for each module. This guide differentiates activities for students depending on their English Language proficiency level. Activities are differentiated for beginning proficiency, intermediate proficiency, and advanced proficiency.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. In addition to the core readings, suggested longer works include a balance of voices and present all identities in a positive light. Photos and images are minimal across the units, are mostly found at module headings, and may consist of people, places, or objects. There are a variety of races, genders, and ethnicities represented in those images.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students explore the theme “Where are you Going Next?” with the essential question, “How do the expectations of society influence the decisions you make?”. Texts in this unit depict speakers from various genders, races, and ethnicities. Texts include:
“On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien tells the story of a young man’s internal struggle after being drafted for the Vietnam War.
“The Party” by Ava Kadishson Schieber is a personal narrative of her life escaping the Nazis in Serbia with her mother and emigrating to Serbia and then Chicago.
“Prom” by Hasan Minhaj tells the story of an Indian-American teenager whose attempt to take a girl to prom is complicated by discrimination.
“We Are Many” by Pablo Neruda is a poem that centers on the idea that humans are a collection of different personalities, experiences, and emotions that shift over time.
In Unit 3, Module 1, Japanese writer Haruki Murakami's “The Silence” explores themes of human isolation, fear, anger, forgiveness, and acceptance.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 4, students read an article titled, “Students Tackle 21st Century Sustainability Challenges on the Navajo Nation.” The article details a project where University of Arizona graduate students teamed up with undergraduates in the Navajo Nation to design a solar-powered water filtration system that can provide safe, clean water for Navajo families. “Through this project, ‘... I’m able to fulfill a promise I made to my family as a young girl, saying that I’ll never forget where I come from and I’ll never think that I am better than anybody, but instead, be grounded and remember my place in the universe,’ said Nikki Tulley, a UA doctoral student in environmental science. ‘My place in the universe will always be bringing resources and services to the Navajo Nation.’”
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Photos across the units are of objects, places, or people and are mostly limited to module headings. Most texts do not include images unless they are a multimedia study in a Read Across Genres module. For example, in Unit 5, Module 4, students read “The Healing Power of Greek Tragedy” by Jeff MacGregor. The image that accompanies the text on the platform includes people of different races and ethnicities.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials provide general and mostly generic scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning. The guidance for teachers primarily falls into the category of words to translate or how to leverage online tools. The online version of the program comes embedded with a wide range of translated languages. However, there is no specific guidance about where or when to leverage these tools. Likewise, scaffolds are provided and encouraged, but only general guidance on how or when to incorporate these scaffolds. ThinkCERCA materials show a positive philosophy about the value of multilingual students in the class and a structured system for all students to achieve in the classroom; however, the suggestions in the materials are broad.
Materials provide some broad suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, Support for English Language Learners states to “Allow students to discuss their ideas in their native language and to share their answers verbally.” The Unit Assessment teacher guidance states, “...Allow students to discuss their ideas in their native language and to share their answers verbally..”
Each Teacher Guide provides prompts to enable access to online differentiation supports such as “translation, voice-to-text, and other technology-enabled supports” and to use the Diverse Learners Guide for more scaffolded tasks.
In the Unit Overview for each unit is a statement about Multilingual English Learners that states that in addition to pre-teaching and other modifications, the expectation is that all students, regardless of native language, should be working alongside their peers. This document states, “These resources are designed for noisy, happy classrooms where students are practicing language and are leveled for beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners.”
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the program, Front Matter materials include a section titled “Excellence and Opportunity for All” that presents the need for scaffolds in a way that presents different learning needs in a positive tone. For example, the materials state that teachers should use scaffolds “...to model the research-based mindsets that allow learners to understand their needs and enable themselves independently and, when appropriate. Use available resources or jettison the scaffolds to challenge themselves.” This section also acknowledges that multilingual students may have differing needs but that the need for vocabulary development intersects with all students and thus is a focus within the program. The materials state, “Students who are multilingual English learners may appear to have the same needs, they are often very different, though one common need exists across the board for all learners of a language--vocabulary. For this reason, ThinkCERCA provides vocabulary support in every lesson along with other robust, leveled English Learner Supports for beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners.”
The ThinkCERCA materials include a document on their “Approach to Supporting Multilingual English Language Learners” that provides an overview of the supports embedded in the program. The materials state that “ThinkCERCA is a tool for empowerment and growth in English language proficiency.” The document lists their Guiding Principles as:
“English Language Learners are emerging multilingual learners whose Home Languages and diverse forms and registers of English are cherished and considered assets.
Meaning-making and comprehension of authentic and relevant materials are paramount.
Content serves as the anchor for foundational literacy skills development in service of mastery of spoken and written academic language.
Mastery of English expands an ML/ELL student’s power and agency to exchange, create, and express ideas and participate in their community authentically.”
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials provide some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse. In units where that is not a focus, there is no focus on using or supporting students of diverse backgrounds. For example, Unit 1 has many opportunities throughout the unit, but Unit 5 has little support beyond vocabulary support for multilingual students. In every unit, there are opportunities to make personal connections through writing and/or speaking, but there is no specific focus for teachers regarding cultural diversity. Translation opportunities are vast on the online platform. However, parent letters are only available in English and Spanish. Overall, student opportunities and teacher guidance are inconsistent and varied throughout the school year.
Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 5, the Show and Tell section prompts teachers to have students research “...a current example of a global citizen connecting different cultures. Ask students to locate an individual who, through business, service, entertainment, or another means of connection, links multiple cultures. Ask, ‘How did the citizen you are researching affect the cultures involved? What was the greatest challenge for this person? What was the impact?’ Use these responses to facilitate a discussion around the impact of global citizenry.”
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each Teacher Guide, a section on Culturally Diverse Learners states, “ThinkCERCA’s curriculum is also designed to be relevant and engaging and provides multiple entry points for students to make meaningful connections to the texts and to each other. Students are encouraged to make personal connections through Quick Journals, Explore Key Concepts, Connect steps, and Share Your Personal Connections, and to draw on their backgrounds and experiences through writing and discussion. In the Teacher Guide, teachers are encouraged to use a range of formative feedback to support culturally diverse learners; this feedback enables teachers to gather data to individualize their instruction.” While this statement is provided, few lessons reference the cultural diversity of students.
Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found.
Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
An embedded translation tool allows users to translate online student materials. The languages available are robust and include Albanian, German, Samoan, and Turkish.
In the Unit Planning Tools, each unit has a parent letter in English and Spanish. The parent letter provides families with a unit overview, a list of the text, and suggestions for home activities, including a suggestion to use the reading tools in the program, such as translations and the picture dictionary.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Quick Journal lesson that asks students to make personal connections to the guiding question. This allows students to share their personal stories. The Quick Journal prompts for Unit 5, Module 1, is “What is our responsibility to uphold our family values?”
Materials include opportunities to discuss personal experience. In Unit 1, Module 4, students participate in a Think-Pair-Share to discuss “...your personal experiences related to the topic.” Directions for the teacher state to have students “...share the parts of your response that you feel comfortable sharing. “
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials allow teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher.
The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program; however, implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials allow teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Teachers can customize the materials using the Digital Unit Planner and assign lessons at the class and student levels.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Teachers can leave feedback through the online rubrics. They can score, grade, and provide feedback that is then available for students to view.
As students complete the writing task for each unit, ThinkCERCA’s generative feedback tool will provide feedback on grammar, usage, mechanics, punctuation, and spelling.
All the materials can be presented to the whole class, allowing teachers to use any part of the lesson as a model.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Spark View mode, students can access an immersive reader function for most Modules. Once this tool is selected, students can listen to a read-aloud, change font size, increase spacing, change font, change the background color, have big words broken into syllables, color code parts of speech, insert a line focus, use a picture dictionary, and translate the text. Direct Instruction videos do not have these features available. However, they are available for the reading check questions. Students also have highlighting tools available when they are asked to analyze the texts.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit has a Digital Unit Planning tool that allows teachers to customize the unit based on teacher input, such as student data, standards, and schedules.
Teachers can assign modules to each class and at the student level, allowing for differentiation of the digital materials.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials provide some guidance on how to leverage digital tools for collaboration. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher. Additionally, teachers can provide feedback as students are in the drafting stage of writing, but there does not seem to be a way for students to respond to the feedback during this process.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. However, guidance for this collaboration is limited. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Module 5, Teacher Flex Activity, the materials suggest having students record their poems digitally, and then, “...listen to other student poems, and give warm feedback to peers.”
Teachers can leave feedback on the online rubrics for student writing tasks, including feedback as they draft and then upon completion.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. Images and graphics support engagement without being distracting. Organizational features in the Teacher Guide include tables, flowcharts, and some color coding to help teachers easily identify skills presented in lessons.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each of the seven units is divided into modules, and each module is clearly outlined in the Teacher Guide using a flowchart with graphic images of the Student Guide pages and color-coded notations to indicate skills. The flowchart also includes graphics that depict whether the lesson is accessed on the computer, paper/pencil in the Student Guide, or as an individual, small group, or whole group lesson.
The Student Guide’s graphics are minimal and not distracting when present. In most modules, an image appears at the beginning and represents the theme of the reading.
In the digital materials, icons help students navigate through lessons. For example, a green hand icon allows students to click for help. When students are writing arguments, icons for claims, reasoning, and evidence are consistent across the program.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Guide and Student Guide can be accessed at the unit level, which includes all of the modules, or at the module level, which only includes the information for that module.
The materials are consistent between teacher and student materials. The Student Guide pages appear in the Teacher Guide; many serve as answer keys.
The layout and structure of the digital materials are consistent across all units, modules, and grade levels. Teachers assign lessons from the teacher platform by clicking an “assign lesson” or “assign unit” button. On the teacher interface, at each unit or module level, there is consistent access to the Unit-at-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, Student Guide, Diverse Learner Guide, Answer Key, and Unit Planning Tools across the top of the page.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Student Guide includes a Preview Key Concepts and Skills page for each module. This page includes a checklist of assignments under the Before You Read, Read, Analyze, and Write categories, as well as links to the assignments in the Student Guide.
The Student Guide’s instructions are clearly labeled and often provide an example for students to follow.
Students can easily navigate the student-facing digital materials using a sidebar with links to each lesson step. This includes a link to a glossary.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program, providing real-time feedback to students. Implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The On-Demand Video Library in the Resources section provides videos for teachers on onboarding and using the program. These include creating classes and student accounts, assigning reading levels, using the student view, and using reports.
In the Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, teachers can access Teacher Training Courses with more short videos demonstrating aspects of the digital materials, such as assigning and scoring writing benchmarks, direct instruction and skill practice lessons, how to create custom lessons, and close reading and writing lessons.
In the Help Center, Product Support provides additional help and guidance for accounts and passwords, lessons and assessments, classes, grading, data and reports, rostering, and troubleshooting.
In the Unit-at-a-Glance documents for each module, there is clear guidance for which parts of lessons are online direct instruction to be assigned and which are additional offline resources. In addition, in the Teacher Guide, a computer icon next to an assignment indicates that it is an online resource.