2023

ThinkCERCA Core Curriculum for English Language Arts and Reading

Publisher
ThinkCERCA
Subject
ELA
Grades
6-12
Report Release
03/19/2025
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
66/72
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report for 8th Grade

Alignment Summary

The grade 8 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment.

Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. 

The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction. Although the materials include research activities, they generally occur in one designated unit. 

The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing.

Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.

8th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

25/25
0
15
22
25
Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 32 informational texts and 24 literary texts, resulting in a 57/43 balance of informational and literary texts, which should support achieving the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards. 

The materials contain 56 core unit texts across the seven units spanning various text types and genres. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Text complexity is mixed throughout the units. The quantitative measures range from 720L-1550L and generally increase throughout the year, and the qualitative measures range from slightly complex to very complex. Scaffolding suggestions often remain the same throughout the year, regardless of each text’s complexity level.

The materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options” for the Unit. Materials provide students with four independent reading options in every unit, each thematically linked to the unit’s content.

Throughout the program, there are on-demand and process writing opportunities.  The writing genre distribution is 33.3% argumentative, 33.3% informational/explanatory, and 33.3% narrative, which closely aligns with the grade-level writing distribution of 35/35/30 required by the standards. There are frequent opportunities across the school year for students to practice and apply writing using evidence.

The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

16/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 32 informational texts and 24 literary texts, resulting in a 57/43 balance of informational and literary texts, which should support achieving the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards. 

The materials contain 56 core unit texts across the seven units spanning various text types and genres. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Text complexity is mixed throughout the units. The quantitative measures range from 720L-1550L and generally increase throughout the year, and the qualitative measures range from slightly complex to very complex. Scaffolding suggestions often remain the same throughout the year, regardless of each text’s complexity level. Some scaffolding suggestions are present, but require teachers to complete additional research or preparation to implement. 

The materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options.” Students are provided with four independent reading options for each unit, each thematically linked to the content in that unit.

Indicator 1A
04/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a. 

Anchor texts are well-crafted and vary in genre. The texts are rich in language and academic vocabulary, representing many different cultures and experiences. Anchor texts are of high-quality and, consider a range of student interests, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, informational articles, fairy tales, drama, and poetry that appeal to various student interests.

Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 3, students read “Amigo Brothers” by Piri Thomas. This short story focuses on two best friends who must fight each other in a championship Golden Gloves tournament. Thomas is an award-winning Puerto Rican author who uses his experiences as an immigrant to draw readers into his stories. 

  • In Unit 2, Module 3, students read the article “Facing Budget Shortfall, These Schools Are Turning to the Sun” by Cara Buckley. Students learn about schools using solar power to help save on electric bills and provide other monetary benefits. Students also learn how the use of solar power can protect the environment. The author is a writer for the New York Times

  • In Unit 6, Module 4, students read “Seven Things to Do in High School to Make Your College Application Stand Out” by Chelsea Castonguay. The informational text provides seven tips in list format, with brief paragraph descriptions below each. Students explore and match the text’s organizational structure with the article’s purpose. 

Indicator 1B
04/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1b. 

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Genres include science fiction, persuasive texts, drama, and historical fiction. Over the course of the school year, students read 24 literary texts and 32 informational texts, which provide a 43%/57% split. This distribution exceeds the split required by the grade-band standards.

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 3, Module 3, students read a personal narrative, “My Country is a Ghost” by Eugenia Triantafyllou. In this allegorical text, students examine the theme of losing heritage when immigrating to a new place. 

  • In Unit 5, Module students read “The Diary of Anne Frank: Act 1, Scene III,” a dramatic interpretation of the seminal text, The Diary of Anne Frank. The drama is told from Anne’s point of view and uses shifts in time to explore how events occurred. 

  • In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. In this updated Cinderella fairy tale, students explore how dialogue and a third-person omniscient narrator can reveal character traits.

Materials reflect a 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Across the year, students read 56 texts, with 32 or 57%  informational and 24 or 43%  literary.

  • In Unit 1, students read eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.

  • In Unit 2, students read eight core texts, with 100% being informational and 0% literary.

  • In Unit 3, students read eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.

  • In Unit 4, students read eight core texts, with 100% being informational and 0% literary.

  • In Unit 5, students read eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.

  • In Unit 6, students read seven core texts, with 100% being informational and 0% literary.

  • In Unit 7, students read nine core texts, with 33% being informational and 67% literary.

Indicator 1C
04/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.

The materials include texts that are appropriately leveled in complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to the associated student task. Each Teacher Unit Guide includes a rationale for the purpose of each unit in the curriculum. There are 56 texts for students to read in Grade 8. The quantitative analysis revealed that 13 texts have no Lexile level because they are Non-Prose, 15 are above the Lexile stretch band, nine are below, and 19 fall within the grade band. The qualitative analysis shows that 21 texts are slightly complex, 26 are moderately complex, and nine are very complex. Most student tasks are found to be grade-level appropriate, with necessary scaffolding for more complex tasks. In the Teacher Guide, Module Preview, and Connection to Unit, a general description of the texts and the connection to the tasks is provided. The materials include a linked spreadsheet in each Unit-At-A-Glance, which provides quantitative and qualitative data for each text in the curriculum and an associated reader and task analysis of each text.

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 1, students read the short story “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier. The publisher’s quantitative measure is 1070L, and the verified measure is 1080L, which falls within the recommended Lexile stretch band. The qualitative measures are moderately complex, making the text appropriate for the grade. After reading the text, students answer five questions before preparing an argumentative paragraph to answer the prompt: “What powerful life lessons does the narrator learn from her interaction with Miss Lottie? Cite specific evidence, including inferences you made, from the text to support your response.” 

  • In Unit 3, Module 3, students read the short story “My Country is a Ghost” by Eugenia Triantafyllou. The publisher-provided quantitative measure is 830L, and the verified measure is 920L, falling below the recommended Lexile stretch band. The qualitative measures are very complex, and the reader and task measures are moderately complex, making the text appropriate for the grade. After reading the text, the Teacher Facilitation Notes state that it explores “the significance of one’s heritage and history, and how they can impact one’s identity, perspective, and purpose. Students learn about Determining Themes in Literature through this reading and a paired activity in the Student Guide.” To end this module, students complete a close reading of a section of the text before responding to the prompt, “How does the author of this allegorical story explore the theme of connection to a person’s heritage, community, or sense of belonging? Trace the development of this theme by analyzing the main character’s experiences in a new land.”

  • In Unit 6, Module 1, students read the biography “Bringing Light to Dark Matter” by Joseph Taylor. The publisher’s quantitative measure is 1120L, and the verified measure is 1140L, which places the text within the recommended Lexile stretch band. The qualitative measure is moderately complex, and the reader and task analysis meets grade-level expectations. After reading the text, students answer the question, “As a doctoral student, Vera shared her findings about how galaxies were arranged in the universe, and her findings were shrugged off. How did Vera respond to this event?” and write a CERCA paragraph to answer the prompt, “How does Vera’s story illustrate the idea that following interests and passions regardless of other people’s perceptions can have a positive impact?”

Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Teacher Guide for each module provides a Module Preview with how the selection connects to the unit and the knowledge and skills focus for the text. The Unit-At-a-Glance provides a link to “Detailed Text Complexity Analysis,” which includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of each text and reader and task considerations. This spreadsheet includes the following columns: 

    • Lesson Title and ThinkCERCA Platform Link

    • Citation or Publisher Permissions Line

    • Author Bio and Awards

    • Grade Level

    • Unit

    • Unit Name

    • Anchor or Read Across Genres Text

    • Lesson Primary CCSS Reading Standard

    • Certified Lexile

    • ATOS

    • Flesch-Kincaid

    • Ease Score

    • Qualitative Measures

      • Structure

      • Language Conventionality and Clarity

      • Knowledge Demands

      • Purpose/Meaning of the Text

    • Quantitative Measures

    • Reader and Task Considerations

    • Recommended Placement

    • Info vs. Lit Text

    • Portfolio Writing Genre

    • Formative and Summative Tasks

  • In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Fueling Up” by Lee Gjertsen Malone. The Detailed Text Complexity Analysis Spreadsheet includes the following information under Reader and Task Considerations for the educational purpose of this text: “‘Fueling Up’ was chosen as an anchor text because it is an excellent example of an informative text and of the unit theme ‘Designing our Communities,’ which asks the question: ‘What are the benefits and challenges of different communities, and how do they design solutions to face these challenges?’”  The Recommended Placement Section states, “Various quantitative measurements place ‘Fueling Up’ into the grades 9-10 text complexity band (see chart); the qualitative analysis would indicate that there are enough supports in place to warrant its placement in the 8th grade.”

  • In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “The Bee Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson. The Detailed Text Complexity Analysis Spreadsheet includes the following information under Reader and Task Considerations for the educational purpose of this text: “‘The Bee Man’ was chosen as an anchor text because it is an excellent example of a fairy tale and of the unit theme, ‘Comparing Ideas.’ which asks students to explore the question: ‘What is the impact of new knowledge on perceptions of our own lives and the lives of those around us?’” The Recommended Placement Section states, “Various quantitative measurements place ‘The Bee Man’ into the grades 6-8 text complexity band; the qualitative analysis would indicate that there are enough complex features to warrant its placement in the eighth grade.”

  • The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.

Indicator 1D
02/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1d. 

Student materials reflect a variety of complexity levels that are mostly appropriate for the grade level bands. The materials include 55 texts with publisher-provided quantitative measures ranging from 720L-1550L and verified measures ranging from 300L to 1570L. While most of the texts fall within or above the recommended grade level band for complexity, 21% of the texts with Lexile data are rated below grade level. Qualitatively, 38% of texts are slightly complex, 46% are moderately complex, and 16% are very complex. After reading texts, students answer five multiple-choice questions. The sentence frames students can use to respond to prompts or write summaries are redundant. The materials provide some scaffolds in student work and in the Teacher Guide to support different populations of students; some of these scaffolds and guidance are repetitive or broad, while some are specific suggestions to support English Language Learners, Students with Exceptional Needs, and Exploration and Extension. Scaffolds are offered before and during the reading of each text. Scaffolds are, at times, suggestions, such as an idea of background information teachers could provide about the text, and are often general and repetitive. Specific vocabulary scaffolds are provided in the Topic Overview of almost every text for struggling readers; the word(s) is always relevant to the specific text. As students read, consistent scaffolds provided throughout all texts include audio read-aloud support and interactive vocabulary definitions in the online text. During writing tasks associated with reading, some specific scaffolds are provided. Many scaffold suggestions remain the same throughout the year, offering little or no guidance to increase students’ ability to engage with increasingly complex text.

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 720–1550L. The overall qualitative range across the year is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 1, the Lexile range is 720L-1140L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 2, the Lexile range is 1170L-1400L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 3, the Lexile range is 760L-1090L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 4, the Lexile range is 740L-1430L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 5, The Lexile range is 1160L-1220L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 6, The Lexile range is 1070L-1300L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 7, The Lexile range is 850L-1550L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. 

  • In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1070L and a verified measure of 1080L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. After reading, students answer five comprehension questions. The following question supports students’ comprehension of the text, “Which of the following quotes from the passage best demonstrates that Lizbeth has conflicted feelings about the turmoil in her life?” Students further respond to the text in the Analyze section of the lesson when they summarize it and write a response to: “What powerful life lessons does the narrator learn from her interaction with Miss Lottie?” In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “The Attack” by Lula Delacre, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 760L and a verified measure of 760L. The qualitative complexity is very complex. After reading, students answer five multiple-choice questions for the reading check. One of the questions about characterization includes, “Choose the sentence that best conveys Jose’s growth and the fact that his character becomes more considerate and less self-centered.” Students further respond to the text in the Analyze section of the lesson as they summarize it and write a response to “How do the characters grow and change as a result of the events of the story?” In Unit 5, Module 1, students read The Diary of Anne Frank: Act I, Scenes I, and II by Francis Goodrich and Albert Hackett, which did not include a publisher-provided quantitative measure because it is Non-Prose. The qualitative complexity is very complex. After reading, students answer five multiple-choice questions. One question supports students’ understanding of characterization, “Which line from Scene I explains why Mr. Frank would want to burn the papers Maep finds before even reading them?” Students further explore characters and their motivations in the Analyze section when they answer, “Choose two characters that are introduced in Scenes I and II and compare how they react to their new setting.” In Unit 7, Module 1, students read The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and Albert Hackett, which includes a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 870L and a verified quantitative measure of 870L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. After reading, students answer five multiple-choice questions. One question supports students’ understanding of characterization: “Reread the following passage from the story: “She had no dresses, no jewels, nothing; these were the only things she loved. She felt she was made for them alone. She wanted so much to charm, to be envied, to be desired and sought after.” What does this quote reveal about Mathilde as a character?” Students answer questions on character actions and motivations consistently throughout the modules.

  • In Unit 2, Module 2, students read the informational selection “Fueling Up” by Lee Malone, which includes a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1170L and a verified measure of 1240L. The qualitative complexity is slightly complex. After reading, students respond to questions such as “Which of these statements provides the strongest evidence supporting the claim that biofuels are better for the environment than petroleum products?” and “Which of the following statements best explains how the author structures the passage?” Students then complete a direct instruction lesson on citing evidence to support analysis in informational text. The lesson focuses on evidence types and how they are used to strengthen and support an argument. The Student Guide includes an Apply Your Understanding task to complete a graphic organizer to respond to the prompt, “What does the evidence show about whether or not using the renewable energy sources mentioned in the articles are viable for communities? What evidence best supports one energy source or the other?” Students then use that information to draft a response to the prompt, “How does the author select and arrange evidence to build a case for switching from petroleum products to biofuels? Is there enough convincing evidence to support the author’s position?” In Unit 4, Module 2, students read the informational selection, “The Holy Grail of Transportation Is Right in Front of Us” by Farhad Manjoo. The text has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1120L and a verified measure of 1120L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. The reading check questions ask students, “What is the author’s purpose for including this sentence?” and “Which sentence from the text most strongly supports the author’s claim that with enough money, bus services could be the answer to sustainable transportation?” Students also complete an Apply Your Learning task to analyze the author’s use of a compare and contrast text structure and compose a response to the prompt, “How does the author make a case for buses through both narrative and compare-contrast approaches to building his argument?” In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Ten Steps to Choosing the Right College” by Katy Hopkins and Sarah Wood. The text includes a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1070L and a verified measure of 1100L. The qualitative complexity is slightly complex. Students read the selection and respond to multiple choice questions such as “What is the most likely reason why the authors repeated almost all of the subheaders as a list at the end of the article?” and “From the article, which evidence provides the outcome from a college education that would matter to most readers?” The Direct Instruction lesson focuses on how authors select and arrange details. Students complete an Apply Your Learning task considering how Hopkins and Wood structure their argument, use quotations and research to build their argument before composing a response to the prompt “How do the authors select and arrange details in order to help readers understand the most important parts of the college selection process?” 

As texts become more complex, some appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Before students read each text, a Topic Overview is provided. Directions state, "Read the topic overview to build background knowledge. Preview the vocabulary before reading.” The Topic Overview section includes a brief introduction to the text with a few vocabulary words hyperlinked in blue. Students can click the vocabulary words to find the part of speech and definition. 

  • In Unit 1, Module 3, students read the short story “Amigo Brothers” by Piri Thomas, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 890L and a verified measure of 880L. The text is qualitatively slightly complex. In preparation for reading, students engage in a vocabulary activity specific to the text. The Teacher Guide provides the following guidance for teachers to use with struggling readers, “Key Academic Vocabulary Scaffold: Irony. Explain to students the irony in the fact that Antonio and Felix, who are close friends like brothers, are ultimately pitted against each other in the boxing ring. Their shared aspirations and camaraderie contrast with the competitive nature of the sport, adding complexity to their relationship and the story’s conflict.” When writing a summary of the story, the Student Guide provides students with the following sentence frames, “In the beginning of the story, the author introduces Felix and Antonio as … who have to …,” “While training for the big fight, the amigo brothers decide… which illustrates…,” and “The story ends with…which shows…” The Teacher Guide includes guidance to support teachers in explaining and modeling a think-aloud for summary writing. The materials state, “When I read the prompts, I am looking for the most important details in the text that demonstrate the key lessons the boys learn from their experiences. First, I will look at the beginning of the text. Next, I will record the most important details about training for the fight. Then I will look at how the story ends. Finally, I will reflect on why I think the author chose to end the story this way.” The materials also include guidance for modeling how to analyze the prompt. As soon as drafting their summaries, the materials suggest teachers: 

    • “Introduce the optional sentence frames online that students can use as they summarize the reading.

    • Feedback Focus: Assess student comprehension by asking students to share the most important details from their summaries.”

  • In Unit 2, Module 3, students read “Facing Budget Shortfalls, These Schools are Turning to the Sun” by Cara Buckley, which has a publisher-proved quantitative measure of 1380L and a verified measure of 1440L. The text is qualitatively slightly complex. Prior to reading, in the Vocabulary section, students engage with new vocabulary words. The Teacher Guide includes the following specific guidance for Struggling Readers during this portion of the lesson: “Key Academic Vocabulary Scaffold: Budget. Explain to students that a budget is a plan for your money. It helps you decide how to spend and save. To create a budget, list all of the money you earn (income) and everything you spend it on (expenses). Then subtract your expenses from your income. Businesses and companies have budgets to make sure they are profitable.” As students read, they use a green highlighter to locate evidence of how low-income schools are using solar power and a purple highlighter to find details in captions and photographs that add to the author’s argument about the benefits of solar power. Then, students summarize the selection using sentence starters such as: “The author argues that solar power can help ____, ______, and _______ by showing that ______. The author clearly states that ________ can be beneficial to _____ and _______ because __________. The author’s claims in favor of solar power for _________ and _________ include _________.” The Teacher Guide for the Analyze part of the lesson includes a think-aloud to model how to analyze the text. The materials state, “When I read the prompts, I know that I am analyzing text features in a text. First, I will look at the passage and identify the issue the author is addressing. Next, I will reflect on what additional information the photo and caption provide. Finally, I will reflect on why the author included the photo in the text.” Later in the lesson, students draft text summaries. The materials provide the following guidance: 

    • “Introduce the optional sentence frames online that students can use as they summarize the reading.

    • Feedback Focus: Assess student comprehension by asking students to share the most important details from their summaries.”

  • In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “The Bee Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1140L and a verified measure of 1200L. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. Prior to reading, in the Topic Overview section, students orient themselves to the text. The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for Struggling Readers in this section, “Before students delve into the text, provide context about the author, Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson. Discuss her background, other works she has written, and any historical or cultural influences that may have shaped her writing.” While this scaffold provides a suggestion for teachers, specific information on the author is not provided in the materials. The student materials provide sentence frames similar to those in Unit 1 when helping the students summarize the text: “The main lesson of ______ is ______ because ______. In the beginning, ______ decides to ______ when ______ because ______. At the end of the story, the lesson that ______ is shown through ______.” The Teacher Guide provides the following guidance for this section of the lesson:

    • “Introduce the optional sentence frames online that students can use as they summarize the reading.

    • Feedback Focus: Assess student comprehension by asking students to share the most important details from their summaries.”

    The materials also include support for struggling readers through Echo Partner Reading. They suggest, “Support for Struggling Readers: Echo Partner Reading: Support struggling readers with fluency and prosody in a shared partner reading and summarizing experience.” While this suggestion is included, no further guidance is provided on how to implement it.

  • In the Draft and Review section across the materials, the following repetitive and broad scaffolds for Multi-Lingual/English Language Learners are included: “Allow for the use of bilingual glossaries, options for recording responses, and translation devices. Support student spelling and mechanics through automatic spelling and grammar checks and predictive spelling.” For Diverse Learners, the following broad scaffold is included: “Support students’ writing with predictive spelling, speech-to-text, voice typing, or dictation. Encourage students to expand each paragraph/section in the copy-and-paste outline from the previous step as needed.”

Indicator 1E
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e. 

The materials reviewed clearly identify opportunities for students to engage in a wide variety of text types and genres. Students read 56 texts covering various genres, including but not limited to short stories, video clips, poetry, and informational texts. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for partner, small-group, and whole-group reading. . Pacing documents are provided in the Unit Planner with 50-minute session schedules. Materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. 

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, students read two short stories, personal narratives, poems, and informational articles. They also watch a video. Each text requires students to interact with the different genres to answer the Essential Question: “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” In Module 2, the students read the personal narrative “I Am the Greatest” by James Bird. Then, students use evidence from the text to determine the message that the author is trying to convey about self-confidence through the challenges that his mother created. In Module 5, students read a poem titled “Experience” by Emily Dickinson. Students analyze the poem by using the SOAPSTone poetry analysis tool. They also compare the details and imagery of “Experience” to another poem, “One Wants a Teller In a Time Like This” by Gwendolyn Brooks. 

  • In Unit 4, students read six informational news articles and two opinion articles. They also watch a video. Each text requires students to interact with the different genres to answer the Essential Question: “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” In Module 3, the students read the opinion essay “Electric Scooters on Collision Course with Pedestrians and Lawmakers” by James F. Sallis. Then, students explain how the author uses a number of reasons to build an argument about how electric rideables should be used in cities. In Module 5, the students read and compare two informational news articles, “Twelve Best Ways to Get Cars Out of Cities” by Kimberly Nicholas and “The Environmental Impacts of Cars, Explained” by the National Geographic Staff. Students use the two articles to show how an author uses evidence to help readers understand the text’s central idea.

  • In Unit 7, students read two short stories, a fairy tale, a creation story, two poems, and two informational texts. They also watch a video. Each text requires students to interact with the different genres to answer the Essential Question: “What is the impact of new knowledge on our perceptions of our own lives and the lives of those around us?” In Module 2, the students read the fairy tale “The Bee Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson. Then, students explore how the author writes a “story within a story” and “understand the literary devices such as symbolism and allegory that authors use to convey meaning and develop their stories.” In Module 4, students read the creation story “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World” by Gabriel García Márquez and translated by Gregory Rabassa. They look for ways that “the author explores how one man can inspire an entire village through the power of the imagination.”

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit Planner provides a pacing guide for 50-minute class periods. Each text is complete with guidance for the teacher found in the Teacher Guide. Each unit takes approximately 22-24 class periods. Students practice reading in pairs, small groups, and whole-class sessions. In addition, they practice previewing the unit, setting personal goals, exploring the theme or topic, conducting research, participating in discussions or Socratic Seminars, and writing about the texts. 

  • In Unit 3, students take 24 class periods to read six texts, watch a video, and analyze two poems. Then, students participate in a Socratic Discussion and write a short story about “a main character that uses the power of imagination to solve a problem.” 

  • In Unit 5, students take 28 class periods to read the play The Diary of Anne Frank. After reading the play, students conduct a performance from a piece of literature and write a cause-and-effect essay that uses evidence from the play to explain the “conflicts that Anne encounter[ed] that motivated her to write about her experiences.” Students also analyze the “lasting effects of her words, thoughts, and ideas for generations of readers.” 

There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a section on independent reading opportunities. For example, the Unit 1 Unit-At-a-Glance includes the following teacher guidance: 

    • “Reserve one to two days for introducing the protocols for student choice during the first month of school: 

      • Introduce best practices for choosing appropriately challenging reading by showing the overview video. 

      • Allow students to brainstorm topics and types of books they may find interesting. 

      • Provide the suggested titles book list but also assure students that they need not restrict their choices only to those titles. 

      • Visit the library and let students select books based on the strategies introduced in the introductory video. 

      • Provide a class period or more for students to ‘get hooked on their book’ of choice while you conduct 1:1 conferences with students to understand their S.M.A.R.T. goals and progress. 

      • Model your expectations of how to complete reading logs and share submission and grading expectations.”

    The Unit 2 Unit-At-a-Glance includes the following guidance: 

    • “Select model book logs that demonstrate the expectations of the independent reading protocol and remove student names. Share digital copies of the exemplar work and review its exemplar qualities with the class.”

Under Resources, Curriculum Resources, Grade 8, Reading, Implementing Independent Reading, slide 8, the materials include a blank reading log with sentence stems to support students in writing about texts. 

  • Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options” for the Unit. There are four independent reading options provided to students for each unit. Each of the options is thematically linked to the content in each unit. The materials include a summary of each text to support students in making a selection based on their individual interests (student choice structure). The materials present teachers with several independent reading structures in the Implementing Independent Reading Guide. In addition to this “student choice” structure, teachers could choose to implement book clubs in two different structures: “one longer work, small groups” or “multiple longer works, small groups.” The materials include the pros and cons of all three structures for independent reading so that teachers can make the right choice for their students.

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

18/18

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The materials provide students with opportunities to respond to text-specific and text-dependent questions that help students make meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied.

The materials provide a variety of protocols to support students in speaking and listening skills. Throughout the course of the year, students participate in Socratic discussions, panel discussions, debate games, pitch decks, and performances. The materials provide opportunities across a variety of speaking and listening skills for students to demonstrate knowledge of what they are reading.

The materials include on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks, including Quick Journals and Responses to Text, are varied and frequent. Process writing is included in each unit and varies throughout the year in type, including research writing, opinion essays, narrative writing, and personal statements. The writing genre distribution is 33.3% argumentative, 33.3% informational/explanatory, and 33.3% narrative, which closely aligns with the grade-level writing distribution of 35/35/30 required by the standards. There are frequent opportunities across the school year for students to practice and apply writing using evidence.

The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f. 

The materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments that help students make meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Each unit has four modules that provide mentor texts where students engage with the texts directly by practicing checking, analyzing, pausing, and reflecting skills. Students also read several different genre selections. The questions, writing prompts, summarizing, and graphic organizers require students to return to the text and gather evidence to support their responses. Questions vary and require students to think critically about the explicit and implicit information presented in the text. Students create inferences, analyze language, determine the best evidence to support a claim and determine the meaning of the text. Each unit has a Teacher Guide that provides support for planning and implementing text-based questions and tasks. The Teacher Guide contains the Unit Snapshot, Rationale, a section for Skills Students Will Know, Understand, and Apply and Guidance for all activities students complete. The Unit and Module Guides have sections that support the teacher in providing activities that are connected to the text. The connections to the text(s) are included in four sections: Before You Read, Read, Analyze, and Write. In addition to the support provided for the mentor texts, materials include a section to support the facilitation of Read Across Genres, Socratic Discussion, Your Portfolio, and Reflect on Your Learning. 

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier. Students answer, “Which of the following quotes from the passage best demonstrates that Lizbeth has conflicted feelings about the turmoil in her life?” and “Which of these statements best describes the author’s purpose in writing this short story?” Both questions require students to return to the text. 

  • In Unit 3, Module 3, students read “My Country is a Ghost” by Eugenia Triantafyllou. Students answer the Reading Check questions, “Which sentence in the passage best supports the idea that ghostless people do have a sense of community?” and “Choose the sentence that best summarizes how Niovi’s identity changes from the beginning to the end of the story.” Students complete a writing task to answer the prompt, “How does the author of this allegorical story explore the theme of connection to a person’s heritage, community, or sense of belonging? Trace the development of this theme by analyzing the main character’s experiences in a new land.”

  • In Unit 6, Module 3, students read “First in the Family to Make Their Mark in College” by Melissa Ezarik. Students answer the question, “What can you infer from Ashley German’s Soto personal account about the importance of building community at a college or university? Reread the following quotation by Jane De León Griffin: ‘All of that is true, but it’s still ‘how are they beneficial to us?’ as opposed to ‘why are we beneficial to them?’ What shift in thinking and policy is De León Griffin suggesting for colleges and universities, and why do you think the author chose to include this quotation? How does this graphic help readers understand the complexities in college choice for first-generation students? Does this graph support the data from the survey mentioned above?”

  • In Unit 6, Module 5, students watch a video and read two magazine articles in the Read Across Genres section. Students read “My Path to Boston University – A Real Student’s Story” by Yesh Datar and “Five Reasons to Consider Community College” by Andrew Warner. Students record their observations and evidence from each article about the subject’s pathway, interests, and personality. They also analyze each article’s structure, coherence, and organization. The students examine the appeal of each writer’s pathway and make personal connections to their own possible pathway. 

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • The Teacher Guide provides general guidance for each lesson step in each unit. 

  • In Unit 2, Module 1, students read “California Just Ran on 100% Renewable Energy, but Fossil Fuels Aren’t Fading Away Yet” by Lauren Sommer. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for the Share Your Reflection section after students read the text. Guidance states, 

    • “Assist students in switching between the Pause and Reflect questions online and recording their responses in the Student Guide.

    • Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses.

    • Remind them to record their discussion reflections in the Student Guide.”

  • In Unit 7, Module 3, students read “The Far and the Near” by Thomas Wolfe. The Teacher Guide has guidance for the Read section of the lesson. Guidance states,

    • “Show students how to use the self-help tools built into the technology. 

    • Encourage students to preview the questions at the end of the selection and leverage the scaffolds and tools to access the text.”

  • In the Resources tab, Training Courses, materials provide video training modules for teachers, including “Establishing Literacy Routines with CERCA Slides, Direct Instruction Lessons, Skill Practice Lessons, and Six Steps for Close Reading and Writing Lessons.” The On-Demand Video Library contains on-demand training videos, such as “Must Moments in Literacy” videos, demonstrating the conditions needed for successful implementation and the common challenges. The Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, Graphic Organizers to Support Close Reading, Effective Writing, and Critical Thinking provides teachers with graphic organizers for reading texts.

Indicator 1G
02/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g. 

The materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for different types of evidence-based discussions across the year’s scope of instructional materials. Each unit has a culminating speaking and listening task, such as a Socratic Discussion, a Panel Discussion, and a Pitch Deck Performance. Each Speaking and Listening Module’s Teacher Guide includes the steps to seeing the speaking and listening task to completion. These guides support the teacher in helping students prepare, carry out, and reflect on the task. The materials provide but are not limited to, a List of Unit Texts, Reflect on the Essential Question Student Page, Prepare for the Discussion Student Page, Building Knowledge Together Student Page, and a Conduct the Poll Again Student Page. These activities are moderated by the teacher with the use of the Facilitation Notes. In addition, each Facilitation Guide provides Essential and/or Recommended time frames for each task phase. Recommended speaking and listening guidance for most discussions with a structure including, but not limited to, instructional videos, completed graphic organizers, prompts, and sentence starters for struggling students. Guidance for structured student discussions includes, but is not limited to, prompts, suggested timing, rationales, different roles for participants, sentence stems, and protocol directions. Teachers facilitate discussions throughout each unit and over the course of the school year.

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Direct Instruction and Skills Practice slideshow lessons in each unit, include instructions for performing each speaking and listening task. Topics and protocols include: 

    • Rules for Discussion

      • Be prepared.

      • Define goals and roles.

      • Participate in a respectful way.

      • Ask and respond to questions.

      • Reflect on ideas.

    • How to Deliver an Oral Presentation

      • Keys to a strong oral presentation

      • Types of oral presentations 

      • Organization

      • Tips for writing note cards

      • Presentation language - formal and informal

      • Appropriate use of voice, props, and gestures.

    • Socratic Discussions

      • What is a Socratic Discussion?

      • Steps to answer the Socratic Question

      • Prepare Reasoning for the Discussion

      • Create your argument and forming a counterargument

      • Respectful speaking and listening rules, including expressing ideas civilly, questioning members to bring in all viewpoints, and making eye contact to show active listening.

      • Sentence frames provided for questions and statements to build effective discussion

    • Panel Discussion

      • What is a panel discussion?

      • Panel members - each bringing a different type of expertise or point of view on the topic

      • The Moderator and audience roles 

      • Format - brief introduction by each panel member, questions from the moderator, questions from the audience, and brief closing by each panel member

      • How to prepare

      • Respectful speaking and listening rules including expressing ideas civilly, questioning members to bring in all viewpoints, and making eye contact to show active listening.

      • Sentence frames provided for questions and statements to build effective discussion

    • Pitch Deck

      • Definition of Pitch Deck

      • How to prepare for the pitch

      • How to prepare reasoning

      • Characteristics of a great pitch deck

      • Listening rules of the audience

    • Debate Game 

      • Preparing reasoning and evidence for the discussion

      • Forming a counterargument

      • How to speak and listen in a Socratic Discussion

      • Speaking and listening rules

      • Questions and statements to build effective discussion

    • Performance

      • Prepare

      • Perform

      • Be a Respectful Audience Member

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit contains one module focused on a speaking and listening activity. The Teacher Guide for this module includes guidance for all parts of the activity. 

  • Under Resources, Speaking and Listening, Speaking and Listening Toolkit- Grade 8, materials include a toolkit for teachers and students. This toolkit includes observation tools and guidance for each Speaking and Listening activity type in the curriculum. 

  • In Unit 2, Module 6, students participate in a Debate Game on the unit’s essential question, “How does a community find, source, and utilize energy effectively?” The Teacher Guide provides guidance for before, during, and after the Debate Game. ThinkCERCA’s Debate Game directions and slides are included in the lesson plan and include additional student handouts, slides with directions, procedure notes, and protocols. Guidance includes the following: 

    • “Explain that students will use their completed Prepare for the Debate notes to support their debates.

    • Facilitate the debate, reminding students to support their thinking with evidence from the texts and to use the Build Knowledge Together sentence starters.

    • Prior to kicking off the debate, review the rules and the performance criteria with students. Remind them that debates would not be useful if there were not two valid and opposing viewpoints, so they should be appreciative of the counterarguments as a support for deepening their own thinking on the subject.

    • Using a class roster, take notes on student performance across the 5 criteria, using the evidence indicators to evaluate whether students Do Not Meet, Meet, or Exceed grade level expectations. In the Debate.”

  • In Unit 6, Module 6, students complete a Pitch Deck to the unit’s essential  question, “What interests do you have that will help you plan your college pathway?” The Teacher Guide provides guidance for teachers to lead students through the step-by-step process of building a Pitch Deck. Teachers “Conduct the Poll Again” activity and Reflect on the Pitch Deck presentations in their groups by answering questions such as “What did people do well? and What could we improve?” Afterward, the teacher prompts students to answer the following questions from the Student Guide: 

    • “What were the strongest arguments, ideas, and evidence presented?

    • Did your ideas about the topic change?

    • Did you learn more about the topic?”  

  • In Unit 7, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion on the unit’s essential question, “How does knowledge change people and their perceptions of themselves and others?” The Teacher Guide provides a step-by-step plan for the teacher to familiarize themselves with the online lessons about Socratic Discussions, the Rules of the Discussion, and the Student Guide activities. It also provides four options for setting up the discussion:

    • “Two discussions that change in intervals of 10-15 minutes: an inner and outer circle that switch places.

    • One discussion with the whole class. Prepare your classroom by putting the chairs in a circle.

    • Fishbowl discussion where 4-6 students engage in discussion. Others tap in at intervals to join the discussion.

    • Independent student groups engage in discussions.”

    In the section “Build Knowledge Together,” the discussion begins. Teacher Guidance states, to “Explain that students will use the provided sentence starters to support their thinking with evidence from the texts. Tell students that you will remain silent as much as possible and that you look forward to observing a student-driven discussion. When appropriate, highlight excellent examples of students’ engagement: “I don’t want to interrupt, but I wanted to briefly mention that [student x] did a great job of [behavior y], which really helps the whole class better understand [z].”After the Socratic Discussion, students complete the “Conduct the Poll Again” activity to see if they “Agree or Disagree: It is always better to know the truth.” Then, the teacher prompts students to “Reflect on their Learning” by responding to questions about the discussion: “What did they learn? Did they change any of their answers? Why or why not?”

Indicator 1H
02/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

The materials support students’ engagement in speaking and listening tasks connected to reading and research. Over the school year, multiple opportunities to demonstrate varied speaking and listening skills are provided during the reading and writing lessons. Unit tasks include Socratic Discussions, Debates, Performances, Panel Discussions, and Pitch Decks that require students to synthesize information from the mentor texts and include evidence to support student responses during discussions with partners, small groups, and the whole class. The online Direct Instruction lessons teach students about the speaking and listening protocols. Students implement specific skills during peer feedback and reflection tasks. Opportunities to discuss multimedia sources are limited. Materials provide teacher guidance for speaking and listening opportunities. 

Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Come to discussions prepared, having read or researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Module 6, students prepare for a Socratic Discussion. After completing all the readings, students use their notes to prepare for Socratic Discussion, allowing them to express their opinions while supporting them with evidence from the texts. Students use the Prepare for Discussion chart from the Student Guide to make a claim that answers the Socratic Question, “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” Then, they use the texts to find evidence to support their claim. Once they have solid evidence and provide reasoning to support their claim, students write notes on the counterargument. After completing this preparation, students engage in a Socratic discussion. 

  • Follow rules for collegial discussions and decision-making, track progress toward specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion on the question, “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” Before beginning the process, students are assigned the Direct Instruction lesson on Socratic Discussion. In the online presentation, students learn what a Socratic Discussion is and is not, how to use evidence to inform and build on ideas, and how to speak respectfully and listen effectively. For this Socratic Discussion, students create a claim and locate supporting evidence from the various texts. They also connect the claim and evidence by providing sound reasoning. In order to participate effectively, students must also prepare a counterargument. By considering what others might say in opposition to their argument, they will have the reasoning to persuade others to adopt their ideas. In the lesson, the students also learn that there are rules for respectful speaking and effective listening. “To respectfully speak, a student must:

      • Express ideas civilly in order to be respectful to the group.

      • Restate what is heard for clarity.

      • Question members in order to bring in all viewpoints.

      • Build on others’ ideas to keep the discussion moving and to add fresh insight into the topic.

      In order to be an effective listener, the students must:

      • Take notes in order to add relevant points and ideas.

      • Make eye contact to show active listening.

      • Let a few members have a turn to speak before speaking again.

      • Don’t just think about what to say next. Listen to add to the exchange in a meaningful way.”

  • Integrate multimedia and visual displays into presentations to clarify information, strengthen claims and evidence, and add interest. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 6, Module 6, students create a Pitch Deck, a set of recorded slides that answer the question, “How can different pathways help you meet your postsecondary goals?” In Spark Courageous Thinking: Pitch Your Future from the Student Guide, students prepare a deck to answer the Pitch Deck prompt, “How can different pathways help you meet your postsecondary goals?” Then, they record themselves making an oral presentation about the best pathway for their future. The deck provides a visual accompaniment for the presentation. The students use a template to develop their Pitch Deck and include “all the elements of the research process.” The deck contains ten slides: Title Page, My College  Interests, My Academic Goals, My College Path Options, Possible College Choices, Possible Challenges, Pitch Your Top College, Explanation of College Selected, Postsecondary Plan, and a Closing Page. 

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Pose questions that connect the ideas of several speakers and respond to others’ questions and comments with relevant evidence, observations, and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Module 6, students engage in a Socratic Discussion. In the Student Guide, Spark Courageous Thinking, the students gather evidence from four short stories, a multimedia source, two poems, and two informational texts to answer the Essential Question, “How do people use their imaginations to entertain, reflect on the past, and explore new ideas?” The Student Materials include a Build Knowledge Together document, which provides sentence stems for students to prompt each other during the discussion. For example, students can use the following sentence stem to paraphrase what they heard and prompt a classmate to expand their thinking: “You said, “________.” Is that because ________? Can you say more about that?”

  • Acknowledge new information expressed by others, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Module 6, students engage in a Socratic Discussion on the question, “How do people use their imaginations to entertain, reflect on the past, and explore new ideas?” After participating in the discussion, students reflect on what they heard and learned and share how their thinking changed through the discussion. Prompting questions include: “What did they learn? Did they change any of their answers? Why or why not?”

  • Analyze the purpose of information presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and evaluate the motives (e.g., social, commercial, political) behind its presentation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Module 6, students view the online lesson Compare and Contrast Literature in Different Mediums. After reading the script of the play, students learn about different types of mediums used to tell a story, the advantages and disadvantages of different mediums, and how the medium impacts the reader’s experience. Students listen to the live production of The Diary of Anne Frank by Albert Hackett and Frances Goodrich, performed by The Actors Studio of Newburyport. In the Compare Mediums portion of the lesson, students discuss and use a graphic organizer to “find at least two pieces of evidence to explain how the elements that are unique to each genre affect the meaning.” No evidence was found regarding students evaluating the motives behind the works’ presentation. 

  • Delineate a speaker’s argument and specific claims, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and relevance and sufficiency of the evidence and identifying when irrelevant evidence is introduced. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Module 1, the students read the online text “California Just Ran on 100% Renewable Energy, but Fossil Fuels Aren’t Fading Away Yet” by Lauren Sommer. Before reading the online text, students view the Direct Instruction lessons on Determining and Tracing a Central Idea Through Details. In this lesson, they learn “What a central idea is and how to find it in an informational text, how the text structure helps determine a central idea, and how to follow a central idea through the details of a text.” To analyze the online version of the text, the students use the Student Guide, Apply Your Learning to Reflect on Details and Visual Evidence that supports the way “the author use[s] details and visuals about the California model to appeal to the audience in this argument for using clean energy.” The specific questions they use to trace the argument include:

      • “What do the details tell you about the problem? What details shape and strengthen the author’s argument? 

      • What does the graph tell you about the problem? How does the graph shape and strengthen the author’s argument?”

As students analyze this piece further, they consider how Sommer “provid[es] credible evidence that effectively supports the claim.” Teachers facilitate discussions in pairs or small groups. 

  • Present claims and findings, emphasizing salient points in a focused, coherent manner with relevant evidence, sound, valid reasoning, and well-chosen details; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Module 6, the teacher assigns the online Direct Instruction for a Socratic Discussion. This generic lesson provides the Steps to Answer the Socratic Question. The lesson guides the students to answer the Socratic question by providing the following information:

      • To answer the question, state a claim or an overall argument.

      • Then, identify the reason you believe the claim and support them with evidence from the text.

      • Explain why the evidence supports your argument using reasoning.

    Students must present their ideas during a Socratic Discussion, following the lesson’s guidance for Respectful Speaking and Effective Listening. Some of these ideas include: “Express ideas civilly in order to be respectful to the group, [b]uild on others’ ideas to keep the discussion moving and to add fresh insight into the topic, and [m]ake eye contact to show active listening.”

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

The materials include on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks, including Quick Journals and Responses to Text, are varied and frequent. The Before Reading journal prompts connect to the text’s topic, theme, or purpose. Process writing tasks include various types of writing using multiple texts as sources. Students follow standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing during process writing. Process writing is included in each unit and varies throughout the year in type, including research writing, opinion essays, narrative writing, and personal statements. Students can write to connect to the topic before reading, summarize texts, analyze the author’s style and writing, and make claims. The materials provide students with guidance and support for each task, including but not limited to structured graphic organizers, models, and rubrics. All writing tasks can be completed in the ThinkCERCA online platform, which provides graphic organizers and opportunities to use technology to produce and publish the writings. 

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 3, students complete a Quick Journal prior to reading “Amigo Brothers” by Piri Thomas. The journal prompt states, “Describe a time when you had a conflict with a friend. What caused this conflict? How did you and your friend react?” 

  • In Unit 4, Module 2, students read “The Holy Grail of Transportation is Right in Front of Us” by Farhad Manjoo. The first step towards completing the culminating research paper is to summarize each text from the unit. Students write a summary of the text. To get the students started, the Student Guide provides a few sentence frames, including: 

    • “Bus transportation in the United States ____, as compared to ______.

    • Government funding is currently used _____, but if this were to change, _____.

    • The author uses the narrative of his trip to ____ to explain how ______.”

  • In Unit 6, Module 7, students write a personal statement for the culminating writing project. Before they begin the lessons, they write a brief response to the following question, “What is a personal interest that you might like to write about? Why?” Students refer back to this piece of writing when they write their essay on the following writing prompt, “Describe how you have taken advantage of a significant educational opportunity or worked to overcome an educational barrier you have faced.”

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Module 7, students engage in an argument writing task after reading several argumentative and opinion texts. Students formulate an argumentative essay based on the following Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what changes have to be made to sourcing, utilizing, and investing in energy to power communities more effectively?” Students pre-write, draft, edit, revise, and share their essays. Once a topic is chosen, students use the Map Your Argument graphic organizer from the Student Guide to plan a hook, counterclaim, evidence, and rhetorical appeals. Once students have a draft, they engage in a lesson on word choice. This activity helps them Make It Powerful by encouraging students to pair up and find neutral words in the essay and turn them into positive or negative statements. This activity is meant to strengthen the language to appeal “to the readers’ emotions and sense of urgency surrounding the issues.” 

  • In Unit 5, Module 8, students write a  Cause-and-Effect essay after reading the play The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. As students develop their essays,they investigate what Resolving Conflicts means to them. Students focus on the Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Using evidence from the play, what conflicts did Anne encounter that motivated her to write about her experiences in her diary? What are the lasting effects of her words, thoughts, and ideas for generations of readers?” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the Draft. The Student Guide includes an activity, Make It Flow, to use after the draft is complete. Students work in pairs to add transitions such as first, then, also, and for example. This exercise aims for the students to demonstrate stronger relationships between the ideas in their essays. 

  • In Unit 7, Module 7, students write a Literary Analysis for their Portfolio. In this comparative analysis, students provide a response to the following prompt, “How does enlightenment change characters, their actions, or their personalities in Plato’s famous ‘Allegory of the Cave’ and other texts in this unit?” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, Revising, and Editing the Draft. As students complete their drafts, the teacher prompts them to refer to the Organize Your Essay task in the Student Guide. After mapping the details of the analysis, students use this graphic organizer to introduce the claim, provide at least three, if not four, key similarities and differences, and a conclusion that captures the argument. 

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Module 4, students read “Tiger Mending” by Aimee Bender. Students complete an online Direct Instruction lesson, “Developing Point of View in Literature.” They use the slide deck to learn what point of view is within a story, different points of view to consider, and how the points of view impact the story. Then, students complete five online questions to show they understood the presentation materials. As the students read the text, they consider the point of view lesson as they analyze the story and find evidence to answer the Writing Prompt, “Analyze the point of view from which the story is told. What insights does the narrator’s perspective reveal about the sisters’ relationship?” They complete this writing prompt on the ThinkCERCA online platform. 

  • In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “The Bee-Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson. After reading the story, students complete a five-question comprehension Check online. Then, they complete two Pause and Reflect questions online. Then, students Summarize the story in the online summary section. 

Indicator 1J
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.

The materials include a year-long writing program consisting of an 33.3/33.3/33.3 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing activities, which closely reflects the 35/35/30 distribution required by the standards. Throughout the year, students receive writing opportunities in each unit. Many of the opportunities focus on argumentative writing skills that are introduced by the acronym CERCA which standards for Claims, Evidence, Reasoning, Counterarguments, and Audience. The materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year to write in response to tasks that are directly related to the texts and essential questions for each unit, including formal Portfolio writing tasks. While teachers have the option of prompting students to write at the end of each module and prompts are provided, there are only two to three required “essential” process writing tasks in each unit; the optional tasks are referred to as “complementary prompts.”  Some writing instruction is included throughout the materials through a series of slide decks that present guidance for students in planning, drafting, and revising. The Teacher Guide includes extra writing instruction guidance in Show and Tell, and Teach Academic Writing Skills boxes. Rubrics included require students to implement the elements of writing as required by the standards.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Two units address argumentative writing. Portfolio writing assignments include an Argumentative Writing in Unit 2 and a Literary Analysis in Unit 7. Over seven units, 33.3% (5) of the writing opportunities are argumentative. 

    • Unit 1: 0

    • Unit 2: 2

    • Unit 3: 0

    • Unit 4: 0

    • Unit 5: 0

    • Unit 6: 0

    • Unit 7: 3

  • Three units address informative/explanatory writing. Portfolio Writing Assignments include a Research Writing paper in Unit 4 and a Cause-and-Effect essay in Unit 5. Over seven units, 33.3% (5) of the writing opportunities over seven units are informative/explanatory: 

    • Unit 1: 0

    • Unit 2: 0

    • Unit 3: 0

    • Unit 4: 2

    • Unit 5: 2

    • Unit 6: 1

    • Unit 7: 0

  • Three units address narrative writing. Portfolio Writing Assignments include a personal narrative in Unit 1,  a short story in Unit 3, and a personal statement in Unit 6. Over seven units, 33.3% (5) of the writing opportunities over seven units are narrative:

    • Unit 1: 2

    • Unit 2: 0

    • Unit 3: 2

    • Unit 4: 0

    • Unit 5: 0

    • Unit 6: 1

    • Unit 7: 0

  • Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:

    • In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay for the Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what changes have to be made to sourcing, utilizing, and investing in energy to power communities more effectively?” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the essay. In the Pre-Writing activities, students “complete online lessons to support their writing.” The Teacher Guide the following guidance for this section of the lesson: 

      • “Explain that learning to build a strong argument equips students with the tools to formulate a claim, support it with relevant evidence, and use logical reasoning. Sequence, cohesion, and transitions all add clarity and coherence to a piece of writing and make ideas more accessible to readers. 

      • Explain that conclusions serve as the final opportunity to leave a lasting impression on the reader and to reinforce the key points in the argument.”

    Next, students read the Argumentative Writing Rubric. The Teacher Guide includes the following teacher guidance for this section: “Show and Tell - Writing a Conclusion: Students need to understand the structure of conclusions in argumentative writing to complete their portfolio. They need to have practice on each type of conclusion: a summary, a focus on the main point, or a call to action. Model each type of concluding work by demonstrating how an author would write a conclusion based on the claim, “ People should eat at home more often.” Summary: in conclusion, people should eat at home more often for several compelling reasons. First, home-cooked meals are typically healthier and more nutritious. Second, preparing food at home is usually more cost-effective. Additionally, cooking and eating together at home can strengthen family bonds and create meaningful shared experiences. Lastly, reducing the frequency of eating out can minimize the environmental impact. Call to Action: in conclusion, people should eat at home more often. not only are home-cooked meals healthier and more nutritious, but they are also more cost-effective and can strengthen family bonds. i encourage everyone to start planning more meals at home to enjoy these benefits. Try cooking with family members or setting aside a few days a week for homemade dinners. This small change can improve your health, save money, and create lasting memories with your loved ones. Main Points: in conclusion, people should eat at home more often. Home-cooked meals are generally healthier and more nutritious, which supports better overall health. Additionally, preparing home food is cost-effective, saving families money. Cooking together also strengthens family bonds and creates valuable shared experiences. Finally, eating at home reduces environmental impact by reducing restaurant waste and packaging. These main points highlight the numerous benefits of dining at home more frequently.”

  • Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:

    • In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a Research paper for the Writing Prompt that they determine. They read the Topic Overview in the online lesson and learn that reading sources to help them learn more is known as inquiry. After that, they use online lessons and activities from the Student Guide to draft their research paper. The Teacher Guide include guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the essay. In the Pre-Writing activities, students “complete online lessons to support their writing.” The Teacher Guide provides following guidance for this section of the lesson: 

      • “Students will have thought a great deal about their topic and shared much of their research with others. They will also have a lot of notes and resources to work with. Now it is time to put it all together in a formal paper. 

      • Encourage students to take notes using Cornell Notes.”

    Students read the Student Exemplar “Transporting Us to a More Sustainable Society” by Samatha Gonzalez. A five-question Check follows the piece. 

  • Explicit instruction in narrative writing:

    • In Unit 3, Module 7, students write a short story for the Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Write a short story, set in an imaginary setting, in which the main character uses the power of imagination to solve a problem?.” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the essay. The Teacher Guide includes the following teacher guidance for the Preview section of the lesson: “Show and Tell—Narrative Endings: Students will be completing their short story in this unit. Review the Direct instruction lesson narrative Endings as a class. Then, refer to the story “The Attack,” which the class read in Module 2. in one sentence, rewrite the ending to demonstrate one of the following: implicit ending, plot twist ending, cliffhanger ending, sad ending. Have the students remember these choices as they write their short story endings.” In the Edit the Draft Together section of the lesson, students engage with peers to revise and edit their draft. The Teacher Guide  provides the following instructions for this portion of the lesson:

      • “Explain that students will use the Personal Narrative Writing Rubric to peer edit their narratives in pairs or small groups.

      • Instruct students to read their final drafts and make specific suggestions for final edits.”

    After peer feedback , students reflect on their writing and how they can improve it. 

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce claim(s), acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the reasons and evidence logically. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Module 1, students engage in viewing a Direct Instruction lesson titled “Introductions in Arguments.” During this activity, they learn that “introductions sets the stage for effective communication in any argument. Learning different ways to start an introduction gives students ideas for capturing an audience’s attention.” During the slide deck, students also learn the parts of an argumentative introduction. Then, students read “California Just Ran On 100% Renewable Energy, But Fossil Fuels Aren’t Fading Away Yet” by Lauren Sommer. Students plan an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does the author use details and visuals about the California model to appeal to the audience in this argument for using clean energy?” Students begin their response with a claim. They have access to supportive sentence frames by clicking on the “Need help getting started?” link. The available sentence starter includes, “The author uses details and visuals from the California model of renewable energy, like ______ and ______, to persuade the reader that ______.”

    • Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant evidence, using accurate, credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Fueling Up” Lee Gjertsen Malone. Then students respond to the following writing prompt, “How does the author select and arrange evidence to build a case for switching from petroleum products to biofuels? Is there enough convincing evidence to support the author's position?” After drafting claims, students add reasons and evidence from the text to support their claims. They can use the “Need help getting started?” link to find definitions for Reasons and Evidence, as well as sentence frames to help them determine what works for reasons and evidence.

    • Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Fueling Up” by Lee Gjertsen Malone. After reading the informational text, students complete the Analyze lesson online. During this lesson, students locate and highlight evidence provided by the author that suggests the benefits of switching to biofuels. Using another color highlighter, students locate evidence that suggests challenges present when switching to biofuels. Students practice revising sentences by using phrases that indicate a counterclaim. The phrases: on the other hand, some say that, and despite the fact that, support students in responding to issues by those who have an opposing view. Students can use the examples that they create in their response to the writing prompt, “How does the author select and arrange evidence to build a case for switching from petroleum products to biofuels? Is there enough convincing evidence to support the author’s position?”

    • Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Module 7, students read “Portfolio: Writing Your Argumentative Essay” by Alicia Patton. The text states, “When going over the claim [the] claim will be the answer to the prompt, stated in clear, strong language without phrases like ‘I think’ or ‘in my opinion’ that can weaken [the] claim.” The text then provides an example of an effective claim that includes audience appeal and would earn students a score on their own essay for the rubric point, “[t]he language of the piece of writing is well-chosen and establishes and maintains a formal style.”

    • Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Module 7,  students engage in viewing a Direct Instruction lesson titled “Conclusions in Arguments.” During this activity, they learn that “A conclusion helps the reader understand the most important points of an argument.” During the slide deck, students also learn three different types of conclusions. Students plan an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what changes have to be made to sourcing, utilizing, and investing in energy to power communities more effectively?” Students begin their response with a claim. They have access to supportive sentence frames by clicking on the “Need help getting started?” link. 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce a topic clearly, previewing what is to follow; organize ideas, concepts, and information into broader categories; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Module 8, students are tasked with creating their own topic for research based on inquiry about issues with transportation. Over the course of the unit, students read six informational news articles and two opinion texts to spur their interest in different topics. In order to reach a topic of interest, students conduct research and arrive at an answer to their research question. They begin the process by stating the main claim that they will use to answer their own research question. Students complete the activity, Map Your Research Paper, after reviewing the online lessons for Understanding the Research Process and Writing the Research Paper. This graphic organizer helps students define the problem for the reader and introduce it with a hook or memorable image, anecdote, quotation or statistic. The next box requires students to propose a solution to the problem that they introduced in the beginning of the essay. Students use the organizer to fashion the introduction to their research paper.

    • Develop the topic with relevant, well-chosen facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper on travel. As part of their planning, students identify the evidence that they will use in their writing. They identify the most pressing issues around the effectiveness and sustainability of transportation. Then, they locate key information (facts, concrete details, etc.) that will help readers understand the problem and buy into the potential solution. 

    • Use appropriate and varied transitions to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Module 8, students complete a research paper. The Student Guide includes a rubric for students. In order to earn points for Coherence, students must write a clearly structured paper. The notes in this section state that “effective transitions connect ideas to show how the information clearly supports the claim to create a cohesive, unified piece of writing.” During the Revise and Edit Draft part of this writing piece, the teacher prompts students to pair up and give feedback on their partners’ essays, “us[ing] the rubric to evaluate each other’s work.” Then, students revise their work based on the feedback they receive. 

    • Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Module 8, students complete a research paper. The Student Guide includes a rubric for students. In order to earn points for Coherence, students must write a clearly structured paper. The notes in this section state that “effective transitions connect ideas to show how the information clearly supports the claim to create a cohesive, unified piece of writing.” During the Revise and Edit Draft part of this writing piece, the teacher prompts students to pair up and give feedback on their partners’ essays, “us[ing] the rubric to evaluate each other’s work.” Then, students revise their work based on the feedback they receive. 

      • In Unit 5, Module 8, students view the online Direct Instruction lesson “Writing the Causes-and-Effect Essay.” They learn that in any story or play, the conflict drives the plot. They also learn that the protagonist experiences conflict, and it is through dialogue or physical activity that a character will show certain behaviors throughout multiple plots and scenarios. As the students draft their compare-and-effect essay they are reminded in the text “Portfolio: Writing Your Cause-and-Effect Essay” by Alicia Patton that choosing precise words like main character, conflict, stanza, act, scene, or rising action reminds the reader that this essay focuses on a work of literature.” Besides choosing this as an “area of growth” during the editing process, the students do not complete a lesson in the Student Guide to add precise words to their essay.

    • Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper. In order to earn “Audience Appeal,” students must write responses that maintain “a formal style and accurate English grammar.” The notes in this section state that “the writing maintains a formal style and shows a skillful command of the conventions of standard English grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling with very few errors.” During the Revise and Edit Draft part of this writing piece, the teacher prompts students to pair up and give feedback on their partners’ essays, “us[ing] the rubric to evaluate each other’s work.” Then, students revise their work based on the feedback they receive. 

      • In Unit 5, Module 8 the students are provided with information about Audience Appeal. In the final Compare-and-Contrast essay, they are scored on their ability to “maintain a formal style and show a skillful command of the conventions of standard English grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling with few errors.” During the lessons leading up to the completion of the final essay the students read a model student exemplar, “The Journey of a Journal” by Suri Marrero, and evaluate the formal style. However, they do not complete an activity in the Student Guide that focuses on maintaining a formal style throughout the essay. 

    • Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Module 8, the students write a research paper based on their own inquiry and research question about sustainable transportation. After viewing the online Direct Instruction lesson, the students should be able to write a conclusion for their essay that includes the final thoughts on the thesis statement and why the research matters. Before the students begin to draft their paper, they complete the Map Your Research Paper assignment from the Student Guide. The organizer states the conclusion should restate the claim, summarize the problem, and use the solution to motivate the readers.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Engage and orient the reader by establishing a context and point of view and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Module 7, students write a short story based on the writing prompt, “Write a short story, set in an imaginary setting, in which the main character uses the power of imagination to solve a problem.” Students use a graphic organizer from the Student Guide title, Plot Your Story, to write the exposition. In this section of the story, students introduce the characters, the setting, and the conflict.

    • Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Module 7, students engage in activities that help them develop a narrative that answers the writing prompt, “Write a personal narrative about a moment when you learned a valuable lesson that changed your life.” During the Draft stage of their writing a “Need help getting started?” link takes students to an organized  structure for their narrative that includes the definitions for pacing and dialogue. Students learn that “pacing can impact a reader’s view of [the] events,” and a reader can slow the pace when a character is struggling or speed it up if there is intense action. Students also learn to use dialogue in their story. Dialogue can show what the characters think and feel or it can help the reader understand the events that are happening in the story. Students are encouraged to add both to their essay in order to score points on the rubric for including narrative techniques. 

    • Use a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence, signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another, and show the relationships among experiences and events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Module 7, students engage in activities that help them develop a narrative that answers the writing prompt, “Write a personal narrative about a moment when you learned a valuable lesson that changed your life.” The final rubric for Final Narrative Writing includes a score for Coherence. In this section student writing is evaluated for “a logical and naturally connected sequence of events using a variety of transitional words to clarify the order of events, shifts in setting, and relationships among events.” Students review this part of the essay while reading the student exemplar “In the Blink of an Eye” by Suri Marrero, and then they try to add transitions to their own writing. There are no formal lessons in the unit about transitions, although students may “replace words and phrases” by revising the sentences in the Edit the Draft Together exercises. They can use the rubric to find evidence where the other student might grow in the use of transitions if they are added to the draft.

    • Use precise words and phrases, relevant descriptive details, and sensory language to capture the action and convey experiences and events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Module 7, students write a short story based on the Writing Prompt, “Write a short story, set in an imaginary setting, in which the main character uses the power of imagination to solve a problem.” After reading several model short stories that contain details and imagery, students must include these elements in their narrative to score points on the final narrative rubric. In order to prepare the final story, students complete the Map Your Short Story exercise from the Student Guide. The directions state that they should “complete the graphic organizer below, writing as many descriptive details as [they] can about [their] character, setting, and events.” 

    • Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on the narrated experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Module 7, students are tasked with writing a personal narrative that answers the Writing Prompt, “Write a personal narrative about a moment when you learned a valuable lesson that changed your life.” In this module, students read “Portfolio: Writing Your Personal Narrative” and learn that the conclusion should reach a resolution. At this point, the author of the story must think about the end of the story. They are asked to evaluate their story to see if there will be unanswered questions or if the details will be tied up neatly by the end. Students also learn that the conclusion can be the place where the theme is revealed. After reading this article, students Draft their narrative. During this phase, students can use the online graphic organizer to develop their narrative. The students can use the “Need help getting started?” link that provides some ideas for writing the conclusion. It states that the end of the narrative should “solve the problem or resolve the conflict, answer any last questions, and leave the readers pleased with the story.”   

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, Module 1, students read The Diary of Anne Frank: Act I, Scenes I and II by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. After reading, students Develop a response that answers the Writing Prompt, “Choose two characters that are introduced in Scenes I and II and compare how they react to their new setting. Use dialogue and stage directions to support your response.” The task requires students to use information from the scenes to Develop a Claim, Reasons, Evidence, Reasoning, and a Counterargument to answer the prompt.

  • In Unit 6, Module 4, students read “Seven Things to Do in High School to Make Your College Application Stand Out” by Chelsey Castonguay. After reading the text, students Develop an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does the author’s organizational structure in the text support the purpose of the article?” The task requires students to use information from the play to Develop a Claim, Reasons, Evidence, Reasoning, and a Counterargument to answer the prompt.

Indicator 1K
02/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to complete evidence-based writing tasks across the school year. The Teacher Guide provides a Module Overview, which identifies the evidence-based writing prompt and genre. Writing opportunities are largely focused on developing and planning an argument, though analysis and synthesis are also included. Each unit includes opportunities to write claims about the text and support the claim with reasons and evidence from the text. In each unit module, the Write section includes tasks such as summarizing the selection, developing and building an argument, completing a draft, and reviewing the draft. Students work with a peer to complete graphic organizers or obtain feedback that occurs frequently during writing. When drafting, students have the opportunity to use an Automated Feedback feature for grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling, but the tool does not provide support for strengthening the argument. However, not all of the drafting tasks are required assignments throughout the program. While some of the module's writing pieces are essential for completion, most are optional. During the Closing of the Lessons, students reflect and share progress as a whole class. At the end of each unit, Your Portfolio writing tasks provide opportunities to write a short story, research paper, literary analysis, personal narrative, cause and effect essay, and argumentative essay. These are closely tied to the texts in their respective units and often require the synthesis of multiple texts. The Student Guide provides several graphic organizers to help students organize their thoughts and text evidence to support their claims. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for specific writing instruction throughout the materials, including reasons for the writing instruction focus, what students should be able to do, and what to focus on to grow as a writer. There is direct instruction guidance for teachers to implement. Teachers and students have access to slideshow lessons and support in the Student Guide. The materials include scaffolds for students in the Student and Teacher Guides.

Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Fueling Up” by Lee Gjertsen Malone. After writing a short summary, students plan an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does the author select and arrange evidence to build a case for switching from petroleum products to biofuels? Is there enough convincing evidence to support the author's position?” Students write a response using the online organizer that helps support their writing of a claim, supporting reasons and evidence, using reasoning, and developing a counterargument. The Teacher Guide for the Develop/Share Your Argument Builder includes the following guidance: 

    • “Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing. 

    • Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.

    • Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence, and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.

    • Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.”

 While students are provided with scaffolds and peer feedback opportunities, teachers are not guided on how to teach these writing skills explicitly.

  • In Unit 5, Module 1, students read “The Diary of Anne Frank: Act I, Scenes I and II” by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Then, students develop an argument to answer the Writing Prompt, “Choose two characters that are introduced in Scenes I and II and compare how they react to their new setting. Use dialogue and stage directions to support your response.” Earlier in the module, teacher guidance provides direct instruction on understanding the importance of setting. The lesson provides a rationale for the lesson. The teacher's directions for the planning of the student writing is provided. Teacher Guide provides the following guidance:

    • “Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing. 

    • Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.

    • Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.

    • Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.”

    After students draft their arguments and receive peer feedback, they draft their CERCA responses. The Teacher Guide includes the following Facilitation Notes for teachers:

    • “Have students drop their drafts into the drafting space and develop their CERCAs.”

    As students Draft their responses, the Teacher Facilitation Notes include the following guidance for feedback: 

    • “Encourage students to share different aspects of their CERCA drafts to ensure they have included a strong claim, supportive reasons, and evidence.”

    Teachers may click on the ThinkCERCA Informative Writing Feedback Bank provided in the Writing Resources in the Feedback Guidance document to find examples of writing feedback they can give students based on how well they are performing on certain skills against the rubric.

  • In Unit 7, Module 7, students write a full-length literary analysis at the end of the unit that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does enlightenment change characters, their auctions, or their personalities in Plato’s famous ‘Allegory of the Cave’ and other texts in this unit?” Students use the online organizer to begin mapping out their essays. Students engage in pre-writing activities that include but are not limited to scoring an example of a literary analysis, choosing their texts, finding evidence from both texts and analyzing the similarities and differences. Then, students use their evidence and analysis to develop a claim. Finally, they draft their literary analysis. The Teacher Guide provides guidance that teachers can use to support students in organizing their essays  in the graphic organizer provided:

    • “Direct students to organize their comparative essays with a clear introduction and two points of similarity or difference.

    •  Remind students to use the graphic organizer to organize their essays, including specific details for focus.”

      Scaffolds are provided for students throughout each step of the writing process, such as, but not limited to, specific vocabulary to translate, adjusted versions of graphic organizers, suggested anchor charts, and technology features such as voice-to-text typing. 

Writing opportunities are focused around students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Module 2, students engage in a Direct Instruction lesson on “Citing Evidence to Support Analysis in Informational Texts.” Students then read “Fueling Up” by Lee Gjertsen Malone and analyze how the author uses evidence to build an argument. As they read, students use color highlighters to identify sentences that will help them respond to the Writing Prompt for the unit, “How does the author use text features such as photos and captions to support the arguments around using solar energy in schools? What do the photos provide that the text does not? How does the author select and arrange evidence to build a case for switching from petroleum products to biofuels? Is there enough convincing evidence to support the author’s position?” As students plan their written responses, they identify key evidence to support their claim, including specific evidence that supports their claim and evidence for the counterargument.

  • In Unit 4, Module 1, students read “For the Climate and Fairness, Take Buses and Sidewalks Before Electric Cars” by Dan Charles. After writing a short summary,  students plan and compose an argument to answer the Writing Prompt: “How does the author use examples to explain the need for public transportation?” As part of the planning for their writing, students Analyze the text to “determine the denotation and connotation of words in the passage using context clues. How does the connotation of words reflect the feelings of the author as well as those who are interviewed?” Students use their analysis to provide evidence supporting their developed claim to respond to the prompt

  • In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. After writing a short summary, they use evidence from their text analysis to build an argument for the following Writing Prompt, “In this updated retelling of the Cinderella story, the author provides a moral lesson about how money shapes our perceptions of happiness. Using evidence from the text, explain how the author develops this theme through the character of Mathilde and the symbol of the necklace.” Students complete the Apply Your Learning Task in the Student Guide to prepare their responses. In this activity, students locate the elements of a fairy tale that are present in the short story. Then, students complete the Prepare Your Argument Builder from the Student Guide, which requires identifying a claim and supporting evidence and reasoning. Students use these documents to prepare their final response to the Writing Prompt. The rubric includes evaluation criteria for the claim, evidence, reasoning, coherence, and audience appeal. 

Indicator 1L
02/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1l. 

The materials provide explicit instruction on grammar and usage standards, and opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of grammar skills in context are available. The materials include a Language and Styles Best Practices Toolkit, which is presented as a resource “for teachers and students to improve audience outcomes on writing rubrics.” This toolkit provides key definitions, generic examples, and a strategy for that particular skill, including capitalization and spelling, punctuation, end punctuation, subjects and predicates, subject-verb agreement, tense, commas, varied sentence structures, redundancy, clarification, modifiers, parallelism, formal and objective style, active and passive language, and style. The materials also include direct, explicit instruction that scaffolds instruction of grammar and usage standards, especially for how students apply the skills in larger writing contexts. The Direct Instruction slideshows include 26 grammar topics. Students practice grade-level grammar standard lessons through a mix of online lessons and corresponding tasks in the Student Guide. Teachers facilitate learning by helping students move to the next online module, moving students into pairs or small groups, having students read or share aloud, having students reflect on takeaways at the close of the module, and monitoring learning progress. Illuminating Key Concepts sections in the Teacher Guides provide additional teacher guidance on teaching specific grammar and usage skills throughout the lessons. The lessons are connected to reading a text and answering questions in the Write to Impress, Build Vocabulary, Citing Evidence, Understanding Author’s Craft, or Sharpen Your Sentences tasks. These opportunities to practice grammar skills give a brief explanation of the standard with examples, general instructions that tell students to experiment with the skill and apply it to writing, and a chart to complete with single-sentence responses to prompts. While there is evidence of focused work for spelling, it is not present throughout the modules. Using quotations and correct citations is addressed by reminding students to review an online MLA Style Manual. In essay writing, grading rubrics state students should follow standard conventions, and teachers are to use the Language and Style Guide for instruction of specific skills during Module 7, Your Portfolio. 

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier. Students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, they write sentences responding to the Writing Prompt, “What powerful life lessons does the narrator learn from her interaction with Miss Lottie? Cite specific evidence, including inferences you made, from the text to support your response.” Students review the assignment for the definitions of participles, gerunds, and infinitives. Then, they locate these verbals in the text. They create two answers for the Writing Prompt that contain a gerund and an infinitive. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar -Verbals, the teacher is provided with guidance: “Explain to students that verbals are verb forms that function as nouns, adjectives, or adverbs in sentences.” They are provided with definitions and examples of verbal forms. Teachers are to guide students through the example in the Write to Impress exercise.

  • Students have opportunities to form and use verbs in the active and passive voice. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “I Am the Greatest” by James Bird. The students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, they revise sentences using active rather than passive verbs. Students are given an example, “The school play was performed by eighth graders from Mr. Meyer’s class.” The task is to rewrite the sentence to make it dynamic and engaging by adding active verb(s). Students must also explain how they changed the sentence. Examples of active and passive sentences from the text provide model sentences for both the active and passive voice. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar -Active Verbs vs. Passive Verbs the teacher is directed: “Explain that active verbs place the emphasis on the subject performing the action, while passive verbs focus on the subject receiving the action. Examples are provided. The teacher is to guide students through the first example on their Write to Impress exercise, then allow students to do the rest independently or in pairs. The teacher may choose to use the Direct Instruction slide show lesson on verbs to enhance instruction.

  • Students have opportunities to form and use verbs in the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Materials found under the Language tab present a lesson on Verbs. The overview includes what a verb is and its purpose in a sentence, the different properties of verbs, and how to use verbs correctly in writing. The Moods of Verbs are addressed in the presentation, and examples of the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive moods are provided. After viewing the lesson, students Check their understanding by taking a five-question comprehension quiz. The quiz question, “Which sentence uses the verb in the indicative mood?” provides an opportunity for the students to demonstrate their understanding of this topic. The teacher can also assign a Skills Practice lesson for Grade 8 students. Students work their way through a lesson that provides writing examples using different moods based on the uses of different verbs. Based on their learning, the students select the correct answers for the various questions.

    • In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. In the short story, students observe how the author uses verbs in the subjunctive, conditional, indicative, and imperative moods. Then, they complete the Write to Impress assignment from the Student Guide. After reading the sentences and definitions for each type of mood, students write their own sentences in the conditional, indicative, and imperative moods. They practice applying their new learning by writing sentences in response to the Writing Prompt, “Explain how the author develops the theme of how money shapes our perceptions of happiness through the character Mathilde and the symbol of the necklace.” In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Verbs lesson, teacher guidance states, “Explain to students that different types of verbs are often used to convey a certain purpose or mood: indicative (factual; i.e. “The car is fast.”), imperative (command; i.e. “Don’t eat my lunch!”), interrogative (question; i.e. “Are you coming with us?”), conditional (future possibility; i.e. “When it snows, we will go sledding.), and subjunctive (wish or hypothetical; i.e. “I hope you have an excellent day.”). To enhance instruction, teachers may review the Direct Instruction slideshow lesson on verbs. 

  • Students have opportunities to recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in verb voice and mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “The Bee-Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar. The story shows how inappropriate verb shifts can affect the mood, voice, and tone to express facts and wishful thinking. For example, the statement “we cannot get away from our natures” is in the indicative mood and indicates a fact considered to be certain or true. The statement, “Bee-ing was the occupation chosen for him by Fate,” is in the subjunctive mood, indicating uncertainty about the facts. In the Write to Impress lesson, Students review the two types of moods and then revise two sentences with the indicative and subjunctive mood so that the sentences indicate the correct verb shift. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar -Verb Shifts, teacher guidance states, “Explain that fictional texts such as ‘The Bee-Man’ by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson often show inappropriate verb shifts to affect mood, voice, and tone and to express facts and wishful thinking.” The teacher is to model the first example for students, and then ask them to work in pairs to complete the remaining questions. Then, the teacher will discuss how the mood of the sentences changed with the shifts.

  • Students have opportunities to use punctuation (comma, ellipsis, dash) to indicate a pause or break. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 6, Module 3, students read “First in the Family Make Their Mark in College” by Melisa Ezarik. Then, students complete the Write to Impress lesson on Using Punctuation. First, they return to the text to find places where the author “uses commas and dashes to indicate a pause or break for reader clarification.” After reviewing the text, students return to the assignment and read the excerpt provided. They note where the pauses or breaks are indicated with commas or dashes. Then, they write two sentences, one with dashes and one with commas, to answer the Writing Prompt, “How does the choice to include personal accounts, graphics, and survey statistics help readers to better understand some of the challenges that many first-generation students face?” In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar -Punctuation, teacher guidance states, “Explain to students that, similar to ellipses, punctuation like commas and dashes can be used to indicate a pause or break for reader clarification.” The teacher is provided with examples to share with the students.

  • Students have opportunities to use an ellipsis to indicate an omission. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Ten Steps to Choosing the Right College” by Katy Hopkins and Sarah Woods. Then, students complete the Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. They return to the essay and notice how the authors use the ellipsis to remove the need for nonrestrictive elements. Next, students read a brief excerpt that indicates the original version and then read a version with an ellipsis. Students compare the two versions and then practice using ellipses in place of the nonrestrictive elements for two provided two sentences. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar- Ellipses, teacher guidance states, “Explain to students that punctuation like ellipses (...) can sometimes remove the need for nonrestrictive elements (additional words or phrases that could be removed without impacting the meaning) in a Passage.” To enhance instruction, it is suggested that the Direct Instruction slide show lesson, Punctuation, be used, which includes a five-question quiz at the end.

  • Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “The Attack” by Lulu Delacre. Students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students focus on spelling correctly. They learn three spelling rules: doubling the final letter before adding a suffix, changing -y to-i when adding -es, and dropping the -e when adding -ing. The instructions provide example sentences for each rule, and then students write sentences from the text that apply the spelling rules. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Spelling, the teacher is provided with guidance which includes referencing the Direct Instruction slideshow lesson on spelling. This lesson includes a rationale for proper spelling and rules such as doubling up rule, common spelling mistakes, when to drop silent e, i after e rule, i before e except after c rule, and commonly confused words. This slideshow lesson is followed by a five-question quiz. 

    • In Unit 6, Module 7, students write a personal statement to answer the Writing Prompt, “Describe how you have taken advantage of a significant educational opportunity or worked to overcome an educational barrier you have faced.” To earn points for audience appeal on the final rubric, the students must ensure their writing demonstrates a skillful command of the conventions of standard English grammar, including spelling. In the Edit the Draft Together from the Student Guide, students “collaborate with a peer or peers to read each other’s drafts.” The directions state that they use the rubric to evaluate each other’s work.

  • Students have opportunities to use verbs in the active and passive voice and in the conditional and subjunctive mood to achieve particular effects (e.g., emphasizing the actor or the action, expressing uncertainty, or describing a state contrary to fact). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Module 1, students read “California Just Ran on 100% Renewable Energy, but Fossil Fuels Aren’t Fading Away Yet” by Lauren Sommer. They engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students learn how using the active and passive voice in conditional or subjunctive moods can achieve particular effects in writing. Students read the examples to see how the author emphasizes actions, expresses uncertainty, or states a contradiction to fact(s). Students review the examples and the text to see how the author uses the different structures to emphasize the type of mood. Then, they write a sentence in the subjunctive and conditional mood that expresses ways in which they or their school can strengthen their community. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar -Active Verbs vs. Passive Verbs, the teacher is directed to explain “that writing in ‘active voice’ makes it clear what person or thing is taking action in a sentence, while ‘passive voice’ does not. Examples are provided. The teacher is to guide students through the first example on their Write to Impress exercise, then allow students to do the rest independently or in pairs. The teacher may choose to use the Direct Instruction slide show lesson on verbs to enhance instruction.

Indicator 1M
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

The materials include a way for students to interact with and build text-specific vocabulary in the texts. The materials include a scope and sequence with the vocabulary tasks for each unit. Vocabulary facilitates students’ understanding of what they are reading. In each module, in the Student Guide, the Build Your Vocabulary activities provide one to four words that appear in the text for students to work with. While reading the text online, vocabulary words are blue so that students can click on them for a definition. Vocabulary support is also built into the online lessons through a glossary of terms. Some vocabulary words were repeated within a unit or across a unit. The year-long vocabulary plan is included in the Unit Planning Tools document for explicitly teaching vocabulary strategies and debriefing vocabulary words. The Build Your Vocabulary activities are listed as essential, and the materials also include online direct instruction, student guide tasks, and some additional offline resources. The Unit Planning Tool includes teacher guidance to support vocabulary instruction, including explicit vocabulary instruction strategies that differentiate between academic vocabulary terms and CERCA words, and a vocabulary presentation resource that provides the vocabulary terms and definitions organized by unit.  

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each Unit Planning Tools document provides a Vocabulary Instruction Guidance document for each unit. This document includes definitions of Key Academic Terms, CERCA words, and Focus Words (words from the reading selections). Throughout the program, the following 17 word learning strategies with guidance are provided for teachers: Morphology, Word Relationships, Prefixes, Synonyms, Frayer Model, Context Clues, Map a Word, Antonyms, Shades of Meaning, Compare and Contrast, Word Analysis, Concept Map, Word Study, Roots Words, Word Web, Analogy Chart, and Etymology of Words. Each Unit focuses on two to four of these strategies. For Unit 1, three explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instructions are presented with key strategies: “ Word Relationships - finding common ideas or relationships with groups of words, Word Mapping -Populating a graphic organizer with meaningful aspects of new words, [and] Word Analysis - Breaking apart words to discover their meaning.” There is a link to additional guidance, including establishing vocabulary notebooks and routines. An additional link to twenty-two Vocabulary Best Practice lessons. 

  • Unit Planning Tools include a Key Vocabulary document for each unit. This document includes a link to a slideshow of Explicit Vocabulary Instruction Resources. The slideshow includes how to set up a Vocabulary Notebook, and slides on all of the vocabulary routines provided in the materials. This document includes key academic terms and CERCA words for the unit, as well as a slide show of the Focus words and their definitions for each module. ThinkCERCA defines these different types of vocabulary words as follows and provides the following high-level teacher guidance for each type: 

    • “Key Academic Terms include high-value vocabulary introduced in class and reviewed in the unit’s Direct Instruction. After leading students through the presentation, provide instruction to support understanding of the key concepts and skills they represent and have students record new terms. (See unit Direct Instruction for resources.)

    • CERCA Words found in the Build Your Vocabulary sections of the student guide deepen key conceptual understandings and enable the expression of reasoning. (The word may not appear in the text, but it captures a key concept for interpreting the text.) Use the Explicit Vocabulary Instruction in the Teacher’s Guide to provide students with explicit support for vocabulary skill development prior to facilitating the collaborative learning experience.

    • Focus Words are a subset of words from reading selections. They enrich grade level readings and often appear in assessments. (After teaching the Focus Words using the slide show and modeling the vocabulary strategies, use Best Practices Facilitation Resources in the Teacher’s Guide to help students develop strategies for vocabulary using engaging tasks.)”

  • Throughout the Teacher Guides, general Vocabulary Explicit Strategy Instruction Guidance is provided. For example, in Unit 1, Module 1, Teacher Guide, for the Build Your Vocabulary Activity, teachers have the following guidance: “Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction—Word Relationships: After completing the Build Your Vocabulary task, ask “What are some of the relationships or common ideas you see in this group of words: empathy, remorse, interaction? As a class, generate some ideas regarding how these words relate to each other (e.g. They are all words that reference human relationships.) After the activity, ask students if the words in the group are synonyms or antonyms of each other or if there is a different relationship between them. (Module words: empathy, remorse, interaction).”

  • The Student Guide provides one Build Your Vocabulary worksheet per module, including Map a Word, Word Analysis, Word Web, and Analogy Chart. The worksheets often include two to three vocabulary terms. In Map a Word, students write the word and definition, part of speech, root word or origin, picture of the word, synonym, antonym, and sentence using the word. In Word Analysis, students write the word, give an example, a definition or explanation, and respond to “makes me think of/connotation. In Word Web, students name words or phrases that are synonyms or closely related to the center word. In the Analogy Chart, students list a familiar concept, the new concept (word), similarities, differences, relationship categories, and what they now understand about the new concept. Other Student Guide activities that may include vocabulary practice include Raise Your Score and Write to Impress, where students practice using context clues to determine word meaning. A glossary of vocabulary terms is included with each text, and those terms are highlighted within the text so that students may click on them to see the definitions. Some general guidance is found in the Unit Planning Tools Document.

  • In Unit 4, Module 1, students read “For the Climate and Fairness, Take Buses and Sidewalks Before Electric Cars” by Dan Charles. Key Vocabulary Words are: disparity, equity, climate change, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gas emissions, infrastructure, mobility, redlining, and skimped. Before students read the text, they complete the Build Your Vocabulary lesson from the Student Guide. Build Your Vocabulary teacher guidance states: “Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction—Concept Map: Use the Explicit Vocabulary Strategy  Instruction resources to introduce the Concept Map. Model the process with a word such as “equity.” Display the concept map and the selected vocabulary word. Complete the part of speech, add a description, and examples. Complete the first one together. Have students fill out maps for the remaining words in your grouping choice.” Students can share their responses to the second and third columns with the class. (terms: disparity, equity, climate change). In the Teacher Will section, teacher guidance states, 

    • “Introduce the Build Your Vocabulary task and review the example provided.

    • Organize students into small groups and assign them one or more words per group. 

    • Assist each group in sharing their findings with the entire class.”

  • In Unit 7, Module 4, students read “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World” by Gabriel García Márquez. Key Vocabulary Words are: condemned, improvised, desolation, nostalgia, mortified, relics, frivolity, ressign, stagger, and desolation. Before students read, they complete the Build Your Vocabulary lesson from the Student Guide. Build Your Vocabulary teacher guidance states: “Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction—Word Analysis: Use the Explicit Vocabulary Strategy, Word Analysis Instruction resources to introduce word study. Have students complete the process of word study after modeling a word such as ambiguity. After modeling how to provide an example sentence, explanation, examples, and visuals, have students complete other words.” In the Teacher Will section, teacher guidance states,

    • “Introduce the Build Your Vocabulary task and review the example provided.

    • Organize students into small groups and assign them one or more words per group. 

    • Assist each group in sharing their findings with the entire class.”

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier. Before reading, students access an online list of vocabulary words that appear in the text. In this module, students review the word “compassion (noun): a concern for the suffering of others.” In Unit 7, Module 4, students read “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World” by Gabriel García Márquez. The word “compassion (adj.): deep feelings of sympathy for others” appears again in the vocabulary list for the text.

  • In Unit 4, Module 3, students read “What Can Convince Chicagoans to Rely Less on Cars?” by Dan Charles. In the online Vocabulary list, students encounter the word “abundant (adj.) plenty.” They also see the word again in Unit 4, Module 5, when they read “Hydrogen-Powered Passenger Trains Are Now Running in Germany” by Sarah Kuta. The word appears in the online Vocabulary list and is highlighted in the text. The interactive link allows the students to hover over the word in the text to see the definition of “abundant (adj): plentiful.”

  • In Unit 4, Module 7, the students learn seven vocabulary words for Your Portfolio: Writing Your Research Paper in Grades 6, 7, and 8. The words include sources, inquiry, research question, synthesize, evaluating, documenting, and citations.

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 4, students read “Off the Shelf” by Patti Smith. They complete a Build Your Vocabulary activity from the Student Guide. Students focus on developing a Word Analysis for the words covet, impulsive, and sacrifice to help them understand, discuss, and write about the text. 

  • In Unit 3, Module 3, students read “My Country Is a Ghost” by Eugenia Triantafyllou. Before students read the story, the online overview provides some background on helping students understand the word allegorical since it appears in the final writing prompt. The Topic Overview provides a highlighted version of the word allegorical so the students can hover over it to discover that it means “containing an allegory, which is the expression of truths or generalizations of human existence by means of symbolic fictional figures and their actions.” Students also complete the Build Your Vocabulary activity in the Student Guide, which prompts them to produce the Map a Word graphic organizer for allegory, tethered and disconnected. By the end of the module, they can develop a response to the prompt: “How does the author of this allegorical story explore the theme of connection to a person’s heritage, community, or sense of belonging?”

  • In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Ten Steps to Choosing the Right College” by Katy Hopkins and Sarah Wood. Then, they complete the Build Your Vocabulary activity from the Student Guide. In the Analogy Chart, students show the similarities, differences, and relationships within the word prospective. Exploring this conceptual term allows students to “deepen their exploration and interpretation of the reading selection.” 

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level, and the materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks.

The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge.

The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. The program allows students to conduct some research activities connected to the unit topics as a part of the research process. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units.

The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards. The Teacher Guide includes guidance and resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units.

The implementation schedules align with the core learning. The materials include lesson-specific task timing guidance and implementation schedules can generally be completed in the allotted time. Optional tasks are meaningful and should not distract from core learning. The materials contain seven units, with each unit taking 22 to 26 days to complete, assuming 50 minutes of instruction a day.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

22/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The program includes opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials include multiple opportunities for students to read and analyze individual texts as well as multiple texts. Tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks.

The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge. Student tasks are Socratic discussions, pitch decks, performances, debate games, and panel discussions. 

The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. Materials allow students to conduct some research activities connected to the unit topics as a part of the research process. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units.

Indicator 2A
04/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a. 

The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of these texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Students read literary and informational texts across various genres that add to their knowledge of the theme or topic. 

Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each of the seven units includes a variety of texts to illustrate and develop the theme or topic and Essential Question. Each unit contains seven to eight grade-appropriate modules that include several readings, an opportunity for student discourse, and a writing assignment for the student portfolio connected by the theme or topic. The focus for each unit is as follows: “Who Do You Aim to Be?,” “How Do We Fuel a Community?,” “How Does Imagination Shape Our Vision?,” “How Can Travel Be Green?,” “What Is the Legacy of Our Words?,” “What Directions Might You Take?,” and “How Does Knowledge Change Perspective?” 

  • In Unit 1, the topic is “Who Do You Aim to Be?” and the Essential Question is “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” Students read two short stories and two personal narratives in the first four modules. According to the Teacher Guide, the responses require students to make personal connections to the topic before each reading. These personal connections support students’ comprehension of the texts. In Module 1, students read the short story “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier. In order to connect to the lesson, they “Describe a time when [they] learned a painful but necessary lesson about how to treat someone who is different from [them].” They look for the powerful life lessons that the narrator learns throughout the story. In Module 2, students explore the personal narrative “I Am the Greatest” by James Bird. As they begin to read the text, students provide an answer to the Connect prompt for the lesson: “Describe a time when you learned an important life lesson.” Students then explore the text to locate examples of challenges the author’s mother provided that helped teach the narrator self-confidence. In Module 3, students read the short story “Amigo Brothers” by Piri Thomas. Before beginning the selection, they answer the Connect prompt: “Describe a time when you had a conflict with a friend.” Students read the text to locate two key lessons that the characters learned from the conflict that emerges in the text. Additional texts in Module 5, Reading Across Genres, prompt students to consider the question, “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change? Students add evidence to their unit notes that answer the question. They view a video, two poems, and two informational texts to find more support for the final piece of writing. Once they compile their ideas, students “write a personal narrative about a valuable life-changing lesson they learned.” The personal connections they made to begin each module support the piece of writing required by this unit.

  • In Unit 4, the topic is “How Can Travel Be Green?” and the Essential Question is, “How can transportation be both effective and sustainable?” In each module, students read challenging mentor texts that are informational news articles or opinion essays. They use the texts to research evidence to determine the best type of transportation that is effective and sustainable. Each text provides a possible solution to the complexities associated with transportation. Each module requires students to use evidence from the text to add to the Class Discussion Question, “How can we take care of our world today to protect it for the future?”  In Module 1, students read “For the Climate and Fairness, Take Buses and Sidewalks Before Electric Cars” by Dan Charles. They look for examples the author uses “to explain the need for public transportation.” In Module 2, students read the informational news article “The Holy Grail of Transportation Is Right in Front of Us” by Farhad Manjoo. Students explore the author’s case for using buses to provide public transportation. In Module 3, students explore the effectiveness and sustainability of using electric rideables in cities. This information comes from the opinion essay “Electric Scooters on Collision Course with Pedestrians and Lawmakers” by James F. Sallis. In Module 4, students look for more evidence to solve the challenges of many people using personal vehicles to travel. They read the article “What Can Convince Chicagoans to Rely Less on Cars?” by Dan Charles to collect their evidence and ideas. In Module 5, students view a video, three more news articles, and another opinion piece to compare and contrast the ideas presented regarding the challenges that are faced when there are too many vehicles on the roads. Students collect evidence from all the readings to write a research paper on the following topic: “Based on the readings and other research, what are the most pressing issues around the effectiveness and sustainability of transportation?”

  • In Unit 7, the topic is “How Does Knowledge Change Perspective?” and the Essential Question is, “What is the impact of new knowledge on our perceptions of our own lives and the lives of those around us?” In each module, students read challenging fictional mentor texts consisting of two short stories, a fairy tale within a tale, and a creation story. They also view a video and compare and contrast two poems and three informational texts to prove that there can be multiple perspectives on the same topic in the Reading Across Genres module. Students engage in analyzing and comparing texts throughout this unit so they can participate in a Socratic Discussion by answering the Essential Question and writing a literary analysis that responds to the prompt, “Using a traditional tale or creation story and the additional texts in the unit, compare themes and story elements, characters in each. Use at least two sets of literary texts in your comparisons to explain how modern authors retell classic texts in new ways.” In Module 1, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. They “explore the ways in which money shapes our perception of what it takes to be happy or at least content.” Students use the examples from the character Mathilde to create their responses. In Module 2, students read “The Bee-Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson. They use evidence from the fairy tale to analyze the author’s retelling of the story and the way modern themes emerge by using the elements of traditional fairy tales. In Module 3, students read a modern short story titled “The Far and the Near” by Thomas Wolfe. In this story, the author uses a familiar theme, “things are not always as they appear,” to convey a “valuable lesson about the human condition.” Students use evidence from the text to explain how the author develops the theme. In Module 4, students read a creation story, “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World.” In this magical tale, the students review symbolism and allegory to determine how figurative language can impact the theme of a story. Over the following few lessons, students read five different texts in the Read Across Genres unit. For example, they read and compare the perspectives from two informational texts, “Things You Cannot Unsee” and “What They Say About Your Brain” by Alexis C. Madrigal, to the text “Three Wise Monkeys of Tōshōgū Shrine” by Atlas Obscura. 

Indicator 2B
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b. 

The materials include opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple texts. After each reading, students are provided with multiple-choice questions that are aligned to the standards. The tasks within the student materials include opportunities for students to analyze the text through varied tasks such as completing graphic organizers, participating in debates, and writing tasks. Each unit of instruction includes direct instruction on a specific text analysis skill, thematically linked reading selections with reading check tasks, which include multiple choice questions to apply the reading analysis skill, and an Apply Your Learning Task, allowing students to practice the skill prior to engaging in a written response. Students have multiple opportunities throughout the year to practice literacy skills across various genres and text selections.

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details  (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  •  In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “The Attack” by Lula Delacre. Then, they answer questions such as, “How does this conflict change Emilio? [and] Why is this dialogue important to understanding the role of the mother in the story and how she deals with conflict?” Additionally, students complete an Apply Your Learning task to record how the characters change from the beginning to the end of the story. Finally, students complete a writing task to respond to the prompt, “How do the characters grow and change as a result of the events of the story?” 

  • In Unit 5, Module 1, students read The Diary of Anne Frank: Act I, Scenes I and II  by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Then they answer five comprehension questions including: “Which of these statements best describes why the author began the play three years after the wartime events? [and] Which of the following most clearly explains the different reactions of Peter and Anne at this moment?” Students then respond to a Writing Prompt: “Choose two characters that are introduced in Scenes I and II and compare how they react to their new setting. Use dialogue and stage directions to support your response.”

  • In Unit 7, Module 3, students read “The Far and the Near” by Thomas Wolfe. After reading, students answer five comprehension questions, including: 

    • “Which line from the story best helps you understand the theme that things are not always as they appear? 

    • What does the author mean when he says, ‘Yes, this was the house he sought, the place he had passed so many times, the destination he had longed for with such happiness’?” 

    Students then respond to the Writing Prompt: “In this modern short story, Wolfe explores the common theme that things are not always as they appear. Using evidence from the text, explain how the author develops this theme to teach a valuable lesson about the human condition.” 

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, “Module 4, students read “Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough a Milestone for the Future of Clean Energy, US Officials Say” by Ella Nilsen. Then, they analyze the craft and structure by answering questions such as: “Which of these statements provides the strongest support for the author’s point of view that nuclear fusion can be a significant future energy source? [and] Which statement best describes how the author is appealing to her audience?” Students then respond to a writing prompt: “Trace the evidence the author provides to make the case for nuclear fusion as a viable future energy source. How does the author use evidence to appeal to the audience’s values?”

  • In Unit 4, Module 1, students read “For the Climate and Fairness, Take Buses and Sidewalks Before Electric Cars” by Dan Charles. Then, they answer questions including: “Why does the author use the word ambitious to describe sustainability director Mike Foley’s plans to redesign Cleveland’s infrastructure? [and] Which of these claims shows that the audience already accepts that greenhouse emissions are harmful to the environment?” Students then respond to the Writing Prompt: “How does the author use examples to explain the need for public transportation?”

  • In Unit 7, Module 2, students complete the online Direct Instruction lesson on Common Literary Devices Within and Across Texts before reading “The Bee Man” by Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson. Students then complete an Apply Your Learning task from the Student Guide to analyze how the author embeds one story into another to determine a deeper meaning within the text. Students analyze how the author uses allegory, characters, conflict, and resolution to respond to the question, “What elements in the fairy tale of the bee-man suggest that it is an allegory?”

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c. 

The materials include multiple opportunities for students to read and analyze individual texts as well as multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks. In order to complete the tasks provided, the students must analyze the texts and integrate their knowledge to complete the literacy activities throughout the unit. Each unit is designed around the unit’s Essential Question. Each unit also includes a Reading Across Genres module, which allows students to read a variety of text types and make connections across topics by responding to questions and completing tasks that require knowledge of the topic. 

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Module 4, students read “Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough a Milestone for the Future of Clean Energy, US Officials Say” by Ella Nilsen. Then, they respond to comprehension questions such as, “Which of these statements provides the strongest support for the author’s point of view that nuclear fusion can be a significant future energy source?” and “Why is it important for the author to respond to this counterargument about nuclear fusion?” Students also analyze the text by highlighting evidence supporting how nuclear fusion can be a viable energy source and examples of when the author appeals to the values of the reader. Students then respond to the writing prompt, “Trace the evidence the author provides to make the case for nuclear fusion as a viable future energy source. How does the author use evidence to appeal to the audience’s values?”

  • In Unit 6, Module 3, students read “First in the Family Make Their Mark in College” by Melissa Ezarik. Then, students answer multiple-choice questions such as, “What is the most likely reason the author began this article with Ashley German Soto’s personal story?” Next, students summarize the text. Lastly, they develop an argument for the following prompt: “How does the choice to include personal accounts, graphics, and survey statistics help readers to better understand some of the challenges that many first-generation students face?”

  • In Unit 7, Module 1, students view the online Direct Instruction presentation on Analyzing Traditional Tales: Fairy Tales. Then, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. They answer comprehension questions such as: 

    • “Reread the following passage from the story: ‘She had no dresses, no jewels, nothing; and these were the only things she loved. She felt she was made for them alone. She wanted so much to charm, to be envied, to be desired and sought after.’ What does this quote reveal about Mathilde as a character?

    • What is the most likely reason Mathilde doesn’t want the other guests to see her leaving the party?”

    Students complete a graphic organizer comparing the traditional “Cinderella” fairy tale and “The Necklace.” Then, students plan an argument to respond to the Writing Prompt, “In this updated retelling of the Cinderella story, the author provides a moral lesson about how money shapes our perceptions of happiness. Using evidence from the text, explain how the author develops this theme through the character of Mathilde and the symbol of the necklace.” 

Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 6, students prepare for a Socratic Discussion. First, they view a Direct Instruction presentation about Socratic Discussions and learn what they are and are not, how to use evidence to inform and build on ideas, and how to speak respectfully and listen effectively. Then, students analyze four mentor texts, a video, two poems, and two informational texts from the readings in the module to answer the Socratic Question, “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” Students use the graphic organizer, Prepare for the Discussion from the Student Guide, and are instructed to use “all of the selections from the unit to make their claim and to cite evidence from multiple texts.” 

  • In Unit 6, Module 5, students explore different pathways to meet their post-secondary goals. First, the students read “My Path to Boston University — A Real Student’s Story” by Yesh Datar. They analyze the author’s claim and evidence by responding to reading check questions, including, “Which piece of evidence from the article provides the strongest support for the claim that attending community college before a four-year college is cost-effective?” Students also read “Five Reasons to Consider Community College” by Andrew Warner and complete a reading check focusing on claims and evidence. Students respond to, “Which sentence from the text best supports the idea that you do not have to have perfect grades to get into a competitive college?” After reading both of the selections, students work with a small group or a partner to complete an organizer to compare the two articles, considering the different pathways, evidence, personalities/interests, and connections to the future. 

  • In Unit 7, Module 8, students read “Allegory of the Cave” by Plato and “One of Ours” by Willa Cather. Then, students answer multiple-choice comprehension and analysis questions about the individual text and then compare the two texts, including, but not limited to, 

    • “On which of these points would the authors of both passages most likely agree?

    • In what way does ‘Excerpt from One of Ours’ most clearly draw on ‘Excerpt from Allegory of the Cave’ for motivation or inspiration?” 

Indicator 2D
04/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d. 

The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. Each writing task is organized by a topic or theme and allows students to demonstrate their understanding of the unit’s topic and/or essential question. The culminating writing assignment requires students to read and analyze texts to draft their response to the prompt. Many of the steps toward the completion of each task are repetitive. For example, students read narrative texts and then write a narrative. There is no variation in building skills or improving writing over the school year. The opportunities for speaking and listening related to these writing tasks are limited to peer review tasks focused on developing the composition, not standards addressed within the unit. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge. Student tasks are Socratic discussions, pitch decks, performances, debate games, and panel discussions. 

Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion. Students begin by independently reviewing the Socratic Discussion direct instruction slick deck. Then, students look at a list of texts they read throughout the unit, which should be considered in their discussion. They use a few handouts in the Student Guide to prepare for discussion, including the Reflect on the Essential Question handout and the Prepare for the Discussion graphic organizer. In both these handouts, students consider their claims with supporting evidence from the unit’s texts to answer the essential question, “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?” After preparing, students move into the discussion. They may use sentence starters on the Build Knowledge Together handout if they need help. Once the discussion is over, teachers Conduct the Poll Again activity to see if students changed their minds throughout the discussion. Lastly, students answer questions to reflect on their discussion. 

  • In Unit 2, Module 7, students complete a writing task that serves as the conclusion of the unit. Students use their texts and tasks from the unit to write an argument that answers the following prompt, “Based on your readings, what changes have to be made to sourcing, utilizing, and investing in energy to power communities more effectively?” Students begin the task by learning the steps in writing an argument, and then students read and score a student exemplar. They draft their response by mapping their argument, making it powerful, sharing their draft with a partner, editing their draft with a partner, and then reflecting on their writing. To complete the task, students must include “well-chosen and relevant” evidence from credible sources, primarily from the texts in the unit. 

  • In Unit 3, Module 7, students complete a writing task that serves as the conclusion of the unit. Before beginning the short story, students view a direct instruction lesson on Writing the Short Story and answer five questions about the content. Students review the narrative rubric before choosing the idea and planning their short story. Students develop their ideas and draft the story based on their understanding of the components from prior activities. After completing the draft, students share their stories and get feedback from a peer. Partners revise and edit both stories together. Then, students reflect on their writing and what they learned from the experience. 

  • In Unit 5, Module 6, students read the play The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett before composing the final piece of writing. They complete a “cause-and-effect essay” in response to the prompt, “Using evidence from the play, what conflicts did Anne encounter that motivated her to write about her experiences in her diary? What are the lasting effects of her words, thoughts, and ideas for generations of readers?” The instructional materials include viewing a direct instruction lesson on Writing the Cause-and-Effect Essay and analyzing a student exemplar, “The Journey of a Journal” by Suri Marrero. Students use the unit’s rubric to analyze the student’s responses. The Student Guide also includes a peer review task, “When you have finished an initial draft, pair with another writer and ask each other to look for sentences in the essay that need transitions.” Students share their writing with another peer using a Share and Listen graphic organizer and make revisions before editing and submitting a final draft. 

  • In Unit 6, Module 6, students participate in a Pitch Deck. Students begin by independently reviewing the Pitch Deck direct instruction slick deck. Then, students look at a list of texts they read throughout the unit, which should be considered in their discussion. They use a few handouts in the Student Guide to prepare for discussion, including the Reflect on the Essential Question handout and the Create Your Pitch Deck graphic organizer. In both these handouts, students consider their claims with supporting evidence from the unit’s texts to answer the essential question, “How can different pathways help you meet your postsecondary goals?” Next, students practice, record, and share their pitch deck presentations. Then, they watch each other’s pitch decks. After pitch decks have been shared, teachers Conduct the Poll Again activity to see if students changed their minds on the essential question. Lastly, students answer questions to reflect on their pitch decks.

Indicator 2E
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2e. 

The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. Each unit includes lessons and activities that follow a consistent pattern for developing students’ writing. The modules provide guidance and protocols for students to practice writing summaries and argumentative paragraphs with respect to the readings. Over the school year, students focus on writing an argumentative paragraph for the modules within each unit. Still, they also write full-length essays in the form of a personal narrative, an argument, a short story, a research paper, a cause-and-effect essay, a personal statement, and a literary analysis. Within each instruction unit, students have opportunities to engage in direct instruction slide decks focused on composition skills related to the culminating writing task for the unit. The Student Guide allows students to complete graphic organizers to develop and organize ideas, analyze student examples, and participate in revising and editing tasks to improve writing. Each unit provides mentor texts that emphasize different writing techniques for students to reference and learn techniques to apply in their writing. Guidance is provided for students as they practice and apply writing standards. The standards can be located in each Unit-At-a-Glance, Scope and Sequence, and Teacher Guide. The Teacher Guide includes some guidance to support the tasks, and additional materials found in the Resources tab of the platform provide guidance for implementing and monitoring students’ writing development. Each culminating writing assignment includes a final rubric to evaluate student writing.

Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, students complete a culminating task that covers a specific genre of writing based on the texts students read in that unit. 

  • In all units, the Student Guide offers support in the form of a prewriting, drafting, and revising checklist, an informative writing rubric, a student model that students score using the rubric, and a worksheet to practice giving feedback to peers. The Student Guide includes a page with specific guidance for the writing task with instructions, the writing prompt, and notes on either collecting research or planning the writing task. Graphic organizers are provided to complete various tasks, such as goal-setting, mapping the task, gathering evidence,  and proofreading evidence for mistakes and inconsistencies. 

  • In Unit 3, Module 7, students read “Tiger Mending” by Aimee Bender. After reading, students prepare to develop a response to the module’s Writing Prompt, “Analyze the point of view from which the story is told. What insights does the narrator’s perspective reveal about the sisters’ relationship?” Prior to beginning the writing, students analyze the text online. To support the finding of evidence to match the prompt, the students reread the story. They use a green highlighter to locate “interactions, including the dialogue, between the sisters.” Then, they add “notes explaining how the narrator’s perspective affects the relationship and interaction between the sisters.” Then, students use the purple highlighter to find details that show how each sister develops and changes throughout the story. Once again, they add “notes describing how the final scene highlights these changes and transforms their relationship.” The careful analysis of the model text helps the students find evidence to support the argumentative paragraph that they write in response to the module’s writing prompt. 

  • In Unit 7, Module 7, students write a literary analysis that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does enlightenment change characters, their actions, or their personalities in Plato’s famous ‘Allegory of the Cave’ and other texts in this unit?” First, the students review a Direct Instruction lesson, “Writing the Literary Analysis” online. The lesson emphasizes the core elements to use when organizing a literary analysis, how to structure a literary analysis, and how to create an effective argument with supporting details. After viewing this slide deck, students read the model student essay, “Enlightenment: The Progression of the World” by Suri Marrero. After reading the student exemplar, students review the online rubric and score the different sections of the student paper in the Score the Example assignment from the Student Guide. Students score the Claim, Evidence, Reasoning, Coherence, and Audience Appeal. They also use the sentence starter: “This draft receives a score of ____ because ____.” This process helps familiarize students with the final rubric and a possible structure for writing their own literary analysis. 

  • Each Student Guide in the materials provides students with scaffolds and structures for writing practice. The Teacher Guide includes Teach Academic Writing Skills, Show and Tell, and Model Your Thinking strategies for the writing tasks, which provides teachers with support for modeling and scaffolding. 

Instructional materials include well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Assessments tab, Writing Benchmarks are included for the beginning, middle, and end of the year. The stated purpose is “to personalize instruction for your students and track progress throughout the year.” Each benchmark test includes a text to read, ten multiple-choice questions to answer, and an argumentative writing prompt. Teacher directions state: “Assign lessons to introduce the CERCA framework and gain insight into student writing readiness. Evaluate completed student work and review results. Assign each student a personal growth focus.” In the Resources tab, training course videos show how to enter the rubric score. Benchmark summary reports in the Reports tab include performance by class, rubric category score, growth focus distribution by class, and individual student data. 

  • ThinkCERCA materials include a bank of Direct Instruction and Skills Practice lessons for writing. The materials include 49 lessons that fall under argument writing, including Structure and organization, Author’s Bias, Introductions in Argument, and Supporting Claims with Evidence. The materials include 37 lessons that fall under narrative writing that include but are not limited to Types of Narrative Writing, Setting in Narrative Writing, Establishing Character in Narrative Writing, and Using Time as a Storytelling Tool. The materials include 62  lessons that fall under informative writing, including but not limited to Citing Evidence to Support Analysis, Summaries in Informative Writing, Citing and Documenting Sources, and Revising for Clarity, Development, and Organization. 

  • Under the Resources tab, Curriculum Resources, Writing, the materials include guidance documents on the following topics (not limited to): Feedback Guidance, Writing Revisions Strategies Toolkit, and Best Practices: Compare Writing. 

    • The Feedback Guidance document includes general guidance for using ThinkCERCA’s provided writing feedback banks across the three core writing types: argumentative, informational, and narrative. This document also links each feedback bank. 

    • The Writing Revision Strategies Toolkit document includes general guidance for teachers to provide student feedback on their writing. It links parts of the CERCA process and how teachers can respond to each student depending on their learning gap. The document also links a Personalized Growth Plan Document, which outlines and provides general guidance on the different settings teachers can use to give feedback (1:1, small group, whole class). This document also includes links to other resources for supporting students with specific action steps based on data from benchmark writing assessments. 

    • The Best Practices: Compare Writing document provides general guidance for a strategy teachers can use to support students in comparing two pieces of writing to analyze and evaluate the “techniques employed by writers.”

  • In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay to answer the Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what changes have to be made to sourcing, utilizing, and investing in energy to power communities more effectively?” Students engage in reading and writing tasks around “How Do We Fuel a Community?” and then use the learnings from the texts to write the argument. Students begin this task by engaging in an online Direct Instruction lesson for “Writing the Argumentative Essay.” In this instructional slide deck, students learn why writers write arguments, how to build a strong argument, how to organize an argument using sequence, cohesion, and transitions, and then what process to use when writing an argument. The teacher prompts students to read a student exemplar, “Fueling Our Community” by Victoria Torres. Then, students apply their learning from the slide deck and the student exemplar to answer five questions about argumentative writing. In order to support the students, the Spark Teacher View provides the answers to the multiple-choice questions. For example, the first question asks, “A claim provides the author’s clear and well-defined position on a debatable topic. Which sentences in this exemplar state the author’s claim?” The Spark Teacher View shows the correct answer, “Communities should use renewable resources like wind, water, and solar energy if we want to make a change in our earth and its environment for the better.”

  • In Unit 4, Module 8, students participate in research to build their own question that connects to the Portfolio Prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the most pressing issues around the effectiveness and sustainability of transportation?” The Direct Instruction slide deck, “Writing the Research Paper” provides students with tips to write their paper. Some of the main learnings in the lesson include the core elements of a research paper, how to write an introduction with a thesis, how to write supporting paragraphs using sources, and how to write a conclusion. Students then read a student example of a research paper. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the Research Paper. As students begin the Map Your Research Paper graphic organizer assignment from the Student Guide, the teacher prompts for each section of the paper. Teacher Guidance for this section states:

    • “Encourage students to organize their research papers with an introductory hook, claim, evidence, and a conclusion. 

    • Instruct students to use the graphic organizer from the Student Guide to map out their research papers, focusing on in-depth questions to stimulate thoughtful responses to each research paper category.” The teacher Guide also includes strategies for supporting the research process: “Have students complete or review Citing and Documenting Sources and leverage digital resources to complete the bibliography. Purdue’s Online Writing Lab is an excellent resource for tools and information in addition to the Direct Instruction provided.”

Indicator 2F
02/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f. 

The materials provide some opportunities across the school year for students to conduct research that develops knowledge and synthesizes and analyzes content related to the unit themes. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units. In Unit 4, at all grade levels, students write a research paper related to the theme of the unit. This is the only opportunity for students to develop a research question. Students develop knowledge on the given topic by confronting and analyzing multiple provided texts related to a topic or theme. Students are instructed to find information from outside sources, but there is limited instruction and guidance on selecting sources, including using advanced searches effectively. In other units, students gather information and evaluate resources. While these areas are addressed, instruction is limited. The materials also include a “Student Research Toolkit,” which includes independent guidance for students on several parts of the research process, such as evaluating sources for credibility. This Toolkit is the same across all grades in the program. Much of the instruction is to refer students to documents that explain research or to Research Skills and Strategies slideshows, not guidance on direct instruction of the skills.

Research projects are somewhat sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 4, Unit Preview, students begin the unit with a direct instruction lesson about the purpose of research writing. The preview includes the definition and characteristics of research writing. A section of the presentation also guides the students in synthesizing information from multiple sources. In Module 2, the Student Guide includes a Sharpen Your Skills task focusing on effectively integrating quotes. In Module 5, the Student Guide includes an “Understand Topics” task in which students are instructed, “When conducting research, main sources are often not sufficient. Additional texts that focus on one small part of an issue can be helpful in fully explaining an issue. Additionally, being able to detect the difference between a fact and an opinion makes research and informational texts more useful.” In Module 6, the Student Guide includes a Plan Your Research task with students completing a four-step graphic organizer using selections from the unit. Students complete sections on exploring the topic, finding reliable sources, collecting relevant and reliable evidence, and creating a thesis statement. After determining the sources, students find pieces of evidence that support their thesis and can be found in at least two sources. They record direct citations to use when drafting their essay. In Module 8, the Student Guide includes a Map Your Research organizer, which supports students in completing their hook, claim, evidence, and conclusion. Then, students also complete a Write it and Cite It task to ensure they have properly documented sources. The materials also include an informational text, The Research Process Step-by-Step Inquiry, that guides evaluating sources using a checklist to determine the sources’ credibility and reliability by assessing the relevance, author’s background and expertise, publication date, bias, etc. The guide also notes that “It’s important to properly cite and document sources, to tell where the information came from and who made the statements” by quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing the information. The guide provides examples of in-text citations and a checklist for avoiding plagiarism. 

Materials somewhat support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, Module 8, students write an informative cause-and-effect essay for their writing portfolio. Before they begin writing, the teacher discusses the rubric and ways to score the student’s writing based on the Informative Writing Rubric. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for the teacher. First, students read the Final Informative Rubric. For this section of the lesson, teacher guidance states, “Instruct students to review the evaluation criteria for ‘Your Portfolio.’” Then, students read the Student Exemplar, and the Teacher Guide states, “Have students complete the reading ‘“The Journey of a Journal’ by Suri Marrero and answer the  comprehension questions.” Students practice giving the student exemplar feedback. The Teacher Guide for this section of the lesson states, “Explain that students will practice giving feedback about the Student Exemplar. Guide students in sharing one area of growth, a success, or an insight about the Student Exemplar draft.” 

  • In Unit 7, Module 5, students read “Things You Cannot Unsee (and What They Say About Your Brain)” by Alexis C. Madrigal and “Three Wise Monkeys of Tōshōgū Shrine” by Fred Cherrygarden. Then, students complete the Analyze and Compare Texts task in the Student Guide. The instructions state that the student should choose to explore two texts/excerpts from the list independently. They use the prompt questions to write notes and make observations about the lives and attitudes of the characters or speakers, explain how the characters or speakers learn new knowledge, and determine how enlightenment changes the characters or their actions. After reading texts, students analyze and compare them to each other using a graphic organizer. Next, the Teacher Guide provides directions for the teacher for the final part of the Analyze and Compare Texts section of the lesson. Guidance states: 

    • “Review the instructions for the slideshow project.

    • Encourage students to include the most relevant details that will help their peers see the comparisons clearly.

    • Circulate as students work to give feedback and encouragement.”

    Students are provided with a document, Guidelines: Informal Research and Formal Research, that includes examples and research steps. Teacher guidance states, “Once students are finished with their Quick Journals, arrange them into groups of 3-4. Ask each group to use online tools to research various optical illusions or “Perception Images.” Tell students their task will be to explore resources and choose an optical illusion that initially appears one way, but reveals more after closer examination or reading the description. They should select an optical illusion to challenge the class and engage in a discussion about how perceptions changed once they were aware of the alternative image or concept. Although this guidance is the final section it is paired with the Quick Journal task where the students “[c]onduct research using the Inquiry-Driven Research.”

  • In various units, Direct Instruction and Skills lessons include research topics.

  • While some teacher guidance is provided, research instruction throughout the program is limited. 

  • Each unit includes a Unit-At-a-Glance states that students will engage in a research activity. For example, the Teacher Guide for Unit 2 states that “Through teacher-led instruction, students are introduced to research strategies in the Research Toolkit and gain practice with the inquiry-driven research process, refining research questions, and sharing research with citations. For their inquiry-driven research project, students will research an author’s biography and refine questions based on their initial findings. Students will learn when to summarize, paraphrase, and use direct quotations through a Documenting Sources Activity.”

Materials provide some opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. 

  • Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 6, Module 5, students can complete the Extend Learning task after watching a video and reading two magazine articles, “My Path to Boston University–A Real Student’s Story” by Yesh Datar and “Five Reasons to Consider Community College.” To complete the activity, students use a college search graph in the Student Guide to compare five colleges or universities. Students select five schools and answer questions such as if the college is in-state, public, or if it is large or small. They also conduct research to find out if the schools have a Study Abroad program and if it is considered a Liberal Arts college. Then, students choose one of the colleges or universities to do deeper research. 

    • In Unit 7, students begin the unit by exploring the theme. In the Student Guide, they complete Informal Research: Various Forms of Fiction. The students complete a writing task that requires them to research information about symbols, allegory, and fiction. Students provide answers to related questions and then discuss why some writers might use certain devices to tell their stories. 

  • Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Module 7, students complete an argumentative essay for the writing prompt, “Based on your readings, what changes have to be made to outsourcing, utilizing, and investing in energy to power communities more effectively?” Students combine information from the texts read throughout the unit. As students prepare their drafts, they are instructed to “use [their] previous classwork to reflect on our ideas in order to determine what you want to write about.” Students then analyze the notes for their written texts and determine if they need to conduct more research. Students then draft a claim and write their essay. 

    • In Unit 3, Module 6, students prepare for a Socratic discussion by reviewing the texts read throughout the unit. The Student Guide states, “Using all of the selections from the unit, complete the chart below with a response to the Socratic Question (or claim), reasons, evidence and reasoning, and notes for providing a possible counterargument.” 

    • In Unit 6, Module 6, students are instructed to create a pitch deck. The pitch deck includes ten slides that use the selections from the unit and other sources to answer the Pitch Deck Question, “How can different pathways help you meet your postsecondary goals?” Students complete the chart with information and notes as they compile ideas to add to the slide deck. There is no expectation present in the student materials to cite sources. 

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

08/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards. The Teacher Guide includes guidance and resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units. Assessment questions are multiple-choice and only include reading standards.

The implementation schedules align with the core learning. The materials include lesson-specific task timing guidance and implementation schedules can generally be completed in the allotted time. Optional tasks are meaningful and should not distract from core learning. The materials contain seven units, with each unit taking 22 to 26 days to complete, assuming 50 minutes of instruction a day.

Indicator 2G
04/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g. 

The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards, including instruction delivered through online slideshows that students complete at their own pace, followed by short multiple-choice quizzes and PDF worksheets. Teachers have access to the Unit Planning Tools that provide support for guidance, planning, and explicit instruction for each unit, as well as a Teacher Guide for each unit. These include clarification of directions and notes to direct students into the online program or Student Guide, suggestions for teacher modeling of aspects of lessons, and opportunities to conduct think-alouds. Assessment questions are multiple-choice and only include reading standards. In other parts of the program, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across the units to ensure students have multiple opportunities to demonstrate mastery of the standard; however, some standards are covered only once.

Over the course of each unit, most instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit of instruction includes a Unit-At-a-Glance, a Teacher Guide, a Student Guide, a Diverse Learners Guide, and an Answer Key. While each module in the online portal is labeled with the primary standard focus, the explicit instruction for meeting each standard does not appear in the materials. The Unit-At-a-Glance overviews the skills addressed with key standards identified. The Teacher Guide includes a Skills Students Will Know, Understand, and Apply Section listing some of the unit's key standards. The units consistently include close reading and academic writing, which are facilitated through an online slide deck presentation labeled Direct Instruction. In the Student Guide, students have various activities aligned to the standards, but the connection to the standard is not directly labeled. Each module in the Student Guide contains the following lessons: Apply Your Learning, Appreciate the Author’s Craft, Draft Your Argument, Building Vocabulary, and Write to Impress; however, the standards are not identified with each activity.

  • In Unit 1, Module 1, the focus standards identified by the publisher are RL.8.1 and W.8.2. In this module, students read “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier. They focus on citing evidence to support inferences. Students read the short story and complete a five-question comprehension check online. Then, they analyze the text using highlighters to identify details and examples. Students review a direct instruction lesson on Citing Evidence to Write about Literary Texts and an Apply Your Learning activity where they identify two pieces of evidence that show Lizabeth’s internal thoughts and reveal what powerful life lessons Lizabeth learns from this encounter. This task is aligned with standard RL.8.1. The Teacher Guide states, 

    • “Remind students that the Direct Instruction lesson is a useful resource.

    • Have students hear the prompts out loud before they begin working. 

    • Facilitate pairs or groups for students to complete the tasks.”

    There is also a sample teacher model for breaking down the prompt provided for the teacher in this section. In addition, the teacher is provided with guidance to model the visualization strategy using a think-aloud. As a final task, students compose a response to the prompt, “What powerful life lessons does the narrator learn from her interaction with Miss Lottie? Cite specific evidence, including inferences you made, from the text to support your response.” This assignment is aligned with standard W.8.2. The Teacher Guide provides general guidance for supporting students. The guidance states, “Feedback Focus: Check in with students to ensure their claims are supported with at least two reasons” and “Feedback Focus:  Encourage students to share different aspects of their CERCA drafts to ensure they have included a strong claim, supportive reasons, and evidence.” 

  • In Unit 4, Module 4, the focus standards identified by the publisher are RI.8.2 and W.8.2. Students read “What Can Convince Chicagoans to Rely Less on Cars?” by Dan Charles, and then answer five comprehension questions, including “Which piece of information would you expect to find under the heading ‘I’m part of the problem’? Which of the statements best expresses why the data from the study is credible?” The Teacher Guide states to “Encourage students to preview the questions at the end of the selection and leverage the scaffolds and tools to access the text.” Students also answer Pause and Reflect questions, including, “With these parking provisions, Chicagoans might not have easy access to parking. Now, think of yourself as a Chicago resident. Would this encourage you or frustrate you? Why?” Students complete an Apply Your Learning task to summarize the texts by creating one-sentence summaries for each section under each subheading. The Teacher Guide states to, 

    • “Remind students that the Direct Instruction lesson is a useful resource. 

    • Have students hear the prompts out loud before they begin working. 

    • Facilitate pairs or groups for students to complete the tasks.”

    There is also a sample teacher model for breaking down the prompt provided for the teacher in this section. This task aligns with standard RI.8.2. Students complete an argumentative piece of writing by responding to the prompt, “Based on evidence from the text, respond to the following prompt: How does the writer use the different perspectives of Chicagoans to explain the transit challenges in the city?” This assignment aligns to standard W.8.2. The Teacher Guide provides general guidance for the Share Your Plan Task to:

    • “Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.

    • Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim. 

    • Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence, and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning. 

    • Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.

    • Have students drop their drafts into the drafting space and develop their CERCAs.”

Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, most questions and tasks align with RI.8.1, RI.8.2, RI.8.5, RI.8.6, RI.8.7, and W.8.1. In Module 1, students read “California Just Ran on 100% Renewable Energy, but Fossil Fuels Aren’t Fading Away Yet” by Lauren Sommer. After reading and completing several tasks, students develop an argument to the prompt, “How does the author use details and visuals about the California model to appeal to the audience in this argument for using clean energy?” (W.8.1)  In Module 4, students independently read “Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough: a Milestone for the Future of Clean Energy, US Officials Say” by Ella Nilsen. Students then answer five questions; “Which of the following words most closely matches the meaning of the word hurdle as used in this sentence: ‘While there are many more steps until this [process] can be commercially viable, that is a major hurdle to cross with nuclear fusion, experts say’? Which of these statements provides the strongest support for the author’s point of view that nuclear fusion can be a significant future energy source? Why is it important for the author to respond to this counterargument about nuclear fusion? Which statement best describes how the author is appealing to her audience? Which of the following is the best statement to include in a summary of the article?” Students use a highlighting exercise to analyze the text and identify evidence for a summary and response: “Trace the evidence the author provides to make the case for nuclear fusion as a viable future energy source. How does the author use evidence to appeal to the audience’s values?” (W.8.1) 

  • In Unit 6, most questions and tasks align with RI.8.3, RI.8.6, and W.8.2. In Module 1, students read “Bringing to Light Dark Matter” by Joseph Taylor. They answer five multiple-choice questions including but not limited to “Which statement best expresses how the authors develop the main idea of the passage?” and “Which of these statements should be included in a summary of this article?” (RI.8.2). In Module 3, students read “First in the Family Make Their Mark in College” by Melissa Ezarik and complete an Apply Your Learning task to consider the impact of the author’s word choice. One of the questions asks, “In the excerpt, how does the author use short sentence structures to emphasize Whitley’s perspective as a first-generation college student and club leader?” (RI.8.5) At the end of the module, students respond to the prompt, “How does the choice to include personal accounts, graphics, and survey statistics help readers to better understand some of the challenges that many first-generation students face?” (W.8.2) In Module 5, students complete a Quick Journal, a task to make a personal connection. Students are asked to respond to the prompt, “What would you like to study after high school?” This is an example of a task that is not standard-aligned. In Module 7, students write a personal statement to answer the prompt, “Describe how you have taken advantage of a significant educational opportunity or worked to overcome an educational barrier you have faced.” (W.8.3) 

Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Module 8 students complete a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection for the end of module assessment over two selections, “Otro Dia, Otra Vez” by Mathew Allan Garcia and an excerpt from the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass. Students complete multiple choice questions such as “Which of the following sentences best conveys the primary theme from the selection ‘Otro Dia, Otra Vez’?” and “Which of the following options provides the most complete summary of the selection titled, ‘Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass’?” which are aligned to standard RL.8.2. Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed. 

  • In Unit 3, Module 8, students complete a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that addresses the standards taught in the module. Students read “The Long Night” by Steve Vance and “From Scratch” by Susie Castellano. Then, students answer 14 multiple choice questions, including, “Which statement best presents a central idea of ‘The Long Night’?” and “Which detail in ‘From Scratch’ best develops the author’s message about adapting?” Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed. 

  • In Unit 6, Module 8, students complete a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection for the unit “What Directions Might You Take?” Students read “The Quietest Leaders” by Alice Andre-Clark and “Looking for a Civic Career?” by Peg Lopata. They answer 13 multiple choice questions: “The author most likely included this section about animals’ personality traits to illustrate that … Based on the information in ‘Looking for a Civic Career?’ Which of the following conclusions can most logically be drawn about volunteering for a civic agency? Which of the following statements best explains how the author’s explanation of civic service relates to the various options for volunteers in the selection ‘Looking for a Civic Career?’” Each question is standards-based but not labeled by the standard they assess. Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed. 

By the end of the academic year, some standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Addressed in multiple units, students become familiar with RL.8.2. In Unit 1, students have multiple opportunities to identify a theme or central idea. When reading “I am the Greatest” by James Bird, students respond to multiple choice questions such as “What word best describes the main theme of this passage?” and compose a written response to the prompt “Using evidence from the text, what message is the author trying to convey about self-confidence through the challenges assigned by his mother?” In Unit 3, students read “My Country is a Ghost” by Eugenia Triantafyllou and answer multiple choice questions such as “Which statement best expresses a main theme of this short story?” Students also write an argumentative response to the prompt, “How does the author of this allegorical story explore the theme of connection to a person’s heritage, community, or sense of belonging? Trace the development of this theme by analyzing the main character’s experiences in a new land.” In Unit 5, the students read The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett and complete multiple choice questions, including, “Which of the following lines from Anne’s diary best supports a final theme of the entire play?” Students also compose a written response to the prompt, “How do the playwrights use specific lines and phrases from Anne’s diary to support a major theme in the play?” 

  • Addressed in multiple units, students become familiar with RI.8.6. In Unit 2, Module 4, students engage in a Direct Instruction lesson on Analyzing Issues and Appeals that covers rhetorical appeals. Students read “Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough a Milestone for the Future of Clean Energy, US Officials Say” by Ella Nilsen. Students answer the question, “Why is it important for the author to respond to this counterargument about nuclear fusion?” Students also respond to the prompt, “Trace the evidence the author provides to make the case for nuclear fusion as a viable future energy source. How does the author use evidence to appeal to the audience’s values?” In Unit 4, Module 3, students engage in a Direct Instruction lesson on Point of View and Purpose in Informational Texts. Students read “Electric Scooters on Collision Course with Pedestrians and Lawmakers” by James F. Sallis and answer the question, “Which of these pieces of evidence indicates that the writer is addressing a counterargument?” Students also complete an Apply Your Learning task to reflect on the author’s choices and purpose. In Unit 6, Module 3, students engage in a Direct Lesson on The impact of the Author’s Choice: Words and  Images. Students read “First in the Family Make Their Mark in College” by Melissa Ezarik and respond to the prompt, “How does the choice to include personal accounts, graphics, and survey statistics help readers to better understand some of the challenges that many first-generation students face?”

  • Addressed only in Unit 3, Module 4, students have limited opportunities to familiarize themselves with RL.8.6. Students engage in a Direct Instruction lesson on Developing Point of View in Literature that examines different types of points of view. Students read “Tiger Mending” by Aimee Bender and answer the question, “Throughout the story, the narrator indicates that she admires but feels inferior to her sister. Which quote best illustrates the narrator’s feelings of admiration and inferiority?” Students also respond to the prompt, “Analyze the point of view from which the story is told. What insights does the narrator’s perspective reveal about the sisters’ relationship?” 

  • The following standards are only labeled as addressed in one unit throughout the school year: L.8.2.A, L.8.4.B, L.8.4.C, , L.8.5.A, and L.8.5.C.

Indicator 2H
04/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h. 

Each unit and module is accompanied by a Unit At-a-Glance that includes high-level pacing guides for a 50-minute or 90-minute class session. The pacing guides can also work with an online or a blended model. Task-specific timing guidance is found in the Teacher Guides. Tasks that are deemed essential are starred in the Unit-at-a-Glance document as well as the Teacher Guide. Most units are designed to be completed within 22-26 instructional days, so the seven units can reasonably be completed within a school year. Each unit includes complementary writing tasks that teachers can use to provide students with additional writing practice. The materials also provide Longer Works units, which are novel-centered and can be used to enhance units within the core curriculum. The provided optional Longer Work of Fiction novel study units are meaningful and follow the same pacing as a core unit. The publisher recommends these as optional units of study during a regular weekly choice period as independent exploration time, schoolwide WIN time, silent sustained reading, or at home independent reading.

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit At-a-Glance includes a 50-minute Class Pacing Guide and a 90-minute Class Pacing Guide. The 50-minute Class Pacing Guide for one unit covers 22-26 days or blocks per unit, which would account for up to 182 school days to complete seven units. The 50-minute Class Pacing Guides include:

    • One block for previewing the unit theme and setting personal goals.

    • One block to explore the theme.

    • 12 to 16 blocks to read and analyze the texts for the unit. Individual core texts take three instructional blocks: Before you Read, Read and Analyze, and Write to a prompt.

    • Three to four blocks to read across genres. 

    • One to two blocks for an integrated speaking and listening activity, such as Socratic discussion, debate, etc.

    • Three to five blocks for the Your Portfolio process writing task.

    • One to two blocks for assessment and reflection.

  • The Teacher Guide provides timing for each part of the lesson. Parts of lessons are labeled as “essential” in the Unit-At-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, and Module-At-a-Glance.

  • Novel study units are optional choices and include a Unit Planner with 50-minute and 90-minute pacing guides. The 50-minute class schedule covers 31 blocks, and the 90-minute block schedule covers 18 blocks. 

Suggested implementation schedules can be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, the Unit At-A-Glance outlines a pacing guide. The 50-minute class paces out a schedule for completing Unit 1 in 21 to 30 instructional days. Students spend two days completing a unit preview; 12 to 16 days reading, analyzing, and writing tasks connected to short stories; three to four days completing tasks where students read across genres; one to two days on a Socratic Discussion; three to four days completing their portfolio writing tasks and reflecting on their learning, and one to two days on the core assessment. 

  • In Unit 5, Module 3, students read “The Diary of Anne Frank: Act I, Scenes IV and V” by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. The suggested pacing is three to four 50-minute sessions (one to two 90-minute sessions) to read the text and complete the activities. To connect with the text, students engage in pre-reading activities, including vocabulary and journaling. Before reading the unit text, students complete a Direct Instruction lesson on developing characters in a drama. Students read the text and answer five comprehension questions independently before analyzing the text and preparing to write. Students summarize the text and respond in writing to a prompt. The suggested timing guidance for all tasks in the Teacher Guide totals 161 minutes; therefore, this module could be reasonably completed in three 50-minute sessions or about two 90-minute sessions. 

  • In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Ten Steps to Choosing the Right College” by Katy Hopkins and Sarah Wood. The suggested pacing for the text is three to four 50-minute sessions (one to two 90-minute sessions). Students read the text online, then complete the five question Check and Pause and Reflect questions online. Students complete the Direct Instruction lesson on “The Impact of An Author’s Choice: Selecting and Arranging Details” before completing an Analyze task highlighting specific details about the text structure and use of statistics in the article. Students complete the Apply Your Learning task before writing the argumentative paragraph in response to the prompt, “How do the authors select and arrange details in order to help readers understand the most important parts of the college selection process?” The suggested timing guidance for all tasks in the Teacher Guide totals 201 minutes; therefore, this module could be reasonably completed in four 50-minute sessions or about three 90-minute sessions.

  • As an added resource, the publisher provides teachers with a Class Planner and Pacing Calculator, which includes the following guidance:

    • “In the sheets that follow, you will find calculators that help you gauge the time it takes for your students to complete certain tasks.

    • We know each of the opportunities for learning that we provide takes time, and we want to empower you to make the most of your time by planning for your students’ needs efficiently and realistically.

    • Simply adjust the number of minutes per session and start recording your estimates or actual minutes spent on given tasks to gauge how long it takes your students to complete them. As they gain experience and practice, they will need less time, so consider adjusting throughout the year so you can plan carefully to meet your students’ needs.”

Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit Planning Tool, additional complementary writing prompts are provided as “practice options as students progress through the curriculum prior to the portfolio piece for each unit.” These prompts are aligned texts read in the unit. The Planning Tool includes student worksheets and graphic organizers to plan their writing as well as reflect on writing. There are no direct instruction notes for the teacher for these prompts. The teacher guidance says, “Make planning decisions based on schedule, your program, and your students’ needs. Use the complementary prompts to ensure appropriate levels of standards coverage in student experiences with the process of writing.”

  • Longer Works of Fiction novel studies for Grades 6, 7, and 8 include A Single Shard by Linda Sue Park, Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis, and Long Way Down by Jason Reynolds. These units include a Unit-at-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, Student Guide, and Diverse Learner Guide in the same format as the Core ELAR. 

  • The publisher provides the Longer Works Units and some guidance on incorporating these units into the curriculum as part of the unit of instruction, independent reading, at-home enrichment, or schoolwide reading programs. 

  • In each module throughout the program, there are “recommended” and “essential” tasks for each lesson. While the publisher suggests completing all activities in a lesson, the “recommended” tasks could be optional and cut when teachers are short on instructional time; however, cutting material repeatedly could affect the delivery of instruction essential to achieving grade-level standards.

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, complementary writing prompts are provided. Teachers are able to use these prompts to give students extra practice with different types of writing and standards. 

  • Longer Works of Fiction novel studies include similar tasks and pacing as core units. The novel studies are intended to enhance core instruction. The materials for The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton include eight modules that follow the same format as the Core ELAR units. In Module 1, students read “Why ‘The Outsiders’ Lives On: A Teenage Novel Turns 50” by Hillel Italie and “reflect on the relationship between real events and conflicts in literature to determine how authors use real events to create fiction.”  In Modules 2-5, students read the anchor text and complete Direct Instruction and Writing Lessons that follow a similar format as the Core ELAR units. In Module 6, Read Across Genres, students read several texts and watch a movie clip of The Outsiders. They consider the unit’s essential question through multiple perspectives and “evaluate the evolution of young adult literature.” In Module 7, Socratic Discussion, students learn about and prepare to participate in a Socratic discussion to the question, “How can belonging to a community influence an individual’s identity, beliefs, and personal choices?” In Module 8, Your Portfolio, students write a literary analysis essay for the prompt, “Choose a text element from The Outsiders to analyze (setting, character, plot, theme, symbolism, etc.), and using evidence from the novel, develop a claim about how S. E. Hinton uses this element to convey the lessons that Ponyboy learns throughout the novel. Cite evidence from the text to describe the lessons he learns and to support your analysis.”

Overview of Gateway 3

Usability

The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. In addition, the materials include family letters for each unit in English and Spanish that inform parents and caregivers about the program and student learning throughout the curriculum. Supporting documentation on the ThinkCERCA website outlines how the program works and the program's research-based strategies.

The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.

The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.

The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Teachers can use a variety of grouping strategies.

The materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. The program provides some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse.

The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher.

The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program; however, implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

09/09

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. In addition, the materials include family letters for each unit in English and Spanish that inform parents and caregivers about the program and student learning throughout the curriculum. Supporting documentation on the ThinkCERCA website outlines how the program works and the program's research-based strategies.

Indicator 3A
02/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a. 

The materials for each unit include a Unit At-a-Glance, a Teacher Guide, and Unit Planning Tools. The Unit At-a-Glance document is also included in the first pages of the Teacher Guide. It includes a unit snapshot, rationale, and breakdown of the skills that will be addressed in the unit. The essential question is presented, along with the timings of each section of the unit. A Unit Assessment Blueprint is found here as well as a document on the progression of scaffolds for independent learning. The Teacher Guides include instructions for implementing the program. Lesson summaries and objectives are found for each module. Teacher tips, support for students with exceptional needs, support for multilingual/English Language Learners, as well as gifted and talented enrichment opportunities are found. Unit Planning Tools include a Comprehensive Scope and Sequence and Planning Guidance document, Vocabulary Instruction Guidance, Key Vocabulary, Resources for Volume Reading, Resources for Students, and a Family Letter in English and Spanish.

Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Frontmatter Overview of Program document provides an overview of the program and highlights implementation, scaffolding, grouping students, distribution of writing, implementing the program without 1:1 device access, and time routines.

  • Each Unit At-a-Glance includes the essential question, unit snapshot, rationale, list of student skills and standards addressed, timing for modules/sessions, lists of anchor texts and suggested longer works and independent reading opportunities, unit planning tools, writing prompts, and assessment blueprints.

  • Unit Planning Tools document includes a comprehensive scope and sequence, vocabulary instruction guidance, key vocabulary terms, resources for volume reading, resources for students, family letters in English and Spanish, and state standard crosswalks.

  • Each Teacher Guide includes lesson summaries, learning objectives, suggested timing for each part of the lesson, module planning tool, direct instruction guidance with teacher tips and “teacher will”/”student will” statements, scripting for some direction instruction, think-alouds, support for students with exceptional needs and multilingual and EL learners, links to toolkits, answer keys for Student Guide worksheets, and feedback focus.

Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Module 3, Apply Your Learning - Determining Themes in Literature lesson, students read “My Country is a Ghost” by Eugenia Triantafyllou. In the lesson, students read a passage from the story and work to determine the theme of the passage. In the Teacher Guide, the teacher is prompted to “Model Your Thinking.” This model states, “First, I will determine how the passage reflects Niovi’s feelings about her mother and her new job. Next, I will analyze the immigrant experience and how it is reflected through Niovi’s perspective. Then, I will understand the meaning of the word ‘ghostless’ and how it relates to the man who hires Niovi. Finally, I will determine the theme of the passage.” Further guidance for annotating and close reading is provided to the teacher, “Model close reading on the page—annotating the passage in the Student Guide by highlighting the details specifically about Niovi’s feelings. Model making a note about your thoughts about each detail in the margins, considering how these details develop the themes in the story. Have them continue to annotate the passage, either independently or in small groups, taking notes in the margins. As they share out, correct any misperceptions or highlight exemplars with the class.”

  • In Unit 3, Module 3, Build Your Vocabulary - Map a Word lesson, students are to map the words allegory, tethered, and disconnected. A Teacher Tip is included in the Teacher Guide that says, “Have students reflect on which vocabulary strategy helps them remember a new word and why. Review the transition of students moving from a whole class to small groups in 30 seconds. Have students assess how their transitions are going and what needs to be tweaked.” Further guidance is provided for using context clues as an explicit vocabulary strategy, “Use the Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction resources (found in the Unit Planning Tools) to help students build vocabulary and deepen understanding of key concepts in reading. Explain to students that context clues are hints that an author leaves within a text to help you understand the meaning of an unfamiliar word. By paying attention to the clues around an unfamiliar word, you can often figure out its meaning without needing a dictionary. Take a look at the way ‘tethered’ is used in the text. Look at the words around ‘tethered’ as clues and make some educated guesses as to what the word might mean.”

Indicator 3B
02/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b. 

The materials include a Resources section that consists of Curriculum Resources, a Help Center, an On-Demand Video Library, and the ThinkCERCA Blog. The Curriculum Resources Tab directs to best practices documents on a variety of topics in writing, reading comprehension, close reading, vocabulary, background knowledge and culture, community, and collaboration. Each of the documents includes suggested time for the activity/strategy, rationale/research base, before, during, and after instructions, and suggested scaffolds and supports. These pages include some grade-level specific Toolkits in writing, speaking and listening, language and grammar, and vocabulary that the teacher or students can use. Materials also include suggested independent reading titles. The Help Center includes product support, an Admin Toolkit, and a Teacher Toolkit. The Teacher Toolkit includes guidance documents for Getting Started, Implementing ThinkCERCA, and Providing Feedback. Each Unit Teacher Guide includes a section titled “Core Unit Progression,” which provides teachers with how the unit fits in the progression of previous and future units within and across grade levels. 

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Front Matter Focus: Reading document outlines the rationale for the unit components, including anchor texts, close reading and writing tasks, and scaffolding. It also provides information about text complexity in the program.

  • The Best Practices Document: Establishing Vocabulary Notebooks and Routines is found in the Curriculum Resources Tab for 8th grade. It includes a rationale, a list of student tasks, instructions for before, during, and after the lesson, and scaffolds and supports.

  • The Best Practices Document: The Teacher Research Toolkit includes guidelines for informal and formal research. It includes a rationale/research base, optimal application notes for before, during, and after lessons, and suggested scope and sequence. The toolkit also includes graphic organizers that can be used by both teachers and students. 

  • The Curriculum Resources tab includes a document titled “Implementing Independent Reading,” which provides suggested routines, a rationale, and instructions for integrating volume reading and independent reading pacing.

  • In the Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, Implementing ThinkCERCA, there is a document titled “Implementing a Writing Lesson with Engagement Strategies.” It outlines the steps of the writing lesson and links to detailed instructions for strategies at each step.

  • The Teacher Guide for each unit includes summaries of what students learn throughout the unit in the different literacy strands (Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Grammar, and Research). Teachers can use these notes to deepen their knowledge of what students are learning in the course. 

  • While the materials include toolkits that teachers and students can use across different parts of literacy, they are the same for each grade level. The following toolkits are available and are the same across grades 6-12: Research, Speaking and Listening, Revision Strategies, and Language and Style Toolkits. 

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each Unit Teacher Guide includes a section titled “Core Unit Progression.” This section provides teachers with explanations of how the unit fits in the progression of previous and future units within and across grade levels. These explanations are tailored to Reading and Writing skills, separately.

Indicator 3C
02/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c. 

The materials provide standard correlation resources at the grade level, Unit, Module, and lesson level. The Unit At-a-Glance and Module-at-a-Glance materials provide teachers with the standards correlated to classroom instruction. There is additional information about the alignment of the CCSS for the writing and assessments of each Unit and Module. Additionally, there is a Grade 8 Planning Tool, Pacing Calculator and Assessment Blueprint Document, and a Scope and Sequence by Strand document that provides a comprehensive view of the CCSS alignment. The Teacher Guide does not include the CCSS, but the teacher has access to the Unit At-a Glance, the Unit Planning Tools, and the Scope and Sequence documents. 

Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit Planning Tools, there is a Grade 8 Planning Tool, Pacing Calculator  and Assessment Blueprint Document that outlines the CCSS by Unit and Module. There is a comprehensive breakdown for the entire program and a more in-depth breakdown for each Unit. Additionally, there is a Scope and Sequence by Strand document that provides a comprehensive view of Curriculum and Instruction, Practice and Feedback, Assessments, and CCSS for vocabulary, writing, research, reading, speaking and listening, and grammar. 

  • In each Unit-at-a-Glance document, the CCSS are listed in a grid formation at the top of the document. For Unit 2, the CCSS are listed for Reading and Multimedia Literacy Skills (RI.8.1; RI.8.2, RI.8.6, RI.8.7; RI.8.8), Writing skills (.W.8.1) Vocabulary/Language Skills (L.8.1.b; L.8.1.c; L.8.3.a; L.8.4; L.4.d; L.8.6), Speaking and Listening (SL.8.1; SL.8.3)), Executive Function skills (W.8.8; W.8.9), and Foundational Reading and Linguistic Skills (RF.2, RF.3)). Underneath each category is a bulleted list of a description of the task-related to the standard such as for Reading and Multimedia Literacy skills:

    • “Use evidence to determine the central idea

    • Analyze the author’s use of evidence

    • Use evidence to draw conclusions

    • Examine the ways an author creates coherence and audience appeal in an informational text

    • Analyze the structure of an argument

    • Analyze and compare arguments

    • Examine text features and visual texts.”

  • In each Unit At-a-Glance document, the Unit Writing Prompts are listed with the corresponding CCSS. 

  • The Unit Assessment Blueprint lists each assessment for the unit with the primary CCSS and the CCSS item standards in each Unit At-a-Glance document.

  • In each Module At-a-Glance, there is a breakdown of the module, which includes the corresponding CCSS for each part of the lesson.

Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit At-a-Glance documents, the CCSS are listed in a grid formation at the top of the document. Then, each document is coded for each module that matches the grid that connects each module task to the CCSS listed in the grid. For example, in Unit 2, Module 2, “Fueling Up” by Lee Gjertsen Malone, the online direct instruction, Citing Evidence to Support Analysis in Informational Texts, has a blue circle with the letter R next to it, indicating that it connects to the standards listed in the section for  Reading and Multimedia Literacy Skills (RI.8.1; RI.8.2, RI.8.6, RI.8.7; RI.8.8).

  • The Teacher Guides contain multiple areas to guide teachers to the learning that is correlated to CCSS, including, but not limited to, Lesson Objectives, Purpose, Teacher Will, and Feedback Focus. The Teacher Guide does not list the CCSS, but the CCSS language is included. The CCSS can be located in each Unit At-a Glance, the Unit Planning Tools, and the Scope and Sequence documents. 

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

The materials include a Family Letter for each unit located in the Unit Planning Tools. The letter includes the name, essential question, text titles, overview of the learning, and two suggestions for activities at home. The letter is available in English and Spanish. The family letter provides the rationale for the unit that connects the essential question to the broad ideas of the unit. This could provide families with areas of home discussion, but it is not explicitly framed as such. The two suggested activities are the same for every unit and every grade level and include how to gain access to the online platform and reading tools available there and a broad suggestion to connect the essential question to “...movies, television shows, and song lyrics.”

Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Each Unit Planning Tool includes a Family Letter in both English and Spanish. Parents can use this letter to orient themselves to what students are learning in each unit.  

  • The Unit 6 Planning Tools include a family letter that includes the unit name, What Directions Might You Take?, as well as the essential questions for the unit, “How can different pathways help you meet your post-secondary goals?” The letter informs families how students will explore the ideas of “...various pathways after high school graduation. This will allow them to plan for their future before the start of high school—an essential piece to the postsecondary planning process.” The family letter also includes the reading selection for the unit, including, but not limited to, “Bringing to Light Dark Matter” by Joseph Taylor and “Five Reasons to Consider Community College” by Andrew Warner. This letter is available in English and Spanish. Additionally, the family letter provides an overview of the learning for the unit including creating and pitching a pitch deck, writing a personal statement, and punctuation used to indicate a pause, break, or omission. 

Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each Unit Planning Tool includes a section for Suggested Activities for Home that includes how to access ThinkCERCA from home, a list of available reading tools on their platform, and a prompt to “...encourage students to discuss the essential question as it applies to movies, television shows, and song lyrics.”

Indicator 3E
02/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e. 

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches and identification of the research-based strategies. On the publisher’s website, a How it Works section outlines the components of the program. This page includes video demonstrations on topics such as using the program within your daily routine, giving students choice and voice, and using station-based rotations. An overview of the program document is included with the core curriculum at each grade level. In the resources section, core resources by grade are found that offer additional guidance for implementing various routines in the program, including writing, reading comprehension, close reading, vocabulary, culture and community, and background knowledge. In addition, there are Overview of Our Research Base documents for each component of the program (Reading, Writing, Grammar, Speaking & Listening, Research, Assessment & Reporting, MLLs, and Gifted & Talented) are included in the resource materials.

Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program.

  • The How it Works provides a high-level overview of the program, outlining six steps to the program:

    • “Step 1: Teacher assigns differentiated lessons to students

    • Step 2: Students read an engaging, authentic text

    • Step 3: Students leverage CERCA to develop their essays

    • Step 4: Peer-to-peer discussion and debate infused along the way

    • Step 5: Teacher provides actionable feedback for growth

    • Step 6: District and school leaders monitor progress”

  • The Overview of the Program document provides a more detailed look at the program’s instructional approach. It outlines topics such as implementation strategies, scaffolding for diverse learners, distribution of writing, time for speaking, listening, and writing, working the program without 1:1 device access, and maximizing student engagement with routines. 

  • The Core Resources for grade 8 include best practices documents for a variety of literacy strategies, including (but not limited to)

    • Compare Writing

    • Choral Reading

    • Paired Reading and Review

    • Choral/Dramatic Reading

    • Partner Restatement

    • Frayer Model

    • Root Word Challenge

    • Socratic Discussion

    • Quick Journal

Materials include and reference research-based strategies.

  • For each strand, an Overview of Our Research Base document is provided, as well as documents for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Grammar, and Vocabulary.

    • Reading: This document includes a research base for unit components, anchor texts, scaffolded close reading, and writing-related tasks. It also discusses reading across genres, the purpose of anchor texts and reading across genres activities, integrated literacy, text complexity, and AI-enabled scaffolding access to grade-level texts. 

    • Writing: This document includes the program’s approach to writing instruction, time for speaking, listening, and writing, and distribution of writing.

    • Speaking and Listening: This document includes an overview of research for the program components, formal speaking and listening, and routines, 

    • Grammar: This section includes an overview of research on explicit and integrated grammar instruction, grammar instruction in context, and conventions routines. 

    • Vocabulary: This document This section includes an overview of research on explicit and integrated vocabulary instruction, establishing routines, selecting vocabulary, best practices, repetition and integration, vocabulary instruction and in-context vocabulary routines, and vocabulary acquisition. 

Indicator 3F
01/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f. 

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Students mainly need access to the online program and a paper or electronic copy of the Student Guide to successfully access the program components. The Unit At-a-Glance Document and Teacher Guides outline which online direct instruction and additional offline resources are used in each module. These are clearly labeled to show when students need access to a computer and when they are working offline.

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each Unit At-a-Glance document lists the online direct instruction lessons for each module as well as additional offline resources. These are all tagged with a color-coded circle to indicate the strand, reading, writing, vocabulary, speaking and listening or executive function, as well as a star for essential tasks. 

  • The Teacher Guide includes a one-page graphic for each module that includes a map of the module with images of the Student Guide pages. Like in the Unit At-a-Glance document, these are all tagged with a color-coded circle to indicate the strand, reading, writing, vocabulary, speaking and listening, or executive function, as well as a star for essential tasks. Additional graphics to indicate whether the activity is teacher-led, individual, paired, small group, online or offline.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

10/10

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.

Indicator 3I
02/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i. 

The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. Additionally, each unit consists of a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a summative and formative assessment. The Module At-a-Glance document for each Reading Assessment module provides the primary and item standards for this assessment. 

Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit At-a-Glance document includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides primary standards for each assessment for each Module in that Unit. The Selection Reading Assessment also lists item standards. 

  • In Unit 5, Module 4, “The Diary of Anne Frank: Act II, Scenes III-V,” the Selection Reading Assessment lists CCSS.RL.8.3 as the primary standard, and CCSS.RL.8.3, CCSS.RL.8.4, and CCSS.RL.8.6 as item standards. The Selection Vocabulary Quiz lists CCSS.L.8.4 as the primary standard. The Formative Writing Practice: Evidence-Based Writing— Informative and Argumentative lists CCSS.W.8.1 or CCSS.W.8.2 as the primary standard. 

  • At the end of each Unit, there is a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a formative and summative assessment opportunity. The primary and item standards are listed in the Unit At-a-Glance and Module At-a-Glance documents for this assessment. 

  • In Unit 5,  Module 9, Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection, the primary standards are CCSS.RL.8.7 and CCSS.W.8.10. In the Unit At-a-Glance, the primary standards are listed as CCSS.RL.8.7 and CCSS.RL.8.5. The item standards are CCSS.RL.8.2, CCSS.RL.8.4, CCSS.RL.8.5, and CCSS.RL.8.7.

Indicator 3J
04/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j. 

The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments. There is a system that provides data reporting for teachers, administration, and districts to review student achievement and growth. In the daily lessons, teachers are provided with a Feedback Focus section that provides some language and/or look-fors for the lesson’s specific tasks. Throughout teacher guides, there is some guidance for teachers to use when students do not show mastery. Writing Portfolio pieces are accompanied by rubrics, and teachers may use the Feedback Guidance located in the program’s Resources to provide students with individualized feedback based on the genre of the assignment. The program includes a direct instruction and skills lesson library that teachers can use to supplement student writing instruction based on this feedback. 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The ThinkCERCA Front Matter resources provide an overview document on the assessment focus for the program. The Overview presents how the assessments are a blend of self-assessment and automated assessments that assess students’ reading, writing, vocabulary, and language skills. Formative assessments are available to “...inform instruction, unit assessments, culminating tasks, quarterly college placement practice opportunities, and benchmark assessments create summative assessments to gauge student progress toward outcomes and overall achievement.” Unit assessments provide teachers with data for skill transfer of reading and a culminating writing assessment. Additionally, benchmark and college placement practices provide opportunities to assess state assessments. 

  • Assessments are available in multiple formats, and teachers have multiple options to assess students’ progress, including pre- and post-assessments for foundational skills, lesson assessments, benchmark writing assessments, informal writing and speaking assessments, unit reading assessments, culminating tasks, and personal reflection. 

  • ThinkCERCA provides a data dashboard that teachers, administration, and district staff can use to “...understand how students are performing across a grade level or across a department…”

  • Each unit includes an assessment at the end of each module that includes a Selection Reading Assessment, a Selection Vocabulary Quiz, and a Formative Writing Assessment. At the end of every unit is a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a unit assessment aligned with standards. This assessment serves as a formative and summative assessment. There is a beginning, middle, and end of year Benchmark assessment scheduled in Units 1, 4, and 7, respectively.  

  • Throughout each module, teachers have opportunities to check for student understanding that is embedded in the lessons that are a combination of anecdotal, written, or speaking assessments. 

  • Writing Portfolio pieces are accompanied by rubrics, and teachers may use the Feedback Guidance located in the program’s Resources to provide students with individualized feedback based on the genre of the assignment and the writing skill. 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Reports Portfolio slide deck, ThinkCERCA provides examples of data reports available including Operational Reports, Instructional Reports, and Benchmark Reports. While all reports provide a level of student performance data and student growth data, none of the reports provide any direct paths to reteaching or supporting students. Rather, general advice is given, such as “Use the class summary to review course-specific data”  and “Use this data to see students’ performance categories and future growth focus.” Teachers can, however, use student data to group students by reteaching, if desired. 

  • Throughout the Teacher Guides, there are Feedback Focus sections that guide the teacher on what to look for in each task. For example, in Unit 5, Module 2,  students are completing a word map. The teacher Feedback Focus section states, “ Encourage students to write complete definitions, examples, and other notes about the terms.” There is no further guidance provided. 

  • The program includes a direct instruction and skills lesson library that teachers can use to supplement student writing instruction based on feedback to their Portfolio Writing pieces. Teacher Guides provide the following guidance: “Search by standard in the Skills Library for personalized lessons to reteach as needed.”

  • Throughout the teacher guides, some assignments include “Respond and Reteach” guidance. This guidance prompts the teacher with scaffolds for students who are still struggling with certain tasks or concepts. 

Indicator 3K
04/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k. 

The materials provide multiple opportunities for student assessments through multiple-choice questions and/or written responses. Throughout the program, the materials provide formative and summative assessments that align with the standards for each grade level. 

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The materials provide Unit assessments aligned to the standards, including, but not limited to, Selection Reading Assessments, Selection Vocabulary Quizzes, Formative Writing Practice, Formative Reading Assessments, Unit Speaking and Listening Assessments, Research Assessments, Culminating Task: Writing Portfolio Assessments, and Unit Reading Assessments. The specific assessments and correlating standards are provided in the Unit-at-a-Glance documentation. These assessments build over the unit from practice to the culminating writing task and the unit reading assessment at the end of each unit. 

  • Baseline Writing Assessments/Benchmark Assessments are provided. Students are assigned a grade-level reading passage. After reading, they answer eight multiple-choice questions. Then, they write an essay that includes text evidence from the reading passage. This assessment is given at the beginning, middle, and end of the year to personalize and track student progress throughout the year. ThinkCERCA reporting tools provide a Benchmark Summary, Benchmark Rubric Category, and Benchmark Item Analysis report. 

  • A Reading Leveling Assessment is provided to measure student reading levels. Students are automatically assigned a short reading passage at, below, and above grade level. Each passage has eight multiple-choice questions to complete. Teachers may adjust the reading passage level as needed. The Leveling Assessment report provides teachers with a Student Report by Lessons report. This report posts Background Knowledge and Applied Knowledge scores. The time suggested for this assessment is 40-60 minutes. 

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

The materials include assessments that provide tools that increase accessibility for reading texts, prompts, questions, and answers, such as Immersive Reader and AI-Enabled Reading Support. This includes the ability for students, including, read-aloud, increased font, and line focus. These universal tools are available for all assessments except the Baseline Writing assessment. Writing assessments do not have a speech-to-text feature built in, but it is mentioned as an accommodation that could be used. The materials also provide some scaffolded materials in the Diverse Learning Guide to support self-assessments and reflections. The materials provide teachers with general guidance on the use of accommodations. 

Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • ThinkCERCA accessibility tools include an Immersive Reader and an AI-enabled reading Support tool, which provides a read-aloud option, increased text size, increased spacing, font choice, and background colors. Students can choose to break apart words into syllables and color code parts of speech. Another tab provides line focus, a picture dictionary, and a translation function. These tools are available on all the assessments except the Baseline Writing assessments. 

Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit At-a-Glance document includes a section titled “Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs” that provides brief and general suggestions, such as using the embedded tools or reading the Diverse Learners Guide.  

  • Within each module is a Diverse Learners Guide that provides students with a more scaffolded version of the Student Guide. For example, the guide may have sentence starters for the Assessment Reflection. 

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

06/06

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.

The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Teachers can use a variety of grouping strategies.

The materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. The program provides some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse.

Indicator 3M
02/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m. 

The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Teachers can consult guidance in lesson support resources such as the Unit At-a-Glance, Unit Scaffolds Plan for Striving Readers, and Teacher Guide. For each unit, a Diverse Learner Guide is provided, which mirrors the Student Guide but includes additional prompts, graphic organizers, sentence frames, and models for diverse learners.

Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit Scaffolds Plan for Striving Readers document outlines lesson supports for struggling readers. It includes the research base and curriculum design for the program, platform, unit, and lesson scaffolds. Lesson scaffolds are described and include background knowledge, key academic vocabulary, pre-reading, during-reading, after-reading, decoding, and fluency strategies.

  • The Unit At-a-Glance documents reference online differentiated supports on several of the pages. The documents state, “Online differentiated supports enable access to grade-level texts for English Language Learners, Diverse Learners, and students who may benefit from additional support.” In the Unit Overview section, there is a paragraph titled “Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs” that says, “As needed, students with diverse learning needs may benefit from pre-teaching lessons that are paired with anchor texts. Additional support for students with Diverse Learning Needs can be found in the Guide for Students with Diverse Learning Needs. These modifications can also be used with multilingual learners as they continue the acquisition of English.”

  • Each Unit At-a-Glance document also includes an “Excellence and Opportunity for All" section that references engaging culturally diverse learners. It includes guidance on making personal connections to the materials through Quick Journals, Explore Key Concepts, Connect Steps, and Share your Personal Connection part of each lesson.

  • The Teacher Guides include guidance for the teacher in the margin with suggested strategies for supporting students with exceptional needs, struggling readers, and/or gifted and talented enrichment opportunities.

Indicator 3N
02/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n. 

The materials provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. A Unit Scaffolds Plan for Gifted and Talented document provides general suggestions and guidelines for challenging gifted students. In the Teacher Guide, modules include at least one instance per lesson with guidance for teachers labeled “Gifted and Talented Enrichment Opportunity.”

The materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit Scaffolds Plan for Gifted and Talented document is a one-page guide that includes the approach and “why” for scaffolding lessons for this group of students. It states this about the core program, “Throughout each unit, students will experience problem-solving challenges, independent research studies, collaboration opportunities, and critical thinking exercises.” Then, it lists five ways to increase rigor: 

    • “Encourage metacognition - Prompt students to showcase their cognitive thought processes by annotating using metacognitive markers, engaging in a post-reading metacognitive reflection, or participating in partner think-aloud activities.

    • Productive struggle—By challenging students with advanced tasks, although still in their Zone of Proximal Development, teachers can inspire perseverance and stamina while also allowing students to think more flexibly rather than correctly.

    • Convergent and divergent thinking includes using open-ended questions and responses, giving students an opportunity to explore new thinking,

    • Depth of understanding - rather than memorization or rote learning

    • Leverage the heavy lifting– Remember that sometimes less is more. Instead of adding more support, consider removing scaffolds to promote independence.”

  • In the Teacher Guides, modules provide guidance for teachers labeled “Gifted and Talented Enrichment Opportunity.” For example, in Unit 3, Module 4, the guide states, “Digital Storytelling: Have students create digital stories or animation using tools like Storyboard That or Scratch, where they retell a myth from the point of view of a different character. Ask them to hone in on the changes in characterization they notice.”

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.

The materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Units begin with goal-setting and end with reflections and celebration. Speaking and listening tasks and discussions allow students to share their thinking in various ways. Quick Journal activities allow students to connect to themes and build background knowledge. Peer review is built into writing tasks. 

Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit includes multi-modal opportunities through whole class, small group, partner, and individual activities. Units consist of modules that follow a pattern of 1-2 sessions of personal goal setting and exploring the theme, 3-5 sessions of close reading and academic writing, 3-4 sessions of reading across genres, 2-3 sessions of “Spark Courageous Thinking” which is a formal, evidence-based discussion, 4-5 sessions of Portfolio writing, and 1-2 sessions of reading assessment and reflection.

  • Students use interactive online resources for guided close reading and argument writing. AI-assisted real-time Feedback is provided to students. Direct instruction video slide lessons on English Language Arts skills are provided. A Student Guide with unit resources and graphic organizers is provided that can be used for digital or paper/pencil work.

Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • At the beginning of each unit, when students preview the theme, they take a poll of their peers to answer a question about the theme. They answer the question themselves, poll some of their peers, pair, and share, and then volunteer to share their rationales with the whole class. At the end of the unit, they return to the question and see if their thoughts have changed.

  • As students explore the theme and essential question for each unit, they apply their understanding in various contexts. These include responding to literature through close reading and comprehension questions, writing arguments using text evidence to answer prompts related to the theme, reading across genres, including multimedia, poetry, and informational texts, a variety of speaking and listening activities, and portfolio writing.

Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students explore themes through close reading, comparing literature, writing evidence-based claims, process writing, discussion, and reflection.

  • Across units, a variety of speaking/discussion tasks, including Debate, Socratic Discussion, Panel Discussion, Performance, and Pitch Decks, allow students to deepen their understanding and apply literacy ideas. After these activities, students conduct polls and reflect on the discussion using graphic organizers from the Student Guide and further class discussion.

Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:  

  • Peer and self-review are present in Module 7 or 8 writing activities. Graphic organizers are provided to guide the peer and self-review process including Share your Personal Narrative, Edit the Draft Together, and Reflect on your Writing. Writing rubrics help guide the peer review process.

  • At the end of each unit, students complete Reflect on Your Success and Celebrate with Others lessons. In Reflect on Your Success, students write a description of what they are most proud of, whether they feel like a more effective learner than when they began the unit, what their best learning conditions are, obstacles presented and strategies tried, and what they want adults to understand about them as a learner. They are asked to share one successful strategy they used during the unit to overcome a challenge. In Celebrate With Others, students use a 3-2-1 strategy and record 3 parts of the unit they enjoyed, 2 ways they improved their skills, and 1 area of growth they still have. They are asked to share one larger theme about their learning that emerges.

Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • At the beginning of each unit, one to two sessions are dedicated to personal goal setting and exploring the theme. Students set a personal SMART goal for the unit.

  • At the end of each unit, students reflect on their SMART goal in a Quick Journal activity. They are asked to answer these questions:

    • “What can you celebrate?

    • Were you able to do the action you planned?

    • Was it specific, measurable,  and realistic? If not, how would you change it?

    • Was it achievable in the given time frame? If not, how would you change it?

    • How might you revise your planning process for the next set of goals?”

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

The materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies. In the Overview of Program Document, the program philosophy of grouping students is outlined under the heading, “Grouping Guidance: Grouping Students Based on Growth Focus and Learning Objectives.” Grouping Guidance is also provided in the Unit At-a-Glance document, which outlines the philosophy of grouping in heterogeneous learning groups. It is recommended that teachers group students based on learning focus rather than readiness levels. Inclusivity is stressed in the guidance, recommending that students in special populations actively participate in class.

Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit At-a-Glance document, there is a section titled “Grouping Guidance.” This document includes some general guidance about grouping students and suggestions for grouping within the program. 

  • The materials suggest grouping in pairs, small groups, or larger groups depending on the activity and learning focus. 

Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The guidance states, “We highly recommend that teachers group students based on the learning focus and avoid grouping students by readiness level. The ThinkCERCA reports provide ample data points to drive instructional groupings. When engaging in reteaching or pre-teaching moments, regardless of student ‘level,’ teachers can group all students who have the same personalized growth focus area together for an immediate teaching opportunity. For example, a teacher may choose to focus on students with the personalized growth focus area of ‘evidence.’ This may mean that a student with 6th-grade readiness may be in the same group as a student with 8th-grade readiness.”

  • Guidance is provided for grouping in pairs, small groups, or larger groups: “Large group learning is best when all students need the instruction or information and students at all ranges of abilities are able to engage. Small groups foster discussion and collaboration and provide teachers with the opportunity to instruct students based on personalized data, while partner and individual work allow for deepened engagement and focused thinking about a topic.”

  • In the Teacher Guide, icons indicate whether a lesson is intended for individual, paired, or small-group learning.

Indicator 3Q
02/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q. 

The materials provide teachers and students with scaffolds and tools to support students’ participation in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Teachers are provided with general tips for the specific vocabulary that may need translations, as well as reminders to use the online tools and the Diverse Learning Guide for scaffolds. There is an additional English Language Learners Guide that teachers can use to provide multilingual learners with scaffolds depending on their English language proficiency level. The online platform has a wide variety of language choices for written translation and read-aloud features. 

Materials consistently provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each Teacher Guide provides guidance in the margin notes for Support for English Language Learners, which provides teachers with specific words to consider for translation. The margins also indicate additional suggestions, including, but not limited to, when to provide tools such as a bilingual dictionary, translation, or digital tools. These tips can be found for most of the specific sections of the module or unit. 

  • The ThinkCERCA materials include a document on their “Approach to Supporting Multilingual English Language Learners” that provides an overview of possible scaffolds aligned to WIDA supports, including, but not limited to, graphic organizers, distinct task chunking, and modified rubrics. There is also a Unit Scaffold Plan for Striving Readers that lists platform, unit, and lesson scaffolds. 

  • Student materials can be translated into many different languages in writing or read aloud. Languages include, but are not limited to, three forms of Spanish, Thai, Urdu, and Zulu. The online platform has a wide variety of language choices for written translation and read-aloud features. 

  • The Teacher Guide provides general tips for translating specific vocabulary and reminders to use the online tools and the Diverse Learning Guide as scaffolds. 

  • There is an English Language Learner Guide provided for each unit, which links to different guides for each module. This guide differentiates activities for students depending on their English Language proficiency level. Activities are differentiated for beginning proficiency, intermediate proficiency, and advanced proficiency. 

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

Materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. In addition to the core readings, suggested longer works include a balance of voices and present all identities in a positive light. Photos and images are minimal across the units, are mostly found at module headings, and may consist of people, places, or objects. There are a variety of races, genders, and ethnicities represented in those images.

Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, students explore the theme “Who Do You Aim to Be?” with the essential question, “How do various personal experiences, positive and negative, allow you to grow and change?”. Texts in this unit depict speakers from various genders, races, and ethnicities. Texts include: 

    • “Marigolds” by Eugenia Collier is a coming-of-age story about a young girl growing up in poverty during the Great Depression.

    • “I Am the Greatest” by James Bird is a personal narrative about a boy who, with the help of his Ojibwe ancestors, overcomes the challenges of growing up.

    • “Amigo Brothers” by Piri Thomas narrates the lived experience of Latinx teens who live in an urban setting and are amateur boxers.

    • “Off the Shelf” by Patti Smith is a memoir set in New Jersey, where a poor young girl steals an encyclopedia.

  • In Unit 3, Module 2, “The Attack” by Lula Delacre, recounts a life-changing event that happens to an immigrant family who is struggling with challenges related to assimilation and identity.

Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 6, Module 5, students read “My Path to Boston University- A Real Student’s Story” by Yesh Datar. He describes his journey to university as a first-generation Indian American.

  • In Unit 6, Module 5, the article “CCE4Me Stories” lists many stories of people from different backgrounds who tell about their paths to community college.

Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Photos across the units are of objects, places, or people and are mostly limited to module headings. Most texts do not include images unless they are multimedia studies in a Read Across Genres module. For example, in Unit 2, Module 3, students read “Facing Budget Shortfalls, These Schools are Turning to the Sun” by  Cara Buckley. This article includes photographs of schools and portrays students of a variety of ages and ethnicities.

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

The materials provide general and mostly generic scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning. The guidance for teachers primarily falls into the category of words to translate or how to leverage online tools. The online version of the program comes embedded with a wide range of translated languages. However, there is no specific guidance about where or when to leverage these tools. Likewise, scaffolds are provided and encouraged, but only general guidance on how or when to incorporate these scaffolds. ThinkCERCA materials show a positive philosophy about the value of multilingual students in the class and a structured system for all students to achieve in the classroom; however, the suggestions in the materials are broad.

Materials provide some broad suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 4, Module 7, Support for English Language Learners states to “Allow students to discuss their ideas in their native language and to share their answers verbally.” The Unit Assessment teacher guidance states, “...Allow students to discuss their ideas in their native language and to share their answers verbally..”

  • Each Teacher Guide provides prompts to enable access to online differentiation supports such as “translation, voice-to-text, and other technology-enabled supports” and to use the Diverse Learners Guide for more scaffolded tasks. 

  • In the Unit Overview for each unit is a statement about Multilingual English Learners that states that in addition to pre-teaching and other modifications, the expectation is that all students, regardless of native language, should be working alongside their peers. This document states, “These resources are designed for noisy, happy classrooms where students are practicing language and are leveled for beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners.”

Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the program, Front Matter materials include a section titled “Excellence and Opportunity for All” that presents the need for scaffolds in a way that presents different learning needs in a positive tone. For example, the materials state that teachers should use scaffolds “...to model the research-based mindsets that allow learners to understand their needs and enable themselves independently and, when appropriate. Use available resources or jettison the scaffolds to challenge themselves.” This section also acknowledges that multilingual students may have differing needs but that the need for vocabulary development intersects with all students and thus is a focus within the program. The materials state, “Students who are multilingual English learners may appear to have the same needs, they are often very different, though one common need exists across the board for all learners of a language--vocabulary. For this reason, ThinkCERCA provides vocabulary support in every lesson along with other robust, leveled English Learner Supports for beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners.”

  • The ThinkCERCA materials include a document on their “Approach to Supporting Multilingual English Language Learners” that provides an overview of the supports embedded in the program. The materials state that “ThinkCERCA is a tool for empowerment and growth in English language proficiency.” The document lists their Guiding Principles as: 

    • “English Language Learners are emerging multilingual learners whose Home Languages and diverse forms and registers of English are cherished and considered assets.  

    • Meaning-making and comprehension of authentic and relevant materials are paramount.

    • Content serves as the anchor for foundational literacy skills development in service of mastery of spoken and written academic language.

    • Mastery of English expands an ML/ELL student’s power and agency to exchange, create, and express ideas and participate in their community authentically.”

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

The materials provide some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse. In units where that is not a focus, there is no focus on using or supporting students of diverse backgrounds. For example, Unit 1 has many opportunities throughout the unit, but Unit 5 has little support beyond vocabulary support for multilingual students. In every unit, there are opportunities to make personal connections through writing and/or speaking, but there is no specific focus for teachers regarding cultural diversity. Translation opportunities are vast on the online platform. However, parent letters are only available in English and Spanish. Overall, student opportunities and teacher guidance are inconsistent and varied throughout the school year. 

Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Module 1, students participate in a lesson about how a story’s setting is influenced by history and culture. 

Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each Teacher Guide, a section on Culturally Diverse Learners states, “ThinkCERCA’s curriculum is also designed to be relevant and engaging and provides multiple entry points for students to make meaningful connections to the texts and to each other. Students are encouraged to make personal connections through Quick Journals, Explore Key Concepts, Connect steps, and Share Your Personal Connections, and to draw on their backgrounds and experiences through writing and discussion. In the Teacher Guide, teachers are encouraged to use a range of formative feedback to support culturally diverse learners; this feedback enables teachers to gather data to individualize their instruction.” While this statement is provided, few lessons reference the cultural diversity of students. 

  • In Unit 5, Before You Read, Teacher Flex Activity states to “Have students brainstorm examples of books, movies, or television shows that use language or speech patterns that differ from their own. Ask students to reflect on the strategies they used to bridge the language gap between their own language and unfamiliar language.”

Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found.

Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • An embedded translation tool allows users to translate online student materials. The languages available are robust and include Albanian, German, Samoan, and Turkish. 

  • In the Unit Planning Tools, each unit has a parent letter in English and Spanish. The parent letter provides families with a unit overview, a list of the text, and suggestions for home activities, including a suggestion to use the reading tools in the program, such as translations and the picture dictionary. 

Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a Quick Journal lesson that asks students to make personal connections to the guiding question. This allows students to share their personal stories. The Quick Journal prompt for Unit 1, Module 1, is “What can we learn from poor choices we made in the past?”

  • Materials include opportunities to discuss personal experience. In Unit 2, Module 2, students participate in a Think-Pair-Share to discuss “...your personal experiences related to the topic.” Directions for the teacher state to have students “...share the parts of your response that you feel comfortable sharing. “

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

Read

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

The materials allow teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher.

The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program; however, implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

The materials allow teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Teachers can customize the materials using the Digital Unit Planner and assign lessons at the class and student levels. 

Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Teachers can leave feedback through the online rubrics. They can score, grade, and provide feedback that is then available for students to view. 

  • As students complete the writing task for each unit, ThinkCERCA’s generative feedback tool will provide feedback on grammar, usage, mechanics, punctuation, and spelling. 

  • All the materials can be presented to the whole class, allowing teachers to use any part of the lesson as a model. 

Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Spark View mode, students can access an immersive reader function for most Modules. Once this tool is selected, students can listen to a read-aloud, change font size, increase spacing, change font, change the background color, have big words broken into syllables, color code parts of speech, insert a line focus, use a picture dictionary, and translate the text. Direct Instruction videos do not have these features available. However, they are available for the reading check questions. Students also have highlighting tools available when they are asked to analyze the texts.  

Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit has a Digital Unit Planning tool that allows teachers to customize the unit based on teacher input, such as student data, standards, and schedules. 

  • Teachers can assign modules to each class and at the student level, allowing for differentiation of the digital materials. 

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

The materials provide some guidance on how to leverage digital tools for collaboration. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher. Additionally, teachers can provide feedback as students are in the drafting stage of writing, but there does not seem to be a way for students to respond to the feedback during this process. 

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. However, guidance for this collaboration is limited. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Module 4, Visual Vocabulary, the materials suggest ways to collaborate digitally. The directions state, “Provide student-friendly definitions. Choose a medium—paper or digital drawing tools—for students to represent the words visually. They can use images, symbols, or creative drawings to capture the essence of each word’s meaning. Encourage them to think about connections between the words and potentially depict those as well. Finally, display or compile the student work, creating a class vocabulary showcase.”

  • Teachers can leave feedback on the online rubrics for student writing tasks, including feedback as they draft and then upon completion.   

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. Images and graphics support engagement without being distracting. Organizational features in the Teacher Guide include tables, flowcharts, and some color coding to help teachers easily identify skills presented in lessons.

Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each of the seven units is divided into modules, and each module is clearly outlined in the Teacher Guide using a flowchart with graphic images of the Student Guide pages and color-coded notations to indicate skills. The flowchart also includes graphics that depict whether the lesson is accessed on the computer, paper/pencil in the Student Guide, or as an individual, small group, or whole group lesson.

  • The Student Guide’s graphics are minimal and not distracting when present. In most modules, an image appears at the beginning and represents the theme of the reading.

  • In the digital materials, icons help students navigate through lessons. For example, a green hand icon allows students to click for help. When students are writing arguments, icons for claims, reasoning, and evidence are consistent across the program.

Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Teacher Guide and Student Guide can be accessed at the unit level, which includes all of the modules, or at the module level, which only includes the information for that module.

  • The materials are consistent between teacher and student materials. The Student Guide pages appear in the Teacher Guide; many serve as answer keys.

  • The layout and structure of the digital materials are consistent across all units, modules, and grade levels. Teachers assign lessons from the teacher platform by clicking an “assign lesson” or “assign unit” button. On the teacher interface, at each unit or module level, there is consistent access to the Unit-at-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, Student Guide, Diverse Learner Guide, Answer Key, and Unit Planning Tools across the top of the page.

Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Student Guide includes a Preview Key Concepts and Skills page for each module. This page includes a checklist of assignments under the Before You Read, Read, Analyze, and Write categories, as well as links to the assignments in the Student Guide.

  • The Student Guide’s instructions are clearly labeled and often provide an example for students to follow.

  • Students can easily navigate the student-facing digital materials using a sidebar with links to each lesson step. This includes a link to a glossary.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.

The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program, providing real-time feedback to students. Implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The On-Demand Video Library in the Resources section provides videos for teachers on onboarding and using the program. These include creating classes and student accounts, assigning reading levels, using the student view, and using reports.

  • In the Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, teachers can access Teacher Training Courses with more short videos demonstrating aspects of the digital materials, such as assigning and scoring writing benchmarks, direct instruction and skill practice lessons, how to create custom lessons, and close reading and writing lessons.

  • In the Help Center, Product Support provides additional help and guidance for accounts and passwords, lessons and assessments, classes, grading, data and reports, rostering, and troubleshooting. 

  • In the Unit-at-a-Glance documents for each module, there is clear guidance for which parts of lessons are online direct instruction to be assigned and which are additional offline resources. In addition, in the Teacher Guide, a computer icon next to an assignment indicates that it is an online resource.