About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: ThinkCERCA Core Curriculum for English Language Arts and Reading | ELA
ELA 6-8
The grade 6-8 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment and usability.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. While the program includes research activities, opportunities for practice are generally limited to one particular unit.
Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View.
The program includes reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each module. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content. They also provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
ELA High School
The grade 9-12 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment and usability.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks. While the program includes research activities, opportunities for practice are generally limited to one particular unit.
Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View.
The program includes reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each module. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content. They also provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
9th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
10th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
11th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
12th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 6th Grade
Alignment Summary
The grade 6 instructional materials for ThinkCERCA Core English Language Arts and Reading meet expectations for alignment.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. The tasks, questions, and assignments are connected to the texts students read and require students to collect textual evidence. Units are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. Throughout the program, there are varied culminating tasks.
The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction. Although the materials include research activities, they generally occur in one designated unit.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing.
Most questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards, and the Teacher Guide mostly includes sufficient guidance or resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The implementation schedules align with the core learning objectives and may be reasonably completed in the time allotted.
6th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 32 informational texts and 22 literary texts, resulting in a 59/41 balance of informational and literary texts, which should support achieving the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
The materials contain 54 core unit texts across the seven units spanning various text types and genres. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Text complexity is mixed throughout the units. The quantitative measures range from 640L-1360L and generally increase throughout the year, and the qualitative measures range from slightly complex to very complex. Scaffolding suggestions often remain the same throughout the year, regardless of each text’s complexity level.
The materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options” for the Unit. Materials provide students with four independent reading options in every unit, each thematically linked to the unit’s content.
Throughout the program, there are on-demand and process writing opportunities. The materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different genres of writing. The writing genre distribution is 33.3% argumentative, 33.3% informational/explanatory, and 33.3% narrative, which closely aligns with the grade-level writing distribution of 35/35/30 required by the standards. Students frequently have opportunities across the school year to practice and apply writing using evidence.
The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and rich in language and academic vocabulary; texts reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Over the course of the school year, materials include 32 informational texts and 22 literary texts, resulting in a 59/41 balance of informational and literary texts, which should support achieving the 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
The materials contain 54 core unit texts across the seven units spanning various text types and genres. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to their associated student task. Text complexity is mixed throughout the units. The quantitative measures range from 640L-1360L and generally increase throughout the year, and the qualitative measures range from slightly complex to very complex. Scaffolding suggestions often remain the same throughout the year, regardless of each text’s complexity level. Some scaffolding suggestions are present, but require teachers to complete additional research or preparation to implement.
The materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading. Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options.” Students are provided with four independent reading options for each unit, each thematically linked to the content in that unit.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
Anchor texts are well-crafted and vary in genre. The texts are rich in language and academic vocabulary, representing many different cultures and experiences. Anchor texts are of high-quality and, consider a range of student interests, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, informational articles, short stories, myths, and poetry that appeal to various student interests.
Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 3, students read the personal narrative The Boy in the Back of the Class, an excerpt from Hope Wins: A Collection of Inspiring Stories for Young Readers by Ronald L. Smith. This excerpt appeals to students because it provides a realistic connection between a boy and his fear of embarrassment when he gets new glasses.
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “Names/Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. In this personal narrative, the author tells of her obstacles in moving from the Dominican Republic to New York City. Told from a first-person point of view, the author provides a perspective on immigrants’ challenges, starting with correctly pronouncing her name. Julia Alvarez is an award-winning author who has written several acclaimed books.
In Unit 7, Module 1, students read the African myth “The Twin Heroes” by Alphonso O. Stafford. The text establishes events that follow the traditional hero’s journey plot structure. The main characters in the text encounter trials and tribulations and eventually evolve into the mythological figures Thunder and Lightning.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Genres include poetry, opinion essays, drama, fairy tales, and personal narratives. Over the course of the school year, students read 22 literary texts and 32 informational texts, which provide a 41%/59% split. This distribution exceeds the split required by the grade-band standards.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 2, students read a personal narrative, “Fish Cheeks,” by Amy Tan, by analyzing imagery. Students explore how the imagery was used to explore the narrator’s feelings about her cultural identity.
In Unit 2, Module 4, students read an argumentative informational text, “Down with Class Participation,” by Mellissa Pandika. Students use this text as a model for tracing an author’s claims and examining the evidence the author uses to support her claim.
In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “Echo and Narcissus,” a myth written in the third person omniscient point of view. The plot follows the traditional structure of the tragedy genre that is common to many Greek myths.
Materials reflect a 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Across the year, students read 54 texts, 32 or 59% informational, and 22 or 41% literary.
In Unit 1, students read eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.
In Unit 2, students read eight core texts, with 100% being informational and 0% literary.
In Unit 3, students read eight core texts, with 25% being informational and 75% literary.
In Unit 4, students read eight core texts, with 87% being informational and 13% literary.
In Unit 5, students read six core texts, with 33% being informational and 67% literary.
In Unit 6, students read eight core texts, with 100% being informational and 0% literary.
In Unit 7, students read eight core texts, with 37% being informational and 63% literary.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.
The materials include texts that are appropriately leveled in complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to the associated student task. Each Teacher Unit Guide includes a rationale for the purpose of each unit in the curriculum. There are 54 texts for students to read in Grade 6. The quantitative analysis revealed that 11 texts have no Lexile level because they are Non-Prose, 15 are above the Lexile stretch band, 16 are below, and 12 fall within the grade band. The qualitative analysis shows that 21 texts are slightly complex, 28 are moderately complex, and five are very complex. Student tasks are found to be grade-level appropriate, with necessary scaffolding for more complex tasks. As for the reader and tasks, 12 exceed grade-level criteria, and 42 meet the reader and task level expectations. In the Teacher Guide, Module Preview, and Connection to Unit, a general description of the texts and the connection to the tasks is provided. The materials include a linked spreadsheet in each Unit-At-A-Glance, which provides quantitative and qualitative data for each text in the curriculum and an associated reader and task analysis of each text.
Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros. The publisher’s quantitative measure is listed as 960L, but the verified measure is 870L, which is below the grade level band. The qualitative measure is slightly complex. Student tasks include answering five questions on theme, character analysis, and figurative language. Students summarize the text in writing and then draft an argument paragraph to answer the prompt: “How do Rachel’s actions show her thoughts and feelings about the misunderstanding between her and her teacher? Cite specific evidence, including inferences you made, from the text to support your response.”
In Unit 4, Module 1, students read the informational text “It’s What’s Outside That Counts” by Catherine Brown. The publisher’s quantitative measure is listed as 1050L, but the verified measure is 1100L, which is on grade level. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex, and the reader and task are appropriately complex for the grade level. Students analyze the text to demonstrate an understanding of connotation and denotation. The Student Guide also contains a Build Your Argument task where students complete an organizer answering the prompt, “How is the term ‘waste’ defined and used throughout the text? Analyze how the examples used impact the reader’s understanding of waste and how to prevent it” by developing a claim and finding supporting examples/evidence and reasoning.
In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “Echo and Narcissus,” retold by Roger Lancelyn Green. The quantitative measure provided by the publisher is 970L, and the verified is 970L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex, and the reader and task analysis exceeds the grade level band. After reading, students plan an argumentative paragraph using the CERCA format to answer the prompt, “Echo and Narcissus are characters in a myth that explains the origins of two very specific personality traits. Explain how the plot and character development in the myth of ‘Echo and Narcissus’ helps readers to understand the consequences of having these traits.”
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit-At-a-Glance provides a link to “Detailed Text Complexity Analysis,” which includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of each text and reader and task considerations. This spreadsheet includes the following columns:
Lesson Title and ThinkCERCA Platform Link
Citation or Publisher Permissions Line
Author Bio and Awards
Grade Level
Unit
Unit Name
Anchor or Read Across Genres Text
Lesson Primary CCSS Reading Standard
Certified Lexile
ATOS
Flesch-Kincaid
Ease Score
Qualitative Measures
Structure
Language Conventionality and Clarity
Knowledge Demands
Purpose/Meaning of the Text
Quantitative Measures
Reader and Task Considerations
Recommended Placement
Info vs. Lit Text
Portfolio Writing Genre
Formative and Summative Tasks
In Unit 2, Module 1, students read “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens. The Detailed Text Complexity Analysis Spreadsheet includes the following information under Reader and Task Considerations for the educational purpose of this text: “‘Starting Schools Later Leads to Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’’ was chosen as an anchor text because it is an excellent informational text that gives students the chance to reflect on a topic of interest that will affect them in the future.” The Recommended Placement Section states, “The quantitative measurements place ‘Starting Schools Later Leads to Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’’ into the 6th-grade appropriate end of the 6-8 text complexity band; the qualitative analysis would indicate that there are enough features to warrant its placement in the 6th grade.”
In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Build Your Brain!” by Douglas Fields. The Detailed Text Complexity Analysis Spreadsheet includes the following information under Reader and Task Considerations for the educational purpose of this text: “‘Build Your Brain’ was selected as an anchor text because it is an example of an informational text that not only addresses the unit theme of ‘Planning Your Future’ but also asks students: ‘How do our brains grow as we engage in formal education?’" The Recommended Placement Section states, “Various readability measures indicate that "Build Your Brain" is suitable for Grade 6. The ATOS and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores place this piece at the 6th-grade level. Despite the lower Lexile level and higher Flesch-Kincaide Ease score, the shorter text length, age-appropriate scenarios, and familiar essay-type format indicate this piece should be placed in the 6th grade.”
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.
Student materials reflect a variety of complexity levels that are mostly appropriate for the grade level bands. The materials include 54 texts with the publisher-provided quantitative measure ranges from 640L-1360L, and the verified measure ranges from 300L-1360L. While most texts fall within or above the Lexile stretch band for complexity, 37% of texts with Lexile data are rated below grade level. Qualitatively, 39% of texts are slightly complex, 52% are moderately complex, and 9% are very complex. After reading texts, students answer five multiple-choice questions. The sentence frames students can use to respond to prompts or write summaries are redundant. The materials provide some scaffolds in student work and in the Teacher Guide to support different populations of students; some of these scaffolds and guidance are repetitive or broad, while some are specific suggestions to support English Language Learners, Students with Exceptional Needs, and Exploration and Extension. Scaffolds are offered before and during the reading of each text. Scaffolds are, at times, suggestions, such as an idea of background information teachers could provide about the text, and are often general and repetitive. Specific vocabulary scaffolds are provided in the Topic Overview of almost every text for struggling readers; the word(s) is always relevant to the specific text. As students read, consistent scaffolds provided throughout all texts include audio read-aloud support and interactive vocabulary definitions in the online text. During writing tasks associated with reading, some specific scaffolds are provided. Many scaffold suggestions remain the same throughout the year, offering little or no guidance to increase students’ ability to engage with increasingly complex text.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 640L–1360L. The overall qualitative range across the year is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 1, the Lexile range is 750L-1000L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 2, the Lexile range is 860L-1280L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 3, the Lexile range is 800L-1140L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 4, the Lexile range is 970L-1300L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 5, the only Lexile is 1280L. All texts are qualitatively Slightly Complex. In Unit 6, The Lexile range is 870L-1060L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex. In Unit 7, The Lexile range is 640L-1360L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Very Complex.
In Unit 1, Module 4, students read “Ice” by Graham Salisbury, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 750L and a verified measure of 730L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. After reading, students answer five multiple-choice questions. Two questions support students in determining a theme or central idea and analyzing its development throughout the texts, including an objective summary. Student questions include, “Which statement best captures the main lesson of this story?” and “Which of these statements should be included in a summary of this story?” Students also complete an Apply Your Learning question: “How does the author reveal details that show what he learned about himself through his relationship with his stepfather?” In Unit 4, Module 4, students read “Food Factories of the Future” by Elizabeth M. Tenney, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1010L and a verified measure of 1030L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. After reading, students answer five multiple-choice questions. Two questions support students in determining a theme or central idea and analyzing its development throughout the texts. Student questions include, “How do the images in the article add to the reader’s understanding of the vertical farms in Abu Dhabi?” and “Which of the following statements could be included in a summary of the main idea of the text?” In this module, students review summarizing informational texts and use guiding documents to write a summary of the text. In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “The Twin Heroes,” adapted by Alphonso O. Stafford, which has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1010L and a verified measure of 1110L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. After reading, students answer five multiple-choice questions. One question supports students in determining a theme or central idea and analyzing its development throughout the text. Student questions include, “Which sentence best describes the main message of this story that is also common to many myths about a hero’s journey?” Students also review summarizing literary texts and use a guided document to write a text summary.
In Unit 2, Module 1, students read the informational selection “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer Zombies” by Alison Pearce Stevens, which includes a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 860L and a verified measure of 840L. The qualitative complexity is slightly complex. After reading, students analyze the author’s use of evidence to support her claim by highlighting expert quotes and research data in different colors while reading the selection. The Student Guide includes an Apply Your Learning task: “As you read the passage, answer the question, “Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?” Later in the unit, students complete a ThinkCerca in response to the prompt, “Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?” In Unit 4, Module 1, students read the informational selection, “It’s What Outside that Counts” by Catherine Brown. The text has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1050L and a verified measure of 1100L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. Students read the text and answer five multiple-choice questions, including “Which quotation from the essay best captures the central idea?” and “How do the statistics and data about the impact food waste has on the planet support the author’s argument?” In Unit 4, Module 5, students read “Farms Sprout in Cities” by Jennifer Cutraro. The text includes a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 970L and a verified measure of 970L. The qualitative complexity is slightly complex. The reading check questions include “Which of the following quotations best supports the author’s main claim that indoor, vertical farms can benefit the future of farming?” and “Does this example support the idea that vertical farming is important? Why?” In the same module, students read “Rooftop Farming Is Getting off the Ground” by Eliza Barclay. This text has a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1300L and a verified measure of 1300L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. Students complete reading check questions, including “Which of the following quotations from the text does not describe the benefits of a rooftop garden?” and “Which of the following quotations from the text provides the least support for the assertion that not all green roofs are good candidates for farming?” After reading both selections, students complete a lesson on Evaluating Evidence and use a graphic organizer to record observations and evidence from the article for categories such as the source of the evidence, the strength of the evidence, connection to the topic, and an overall analysis of the use of research in supporting the article’s purpose. In Unit 6, Module 1, students read a magazine article, “Build Your Brain” by R. Douglas Field. This text includes a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1060L and a verified measure of 1020L. The qualitative complexity is moderately complex. After reading the selection, students respond to multiple choice questions, including “Which of the following quotations best supports the argument that teenagers should prioritize focusing on their brain development now?” and “How do the statistics and data about human brain development support the author’s arguments?” Students then analyze the text, highlighting the author’s examples and anecdotes to explain how the human brain develops and research how teenagers can build their brains. Then, students complete an Apply Your Learning task in the Student Guide that includes an organizer to analyze the author’s use of examples and anecdotes to support his argument in preparation for the writing prompt, “What are the most impactful anecdotes and examples that the author uses to build an argument about what teenagers should be doing to maximize their brain growth?”
As texts become more complex, some appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Before students read each text, a Topic Overview is provided. Directions state, "Read the topic overview to build background knowledge. Preview the vocabulary before reading.” The Topic Overview section includes a brief introduction to the text with a few vocabulary words hyperlinked in blue. Students can click the vocabulary words to find the part of speech and definition.
In Unit 1, Module 3, students analyze the text “The Boy in the Back of the Class” by Ronald L. Smith, with a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 680L and a verified quantitative measure of 670L. The text is qualitatively slightly complex. The Teacher Guide provides multiple opportunities to scaffold for different student groups as they engage with the text. Specific examples include:
Guidance is provided on how to demonstrate making inferences. The Teacher Guide suggests beginning with explicit information before progressing to inferences, including an example from the selection.
Scaffolds for Multilingual/English Language Learners include teaching vocabulary words for translation specific to the text, such as “explore, concepts, intentional, narrative, and powerful.”
Scaffolds to students with exceptional needs include accessing other resources such as the “Foundational Reading and Linguistics Course” or the “DIverse Learners Guide.”
Scaffolds for struggling readers include offering strategies to build students’ background knowledge, fluency supports such as echo and partner reading. For example, during the Topic Overview, Support for Struggling Readers: Background Knowledge, the following scaffold suggestion is included: “The author references the 1940s movie The Wizard of Oz because the movie begins in black and white and switches to color when Dorothy arrives in Oz, a beautiful fantasy world. Play this clip for students and discuss the impact the transition of black and white to color has on the viewer. How does the author’s comparison of seeing clearly with glasses for the first time relate to Dorothy’s arrival in Oz?”
In Unit 4, Module 4, students read “Food Factories of the Future?” by Elizabeth M. Tenney with a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 1010L and a verified quantitative measure of 1030L. The text is qualitatively moderately complex. Students read the text and complete a set of comprehension questions during the Check part of the lesson. The Teacher Guide includes the following general scaffold for Struggling Readers during this part of the lesson: “Read & Quiz: This strategy is ideal for articles or text that may be considered ‘boring’ or for students with a shorter attention span.” While this general suggestion is included, there is no further guidance provided on how to implement the scaffold for this specific lesson. Then, students complete an Apply Your Learning lesson to write a summary of the informational text. The Teacher Guide states: “Remind students that the Direct Instruction lesson is a useful resource. Have students hear the prompts out loud before they begin working. Facilitate pairs or groups for students to complete the tasks.” The Teacher Guide also includes support for modeling how to write an effective summary. One example is a think-aloud, where teachers explain what the summary task requires by providing an outline of the information needed to respond to the prompt. The materials include prompts such as “First, I will summarize why it is challenging to grow plants in climates like Abu Dhabi.” The materials also include support to assist teachers in modeling a think-aloud for visualization, annotating, and close reading. In the Student Guide, questions are included for each section to help students write the summary, such as “Why is it challenging to grow plants in climates like Abu Dhabi? What are some advantages of hydroponics? What are some examples of hydroponic plants?”
In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Learning Rewires the Brain” by Alison Pearce Stevens with a publisher-provided quantitative measure of 870L and a verified quantitative measure of 870L. The text is qualitatively very complex. After reading the selection and responding to comprehension questions, students complete an Apply Your Learning task responding to questions about how the author chooses, explains, and arranges research, data, and information to inform the reader about the topic. The Teacher Guide includes suggestions for teachers to support struggling readers by building background knowledge. The materials state, “Ask students to think of a time when they were doing an activity but not concentrating on the activity. For example, maybe when they first learned to ride a bike, they had to focus on pedaling and steering, but after they practiced, they didn’t have to think about it. While they ride they can be concentrating on something else entirely. This is just one way our brain changes with practice.” The materials also include scaffolded instruction for modeling a think-aloud to respond to a prompt on the author’s craft and using the Diverse Learners Guide for alternative tasks when appropriate. When students draft their written essays, teachers are provided with suggestions: “Support students’ writing with predictive spelling, speech-to-text, voice typing, or dictation.” Other scaffolds include providing students with bilingual glossaries, alternate versions of the task, options for recording responses, etc., having students listen to the selection through the online platform, providing extended time to read and answer the Pause and Reflect questions, or providing students with different instructions or an adjusted version of the activity provided in the Diverse Learners Guide.
In the Draft and Review section across the materials, the following repetitive and broad scaffolds for Multi-Lingual/English Language Learners are included: “Allow for the use of bilingual glossaries, options for recording responses, and translation devices. Support student spelling and mechanics through automatic spelling and grammar checks and predictive spelling.” For Diverse Learners, the following broad scaffold is included: “Support students’ writing with predictive spelling, speech-to-text, voice typing, or dictation. Encourage students to expand each paragraph/section in the copy-and-paste outline from the previous step as needed.”
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.
The materials reviewed clearly identify opportunities for students to engage in a wide variety of text types and genres. Students read 54 texts covering various genres, including but not limited to informational texts, video clips, poetry, and personal narratives. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for partner, small-group, and whole-group reading. Pacing documents are provided in the Unit Planner with 50-minute session schedules. Materials provide suggestions and guidance for independent reading.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, students read two informational news articles, one informational news article that emphasizes text features, and three opinion essays. Students also watch a video, review a photo essay, and review a visual news article feature. Each text requires students to interact with different genres to answer the Essential Question: “What is the best way for today’s schools to ensure the success of tomorrow’s students?” For example, in Module 4, students read “Down with Class Participation Grades” by Melissa Pandika. Then, students engage in a lesson on analyzing issues and appeals. They also “trace the author’s evidence about the argument regarding participation grades in school.” In Module 5, students read the opinion essay “The Case for Making Classrooms Phone-Free” by Tyler Rablin and “trace the evidence the author provides about the argument for cell phone bans in schools.” Students also view the photo essay “Check ‘Em Out! A Collection of Extraordinary Libraries” by Carrie Tillotson. They learn about the keys to understanding visual sources and answer the question: “How does the author use the photos and captions to convey the idea that libraries of the future may have to look different from the libraries of today?”
In Unit 4, students read six informational news articles, a magazine article, and a poem. They also review an infographic. Each text requires students to interact with different genres to answer the Essential Question: “What are the impacts of locally grown and sustainable food sources?” For example, in Module 1, students read “It’s What’s Outside That Counts” by Catherine Brown. Students use the text to define the term “waste” and the way the author uses it throughout the text. Then, students analyze the examples from the text to determine ways to prevent waste. In Module 5, students read the poem “Recycling Center” by Brenda Hillman and “describe trash and how it is processed.”
In Unit 7, students read two myths, fairy tales, poems, and informational articles. Each text requires students to interact with different genres to answer the Essential Question: “How do myths and traditional tales teach readers about values and human behavior?” In Module 2, students read the myth “Echo and Narcissus” by Roger Lancelyn Green and analyze it for components of a traditional myth. In Module 3, students read the fairy tale “The Fisherman and His Wife” by The Brothers Grimm and analyze it for components of a traditional myth. By the end of the unit, the students write a literary analysis to compare the themes of two of the stories in the unit.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Planner provides a pacing guide for a 50-minute class periods. Each text is complete with guidance for the teacher found in the Teacher Guide. Each unit takes approximately 22-26 to teach. Students practice reading in pairs, small groups, and whole-class sessions. In addition, they practice previewing the unit, setting personal goals, exploring the theme or topic, conducting research, participating in discussions or Socratic Seminars, and writing about the texts.
In Unit 3, students take 24 class periods to read eight texts and view a video so that they can participate in discussions and write a short story that is “set in a realistic or historical setting that addresses a changed perspective the main character has that influences their ideas, actions, and choices” throughout the storyline.
In Unit 6, students take 24 class periods to read eight texts and view a video so “that they can participate in discussions, and write a personal statement about the lessons [people] take from the obstacles [they] encounter that can be fundamental to later success.”
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a section on independent reading opportunities. For example, the Unit 1 Unit-At-a-Glance includes the following teacher guidance:
“Reserve one to two days for introducing the protocols for student choice during the first month of school:
Introduce best practices for choosing appropriately challenging reading by showing the overview video.
Allow students to brainstorm topics and types of books they may find interesting.
Provide the suggested titles book list but also assure students that they need not restrict their choices only to those titles.
Visit the library and let students select books based on the strategies introduced in the introductory video.
Provide a class period or more for students to ‘get hooked on their book’ of choice while you conduct 1:1 conferences with students to understand their S.M.A.R.T. goals and progress.
Model your expectations of how to complete reading logs and share submission and grading expectations.”
The Unit 2 Unit-At-a-Glance includes the following guidance:
“Select model book logs that demonstrate the expectations of the independent reading protocol and remove student names. Share digital copies of the exemplar work and review its exemplar qualities with the class.”
Under Resources, Curriculum Resources, Grade 6, Reading, Implementing Independent Reading, slide 8, the materials include a blank reading log with sentence stems to support students in writing about texts.
Each Unit-At-a-Glance includes a link to “Independent Reading Options” for the Unit. There are four independent reading options provided to students for each unit. Each of the options is thematically linked to the content in each unit. The materials include a summary of each text to support students in making a selection based on their individual interests (student choice structure). The materials present teachers with several independent reading structures in the Implementing Independent Reading Guide. In addition to this “student choice” structure, teachers could choose to implement book clubs in two different structures: “one longer work, small groups” or “multiple longer works, small groups.” The materials include the pros and cons of all three structures for independent reading so that teachers can make the right choice for their students.
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The materials provide students with opportunities to respond to text-specific and text-dependent questions that help students make meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied.
The materials provide a variety of protocols to support students in speaking and listening skills. Throughout the course of the year, students participate in Socratic discussions, panel discussions, debate games, pitch decks, and performances. The materials provide opportunities across a variety of speaking and listening skills for students to demonstrate knowledge of what they are reading.
The materials include on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks, including Quick Journals and Responses to Text, are varied and frequent. Process writing is included in each unit and varies throughout the year in type, including research writing, opinion essays, narrative writing, and personal statements. The materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different genres of writing. The writing genre distribution is 33.3% argumentative, 33.3% informational/explanatory, and 33.3% narrative, which closely aligns with the grade-level writing distribution of 35/35/30 required by the standards. There are frequent opportunities across the school year for students to practice and apply writing using evidence.
The materials include grammar and usage activities and opportunities for students to interact with and acquire academic vocabulary. Materials include explicit vocabulary and grammar and usage instruction.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.
The materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments that help students make meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Each unit has four modules that provide mentor texts where students engage with the texts directly by practicing checking, analyzing, pausing, and reflecting skills. Students also read several different genre selections. The questions, writing prompts, summarizing, and graphic organizers require students to return to the text and gather evidence to support their responses. Questions vary and require students to think critically about the explicit and implicit information presented in the text. Students create inferences, analyze language, determine the best evidence to support a claim and determine the meaning of the text. Each unit has a Teacher Guide that provides support for planning and implementing text-based questions and tasks. The Teacher Guide contains the Unit Snapshot, Rationale, a section for Skills Students Will Know, Understand, and Apply and Guidance for all activities students complete. The Unit and Module Guides have sections that support the teacher in providing activities that are connected to the text. The connections to the text(s) are included in four sections: Before You Read, Read, Analyze, and Write. In addition to the support provided for the mentor texts, materials include a section to support the facilitation of Read Across Genres, Socratic Discussion, Your Portfolio, and Reflect on Your Learning.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “Fish Cheeks” by Amy Tan. After reading, students complete a Check and answer the questions, “What images from paragraph three create a negative tone and best describe the narrator’s feelings about the subject?” and “What image best tells the narrator that Robert is as embarrassed as she is?”
In Unit 3, Module 4, students read “The Difficult Path” by Grace Lin. After reading, students complete a Check and answer the questions, “Which statement best describes the message of this passage? and “Which piece of evidence provides the strongest support for the claim that Lingsi has great respect for the education she has been given?
In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Learning Rewires the Brain” by Allison Pearce Stevens and answer the question,” How does the author support the idea that glia play an important role in decision making?” Students must also use the texts in the unit to complete the writing task, “How does the author arrange their research, data, and information to explain how different types of learning and activity lead to changes in brain cells?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Guide provides general guidance for each lesson step in each unit.
In Unit 2, Module 4, students read “Down with Class Participation Grades” by Melissa Pandika. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for Summarizing. During the Lesson, the teacher is to: “Introduce the optional sentence frames online that students can use as they summarize the reading.” Teachers can have students share their summaries in a flex activity. Guidance for the teacher states, “Have students compare summaries before writing a combined summary that captures the main ideas.”
In Unit 5, Module 1, students begin reading Lucille Fletcher’s play “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part I.” The Teacher Guide provides guidance Read, Check, Pause, and Reflect. As students read the text, the Check, Pause, and Reflect section includes the following guidance:
“Assist students in switching between the Pause and Reflect questions online and recording their responses in the Student Guide.
Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses.
Remind them to record their discussion reflections in the Student Guide.”
In the Resources tab, Training Courses, materials provide video training modules for teachers, including “Establishing Literacy Routines with CERCA Slides, Direct Instruction Lessons, Skill Practice Lessons, and Six Steps for Close Reading and Writing Lessons.” The On-Demand Video Library contains on-demand training videos, such as “Must Moments in Literacy” videos, demonstrating the conditions needed for successful implementation and the common challenges. The Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, Graphic Organizers to Support Close Reading, Effective Writing, and Critical Thinking provides teachers with graphic organizers for reading texts.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.
The materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for different types of evidence-based discussions across the year’s scope of instructional materials. Each unit has a culminating speaking and listening task, such as a Socratic Discussion, a Panel Discussion, and a Pitch Deck Performance. Each Speaking and Listening Module’s Teacher Guide includes the steps to seeing the speaking and listening task to completion. These guides support the teacher in helping students prepare, carry out, and reflect on the task. The materials provide but are not limited to, a List of Unit Texts, Reflect on the Essential Question Student Page, Prepare for the Discussion Student Page, Building Knowledge Together Student Page, and a Conduct the Poll Again Student Page. These activities are moderated by the teacher with the use of the Facilitation Notes. In addition, each Facilitation Guide provides Essential and/or Recommended time frames for each task phase. Recommended speaking and listening guidance for most discussions with a structure including, but not limited to, instructional videos, completed graphic organizers, prompts, and sentence starters for struggling students. Guidance for structured student discussions includes, but is not limited to, prompts, suggested timing, rationales, different roles for participants, sentence stems, and protocol directions. Teachers facilitate discussions throughout each unit and over the course of the school year.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Direct Instruction and Skills Practice slideshow lessons in each unit, include instructions for performing each speaking and listening task. Topics and protocols include:
Rules for Discussion
Be prepared.
Define goals and roles.
Participate in a respectful way.
Ask and respond to questions.
Reflect on ideas.
How to Deliver an Oral Presentation
Keys to a strong oral presentation
Types of oral presentations
Organization
Tips for writing note cards
Presentation language - formal and informal
Appropriate use of voice, props, and gestures.
Socratic Discussions
What is a Socratic Discussion?
Steps to answer the Socratic Question
Prepare Reasoning for the Discussion
Create your argument and forming a counterargument
Respectful speaking and listening rules including expressing ideas civilly, questioning members to bring in all viewpoints, and making eye contact to show active listening.
Sentence frames provided for questions and statements to build effective discussion
Panel Discussion
What is a panel discussion?
Panel members - each bringing a different type of expertise or point of view on the topic
The Moderator and audience roles
Format - brief introduction by each panel member, questions from the moderator, questions from the audience, and brief closing by each panel member
How to prepare
Respectful speaking and listening rules including expressing ideas civilly, questioning members to bring in all viewpoints, and making eye contact to show active listening.
Sentence frames provided for questions and statements to build effective discussion
Pitch Deck
Definition of Pitch Deck
How to prepare for the pitch
How to prepare reasoning
Characteristics of a great pitch deck
Listening rules of the audience
Debate Game
Preparing reasoning and evidence for the discussion
Forming a counterargument
How to speak and listen in a Socratic Discussion
Speaking and listening rules
Questions and statements to build effective discussion
Performance
Prepare
Perform
Be a Respectful Audience Member
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains one module focused on a speaking and listening activity. The Teacher Guide for this module includes guidance for all parts of the activity.
Under Resources, Speaking and Listening, Speaking and Listening Toolkit- Grade 6, materials include a toolkit for teachers and students. This toolkit includes observation tools and guidance for each Speaking and Listening activity type in the curriculum.
In Unit 1, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Seminar on the unit’s essential question, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?”The Teacher Guide provides a step-by-step plan for the teacher to familiarize themselves with the online lessons about Socratic Discussions, the Rules of the Discussion, and the Student Guide activities. It also provides four options for setting up the discussion:
“Two discussions that change in intervals of 10-15 minutes: an inner and outer circle that switch places.
One discussion with the whole class. Prepare your classroom by putting the chairs in a circle.
Fishbowl discussion where 4-6 students engage in discussion. Others tap in at intervals to join the discussion.
Independent student groups engage in discussions.”
In the section “Build Knowledge Together,” the discussion begins. Teacher Guidance states to “Explain that students will use the provided sentence starters to support their thinking with evidence from the texts. Tell students that you will remain silent as much as possible and that you look forward to observing a student-driven discussion. When appropriate, highlight excellent examples of students’ engagement: “I don’t want to interrupt, but I wanted to briefly mention that [student x] did a great job of [behavior y], which really helps the whole class better understand [z].”After the Socratic Discussion, students complete the “Conduct the Poll Again” activity to see if they “Agree or Disagree: It is always better to know the truth.” Then, the teacher prompts students to “Reflect on their Learning” by responding to questions about the discussion: “What did they learn? Did they change any of their answers? Why or why not?”
In Unit 4, Module 7, students participate in a Panel Discussion on the unit’s essential question, “How can food be healthy, grown locally, and sustainable?” In the Teacher Guide, guidance helps the teacher prepare students for the Panel Discussion. The lesson supports students in “Understand[ing] the purpose and process of a panel discussion and be able to synthesize multiple sources to present their positions and supporting evidence.” During the Build Knowledge Together section, students engage in the discussion. Teacher Guidance states,
“Facilitate students’ organization and preparedness for the panel discussion, reminding them to have their completed Plan Your Points activity on-hand.
As needed, review salient points from the Panel Discussion lesson online and the Panel Discussion introduction in the Student Guide.
Facilitate the panel discussion, reminding panelists to support their thinking with evidence from the texts and to use the Build Knowledge Together sentence starters.
Prior to kicking off the panel discussion, allow students to practice addressing each other directly without prompting from you and using add on statements such as, “As some of the other panelists have already mentioned, “x”...”
In Unit 6, Module 6, students complete A Pitch Deck on the unit’s essential question, “How does building a growth mindset help with planning your future?” The Teacher Guide provides guidance for teachers to lead students through the step-by-step process of building a Pitch Deck. Teachers “Conduct the Poll Again” activity and Reflect on the Pitch Deck presentations in their groups by answering questions such as “What did people do well? and What could we improve?” Afterward, the teacher prompts students to answer the following questions from the Student Guide:
“What were the strongest arguments, ideas, and evidence presented?
Did your ideas about the topic change?
Did you learn more about the topic?”
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.
The materials support students’ engagement in speaking and listening tasks connected to reading and research. Over the school year, multiple opportunities to demonstrate varied speaking and listening skills are provided during the reading and writing lessons. Unit tasks include Socratic Discussions, Debates, Performances, Panel Discussions, and Pitch Decks that require students to synthesize information from the mentor texts and include evidence to support student responses during discussions with partners, small groups, and the whole class. The online Direct Instruction lessons teach students about the speaking and listening protocols. Students implement specific skills during peer feedback and reflection tasks. Opportunities to discuss multimedia sources are limited. Materials provide teacher guidance for speaking and listening opportunities.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, students participate in a Debate Game focused on the Debate Question, “What is the best way for today’s school to ensure the success of tomorrow’s students?” Students prepare for the debate by completing a graphic organizer from the Student Guide. They make a claim, locate reasons, and find evidence supporting one side of the argument. Then, students include notes about a rebuttal and closing arguments before participating in the debate.
Follow rules for collegial discussions, set specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion Question, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?” Before beginning the process, students are assigned the Direct Instruction lesson on Socratic Discussion. In the online presentation, students learn what a Socratic Discussion is and is not, how to use evidence to inform and build on ideas, and how to speak respectfully and listen effectively. For this Socratic Discussion, students create a claim and locate supporting evidence. They will also connect the claim and evidence by providing sound reasoning. In order to participate effectively, students must also prepare a counterargument. By considering what others might say in opposition to their argument, they will have the reasoning to persuade others to adopt their ideas. In the lesson, the students also learn that there are rules for respectful speaking and effective listening. “To respectfully speak, a student must:
Express ideas civilly in order to be respectful to the group.
Restate what is heard for clarity.
Question members in order to bring in all viewpoints.
Build on others’ ideas to keep the discussion moving and to add fresh insight into the topic.
In order to be an effective listener, the students must:
Take notes in order to add relevant points and ideas.
Make eye contact to show active listening.
Let a few members have a turn to speak before speaking again.
Don’t just think about what to say next. Listen to add to the exchange in a meaningful way.”
Include multimedia components (e.g., graphics, images, music, sound) and visual displays in presentations to clarify information. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Module 6, students create a Pitch Deck, a set of recorded slides as they answer the question, “How do our brains develop as we engage with formal education?” In Spark Courageous Thinking: Pitch Your Future from the Student Guide, students prepare a deck based on the slides from Plan Your Future in Modules 1 through 4. Then, they record themselves making an oral presentation about the best pathway for their future. The deck provides a visual accompaniment for the presentation. Students use a template to develop their Pitch Deck, and they include “all the elements of the research process.” The deck contains nine slides: A title Page, My Learning Style, My Academic Strengths, My Challenges, Mindset Definition, a Personal Growth Mindset Pitch, an Explanation of Growth Mindset Motto, a Mindset Plan, and a Closing Page.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Module 6, students prepare to participate in a Socratic Discussion. In the Teacher Guide, the Learning Objective states, "Students will understand the structure and methods of a Socratic discussion and be able to formulate a personal response to a Socratic question and support it with evidence from multiple sources.”Students use the “Prepare for Discussion” guide in the Student Guide to answer the question, “How do myths and traditional tales teach readers about values and human behavior?” Students are reminded “to support their thinking with evidence from the text and personal experience.”
Review the key ideas expressed and demonstrate understanding of multiple perspectives through reflection and paraphrasing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Student Guide, Explore the Theme, students provide their Experiences, Emotions, Opinions of others, and Beliefs and values in relation to the question, “Who or what has changed your perspective?” Students use their personal responses to the question, “Who or what has the greatest influence on changing your perspective?” to approach the readings in the unit. As they read the texts, they compare their own perspective to that of the author or the characters in the stories. Students begin the unit by completing their own Concept Map in the Student Guide. Students read and discuss multiple texts to develop a deeper understanding of information to prepare for the Socratic Discussion in Module 6. Students use their background and the texts’ evidence to prepare to discuss the Essential Question, “How can looking at the world through someone else’s eyes change our perception?”
Interpret information presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain how it contributes to a topic, text, or issue under study. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 4, students view the online lesson Compare and Contrast Literature in Different Mediums. After reading the script of the play, students learn about different types of mediums used to tell a story, the advantages and disadvantages of different mediums, and how the medium impacts the reader’s experience. Students listen to the live production of Sorry, Wrong Number by Lucille Fletcher as it was performed on the program Suspense by Dramatists Play Service, Inc. and Old Time Radio Archive. Questions from the Reading Check ask the students to respond to include: “Which of the following statements best describe Agnes Moorehead’s portrayal of Mrs. Stevenson when compared to the script?” and “How does the use of sound effects contribute to the listener’s experience of the play?”
Delineate a speaker’s argument and specific claims, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 1, students read “It’s What’s Outside That Counts” by Catherine Brown. In this informational news article, students consider the Guiding Question, “How does food waste negatively impact the planet?” In this article, the students analyze the passage to determine the meaning of words and phrases. As the students use the lesson from Apply Your Learning to reflect on the author’s word choice, they find the strength in the argument based on the author’s word choice and clues in the article that express the issues with food waste. As students develop their Argument Builder from the Student Guide, they locate evidence in the text that responds to the question, “How is the term ‘waste’ defined and used throughout the text?” Students trace the author’s word choice, phrases, and arguments throughout the text to provide examples of how the word waste is used and how readers can prevent it. Students share their ideas in small groups and listen to each other in order to add ideas or incorporate feedback to strengthen their initial argument.
Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 6, the teacher assigns the online Direct Instruction for a Socratic Discussion. This generic lesson provides the Steps to Answer the Socratic Question. The lesson guides the students to answer the Socratic question by providing the following information:
“To answer the question, state a claim or an overall argument.
Then, identify the reason you believe the claim and support them with evidence from the text.
Explain why the evidence supports your argument using reasoning.”
Students must present their ideas during a Socratic Discussion, following the lesson’s guidance for Respectful Speaking and Effective Listening. Some of these ideas include: “Express ideas civilly in order to be respectful to the group, [b]uild on others’ ideas to keep the discussion moving and to add fresh insight into the topic, and [m]ake eye contact to show active listening.”
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i.
The materials include on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks, including Quick Journals and Responses to Text, are varied and frequent. The Before Reading journal prompts connect to the text’s topic, theme, or purpose. Process writing tasks include various types of writing using multiple texts as sources. Students follow standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing during process writing. Process writing is included in each unit and varies throughout the year in type, including research writing, opinion essays, narrative writing, and personal statements. Students can write to connect to the topic before reading, summarize texts, analyze the author’s style and writing, and make claims. The materials provide students with guidance and support for each task, including but not limited to structured graphic organizers, models, and rubrics. All writing tasks can be completed in the ThinkCERCA online platform, which provides graphic organizers and opportunities to use technology to produce and publish the writings.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 2, students complete a Quick Journal prior to reading “Fish Cheeks” by Amy Tan. The journal prompt states, “Describe a time when you did not want to participate in a family activity, custom, or tradition. How did your need for independence affect others? Then, students answer the question, “Why might we sometimes feel the need to separate from our family identities as we grow?
In Unit 5, Module 2, students read “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part II” by Lucille Fletcher. Then, they write a summary of the text and later craft an argumentative response to the prompt, “How does the playwright use miscommunication to create humor, suspense, and tension between Mrs. Stevenson and the other characters?”
In Unit 6, Module 7, students Connect with the writing lesson by writing a brief response to the following question, “What is a personal interest that you might like to write about? Why?” When students write their Personal Statement for this unit, they can refer back to this piece of writing to support their response to the Writing Prompt, “The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?”
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students read texts focusing on the question, “How Do We Design Better Schools?” Students review an online Direct Instruction lesson about Writing the Argumentative Essay. Then, they read and analyze the Student Exemplar, “Why Getting Rid of Participation Grades Will Improve Learning Environments” by Mateo Burgos. In the Writing Lesson, students read “Portfolio: Writing Your Argumentative Essay” by Alicia Patton. They answer five multiple-choice questions and write a summary of the text. Then, students use their Argument Builder from the Student Guide, along with their summary and ideas from the personal writing, to generate a response to the Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what single change to your learning environment or school’s design would have the greatest positive impact for student success?” Students Create a Draft online and follow the directions for the Edit the Draft Together task. During this assignment, students also do a self-assessment of the draft and then collaborate with peers to evaluate the writing. Lastly, they revise and edit the draft online before submitting their final work to the teacher.
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper on the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the most pressing issues and solutions surrounding food sustainability?” The Teacher Guide provides guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the Research Paper. Students read “How to Secure the Future of Food” by Mateo Burgos during the pre-write exercises. Then, they “use the online rubric for the lesson and give each aspect of the essay a score.” This activity provides students access to a model essay so they understand their writing goals. During the Editing lesson, the teacher prompts the students to complete the Edit the Draft Together activity from the student guide. Students are advised to “Use the online rubric for the lesson, checking each box when [they] find evidence that [they] have achieved the criteria.”
In Unit 6, Module 7, students read several magazine articles and informational texts to answer the Essential Question, “How do your brains develop as we engage with formal education?” Students determine a personal interest they might like to write about before reading a selection titled “Portfolio: Writing Your Personal Statement,” which explains the purpose and elements of the writing. Then, using a graphic organizer, the students develop their responses and create a draft of their writing using the online platform. Before submitting the work for a final grade, students edit and review it.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 2, students read “How the Teens of St. Pete Youth Farm Fight Food Insecurity, One Harvest at a Time” by Gabrielle Calise. The students complete the online five-question multiple-choice questions. If they miss a question, they use the Raise Your Score activity in the Student Guide to consider which of the multiple-choice answers must be right. In the Student Guide, they write down the question they missed and then write a prediction to help find the correct answer.
In Unit 7, Module 2, students read “Echo and Narcissus” by Roger Lancelyn Green and write a summary. Students complete the summary in the ThinkCERCA platform. Sentence frames can be accessed if needed.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.
The materials include a year-long writing program consisting of an 33.3/33.3/33.3 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing activities, which closely reflects the 35/35/30 distribution required by the standards. Throughout the year, students receive writing opportunities in each unit. Many of the opportunities focus on argumentative writing skills that are introduced by the acronym CERCA which standards for Claims, Evidence, Reasoning, Counterarguments, and Audience. The materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year to write in response to tasks that are directly related to the texts and essential questions for each unit, including formal Portfolio writing tasks. While teachers have the option of prompting students to write at the end of each module and prompts are provided, there are only two to three required “essential” process writing tasks in each unit; the optional tasks are referred to as “complementary prompts.” Some writing instruction is included throughout the materials through a series of slide decks that present guidance for students in planning, drafting, and revising. The Teacher Guide includes extra writing instruction guidance in Show and Tell, and Teach Academic Writing Skills boxes. Rubrics included require students to implement the elements of writing as required by the standards.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Two units addresses argumentative writing. Portfolio writing assignments include an Argumentative Writing Essay in Unit 2 and a Literary Analysis in Unit 7. Over seven units, 33.3% (5)of the writing opportunities are argumentative.
Unit 1: 0
Unit 2: 2
Unit 3: 0
Unit 4: 0
Unit 5: 0
Unit 6: 0
Unit 7: 3
Three units address informative/explanatory writing. Portfolio writing assignments include Research Writing in Unit 4 and a cause-and-effect essay in Unit 5. Over seven units, 33.3% (5) of the writing opportunities are informative/explanatory.
Unit 1: 0
Unit 2: 0
Unit 3: 0
Unit 4: 2
Unit 5: 2
Unit 6: 1
Unit 7: 0
Three units address narrative writing. Portfolio writing assignments include a Personal Narrative in Unit 1, a Short Story in Unit 3, and a personal statement in Unit 6. Over seven units, 33.3% (5) of the writing opportunities are narrative:
Unit 1: 2
Unit 2: 0
Unit 3: 2
Unit 4: 0
Unit 5: 0
Unit 6: 1
Unit 7: 0
Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay for the Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what single change to your learning environment or school’s design would have the greatest positive impact on student success?” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the essay. In the Pre-Writing activities, students “complete online lessons to support their writing.” The Teacher Guide provides the following instructions for this portion of the lesson:
Learning to build a strong argument equips students with the ability to formulate a claim, support it with relevant evidence, and use logical reasoning. Sequence, cohesion, and transitions all add to the clarity and coherence of writing and make ideas more accessible to readers. The writing process develops systematic writing skills from brainstorming, revising, editing to composing.
Explain that conclusions serve as the final opportunity to leave a lasting impression on the audience and reinforce the key points in the argument.”
Students read the Student Exemplar, “Why Getting Rid of Participation Grades Will Improve Learning Environments” by Mateo Burgos. A five-question Check follows the piece. After scoring the exemplar, students score it. The Teacher Guide now includes the following guidance for this section of the lesson: Show and Tell: Model for students how to engage with the scoring process and to understand the criteria used to determine quality writing. Point to an example from the text and share how it meets/doesn’t meet and exemplify the criteria in the rubric. See answer key for ideas. See Best Practices: Student Scoring.”
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a Research paper for the Writing Prompt that they determine. They read the Topic Overview in the online lesson and learn that reading sources to help them learn more is known as inquiry. After that, they use online lessons and activities from the Student Guide to draft their research paper. he Teacher Guide includes guidance for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the essay. In the Pre-Writing activities, students “complete online lessons to support their writing.”The Teacher Guide provides the following instructions for this portion of the lesson:
“Students will have thought a great deal about their topic and shared much of their research with others. They will also have a lot of notes and resources to work with. Now it is time to put it all together in a formal paper.
Encourage students to take notes using Cornell Notes.”
Students read the Student Exemplar, “How to Secure the Future of Food” by Mateo Burgos. A five-question Check follows the piece. After completing the questions, the Teacher Guide includes the following information: “Show and Tell: Model for students how to engage with the scoring process and to understand the criteria used to determine quality writing. Point to an example from the text and share how it meets/doesn’t meet and exemplify the criteria in the rubric. See answer key for ideas. See Best Practices: Student Scoring.”
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Unit 1, Module 7, students write a personal narrative for the Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Write a personal narrative about a moment in your life when you shared a side of yourself that you were afraid to show others.” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for for Pre-Writing, Drafting, and Editing the essay. In the Preview section of the lesson, the Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for the teacher, Teach Academic Writing Skills: Before students begin writing their personal narratives, have them revisit their prewriting experiences to review details about the unit’s theme. The Direct Instruction lesson, Beginnings in Narrative Writing, provides examples that students can leverage as they write their own narratives. The lesson also offers guidance in writing the opening of a personal narrative and highlights the importance of concrete sensory details in narrative writing. During Pre-Writing, students read the Narrative Writing Rubric.The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for teachers in this section of the lesson: Show and Tell: Model for students how to understand the criteria used to determine quality writing to help them engage with the scoring process. Point to an example from the text and share how it compares to the criteria in the rubric. See answer key for ideas. See Best Practices: Student Scoring. Show and Tell: Supplement the examples in the texts with a model from your own experience. Use a hook, something that illustrates a key moment in your story and entices the reader to want to read on. (“The moment I walked across the stage and accepted my trophy, I knew that I would never feel the same about my ability to succeed.”). Then, ask students to discuss how the sentence impacted their interest in the story. After students map their narratives, they engage in a Make it Vivid activity. The Teacher Guide provides the following guidance for this section of the lesson: Show and Tell: Help students craft vivid paragraphs. Choose a feeling from their personal inventory, like “reflective,” and set the scene—a sunny day. To paint a picture, use repetition, synonyms, images, and analogies. (“In the bright sunlight, the world seemed like my palette, but I wasn’t sure what to paint. Everything seemed possible, but the direction was unknown as I stood at an intersection in a quiet part of the city.”) In the Edit the Draft Together section of the lesson, students engage with peers to revise and edit their draft. The Teacher Guide provides the following instructions for this portion of the lesson:
“Explain that students will use the Personal Narrative Writing Rubric to peer edit their narratives in pairs or small groups.
Instruct students to read their final drafts and make specific suggestions for final edits.”
After peer feedback , students reflect on their writing and how they can improve it.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Should Kids Get Homework?” by Sarah Wood. In the online Writing Lesson, students begin by writing a summary of the article. This helps them organize their ideas to Develop an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “Write an argumentative essay about whether the author provides more convincing arguments for or against homework.” Students formulate claims, and add reasons and evidence. They can click the “Need help getting started?” link to find sentence frames to support their writing.
Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Module 4, students read “Jenny and the Night Women” by the Melissa Albert. They Develop an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does Melissa Albert’s modern take develop the theme of greed and its impact on human behavior. Use details from the story about Jenny, the main character, and her parents in order to write how people changes as a result of their greed.” The online lesson guides students through the development of writing a claim that is supported by reasons, evidence, and reasoning. Students also address counterarguments in the draft of the response.
Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students develop an argumentative essay to answer the following question, “Based on your readings, what single change to your learning environment or school’s design would have the greatest positive impact on student success?” After selecting and mapping the argument In the Student Guide, the students complete the Make It Powerful activity. In this activity, the students complete a graphic organizer to change three neutral words into words with a positive or negative connotation to “appeal to the readers’ emotions and sense of urgency surrounding the issues.”
Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students complete the online Direct Instruction lesson on argument writing, including formal style guidance. The lesson explains the need for objective and unbiased language in their essay, "writing from the third person” and “avoiding slang and contractions.”
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay. They complete the online Direct Instruction lesson on Writing the Argumentative Essay. During this lesson, they learn that in a conclusion, they will “Restate [their] claim and include a call to action.” They also learn that in the conclusion, they can “add a final statement that tells readers why [their] topic matters, or ways this topic can be explored further.” When they prepare to write the conclusion, they must “provide a well-crafted conclusion that builds on and captures the writer’s argument, without merely repeating the claims.” Students then read the Student Exemplar, “Why Getting Rid of Participation Grades Will Improve Learning Environments” by Mateo Burgos. Then, they engage in a lesson to Score this Example. Students analyze all parts of the essay but pay particular attention to the conclusion, scoring it between 1 and 5 to get an idea of how to prepare a conclusion for an argumentative essay. They also analyze the conclusions from Module 1 and Module 2 reading as examples of advanced levels of well-crafted conclusions that build on the writer’s argument. Students apply this learning when they write their own argumentative essays.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce a topic; organize ideas, concepts, and information, using strategies such as definition, classification, comparison/contrast, and cause/effect; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 3, students read “Students Keep Hundreds of Pounds of Food Waste From Entering Landfills” by Bridget O’Shea. Then, they write a response to the prompt, “How do the different perspectives in the article emphasize the impact of the student’s work preventing food waste?” Students receive specific instruction on organizing their writing and use a graphic organizer to plan:
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence, and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers” Students can click the “Need help getting started?” link for a series of questions that include possible sentence frames for organizing their writing.
In Unit 5, Module 6, students engage in an online Direct Instruction lesson for Writing the Cause-and-Effect Essay. As they learn about the organization of this type of essay, they learn that the introduction “contains a hook to engage the readers.” As they develop their essay, they begin with a claim, or “main idea or thesis, that clearly previews the focus of the piece and fully answers the question or prompt.” Students choose [their] Focus and “Develop a draft claim/thesis that captures how Mrs. Stevenson’s dialogue, behaviors, and action contribute to the finale of the play.” As they share [their] essays, the focus is on the introduction, so the students discuss what their introductions look like and if the claim or thesis statement reveals a roadmap for developing the essay.
Develop the topic with relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper for the prompt, “Based on the readings and other research, what are the most pressing issues surrounding food sustainability?” A graphic organizer to help students Map [Their] Research Paper is provided in the Student Guide. Students plan their claim, and in Step 2, they locate key information from the readings that help the reader understand the problem. Students “select at least three pieces of evidence that will be the basis for [their] three body paragraphs.”
Use appropriate transitions to clarify the relationships among ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a Cause-and-Effect essay for the prompt, “Analyze Mrs. Stevenson’s behavior throughout the play. How do her character’s mannerisms and actions affect the final outcome of the play?” After students have finished their initial draft, they pair up with others to look for sentences that need transitions. In the Make It Flow exercise from the Student Guide, students look at the essay to determine if transitions would improve the overall organization, main claim, sub-claims, and choppy sentences. In addition, the activity provides possible transitions to clarify relationships such as first, then, also, and for example. The worksheet also suggests steps for revising different areas of the paper to clarify relationships.
In Unit 4, Module 8, students complete a research paper. The Student Guide includes a rubric for students. In order to earn points for Coherence, students must write a clearly structured paper. The notes in this section state that “effective transitions connect ideas to show how the information clearly supports the claim to create a cohesive, unified piece of writing.” During the Revise and Edit Draft part of this writing piece, the teacher prompts students to pair up and give feedback on their partners’ essays, “us[ing] the rubric to evaluate each other’s work.” Then, students revise their work based on the feedback they receive.
Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a Cause-and-Effect essay for the prompt, “Analyze Mrs. Stevenson’s behavior throughout the play. How do her character’s mannerisms and actions affect the final outcome of the play?” In the online portion of the writing lesson, students read “Portfolio: Writing Your Cause-and Effect Essay” by Alicia Patton. In the first paragraph, students are encouraged to use “thoughtful organization and the precise use of word choices and transitions to make their writing clear.” As students draft their essays, the online link for “Need help getting started?” provides some helpful notes about choosing language that will persuade [their] readers to agree with [their] argument.” During this stage of the essay, they are to use vocabulary words to convey information about radio plays, plot structure, and character motivations.
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper. The Student Guide includes a rubric for students. In order to earn points for Coherence, students must write a clearly structured paper. The notes in this section state that “effective transitions connect ideas to show how the information clearly supports the claim to create a cohesive, unified piece of writing.” During the Revise and Edit Draft part of this writing piece, the teacher prompts students to pair up and give feedback on their partners’ essays, “us[ing] the rubric to evaluate each other’s work.” Then, students revise their work based on the feedback they receive.
Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Module 8, students read the “Final Informative Rubric.” In order to earn “Audience Appeal,” students must write responses that maintain “a formal style and accurate English grammar.” In order to support students, the online lesson for Module 8 requires the students to formulate a research question that interests them. In the Outline, students write the main claim they want to use to answer the question. As they progress, the paper must maintain a formal and objective tone in order to earn credit for “Audience Appropriate Language based on the final rubric.”
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the information or explanation presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a Cause-and-Effect essay for the prompt, “Analyze Mrs. Stevenson’s behavior throughout the play. How do her character’s mannerisms and actions affect the final outcome of the play?” As they draft their essays, they can click on the link for “Need help getting started?” This section provides a sentence frame that helps them write a “brief conclusion that wraps up [their] argument.” The sentence frame, “Based on details from the story, ____’s decision to _____ led to ______,” provides support for developing a conclusion that wraps up the argument and reinforces the claim.
In Unit 4, Module 8, students research the most pressing issues surrounding food and write an essay detailing what they learned. Students plan the writing of their paper, including the conclusion. Students answer the questions, “What is your call to action? What do you want readers to remember?” Writing guidance explains to students that they should restate their claim, summarize the problem, and provide a solution.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Engage and orient the reader by establishing a context and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 7, students write a personal narrative that answers the Writing Prompt, “Write a personal narrative about a moment in your life when you shared a side of yourself that you were afraid to show others.” In this essay, students are guided through the essay's drafting process. During this online activity, they can click on the “Need help getting started?” link. Here, they can find help structuring the narrative by addressing the story's beginning, middle, and end. The support link provides ideas for the beginning by prompting students to introduce the characters, describe the setting, establish a point of view, and set up the main conflict. In the middle, students are encouraged to use dialogue and action to demonstrate what the characters think and feel and how they are affected by the problem or conflict. In the end, the support provides three hints to effectively end the essay:
“Solve the problem or resolve the conflict.
Answer any last questions from the story.
Leave your readers pleased with the story.”
Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 7, students write a personal narrative that answers the Writing Prompt, “Write a personal narrative about a moment in your life when you shared a side of yourself that you were afraid to show others.” In the Student Guide, Explore the Theme, students learn that there are narrative techniques that develop the experiences, events, and/or characters. The techniques include using engaging dialogue, planning for strategic pacing, and developing vivid descriptions. After Mapping their Personal Narrative, students return to the essays and pair with another writer. The pair “determine[s] how [they] might choose words that would help [them] develop the image in greater detail. Students complete a graphic organizer by placing three Generic Nouns in the left-hand column. In the right-hand column, they practice using vivid adjectives to paint a picture, adding words that indicate the size, shape, color, age, quality, or another attribute of the noun.”
Use a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence and signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 7, students write a short story based on the Writing Prompt, “Write a short story set in a realistic or historical setting that addresses a changed perspective the main character has that influences their ideas, actions, and choices.” In the Student Guide, they complete the Edit the Draft Together exercise with another student. First, students complete a self-assessment of their own draft. They use the online rubric to check boxes where they have achieved the criteria. Coherence is one of the criteria where the students must check boxes. One of the boxes states that the essay “guides readers through a logical and naturally connected sequence of events using a variety of transitional words to clarify the order of events and the shifts in setting.” After evaluating their success in this area, a peer reviews the paper to ensure they have created coherence based on this rubric point.
Use precise words and phrases, relevant descriptive details, and sensory language to convey experiences and events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Module 7, students write a personal statement that answers the Writing Prompt, “The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?” Students complete the activity “Make It Vivid” from the Student Guide. In this activity, students identify specific adjectives that they might use to make the experience more specific and add further color for the reader. In their statement, they add language that reveals how they felt about an object or specific moment.
Provide a conclusion that follows from the narrated experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 7, students write a short story that answers the Writing Prompt, “Write a short story set in a realistic or historical setting that addresses a changed perspective the main character has that influences their ideas, actions, and choices.” In the online version of the Direct Instruction lesson, students learn that a narrative conclusion should ensure that “the consequences of solving the problem or conflict are made clear.” So, using the online graphic organizer to Draft their story, students can click the “Need help getting started?” link. This link takes them to a list of what to include at the end of a short story. The notes suggest that students:
“Solve the problem or resolve the conflict.
Answer any last questions from the story.
Leave your readers pleased with the story.”
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 2, students read Sorry, Wrong Number: Part II by Lucille Fletcher. After reading, students Develop a response that answers the writing prompt, “Fletcher uses humor and suspense to create drama and entertain the audience. Review the character interactions in Part II. How do you see these strategies used in the interactions below?” They create a claim and add reasons, evidence, reasoning, and a counterargument that reflects elements of the memoir to answer the question.
In Unit 7, Module 4, students read “Jenny and the Night Women'' by Melissa Albert. After reading, the students develop an argument that answers the writing prompt, “How does Melissa Albert’s modern tale develop the theme of greed and its impact on human behavior? Use details from the story about Jenny, the main character, and her parents in order to write about how people change as a result of their greed.” The task requires students to use information from the fairy tale to develop a claim, reasons, evidence, reasoning, and a counterargument to answer the prompt.
Indicator 1K
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.
The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to complete evidence-based writing tasks across the school year. The Teacher Guide provides a Module Overview, which identifies the evidence-based writing prompt and genre. Writing opportunities are largely focused on developing and planning an argument, though analysis and synthesis are also included. Each unit includes opportunities to write claims about the text and support the claim with reasons and evidence from the text. In each unit module, the Write section includes tasks such as summarizing the selection, developing and building an argument, completing a draft, and reviewing the draft. Students work with a peer to complete graphic organizers or obtain feedback that occurs frequently during writing. When drafting, students have the opportunity to use an Automated Feedback feature for grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling, but the tool does not provide support for strengthening the argument. However, not all of the drafting tasks are required assignments throughout the program. While some of the module's writing pieces are essential for completion, most are optional. During the Closing of the Lessons, students reflect and share progress as a whole class. At the end of each unit, Your Portfolio writing tasks provide opportunities to write a short story, research paper, literary analysis, personal narrative, cause and effect essay, and argumentative essay. These are closely tied to the texts in their respective units and often require the synthesis of multiple texts. The Student Guide provides several graphic organizers to help students organize their thoughts and text evidence to support their claims. The Teacher Guide provides guidance for specific writing instruction throughout the materials, including reasons for the writing instruction focus, what students should be able to do, and what to focus on to grow as a writer. There is direct instruction guidance for teachers to implement. Teachers and students have access to slideshow lessons and support in the Student Guide. The materials include scaffolds for students in the Student and Teacher Guides.
Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Should Kids Get Homework?” by Sarah Wood. In the online Write section, Develop, students write an argument to the prompt, “Trace and evaluate the author’s evidence for and against homework.” Teacher materials provide a Lesson Summary that identifies the two areas of direct instruction for argumentative writing as citing evidence to support analysis and integrating evidence effectively. There is support for direct instruction, including a statement that explains the reasoning behind the direct instruction, previous learning, and next steps. Teacher materials include a Show and Tell strategy that provides teacher guidance on how to teach students how to integrate evidence with effective word choices. Teachers group students and have them brainstorm verbs that they could use to introduce a quote. Teacher materials point out how to find synonyms for commonly used verbs such as states and provide other words, including offers, claims, and explains. Additionally, there are Teacher Tips that offer suggestions and considerations for teachers. Finally, the Teacher Will section provides the following guidance:
“Lead students through the Direct Instruction presentations prior to having students review them on their own and complete the assessments. A list of key academic terms for the unit is available in the Student Guide. Students may also record key definitions in their Vocabulary Notebooks.
Explain that by learning to identify various types of evidence, such as facts, statistics, examples, and expert opinions, students can evaluate the credibility and relevance of information.
Explain that understanding how evidence supports claims and ideas helps students construct well-supported arguments and make informed decisions.
Guide students in incorporating evidence to support their claims with factual information, examples, statistics, and make their arguments more convincing”.
The Students Will section lists student movements, including:
“Learn how to identify various types of evidence, including facts, statistics, examples, and expert opinions.
Learn how to support claims and ideas, and how to cite evidence in their writing.
Learn the importance of and process of effectively integrating evidence.
Record key definitions in their Vocabulary Notebooks.”
After developing a claim, locating evidence, and formulating reasons, students answer the question, “Which side of the argument is more convincing based on the evidence?” The Teacher Guide includes steps such as:
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.
Have students drop their drafts into the drafting space and develop their CERCAs.” The teacher materials provide the same instruction.
Students share their arguments in small groups, using the Student Checklist for Peer and Self Editing.
In Unit 3, Module 3, students read “The Difficult Path” by Ken Liu. In the Write section, students write a summary of the text. In Plan, Develop, students come up with an argument for the prompt, “How does the author’s choice to use first person point of view in the story help illuminate the strength of the narrator, Lingsi, as she travels her difficult path?” Students are guided online to write a claim, add reasons and evidence, provide reasoning, and a counterargument. In the “Need help getting started?” link, students can access a definition for each part of the argument. In addition, there are more sentence stems to help them begin. In the Writing tab, sentence frames are provided for each required component. The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance:
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence, and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers."
Students share their arguments in small groups, using the Student Checklist for Peer and Self Editing. As students Draft their responses, the Teacher Guide includes the following guidance: “Feedback Focus: Encourage students to share different aspects of their CERCA drafts to ensure they have included a strong claim, supportive reasons, and evidence.” Teachers may click on the ThinkCERCA Argumentative Writing Feedback Bank provided in the Writing Resources in the Feedback Guidance document to find examples of writing feedback they can give students based on how well they are performing on certain skills against the rubric. For example, if a student is performing at a 3 out of 5, the teacher can say: “You’re on the right track because you’ve included evidence from the text! Now, reread your reasons and the evidence that follows each one. Does the evidence really support the reason it’s paired with? Is it credible? If not, revise!”
In Unit 7, Module 7, students view a Direct Instruction slide deck on “Writing the Literary Analysis. Prior to writing the analysis, students learn “What core elements to use when organizing a literary analysis, how to structure a literary analysis, and how to create an effective argument with supporting details.” After viewing the presentation, students read the Student Exemplar, “Always Wanting More” by Tessa Hudson. Then, they employ the lessons that they learned about writing a literary analysis by developing a literary analysis for the prompt, “Using the myths and the traditional tales in the unit, compare the themes of at least two of the stories to explain how they convey values and human behavior.” Students complete online assignments in Plan and Develop before writing their Literary Analysis draft. In the Student Guide, students Read the Final Argumentative Rubric, Score the Example, Practice Providing Feedback for the example, and Choose Texts for Comparison. Once students develop a sound background in writing this type of essay, they use their selected texts to Compare Similarities, Analyze Differences, and Finalize Your Analysis tasks. In the Teacher Guide, the following Facilitation Notes are available for teachers as students write their essays:
“Students will remain online to complete the Develop and Draft section for ‘Portfolio: Writing Your Literary Analysis.’
Circulate as needed to help students who need support.”
Throughout each step of the writing process, there are scaffolds such as, but not limited to, specific vocabulary to translate, adjusted versions of graphic organizers, suggested anchor charts, and technology features such as voice to text typing.
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, students read three informational news articles, three opinion articles, view a video, and view two visual texts about education and school issues. In Module 7, they write an argument for the prompt, “Based on your readings, what single change to your learning environment or school’s design would have the greatest positive impact for student success?” The Plan and Develop section includes a Text tab reiterating the essential elements of The Claim, Reasons, Evidence, Reasoning, and Counterargument. It also provides an example of an Outline that students could use to organize their essays and ideas for Composing and Revising. In each section, students use Pause and Reflect questions to review their own ideas and structure:
“How does the reasoning in the example support the argument as well as explain why the evidence is important to it?
Do you think the example provided for the counterargument and rebuttal effectively strengthened the original argument about outlawing food and harmful ingredients? What did the rebuttal provide that made the argument stronger?
Which part of the argument do you anticipate being the most difficult for you to write? Once you have completed your draft, consider choosing that part to focus on in a peer edit.”
Students also complete a Map Your Argument activity from the Student Guide. In this assignment students develop a Hook, Claim, Counterclaim, Evidence, and Rhetorical Appeals that they want to use to write their essay. The Evidence section requires reading the articles closely to find strong, credible evidence so that the students have the information to follow these instructions: “As you read the texts, the writers used strong and credible evidence in the form of summaries, quotations, and examples that supported the arguments and issues. What evidence have you evaluated from your readings that supports your claim and allows you to further support your argument with reasoning?”
In Unit 5, Module 6, students complete the online Direct Instruction lesson for “Writing the Cause-and-Effect Essay” and read a Student Exemplar, “Mrs. Stevenson” by Ellery Rohlfing. Students complete the Choose Your Focus activity in the Student Guide to begin their cause-and-effect essay. They use resources from the Unit Review, Planning Your Informative Essay, and Consider Various Approaches to Your Cause-and-Effect Essay before building a claim to answer the following Portfolio Writing Prompt, “Analyze Mrs. Stevenson’s behavior throughout the play. How do her character’s behaviors, dialogue, and actions affect the final outcome of the play?” Then, using a graphic organizer, students Map [Their] Cause-and Effect Essay by organizing their ideas about how “the tension and conflicts in the play develop the theme.” When the students return to the online lesson in the Plan and Develop section, they can view the rubric for the essay. They will find that the Evidence must be “Well-chosen, relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information [that] supports the claim and present[s] a thorough explanation of the topic. The Reasoning must be “Detailed explanations [that] show how facts and details support the claim and effectively link the evidence to the claim for the reader.” In order to meet those expectations, students must use credible information from the texts provided in the unit.
In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Build Your Brain!” by R. Douglas Fields. Prior to reading the text, students engage in two online Direct Instruction lessons. The first lesson is “The Purposes of Personal Statement Writing, and the second is “Using Examples and Anecdotes to Explain Ideas.” In the later lesson, students learn that “Examples are detailed accounts of information that explain a general rule,” such as: ‘Dogs are one type of pet that requires a lot of work.’ The statement names the pet but does not provide a personal example. On the other hand, the statement ‘When I was a kid, I walked my family’s dog three times a day’ is an anecdote because it shares a personal experience.” Students read the text and look for supporting evidence that answers the Writing Prompt, “What are the most impactful anecdotes and examples that the author uses to build an argument about what teenagers should be doing to maximize their brain growth?” The Student Guide includes a task where students complete an argument builder identifying their claim, text evidence, and reasoning in response to the prompt.
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
The materials provide explicit instruction on grammar and usage standards, and opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of grammar skills in context are available. The materials include a Language and Styles Best Practices Toolkit, which is presented as a resource “for teachers and students to improve audience outcomes on writing rubrics.” This toolkit provides key definitions, generic examples, and a strategy for that particular skill, including capitalization and spelling, punctuation, end punctuation, subjects and predicates, subject-verb agreement, tense, commas, varied sentence structures, redundancy, clarification, modifiers, parallelism, formal and objective style, active and passive language, and style. The materials also include direct, explicit instruction that scaffolds instruction of grammar and usage standards, especially for how students apply the skills in larger writing contexts. The Direct Instruction slideshows include 26 grammar topics. Students practice grade-level grammar standard lessons through a mix of online lessons and corresponding tasks in the Student Guide. Teachers facilitate learning by helping students move to the next online module, moving students into pairs or small groups, having students read or share aloud, having students reflect on takeaways at the close of the module, and monitoring learning progress. Illuminating Key Concepts sections in the Teacher Guides provide additional teacher guidance on teaching specific grammar and usage skills throughout the lessons. The lessons are connected to reading a text and answering questions in the Write to Impress, Build Vocabulary, Citing Evidence, Understanding Author’s Craft, or Sharpen Your Sentences tasks. These opportunities to practice grammar skills give a brief explanation of the standard with examples, general instructions that tell students to experiment with the skill and apply it to writing, and a chart to complete with single-sentence responses to prompts. While there is evidence of focused work for spelling, it is not present throughout the modules. Using quotations and correct citations is addressed by reminding students to review an online MLA Style Manual. In essay writing, grading rubrics state students should follow standard conventions, and teachers are to use the Language and Style Guide for instruction of specific skills during Module 7, Your Portfolio.
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to ensure that pronouns are in the proper case (subjective, objective, possessive). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 2, students read “Fish Cheeks” by Amy Tan. They engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, they write sentences responding to the Writing Prompt, “What specific kinds of imagery does the author use to communicate the tension that the narrator feels about her cultural identity?” Students review an example of a sentence written with subjective pronouns, and they use that model to write one sentence with an objective pronoun and a sentence with a possessive pronoun. In the Teacher Guide, “Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Pronouns”, the teacher is directed, “For further support in discussing pronouns, see the Direct Instruction Lesson, which covers the purpose and functions of pronouns.” This lesson includes a slide show defining pronouns, examples of sentences with subject and object pronouns, possessive pronouns, intensive pronouns, relative pronouns, using antecedents, and avoiding inappropriate shifts in pronoun person. A five-question quiz follows. The teacher is directed to review these concepts after completing the Direct Instruction Lesson. There is a Skills Practice activity available, which consists of an interactive slide show with definitions of different types of pronouns and 15 embedded questions for the students to demonstrate understanding.
Students have opportunities to use intensive pronouns. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 4, students read “Ice” by Graham Salisbury. Students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, they write sentences that use intensive pronouns to emphasize something or indicate a surprise. Students create a sentence using myself as an intensive pronoun. They repeat the process using himself, herself, or itself as an intensive pronoun. Then, they write a final sentence using ourselves, yourselves, or themselves as an intensive pronoun. In the Teacher Guide, “Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Pronouns”, the definition of intensive pronouns is provided. The teacher is directed to “review the Write to Impress activity. Before students begin, share your own example and ask students to think about how the intensive pronoun adds to the meaning of the sentence.” There is a Skills Practice activity available, which consists of an interactive slide show with definitions of different types of pronouns and 15 embedded questions for the students to demonstrate understanding.
Students have opportunities to recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in pronoun number and person. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “The Twin Heroes” by Alphonso O. Stafford and engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students read and focus on how the short story demonstrates the appropriate shifts in pronouns. For this assignment, students correct inappropriate shifts in pronouns by rewriting incorrect examples with correct pronoun usage. In the Teacher Guide, “Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Pronouns, the teacher is prompted, “Begin by asking students to recall and share common pronouns (him, her, they, we, you, etc.) Tell students about the importance of consistent pronoun usage in writing. Readers can get confused when a writer changes or uses pronouns inconsistently.” They read the instructions for the activity together, then students are to complete it independently to fix the pronoun errors.
Students have opportunities to recognize and correct vague pronouns (i.e., ones with unclear or ambiguous antecedents). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write a cause-and-effect essay responding to the prompt, “Analyze Mrs. Stevenson’s behavior throughout the play. How do her character’s mannerisms and actions affect the final outcome of the play?” The Student Guide includes an activity, Make it Flow, where students revise by searching their essay for “pronouns such as that, this, these, those, it.” Students’ instructions state: “Determine whether using the pronoun is better than repeating the noun or noun phrase to which it refers.” There is no direct instruction for pronouns here, However, later, in the Teacher Guide during the Edit the Draft Together lesson, materials instruct the teacher: “Use the Pronouns slide linked in the Language and Style Toolkit.” The slide includes rules for using pronouns and examples of intensive pronouns, pronoun shifts, vague pronouns, and proper pronoun cases.
In Unit 7, Module 7, students draft a literary analysis to answer the Writing Prompt, “Using the myths and the traditional tales in the unit, compare the themes of at least two of the stories to explain how they convey values and human behavior.” After writing the initial draft, students participate in editing and revising sentences that might need transitions. In Use Transition Sentences, students are instructed to “Search your essay for pronouns such as that, this, these, those.” They ensure the references are clear and decide whether the pronoun is more powerful than repeating the noun. They determine “which approach would make the sentence clearer.” No additional direct instruction for pronouns was found in this lesson.
Students have opportunities to recognize variations from standard English in their own and others’ writing and speaking, and identify and use strategies to improve expression in conventional language. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 3, students read “The Boy in the Back of the Class” by Ronald L. Smith. They engage in a Write to Impress lesson in the Student Guide. This lesson focuses on how the author uses standard English variations to draw the readers into the text. Students correct the author’s sentences to change the author’s variations so that they are correct. For example, students are given the sentence, “Me and Jason slayed the new video game” and they must change it to “Jason and I beat the new video game.” In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Variations of Standard English, guidance for the teacher is included to teach the concept. The teacher is directed, “For further support in discussing pronouns, see the Direct Instruction Lesson, which covers Correcting Variations from standard English.” This lesson includes a slide show defining standard English, variations to the English language, double negatives, slang, abbreviations, and figurative language. A five-question quiz follows. The teacher is directed to “review the instructions of the activity with students, pointing out that they will both identify variations and revise them using more formal language appropriate for school. Review the example together and have students complete the rest of the activity individually.”
Students have opportunities to use punctuation (commas, parentheses, dashes) to set off nonrestrictive/parenthetical elements. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Module 1, students read “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part I” by Lucille Fletcher. In this module, students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students learn the reasons that the author uses dashes, commas, and parentheses throughout the play. They use the examples to create their own sentences using commas, dashes, and parentheses in response to the Writing Prompt, “Consider the historical, social, and economic aspects of the play. What are the most important ways in which these elements of the setting affect Mrs. Stevenson’s character?” In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar, the teacher is provided with guidance which includes referencing the Direct Instruction slideshow lessons: “Prior to having students complete this activity, review with them the functions of dashes, commas, and parentheses. Dashes, commas, and parentheses can be used to separate non-restrictive clauses (clauses that are non-essential to the sentence) and other additional but nonessential information from the surrounding text. Dashes and commas can also be used to indicate pauses or breaks. Dashes can also indicate omissions in a text.”
Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 7, students write an argumentative essay to answer the Writing Prompt, “Based on your readings, what single change to your learning environment or school’s design would have the greatest positive impact on student success?” To earn points for audience appeal on the final rubric, the students must ensure their writing adheres to the conventions of standard English grammar, including spelling. In the Edit the Draft Together from the Student Guide, students “collaborate with a peer or peers to read each other’s drafts.” The directions state that they must use the rubric to evaluate each other’s work. No additional instructions were found here
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “Names/Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. Students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students focus on spelling correctly. They learn three spelling rules, including the -i comes after the -e in most English words; homophones sound the same, but their meanings and spellings are different; and when adding the -sing endings to a word that ends in y, replace the -y with -i. The instructions provide example sentences for each rule, and then students write sentences from the text that apply the spelling rules. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar, the teacher is provided with guidance which includes referencing the Direct Instruction slideshow lesson on spelling. This lesson includes a rationale for proper spelling and rules such as doubling up rule, common spelling mistakes, when to drop silent e, i after e rule, I before e except after c rule, and commonly confused words. This slideshow lesson is followed by a five-question quiz.
Students have opportunities to vary sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros. They engage in a Sharpen Your Sentences lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students practice expanding their sentences by adding but, because, or so to expand their sentences. Students use the sentence starter, “In the story, the narrator describes her inner frustration with her teacher,” and then expand it using but, because, or so. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Using Conjunctions, the teacher is provided with guidance for teaching the concept. Guidance includes example sentences that show how different conjunctions add meaning to the sentences.
In Unit 2, Module 1, students read “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens. In the Student Guide, Write to Impress activity, students complete a graphic organizer. Throughout the text, the author uses a variety of sentence patterns to engage the reader. The instructions provide examples of simple sentences, a compound sentence, a complex sentence, and a compound-complex sentence from the text. Students write a compound, complex, and compound-complex sentence to answer the Writing Prompt, “Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?” In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Vary your Sentence patterns, teachers are provided with guidance which includes walking students through the Direct Instruction slideshow lesson, Sentence Structures: “Explain how the four sentences are different structurally and, therefore, serve different purposes. Next, students should work in pairs or individually to respond to the writing prompt, ‘Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?’”
In Unit 5, Module 1, students read “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part I” by Lucille Fletcher. Students use the Student Guide’s Sharpen Your Sentences lesson in this module. In this lesson, students learn how to use language to structure sentences that indicate a cause and an effect. They are provided with the situation and use the sentence starter to decide how to complete the sentence. There are three different ways that the assignment has the students write the cause-and-effect sentences. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar: Cause and Effect Sentences, the teacher is provided guidance to explain cause and effect to students. They are provided with definitions and examples. The teacher is directed to model for students how to convert the first sentence stem in their student guide activity to a full cause-and-effect sentence. In the end, they are to compare the different versions of the sentence and vote on which the students find the most impactful.
Students have opportunities to maintain consistency in style and tone. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 4, students read “Down with Class Participation Grades” by Melissa Pandika. In this module, students engage in a Write to Impress lesson from the Student Guide. In this lesson, students learn how to maintain consistent sentences for style and tone. Students explore the text to find examples of the author’s informal style. Then, they use the examples in the assignment to find words demonstrating the causal, spontaneous, and conversational style that makes her argument more meaningful for her intended audience. In the Teacher Guide, Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Style and Tone, the teacher is provided with guidance for instruction. This includes walking students through the Direction Instruction slideshow lesson, Revising for Style and Word Choice, which covers the importance of revising style, word choice, and tone to support audience engagement. Slides are followed by a five-question quiz. An extension activity is provided where students rewrite their sentences either in a more formal tone or in a “texting tone.”
In Unit 4, Module 8, students write a research paper to answer their own research questions. To earn points for audience appeal on the final rubric, the students must ensure their writing “maintains a formal style.” In the Edit the Draft Together, students “collaborate with a peer or peers to read each other’s drafts.” The directions state that they must use the rubric to evaluate each other’s work. In the Teacher Guide, there is a reference to the Language and Style Toolkit - Grade 6. The teacher is directed to the student-facing slide on redundancy. This slide includes examples of redundancy and a strategy: “Review your sentences to identify and eliminate unnecessary words, phrases, or ideas that repeat information already stated within the same paragraph. By reducing wordiness and eliminating redundancy, you enhance clarity and maintain reader engagement.” Further instruction for the teacher is to have the students use highlighters to mark repeated words and phrases used throughout their essays. They are to add those to a two-column chart and then work as a group to come up with alternative words.
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.
The materials include a way for students to interact with and build text-specific vocabulary in the texts. The materials include a scope and sequence with the vocabulary tasks for each unit. Vocabulary facilitates students’ understanding of what they are reading. In each module, in the Student Guide, the Build Your Vocabulary activities provide one to four words that appear in the text for students to work with. While reading the text online, vocabulary words are blue so that students can click on them for a definition. Vocabulary support is also built into the online lessons through a glossary of terms. Some vocabulary words were repeated within a unit or across a unit. The year-long vocabulary plan is included in the Unit Planning Tools document for explicitly teaching vocabulary strategies and debriefing vocabulary words. The Build Your Vocabulary activities are listed as essential, and the materials also include online direct instruction, student guide tasks, and some additional offline resources. The Unit Planning Tool includes teacher guidance to support vocabulary instruction, including explicit vocabulary instruction strategies that differentiate between academic vocabulary terms and CERCA words, and a vocabulary presentation resource that provides the vocabulary terms and definitions organized by unit.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Planning Tools document provides a Vocabulary Instruction Guidance document for each unit. This document includes definitions of Key Academic Terms, CERCA words, and Focus Words (words from the reading selections). Throughout the program, the following 17 word learning strategies with guidance are provided for teachers: Morphology, Word Relationships, Prefixes, Synonyms, Frayer Model, Context Clues, Map a Word, Antonyms, Shades of Meaning, Compare and Contrast, Word Analysis, Concept Map, Word Study, Roots Words, Word Web, Analogy Chart, and Etymology of Words. Each Unit focuses on two to four of these strategies. For Unit 1, four explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instructions are presented with key strategies: “Morphology - how to look for familiar word parts, Word Relationships - finding common ideas or relationships with groups of words, Prefixes - breaking words apart and using prefixes to make sense of them, [and] Synonyms - finding similarities among groups of words.” There is a link to additional guidance, including establishing vocabulary notebooks and routines. An additional link to twenty-two Vocabulary Best Practice lessons.
Unit Planning Tools include a Key Vocabulary document for each unit. This document includes a link to a slideshow of Explicit Vocabulary Instruction Resources. The slideshow includes how to set up a Vocabulary Notebook, and slides on all of the vocabulary routines provided in the materials. This document includes key academic terms and CERCA words for the unit, as well as a slide show of the Focus words and their definitions for each module. ThinkCERCA defines these different types of vocabulary words as follows and provides the following high-level teacher guidance for each type:
“Key Academic Terms include high-value vocabulary introduced in class and reviewed in the unit’s Direct Instruction. After leading students through the presentation, provide instruction to support understanding of the key concepts and skills they represent and have students record new terms. (See unit Direct Instruction for resources.)
CERCA Words found in the Build Your Vocabulary sections of the student guide deepen key conceptual understandings and enable the expression of reasoning. (The word may not appear in the text, but it captures a key concept for interpreting the text.) Use the Explicit Vocabulary Instruction in the Teacher’s Guide to provide students with explicit support for vocabulary skill development prior to facilitating the collaborative learning experience.
Focus Words are a subset of words from reading selections. They enrich grade level readings and often appear in assessments. (After teaching the Focus Words using the slide show and modeling the vocabulary strategies, use Best Practices Facilitation Resources in the Teacher’s Guide to help students develop strategies for vocabulary using engaging tasks.)”
Throughout the Teacher Guides, general Vocabulary Explicit Strategy Instruction Guidance is provided. For example, in Unit 1, Module 1, Teacher Guide, for the Build Your Vocabulary Activity, teachers have the following guidance: “Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction—Word Parts: Use the Vocabulary Presentation Resources to introduce the Vocabulary Notebooks Routine and the routine of Building Your Vocabulary. Ask: “what other words can you think of that beginning with ‘con’ or ‘mis.’ Discuss the possible meaning of the word part that connects the words we have generated. These are word parts that have meaning. Students may generate words such as ‘with’ and ‘wrong’ to describe the connection. We call them morphemes. Morphology is the study of word parts. Have students record the terms Morphemes and Morphology and the definitions in their Vocabulary Notebook.”
The Student Guide provides one Build Your Vocabulary worksheet per module, including Map a Word, Word Analysis, Word Web, and Analogy Chart. The worksheets often include two to three vocabulary terms. In Map a Word, students write the word and definition, part of speech, root word or origin, picture of the word, synonym, antonym, and sentence using the word. In Word Analysis, students write the word, give an example, a definition or explanation, and respond to “makes me think of/connotation. In Word Web, students name words or phrases that are synonyms or closely related to the center word. In the Analogy Chart, students list a familiar concept, the new concept (word), similarities, differences, relationship categories, and what they now understand about the new concept. Other Student Guide activities that may include vocabulary practice include Raise Your Score and Write to Impress, where students practice using context clues to determine word meaning. A glossary of vocabulary terms is included with each text, and those terms are highlighted within the text so that students may click on them to see the definitions. Some general guidance is found in the Unit Planning Tools Document.
In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “Sometimes a Dream Needs a Push” by Walter Dean Meyers. Key Vocabulary Words are: curtailed, disappointment, dribbling, inspire, predicament, paralyzed, and supportive. Before students read the text, they complete the Build Your Vocabulary lesson from the Student Guide.Build Your Vocabulary teacher guidance states: “Shades of Meaning: Introduce the terms disappointment, inspire, supportive and provide student-friendly definitions. Include the part of speech. Illustrate the word with examples and ask students to consider other related words, such as sadness, motivate, and comforting. Then, have them discuss the shades of meaning that convey slightly different experiences, emotions, or tone. For example, disappointment might make one feel sadness, but it distinctly means that someone had an expectation that was not met.” In the Teacher Will section, teacher guidance states:
“Introduce the Build Your Vocabulary task and review the example provided.
Organize students into small groups and assign them one or more words per group.
Assist each group in sharing their findings with the entire class.”
In Unit 5, Module 1, students read “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part I” by Lucille Fletcher. Key Vocabulary Words are: apprehend, bland, civic, efficient, explicitly, faintly, fiends, frantically, illuminating, imperious, manually, neurotic, operators, overcome, peripheral, retrace, suspense, unnerved, unobtrusively, and wearily. Before students read the text, they complete the Build Your Vocabulary lesson from the Student Guide. Build Your Vocabulary teacher guidance states: “Context Clues: Use the Explicit Vocabulary Strategy Instruction resources to introduce or review context clues. Use the terms in the task and provide student-friendly definitions. Illustrate the word with examples and ask students to generate their own examples. Model the process by sharing an example, such as switchboards. Since we later hear a description of what operators do at the switchboard, we might be able to guess that this is some sort of board that allows operators to connect wires in different ways. Have students develop additional examples of how these three relatively familiar words might mean slightly different things in different contexts. Then, have students write a sentence using a new word that shows two different contexts in which the word might have slightly different meanings.” In the Teacher Will section, teacher guidance states,
“Introduce the Build Your Vocabulary task and review the example provided.
Organize students into small groups and assign them one or more words per group.
Assist each group in sharing their findings with the entire class.”
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 7, students learn 12 vocabulary words for Your Portfolio: Writing Your Personal Narrative in Grades 6, 7, and 8. The words include cohesive, concrete, eliminate, enhance, enthralling, envision, mechanics, omniscient, simultaneously, speech patterns, vital, and weave.
In Unit 2, Module 1, students read “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens. Before reading, students access an online list of 22 words that appear in the text. In this module, students familiarize themselves with the word “function (noun): the ways in which a person works or operates.” In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Build Your Brain” by R. Douglas Fields. They view the list of 24 vocabulary words. Here, students are introduced to the word “functions (noun): ways in which something works, which has a slightly different meaning.” Seeing this word again provides the background knowledge to make the word memorable.
In Unit 4, Module 3, students read “Students Keep Hundreds of Pounds of Food Waste from Entering Landfills” by Bridget O’Shea. Before reading, students produce a Quick Journal response in the Student Guide based on the prompt, “How can we reduce food waste on a large scale?” The instructions state, “Think about ways that individuals try to reduce waste. To cut down on food waste, some people may try composting and recycling. Now, brainstorm some ideas for how to reduce waste on a larger community or nationwide level. Then, answer the question: How can we reduce food waste on a large scale?” Students can use their background and knowledge from the Quick Journal to complete the next activity, Build Your Vocabulary in the Student Guide. This Concept Map focuses on students’ use of the terms compost, implement, and initiatives. Once students begin to read the text, they are more familiar with composting, which appears thirteen times in the reading.
In Unit 5, Module 1, students read “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part I” by Lucille Fletcher. Before reading, students access an online list of vocabulary words that appear in the text. In this module, students familiarize themselves with the word “adaption (noun): something, such as a film, that is based on an existing work, such as a play.” In Unit 6, Module 1, students read “Build Your Brain” by R. Douglas Fields. They view the list of vocabulary words. While the word “adaptable (adj.): able to change to suit the environment” has a different part of speech and a slightly different meaning, seeing the word again provides the background knowledge to make the word memorable.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, students read “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros. Before the students read, they complete the Build Your Vocabulary activity from the Student Guide. In the Map a Word activity, students analyze the words conflict, misunderstanding, and frustration as a way to better understand, discuss, and write about the text. Students define the words and provide the part of speech, the word origins, the structure of the word, a synonym, and an antonym. Then, students write a sentence using the word correctly in context.
In Unit 3, Module 3, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. Before students begin reading, they connect with the content of the text by responding to the Quick Journal prompt in their Student Guide. The students answer the question, “What is the value of sharing a cultural heritage?” After replying to the Quick Journal, students share their responses with one another, building a robust background to complete the Build Your Vocabulary activity from the Student Guide. Students complete the Map, a Word graphic organizer for the vocabulary words cultural, heritage, and cherish. For each word, students must provide the word and definition, the part of speech, the root word or origin, a picture, a synonym, an antonym, and a sentence using the word. Since students use the words several times, their familiarity with it increases even before reading the text.
In Unit 7, Module 3, students read “The Fisherman and His Wife” by the Brothers Grimm. They complete a Write to Impress activity from the Student Guide to Build Academic Vocabulary. Students read the following passage from the story: “So the fisherman went. But when he came to the shore, the wind was raging, and the sea was tossed up and down in boiling waves. At this sight, the fisherman was dreadfully frightened, and he trembled so that his knees knocked together.” The Instructions state, “Using context and a definitive source, determine the meaning of the words from the passage below. Then, create sentences explaining your context clues and the definitive source you used.”
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level, and the materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks.
The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. The program allows students to conduct some research activities connected to the unit topics as a part of the research process. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards. The Teacher Guide includes guidance and resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units.
The implementation schedules align with the core learning. The materials include lesson-specific task timing guidance and implementation schedules can generally be completed in the allotted time. Optional tasks are meaningful and should not distract from core learning. The materials contain seven units, with each unit taking 22 to 26 days to complete, assuming 50 minutes of instruction a day.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The program includes opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials include multiple opportunities for students to read and analyze individual texts as well as multiple texts. Tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks.
The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge. Student tasks are Socratic discussions, pitch decks, performances, debate games, and panel discussions.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. Materials allow students to conduct some research activities connected to the unit topics as a part of the research process. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
The materials are grouped around a unit theme or topic and an essential question to build students’ knowledge over the course of the school year. The sequence of the texts helps students read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. Students read literary and informational texts across various genres that add to their knowledge of the theme or topic.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each of the seven units includes a variety of texts to illustrate and develop the topic and Essential Question. Each unit contains seven grade-appropriate modules, including several readings, student discourse opportunities, and a writing assignment connected by the theme or topic. The focus for each unit is as follows: “Who Are You?,” “How Do We Design Better Schools?,” “How Can Perceptions Shape Our Choices?,” “Where’s All The Food?,” “What Is All The Drama About?,” “How Do Our Brains Work?,” and “How Do Myths and Tales Teach Us?”
In Unit 1, the topic is “Who Are You?” and the Essential Question is, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?” Students read four mentor texts and five other selections in the Read Across Genres module that are related to the topic and try to find support to answer the essential question. The text promotes locating evidence and analyzing a single text to create responses. In Module 1, students read the short story “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros. They read the text to “[U]nderstand the internal and external conflicts of growing up and how age shapes how we are expected to respond to life’s challenges.” In Amy Tan’s “Fish Cheeks,” students read to “[U]nderstand how one’s personal identity can sometimes conflict with family cultural expectations.” While reading the personal narrative “The Boy in the Back of the Class” by Ronald L. Smith, students read to “[U]nderstand how stereotypes can impact young people.” In “Ice” by Graham Salisbury, students read the memoir to “[U]nderstand how Salisbury develops themes of acceptance and identity when growing up.” Additional selections in the Read Across Genres section include a media literacy selection, poetry, and informational texts. After viewing the video by Aleeza Kazmi, students use the Quick Journal to answer the question, “How do you see yourself in ways that may be different from how others see you?”
In Unit 3, the topic is “How Can Perceptions Shape Our Choices?” and the Essential Question is “How can looking at the world through someone else’s eyes change our perception?” Students read four mentor texts and five selections in the Read Across Genres module that are related to the topic. In Module 1, students read “Names/Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. Students evaluate the author’s “descriptions of her many name changes” to explain “how she saw herself growing up.” In Module 2, the students read the text “Sometimes a Dream Needs a Push” by Walter Dean Meyers. They explain how “Chris and his father begin to view wheelchair basketball and each other in different ways.” In Module 3, students read the short story “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. They use the text to gather evidence to support that the “main character change[s] as a result of his friends meeting his grandfather.” Students also explain the importance of family and heritage as it relates to the story. In Module 4, the students read “The Difficult Path” by Grace Lin. They determine the difficult path that the narrator, Lingsi, must travel. In addition, they evaluate “the author’s choice to use a first-person point of view to illuminate the strengths of the narrator.” In Module 5, students watch the video “Father Helps Olympian Cross the Finish Line” and write down their thoughts regarding the Module’s question, “How can looking at the world through someone else’s eyes change our perception?” in a Quick Journal. Students respond to each reading by using several other texts, including poetry and informational texts. They participate in a Socratic Discussion utilizing the text evidence to support their claims.
In Unit 6, the topic is “How Do Our Brains Work?” and the Essential Question is, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?” Students read three mentor texts and five selections in the Read Across Genres module that are related to the topic. Students must sift through these complex texts, making connections between the author’s experiences and research. In Module 1, students read “Build Your Brain!” by R. Douglas Fields. The magazine article explains how the brain is developed. In Module 2, students read “Learning Rewires the Brain'' by Alison Pearce Stevens. In this nonfiction narrative, students are instructed to “explore different areas of the brain and their unique functions.” In Module 3, the students read the mentor text “Inside the Reading Mind '' by Carrie M. Cannella. In this magazine article, students read to “[U]nderstand how the different areas of the brain help us make meaning and sound out letters.” The final text from Module 4 is also a magazine article, “Mindset Matters” by Meg Thatcher. Students read to “[U]nderstand the benefits of having a growth mindset over a fixed mindset. Additional selections in the Read Across Genres section include a media literacy selection and two informational texts that “Compare Pathways” in two personal statements. After reading two passages, students compare the career pathways and results of Gil Bransford and Frederick Law Olmstead.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.
The materials include opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple texts. After each reading, students are provided with multiple-choice questions that are aligned to the standards. The tasks within the student materials include opportunities for students to analyze the text through varied tasks such as completing graphic organizers, participating in debates, and writing tasks. Each unit of instruction includes direct instruction on a specific text analysis skill, thematically linked reading selections with reading check tasks, which include multiple choice questions to apply the reading analysis skill, and an Apply Your Learning Task, allowing students to practice the skill prior to engaging in a written response. Students have multiple opportunities throughout the year to practice literacy skills across various genres and text selections.
For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 1, students read “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens. They analyze the development of the central idea. The Student Guide includes a graphic organizer for students to Apply Your Learning to Determining and Tracing a Central Idea Through Details. Students reflect on details and evidence from the passage to answer the prompt, “Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?” The graphic organizer includes the questions,
“What is the author’s central idea in the text above? Which statement in the passage tells you this?
What does the expert quote tell you about the issue? How does this piece of evidence shape and strengthen the author’s argument?”
In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “Sometimes a Dream Needs a Push” by Walter Dean Myers. Then, students answer the question, “Which of the following pieces of text evidence best explains how Chris’s dad felt about basketball at the beginning of Chris’s wheelchair basketball career?” Students also complete an Apply Your Learning task to answer questions and summarize how the characters’ perceptions changed from the beginning to the end of the story.
In Unit 7, Module 1, students complete a Direct Instruction lesson on summarizing literary text and read “The Twin Heroes,” an African myth adapted by Alphonso O. Stafford. The Student Guide includes an Apply Your Learning: Summarizing Literary Text task, which asks students to compose a one-sentence summary for the characters, setting, and plot before combining them to create a summary of the text. In Module 4, students complete a direct instruction lesson on Common Themes Within and Across Texts. Students complete an Apply Your Learning Task analyzing specific aspects of ”The Fisherman and His Wife” and “Jenny and the Night Women” to determine each text's theme about living without boundaries.
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 4, students read “Down with Class Participation Grades” by Melissa Pandika. Then, they take the reading check and answer the question, “Which of these statements best describes the author’s purpose in writing this essay?” Students also complete an Apply Your Learning task to break the texts into chunks and then note how the author relays her message effectively.
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “Names and Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. Then, they analyze the author’s craft by completing a graphic organizer in the Student Guide. The students find examples of establishing the setting, point of view, and characters and employing narrative techniques. Students also respond to multiple choice questions, such as,
“Which quote from the text uses the literary device called a simile in order to convey how different the narrator spent most of her life feeling?
What can you mostly infer from the details provided about how the author feels when her classmates ask her where she is ‘from’?”
In Unit 7, Module 5, students complete a Direct Instruction lesson on poetic structure before reading the poems “Contentment” by Oliver Wendell Holmes and “Legacies” by Nikki Giovanni. Then, they complete the Analyze Poetic Structure task. Students are asked to “find at least two pieces of evidence to explain how each poet uses structural choices to express what matters most. In your analysis, consider line breaks, spacing, and stanzas, as well as other visual elements like font, punctuation, or styles such as italics.”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.
The materials include multiple opportunities for students to read and analyze individual texts as well as multiple texts. The tasks are sequenced in a way that is appropriate for the grade level and include text-specific and text-dependent questions and/or tasks. In order to complete the tasks provided, students must analyze the texts and integrate their knowledge to complete the literacy activities throughout the unit. Each unit is designed around the unit’s Essential Question. Each unit also includes a Reading Across Genres module, which allows students to read a variety of text types and make connections across topics by responding to questions and completing tasks that require knowledge of the topic.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 2, students read “Should Kids Get Homework?” by Sarah Wood. They complete reading check questions such as, “Which claim best supports the central idea of this article?” and “Which piece of text evidence most strongly supports the argument that homework can have a favorable effect on children?” Then, students analyze the author’s claims by highlighting the evidence provided by the author about the harmful effects of homework on children and the value of homework. Students engage in a direct instruction lesson on Citing Evidence to Support Analysis in Informational Texts before completing an Apply Your Learning task with a graphic organizer students use to determine “What evidence does the author provide about school start times and adolescents that strengthened the argument for one side or the other?” and “What evidence does Wood provide about homework that strengthened the argument for one side or the other?” Students then complete a writing task responding to the prompt, “Trace and evaluate the author’s evidence for and against homework. Which side of the argument is more convincing based on the evidence?” The text and tasks align with the guiding question for the module, “Does homework truly support academic growth?”
In Unit 5, Module 4, students compare and contrast a drama text with a radio performance of the drama. During this unit, students read Sorry, Wrong Number by Lucille Fletcher. In this module, they listen to the live production of Sorry, Wrong Number by Lucille Fletcher, Suspense: Dramatists Play Service, Inc., and Old Time Radio Archive. Then, students answer questions such as “How does the acting of the woman at Henchley hospital match the description ‘middle-aged, solid, firm, practical’ from the script?” and “Which of the following statements does not explain significant differences between the script and the recording?” Students also complete a Compare Text to Multimedia task using a graphic organizer to answer the question, “What effects do the techniques of the play’s production have on the text’s meaning?”
In Unit 6, Module 4, students read “Mindset Matters” by Meg Thacher. Then, students answer five comprehension questions in the Reading Check that include questions like “Which of the following is the best description of how the author develops the central idea of fixed versus growth mindsets?” and “What is the most likely reason the author includes information on how the brain works?” They analyze the text, highlighting “information about growth and fixed mindsets” and “how having a growth mindset affects learning.” Students plan an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “How does the author convey the idea of a growth mindset through anecdotes, examples, and expert sources?”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, students prepare and conduct a Debate Game. The Unit’s topic is “How do we design better schools?” and the texts for this unit relate to the topic. For example, one of the anchor texts, “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens, and a multimedia selection, “School for Tired Teens” by BBC News. Each text selection comes with questions and tasks about the topic. At the end of the unit, students use these varied texts to complete the debate preparation. The debate prompt is “What is the best way for today’s schools to ensure the success of tomorrow’s students?” students complete a graphic organizer to gather reasons, evidence, rebuttal, and closing notes for their debate from each of the texts from the unit.
In Unit 6, Module 5, students explore various texts about career pathways. Students read “By the Numbers” by Brian S. McGrath and answer reading check questions, including, “Which piece of evidence from the text proves that Bransford gained necessary skills from his first position to reach his dream job?“ Then, students read “The Search for a Career” by Helen Kitrosser and complete the reading check questions, including, “Which detail from the passage best explains something that inspired Olmsted to become a landscape architect?” Finally, students work with a small group or a partner to complete an organizer to compare the two articles, focusing on the different pathways, evidence, personalities/interests, and connections to the future for each article.
In Unit 7, Module 8, students read an “Excerpt from The Shepherdess and the Sweep” by Hans Christian Anderson and “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost. Then, students answer a set of multiple-choice questions based on the individual texts and then compare the two texts, including, but not limited to,
“Which statement provides the best comparison of the topics of ‘Excerpt from The Shepherdess and the Sweep’ and ‘The Road Not Taken’?
How does the poetic form of ‘The Road Not Taken’ most differ from the fairy tale ‘Excerpt from The Shepherdess and the Sweep’ in the way the message is developed and revealed?”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
The materials include two culminating tasks for each unit: a speaking and listening task and a writing task that becomes part of the student’s portfolio. In each culminating writing task, students show their knowledge and understanding of the topic by writing an essay for a specific genre. Each writing task is organized by a topic or theme and allows students to demonstrate their understanding of the unit’s topic and/or essential question. The culminating writing assignment requires students to read and analyze texts to draft their response to the prompt. Many of the steps toward the completion of each task are repetitive. For example, students read narrative texts and then write a narrative. There is no variation in building skills or improving writing over the school year. The opportunities for speaking and listening related to these writing tasks are limited to peer review tasks focused on developing the composition, not standards addressed within the unit. In each culminating speaking and listening task, students participate in various speaking and listening activities as they explore each unit’s essential question(s) and knowledge. Student tasks are Socratic discussions, pitch decks, performances, debate games, and panel discussions.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 6, students participate in a Socratic Discussion. Students begin by independently reviewing the Socratic Discussion direct instruction slick deck. Then, students look at a list of texts they read throughout the unit, which should be considered in their discussion. They use a few handouts in the Student Guide to prepare for discussion, including the Reflect on the Essential Question handout and the Prepare for the Discussion graphic organizer. In both these handouts, students consider their claims with supporting evidence from the unit’s texts to answer the essential question, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?” After preparing, students move into the discussion. They may use sentence starters on the Build Knowledge Together handout if they need help. Once the discussion is over, teachers Conduct the Poll Again activity to see if students changed their minds throughout the discussion. Lastly, students answer questions to reflect on their discussion.
In Unit 2, Module 7, students complete a writing task that serves as the conclusion of the unit. Students use their texts and tasks from the unit to answer the writing prompt, “Based on your readings, what single change to your learning environment or school’s design would have the greatest positive impact for student success?” This relates to the module topic of “How do we design better schools?” Students learn the steps in writing an argument by viewing a slide deck, and then students read and score a student exemplar. Students map their arguments, revise sentences to make the writing powerful, share and edit their draft with a partner, and reflect on their writing. To complete the task, students must include “well-chosen and relevant” evidence from credible sources, primarily from the texts in the unit. The Portfolio addresses reading informational texts standards and argument writing standards.
In Unit 3, Module 7, students complete a writing task at the conclusion of the unit. Students view a direct instruction lesson on Writing the Short Story and answer five questions about the content. Students review the narrative rubric before choosing an idea for their short story. Then, they begin planning the story. Students develop their ideas, draft the story, and get feedback from a peer who they will collaborate with to edit the story. At the end of the task, students reflect on their writing and what they learned from the experience.
In Unit 4, Module 7, students participate in a Panel Discussion. They begin by independently reviewing the Panel Discussion direct instruction slick deck. Then, they look at a list of texts they read throughout the unit that should be considered in their discussion. They use a few handouts in the Student Guide to prepare for discussion, including the Reflect on the Essential Question handout and the Plan Your Points graphic organizer. In both these handouts, students consider their claims with supporting evidence from the unit’s texts to answer the essential question, “What are the impacts of locally grown and sustainable food sources?” After preparing, students move into the discussion. They may use sentence starters on the Build Knowledge Together handout if they need help. Once the discussion is over, teachers Conduct the Poll Again activity to see if students changed their minds throughout the discussion. Lastly, students answer questions to reflect on their discussion.
In Unit 5, Module 6, students read the play Sorry, Wrong Number by Lucille Fletcher before composing the final piece of writing. Students complete a “cause-and-effect essay” in response to the prompt, “Analyze Mrs. Stevenson’s behavior throughout the play. How do her character’s behaviors, dialogue, and actions affect the final outcome of the play?” The instructional materials include a direct instruction lesson on Writing the Cause-and-Effect Essay and a student exemplar, “Mrs. Stevenson” by Ellery Rohlfing. Students view the direct instruction lesson and answer five questions to show their understanding. Then, they analyze the student exemplar by using the unit rubric. These activities prepare students to produce a draft of their essay and participate in a peer review task. During the peer review, they focus on improving their writing by following the directions provided by the materials, “[w]when you have finished an initial draft, pair with another writer and ask each other to look for sentences in the essay that need transitions.” They complete the Share and Listen graphic organizer and suggest ways to improve a peer’s essay. Students also receive suggestions for improving their own draft before submitting a final draft.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.
The materials provide writing instruction that aligns to the standards across the school year and meets the distribution required by the standards for argumentative, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing. Each unit includes lessons and activities that follow a consistent pattern for developing students’ writing. The modules provide guidance and protocols for students to practice writing summaries and argumentative paragraphs with respect to the readings. Over the school year, students focus on writing an argumentative paragraph for the modules within each unit. Still, they also write full-length essays in the form of a personal narrative, an argument, a short story, a research paper, a cause-and-effect essay, a personal statement, and a literary analysis. Within each instruction unit, students have opportunities to engage in direct instruction slide decks focused on composition skills related to the culminating writing task for the unit. The Student Guide allows students to complete graphic organizers to develop and organize ideas, analyze student examples, and participate in revising and editing tasks to improve writing. Each unit provides mentor texts that emphasize different writing techniques for students to reference and learn techniques to apply in their writing. Guidance is provided for students as they practice and apply writing standards. The standards can be located in each Unit-At-a-Glance, Scope and Sequence, and Teacher Guide. The Teacher Guide includes Teach Academic Writing Skills, Show and Tell, and Model Your Thinking strategies to support the tasks, and additional materials found in the Resources tab of the platform provide guidance for implementing and monitoring students’ writing development. Each culminating writing assignment includes a final rubric to evaluate student writing.
Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, students complete a culminating task that covers a specific genre of writing based on the texts students read in that unit.
In all units, the Student Guide offers support in the form of a prewriting, drafting, and revising checklist, an informative writing rubric, a student model that students score using the rubric, and a worksheet to practice giving feedback to peers. The Student Guide includes a page with specific guidance for the writing task with instructions, the writing prompt, and notes on either collecting research or planning the writing task. Graphic organizers are provided to complete various tasks, such as goal-setting, mapping the task, gathering evidence, and proofreading evidence for mistakes and inconsistencies.
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “Names/Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. The first step the students take after reading is to write a short text summary. Sentence frames, such as: “Julia Alvarez narrates her story about the ways ____ can impact you by describing feelings that occur when others _____” are provided. After completing the summary, students plan an argument that answers the Writing Prompt, “What do Julia Alvarez’s descriptions of her many name changes say about how she saw herself growing up?” In Module 2, students read a narrative, summarize it in writing, and draft a response to the Writing Prompt, “Explain how, over the course of the story, Chris and his father begin to view wheelchair basketball and each other in different ways.” After reading the mentor text in Modules 3 and 4, students summarize the text in writing and then respond to the following prompts: “How does the main character change as a result of his friends meeting his grandfather? How do the series of events from his grandfather’s arrival to the end of the story help readers understand about the importance of family and heritage? How does the author’s choice of first-person point of view help show the strength of the narrator?” In Module 7, students write an entire short story set in a realistic or historical setting, showing a changed perspective in the main character that influences their ideas, actions, and choices. The unit’s writing lessons help students analyze previously read texts and build skills for writing the short story.
In Unit 7, Module 7, students use the online organizer to create a full-length literary analysis essay that answers the Writing Prompt, “Using the myths and the traditional tales in the unit, compare the themes of at least two of the stories to explain how they convey values and human behavior.” Prior to finalizing the essay, students complete the Compare Similarities and Analyze Differences assignments from the Student Guide. Then, they complete the Organize Your Essay assignment, providing an introduction that grabs the reader’s attention and reveals the claim, a key point of similarity or difference, another key point of similarity or difference, a third key point of similarity or difference, and then a conclusion that captures the argument and concludes the essay. Students revise their work by adding transitions and then edit the draft with a partner. Before submitting the final essay, students use the final rubric to evaluate and change their writing.
Each Student Guide in the materials provides students with scaffolds and structures for writing practice. The Teacher Guide includes Teach Academic Writing Skills, Show and Tell, and Model Your Thinking strategies for the writing tasks, which provides teachers with support for modeling and scaffolding.
Instructional materials include well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Assessments tab, Writing Benchmarks are included for the beginning, middle, and end of the year. The stated purpose is “to personalize instruction for your students and track progress throughout the year.” Each benchmark test includes a text to read, ten multiple-choice questions to answer, and an argumentative writing prompt. Teacher directions state: “Assign lessons to introduce the CERCA framework and gain insight into student writing readiness. Evaluate completed student work and review results. Assign each student a personal growth focus.” In the Resources tab, training course videos show how to enter the rubric score. Benchmark summary reports in the Reports tab include performance by class, rubric category score, growth focus distribution by class, and individual student data.
ThinkCERCA materials include a bank of Direct Instruction and Skills Practice lessons for writing. The materials include 49 lessons that fall under argument writing, including but not limited to Structure and Organization, Author’s Bias, Introductions in Argument, and Supporting Claims with Evidence. The materials include 37 lessons that fall under narrative writing that include but are not limited to Types of Narrative Writing, Setting in Narrative Writing, Establishing Character in Narrative Writing, and Using Time as a Storytelling Tool. The materials include 62 lessons that fall under informative writing, including but not limited to Citing Evidence to Support Analysis, Summaries in Informative Writing, Citing and Documenting Sources, and Revising for Clarity, Development, and Organization.
Under the Resources tab, Curriculum Resources, Writing, the materials include guidance documents on the following topics (not limited to): Feedback Guidance, Writing Revisions Strategies Toolkit, and Best Practices: Compare Writing.
The Feedback Guidance document includes general guidance for using ThinkCERCA’s provided writing feedback banks across the three core writing types: argumentative, informational, and narrative. This document also links each feedback bank.
The Writing Revision Strategies Toolkit document includes general guidance for teachers to provide student feedback on their writing. It links parts of the CERCA process and how teachers can respond to each student depending on their learning gap. The document also links a Personalized Growth Plan Document, which outlines and provides general guidance on the different settings teachers can use to give feedback (1:1, small group, whole class). This document also includes links to other resources for supporting students with specific action steps based on data from benchmark writing assessments.
The Best Practices: Compare Writing document provides general guidance for a strategy teachers can use to support students in comparing two pieces of writing to analyze and evaluate the “techniques employed by writers.”
In Unit 1, Module 4, students read the story “Ice” by Graham Salisbury. After reading, the teacher guides students through several writing exercises in response to the reading. First, the teacher facilitates the Summarize section of the module. In this activity, the students write a summary of the text in the online version of the program. The Teacher Guide prompts the teacher to “Introduce the optional sentence frames online that students can use as they summarize the reading.”
In Unit 7, Module 7, students write a literary analysis essay that answers the Writing Prompt, “Using the myths and the traditional tales in the unit, compare the themes of at least two of the stories to explain how they convey values and human behavior.” The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance during the Organize the Essay section
“Direct students to organize their comparative essays with a clear introduction and two points of similarity or difference.
Remind students to use the graphic organizer to organize their essays, including specific details for focus.”
As students draft, some links can be clicked throughout the process entitled “Need help getting started?” These links provide an explanation for each section of the argument. For example, for Claim, the link suggests that “Your claim should clearly state your opinion–based on what you learned from the reading–about the themes of the myths and tales in the unit.” The text then provides an example sentence for the students to follow to write a claim, “Both ___ and ___ explore the theme of ____ to show the value of ______.”
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
The materials provide some opportunities across the school year for students to conduct research that develops knowledge and synthesizes and analyzes content related to the unit themes. The research opportunities are not consistently integrated throughout the curriculum; they generally occur in one designated unit, although occasional research activities are associated with specific texts in some other units. In Unit 4, at all grade levels, students write a research paper related to the theme of the unit. This is the only opportunity for students to develop a research question. Students develop knowledge on the given topic by confronting and analyzing multiple provided texts related to a topic or theme. Students are instructed to find information from outside sources, but there is limited instruction and guidance on selecting sources, including using advanced searches effectively. In other units, students gather information and evaluate resources. While these areas are addressed, instruction is limited. The materials also include a “Student Research Toolkit,” which includes independent guidance for students on several parts of the research process, such as evaluating sources for credibility. This Toolkit is the same across all grades in the program. Much of the instruction is to refer students to documents that explain research or to Research Skills and Strategies slideshows, not guidance on direct instruction of the skills.
Research projects are somewhat sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Unit Preview, students begin the unit with a direct instruction lesson about the purpose of research writing. The preview includes the definition and characteristics of research writing. A section also guides the students in synthesizing information from multiple sources. In Module 2, students read “How the Teens of St. Pete Youth Farm Fight Food Insecurity, One Harvest at a Time” by Gabrielle Calise. Students plan an argument to address the writing prompt, “How does the impact of each section of the article help readers understand the outcomes of the school-based farming program?” After drafting the response, students used the Sharpen Your Sentences task from the Student Guide to integrate quotes effectively. In Module 5, the Student Guide includes an Understand Topics task in which students are instructed, “When conducting research, main sources are often not sufficient. Additional texts that focus on one small part of an issue can be helpful in fully explaining an issue. Additionally, being able to detect the difference between a fact and an opinion makes research and informational texts more useful.” In this activity, they use the texts “Recycling Center” by Brenda Hillman and “Food Waste” by National Geographic to determine the similarities and differences between the perspectives provided in each article. In Module 6, the Student Guide includes a Plan Your Research task where students complete a graphic organizer using selections from the unit. Students complete sections on exploring the topic, finding reliable sources, collecting relevant and reliable evidence, and creating a thesis statement. After determining the sources, students find pieces of evidence that support their thesis and can be found in at least two sources. They record direct citations to use when drafting their essay. In Module 8, the Student Guide includes a Map Your Research organizer, which supports students in completing their hook, claim, evidence, and conclusion. Then, students also complete a Write it and Cite It task to ensure they have properly documented sources. The materials also include an informational text, “The Research Process Step-by-Step Inquiry,” that guides evaluating sources using a checklist to determine the sources’ credibility and reliability by assessing the relevance, author’s background and expertise, publication date, bias, etc. The guide also notes that “It’s important to properly cite and document sources, to tell where the information came from and who made the statements” by quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing the information. The guide provides examples of in-text citations and a checklist for avoiding plagiarism.
Materials somewhat support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, students prepare to use the texts from the previous modules to participate in The Debate Game. The Teacher Guide includes the following purpose for this module: “Understand how to prepare for and participate in a formal debate and be able to formulate an argument, supporting evidence, and responses to questions, drawing support from the texts in the unit.” Guidance states,
“Lead students through the Direct Instruction presentations prior to having students review them on their own and complete the assessments. A list of key academic terms for the unit is available in the Student Guide. Students may also record key definitions in their Vocabulary Notebooks.
Explain that through debate, students learn to articulate their ideas effectively, consider multiple perspectives, and respond thoughtfully to differing viewpoints, all of which are essential for academic success and effective communication in various contexts.
Explain that sharing ideas with others through discussion fosters collaboration, community, and critical thinking.
Support students in expressing their ideas and reasoning to clarify their own understanding, develop stronger communication skills, and understand diverse viewpoints.”
Students will understand how to prepare for and participate in a formal debate and be able to formulate an argument, supporting evidence, and responses to questions, drawing support from the texts in the unit.” The Teacher Guide includes guidance for each part of the lesson. As the teacher begins the debate, guidance is provided for citing research in the Show and Tell-Cite Research to Bolster Your Argument: “Remind students to include verbal citations of credible research when presenting evidence during their debates. Model this skill for them and ask for volunteers to share their own verbal citations. (‘Noted psychologist Janice Egan wrote in Teaching Success that facing challenges will build problem-solving skills and confidence.’)” Teacher guidance states,
“Explain that students will use their completed Prepare for the Debate notes to support their debates.
Facilitate the debate, reminding students to support their thinking with evidence from the texts and to use the Build Knowledge Together sentence starters.
Prior to kicking off the debate, review the rules and the performance criteria with students. Remind them that debates would not be useful if there were not two valid and opposing viewpoints, so they should be appreciative of the counterarguments as a support for deepening their own thinking on the subject.
Using a class roster, take notes on student performance across the 5 criteria, using the evidence indicators to evaluate whether students Do Not Meet, Meet, or Exceed grade level expectations. In the Debate.”
In Unit 4, students read and view texts and media that build knowledge around the topic of food sustainability. The teacher facilitates viewing direct instruction lessons on research writing, including The Purpose of Research Writing, Evaluating Evidence, Understanding a Topic Through Multiple Sources, Understanding the Research Process, Synthesizing Information from Sources, and Writing the Research Paper. In Module 8, students complete the research paper. The Teacher Guide includes guidance for the teacher. First, students read the Final Informative Rubric. For this section of the lesson, teacher guidance states, “Instruct students to review the evaluation criteria for Your Portfolio.” Then, students read the Student Exemplar, and the Teacher Guide states, “Instruct students to complete the reading ‘How to Secure the Future of Food’ by Mateo Burgos.” Students practice giving the student exemplar feedback. The Teacher Guide for this section of the lesson states, “Explain that students will practice giving feedback about the Student Exemplar. Guide students in sharing one area of growth, a success, or an insight about the Student Exemplar draft.” Teacher materials state to model the scoring process and how to understand the scoring criteria.
In various units, Direct Instruction and Skills lessons include research topics.
While some teacher guidance is provided, research instruction throughout the program is limited.
Each unit includes a Unit-At-a-Glance states that students will engage in a research activity. For example, the Teacher Guide for Unit 2 states that “Through teacher-led instruction, students are introduced to research strategies in the Research Toolkit and gain practice with the inquiry-driven research process, refining research questions, and sharing research with citations. For their inquiry-driven research project, students will research an author’s biography and refine questions based on their initial findings. Students will learn when to summarize, paraphrase, and use direct quotations through a Documenting Sources Activity.”
Materials provide some opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and refocusing the inquiry when appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Module 6, students are instructed to conduct research for a pitch deck. According to the Student Guide, the Pitch Deck is a “structured presentation of an idea that is backed with evidence from various sources.” Students use a list of texts from the Student Guide to analyze and discuss to answer the essential question, “How do our brains develop as we engage with formal education?” All the texts are read during the unit of study, and no additional sources are listed or required to complete the pitch deck. Student directions say, “Your pitch deck should include all of the elements outlined in the research process.” However, there is no teacher guidance to explain or model a research process that results in a pitch deck. There is also no expectation present in the student materials to cite sources. The Teacher Guide states, “After students complete the Direct Instruction lesson, ask them to brainstorm a list of what their audience might need to know in order to ‘buy’ their pitches. What background knowledge should their viewers have? Are there any relevant statistics or expert opinions that could help strengthen their pitches? What might be some objections a viewer might pose? Once the class brainstorms some possibilities for additional research, guide students to use their available resources to find the answers. Remind students to cite the sources they use in their presentations.”
In Unit 7, Module 5, students read “How Fairy Tales Have Stood the Test of Time” by Adam Ganz and “A Fairy Tale Is More Than Just a Fairy Tale” by Jack Zipes. Students engage in the Analyze and Compare Texts activity from the Student Guide. The Instructions are to “Select a traditional tale you like, such as Little Red Riding Hood or the Three Little Pigs. Research 2–3 versions of the same fairy tale, folktale, or origin story.” Students use graphic organizers to analyze each version separately and then compare the similarities and differences in the retellings of each tale. They are required to cite their sources on the graphic organizer. Then, students created a brief slideshow to share the comparison, but there were no places for citations in the presentation. The Teacher Guide simply repeats student directions and does not provide guidance for locating or formulating citations.
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 6, students draw on the texts from the unit to prepare for a Socratic discussion. Students complete the Prepare for the Discussion graphic organizer in the Student Guide. The instructions state, “Using all of the selections from the unit, complete the chart below with a response to the Socratic Question (or claim), reasons, evidence and reasoning, and notes for providing a possible counterargument.” Students develop a claim in response to the Socratic Question, “How can looking at the world through someone else’s eyes change our perception?” Then, they locate reasons and evidence to support their argument. In addition, they add reasoning that connects the reasons and evidence together. There is a section for them to take notes on other counterarguments so that they are prepared if these emerge during the discussion.
In Unit 4, Module 4, students engage in a direct instruction lesson on summarizing informational texts, including the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing. Students read the informational text “Food Factories of the Future” by Elizabeth M. Tenney. They use evidence from the text to respond to the prompt, “What is the central idea of this article exploring farming techniques? Use specific evidence from the text to support your response.”
In Unit 5, Module 6, students write an informative cause-and-effect essay. The student directions state, “Conduct additional research using the text, as much of the text as possible, and nothing but the text to support your claim/thesis.” The text has already been read in the previous modules, so in this case, “research” indicates revisiting the text.
In Unit 6, Module 2, students read “Learning Rewires the Brain” by Alison Pearce Stevens. Then, they plan an argument that answers the writing prompt, “How does the author arrange their research, data, and information to explain how different types of learning and activity lead to changes in brain cells?” In the Apply Your Learning task from the Student Guide, students reflect on various sections of the text and locate presented facts that answer questions such as “In the section ‘Rewiring,’ how does the author use brain scan data from Spreng’s research to illustrate how different regions of the brain respond to learning?” and “In the section ‘Firing Faster,’ how does the author use information from Fields’s research to explain how glial cells change due to learning?”
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards. The Teacher Guide includes guidance and resources to support standards-aligned, explicit instruction. The majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units. Assessment questions are multiple-choice and only include reading standards.
The implementation schedules align with the core learning. The materials include lesson-specific task timing guidance and implementation schedules can generally be completed in the allotted time. Optional tasks are meaningful and should not distract from core learning. The materials contain seven units, with each unit taking 22 to 26 days to complete, assuming 50 minutes of instruction a day.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.
The materials spend the majority of instructional time on tasks and assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards, including instruction delivered through online slideshows that students complete at their own pace, followed by short multiple-choice quizzes and PDF worksheets. Teachers have access to the Unit Planning Tools that provide support for guidance, planning, and explicit instruction for each unit, as well as a Teacher Guide for each unit. These include clarification of directions and notes to direct students into the online program or Student Guide, suggestions for teacher modeling of aspects of lessons, and opportunities to conduct think-alouds. Assessment questions are multiple-choice and only include reading standards. In other parts of the program, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across the units to ensure students have multiple opportunities to demonstrate mastery of the standard; however, some standards are covered only once.
Over the course of each unit, most instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit of instruction includes a Unit-At-a-Glance, Unit Planning Tools, a Teacher Guide, a Student Guide, a Diverse Learners Guide, and an Answer Key. While each module in the online portal is labeled with the primary standard focus, the explicit instruction for meeting each standard does not appear in the materials. The Unit-At-a-Glance overviews the skills addressed with key standards identified. The Unit-At-a-Glance includes a Skills Students Will Know, Understand, and Apply Section listing some of the unit's key standards. It also includes an overview of each module with suggested timing for Before You Read, Read and Analyze the Anchor Texts, and Close Reading and Academic Writing portions of the lessons. Unit Planning Tools include general guidance for How to Align to Standard. The units consistently include close reading and academic writing, which are facilitated through an online slide deck presentation labeled Direct Instruction. In the Student Guide, students have various activities aligned to the standards, but the connection to the standard is not directly labeled. Each module in the Student Guide contains the following lessons: Apply Your Learning, Appreciate the Author’s Craft, Draft Your Argument, Building Vocabulary, and Write to Impress; however, the standards are not identified with each activity.
In Unit 2, Module 1, the focus standards identified by the publisher are RI.6.2 and W.6.1. In this module, students read “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens. Students read the article and complete a five-question comprehension check online. Students also analyze the text using highlighters to identify expert quotes and research data. Students review a direct instruction lesson on Determining and Tracing a Central Idea Through Details and complete a Share Your Plan task where they identify examples of evidence and coherence within the text. Students answer the following questions in a graphic organizer in their student guide, “What is the author’s central idea in the text above? Which statement in the passage tells you this? What does the expert quote tell you about the issue? How does this piece of evidence shape and strengthen the author’s argument? These questions align with standard RL.6.2. The Teacher Guide provides some guidance, including exemplar responses, for supporting students with this task; there are also scaffolds provided for students in different populations. Students then compose an argument responding to the prompt, “Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?” This task aligns with standard W.6.1. The Teacher Guide provides some instructional guidance for supporting students. The guidance states,
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.
Feedback Focus: Check in with students to ensure their claims are supported with at least two reasons.”
A suggested Teacher Flex Activity is shown that says, “Have students reflect on their Develop work: What are the strongest parts of their arguments? Which areas could be strengthened?”
In Unit 5, Module 3, the focus standards identified by the publisher are RL.6.3 and W.6.1. In this module, students read Sorry, Wrong Number: Part III by Lucille Fletcher. Students read this part of the play and complete a five-question comprehension check online. Students also analyze the text using highlighters to analyze character actions and how the main conflict is revealed. Students review a direct instruction lesson on Understanding Types of Conflict in Literature and Apply their Learning to questions in the Student Guide. The Teacher Guide includes the following guidance for this section of the lesson,
“Remind students that the Direct Instruction lesson is a useful resource.
Have students hear the prompts out loud before they begin working.
Facilitate pairs or groups for students to complete the tasks.”
There is also a sample teacher model for breaking down the prompts provided for the teacher in this section. In addition, the teacher is provided with instructions for helping students visualize the stage directions. The teacher models a think-aloud. Other guidance is provided for modeling annotating and close reading. This activity is aligned with standard RL.6.3. Students then compose an argument to the prompt, “Of the six main types of conflict found in literature, what type best describes the main conflict of Sorry, Wrong Number? Include specific evidence from Part III of the play to support your response.” This task aligns with standard W.6.1. The Teacher Guide provides general guidance for supporting students. The guidance states,
“Explain to students that their claims should answer all aspects of the prompt, provide a clear focus for the writing, and present the points they will cover in their writing.
Remind students to provide at least two reasons to support the claim.
Explain to students that no reason can be submitted without supporting evidence and that no evidence can be provided without an explanation of reasoning.
Guide students in sharing their CERCA plans with peers.
Feedback Focus: Check in with students to ensure their claims are supported with at least two reasons.”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, students read argumentative texts around the topic of school, and most of the tasks align with grade-level standards. In Module 1, students read “Starting Schools Later Leads To Less Tardiness, Fewer ‘Zombies’” by Alison Pearce Stevens. They analyze how writers use claims and evidence to organize arguments (R.I.6.2). After reading the text, students respond to multiple-choice questions such as “Which statement best expresses the central idea of this article?” and “Which piece of evidence provides the strongest support for the claim that high school start times should be later?” Students complete a second read of the text, highlighting evidence such as expert quotes and statistics. Students draft a summary of the text and then compose a written response to the prompt, “Does the author provide convincing evidence to persuade the audience that school start times need to change?” (W.6.1) In Module 3, students read Module 3: “Straight from School Gardens to Lunchrooms: Delicious or Dangerous?” by Grace Chen with a focus on analyzing the author’s use of text features and visuals to support an argument (R.I.6.7). The Reading Check questions include “How do the examples in the selection add to the reader’s understanding of school gardens in the US?” and “What is the main reason why the author includes the video in the text?” Students complete a graphic organizer analyzing an excerpt of the article and respond to the questions “Analyze the author’s use of text features such as subheadings and bullet points in the article. What is the function of each of these text features?” and “Why do you think the author organized the passage above by bulleting the information? Why did the author not bullet other information in the article?” Students also reread the selection and highlight text features and evidence the author provides to help the reader better understand the importance of school gardens. At the end of the module, students compose an argumentative response to the prompt, “Analyze the author’s use of the video, subheadings, bullet points, and examples in the text. Do these text features help the author make a strong case for building school gardens?” (W.6.1) In Module 4, students read “Down with Class Participation Grades” by Melissa Pandika to analyze the author’s purpose and use of appeals (R.I.6.7). Students respond to comprehension questions including, “Which of these statements best describes the author’s purpose in writing this essay?” and “How do the personal anecdotes and experiences included by the author add to the reader’s understanding of participation grading in the classroom?” Students analyze the text for anecdotal details and research evidence (R.I.6.1) and compose a response to the prompt, “Trace the evidence that the author provides about the argument regarding participation grades in schools. How does the author use evidence to appeal to the values of the reader?” (R.W.6.1).
In Unit 6, How Do Our Brains Work, most of the student questions and tasks align with grade-level standards. In Module 1, Build Your Brian!, publisher materials list CCSS.RI.6.3 and CCSS.W.6.1 as the main standards. After reading “Build Your Brain” by R. Douglas Fields, students answer standard-based questions such as, “Why does the author use the example of the newborn colt to explain the development of the human brain?” Students write to answer the prompt, “What are the most impactful anecdotes and examples that the author uses to build an argument about what teenagers should be doing to maximize their brain growth?” In Unit 2, students complete a Quick Journal, which is a task to activate prior knowledge. Students are asked to respond to the prompt, “What is a talent that you have, and how did you develop it over time?” This is an example of a task that is not standard-aligned. In Module 4, Mindset Matters, publisher-identified standards are CCSS.RI.6.3 and CCSS.W.6.2. After reading “Mindset Matters” by Meg Thacher, students answer five comprehension check questions including, “What is the most likely reason the author starts the article with quotes from two different students and their thoughts about a challenging test?” Students also write to answer the prompt, “How does the author convey the idea of a growth mindset through anecdotes, examples, and expert sources?” In Unit 6, Core Reading Assessment and Reflection, students complete a cold read of “A Guide to the Believing Brain” by Kathryn Hulick and answer fourteen questions including, but not limited to, “... how does the author introduce the idea that the brain is responsible for supernatural phenomena?” and “In what way does the author introduce a key idea about hyperthymesia in this paragraph?”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit’s final module includes an assessment with 10-15 multiple-choice questions over a paired reading selection. The assessment evaluates mastery of the skills addressed throughout the unit using new selections. In Unit 3, students read various short stories and complete an end-of-module assessment over two selections, “A Wish for Kali” by Parul Sharma and “The Wonderful Weaver” by James Baldwin. Students complete multiple choice questions such as “What is the primary theme in ‘A Wish for Kali’?” and “How does the author establish the point of view of the narrator and make it distinct from other characters in ‘A Wish for Kali’?” Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed.
In Unit 2, Module 8, after reading multiple texts and analyzing them throughout the unit, students complete the Core Assessment “Where in the World? A Source of Controversy” and “Take a Whiff on the Wild Side.” Students read the texts and complete 13 multiple choice questions, including “Which of the following statements most effectively captures the central idea of the selection ‘Where in the World? A Source of Controversy?’” and “The author claims in Take a Whiff on the Wild Side’ that humans lack a strong sense of smell. How does the author best support this claim?” Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed.
In Unit 5, Module 8, students complete a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection to assess standards taught during the unit. Students read a selection from Sorry, Wrong Number by Lucille Fletcher and then watch a scene from the 1948 film Sorry, Wrong Number. Students complete fifteen questions that are standards-aligned including, but not limited to, “How does the line ‘There won’t be any slip up’ most impact the development of the plot?” and “In the Sorry, Wrong Number film clip, how does the ability to see the setting most contribute to the viewer’s understanding of the character of the woman beyond what the text presents?” Individual questions are not labeled by the standard being assessed.
By the end of the academic year, most standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Addressed in multiple units, students become familiar with RL.6.2. In Unit 1, Module 4, students read “Ice” by Graham Salisbury. Then, students engage in an Apply Your Learning task to determine the theme of the narrative. Students answer the questions “Which statement best captures the main lesson of this story?” and “Which statement best describes how the narrator changes throughout the story?” In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “Names/Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. Students engage in a Direct Instruction lesson on Determining Themes in Literature. After reading, students answer the question, “Which of the following statements best captures the theme, or the central message, of this selection?” Students also complete an Apply Your Learning task to “Reflect on Details to Determine a Theme” by analyzing three specific details from the text. In Unit 7, Module 1, students read “The Twin Heroes,” adapted by Alphonso O. Stafford. Students answer the question, “Which sentence best describes the main message of this story that is also common to many myths about a hero’s journey?”
Addressed only in Unit 6, students have limited opportunities to familiarize themselves with RI.6.3. However, in the unit, several modules address RI.6.3. In Module 1, students engage in a Direct Instruction lesson on “Using Examples and Anecdotes to Explain Ideas.” Students read “Build Your Brain!” by R. Douglas Fields and answer the prompt, “What are the most impactful anecdotes and examples that the author uses to build an argument about what teenagers should be doing to maximize their brain growth?” In Module 4, students read “Mindset Matters” by Meg Thacher and answer the question “What is the most likely reason the author starts the article with quotes from two different students and their thoughts about a challenging test?” and “How does the chart at the end of the article support the reader’s understanding of a growth mindset?” Students also answer the prompt, “How does the author convey the idea of a growth mindset through anecdotes, examples, and expert sources?“
The following standards are only labeled as addressed in one unit throughout the school year: L.6.1, L.6.1.A, L.6.1.B, L.6.1C, L.6.1.E, L.6.4.B, L.6.5.B, and L.6.5.C.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.
Each unit and module is accompanied by a Unit At-a-Glance that includes high-level pacing guides for a 50-minute or 90-minute class session. The pacing guides can also work with an online or a blended model. Task-specific timing guidance is found in the Teacher Guides. Tasks that are deemed essential are starred in the Unit-at-a-Glance document as well as the Teacher Guide. Most units are designed to be completed within 22-26 instructional days, so the seven units can reasonably be completed within a school year. Each unit includes complementary writing tasks that teachers can use to provide students with additional writing practice. The materials also provide Longer Works units, which are novel-centered and can be used to enhance units within the core curriculum. The provided optional Longer Work of Fiction novel study units are meaningful and follow the same pacing as a core unit. The publisher recommends these as optional units of study during a regular weekly choice period as independent exploration time, schoolwide WIN time, silent sustained reading, or at home independent reading.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit At-a-Glance includes a 50-minute Class Pacing Guide and a 90-minute Class Pacing Guide. The 50-minute Class Pacing Guide for one unit covers 22-26 days or blocks per unit, which would account for up to 182 school days to complete seven units. The 50-minute Class Pacing Guides include:
One block for previewing the unit theme and setting personal goals.
One block to explore the theme.
12 to 16 blocks to read and analyze the texts for the unit. Individual core texts take three instructional blocks: Before you Read, Read and Analyze, and Write to a prompt.
Three to four blocks to read across genres.
One to two blocks for an integrated speaking and listening activity, such as Socratic discussion, debate, etc.
Three to five blocks for the Your Portfolio process writing task.
One to two blocks for assessment and reflection.
The Teacher Guide provides timing for each part of the lesson. Parts of lessons are labeled as “essential” in the Unit-At-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, and Module-At-a-Glance.
Novel study units are optional choices and include a Unit Planner with 50-minute and 90-minute pacing guides. The 50-minute class schedule covers 31 blocks, and the 90-minute block schedule covers 18 blocks.
Suggested implementation schedules can be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the Unit At-a-Glance outlines a pacing guide. The 50-minute class paces out a schedule for completing Unit 1 in 21 to 30 instructional days. Students spend two days completing a unit preview; 12 to 16 days reading, analyzing, and writing tasks connected to short stories; three to four days completing tasks where students read across genres; one to two days on a Socratic Discussion; three to four days completing their portfolio writing tasks and reflecting on their learning, and one to two days on the core assessment.
In Unit 3, Module 1, students read “Names and Nombres” by Julia Alvarez. The suggested pacing for reading the text and completing the associated tasks is three to four 50-minute sessions (one to two 90-minute sessions). Students read the text online, then complete the five question Comprehension Check and two Pause and Reflect questions online. Then, students complete the direct instruction lesson on Determining Themes in Literature before completing an Analyze task by highlighting specific details in the text. Students complete the Apply Your Learning task before writing a paragraph responding to the prompt, “What do Julia Alvarez’s descriptions of her many name changes say about how she saw herself growing up?” The suggested timing guidance for all tasks in the Teacher Guide totals 193 minutes; therefore, this module could be reasonably completed in four 50-minute sessions or two 90-minute sessions.
In Unit 5, Module 2, students read “Sorry, Wrong Number: Part II” by Lucille Fletcher. The suggested pacing is four to five 50-minute sessions (two to three 90-minute sessions) to read the text and complete the activities. To connect with the text, students engage in pre-reading activities, including vocabulary and journaling. Before reading the unit text, students complete a Direct Instruction lesson on the impact of point of view on the audience. Students read the text and answer five comprehension questions independently before analyzing the text and preparing to write. Students then summarize the text and respond in writing to a prompt. The suggested timing guidance for all tasks in the Teacher Guide totals 236 minutes; therefore, this module could be reasonably completed in five 50-minute sessions or three 90-minute sessions.
As an added resource, the publisher provides teachers with a Class Planner and Pacing Calculator, which includes the following guidance:
“In the sheets that follow, you will find calculators that help you gauge the time it takes for your students to complete certain tasks.
We know each of the opportunities for learning that we provide takes time, and we want to empower you to make the most of your time by planning for your students’ needs efficiently and realistically.
Simply adjust the number of minutes per session and start recording your estimates or actual minutes spent on given tasks to gauge how long it takes your students to complete them. As they gain experience and practice, they will need less time, so consider adjusting throughout the year so you can plan carefully to meet your students’ needs.”
Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit Planning Tool, additional complementary writing prompts are provided as “practice options as students progress through the curriculum prior to the portfolio piece for each unit.” These prompts are aligned texts read in the unit. The Planning Tool includes student worksheets and graphic organizers to plan their writing as well as reflect on writing. There are no direct instruction notes for the teacher for these prompts. The teacher guidance states, “Make planning decisions based on schedule, your program, and your students’ needs. Use the complementary prompts to ensure appropriate levels of standards coverage in student experiences with the process of writing.”
Longer Works of Fiction novel studies for Grades 6, 7, and 8 include A Single Shard by Linda Sue Park, Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis, and Long Way Down by Jason Reynolds. These units include a Unit-at-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, Student Guide, and Diverse Learner Guide in the same format as the Core ELAR.
The publisher provides the Longer Works Units and some guidance on incorporating these units into the curriculum as part of the unit of instruction, independent reading, at-home enrichment, or schoolwide reading programs.
In each module throughout the program, there are “recommended” and “essential” tasks for each lesson. While the publisher suggests completing all activities in a lesson, the “recommended” tasks could be optional and cut when teachers are short on instructional time; however, cutting material repeatedly could affect the delivery of instruction essential to achieving grade-level standards.
Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, complementary writing prompts are provided. Teachers are able to use these prompts to give students extra practice with different types of writing and standards.
Optional Longer Works of Fiction novel studies include similar tasks and pacing as core units. The novel studies are intended to enhance core instruction. The materials for A Long Way Down by Jason Reynolds include eight modules that follow the same format as the Core ELAR units. In Module 1, students read the novel’s first part and analyze the author’s craft in the exposition. In Modules 2-5, students continue to read the anchor text and complete Direct Instruction and Writing Lessons that follow a similar format as the Core ELAR units. In Module 6, Read Across Genres, students read and analyze poetry, informational texts, and a multimedia piece to “enrich their understanding of” the core text. In Module 7, Socratic Discussion, students learn about and prepare to participate in a Socratic discussion to the question, “How does our environment influence specific behaviors, and why is it difficult to break away from what we know or what we do to survive?” In Module 8, Your Portfolio, students write a literary analysis essay for the prompt, “Analyze how Will’s experiences shape his views on loyalty, revenge, and what it means to grow up. Cite evidence from the novel to support your stance on which experiences had the greatest impact on his character development.”
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. In addition, the materials include family letters for each unit in English and Spanish that inform parents and caregivers about the program and student learning throughout the curriculum. Supporting documentation on the ThinkCERCA website outlines how the program works and the program's research-based strategies.
The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Teachers can use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. The program provides some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse.
The platform allows teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher.
The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program; however, implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials provide comprehensive guidance to assist teachers in presenting the instructional materials, including annotations and suggestions in the Teacher Guides, some adult-level explanations so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, and standards correlation documents. In addition, the materials include family letters for each unit in English and Spanish that inform parents and caregivers about the program and student learning throughout the curriculum. Supporting documentation on the ThinkCERCA website outlines how the program works and the program's research-based strategies.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The materials for each unit include a Unit At-a-Glance, a Teacher Guide, and Unit Planning Tools. The Unit At-a-Glance document is also included in the first pages of the Teacher Guide. It includes a unit snapshot, rationale, and breakdown of the skills that will be addressed in the unit. The essential question is presented, along with the timings of each section of the unit. A Unit Assessment Blueprint is found here as well as a document on the progression of scaffolds for independent learning. The Teacher Guides include instructions for implementing the program. Lesson summaries and objectives are found for each module. Teacher tips, support for students with exceptional needs, support for multilingual/English Language Learners, as well as gifted and talented enrichment opportunities are found. Unit Planning Tools include a Comprehensive Scope and Sequence and Planning Guidance document, Vocabulary Instruction Guidance, Key Vocabulary, Resources for Volume Reading, Resources for Students, and a Family Letter in English and Spanish.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Frontmatter Overview of Program document provides an overview of the program and highlights implementation, scaffolding, grouping students, distribution of writing, implementing the program without 1:1 device access, and time routines.
Each Unit At-a-Glance includes the essential question, unit snapshot, rationale, list of student skills and standards addressed, timing for modules/sessions, lists of anchor texts and suggested longer works and independent reading opportunities, unit planning tools, writing prompts, and assessment blueprints.
Unit Planning Tools document includes a comprehensive scope and sequence, vocabulary instruction guidance, key vocabulary terms, resources for volume reading, resources for students, family letters in English and Spanish, and state standard crosswalks.
Each Teacher Guide includes lesson summaries, learning objectives, suggested timing for each part of the lesson, module planning tool, direct instruction guidance with teacher tips and “teacher will”/”student will” statements, scripting for some direction instruction, think-alouds, support for students with exceptional needs and multilingual and EL learners, links to toolkits, answer keys for Student Guide worksheets, and feedback focus.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, Share your Reflections activity, the teacher presents four comprehension questions about the text “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros. These questions are labeled with DOK. In the Teacher Guide, guidance is presented in a “Speaking and Listening Toolkit - Using Evidence to Build on Others’ Ideas.” The guidance states, “As students engage in the ‘Pause and Reflect’ activity, explain that recording questions from the text before sharing their reflections with their audience helps them explore the text they are reading together, rather than simply sharing their point of view about the topic without deeper engagement with the text. Emphasize that the point of the experience is to build knowledge together, speak respectfully, and listen attentively. Demonstrate how they will improve their contributions by grounding their reflections in the text by modeling your thinking about a specific piece of text.” Further guidance is listed in the “Teacher will” section:
“Assist students in switching between the Pause and Reflect questions online and recording their responses in the Student Guide
Facilitate pairs or small groups for students to discuss their responses.
Remind them to record their discussion reflections in the Student Guide.”
In Unit 1, Module 1, Sharpen Your Sentences activity, students are to expand sentences using but, because, or so. Directions in the Teacher Guide tell the teacher to “explain that students will practice expanding sentences using the conjugations but, because, and so.” Guidance in the form of Illuminating Key Concepts in Language and Grammar - Using Conjunctions says, “This activity asks students to expand three sentences by using the conjunctions, but, because, and so. Begin by going over the conjunctions, which are words used to connect clauses, and how they function in expanding sentences. Then, model with example sentences: I love English class, but it requires a lot of homework. I love English class because my teacher is awesome. I love English class, so I usually have good grades in that class. Explain how but introduces a conflicting idea because introduces the cause of the preceding statement and so introduces the effect of the preceding idea. Explain how this activity asks students to elaborate on this element of the text by expanding on this particular statement by using these three conjunctions. Students then complete the three prompts. Upon completing this work, have at least three students share their favorite completed sentences and discuss how the conjunctions connect and expand ideas.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials include a Resources section that consists of Curriculum Resources, a Help Center, an On-Demand Video Library, and the ThinkCERCA Blog. The Curriculum Resources Tab directs to best practices documents on a variety of topics in writing, reading comprehension, close reading, vocabulary, background knowledge and culture, community, and collaboration. Each of the documents includes suggested time for the activity/strategy, rationale/research base, before, during, and after instructions, and suggested scaffolds and supports. These pages include some grade-level specific Toolkits in writing, speaking and listening, language and grammar, and vocabulary that the teacher or students can use. Materials also include suggested independent reading titles. The Help Center includes product support, an Admin Toolkit, and a Teacher Toolkit. The Teacher Toolkit includes guidance documents for Getting Started, Implementing ThinkCERCA, and Providing Feedback. Each Unit Teacher Guide includes a section titled “Core Unit Progression,” which provides teachers with how the unit fits in the progression of previous and future units within and across grade levels.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Front Matter Focus: Reading document outlines the rationale for the unit components, including anchor texts, close reading and writing tasks, and scaffolding. It also provides information about text complexity in the program.
The Best Practices Document: Establishing Vocabulary Notebooks and Routines is found in the Curriculum Resources Tab for 6th grade. It includes a rationale, a list of student tasks, instructions for before, during, and after the lesson, and scaffolds and supports.
The Best Practices Document: The Teacher Research Toolkit includes guidelines for informal and formal research. It includes a rationale/research base, optimal application notes for before, during, and after lessons, and suggested scope and sequence. The toolkit also includes graphic organizers that can be used by both teachers and students.
The Curriculum Resources tab includes a document titled “Implementing Independent Reading,” which provides suggested routines, a rationale, and instructions for integrating volume reading and independent reading pacing.
In the Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, Implementing ThinkCERCA, there is a document titled “Implementing a Writing Lesson with Engagement Strategies.” It outlines the steps of the writing lesson and links to detailed instructions for strategies at each step.
The Teacher Guide for each unit includes summaries of what students learn throughout the unit in the different literacy strands (Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Grammar, and Research). Teachers can use these notes to deepen their knowledge of what students are learning in the course.
While the materials include toolkits that teachers and students can use across different parts of literacy, they are the same for each grade level. The following toolkits are available and are the same across grades 6-12: Research, Speaking and Listening, Revision Strategies, and Language and Style Toolkits.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Teacher Guide includes a section titled “Core Unit Progression.” This section provides teachers with explanations of how the unit fits in the progression of previous and future units within and across grade levels. These explanations are tailored to Reading and Writing skills, separately.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials provide standard correlation resources at the grade level, Unit, Module, and lesson level. The Unit At-a-Glance and Module-at-a-Glance materials provide teachers with the standards correlated to classroom instruction. There is additional information about the alignment of the CCSS for the writing and assessments of each Unit and Module. Additionally, there is a Grade 6 Planning Tool, Pacing Calculator and Assessment Blueprint Document, and a Scope and Sequence by Strand document that provides a comprehensive view of the CCSS alignment. The Teacher Guide does not include the CCSS, but the teacher has access to the Unit At-a Glance, the Unit Planning Tools, and the Scope and Sequence documents.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit Planning Tools document, there is a Grade 6 Planning Tool, Pacing Calculator and Assessment Blueprint Document that outlines the CCSS by Unit and Module. There is a comprehensive breakdown for the entire program and a more in-depth breakdown for each Unit. Additionally, there is a Scope and Sequence by Strand document that provides a comprehensive view of Curriculum and Instruction, Practice and Feedback, Assessments, and CCSS for vocabulary, writing, research, reading, speaking and listening, and grammar.
In each Unit At-a-Glance document, the CCSS are listed in a grid formation at the top of the document. For Unit 3, the CCSS are listed for Reading and Multimedia Literacy Skills ((RL.6.3; RL.6.2; RI.6.7; RL.6.4), Writing skills (W.6.1; W.6.1c; W.6.1b), Vocabulary/Language Skills (L.6.6; L.6.4a; L.6.4b; L.6.5a; L.6.5b), Speaking and Listening (SL.6.1; RL.6.1), Executive Function skills(W.6.8; W.6.9), and Foundational Reading and Linguistic Skills (RF.2, RF.3). Underneath each category is a bulleted list of a description of the task-related to the standard such as for Reading and Multimedia Literacy skills:
“Determine themes in literature
Learn how authors develop characters in fiction.
Analyze story elements in literature
Understand how authors develop points of view in literature
Analyze and compare poetry elements”
The Unit At-a-Glance documents list the Unit Writing Prompts with the corresponding CCSS.
The Unit Assessment Blueprint lists each assessment for the unit with the primary CCSS and the CCSS item standards in each Unit At-a-Glance document.
In each Module At-a-Glance, there is a breakdown of the module, which includes the corresponding CCSS for each part of the lesson.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit At-a-Glance documents, the CCSS are listed in a grid formation at the top of the document. Then, each document is coded for each module that matches the grid that connects each module task to the CCSS listed in the grid. For example, in Unit 3, Module 2, ”Sometimes a Dream Needs a Push” by Walter Dean Myers, the online direct instruction, Developing Characters in Fiction, has a blue circle with the letter R next to it, indicating that it connects to the standards listed in the section for Reading and Multimedia Literacy Skills ((RL.6.3; RL.6.2; RI.6.7; RL.6.4).
The Teacher Guides contain multiple areas to guide teachers to the learning that is correlated to CCSS, including, but not limited to, Lesson Objectives, Purpose, Teacher Will, and Feedback Focus. The Teacher Guide does not list the CCSS, but the CCSS language is included. The CCSS can be located in each Unit At-a Glance, the Unit Planning Tools, and the Scope and Sequence documents.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials include a Family Letter for each unit located in the Unit Planning Tools. The letter includes the name, essential question, text titles, overview of the learning, and two suggestions for activities at home. The letter is available in English and Spanish. The family letter provides the rationale for the unit that connects the essential question to the broad ideas of the unit. This could provide families with areas of home discussion, but it is not explicitly framed as such. The two suggested activities are the same for every unit and every grade level and include how to gain access to the online platform and reading tools available there and a broad suggestion to connect the essential question to “...movies, television shows, and song lyrics.”
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Planning Tool includes a Family Letter in both English and Spanish. Parents can use this letter to orient themselves to what students are learning in each unit.
The Unit 1 Planning Tools include a family letter that includes the unit name, Who Are You?, and the essential questions for the unit, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?” The letter informs families how students will explore the ideas of “...experiences of others similar to and different from themselves allows students to develop self-awareness, social awareness, and empathy…” The family letter also includes the reading selection for the unit, including, but not limited to,“Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros and “Fish Cheeks” by Amy Tan. This letter is available in English and Spanish. Additionally, the family letter provides an overview of the learning for the unit including Socratic discussion, intensive pronouns, and how to ensure correct pronoun case.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit Planning Tool includes a section for Suggested Activities for Home that includes how to access ThinkCERCA from home, a list of available reading tools on their platform, and a prompt to “...encourage students to discuss the essential question as it applies to movies, television shows, and song lyrics.”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches and identification of the research-based strategies. On the publisher’s website, a How it Works section outlines the components of the program. This page includes video demonstrations on topics such as using the program within your daily routine, giving students choice and voice, and using station-based rotations. An overview of the program document is included with the core curriculum at each grade level. In the resources section, core resources by grade are found that offer additional guidance for implementing various routines in the program, including writing, reading comprehension, close reading, vocabulary, culture and community, and background knowledge. In addition, there are Overview of Our Research Base documents for each component of the program (Reading, Writing, Grammar, Speaking & Listening, Research, Assessment & Reporting, MLLs, and Gifted & Talented) are included in the resource materials.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program.
The How it Works section provides a high-level overview of the program, outlining six steps to the program:
“Step 1: Teacher assigns differentiated lessons to students
Step 2: Students read an engaging, authentic text
Step 3: Students leverage CERCA to develop their essays
Step 4: Peer-to-peer discussion and debate infused along the way
Step 5: Teacher provides actionable feedback for growth
Step 6: District and school leaders monitor progress”
The Overview of the Program document provides a more detailed look at the program’s instructional approach. It outlines topics such as implementation strategies, scaffolding for diverse learners, distribution of writing, time for speaking, listening, and writing, working the program without 1:1 device access, and maximizing student engagement with routines.
The Core Resources for grade 6 include best practices documents for a variety of literacy strategies, including (but not limited to)
Compare Writing
Choral Reading
Paired Reading and Review
Choral/Dramatic Reading
Partner Restatement
Frayer Model
Root Word Challenge
Socratic Discussion
Quick Journal
Materials include and reference research-based strategies.
For each strand, an Overview of Our Research Base document is provided, as well as documents for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Grammar, and Vocabulary.
Reading: This document includes a research base for unit components, anchor texts, scaffolded close reading, and writing-related tasks. It also discusses reading across genres, the purpose of anchor texts and reading across genres activities, integrated literacy, text complexity, and AI-enabled scaffolding access to grade-level texts.
Writing: This document includes the program’s approach to writing instruction, time for speaking, listening, and writing, and distribution of writing.
Speaking and Listening: This document includes an overview of research for the program components, formal speaking and listening, and routines,
Grammar: This section includes an overview of research on explicit and integrated grammar instruction, grammar instruction in context, and conventions routines.
Vocabulary: This document This section includes an overview of research on explicit and integrated vocabulary instruction, establishing routines, selecting vocabulary, best practices, repetition and integration, vocabulary instruction and in-context vocabulary routines, and vocabulary acquisition.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Students mainly need access to the online program and a paper or electronic copy of the Student Guide to successfully access the program components. The Unit At-a-Glance Document and Teacher Guides outline which online direct instruction and additional offline resources are used in each module. These are clearly labeled to show when students need access to a computer and when they are working offline.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit At-a-Glance document lists the online direct instruction lessons for each module as well as additional offline resources. These are all tagged with a color-coded circle to indicate the strand, reading, writing, vocabulary, speaking and listening or executive function, as well as a star for essential tasks.
The Teacher Guide includes a one-page graphic for each module that includes a map of the module with images of the Student Guide pages. Like in the Unit At-a-Glance document, these are all tagged with a color-coded circle to indicate the strand, reading, writing, vocabulary, speaking and listening, or executive function, as well as a star for essential tasks. Additional graphics to indicate whether the activity is teacher-led, individual, paired, small group, online or offline.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments and include suggestions for teachers on following up with students. The materials include accommodations that ensure all students can access assessments as well as general teacher guidance on implementing those accommodations.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include reading, writing, and vocabulary assessments at the end of each Module. The Unit At-a-Glance includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides the primary and item standards. Additionally, each unit consists of a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a summative and formative assessment. The Module At-a-Glance document for each Reading Assessment module provides the primary and item standards for this assessment.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit At-a-Glance document includes a Unit Assessment Blueprint that provides primary standards for each assessment for each Module in that Unit. The Selection Reading Assessment also lists item standards.
In Unit 2, Module 2, “Should Kids Get Homework?,” the Selection Reading Assessment lists CCSS.RI.6.1 as the primary standard and CCSS.RI.6.2, CCSS.RI.6.1.CCSS.RI.6.8, CCSS.RL.6.3, and CCSS.RL.6.4 as item standards. The Selection Vocabulary Quiz lists CCSS.L.6.4 as the primary standard. The Formative Writing Assessment: Evidence-Based Writing— Argumentative lists CCSS.W.6.1 as the primary standard.
At the end of each Unit, there is a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a formative and summative assessment opportunity. The primary and item standards are listed in the Unit At-a-Glance and Module At-a-Glance documents for this assessment.
In Unit 2, Module 8, the Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection lists the primary standards as CCSS.RI.6.5, CCSS.W.6.10, and CCSS.RI.6.10. In the Unit At-a-Glance, the primary standards are listed as CCSS.RI.6.8, CCSS.RI.6.2, and CCSS.RI.6.1. The item standards are CCSS.RI.6.1, CCSS.RI.6.2, CCSS.RI.6.4, and CCSS.RI.6.8.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials provide multiple opportunities to assess students’ learning through varied methods of formal and informal assessments. There is a system that provides data reporting for teachers, administration, and districts to review student achievement and growth. In the daily lessons, teachers are provided with a Feedback Focus section that provides some language and/or look-fors for the lesson’s specific tasks. Throughout teacher guides, there is some guidance for teachers to use when students do not show mastery. Writing Portfolio pieces are accompanied by rubrics, and teachers may use the Feedback Guidance located in the program’s Resources to provide students with individualized feedback based on the genre of the assignment. The program includes a direct instruction and skills lesson library that teachers can use to supplement student writing instruction based on this feedback.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The ThinkCERCA Front Matter resources provide an overview document on the assessment focus for the program. The Overview presents how the assessments are a blend of self-assessment and automated assessments that assess students’ reading, writing, vocabulary, and language skills. Formative assessments are available to “...inform instruction, unit assessments, culminating tasks, quarterly college placement practice opportunities, and benchmark assessments create summative assessments to gauge student progress toward outcomes and overall achievement.” Unit assessments provide teachers with data for skill transfer of reading and a culminating writing assessment. Additionally, benchmark and college placement practices provide opportunities to assess state assessments.
Assessments are available in multiple formats, and teachers have multiple options to assess students’ progress, including pre- and post-assessments for foundational skills, lesson assessments, benchmark writing assessments, informal writing and speaking assessments, unit reading assessments, culminating tasks, and personal reflection.
ThinkCERCA provides a data dashboard that teachers, administration, and district staff can use to “...understand how students are performing across a grade level or across a department…”
Each unit includes an assessment at the end of each module that includes a Selection Reading Assessment, a Selection Vocabulary Quiz, and a Formative Writing Assessment. At the end of every unit is a Unit Reading Assessment and Reflection that serves as a unit assessment aligned with standards. This assessment serves as a formative and summative assessment. There is a beginning, middle, and end-of-year Benchmark assessment scheduled in Units 1, 4, and 7, respectively.
Throughout each module, teachers have opportunities to check for student understanding that is embedded in the lessons that are a combination of anecdotal, written, or speaking assessments.
Writing Portfolio pieces are accompanied by rubrics, and teachers may use the Feedback Guidance located in the program’s Resources to provide students with individualized feedback based on the genre of the assignment and the writing skill.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Reports Portfolio slide deck, ThinkCERCA provides examples of data reports available including Operational Reports, Instructional Reports, and Benchmark Reports. While all reports provide a level of student performance data and student growth data, none of the reports provide any direct paths to reteaching or supporting students. Rather, general advice is given, such as “Use the class summary to review course-specific data” and “Use this data to see students’ performance categories and future growth focus.” Teachers can, however, use student data to group students by reteaching, if desired.
Throughout the Teacher Guides are Feedback Focus sections that guide the teacher on what to look for in each task. For example, in Unit 6, Module 2, students are completing questions about the author’s choices. The teacher Feedback Focus section states, “Circulate to spot-check student work and make note of challenging prompts for students to review as a class.” There is no further guidance provided.
The program includes a direct instruction and skills lesson library that teachers can use to supplement student writing instruction based on feedback to their Portfolio Writing pieces. Teacher Guides provide the following guidance: “Search by standard in the Skills Library for personalized lessons to reteach as needed.”
Throughout the teacher guides, some assignments include “Respond and Reteach” guidance. This guidance prompts the teacher with scaffolds for students who are still struggling with certain tasks or concepts.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials provide multiple opportunities for student assessments through multiple-choice questions and/or written responses. Throughout the program, the materials provide formative and summative assessments that align with the standards for each grade level.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials provide Unit assessments aligned to the standards, including, but not limited to, Selection Reading Assessments, Selection Vocabulary Quizzes, Formative Writing Practice, Formative Reading Assessments, Unit Speaking and Listening Assessments, Research Assessments, Culminating Task: Writing Portfolio Assessments, and Unit Reading Assessments. The specific assessments and correlating standards are provided in the Unit-at-a-Glance documentation. These assessments build over the unit from practice to the culminating writing task and the unit reading assessment at the end of each unit.
Baseline Writing Assessments/Benchmark Assessments are provided. Students are assigned a grade-level reading passage. After reading, they answer eight multiple-choice questions. Then, they write an essay that includes text evidence from the reading passage. This assessment is given at the beginning, middle, and end of the year to personalize and track student progress throughout the year. ThinkCERCA reporting tools provide a Benchmark Summary, Benchmark Rubric Category, and Benchmark Item Analysis report.
A Reading Leveling Assessment is provided to measure student reading levels. Students are automatically assigned a short reading passage at, below, and above grade level. Each passage has eight multiple-choice questions to complete. Teachers may adjust the reading passage level as needed. The Leveling Assessment report provides teachers with a Student Report by Lessons report. This report posts Background Knowledge and Applied Knowledge scores. The time suggested for this assessment is 40-60 minutes.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials include assessments that provide tools that increase accessibility for reading texts, prompts, questions, and answers, such as Immersive Reader and AI-Enabled Reading Support. This includes the ability for students, including, read-aloud, increased font, and line focus. These universal tools are available for all assessments except the Baseline Writing assessment. Writing assessments do not have a speech-to-text feature built in, but it is mentioned as an accommodation that could be used. The materials also provide some scaffolded materials in the Diverse Learning Guide to support self-assessments and reflections. The materials provide teachers with general guidance on the use of accommodations.
Materials offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
ThinkCERCA accessibility tools include an Immersive Reader and an AI-enabled reading Support tool, which provides a read-aloud option, increased text size, increased spacing, font choice, and background colors. Students can choose to break apart words into syllables and color code parts of speech. Another tab provides line focus, a picture dictionary, and a translation function. These tools are available on all the assessments except the Baseline Writing assessments.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit At-a-Glance document includes a section titled “Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs” that provides brief and general suggestions, such as using the embedded tools or reading the Diverse Learners Guide.
Within each module is a Diverse Learners Guide that provides students with a more scaffolded version of the Student Guide. For example, the guide may have sentence starters for the Assessment Reflection.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials provide teachers scaffolds and tools to support students in participating in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning are generic.
The program provides varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Teachers can use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. The program provides some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials regularly provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English Language Arts and literacy. Teachers can consult guidance in lesson support resources such as the Unit At-a-Glance, Unit Scaffolds Plan for Striving Readers, and Teacher Guide. For each unit, a Diverse Learner Guide is provided, which mirrors the Student Guide but includes additional prompts, graphic organizers, sentence frames, and models for diverse learners.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Scaffolds Plan for Striving Readers document outlines lesson supports for struggling readers. It includes the research base and curriculum design for the program, platform, unit, and lesson scaffolds. Lesson scaffolds are described and include background knowledge, key academic vocabulary, pre-reading, during-reading, after-reading, decoding, and fluency strategies.
The Unit At-a-Glance documents reference online differentiated supports on several of the pages. The documents state, “Online differentiated supports enable access to grade-level texts for English Language Learners, Diverse Learners, and students who may benefit from additional support.” In the Unit Overview section, there is a paragraph titled “Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs” that says, “As needed, students with diverse learning needs may benefit from pre-teaching lessons that are paired with anchor texts. Additional support for students with Diverse Learning Needs can be found in the Guide for Students with Diverse Learning Needs. These modifications can also be used with multilingual learners as they continue the acquisition of English.”
Each Unit At-a-Glance document also includes an “Excellence and Opportunity for All" section that references engaging culturally diverse learners. It includes guidance on making personal connections to the materials through Quick Journals, Explore Key Concepts, Connect Steps, and Share your Personal Connection part of each lesson.
The Teacher Guides include guidance for the teacher in the margin with suggested strategies for supporting students with exceptional needs, struggling readers, and/or gifted and talented enrichment opportunities.
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. A Unit Scaffolds Plan for Gifted and Talented document provides general suggestions and guidelines for challenging gifted students. In the Teacher Guide, modules include at least one instance per lesson with guidance for teachers labeled “Gifted and Talented Enrichment Opportunity.”
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Scaffolds Plan for Gifted and Talented document is a one-page guide that includes the approach and “why” for scaffolding lessons for this group of students. It states this about the core program, “Throughout each unit, students will experience problem-solving challenges, independent research studies, collaboration opportunities, and critical thinking exercises.” Then, it lists five ways to increase rigor:
“Encourage metacognition - Prompt students to showcase their cognitive thought processes by annotating using metacognitive markers, engaging in a post-reading metacognitive reflection, or participating in partner think-aloud activities.
Productive struggle—By challenging students with advanced tasks, although still in their Zone of Proximal Development, teachers can inspire perseverance and stamina while also allowing students to think more flexibly rather than correctly.
Convergent and divergent thinking includes using open-ended questions and responses, giving students an opportunity to explore new thinking,
Depth of understanding - rather than memorization or rote learning
Leverage the heavy lifting– Remember that sometimes less is more. Instead of adding more support, consider removing scaffolds to promote independence.”
In the Teacher Guides, modules provide guidance for teachers labeled “Gifted and Talented Enrichment Opportunity.” For example, in Unit 1, Module 1, Check lesson, the guide states, “Advanced Evaluation: Have students who finish early and completely take a closer look at the simile: ‘But when the sick feeling goes away, and I open my eyes, the red sweater’s still sitting there like a big red mountain.’ Challenge students to defend the author’s choice of figurative language with textual evidence or suggest an alternative simile to enhance the author’s expression of emotions. This can be done independently or as a Paired Argument Building Activity.”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time, variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, and opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Units begin with goal-setting and end with reflections and celebration. Speaking and listening tasks and discussions allow students to share their thinking in various ways. Quick Journal activities allow students to connect to themes and build background knowledge. Peer review is built into writing tasks.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit includes multi-modal opportunities through whole class, small group, partner, and individual activities. Units consist of modules that follow a pattern of 1-2 sessions of personal goal setting and exploring the theme, 3-5 sessions of close reading and academic writing, 3-4 sessions of reading across genres, 2-3 sessions of “Spark Courageous Thinking” which is a formal, evidence-based discussion, 4-5 sessions of Portfolio writing, and 1-2 sessions of reading assessment and reflection.
Students use interactive online resources for guided close reading and argument writing. AI-assisted real-time Feedback is provided to students. Direct instruction video slide lessons on English Language Arts skills are provided. A Student Guide with unit resources and graphic organizers is provided that can be used for digital or paper/pencil work.
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
At the beginning of each unit, when students preview the theme, they take a poll of their peers to answer a question about the theme. They answer the question themselves, poll some of their peers, pair, and share, and then volunteer to share their rationales with the whole class. At the end of the unit, they return to the question and see if their thoughts have changed.
As students explore the theme and essential question for each unit, they apply their understanding in various contexts. These include responding to literature through close reading and comprehension questions, writing arguments using text evidence to answer prompts related to the theme, reading across genres, including multimedia, poetry, and informational texts, a variety of speaking and listening activities, and portfolio writing.
Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students explore themes through close reading, comparing literature, writing evidence-based claims, process writing, discussion, and reflection.
Across units, a variety of speaking/discussion tasks, including Debate, Socratic Discussion, Panel Discussion, Performance, and Pitch Decks, allow students to deepen their understanding and apply literacy ideas. After these activities, students conduct polls and reflect on the discussion using graphic organizers from the Student Guide and further class discussion.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Peer and self-review are present in Module 7 or 8 writing activities. Graphic organizers are provided to guide the peer and self-review process including Share your Personal Narrative, Edit the Draft Together, and Reflect on your Writing. Writing rubrics help guide the peer review process.
At the end of each unit, students complete Reflect on Your Success and Celebrate with Others lessons. In Reflect on Your Success, students write a description of what they are most proud of, whether they feel like a more effective learner than when they began the unit, what their best learning conditions are, obstacles presented and strategies tried, and what they want adults to understand about them as a learner. They are asked to share one successful strategy they used during the unit to overcome a challenge. In Celebrate With Others, students use a 3-2-1 strategy and record 3 parts of the unit they enjoyed, 2 ways they improved their skills, and 1 area of growth they still have. They are asked to share one larger theme about their learning that emerges.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
At the beginning of each unit, one to two sessions are dedicated to personal goal setting and exploring the theme. Students set a personal SMART goal for the unit.
At the end of each unit, students reflect on their SMART goal in a Quick Journal activity. They are asked to answer these questions:
“What can you celebrate?
Were you able to do the action you planned?
Was it specific, measurable, and realistic? If not, how would you change it?
Was it achievable in the given time frame? If not, how would you change it?
How might you revise your planning process for the next set of goals?”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies. In the Overview of Program Document, the program philosophy of grouping students is outlined under the heading, “Grouping Guidance: Grouping Students Based on Growth Focus and Learning Objectives.” Grouping Guidance is also provided in the Unit At-a-Glance document, which outlines the philosophy of grouping in heterogeneous learning groups. It is recommended that teachers group students based on learning focus rather than readiness levels. Inclusivity is stressed in the guidance, recommending that students in special populations actively participate in class.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Unit At-a-Glance document, there is a section titled “Grouping Guidance.” This document includes some general guidance about grouping students and suggestions for grouping within the program.
The materials suggest grouping in pairs, small groups, or larger groups depending on the activity and learning focus.
Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The guidance states, “We highly recommend that teachers group students based on the learning focus and avoid grouping students by readiness level. The ThinkCERCA reports provide ample data points to drive instructional groupings. When engaging in reteaching or pre-teaching moments, regardless of student ‘level,’ teachers can group all students who have the same personalized growth focus area together for an immediate teaching opportunity. For example, a teacher may choose to focus on students with the personalized growth focus area of ‘evidence.’ This may mean that a student with 6th-grade readiness may be in the same group as a student with 8th-grade readiness.”
Guidance is provided for grouping in pairs, small groups, or larger groups: “Large group learning is best when all students need the instruction or information and students at all ranges of abilities are able to engage. Small groups foster discussion and collaboration and provide teachers with the opportunity to instruct students based on personalized data, while partner and individual work allow for deepened engagement and focused thinking about a topic.”
In the Teacher Guide, icons indicate whether a lesson is intended for individual, paired, or small-group learning.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide teachers and students with scaffolds and tools to support students' participation in the regular lesson despite language barriers. Teachers are provided with general tips for the specific vocabulary that may need translations, as well as reminders to use the online tools and the Diverse Learning Guide for scaffolds. There is an additional English Language Learners Guide that teachers can use to provide multilingual learners with scaffolds depending on their English language proficiency level. The online platform has a wide variety of language choices for written translation and read-aloud features.
Materials consistently provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Teacher Guide provides guidance in the margin notes for Support for English Language Learners, which provides teachers with specific words to consider for translation. The margins also indicate additional suggestions, including, but not limited to, when to provide tools such as a bilingual dictionary, translation, or digital tools. These tips can be found for most of the specific sections of the module or unit.
The ThinkCERCA materials include a document on their “Approach to Supporting Multilingual English Language Learners” that provides an overview of possible scaffolds aligned to WIDA supports, including, but not limited to, graphic organizers, distinct task chunking, and modified rubrics. There is also a Unit Scaffold Plan for Striving Readers that lists platform, unit, and lesson scaffolds.
Student materials can be translated into many different languages in writing or read aloud. Languages include, but are not limited to, three forms of Spanish, Thai, Urdu, and Zulu.
The Teacher Guide provides general tips for translating specific vocabulary and reminders to use the online tools and the Diverse Learning Guide as scaffolds.
There is an English Language Learner Guide provided for each unit, which links to different guides for each module. This guide differentiates activities for students depending on their English Language proficiency level. Activities are differentiated for beginning proficiency, intermediate proficiency, and advanced proficiency.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Materials provide a balance of images and information about people representing various demographic and physical characteristics. In each unit, texts are balanced with a variety of author voices from across cultures. Both fictional and nonfictional depictions of people are balanced across ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. In addition to the core readings, suggested longer works include a balance of voices and present all identities in a positive light. Photos and images are minimal across the units, are mostly found at module headings, and may consist of people, places, or objects. There are a variety of races, genders, and ethnicities represented in those images.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students explore the theme “Who Are You?” with the essential question, “What are the rewards and challenges of staying true to yourself?”. Texts in this unit depict speakers from various genders, races, and ethnicities. Texts include:
In “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros, a young girl struggles with complex adolescent emotions.
“Fish Cheeks” by Amy Tan offers insight into the experiences of Chinese American families and relationships.
In “Boy in the Back of the Class,” Ronald Smith recounts a time in middle school when he was concerned about how his peers would react to him getting glasses.
“Ice” by Graham Salisbury is a story set in Hawaii and depicts family relationships.
“I Know My Soul” by Claude McKay is a self-reflective poem by an African American author.
Alberto Rios's “The Day of the Refugios” explores the Mexican-American experience on the Mexican-American border between Mexico and the United States.
In Unit 3, Module 1, “Names/Nombres,” Julia Alvarez tells the story of Julia Alvarez, who moves to New York City from the Dominican Republic with her family. Upon entry to United States Immigration, she immediately encounters the mispronunciation of her name. Julia’s coming-of-age narrative explores her experiences with names and the cultural misunderstandings that she and her family endured as immigrants.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Module 2, students read “Sometimes a Dream Needs a Push” by Walter Dean Myers, the story of the son of an NBA basketball player who is paralyzed from the waist down after a car accident. He joins a wheelchair basketball league and overcomes challenges. Students focus on the characters and their development, noting how they handle disappointment but also inspire each other and offer support.
In Unit 4, Module 2, students read Gabrielle Calise’s “How the Teens of St. Pete Youth Farm Fight Food Insecurity One Harvest at a Time.” The article deals with food insecurity and highlights youth ambassadors from the South St. Petersburg Community Redevelopment Area who are dedicated to community service and environmental work.
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Photos across the units are of objects, places, or people and are mostly limited to module headings. Most texts do not include images unless they are a multimedia study in a Read Across Genres module. For example, in Unit 2, Module 5, students read a multimedia article titled “Check ‘em Out! A Collection of Extraordinary Libraries” by Carrie Tillotson. This includes images of unique libraries, and some of them have people, including girls wearing protective masks, a female librarian telling a story to seated children, an outdoor library in Columbia with students listening to a male teacher or librarian, and a neighborhood little library with adults of different races and genders interacting with the books.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials provide general and mostly generic scaffolds and supports for students to use their home language to leverage their learning. The guidance for teachers primarily falls into the category of words to translate or how to leverage online tools. The online version of the program comes embedded with a wide range of translated languages. However, there is no specific guidance about where or when to leverage these tools. Likewise, scaffolds are provided and encouraged, but only general guidance on how or when to incorporate these scaffolds. ThinkCERCA materials show a positive philosophy about the value of multilingual students in the class and a structured system for all students to achieve in the classroom; however, the suggestions in the materials are broad.
Materials provide some broad suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Module 6, Support for English Language Learners states to “Allow students to discuss their ideas in their native language and to share their answers verbally.” For the Unit Assessment, teacher guidance states, “...allow students to have questions and answers read aloud in their native language.”
Each Teacher Guide provides prompts to enable access to online differentiation supports such as “translation, voice-to-text, and other technology-enabled supports” and to use the Diverse Learners Guide for more scaffolded tasks.
In the Unit Overview for each unit is a statement about Multilingual English Learners that states that in addition to pre-teaching and other modifications, the expectation is that all students, regardless of native language, should be working alongside their peers. This document states, “These resources are designed for noisy, happy classrooms where students are practicing language and are leveled for beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners.”
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the program, Front Matter materials include a section titled “Excellence and Opportunity for All” that presents the need for scaffolds in a way that presents different learning needs in a positive tone. For example, the materials state that teachers should use scaffolds “...to model the research-based mindsets that allow learners to understand their needs and enable themselves independently and, when appropriate. Use available resources or jettison the scaffolds to challenge themselves.” This section also acknowledges that multilingual students may have differing needs but that the need for vocabulary development intersects with all students and thus is a focus within the program. The materials state, “Students who are multilingual English learners may appear to have the same needs, they are often very different, though one common need exists across the board for all learners of a language--vocabulary. For this reason, ThinkCERCA provides vocabulary support in every lesson along with other robust, leveled English Learner Supports for beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners.”
The ThinkCERCA materials include a document on their “Approach to Supporting Multilingual English Language Learners” that provides an overview of the supports embedded in the program. The materials state that “ThinkCERCA is a tool for empowerment and growth in English language proficiency.” The document lists their Guiding Principles as:
“English Language Learners are emerging multilingual learners whose Home Languages and diverse forms and registers of English are cherished and considered assets.
Meaning-making and comprehension of authentic and relevant materials are paramount.
Content serves as the anchor for foundational literacy skills development in service of mastery of spoken and written academic language.
Mastery of English expands an ML/ELL student’s power and agency to exchange, create, and express ideas and participate in their community authentically.”
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials provide some guidance for teachers to leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds, particularly in units with texts that are diverse. In units where that is not a focus, there is no focus on using or supporting students of diverse backgrounds. For example, Unit 1 has many opportunities throughout the unit, but Unit 5 has little support beyond vocabulary support for multilingual students. In every unit, there are opportunities to make personal connections through writing and/or speaking, but there is no specific focus for teachers regarding cultural diversity. Translation opportunities are vast on the online platform. However, parent letters are only available in English and Spanish. Overall, student opportunities and teacher guidance are inconsistent and varied throughout the school year.
Materials make connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Module 3, students engage in a lesson on the variations of standard English. At the end of the lesson, students have the opportunity to “...share out examples of slang and idioms they commonly use and share who would understand these phrases and who might not.”
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each Teacher Guide, a section on Culturally Diverse Learners states, “ThinkCERCA’s curriculum is also designed to be relevant and engaging and provides multiple entry points for students to make meaningful connections to the texts and to each other. Students are encouraged to make personal connections through Quick Journals, Explore Key Concepts, Connect steps, and Share Your Personal Connections, and to draw on their backgrounds and experiences through writing and discussion. In the Teacher Guide, teachers are encouraged to use a range of formative feedback to support culturally diverse learners; this feedback enables teachers to gather data to individualize their instruction.” While this statement is provided, few lessons reference the cultural diversity of students.
Materials include equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found.
Materials include opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
An embedded translation tool allows users to translate online student materials. The languages available are robust and include Albanian, German, Samoan, and Turkish.
In the Unit Planning Tools, each unit has a parent letter in English and Spanish. The parent letter provides families with a unit overview, a list of the text, and suggestions for home activities, including a suggestion to use the reading tools in the program, such as translations and the picture dictionary.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Quick Journal lesson that asks students to make personal connections to the guiding question. This allows students to share their personal stories. The Quick Journal prompt for Unit 5, Module 2, is “What is a talent you have, and how did you develop it over time?”
Materials include opportunities to discuss personal experience. In Unit 1, Module 4, students participate in a Think-Pair-Share to discuss “...your personal experiences related to the topic.” Directions for the teacher state to have students “...share the parts of your response that you feel comfortable sharing. “
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials allow teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher.
The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program; however, implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials allow teachers to use lessons and digital tools in presentation mode by displaying the Spark Teacher View. The student materials mostly provide students with a robust array of digital tools, including but not limited to immersive reading tools, generative writing tools, and digital highlighting. However, tools are not universal, as the direct teaching lessons do not have any tools available, and the highlighting tools are only available in some of the lessons. Teachers can customize the materials using the Digital Unit Planner and assign lessons at the class and student levels.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Teachers can leave feedback through the online rubrics. They can score, grade, and provide feedback that is then available for students to view.
As students complete the writing task for each unit, ThinkCERCA’s generative feedback tool will provide feedback on grammar, usage, mechanics, punctuation, and spelling.
All the materials can be presented to the whole class, allowing teachers to use any part of the lesson as a model.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Spark View mode, students can access an immersive reader function for most Modules. Once this tool is selected, students can listen to a read-aloud, change font size, increase spacing, change font, change the background color, have big words broken into syllables, color code parts of speech, insert a line focus, use a picture dictionary, and translate the text. Direct Instruction videos do not have these features available. However, they are available for the reading check questions. Students also have highlighting tools available when they are asked to analyze the texts.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit has a Digital Unit Planning tool that allows teachers to customize the unit based on teacher input, such as student data, standards, and schedules.
Teachers can assign modules to each class and at the student level, allowing for differentiation of the digital materials.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials provide some guidance on how to leverage digital tools for collaboration. Some units provide a way to collaborate digitally, such as creating a class presentation for questions, predictions, and images or having students create videos and then have the class view and provide feedback. However, the platform does not provide any of these, and they would need to be created and shared by the teacher. Additionally, teachers can provide feedback as students are in the drafting stage of writing, but there does not seem to be a way for students to respond to the feedback during this process.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. However, guidance for this collaboration is limited. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Module 1, Consuming Complex Information and Thinking About It Critically—Anticipation, the materials suggest creating a “...shared digital presentation for students to share questions, predictions, and images for the whole group.”
Teachers can leave feedback on the online rubrics for student writing tasks, including feedback as they draft and then upon completion.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The visual design of the materials supports learning. The design of the Student Guide and Teacher Guide is consistent throughout the program and across all grade levels. Images and graphics support engagement without being distracting. Organizational features in the Teacher Guide include tables, flowcharts, and some color coding to help teachers easily identify skills presented in lessons.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each of the seven units is divided into modules, and each module is clearly outlined in the Teacher Guide using a flowchart with graphic images of the Student Guide pages and color-coded notations to indicate skills. The flowchart also includes graphics that depict whether the lesson is accessed on the computer, paper/pencil in the Student Guide, or as an individual, small group, or whole group lesson.
The Student Guide’s graphics are minimal and not distracting when present. In most modules, an image appears at the beginning and represents the theme of the reading.
In the digital materials, icons help students navigate through lessons. For example, a green hand icon allows students to click for help. When students are writing arguments, icons for claims, reasoning, and evidence are consistent across the program.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Guide and Student Guide can be accessed at the unit level, which includes all of the modules, or at the module level, which only includes the information for that module.
The materials are consistent between teacher and student materials. The Student Guide pages appear in the Teacher Guide; many serve as answer keys.
The layout and structure of the digital materials are consistent across all units, modules, and grade levels. Teachers assign lessons from the teacher platform by clicking an “assign lesson” or “assign unit” button. On the teacher interface, at each unit or module level, there is consistent access to the Unit-at-a-Glance, Teacher Guide, Student Guide, Diverse Learner Guide, Answer Key, and Unit Planning Tools across the top of the page.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Student Guide includes a Preview Key Concepts and Skills page for each module. This page includes a checklist of assignments under the Before You Read, Read, Analyze, and Write categories, as well as links to the assignments in the Student Guide.
The Student Guide’s instructions are clearly labeled and often provide an example for students to follow.
Students can easily navigate the student-facing digital materials using a sidebar with links to each lesson step. This includes a link to a glossary.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials provide teacher guidance for using embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. Embedded technology is a central part of the program, providing real-time feedback to students. Implementation models are provided for 1:1 and low-tech access.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The On-Demand Video Library in the Resources section provides videos for teachers on onboarding and using the program. These include creating classes and student accounts, assigning reading levels, using the student view, and using reports.
In the Help Center, Teacher Toolkit, teachers can access Teacher Training Courses with more short videos demonstrating aspects of the digital materials, such as assigning and scoring writing benchmarks, direct instruction and skill practice lessons, how to create custom lessons, and close reading and writing lessons.
In the Help Center, Product Support provides additional help and guidance for accounts and passwords, lessons and assessments, classes, grading, data and reports, rostering, and troubleshooting.
In the Unit-at-a-Glance documents for each module, there is clear guidance for which parts of lessons are online direct instruction to be assigned and which are additional offline resources. In addition, in the Teacher Guide, a computer icon next to an assignment indicates that it is an online resource.