2019
ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0

3rd Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 3rd Grade Overview
Cover for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations
66%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
6 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
6 / 10

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations for Gateway 2. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application, and they partially meet expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

6 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application. The materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skills and fluency and engage students in non-routine application problems, but the instructional materials inconsistently embed opportunities for students to independently develop conceptual understanding. The materials over-emphasize fluency, procedures, and algorithms.

Indicator 2a

1 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations for developing conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The materials include some problems and questions that develop conceptual understanding throughout the grade-level. Students have limited opportunities to engage with concepts from a number of perspectives, or to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade.

Cluster 3.OA.A includes representing and solving problems involving multiplication and division. In Modules 6, 7, and 8, there are some opportunities for students to work with multiplication and division through the use of visual representations and different strategies. For example:

  • In Module 6, Lesson 6, students count in steps of 3 while the teacher writes the numbers out in two lines 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, and 60. Students respond to, “What to you notice?” and “What do you think the last number in the next row will be?”. Students make predictions and discuss patterns they see. Students fill in a hundreds chart with multiples of nine and examine jumps of nine on a number line. In the Step Up portion of the lesson, students relate subtraction facts with nines multiplication facts such as 10 - 1 = 1 x 9; 20 - 2 = 2 x 9; 30 - 3 = 3 x 9, etc. (3.OA.1).
  • In Module 7, Lesson 2, students discuss the relationship between multiplication and division. The teacher uses “grouping and sharing” mats to provide visual representations of sharing a large group of objects into smaller equal groups. The teacher writes the multiplication equation that represents the total number of objects (3 x 4 = 12). The teacher moves all of the counters back to the larger group and explains how students can see the number of groups to be made based on the mat, count the total number of counters, and recognize the unknown is how many counters are in each group. The teacher writes the related division equation 123 = 4. During Step In, the teacher guides students through writing multiplication and division facts that are related to a given array. When students begin to practice independently in the Step Up portion of the lesson, they are provided the opportunity to use arrays to write related multiplication and division facts (3.OA.2).
  • In Module 6, Lesson 5, students examine a picture with bags and a total number of marbles, and the students answer questions like, “What do you need to find out?, What equation could we write?” (3.OA.2).
  • In Module 7, Lesson 1, students describe arrays of familiar facts (fives) then add one more row. For example, 5 x 8 = 40, and one more row of 8 is 48, which introduces the distributive property (3.OA.1).
  • In Module 8, Lessons 1-4, address conceptual understanding by focusing on division facts using arrays. Students are given an array with some of the array covered but the total amount of dots given, total rows of dots. Students then represent the array as a division equation and write multiplication problems related to the division problem (3.OA.2).

The instructional materials present few opportunities for students to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade-level. In most independent activities students are directed how to solve problems. For example:

  • In Student Journal, Module 1, Lesson 11, Multiplication, Introducing the 5’s Facts, arrays are provided for students and students record the associated multiplication fact (3.OA.1).
  • In Module 1, Lesson 8, Activity 1, students determine the mystery number, 2,564, through a series of questions that do not require students to demonstrate conceptual understanding (3.OA.1).
  • In Module 6, Lesson 5, students use counters and a total of 32 marbles and four empty bags. Students use the counters to determine the total number of marbles in each of the four bags and record the associated division fact. Students are told how to calculate the problem and are not given the opportunity to demonstrate their understanding (3.OA.2).

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 meet expectations that they attend to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency. Materials attend to the Grade 3 expected fluencies, single-digit products and quotients (products from memory by end of Grade 3) and add/subtract within 1000.

The instructional materials develop procedural skills and fluencies throughout the grade-level. Opportunities to formally practice procedural skills are found throughout practice problem sets that follow the units. Practice problem sets also include opportunities to use and practice emerging fluencies in the context of solving problems. Ongoing practice is also found in Assessment Interviews, Games, and Maintaining Concepts and Skills.

The materials attend to the Grade 3 expected fluencies, fluently multiply and divide within 100, using strategies such as the relationship between multiplication and division or properties of operations (3.OA.7). By the end of Grade 3, know from memory all products of two one-digit numbers. For example, In Module 3, Lesson 1, students build fluency through completing Maintaining Concepts and Skills. In Maintaining Concepts and Skills, students identify addition, subtraction and multiplication facts primarily of fives and tens.

In addition, the instructional materials embed opportunities for students to independently practice procedural skills and fluency:

  • Maintaining Concepts and Skills lessons incorporate practice of previously learned skills from the prior grade level. For example, Maintaining Concepts and Skills in Module 1, Lesson 2, provides practice for adding and subtracting within 20 (2.NBT.2).
  • Each module contains a summative assessment called Interviews.  According to the program, “There are certain concepts and skills , such as the ability to route count fluently, that are best assessed by interviewing students.”  For example, Module 4’s Interview 1 has students demonstrate fluency of 2’s multiplication facts and Interview 2 has students demonstrate fluency of 4’s multiplication facts.
  • Fundamentals Games contain a variety of computer/online games that students can play to develop grade level fluency skills. For example Double Bucket, students demonstrate fluency of 2’s multiplication facts and on Interview 2 students demonstrate fluency of 4’s multiplication facts (3.OA.7).
  • Some lessons provides opportunities for students to practice the procedural fluency of the concept being taught in the Step Up section of the student journal.
  • Activities provide practice for skills learned earlier in the grade such as, Module 9, Lesson 6 where students practice multiplication facts (3.OA.7).

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 meet expectations that the materials are designed so teachers and students spend time working with engaging applications of the mathematics.

Engaging applications include single and multi-step word problems presented in contexts in which the mathematics is applied. There are routine problems, and students also have opportunities to engage with non-routine application problems. Thinking Tasks found at the end of Modules 3, 6, 9, and 12, provide students with problem-solving opportunities that are complex and non-routine with multiple entry points.

Examples of routine application problems include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Lesson 7, addresses standard 3.OA.3, “Henry cut 5 lengths of rope. Each piece was 4 meters long. What was the total length of rope?".
  • In Module 4, Lesson 6, addresses standard 3.OA.3, “32 chicken nuggets are shared equally among 8 friends. How many nuggets are in each share?”.
  • Maintaining Concepts and Skills includes some application problems and addresses standard 3.OA.8, for example Module 3, Lesson 8, “Samuel’s mom bought 3 tickets for the roller coaster. Tickets are $4 each. What was the total cost?”.
  • In Module 4, Lesson 4, addresses standard 3.OA.8, “Michelle’s grandmother gave her $40 to spend at the county fair. Michelle had 6 rides on the Mega Drop and 4 rides on the Rollercoaster. Rides on the Mega Drop cost $5 each and rides on the Rollercoaster cost $8 each. She also bought lunch for $12 at the end of the day, she has $2 left. How much of her own money did she take to the fair?”.
  • In Module 1, Problem Solving Activity 3, addresses standard 3.OA.3, “Stella has been collecting baseball cards. Every week she doubles the number of baseball cards she has. Stella has 120 cards. How many cards did she have three weeks ago? How many cards will Stella have next week?”.
  • In Module 8, Problem Solving Activity 4 has eight story problems and addresses standard 3.OA.3, “A farmer planted fruit trees in rows of 9. He planted 81 trees in total. How many rows did he plant?”.

Examples of non-routine application problems with connections to real-world contexts include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 2, Investigation 2, students brainstorm a list of real-life situations where it would be necessary to read and write time to the nearest minute. In the extension, students brainstorm situations where it would be necessary to write time to the nearest second (3.MD.1).
  • In Module 3, Thinking Task, Question 2 states, “A class of Grade 3 students is raising money for a field trip. They decide to run a car wash as a fundraiser. Customers can decide between three different types of car washes (A chart with car wash prices is provided). At the end of the carwash, the Premium Wash option raised $90. The Quick Wash option raised the same amount. How many cars were washed with the Quick Wash option?”
  • In Module 6, Thinking Task, Question 1 states, “This year, the PTA raised $300 to plant a school garden. The PTA president announces that this year they raised $124 more dollars than last year. How much money did they raise last year.”
  • In Module 9, Thinking Task, Question 1 provides a diagram of where students and families will sit during a choir performance in the gym. Questions include, “How many students will fit in each full row of the risers? What is the greatest number of students who can stand on all the risers to perform all at once?”
  • In Module 12, the Thinking Task states, “Mrs Chopra’s Grade 3 class has been asked to hang their drawings on a folding display board, the board has four rectangular panels, each panel is 3 feet x 6 feet, drawings can be posted on the front and the back of each panel, all the drawings were made on rectangular paper in three different sizes.” A table of drawing sizes is provided with the following information: 32 small 1 x 1, 16 medium 1 x 2, 8 large 2 x 2. Question 1: “What is the area of each panel?” Students must use the information from the table to answer the question. Question 2 states, “Write an expression that shows how to find the total area for the front and the back panels of the display board."

Indicator 2d

1 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. All three aspects of rigor are present in the materials, but there is an over-emphasis on procedural skills and fluency.

There is some evidence that the curriculum addresses conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application standards, when called for, and evidence of opportunities where multiple aspects of rigor are used to support student learning and mastery of the standards. There are multiple lessons where one aspect of rigor is emphasized. The materials have a an emphasis on fluency, procedures, and algorithms.

Examples of conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application presented separately in the materials include:

  • In Module 2, Lesson 4 (3.NBT.2), students use the traditional algorithm to solve addition problems. Scaffolding is given by providing the place value chart and the addends placed in the the chart for the students to only find the sum.
  • In Module 10, Lesson 12 (3.OA.8), students match equations to two step word problems provided.
  • In Module 8, Lesson 9 (3.MD.7), students use the area model to multiply whole numbers.

Examples of students having opportunities to engage in problems that use two or more aspects of rigor, include:

  • In Module 3, Activity 7 (3.OA.D), students solve problems involving the four operations, and identify and explain patterns in arithmetic.
  • In Module 10, Lesson 11 (3.OA.8), students write a single equation that could be used to solve a word problem, and come up with two step equations that solve the problem.
  • In Module 3, Thinking Task, students are provided a chart with car wash prices. Question 4 states, “A Premium Wash takes 30 minutes to complete. A Deluxe Wash takes 15 minutes, and a Quick Wash takes only 10 minutes. Which of these options would the class of Grade 3 students want their customers to choose? Remember, the class wants to raise as much money as possible. Explain which option you think is best.”

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

6 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The materials identify the Standards for Mathematical Practice and use them to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade, and partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. The materials partially attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

2 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level.

All eight MPs are clearly identified throughout the materials. For example:

  • The Math Practices are initially identified in the Steps portion of each module course information.
  • Videos for each module can be found under the Resources tab which explains the Math Practices and Habits of Mind.
  • A table is provided to show which mathematical practices are in each lessons.
  • Resources states that each practice standard is, “experienced, practiced, and enhances as a result of working on meaningful problems”.
  • Module Lessons tabs have a Lesson Contents overview that lists each lesson and the standards and mathematical practices in the lesson.

The MPs are used to enhance the mathematical content and are not treated separately from  content in lessons. However, there is limited guidance for teachers on the connections between the MPs and the content standards.

Indicator 2f

1 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. The instructional materials do not attend to the full intent of MP4 and MP5.

For MP4, students are given models to use and have few opportunities to develop their own mathematical models. In addition, students have few opportunities to compare different models in problem contexts. Examples include:

  • In Module 2, Lesson 3, students use place value strategies to calculate sums using a number line. For example, a support page of the number line is given to the students, next the students are placed in pairs, then invited to share their strategies with the class.
  • In Module 4, Lesson 2, students use grouping and sharing mats to relate the operations of multiplication and division. In the Students Journal, students write fact families for multiplication and division. Arrays are provided for students.
  • In Module 9, Lesson 5, students use base ten blocks to demonstrate subtraction methods and are encouraged to describe similarities between their methods and the standard algorithm.

For MP5, students are given few opportunities to use tools strategically, as they are most often given the tools to use for a problem. Examples include:

  • In Module 2, Lesson 2, students are given base ten blocks or number lines to solve. The teacher directions state, “Encourage them to to show their thinking with base 10 blocks or number lines from the support page. Some students may prefer to write an equation.”
  • In Module 6, Lesson 2, students are given a hundreds chart to visualize and analyze patterns made by 9s.
  • In Module 7, Lesson 5, students select and use one of four tools to solve multi-step word problems. The materials state, “Pencils come in packs of 10 or 6. If I have 3 packs of 10, and 4 packs of 6, how many pencils do I have?”

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

0 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 do not meet the expectations for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

There are no opportunities in the Student Journal or assessments for students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments or the work of others. MP3 is identified in the Steps portion of the lesson. Teachers are given sentence stems to provide students to promote construction of arguments and justification of student thinking.

Examples where the materials do not prompt students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments of others include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Lesson 2, students place three 3-digit numbers on a blank number line. The teacher asks, “How could you locate the position of each of these numbers? Do you have to mark 0 on the number line? How did you decide which numbers to mark at the start and end of the number line?”.
  • In Module 2, Lesson 6, students predict the number of minutes past the hour based on the position of the hour hand. In the Student Journal, Question 3 is noted as an opportunity for students to justify their answers. However, the question shows three analog clocks, and the student directions state, “Draw hands on the clock to match the times given for 23 minutes past 9, 45 minutes past 3, and 4 minutes past 7.”
  • In Module 9, Lesson 1, students explain their solutions for estimating the difference between two and three digit numbers. The teacher projects four sets of numbers and asks, “What do you think is a reasonable estimate for the difference between these pairs of numbers? How can you use what you know about estimating with two-digit numbers to help you?” The materials do not contain prompts for students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments of other students.

Indicator 2g.ii

2 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

Teacher guidance, questions, and sentence stems for MP3 are found in the Steps portion of the lessons. In some lessons, teachers are given questions that prompt mathematical discussions and engage students to construct viable arguments, and in other lessons, teachers are provided questions and sentence stems to facilitate students in analyzing the arguments of others, and to justify their answers.

Examples where teachers are provided guidance to engage students in constructing viable arguments and/or analyzing the think of others include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 3, Lesson 9, students reflect on the question, “When comparing 2 three-digit numbers, can one number be greater than the other even though there are fewer hundreds in the number? Students are invited to share their thinking with the class. Teachers encourage respectful critique using sentence stems such as: I agree/disagree with your answer because, So what you’re saying is, and Why do you think that?”.
  • In Module 5, Lesson 6, students explain the pattern in their own words to a partner and the partner responds. Teachers prompt students to listen without interrupting and to use the sentence stems, “I noticed the same pattern and I also noticed, I don’t think that shows a pattern because, and I looked at the equations in a different way.”.
  • In Module 8, Lesson 9, students place fractions on a number line and name other fractions located at the same point. Teachers encourage students to justify their thoughts and critique the reasoning of others by prompting the discussion with sentence stems, "I know these fractions are equivalent because, I think the fractions ___ and ___ are equivalent because, and I agree/disagree with your answer because...”.
  • In Module 10, Lesson 6, students share their labeled sketches for Question 1. Teachers are prompted to remind students to listen carefully and critique the problems using the sentence stems, “I can identify the numbers from the equation in Problem, I don’t think that problem matches because, We could change the problem by, and The area is not correct because.”

Indicator 2g.iii

1 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 3 partially meet expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

Accurate mathematics vocabulary is present in the materials, but there are no instructions on how to use the language of mathematics. While vocabulary is identified throughout the materials, there is no explicit directions for instruction of the vocabulary for the teacher in the Steps portion of the lesson.Examples include but are not limited to:

  • Vocabulary instruction for each module is found under Mathematics, Vocabulary Development. Vocabulary identified in bold print is developed throughout the module. The targeted module vocabulary words can be printed onto cards under Resources. For example, in Module 1, vocabulary includes words such as addition, multiplication, and product.
  • Materials use the term “Turn around facts,” which is not accurate terminology.
  • Each module contains a parent newsletter. The newsletter highlights key vocabulary and provides the definition for parents in the Glossary section of the newsletter.
  • In Module 1, Lesson 7, equation is present in the Student Journal, but the definition is not introduced in any lesson in Module 1.