2019
ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0

6th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 6th Grade Overview
Cover for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations
72%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
7 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
6 / 10

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 partially meet expectations for Gateway 2. The instructional materials meet expectations for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application, and they partially meet expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

7 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 meet expectations for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application. The materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skills and fluency, and embed opportunities for students to independently develop conceptual understanding and engage in non-routine application problems. The materials over-emphasize fluency, procedures, and algorithms.

Indicator 2a

2 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 meets expectations for developing conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The materials include problems and questions that develop conceptual understanding throughout the grade-level.

Cluster 6.RP.A addresses understanding ratio concepts and using ratio reasoning to solve problems. Multiple modules explore a variety of real-world applications using a few mathematical representations. Opportunities exist for students to work with ratios that call for conceptual understanding and include the use of some visual representations and different strategies. For example:

  • In Module 6, Lesson 8, students discuss as a whole class how to solve, “A car travels 200 miles in 4 hours. How far does it travel in 1 hour?” Students are then shown how to use tables to organize rates. In the Student Journal students find unit rates, it is suggested they use tables (6.RP.1).
  • In Module 3, Lesson 2, students build pictorial representations (tape diagrams) of ratios after discussing their thinking on ratios from prior lessons (6.RP.1).
  • In Module 3, Lesson 1, introduces ratios by giving students real-world examples of ratios and having students describe the relationship between the two amounts. In 3.1, “Mix and Match ratio cards” students match real-world examples of ratio to find corresponding number ratio. Students relate abstract to concrete examples (6.RP.1).
  • In Module 8, Lesson 1, links part-whole ratios to fractions using connecting cubes of two different colors. Student build a character then describe the ratio of colors used to build their character. Next, students analyze the profit of 1/4 being donated to charity and what the ratio of profit to donation would be (6.RP.1).

Cluster 6.EE addresses apply and extend previous understandings of arithmetic to algebraic expressions, reason about and solve one-variable equations and inequalities and represent and analyze quantitative relationships between dependent and independent variables. Multiple modules explore a variety of real-world applications using a few mathematical representations. Opportunities exist for students to work with expressions and equations that call for conceptual understanding and include the use of some visual representations and different strategies. For example:

  • In Module 2, Lesson 1, students discuss questions such as, “What is the difference between and expression and an equation?" (6.EE.1).
  • In Module 7, Lesson 1, students are presented with a visual representation of 16 blocks representing $$4^2$$. Students are led through discussions such as, “what number does this picture represent?”, “what expression can we write to match?”, and “what type of number is 16?”. The student materials engage students with visual representations of squares and have students write an expression “to name each collection of tiles” (6.EE.3).
  • In Module 7, Lesson 4, students are shown how to find the greatest common factor (GCF) and use the distributive property to simplify expressions. Students then work in groups using rolling algebraic cubes to create expressions and simplify them. In the Student Journal, students first determine the GCF of an expression. Then students use the distributive property to simplify expressions, however, blank number sentences are provided (6.EE.3).

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 meet expectations that they attend to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials develop procedural skills and fluencies throughout the grade-level. Opportunities to formally practice procedural skills are found throughout practice problem sets that follow the units. Practice problem sets also include opportunities to use and practice emerging fluencies in the context of solving problems. Ongoing practice is also found in Assessment Interviews, Games, and Maintaining Concepts and Skills.

The materials attend to the Grade 6 expected fluencies, multi-digit division and multi-digit decimal operations (6.NS.2); add, subtract, multiply and divide multi-digit decimals using the standard algorithm for each operation (6.NS.3); and apply and extend previous understandings of arithmetic to algebraic expressions (6.EE.A). For example:

  • In Module 3, Lessons 8-12, students use multi-digit division of whole numbers and decimals (6.NS.2,3).
  • In Module 5 Interview, students calculate quotients in expressions that include fractions and whole numbers (6.NS.2,3).
  • In Module 2, Lesson 8, includes using <, >, or = to compare expressions that include skills such as subtracting or multiplying decimal numbers.
  • In Module 2, Lessons 9-12, students solve problems using the standard algorithm for performing mathematical operations with decimals (6.NS.3).
  • In Module 3, Lesson 10, students add and subtract decimals, and multiply or divide numbers as they convert units. In Module 2, Lessons 9-12, provide practice for solving problems using the standard algorithm for performing mathematical operations with decimals (6.NS.3).
  • In Module 4, Lesson 2, provides practice in writing equations to match word problems. For example, “What variable can you use to represent the value?” and “What operations will we use to calculate that value?” (6.EE.A).

In addition, the instructional materials embed opportunities for students to independently practice procedural skills and fluencies:

  • The Stepping Stones 2.0 overview states that every even numbered lesson includes a section called Maintaining Concepts and Skills that incorporates practice of previously learned skills from the prior grade level.
  • Each module contains a summative assessment called Interviews. According to the program, “There are certain concepts and skills, such as the ability to route count fluently, that are best assessed by interviewing students.” For example, Module 9 Interview, students must demonstrate fluency of finding the mean, median, and mode of a data set.
  • Some lessons provide opportunities for students to practice procedural skills during  the Step Up section of the student journal.
  • Fundamentals Games contains a variety of games that students can play to develop grade level fluency skills.

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 meet expectations that the materials are designed so teachers and students spend time working with engaging applications of the mathematics.

Engaging applications include single and multi-step word problems presented in contexts in which the mathematics is applied. There are routine problems, and students also have opportunities to engage with non-routine application problems. Thinking Tasks found at the end of Modules 3, 6, 9, and 12, provide students with problem-solving opportunities that are complex and non-routine with multiple entry points.

Examples of routine application problems include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 6, Lesson 8, addresses the standard 6.RP.3, “Antonio mixes teaspoons of yellow and red paint in the ratio of 12:4. How much yellow paint will be used for 1 teaspoon of red?”
  • In Module 5, Lesson 2, addresses the standard 6.NS.1, “A straw is ten-twelfths of a foot long. Nicole cuts the straw into shorter pieces that are each two-twelfths of a foot long. How many pieces did she cut?”
  • In Module 7, Lesson 10, address the standard 6.EE.7, “Three friends enter a 15-mile fun run. Dwane runs the first 4 1/2 miles. Natalie runs the next 3 1/4 miles. Reece runs the rest of the distance. How far did Reece run? Let r represent the unknown distance.”
  • In Module 4, Lesson 11, addresses the standard 6.EE.9, “In a math test, a student scores 5 points for each correct answer. What is a student’s score if they get 15 correct answers?” (identifying dependent and independent variables).
  • In Module 9, Lesson 12, address the standard 6.G.4, “The roof of a cottage needs refurbishing. One side of the roof is 30 ft long by 12.5 ft wide. If a bundle of shingles can be purchased to cover $$24 ft^2$$ , how many bundles are needed?”.
  • Maintaining Concepts and Skills includes application exercises. For example, in Module 12, Lesson 10, “Andrea wants to buy a guitar that costs $150. The music store has a 25% off sale. When she buys the guitar she is given an extra 5% off. What amount does she pay for the guitar?”
  • In Module 3, Investigation 2, students work in pairs to answer, “Emily has beetles to feed her lizards. Altogether she has a total of 52 legs. How many lizards could Emily have? What is the ratio of lizards to beetles?” (6.RP.1).

Examples of non-routine application problems with connections to real-world contexts include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 3, Thinking Task, Question 1, students read points on a coordinate grid to fill in a table showing the cost of a phone bill per month. Question 3 states, “Riku investigates the call rate for Option B. It will cost $0.30 for each minute that she spends on the phone. She decides to calculate the total cost of a six-minute call. Which of these displays is most likely to show the total cost? Explain your thinking.” This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
  • In Module 6, Thinking Task 6, Question 2 states, “An architect hired by the school district draws up these plans (design shown). She decides to split the hall into three areas: stage, auditorium, and entrance. The stage needs wooden flooring and the auditorium will be carpeted. The school has a budget of $900 to spend on the wooden stage flooring. One dimension of the stage is 8m. They would like the other dimension to be somewhere between 3 and 5 meters. Given their budget, write the dimensions for the largest stage the school can afford to build. Show your thinking.” This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
  • In Module 9, Thinking Task, students find the surface area of a greenhouse with dimensions given and identify the net that matches the greenhouse design. Question 3 states, “Archie plans to build the garden bed in this picture (3ft x 6ft x 6in deep). The measurements are taken from inside the garden bed. He will need to buy the wood to build it and the soil to fill it. He has all the other tools and materials that are necessary. What is the cost of building the garden bed?” This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
  • In Module 12, Thinking Task, students are provided a collection of data in two tables. Number of vehicles that drive past the school at certain times during the day, the other set of data is a record of each vehicle’s speed. Question 1 states, “How many vehicles traveled at a speed that is equal to or greater than 25 miles per hour?” This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.

Indicator 2d

1 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 partially meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. All three aspects of rigor are present in the materials, but there is an over-emphasis on procedural skills and fluency.

There is some evidence that the curriculum addresses standards, when called for, with specific and separate aspects of rigor and evidence of opportunities where multiple aspects of rigor are used to support student learning and mastery of the standards. There are multiple lessons where one aspect of rigor is emphasized. The materials have a an emphasis on fluency, procedures, and algorithms.

Examples of conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application presented separately in the materials include:

  • In Module 2, Lessons 9-12, address addition and multiplication of decimal fractions. This standard is assessed in Module 2, Check-Up 2 (6.NS.2).
  • In Module 4, Lesson 11 (6.EE.3), students demonstrate conceptual understanding when they respond to, “Can independent variables involve fractions? Why?”
  • In Module 3, Lesson 3 (6.RP.1), students use tables to represent and reinforce equivalent ratios. Given a muffin recipe students find “how much of each ingredient is needed to bake 20 muffins”. A table is used to record the equivalent relationship between quantities.

Examples of students having opportunities to engage in problems that use two or more aspects of rigor, include:

  • In Module 5, Lesson 4, students engage with all three aspects of rigor as they solve, “In his backyard, William is planting the same vegetables together in patches that are 2/3 of a yard wide and 1 yard long. The available space in his backyard measures 6 yards by 9 yards. William uses division to figure out the greatest number of vegetable patches he can have while allowing a walking space of 1/2 yard going in one directions between rows of vegetable patches.”
  • In Module 12, Lesson 10, students engage with conceptual understanding and application to solve, “Andrea wants to buy a guitar that costs $150. The music store has a 25% off sale. When she buys the guitar she is given an extra 5% off. What amount does she pay for the guitar?”
  • In Module 3, Lesson 2 (6.RP. 1), students apply their understanding of equivalent ratios using tape diagrams to solve several real-world problems during the Step Up discussion. In Ongoing Practice, students independently solving word problems using tape diagram models.
  • In Module 12, Thinking Task, students are provided a collection of data in two tables. Number of vehicles that drive past the school at certain times during the day, the other set of data is a record of each vehicle’s speed. Question 2 states, “Show the number of vehicles that drove past the school throughout the morning in this graph. You will need to add the following information that is missing: title, labels for the x-axis and the y-axis, values along each scale.”.

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

6 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 partially meet expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The materials identify the Standards for Mathematical Practice and use them to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade, and partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. The materials partially attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

2 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level.

All eight MPs are clearly identified throughout the materials. For example:

  • The Math Practices are initially identified in the Steps portion of each module course information.
  • Videos for each module can be found under the Resources tab which explains the Math Practices and Habits of Mind.
  • A table is provided to show which mathematical practices are in each lessons.
  • Resources states that each practice standard is, “experienced, practiced, and enhances as a result of working on meaningful problems”.
  • Module Lessons tabs have a Lesson Contents overview that lists each lesson and the standards and mathematical practices in the lesson.

The MPs are used to enhance the mathematical content and are not treated separately from  content in lessons. However, there is limited guidance for teachers on the connections between the MPs and the content standards.

Indicator 2f

1 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. The instructional materials do not attend to the full intent of MP4 and MP5.

For MP4, students are given models to use and have few opportunities to develop their own mathematical models. In addition, students have few opportunities to compare different models in problem contexts. Examples include:

  • In Module 4, Lesson 7, students complete tables to show the data generated by a pattern. In the Student Journal, students fill in tables that are already created.
  • In Module 3, Lesson 2, students are told to use tape diagrams to model equivalent ratios.
  • In Module 6, Lesson 8, students are given a model to map a constant relationship between variables to determine rate.

For MP5, students are given few opportunities to use tools strategically, as they are most often given the tools to use for a problem. Examples include:

  • In Module 3, Lesson 5, students are instructed to use either equivalent fractions or relationships to calculate and identify equivalent ratios. Instructional Steps state, “Allow students time to use one or both methods to calculate the equivalent ratios.” Students choose one of two models to find the equivalent ratio.
  • In Module 7, Lesson 2, students are provided algebra tiles to represent the problem.
  • In Module 9, Lesson 6, students analyze information presented on dot plots. Students are given a data set and told to work in pairs to represent the data. Students are not given a choice on how to represent the data since they are working with dot plots.

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

0 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 do not meet the expectation for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

There are no opportunities in the Student Journal or assessments for students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments or the work of others. MP3 is identified in the Steps portion of the lesson. Teachers are given sentence stems to provide students to promote construction of arguments and justification of student thinking.

Examples where the materials do not prompt students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments of others include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 2, Lesson 11, after completion of Student Journal pages 74-75, the teacher has students look at question 3 and explain the algorithm steps they followed. Then the teacher asks, “Who likes working with whole numbers, and then adjusting their answers? Who preferred to work with decimal fractions?”
  • In Module 7, Lesson 2, students write expressions to match each group of tiles then write an equivalent expression. Next students explain and compare their expressions, adjusting errors. Students are not constructing arguments or justifying their expressions, and they are not analyzing each other’s work.
  • In Module 12, Lesson 2, the teacher projects a word problem which the students read and discuss. Then the teacher asks, “How did you decide which numbers to write?”

Indicator 2g.ii

2 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

Teacher guidance, questions, and sentence stems for MP3 are found in the Steps portion of the lessons. In some lessons, teachers are given questions that prompt mathematical discussions and engage students to construct viable arguments, and in other lessons, teachers are provided questions and sentence stems to facilitate students in analyzing the arguments of others, and to justify their answers.

Examples where teachers are provided guidance to engage students in constructing viable arguments and/or analyzing the think of others include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Lesson 7, students compare and order positive and negative numbers on a number line. Teachers encourage students to critique their reasoning using the sentence stems, “I have a different opinion, I think, I agree (disagree) because, and That makes sense, but...”.
  • In Module 4, Lesson 2, students analyze four equations to determine which correctly matches a word problem presented. Teachers ask students to justify their findings, encourage students to ask clarifying questions, and to critique the reasoning students present.
  • In Module 5, Lesson 6, students explore division of common fractions by common fractions with unrelated denominators. Teachers provide sentence stems to encourage critique, “I noticed the same pattern and I also noticed, I don’t think that ... shows a pattern because, and I looked at the equations in a different way.”.
  • In Module 8, Lesson 5, students work independently or in pairs to calculate the percentages and solve the problems on Slide 5. Teachers encourage students to model and record their thinking and to justify their answers. If students do not agree, they are instructed to share their own thinking and justify why it is correct.

Indicator 2g.iii

1 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 6 partially meet expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

Accurate mathematics vocabulary is present in the materials, but there are no instructions on how to use the language of mathematics. While vocabulary is identified throughout the materials, there is no explicit directions for instruction of the vocabulary for the teacher in the Steps portion of the lesson. Examples include but are not limited to:

  • Vocabulary instruction for each module is found under Mathematics, Vocabulary Development. Vocabulary identified in bold print is identified as being developed throughout the module. The targeted module vocabulary words can be printed onto cards under Resources. For example, in Module 1 vocabulary includes words such as nearest absolute value, integers, and negative numbers.
  • Each module contains a parent newsletter. The newsletter highlights key vocabulary and provides the definition for parents in the Glossary section of the newsletter.
  • In Module 1, Lesson 5, integer is present in the Student Journal, but the definition is not introduced in any lesson in Module 1.