5th Grade - Gateway 2
Back to 5th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations | 66% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1: Rigor | 6 / 8 |
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices | 6 / 10 |
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations for Gateway 2. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application, and they partially meet expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application. The materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skills and fluency and engage students in non-routine application problems, but the instructional materials inconsistently embed opportunities for students to independently develop conceptual understanding. The materials over-emphasize fluency, procedures, and algorithms.
Indicator 2a
Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.
The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations for developing conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.
The materials include some problems and questions that develop conceptual understanding throughout the grade-level. Students have little access to concepts from a number of perspectives or to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade.
Domain 5.NBT addresses understanding the place value system and performing operations with multi-digit whole numbers and with decimals to hundredths. Multiple modules explore a variety of real-world applications using a few mathematical representations. Opportunities exist for students to work with place value that call for conceptual understanding and include the use of some visual representations and different strategies. For example:
- In Module 1, Lesson 5, begins with a discussion of a place value table and students talk about the places that are grouped into three digits such as millions and thousands and how those places make a pattern of hundreds, tens, and ones. Students select random digits and place them onto a place value expander to create a 9-digit number. Students read the number then engage in a discussion that includes saying the tens and ones together in each grouping of numbers (5.NBT.1).
- In Module 3, Lesson 8, comparing and ordering thousandths, the class is divided into two teams and the students play the game “Near or Far”. Each member of the team comes forward, spins the cubes, and creates the largest possible decimal number. Then students place the numbers created in order from greatest to least. In the Student Journal, students place numbers in order using a number line, which is provided, or make comparisons using greater than, less than, or equal. Students do not discuss the conceptual understanding that digits to the left are 10 times larger than digits to the right when making their comparisons (5.NBT.1).
Cluster 5.NF uses equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions. Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions. Multiple modules explore a variety of real-world applications using a few mathematical representations. Opportunities exist for students to work with fractions that call for conceptual understanding and include the use of some visual representations and different strategies. For example:
- In Module 6, Lesson 10, students discuss remainders and the context in which they may be used to answer a questions. For instance, when a remainder of 4 must be divided as units of fertilizer between 6 trees, how could this be done? (5.NF.3).
- In Module 8 Lesson 3, students find a fraction of a whole number with unit fractions using number lines (5.NF.1).
The instructional materials present few opportunities for students to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade-level. In most independent activities students are told how to solve problems. For example:
- In Module 9, Lesson 5, students divide 3 by 1/2 and are shown a pot that is divided into 3 quarts and then divided into 1/2 quarts to see 6 servings. Students then divide 1/2 by 3. They are shown a pot with 1/2 a quart which is then divided into thirds to see each friend will get 1/6 quarts of soup. Students are then shown the same process using bar diagrams. In the Student Journal, students solve five problems using bar diagrams which are provided. Since the diagrams are provided and the questions mirror the example, students do not demonstrate conceptual understanding (5.NF.2).
- In Module 12, Lesson 2, students do not have the opportunity to demonstrate conceptual understanding of division and place value. Students are taught the standard algorithm for division (5.NBT.2).
Indicator 2b
Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.
The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stone 2.0 Grade 5 meet expectations that they attend to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency. Materials attend to the Grade 5 expected fluencies (5.NBT.2), multi-digit multiplication.
The instructional materials develop procedural skills and fluencies throughout the grade-level. Opportunities to formally practice procedural skills are found throughout practice problem sets that follow the units. Practice problem sets also include opportunities to use and practice emerging fluencies in the context of solving problems. Ongoing practice is also found in Assessment Interviews, Games, and Maintaining Concepts and Skills.
The materials attend to the Grade 5 expected fluencies, fluently multiply multi-digit numbers using the standard algorithm (5.NBT.5). For example, in Module 2, Lessons 2-5, extends knowledge of the standard algorithm for multi-digit multiplication through multi-digit by multi-digit multiplication. In Investigations 1, 2, and 3, students build procedural skill and fluency involving multi-digit numbers. In Activities 1, 2, and 4, students work with the standard algorithm to multiply multi-digit numbers.
In addition, the instructional materials embed opportunities for students to independently practice procedural skills and fluency:
- Fundamentals Games contains a variety of games that students can play to develop grade level fluency skills. For example, Use a Ten Fact (multiplication with two-digit numbers), develops fluency in multi-digit multiplication.
- The Stepping Stones 2.0 overview states that every even numbered lesson includes a section called Maintaining Concepts and Skills that incorporates practice of previously learned skills from the prior grade level. In Module 10, Lesson 2, provides computation practice with multi-digit dividends and one-digit divisors.
- Each module contains a summative assessment called Interviews. According to the program, “There are certain concepts and skills, such as the ability to route count fluently, that are best assessed by interviewing students.” For example, Module 9’s Interview, students must demonstrate fluency of finding the mean, median, and mode of a data set.
- Some lessons provide opportunities for students to practice procedural skills during the Step Up section of the student journal.
- Assessments also give problems that call for fluency and procedural skill. For example, in the Module 2 performance task, students use the standard algorithm to complete multi-digit by multi-digit multiplication.
Indicator 2c
Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade
The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 meet expectations that the materials are designed so teachers and students spend time working with engaging applications of the mathematics.
Engaging applications include single and multi-step word problems presented in contexts in which the mathematics is applied. There are routine problems, and students also have opportunities to engage with non-routine application problems. Thinking Tasks found at the end of Modules 3, 6, 9, and 12, provide students with problem-solving opportunities that are complex and non-routine with multiple entry points.
Examples of routine application problems include, but are not limited to:
- In Module 8, Lesson 3, addresses the standard 5.NF.2, “The cost of a hamburger is one-sixth the price of a family meal. What is the cost of one hamburger if the family meal costs $12?”.
- In Module 4, Lesson 6, addresses the standard 5.NF.1, “Lisa has 2 red apples and 2 green apples. She cuts the red apples into fourths, and the green apples into eighths. She eats 2 pieces of red apple and 3 pieces of green apple. Which color of apple has more left over?”.
- In Module 9, Lesson 11, addresses the standard 5.MD.3, “Three packages are each filled with 400 g boxes. Each package weighs 2 kg. How many 400g boxes were used?”.
- In Module 5, Activity 2, students work in pairs to discuss the problem and addresses the standard 5.NBT.7, “A weather research center records temperatures to the nearest hundredth of a degree (table provided). On which day was there the greatest variation in temperature? Show your thinking.”.
Examples of non-routine application problems with connections to real-world contexts include, but are not limited to:
- In Module 3, Thinking Task, Question 1 states, “Nancy begins the game by building this tower (students refer to the picture). What is the volume? Show your thinking." This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
- In Module 6, Thinking Task, Question 2 states, “The Marathon organizers will purchase energy powder. The Leadership Team will prepare a 10 gallon cooler of energy drink for each water stop. One three-pound tub of energy drink powder makes 24 quarts and costs $8.50. How many tubs will they have to buy and how much will it cost?” Students must use the Course Map provided to solve. This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
- In Module 9, Thinking Task, Question 1 states, “What is the difference in height between the tree with the greatest growth and the tree with least growth?” Students use a line plot provided to solve. This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
- In Module 12, Thinking Task, students are given two portable building options with different dimensions (Building A 7m x 5.3m Building B 15m x 9 m). The students must help the school decide which building is the better option for the school to purchase. Question 1 states, “Calculate the floor area for building A. Show your thinking. Remember to write the unit of measurement.” This non-routine question prompts students to apply mathematical knowledge/skills to real-world contexts.
Indicator 2d
Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.
The instructional materials for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. All three aspects of rigor are present in the materials, but there is an over-emphasis on procedural skills and fluency.
There is some evidence that the curriculum addresses standards, when called for, with specific and separate aspects of rigor and evidence of opportunities where multiple aspects of rigor are used to support student learning and mastery of the standards. There are multiple lessons where one aspect of rigor is emphasized. The materials have a an emphasis on fluency, procedures and algorithms.
Examples of conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application presented separately in the materials include:
- In Module 6, Lesson 6, students explain, “Does it make more sense to write the answer in the format of improper fractions or mixed numbers? Why?”
- In Module, 12 Lesson 2, “Division: Developing the standard algorithm,” students use the standard algorithm for division.
- In Module 12, Problem Solving Activity 4, “Three families are vacationing together. They are equally sharing the hotel cost which is $2,634. Thomas’ family is also renting a car for $348. How much will Thomas’ family have to pay for the car rental and hotel together?”
Examples of students having opportunities to engage in problems that use two or more aspects of rigor, include:
- In Module 7, Lesson 4, Maintaining Concepts and Skills states, “Deon bought a bag of apples that weighed more than 3 kilograms but less than 4 kilograms. Monique bought a bag of apples that weighed 7/8 of a kilogram less than Deon’s bag of apples. Hunter bought the same amount of apples as Deon and Monique together. What could be the mass of the apples each person bought?”
- In Module 2, Problem Solving Activity 2, “Between 1,200 and 1,300 people will attend the Freemont High School graduation. The chairs need to be arranged in a rectangular array and 18 to 23 chairs can fit into a row. How many rows and how many chairs in a row are needed to make sure they have enough chairs for all the people?”
- In Module 3, Thinking Task, Question 3 states, “Nancy stacks a total of 160 blocks to build two towers. Tower A is shaped like a cube. Tower B is shaped like a rectangular-based prism. Write the possible dimensions for each tower. Show your thinking" (two different dimension prisms are provided for students to label with length, width, and height).
- In Module 9, Thinking Task, Question 3 states, “In order to see which type of tree grew the most over the course of one year the club will combine the growth data of each tree measured. For this item: Solve using the order of operations. Compare the total growth of the four types of trees.”
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The materials identify the Standards for Mathematical Practice and use them to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade, and partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. The materials partially attend to the specialized language of mathematics.
Indicator 2e
The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level.
All eight MPs are clearly identified throughout the materials. For example:
- The Math Practices are initially identified in the Steps portion of each module course information.
- Videos for each module can be found under the Resources tab which explains the Math Practices and Habits of Mind.
- A table is provided to show which mathematical practices are in each lessons.
- Resources states that each practice standard is, “experienced, practiced, and enhances as a result of working on meaningful problems”.
- Module Lessons tabs have a Lesson Contents overview that lists each lesson and the standards and mathematical practices in the lesson.
The MPs are used to enhance the mathematical content and are not treated separately from content in lessons. However, there is limited guidance for teachers on the connections between the MPs and the content standards.
Indicator 2f
Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. The instructional materials do not attend to the full intent of MP4 and MP5.
For MP4, students are given models to use and have few opportunities to develop their own mathematical models. In addition, students have few opportunities to compare different models in problem contexts. Examples include:
- In Module 1, Lesson 2, students use expanders to help read and write seven-digit numbers.
- In Module 2, Lesson 7, students use base ten blocks to build prisms and explore concepts of volume. Students should evaluate the utility of models to determine which models are most useful and efficient to solve problems, in this lesson students are given the model.
- In Module 4, Lesson 1, students use area models to identify equivalent common fractions. In the Student Journal, an area model is used in the example to show how to find equivalent fractions.
For MP5, students are given few opportunities to use tools strategically, as they are most often given the tools to use for a problem. Examples include:
- In Module 1, Lesson 7, students use the halfway point between two multiples on a number line to help them round.
- In Module 3, Lesson 10, students are rounding decimal fractions to the nearest tenth, hundredth, and thousandth. Students are told to “use the thousandths square on the support page with thousandths models or draw number lines to help their thinking. Some students may prefer place value strategies.” Students are given and told what tools to use to round decimal fractions.
- In Module 5, Lesson 3, students apply the standard algorithm to add decimal fractions with a varying number of places. Students are given place value chart templates and told to estimate before solving. Steps directions states, “Encourage them to first estimate the total for each example, then use their estimate to check the reasonableness of their answer.” Students are given specific tools to add decimals.
- In Module 9, Lesson 3, students calculate division of any whole number by a unit fraction. Instructional Steps state, “Emphasize that when they know how many one-sevenths are in a whole it is only the case of multiplying that number by 8 to determine the number in 8 wholes” (8 ÷ 1/7 ). Students are not given any other way to solve the problem, and the materials state that having students compare their solutions and discuss as a class meets MP5.
Indicator 2g
Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:
Indicator 2g.i
Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 do not meet the expectation for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.
There are no opportunities in the Student Journal or assessments for students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments or the work of others. MP3 is identified in the Steps portion of the lesson. Teachers are given sentence stems to provide students to promote construction of arguments and justification of student thinking.
Examples where the materials do not prompt students to construct viable arguments or analyze the arguments of others include, but are not limited to:
- In Module 1, Lesson 4, the teacher chooses five students to come up and grab a number card and hold them facing the class. The teacher then asks the following questions of students, “If you read this number from left to write, what would you say? How could we rearrange the numbers to show the greatest number possible? How did you decide what order to place the cards? How could we rearrange the cards to show the least number possible? How could we rearrange the cards to show a number close to 300,000? What odd number between 60,000 and 70,000 could we show?”
- In Module 3, Lesson 12, students record results of the amount of time (reaction time) it takes them to grab a ruler that is dropped. Once all the student data is collected, the teacher asks, “Imagine that were were asked to compare our results with the class next door. What single length best represents the reactions of our class?”. The suggested answer is to find the most common or middle reaction time.
- Module 9, Lesson 2, the teacher projects slide 2 which shows 24 ÷ 8 and asks the class, “What questions could this equation be representing?” Then students state what the solution would be.
Indicator 2g.ii
Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.
Teacher guidance, questions, and sentence stems for MP3 are found in the Steps portion of the lessons. In some lessons, teachers are given questions that prompt mathematical discussions and engage students to construct viable arguments, and in other lessons, teachers are provided questions and sentence stems to facilitate students in analyzing the arguments of others, and to justify their answers.
Examples where teachers are provided guidance to engage students in constructing viable arguments and/or analyzing the think of others include, but are not limited to:
- In Module 2, Lesson 2, students multiply 3 and 4-digit numbers by a 1 digit number. Teachers encourage critical thinking and respectful critique by asking questions such as, “Do you agree with the method (Peter) chose? How is it different from the method you would use? and What other problems could you solve (or not solve) using this method?”.
- In Module 2, Lesson 5, students extend the standard algorithm to multiply 2 3-digit numbers. Teachers encourage respectful critiquing of ideas by providing sentence stems such as, “I have a different opinion. I think, I agree (disagree) because, and that makes sense, but...”.
- In Module 4, Lesson 6, students solve multi-step word problems that involve the comparison of two or more common fractions. Teachers encourage students to use examples and non-examples to support their arguments, and to critique the reasoning of their peers by asking, “Do you agree or disagree with (Jie)? Why? What is another example that would support (Lillian’s) thinking? Who can explain why (Susan’s) example makes sense? and How is (Jerome’s) thinking similar to (Rita’s)? How is it different?”.
- In Module 10, Lesson 5, students share and justify the strategies they used to calculate the area of various rooms. Teachers encourage critical thinking and respectful critique by asking questions such as, “Do you agree with the method (Jerome) chose? How is it different from the method you would use? What other problems could you solve (or not solve) using this method?”.
Indicator 2g.iii
Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.
The instructional materials reviewed for ORIGO Stepping Stones 2.0 Grade 5 partially meet expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.
Accurate mathematics vocabulary is present in the materials, but there are no instructions on how to use the language of mathematics. While vocabulary is identified throughout the materials, there are no explicit directions for instruction of the vocabulary for the teacher in the Steps portion of the lesson. Examples include but are not limited to:
- Vocabulary instruction for each module is found under Mathematics, Vocabulary Development. Vocabulary identified in bold print is identified as being developed throughout the module. The targeted module vocabulary words can be printed onto cards under Resources. For example, in Module 12 vocabulary includes words such as division, algorithm, and division bracket.
- Each Module contains a parent newsletter. The newsletter highlights key vocabulary and provides the definition for parents in the Glossary section of the newsletter.
- In Module 6, Lesson 4, common denominator is present in the Student Journal, but the definition is not introduced in any lesson in Module 6.