10th Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 10th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Text Quality
Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in EvidenceGateway 1 - Meets Expectations | 87% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity | 12 / 14 |
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions | 16 / 18 |
Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. There are a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 42/58 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day required by the standards. The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band, which support students’ literacy growth.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.
There are varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. There are multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities, and there are frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. There is a yearlong writing plan provided that does not reflect the distribution of writing types of the standards and some guidance for teachers on explicit writing instruction.
While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking.
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’ overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Materials provide six units across the grade level with different themes and multiple texts to engage students. There are a lower number of informational texts than literary texts and reflect a 42/58 balance, which may not support achieving the 70/30 balance of informational and literary texts across the school day that is required by the standards.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purposes for the anchor and series of texts, a complexity analysis of the relationship to the associated student task is not provided.
The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band, which support students’ literacy growth. The complexity is mixed throughout the units. Six units offer a variety of texts for whole-class, small-group, and independent reading that encourage independent reading goals.
Indicator 1a
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1a.
Materials provide opportunities for students to read a wide variety of texts, including classics by well-known authors. The texts are well-crafted and content-rich and should build students’overall vocabulary and knowledge base. Materials provide six units across the grade level with different themes and multiple texts to engage students.
Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe, a short story rich in language and incorporating gothic elements by one of American literature’s central figures in horror and science fiction. In Small-Group Learning, students view photographs from The Dream Collector by Arthur Tress, multimedia that supports the unit theme.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, which is part of the literary canon, and view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” from the BBC. Students consider the effects of personal and societal change. In Small-Group Learning, students read “The Doll’s House” by Katherine Mansfield, which is about a group of girls hateful in their pursuit of popularity and is set in late 1800s New Zealand.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai, delivered when she was sixteen, advocating for every child to have equal access to education. Students should be engaged by the topic and relate to the age of the author.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe, the father of modern African literature in English. Students learn about Nigeria and the effects of the Bifranian Civil War as they consider themes of family and survival.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez, a well-crafted monologue offering a unique perspective of Caliban. Students also read The Tempest, Act I by William Shakespeare, an established work in the literary canon.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Blind” by Fatima Naoot, translated by Kees Nijland, which includes complex and challenging information and the discovery of new meaning. Students also read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller to gain perspective on how someone without “sight” can still “see” by tapping into other senses.
Indicator 1b
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
Indicator 1c
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.
The materials have the appropriate level of complexity according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated student task. While the materials provide an accurate text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose for the anchor and series of texts, a complexity analysis of the relationship to the associated student task is not provided. In the Teacher’s Edition Planning section for each unit, a Text Complexity Rubric provides quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative measures include Lexile score and word count. Qualitative measures are scored and explained by the following categories: knowledge demands, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and levels of meaning/purpose, including notes explaining the reason for the score in the category. All texts are rated as moderately complex, complex, or very complex based on the provided qualitative and quantitative measures. Texts that quantitatively fall below the grade level remain moderately complex due to their qualitative nature and student tasks. While no explanation of the relationship to their associated student task is provided, the Planning section provides a rationale for the selection of each text in the Summary and Insight sections. The text selection rationale is divided into different categories: Launch Text, Whole-Class Learning texts, and Small-Group Learning texts. The Connection to Performance Tasks explains how texts are associated with Performance Tasks with a focus on writing or speaking and listening; however, there is no explanation for other tasks in the units.
Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe, which has a Lexile level of 1410L, appropriate for a shared learning experience. The text is exceedingly qualitatively complex, and the Teacher’s Edition, Planning section states: “Multiple levels of meaning and symbolism may be difficult to grasp. Concepts and meanings are not clearly explained.” The text connects to a Performance Task: Writing Focus which is an explanatory essay for the prompt: “How and when does imagination overcome reason?”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu, which has an overall level of complex. The quantitative measure is 1100L, and the qualitative measure is moderately complex. The associated student task level is meets. In Effective Expression: Research, students create a research-based multimedia presentation that “incorporate text, images, and if possible, audio or video to express your ideas.” They choose one of three different options and include quotations and examples from the speech by Tutu.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall, which does not have an overall complexity level or a Lexile level. The qualitative measure is very complex. The associated student task level is exceeds. The student tasks include additional embedded instruction to support students. In Analyze Craft and Structure, a short description is provided of the structure of a Greek Plays followed by a graphic organizer to use while analyzing the structure.
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level; however, there is no complexity analysis for the associated task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, every text includes a Text Complexity rubric for both quantitiave and qualitative measures. For example, in Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Metamorphosis translated by Ian Johnston, which has an overall level of complex. The quantitative measure is 1310L, and the qualitative measure is moderately complex. The associated student task level is meets. On page 136c, The Text Complexity Rubric provides a score for the qualitative elements along with a rationale for that score. The text scored a four out of five in the following criteria on the rubric: knowledge demands, language conventionality and clarity, and levels of meaning/purpose. Structure scored a three out of five. The rationales include the exploration of complex, abstract themes through a metaphorical situation in knowledge demands, the use of complex language with archaic syntax in language conventionality, and to understand the story students must uncover multiple levels of meaning, interrupt the metaphorical situation, and understand challenging language. In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read the “Inaugural Address” by John F. Kennedy, which has a Lexile level of 1410L. A Text Complexity Rubric is available, including Insight on selection of the text: “This influential speech shows how patriotism is compatible with care for the world at large. Kennedy’s call for freedom internationally has become an important part of American rhetoric and has influenced many subsequent presidents.” The Connection to the Essential Question, “What is the relationship between power and freedom?” shares, “Kennedy emphasizes the value of cooperation and sharing for achievement goals. In his account, one nation’s power may not be sufficient to help all of humanity; international cooperation is necessary.”
Although there is not an explicit rationale clearly stated for each text, there is an explicitly stated connection to the unit topic, essential question, and performance task for each text.
The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.
Indicator 1d
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.
The materials provide a series of texts at a variety of appropriate complexity levels for the grade band which support students’ literacy growth. The complexity is mixed throughout the units. Overall, the quantitative measures generally increase across the year, and the qualitative measures are moderately complex throughout the year. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 740L–1410L. Over the course of the year, 56% of texts lack quantitative ratings. Specifically, the qualitative measures increase through the first five units, though they decrease in the last unit. While this decrease in qualitative and quantitative data suggests a level decrease, the student tasks all meet or exceed the standards. All units consistently provide an opportunity for students to grow their skills with additional support during Whole-Class Learning activities as they engage in reading and writing in relation to the Essential Question. In Small-Group Learning, students have opportunities for repeated reading of texts accessible for the grade level. Students also have opportunities to read and analyze texts independently. In all activities, students have access to models of literacy skills which help them complete tasks that require appropriate application of depth of knowledge and work toward the speaking and listening performance task and Performance-Based Assessment. The text pairings work together to scaffold the student tasks with the scaffolding suggestions provided in the Teacher’s Edition. Students read and annotate the texts while teachers guide them with text-specific scaffolding options throughout the units. The scaffolding suggestions are found in clearly identified locations and are consistent, including providing specific suggestions for various student populations, such as English Language Learners, below level learners, on level learners, and above level learners. While the general scaffolding options remain static throughout units, the Teacher’s Edition provides specific options related to the texts.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the Lexile range is 900L–1410L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 2, the Lexile range is 740L–1310L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 3, the Lexile range is 870L–1410L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Moderately Complex. In Unit 4, the Lexile range is 820L–1410L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 5, The Lexile range is 1000L-1100L. The qualitative range is Moderately Complex to Exceedingly Complex. In Unit 6, the Lexile range is 970L to 1170L. The qualitative range is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex. The overall quantitative complexity measures across the year range from 740L-1410L. The overall qualitative range across the year is Slightly Complex to Exceedingly Complex.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar (1030L), and students analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature with a first read, close read, and analysis of the text with teacher guidance. In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou and “Some Advice to Those Who Will Serve Time in Prison" by Nazim Hikmet, translated by Randy Blasing and Mutlu Konukstudents. Students complete a writing assignment individually by writing an original poem based on one of the poems, with the optional prompt: “Imagine that the speaker of ‘Some Advice to Those Who Will Serve Time in Prison’ is set free after many years of unjust imprisonment. Using the poem as a model, write another poem of advice from the speaker’s point of view about a first day of freedom.” In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argumentative essay to the question: “Can justice and forgiveness go hand in hand?” Instructions include, but are not limited to, “Articulate the reasons that support your point of view.” As the units progress, the tasks connected to tracing and presenting point of view increase in complexity.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read the short story “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston (1310L). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the questions, “Describe how Gregor’s insect-like body changes from the opening of the story to the ending. How do these physical changes reflect Gregor’s evolving emotional state?” In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read the short story “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe (820L). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the questions, “What are the ‘five inestimable blessings’ for which Jonathan is grateful? What does Jonathan’s attitude toward these blessings show you about the nature of the Nigerian civil war?” In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read the drama Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall (NP). In the Analyze the Text section, students interpret with the questions, “Why does Oedipus feel he is the person most affected by the plague that has stricken Thebes? How does this fact affect Oedipus’ reception of Creon when Creon returns from Apollo’s oracle?” As the units progress, the tasks connected to character development increase in complexity.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe (1410L), which has an overall complexity level of highly complex. The Teacher’s Edition suggests teachers ensure English Language Learners notice and understand personification to apply that understanding to the effect on the mood and tone of the story.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith. In the Teacher’s Edition, page 470b, a chart shows the available resources and supports available for the text, such as English and Spanish versions of an audio, first read extension questions, and an accessible leveled text. On page 470c, there is a text complexity rubric and a graphic organizer providing suggestions for support based on the text’s rubric scores. On page 470d, a flow chart assists teachers in identifying the standards being taught and what supports to use for students below and above the standard.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Neglected Senses” from For the Benefit of Those Who See by Rosemary Mahoney. In the Teacher’s Edition, page 786b, a chart shows the available resources and supports available for the text, such as English and Spanish versions of an audio, first read extension questions, and an accessible leveled text. On page 786c, there is a text complexity rubric and a graphic organizer providing suggestions for support based on the text’s rubric scores. On page 786d, a flow chart assists teachers in identifying the standards being taught and what supports to use for students below and above the standard.
Indicator 1e
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.
The materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading, including accountability structures of independent reading. Six units offer a variety of texts for whole-class, small-group, and independent reading that encourage independent reading goals. Texts connect to a common topic or theme and Essential Question for the unit. Teacher lesson plans include selection resources and explain the connections of the text to the Essential Question and to the performance task. Throughout the year, students engage with texts of a variety of types and genres, and the consistent structure of the materials provides support for students as they grow their skills and ability to read grade level texts. Each unit starts with a launch text which models a specific type of writing, followed by whole group reading and activities, small group reading and activities, and independent reading. There is sufficient guidance to foster independence for all readers, including independent reading procedures and texts for students to read independently. The Frontmatter also provides a selection of trade books with suggestions for how to incorporate them in each unit. Lesson plans for the trade books can be found on myPerpectives+.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read an informational essay, short stories, and an informational graphic. In Small-Group Learning, students read a short story, photo gallery, interview, and poetry collection. The students choose between a criticism, an explanatory nonfiction, a short story, and a newspaper article tied to the unit’s theme in the independent reading section.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read five texts, including “In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness” by Marie Arana, a short story “The Golden Touch” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, a magazine article “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith, and various poems. There are also five independent reading selections available from which to choose.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter and each Teacher’s Edition for each unit, the time for students to engage with texts during the Unit Introduction, Whole-Class learning, Small-Group learning, and Independent Learning is similar. There is one day for the Launch Text during the Unit Introduction, 14 days for the Whole Class Learning, 11 days for Small-Group Learning, and two days for independent learning. The Teacher’s Edition for each unit also notes, “Pacing is suggested for a 40- to 50-minute class period. If you use block scheduling, you may combine days to meet your schedule needs.” These opportunities to engage with multiple texts and a volume of reading are consistent across the school year.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read four texts over twelve regular classes or six block classes. In the Small-Group Learning, students read two texts over nine regular classes or four and a half block classes. Students end the unit by reading one independent text choice over two classes or one block before the final performance task. The Teacher’s Edition provides a pacing guide for each unit along with suggested supports for various student needs in the wrap-around materials.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter state: “Students self-select a text to explore an aspect of the unit topic and share their learning with the class.” Each unit includes options for students to choose an independent reading selection via the Interactive Student Edition, and the activity takes place over two days. Independent Learning strategies are available in the Teacher’s Edition, including a video. Students can use the “Create a schedule” strategy to track completion and “Assess whether you need to adapt your plan to meet all your goals and deadlines.”
In each unit, independent reading selections are listed at the end of the unit. The section provides guidance for students to pick an independent text. In the “Look Back” section, students review the texts already read in the unit for topics of interest, “Look Ahead” includes titles to see which is of interest, and “Look Inside” allows students to scan the selection they choose to be sure it meets their needs. A graphic organizer helps students plan their reading and study of the text. First Read and Close Read guides are included for students during reading to prepare for sharing with the class at the end of the independent reading.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Independent Learning, students can choose to read “Visual Neuroscience: Look and Learn” by Apoorva Mandavilli. Resources such as text questions, audio summaries, and a selection test are available. The materials include the connection to the Essential Question, including, “This selection will help students respond to the Essential Question, ‘What does it mean to see?’ Students may note that seeing is a matter of degree. To a person who has had no sight since birth, even partial vision offers new and vital experiences of the world.”
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions to support their responses to questions.
The materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions to support student skills and growth, which includes a standard protocol for working in groups and developing presentations and various prompts and strategies to assist growth in both the content and the speaking and listening skills. Speaking and listening instruction for teachers includes facilitation, monitoring, evaluation guides, rubrics, and support. There are multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. There is a yearlong writing plan consisting of a 28/41/31 balance of argumentative, informative, explanatory, and narrative writing, which does not fully reflect the 40/40/20 distribution of writing modes as required by the standards. The Teacher’s Edition offers some guidance and includes explicit instruction within argumentative, informative, and narrative writing tasks. There are frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence.
While the materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking.
Indicator 1f
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understanding of the texts being studied. Text-based questions require students to cite specific evidence as well as draw inferences and conclusions using the cited evidence to support their responses to questions with every story in each unit. The uniform structure includes comprehension check questions, research prompts based on the anchor and exemplar texts, close reading tasks, analysis of craft and structure tasks and questions, vocabulary tasks and questions, author style analysis tasks, writing tasks that ask students to draw on their understanding of the texts, and core writing or speaking assessments that center around understanding from multiple texts in the unit. The questions following each text align with unit Essential Questions and text-specific guiding questions.
The Teacher’s Edition for each unit includes a list of Lesson Resources that include guidance for Making Meaning. The teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-specific and/or text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments. Guides are provided for choosing appropriate supports and additional text-based questions for students who need scaffolding to access the grade-level material or challenges to go beyond the grade-level material.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Revenge of the Geeks” by Alexandra Robbins. In Analyze the Text section, students answer questions: “Reread the first five paragraphs of the selection. Where does the author state her claim, or main idea, in this argument? Restate the claim in your own words. What three examples does Robbins cite in this section of the text to support this claim?”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou, and answer questions following the First Read: “1. According to the speaker, what are three things the free bird does?; 4. How does the free bird regard the sky?”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part I by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Close Read section, students answer the questions: “Reread lines 347–351 in the argument between Teiresias and Oedipus. Mark the nouns. What word is repeated? What is the effect of that repetition?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, the Teacher’s Edition wrap-around material for “Encountering the Other: The Challenge for the 21st Century” by Ryszard Kapuscinski, includes information under the section, Formative Assessment: “If students struggle to close read the text, then provide the Encountering the Other: Text Questions available online in the Interactive Teacher’s Edition or Unit Resources. Answers and DOK levels are also available.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, the Teacher’s Edition section, Writing to Sources wrap-around for “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe, provides teacher instructions: “Guide students in a discussion about what makes Jonathan do the things he does. What is he afraid of? What has he lost? And finally, what will his future look like with these traits?”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. The Teacher’s Edition includes additional guidance before beginning the text collection by posing questions: “How do inner feelings of hatred and resentment affect the outward actions of a person? Modeling the questions readers might ask as they read ‘En el Jardin de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection’ and ‘Caliban’ brings the text alive for students and connects it to the Small-Group Performance Task assignment.”
Indicator 1g
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.
The materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions to support student skills and growth, which includes a standard protocol for working in groups and developing presentations and various prompts and strategies to assist growth in both the content and the speaking and listening skills. Speaking and listening instruction for teachers includes facilitation, monitoring, evaluation guides, rubrics, and support.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Conversation and Discussion guide for high school. This web-based tool gives specific guidelines and directions on discussions such as:
Leading a Group Discussion
Formal Group Discussion Guidelines
Informal Group Discussion Guidelines
Debates
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for leading a group discussion: “Here are some guidelines for leading a group discussion:
Introduce the topic and purpose of the discussion.
Lay out any ground rules for the discussion.
Be objective when summarizing the group’s discussion.
Make sure that no one dominates the discussion. Invite and encourage contributions from all participants.
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Formal Group discussion guidelines: “Here are tips for successful discussions and an exchange of ideas in a structured setting
Do not use an excessive amount of informal or colloquial speech in a formal discussion.
Manners are important in any discussion; make sure you allow others to speak, and do not interrupt.
Use exclamatory language, or dramatic language, sparingly; a little goes a long way.
Diction, or the proper use of vocabulary related to the topic of the discussion, is an important element of any discussion.
Stay focused on the subject under discussion.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Informal Group discussion guidelines: “Informal discussion is open-ended and participants are free to speak in a more conversational manner, but most rules still apply.
Speech may be more colloquial but should still maintain a professional code of conduct.
Dramatic and exclamatory remarks help emphasize one's point of view, but overuse weakens their effectiveness.”
In the Conversation and Discussion guide, materials provide the following guidance for Practices that make for good Debates: “During the debate, be sure to adhere to these practices:
Be courteous and listen to your opponent's point of view; allow others the opportunity to speak.
If you are debating as a team, support your team members.
Speak only when it is your turn, and follow the moderator's instructions.
Speak clearly, slowly, and loudly enough to be heard and understood by the audience.
Speak with spirit, enthusiasm, and conviction.”
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Introduction, the Teacher’s Edition provides Unit Goals for Speaking and Listening with instructions for the teacher: “Explain to students that they will work together to build on one another’s ideas, develop consensus, and communicate with one another. They will also learn to incorporate audio, visuals, and text in presentations.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith, after which students deliver a multimedia presentation answering the question, "In what ways can material possessions create both a sense of comfort and a sense of anxiety?” The Teacher’s Edition provides suggestions for the scaffolded tasks that guide students in building the presentation: “Gather Evidence and Media Examples: Suggest that groups brainstorm what to look for as they search for media to represent wealth and the impact it has: a large home with a person looking lonely and worried, a family enjoying themselves on vacation, a person working in an office late at night, a wealthy benefactor who has given a significant sum of money to a charity.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Country of the Blind” by H.G. Wells. In the Teacher’s Edition, the wrap-around material for the Close Reading section states: “Remind students to use Accountable Talk in their discussions and to support one another as they complete the close read.”
Indicator 1h
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.
The materials provide multiple opportunities over the school year for students to demonstrate what they are reading and researching through varied speaking and listening tasks. While not all sub-standards for speaking and listening are explicitly outlined in the Teacher’s Edition, varied opportunities are included to collaborate and synthesize ideas as a group. Opportunities are present during speaking and listening work for students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Students regularly engage in speaking and listening in Whole-Group Learning and Small-Group Learning with activities such as small-group discussions, oral presentations, and collaborative dramatic interpretations. Speaking and Listening activities are varied and included as a recurring component in the after-reading activities throughout the units. Small-Group Learning uses informal student discussions for each selection. There are protocols for students to establish norms and roles within the small group. When completing activities, students draw evidence and information from the texts they read and their prior knowledge or research. Each unit includes a speaking and listening-based Performance Task as a part of Small-Group Learning. The Teacher’s Edition includes suggestions for supporting students in successfully participating in these activities, such as guidance on incorporating structure to meet the requirements of the tasks and facilitate the successful demonstration of standards.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus, students work in a group to create a multimedia presentation to answer the question, “When, if ever, are limits on freedom necessary?” Students identify details from the texts in the unit that support their response to the question. They work collaboratively to organize their ideas and present them in a media format of their choice. The assessment is graded on “Content,” “Use of Media,” and “Presentation Techniques.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase'' by Margie Goldsmith. In the Speaking and Listening activity, students participate in a group debate. After choosing one of three provided questions, group members complete the following task independently: “Identify at least three specific reasons for your position as well as passages from Goldsmith’s article that you could use to illustrate your points.” After preparing independently, students share their positions and “Take turns discussing and analyzing one another’s positions. Ask questions, and clarify your responses. Work together to reach a conclusion that identifies the strongest argument. This may draw on points from several group members. Summarize your conclusion, and then share it with the class as a whole.”
Work with peers to set rules for collegial discussions and decision-making (e.g., informal consensus, taking votes on key issues, presentation of alternate views), clear goals and deadlines, and individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All units begin Small-Group Learning with an overview of how to work as a small group. Students practice taking a position on a question, sharing their views, and listening to others’ perspectives. Students then decide on group rules, apply the rules to a discussion of their prior learning on the topic, give their group a name, create a group communication plan, make a schedule for reading the texts, and assign roles for the culminating project. A Collaboration Checklist is provided for many activities.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver a multimedia presentation. The Teacher’s Edition directions for the activity state, “Before groups begin work on their projects, have them clearly differentiate the role each group member will play.” Students are also directed to use the Small-Group Learning schedule and allow all students to share their ideas.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith and deliver a multimedia presentation. The presentation process student instructions state: “Make a list of the tasks you will need to complete to finish your project. Then, assign individual group members to each task. Finally, determine how you will make decisions about choices of images, text, and design elements.”
Make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, students view photographs from The Dream Collector by Arthur Tress and create a visual presentation incorporating both text and images. The Teacher’s Edition provides additional guidance for Illuminating the Standards: “To help students understand what an effective visual presentation looks and sounds like, find video examples of multimedia presentations on the Internet. After previewing the videos, play them for the class and have students note the elements of an effective visual presentation. Point out details such as the ratio of text to images and the use of transitions between images. Encourage students to think about how they can use oral and written aspects in their presentations to support the visual materials without overshadowing it.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students present an oral retelling. In the planning process, student instructions state: “Consider including photographs, illustrations, music, charts, graphs, or video clips to add interest and depth to your retelling. Allow each group member to make suggestions.”
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that relate the current discussion to broader themes or larger ideas; actively incorporate others into the discussion; and clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Launch, students form small groups to discuss the question, “Why might exceptionally talented people be considered odd?” Directions state: “Consider similarities in your points of view and work to clarify differences. Support your ideas with examples from texts you have read or your own observations.”
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith and complete a speaking and listening task in the form of a debate. The materials ask students to Debate the Question and provide instructions for the speaking and listening task: “Gather with your group and invite each group member to present his or her response and evidence. Take turns discussing and analyzing one another’s positions. Ask questions, and clarify your responses. Work together to reach a conclusion that identifies the strongest argument. This may draw on points from several group members. Summarize your conclusion, and then share it with the class as a whole."
Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives, summarize points of agreement and disagreement, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views and understanding and make new connections in light of the evidence and reasoning presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, the Launch activity is to have a Four-Corner Debate on the statement, “Seeing is believing.” Students choose a corner depending on their level of agreement with the statement and then, “Discuss questions such as “What details from the text or your own experience lead you to take this position?” Then a representative of each group shares the corner’s primary evidence. After hearing all corners’ positions, students may choose to change corners. If they change, students need to explain what evidence changed their minds.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall, and complete a speaking and listening task relating to a brief critique of the audio performance included with Part II of the play. The materials provide instructions for students to Share and Discuss. The Teacher’s Edition includes additional guidance: “Although students may disagree about the quality of the performance, remind students to help their classmates to produce a strong critique. Peers can suggest edits or additional details to improve the writing. Encourage students to use the Evaluation guide to help them focus their comments.”
Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally), evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Revenge of the Geeks” by Alexandra Robbins. In the Analyze Craft and Structure-activity after reading, student instructions about Reasoning and Evidence are provided. It specifically provides an explanation of “Credibility: Evidence should be drawn from reliable, authoritative sources. A credible source may present a distinct perspective, but it should not display bias, unfounded judgments, or sweeping generalizations.” In the Practice section, students complete a chart explaining how the author supports her claim with credible and relevant evidence. While this is attached to a reading assignment, not speaking or listening, it does provide direct instruction and practice on the credibility of sources. Later in Unit 2, the Performance-Based Assessment, Speaking and Listening: Oral Presentation, students present the argumentative essay they wrote in the writing portion of the assessment for the prompt: “Is the experience of being an outsider universal?” Students must use “credible evidence from at least three of the selections you read and researched.” In the Speaking and Listening section, student instructions state: “Students should annotate their written arguments based on feedback they have received from readers as well as their own evaluation of effective reasons and evidence. Remind students that the effectiveness of an oral argument relies on how the speaker establishes credibility with his or her audience. Emphasizing points that readers found effective will build credibility into the oral argument.” In the provided “Oral Presentation Rubric,” one criterion for “3” under “Content” states: “Presentation has strong valid reasons and evidence that supports the claim while clearly acknowledging counterclaims.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller. The Research section activity is to research, prepare, and deliver a group presentation on one of three options. Each of the options requires that students use different formats in the sources, such as photographs, illustrations, and audio clips. However, there is no formal instruction on evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source.
Evaluate a speaker's point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC and complete a speaking and listening task in the form of a debate about whether to place Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” on a school’s required reading list. Students take a position, organize ideas and evidence, anticipate counterarguments, and write an opening statement: “With your partner, discuss the arguments in favor of your position. Consider the literary merit of the story, its significance in literary history, and other qualities that you find important. Refer to the text as you work. Use the chart to gather your ideas and evidence.” One of the standards this assignment assesses is SL.3: “Evaluate speaker’s point of view…identifying any fallacious reasoning…”; however, neither student nor teacher instructions explicitly teach how to do this.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read “The Thrill of the Chase” by Margie Goldsmith and participate in a debate. As a part of the assessment protocol, students draw conclusions: “Gather with your group and invite each group member to present his or her response and evidence. Take turns discussing and analyzing one another’s positions. Ask questions, and clarify your responses. Work together to reach a conclusion that identifies the strongest argument.”
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task: Speaking and Listening, students deliver a group multimedia presentation to answer the question, “In what ways can material possessions create both a sense of comfort and a sense of anxiety?” Groups follow steps to prepare. They identify evidence from the unit texts to answer the question, write a thesis statement, and find additional evidence to support the thesis. Once the evidence is collected, the group collaborates to identify their strongest examples and organize them into a presentation. In the “Rehearse With Your Group” section, a checklist is provided for students to evaluate their content, use of media, and presentation techniques. One item on the checklist for presentation techniques states: “The speaker uses voice and gestures effectively.” The items for content states: “The presentation presents a clear thesis. Main ideas are supported with evidence from the texts…. The presentation conveys information coherently.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu and create an argumentative group presentation that addresses the question: “Does forgiveness first require an apology?” Students plan with a group to analyze the text, choose roles, gather evidence, and choose order and format. The materials include instructions, such as: “Model your presentation on talk shows you’ve seen. For instance, some shows invite guests out one by one but then have them interact with one another as well as the host. Select the format of the show and the order in which the guests will appear.”
Indicator 1i
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i.
The materials include various on-demand and process writing opportunities. On-demand writing tasks are offered throughout the year, connecting to the Introduction, Whole-Class Learning, Small Group Learning, and Independent Learning sections. They include a mix of summaries, quick writes, and responses to texts. Process writing tasks include various types of essays using single or multiple texts as sources and following standard writing procedures from prewriting/planning to revising and/or editing. Students are provided step-by-step guidance for each task and a checklist or peer review process. At the end of each Whole-Class Learning section, students complete a writing Performance Task over the course of two days. A Performance-Based Assessment writing task is at the end of each unit with a Unit Reflection. Materials include digital resources where appropriate. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance on how to model each type of writing, including a launch text to start the unit that functions as a model for the Performance-Based Assessment. The Teacher’s Edition also includes Digital Perspectives boxes in each unit that often suggest digital resources but do not provide the resource or links to the resources.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, the activities with the Launch Text include a Quickwrite: “Consider class discussions, presentations, the video, and the Launch Text as you think about the prompt. Prompt: In what ways does transformation play a role in stories meant to scare us?”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt. In the Teacher’s Edition, the WriteNow Express and Reflect states: “As students read and interpret the excerpt from Roosevelt’s ‘Four Freedoms’ speech, ask them to identify the other nations that are involved in the effort to stop the threat of invasion. Have students write a speech for the leader of one of those nations to its people responding to Roosevelt’s call to action by the United States. Ask students to consider the point of view from one of the other countries and how the message would be received by its citizens.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest, Act II by William Shakespeare and complete a WriteNow on-demand activity in which they express and reflect when imagining utopias: “Have students close read Gonzalo’s vision of his utopia, or perfect world, in lines 144–153. Explain to students that in 1551, the English version of Thomas More’s Utopia was published. The book depicts a ‘perfect’ society and its political, social, and religious culture and customs. Since then, writers and philosophers have imagined their own utopias, as Gonzalo does in The Tempest. Have each student write a short essay describing his or her version of a utopia. Then have them share their work with the class.”
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, and view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC. In the Performance Task, students write an argument to the question, “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” The materials provide information on building an informative essay and provide the protocol for the writing process, including prewriting and planning activities, drafting activities, a language development process focused on creating cohesive writing through transitions, a revision process that includes evaluating the draft based on a provided rubric, evaluation through the peer review process, proofreading and editing, publishing the work by presenting to the class, and reflecting on the learning and writing process.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay over the course of two days as they consider the question, “What can one person do to defend the rights of all people?” The Teacher’s Edition provides Revision guidance, including but not limited to: “1. Display your first draft on the screen. Use think-alouds as you use RADaR strategies for revision: REPLACE, ADD, DELETE, REORDER. For each change you implement, mark the type of change you made.” Students engage in a full writing process, including editing for conventions and proofreading for accuracy.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. In the Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative. As a part of the performance task, students follow the writing protocol provided by the text. These include prewriting and planning activities, a drafting organizer, a language development process focused on varied sentence structure, a revision process that includes evaluating the draft based on a provided rubric, evaluation through a peer review process, proofreading and editing, publishing the work by presenting to the class and finally reflecting on the learning and writing process.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All units include interactive digital components such as a reader’s notebook for answering specific questions and making notes about selections, audio summaries, video and audio selections, online annotations, and online assessments.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read from “Freedom of the Press Report 2015” by Freedom House and research the issue of freedom of the press to create an infographic. In the Teacher’s Edition, a Digital Perspectives box suggests teachers prepare students for the assignment: “To help students better understand how to prepare an infographic, provide other examples on the Internet on the other topics. Project the examples for the class (after previewing them yourself) and have students note the different kinds of elements they include and how trends have been presented.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall. At the end of the selection, a box is provided with a link to the audio of a performance of the play and states: “How does listening to this audio performance, by L. A. Theatre Works, enhance your understanding of the characters and events featured in Oedipus the King?”
Indicator 1j
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.
The materials reflect a 28/41/31 balance of argumentative, informative or explanatory, and narrative writing, which does not fully reflect the 40/40/20 distribution of writing modes as required by the standards. The Teacher’s Edition offers some guidance and includes explicit instruction within argumentative, informative, and narrative writing tasks. Where appropriate, writing opportunities are often connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports).
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing. Materials include an uneven distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 28% argumentative, 41% informative, and 31% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is eight argumentative, 12 informative, and nine narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Percentage or number of opportunities for argumentative writing: three units address argumentative writing. 28% of writing opportunities over six units are argumentative.
Unit 1: 0
Unit 2: 4
Unit 3: 0
Unit 4: 0
Unit 5: 3
Unit 6: 1
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing: five units address informative/explanatory writing. 41% of writing opportunities over six units are informative/explanatory.
Unit 1: 3
Unit 2: 1
Unit 3: 4
Unit 4: 3
Unit 5: 1
Unit 6: 0
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing: four units address informative writing. 31% of writing opportunities over six units are narrative.
Unit 1: 2
Unit 2: 0
Unit 3: 1
Unit 4: 2
Unit 5: 0
Unit 6: 4
Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, then view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC, and write an argument to answer the prompt: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” Before writing, teachers prompt students to review the elements of the argument and a model text. During pre-writing, teachers prompt students to focus on narrowing the topic through the use of a chart. During drafting, the focus is on writing clear introductions that clearly state the claim. The teacher is instructed to “point out to students that their claim or main idea, is needed before they move on to sequence their ideas logically. Point out that it’s normal for writers’ claims to change as writers dig deeper into their ideas, evidence, and counterarguments. They must be careful to make sure their claims and their conclusions agree with each other as they complete their first drafts.” During revision, teachers Help students conduct an honest evaluation of their first drafts by suggesting that they adopt the attitude of a reader from outside of class.”
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC and write a visual analysis in a Writing to Sources assignment. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to support students: “Explain to students that when they are evaluating video, they should consider not only whether images are presented in black and white, but also focus on which images are presented in black and white versus color. Remind students to consider the music that accompanies the images, as film producers rely on these color and sound choices to set the mood and evoke feelings from viewers.” Teachers can also use a Writing to Sources: Visual Analysis support document.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, students read Where is Here? by Joyce Carol Oates and complete the Writing to Sources task where they work as a group to write a narrative that “extends the scope of ‘Where is Here?’” Prior to writing, the teacher provides a chart to help plan the narrative with columns addressing action and the goal of each paragraph. Teachers review the qualities of each writing genre with the class and encourage students to “take notes or create a brief outline to address the prompt for the topic they have chosen.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, students read Oedipus the King, Part II by Sophocles, translated by Nicholas Rudall, and complete a Writing to Sources task, which is to write a dialogue. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to support students, including: “Explain the strategy ‘show, don’t tell’ to students so that they understand that much can be said without directly stating it. For example, the question of whether Oedipus deserved his punishment can be answered by characters expressing either disgust or pity of the king’s punishment, commenting on negative or redeeming characteristics of the king, or expressing their wishes for a different outcome.”
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare, a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. Then, they write an argument answering the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” As a part of the writing process, students develop a claim based on the text and other sources while guided to consider valid points from other sides. In the “Prewriting/Planning” section, students develop a working thesis statement as well as explore counterclaims by completing sentence stems.
Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level and concerns. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, then view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC, and write an argument based on the prompt: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” As a part of the writing process, students draw evidence from multiple types of sources, including the anchor texts. The Teacher’s Edition suggests: “Encourage students to make sure they have various types of evidence, such as those listed on the student page. If they have only one type of evidence, they may need to gather more varied types of evidence. Ask if they have verified the truthfulness of their evidence, explaining that a misrepresentation of the facts will weaken their argument.”
Use words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare, a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez, and write an argument answering the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” As students draft their essays, the text provides instruction on transitions between ideas and source information: “As you draft your argument, use appropriate transitions and punctuation to smoothly incorporate quotations and paraphrases into your writing.”
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston, then view “Franz Kafka and Metamorphosis” by BBC, and write an argument based on the prompt: “Are outsiders simply those who are misjudged or misunderstood?” Student instructions related to maintaining formal language appropriate to the context of the argument and purpose state: “Use a formal, objective tone or attitude. Use precise words. Avoid slang, contractions, and other elements of casual language that are inappropriate for academic writing” and “make sure that you have used an appropriately formal style that includes precise and vivid language, accurate use of academic terms, and transitions that establish clear relationships among your ideas.”
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare, a poetry collection, including “En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection” by Virgil Suárez. Then, they write an argument answering the prompt: “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue (forgiveness)?” In the revision process, the Student Edition provides rhetorical questions to develop an effective conclusion: “Are [the ideas] presented in a logical order? Have you made the connections between your ideas, exact quotations, and paraphrases clear? Does your conclusion follow naturally from the claim and evidence that you presented, and does it end your essay memorably?”
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information to make important connections and distinctions; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. In Writing to Compare, students compare this text to “Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allen Poe in terms of Gothic Style and the use of Magical Realism. Students are guided to plan/prewrite by focusing on the setting in each story and how it shows Gothic style and Magical Realism. In the drafting stage, students are given sentence starters to help them develop their essays and guidance in developing their evidence. Finally, students review, revise, and edit their final drafts.
Develop the topic with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an explanatory essay. After reading several Gothic texts, students write an explanatory essay answering the question, “How and when does imagination overcome reason?” During the drafting stage, students receive instruction in identifying and choosing evidence and support from the text to support their analysis. The Teacher’s Edition includes support for discussing how to use personal experience along with text-based evidence in supporting a thesis or main point in an essay.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai and view “Diane Sawyer Interviews Malala Yousafzai” by ABC News. In Writing to Compare, students write an explanatory essay to explain “why Yousafzai has been able to attract supporters from all over the world.” In the prewriting stage, students are instructed to look at details from the speech and interview that mirror one another and consider how they are presented in each text and how they represent Malala’s story. In the drafting stage, students are given a sentence stem for the thesis focusing on how the details show why Malala is a compelling figure. There is also explicit instruction for finding a variety of types of evidence, including exact quotes, paraphrases, and examples.
Use appropriate and varied transitions to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. In Writing to Sources, students write a character analysis for Johnathan, the main character. The directions state: “Link supporting details to your main idea using phrases such as for example. Include transition words such as instead to connect ideas.” In the Reflecting on Your Writing section, students answer which transition words they used to move readers from idea to idea. The Teacher’s Edition suggests teachers help students brainstorm other transitions if they are using the same one multiple times.
Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay for the prompt: “What makes something valuable? What makes something a treasure?” In the drafting stage, students receive explicit instruction in creating cohesion by using conjunctive adverbs to show logical relationships between ideas. In the revising stage, the checklist reminds students to look for “words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationship between ideas.”
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver an explanatory presentation. To start, students write an explanatory essay for the prompt, “What does it mean to be free?” The additional instructions state: “Use a formal tone and an objective tone, and follow the conventions of standard English.” The assignment rubric includes a category on maintaining a formal style and an objective tone throughout the essay to score at the highest level.
Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, Performance Task, students deliver a multimedia presentation after writing an informative essay answering the questions, “How do we decide what we want versus what we need? What can result from an imbalance between want and need?” Student directions state to review the elements of an informative essay by looking at the rubric prior to writing. A conclusion that summarizes the ideas and readdresses the thesis is included on the rubric. The Teacher’s Edition advises teachers to remind students to include a memorable conclusion.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Engage and orient the reader by setting out a problem, situation, or observation, establishing one or multiple point(s) of view, and introducing a narrator and/or characters; create a smooth progression of experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Performance-Based Assessment, students write a nonfiction narrative for the prompt: “Is there a difference between seeing and knowing?” Student instructions are to “present both clearly delineated characters - the people who are involved in the action of the story- and settings.” There is an expectation for a “logically sequenced series of events that show the choices people make and their reasons for making them.” Once completed, students share their narratives with the class in a “storytelling session.”
Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, and multiple plot lines, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read The Country of the Blind by H.G. Wells and complete a Writing to Sources task: “Write a response to the story” and choose from three options: a retelling, character description, or dialogue. Once the group decides on a writing style, they review notes they took during reading and analysis of the text to clarify and focus their ideas. Students work independently to create a written piece based on one of the three options and share them with the group. The retelling option asks students to “rewrite a portion of the story as a flashback.” The character description asks students to “write a description of Nunez from another character’s point of view.” The dialogue directs students to “write a dialogue in which Nunez describes his experiences…to an outsider.”
Use a variety of techniques to sequence events so that they build on one another to create a coherent whole. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Small-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection and complete a group Writing To Sources task to “plan and write a short story that answers a question left open by one of the poems.” Students choose from three options and use a graphic organizer to “brainstorm for ideas about the setting and characters” of the story. As a group, they “determine how the conflict will begin, develop, and resolve.” Students are encouraged to “plan the direction the story will take before beginning to write.” There is a focus on prewriting strategies that will help the group create a cohesive story.
Use precise words and phrases, telling details, and sensory language to convey a vivid picture of the experiences, events, setting, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative for the prompt: “Can we see ourselves as clearly as others see us?” In the Prewriting/Planning section, students Gather Evidence: “Before you draft, collect ideas for descriptions you want to include in your narrative.” The bulleted list includes “sensory details, words that appeal to the senses of sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing.” Students’ instructions state: “Using vivid details adds interest and depth to your writing” and gives an example of sensory details from the Launch Text.
Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on what is experienced, observed, or resolved over the course of the narrative. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant, translated by Andrew MacAndrew, and complete a Writing To Sources task: “Adopt the perspective of Mathilde Loisel, and write a diary entry in which you explain how your life changed after the party.” Students are reminded that a diary entry “describes the writer’s own experiences and expresses his or her thoughts, feelings, and observations.” Students also have access to supplemental resources that help organize the introspective thoughts of the narrator of the diary entry.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe and “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar and complete a Writing to Compare task connecting to the texts. Students write an explanatory essay comparing and contrasting the Gothic style and Magical Realism as seen in the stories. Students use a chart to gather details relating to the setting and later complete an evidence log in which they record what they have learned from “House Taken Over.”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an informative essay for the prompt: “What does it mean to be free?” The task requires students to “develop the topic with facts, details, quotations, examples, and other evidence from at least three of the selections you read.”
Indicator 1k
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support sophisticated analysis, argumentation, and synthesis.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.
The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Writing opportunities are focused on students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. The writing opportunities include shorter specific writing aligned with a specific text or texts, longer process writing in the performance tasks, writing as a preparation for a speaking task, and short, informal written responses to questions. During Whole-Class Learning, most units end with a writing task that involves explicit instruction in the skills needed to complete the task. During Small-Group Learning, students work collaboratively to complete research assignments and other writing projects that reference the text and often require support from the text or other credible sources. Graphic organizers are available to help students organize textual evidence to support a claim. Students are required to go outside the texts and conduct research to add additional evidence for some activities. All units have multiple opportunities to write using evidence, although it is more limited in Unit 6, which focuses on students doing narrative writing. The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to assist students when completing writing tasks and can offer additional support in the form of modeling and graphic organizers.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “My Introduction to Gothic Literature” (author not cited). After reading, students write a summary of the text. The teacher is instructed to provide students with the following guidance for their summary paragraphs:
“Write in the the present tense.
Make sure to include a title of the work.
Be concise: a summary should not be equal in length to the original text.
If you need to quote the words of the author, use quotation marks.
Don’t put your own opinions, ideas, or interpretations into the summary. The purpose of writing a summary is to accurately represent what the author says, not to provide a critique.”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, translated by Ian Johnston and watch a video “Franz Kafka and the Metamorphsosis” by BBC. Afterward, students write an argumentative essay onthe question “Are outsiders simply those that are misjudged or misunderstood?” Students are first presented with the elements of an argument and a model argumentative essay. As students begin planning their essay, the teacher prompts students to use varied types of evidence. The teacher has “students review the facts they listed in their Evidence Log.” Then, the teacher encourages “students to make sure they have various types of evidence, such as those listed on the student page. If they have only one type of evidence, they may need to gather more varied types of evidence.” The teacher also “Ask[s] if they have verified the truthfulness of their evidence, explaining that a misrepresentation of the facts will weaken their argument.” Lastly, the teacher reminds students “to use reliable sources and to be wary of the many factual errors found on the Internet.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Group Learning, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare and En el Jardín de los Espejos Quebrados, Caliban Catches a Glimpse of His Reflection by Virgil Suarez.After reading, students write an argumentative essay in which they state their position on the question “Is there more value in vengeance or virtue?” Students are first presented with the elements of an argument and a model argumentative essay. The Teacher Edition prompts teachers to note that “Students might be accustomed to making an argument based on nonfiction texts” therefore the teacher “Remind[s students] that argumentative text focusing oninterpretations of literature should contain all the same elements and be well-organized and use tone and word choice to create authoritativeness.” As students begin to plan their writing and collect evidence, the teacher reminds them that “their argument will become stronger with each additional source they cite in their essay. Explain that one or two pieces ofevidence will fail to convince readers, since one or two data points may be insufficient to draw a reasonable conclusion. As the data points build, it becomes more difficult for a reader to dismiss the examples as exceptions to the rule”
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai and watch her interview with Diane Sawyer; following the reading and viewing, students write an explanatory essay. The materials ask students to “Consider which details are emphasized in the speech and the interview, as well as the effect these details have on your understanding of Yousafzai, her experience, and her activism. Cite evidence from both texts in your essay.” A graphic organizer is available to assist students in analyzing the text.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. Students write a character analysis of Jonathan. The text provides students with prompts and suggestions to look for supporting evidence, including but not limited to: “First, review the story to analyze Jonathan in detail. Using a two-column chart, list his strengths and weaknesses; [then] identify specific examples in the story that demonstrate each trait.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Small-Group Learning, Performance-Based Assessment, students write an argumentative essay responding to the following question: “Can justice and forgiveness go hand in hand?” The materials ask students to “Use credible evidence from at least three of the selections you read and researched in this unit to support your claim.”
Indicator 1l
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
The materials include opportunities to demonstrate the application of grammar and convention skills in context in writing tasks; however, explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards is lacking. Some grammar substandards include explicit instruction but have limited practice or are not outlined thoroughly, such as spelling and using a style manual. Some substandards are included when the explicit instruction is about a grammatical element connected to the substandard. Students apply grammar skills in context in Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning, though the opportunities are not always authentic. Students complete Language Development tasks that connect to a text they are reading; the tasks include a teaching component with sections for Language Development, such as Concept Vocabulary, Word Study, Conventions, and Author’s Style. The materials offer other practice opportunities in a Grammar Center that includes workbooks and tutorials for each grade level. The End Matter of the Teacher’s Edition provides a Grammar Handbook consistent for each grade level that provides a structure for teachers to scaffold grammar instruction.
Materials include some explicit instruction of some of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include some authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to use parallel structure. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Small-Group Learning, students read “Revenge of the Geeks” by Alexandra Robbins and complete an Author’s Style task around parallel structure. Students read examples of nonparallel and parallel structure and “Mark the parallel sentence elements in each of these passages from ‘Revenge of the Geeks.’ Parallel elements may appear in a single sentence or in multiple sentences.” The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to facilitate and check student work. One example includes “3. Research shows that they are more likely . . . to conform, which can also mean they’re less likely to innovate.” To conclude the task, students complete a Write It activity by writing a paragraph about the text: “Include at least one example of parallel structure. Mark your examples.”
Students have opportunities to use various types of phrases (noun, verb, adjectival, adverbial, participial, prepositional, absolute) and clauses (independent, dependent; noun, relative, adverbial) to convey specific meanings and add variety and interest to writing or presentations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. The Conventions activity focuses on understanding how independent and dependent clauses create a variety of sentence structures. After looking at examples from the story of the four basic sentence structures, students reread two paragraphs from the story and identify all the types of sentence structures. They turn two simple sentences into a compound sentence, a complex sentence, and a compound-complex sentence. Later in Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. The Conventions activity focuses on prepositional phrases. After reviewing examples of prepositional phrases from the story, students analyze three sentences by marking the prepositions and their objects. They edit a paragraph by adding prepositions to make it more interesting and detailed.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, students read from “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin D. Roosevelt and complete the Conventions task focusing on types of phrases. The student materials provide examples of noun phrases. Students mark the noun phrases and head nouns in sentences from the speech. One example includes “c. Our national policy in foreign affairs has been based on a decent respect for all nations, large and small.” The Teacher’s Edition provides answers. To conclude the task, students complete a Write It activity: “In the example, the original sentence has been revised to include another noun phrase. Following the example, rewrite each sentence below by adding a noun phrase. Mark the noun phrase you added, as well as its head noun.” The Teacher’s Edition provides possible student responses.
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Small-Group Learning, students read “View From the Empire State Building” by Helen Keller. The Conventions activity focuses on prepositional phrases that act as adverbial phrases. After looking at examples, students identify adverbial phrases in three sentences and then write a paragraph using at least three adverbial phrases.
Students have opportunities to use a semicolon (and perhaps a conjunctive adverb) to link two or more closely related independent clauses. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. While the Teacher’s Edition front matter indicates the sub-standard for semicolons is taught, the activity does not include any practice or examples using a semicolon. It does say that a semicolon can be used to join sentences in a chart of how to form various sentence structures, but it does not give an example or ask students to practice it.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, translated by Andrew MacAndrew, and complete the Conventions task about the use of semicolons to “join two closely related independent clauses that are not already joined by a coordinating conjunction.” Students read examples of correct use of semicolons, with and without a conjunctive adverb or transitional phrase: “Mark where a semicolon should be inserted in each of the following sentences based on ‘The Necklace.’” An example includes “d. The necklace turns out to have been much less valuable than Madame Loisel thought in fact, it was merely a cheap costume jewelry.” The Teacher’s Edition provides guidance to Make It Interactive: “Have students write sentences that use semicolons to join independent clauses. Then, have them underline the subjects and verbs of each independent clause to illustrate the fact that there is a complete sentence on each side of the semicolon.” To conclude the task, students complete a Write It activity by writing “three sentences of your own to describe Madame Loisel—her character, her dreams, and her experiences in the story. Use a semicolon in each sentence.”
Students have opportunities to use a colon to introduce a list or quotation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument and complete a Language Development: Conventions task. The Student Edition provides a Tip for punctuation: “Use a colon to introduce longer quotations.” As students draft their arguments, examples are available to assist students to “smoothly incorporate quotations and paraphrases into [their] writing.” For example, “Introduce the longer quotation, then use a colon. Note that a block quotation does not have quotation marks surrounding it.” Teacher instructions state: “Remind students that proper language, grammar, and punctuation help improve the readability of their argument. Consider reviewing examples of correct use of language and punctuation from the launch text.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument. As a part of the drafting process in writing, the text provides explicit instruction on incorporating quotations from the anchor texts and proper punctuation; one of the punctuation options is a colon. Students view models of different ways to punctuate quotations and how to use a colon appropriately to introduce lists or quotations. The Teacher’s Edition suggests reviewing the launch text to provide more examples of properly punctuated quotations.
Students have opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, during the review, revise, edit step in the Proofread for Accuracy section, students are told to read carefully and look for errors in spelling and punctuation. There is no explicit instruction provided on this skill.
In Unit 4, All That Glitters, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe. In the Author’s Style section, students examine the effect of nonstandard spelling in dialect on a piece of writing. The text provides an explanation of what dialectical writing is and an analysis through a comparison of standard form and stylized form of the language. After the comparative study, students reflect on the impact of the nonstandard language choices on the text. The Teacher’s Edition provides the suggestion to point out how the variations give clues to readers about characterization in particular. Students complete a writing task: “Write a brief paragraph in which you describe your morning routine. Use standard English. Then, write another paragraph on the same topic. Use nonstandard language variations with which you are familiar.”
In Unit 6, Blindness and Sight, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write a nonfiction narrative. During revision, students use the checklist, Focus and Organization, Development of Ideas/Elaboration, and Conventions, to revise. One of the checklist items states: “Consulted a dictionary to check correct spelling and meaning.” As students complete Editing and Proofreading, student instructions state: “Read your draft carefully, looking for errors in spelling and punctuation.” The Teacher’s Materials include guidance: “As students proofread, they should check for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Remind them that they should not rely on word processing programs to find all mistakes, as they can sometimes miss some errors. For example, spell checkers will not recognize that the wrong form of a homonym was used. They should also be aware that it’s easy to misspell names of people and places.”
Write and edit work so that it conforms to the guidelines in a style manual (e.g., MLA Handbook, Turabian’s Manual for Writers) appropriate for the discipline and writing type. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition, End Matter, Tool Kit: Research, guidance is provided for Formats for Citing Sources: “In the body of your paper, provide a footnote, an endnote, or a parenthetical citation, identifying the sources of facts, opinions, or quotations. At the end of your paper, provide a bibliography or a Works Cited list, a list of all the sources referred to in your research. Follow an established format, such as Modern Language Association (MLA) style.” Additional information is available with sample parenthetical citations and instructions on creating a Works Cited list with an MLA (8th Edition) Style for Listing Sources.
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an argument. In the prewriting/planning step, students find various types of evidence to use in their argument. Student instructions state: “Consult an online or print style manual to confirm how to incorporate quotations or paraphrases into your essay correctly.” There are no additional instructions or examples for students to use.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, students write an informative essay. During Editing and Proofreading, student instructions state: “Use a style guide if you need help crediting your sources correctly.”
Indicator 1m
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 10 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.
The materials provide a comprehensive year-long plan for students to acquire both academic and concept vocabulary in a systematic way. Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Materials include lessons and activities for vocabulary critical to understanding the text, the overall concept of the unit, and the genre of writing for each unit. Vocabulary is repeated in various contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Units systematically build vocabulary, as each unit includes academic vocabulary instruction before reading texts in the Introduction and builds during the reading of individual texts. Students rank their familiarity with the words before reading and, after reading, think about the connection between the words and practice using the words and Greek and Latin roots in the Word Study and Concept Vocabulary sections. Concept Vocabulary is found in Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning activities for the texts in each unit. Activities for demonstrating understanding of the Concept Vocabulary become more complex as the year progresses. Vocabulary is associated with the writing focus of the Performance Tasks, and students can incorporate vocabulary in authentic ways during the Performance Tasks and from their Word Networks during the Performance-Based Assessment. Stand-alone vocabulary assessments include a pre-test, mid-year assessment, and end-of-year assessment. The Vocabulary Center includes supplemental practice resources for students to work with common general academic and domain-specific words using Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Word Study Worksheets, Domain-Specific Academic Vocabulary lessons, and General Academic Vocabulary lessons. Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive vocabulary development component.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher’s Edition Table of Contents and Frontmatter, the materials include a Standards Correlation, including Language: Conventions, Effective Use, and Vocabulary: “The vocabulary standards focus on understanding words and phrases, their relationships, and their nuances and on acquiring new vocabulary, particularly general academic and domain-specific words, and phrases.” Each unit includes Vocabulary/Word Study, and the Unit at a Glance includes the academic vocabulary, concept vocabulary, and word study, such as the following: Latin Prefix, Latin Root, Cognates, Connotation and Denotation, and Multiple-Meaning Words. The materials include a consistent approach for students to interact with word relationships and build academic vocabulary regularly. Each unit offers information in the Introduction regarding the Academic Vocabulary for students to interact with and with teacher guidance, such as offering possible student responses. The materials offer Language Development consistently in the Whole-Class and Small-Group Learning sections with Word Networks and through annotations when close reading. The Teacher’s Edition End Matter also includes a Glossary: Academic Concept Vocabulary and the academic vocabulary appears in blue type. The Index also offers a list of the academic vocabulary and concept vocabulary with corresponding page numbers.
In the Teacher’s Edition during the Launch text of each unit, the Vocabulary Development box provides teachers with additional Academic Vocabulary Reinforcement activities.
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, academic and concept vocabulary are embedded throughout. In each unit Introduction, students view a chart with academic vocabulary for the unit, read mentor sentences with the words, and complete a chart for the predicted meaning and related words. Each text Introduction includes a Concept Vocabulary section where students rank words from least familiar to most familiar. All words are defined in the footnotes of the text. After reading, the Concept Vocabulary section includes activities with words from the Introduction, and the Word Study section includes practice with Latin and Greek word parts. The structure of the vocabulary lessons remains consistent throughout the year.
In Unit 1, Inside the Nightmare, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortázar. In the Making Meaning section, students rank the Concept Vocabulary words in order from most familiar (1) to least familiar (6) before they read the text. An example is vestibule, appearing multiple times in the text: “One entered the house through a vestibule with enameled tiles, and a wrought-iron grated door opened onto the living room. You had to come in through the vestibule and open the gate to go into the living room…”
In Unit 2, Outsiders and Outcasts, Introduction, in the Academic Vocabulary: Argument activity, the word contradict is included. It is also used again in the Whole-Class Learning, Performance Task, where students are encouraged to use the academic vocabulary in the argumentative essay. In the end of unit Performance-Based Assessment, students are reminded they will need to know the meaning of the academic vocabulary to complete the final assessment successfully. While academic vocabulary is included in three activities in Unit 2, it is not formally revisited in other units.
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Small-Group Learning, students read “Speech at the United Nations” by Malala Yousafzai. Before reading, students view the words and learn strategies for recognizing parts of the words: “Separating a word into its parts can often help you identify its meaning. Those parts might include base words, roots, or affixes,” Examples include:
“Unfamiliar Word: unidirectional Familiar Base Word: direction, meaning‘point toward which something faces or moves
Familiar Affixes: the prefix uni-, meaning ‘one’; the suffix -al, which forms adjectives
Conclusion: Unidirectional may mean moving in only one direction, or toward only one point.”
After reading, students practice with the following task: “The three concept vocabulary words are related. With your group, determine what the words have in common. Write your ideas, and add another word that fits the category.”
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest, Act V by William Shakespeare, and encounter the vocabulary word pardon. During Making Meaning before the reading, students rank their familiarity with the word pardon. Following the reading, students consider why vocabulary was selected, including pardon. Later in Unit 5, Small-Group Learning, students encounter the same vocabulary word pardon when reading “Under a Certain Little Star” by Wislawa Szymborska, translated by Joanna Trzeciak: “Pardon me, hounded hope, for laughing sometimes/Pardon me, deserts, for not rushing in with a spoonful of water.” The word pardon appears again later in the unit during Small-Group Learning when students read “Let South Africa Show the World How to Forgive” by Desmond Tutu. During that reading, in the Teacher’s Edition, a Vocabulary Development activity asks teachers to “Draw students’ attention to paragraph 11. Have students fill out a word map for the word amnesty.” Synonyms in the chart include pardon and forgiveness.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 9–10 General Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It sections. Examples of Vocabulary Terms include, but are not limited to: allusion, empathy, hypothesis, suspense, chronicle, and integral. The Interactive lessons include an activity in which students “Drag each vocabulary word in the left-hand column to match it with the word in the right-hand column that has the same root as the vocabulary word.”
In the Vocabulary Center, Interactive Vocabulary Lessons, Grades 9–10 Domain-Specific Academic Vocabulary, the lesson includes Show It, Try It, and Apply It sections. Examples of Vocabulary Terms include, but are not limited to: ideology, sovereignty, catalyst, monochrome, genetic mutation, local area network, and tangent. The Interactive lessons include an activity in which students “Identify the domain of each vocabulary word. Drag each word into the correct subject area column.”
In Unit 3, Extending Freedom’s Reach, Introduction, the materials include academic terms that “appear in all subjects and can help you read, write, and discuss with more precision. Here are five academic words that will be useful to you in this unit as you analyze and write informative texts.” Students complete a chart to predict meaning and write at least two related words for the following: attribute, hierarchy, demarcate, fundamental, and democracy.
In Unit 5, Virtue and Vengeance, Whole-Class Learning, students read the “Historical Context of The Tempest” (author not cited), which includes the Tier II academic words and Tier II domain-specific words: allusion, articulate, contentious, vehement, and tolerate.