4th Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 4th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Text Complexity and Quality
Text Quality & ComplexityGateway 1 - Meets Expectations | 88% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality & Complexity | 19 / 20 |
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence | 15 / 16 |
Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development | 3 / 6 |
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests. Texts include a mix of informational and literary texts. Materials include texts that have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. The program materials in each Literature Unit and Science and Social Studies Unit contain a text complexity analysis that includes quantitative measure, qualitative measure, and a rationale for including the text. Anchor and supporting texts provide opportunities for students to engage in a broad range of text types and disciplines. The lessons throughout the units have sets of high quality sequences of text dependent questions that build to a culminating task. The materials include supporting documents that outline strategies and structures for evidence-based discussions. Materials support speaking and listening about the text through group learning activities and class discussions. The majority of lessons include on-demand writing, such as a Target Task that requires students to respond in writing to the text covered in the lesson. Materials partially meet the criteria for materials including explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context. The program does not explicitly teach word analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected texts and tasks. While the program contains texts that could allow students the opportunity to practice reading fluently, the program does not provide explicit instruction on how to read with accuracy, appropriate rate, and prosody.
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality & Complexity
Texts are worthy of students' time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students' advancing toward independent reading.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests. There is a wide array of informational and literary text integrated throughout every unit. Materials include texts that have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. The instructional materials reviewed meet the expectations that materials support students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. The program materials in each Literature and Science and Social Studies unit contain a text complexity analysis that includes quantitative measure, qualitative measure, and a rationale for including the text. Anchor and supporting texts provide opportunities for students to engage in a broad range of text types and disciplines.
Indicator 1a
Anchor texts are of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.
The texts in both Literature and Science and Social Studies are of publishable quality, many are written by well-known authors, and many are also part of well-known series. The texts are culturally diverse and contain strong academic vocabulary. The texts contain engaging pictures, and the content is written in a manner that is engaging for students.
Examples in Literature include:
- In Unit 1, students read Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor; it is a Newberry Award recipient and a heartwarming tale.
- In Unit 2, students read Where the Mountain Meets the Moon by Grace Lin, which is an engaging and thought-provoking story with vibrant illustrations and rich, figurative language.
- In Unit 3, students read The Wild Book by Margarita Engle and, despite the Lexile being in the 5-6 grade band, the text structure is simple and the theme is clear, making is appropriate and worthy of reading in Grade 4.
- In Unit 4, students read Greek Myths by Geraldine McCaughrean and Greek Myth Plays by Carol Pugliano-Martin. These are well-known, but adapted, Greek Myths and are worthy of reading.
- In Unit 5, students read Joey Pigza Swallowed the Key by Jack Gantos, which is a National Book Award Finalist, making it an appropriate text for students in Grade 4.
- In Unit 6, students read the Newberry Award winning text, Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis. The historical context and rich language make this novel worthy of careful reading.
Examples in Science and Social Studies include:
- In Unit 1, numerous texts are included in the unit including Earthquakes by Seymour Simon, which includes strong academic content and vocabulary.
- In Unit 2, students read Liberty! How the Revolutionary War Began by Lucille Recht Penner, which contains strong academic content and vocabulary, and it is engaging for students as it contains vibrant illustrations.
- In Unit 3, students read Kids’ Guide to Government: National Government and Kids Guide to Government: State Government by Ernestine Giesecke, which have strong academic content and vocabulary, are engaging, and are age appropriate.
- In Unit 4, students read Forms of Energy by Anna Claybourne, which is of publishable quality due to its content and strong vocabulary.
- In Unit 5, students read the award winning book Heart and Soul: The Story of America and African Americans by Kadir Nelson, which contains vibrant illustrations, engaging and relevant content, and strong vocabulary.
- In Unit 6, students read A True Book: The Circulatory System and A True Book: The Respiratory System by Christine Taylor Butler, which contains strong vocabulary, along with captivating facts and details.
Indicator 1b
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials reflecting the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. Texts include a mix of informational and literary texts. There is a wide array of informational and literary text integrated throughout every unit. Additional supplementary texts are included, resulting in a wide distribution of genres and text types as required by the standards, including articles, historical fiction, mythology, folktales, poetry, audio interviews, and songs. The majority of the literary texts are found in the Literature curriculum, and the majority of the informational texts are found in the Science and Social Studies curriculum.
The following are representative examples of literary texts found within the instructional materials:
- Literature, Unit 1: Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor
- Literature, Unit 2: Where the Mountain Meets the Moon by Grace Lin
- Literature, Unit 3: Fish in a Tree by Lynda Mullaly Hunt
- Literature, Unit 4: Greek Myths by Geraldine McCaughrean
- Literature, Unit 5: Joey Pigza Swallowed by Key by Jack Gantos
- Literature, Unit 6: Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis
The following are representative examples of informational texts found within the instructional materials:
- Science and Social Studies, Unit 1: How Mountains Are Made by Kathleen Weidner Zoehfeld
- Science and Social Studies, Unit 2: Let it Begin Here: Lexington and Concord by Dennis Brindell Fradin
- Science and Social Studies, Unit 3: Kids’ Guide to Government, National Government by Ernestine Giesecke
- Literature, Unit 3: “The Facts about Dyslexia”
- Science and Social Studies, Unit 4: Forms of Energy by Anna Claybourne
- Science and Social Studies, Unit 5: If You Lived when there was Slavery in America by Anne Kamma
- Literature, Unit 5: “About ADHD”
- Science and Social Studies, Unit 6: A Tree Book, The Circulatory System by Christine Taylor Butler
- Literature, Unit 6: Children of the Great Depression by Russell Freedman
Indicator 1c
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for texts having the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. The majority of the texts in Grade 4 are the appropriate quantitative measure for Grade 4 students. Texts that fall outside of the 4-5 Lexile band have qualitative features and/or tasks that bring it to the appropriate level for students to access the text.
Some representative examples of texts that fall within the appropriate level of complexity (using quantitative and qualitative measures) include the following:
- In Literature, Unit 2, students read Where the Mountain Meets the Moon by Grace Lin, which has a Lexile of 810. The qualitative measures, particularly the text structure and vocabulary, make the text moderately complex and appropriate for placement in Grade 4.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, students read Liberty! How the Revolutionary War Began by Lucille Recht Penner which has a Lexile of 780. The qualitative measures, particularly the illustrations, graphics, page layout, and knowledge demands, support the placement of the text in this unit.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 3, students read Kids’ Guide to Government: National Government and Kids’ Guide to Government: State Government have Lexiles of 970 and 940, respectively, which fall within the stretch grade level band for Grade 4. However, the writing includes simplistic and easy to follow text structure and text features, which will enable students in Grade 4 to access these texts.
- In Literature, Unit 4, students read Greek Myths by Geraldine McCaughrean, which has a Lexile of 670. The myths follow a conventional plot sequence and use literal, straightforward language.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 4, students read Forms of Energy by Anna Claybourne which has a Lexile of 900. The quantitative analysis, specifically the complex knowledge demands and text structure, support the placement of the core text in this unit.
- In Literature, Unit 6, students read Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis, which has a Lexile of 950. The qualitative measures match the task demands of the unit, especially given the placement as the final text for the course. The vocabulary and content knowledge of the text, particularly the setting and specific details about life during the Great Depression and the figurative language used to describe events, makes the knowledge demands of the text moderately complex. There are specific lessons focusing on building background knowledge and unpacking figurative language, making the text more accessible.
One text falls below the appropriate quantitative measure band but has an appropriate qualitative measure and reader and task:
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 1, students read How Mountains are Made by Kathleen Weidner Zoehfeld, which has a Lexile of 620. The text is used to build background knowledge for students. Because the text is simple in structure and presentation, it allows students to become familiar with more complex subject matter.
Some representative examples of texts that are above the quantitative measure but do have appropriate qualitative measures and reader and task include:
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 1, students read Earthquakes by Seymour Simon which has a Lexile of 1010. The author introduces readers to earthquakes through engaging descriptions and stunning full-color photographs, making the new content accessible.
- In Literature, Unit 3, students read The Wild Book by Margarita Engle, which has a Lexile of 1050. The qualitative measures, particularly the levels of meaning and text structure, support the placement of the text in this course. The themes of the text are clearly developed over the course of the text, simplifying the levels of meaning. The themes and plot are developed in chronological and a linear manner, making the storyline easier to track and comprehend. The simple levels of meaning and text structure make this text accessible in Grade 4.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 3, students read Let it Shine: Stories of Black Women Freedom Fighters by Andrea Davis Pinkney, which has a Lexile of 1000. It is written as narrative nonfiction and requires the students to understand the genre features of a biography. The texts require varying levels of knowledge demands, but the lessons support students’ in building their background knowledge.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, students read Heart and Soul: The Story of American and African Americans by Kadir Nelson, which has a Lexile of 1050. The text structure and sentence structure help to make the text more accessible, despite the complex knowledge demands. The texts describes a period of history, but does not go in depth, making it more accessible to students.
Indicator 1d
Materials support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)
Texts are at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band. Skills build upon one another within units and across the year. Texts require deeper analysis throughout the year, and themes become more complex in the texts. Questions increase within the depth of knowledge: requiring inferences, analysis, and synthesis throughout the year. Examples include:
- In Literature, Unit 1, students look for text-based evidence when they read. Unlike in 3rd grade where they start by citing evidence, here they are asked right away to gather, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate. They make predictions about the texts and consider important themes by finding evidence. For example, in Lesson 20, students analyze why the author decided to write Shiloh in both first person and present tense and how it affects what the narrator knows and what the reader knows.
- In Literature, Unit 3, students read The Wild Book by Margarita Engle, which has a Lexile above grade level at 1050. The rationale for the text states that the “text does have complex knowledge demands and genre demands; however, the simple levels of meaning and text structure make the text accessible to readers at this level.” Additional support texts in this set are at various Lexiles from 500 to 700. This specific unit builds on previous units in which students have learned about the features of poetry; however, in this unit, “students begin to see poetry as not just stand-alone poems, but as an art form where a poet can express himself or herself freely.” This unit requires students to discuss and write about poetry and to analyze how the author develops theme within individual poems and across a longer work. For example, in Lesson 11 students analyze the figurative language that the author uses to enrich the text.
- In Literature, Unit 6, students read Bud, Not Buddy, which is supported by Children of the Great Depression, a nonfiction text by Russell Freedman. The majority of this unit focuses on spiraling strategies, and students summarize key events, analyze characters and setting, and figure out the meaning of unknown words. The culminating task requires the students to analyze the themes of the book and how the author develops the themes over the course of the novel.
In addition, informational writing focus correction areas are identified in the Science and Social Studies and Literature unit overviews and show a clear progression and an increase in demand for student performance. For example:
- In Unit 1, students make correct claims that connect to the topic and refer to one text-based detail from the text.
- In Unit 2, students use strong paragraph structure.
- In Unit 3, students select the most relevant text-based details, refer to more than one text-based detail, and write 2-3 sentences about each text-based reason. They also write introductions and conclusions.
- In Unit 4, students elaborate on text-based details, make sure all paragraphs are relevant to the claim, and order the paragraphs in a logical structure.
- In Units 5 and 6, all focus correction areas have been taught. Individual and small group instruction is provided to students who have not mastered specific skills.
Writing projects from the units, specifically in Science and Social Studies, also show an increase in demands of students throughout the year. For example:
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 1, students write an essay that describes why volcanoes are dangerous, what causes them to erupt, and what devastation follows.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, students analyze the role of black heroes in the American Revolution and why they were important by reading, synthesizing, and explaining concepts.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 3, students provide multiple details from the entire unit to support the claim, which requires students to use information from all the texts.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 4, students describe what the world’s energy future will look like if renewable sources of energy are not found. Students use information from multiple texts, synthesize information, and draw conclusions based on textual evidence.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, students explain how courageous individuals create and drive change and how the actions of others inspire us to make and fight for change by stating a claim and supporting it with details from multiple texts.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 6, students defend if the respiratory system is the same in all animals, which requires students to gather information, compare information from texts, make a claim, and support the claim.
Indicator 1e
Anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria that anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.
The program materials in each unit in Literature and Science and Social Studies contain a text complexity analysis that includes quantitative measure, qualitative measure, and a rationale for including the text. The text complexity analysis is accessible from the Unit Overview.
Literature contains a text complexity rationale for each unit and explains why the text is appropriate for Grade 4 and the placement within the program, such as:
- In Unit 1, students read Shiloh, which has a Lexile of 890. The qualitative analysis states that the simple levels of meaning and simple text structure support the placement of the text within this unit.
- In Unit 2, the core text, Where the Mountain Meets the Moon, has a Lexile of 810. The qualitative measures, particularly the text structure and vocabulary, make the text moderately complex, yet appropriate according to the program.
- In Unit 3, the text, The Wild Book, which has a Lexile in the 5th to 6th grade band of 1050, has themes that are relatively obvious and are clear over the course of the text, making the levels of meaning not very complex according to the program.
- In Unit 4, the texts throughout this unit are appropriate. For example, the core text, Greek Myths with a Lexile of 670, follows a conventional plot sequence and uses literal, straightforward language.
- In Unit 5, the core text, Joey Pigza Swallowed a Key, has a Lexile of 940. The program states that the text is told through the eyes of Joey, so there are multiple, subtle layers of meaning that require a deep analysis of the text and an understanding of ADHD. However, the simple text structure and content knowledge, paired with the complex meaning and language makes the text appropriate.
- In Unit 6, the core text, Bud, Not Buddy, has a Lexile of 950, but with qualitative measures match the reader and task and make it appropriate for Grade 4.
Science and Social Studies units contain a text complexity rationale. Examples include:
- In Unit 1, there are multiple texts, such as How Mountaineers are Made, which has a Lexile of 620 and Earthquakes, which has a lexile of 1010. The program states that the texts in this unit were chosen because of the wide variety of text features, content, and accessibility.
- In Unit 2, the core text, Liberty! How the Revolutionary War Began, has a Lexile of 780. The program states that the qualitative measures, particularly the illustrations, graphics, and page layout, and the knowledge demands, support the placement of the text in this unit.
- In Unit 3, Lexile scores and rationale for the texts are not provided.
- In Unit 4, the texts have a Lexile range of 770 to 940. The qualitative measures, particularly the text structure and subject matter, support the placement of the text within this unit according to the program.
- In Unit 5, the text, The Story of America and African Americans, Heart and Soul: The Story of American and African Americans, has a Lexile of 1050 but no rationale is given.
- In Unit 6, the core text is unleveled, but the qualitative analysis, specifically the text structure and knowledge demands, suggest that the text is appropriate in the 3rd to 4th grade level. The core text, according to the program, is written as expository nonfiction and uses a variety of organizing structures to describe the differing world religions and how they were created.
Indicator 1f
Anchor text(s), including support materials, provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the criteria that anchor and supporting texts provide opportunities for students to engage in a broad range of text types and disciplines as well as a volume of reading to achieve grade level reading proficiency.
Anchor and supporting texts provide opportunities for students to engage in a broad range of text types and disciplines. In the Publisher’s Documents, a teacher can use a variety of “text consumptions” from read alouds to independent reading; however, there is no directive for teachers on which text consumption strategy to use, which does not guarantee a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level proficiency. The lessons do not explicitly outline or identify which strategy should be used, other than the occasional sample lesson. The teaching notes imply that the students read independently at times, though it is not explicitly stated.
In the Publisher’s Documents, text consumption strategies are listed, including read aloud, shared reading, partner reading, independent reading, small group reading, and close reading. Teachers are to use their own discretion to choose which strategy to use when. Because of this, students are not guaranteed to achieve grade level reading proficiency. The documents also explain the literary blocks. It suggests 60-90 minutes a day for Literature, 60-90 minutes per day for Science and Social Studies, 45-60 minutes of independent reading, 60 minutes for guided reading, and foundational skills as needed. The course summary also states that they set their fiction block of instruction so that over the course of the week students grapple with the text and themes of the unit in multiple ways. However, without direct instruction for teachers on when the text should be read and discussed individually or in small groups or as a class, it is unclear whether all students will engage in a range and volume of reading.
Close reading is specified at times throughout the program. For example, in Literature, Unit 1, students complete a close read in Lessons 1 and 4. Close reading is also found in Literature, Unit 6, Lessons 7, 8, 16, and 20. In addition, sample lesson plans are included at times which do specify how to read a text, though this is not found throughout the program. For example, in Literature, Unit 2, Lesson 7, students are to read Chapter 12 as a class and then reread independently to annotate. In Lesson 11, students partner read Chapter 19. Similarly, in Literature, Unit 4, Lesson 5, the sample lesson plan is for students to read in a small group.
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria that most questions, tasks, and assignments are text dependent/specific, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text). The lessons throughout the units have sets of high quality sequences of text-dependent questions that build to a culminating task. The materials include supporting documents that outline strategies and structures for evidence-based discussions. Each unit and lesson includes evidence-based Key Questions and Target Tasks that require teachers to use one of the evidence-based discussions. Materials support speaking and listening about the text through group learning activities and class discussions. The majority of lessons include on-demand writing, such as a Target Task that requires students to respond in writing to the text covered in the lesson. Materials provide opportunities for students to learn how to write narrative, informational, and opinion pieces across both the Literature and Science and Social Studies units, and include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing. Materials partially meet the criteria for materials including explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.
Indicator 1g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria that most questions, tasks, and assignments are text dependent/specific, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
Materials contain questions and tasks that require students to engage with the text directly and to draw on textual evidence to support answers. Each unit includes questions or activities in the Target Task and Key Questions section that require students to interact with the text. Questions asked include those which require both explicit answers and inferences from the text. The unit summaries that are provided include focus on the progression of learning to use evidence to answer questions and write in response to the text. Every lesson has text-based questions for the teacher to engage with the students in discussion. The questions are specific to analyze the unit text. There are also writing tasks that are embedded throughout each unit with Target Tasks that include writing prompts in response to the text.
In the Grade 4 Literature examples of questions and tasks that require the students to use evidence from the text are as follows:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 8, after reading Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, students are asked to read the sentence and answer from page 53: “'Judd is sure studying me hard. So is dad.' Why are they both studying him hard? Read the sentence from page 44. 'Law never told me before what I could do with my dogs, won’t be tellin’ me now.' What does this sentence show/confirm about Judd?"
- In Unit 2, Lesson 16, after students read The Mountain meets the Moon by Grace Lin, students are asked: "What description does the author include to help a reader visualize the lions? How do the lions respond to the Dragon? What information does Dragon learn from them? Summarize what happened in the short story, 'A String of Destiny.' How are the events of this story connected to the rest of the chapter."
- In Unit 3, Lesson 9, after reading The Wild Book by Margarita Engle, students are asked to answer: "Daily Music: What is the significance of the title? How does the narrator feel? Dance-Smart: What is the significance of the tite? How do the narrator's feelings about dancing at the end of the poem compare with her feelings about reading aloud? Why? Still Struggling: What is the significance of the title? Read the last seven lines of this poem. What do they show about the narrator?"
- In Unit 5, Lesson 4, after students read Joey Pigza Swallowed the Key by Jack Gantos, students are asked to "Read the quotation from page 18, 'I know I'm not perfect,but I didn't think it was fair that they told me one thing and wrote down another.' Why do Joey and the adults have different points of view? Close read paragraph 2 on page 19. What description does the include to show how Joey feels during the day? Why does the author include this description? Why does Joey not understand Mrs. Maxy's rules? Is he not following them on purpose?"
- In Unit 6, Lesson 20, after students read Bud, not Buddy by Paul Curtis students are asked: "Compare Bud's experience with the Sleet family with Bud's time in Hooverville. Explain why Christopher Paul Curtis would include both scenes? What do both scenes teach us about the Great Depression?"
Similarly, students are asked to use the text to answer questions and complete tasks in the Grade 4 Science and Social Studies. Examples include:
- In Unit 2, Lesson 17, after reading If you Lived at the Time of the American Revolution by Kay Moore, the student is asked: "Summarize how Loyalist families were treated after the Declaration of Independence was signed. Was this treatment just? Summarize how you could tell that Someone was a Patriot. How did Patriot families support the war? How did Loyalist families support the war? what roles did women and children play in the Revolutionary War?"
- In Unit 4, Lesson 3, after reading Forms of Energy by Anna Claybourne, students are asked "Are heat and temperature the same thing? Explain."
- In Unit 6, Lesson 22, after reading Parasites, students are asked "What is the section 'They came for Blood' mostly about? What evidence does the author include to support the main idea?"
Indicator 1h
Sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for having sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent/specific questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).
The units have sets of high quality sequences of text-dependent questions that build to a culminating task. In many of the Literature units, students write as a part of the culminating project and some tasks include writing, or rewriting, scenes or parts of the literature from that unit. In Science and Social Studies, projects involve more in-depth research of topics that they learned throughout the units. There is a unit assessment included after each unit.
Examples of culminating tasks throughout Literature and Science and Social Studies include:
- In Literature, Unit 1, students write the next chapter of Shiloh based on what they know about the characters. Questions throughout the unit support this culminating tasks such as in Lesson 7, students have to describe Marty by using specific details to describe a character, the setting, or an event in detail.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, students research a hero of the American Revolution and create an informational children’s book that describes his or her influence during the war. Another option for the culminating task is to write an informational children’s book about the war and the events that led up to the Revolution.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 3, students are told they are hired by the president to advise on proposed reforms to school lunch. Students share strengths and areas of improvement and recommendations for change. Students also include ways to convince other stakeholders and members of Congress. Students complete this task to show they understand how government works, and they focus on the different branches of government throughout the unit.
- In Literature, Unit 4, students create an additional version of Hercules using the genre structures and points of views learned in the unit.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, students are given several choices for a research project including researching one of the key figures in the fight to free slaves. Students research, write, and present on their topic.
- In Literature, Unit 6, students compare and contrast the development of theme in Bud, Not Buddy with other novels from the course. This task occurs on Lesson 34, the theme is discussed throughout the unit, such as in Lesson 4, where students use evidence from Chapters 3 and 4 to explain how the theme is shown through the characters’ actions and thoughts.
Indicator 1i
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidencebased discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. (May be small group and all-class.)
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials providing frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions (small groups, peer-to-peer, whole class) that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax.
Throughout the curriculum there are opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Each unit and lesson includes evidence-based Key Questions and Target Tasks that require teachers to use one of the evidence-based discussions. These questions and the opportunity to choose the protocol provides opportunities for students to take a closer look at the author’s craft, vocabulary, and syntax. There are Match Minis that are videos for teachers that demonstrate how to implement these protocols. It is important to note that because there are lesson frames, and not step-by-step scripts for each lessons, the teachers have to use their own discretion for when to introduce and use the various protocols.
In the Publisher’s Support Documents for teachers, there is an explanation of the strategies and structures in a step-by-step fashion. Some lessons refer explicitly to these strategies and structures as an option, and other times, teachers can utilize them when they see fit. Some of the instructional strategies discussed include:
- Turn and Talk: Low-risk oral language strategy that provides scaffolded opportunities for all students to formulate and build upon each other’s ideas.
- Stop and Jot: Gives students a chance to process individually and make sense of information before participating in a turn and talk, class discussion, or moving on with a lesson. (A sample lesson plan for teaching stop and jot is provided.)
- Discussion: Rigorous discussion explicitly fosters habits that increase student thinking by challenging them to test out their own ideas, build on those of their peers, and ultimately lead a persuasive discussion. The length and format of a rigorous discussion can and should vary.
There is a detailed document that provides steps and guidelines for preparing, leading, and following up a discussion. To prepare for a discussion teachers determine the content goal, anticipate student misconceptions, and articulate a question or problem. To lead a discussion, teachers should start by explicitly naming the habits of the discussion skill that will be practiced, pause discussion and provide think time when needed, and track data from the discussion. After a discussion, teachers should use data to inform future classes. A rubric is included to evaluate the student discussions. Various text consumption strategies are provided, such as read aloud, shared reading, partner reading, and small group reading.
Match Mini Protocols that illustrate various protocols include:
- Part 1: In-class discussion
- Part 2: Protocols for classroom discussions which assists the teacher with evidence-based discussing using the text-based questions and vocabulary.
Examples from the lesson frameworks include, but are not limited to, the following:
- In Literature, Unit 2, Lesson 29, teachers are provided with a discussion preparedness protocol after reading Where the Mountain Meets the Moon by Grace Lin. Students are taught how to show active listening by tracking the speaking, using nonverbal signals, and building on what other scholars have shared. Students have their papers to help them make points as well as take notes, and the teacher is the moderator.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, Lesson 6, the Criteria for Success states that “scholars debate essential questions. Scholars should answer the question and respond to one another-building on, agreeing and/or disagreeing.”
- In Literature, Unit 4, Lesson 16, students discuss why the author included the chorus after reading “Echo and Narcissus.”
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 4, Lesson 4, teachers pick an activity that reinforces the ideas and concepts from the previous day and challenges the students to use targeted vocabulary to explain what is happening.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, students hear a text as a read aloud as opposed to small group or individual reading, with close reading utilized to help the students understand the context.
Indicator 1j
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.
Materials support speaking and listening about the text through group learning activities and class discussions. There are examples of opportunities for speaking and listening in the lesson frames and teaching notes, where the word "discussion" is explicitly used to indicate to the teacher that a discussion should be taking place in class. There are notes in the individual lessons, explanations in the unit summaries, and an explanation in the year-long progression from discussion and debate to discussion and writing. Lessons that provide a sample lesson plan give teachers the most support in providing students with the lesson structure and pacing of a discussion within the text. There are also Key Questions that teachers can choose to use for discussions. Several of the Target Tasks are labeled Discussion and Writing. Questions and tasks require students to return to the text to participate in speaking and listening activities. In addition, Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, deals with a very complex text that is meant to be done as a read aloud for text consumption, which requires students to use their listening skills. The Intellectual Prep for each unit specifies that discussions will be included throughout the lessons.
In the Intellectual Prep section of the Unit Prep, teachers are instructed to first determine a discussion focus for the unit based on priority speaking and listening standards. Then, teachers plan how to introduce the discussion. Teachers reinforce the habit over the course of the unit.
In Literature, there are many opportunities for students to practice their speaking and listening skills about what they are reading and researching. Examples include:
- In Unit 2, Lesson 4, after reading Where the Mountain Meets the Moon by Grace Lin, students engage in a discussion on how Grace Lin uses a technique of switching perspectives. They review specific quotes and answer questions, such as:
- What do the underlined phrases mean?
- Why would the author include them? How do they help a reader better understand Mini?
- How would the sentence be different if the author didn’t include them?
- In Unit 4, Lesson 6, students discuss as a group how the point of view influences how events are described from the different readings of the Greek Myths.
- In Unit 6, Lesson 20, students engage in a debate where they compare and contrast Bud’s time with the Sleet family and in Hooserville in the text, Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis. Students have the option to debate the statement that Bud could have felt at home anywhere people were nice to him.
In Science and Social Studies there are many opportunities for students to practice their speaking and listening skills about what they are reading and researching. Examples include:
- In Unit 1, the summary states that students will be frequently challenged to debate questions from the text, and therefore, strong habits of discussion are introduced over the course of the unit, such as in Lesson 8 where the Target Task asks students to agree or disagree with a statement about different mountain types, which is used to introduce debate-focused target tasks. In this lesson, students take a stand and use evidence to support their answer. Students are exposed to the expectations of debates. To prepare for the debate, students use the cause and effect brainstorm structure for each mountain type.
- In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students got the main idea of each paragraph and then as a class, they discuss the main idea of each section. Teachers need to make sure students pull supporting details from the paragraphs and the illustrations. They do the section titled “What is Government” together, and then “The Constitution” independently.
- In Unit 5, Lesson 6, the test is read aloud and students prepare to discuss the information that they learned. Students synthesize the information to describe slavery and articulate how slaves were treated differently than other Americans.
Indicator 1k
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials including a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
In the materials, the majority of lessons include on-demand writing, such as a Target Task that requires students to respond in writing to the text covered in the lesson. These tasks vary in type and require students to respond to print and video materials. The writing prompts in Science and Social Studies help students process the concepts that they have learned in the informational text. The Publisher’s Documents have guides for informational writing, narrative writing, and literary analysis. Guides provide writing protocols for teachers to use in instruction, along with explanations on implementing the structure within the lesson frames. Guides provide guidance on supporting students throughout the writing process while allowing for maximum response to student needs in individual classrooms. The Unit Overviews identify skills that should be focused on writing, and the Publisher’s Documents help teachers to plan for addressing these skills in the lessons. The information for routines, procedures, and expectations is included in the Writing Focus Areas under Unit Prep, though not specified in each lesson.
Guidance for writing can be found in the Publisher’s Documents for each type of writing. Examples of guidance include the following:
- Guide to Informational Writing establishes the rationale for informational writing, which is that informational writing anchors lessons that are in Science and Social Studies. The informational writing is completed in response to a text, or a series of texts, in order to build and deepen students’ understanding of content. This guide includes protocols for process writing. The teacher uses the protocols within this document to provide practice in process writing throughout the year. Each step in the process is defined and explained in the document to provide support for the teacher.
- Guide to Narrative Writing explains that the anchor lessons will not be mastered in one lesson, and teachers will assess student writing and adjust lessons based on what they observe. The lessons should be customized based on the needs of the students, and teachers provide individualized feedback to students during the lessons.
- Guide to Literary Analysis includes common misconceptions and mistakes in literary analysis, such as excessive reliance on emotional understandings or mistaken beliefs.
- Implementing Daily writing practices is included in the Publisher’s Documents. This guide states that the lessons can be either one day or multiple day lessons depending on the teaching point.
On-demand writing is found in most Literature and Science and Social Studies lessons. In Literature, on-demand writing activities include retellings and evidence-based responses about characters, setting, and plot. In Science and Social studies, the writing assignments help students process what they have learned regarding the concepts in the informational text by sequencing, making connections, and summarizing. For example:
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 1, Lesson 15, students write an essay that describes how earthquakes happen, why they are dangerous, and potential solutions for minimizing them, within one class period.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, Lesson 23, students take one day to write an informational children's book about a hero of the American Revolution.
- In Literature, Unit 3, Lesson 6, students write an essay that explains how the theme of the poem is shown throughout the speaker. This essay is completed in one day.
- In Literature, Unit 5, Lesson 15, students choose one of two different on-demand writing prompts, such as choosing an event from the story and writing it from a different perspective.
Students have opportunities to engage in the writing process in several units. Teachers use the Publisher’s Documents as a guide to help plan the lessons. Examples of this include, but are not limited to, the following:
- In Literature, Unit 2, Lesson 35, students write a narrative story that contains a few similar events or characters from Where the Mountains Meet the Moon. On Day 1, students brainstorm, on Days 2 and 3, students draft, and on Days 4 and 5, students revise, edit, and publish.
- In Literature, Unit 4, Lesson 25, students begin a 4-day writing task to create an additional version of Hercules using the genre structures and points of views taught in the lesson. Students brainstorm, draft, edit/revise, and share.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 4, Lesson 19 and 20, students describe what the world’s energy future will look like if renewable sources of energy are not found. On the following day, students create a presentation that states a claim and provide evidence to support the increase and decrease of energy sources utilized by their communities.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 6, Lesson 26, students spend 4 days researching and participating in end of unit projects on constructing an argument that animals and plants have internal and external structures that support survival, growth, behavior, and reproduction.
Indicator 1l
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials providing opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
In the materials, there is equal distribution of text types for writing instruction and prompts according to the standards. Students engage with narrative, informational, and opinion writing prompts, including literary analysis.
Some examples of narrative writing lessons and prompts include:
- In Literature, Unit 1, Lesson 26, students write the next chapter of Shiloh using what they know about Marty and Shiloh.
- In Literature, Unit 2, Lesson 8, students write a first-person narrative journal entry and retell a version of an event from Where the Mountain Meets the Moon.
- In Literature, Unit 4, Lesson 7, students rewrite the myth Pandora from another character's point of view.
- In Literature, Unit 5, Lesson 7, students pick a small moment from their own life and rewrite it in a way that “explodes” the moment. Students use Jack Gantos as a mentor author. Criteria for success includes that the moment should be small but should have a huge amount of detail.
- In Literature, Unit 6, Lesson 28, students rewrite a scene from Bud, Not Buddy told from the perspective of Mr. Calloway. Students must include dialogue from the text in their narrative.
Informational writing is throughout the curriculum materials and includes literary analysis. Examples in both Literature and Science and Social Studies are:
- In Literature, Unit 1, Lesson 18, students have to describe the interaction between Judd Travers and Marty’s family in Shiloh.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 1, Lesson 3, students write to describe minerals, rocks, and soil.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, Lesson 15, the writing prompt includes many questions about the American Revolution including what significant ideas and values are at the heart of the American Revolution. Students first discuss the questions before writing.
- In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 13, students write an essay that explains how the theme of the poem is shown through the speaker in the text, The Wild Book.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 3, Lesson 8, students describe the similarities and differences between the Senate and House of Representatives. They need to explain how the author uses evidence and reasons to show the difference between the two.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 4, Lesson 13, students summarize how fossil fuels work. They explain the pros and cons surrounding the use of fossil fuels as well.
- In Literature, Unit 5, Lesson 5, students have to pick a character from Joey Pigza Swallowed a Key and analyze how Joey’s relationship with the character influences the way he feels about himself.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, Lesson 22, students explain the ways in which women participated in the fight for equality and the challenges they faced.
Opinion writing is found in both Literature and Science and Social Studies and includes:
- In Literature, Unit 1, Lesson 9, students explain why they think the author Phyllis Reynolds Naylor of Shiloh uses both first-person and present tense in the text. They write how it affects what the narrator knows and what the reader knows.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, Lesson 7, students write who they think will most likely win the American Revolutionary War and explain why.
- In Literature, Unit 3, Lesson 16, students first compare and contrast the ways in which the different authors develop the topic of learning disabilities and then explains how having a learning disability may impact the way people sees themselves and the way others see them.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 4, Lesson 19, students explain what the world’s energy future will look like if renewable sources of energy are not found.
- In Literature, Unit 5, Lesson 9, students explain how a chapter in Joey Pigza Swallowed a Key might have been different if it was told from Mrs. Maxy’s point of view.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 5, Lesson 10, students explain how courageous individuals create and drive change and how the actions of others inspire people to make and fight for change in lives. Students use Harriet Tubman to help answer these questions.
- In Science and Social Studies, Unit 6, Lesson 6, students have to agree or disagree with the statement, "Cells are an important internal structure in both plants and animals that support survival, growth, and behavior."
Indicator 1m
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the criteria for materials including frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information appropriate for the grade level.
Material includes frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing. Some assignments require students to close-read a particular piece of text and use detailed evidence to support their responses to writing prompts. While other writing assignments require students to compare two pieces of text and draw evidence from both to support claims. The Literary Analysis Rubric used to grade all of the writing supports the use of evidence-based writing. Explicit references to the text in the student’s writing yields more points on the rubric.
Examples of evidence-based writing in Literature include:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 13, the writing prompt is for students to describe Marty from Shiloh. Included in the notes section of the lesson frame are specific instruction for how to guide students in the use of text evidence. For example, it suggests that the teacher reviews with students that character descriptions should always be based on evidence.
- In Unit 3, Lesson 6, students write an essay that explains how the theme of the poem in The Wild Book is shown through the speaker. They have to include specific details from multiple poems to support their essay.
- In Unit 4, Lesson 4, the target task writing prompt is “What connections can be made between the original story, the story told in first-person point of view, the poem, and the video? What parts of the text are emphasized in each version? Why?”. Students answer this question using the “Myth of Pandora’s Box.”
- In Unit 6, Lesson 6, the students write an essay that describes how Christopher Paul Curtis uses figurative language in Bud, Not Buddy, and how the figurative language affect a reader’s understanding of different characters.
Examples of evidence-based writing in Science and Social Studies include:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 9, students pick one type of mountain and describe how it is formed. They need to include important details, vocabulary, and visuals to support their answer. This is the second writing day of the unit. The purpose of the lesson is to teach students how to turn a cause and effect brainstorm into a well-structured paragraph.
- In Unit 3, Lesson 4, students write an essay that describes why the government has different branches and the reasons for each. They have to use examples from two articles that they read.
- In Unit 4, Lesson 9, the target task writing prompt is “The author starts by saying that ‘electricity is the most useful of all forms of energy.’ How does electricity work and why is it the most useful form?”
- In Unit 6, Lesson 7, students have to agree or disagree with the statement, “It would be easy to survive and grow without a nervous system because our body has lots of other systems” and defend why.
Indicator 1n
Materials include explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the criteria for materials including explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.
Explicit instruction of language standards for grammar and conventions are included in the materials. There are opportunities for students to apply their learning grammar and conventions to their own writing. There are missed opportunities for students to learn all the grade-level grammar and convention standards though.
L.4.1e Form and use prepositional phrases
- In Unit 5, Lesson 26, students analyze and discuss sentences with prepositional phrases. Examples of the sentences are: ‘“He appears around the corner.” “He appears.” The teacher asks, "Which sentence helps a reader better visualize what is happening? Why?"’ Afterwards the teacher is instructed to, “Have students write 2-3 sentences that include prepositional phrases to describe which one? What kind? How? Where? When? Or to what extent?”
L.4.1f Produce complete sentences, recognizing and correcting inappropriate fragments and run-ons
- In Unit 1, Lesson 7, students examine and discuss examples of complete and incomplete sentences such as, ‘“He thumps his tail.”’ and ‘“Marty is a person who. Marty is a person who is kind and caring.”
- In Unit 1, Lesson 13, Day 2, students learn what a fragment sentence is. Students read several different sentences and determine what is causing the sentence to be a fragmented sentence.
L.4.1g Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to, too, two; there, their)
- In Unit 3, Lesson 5, students learn about the different meanings of the words too, to and two and how these are frequently confused words. The students discuss how the author uses the words too and to in a sentence in the story, “The Wild Book.”
- In Unit 3, Lesson 10, students learn about the words they’re, their and there and how each of these words impacts the stories they read. Students then practice writing a poem using these words.
L.4.2b Use commas and quotation marks to mark direct speech and quotations from a text
- In Unit 4, Lesson 13,students learn about the importance of using dialogue in their writing and how this helps keeps stories connected. Students have an example of how rewriting the dialogue helps to better understand the character’s point of view by reading and comparing 2 passages.
L.4.2c Use a comma before a coordinating conjunction in a compound sentence
- In Unit 2, Lesson 4, students practice analyzing and discussing compound sentences that use and with a comma. For example, ‘“'I’ll buy that one,' Minli said, and she pointed at the fiery orange fish with the black eyes and fin that had caught her eye.” (p. 13) The teacher asks: "What do you notice?" "Is this a compound sentence? Why?"’
L.4.3a Choose words and phrases to convey ideas precisely.
- In Unit 4, Lesson 22, students practice expanding and adding more details to sentences from a graphic novel they have been reading. For example, “Hercules saw the lion. (Hercules crept towards the lion and aimed his bow right at the lion).” Students are also provided with a list of sentences to rewrite with a partner.
- In Unit 5, Lesson 21, students take one moment from the story, they then rewrite the event from the character’s point of view. They are encouraged to use descriptive details and precise words.
L.4.3b Choose punctuation for effect.
- In Unit 5, Lesson 21, students determine how the questions at the end help people better understand Ed’s perspective and how an author uses questions at the end of a story.
There are opportunities for students to apply grammar and convention learning in-context.
- In Unit 3, Lesson 10, students learn about the words they’re, their and there and how each of these words impacts the stories they read. Students then practice writing a poem using these words.
- In Unit 2, Lesson 8, students practice analyzing and discussing compound sentences that use but and a comma. For example, ‘“It was one thing to climb on top of him while he was half covered by water, but now on dry land she realized how large he really was.” (p. 70) Students practice using this skill in their writing and teachers are told, “Have students add two to three sentences to their narratives that include the conjunction but to show contrasting ideas. Pick two to three student sentences to analyze and notice together as a class.”
The following standards are not addressed in the materials:
- L.4.1a Use relative pronouns (who, whose, whom, which, that) and relative adverbs (where, when, why)
- L.4.1b Form and use the progressive (e.g., I was walking; I am walking; I will be walking) verb tenses
- L.4.1c Use modal auxiliaries (e.g., can, may, must) to convey various conditions
- L.4.1d Order adjectives within sentences according to conventional patterns (e.g., a small red bag rather than a red small bag)
- L.4.2a Use correct capitalization
- L.4.2d Spell grade-appropriate words correctly, consulting references as needed
- L.4.3c Differentiate between contexts that call for formal English (e.g., presenting ideas) and situations where informal discourse is appropriate (e.g., small-group discussion)
Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the criteria for materials, questions, and tasks addressing grade-level CCSS for foundational skills by providing explicit instruction and assessment in phonics and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.
Indicator 1o
Materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills by providing explicit instruction and assessment in phonics and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.
The materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the criteria for materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills by providing explicit instruction and assessment in phonics and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.
The materials contain section for foundational skills. The teacher can find this in the Unit Prep. Within the Unit Prep, there is Phonics and Word Recognition Focus Areas. This contains information about the syllabication routine and the structural analysis routine that are to be applied to lessons. Explicit instruction of phonics and word recognition is intended to be done daily, but the lessons do not contain the full guidance to the teacher to explicitly teach phonics and word recognition. In Unit 1, Shiloh, the Unit Prep information states: “A sample routine is included in lesson 4 and 18, however, this vocabulary and word-work routine should take place daily.” Daily lesson plans for vocabulary and word-work are not provided. The assessments for foundational skills are to be assessed through the fluency rubric, but the fluency rubric is to assess fluency and not phonics.
Materials contain some explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words, syllabication patterns, and word recognition consistently over the course of the year.
- In Unit 1, Lesson 1, students practice syllabication using the sound syllabication vocabulary routine. The students first find the word, tormented in the text. The teacher tells how many syllables are in the word and how they determined this number of syllables. The teacher points out that the word is r-controlled, three syllables, closed and final syllabication rules in the sentences. Students than practice with the words, separate, mysterious and syllable to determine if those syllable rules make sense.
- In Unit 2, students learn synonyms and antonyms. The teacher asks students to identify what words were tricky when they are reading the texts throughout the unit. What strategies students used to read the word, how many syllables are in the word and how they knew. Teachers are told that students should have mastered all phonics at this level, but that during the first fluency check, they should listen to students read in order to determine which students need more support.
- In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students complete the vocabulary routine for the words tormented, vanishing and tremble. As part of this routine students practice breaking the words apart into syllables, for example, “Sound out the word by breaking the word into syllables. (tor-ment-ed) Identify the number of syllables and explain how you determined the number of syllables. (Three syllables - r-controlled, closed, final)”
- In the Unit 6 Prep, Foundational Skills section, teachers are informed: “There are no whole class vocabulary words during this unit. All phonics and word knowledge instruction should take place during individual student conferences or in small-groups. Based on running-records from the fluency check-point in Unit 4, determine which students may still need additional support with syllabication and plan additional small-group word work lessons.” Guidance is not provided for teachers in planning these lessons.
Few assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year to inform instructional adjustments of phonics and word recognition to help students make progress toward mastery. The assessment of foundational skills is focused on fluency and vocabulary. For example:
- The Unit 3 assessment includes the following: “1. Part A What is the meaning of the word drift as it is used in paragraph 18 of “Just Like Home”? (RL4.4, L4.4) a. consider b.wander c. change d. hover.”
Materials contain some explicit instruction of word solving strategies (graphophonic and syntactic) to decode unfamiliar words. The vocabulary routine does use graphophonic and morphological cues with a heavy emphasis on context cues (semantic cues).
- In Unit 1, Lesson 3, students practice using this routine with the word mistreated. (The word is from Shiloh)
- “Find the word in the sentence. (p. 14)
- Sound out the word by breaking it into syllables. (mis-trea-ted)
- Examine the word for meaningful parts (base word, prefixes, or suffixes)
- If there is a prefix, take it off first. (mis- means wrongly)
- If there is a suffix, take it off second. (-ed, means in the past)
- Look at the base word to see if you know it or if you can think of a related word. (treat)
- Ressemble the word, thinking about the meaning contributed by the base, the suffix, and then the prefix. (wrongly - treat - in the past --> something was treated badly in the past)
- Try out the meaning.
- What words are synonyms? Antonyms?
- If needed, check the meaning of the word or pronunciation in a dictionary, glossary, or thesaurus.”
Indicator 1p
Materials, lessons, and questions provide instruction in and practice of word analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the criteria for materials, lessons, and questions provide instruction in and practice of word analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.
The materials contain two routines for determining the meaning of words: Structural Analysis Routine and the Syllabication Routine. The vocabulary routine that is used over the course of the school year provides students with instruction in word analysis tasks. In this routine, students analyze the root word, prefixes and suffixes to determine the meaning of unknown words. This routine also includes using context clues to determine the meaning of unknown words. The words analyzed are from texts students are studying. While teachers are told that word work should take place on a daily basis, specific lessons are not provided daily. According to the document, “Our Approach to Foundational Skills,” “Morphology routines should take place daily. Teachers should pick 2-3 key vocabulary words and use the structural analysis routine below to deconstruct the word with students.” Assessments focused more heavily on comprehension with a few vocabulary questions rather than on word analysis skills.
There are opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis skills in connected texts and tasks.
- In Unit 1, Lesson 18, there is the model vocabulary routine that teachers are prompted to do with students to break down the syllabication in the word, nonsense. Students look at whether there is a prefix and a suffix and how those impact the word. Then students look at the base word to see if they know the base word or another word similar to the base word. Then they determine if there is antonyms or synonyms of the word.
- In Unit 2, Lesson 2, students analyze the word infuriated by breaking the word into syllables and then analyze the prefix and suffix. Students discuss the word’s meaning and discussing synonyms and antonyms for the word.
- In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students find the word tormented in the sentence. Students sound out the word by breaking it into syllables, and the teacher explains how they determined the number of syllables in the word. The teacher states there are 3: r-controlled, closed and final. Then students determine the meaning of the word.
- In Unit 4, Lesson 3, students analyze the word mysterious. Students break the word apart into syllables and analyze the suffix. Students also discuss synonyms and antonyms for the word. Students repeat the process when they analyze the word consolation.
- In Unit 5, Unit Prep, Foundational Skills Overview, teachers are not provided with vocabulary word lists to use with students. Instead teachers are instructed that, “All phonics and word knowledge instruction should take place during individual student conferences or in small-groups. Based on running-records from the fluency check-point in Unit 4, determine which students may still need additional support with syllabication and plan additional small-group word work lessons. When circulating during independent reading, prompt:
- Which words were tricky in this section of text?
- What strategies did you use to read the word and figure out the word’s meaning?
- How many syllables does the word have? How do you know?
- What affixes does the word have? How do they influence the meaning of the word?”
Materials some opportunities for word analysis assessment to monitor student learning of word analysis skills.
- In Unit 4, when the students are reading the selection after completing the vocabulary syllabication practice, the teacher walks around the room and asks:
- What words were tricky to read?
- What strategies did you use to figure out the word?
- How many syllables did the word have?
- How did you figure that out?
- In Unit 2, the assessment contains the following questions about vocabulary:
- What does the word contempt mean as it is used in paragraph 26?
- a) disapproval
- b) eagerness
- c) awe
- d) weariness
- Select one sentence from paragraphs 23 through 26 that contains a clue to the meaning of the word contempt. Underline the sentence in the text or copy it below.
Indicator 1q
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading, that is, to read on-level prose and poetry with accuracy, rate appropriate to the text, and expression.
The materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the criteria for instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading, that is, to read on-level prose and poetry with accuracy, rate appropriate to the text, and expression.
The materials include a variety of texts for students to practice reading fluently with a focus on expression, intonation, volume, smoothness, and accuracy. Units 1-4 contain new fluency skills and Units 5-6 contain fluency skill review. Within the Unit Prep of each unit, there is a Fluency Focus Area section. This section lists the fluency focus. There is a Grades 3-5 Fluency Rubric for a teacher to use for assessing each student’s fluency. Students are also to use the Grades 3-5 Reading Fluency Rubric for self-assessment or for assessing a peer. The rubric contains the following fluency categories: expression and volume, phrasing, smoothness, pace, and accuracy, but there is no guidance for rate with specifics for words per minute at each grade level. The materials do not provide teachers with specific instructional adjustments to help students make progress in fluency. For example, in Unit 2, the instructions state: “Use data from fluency check-points to help prioritize students for additional fluency supports throughout the unit.” Examples or models of what these supports would look and sound like are not consistently provided.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy and fluency in oral and silent reading.
- In Unit 1, the fluency focus areas are, “Reads with expression and volume to match interpretation of the passage. Uses proper intonation to show interpretation of the passage. Uses dialect with smoothness and accuracy. Reads with a rate appropriate to task and purpose.”
- Teachers are provided with suggestions for teaching fluency in this unit (the text being read is Shiloh) Some of these suggestions include:
- “On page 14, model how to say and read the word ‘em in a way that accurately reflects the way Marty’s father would speak.”
- “On page 15, model reading the word lettin’.”
- “On page 17, model reading the conversation with Judd aloud, placing an emphasis on how to show each characters’ emotion.”
- In Unit 2, teachers are provided with the focus for this unit which is smoothness, accuracy and expression. Students continue to learn how to read dialogue with expression (taught in Unit 1). Much of how the fluency skills are taught in Unit 2 is left to teacher discretion: “Decide which chapter to read based on the demands of the chapter and the desired teaching point.”
- In Unit 3, at the end of the unit, students pick their favorite poem and read it outloud to the class.
- In the Unit 4, the teacher is informed that students will work on fluency in this unit through reading and performing scripts that tie in to the myths being studied. The fluency focus areas for students in this Unit are: “Reads with good expression and enthusiasm throughout the text. Reading sounds like natural language. Varies expression and volume to match his/her interpretation of the passage. Reads smoothly. Reads with a rate appropriate to task and purpose.”
- In Unit 5, there is review of previously taught fluency skills. There are suggested supports such as: “Review with students how to read different sentences and punctuation with the proper intonation and expression.”
- In Unit 6, there is review of previously taught fluency skills.
Materials support reading or prose and poetry with attention to rate, accuracy, and expression, as well as direction for students to apply reading skills when productive struggle is necessary.
- In Unit 2, the instructions to the teacher are to: “Continue to emphasize how to determine reading rate.” The teacher is to reinforce that reading a text at a slower rate helps a reader analyze craft. But reading slowly on the first reading takes away for the overall meaning.
- In Unit 3, students read poems in a verse novel, “Wild Book.” The first time a poem is read, it is read outloud where the teacher models appropriate tone and how to read a poem with fluency. Students practice reading poetry fluently.
- In Unit 5, students read the text by Jack Gantos, which contains a variety of sentence structures. The teacher is prompted to model how to read with fluency using different punctuation and with proper intonation and expression.
Materials support students’ fluency development of reading skills (e.g., self-correction of word recognition and/or for understanding, focus on rereading) over the course of the year (to get to the end of the grade-level band). There are multiple lessons on self-correction.
- In the Unit 2 overview, teachers are informed that students will begin working on self-correcting during this unit. Teachers are provided with the following suggestion for teaching this skill, “During one of the first few lessons pick another section of text to read aloud and monitor how to self-correct when faced with a difficult word. After reading aloud and modeling, prompt:
- What strategies does a fluent reading use to self-correct when reading difficult words?
- How does self-correcting help a reader better understand the text?
- What does it sound like for a reader to read smoothly?”
- In Unit 4, on Days 5, 11, and 16, students read the drama for each Greek Myth. The instructions state that the stories should be read multiple times in order to help students build on fluency.
- In the Unit 5 Overview teachers are informed: “Review with students how to self-correct when reading difficult words or sentences.”
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current fluency skills, but do not provide teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery of fluency.
- In the Unit 1 overview, teachers are told to have students either self assess or have a partner assess their reading. The teacher also assesses the student on fluency using the Grades 3-5 Reading Fluency Rubric.
- In Unit 1, the teacher evaluates students on phrasing, expression and volume with the Grades 3-5 Reading Fluency Rubric.
- In Unit 2, the teacher selects 4-5 stories to use as fluency check-points. Students are scored using the Grades 3-5 Reading Fluency Rubric. If a student does not score well on the rubric, the teacher is to “Use data from fluency check-points to help prioritize students for additional fluency supports throughout the unit.” However, examples or models of what these supports would look like are not provided.
- In Unit 3, students pick their favorite poem from the unit, rehearse it and then perform it for the class. The teacher uses the fluency rubric to score the student’s performance.
- In Unit 4, students perform a drama that ties in to a myth they have been learning about. The teacher uses the fluency rubric to assess each child’s performance.
- In Unit 5, students both self-assess their own fluency and the teacher assesses the student using the fluency rubric.
- In Unit 6, there are no new fluency strategies taught, but the teacher is encouraged to use previous strategies to spiral in fluency standards and areas that students need to improve. The teacher is also prompted to use fluency data from other checkpoints to help re-teach fluency skills.