2025
Imagine IM

3rd-5th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 3rd-5th Grade Overview
Cover for Imagine IM
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor and Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations
100%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance
8 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices
8 / 8

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 meet expectations for rigor and balance and mathematical practices. The materials help students develop procedural skills, fluency, and application. The materials also make meaningful connections between the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).

Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance

8 / 8

Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion

For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.

While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.

To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.

Materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations by giving appropriate attention to: developing students’ conceptual understanding; procedural skill and fluency; and engaging applications.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 meet expectations for rigor. The materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, give attention throughout the year to procedural skill and fluency, and spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of mathematics. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade.

Indicator 2a

2 / 2

Materials support the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

Multiple conceptual understanding problems are embedded throughout the grade level within Warm-Ups, Activities, or Cool-Downs. Students have opportunities to engage with these problems both independently and with teacher support. According to the Teacher Course Guide, the Key Structures in This Course, Principles of IM Curriculum Design section emphasizes the role of purposeful representations in developing conceptual understanding. The Purposeful Representations section states, “Across lessons and units, students are systematically introduced to representations and encouraged to use those that make sense to them. As their learning progresses, students make connections between different representations and the concepts and procedures they show.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 2, Area and Multiplication, Lesson 7, Warm-Up, students develop conceptual understanding of measurement units, larger square units can be useful in situations involving larger areas. Students see a picture of a girl on a playground holding a large square, and Student Task Statements state, “What do you notice? What do you wonder?” Activity Synthesis states, “If needed, ‘What could you measure with this square?’ (You could measure the area of big areas, like the playground.) ‘Why might you want this square instead of square centimeters or square inches?’ (It takes fewer squares of this size to measure an area that is a lot larger like a playground or a room.)” (3.MD.6)

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 6, Multiplying and Dividing Multi-Digit Numbers, Lesson 13, Activity 2, students develop conceptual understanding of dividing multi-digit numbers in the context of real-life situations. Student Task Statements state, “1. Priya’s mom makes 85 gulab jamuns for the class to share. Priya gives 5 gulab jamuns to each student in the class. How many students are in Priya’s class? Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Han’s uncle sends 108 chocolate-covered breadsticks for a snack. The students in Han's class are seated at 6 tables. Han plans to give the same number of breadsticks to each table. How many breadsticks does each table get? Explain or show your reasoning.” (4.NBT.6)

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 8, Putting It All Together, Lesson 10, Activity 1, students develop conceptual understanding as they practice adding fractions with unlike denominators and reason about how the size of the numerators and denominators impact the value of a fraction. Student Task Statements state, “Use the directions to play Greatest Sum with a partner. 1. Spin the spinner. 2. Write the number in an empty box for Round 1. Be sure your partner can’t see your paper. Once a number is written down, it can’t be changed. 3. Take turns. Spin and write numbers in the empty boxes until all 4 boxes have been filled. 4. Find the sum. 5. The partner with the greater sum wins the round. 6. The partner who won the most rounds wins the game. If there is a tie, players add the sums from all 4 rounds. The greater total sum wins the game.” Activity Synthesis states, “‘What strategies were helpful as you played Greatest Sum?’ (I tried to make fractions that have a larger numerator than denominator so they would be greater than one. I tried to make sure the ones and twos were in the denominator and put bigger numbers in the numerator.) ‘How did you add your fractions?’ (I wrote equivalent fractions with a common denominator)” (5.NF.1)

According to the Teacher Course Guide, the materials are designed to provide students with opportunities to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding, when appropriate. Key Structures in This Course, Principles of IM Curriculum Design, Coherent Progression states, “Each activity starts with a Launch that gives all students access to the task. Independent work time follows, allowing them to grapple with problems individually before working in small groups. In the Activity Synthesis at the end, students consolidate their learning by making connections between their work and the mathematical goals.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, Lesson 3, Activity 2, students demonstrate conceptual understanding of fractions as they match fractions to shaded diagrams. Student Task Statement states, “Your teacher will give you a set of cards. 1. Match each fraction to a diagram. Be ready to explain why some fractions do not have a matching diagram. 2. Compare your matches with another group. 3. Use Cards R, T, V, and X to create a shaded diagram for each fraction card that did not have a match. Be ready to share your new cards and explain why they match.” (3.NF.1)

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 4, From Hundredths to Hundred-thousands, Lesson 11, Cool-Down, students demonstrate conceptual understanding of place value to locate large numbers on a number line. Student Task Statements state, “1. Estimate the location of 28,500 on the number line and label it with a point. 2. Which point—A, B, or C—could represent a number that is 10 times as much as 28,500? Explain your reasoning.” For problem 1, an image of a number line is shown with A,B,C on the number line from 0 to 400,000. (4.NBT.1)

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 6, More Decimal and Fraction Operations, Lesson 20, Activity 2, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they compare a product of fractions to one of the factors. Student Task Statement states, “Andre says: When you multiply any fraction by a number less than 1, the product will be less than the fraction. When you multiply any fraction by a number greater than 1, the product will be greater than the fraction. Each partner chooses a different statement and describes why it is true. Show your thinking, using diagrams, symbols, or other representations.” (5.NF.5)

Indicator 2a.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3–5 of Imagine IM meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts.  The materials provide embedded, intentional supports that promote conceptual understanding of grade-level mathematics through activating prior knowledge, pairing concrete, visual, and abstract representations, and engaging students in scaffolded tasks that are aligned with the depth and intent of the standards.

In every unit, the materials consistently provide opportunities for students to explore and make sense of mathematical ideas before engaging with multiple representations to formalize procedures, supporting conceptual understanding. To do this, the materials embed various representations, structured discourse, and Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) to promote deep conceptual understanding. For example:

  • Concrete and virtual manipulatives and visual representations such as tape diagrams, number lines, and area models are used alongside MLRs to solidify understanding of fractions and operations.

  • Sentence frames and structured partner work encourage students to explain their reasoning, compare strategies, and make sense of concrete and visual representations.

  • Tasks that require students to move between representations (concrete, visual, and abstract) align with the standards’ call for conceptual understanding.

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, Lesson 1, Activity 1, students work in partners to sort cards with various shapes partitioned in different ways to build the concept of equal parts and fractions (3.NF). While working in partners, the materials suggest optional language supports for MLLs through MLR2: Collect and Display, listed in a note titled Access for English Language Learners. As students use vocabulary with their partners like partition, equal parts, and thirds while sorting shapes, MLR2 suggests that the teacher display the written words and encourage students to borrow language from the display as needed. This language support helps MLLs connect abstract mathematical vocabulary to the concrete representations. By focusing on both the concrete representation of shapes and student explanations, the materials support MLLs in the language needed to build conceptual understanding of fractions as equal parts of a whole.

In Grade 4, Unit 6, Multiplying and Dividing Multi-digit Numbers, Lesson 13, the lesson intentionally supports MLLs in developing conceptual understanding of division situations involving equal-size groups through embedded language supports (4.NBT.6). The Warm-up invites partners to engage in the Instructional Routine Estimation Exploration to estimate how many paletas are shown in a picture. (For more about Estimation Exploration, see the reports for 2f.MLL, 2g.MLL, and 2h.MLL.) This approach, coupled with teacher-provided think-time and structured partner discussions, allows MLLs to process language internally, orally rehearse in their preferred language, and then contribute to whole-class discourse. These language supports promote MLLs’ full and complete participation by recognizing the linguistic processing time and interaction necessary for all learners to engage meaningfully in mathematical discourse. Then, in Activity 1, students work in partners during MLR5: Co-craft Questions to build conceptual understanding of visions through asking and answering questions about a division situation of a real-world context involving paletas, connecting these interpretations to visual representations. The Activity Synthesis offers further language supports for MLLs by activating prior knowledge of the terms dividend, divisor, and quotient from Grade 3. These language supports help bridge everyday language and mathematical language, supporting students in moving from concrete to visual to abstract representations. In this Activity, the concrete representation support is offered in a note titled Access for Students with Disabilities by providing multiple means of expression and communication, ensuring that language is not a barrier to understanding and engaging with core mathematical ideas.

These pieces of evidence demonstrate that the materials support MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. The materials are structured to build conceptual understanding through tasks that connect concrete, visual, and abstract representations with academic language and mathematical reasoning. 

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

According to the Teachers Course Guide, Key Structures of This Course, Principles of IM Curriculum Design, Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Fluency, “Warm-Up routines, practice problems, centers, and other built-in activities help students develop procedural fluency, which develops over time.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes: 

  • Unit 7, Two-dimensional Shapes and Perimeter, Lesson 7, Warm-Up, students develop procedural skill and fluency as they use strategies they have learned to add multi-digit numbers. Student Task Statement states, “Decide whether each statement is true or false. Be prepared to explain your reasoning. 123+75+123+75=100+100+70+70+5+5+3+3, 123+75+123+75=(2\times123)+(2\times75), 123+75+123+75=208+208, 123+75+123+75=246+150.” (3.NBT.2)

An example in Grade 4 includes: 

  • Unit 9, Putting It All Together, Lesson 9, Warm-Up, students develop procedural skill and fluency with subtraction. Activity states, “1 minute: quiet think time. Record answers and strategies. Keep expressions and work displayed. Repeat with each expression.” Student Task Statement states, “Find the value of each expression mentally. 5,000-403, 5,300-473, 25,300-493, 26,000-1,493.” (4.NBT.4)

An example in Grade 5 includes: 

  • Unit 4, Wrapping Up Multiplication and Division with Multi–Digit Numbers, Lesson 4, Warm-Up, students develop procedural skill and fluency as they notice the patterns in calculations within the number talk, leading towards the standard algorithm. Student Task Statement states, “Find the value of each product mentally. 3\times3, 3\times20, 3\times600, 3\times623.” Activity Synthesis states, “‘How is the last product related to the first three?’ (It is the sum of the first three.) ‘Did the first three calculations help you find the last product?’ (Yes, I was able to add them together to find 3\times623.)” (5.NBT.5)

According to the Teacher Course Guide, Key Structures of This Course, Principles of IM Curriculum Design, Coherent Progression, materials were designed to include opportunities for students to independently demonstrate procedural skill and fluency, when appropriate. “Each activity starts with Launch that gives all students access to the task. Independent work time follows, allowing them to grapple with problems individually before working in small groups. In the Activity Synthesis at the end, students consolidate their learning by making connections between their work and the mathematical goals.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 4, Relating Multiplication to Division, Lesson 9, Activity 2, students demonstrate fluency as they identify patterns in multiplication. Activity states, “‘In the right column, write at least two multiplication facts you can figure out because you know the given multiplication fact in the left column.’ 3–5 minutes: independent work time. ‘Now, share the facts that you found with your partner. Record any facts that your partner found that you didn’t find. Be sure to explain your reasoning.’” Student Task Statement states, “1. In each row, write at least 2 multiplication facts you can figure out because you know the given multiplication fact in the left column. Be prepared to share your reasoning. If I know… 2\times4, then I also know 4\times2, 4\times4, 2\times8.” (3.OA.7) 2. If time permits, complete the rest of the multiplication table from the previous activity. Use the multiplication facts you know to find those you don’t know.”

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 4, From Hundredths to Hundred-thousands, Lesson 20, Cool-Down, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency as they use the standard algorithm for subtraction. Student Task Statement states, “Use the standard algorithm to find the value of the difference. 173,225-114,329.” (4.NBT.4)

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 8, Putting It All Together, Lesson 1, Activity 2, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency as they practice using the standard algorithm to find products. Student Task Statement states, “1. Use the digits 7, 3, 2, and 5 to make the greatest product. Use each digit only once.” Launch states, “Groups of 2. Display: 7, 3, 2, 5. ‘Using only these digits, what multiplication expressions could we write?’ 1 minute: quiet think time. Record answers for all to see. ‘Which of these expressions do you think would make the greatest product? Be prepared to explain your reasoning.’ (I think the three-digit by one-digit expression would make the greatest product because you can put the 7 in the hundreds place.) ‘Use the digits 7, 3, 2, and 5 to make the greatest product.’” (5.NBT.5)

Indicator 2b.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3–5 of Imagine IM partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in intentional opportunities to develop procedural skills and fluencies. The materials partially provide embedded opportunities for MLLs to engage in developing procedural fluency through well-structured tasks and routines. They lack consistent and explicit language supports necessary for MLLs to fully and completely participate in all phases of procedural learning, particularly in explanation, justification, and synthesis.

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 7, Two-Dimensional Shapes and Perimeter, Lesson 7, Warm-up, students work independently during the Instructional Routine True or False to determine whether expressions involving repeated addition and multiplication are equivalent (3.NBT.2). The Instructional Routine True or False supports procedural fluency by prompting students to justify their reasoning about equivalence by applying their knowledge about addition, multiplication, and properties of operations. However, the Warm-up lacks suggestions for the productive language demands of justifying mathematical reasoning. This limits accessibility for MLLs who may demonstrate procedural skills and fluency and still need support with expressing their ideas with academic language. 

In Grade 5, Unit 8, Putting It All Together, Lesson 1, students create expressions for the greatest product using specific digits and then explain their reasoning, targeting procedural fluency with multiplication (5.NBT.5). Activity 1 begins with structured language supports for students to work in partners to agree or disagree with mathematical statements about the greatest products that can be made with specific digits. The materials direct the teacher to support MLLs with the language demands of the task using Mathematical Language Routine 8 Discussion Supports, where students restate their partner’s reasoning using the displayed sentence frame, “I heard you say...” Then, the activity moves to independent practice of procedural skills and fluency in the next problem where students are asked to explain how to create the greatest product using specific digits. The materials do not provide language supports for the productive language demands of explaining mathematical reasoning. The activity concludes with whole-class discourse in which the teacher asks students to generalize about the placement of digits when multiplying larger numbers. Without consistent language supports, MLLs do not have access to the meaning-making that occurs during the whole-class discourse, limiting their full and complete participation in the task. 

The materials partially meet the criteria for this Indicator because the lessons’ instructional design includes Warm-ups, one to three instructional Activities, Lesson Syntheses, and Cool Downs which are designed to give students repeated access to procedural skills and fluency. However, these aspects of the instructional design often do not consistently include built-in supports for MLLs who may need productive language supports for speaking or writing their thinking in English, specifically where procedural skills and fluency is called for in the standards. Without consistent language supports, MLLs may have limited opportunities to fully demonstrate procedural understanding or engage in discussions requiring explanation and justification. 

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Materials support the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters. 

Multiple routine and non-routine applications of mathematics are included throughout the grade level, with single- and multi-step application problems embedded within Activities or Cool-Downs. Students have opportunities to engage with these applications both with teacher support and independently. According to the Teacher Course Guide, materials are designed to provide students with opportunities to independently demonstrate their understanding of grade-level mathematics when appropriate. Key Structures in This Course, Principles of IM Curriculum Design, Coherent Progression states, “Each activity starts with a Launch that gives all students access to the task. Independent work time follows, allowing them to grapple with problems individually before working in small groups. In the Activity Synthesis at the end, students consolidate their learning by making connections between their work and the mathematical goals.” 

An example of a routine application of the math in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 3, Wrapping Up Addition and Subtraction within 1000, Lesson 19, Activity 2, students solve a multi-step real-world problem and then write an equation to represent the problem. Activity states, “‘Take some independent time to work on this problem. You can choose to solve the problem first or write the equation first.’ 5–7 minutes: independent work time, Monitor for different ways students: Write an equation. Represent the problem, such as by using a tape diagram. Decide if their answer makes sense, such as by thinking about the situation or by rounding.” Student Task Statement reads, “Kiran is setting up a game of mancala (mahn-KAH-lah). He has a jar of 122 stones. From the jar, he takes 3 stones to put in each of the 6 pits on his side of the board. How many stones are in the jar now? 1. Write an equation to represent the situation. Use a letter for the unknown quantity. 2. Solve the problem. Explain or show your reasoning. 3. Explain how you know your answer makes sense.” (3.OA.8)

An example of a non-routine application of the math in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 6, Measuring Length, Time, Liquid Volume, and Weight, Lesson 15, Activity 1, students solve a real-world problem by using concepts of time, weight, and volume. Launch states, “‘We’re going to solve some problems about a day at the fair. What are some things you could do during a day at the fair?’ (Go on rides, walk around, play games, look at some of the animals) 30 seconds: quiet think time. Share responses. Give each group tools for creating a visual display.” The Student Task Statement reads, “You spent a day at the fair. Solve 4 problems about your day and create a poster to show your reasoning and solutions. 1. You arrived at the fair! Entry to the fair is $9 a person. You went there with 6 other people. How much did it cost your group to enter the fair? 2. How did you start your day? (Choose 1.) You arrived at the giant pumpkin weigh-off at 11:12 a.m. and left at 12:25 p.m. How long were you there? You spent 48 minutes at the carnival and left at 12:10 p.m. What time did you get to the carnival? 3. What was next? (Choose 1.) You visited a barn with 7 sheep. Together, the sheep are given 91 liters of water a day. Each sheep is given the same amount. How much water does each sheep get each day? You visited a life-size sculpture of a cow made of butter. The butter cow weighs 273 kilograms, which is 277 kilograms less than the actual cow. How much does the actual cow weigh? 4. Before you went home, you played some games. At the balloon pop game, there were 72 balloons arranged in 9 equal rows. How many balloons were in each row?” (3.MD.1, 3.MD.2, 3.OA.3)

An example of a routine application of the math in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 3, Extending Operations to Fractions, Lesson 6, Cool-Down, students apply their understanding about multiplication of a fraction by a whole number to solve real-world problems. Student Task Statement reads, “1. Tyler bought 5 cartons of milk. Each carton contains \frac{3}{4} liter. How many liters of milk did Tyler buy? Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Han bought 3 cartons of chocolate milk. Each carton contains \frac{5}{8} liter. Did Han buy the same amount of milk as Tyler? Explain or show your reasoning.” (4.NF.4c)

An example of a non-routine application of the math in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 1, Factors and Multiples, Lesson 6, Activity 2, students examine factors of numbers from 1 to 20 and use them to solve problems. Launch states, “‘Let’s solve some problems about a game you read about earlier, where students take turns opening and closing lockers. Silently read and think about each question.’ 1 minute: quiet think time. ‘Work in your group to answer each question. Consider the representations you created or saw earlier to help you think about the problems.’” Student Task Statement reads, “Tyler’s class plays the same locker game again. Your goal this time is to find out which lockers are touched as each of the 20 students takes their turns. 1. Which locker numbers does the 3rd student touch? 2. Which locker numbers does the 5th student touch? 3. How many students touch locker 17? Explain or show how you know. 4. Which lockers are touched by only 2 students? Explain or show how you know. 5. Which lockers are touched by only 3 students? Explain or show how you know. 6. Which lockers are touched the most? Explain or show how you know. If you have time: Which lockers are still open at the end of the game? Explain or show how you know.” (4.OA.4)

An example of a routine application of the math in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 3, Multiplying and Dividing Fractions, Lesson 18, Activity 1, students work with real-world problems involving multiplication and division of fractions. Student Task Statement reads, “1. Diego and some classmates paint one wall of a long hallway. They have 2 gallons of paint to share equally in paint trays. Each paint tray holds 1⁄4 gallon of paint. How many paint trays can they fill with the 2 gallons of paint? a. Draw a diagram to represent the situation. b. Write a division equation to represent the situation. c. Write a multiplication equation to represent the situation. 2. Diego and Clare decide to equally share 1⁄4 gallon of a special paint that glows in the dark. How many gallons of paint does each person get? a. Draw a diagram to represent the situation. b. Write a division equation to represent the situation. c. Write a multiplication equation to represent the situation.” (5.NF.4, 5.NF.6, 5.NF.7)

An example of a non-routine application of the math in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 7, Shapes on the Coordinate Plane, Lesson 13, Activity 1, students plot points that represent the length and width of a rectangle with a given perimeter. Student Task Statement reads, “1. Jada draws a rectangle with a perimeter of 12 centimeters. What could be the length and width of the rectangle if all the side lengths are whole numbers? Use the table to record 5 possible answers. 2. Represent the length and width of each rectangle as a point on the coordinate grid. 3. If Jada draws a square, how long and wide will it be? 4. If Jada’s rectangle is 2.5 cm long, how wide is it? Represent this rectangle as a point on the coordinate grid. 5. If Jada’s rectangle is 3.25 cm long, how wide is it? Represent this rectangle as a point on the coordinate grid.” (5.G.2, 5.NBT.7, 5.OA.3)

Indicator 2c.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3–5 of Imagine IM partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications. The materials partially provide supports that allow MLLs to engage in applying mathematical concepts and skills in routine and non-routine tasks as well as partner and whole-class discourse focusing on mathematical reasoning. These supports are not consistently provided or available at the point of entry, which limits full and complete participation for MLLs across all lessons.

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 6, Measure Length, Time, Liquid Volume, and Weight, Lesson 19, students work in partners to solve non-routine, real-world word problems using concepts of time, weight, and volume (3.MD.1, 3.MD.2, 3.OA.3). In Activity 1, partners create a poster that shows their solutions and mathematical reasoning to four word problems. The teacher encourages students to be creative in how they put their ideas on their poster, and to do so in an organized manner. This activity lacks suggestions for the receptive language demands of MLLs reading the non-routine, real-world word problems and listening to their partner discuss their reasoning. This activity also lacks suggestions for the productive language demands of MLLs orally describing their reasoning and writing on the joint poster. The lesson moves on to Activity 2, where students engage in a Gallery Walk to compare and connect various solution strategies. A note titled Access for English Language Learners suggests the use of Mathematical Language Routine (MLR) 7 Compare and Connect which recommends that the teacher leads a discussion at the end of the Gallery Walk to compare and connect solution strategies by asking questions like, “What did the approaches have in common? How were they different? Why did the different approaches lead to the same outcome?” During the discussion, the note recommends that the teacher includes multimodal instructional moves through pointing and gesturing to the corresponding mathematical representations, which is supportive of building MLLs’ listening skills. In summary, these activities do not consistently provide language supports for all four domains of language: reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Without consistent language supports, MLLs do not have support for grappling with non-routine, real-world application problems, limiting their full and complete participation in tasks. 

Additionally, in Grade 5, Unit 3, Multiplying and Dividing Fractions, Lesson 18, students make sense of routine, real-world word problems involving multiplication and division of fractions (5.NF.6, 5.NF.7). In Activity 1, students work with partners to read and make sense of word problems and for each problem, students engage in partner discussions to support them by independently drawing a diagram and writing multiplication or division equation(s) to represent each situation. A note titled Access for English Language Learners suggests the use of MLR6 Three Reads to support MLLs with the language demands of reading and making sense of word problems; the teacher directs students to read the problem three different times with three separate purposes, aiming to gain clarity in comprehension with each read. However, the activity lacks suggestions for the productive language demands during partner discussions around how to draw a diagram and write equations to represent each situation. Then, in Activity 2, students engage with three more routine, real-world word problems in a similar manner as in Activity 1, this time with 6 minutes of independent work time before partners are directed to discuss their diagrams, equations, and solutions. The materials do not draw a connection for teachers between the suggested use of MLR6 in Activity 1 in the independent student work time in Activity 2, which creates a barrier in the point of entry into the task for MLLs. Therefore, the lesson lacks consistent language supports for accessible entry points into tasks as well as the language demands of reading, speaking, and listening while MLLs grapple with, make sense of, and solve application problems. 

The materials partially meet the criteria for this Indicator because in every lesson, students are asked to engage with routine and non-routine application problems through: tasks that promote the use of known facts to build new understanding, the incorporation of multiple representations, such as number lines, arrays, and symbolic equations, and lesson structures that move from independent exploration to partner discussion and group synthesis, promoting reflection and connection-making. However, these opportunities often do not consistently include language supports for MLLs to participate in the full depth of application-based learning at critical moments, such as the launch of new tasks or during partner synthesis discussions.

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations in that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.

Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously throughout the materials in order to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single unit of study or topic. 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 4, Relating Multiplication to Division, Lesson 19, Activity 2, students engage in all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application as they represent division within 100. Launch states, “Give base-ten blocks to each group. Ask students to keep their books closed. ‘Use base-ten blocks to find the value of 60\div5.’ 1–2 minutes: independent work time.” Student Task Statement reads, “Jada and Han used base-ten blocks to represent 60\div5. 1. Make sense of Jada’s and Han’s work. a. What did they do differently? b. Where do you see the value of 60\div5 in each person’s work? 2. How would you use base-ten blocks to represent these expressions and find their value? Be prepared to explain your reasoning. a. 64\div4: Would you make 4 groups or groups of 4? b. 72\div6: Would you make 6 groups or groups of 6? c. 75\div15: Would you make 15 groups or groups of 15?” (3.OA.2, 3.OA.7)

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 3, Extending Operations to Fractions, Lesson 1, Activity 1, students engage in all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application as they interpret situations involving equal groups. Activity states, “‘Take a few quiet minutes to think about the first set of problems about crackers. Then discuss your thinking with your partner.’ 4 minutes: independent work time. 2 minutes: partner discussion. Pause for a whole-class discussion. Invite students to share their responses. If no students mention that there are equal groups, ask them to make some observations about the size of the groups in each image. Discuss the expressions students wrote: ‘What expression did you write to represent the crackers in Image A? Why? ($$6\times4$$, because there are 6 groups of 4 full crackers.) What about the crackers in Image B? Why? ($$6\times\frac{1}{4}$$, because there are 6 groups of \frac{1}{4} of a cracker.)’ Ask students to complete the remaining problems. 5 minutes: independent or partner work time. Monitor for students who reason about the quantities in terms of ‘___ groups of ___’ to help them write expressions.” Student Task Statement reads, “Here are images of some crackers. a. How are the crackers in image A and image B alike? b. How are they different? c. How many crackers are in each image? d. Write an expression to represent the crackers in each image. 2. Here are more images and descriptions of food items. For each question, write a multiplication expression to represent the quantity. Then answer the question. a. Clare has 3 baskets. She put 4 eggs into each basket. How many eggs did she put in baskets? b. Diego has 5 plates. He put \frac{1}{2} of a kiwi fruit on each plate. How many kiwis did he put on plates? c. Priya prepared 7 plates with \frac{1}{8} of a pie on each. How much pie did she put on plates? d. Noah scoops \frac{1}{3} cup of brown rice 8 times. How many cups of brown rice does he scoop?” (4.NF.4)

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 6, More Decimal and Fraction Operations, Lesson 12, Activity 2, students develop all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application, as they solve multi-step problems involving the addition and subtraction of fractions. Student Task Statement reads, “1. Choose a problem to solve. Problem A: Jada is baking protein bars for a hike. She adds \frac{1}{2} cup of walnuts and then decides to add another \frac{1}{3} cup. How many cups of walnuts has she added altogether? The recipe requires 1\frac{1}{3} cups of walnuts. How many more cups of walnuts does Jada add? Explain or show your reasoning. Problem B: Kiran and Jada hiked 1\frac{1}2} miles and took a rest. Then they hiked another \frac{4}{10} mile before stopping for lunch. How many miles have they hiked so far? The trail is a total of 2\frac{1}{2} miles. hHow much farther do they hike? Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Discuss the problems and solutions with your partner. How are your strategies alike? How are they different? 3. Revise your work if necessary.” (5.NF.2)

Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices

8 / 8

Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion

For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.

While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.

To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.

Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 meet expectations for mathematical practices. The materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).

Indicator 2e

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP1 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 2, Area and Multiplication, Lesson 10, Activity 1, students solve a real-world problem involving area. The Student Task Statement reads, “Noah is painting a wall in a community garden. The wall is shaped like a rectangle. A diagram of the wall is shown here. Paint is sold in 3 different sizes: A small container will cover 3 square meters. A medium container will cover 10 square meters. A large container will cover 40 square meters. What should Noah buy? Explain your reasoning.” Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is for students to solve a real-world problem involving area. The activity includes a rectangle in which the side lengths are labeled. When students solve problems with multiple solutions and have to choose and justify a solution, they make sense of problems and persevere in solving them (MP1).”

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 2, Fraction Equivalence and Comparison, Lesson 14, Activity 1, students reason about fractions given descriptive clues. Preparation, Lesson Narrative reads, “In the first activity, students compare sets of fractions with like and unlike denominators. They do so by using benchmarks, writing equivalent fractions, or reasoning about the numerators and denominators. In the second activity, students interpret and solve problems involving fractional measurements in context. Both activities present a new setup, structure, or context, requiring students to make sense of the given information and the problems, and to persevere in solving them (MP1).” The Student Task Statement reads, “Six friends were each given a list of 5 fractions. They each chose 1 fraction and wrote clues about their choice. Use their clues to identify the fraction they each chose.”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 8, Putting It All Together, Lesson 6, Activity 2, students make sense of problems as they calculate the volume of different objects. The Student Task Statement reads, “1. The Great Pyramid of Giza was built in Egypt more than 4,000 years ago. Today, it is 137 meters tall. The base of the pyramid is a square. Each side of the base is 230 meters long. If the pyramid was shaped like a rectangular prism, what would the volume of the prism be? 2. The Empire State Building is in New York City. The base is 129 meters by 57 meters. The building is 381 meters tall. Estimate the volume of the Empire State Building. 3. Which do you think is larger, the Great Pyramid or the Empire State Building? Explain or show your reasoning.” Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is for students to solve problems about the volume of different structures. While students can find products of the given numbers, those products do not represent the actual volumes of the structures because neither the Great Pyramid of Giza nor the Empire State Building is a rectangular prism. The pyramid steadily decreases in size as it gets taller, while the Empire State Building also decreases in size at higher levels but not in the same regular way as the pyramid. With not enough information to make a definitive conclusion, students can see that both structures are enormous and that their volumes are roughly comparable, close enough that more studying would be needed for a definitive conclusion (MP1).”

Indicator 2e.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.

In every unit, the materials consistently provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when making sense of problems through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for English Language Learners. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation is the Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide,  What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, describes how the Instructional Routine Notice and Wonder supports MP1: “Notice and Wonder invites all students into a mathematical task with two low-stakes prompts: ‘What do you notice? What do you wonder?’ By thinking about things they notice and wonder, students gain entry into the context and might have their curiosity piqued. Students learn to make sense of problems (MP1) by taking steps to become familiar with a context and the mathematics that might be involved.” 

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistently employ Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The Course Guide,  Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners outlines how the material’s lesson design centers the unique language needs of MLLs by embedding Stanford University’s four design principles, the first of which is Support Sense-Making, which aligns with MP1. The specific MLRs that directly support MP1 are as follows:

  • MLR4 Information Gap: In a group, each student has different parts of a mathematical situation, and they piece together that information orally or visually to bridge the gap between the parameters of the situation and a question to solve a mathematical problem.

  • MLR5 Co-Craft Questions: Students examine a problem stem, a graph, a video, an image, or a list of interesting facts and author a mathematical question that might be asked about the situation. With partners or as a class, they compare questions before the teacher reveals the mathematical question of the task as designed. 

  • MLR6 Three Reads: Students are guided to read a problem three separate times with three separate purposes, with quick discussions between each read.

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language.

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions, such as:

    • Revoicing or rephrasing.

    • Pressing for details.

    • Providing sentence frames.

    • Providing multimodal instructional suggestions (e.g., reading, writing, speaking, listening, pointing, gesturing, acting out, etc).

    • Using choral responses.

    • Modeling a think-aloud.

    • Providing think time.

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 6, Measuring Length, Time, Liquid Volume, and Weight, Lesson 7, the Warm-Up begins with a picture showing two differently sized containers with water in them. Students engage in the Instructional Routine Notice and Wonder with a partner, followed by a whole-class discussion around which container is filled with the most water. The Warm-Up provides MLLs with real-life examples of volume, allowing them to use what they see to make sense of a new concept even before they are introduced to the specific mathematical vocabulary term volume in the Activity Synthesis. In Activity 1, students work in groups of 4 to explore the volume of two different containers filled with water as compared to a smaller container labeled unit. Students first estimate each container’s capacity in terms of the number of smaller units, then work together to measure capacity by physically moving water to the containers using the smaller container labeled unit. Using physical manipulatives supports MLLs with making sense of how liquid volume relates to the size and shape of containers. The Activity Synthesis directs the teacher to facilitate a whole-class discussion about groups’ estimations and answers before introducing the phrase volume of a container. The lesson continues to Activity 2, where students engage in a whole-class water pouring demonstration to introduce liters as a formal unit to measure liquid volume. The Activity Narrative states, “While it is highly recommended that the class has the experience of filling and marking the container, a video has been provided to show the process and could be used for a class demonstration.” Before the demonstration or video, a note titled Access for English Language Learners suggests the use of MLR5 Co-Craft Questions to support MLLs with making sense of the context. Throughout this lesson, students have worked on only one problem context; the materials consistently employ deep, sustained engagement with a small number of problems, supporting students in persevering in solving problems. 

Inspire Math videos appear at regular, consistent intervals within units across Grades 3-5, as described in the report for 1d.MLL. These videos help students make sense of the contexts of problems, showcasing the mathematics of each unit in a real-world, engaging context. The materials suggest that teachers show Inspire Math videos at three points in the unit: Introduce in Lesson 1, Review in a specified lesson partway through each unit, and Reinforce in a specified lesson towards the end of the unit. 

While the materials for Grades 3-5 sparsely and inconsistently feature live demonstrations and videos within lesson facilitation, the Instructional Routine Notice and Wonder, the MLRs listed above, and the use of digital and physical manipulatives appear consistently and frequently within Grades 3-5. There is a missed opportunity for the materials to support MLLs with making sense of problems by providing language support for multiple-meaning terms. In the example above, students grapple with how much space a liter of liquid fills; MLLs could benefit from explicit, direct instruction about the multiple meanings of the term space: space as in how much space something occupies, or space as in outer space. 

Indicator 2f

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP2 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, Lesson 4, Activity 2, students use diagrams to represent the fractional amount in a given situation. Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is for students to use diagrams to represent situations that involve non-unit fractions. The Activity Synthesis focuses on how students partition and shade the diagrams and how the end of the shaded portion could represent the location of an object. When students interpret the different situations in terms of the diagrams, they reason abstractly and quantitatively (MP2).” Activity reads, “‘In the activity, each strip represents the length of a street where Pilolo is played. Work independently to represent each situation on a diagram.’ 3–5 minutes: independent work time. ‘With a partner, choose one of the situations and make a poster to show how you represented the situation with a fraction strip. You may want to include details, such as notes, drawings, labels, and so on, to help others understand your thinking.’ Give students materials for creating a display.” The Student Task Statement reads, “Here are 4 situations about playing Pilolo (PIH-loh-loh) and 4 diagrams. Each diagram represents the length of a street where the game is played. Represent each situation on a diagram. Be prepared to explain your reasoning.1. A student walks \frac{4}{8} the length of the street and hides a rock. 2. A student walks \frac{2}}{3} the length of the street and hides a penny. 3. A student walks \frac{3}{4} the length of the street and hides a stick. 4. A student walks \frac{5}{6} the length of the street and hides a penny. 5. This diagram represents the location of a hidden stick. About what fraction of the length of the street did the student walk to hide it? Be prepared to explain your reasoning.”

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 5, Multiplicative Comparison and Measurement, Lesson 15, Activity 2, students reason abstractly and quantitatively when they convert feet and inches and solve a logic puzzle. The Student Task Statement reads, “While on an outing, a group of friends had a stone-stacking contest to see who could build the tallest stone tower. Andre’s tower is 3 times as tall as Diego’s, but Diego didn’t build the shortest tower. Tyler built the tallest tower at 4 feet and 2 inches. One person built a tower that is 39 inches tall. Tyler's tower is 5 times as tall as the shortest tower. 1. How tall is each person’s stone tower? 2. Elena came along and built a tower that is 5 times as tall as Diego’s tower. Is Elena’s tower more than 6 feet? Show your reasoning.” Activity Narrative reads, “In this activity, students apply their knowledge of multiplicative comparison and ability to convert feet and inches to solve a logic puzzle. They use several given clues to determine the heights of four objects. As they use the clues to reason about the heights of the towers and who built them, students reason abstractly and quantitatively (MP2).”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 2, Fractions as Quotients and Fraction Multiplication, Lesson 7, Activity 2, students reason abstractly and quantitatively as they match expressions and diagrams. The Student Task Statement reads, “Your teacher will give you a set of cards that show expressions and diagrams. 1. Find the cards that match this situation. Be ready to explain your reasoning. Han, Lin, Kiran, and Jada run a 3-mile relay race as a team. They each run the same distance. 2. How far does each person run?” Activity Narrative reads, “Students reason abstractly and quantitatively (MP2) when they relate the story to the diagrams and expressions. All of the diagrams and expressions involve the same set of numbers so students need to carefully analyze the numbers in the story, the diagrams, and the expressions in order to choose the correct matches.”

Indicator 2f.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively.

In every unit, the materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when reasoning abstractly and quantitatively through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for English Language Learners. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation is the Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide,  What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, describes how the Instructional Routines Card Sort and Estimation Exploration support MP2. Card Sort states, “A card-sorting task gives students opportunities to analyze representations, statements, and structures closely, and make connections (MP2 and MP7).” Estimation Exploration states, “Estimation Exploration encourages students to use what they know and what they can see to problem-solve for a rough evaluation of a quantity rather than giving a ‘wild guess.’ The estimates can be in the context of measurement, computation, or numerosity—estimating about a large group of objects (MP2).”

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistency employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP2 are as follows:

  • MLR4 Information Gap: In a group, each student has different parts of a mathematical situation, and they piece together that information orally or visually to bridge the gap between the parameters of the situation and a question to solve a mathematical problem. Through this questioning, students are clarifying the meaning of the numbers and symbols in the mathematical situation.

  • MLR6 Three Reads: Students are guided to read a problem three separate times with three separate purposes, with quick discussions between each read. In the second read, students are guided to consider quantities and units involved in the problem.

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their own understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language. Through this discussion, students are making sense of the relationships between representations and the problem to solve.

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions, which at times focuses on making sense of representations and symbols. 

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 4, Relating Multiplication to Division, Lesson 4, Activity 1, students work in partners to match five division expressions to five real-world division situations. All of the division situations involve tops from various cultures, and the activity begins with a short partner and whole-class discussion to activate or build prior knowledge around the tops contexts. Using one real-world context throughout several problems supports MLLs with abstract reasoning because students only need to activate or build prior knowledge one time, freeing up their working memory to focus on the language needed to engage with the mathematics at hand. As students work in partners to match expressions and situations, the materials direct the teacher to monitor for students who can justify their matches by explaining how the numbers in the expression represent the situation. The lesson does not contain language support for MLLs to participate fully in the partner discussion. The activity ends with whole-class discourse in which students share their matches. The teacher asks questions that aim to support abstract reasoning by drawing connections between the expressions and the division situations, such as, “How do the numbers in the expression represent what is in the situation?” The lesson does not provide language supports for MLLs to participate fully in the whole-class discourse. 

The materials partially meet the criteria for this Indicator because while the materials embed opportunities for students to engage with MP2 through the use of specific Instructional Routines and MLRs, the materials lack language supports during partner and whole-class discourse in which students are asked to reason abstractly and quantitatively. 

Indicator 2g

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP3 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 3, Wrapping Up Addition and Subtraction within 1,000, Lesson 9, Cool-Down, students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others as they solve subtraction problems using the algorithm. Preparation, Lesson Narrative states, “Previously, students learned to record subtraction, using an algorithm in which the numbers are written in expanded form. They made connections between the structure and the steps of the algorithm and those of the base-ten diagram that represents the same subtraction. In this lesson, students take a closer look at the algorithm and use it to find differences. Students also examine a common error in subtracting numbers when decomposition of a place-value unit is required. When students discuss shown work, they construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (MP3).” The Student Task Statement reads, (Students see the thinking of a student on the problem with regrouping.) “Andre found the value of  739-255. His work is shown. Explain how he subtracted and the value he found for 739-255.”

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 6, Multiplying and Dividing Multi-digit Numbers, Lesson 9, Activity 1, students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others as they use partial products. Activity reads, “4 minutes: independent work time on the first problem about Noah’s diagram. 4 minutes: partner discussion. 5 minutes: group work time on the rest of the activity. Monitor for students who include the place value of each digit in 124 in explaining what is happening in the algorithm.” The Student Task Statement reads, “‘1. Noah draws a diagram and writes expressions to multiply 2 numbers. How does each expression represent Noah’s diagram? 2. Noah learns another way to record the multiplication.’ An image of Noah’s work is shown along with his calculations. ‘Make sense of each step of the calculations and record your thoughts.’” Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is to analyze an algorithm that uses partial products. Students are not required to use a specific notation, but analyzing each algorithm deepens their understanding of the structure of place value in multiplication. When students interpret and make sense of Noah's work, they construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (MP3).”

 An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 5, Place Value Patterns and Decimal Operations, Lesson 15, Activity 3, students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others as they analyze a common error when using the standard algorithm to subtract decimals. The Student Task Statement reads, “1. Find the value of 622.35-71.4 Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Elena and Andre try to find the value of 622.35-71.4. Who do you agree with? Explain or show your reasoning.” Activity Narrative states, “When students share their explanation of Han's calculations with a partner and revise their work after receiving feedback, they critique the reasoning of others and improve their arguments (MP3).”

Indicator 2g.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

In every unit, the materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when constructing arguments through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for English Language Learners. 

An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation are the Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide, What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, describes how the Instructional Routines 5 Practices and Choral Counting support MP3. 5 Practices states, “Lessons that include this routine allow students to solve problems in ways that make sense to them. Monitor to uncover and nurture conceptual understandings during the activity, as students engage in a problem in meaningful ways. During the Activity Synthesis, students collectively reveal multiple approaches to a problem and make connections between these approaches (MP3).” Choral Counting states, “While Choral Counting offers students the opportunity to practice verbal counting, the recorded count is the primary focus of the routine. As students reflect on the recorded count, they make observations, predict upcoming numbers in the count, and justify their reasoning (MP7 and MP3).” Additionally, the Course Guide,  Standards for Mathematical Practice states, “Some instructional routines are generally associated with certain MPs. For example… The Estimation Exploration routine offers students opportunities to share a mathematical claim and the thinking behind it (MP3), and to make an estimate or a range of reasonable answers, with incomplete information, which is a part of modeling with mathematics (MP4).”

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistency employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP3 are:

  • MLR1 Stronger and Clearer Each Time: Students construct a verbal or written response to a math problem, then verbally share their response with a partner to get feedback from the listener to improve the response, and revise their original response based on the feedback they received.

  • MLR2 Collect and Display: Students access their own and others’ mathematical ideas as the teacher scribes the language, strategies, and concepts students use during partner, small group, or whole-class while constructing arguments and critiquing others. 

  • MLR3 Critique, Correct, Clarify: Students critique mathematical reasoning by rewriting a math response from an example that is incorrect, incomplete, or otherwise ambiguous.

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their own understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language.

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions that support constructing mathematical arguments, such as:

    • Revoicing or rephrasing.

    • Pressing for details.

    • Providing sentence frames.

    • Modeling a think-aloud.

    • Providing think time to allow for mental or oral rehearsal.

Expanding on the sentence frames that MLR8 Discussion Supports occasionally references, the Course Guide, Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners contains a table with sample sentence frames and sentence starters for five language functions. Three of the language functions are directly related to MP3: explain, justify, and question. 

Expanding on the sentence frames that MLR8 Discussion Supports occasionally references, the Course Guide, 4. Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for English Learners contains a table with sample sentence frames and sentence starters for five language functions. Three of the language functions—explain, justify, and question—are directly related to MP3. Example sentence frames include:

  • Explain: “First, I ____, because…” / “I noticed ____ so I…”

  • Justify: “I know ____, because…” / “I heard you say… ”

  • Question: “Why did you ____?” / “Can you say more about… ?”

These sentence frames support interdisciplinary language connections since they are generic in nature. This section of the Course Guide states, “The table shows examples of generic sentence frames that can support common disciplinary language functions across a variety of content topics. Some of the lessons in these materials include suggestions of additional sentence frames that could support the specific content and language functions of that lesson.” The materials do not reference these sentence frames within lessons at point-of-use. 

It is important to note that while the language domain of writing is addressed through routines such as MLR1 Stronger and Clearer Each Time, writing is not as consistently emphasized as listening and speaking. There’s a missed opportunity to expand structured writing tasks across more lessons to ensure balanced development across all language domains. Many of the sentence frames provided in MLR8 Discussion Supports, within the Course Guide, 4. Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for English Learners, and in the unit-level resource Supporting Equity and Engagement, could be applied in a written constructed response setting, yet the materials infrequently reference the use of sentence frames to support written constructed responses. In the unit-level resource Supporting Equity and Engagement, Strategies for Implementation, one of the suggested uses states, “Display a frame and have students use it to write their reasoning.” There is no additional guidance about using sentence frames in writing at the point of use within lesson facilitation.

Indicator 2h

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students have opportunities to engage with MP4 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 6, Measuring Length, Time, Liquid Volume, and Weight, Lesson 14, Cool-Down, students reason about situations involving elapsed time. Student Task Statement reads, “1. A show at the carnival starts at 2:45 p.m. and lasts 47 minutes. What time does the show end? Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Another show that is 24 minutes long ends at 5:10 p.m. Kiran says that the show starts before 4:40 p.m. Do you agree? Explain or show your reasoning.” Preparation, Lesson Narrative reads, “In earlier lessons, students encountered and solved problems about time and liquid volume. In this lesson, students model with mathematics (MP4) as they determine quantities, questions, and solutions that make sense in given situations and that adhere to mathematical and real-world constraints when solving problems.”

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 1, Factors and Multiples, Lesson 6, Activity 1, students model with mathematics as they apply their knowledge of factors, multiples, prime numbers, and composite numbers to solve problems about a game involving opening and closing of lockers. Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is for students to visualize and make sense of the context of problems they will solve in the next activity. They will also consider representations that can be used to model the quantities and actions in the situation (MP4) and try creating them.” Student Task Statement reads, “The picture shows lockers in a school hallway. The 20 students in Tyler’s fourth-grade class play a game in a hallway that has 20 lockers in a row. The lockers are numbered from 1 to 20. The 1st student starts with the 1st locker, and while going down the hallway, opens all the lockers. The 2nd student starts with the 2nd locker, and while going down the hallway, shuts every other locker. The 3rd student stops at every 3rd locker and opens the locker if it is closed or shuts the locker if it is open. The 4th student stops at every 4th locker and opens the locker if it is closed or shuts the locker if it is open. This process continues through the 20th student, so that all 20 students in the class touch the lockers. Create a representation to show what you understand about this problem. Consider: How does your representation show lockers? How does your representation keep track of students who touch lockers? How does your representation show which lockers are open or closed?”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 3, Multiplying and Dividing Fractions, Lesson 9, Activity 2, students model with mathematics as they apply fraction multiplication to problems. Activity Narrative reads, “The goal of this activity is to examine calculations with measurements of a flag and try to figure out what question the calculations answer. The answers include units and this can serve as a guide to students. Since the first calculation has an answer in inches, the question it answers must ask for a length. Since the second calculation has an answer in square inches, the question it answers must ask for an area. This is an important step in solving the problems as students can then look at the diagram and the measurements and decide what the question could be. One important part of the modeling cycle (MP4) is interpreting information. That information may be presented in words or graphs or with mathematical symbols. In this case, students interpret equations in light of given numerical relationships and diagrams.” The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

    Students have opportunities to engage with MP4 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

    An example in Grade 3 includes:

    • Unit 6, Measuring Length, Time, Liquid Volume, and Weight, Lesson 14, Cool-Down, students reason about situations involving elapsed time. Student Task Statement reads, “1. A show at the carnival starts at 2:45 p.m. and lasts 47 minutes. What time does the show end? Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Another show that is 24 minutes long ends at 5:10 p.m. Kiran says that the show starts before 4:40 p.m. Do you agree? Explain or show your reasoning.” Preparation, Lesson Narrative reads, “In earlier lessons, students encountered and solved problems about time and liquid volume. In this lesson, students model with mathematics (MP4) as they determine quantities, questions, and solutions that make sense in given situations and that adhere to mathematical and real-world constraints when solving problems.”

    An example in Grade 4 includes:

    • Unit 1, Factors and Multiples, Lesson 6, Activity 1, students model with mathematics as they apply their knowledge of factors, multiples, prime numbers, and composite numbers to solve problems about a game involving opening and closing of lockers. Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is for students to visualize and make sense of the context of problems they will solve in the next activity. They will also consider representations that can be used to model the quantities and actions in the situation (MP4) and try creating them.” Student Task Statement reads, “The picture shows lockers in a school hallway. The 20 students in Tyler’s fourth-grade class play a game in a hallway that has 20 lockers in a row. The lockers are numbered from 1 to 20. The 1st student starts with the 1st locker, and while going down the hallway, opens all the lockers. The 2nd student starts with the 2nd locker, and while going down the hallway, shuts every other locker. The 3rd student stops at every 3rd locker and opens the locker if it is closed or shuts the locker if it is open. The 4th student stops at every 4th locker and opens the locker if it is closed or shuts the locker if it is open. This process continues through the 20th student, so that all 20 students in the class touch the lockers. Create a representation to show what you understand about this problem. Consider: How does your representation show lockers? How does your representation keep track of students who touch lockers? How does your representation show which lockers are open or closed?”

    An example in Grade 5 includes:

    Unit 3, Multiplying and Dividing Fractions, Lesson 9, Activity 2, students model with mathematics as they apply fraction multiplication to problems. Activity Narrative reads, “The goal of this activity is to examine calculations with measurements of a flag and try to figure out what question the calculations answer. The answers include units and this can serve as a guide to students. Since the first calculation has an answer in inches, the question it answers must ask for a length. Since the second calculation has an answer in square inches, the question it answers must ask for an area. This is an important step in solving the problems as students can then look at the diagram and the measurements and decide what the question could be. One important part of the modeling cycle (MP4) is interpreting information. That information may be presented in words or graphs or with mathematical symbols. In this case, students interpret equations in light of given numerical relationships and diagrams.” The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

    Students have opportunities to engage with MP4 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

    An example in Grade 3 includes:

    • Unit 6, Measuring Length, Time, Liquid Volume, and Weight, Lesson 14, Cool-Down, students reason about situations involving elapsed time. Student Task Statement reads, “1. A show at the carnival starts at 2:45 p.m. and lasts 47 minutes. What time does the show end? Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Another show that is 24 minutes long ends at 5:10 p.m. Kiran says that the show starts before 4:40 p.m. Do you agree? Explain or show your reasoning.” Preparation, Lesson Narrative reads, “In earlier lessons, students encountered and solved problems about time and liquid volume. In this lesson, students model with mathematics (MP4) as they determine quantities, questions, and solutions that make sense in given situations and that adhere to mathematical and real-world constraints when solving problems.”

    An example in Grade 4 includes:

    • Unit 1, Factors and Multiples, Lesson 6, Activity 1, students model with mathematics as they apply their knowledge of factors, multiples, prime numbers, and composite numbers to solve problems about a game involving opening and closing of lockers. Activity Narrative reads, “The purpose of this activity is for students to visualize and make sense of the context of problems they will solve in the next activity. They will also consider representations that can be used to model the quantities and actions in the situation (MP4) and try creating them.” Student Task Statement reads, “The picture shows lockers in a school hallway. The 20 students in Tyler’s fourth-grade class play a game in a hallway that has 20 lockers in a row. The lockers are numbered from 1 to 20. The 1st student starts with the 1st locker, and while going down the hallway, opens all the lockers. The 2nd student starts with the 2nd locker, and while going down the hallway, shuts every other locker. The 3rd student stops at every 3rd locker and opens the locker if it is closed or shuts the locker if it is open. The 4th student stops at every 4th locker and opens the locker if it is closed or shuts the locker if it is open. This process continues through the 20th student, so that all 20 students in the class touch the lockers. Create a representation to show what you understand about this problem. Consider: How does your representation show lockers? How does your representation keep track of students who touch lockers? How does your representation show which lockers are open or closed?”

    An example in Grade 5 includes:

    Unit 3, Multiplying and Dividing Fractions, Lesson 9, Activity 2, students model with mathematics as they apply fraction multiplication to problems. Activity Narrative reads, “The goal of this activity is to examine calculations with measurements of a flag and try to figure out what question the calculations answer. The answers include units and this can serve as a guide to students. Since the first calculation has an answer in inches, the question it answers must ask for a length. Since the second calculation has an answer in square inches, the question it answers must ask for an area. This is an important step in solving the problems as students can then look at the diagram and the measurements and decide what the question could be. One important part of the modeling cycle (MP4) is interpreting information. That information may be presented in words or graphs or with mathematical symbols. In this case, students interpret equations in light of given numerical relationships and diagrams.” Student Task Statement, “Han has a replica of the flag of Columbia. It is 3\frac{1}{2} inches wide and 5\frac{1}{4} inches long. The yellow stripe is \frac{1}{2} of the width of the flag. The blue and red stripes are each \frac{1}{4} of the width. 1. \frac{1}{4} \times 3\frac{1}{2}=\frac{7}{8}.  The answer is \frac{7}{8} inch. What is the question? 2. \frac{1}{2}\times 3\frac{1}{2}=\frac{7}{4} and \frac{7}{4}\times \frac{21}{4}=\frac{147}{16}.The answer is \frac{147}{16} square inches. What is the question?”

Indicator 2h.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics.

In every unit, the materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when modeling with mathematics through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for Multilingual Learners. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation are the Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice states, “Some instructional routines are generally associated with certain MPs. For example… The Estimation Exploration routine offers students opportunities to share a mathematical claim and the thinking behind it (MP3), and to make an estimate or a range of reasonable answers, with incomplete information, which is a part of modeling with mathematics (MP4).”

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistency employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP4 are:

  • MLR4 Information Gap: In a group, each student has different parts of a mathematical situation, and they work together to piece together that information orally or visually to bridge the gap between the parameters of the situation and a question to solve a mathematical problem. Through this questioning, students are breaking down the modeling process, identifying important information in the problem. 

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their own understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language. Through this discussion, students are modeling the situation with representations and describing what they do with the models. 

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions, which at times focuses on describing what students do with mathematical models. 

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 3, Wrapping Up Addition and Subtraction within 1,000, Lesson 19, Activity 1, students work in groups of 3 to match tape diagrams, equations, and word problems, and to explain the connection to model with mathematics. The activity is composed of several opportunities for students to use and develop language authentically through structured small group and whole-class discourse. The activity begins with each member of the small group choosing one word problem to independently read and make sense of the context. The materials do not provide language supports to aid MLLs with reading their chosen word problem. Then, the teacher prompts students to be ready to explain to their group how they have made sense of their chosen context; prompting students how they will use language in the future provides MLLs with time to translate in their heads, if needed, and mentally rehearse what they will share with their groups. After students work independently for 2 minutes, the teacher invites group members to share their thoughts with their group. The activity continues with small groups working together to match each word problem with a provided tape diagram, explaining the visual model (tape diagram) represents the quantities and relationships described in the word problem. Through this work time, the materials prompt teachers to provide opportunities for structured small group discourse through pausing the small group work three times, asking groups to answer probing questions that aim to support modeling with mathematics, such as, “How did you connect the diagrams to the situations?” The materials do not provide consistent language support for MLLs to participate fully in the structured small-group and whole-class discourse in which they model with mathematics. 

The materials partially meet the criteria for this Indicator because while the materials embed opportunities for students to engage with MP4 through the use of specific Instructional Routines and MLRs, the materials lack language supports during partner and whole-class discourse in which students are asked to model with mathematics.

Indicator 2i

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP5 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 4, Relating Multiplication to Division, Lesson 13, Cool-Down, students use appropriate tools strategically when they multiply within 100. Student Task Statement reads, “There were 6 buckets of sunflowers at the farmers market. Each bucket had 11 sunflowers. How many sunflowers were in the buckets? Show your thinking using objects, a drawing, or a diagram.” Activity 1 Narrative states, “This is the first time students have solved multiplication problems with numbers in this range, so they should be encouraged to use the tools provided to them during the lesson if they choose (MP5). Students should also be encouraged to use strategies and representations from the previous section.” This outlines the goal of working with tools throughout this lesson.

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 8, Properties of Two-dimensional Shapes, Lesson 9, Activity 1, students use tools strategically as they identify line symmetry and solve problems. Student Task Statement reads, “1. Mai has a piece of paper. She can get each of these 2 shapes by folding the paper once along a line of symmetry. What is the shape of the unfolded paper?” Activity Narrative states, “The first question offers opportunities to practice choosing tools strategically (MP5). Some students may wish to trace the half-figures on patty paper, to make cutouts of them, or to use other tools or techniques to reason about the original figure. Provide access to the materials and tools they might need.”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 6, More Decimal and Fraction Operations, Lesson 8, Cool-Down, students use an appropriate strategy as a tool to find solutions to problems involving addition and subtraction of fractions and then explain their strategy. Student Task Statement reads, “Find the value of each expression. Explain or show your reasoning. 1. \frac{5}{6}-\frac{1}{3}. 2. \frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{2}.” Activity 2 Narrative reads, “The approaches are sequenced from more concrete to more abstract to help students connect a variety of different, but familiar, representations as they make sense of adding and subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. Students, who choose to draw number lines or tape diagrams, use appropriate tools strategically (MP5). Aim to elicit both key mathematical ideas and a variety of student voices, especially students who haven’t shared recently.”

Indicator 2i.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose appropriate tools strategically.

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistently employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP5 are:

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their own understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language. Through this discussion, students are choosing appropriate tools or strategies and recognizing the pros and cons of each tool. 

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions, which at times focuses on describing how to use various tools.

Specifically, in Grade 3, Unit 3, Wrapping Up Addition and Subtraction within 1,000, Lesson 5, students work in partners to compare and contrast addition algorithms. The lesson includes multiple opportunities for students to engage in structured partner and whole-class discourse. The Warm-up begins with the Instructional Routine Notice and Wonder, in which students discuss an addition problem involving larger numbers. This discussion is designed to activate or build prior knowledge around place value understanding, supporting MLLs in anticipating language they may need when comparing algorithms later in the lesson. In Activity 1, students examine two worked examples that show different addition algorithms and engage in structured partner discourse comparing and contrasting the worked examples. The Activity Synthesis prompts the teacher to facilitate whole-group discourse using questions such as, “Where do you see the 8, 90, and 500 in Elena’s algorithm?” This supports students in analyzing how each algorithm represents place value concepts, which are key mathematical tools in this context. However, the materials do not include language supports to help MLLs explain how these tools are being used or to compare them effectively during discourse. Activity 2 follows a similar structure. A note titled Access for Multilingual Learners suggests the use of MLR8 Discussion Supports, which encourages the teacher to provide MLLs an opportunity to orally rehearse with a partner before contributing to the whole-group discussion. While this support is beneficial, it is not paired with specific guidance on how MLLs might talk about tool use or choose between different representations to solve problems. In summary, while the lesson engages students in reasoning about multiple tools—such as expanded notation and algorithmic strategies—it does not consistently provide the language supports necessary for MLLs to fully and strategically engage in selecting and discussing those tools, limiting the development of MP5.

The materials partially meet the criteria for this Indicator because while the materials embed opportunities for students to engage with MP5 through the use of specific MLRs, the materials lack language supports during partner and whole-class discourse in which students are asked to choose appropriate tools strategically.

Indicator 2j

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP6 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 3, Wrapping Up Addition and Subtraction Within 1,000, Lesson 8, Cool-Down, students use accuracy and precision when they use base-ten diagrams to make sense of a written subtraction algorithm. The Student Task Statement reads, “Explain how the diagram matches the algorithm.” Activity 2 Narrative reads, “As students work, encourage them to refine their descriptions of what is happening in both the diagrams and the algorithms, using more precise language and mathematical terms (MP6).”

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 7, Angle and Angle Measurement, Lesson 1, Cool-Down, students attend to precise mathematical language as they describe a drawing to a partner. Activity Narrative reads “The purpose of this activity is to motivate a need for more precise geometric language. Students work with a partner to replicate given geometric images—one partner describes the images and the other draws them, solely based on the verbal descriptions from their partner. Students do this over several rounds, switching roles after two rounds. As students attempt to produce more accurate drawings, they try to fine-tune their descriptions. They notice that more specific language or terminology is needed to better describe the features in the images (MP6).” Student Task Statement reads, “Here is a drawing on a card: Write a description of the drawing that could be used by a classmate to make a copy.” Student Response reads, “Sample response: Draw two diagonal lines: one from the top left corner to the bottom right, and another from the bottom left corner to the top right. Draw a line that goes up and down through the point where the two diagonal lines cross. From the top of that line, draw a line to the bottom right corner. The bottom segment of the up-and-down line is thicker than the rest of the lines. The lines make a lot of triangles of different sizes.”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 4, Wrapping Up Multiplication and Division with Multi-Digit Numbers, Lesson 6, Cool-Down, students attend to precision when they apply the standard algorithm for multiplication. Student Task Statement reads, “Use the standard algorithm to find the product 251\times34.” Activity Narrative states, “The goal of this activity is to multiply numbers with no restrictions on the number of new units composed. Students first multiply a three-digit number by a one-digit number and a three-digit number by a two-digit number, with no ones. They then can put these two results together to find the product of a three-digit number and two-digit number ,with many compositions. They then solve another three-digit-number-by-two-digit-number example, with no scaffolding. Because these calculations have new units composed in almost every place value, students will need to locate and use the composed units carefully. It gives students a reason to attend to the features of their calculation and to use language precisely (MP6).”

Indicator 2j.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision.

In every unit, the materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when attending to precision through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for English Language Learners. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation are the Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide, 3. What’s in an IM Lesson, describes how the Instructional Routines Card Sort and Which Three Go Together? support MP6. Card Sort states, “Students sort cards on their own or in groups of 2–4. They organize objects into categories or groups, based on shared characteristics or connections. As students work, monitor for the different ways groups choose their categories, and encourage increasingly precise mathematical language (MP6).” Which Three Go Together? states, “Which Three Go Together fosters a need for students to identify defining attributes and use language precisely in order to compare and contrast a carefully chosen group of geometric figures, images, or other mathematical representations (MP6).”

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistency employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP6 are:

  • MLR2 Collect and Display: Students access their own and others’ mathematical ideas as the teacher scribes the vocabulary, strategies, and concepts students use during partner, small group, or whole-class discourse.

  • MLR4 Information Gap: In a group, each student has different parts of a mathematical situation, and they work together to piece together that information orally or visually to bridge the gap between the parameters of the situation and a question to solve a mathematical problem. This process prompts students to refine the language they use to ask increasingly more precise questions until they get useful input.

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions that support using precise terms, such as:

    • Revoicing or rephrasing.

    • Pressing for details.

    • Providing sentence frames.

    • Modeling a think-aloud.

    • Providing think time to allow for mental or oral rehearsal.

For example, in Grade 4, Unit 7, Angles and Angle Measurements, Lesson 15, Activity 2, students work with partners to solve abstract, multi-step problems involving angle measurements. The Launch directs the teacher to facilitate MLR4 Information Gap using one Problem Card and one Data Card. MLR4 is structured to allow for 1-2 minutes of intentional think-time between steps, supporting MLLs by allowing time to translate in their heads, if needed, and mentally rehearse before engaging in whole-class discussions. Students continue using MLR4 wih new Problem and Data Cards at their own pace in pairs. The routine includes a visual diagram and sentence frames (e.g., “I need to know ____ because…”) that support MLLs in engaging in mathematically precise questioning and reasoning during partner discussion.  

Generally, the materials invite students to engage with a mathematical concept, both through speaking and listening during mathematical discourse and through the use of visuals or manipulatives, before attaching a precise new vocabulary term to the concept. For example, Grade 5, Unit 1, Finding Volume, Lesson 1 introduces students to the concept of volume by building on their understanding of area and multiplication. The Warm-up uses the Instructional Routine Which Three Go Together? to activate prior knowledge about comparing area and volume. The Warm-up supports MLLs with activating or building prior knowledge around the language needed to communicate about area and multiplication. Activity 1 invites students to work independently and in partners to compare sets of two drawings of cubes in various arrangements, using everyday language such as bigger and wider. A note titled Access for English Language Learners suggests the use of MLR2 Collect and Display, in which the teacher circulates to listen for, record, and display comparison words students use such as bigger, longer, wider, and more than. This provides support for MLLs to fully participate in partner discussions, eventually connecting these everyday terms to the precise mathematical term volume. The activity concludes with the Activity Synthesis, where the teacher is directed to provide a student-friend definition of the term volume.  

The materials include a student-facing glossary that contains the printed word and the student-friendly definition. Under the section labeled Support, the materials provide all of the glossary terms as vocabulary cards. The materials state, “This lesson plan contains all of the vocabulary cards for terms introduced in Grade 5, Unit 1. Some ways to use this lesson plan include: projecting or assigning to students as a review of vocabulary prior to the end-of-unit assessment, printing in ‘Handout’ format to create labels for a word wall, printing in ‘Reference’ format as a note-taking tool for students.” Vocabulary cards are referenced at point-of-use within lessons with a Teaching Note that says, “OPTIONAL: Use this card to introduce or review the vocabulary in this lesson.” 

Indicator 2k

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP7 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 8, Putting It All Together, Lesson 1, Cool-Down, students use structure to determine if the three representations all show the same fractional value. Preparation, Lesson Narrative reads, “In previous lessons, students learned how to represent fractions with area diagrams, fraction strips, and number lines. In this lesson, students revisit each representation in an estimation context. Students have an opportunity to think about how to partition each representation to decide what fraction is shown (MP7). Additionally, if time allows and it seems of benefit to students’ understanding, there is an option after each activity to find the exact value of the fraction in the Task Statement.” Student Task Statement reads, “Could the shaded part of the shape, the point on the number line, and the shaded part of the diagram all represent the same fraction? Explain your reasoning.” Students see a diamond, a number line, and a diagram that do not all represent the same fraction.

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 9, Putting It All Together, Lesson 1, Cool-Down, students look for and make use of structure as they reason about sums of fractions. Preparation, Lesson Narrative reads, “In this lesson, students practice multiplying a fraction and a whole number and adding and subtracting fractions, including mixed numbers. They rely on their understanding of equivalence and the properties of operations to decompose fractions, whole numbers, and mixed numbers to enable comparison, addition, subtraction, and multiplication (MP7).” Student Task Statement reads, “Here are some fractions: \frac{15}{10}, \frac{13}{10}, \frac{53}{100}, \frac{9}{10}. 1. Select two fractions that have a sum greater than 2. Explain or show your reasoning. 2. Use all four fractions to write an expression that has a value greater than 1 but less than 2.”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 5, Place Value Patterns and Decimal Operations, Lesson 2, Warm-Up, students look for and make use of structure as they use a hundreds grid to estimate a shaded region. Activity Narrative reads, “When students reflect about how the hundredths grid could help refine their estimate, they observe the value and power of its structure (MP7).” Launch states, “Groups of 2. Display the image. ‘What is an estimate that’s too high? Too low? About right?’ 1 minute: quiet think time.” The Student Task Statement reads, “How much of the square is shaded?” Activity Synthesis reads, “‘Why is estimating the shaded region more difficult without the grid lines of a hundredths grid?’ (The grid lines show me the tenths and hundredths. Without grid lines, I can only guess or estimate.)”

Indicator 2k.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure.

In every unit, the materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when looking for and making use of structure through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for English Language Learners. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation are the Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide,  What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, describes how the Instructional Routines Card Sort, Choral Count, How Many Do You See?, Number Talk, and True or False? support MP7. Card Sort states, “A card-sorting task gives students opportunities to analyze representations, statements, and structures closely, and make connections (MP2 and MP7).” Choral Count states, “While Choral Counting offers students the opportunity to practice verbal counting, the recorded count is the primary focus of the routine. As students reflect on the recorded count, they make observations, predict upcoming numbers in the count, and justify their reasoning (MP7 and MP3). How Many Do You See? states, “How Many Do You See helps early math learners develop an understanding of counting and quantity through subitizing and combining parts of sets to find the total in a whole collection. In later grades, this routine encourages students to use operations and groupings that make finding the total number of dots faster. Through these recorded strategies, students look for relationships between the operations and their properties (MP7).” Number Talk states, “The sequence of problems in a Number Talk encourages students to look for structure and use repeated reasoning to evaluate expressions and develop computational fluency (MP7 and MP8).” Finally, True or False? states, “The True or False routine structure encourages students to reason about numerical expressions and equations using base-ten structure, meaning and properties of operations, and the meaning of the equal sign. Often, students can determine whether an equation or inequality is true or false without doing any direct computation (MP7).” 

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistency employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP7 are:

  • MLR4 Information Gap: In a group, each student has different parts of a mathematical situation, and they work together to piece together that information orally or visually to bridge the gap between the parameters of the situation and a question to solve a mathematical problem. Through this questioning, students are breaking down steps in multistep problems.

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their own understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language. Through this discussion, students are analyzing a problem with several different approaches. 

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions, which at times provides sentence frames to support students with describing what patterns or structures they notice. 

Expanding on the sentence frames occasionally provided in MLR8 Discussion Supports, the Course Guide,  Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners contains a table with sample sentence frames and sentence starters for five language functions. The language functions of comparing and contrasting are directly related to MP7. These sentence frames support interdisciplinary language connections since they are generic in nature. This section of the Course Guide states, “The table shows examples of generic sentence frames that can support common disciplinary language functions across a variety of content topics. Some of the lessons in these materials include suggestions of additional sentence frames that could support the specific content and language functions of that lesson.” The materials do not reference these sentence frames within lessons at point-of-use. 

Indicator 2l

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards. 

Students have opportunities to engage with MP8 across the year, and it is often explicitly identified for teachers within the Teacher Course Guide (Standards for Mathematical Practice) and within specific lessons (Preparation Narratives and Lesson Activities’ Narratives). According to the Teacher Course Guide, Standards for Mathematical Practice, “The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MP) describe the types of thinking and behaviors in which students engage as they do mathematics. Throughout the curriculum, the Teacher Guide identifies lessons and activities in which to observe the different MPs. The unit-level Mathematical Practice chart is meant to highlight a handful of lessons in each unit that showcase certain MPs. Some units, due to their size or the nature of their content, have fewer predicted chances for students to engage in a particular MP, indicated in the chart by a dash.” 

An example in Grade 3 includes:

  • Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, Lesson 2, Cool-Down, students use repeated reasoning as they partition shapes into equal parts. The Student Task Statement reads “1. Label each part with the correct fraction. 2. Partition and shade the rectangle to show \frac{1}{4}.” Activity 1 Narrative states, “When students make halves, fourths, and eighths, they observe regularity in repeated reasoning as each piece is subdivided into two equal pieces. They observe the same relationship between thirds and sixths (MP8).” The Cool-Down provides an opportunity to demonstrate this reasoning.

An example in Grade 4 includes:

  • Unit 3, Extending Operations to Fractions, Lesson 7, Activity 2, students use repeated reasoning as they decompose fractions to find sums. Activity Narrative states, “In the previous activity, students saw that a fraction can be decomposed into a sum of fractions with the same denominator and that it can be done in more than one way. In this activity, they record such decompositions as equations. The last question prompts students to consider whether any fraction can be written as a sum of smaller fractions with the same denominator. Students see that only non-unit fractions (with a numerator greater than 1) can be decomposed that way. Students observe regularity in repeated reasoning as they decompose the numerator, 9, into different parts while the denominator in all cases is 5 (MP8).” Activity states, “‘Take a few quiet minutes to complete the activity. Then, share your responses with your partner.’ 5–6 minutes: independent work time. 3–4 minutes: partner discussion. Monitor for different explanations students offer for the last question.” Student Task Statement reads, “1. Use different combinations of fifths to make a sum of \frac{9}{5}. a. \frac{9}{5} = ___ + ___ + ___ + ___ + ___ b. \frac{9}{5} = ___ + ___ + ___ + ___ c. \frac{9}{5} = ___ + ___ + ___ d. \frac{9}{5}= ___ + ___ 2. Write different ways to use thirds to make a sum of \frac{4}{3}}. How many can you find? Write an equation for each combination. 3. Is it possible to write any fraction with a denominator of 5 as a sum of other fifths? Explain or show your reasoning.” Activity Synthesis states, “Invite students to share their equations. Display or record them for all to see. Next discuss students' responses to the last question. Select students with different explanations to share their reasoning. If not mentioned by students, highlight that fractions with a numerator of 1 (unit fractions) cannot be further decomposed into smaller fractions with the same denominator because it is already the smallest fractional part. Other fractions, with a numerator other than 1 (non-unit fractions), can be decomposed into fractions with the same denominator.”

An example in Grade 5 includes:

  • Unit 4, Wrapping Up Multiplication and Division with Multi-Digit Numbers, Lesson 12, Activity 2, students use repeated reasoning as they use partial quotients to divide up to four-digit dividends by a two-digit divisor. The Student Task Statement reads, “Estimate the value of each quotient. Then use a partial-quotients algorithm to find the value. 1. A reasonable estimate for 612\div34 is: 2. A reasonable estimate for 536\div23 is: 3. A reasonable estimate for 1,044\div29 is: ” Activity Narrative states, “Before finding the quotient, students estimate the value of the quotient, which helps students both decide which partial quotients to use and evaluate the reasonableness of their solution (MP8). ” Activity Synthesis states, “Ask 2–3 students to share their work showing different partial quotients for the same problem. ‘How can you make sure that the whole-number quotient you got at the end is reasonable?’ (It should be close to my estimate. I can multiply the quotient and divisor and that should give me the dividend.) If students share with other partners, ask: ‘How did explaining your work to others help you today?’ or ‘What did someone say today that helped you in your understanding of division?’ (I learned that it’s okay to take more steps because I was comfortable with the multiples I used.)”

Indicator 2l.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

In every unit, the materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. The materials provide these opportunities through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as a suggested support in notes titled Access for English Language Learners. One example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation is the use of Instructional Routines. Specifically, the Course Guide,  What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, describes how the Instructional Routine Number Talk supports MP8. Number Talk states, “The sequence of problems in a Number Talk encourages students to look for structure and use repeated reasoning to evaluate expressions and develop computational fluency (MP7 and MP8).”

As described in the report for 1d.MLL, the materials consistency employ Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] by Stanford University UL/SCALE. The specific MLRs that directly support MP8 are:

  • MLR7 Compare and Connect: Students identify, compare, and contrast their own understandings with other students’ mathematical approaches, representations, concepts, examples, and language. Through this discussion, students notice repeated calculations or evaluate the reasonableness of answers.

  • MLR8 Discussion Supports: Teachers provide a variety of supports to foster inclusive whole-class discussions, which at times provides sentence frames to support students with describing a general formula or algorithm.

For example, in Grade 3, Unit 7, Two-Dimensional Shapes and Perimeter, Lesson 6, students work independently and in partners to engage with the concept of perimeter for the first time by determining the number of paper clips it takes to line all of the side lengths of flat shapes. As students repeat this measurement process across shapes, they are prompted to observe that the total count of units around a shape’s boundary remains consistent—allowing them to generalize and define perimeter based on that repeated reasoning. The Warm-up begins with the Instructional Routine Notice and Wonder in which students engage in structured partner and whole-group discussions to make a prediction about the number of paper clips it would take to line all of the side lengths of a trapezoid. This Warm-up supports MLLs with anticipating the geometric language needed to explain reasoning about calculating perimeter later in the lesson. Activity 1 directs the teacher to give students a concrete experience of lining the side lengths of flat shapes with paper clips. Students work in small groups and apply self-selected strategies to determine the number of paper clips needed for each shape. The Activity Synthesis directs the teacher to facilitate whole-class discourse in which students share their answers and strategies and the teacher defines the term perimeter with a student-friendly definition. The materials do not provide language supports to aid MLLs’ full participation in their small groups or in the whole-class discourse. Activity 2 invites students to work first independently and then in partners to determine the perimeter of shapes on a grid and explain or show their reasoning. The Activity Synthesis for Activity 2 mirrors the Activity Synthesis for Activity 1. A note titled Access for Multilingual Learners suggests the use of MLR8 Discussion Supports in which the teacher optionally invites MLLs to chorally repeat phrases to support the transfer of new vocabulary to long-term memory. The materials do not provide language support to aid MLLs with independently write their reasoning for their calculated perimeters, express what they notice, engage in partner discussions, or participate fully in whole-class discourse. 

The materials partially meet the criteria for this Indicator because while the materials embed opportunities for students to engage with MP8 through the use of specific Instructional Routines and MLRs, the materials lack language supports during partner and whole-class discourse in which students are asked to look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.