3rd-5th Grade - Gateway 3
Back to 3rd-5th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Teacher and Student Supports
Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 100% |
|---|---|
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports | 10 / 10 |
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports | 6 / 6 |
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design |
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 meet expectations for Teacher & Student Supports. The materials meet expectations for Criterion 1, Teacher Supports, Criterion 2, Student Supports and Criterion 3, Intentional Design.
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize with integrity to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 meet expectations for Teacher Supports. The materials provide clear guidance through useful annotations and suggestions for enacting both student and ancillary materials. They include explanations and examples of grade-level concepts and standards, along with how these connect to prior and future grade levels, supporting teacher content knowledge. A year-long scope and sequence is provided, along with standards correlation information. The materials offer strategies for communicating with stakeholders and suggestions to support student progress. Additionally, they explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and clarify the role of the standards. A comprehensive list of required supplies is included, as well as multiple opportunities for assessing student learning, guidance for interpreting performance, and suggestions for follow-up instruction.
Indicator 3a
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in engaging students to guide their mathematical development.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in order to guide their mathematical development.
The Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook) contains sections titled What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, Key Structures in This Course, Scope and Sequence for Grade 3 through Grade 5, and Pacing Guide and Dependency Chart which provide instructional guidance related to the use of student and ancillary materials. Examples include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Key Structures in This Course, Coherent Progression, “Each unit starts with an invitation to the mathematics. The first few lessons provide an accessible entry point for all students and offer the opportunity to observe students’ prior understandings. Each lesson starts with a Warm-Up to activate students’ prior knowledge and to set up the work of the day. This is followed by instructional activities in which students are introduced to new concepts, procedures, contexts, or representations, or make connections between them. The Lesson Synthesis at the end consolidates understanding and makes the learning goals of the lesson explicit. In the Cool-Down that follows, students apply what they learned. Each activity starts with a Launch that gives all students access to the task. Independent work time follows, allowing them to grapple with problems individually before working in small groups. In the Activity Synthesis at the end, students consolidate their learning by making connections between their work and the mathematical goals. Each activity includes carefully chosen contexts and numbers that support the coherent sequence of learning goals in the lesson.”
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Key Structures in This Course, Principles of IM Curriculum Design, Productive Discussions states, "Promoting productive and meaningful conversations between students and teachers is essential to success in a problem-based classroom. To facilitate these conversations, the Imagine IM curriculum incorporates the framework presented in 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions (Smith & Stein, 2011). The 5 Practices are: anticipating, monitoring, selecting, sequencing, and making connections between students’ responses. All Imagine IM lessons support the practices of anticipating, monitoring, and selecting students’ work to share during whole-group discussions. In lessons in which students make connections between representations, strategies, concepts, and procedures, the Lesson Narrative and the Activity Narrative support the practices of sequencing and connecting as well, and the lesson is tagged so that these opportunities are easily identifiable. For additional opportunities to connect students’ work, look for activities tagged with MLR7 Compare and Connect. Similar to the 5 Practices routine, MLR7 supports the practices of monitoring, selecting, and making connections. In curriculum workshops and PLCs, rehearse and reflect on enacting the 5 Practices."
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, Narratives Tell The Story states, “The story of each grade is told in eight or nine units. Each unit has a narrative that describes the mathematical work that will unfold in that unit. Each lesson and each activity in the unit also has a narrative. The Lesson Narrative explains: The mathematical content of the lesson and its place in the learning sequence. The meaning of any new terms introduced in the lesson. How the mathematical practices come into play, as appropriate. The Activity Narrative explains: The mathematical purpose of the activity and its place in the learning sequence. What students are doing during the activity. What to look for, while students are working on an activity, to orchestrate an effective Activity Synthesis. Connections to the mathematical practices, when appropriate.”
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Scope and Sequence for Grade 3 through Grade 5, lists each of the eight units, explains connections to prior learning, describes the progression of learning throughout the unit, and the integration of new terminology/vocabulary throughout each unit.
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Pacing Guides and Dependency Diagrams, shows the interconnectedness between lessons and units within Grade 3 and across all grades.
The Grade 3 through Grade 5 Glossary, provides a visual glossary for teachers that includes both definitions and illustrations.
Materials include sufficient annotations and suggestions presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include:
In Grade 3, Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, Lesson 17, Warm-Up, provides teachers guidance on how to work with estimation and fractions. Launch states, “Groups of 2. Display the image. ‘What is an estimate that’s too high? Too low? About right?’ 1 minute: quiet think time. Activity, ‘Discuss your thinking with your partner.’ 1 minute: partner discussion. Record responses. Activity Synthesis, Consider asking: ‘Is anyone’s estimate less than ¼ inch? Is anyone’s estimate greater than ½ inch? Based on this discussion, does anyone want to revise their estimate?’”
In Grade 4, Unit 7, Angles and Angle Measurement, Lesson 13, Lesson Synthesis provides teachers guidance on how to help students find unknown measurements by composing or decomposing known measurements. “‘Today we used different operations to find the measurements of different angles.’ Display: ‘Here are some angles whose measurements we tried to find: Angle P, Angle S and some angles composed of smaller angles. We used different operations to find the unknown measurements.’ ‘Which of these angles can we find by using division?’ (Angle P: If we know that 2 copies of P make a right angle, which is 90°, then dividing 90° by 2 gives us the measure of P.) ‘Which unknown angle can we find by multiplication?’ (The angle made up of four 30° angles has a measurement of 430.) ‘Which unknown angle can we find by subtracting one angle from another? (Angle S: We can subtract 30° from 180° and divide by 2 to find the measure of S, which is 75°.) ‘Which unknown angle can we find by adding known angles?’ (Once we know the measure of angle S we can find the last angle: 15+75+15, which is 105°)’”
In Grade 5, Unit 1, Finding Volume, Lesson 4, Activity 1, teachers are provided context to help students reason about the volume of prisms. Narrative states, “This activity continues to develop the idea of decomposing rectangular prisms into layers. Students explicitly multiply the number of cubes in a base layer by the number of layers. Students can use any layer in the prism as the base layer as long as the height is the number of those base layers.” Launch states, “Groups of 2. Display the first image from the student book. ‘What do you know about the volume of this prism?’ ‘What would you need to find out to find the exact volume of this prism?’ ‘You are going to work with prisms that are only partially filled in this activity.’ Give students access to connecting cubes.” Activity states, “5 minutes: independent work time. 5 minutes: partner work time. Monitor for students who: Notice that Prisms A and D and Prisms B and C are ‘the same’ but sitting on different faces, so the layers might be counted in different ways. Reason about the partially filled prisms by referring to the cubes in one layer they would see if all of the cubes were shown. Recognize that there are several different layers they can use to determine the volume of a prism, all of which result in the same volume.”
Indicator 3b
Materials contain explanations and examples of grade-level/course-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade/course levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for containing adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the current grade so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The Further Reading section, located within the Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), connects research to pedagogy. It includes explanations and examples of both grade-level and above-grade-level content to support teacher understanding. Additionally, Unit Overviews, Lesson Narratives, and Activity Synthesis sections throughout the lessons provide similar support, offering explanations and examples of how grade-level concepts connect to content in other grade levels.
Examples in Grade 3 include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Further Reading, Unit 1, Ratio Tables are not Elementary supports teachers with context for work beyond the grade. The materials state, “In this blog post, McCallum discusses the difference between multiplication tables and tables of equivalent ratios, highlighting how K–5 arithmetic work prepares students to make sense of these tables.”
Unit 6, Measuring Length, Time, Lesson 16, Activity 1, Narrative states, “The purpose of this activity is for students to use the provided materials to design their own game. Students decide the rules and objectives of the game. After playing the game at least once, students revise their design to include two of the following elements: measuring elapsed time, measuring distance, multiplication or division within 100, addition or subtraction within 1,000. If there is time, a pair of students from each group can swap with another group at different points of this activity so they have an opportunity to play a different game.”
Examples in Grade 4 include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Further Reading, Unit 7, Making Peace with the Basics of Trigonometry supports teachers with context for work beyond the grade. The materials state, “In this blog post, Phillips highlights how student exploration in trigonometry allows them to see that trigonometric ratios come from measuring real triangles, fostering conceptual understanding. This blog is included in this unit as an example of how concepts of angle come into play in mathematics beyond elementary school.”
Unit 6, Multiplying and Dividing Multi-digit Numbers, Lesson 25, About this lesson, Lesson Narrative states, “In the final lesson of the unit, students apply their knowledge of numbers in base-ten and their estimation and computation skills to solve problems about languages and populations in the United States. The census data used here prompts students to work with large numbers and to interpret them carefully.”
Examples in Grade 5 include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Further Reading, Unit 3, Why is a negative times a negative a positive? supports teachers with context for work beyond the grade. The materials state, “In this blog post, McCallum discusses how the ‘rule’ for multiplying negative numbers is grounded in the distributive property.”
Unit 6, More Decimals and Fraction Operations, Lesson 21, About this lesson, Lesson Narrative states, “This lesson is optional because it does not address any new mathematical content standards. This lesson does provide students with an opportunity to apply precursor skills of mathematical modeling. In this lesson, students brainstorm and define categories of how to spend time. Then they collect and represent data on a line plot. They analyze and describe the data to tell a story about the use of time.”
Indicator 3c
Materials include a year-long scope and sequence with standards correlation information.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade K meet expectations for including a year-long scope and sequence with standards’ correlation information. Examples include:
The Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook) includes multiple components that support planning and understanding of the program’s structure and standards alignment. Examples include:
The Scope and Sequence section narratively outlines unit content, prior knowledge, future learning, and terminology. The materials state, “The big ideas in IM Grade 3 include: developing understanding of multiplication and division, and strategies for multiplication and division within 100; developing understanding of fractions, especially unit fractions (fractions with numerator 1); developing understanding of the structure of rectangular arrays and of area; and describing and analyzing two-dimensional shapes.”
Additional Grade 3 examples include:
Lessons by Standard provides a table that shows each content standard for the grade level and the lessons in which it appears. For example, 3.OA.A.1 is addressed in Unit 1, Lessons 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, and 19; Unit 2, Lesson 1; and Unit 8, Lesson 13.
Standards by Lesson provides a table listing the standards covered within each lesson. For example, Unit 8, Lesson 9 addresses 3.MD.C.7; 3.OA.B.5; and 3.OA.C.7.
Standards for Mathematical Practice, mapping practice standards (MPs) to lessons. For example, Unit 4, Lesson 4 integrates MP2, and MP6.
Additional Grade 4 examples include:
Lessons by Standard provides a table that shows each content standard for the grade level and the lessons in which it appears. For example, 4.NBT.B.4 is addressed in Unit 4, Lessons 10, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23; Unit 6, Lessons 24 and 25; and Unit 9, Lessons 4 and 9.
Standards by Lesson provides a table listing the standards covered within each lesson. For example, Unit 5, Lesson 2 addresses 4.OA.A.1 and 4.OA.A.2.
Standards for Mathematical Practice, mapping practice standards (MPs) to lessons. For example, Unit 3, Lesson 6 integrates MP2, and MP3.
Additional Grade 5 examples include:
Lessons by Standard provides a table that shows each content standard for the grade level and the lessons in which it appears. For example, 5.NF.B.5 is addressed in Unit 6, Lesson 20.
Standards by Lesson provides a table listing the standards covered within each lesson. For example, Unit 3, Lesson 9 addresses 5.NF.B.4.a and 5.NF.B.6.
Standards for Mathematical Practice, mapping practice standards (MPs) to lessons. For example, Unit 5, Lesson 14 integrates MP5, and MP8.
In addition, the Pacing Guide and Dependency Chart within the Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook) outlines the number of lessons and suggested teaching days per unit, supporting year-long planning and implementation. Each lesson includes references to the standards addressed and often notes how the lesson builds on prior learning.
Indicator 3d
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Indicator 3e
Materials explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and explain the role of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for explaining the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and explain the role of the standards. Examples include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Problem-Based Teaching and Learning states, “Imagine Illustrative Mathematics (Imagine IM) is a problem-based curriculum that fosters the development of mathematics learning communities in classrooms, gives students access to the mathematics through a coherent progression, and offers teachers the opportunity to deepen their knowledge of mathematics, students’ thinking, and their own teaching practice. The curriculum and the professional-learning materials support students’ and teachers’ learning, respectively. This document defines the principles that guide IM’s approach to mathematics teaching and learning. It then outlines how each component of the curriculum supports teaching and learning, based on these principles.”
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Problem-Based Teaching and Learning, Learning Mathematics by Doing Mathematics states, “Students learn mathematics as a result of solving problems. Mathematical ideas are the outcomes of the problem-solving experience rather than the elements that must be taught before problem solving” (Hiebert et al., 1996). A problem-based instructional framework supports teachers in structuring lessons so students are the problem solvers learning the mathematics.”
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Key Structures in This Course, Coherent Progression states, “The basic architecture of the materials supports all learners through a coherent progression of the mathematics, based both on the standards and on research-based learning trajectories. Activities and lessons are parts of a mathematical story that spans units and grade levels. This coherence allows students to view mathematics as a connected set of ideas that makes sense.”
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), What’s in an Imagine IM Lesson, Instructional routines (IRs) in the materials are designed to promote student engagement in mathematical conversations through predictable, discourse-driven structures. Instructional Routines state, “enacted in classrooms to structure the relationship between the teacher and the students around content in ways that consistently maintain high expectations of student learning while adapting to the contingencies of particular instructional interactions” (Kazemi, Franke, & Lampert, 2009). A small, intentionally selected set of IRs is used throughout the curriculum to support consistent implementation and reduce cognitive load for teachers. Each routine is aligned to specific unit, lesson, or activity learning goals and is intended to support student access to mathematics by requiring them to think and communicate mathematically. Routines are identified by name within activities, and professional learning includes classroom videos and opportunities for educators to observe, practice, and reflect on their use.
Indicator 3e.MLL
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs and the identification of the research-based strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM meet the expectations that materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) and the identification of research-based strategies. The materials frame their MLL approach and support throughout the program for the explicit purpose of ensuring they are able to meet grade-level standards.
Specifically, within the Course Guide, Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners, the materials state that problem-based math classrooms are rich in language and require students to use multiple forms of communication, such as reading, writing, speaking, and listening, to make sense of mathematical ideas. The materials outline that students are expected to explain their thinking, make arguments, and engage in discussions. To support MLLs, the materials state that they integrate language development with math learning, creating inclusive, language-rich environments that encourage participation from all students. The materials state, “This table reflects the attention and support for language development at different levels of the curriculum:
Course:
Foundation of curriculum: theory of action and design principles that drive a continuous focus on language development.
Student glossary of terms.
Lesson:
Language goals, embedded in learning goals, describe the language demands of the lesson.
Definitions of new glossary terms.
Activity:
Strategies to support access for English learners, based on the language demands of the activity.
Math language routines.”
Then, this section of the Course Guide continues to explicitly reference research from Stanford University's UL/SCALE initiative, particularly the framework outlined in Principles for the Design of Mathematics Curricula: Promoting Language and Content Development. This citation anchors the materials’ MLL approach in four research-based design principles:
Principle 1: Support sense-making- Scaffold tasks and amplify language so students can make their own meaning.
Principle 2: Optimize Output - Strengthen opportunities for students to describe their mathematical thinking to others, orally, visually, and in writing.
Principle 3: Cultivate Conversation - Strengthen opportunities for constructive mathematical conversations.
Principle 4: Maximize Meta-awareness - Strengthen the meta-connections and distinctions between mathematical ideas, reasoning, and language.
The materials state, "These design principles and related mathematical language routines ensure language development is an integral part of planning and delivering instruction. Moreover, they work together to guide teachers to amplify the important language that students are expected to know and use in each unit.”
As the report for 1d.MLL describes, the materials incorporate Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) by Stanford University’s UL/SCALE as their primary research-based strategy. For example, in Grade 3, Unit 7, Two-dimensional Shapes and Perimeter, Lesson 3, Activity 2 features a note titled Access for Multilingual Learners that suggests the use of MLR 8 Discussion Supports, which directs teachers to use think-alouds and gestures to connect geometric language to concepts. Similarly, MLR 1 Stronger and Clearer and MLR 6 Three Reads appear throughout the curriculum, each tied to specific research by scholars like Zwiers and Kelemanik.
Additionally, the Course Guide, Key Structures in This Course contains a section titled Teaching Moves to Support Math Community. This section outlines some of the research-based student and teacher vital actions as authored by the SERP Institute (see report for 1d.MLL). One of the seven student vital actions listed is “English learners produce language,” which pulls from research from Barwell, Moschovich, and Savignon. The materials list the following corresponding vital teacher actions:
“Provide multiple contexts for everyday words that have precise mathematical meaning, and invite students to explain what the word refers to in each context. Ask them to use the word to make connections between the different representations.
Encourage students to use language to construct meaning from representations, with prompts such as:
“Explain where you see (length, ten, oranges) in the (figure, equation, table). How do you know it represents the same thing?”
Ensure that every student speaks, listens, reads, and writes.”
In summary, the materials clearly articulate their MLL approach through direct research references and implement consistent, classroom-ready strategies (e.g., MLRs) that are both research-based and practically embedded across units. Therefore, the materials meet the criteria of providing explanations of the instructional approaches for MLLs and the identification of research-based strategies.
Indicator 3f
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook) includes a comprehensive Required Materials list detailing all materials needed for the grade-level content. Each unit also provides a Planning Map, which outlines the materials required throughout the unit. At the lesson level, the Materials tab specifies what is needed for that specific lesson. This information can also be found within the About This Lesson tab. If no materials are required, the section will either be left blank or state "none."
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, Lesson 4, About this lesson, Materials to gather, “Activity 2: Materials for creating a display.” Materials to copy, “Activity 1: Secret Fraction Stage 1 Directions (groups of 2), Activity 1: Secret Fraction Stage 1 Cards (groups of 2).” Required Preparation, “Activity 1: Create a set of cards from the blackline master for each group of 2 students.”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Unit 2, Fraction Equivalence and Comparison, Lesson 17, About this lesson, Materials to gather, “Activity 1: Markers, Paper, Paper clips, Tape (painter's or masking), Activity 2: Markers, Paper, Paper clips, Tape (painter's or masking).” Required Preparation, “Activity 1 and 2: Each group of 2 needs 1-inch paper strips and 10–12 paper clips.”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Unit 6, Shapes on the Coordinate Grid, Lesson 14, Activity 1, Materials to gather, “Paper clips, Pencils.”
Indicator 3g
The assessment system provides consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
Each End-of-Unit Assessment and the End-of-Course Assessment include answer keys and standards alignment to support teachers in interpreting student understanding. According to the Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook) and Assessment Guidance, “All summative-assessment problems include a complete solution and standards alignment. Multiple-choice and multiple-response problems often include a reason for each potential error that a student might make. Unlike formative assessments, problems on summative assessments generally do not prescribe a method of solution.” Examples include:
In Grade 3, Unit 5, Fractions as Numbers, End-of-Unit Assessment Answer Key, Problem 4 states, “Which fraction is equivalent to \frac{9}{3}? A: \frac{1}{3}, B: \frac{10}{4}, C: \frac{6}{2}, D: \frac{8}{2}.” The Narrative for Problem 4 states, “Students identify a fraction that is equivalent to a whole number expressed as a fraction. While they are not directly asked to write \frac{9}{3} as a whole number, the most likely reasoning is to identify that this is 3 wholes and so is \frac{6}{2}. Students may select A if they confuse the meanings of the numerator and the denominator, and think of the fraction \frac{1}{3}. They may select B if they add 1 to both the numerator and the denominator. They may select D if they subtract 1 from both the numerator and the denominator.” The answer key aligns the item to standards 3.NF.3a and 3.NF.3c, and includes sample representations to support teacher interpretation of student strategies.
In Grade 4, Unit 3, Extending Operations to Fractions, End-of-Unit Assessment Answer Key, Problem 5 states, “The line plot shows the lengths of some colored pencils. (There is an image of a line graph showing colored pencil lengths in inches.) a. What is the difference in length between the longest pencil and the shortest pencil shown in this line plot? Show your reasoning. b. How many pencils measure 4\frac{1}{2}inches or more? c. Two more colored pencils measure 2\frac{1}{4} inches and 5\frac{1}{8} inches. Plot these measurements on the line plot.” The Narrative for Problem 5 states, “Students interpret the measurement data on the line plot to answer questions and use the data to subtract fractions. For the first question, students may use the numbers on the line plot to help find the difference, or they may reason more abstractly as in the provided solution.” The answer key aligns the item to standard 4.MD.4, and includes sample representations to support teacher interpretation of student strategies.
In Grade 5, Unit 2, Fractions as Quotients and Fraction Multiplication, End-of-Unit Assessment Answer Key, Problem 5 states, “A hiking trail is 7 miles long. Han hikes \frac{1}{3} of the trail and then stops for water. Jada hikes \frac{2}{3} of the trail and then stops for water. a. How many miles did Han hike before stopping for water? Explain or show your reasoning. b. How many miles did Jada hike before stopping for water? Explain or show your reasoning.” The Narrative for Problem 5 states, “Students multiply a whole number by a fraction to solve a story problem. No representation for the problem is requested so students may draw a tape diagram (or discrete diagram), or an area diagram, or they may reason about the quantities without a picture. Students may use the strategy of doubling the distance they found for Han because they know \frac{2}{3} is twice as long as \frac{1}{3}. If students calculate Han's distance incorrectly before doubling it to find Jada's distance, their answer for Jada's distance should still count as correct.” The answer key aligns the item to standards 5.NF.4a and 5.NF.6, and includes sample representations to support teacher interpretation of student strategies.
The materials also include guidance for determining next instructional steps, integrated into both formative and summative assessment opportunities. Most lessons conclude with a Cool-down task designed to assess student thinking in relation to the lesson’s learning goal. The Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook) section titled Key Structures in This Course, Response to Student Thinking includes the following description:
“The materials offer guidance to support students in meeting the learning goals. This guidance falls into one of two categories, Next-Day Support or Prior-Unit Support, based on anticipated student responses. This guidance offers ways to continue teaching grade-level content, with appropriate and aligned practice and support for students. These suggestions range from providing students with more concrete representations in the next day’s lesson to recommending a section from a prior unit, with activities that directly connect to the concepts in the lesson.”
In addition to this formative support, the materials provide teachers with structured guidance following summative assessments. The End-of-Unit Assessment Guidance describes how teachers might observe patterns of student understanding and offers suggestions for addressing unfinished learning alongside upcoming grade-level instruction: “The End-of-Unit Assessment Guidance includes example observations of students’ unfinished learning and strategies for support in the Next-Unit Support. The guidance is organized around evidence for understanding and mastery of the grade-level content standards. Rather than provide item-by-item analysis, the observations encourage analyzing multiple items (when appropriate) to look for evidence of what students understand about the standards. The Next-Unit Support offers ideas for how to address any unfinished learning alongside upcoming grade-level work or before the concept is needed for upcoming grade-level work. These supports include suggestions for questions to ask during activities, representations to use, centers to encourage, and ways to incorporate the End-of-Unit Assessment as an additional learning opportunity. When needed, supports also include ways to revisit activities (for example, a Card Sort) in new ways to build on what students already know and focus on both unfinished and new learning.” For example:
In Grade 3, Unit 2, Area and Multiplication, Problem 5, End-of Unit Assessment Guidance states, “Observation: Students find the area of a rectangle in which the unit squares are visible, but do not yet show they can find the area of a rectangle by multiplying the side lengths. Students show they understand area can be found by performing an operation with the values of the side lengths, but do not consistently use multiplication. Next Unit Supports: As students play Stage 2 of Rectangle Rumble in the next unit, invite them to connect the factors to the side lengths of the rectangles they draw. Prompt students to draw a rectangle with the same dimensions, using inches as the unit for each side. Ask them how they could find the area in square inches.Observation: Students show they understand that area can be found by decomposing the figure, but only find parts of the area or use values that do not match the lengths of the sides. Next Unit Supports: As they play Stage 2 of Rectangle Rumble in the next unit, invite students to compose rectilinear figures from the rectangles that share sides on the gameboards. Ask them to identify the areas of the rectilinear figures they create. Before they multiply with greater numbers in Unit 4 Section C, consider inviting selected students to use inch squares to recreate the problems in the assessment (or related practice problems). Encourage students to physically decompose the area into non-overlapping rectangles and use what they notice to identify the area of the rectilinear figure.”
In Grade 4, Unit 1, Factors and Multiplies, Problem 1, End-of Unit Assessment Guidance states, “Observation: Student responses show they may be confusing the meaning of factor and multiple or prime and composite. Next Unit Supports: Throughout the course, students will apply the idea of factors and multiples. In the next unit as students play Mystery Number, Stages 3 and 4, ask them to reflect on how they used the given vocabulary (which includes prime, composite, factor, and multiple) to create clues and to guess their partner’s number. Observation: Students list only some of the factor pairs for a given number. Next Unit Supports: Before students use the language of multiples and factors to find equivalent fractions in Section B of the next unit, provide opportunities for students to continue to associate side lengths of rectangles (factors 1–5) for a given area as they play Can You Build It, Stage 2. Ask how they know that they have found all the possible rectangles. Observation: Students show they may understand factor, multiple, prime, and composite, but may not yet be fluent with their multiplication facts. For example, they say 27 is prime because they do not determine that 3\times 9=27. Next Unit Supports: Before students work with multiplying numerators and denominators ( 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 ) to generate equivalent fractions in Section B of the next unit, invite them to play Capture Squares, Stage 7. Ask students to reflect on which facts they know and which they need some support.”
In Grade 5, Unit 7, Shapes on a Coordinate Grid, Problem 4, End-of Unit Assessment Guidance states, “Observation: Students show they may understand the attributes of different categories of shapes, but may not yet understand which categories are subcategories of others or which attributes distinguish subcategories of larger categories. Next Unit Supports: During the next unit, consider inviting selected students to revisit the Quadrilaterals Grade 5 Card Sort. Ask students to find shapes that fit certain attributes and explain how they know to help them make sense of the problems on the assessment. For example, find a rhombus that is not a square, explain how you know it is a rhombus but not a square. Alternatively, ask students to find all the shapes that are parallelograms and ask them if all of the parallelograms they found are rhombuses. Encourage students to use the class chart that shows the hierarchy of quadrilaterals to help them find the shapes.”
Indicator 3h
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Indicator 3i
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials are designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 meet expectations for Student Supports. The materials provide strategies to ensure that students in special populations can access grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards. They offer regular extensions and opportunities for advanced students to engage with mathematics at greater depth. Across the series, the materials include varied approaches to learning tasks and offer multiple ways for students to demonstrate their understanding, along with opportunities for self-monitoring. Teachers are supported with strategies for using varied grouping methods, and assessments include accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge without altering the content. Supports are included for varying reading levels to ensure accessibility, and manipulatives—both virtual and physical, accurately represent mathematical concepts and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods. The materials partially provide a range of representation of people and include detailed instructions and support for educators to effectively incorporate and draw upon students’ different cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3j
Materials provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
Examples include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Advancing Mathematical Language and Access For Multilingual Learners, states, “To support students who are learning English in their development of language, this curriculum includes instruction devoted to advancing language development alongside mathematics learning, and fostering language-rich environments in which there is space for all students to participate.” Mathematical Language Routines states, “Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) are instructional routines that provide structured but adaptable formats for amplifying, assessing, and developing students' language. The MLRs included in this curriculum were selected because they simultaneously support students’ learning of mathematical practices, content, and language. They are particularly well-suited to meet the needs of linguistically and culturally diverse students who are learning mathematics while concurrently acquiring English.” MLRs are included in select activities of each unit, and are described in the Teacher Guide for the lessons in which they appear within the Activity Narrative, Access for Multilingual Learners.
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Diverse Abilities, Access For Students With Diverse Abilities states, “Supplemental instructional strategies, included in Access for Students with Diverse Abilities of each lesson, increase access, reduce barriers and maximize learning. Each support is aligned to the Universal Design for Learning Guidelines (udlguidelines.cast.org), and based on one of the three principles of UDL, providing alternative means of engagement, representation, or action and expression. These supports offer additional ways to adjust the learning environment so that students can access activities, engage in content, and communicate their understanding. Supports are tagged, with the areas of cognitive functioning they are designed to address, to help identify and select appropriate supports for students. Designed to facilitate access to Tier 1 instruction by capitalizing on students’ strengths to address obstacles related to cognitive functions or challenges, these strategies and supports are appropriate for any student who needs additional support to access rigorous, grade-level content. Use these lesson-specific supports, as needed, to help students succeed with a specific activity, without reducing the mathematical demands of the task. Phase them out as students gain understanding and fluency. Use a UDL approach and students’ IEPs, their strengths, and their challenges to ensure access. When students may benefit from alternative means of access or support, draw on ideas from the tables below or visit udlguidelines.cast.org for more information.”
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Diverse Abilities, Accessibility For Students With Visual Impairments states, “For students with visual impairments, accessibility features are built into the materials: 1. A palette of colors distinguishable to people with the most common types of color blindness. 2. Tasks and problems are designed so that success does not depend on the ability to distinguish between colors. 3. Mathematical diagrams, presented in scalable vector graphic (SVG) format, can be magnified, without loss of resolution, and rendered in Braille. 4. Where possible, text associated with images is not part of the image file, but rather included as an image caption accessible to screen readers. 5. Alt text on all images makes interpretation easier for users accessing the materials, with a screen reader. All images in the curriculum have alt text: a very short indication of the image’s contents, so that the screen reader doesn’t skip over as if nothing is there. Some images have a longer description to help students’ with visual impairments recreate the image in their mind. Understand that students with visual impairments likely will need help accessing images in lesson activities and assessments. Prepare appropriate accommodations. Accessibility experts, who reviewed this curriculum, recommended that eligible students have access to a Braille version of the curriculum materials, because a verbal description of many of the complex mathematical diagrams is inadequate to support their learning.”
Grade 3, Unit 8, Putting It All Together, Lesson 3, Activity 1, Access for Students with Diverse Abilities, “Engagement: Develop Effort and Persistence: Chunk this task into more manageable parts. Check in with students to provide feedback and encouragement after each round. Supports accessibility for: Organization, Focus.”
Grade 4, Unit 7, Angles and Angle Measurement, Lesson 9, Activity 2, Access for Students with Diverse Abilities, “Action and Expression: Internalize Executive Functions. Invite students to estimate the size of the angle before finding each precise measurement. Offer the sentence frame: ‘This angle will be greater than ___ and less than ____. It will be closer to ____.’ Supports accessibility for: Conceptual Processing, Visual-Spatial Processing, Attention. Advances: reading, writing.”
Grade 5, Unit 5, Place Value Patterns and Decimal Operations, Lesson 8, Activity 2, Access for Students with Diverse Abilities, “Action and Expression: Internalize Executive Functions. Invite students to verbalize their strategy for determining proximity before they begin. Students can speak quietly to themselves, or share with a partner. Supports accessibility for: Organization, Conceptual Processing, Language.”
Indicator 3k
Materials regularly provide extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level/course-level mathematics at greater depth.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for regularly providing extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level mathematics at greater depth. Examples include:
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), What's in an Imagine IM Lesson, Practice Problems, Exploration Problems states, “Each section has two or more exploration practice problems that offer differentiation for students ready for a greater challenge. There are two types of exploration problems. One type is a hands-on activity directly related to the material of the unit that students complete either in class if they have free time, or at home. The second type of exploration problem is more open ended and challenging. These problems go deeper into grade-level mathematics. They are not routine or procedural, and they are not ‘the same thing again but with harder numbers.’” While there are no instances where advanced students do more assignments than their classmates, materials do provide multiple opportunities for students to investigate grade-level content at greater depth.
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Key Structures in This Course, Authentic Use of Contexts and Suggested Launch Adaptations, Advancing Student Thinking states, “This section offers look-fors and questions to support students as they engage in an activity. Effective teaching requires supporting students as they work on challenging tasks, without taking over the process of thinking for them (Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000). As teachers monitor during the course of an activity, they gain insight into what students know and are able to do. Based on these insights, the Advancing Student Thinking section provides questions that advance students’ understanding of mathematical concepts, strategies, or connections between representations.” Respond to Student Thinking states, “Most lessons end with a Cool-Down to formatively assess students’ thinking in relation to the learning goal of the day. The materials offer guidance to support students in meeting the learning goals. This guidance falls into one of two categories, Next-Day Support or Prior-Unit Support, based on anticipated student responses. This guidance offers ways to continue teaching grade-level content, with appropriate and aligned practice and support for students. These suggestions range from providing students with more concrete representations in the next day’s lesson to recommending a section from a prior unit, with activities that directly connect to the concepts in the lesson.”
In Grade 3, Unit 7, Two-dimensional Shapes and Perimeter, Section B: What is Perimeter?, Section B Practice Problems, Problem 6: Exploration states, “a. Draw some different shapes that you can find the perimeter of. Then find their perimeters. b. Can you draw a rectangle whose perimeter is an odd number of units? Yes. No. Explain or show your reasoning. c. Can you draw a pentagon or hexagon (or a figure with even more sides) whose perimeter is an odd number of units? Yes. No.”
In Grade 4, Unit 2, Fraction Equivalence and Comparison, Section C: Fraction Comparison, Section C Practice Problems, Problem 7: Exploration states, “Jada lists these fractions that are all equivalent to 1⁄2 : 2⁄4, 3⁄6, 4⁄8, 5⁄10 She notices that each time the numerator increases by 1, the denominator increases by 2. Will this pattern continue? A. Yes. B. NO. Explain your reasoning.”
In Grade 5, Unit 4, Wrapping Up Multiplication and Division with Multi-Digit Numbers, Section C: Let’s Put It to Work, Section C Practice Problems, Problem 5: Exploration states,“The Pentagon has 5 floors. The Empire State Building has 102 floors. Noah says that the Empire State Building is larger. Do you agree? Yes. No. Explain how you know.”
Indicator 3l
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Indicator 3m
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Indicator 3m.MLL
Materials include guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for MLLs to ensure equitable participation.
The instructional materials for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM do not meet the criteria for including guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) to ensure equitable participation.
The materials do not provide explicit teacher-facing guidance on grouping structures that are tailored to the needs of MLLs. While structured partner discourse routines are observed, such as 1–2 minutes of silent think-time followed by 2–3 minutes of partner talk, these practices are presented as general discussion protocols. They are not linked to specific strategies for supporting multilingual learners’ engagement or language development. Additionally, the materials do not elaborate on grouping considerations such as language proficiency levels, home language support, or pairing strategies to foster academic language growth among MLLs.
Indicator 3n
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
Indicator 3n.MLL
Assessments offer accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Imagine IM do not meet the criteria of providing accommodations that allow Multilingual Learners (MLLs) to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. The materials do not provide guidance for teachers to account for varied levels of English language proficiency without changing the content of the assessment, yet still allowing MLLs to show grade level mastery regardless of language ability.
Indicator 3o
Materials provide a range of representation of people and include detailed instructions and support for educators to effectively incorporate and draw upon students’ different cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3p
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
Indicator 3q
Manipulatives, both virtual and physical, are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they represent and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM Grade 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing manipulatives, both virtual and physical, that are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they support and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
Teachers can assign digital manipulatives to individual students or the entire class based on student need, allowing for personalized learning experiences.
Teacher Course Guide (Flipbook), Key Structures in This Course, Purposeful Representations states, “Curriculum representations, and the grade levels at which they are used, are determined by their usefulness for particular mathematical learning goals. More concrete representations are introduced before those that are more abstract. For example, in Imagine IM Kindergarten, students begin by counting and moving objects—before they represent these objects in 5- and 10-frames—to lay the foundation for understanding the base-ten system. In later grades, these familiar representations are extended so that as students encounter greater numbers, they use place-value diagrams and more symbolic methods, such as equations, to represent their understanding. When appropriate, the reasoning behind the selection of certain representations in the materials is made explicit.” Manipulatives are referenced within lessons as appropriate to support concept development. Examples include:
Grade 3, Unit 2, Area and Multiplication, Lesson 2, Activity 1, students make figures out of square tiles and order the figures from smallest to largest. Launch states, “Groups of 4. Give each group inch tiles. ‘Take some tiles and build a shape.’ 2 minutes: independent work time.” Activity states, “‘Now work with your group to order the figures. Be prepared to explain how you ordered the figures’ 5 minutes: group work time, Monitor for groups who order by: The amount of space the figure takes up on the table. The length of the figure. The number of tiles used to create the figure.”
Grade 4, Unit 3, Extending Operations to Fractions, Lesson 2, Activity 1, students interpret multiplication expressions and diagrams as the number of groups and the amount in each group, and match representations of the same quantity. Launch states, “Groups of 2. Give each group a set of cards. Activity states, ‘This set of cards include expressions and diagrams. Match the expressions to the diagrams. Work with your partner to explain your reasoning.’ ‘Some expressions will not have a matching diagram.’ 5 minutes: partner work time. Monitor for students who reason about the number of groups and the amount in each group as they match. Pause for a discussion. Invite students to share their matches and their reasoning. Highlight reasoning that clearly connects one factor in the expression to the number of groups and the other factor to the size of each group. ‘Now you will complete an unfinished diagram for 7\times \frac{1}{8}, and then draw a new diagram for an expression without a match.’ 5 minutes: independent work time.”
Grade 5, Unit 5, Place Value Patterns and Decimal Operations, Lesson 17, Activity 2, students find products of a whole number and some tenths or hundredths using hundredths grid or a strategy that made sense to them. Launch states, “Groups of 2. Make hundredths grids available for students. Activity states, ‘Take a few minutes to find the value of the expressions in the first problem.’ 1-2 minutes: quiet think time. 5 minutes: partner work time. Problem 1, Find the value of each expression. Explain or show your reasoning. a.3\times 0.5 b. 5\times 0.3 c. 7\times 0.02’”
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design
Materials include a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials reviewed for Imagine IM, Grade 3 through 5 integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic mathematics software in ways that engage students in the grade-level standards; include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other; have a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject that is neither distracting nor chaotic; and provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning.
Indicator 3r
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Indicator 3s
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
Indicator 3t
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Indicator 3u
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.