2023
Fishtank Plus ELA 6-8

8th Grade - Gateway 1

Back to 8th Grade Overview
Cover for Fishtank Plus ELA 6-8
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Text Quality and Complexity

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations
91%
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
18 / 18
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
15 / 18

The grade 8 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted and from multiple perspectives. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The questions and tasks included in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit.

In the program, students regularly engage in fruitful class discussions where they can practice their speaking and listening skills, as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students also engage in on-demand and process writing opportunities across text types, although the opportunities do not reflect the distribution of text types expected of the standards. Explicit evidence-based writing instruction guidance in the materials is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The materials do include guidance on vocabulary instruction, and students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

18 / 18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

The grade 8 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works, with a 76/24 split. Even though some of the texts are somewhat below the grade band level, the required tasks, as well as the concepts and language within the texts, allow for challenging material at the 8th-grade level. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. There are a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading.

Indicator 1a

4 / 4

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a. 

Anchor texts are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The anchor texts in each unit are engaging, high interest, and will stretch students’ thinking while covering ideas around injustice, oppression, and good and evil within humanity. Students read award-winning texts from multiple perspectives and have the opportunity to explore both literary and nonfiction texts of different genres that bring real experiences to life for readers. 

Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, students read the anchor text All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. The novel, 2016 Coretta Scott King Author Honor book and recipient of the Walter Dean Myers Award for Outstanding Children’s Literature, is told from two perspectives—that of a white boy and that of a black boy—who both witness the same event. The text is accessible and deals with injustice and oppression and how to stand up and make a difference. 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read two award-winning anchor texts, The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett and Night by Elie Wiesel. Both texts use first-person narrative to recount the horrors of different aspects of the Nazi occupation of Europe and the atrocities perpetrated against the Jewish people of Europe. The texts are well-crafted, challenging reads because of content, language, and time period. The stories explore whether humans are really good at heart and why it is still important to listen to stories from the Holocaust.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students read two anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm by George Orwell. Animal Farm is an award-winning satire. Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) gives students historical background information on the time period Orwell was warning about. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. The graphic novel is an autobiographical series of comics that depicts the author’s childhood up to her early adult years in Iran and Austria during and after the Islamic Revolution. The text is culturally relevant and includes vibrant images. The story contains shifting narrators, flashbacks, and cultural and historical references.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students read the anchor text, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore. The informational text includes imagery about a real-world issue and its impact on students’ lives.

Indicator 1b

4 / 4

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1b. 

Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the year. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works with a 76/24 split. The materials provide a balanced approach to instructional time for the informational and literary texts. Text types include memoirs, autobiographies, articles, speeches, nonfiction books, interviews, comics, videos, graphic novels, drama, poems, short stories, historical fiction novels, and novels. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read a contemporary fiction text by the same name written by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, read the article “What is White Privilege, Really?” by Cory Collins, watch videos “A Conversation about Growing Up Black” on The New York Times’ YouTube channel, examine websites “The Constitution of the United States,” read a speech “Why Black Lives Matter,” and read a series of short stories including Flying Lessons & Other Short Stories by Ellen Oh. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: a graph link from the US Census Bureau, an interview “The Racially Charged Meaning Behind the Word ‘Thug’”, and video “How to Be an Ally.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil, Night, students read Night, an autobiography by Elie Wiesel, and The Diary of Anne Frank, a play written by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Additional texts include a speech, excerpts from Anne Frank’s autobiography, Diary of a Young Girl, and an informational video “The Path to Nazi Genocide” by the United States Holocaust Museum. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: a  video "Chiune Sugihara: Righteous Among the Nations" (YouTube), a video "Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé" by British Pathé, a video "German Jewish deportees arriving at the Warsaw Ghetto" by Yad Vashem, an article "Ghettos Under the Nazis" by Susan D. Glazer (My Jewish Learning), a video "Surviving the Holocaust: Segment 5 — Arrival at Auschwitz" (YouTube).

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students read Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm by George Orwell, articles including “An Introduction to Communism” by Jessica McBirney, watch videos such as “One Human Family, Food for All” on Caritas Internationalis’ YouTube channel, and watch the movie Animal Farm. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as a video: “Russian Revolution and Civil War: Crash Course European History #35”, and articles “A Sinister Alliance: Soviet-German Relations” and “Warlords: Hitler vs. Stalin,” and a website that provides more information on the history of the film and the CIAs involvement in the making of the film. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read a graphic novel Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi, an informational article “How to read a comic book: appreciating the story behind the art” by Alex Abad-Santos, listen to an informational radio segment “The Stolen Revolution: Iranian Women of 1979” by CBC Radio, and read articles such as “Why do Muslim women wear a hijab?” by Caitlin Killian. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as a video "Mouvement de libération des femmes iraniennes année zero - English Subtitles" (YouTube), a video "What Happened in the Iran-Iraq War?” (YouTube), and "Women discuss what it’s like to wear a hijab" by Nara Schoenberg (The Detroit News).

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students read  An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore, evaluate speeches such as “Greta Thunberg challenging The World Economic Forum in Davos - January 22 2019,” read articles including “The Science of Climate Change Explained” by Julia Rosen, read books such as Everything Change: An Anthology of Climate Fiction by Manjana Milkoreit, Meredith Martinez, Joey Eschrich, and the short story “Row” by Charmaine Wilkerson, and examine the website “After Water Project.”

Materials reflect a balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials reflect a 76/24 balance of informational and literary texts with 44 informational texts and seven literary texts.

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, the materials across the unit contain seven informational texts and two literary texts. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, the materials across the unit contain five informational texts and one literary text. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, the materials across the unit contain nine informational texts and two literary texts. One core text is literary, and the other core text is informational.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the materials across the unit contain seven informational texts and one literary text. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, the materials across the unit contain 16 informational texts and one literary text. The core text is informational.

Indicator 1c

4 / 4

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.

Materials include anchor texts that are within or above the Lexile stretch band, ranging between 590L to 1170L, and the publisher consistently provides qualitative analysis rationales. There is a balance of accessible texts and more complex texts across the grade level. Even though some of the texts are somewhat below the grade band level, the required tasks, as well as the concepts and language within the texts, allow for challenging material. The qualitative analysis rationales for text selection and placement are in the Text Selection Rationale or the Notes for Teacher section. The Notes for Teacher section also informs educators what to be aware of and calls out concerning features of the texts. Qualitative analysis shows that the complexity increases slightly for varying reasons, including text structure, language, and knowledge demands. The qualitative rationale states that the relationship between the texts and the associated student tasks are accessible for the grade level with instances when students move into more complex tasks. The qualitative text complexity is determined by the Achieve the Core’s Literary Text Complexity Rubric. 

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, the anchor text, All American Boys (770L) by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely falls below the Lexile band. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate difficulty since the text has double protagonists in rotating perspectives, figurative language, and wordplay in a unique structure. The associated student tasks are moderate as they require students to “Draw conclusions about Quinn and Rashad’s perspectives based on what they say and do.” The overall qualitative measure is accessible.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, the two anchor texts,l Night (590L) by Elie Wiesel and the play The Diary of Anne Frank (NP) by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, fall below the median Lexile for Grade 8 at the beginning of the year. Qualitatively, the text is of medium and moderate complexity, respectively. In Night, Wiesel consistently uses complex structure, language, metaphor, and symbolism to get across the experiences of the Holocaust. In addition, there are many references to Judaism that students will need to build background around in order to fully understand the text. In The Diary of Anne Frank, students read stage directions and spoken dialogue and make connections between Anne Frank the character and Anne Frank the historical figure. The associated tasks are medium and moderate, respectively. The overall qualitative measure is moderate and complex.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, the anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) (970L) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm (1170L) by George Orwell, both fall within the stretch Lexile band. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate complexity due to accessible language about the Russian Revolution to build context for students. The qualitative analysis for Animal Farm is of high difficulty due to elevated vocabulary and complex sentences, but students should be able to access the text after building knowledge with Joseph Stalin. The associated tasks are moderate and medium, respectively. The overall qualitative measure is moderate and complex.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood (GN380L) by Marjane Satrapi, is below the Lexile range. Qualitatively, the text is of medium complexity due to students analyzing both text and images to assist with characterization, identification of the theme, text structure, unfamiliar setting, and identification of the mood. The associated student tasks are medium. The overall qualitative measure is complex.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, the anchor text, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore, is listed as an unleveled text by the publisher. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate difficulty due to tier two and three vocabulary, “complex scientific content and concepts and... wider social implications of climate change.” The associated tasks are challenging. The overall qualitative measure is complex.

Anchor/Core texts and a series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the text All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. The rationale also includes qualitative features to consider, such as unique structure, “wordplay, figurative language, verbal irony, and tier-two vocabulary.” The Notes for Teachers section recommends that teachers send a parent letter advising them of the topics being discussed, profanity, and references to drinking and drugs. Resources are also available to help students facilitate conversations about race in their classrooms. The educational purpose of the text is to provide an opportunity for students to think deeply about the content and the complexities of racial injustice, police brutality, loyalty, and their obligation to stand up for what is right.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the novel Night (590L), but the play The Diary of Anne Frank is unrated. While the Lexile level for Night is below Grade 8 Lexile band, the publisher notes that this text is often taught in high school courses because of text complexity: “His language is nonetheless complex because of his regular use of figurative language, symbols, motifs, and punctuation-- all in the service of communicating an experience that is impossible to capture in language. The vocabulary demands of the text are also high, as Wiesel uses many tier-two words. Students will need to have significant schematic support to understand Wiesel’s references to Judaism.” Similarly, The Diary of Anne Frank requires outside knowledge in order to fully comprehend the story, and the text structure may be unique to students as they must “differentiate between spoken lines and stage directions...the playwright has chosen to use voiceover narration in addition to dialogue.” While the overall story is chronological, there are “frequent jumps around in time that must be inferred by the reader.” The educational purpose of the texts is to provide an opportunity to explore human nature and students’ understanding of “one of the darkest moments in human history.” Elie Wiesel’s memoir and Anne Frank’s story resonate with young-adult readers, and “students begin to make connections between individual lives, historical events, and larger truths about what it means to be human.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) (970L) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm (1170L) by George Orwell. The rationale includes qualitative features to consider for Animal Farm, such as tier-two and tier-three vocabulary words, subtle irony, and dense sentence structures. The educational purpose of Joseph Stalin is to “introduce students to the real-life atrocities committed during this time period and give them a small window into the lives of the tens of millions of people who were murdered, starved, exiled, imprisoned, or killed on the battlefield” and to build knowledge “around the rise of Communism and the Russian Revolution” before reading Animal Farm, which has a higher level of complexity. Animal Farm is the first allegory they will read, and students use both texts to examine propaganda and artistic expression. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood (GN380L) by Marjane Satrapi, which is below the Grade 8 Lexile band. The rationale includes qualitative features that highlight the complexity of the text, “particularly in terms of structure and knowledge demands,” such as “first-person narrator (the writer as an adult reflecting on her childhood) but occasionally transitions to different narrators who tell stories that are presented as flashbacks.” The educational purpose of the text is to continue students’ “year-long study of the relationship between power and human behavior” as they learn about coming of age during the Iranian Revolution. The text Persepolis will “provide insight into this significant historical event through young Margi’s eyes, learning about the human impact of political upheaval and the ways that people resist repression in large and small ways.”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: An Inconvenient Sequel, the Text Selection Rationale does not include a Lexile rating for the anchor text, An inconvenient Truth by Al Gore. The rationale includes qualitative features, such as vocabulary demands with “multiple tier-two and tier-three words on most pages.” The qualitative features also make the text “both rigorous and accessible to 8th-grade readers, as they encounter complex scientific content and concepts and consider the wider social implications of climate change.” The educational purpose is to introduce students to the real-world problem of climate change. The Notes for Teachers section explicitly notes that climate change is not presented as a debate, and “students will read texts that include facts agreed upon by the scientific community.”

Indicator 1d

4 / 4

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d. 

Materials include the anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The Unit Summary and individual lessons outline a path for growth in literacy skills over time. Texts of varying complexity are included in each unit and are interconnected to add meaning to unit topics. Students practice skills during the beginning, middle, and end of the year and learn concepts and standards. Each lesson includes a Standards Map that shows when the literacy skills appear as core or supporting standards in units.   

Materials include suggested supports in each lesson. The teacher resources provide guidance on using the supports when reading the texts. Lessons contain multiple supports, including Language Supports and Additional supports during Close Reading, which feature guiding questions and key ideas students should understand. Discussion supports include questions and graphic organizers to guide students in locating information for discussions. Some lessons include supports for the Target Task with scaffolded questions that build understanding. Although not all lessons include the same supports, lessons other than writing lessons include multiple sections of support that provide teachers with scaffolds to ensure that students can access the texts and successfully complete the lessons. 

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • One literacy skill that is taught throughout the year is to engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (SL.8.1). In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, the lesson objective states: “Engage in a Socratic Seminar with classmates, drawing evidence from unit texts, and carefully explaining reasoning. The teacher determines the type of discussion, and students answer proposed Discussion Questions that explore character development in the story, racial injustice in the story and within our world, and what people can do to stop injustices today. Two questions include, “Who changes more over the course of the text: Quinn or Rashad? Are Quinn and Rashad equally responsible for standing up against injustice?” In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, the lesson objective states: “Engage in a Socratic Seminar with peers, demonstrating a deep understanding of the text and topic by posing and responding to questions and providing evidence to support ideas.” The teacher determines the type of discussion, and students answer Discussion Questions that analyze Orwell’s feelings about communism, the most effective weapon Napoleon uses, why animals choose to believe Squealer’s lies, and the book is still relevant today. Two questions include, “Why did the animals continue to believe Squealer’s lies, even as they became more obvious? Is this book still relevant today?” In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, the lesson objective states: “Engage in a Socratic Seminar with peers, responding directly to others by rephrasing and delineating arguments, determining the strength of evidence, and posing clarifying questions.” The teacher determines the type of discussion, and the students answer Discussion Questions, such as “Must we change? Can we change? Will we change? What is the relationship between climate change, money, and power?”

  • Another literacy skill taught throughout the year is to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to the characters, setting, and plot; provide an objective summary of the text (RL.8.2). In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 18, the lesson objective states: “Determine themes in All American Boys and explain how they are developed over the course of the text.” Close Reading Questions ask: “What thematic topics do Reynolds and Kiely explore in this text? Try to come up with at least five. What theme do Reynolds and Kiely develop in All American Boys on the topic of “loyalty”? What specific sections, details, or events from the text help to develop this theme?” The Writing Prompt asks: “What theme do Reynolds and Kiely develop in All American Boys on the topic of ‘injustice’? What specific characters and/or events from the text help to develop this theme?” In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 20, the lesson objective states: “Determine what Orwell wants the reader to understand about the Russian Revolution and human nature more broadly, and explain how he develops these ideas in Animal Farm.” The Close Reading Question asks: “What does Orwell want the reader to understand about Stalin and the Russian Revolution?” In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 17, the lesson objective states: “Determine themes in Persepolis and explain how Satrapi develops them in the text.” The Writing Prompt asks: “What theme does Satrapi develop on the topic of resistance? Write a paragraph in which you explain how she develops this theme over the course of the text. Provide examples from at least two different sections of the text and be sure to use references to text and images to support your answer.”

As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, and skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, the general description of the supports available states: “The Fishtank ELA curriculum includes five types of supports to help provide students access to different features of text complexity-language supports, background knowledge supports, additional supports, foundational skills supports, and opportunities for enrichment. After you have determined the aspect of the texts that will be most challenging for your students, you can decide which supports are most appropriate. These supports can be used with the whole group, in small groups, or individually.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.

  • In the Teacher Tools, “Supporting English Learners,” the guidance states: “Learn how to provide scaffolds that help English Learners access complex texts. Explore the different types of graphic organizers that can be used as scaffolds.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, various resources are included to support Speaking and Listening, such as Tiers of Academic Discourse, Types of Academic Discourse, Sentence Frames for Academic Discourse, Discussion Graphic Organizer.” Teachers can also read more information about academic discourse with Preparing for Academic Discourse and Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse. These resources are provided in all units at each grade level, where Speaking and Listening standards are assessed.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 4, while students read Night, additional supports for each question include scaffolding questions and student understandings: “What is the purpose of stage directions in a play? What can the reader infer from this ‘look’? What emotions are communicated through these stage directions? Students should understand: The stage directions communicate to the reader that Mr. Dussel does not want to tell them bad news -- that Hanneli was taken away by the Nazis.” 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 7, there are supports for building background knowledge,  Language Supports that identify possible words/phrases with short definitions, Close Reading scaffolding questions, and guidance for teachers to help make the reading more accessible, and a graphic organizer that assists students in organizing the main ideas of each chapter and the evidence of how the author develops the central idea. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 8, in the Close Read section, the following student understandings, and sentence frames are included: “Students should understand: The use of dark color creates an ominous mood. The large heads are looking down at Satrapi’s mother; their expression is angry and their size and number develops the sense of being watched. Marji’s mother has her collar pulled up, as if she is trying to hide from their gaze. This panel communicates the sense that people were being closely watched, and that being ‘caught’ could be very dangerous”. Sentence frames include: “In the final panel on page 5, Satrapi communicates the idea that __________. In the panel, ___________ and _________. These images ___________.”

  • In Unit 5: Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 7, there are multiple sections of Additional Supports during Close Reading that provide scaffolding questions and the corresponding page number where students should locate the evidence to support an answer. There is also a Suggested Support for building background knowledge and accessing prior knowledge, including a link to an article to help students better understand atomic testing. Teachers are suggested to use a “drop-in” definition to help students understand additional difficult words. There is also supports for the task and the class discussion. 

Indicator 1e

2 / 2

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e. 

Materials include a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading. There is support in place connecting to specific texts as students engage in these readings. Over the course of the year, students read different types of texts ranging from traditional print sources; such as literary and informational novels, newspaper articles, and magazine articles, to non-traditional sources such as graphic novel, film, and video. Students engage in a volume of reading across the school year, including reading during and outside the school day on a consistent basis. The Teacher Tools section includes procedures and routines for different types of reading, including Interactive Read Alouds, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading. The materials include independent reading opportunities that are often homework assignments; students take part in comprehensive discussions and activities related to the homework reading in class the following day. The resource, Recommended Texts for Independent Reading, makes recommendations for fiction and non-fiction texts with aligned themes and topics and additional texts by the same author.

Teacher Tools provide additional guidance for educators relating to independent reading procedures, though the guidance is often general rather than lesson-specific. For example, the Components of an ELA Lesson under the Homework heading states: “Some lessons require students to read sections of the text prior to class. Homework for the next lesson is identified. Homework should be assigned at the end of the class period.” Teacher Tools also offer guidance relating to Reading Structures and Routines, including information for Independent Reading for Homework (6–12): “...to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.” The Teacher Tools are consistent across grade levels, and the guidance provides suggestions for accountability measures, such as graphic organizers, annotations, and written checks for understanding. Though there is no specific tracking system provided, students are expected to complete reading homework on a regular basis to be able to complete in-class activities. They are held accountable to this reading through homework questions related to the assigned reading which can be found in each lesson plan. The teacher uses these questions to launch the following lesson with a quick class discussion.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and provide supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following::

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read the anchor text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. Supplemental texts include articles, government documents, videos, a speech, short stories, and an opinion.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read the anchor texts, The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett (play) and Night by Elie Wiesel. Supplemental texts include videos, a memoir, and a speech.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students read two anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm by George Orwell. Supplemental texts include articles, videos, and the movie version of Animal Farm.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. Supplemental texts include articles, videos, a comic, and a radio segment.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students read the anchor text, An Inconvenient Sequel by Al Gore. Supplemental texts include articles, speeches, a short story, a website, and a fiction anthology.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read multiple texts such as: All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, “What is White Privilege, Really?” by Cory Collins, and “The ‘Say Her Name’ Movement Started for a Reason: We Forget Black Women Killed by Police” by Precious Fondren. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read multiple texts such as: The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, Night by Elie Wiesel, Ann Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl by Ann Frank, and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read multiple texts such as: Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi, “What is a Graphic Novel” by Jessica Abel, “How to read a comic book: appreciating the story behind the art” by Alex Abad-Santos, and “Why do Muslim women wear a hijab?” by Caitlin Killian. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework.  

There is teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance for a proposed schedule for independent reading is explained: “In order to show accelerated reading growth, students need to read for at least 15 minutes a day, with the greatest growth being shown in students who read over a half-hour to an hour a day. Due to the block structure of most middle and high schools, it would be nearly impossible for students to read in class for 30 minutes a day while also having time to critically analyze the text through discussion and writing. Therefore, to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.”

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance related to accountability is stated: 

    • “Assign an annotation focus. Have students annotate in the text to show their understanding of the text. Student annotations can be used to show that students are reading and that they understand what they are reading. Students can return to their annotations during class discussions and writing.

    • Provide Graphic Organizers. While reading, have students use different graphic organizers to interact with the text. Potential graphic organizers include: Say, Mean, Matter Graphic Organizer or Double Journal Entry.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 11, students read the next chapter of Animal Farm by George Orwell for homework. Guidance includes specific questions for students to answer while reading, such as: “What event finally sparks the rebellion? What rule do the animals make about clothing? What do the pigs reveal that they have been learning?”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 6, students read the article, “As Rising Heat Bakes US Cities, The Poor Often Feel It Most” by Meg Anderson and Sean McMinn. For homework, students read the article, “Notes from a Bottle” by James Stevenson. Guidance includes specific questions for students to anser while reading, such as: “When does this story take place? Who are the main characters in this story?”

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

15 / 18

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The grade 8 materials include questions and tasks that require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year. The questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. There are consistent opportunities to practice speaking and listening skills as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, reflecting a 40/20/40 split. Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit teacher guidance on evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. Materials include guidance on vocabulary instruction. Students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.

Indicator 1f

2 / 2

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.

Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and text-dependent, referencing specific page numbers or portions of the text at times. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year, and the questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. Almost all segments of the Lesson Plan, including Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions, require students to return to the text and provide evidence to support their ideas and support students in making meaning of core understanding of the texts being studied. The program uses a common system of organization, and students answer a series of writing prompts and questions to comprehend the text, build knowledge, and understand how the reading and tasks connect to each unit's overall topic/theme. 

Materials provide support for planning instruction and implementing text-based questions and tasks, including Sample Responses and Notes for Teachers that highlight areas where students might struggle. The Notes for Teachers include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support both within and outside of the materials. Additional lesson-specific Notes are available in some lessons, such as in Unit 5, Lesson 16. In each lesson, the Enhanced Lesson Plans provide Scaffolding questions for both the Close Read Questions and Writing Prompts to support teachers and students in answering the questions or completing the tasks successfully. 

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 7, students read All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely and answer Close Read Questions: “How does watching the recording of the attack impact Rashad? Provide evidence from pages 94–95 to support your answer. Why did the authors most likely include the passage on page 106 about Jill’s party? What does this description reveal? Provide evidence from page 106 to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 9, students complete the Writing Prompt: “Which specific incidents, lines of text, and panels reveal that Marji is very young and has more to learn about how the world works? Provide at least two examples from today’s reading, referencing both text and images to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 3, students read “The Science of Climate Change Explained” by Julia Rosen and answer the Writing Prompt: “What evidence does Rosen provide to support the claim that climate change is caused by human activity? How does she respond to ideas that challenge this claim? Provide specific evidence from the section.” 

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In all units, materials provide support for teachers. In the Unit Summary, materials provide a number of supports for teachers when approaching the unit texts, including an overview of both the text and the learning outcomes. The Unit Summary includes the Notes for Teachers section, which contains pertinent information about teaching the core text, such as how to approach specific lessons and where to find further supports in the materials. In each lesson, the Key Understandings section provides an overview of the Skills and Strategies that students should be learning and using. The Knowledge section provides the main ideas and plot details from the text(s). 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 16, students answer the Close Reading Question: “Do the people writing about Rashad on the internet really ‘see’ him? Support your position with evidence from pages 277-278.” Additional supports include scaffolded questions and student understandings, such as, “How do the different photos of Rashad change the way that others view him?” 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 8, students complete a Writing Prompt about symbolism: “Considering what is happening in these passages, what might ‘night’ symbolize, based on this section of text? Support your answer with at least two pieces of evidence from these pages.” Teacher guidance states to explain motif and symbolism and to help students identify that night is a motif in the text but also a symbol. There are specific activities provided that help students answer the prompt, such as working with a partner, providing examples of what almost meets expectations and meets expectations, and guiding students in evaluating their own work based on feedback. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 14, students complete a Writing Prompt where they compare characters in two unit texts Animal Farm by George Orwell and Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum. Materials provide a Sample Response, which includes an additional note at the end for teachers: “*Students may also identify that Napoleon and Stalin both use propaganda/manipulative language, but there is less evidence to support this position in the sections of Stalin (A Wicked History) we read today.” 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 12, students answer the Close Read Question: “How were women treated who did not conform to the new rules about ‘modesty’? Provide two different examples and use evidence from both texts to support your answer.” Teachers are provided with scaffolding questions in the Additional Supports section that guide students who may struggle to successfully answer the question. There is also a list of key understandings that students need to reach before in order to answer the question. Some of these key moments to analyze include women experiencing “verbal and physical attacks they’d faced on the streets from pro-regime thugs”, being fired from work, and facing expulsion for refusing to wear a veil.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, students participate in a Socratic Seminar where they focus on Discussion Questions from informational texts in the unit: “What is the relationship between climate change, money, and power? Does individual action matter to limiting climate change?” The Notes section includes guidance such as, “Create clear expectations for the discussion and student groups (if necessary). Additionally, decide what discourse strategies you will model for students to ensure that students are able to effectively engage with one another (for guidance, see our Teacher Tool about Tiers of Academic Discourse).” Materials also include sentence stems for student support as they answer discussion questions.

Indicator 1g

2 / 2

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g. 

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students practice speaking and listening skills with Discussion Questions in each lesson, which are “open-ended questions designed to prompt student reflection on the day’s reading and to make connections between the text, larger social issues, and their own lives. Discussion questions often come at the end of lessons and are an opportunity to bring students together to speak and listen to one another.” The protocols support students’ developing speaking and listening skills for a variety of discussions, including different formats of whole class, small group, and partner discussions. Each unit also includes a full day of Socratic Seminar discussion.

Materials provide teachers with many options for including discourse in the classroom and the freedom to choose which protocols are appropriate for their students. Instructional supports and protocols are available in the Enhanced Lesson Plans Building Background and Engagement section in those lessons that include a discussion that gives at least some guidance on how to conduct the discussion. There are also specific guidelines in the Socratic Seminar lessons that build from the first unit to the last in each grade showing a progression in building discussion skills. The skills and protocols are scaffolded for teachers and students to build greater mastery and student independence. The Teacher Tools includes resources for how to help engage students in discourse, create a classroom culture that supports conversation, and monitor student growth. The Academic Discourse section provides teachers with four different resources for guiding and supporting students in developing speaking and listening skills. These resources are referenced and linked consistently across the units. 

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section, different types of protocols are provided. One example is a partner discussion, which includes the following protocol: Teachers choose from various discussion protocols to have students discuss open-ended questions, such as Think-Pair-Share: 

    • “Students are given time to think before pairing up and sharing. 

    • Teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. 

    • Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer.

    • Students pair up. 

    • Students take turns sharing their answers.”

  • In each unit, a Socratic Seminar is provided as a formal discussion, and students use one teacher-chosen, open-ended question from the multiple Discussion Questions provided in the lesson. The same directions are provided for the teacher in the Notes section of each Socratic Seminar lesson: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion. Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 9, students answer Discussion Questions: “Do you think that optimism or pessimism is a more useful emotion/perspective on the world? What is the difference between optimism and delusion?” The Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section, includes multiple outlined protocols for teachers, such as Numbered Heads Together:

    • “Teacher or student prepares questions or problems to asks (sic) teams. 

    • Students number off (1–4).

    • Teacher or student poses a problem and gives think time. Students privately write their answers. 

    • Students ‘put their heads together’: showing their answers, discussing, and teaching each other.

    • Students ensure that everyone agrees and can teach back the answer.

    • Teacher calls a number. Student with that number answers the question.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 12, the enhanced lesson plan includes discussion preparation guidelines:

    • (1 min) Have students jot down their responses to the question.

    • (2 min) Have students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts. Circulate and listen in for strong points.

    • (2 min) Whole-class discussion. Take hands or call on students who made interesting comments during small-group discussion.

  • Over the course of the year, a systematic approach is used to develop speaking and listening skills through the Socratic Seminars in each unit. Examples of protocols that build mastery and independence include, but ar not limited to: 

    • In Unit 1,Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, teachers are instructed to introduce the Socratic Seminar and its purpose. Students read an overview of how the discussion will occur and brainstorm to develop a list of expectations and rules. Suggested rules and expectations are included in the materials. Teacher guidance includes introducing a rubric, modeling a Socratic seminar through the use of videos and class discussion, and allowing students time to gather evidence to enhance their participation. 

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 19, students review the rules and expectations established in Unit 1 then go back to their self-reflection from Unit 1 to identify one thing they did well and would like to continue doing and one area to improve on in the discussion in Unit 2. The plans include having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Students can add to or clarify the previous speaker’s ideas, challenge the ideas, or add new information that has not been shared previously. Students also give a gist of the previous information to ensure that they are listening. 

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, teachers share their expectations of the seminar with students and model academic discourse strategies. Students reflect on their past discussions and summarize what the person before them said to ensure that students are listening. The plans include having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols for the discussion require students to respond directly to the person who spoke previously, determining if they want to challenge, add onto that person’s idea, or introduce a new idea that has not been discussed. 

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 29, the plans include having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols for the discussion require students to ask questions of classmates. Teacher suggestions are to pause the discussion after several people speak to allow students to write down questions they can ask and then allow students to ask their questions. This is done several times in the lesson.

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, the plans call for a continued emphasis on having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols for the discussion require students to  respond directly to the person who spoke previously, determining if they want to challenge, add onto that person’s idea, or introduce a new idea that has not been discussed. Students are expected to run the discussion. 

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse document outlines ways that teachers can “progress monitor and support students’ development of key conversation and discourse strategies.” The document includes other suggestions for support, such as:

    • “Provide sentence frames for students to use. Sentence frames should help students articulate their thoughts. Include sentence frames that use a variety of sentence structures to ensure that students have multiple options.

    • Provide scaffolding questions. If students are unable to initially answer the original question, provide scaffolding questions that build students to the deeper understandings.”  

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Tiers of Academic Discourse resource provides an explanation of each tier. Tier 1 describes how students clarify and share their thoughts. Materials provide information on three elements of instruction: Key Student Discourse Strategies, Key Teacher Talk Moves, and Sentence Frames. In Tier 2, students engage with the thinking of others; as with Tier 1, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. In Tier 3, students critique and analyze the reasoning of others; as found in Tiers 1 and 2, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse resource includes an Overview statement: “The goal is that by the end of the year, students will be able to participate in academic discourse using strategies from all three components, allowing them to show a deeper and more nuanced understanding of key content. Based on data from progress monitoring, students may need additional support in order to effectively orally communicate key ideas. Use the suggested supports below to decide which support to add for the whole class or for subsets of students.” Materials provide teachers with the following downloadable tools to use in the classroom: Academic Discourse Rubric, Discussion Self Assessment, Discussion Peer Assessment, Socratic Seminar Recording Form, and End-of-Discussion Assessment. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, students engage in a Socratic Seminar. Additional instructional supports include but are not limited to: “Share your expectations of the seminar with students. Model your chosen academic discourse strategies. Because students have experience with Socratic Seminar from Units 1 and 2, they should understand the basic structures of the day.” Language Supports are also available with sentence stems for academic discourse and instructions for supporting all students with academic discourse.

Indicator 1h

2 / 2

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

Materials include multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate what they are reading through various speaking and listening tasks in all units. The speaking and listening activities all require evidence from unit texts. Many discussions require students to have read the texts in advance to identify the author’s argument, create their own claims, and provide enough evidence to support their claims. Lessons regularly include Discussion Questions that allow students to practice speaking and listening skills. Each unit includes a Socratic Seminar. Research and formal presentation activities require data and images and offer students opportunities to ask clarifying questions of peers and work cooperatively. Academic Discourse Teacher Tools include guidance by providing key discourse strategies, teacher talk moves, and sentence frames. The materials provide tools to monitor academic discourse, including rubrics and recording forms, and the Teacher Tools include protocols for whole-class, small-group, and partner discourse. Teachers are provided with appropriate support and information to effectively teach students how to create collegial relationships and how to interact in discussions. 

Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Tier 3 Key Teacher Talk Moves states: “Press for reasoning: Teacher pushes students to apply their own reasoning to someone else’s reasoning. Potential questions include, ‘Do you agree or disagree with X, why? What do you think about X argument, why?’” and “Turn and Talk: Teacher gives students time to talk through their ideas with a partner. Student talk should focus on arriving at consensus or critiquing/defending a position.”

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Types of Academic Discourse section, for the Fishbowl protocol, teachers are directed to “make sure that students understand the roles they will play.” Those roles are then defined as “inner circle discusses a question” and “the outer circle observes.” Teachers are then instructed that “This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task – often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback.”

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 4, students explain how racism and racial bias shape the way that characters in All American Boys by Jason Reynold and Brendan Kiely are viewed. Students watch the video, “A conversation about Growing Up Black” by The New York Times. Students answer the following Writing Prompt: “In the video, ‘A Conversation about Growing Up Black,’ one young man—Bisa—says, ‘The way people perceive you is not up to you.’ (2:14-2:20). How would Rashad’s father respond to this idea? Provide at least one piece of evidence from pages 49-52 to support your answer. How would Spoony respond to this statement? Provide at least one piece of evidence from pages 52-53 and 60 to support your answer.” Students also answer Discussion Questions: “Why do you think that Rashad’s father is so hard on his sons? Does the video we watched today change your understanding of his behavior?” 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 5, students work with a group to create an information poster that explains a specific type of propaganda. Students include research and examples of the propaganda. The Lesson Objective is for students to present their poster to classmates, while the Skills and Strategies section states that students should “Present that information clearly and in a way their classmates can understand.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 20, students participate in a Socratic Seminar connecting to the reading of all unit texts. The lesson addresses the core standards SL.8.1.d (acknowledge new information expressed by others, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented). Teacher Tools are available including an Academic Discourse Rubric that assesses students’ ability to clarify and share their own thoughts, engage with the thinking of others, and critique and analyze the reasoning of others. Additional resources are available to support students with sentence stems they can utilize during academic discourse.

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 20, students prepare for the Socratic Seminar the following day as homework, which connects to the reading of All American Boys by Jason Reynold and Brendan Kiely: “Review the discussion questions and gather sufficient evidence.” Discussion Questions are available in Lesson 21, such as “Are Quinn and Rashad equally responsible for standing up against injustice?”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 23, students present digital presentations using appropriate volume, eye contact, emphasis, and pronunciation. Students work in groups to create the digital presentation, which “Includes at least four photographs and a map or graph/chart.” A sample presentation is available with a map to provide support. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 18, students watch the video, “Majede Najar: Why I wear a hijab” by TEDTalentSearch, and analyze the central idea, noting how the speaker develops her arguments.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, students participate in a Socratic Seminar. The objective of the lesson includes: “responding directly to others by rephrasing and delineating arguments, determining the strength of evidence, and posing clarifying questions.” The Teacher Tools include support for the Tiers of Academic Discourse, including sentence frames “To question/clarify to fully understand classmates’ ideas.”

Indicator 1i

2 / 2

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students complete on-demand prompts that connect to the discussions and activities for each lesson, and each unit includes process writing that spans more than one lesson. Specifically, students write longer essays to prompts that connect to core and supplemental texts using the steps of the writing process, including specific revision opportunities. In some units, students use digital resources to conduct research and create digital materials for presentations. The Teacher Tools include multiple resources with further details on how to provide guidance on both process and on-demand writing, including planning and executing writing lessons and strategies for giving feedback.  

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 5, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How does Anne’s new relationship with Peter change her perspective? What specific incidents and lines of text reveal this change? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from today’s reading to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 15, students write three short responses connecting to the reading of An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore and “The seven megatrends that could beat global warming: 'There is reason for hope'” by Damian Carrington. One question asks: “What evidence does Carrington provide to support these key points? Provide evidence from sections 1 and 7.”

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lessons 22-25, students complete a narrative writing project where they “construct a short story that explores the power of perspective.” Each lesson focuses on different parts of narrative writing, including outlining to sequence events, adding narrative strategies like dialogue, and revising their narrative for transitions, mechanics, and organization.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 25-27, students “Write a five-paragraph literary analysis that explores how rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) are used as propaganda,” connecting to Animal Farm by George Orwell. The writing task takes place over three lessons. During Lesson 27, students revise their essays for clarity, mechanics, and organization. As homework, students check their work for the requirements utilizing the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Essay Rubric. Teacher guidance includes, “Students who finish early may benefit from working as a peer-editor.” The rubric provides criteria for the introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion. There are also criteria available relating to Form and Style and Language and Mechanics.

  • In Unit 4: Surviving Persepolis, Lesson 6, students logically organize the information in their five-minute group presentations about one aspect of Iranian history. Additional guidance is available for Editing/Revision. Teachers remind students to edit and revise their work for grammar as well as content. The materials provide suggestions for transitions in the form of a chart, which can assist students to show a relationship between ideas. 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17-19, students write a letter to their representative in Congress educating on climate change and urging them to take action. Each lesson takes students through the writing process to complete the letter. In Lesson 19, students revise and edit for form and style, ensuring that they use strong clauses to connect ideas. Teachers instructions state that students should “check their work for the requirements in the Argumentative Writing: Persuasive Letter Rubric.” A link is provided to take teachers to the rubric. Guidance for teachers states that students should check for the following:

    • “All tenses match

    • All subject/verbs agree

    • Variety of type of sentences

    • Transitions between ideas

    • Pronouns in the proper case

    • Appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

    • Fix any comma splices or fragments or run-ons

Students who finish early may benefit from working as a peer-editor.”

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lessons 20-23, students research modern violent persecution and groups that are “currently under genocide alert” for a research presentation. They conduct research on a computer for the information and to “create a digital presentation” that uses slides to show their research.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2-6, students are given a list of suggested topics from Iranian history and culture that match the lessons in the unit. The prompt states: “Working with your group, create a digital presentation.” This digital presentation must include slides, images, and facts, statistics, and quotations from their research.”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17, students gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources. Students “collect information on their representatives’ voting record on climate change” and write a letter to their “representatives (two senators and a representative) in Congress, educating them on climate change and urging them to take action.” 

Indicator 1j

1 / 2

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j. 

Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different types of writing; however, the distribution does not reflect the requirements of the standards. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, though the percentage of informative lessons is less than the percentage of argumentative and narrative lessons, reflecting a 40/20/40 split. All writing assignments are text-specific or text-dependent and are connected to a unit theme and/or yearlong theme. The materials include explicit instruction in the different types of writing, though the instruction is not directly included in the teacher plans for each lesson. The resources are found in the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6-8) section. In addition, teacher support is offered for planning instruction and guiding student thinking with example answers in each lesson and Notes that highlight areas where students might struggle. These Notes include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support within and outside of the materials.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing, though they do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials include an uneven distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 40% argumentative, 20% informative, and 40% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is four argumentative, two informative, and four narrative.

  • In the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the writing instruction for argumentative and informational writing are grouped together.

    • The Persuasive/Argumentative Writing or Informational Writing section includes five sub-sections: Examine Evidence, Crafting a Thesis Statement, Structure a Body Paragraph, Writing Introductions and Conclusions, and Rhetorical Appeals. A mentor text is used for the majority of writing assignments. Instructions to help students write an introductory paragraph start with students studying the mentor text and answering questions as they read, such as “What is the purpose of an introduction?” Students return to the mentor text as they write. 

    • In Giving Writing Feedback, Persuasive/Argumentative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to create topic sentences that flow from the thesis statement; one “strategy is to work backwards through specific evidence to build the main claim and the topic sentences. This can also be modeled by:

      • selecting a particularly persuasive line of evidence from the research

      • building next to a topic sentence that would flow from that evidence

      • finally crafting a thesis statement that would include the subclaim from the topic sentence as part of the comprehensive argument”

    • In Giving Writing Feedback, Informational Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to use transitional words, phrases, or clauses to manage the sequence of events, teachers can “Review and model how to use transitional phrases to manage the sequence of events.

      • Transitional words or phrases can be used to show there is a transition in time. (The next day, after a while, before long, late that afternoon, the next thing I knew, etc.)”

      • Transitional words and phrases can be used to show there is a transition in setting or location. (In our backyard, when we went upstairs, at the post office, behind the trees etc.)

      • Transitional words and phrases can be used to show a sequence of events, or to show the connection between events. (At the beginning, as a result, it started when, as soon as, in the end, etc.)” 

  • In Teacher Tools, In the Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the Narrative Language section includes four sub-sections: Plot and Conflict, Language, Dialogue, and Conclusions. The Language section directs teachers to explicitly point out descriptive and sensory language in the mentor texts and suggest to students how they might include some of this language, such as mentioning that “Literary devices like similes, metaphors, and hyperbole are also a great way of drawing the reader into the text.” In Narrative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to develop a point of view or establish a context; teachers can prompt students to think about the following questions when brainstorming setting:

    • “What is the main location?

    • Are there any features of the main location that make it unique and should be highlighted?

    • Are there activities or occupations that are unique and/or important to the setting?

    • Does the setting influence the mood?

    • How does the setting influence the character’s actions?”

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 13, students write an argumentative paragraph to answer the question, “How does Eliezer feel about God and religion?” after reading an excerpt from the book Night by Elie Wiesel. The Teacher Tools Writing section of the materials includes an Argumentative Writing- Literary Analysis Paragraph Rubric for grading. One section on the rubric rates form and style, looking specifically for things such as a variety of types of sentences. The directions also instruct students to include elements of an argumentative piece, including a conclusion.

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 26, students “Write a five-paragraph literary analysis that explores how rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) are used as propaganda in the book.” Students introduce a claim, organize the reasons and evidence logically, and support the “argument with evidence from the text to develop your thesis.” In Lesson 27, students draft the introduction and conclusion. The Writing Prompt states, “Include a strong introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion for the essay.” Students practice providing a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented as a core standard in the lesson.

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 18, students write a letter to an elected official in Congress where they make a claim about climate change legislation and then include facts, statistics, and actions to be taken in the body of their letter. As homework, they read and annotate a mentor text, paying specific attention to the following pieces of the body paragraphs: 

      • “Topic sentence (with sub-claim)

      • Introduce the words/ideas from research (the citation)

      • Strong, relevant proof/evidence

      • Explanation (connecting the topic sentence and the thesis to the evidence)

      • Transitions (between ideas or paragraphs)”

In Lesson 19, students revise letters for form and style, using strong clauses to create cohesion between ideas. The Writing Prompt asks students to “Use formal, concise language that communicates the urgency of the situation.” students practice the skill of establishing and maintaining a formal style as a supporting standard in the lesson.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 20, students choose a group under a genocide alert, research that group, and consider how to use written text and images to produce a digital presentation. Specifically, students start with an introduction that will explain the background information about the genocide. Students study the term “genocide” and learn how to classify the level of genocide as a part of this presentation. They include researched information about the recent events in the area, classify the level of genocide according to the “10 Stages of Genocide,” and describe the response from the international community. Students are expected to develop a clear and organized presentation including showing the relationships between ideas. As a conclusion, students make recommendations that their classmates can take to help. In Lesson 23, students present their findings about the group they studied and demonstrate a solid knowledge of English grammar, using verbs in both active and passive voices.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2, the students create a group presentation on Iranian history. Presentation should be 

    • “Organized logically and clearly

    • Include background on the topic, at least four images (photographs, maps, or graphs/charts) or video clips, accurate facts, statistics, and quotations, a response or quotation from a witness and/or experts

    • Use any technical terms or definitions needed to understand the content.”

Students should end their presentation with “an explanation of why this aspect of Iranian history or culture is important” to tie all of the pieces together. In Lesson 6, students are finalizing their presentations, and the objective is to “logically organize the information in their presentations and include all required components.” The entire class period is dedicated to supporting students in the process of creating cohesion and clarifications.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 22, students read and annotate a mentor text for “a strong beginning, a middle, and a resolution.” As they begin to write the narrative, they use a first-person narrator who “tells a story about a conflict.” They must include “dialogue, descriptive details, and language that appeals to the five senses.” In Lesson 25, students complete their narrative and edit for “transitions, mechanics, and organization.” Students can refer back to any of the mentor texts studied for an example.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 21, students write either an essay or a comic strip that narrates an important experience from their lives that changed them in some way. Regardless of the mode, students need to 

      • “follow the traditional narrative structure so that the story unfolds logically

      • use narrative techniques like dialogue and description

      • use effective transitions that show the passage of time and the connection between different events in their stories

      • evoke images in the readers’ minds either by drawing them (the comic) or providing specific description language and sensory details (the essay) 

      • create a conclusion that flows logically from the narrative”

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, All American Boys, Lesson 12, students answer a Writing Prompt connected to the text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. The Writing Prompt states: “On page 215, Quinn writes, ‘The Invisible Man at Central High: Rashad.’ How do the authors develop the idea in today’s reading that Rashad is ‘invisible’? Write a two-paragraph response in which you provide two ways that the authors develop this idea, and provide evidence from pages 186–218 to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 21, students write either an essay or a comic strip that narrates an important experience from their lives that changed them in some way. This experience connects to Marjane Satrapi’s memoir, Persepolis, where she describes growing up during the Iranian Revolution.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 10, the narrative writing task is based on synthesizing multiple texts in the unit. The prompt states: “You have read a number of nonfiction texts about the current and potential impacts of climate change on our planet. You have also read several examples of poetry and short stories that discuss the climate crisis and what the future might hold. Your task is to write your own cli-fi short story that provides an answer to the following question: What might life on this planet look like if we do not address the climate crisis? Using what you have learned about scientists’ predictions for our future, write a story that describes the experience of at least one main character who is attempting to navigate this new, inhospitable planet.” 

Indicator 1k

1 / 2

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited to teacher guidance such as a sample writing response. Students engage in close reading tasks, develop claims for an intended audience, and support their position with evidence. Evidence used throughout the units comes primarily from texts included in the materials and independent research at times. Writing opportunities connect purposefully to the texts students are reading, and the tasks provide a means for building knowledge and writing skills across the school year. Students practice utilizing claims and support consistently, and rarely is writing done simply based on opinion.

Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence; however, materials provide limited opportunities across the school year for students to learn about writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 14, students read Night by Elie Wiesel and answer the Writing Prompt: “Compare the different reactions that Wiesel and his neighbor in the infirmary have to the news that the Red Army might be soon liberating Buna. What do their responses reveal about each person? Support your answer with two pieces of evidence from pages 78–81, and explain how they support your ideas.” A Sample Response is included for reference. The materials provide additional practice questions: “What is the impact of the selection on prisoners? What do their reactions reveal about human nature more broadly? Provide evidence from pages 70– the top of page 76.”The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 3, students read pages 38–49 from Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and answer the question: “What does the revolution—and its aftermath—reveal about Stalin as a person and as a leader?” Students use “at least three different pieces of evidence” to support the claim. The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 13, students read the article, "Focusing on How Individuals Can Stop Climate Change Is Very Convenient for Corporations,” and answer the Writing Prompt explaining how the author responds to “conflicting evidence and viewpoints in their writing? Provide at least two different examples and carefully explain your thinking.” Students are instructed to focus on the counter-argument in the writing and explain how the author establishes it. Although materials provide some additional scaffolding questions to help students find evidence in the text, the teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction. 

Writing opportunities are focused on students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 16, students read All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely and answer the question taking the perspective of Quinn: “What does it mean to be an All-American boy?” To support their claim, students will include evidence from the text. The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes more questions for students to analyze claims and work with evidence. The following is an example question: “Do the people writing about Rashad on the internet really ‘see’ him? Support your position with evidence from pages 277-278.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 21, students read Animal Farm by George Orwell and watch a film by the same title. Then they answer the Writing Prompt: “Contrast the ways that Napoleon is depicted early in the novel and early in the film. Provide evidence from both the text and film to support your answer. Evaluate the director’s choices.” The materials provide some additional scaffolding questions to help students find evidence in the text. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 23, students apply skills they have practiced when they complete the Unit Assessment. In Section 2 of the assessment, one requirement is to write an essay to the prompt: “Why did Satrapi write Persepolis? What impact has this graphic novel had on readers and on the world?” Students provide textual evidence to support their position from texts “Why I wrote Persepolis” by Marjane Satrapi and “Rereading Persepolis in 2020: What I’ve Learned” by Giovanna Centeno.

Indicator 1l

1 / 2

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l. 

Materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, and based on the information provided in the lessons, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The grammar standards are listed as core standards in the Standards Map, are referred to in some lesson objectives, and are named in writing rubrics; however, the guidance for educators is limited. Explicit instruction in the lessons is limited and does not ensure that students meet all the grade-level grammar and usage standards with the necessary support for application in context. In some writing lessons, Language Mini-Lessons are included where students have opportunities to notice how authors use language and its conventions; however,  practice opportunities for students to learn and apply the skills are limited. In Teacher Support, the Writing section addresses grammar in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction: “Fishtank ELA units teach grammar and language in context by integrating grammar and mechanics with craft and analysis. Students see how grammar and language help authors communicate specific ideas, and then learn how to use the same techniques in their Before writing.” This section also provides tips and a blank graphic organizer for students to use to create an Editing Checklist. The Teacher Tools encourage educators to provide opportunities for progress monitoring, including thinking about questions from Mechanically Inclined, such as “What have I done to teach this grammar of mechanics pattern?” The Teacher Tools are general, connecting to all grade levels and units. 

Materials include very limited explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards and few authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have some opportunities to explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 22, the objective is to “translate the expectations of the writing task and analyze a mentor text.” In the Enhanced Lesson, a mini-lesson is provided with the objective: “Differentiate between verbs and verbals and locate verbals within a sentence.” Teacher guidance explains the purpose of the lesson: “The goal is for students to recognize the impact of using gerunds, participles, and infinitives in their own writing. It helps to be able to identify these parts of a sentence. Students will also need to be able to recognize these devices as they move through close reading of text.” Teachers start by reviewing the basic elements of language relevant to this practice (verb, subject, object, and modifier). Students “practice distinguishing between verbs and verbals using the bolded words in” given sentences. Teachers are directed to “Model first, then move to guided practice.  If students are stuck, remind them to look for the subject first, then the action (the verb), to distinguish between verbs and verbals.” Students find examples of verbals in sentences from All American Boys.  

      • In Lesson 23, another mini-lesson on verbs and verbals is included. Students review the previous day’s lesson and “break down verbals into three different subcategories: gerund, participle, and infinitive. Then students apply their new knowledge to examples from the previous lesson, and “choose which type of verbal is being used in each sentence.” 

      • In Lesson 24, students continue to “practice identifying verbals as subjects, objects and modifiers,” in a mini-lesson. After completing the practice, the Additional Supports section suggests that students “can also look through their own writing to locate verbals.”

      • In Lesson 25, students “make inferences regarding the effect of verbals in a model text.” They look at given sentences from All American Boys and teachers are directed to “have students find the verbal, choose the type (gerund, participle, infinitive), and then make claims about the effect of that verbal on the sentence -- what does the gerund, participle, infinitive in the sentence do or say or suggest?”

  • Students have minimal opportunities to form and use verbs in the active and passive voice. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 20, the objective states that students will “outline the stages of genocide in preparation for creating a presentation.” In the Enhanced Lesson, a mini-lesson is included on how to discuss the difference between active and passive voice. The teacher is provided with the definitions and examples of passive and active voice. Students then practice “identifying which sentences are active and which are passive” and “Discuss the effect.”

      • In Lesson 21, students review the definitions of active and passive voice and read sentences from the text “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel. Students “Discuss which are active and which are passive–find the subject and the verb.” Students answer: “What is the effect? Why might Wiesel have chosen that voice?”

      • In Lesson 22, students practice moving from active to passive voice and vice versa and then practice the skill with given sentences.

      • In Lesson 23, students apply the “use of active and passive verbs in their own writing” by editing both given sentences and their current work.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to form and use verbs in the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 25, a Language Mini Lesson objective states: “Define the types of verb moods.” In this lesson, “students explore the function of verb moods” by using examples from the reading. A definition is given for indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive moods with examples of each. 

      • In Lesson 26, the objective states: “Practice writing sentences in different types of verb moods.” Students rewrite a sentence with another mood.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2, the Enhanced Lesson includes a mini-lesson with the objective to define the types of verb moods. The following guidance is provided: “Note to teacher: In this lesson, students explore the function of verb moods. Using examples from the reading, students can discuss the effect of different moods. Review the types of verb moods: indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive. These forms or categories illustrate how a verb can offer a fact (indicative mood), a command (imperative mood), a question (interrogative mood), a condition (conditional mood), or a wish or possibility (subjunctive mood). Review these examples from Persepolis and locate the verbs.” 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in verb voice and mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 27, the Language Mini Lesson instructs about inappropriate shifts in tense, voice, and mood using examples from the reading. “Students can discuss the effect of different sentence structures and the use of different moods.” In a second mini-lesson, students “locate verb shifts and discuss possible solutions.” 

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 4, Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson states: “Identify and discuss errors in verb tense, voice, and mood.” The following guidance is provided: “Note to teachers: In this lesson, students explore the issue of inappropriate shifts in verb tense, voice, and mood. Using examples from the reading, students can discuss the effect of different sentence structures and the use of different moods. 

      • Verbs in a sentence should stay consistent, but sometimes writers make unnecessary or unintended changes in tense, voice, and mood. These unnecessary changes, also called ‘shifts,’ can make reading difficult and can be confusing. Shifts or inconsistencies can be easily fixed; reading sentences out loud can help writers notice shifts when they occur in their own writing.

      • Here are some examples of problems and solutions in verb shifts:

        • 1. Fixing shifts in verb tense: There are three main verb forms for showing time or tense: simple, present, and progressive. Each has a different effect, but the most important consideration for a writer is that whichever verb tense is chosen needs to stay consistent -- not to switch around.”

      • In Lesson 5, students continue to “identify and revise errors in verb tense, voice, and mood” by practicing with examples from the text.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to use punctuation (comma, ellipsis, dash) to indicate a pause or break. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions: An Inconvenient Sequel, Lesson 17, Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson has students review the difference between a hyphen and a dash. Students then read sentences from the text containing an em dash and discuss the effect of the punctuation on the reader. Lesson 18 continues this skill and asks students to differentiate between a hyphen and a dash.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to use an ellipsis to indicate an omission. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17, the objective states: “Identify the features of a successful letter to Congress, collect information on their representatives’ voting record on climate change, and begin to craft a strong hook.” At the end of the lesson, students should work on standard L.8.2.a and “use punctuation (comma, ellipsis, dash) to indicate a pause or break.” There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill. This same skill is repeated in Lesson 18 with a different objective.

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 19, the objective states: “Revise letters for form and style, using strong clauses to create cohesion between ideas.” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, a Language Mini Lesson is provided on using an ellipsis and its impact on the meaning of sentences. The Supporting All Students section says that “students will continue to practice using the ellipsis when quoting text in their own writing.” 

      • A second Language Mini Lesson has students review the purpose of the ellipsis and use it to quote text. 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 18, the objective states: “Construct a strong thesis statement and compose effective body paragraphs for their letter to Congress.” Standard L.8.2.c is listed as a supporting standard, but there is no guidance or mention of students learning to spell correctly. 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to use verbs in the active and passive voice and in the conditional and subjunctive mood to achieve particular effects (e.g., emphasizing the actor or the action, expressing uncertainty, or describing a state contrary to fact). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 6, the objective states that students “Logically organize the information in their presentations and include all required components.” Standard L.8.3.a is a supporting standard. There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.

Indicator 1m

4 / 4

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

Materials include a rationale for how vocabulary should be taught and how the publisher views vocabulary as part of a lesson. There is explicit instuction of the vocabulary that is essential to understanding the text within lessons. Each unit includes a Vocabulary Practice with vocabulary words and definitions for each lesson, which consists of a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Vocabulary is included in some scaffolding questions and students have opportunities to apply the words in context. In addition, students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary. Teachers can assess some student learning around text-based vocabulary in each end of unit assessment. Some guidance is provided for how vocabulary is structured in the units, how to teach vocabulary, and how to support a range of learners during vocabulary instruction. The Enhanced Lesson Plans include a link to Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary; however, the guidance is not specific for the “priority vocabulary” words identified in the lesson, and other words included in the Supporting All Students section do not include a link and offer minimal guidance. The Teacher Tools share a brief overview: “Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic.” Students interact with vocabulary words through reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks. Teacher Tools include routines such as Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary and Implicit Instruction of Vocabulary. 

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit and lesson, vocabulary words are introduced before reading texts as necessary to understand the texts or the context surrounding them. 

  • Within the units, vocabulary words are intentionally included in many ways, so students become familiar with them through repetition, such as the words being present in questions, used during discussions, and heard in teacher-provided sentence stems. Some words are revisited from previous lessons, and students are asked to use them to indicate authentic learning of the words. Sometimes, once the lesson where the word is taught is passed, the word is not revisited. 

  • The Teacher Tools include Vocabulary guidance to share the two types of words in the materials: words to teach quickly and drop-in and words to study in-depth. The guidance includes instructions for teachers to “decide if the words are inferrable or not inferrable” and encourage learning vocabulary “indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines” rather than through explicit instruction. 

  • The Vocabulary Teacher Tool shares the ways that students interact with vocabulary words within a lesson and across the unit, such as “Close reading moments are included within lessons to analyze the use of words in context” or “When applicable, vocabulary words are used in later units in key questions or as part of word banks and sentence frames.” 

  • Materials include Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary guidance in the teacher tools section, which includes routines to introduce and review priority vocabulary. However, there is not sufficient guidance or reminders in the lesson plans themselves, to assist teachers.

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Domain-specific vocabulary is taught across multiple units. For example:

    • Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze different types of irony. One type is verbal irony which is defined as “when a speaker's intended meaning is the opposite of what they literally say” and the other is dramatic irony which is defined as “a literary technique where the author provides information to the reader that the characters are not aware of, evoking humor, suspense, or tragedy.” 

      • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 6, students read a selection from All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely to examine how the author conveys Rashad’s emotions through the use of verbal irony. 

      • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 15, students read a chapter of Animal Farm by George Orwell to explore dramatic irony, answering this question: “How does Squealer gaslight the animals on page 66-67 on the subject of beds? Provide evidence from these pages to support your answer, and explain how it is an example of dramatic irony—and the impact it has on the reader.”

    • Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze theme. 

      • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 18, students encounter the academic vocabulary thematic topic when they determine themes in All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brandon Kiely and explain how the themes are developed over the course of the text. Students answer Close Read Questions, such as the following: “What thematic topics do Reynolds and Kiely explore in this text? Try to come up with at least five.” 

      • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 17, students determine themes in the text Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. Students answer Close Read Questions, such as “What thematic topics does Satrapi explore in this text?” The same definition is available as the one in Unit 1.

  • Academic vocabulary words found in texts are introduced in units, but not always taught across multiple texts. For example:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 4, students learn the vocabulary word dehumanize as they watch the documentary “A Conversation about Growing Up Black” by The New York Times. Students answer Close Read Questions: “What does Jumoke mean when he says, ‘We’re starting to be dehumanized,’ at minute 2:54?” A definition is available as a reference: “To make someone feel or appear less than human; to deny that someone is fully human and treat them that way.” In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 10, students read Night by Elie Wiesel and revisit the word dehumanize when explaining “how the prisoners in Auschwitz-Birkenau were systematically dehumanized and stripped of their identities.” Students answer a Writing Prompt: “On page 37, Wiesel writes, ‘The child I was had been consumed by the flames. All that was left was a shape that resembled me. My soul had been invaded–and devoured–by a black flame.’ Find one example from today’s reading that demonstrates the impact of systematic dehumanization on Eliezer, explaining how his behavior and perspective have changed since arriving at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Provide quoted evidence and carefully explain your thinking.” Close Read Questions include, “Find at least four places on pages 34–42 where the prisoners are dehumanized by the Nazis (and other prisoners in positions of power). Provide specific evidence to support your answer, and explain why this treatment is dehumanizing.” The Discussion Questions include, “Why do you think the Nazis worked so deliberately to strip people of their identities and dehumanize their prisoners?”

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 5, the word propaganda is introduced. Students read three articles, two of which use the word in their title. In the lesson, students study different forms of propaganda and do a project to help inform their classmates on the different forms propaganda can take. In Lesson 8, students create an infographic that shows their research on a specific aspect of propaganda. In Lesson 13, students analyze the impact of different propaganda techniques the pigs use in Animal Farm by George Orwell. The word reappears numerous times throughout the unit.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 9, the word bleak is defined in the Vocabulary section. Students come across the word in their reading of Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi, and the word is explicitly taught in the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary section of the lesson. The word appears again in lessons 10, 11, and 12. For example, in lesson 11, students encounter the word in the question, “Would you describe Marji’s outlook on the world now as ‘bleak’?” 

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a complete Vocabulary Glossary for each grade that notes the Part of Speech and Definition. The teacher can search for vocabulary words in the list, create a comprehensive list of all vocabulary words when “Select a Unit” appears, and create a list for each individual unit by selecting a specific unit. The Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words are broken down into the following categories: text-based, root/affix, and academic. For example, in Unit 1, the text-based vocabulary words are allegiance, ambivalent, amplify, dehumanize, disproportionate, dumbfounded, explicit, implicit, impeccable, naive, perceive, radical, surreal, synonymous, transfixed, and ubiquitous. The academic vocabulary words are author's purpose, colloquial language, connotation, enjambment, epigraph, figurative language, free verse, metaphor, mood, personification, point of view/perspective, structure, thematic topic, theme, and verbal irony.  Even though the words are introduced, none of the lessons include explicit instruction for how to teach the vocabulary and teachers are expected to remember to reference the teachers tools section for generic guidance. No specific words are identified as more critical than the others.