2021

Fishtank Plus ELA 6-8

Publisher
Fishtank Learning
Subject
ELA
Grades
6-8
Report Release
04/21/2023
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
60/72
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report for 8th Grade

Alignment Summary

The grade 8 Fishtank Plus ELA materials meet the expectations for alignment. The materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit. 

Throughout the program, students have the ability to engage in fruitful discussions and to practice their writing skills. Students engage in all forms of writing, although the writing types do not reflect the distribution of text types expected by the standards. The materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammage usage standards but do include multiple opportunities for students to engage in guided vocabulary instruction. 

The grade 8 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “coming of age” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills.

The pacing guide and the implementation schedule provided may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.

8th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

19/25
0
15
22
25
Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

The grade 8 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted and from multiple perspectives. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The questions and tasks included in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit.

In the program, students regularly engage in fruitful class discussions where they can practice their speaking and listening skills, as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students also engage in on-demand and process writing opportunities across text types, although the opportunities do not reflect the distribution of text types expected of the standards. Explicit evidence-based writing instruction guidance in the materials is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The materials do include guidance on vocabulary instruction, and students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

18/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

The grade 8 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works, with a 76/24 split. Even though some of the texts are somewhat below the grade band level, the required tasks, as well as the concepts and language within the texts, allow for challenging material at the 8th-grade level. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. There are a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading.

Indicator 1A
04/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a. 

Anchor texts are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The anchor texts in each unit are engaging, high interest, and will stretch students’ thinking while covering ideas around injustice, oppression, and good and evil within humanity. Students read award-winning texts from multiple perspectives and have the opportunity to explore both literary and nonfiction texts of different genres that bring real experiences to life for readers. 

Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, students read the anchor text All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. The novel, 2016 Coretta Scott King Author Honor book and recipient of the Walter Dean Myers Award for Outstanding Children’s Literature, is told from two perspectives—that of a white boy and that of a black boy—who both witness the same event. The text is accessible and deals with injustice and oppression and how to stand up and make a difference. 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read two award-winning anchor texts, The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett and Night by Elie Wiesel. Both texts use first-person narrative to recount the horrors of different aspects of the Nazi occupation of Europe and the atrocities perpetrated against the Jewish people of Europe. The texts are well-crafted, challenging reads because of content, language, and time period. The stories explore whether humans are really good at heart and why it is still important to listen to stories from the Holocaust.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students read two anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm by George Orwell. Animal Farm is an award-winning satire. Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) gives students historical background information on the time period Orwell was warning about. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. The graphic novel is an autobiographical series of comics that depicts the author’s childhood up to her early adult years in Iran and Austria during and after the Islamic Revolution. The text is culturally relevant and includes vibrant images. The story contains shifting narrators, flashbacks, and cultural and historical references.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students read the anchor text, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore. The informational text includes imagery about a real-world issue and its impact on students’ lives.

Indicator 1B
04/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1b. 

Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the year. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works with a 76/24 split. The materials provide a balanced approach to instructional time for the informational and literary texts. Text types include memoirs, autobiographies, articles, speeches, nonfiction books, interviews, comics, videos, graphic novels, drama, poems, short stories, historical fiction novels, and novels. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read a contemporary fiction text by the same name written by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, read the article “What is White Privilege, Really?” by Cory Collins, watch videos “A Conversation about Growing Up Black” on The New York Times’ YouTube channel, examine websites “The Constitution of the United States,” read a speech “Why Black Lives Matter,” and read a series of short stories including Flying Lessons & Other Short Stories by Ellen Oh. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: a graph link from the US Census Bureau, an interview “The Racially Charged Meaning Behind the Word ‘Thug’”, and video “How to Be an Ally.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil, Night, students read Night, an autobiography by Elie Wiesel, and The Diary of Anne Frank, a play written by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Additional texts include a speech, excerpts from Anne Frank’s autobiography, Diary of a Young Girl, and an informational video “The Path to Nazi Genocide” by the United States Holocaust Museum. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: a  video "Chiune Sugihara: Righteous Among the Nations" (YouTube), a video "Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé" by British Pathé, a video "German Jewish deportees arriving at the Warsaw Ghetto" by Yad Vashem, an article "Ghettos Under the Nazis" by Susan D. Glazer (My Jewish Learning), a video "Surviving the Holocaust: Segment 5 — Arrival at Auschwitz" (YouTube).

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students read Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm by George Orwell, articles including “An Introduction to Communism” by Jessica McBirney, watch videos such as “One Human Family, Food for All” on Caritas Internationalis’ YouTube channel, and watch the movie Animal Farm. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as a video: “Russian Revolution and Civil War: Crash Course European History #35”, and articles “A Sinister Alliance: Soviet-German Relations” and “Warlords: Hitler vs. Stalin,” and a website that provides more information on the history of the film and the CIAs involvement in the making of the film. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read a graphic novel Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi, an informational article “How to read a comic book: appreciating the story behind the art” by Alex Abad-Santos, listen to an informational radio segment “The Stolen Revolution: Iranian Women of 1979” by CBC Radio, and read articles such as “Why do Muslim women wear a hijab?” by Caitlin Killian. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as a video "Mouvement de libération des femmes iraniennes année zero - English Subtitles" (YouTube), a video "What Happened in the Iran-Iraq War?” (YouTube), and "Women discuss what it’s like to wear a hijab" by Nara Schoenberg (The Detroit News).

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students read  An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore, evaluate speeches such as “Greta Thunberg challenging The World Economic Forum in Davos - January 22 2019,” read articles including “The Science of Climate Change Explained” by Julia Rosen, read books such as Everything Change: An Anthology of Climate Fiction by Manjana Milkoreit, Meredith Martinez, Joey Eschrich, and the short story “Row” by Charmaine Wilkerson, and examine the website “After Water Project.”

Materials reflect a balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials reflect a 76/24 balance of informational and literary texts with 44 informational texts and seven literary texts.

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, the materials across the unit contain seven informational texts and two literary texts. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, the materials across the unit contain five informational texts and one literary text. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, the materials across the unit contain nine informational texts and two literary texts. One core text is literary, and the other core text is informational.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the materials across the unit contain seven informational texts and one literary text. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, the materials across the unit contain 16 informational texts and one literary text. The core text is informational.

Indicator 1C
04/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.

Materials include anchor texts that are within or above the Lexile stretch band, ranging between 590L to 1170L, and the publisher consistently provides qualitative analysis rationales. There is a balance of accessible texts and more complex texts across the grade level. Even though some of the texts are somewhat below the grade band level, the required tasks, as well as the concepts and language within the texts, allow for challenging material. The qualitative analysis rationales for text selection and placement are in the Text Selection Rationale or the Notes for Teacher section. The Notes for Teacher section also informs educators what to be aware of and calls out concerning features of the texts. Qualitative analysis shows that the complexity increases slightly for varying reasons, including text structure, language, and knowledge demands. The qualitative rationale states that the relationship between the texts and the associated student tasks are accessible for the grade level with instances when students move into more complex tasks. The qualitative text complexity is determined by the Achieve the Core’s Literary Text Complexity Rubric. 

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, the anchor text, All American Boys (770L) by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely falls below the Lexile band. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate difficulty since the text has double protagonists in rotating perspectives, figurative language, and wordplay in a unique structure. The associated student tasks are moderate as they require students to “Draw conclusions about Quinn and Rashad’s perspectives based on what they say and do.” The overall qualitative measure is accessible.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, the two anchor texts,l Night (590L) by Elie Wiesel and the play The Diary of Anne Frank (NP) by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, fall below the median Lexile for Grade 8 at the beginning of the year. Qualitatively, the text is of medium and moderate complexity, respectively. In Night, Wiesel consistently uses complex structure, language, metaphor, and symbolism to get across the experiences of the Holocaust. In addition, there are many references to Judaism that students will need to build background around in order to fully understand the text. In The Diary of Anne Frank, students read stage directions and spoken dialogue and make connections between Anne Frank the character and Anne Frank the historical figure. The associated tasks are medium and moderate, respectively. The overall qualitative measure is moderate and complex.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, the anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) (970L) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm (1170L) by George Orwell, both fall within the stretch Lexile band. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate complexity due to accessible language about the Russian Revolution to build context for students. The qualitative analysis for Animal Farm is of high difficulty due to elevated vocabulary and complex sentences, but students should be able to access the text after building knowledge with Joseph Stalin. The associated tasks are moderate and medium, respectively. The overall qualitative measure is moderate and complex.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood (GN380L) by Marjane Satrapi, is below the Lexile range. Qualitatively, the text is of medium complexity due to students analyzing both text and images to assist with characterization, identification of the theme, text structure, unfamiliar setting, and identification of the mood. The associated student tasks are medium. The overall qualitative measure is complex.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, the anchor text, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore, is listed as an unleveled text by the publisher. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate difficulty due to tier two and three vocabulary, “complex scientific content and concepts and... wider social implications of climate change.” The associated tasks are challenging. The overall qualitative measure is complex.

Anchor/Core texts and a series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the text All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. The rationale also includes qualitative features to consider, such as unique structure, “wordplay, figurative language, verbal irony, and tier-two vocabulary.” The Notes for Teachers section recommends that teachers send a parent letter advising them of the topics being discussed, profanity, and references to drinking and drugs. Resources are also available to help students facilitate conversations about race in their classrooms. The educational purpose of the text is to provide an opportunity for students to think deeply about the content and the complexities of racial injustice, police brutality, loyalty, and their obligation to stand up for what is right.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the novel Night (590L), but the play The Diary of Anne Frank is unrated. While the Lexile level for Night is below Grade 8 Lexile band, the publisher notes that this text is often taught in high school courses because of text complexity: “His language is nonetheless complex because of his regular use of figurative language, symbols, motifs, and punctuation-- all in the service of communicating an experience that is impossible to capture in language. The vocabulary demands of the text are also high, as Wiesel uses many tier-two words. Students will need to have significant schematic support to understand Wiesel’s references to Judaism.” Similarly, The Diary of Anne Frank requires outside knowledge in order to fully comprehend the story, and the text structure may be unique to students as they must “differentiate between spoken lines and stage directions...the playwright has chosen to use voiceover narration in addition to dialogue.” While the overall story is chronological, there are “frequent jumps around in time that must be inferred by the reader.” The educational purpose of the texts is to provide an opportunity to explore human nature and students’ understanding of “one of the darkest moments in human history.” Elie Wiesel’s memoir and Anne Frank’s story resonate with young-adult readers, and “students begin to make connections between individual lives, historical events, and larger truths about what it means to be human.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) (970L) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm (1170L) by George Orwell. The rationale includes qualitative features to consider for Animal Farm, such as tier-two and tier-three vocabulary words, subtle irony, and dense sentence structures. The educational purpose of Joseph Stalin is to “introduce students to the real-life atrocities committed during this time period and give them a small window into the lives of the tens of millions of people who were murdered, starved, exiled, imprisoned, or killed on the battlefield” and to build knowledge “around the rise of Communism and the Russian Revolution” before reading Animal Farm, which has a higher level of complexity. Animal Farm is the first allegory they will read, and students use both texts to examine propaganda and artistic expression. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood (GN380L) by Marjane Satrapi, which is below the Grade 8 Lexile band. The rationale includes qualitative features that highlight the complexity of the text, “particularly in terms of structure and knowledge demands,” such as “first-person narrator (the writer as an adult reflecting on her childhood) but occasionally transitions to different narrators who tell stories that are presented as flashbacks.” The educational purpose of the text is to continue students’ “year-long study of the relationship between power and human behavior” as they learn about coming of age during the Iranian Revolution. The text Persepolis will “provide insight into this significant historical event through young Margi’s eyes, learning about the human impact of political upheaval and the ways that people resist repression in large and small ways.”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: An Inconvenient Sequel, the Text Selection Rationale does not include a Lexile rating for the anchor text, An inconvenient Truth by Al Gore. The rationale includes qualitative features, such as vocabulary demands with “multiple tier-two and tier-three words on most pages.” The qualitative features also make the text “both rigorous and accessible to 8th-grade readers, as they encounter complex scientific content and concepts and consider the wider social implications of climate change.” The educational purpose is to introduce students to the real-world problem of climate change. The Notes for Teachers section explicitly notes that climate change is not presented as a debate, and “students will read texts that include facts agreed upon by the scientific community.”

Indicator 1D
04/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d. 

Materials include the anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The Unit Summary and individual lessons outline a path for growth in literacy skills over time. Texts of varying complexity are included in each unit and are interconnected to add meaning to unit topics. Students practice skills during the beginning, middle, and end of the year and learn concepts and standards. Each lesson includes a Standards Map that shows when the literacy skills appear as core or supporting standards in units.   

Materials include suggested supports in each lesson. The teacher resources provide guidance on using the supports when reading the texts. Lessons contain multiple supports, including Language Supports and Additional supports during Close Reading, which feature guiding questions and key ideas students should understand. Discussion supports include questions and graphic organizers to guide students in locating information for discussions. Some lessons include supports for the Target Task with scaffolded questions that build understanding. Although not all lessons include the same supports, lessons other than writing lessons include multiple sections of support that provide teachers with scaffolds to ensure that students can access the texts and successfully complete the lessons. 

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • One literacy skill that is taught throughout the year is to engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (SL.8.1). In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, the lesson objective states: “Engage in a Socratic Seminar with classmates, drawing evidence from unit texts, and carefully explaining reasoning. The teacher determines the type of discussion, and students answer proposed Discussion Questions that explore character development in the story, racial injustice in the story and within our world, and what people can do to stop injustices today. Two questions include, “Who changes more over the course of the text: Quinn or Rashad? Are Quinn and Rashad equally responsible for standing up against injustice?” In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, the lesson objective states: “Engage in a Socratic Seminar with peers, demonstrating a deep understanding of the text and topic by posing and responding to questions and providing evidence to support ideas.” The teacher determines the type of discussion, and students answer Discussion Questions that analyze Orwell’s feelings about communism, the most effective weapon Napoleon uses, why animals choose to believe Squealer’s lies, and the book is still relevant today. Two questions include, “Why did the animals continue to believe Squealer’s lies, even as they became more obvious? Is this book still relevant today?” In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, the lesson objective states: “Engage in a Socratic Seminar with peers, responding directly to others by rephrasing and delineating arguments, determining the strength of evidence, and posing clarifying questions.” The teacher determines the type of discussion, and the students answer Discussion Questions, such as “Must we change? Can we change? Will we change? What is the relationship between climate change, money, and power?”

  • Another literacy skill taught throughout the year is to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to the characters, setting, and plot; provide an objective summary of the text (RL.8.2). In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 18, the lesson objective states: “Determine themes in All American Boys and explain how they are developed over the course of the text.” Close Reading Questions ask: “What thematic topics do Reynolds and Kiely explore in this text? Try to come up with at least five. What theme do Reynolds and Kiely develop in All American Boys on the topic of “loyalty”? What specific sections, details, or events from the text help to develop this theme?” The Writing Prompt asks: “What theme do Reynolds and Kiely develop in All American Boys on the topic of ‘injustice’? What specific characters and/or events from the text help to develop this theme?” In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 20, the lesson objective states: “Determine what Orwell wants the reader to understand about the Russian Revolution and human nature more broadly, and explain how he develops these ideas in Animal Farm.” The Close Reading Question asks: “What does Orwell want the reader to understand about Stalin and the Russian Revolution?” In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 17, the lesson objective states: “Determine themes in Persepolis and explain how Satrapi develops them in the text.” The Writing Prompt asks: “What theme does Satrapi develop on the topic of resistance? Write a paragraph in which you explain how she develops this theme over the course of the text. Provide examples from at least two different sections of the text and be sure to use references to text and images to support your answer.”

As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, and skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, the general description of the supports available states: “The Fishtank ELA curriculum includes five types of supports to help provide students access to different features of text complexity-language supports, background knowledge supports, additional supports, foundational skills supports, and opportunities for enrichment. After you have determined the aspect of the texts that will be most challenging for your students, you can decide which supports are most appropriate. These supports can be used with the whole group, in small groups, or individually.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.

  • In the Teacher Tools, “Supporting English Learners,” the guidance states: “Learn how to provide scaffolds that help English Learners access complex texts. Explore the different types of graphic organizers that can be used as scaffolds.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, various resources are included to support Speaking and Listening, such as Tiers of Academic Discourse, Types of Academic Discourse, Sentence Frames for Academic Discourse, Discussion Graphic Organizer.” Teachers can also read more information about academic discourse with Preparing for Academic Discourse and Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse. These resources are provided in all units at each grade level, where Speaking and Listening standards are assessed.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 4, while students read Night, additional supports for each question include scaffolding questions and student understandings: “What is the purpose of stage directions in a play? What can the reader infer from this ‘look’? What emotions are communicated through these stage directions? Students should understand: The stage directions communicate to the reader that Mr. Dussel does not want to tell them bad news -- that Hanneli was taken away by the Nazis.” 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 7, there are supports for building background knowledge,  Language Supports that identify possible words/phrases with short definitions, Close Reading scaffolding questions, and guidance for teachers to help make the reading more accessible, and a graphic organizer that assists students in organizing the main ideas of each chapter and the evidence of how the author develops the central idea. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 8, in the Close Read section, the following student understandings, and sentence frames are included: “Students should understand: The use of dark color creates an ominous mood. The large heads are looking down at Satrapi’s mother; their expression is angry and their size and number develops the sense of being watched. Marji’s mother has her collar pulled up, as if she is trying to hide from their gaze. This panel communicates the sense that people were being closely watched, and that being ‘caught’ could be very dangerous”. Sentence frames include: “In the final panel on page 5, Satrapi communicates the idea that __________. In the panel, ___________ and _________. These images ___________.”

  • In Unit 5: Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 7, there are multiple sections of Additional Supports during Close Reading that provide scaffolding questions and the corresponding page number where students should locate the evidence to support an answer. There is also a Suggested Support for building background knowledge and accessing prior knowledge, including a link to an article to help students better understand atomic testing. Teachers are suggested to use a “drop-in” definition to help students understand additional difficult words. There is also supports for the task and the class discussion. 

Indicator 1E
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e. 

Materials include a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading. There is support in place connecting to specific texts as students engage in these readings. Over the course of the year, students read different types of texts ranging from traditional print sources; such as literary and informational novels, newspaper articles, and magazine articles, to non-traditional sources such as graphic novel, film, and video. Students engage in a volume of reading across the school year, including reading during and outside the school day on a consistent basis. The Teacher Tools section includes procedures and routines for different types of reading, including Interactive Read Alouds, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading. The materials include independent reading opportunities that are often homework assignments; students take part in comprehensive discussions and activities related to the homework reading in class the following day. The resource, Recommended Texts for Independent Reading, makes recommendations for fiction and non-fiction texts with aligned themes and topics and additional texts by the same author.

Teacher Tools provide additional guidance for educators relating to independent reading procedures, though the guidance is often general rather than lesson-specific. For example, the Components of an ELA Lesson under the Homework heading states: “Some lessons require students to read sections of the text prior to class. Homework for the next lesson is identified. Homework should be assigned at the end of the class period.” Teacher Tools also offer guidance relating to Reading Structures and Routines, including information for Independent Reading for Homework (6–12): “...to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.” The Teacher Tools are consistent across grade levels, and the guidance provides suggestions for accountability measures, such as graphic organizers, annotations, and written checks for understanding. Though there is no specific tracking system provided, students are expected to complete reading homework on a regular basis to be able to complete in-class activities. They are held accountable to this reading through homework questions related to the assigned reading which can be found in each lesson plan. The teacher uses these questions to launch the following lesson with a quick class discussion.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and provide supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following::

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read the anchor text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. Supplemental texts include articles, government documents, videos, a speech, short stories, and an opinion.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read the anchor texts, The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett (play) and Night by Elie Wiesel. Supplemental texts include videos, a memoir, and a speech.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students read two anchor texts, Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and Animal Farm by George Orwell. Supplemental texts include articles, videos, and the movie version of Animal Farm.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read the anchor text, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. Supplemental texts include articles, videos, a comic, and a radio segment.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students read the anchor text, An Inconvenient Sequel by Al Gore. Supplemental texts include articles, speeches, a short story, a website, and a fiction anthology.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read multiple texts such as: All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, “What is White Privilege, Really?” by Cory Collins, and “The ‘Say Her Name’ Movement Started for a Reason: We Forget Black Women Killed by Police” by Precious Fondren. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read multiple texts such as: The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, Night by Elie Wiesel, Ann Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl by Ann Frank, and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read multiple texts such as: Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi, “What is a Graphic Novel” by Jessica Abel, “How to read a comic book: appreciating the story behind the art” by Alex Abad-Santos, and “Why do Muslim women wear a hijab?” by Caitlin Killian. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework.  

There is teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance for a proposed schedule for independent reading is explained: “In order to show accelerated reading growth, students need to read for at least 15 minutes a day, with the greatest growth being shown in students who read over a half-hour to an hour a day. Due to the block structure of most middle and high schools, it would be nearly impossible for students to read in class for 30 minutes a day while also having time to critically analyze the text through discussion and writing. Therefore, to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.”

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance related to accountability is stated: 

    • “Assign an annotation focus. Have students annotate in the text to show their understanding of the text. Student annotations can be used to show that students are reading and that they understand what they are reading. Students can return to their annotations during class discussions and writing.

    • Provide Graphic Organizers. While reading, have students use different graphic organizers to interact with the text. Potential graphic organizers include: Say, Mean, Matter Graphic Organizer or Double Journal Entry.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 11, students read the next chapter of Animal Farm by George Orwell for homework. Guidance includes specific questions for students to answer while reading, such as: “What event finally sparks the rebellion? What rule do the animals make about clothing? What do the pigs reveal that they have been learning?”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 6, students read the article, “As Rising Heat Bakes US Cities, The Poor Often Feel It Most” by Meg Anderson and Sean McMinn. For homework, students read the article, “Notes from a Bottle” by James Stevenson. Guidance includes specific questions for students to anser while reading, such as: “When does this story take place? Who are the main characters in this story?”

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

15/18

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The grade 8 materials include questions and tasks that require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year. The questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. There are consistent opportunities to practice speaking and listening skills as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, reflecting a 40/20/40 split. Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit teacher guidance on evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. Materials include guidance on vocabulary instruction. Students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.

Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and text-dependent, referencing specific page numbers or portions of the text at times. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year, and the questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. Almost all segments of the Lesson Plan, including Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions, require students to return to the text and provide evidence to support their ideas and support students in making meaning of core understanding of the texts being studied. The program uses a common system of organization, and students answer a series of writing prompts and questions to comprehend the text, build knowledge, and understand how the reading and tasks connect to each unit's overall topic/theme. 

Materials provide support for planning instruction and implementing text-based questions and tasks, including Sample Responses and Notes for Teachers that highlight areas where students might struggle. The Notes for Teachers include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support both within and outside of the materials. Additional lesson-specific Notes are available in some lessons, such as in Unit 5, Lesson 16. In each lesson, the Enhanced Lesson Plans provide Scaffolding questions for both the Close Read Questions and Writing Prompts to support teachers and students in answering the questions or completing the tasks successfully. 

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 7, students read All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely and answer Close Read Questions: “How does watching the recording of the attack impact Rashad? Provide evidence from pages 94–95 to support your answer. Why did the authors most likely include the passage on page 106 about Jill’s party? What does this description reveal? Provide evidence from page 106 to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 9, students complete the Writing Prompt: “Which specific incidents, lines of text, and panels reveal that Marji is very young and has more to learn about how the world works? Provide at least two examples from today’s reading, referencing both text and images to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 3, students read “The Science of Climate Change Explained” by Julia Rosen and answer the Writing Prompt: “What evidence does Rosen provide to support the claim that climate change is caused by human activity? How does she respond to ideas that challenge this claim? Provide specific evidence from the section.” 

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In all units, materials provide support for teachers. In the Unit Summary, materials provide a number of supports for teachers when approaching the unit texts, including an overview of both the text and the learning outcomes. The Unit Summary includes the Notes for Teachers section, which contains pertinent information about teaching the core text, such as how to approach specific lessons and where to find further supports in the materials. In each lesson, the Key Understandings section provides an overview of the Skills and Strategies that students should be learning and using. The Knowledge section provides the main ideas and plot details from the text(s). 

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 16, students answer the Close Reading Question: “Do the people writing about Rashad on the internet really ‘see’ him? Support your position with evidence from pages 277-278.” Additional supports include scaffolded questions and student understandings, such as, “How do the different photos of Rashad change the way that others view him?” 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 8, students complete a Writing Prompt about symbolism: “Considering what is happening in these passages, what might ‘night’ symbolize, based on this section of text? Support your answer with at least two pieces of evidence from these pages.” Teacher guidance states to explain motif and symbolism and to help students identify that night is a motif in the text but also a symbol. There are specific activities provided that help students answer the prompt, such as working with a partner, providing examples of what almost meets expectations and meets expectations, and guiding students in evaluating their own work based on feedback. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 14, students complete a Writing Prompt where they compare characters in two unit texts Animal Farm by George Orwell and Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum. Materials provide a Sample Response, which includes an additional note at the end for teachers: “*Students may also identify that Napoleon and Stalin both use propaganda/manipulative language, but there is less evidence to support this position in the sections of Stalin (A Wicked History) we read today.” 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 12, students answer the Close Read Question: “How were women treated who did not conform to the new rules about ‘modesty’? Provide two different examples and use evidence from both texts to support your answer.” Teachers are provided with scaffolding questions in the Additional Supports section that guide students who may struggle to successfully answer the question. There is also a list of key understandings that students need to reach before in order to answer the question. Some of these key moments to analyze include women experiencing “verbal and physical attacks they’d faced on the streets from pro-regime thugs”, being fired from work, and facing expulsion for refusing to wear a veil.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, students participate in a Socratic Seminar where they focus on Discussion Questions from informational texts in the unit: “What is the relationship between climate change, money, and power? Does individual action matter to limiting climate change?” The Notes section includes guidance such as, “Create clear expectations for the discussion and student groups (if necessary). Additionally, decide what discourse strategies you will model for students to ensure that students are able to effectively engage with one another (for guidance, see our Teacher Tool about Tiers of Academic Discourse).” Materials also include sentence stems for student support as they answer discussion questions.

Indicator 1G
02/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g. 

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students practice speaking and listening skills with Discussion Questions in each lesson, which are “open-ended questions designed to prompt student reflection on the day’s reading and to make connections between the text, larger social issues, and their own lives. Discussion questions often come at the end of lessons and are an opportunity to bring students together to speak and listen to one another.” The protocols support students’ developing speaking and listening skills for a variety of discussions, including different formats of whole class, small group, and partner discussions. Each unit also includes a full day of Socratic Seminar discussion.

Materials provide teachers with many options for including discourse in the classroom and the freedom to choose which protocols are appropriate for their students. Instructional supports and protocols are available in the Enhanced Lesson Plans Building Background and Engagement section in those lessons that include a discussion that gives at least some guidance on how to conduct the discussion. There are also specific guidelines in the Socratic Seminar lessons that build from the first unit to the last in each grade showing a progression in building discussion skills. The skills and protocols are scaffolded for teachers and students to build greater mastery and student independence. The Teacher Tools includes resources for how to help engage students in discourse, create a classroom culture that supports conversation, and monitor student growth. The Academic Discourse section provides teachers with four different resources for guiding and supporting students in developing speaking and listening skills. These resources are referenced and linked consistently across the units. 

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section, different types of protocols are provided. One example is a partner discussion, which includes the following protocol: Teachers choose from various discussion protocols to have students discuss open-ended questions, such as Think-Pair-Share: 

    • “Students are given time to think before pairing up and sharing. 

    • Teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. 

    • Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer.

    • Students pair up. 

    • Students take turns sharing their answers.”

  • In each unit, a Socratic Seminar is provided as a formal discussion, and students use one teacher-chosen, open-ended question from the multiple Discussion Questions provided in the lesson. The same directions are provided for the teacher in the Notes section of each Socratic Seminar lesson: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion. Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 9, students answer Discussion Questions: “Do you think that optimism or pessimism is a more useful emotion/perspective on the world? What is the difference between optimism and delusion?” The Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section, includes multiple outlined protocols for teachers, such as Numbered Heads Together:

    • “Teacher or student prepares questions or problems to asks (sic) teams. 

    • Students number off (1–4).

    • Teacher or student poses a problem and gives think time. Students privately write their answers. 

    • Students ‘put their heads together’: showing their answers, discussing, and teaching each other.

    • Students ensure that everyone agrees and can teach back the answer.

    • Teacher calls a number. Student with that number answers the question.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 12, the enhanced lesson plan includes discussion preparation guidelines:

    • (1 min) Have students jot down their responses to the question.

    • (2 min) Have students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts. Circulate and listen in for strong points.

    • (2 min) Whole-class discussion. Take hands or call on students who made interesting comments during small-group discussion.

  • Over the course of the year, a systematic approach is used to develop speaking and listening skills through the Socratic Seminars in each unit. Examples of protocols that build mastery and independence include, but ar not limited to: 

    • In Unit 1,Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, teachers are instructed to introduce the Socratic Seminar and its purpose. Students read an overview of how the discussion will occur and brainstorm to develop a list of expectations and rules. Suggested rules and expectations are included in the materials. Teacher guidance includes introducing a rubric, modeling a Socratic seminar through the use of videos and class discussion, and allowing students time to gather evidence to enhance their participation. 

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 19, students review the rules and expectations established in Unit 1 then go back to their self-reflection from Unit 1 to identify one thing they did well and would like to continue doing and one area to improve on in the discussion in Unit 2. The plans include having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Students can add to or clarify the previous speaker’s ideas, challenge the ideas, or add new information that has not been shared previously. Students also give a gist of the previous information to ensure that they are listening. 

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, teachers share their expectations of the seminar with students and model academic discourse strategies. Students reflect on their past discussions and summarize what the person before them said to ensure that students are listening. The plans include having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols for the discussion require students to respond directly to the person who spoke previously, determining if they want to challenge, add onto that person’s idea, or introduce a new idea that has not been discussed. 

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 29, the plans include having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols for the discussion require students to ask questions of classmates. Teacher suggestions are to pause the discussion after several people speak to allow students to write down questions they can ask and then allow students to ask their questions. This is done several times in the lesson.

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, the plans call for a continued emphasis on having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols for the discussion require students to  respond directly to the person who spoke previously, determining if they want to challenge, add onto that person’s idea, or introduce a new idea that has not been discussed. Students are expected to run the discussion. 

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse document outlines ways that teachers can “progress monitor and support students’ development of key conversation and discourse strategies.” The document includes other suggestions for support, such as:

    • “Provide sentence frames for students to use. Sentence frames should help students articulate their thoughts. Include sentence frames that use a variety of sentence structures to ensure that students have multiple options.

    • Provide scaffolding questions. If students are unable to initially answer the original question, provide scaffolding questions that build students to the deeper understandings.”  

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Tiers of Academic Discourse resource provides an explanation of each tier. Tier 1 describes how students clarify and share their thoughts. Materials provide information on three elements of instruction: Key Student Discourse Strategies, Key Teacher Talk Moves, and Sentence Frames. In Tier 2, students engage with the thinking of others; as with Tier 1, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. In Tier 3, students critique and analyze the reasoning of others; as found in Tiers 1 and 2, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse resource includes an Overview statement: “The goal is that by the end of the year, students will be able to participate in academic discourse using strategies from all three components, allowing them to show a deeper and more nuanced understanding of key content. Based on data from progress monitoring, students may need additional support in order to effectively orally communicate key ideas. Use the suggested supports below to decide which support to add for the whole class or for subsets of students.” Materials provide teachers with the following downloadable tools to use in the classroom: Academic Discourse Rubric, Discussion Self Assessment, Discussion Peer Assessment, Socratic Seminar Recording Form, and End-of-Discussion Assessment. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, students engage in a Socratic Seminar. Additional instructional supports include but are not limited to: “Share your expectations of the seminar with students. Model your chosen academic discourse strategies. Because students have experience with Socratic Seminar from Units 1 and 2, they should understand the basic structures of the day.” Language Supports are also available with sentence stems for academic discourse and instructions for supporting all students with academic discourse.

Indicator 1H
02/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

Materials include multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate what they are reading through various speaking and listening tasks in all units. The speaking and listening activities all require evidence from unit texts. Many discussions require students to have read the texts in advance to identify the author’s argument, create their own claims, and provide enough evidence to support their claims. Lessons regularly include Discussion Questions that allow students to practice speaking and listening skills. Each unit includes a Socratic Seminar. Research and formal presentation activities require data and images and offer students opportunities to ask clarifying questions of peers and work cooperatively. Academic Discourse Teacher Tools include guidance by providing key discourse strategies, teacher talk moves, and sentence frames. The materials provide tools to monitor academic discourse, including rubrics and recording forms, and the Teacher Tools include protocols for whole-class, small-group, and partner discourse. Teachers are provided with appropriate support and information to effectively teach students how to create collegial relationships and how to interact in discussions. 

Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Tier 3 Key Teacher Talk Moves states: “Press for reasoning: Teacher pushes students to apply their own reasoning to someone else’s reasoning. Potential questions include, ‘Do you agree or disagree with X, why? What do you think about X argument, why?’” and “Turn and Talk: Teacher gives students time to talk through their ideas with a partner. Student talk should focus on arriving at consensus or critiquing/defending a position.”

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Types of Academic Discourse section, for the Fishbowl protocol, teachers are directed to “make sure that students understand the roles they will play.” Those roles are then defined as “inner circle discusses a question” and “the outer circle observes.” Teachers are then instructed that “This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task – often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback.”

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 4, students explain how racism and racial bias shape the way that characters in All American Boys by Jason Reynold and Brendan Kiely are viewed. Students watch the video, “A conversation about Growing Up Black” by The New York Times. Students answer the following Writing Prompt: “In the video, ‘A Conversation about Growing Up Black,’ one young man—Bisa—says, ‘The way people perceive you is not up to you.’ (2:14-2:20). How would Rashad’s father respond to this idea? Provide at least one piece of evidence from pages 49-52 to support your answer. How would Spoony respond to this statement? Provide at least one piece of evidence from pages 52-53 and 60 to support your answer.” Students also answer Discussion Questions: “Why do you think that Rashad’s father is so hard on his sons? Does the video we watched today change your understanding of his behavior?” 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 5, students work with a group to create an information poster that explains a specific type of propaganda. Students include research and examples of the propaganda. The Lesson Objective is for students to present their poster to classmates, while the Skills and Strategies section states that students should “Present that information clearly and in a way their classmates can understand.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 20, students participate in a Socratic Seminar connecting to the reading of all unit texts. The lesson addresses the core standards SL.8.1.d (acknowledge new information expressed by others, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented). Teacher Tools are available including an Academic Discourse Rubric that assesses students’ ability to clarify and share their own thoughts, engage with the thinking of others, and critique and analyze the reasoning of others. Additional resources are available to support students with sentence stems they can utilize during academic discourse.

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 20, students prepare for the Socratic Seminar the following day as homework, which connects to the reading of All American Boys by Jason Reynold and Brendan Kiely: “Review the discussion questions and gather sufficient evidence.” Discussion Questions are available in Lesson 21, such as “Are Quinn and Rashad equally responsible for standing up against injustice?”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 23, students present digital presentations using appropriate volume, eye contact, emphasis, and pronunciation. Students work in groups to create the digital presentation, which “Includes at least four photographs and a map or graph/chart.” A sample presentation is available with a map to provide support. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 18, students watch the video, “Majede Najar: Why I wear a hijab” by TEDTalentSearch, and analyze the central idea, noting how the speaker develops her arguments.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, students participate in a Socratic Seminar. The objective of the lesson includes: “responding directly to others by rephrasing and delineating arguments, determining the strength of evidence, and posing clarifying questions.” The Teacher Tools include support for the Tiers of Academic Discourse, including sentence frames “To question/clarify to fully understand classmates’ ideas.”

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students complete on-demand prompts that connect to the discussions and activities for each lesson, and each unit includes process writing that spans more than one lesson. Specifically, students write longer essays to prompts that connect to core and supplemental texts using the steps of the writing process, including specific revision opportunities. In some units, students use digital resources to conduct research and create digital materials for presentations. The Teacher Tools include multiple resources with further details on how to provide guidance on both process and on-demand writing, including planning and executing writing lessons and strategies for giving feedback.  

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 5, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How does Anne’s new relationship with Peter change her perspective? What specific incidents and lines of text reveal this change? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from today’s reading to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 15, students write three short responses connecting to the reading of An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore and “The seven megatrends that could beat global warming: 'There is reason for hope'” by Damian Carrington. One question asks: “What evidence does Carrington provide to support these key points? Provide evidence from sections 1 and 7.”

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lessons 22-25, students complete a narrative writing project where they “construct a short story that explores the power of perspective.” Each lesson focuses on different parts of narrative writing, including outlining to sequence events, adding narrative strategies like dialogue, and revising their narrative for transitions, mechanics, and organization.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 25-27, students “Write a five-paragraph literary analysis that explores how rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) are used as propaganda,” connecting to Animal Farm by George Orwell. The writing task takes place over three lessons. During Lesson 27, students revise their essays for clarity, mechanics, and organization. As homework, students check their work for the requirements utilizing the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Essay Rubric. Teacher guidance includes, “Students who finish early may benefit from working as a peer-editor.” The rubric provides criteria for the introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion. There are also criteria available relating to Form and Style and Language and Mechanics.

  • In Unit 4: Surviving Persepolis, Lesson 6, students logically organize the information in their five-minute group presentations about one aspect of Iranian history. Additional guidance is available for Editing/Revision. Teachers remind students to edit and revise their work for grammar as well as content. The materials provide suggestions for transitions in the form of a chart, which can assist students to show a relationship between ideas. 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17-19, students write a letter to their representative in Congress educating on climate change and urging them to take action. Each lesson takes students through the writing process to complete the letter. In Lesson 19, students revise and edit for form and style, ensuring that they use strong clauses to connect ideas. Teachers instructions state that students should “check their work for the requirements in the Argumentative Writing: Persuasive Letter Rubric.” A link is provided to take teachers to the rubric. Guidance for teachers states that students should check for the following:

    • “All tenses match

    • All subject/verbs agree

    • Variety of type of sentences

    • Transitions between ideas

    • Pronouns in the proper case

    • Appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

    • Fix any comma splices or fragments or run-ons

Students who finish early may benefit from working as a peer-editor.”

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lessons 20-23, students research modern violent persecution and groups that are “currently under genocide alert” for a research presentation. They conduct research on a computer for the information and to “create a digital presentation” that uses slides to show their research.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2-6, students are given a list of suggested topics from Iranian history and culture that match the lessons in the unit. The prompt states: “Working with your group, create a digital presentation.” This digital presentation must include slides, images, and facts, statistics, and quotations from their research.”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17, students gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources. Students “collect information on their representatives’ voting record on climate change” and write a letter to their “representatives (two senators and a representative) in Congress, educating them on climate change and urging them to take action.” 

Indicator 1J
01/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j. 

Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different types of writing; however, the distribution does not reflect the requirements of the standards. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, though the percentage of informative lessons is less than the percentage of argumentative and narrative lessons, reflecting a 40/20/40 split. All writing assignments are text-specific or text-dependent and are connected to a unit theme and/or yearlong theme. The materials include explicit instruction in the different types of writing, though the instruction is not directly included in the teacher plans for each lesson. The resources are found in the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6-8) section. In addition, teacher support is offered for planning instruction and guiding student thinking with example answers in each lesson and Notes that highlight areas where students might struggle. These Notes include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support within and outside of the materials.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing, though they do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials include an uneven distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 40% argumentative, 20% informative, and 40% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is four argumentative, two informative, and four narrative.

  • In the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the writing instruction for argumentative and informational writing are grouped together.

    • The Persuasive/Argumentative Writing or Informational Writing section includes five sub-sections: Examine Evidence, Crafting a Thesis Statement, Structure a Body Paragraph, Writing Introductions and Conclusions, and Rhetorical Appeals. A mentor text is used for the majority of writing assignments. Instructions to help students write an introductory paragraph start with students studying the mentor text and answering questions as they read, such as “What is the purpose of an introduction?” Students return to the mentor text as they write. 

    • In Giving Writing Feedback, Persuasive/Argumentative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to create topic sentences that flow from the thesis statement; one “strategy is to work backwards through specific evidence to build the main claim and the topic sentences. This can also be modeled by:

      • selecting a particularly persuasive line of evidence from the research

      • building next to a topic sentence that would flow from that evidence

      • finally crafting a thesis statement that would include the subclaim from the topic sentence as part of the comprehensive argument”

    • In Giving Writing Feedback, Informational Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to use transitional words, phrases, or clauses to manage the sequence of events, teachers can “Review and model how to use transitional phrases to manage the sequence of events.

      • Transitional words or phrases can be used to show there is a transition in time. (The next day, after a while, before long, late that afternoon, the next thing I knew, etc.)”

      • Transitional words and phrases can be used to show there is a transition in setting or location. (In our backyard, when we went upstairs, at the post office, behind the trees etc.)

      • Transitional words and phrases can be used to show a sequence of events, or to show the connection between events. (At the beginning, as a result, it started when, as soon as, in the end, etc.)” 

  • In Teacher Tools, In the Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the Narrative Language section includes four sub-sections: Plot and Conflict, Language, Dialogue, and Conclusions. The Language section directs teachers to explicitly point out descriptive and sensory language in the mentor texts and suggest to students how they might include some of this language, such as mentioning that “Literary devices like similes, metaphors, and hyperbole are also a great way of drawing the reader into the text.” In Narrative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to develop a point of view or establish a context; teachers can prompt students to think about the following questions when brainstorming setting:

    • “What is the main location?

    • Are there any features of the main location that make it unique and should be highlighted?

    • Are there activities or occupations that are unique and/or important to the setting?

    • Does the setting influence the mood?

    • How does the setting influence the character’s actions?”

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 13, students write an argumentative paragraph to answer the question, “How does Eliezer feel about God and religion?” after reading an excerpt from the book Night by Elie Wiesel. The Teacher Tools Writing section of the materials includes an Argumentative Writing- Literary Analysis Paragraph Rubric for grading. One section on the rubric rates form and style, looking specifically for things such as a variety of types of sentences. The directions also instruct students to include elements of an argumentative piece, including a conclusion.

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 26, students “Write a five-paragraph literary analysis that explores how rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) are used as propaganda in the book.” Students introduce a claim, organize the reasons and evidence logically, and support the “argument with evidence from the text to develop your thesis.” In Lesson 27, students draft the introduction and conclusion. The Writing Prompt states, “Include a strong introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion for the essay.” Students practice providing a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented as a core standard in the lesson.

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 18, students write a letter to an elected official in Congress where they make a claim about climate change legislation and then include facts, statistics, and actions to be taken in the body of their letter. As homework, they read and annotate a mentor text, paying specific attention to the following pieces of the body paragraphs: 

      • “Topic sentence (with sub-claim)

      • Introduce the words/ideas from research (the citation)

      • Strong, relevant proof/evidence

      • Explanation (connecting the topic sentence and the thesis to the evidence)

      • Transitions (between ideas or paragraphs)”

In Lesson 19, students revise letters for form and style, using strong clauses to create cohesion between ideas. The Writing Prompt asks students to “Use formal, concise language that communicates the urgency of the situation.” students practice the skill of establishing and maintaining a formal style as a supporting standard in the lesson.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 20, students choose a group under a genocide alert, research that group, and consider how to use written text and images to produce a digital presentation. Specifically, students start with an introduction that will explain the background information about the genocide. Students study the term “genocide” and learn how to classify the level of genocide as a part of this presentation. They include researched information about the recent events in the area, classify the level of genocide according to the “10 Stages of Genocide,” and describe the response from the international community. Students are expected to develop a clear and organized presentation including showing the relationships between ideas. As a conclusion, students make recommendations that their classmates can take to help. In Lesson 23, students present their findings about the group they studied and demonstrate a solid knowledge of English grammar, using verbs in both active and passive voices.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2, the students create a group presentation on Iranian history. Presentation should be 

    • “Organized logically and clearly

    • Include background on the topic, at least four images (photographs, maps, or graphs/charts) or video clips, accurate facts, statistics, and quotations, a response or quotation from a witness and/or experts

    • Use any technical terms or definitions needed to understand the content.”

Students should end their presentation with “an explanation of why this aspect of Iranian history or culture is important” to tie all of the pieces together. In Lesson 6, students are finalizing their presentations, and the objective is to “logically organize the information in their presentations and include all required components.” The entire class period is dedicated to supporting students in the process of creating cohesion and clarifications.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 22, students read and annotate a mentor text for “a strong beginning, a middle, and a resolution.” As they begin to write the narrative, they use a first-person narrator who “tells a story about a conflict.” They must include “dialogue, descriptive details, and language that appeals to the five senses.” In Lesson 25, students complete their narrative and edit for “transitions, mechanics, and organization.” Students can refer back to any of the mentor texts studied for an example.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 21, students write either an essay or a comic strip that narrates an important experience from their lives that changed them in some way. Regardless of the mode, students need to 

      • “follow the traditional narrative structure so that the story unfolds logically

      • use narrative techniques like dialogue and description

      • use effective transitions that show the passage of time and the connection between different events in their stories

      • evoke images in the readers’ minds either by drawing them (the comic) or providing specific description language and sensory details (the essay) 

      • create a conclusion that flows logically from the narrative”

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, All American Boys, Lesson 12, students answer a Writing Prompt connected to the text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. The Writing Prompt states: “On page 215, Quinn writes, ‘The Invisible Man at Central High: Rashad.’ How do the authors develop the idea in today’s reading that Rashad is ‘invisible’? Write a two-paragraph response in which you provide two ways that the authors develop this idea, and provide evidence from pages 186–218 to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 21, students write either an essay or a comic strip that narrates an important experience from their lives that changed them in some way. This experience connects to Marjane Satrapi’s memoir, Persepolis, where she describes growing up during the Iranian Revolution.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 10, the narrative writing task is based on synthesizing multiple texts in the unit. The prompt states: “You have read a number of nonfiction texts about the current and potential impacts of climate change on our planet. You have also read several examples of poetry and short stories that discuss the climate crisis and what the future might hold. Your task is to write your own cli-fi short story that provides an answer to the following question: What might life on this planet look like if we do not address the climate crisis? Using what you have learned about scientists’ predictions for our future, write a story that describes the experience of at least one main character who is attempting to navigate this new, inhospitable planet.” 

Indicator 1K
01/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited to teacher guidance such as a sample writing response. Students engage in close reading tasks, develop claims for an intended audience, and support their position with evidence. Evidence used throughout the units comes primarily from texts included in the materials and independent research at times. Writing opportunities connect purposefully to the texts students are reading, and the tasks provide a means for building knowledge and writing skills across the school year. Students practice utilizing claims and support consistently, and rarely is writing done simply based on opinion.

Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence; however, materials provide limited opportunities across the school year for students to learn about writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 14, students read Night by Elie Wiesel and answer the Writing Prompt: “Compare the different reactions that Wiesel and his neighbor in the infirmary have to the news that the Red Army might be soon liberating Buna. What do their responses reveal about each person? Support your answer with two pieces of evidence from pages 78–81, and explain how they support your ideas.” A Sample Response is included for reference. The materials provide additional practice questions: “What is the impact of the selection on prisoners? What do their reactions reveal about human nature more broadly? Provide evidence from pages 70– the top of page 76.”The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 3, students read pages 38–49 from Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum and answer the question: “What does the revolution—and its aftermath—reveal about Stalin as a person and as a leader?” Students use “at least three different pieces of evidence” to support the claim. The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 13, students read the article, "Focusing on How Individuals Can Stop Climate Change Is Very Convenient for Corporations,” and answer the Writing Prompt explaining how the author responds to “conflicting evidence and viewpoints in their writing? Provide at least two different examples and carefully explain your thinking.” Students are instructed to focus on the counter-argument in the writing and explain how the author establishes it. Although materials provide some additional scaffolding questions to help students find evidence in the text, the teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction. 

Writing opportunities are focused on students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 16, students read All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely and answer the question taking the perspective of Quinn: “What does it mean to be an All-American boy?” To support their claim, students will include evidence from the text. The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes more questions for students to analyze claims and work with evidence. The following is an example question: “Do the people writing about Rashad on the internet really ‘see’ him? Support your position with evidence from pages 277-278.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 21, students read Animal Farm by George Orwell and watch a film by the same title. Then they answer the Writing Prompt: “Contrast the ways that Napoleon is depicted early in the novel and early in the film. Provide evidence from both the text and film to support your answer. Evaluate the director’s choices.” The materials provide some additional scaffolding questions to help students find evidence in the text. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 23, students apply skills they have practiced when they complete the Unit Assessment. In Section 2 of the assessment, one requirement is to write an essay to the prompt: “Why did Satrapi write Persepolis? What impact has this graphic novel had on readers and on the world?” Students provide textual evidence to support their position from texts “Why I wrote Persepolis” by Marjane Satrapi and “Rereading Persepolis in 2020: What I’ve Learned” by Giovanna Centeno.

Indicator 1L
01/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l. 

Materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, and based on the information provided in the lessons, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The grammar standards are listed as core standards in the Standards Map, are referred to in some lesson objectives, and are named in writing rubrics; however, the guidance for educators is limited. Explicit instruction in the lessons is limited and does not ensure that students meet all the grade-level grammar and usage standards with the necessary support for application in context. In some writing lessons, Language Mini-Lessons are included where students have opportunities to notice how authors use language and its conventions; however,  practice opportunities for students to learn and apply the skills are limited. In Teacher Support, the Writing section addresses grammar in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction: “Fishtank ELA units teach grammar and language in context by integrating grammar and mechanics with craft and analysis. Students see how grammar and language help authors communicate specific ideas, and then learn how to use the same techniques in their Before writing.” This section also provides tips and a blank graphic organizer for students to use to create an Editing Checklist. The Teacher Tools encourage educators to provide opportunities for progress monitoring, including thinking about questions from Mechanically Inclined, such as “What have I done to teach this grammar of mechanics pattern?” The Teacher Tools are general, connecting to all grade levels and units. 

Materials include very limited explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards and few authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have some opportunities to explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 22, the objective is to “translate the expectations of the writing task and analyze a mentor text.” In the Enhanced Lesson, a mini-lesson is provided with the objective: “Differentiate between verbs and verbals and locate verbals within a sentence.” Teacher guidance explains the purpose of the lesson: “The goal is for students to recognize the impact of using gerunds, participles, and infinitives in their own writing. It helps to be able to identify these parts of a sentence. Students will also need to be able to recognize these devices as they move through close reading of text.” Teachers start by reviewing the basic elements of language relevant to this practice (verb, subject, object, and modifier). Students “practice distinguishing between verbs and verbals using the bolded words in” given sentences. Teachers are directed to “Model first, then move to guided practice.  If students are stuck, remind them to look for the subject first, then the action (the verb), to distinguish between verbs and verbals.” Students find examples of verbals in sentences from All American Boys.  

      • In Lesson 23, another mini-lesson on verbs and verbals is included. Students review the previous day’s lesson and “break down verbals into three different subcategories: gerund, participle, and infinitive. Then students apply their new knowledge to examples from the previous lesson, and “choose which type of verbal is being used in each sentence.” 

      • In Lesson 24, students continue to “practice identifying verbals as subjects, objects and modifiers,” in a mini-lesson. After completing the practice, the Additional Supports section suggests that students “can also look through their own writing to locate verbals.”

      • In Lesson 25, students “make inferences regarding the effect of verbals in a model text.” They look at given sentences from All American Boys and teachers are directed to “have students find the verbal, choose the type (gerund, participle, infinitive), and then make claims about the effect of that verbal on the sentence -- what does the gerund, participle, infinitive in the sentence do or say or suggest?”

  • Students have minimal opportunities to form and use verbs in the active and passive voice. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 20, the objective states that students will “outline the stages of genocide in preparation for creating a presentation.” In the Enhanced Lesson, a mini-lesson is included on how to discuss the difference between active and passive voice. The teacher is provided with the definitions and examples of passive and active voice. Students then practice “identifying which sentences are active and which are passive” and “Discuss the effect.”

      • In Lesson 21, students review the definitions of active and passive voice and read sentences from the text “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel. Students “Discuss which are active and which are passive–find the subject and the verb.” Students answer: “What is the effect? Why might Wiesel have chosen that voice?”

      • In Lesson 22, students practice moving from active to passive voice and vice versa and then practice the skill with given sentences.

      • In Lesson 23, students apply the “use of active and passive verbs in their own writing” by editing both given sentences and their current work.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to form and use verbs in the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 25, a Language Mini Lesson objective states: “Define the types of verb moods.” In this lesson, “students explore the function of verb moods” by using examples from the reading. A definition is given for indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive moods with examples of each. 

      • In Lesson 26, the objective states: “Practice writing sentences in different types of verb moods.” Students rewrite a sentence with another mood.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2, the Enhanced Lesson includes a mini-lesson with the objective to define the types of verb moods. The following guidance is provided: “Note to teacher: In this lesson, students explore the function of verb moods. Using examples from the reading, students can discuss the effect of different moods. Review the types of verb moods: indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive. These forms or categories illustrate how a verb can offer a fact (indicative mood), a command (imperative mood), a question (interrogative mood), a condition (conditional mood), or a wish or possibility (subjunctive mood). Review these examples from Persepolis and locate the verbs.” 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in verb voice and mood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 27, the Language Mini Lesson instructs about inappropriate shifts in tense, voice, and mood using examples from the reading. “Students can discuss the effect of different sentence structures and the use of different moods.” In a second mini-lesson, students “locate verb shifts and discuss possible solutions.” 

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 4, Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson states: “Identify and discuss errors in verb tense, voice, and mood.” The following guidance is provided: “Note to teachers: In this lesson, students explore the issue of inappropriate shifts in verb tense, voice, and mood. Using examples from the reading, students can discuss the effect of different sentence structures and the use of different moods. 

      • Verbs in a sentence should stay consistent, but sometimes writers make unnecessary or unintended changes in tense, voice, and mood. These unnecessary changes, also called ‘shifts,’ can make reading difficult and can be confusing. Shifts or inconsistencies can be easily fixed; reading sentences out loud can help writers notice shifts when they occur in their own writing.

      • Here are some examples of problems and solutions in verb shifts:

        • 1. Fixing shifts in verb tense: There are three main verb forms for showing time or tense: simple, present, and progressive. Each has a different effect, but the most important consideration for a writer is that whichever verb tense is chosen needs to stay consistent -- not to switch around.”

      • In Lesson 5, students continue to “identify and revise errors in verb tense, voice, and mood” by practicing with examples from the text.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to use punctuation (comma, ellipsis, dash) to indicate a pause or break. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions: An Inconvenient Sequel, Lesson 17, Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson has students review the difference between a hyphen and a dash. Students then read sentences from the text containing an em dash and discuss the effect of the punctuation on the reader. Lesson 18 continues this skill and asks students to differentiate between a hyphen and a dash.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to use an ellipsis to indicate an omission. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17, the objective states: “Identify the features of a successful letter to Congress, collect information on their representatives’ voting record on climate change, and begin to craft a strong hook.” At the end of the lesson, students should work on standard L.8.2.a and “use punctuation (comma, ellipsis, dash) to indicate a pause or break.” There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill. This same skill is repeated in Lesson 18 with a different objective.

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 19, the objective states: “Revise letters for form and style, using strong clauses to create cohesion between ideas.” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, a Language Mini Lesson is provided on using an ellipsis and its impact on the meaning of sentences. The Supporting All Students section says that “students will continue to practice using the ellipsis when quoting text in their own writing.” 

      • A second Language Mini Lesson has students review the purpose of the ellipsis and use it to quote text. 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 18, the objective states: “Construct a strong thesis statement and compose effective body paragraphs for their letter to Congress.” Standard L.8.2.c is listed as a supporting standard, but there is no guidance or mention of students learning to spell correctly. 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to use verbs in the active and passive voice and in the conditional and subjunctive mood to achieve particular effects (e.g., emphasizing the actor or the action, expressing uncertainty, or describing a state contrary to fact). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 6, the objective states that students “Logically organize the information in their presentations and include all required components.” Standard L.8.3.a is a supporting standard. There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.

Indicator 1M
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

Materials include a rationale for how vocabulary should be taught and how the publisher views vocabulary as part of a lesson. There is explicit instuction of the vocabulary that is essential to understanding the text within lessons. Each unit includes a Vocabulary Practice with vocabulary words and definitions for each lesson, which consists of a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Vocabulary is included in some scaffolding questions and students have opportunities to apply the words in context. In addition, students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary. Teachers can assess some student learning around text-based vocabulary in each end of unit assessment. Some guidance is provided for how vocabulary is structured in the units, how to teach vocabulary, and how to support a range of learners during vocabulary instruction. The Enhanced Lesson Plans include a link to Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary; however, the guidance is not specific for the “priority vocabulary” words identified in the lesson, and other words included in the Supporting All Students section do not include a link and offer minimal guidance. The Teacher Tools share a brief overview: “Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic.” Students interact with vocabulary words through reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks. Teacher Tools include routines such as Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary and Implicit Instruction of Vocabulary. 

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit and lesson, vocabulary words are introduced before reading texts as necessary to understand the texts or the context surrounding them. 

  • Within the units, vocabulary words are intentionally included in many ways, so students become familiar with them through repetition, such as the words being present in questions, used during discussions, and heard in teacher-provided sentence stems. Some words are revisited from previous lessons, and students are asked to use them to indicate authentic learning of the words. Sometimes, once the lesson where the word is taught is passed, the word is not revisited. 

  • The Teacher Tools include Vocabulary guidance to share the two types of words in the materials: words to teach quickly and drop-in and words to study in-depth. The guidance includes instructions for teachers to “decide if the words are inferrable or not inferrable” and encourage learning vocabulary “indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines” rather than through explicit instruction. 

  • The Vocabulary Teacher Tool shares the ways that students interact with vocabulary words within a lesson and across the unit, such as “Close reading moments are included within lessons to analyze the use of words in context” or “When applicable, vocabulary words are used in later units in key questions or as part of word banks and sentence frames.” 

  • Materials include Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary guidance in the teacher tools section, which includes routines to introduce and review priority vocabulary. However, there is not sufficient guidance or reminders in the lesson plans themselves, to assist teachers.

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Domain-specific vocabulary is taught across multiple units. For example:

    • Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze different types of irony. One type is verbal irony which is defined as “when a speaker's intended meaning is the opposite of what they literally say” and the other is dramatic irony which is defined as “a literary technique where the author provides information to the reader that the characters are not aware of, evoking humor, suspense, or tragedy.” 

      • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 6, students read a selection from All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely to examine how the author conveys Rashad’s emotions through the use of verbal irony. 

      • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 15, students read a chapter of Animal Farm by George Orwell to explore dramatic irony, answering this question: “How does Squealer gaslight the animals on page 66-67 on the subject of beds? Provide evidence from these pages to support your answer, and explain how it is an example of dramatic irony—and the impact it has on the reader.”

    • Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze theme. 

      • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 18, students encounter the academic vocabulary thematic topic when they determine themes in All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brandon Kiely and explain how the themes are developed over the course of the text. Students answer Close Read Questions, such as the following: “What thematic topics do Reynolds and Kiely explore in this text? Try to come up with at least five.” 

      • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 17, students determine themes in the text Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. Students answer Close Read Questions, such as “What thematic topics does Satrapi explore in this text?” The same definition is available as the one in Unit 1.

  • Academic vocabulary words found in texts are introduced in units, but not always taught across multiple texts. For example:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 4, students learn the vocabulary word dehumanize as they watch the documentary “A Conversation about Growing Up Black” by The New York Times. Students answer Close Read Questions: “What does Jumoke mean when he says, ‘We’re starting to be dehumanized,’ at minute 2:54?” A definition is available as a reference: “To make someone feel or appear less than human; to deny that someone is fully human and treat them that way.” In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 10, students read Night by Elie Wiesel and revisit the word dehumanize when explaining “how the prisoners in Auschwitz-Birkenau were systematically dehumanized and stripped of their identities.” Students answer a Writing Prompt: “On page 37, Wiesel writes, ‘The child I was had been consumed by the flames. All that was left was a shape that resembled me. My soul had been invaded–and devoured–by a black flame.’ Find one example from today’s reading that demonstrates the impact of systematic dehumanization on Eliezer, explaining how his behavior and perspective have changed since arriving at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Provide quoted evidence and carefully explain your thinking.” Close Read Questions include, “Find at least four places on pages 34–42 where the prisoners are dehumanized by the Nazis (and other prisoners in positions of power). Provide specific evidence to support your answer, and explain why this treatment is dehumanizing.” The Discussion Questions include, “Why do you think the Nazis worked so deliberately to strip people of their identities and dehumanize their prisoners?”

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 5, the word propaganda is introduced. Students read three articles, two of which use the word in their title. In the lesson, students study different forms of propaganda and do a project to help inform their classmates on the different forms propaganda can take. In Lesson 8, students create an infographic that shows their research on a specific aspect of propaganda. In Lesson 13, students analyze the impact of different propaganda techniques the pigs use in Animal Farm by George Orwell. The word reappears numerous times throughout the unit.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 9, the word bleak is defined in the Vocabulary section. Students come across the word in their reading of Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi, and the word is explicitly taught in the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary section of the lesson. The word appears again in lessons 10, 11, and 12. For example, in lesson 11, students encounter the word in the question, “Would you describe Marji’s outlook on the world now as ‘bleak’?” 

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a complete Vocabulary Glossary for each grade that notes the Part of Speech and Definition. The teacher can search for vocabulary words in the list, create a comprehensive list of all vocabulary words when “Select a Unit” appears, and create a list for each individual unit by selecting a specific unit. The Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words are broken down into the following categories: text-based, root/affix, and academic. For example, in Unit 1, the text-based vocabulary words are allegiance, ambivalent, amplify, dehumanize, disproportionate, dumbfounded, explicit, implicit, impeccable, naive, perceive, radical, surreal, synonymous, transfixed, and ubiquitous. The academic vocabulary words are author's purpose, colloquial language, connotation, enjambment, epigraph, figurative language, free verse, metaphor, mood, personification, point of view/perspective, structure, thematic topic, theme, and verbal irony.  Even though the words are introduced, none of the lessons include explicit instruction for how to teach the vocabulary and teachers are expected to remember to reference the teachers tools section for generic guidance. No specific words are identified as more critical than the others. 

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

The grade 8 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “human nature” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. Although students practice writing, there is insufficient explicit writing instruction.

Throughout the program, the majority of instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned with the grade-level standards. By the end of the school year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed by the program, although there are a couple of standards that are only covered once. 

The grade 8 materials provide the teacher with a clear pacing guide for the school year, and the implementation schedule provided may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

20/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

The grade 8 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “human nature” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details according to grade-level standards and include coherently sequenced questions and tasks to support students in developing these skills. They also include sequences of text-based questions and tasks that support students’ abilities to integrate knowledge and ideas in individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials provide opportunities for students to improve their analytical skills through questions and tasks that are purposefully sequenced to assist students in deepening their understanding of texts. 

The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. While there is writing practice, there is insufficient explicit writing instruction. In addition, while the materials include research projects to build knowledge, there is neither a clear progression of research skills in the assignments moving from providing more scaffolding to less scaffolding nor an increase in rigor in the research-based assignments. Moreover, the Teacher Tools include some general information about teaching research-based assignments in the classroom but the lesson-specific information about how to teach individual lessons is lacking.

Indicator 2A
04/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a. 

Materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme, “Are human beings fundamentally good or evil?” and the relationship between people and power, to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The Course Summary states: “Through careful study of classic and contemporary texts, students will consider how access to power influences human behavior, and how everyday people respond in the face of unjust leadership, violent oppression, and cruelty. Students will grapple with some of the darkest events of the 20th century, and contemplate their power as young people to create the future they wish to see.” Each unit begins with a clear statement of how that unit’s materials fit within the theme and what students will be learning. The theme is supported by Essential Questions that students explore; the texts explore literary characters’ experiences and real-world stories, articles, and questions that build upon the initial theme. Students critically think about real-world applications of the theme in their own lives. The associated tasks connect to the theme and require students to demonstrate their understanding in various ways. The text sets, including informational texts, build knowledge and students’ content knowledge and ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. They also build students’ content knowledge and ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Additional texts are available to build background on the theme and topic, but additional questions or tasks do not accompany most suggested texts.

Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, texts are organized around the unit theme of Facing Prejudice and the yearlong theme, “Are human beings fundamentally good or evil?” The materials state: “Students explore the American experience through the eyes of two young men - one white and one Black - connected through an incident of police brutality.” This occurs through the reading of the core text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. 

    • In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “How do race and racial bias shape a person’s experience and understanding of the world? What responsibility do people have when they witness—or are the victim of—injustice?”

    • The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “Police brutality disproportionately affects Black Americans. Racism is present and pervasive in America today—whether or not people choose to acknowledge it—and has real and deadly implications for the Black community. White Americans have a responsibility to engage with this reality, educate themselves, and stand up for racial justice.”

    • Throughout the unit, students read the core text and nine other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are offered.

    • In Lesson 1, an additional text as a suggested read for enrichment is included in Opportunities for Enrichment: “To learn more about what it means to be anti-racist, have students read ‘What it Means to Be Anti-racist’.” 

    • In Lesson 4, students read the core text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, and view a video, “A Conversation about Growing Up Black” by The New York Times. Students answer Close Read Questions that connect to the Essential Questions in the unit, such as “Summarize how the young Black men in the video feel that the (white) world perceives them; How has race–and racial bias/racism–shaped these young men’s relationship to law enforcement?”Additional suggested texts are included to build background and access prior knowledge: “Spoony is described as having ‘locs,’ which his father doesn’t approve of because he believes it will make people judge him: ‘They’ll think you’re doing drugs.’ (p. 51) You may wish to take the opportunity to talk about the significance—and complex politics—of Black hair.” Additional texts include “A Brief History of Black Hair, Politics, and Discrimination", "The History of Dreadlocks," "How Natural Black Hair at Work Became a Civil Rights Issue," and "The 'Good Hair' Study Results"

    • In Lesson 12, students continue their reading of All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. Students “Explain the ways that characters’ lives are shaped by race and racism in All American Boys.” 

    • In Lesson 21, students draw on evidence from their unit texts to answer Discussion Questions, such as “Do people have a responsibility to stand up when they see injustice occur? Is this true in all circumstances?” The reading and activities connect to the Essential Questions in the unit.

  • In Unit 4, texts are organized around the unit theme of Surviving Repression and the yearlong theme, “Are humans fundamentally good or evil?” The materials have students “explore human nature through the story of a young girl coming of age during the Iranian Revolution, and the challenges she faced during this violent, turbulent time.”

    • In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “What tools do governments use to control and oppress people, and what tools do people use to resist oppression? In what ways is the experience of growing up universal, and in what ways is it shaped by a person’s setting and circumstances?”

    • The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “A country’s government does not necessarily reflect the beliefs and desires of all of its people. The risks of resisting an oppressive government can be severe, and yet some people are willing to lay down their lives in the service of their beliefs. The experiences of growing up during a time of political upheaval are both unique and universal.”

    • Throughout the unit, students read the core text and 11 other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings.

    • In Lesson 1, students watch the video, “Rick Steves’ Iran” by Rick Steves Europe. This video builds students’ background knowledge of Iran, including information on political stances, Iran’s view of the United States, and the role of Islam in the Iranian Culture. The teacher is prompted to remind students that the video is made from the perspective of a white American man and that the perspective from which Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood is quite different, being told by an Iranian woman who grew up during the time period of the story– the Iranian Revolution. 

    • In Lesson 8, students read Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. Students answer a Writing Prompt that also connects to the Essential Questions of the unit: “What does the incident at the Rex Cinema (pp. 14–15) reveal about Iran in 1980? How does Satrapi use text and images to communicate ideas? Provide specific details both from the text and images to support your answer.” Students are building knowledge and understanding that “The shah’s government is oppressive and violent, as demonstrated by the fire at the Rex Cinema.” 

    • In Lesson 14, students read Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi. Students answer Close Read Questions that connect to the Essential Questions of the unit, such as “What are the risks of resisting authority during this time period? Provide at least two examples from today’s reading and explain your thinking.” Additional Close Read and scaffolding questions include, but are not limited to: “How do Marji and her classmates respond to the new rules and expectations at their school?  Provide evidence from both text and images (pp. 95-98) to support your answer. What new rules and expectations are there for Marji and her classmates at school? How does Marji’s teacher view their behavior on page 97? What does the text tell you? What do the illustrations show you?”

    • In Lesson 20, students draw on evidence from all the unit texts to answer Discussion Questions that connect to the Essential Questions in the unit, such as “What is the relationship between gender and power in Persepolis?”

  • In Unit 5, texts are organized around the unit theme of Facing Calamity and the yearlong theme, “Are humans fundamentally good or evil?” The materials state, “Students explore human nature by studying the climate crisis and its causes and impact, and the role of government, businesses, and individuals in finding solutions.”

    • In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “Who is responsible for causing the climate crisis and who is responsible for solving it? What is the relationship between the climate crisis and social, economic, and political power? How do scientists and fiction writers imagine the future if we do—and do not—address climate change?”

    • The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme:

      • “We are already seeing the impacts of climate change today, and things will only get catastrophically worse if we do not immediately address this crisis. 

      • People with less money and political power are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. 

      • The world’s slow response to climate change can at least partially be linked to the actions of large corporations that have benefited financially from ignoring the crisis. 

      • There is a growing movement of activists and artists who are speaking out about climate change and the dangers we face by not urgently addressing it.”

    • Throughout the unit, students read the core text and 16 other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are offered.

    • In Lesson 6, students read an informational article “As Rising Heat Bakes US Cities, The Poor Often Feel It Most” by Meg Anderson. Students take a position on whether climate change will affect all people equally. A video is included, “Why It’s Usually Hotter in A City,” and a graphic organizer that helps students to organize information from the video.

    • In Lesson 14, students complete a Writing Prompt in which they must answer the following questions, which connect to the Essential Questions in the unit and their reading of the core text, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power by Al Gore: 

      • “What do people need to know about this approach to fighting climate change in one clear sentence? (Provide a central idea statement.)

      • What are the most important actions to take if you are using this approach?

      • Why is this approach important and effective for fighting climate change?

      • What are potential challenges to this approach, and how might you overcome them?

      • What is the very first step a person would need to take if they wanted to take action this way?”

    • In Lesson 16, students draw on readings to answer Discussion Questions that connect to the Essential Questions of the unit, such as the following: “What is the relationship between climate change, money, and power? What or who is responsible for climate change? Does individual action matter to limiting climate change?”

Indicator 2B
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b. 

Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details according to grade-level standards. Students determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular key ideas and details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments; and analyze in detail how a key individual, event, or idea is introduced, illustrated, and elaborated in a text (e.g., through examples or anecdotes). Materials include coherently sequenced questions and tasks to support students in developing these skills. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also provides additional scaffolding questions. Students analyze craft and structure according to grade-level standards, such as determining the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyzing how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas; and determining an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text. These skills are systematically built over the course of the unit through increasingly complex Close Reading Questions, Discussion Questions, and Writing Prompts to complete the Socratic Seminar and Content Assessment.  

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read multiple texts before participating in a Socratic Seminar to determine how characters in the core text, All-American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, change and what impacted that change. Throughout the unit, students analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in the novel impact the plot or characters. 

    • In Lesson 2, students answer the Writing Prompt, “What does the reader understand about the incident at Jerry’s because the chapter is told from Rashad’s narrative perspective? Pull out specific evidence from the text and carefully explain your thinking.”

    • In Lesson 8, students read pages 123-162 in All-American Boys and answer the Writing Prompt, “How has witnessing Rashad's assault impacted Quinn’s perspective on race? What specific incidents and lines of text reveal his perspective at this point in the text? Provide evidence from pages 136-140.” 

    • In Lesson 16, students consider a variety of events in the novel in the Close Read Questions: “Do the people writing about Rashad on the internet really ‘see’ him? Support your position with evidence from pages 277-278. What motivates Quinn to call the police and provide a statement? Support your answer with evidence from pages 285-286.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides additional supports such as sentence stems for teachers to use with students such as, “Quinn decides to call the police and provide a statement because ___________.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hacket and Night by Elie Wiesel over multiple lessons and analyze specific details.

    • In Lesson 2, students answer a Writing Prompt about what Anne is like providing text evidence that supports those character traits. Then, Close Read Questions continue to develop the understanding by asking: “How is Anne’s reaction to her father different from her reaction to her mother on page 15? What can you infer based on these interactions about her relationship with each parent? Provide two pieces of evidence to support your answer.”

    • Lesson 3, students “Identify specific incidents and lines of text that reveal aspects of character dynamics in The Diary of Anne Frank.” Students practice standard RL.8.3, (analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in a story or drama propel the action, reveal aspects of a character, or provoke a decision). Students discuss Close Read Questions:

      • “What does the incident with Peter’s shoes reveal about Anne? What does it reveal about Peter? What does it reveal about their relationship? Provide evidence from pages 18-19 to support your answer. Additional questions in the Enhanced Lesson Plan include: “Read their conversation on page 18: Can it be interpreted as Peter being playful? Can it be interpreted as Peter being truly frustrated?”

      • “What does Miep’s request to have Mr. Dussel move into the Annex reveal about Mr. Van Daan? Select one additional character living in the Annex and explain what we learn about them as a result of this incident. Provide evidence from pages 25-26 to support your answer.”

    • In Lesson 7, students read Night and “Explain how events in Night reveal aspects of characters and suggest larger truths about human nature.” The tasks connect to RI.8.3. Students complete the Writing Prompt: “What does the community’s reaction to Moishe the Beadle’s warning, the news about the invasion of Hungary and the arrival of German soldiers, reveal about them—and about human nature more generally? Provide at least three pieces of evidence from pages 3-11 to support your answer.” Students have other opportunities to work with both of the core texts later in the unit. The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional questions to support the prompt including: “What impact does Moishe have on Eliezer’s life when they begin to study and talk together? What can you infer about the way that Eliezer feels about Moishe based on the time they spend together in the synagogue?? Why would Eliezer go from seeing Moishe as a teacher to doubting his sanity? What happened to Moishe the Beadle when he was deported? Why did he return to Sighet? What does their reaction tell us about the way people sometimes respond in situations that are uncertain, or when people are very afraid, or when people do not have enough information?”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, students participate in a Socratic Seminar at the end of the unit. Throughout the unit, students analyze central ideas as they read different texts about climate change. 

    • In Lesson 7, students read the story, “Notes from a Bottle” by James Stevenson and answer the Writing Prompt: “Although the author of this story does not explicitly mention climate change, how can the theme he develops in this story apply to the current climate crisis? Carefully explain your reasoning and what we can learn from this story today.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional questions to scaffold: “What is Stevenson trying to say about the way that people responded to the flood? What does this tell us about human nature? What warning is Stevenson trying to communicate? Have people always taken climate change seriously?”

    • In Lesson 12, students provide the central idea of two articles, “Exxon Knew About Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago” by Shannon Hall and “Fishermen Sue Big Oil for Its Role in Climate Change” by Alastair Bland, in both the Close Read Questions and the Writing Prompt. One Close Read Question asks, “In two to three sentences, summarize Exxon’s history conducting climate change research in the 1970s and 80s, based on information from paragraphs 1 through 4 in the article ‘Exxon Knew About Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago.” The Writing Prompt states: “Summarize the first two sections of the article ‘Fishermen Sue Big Oil for Its Role in Climate Change (Introduction and A Recent History of Heatwaves)’ in three to five sentences and include the central idea of this section of text as the first sentence of your summary.” 

    • In Lesson 14, students read a section of An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power Truth by Al Gore, and prior to the Socratic Seminar, the Close Read Questions ask, “What is Gore’s central message about political activism (pp. 177–183)? Provide two pieces of evidence that strongly support your answer.” All of these activities and questions lead the student through an analysis of various central ideas that they can then use to support their thinking in the Socratic Seminar. 

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 19, students read “The ‘Say Her Name’ Movement Started for a Reason: We Forget Black Women Killed by Police” by Precious Fondren and answer Close Read Questions connected to Standard RI.8.6 (determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints):

    • “1) What is Fondren trying to persuade her reader of? Provide specific evidence from the text to support your answer. 

    • 2) What is Fondren trying to inform her reader about? Provide specific evidence from the text to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, students write a literary analysis essay about how rhetorical appeals and propaganda are used in Animal Farm by George Orwell. In order to support students in completing the essay, students focus on how language and the use of language interact with other elements in the text throughout the unit.

    • In Lesson 11, the first lesson with the novel, students answer Close Read Questions that focus on the language used to describe the farm: 

      • “How does Old Major describe the lives of farm animals in England? What specific words and phrases does Orwell use to clearly develop Old Major’s perspective?? Select at least three examples from pages 6-9 and support your answer.

      • What is Old Major’s perspective of human beings and what is his tone when describing them? What specific words and phrases does Orwell use to develop Major’s perspective and tone? Select at least three examples from chapter one to support your answer.

      • What specific words and phrases does Orwell use in the song ‘Beasts of England’ to develop the tone of this song? Select at least three examples from pages 12-13 and explain how they develop the tone.”

    • In Lesson 13, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How does Squealer use the propaganda techniques of fear and transfer in his speech on pages 35–36? Provide at least two pieces of quoted textual evidence and explain how it demonstrates this technique. Use the word ‘manipulate’ in your answer.”

    • In Lesson 15, students answer Close Read Questions that focus on the use of different forms of propaganda, the answers to which must also focus on language and the use of language. 

      • “How does Squealer gaslight the animals on page 64? Provide evidence that demonstrates this technique from pages 63-64, and explain how this is also an example of dramatic irony—and the impact it has on the reader.

      • “How does Napoleon use the propaganda technique of scapegoating on pages 69-71? Provide two pieces of quoted evidence from these pages and carefully explain your thinking.”

These lessons build students’ understanding of how language is integral to the different forms of propaganda and rhetorical appeals in order to complete the essay.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Students practice standard RI.8.5 (analyze in detail the structure of a specific paragraph in a text, including the role of particular sentences in developing and refining a key concept) in multiple lessons. The Grade 8 Course Overview identifies RI.8.5 as one of “two key standards that students will have multiple opportunities to practice and apply to text.”

    • In Lesson 9, students read pages 18-32 Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood by Marjane Satrapi and “Explain how specific incidents impact and reveal aspects of characters and setting, and describe how Satrapi communicates this through text and images.” Students answer a Writing Prompt: “Which specific incidents, lines of text, and panels reveal that Marji is very young and has more to learn about how the world works? Provide at least two examples from today’s reading, referencing both text and images to support your answer.”

    • In Lesson 11, students answer Close Read Questions connecting to pages 47-71 of the same text: 

      • “How does hearing about the torture of political prisoners impact Marji (pp. 50–53)? Provide at least two ways that she is impacted by the vivid descriptions of torture, using evidence from text and images to support your answer.

      • How does Marji respond to the knowledge that her father is not ‘a hero’? What does this reveal about her character? Support your answer with evidence from text and images from pages 52–54.

      • How does listening to Uncle Anoosh’s stories impact Marji? What does her reaction reveal about her character? Provide at least two ways that she is impacted by his stories, using text and images from pages 54-61 to support your answer.”

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c. 

Materials include sequences of text-based questions and tasks that support students’ abilities to integrate knowledge and ideas in individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials provide opportunities for students to improve their analysis skills through questions and tasks that are purposefully sequenced to assist students in deepening their understanding of texts. The questions help students in the successful completion of the culminating tasks, such as Socratic Seminars.

Throughout the units, students analyze a series of big ideas using the knowledge they have built throughout the unit. This is evaluated in one, and sometimes both, of the culminating tasks at the end of the unit. In all units, students read a variety of texts that center around the theme and central idea of the unit. They use the different texts to convey their understanding in the culminating tasks. 

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lessons 21–23, students identify places where the film version of Animal Farm by George Orwell differs from the original text and evaluate the choices the director made. Students examine two different texts as they analyze the extent to which a filmed or live production of a story or drama stays faithful to or departs from the text or script and evaluate the choices made by the director or actors. Students answer Close Read Questions: “Where did the filmmakers condense the timeline of events in the first several chapters of Animal Farm? What is the impact of this choice? Where do the filmmakers choose to elaborate/spend more time on events than Orwell did in the first several chapters of Animal Farm? What is the impact of this choice?” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional Scaffolding questions to support the above Close Read Questions:

    • “When does Old Major die in the book? When does he die in the movie?

    • How long after the meeting does the revolution occur in the book (page 15)? When does it occur in the movie (12:05)?

    • When do human beings come back to try and take the farm back in the book (chapter four)? When does it occur in the movie (15:00)? 

    • Why would a filmmaker decide to condense the timeline of events? 

    • In your opinion, does this improve the audience’s experience and understanding of the story?”

Students answer a Writing Prompt: “Contrast the ways that Napoleon is depicted early in the novel and early in the film. Provide evidence from both the text and film to support your answer. Evaluate the director’s choices.” The next two lessons provide additional opportunities to answer a series of text-dependent questions to deepen understanding of the texts and grow students’ skills. In Lesson 22, the questions include but are not limited to: 

  • “What decision has the filmmaker made about the use of dialogue in the film? Is this choice faithful to the original text, or a departure? Provide examples to support your answer. 

  • Where in the film has the filmmaker condensed the timeline of events from the text, or omitted events altogether? What is the impact of this change?”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 2, students identify key ideas the author, Al Gore, uses to support his claim about climate change and assess whether the evidence he provides is relevant and sufficient in the core text An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power. Close Read Questions assist in deepening students’ knowledge of the text: 

    • “What is Gore’s central argument about climate change on pages 10–18?

    • What argument is Gore making about the impact of climate change on the oceans on page 14? Identify the evidence that he provides to support this claim and explain whether this evidence is relevant and sufficient to support his claim.

    • What argument is Gore making about the impact of climate change on forests on pages 15 through 17? Identify the evidence that he provides to support this claim and explain whether this evidence is relevant and sufficient to support his claim.” 

The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides additional Scaffolding questions and support for the above question for students and teachers:

  • “Which of his three questions laid out on page 10 does he begin to answer on these pages?

  • What kind of information does he include on these pages?

  • What do the images he uses show us?

  • What does he want us to understand as a result of reading these pages?

  • Is climate change something that is a problem for the future?”

Students should understand:

  • “Gore’s primary argument here is that we must change because climate change is already causing tremendous damage to our planet.

  • Gore states on page 10 that he believes that we must change and that we can change. However, students must identify that he only talks about why we must change on these specific pages.”

Students then complete the Writing Prompt: “What argument does Gore make about the impact of climate change on human health? Identify the evidence that he provides to support this claim and explain whether this evidence is relevant and sufficient to support his claim.” In Lessons 3 and 6, students practice the same skills: delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assess whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient, and recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced. 

Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read the core text, Persepolis, along with other texts, including the article, “The Stolen Revolution: Iranian Women of 1979” (author not cited). 

    • In Lesson 12, students answer questions about the novel and article through both the Close Read Questions and the Writing Prompt using evidence from both texts to support their answers. One question asks, “How did the new fundamentalist government impact the lives of women in Iran? Provide at least two examples and use evidence from both texts to support your answer.” The Writing Prompt asks, “How did many women respond to the more restrictive rules about their clothing? Provide two different examples of the way they resisted and fought back and use evidence from both texts to support your answer.”

    • In Lessons 18 and 19, students read about the hijab and different perspectives on wearing it in the article, “Why do Muslim women wear a hijab?” by Caitlin Killians, and a video, “Majede Najar: Why I wear a hijab” by TEDTalentSearch. The Writing Prompt asks, “In which paragraph does Goodarzi respond directly to viewpoints that conflict with her own? Identify the specific paragraph, note the conflicting viewpoints she acknowledges, and explain how she responds to them.” In Lesson 19, students read “Under cover of darkness: Why World Hijab Day is an insult to girls like me” by Soutiam Goodarzi and answer Close Read Questions: “What is Goodarzi’s point of view on wearing a hijab? Provide two pieces of evidence from the text that support your evidence. What is the purpose of paragraphs 5 and 6 in this article? What ideas do they develop?”

    • In Lesson 20, students participate in a Socratic Seminar connected to all of the texts in the unit. Questions include, “What does Persepolis—and the nonfiction articles we read about wearing a hijab—communicate about the importance of having choices?; How do people maintain their humanity during times of war?; How does having power change people?; and What is the relationship between gender and power in Persepolis?” In order to do this, students have been provided with opportunities to discuss these ideas throughout the unit.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 7, students analyze how a modern work of fiction draws on themes, patterns of events, or character types from traditional stories and the Bible, including describing how the material is rendered new. Students complete Close Read Questions connecting to “Notes from a Bottle” by James Stevenson:

    • “Locate Stevenson’s allusion to the biblical story of Noah and the flood. How does this allusion develop meaning in the story? How does your knowledge of the causes and outcome of Noah’s story impact your understanding of ‘Notes from a Bottle’?

    • How does Stevenson initially describe the attitude of the residents toward the flood? How does their attitude change as the story progresses? Provide specific evidence from the text to support your answer.

    • At the end of the story, Alice MacNeil tries to get everyone to sing ‘Nearer My God to Me,’—a song that the passengers aboard the Titanic sang as the boat was sinking. How does this allusion to the Titanic develop meaning in the story?”

    • In Lesson 7, students analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information on the same topic. Students read two articles, “What the new report on climate change expects from you” by Eliza Mackintosh and “Focusing on how individuals can stop climate change is very convenient for corporations” by Morten Fibieger Byskov,  and identify where the texts agree and disagree. 

Indicator 2D
04/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d. 

Materials include culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. One type of culminating task is a Content Assessment that “pushes students to synthesize unit content knowledge or unit essential questions orally or in writing” and “should be used as the primary assessment because it shows mastery of unit content knowledge and standards.” Content Assessments are found at the end of each unit and include two to four sections that include vocabulary, grammar, and content knowledge questions, multiple choice and/or short answer questions connected to excerpts from multiple texts, and an essay connected to texts. In addition to the Content Assessment, culminating tasks within each unit include Socratic Seminars, essays, and presentations. The culminating tasks connect in a meaningful way to the unit themes and essential questions. The questions and tasks in each lesson that are connected to texts and research opportunities scaffold students towards the successful completion of the culminating task. For example, Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions provide opportunities for students to explore the topic and themes to demonstrate their understanding. The culminating tasks offer some variety for students since Teacher Tools offer different types of academic discourse, and the questions vary according to the unit texts and themes. The guidance is general in the Teacher Tools that connects across Grades 6–8.

Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 13 students read and analyze pieces of  Night by Elie Wiesel and write an analytical paragraph connecting Wiesel’s feelings in the text to his beliefs about God and religion in the Writing Prompt: “At the beginning of Night, Eliezer says, ‘Why did I pray? Strange question. Why did I live? Why did I breathe?’ (p. 4). God and religion fundamentally define his sense of himself. After his brutal experience in the camps, Eliezer’s perspective drastically changes. How does Eliezer feel about God and religion? Write an analytical paragraph that answers this question. Include a topic sentence, evidence from the text, analysis, and a conclusion in your argument.” In Lessons 20–23, students complete a culminating task to research a current group of people at risk for genocide. In the writing portion of the culminating task, students work in groups to create a presentation: “In Elie Wiesel’s speech ‘The Perils of Indifference,’ he warns that ‘to be indifferent to that suffering is what makes the human being inhuman. Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred.’ In this project, you will learn about the pyramid of hate and stages of genocide before researching and presenting on a community where people continue to suffer violent persecution today. By sharing this information with your classmates, you can help put an end to indifference.” After collecting information, students create a digital presentation and, in Lesson 23, present it to their classmates. In Lesson 24, students complete the Content Assessment. In Section 1, students answer nine multiple choice and short answer vocabulary questions. In Section 2, they complete a cold read of three texts, an excerpt from Farewell to Manzanar by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston, an excerpt from “Remarks at the Dedication of Yad Vashem Holocaust History Museum” by Elie Wiesel, and the article “Right-Wing Hate Groups are Recruiting Video Gamers” by Anya Kamanetz,  and answer multiple choice questions. In Section 3, students read two articles, both adapted by Fishtank Learning Staff, “Right-Wing Hate Groups Are Recruiting Video Gamers” by Anya Kamenetz and “Neo-Nazi Terror Groups Are Using iFunny to Recruit” by Mack Lamoureux and Zachary Kamel. Students write an essay to the following prompt: “Explain how the internet and online propaganda has made white supremacy appeal to young white people. Write an informational essay where you explain how online activity is racializing a new generation of young extremists and white supremacists.” A number of Reading: Informational Text and Language standards are assessed within the multiple choice questions. Students also focus on mastering several Writing standards.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 20, students complete a Socratic Seminar as one culminating task. Teachers determine what type of discourse they will use and present questions to discuss: “What does Persepolis—and the nonfiction articles we read about wearing a hijab—communicate about the importance of having choices? What is the relationship between gender and power in Persepolis?” In Lesson 23, students complete the Content Assessment. In Part One, students complete multiple choice and short answer vocabulary and grammar questions. In Part Two, students cold read five texts, an excerpt from Persepolis II: Story of a Return” by Marjane Satrapi, an excerpt from Maus: A Survivor’s Tale by Art Spiegelman, “Meet the Iranian youth exporting Persian culture to the world” by Mersiha Gadzo, “Why I Wrote Persepolis” by Marjane Satrapi, and “Rereading Persepolis in 2020: What I’ve Learned” by Giovanna Centeno, answer multiple choice and short answer questions, and write an essay “in which you explain the impact of graphic novel Persepolis, providing at least three different examples and supporting them with sufficient textual evidence.” Lessons 20 and 23 focus on mastery of specific Speaking & Listening and Writing standards.  

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 14, students read an excerpt of An Inconvenient Sequel by Al Gore and find the central idea of the text. Then, students create a short television commercial convincing other members of their class to take action regarding climate change. In Lesson 16, students participate in a Socratic Seminar as one culminating task. The questions they discuss include; “(From An Inconvenient Sequel) Must we change?”; “(From An Inconvenient Sequel) Can we change?”; “(From An Inconvenient Sequel) Will we change?”; “What or who is responsible for climate change?”; “What is the role of young people within the climate movement?”; “What is the relationship between climate change, money, and power?”; “What is the role of literature within the climate movement?”; “Does individual action matter to limiting climate change?” In Lessons 17–19, students research the two senators and a representative in Congress from their home state to learn about their stance on climate change. They write a letter “educating them on climate change and urging them to take action.” Throughout the task, students practice both writing and language skills from the standards. In Lesson 20, students complete the Content Assessment. In Part One, students complete multiple choice and short answer questions on vocabulary and grammar. In Part Two, students read three texts, “Veganism is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce our environmental impact on planet, study finds: Avoiding meat and dairy could reduce your carbon footprint from food by nearly three quarters” by Olivia Petter, “Don’t let vegetarian environmentalists shame you for eating meat. Science is on your side” by Bjorn Lomborg, and “This World” by Mary Oliver, answer multiple choice questions, and write an essay. In the essay, students write a letter to the school board where they express their opinion on the prompt: “Imagine that your local school board is looking for ways to ‘go green’ and reduce the impact schools have on the environment…they are considering serving vegan lunches in school cafeterias three days a week.” They use evidence from two articles, working to again master supporting claims with logical reasoning and evidence.

Indicator 2E
02/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e. 

Materials include frequent writing opportunities and address different types of writing to support students’ writing development; however, materials miss opportunities for explicit writing instruction and lesson guidance. Students practice writing in every lesson, and student directions for tasks encourage them to use tools, such as graphic organizers, checklists, and rubrics to help them brainstorm, organize, and edit their writing. Materials include different types of writing tasks that are embedded in the curriculum, connecting to the topics and texts students are studying. Writing opportunities include short written responses, research projects, presentations, and longer writing tasks. Many lessons include the practice of essential writing skills to meet grade-level standards; however, explicit connections to the standards and guidance to assist students in their learning and completion of the writing tasks are lacking. Student writing lessons at the beginning of the year provide appropriate scaffolds and structure in the design of the lesson prompt and correlating materials. Materials include new and more challenging writing tasks with less or no scaffolds as students gain more writing independence.

Teacher guidance includes protocols to support teachers in implementing and monitoring students’ writing development. General guidance is found in the Teacher Tools, such as Instructional Strategies for Writing Lesson (6–8), which is a separate resource. More specific guidance is provided in the Progress Monitoring and Assessment Teacher Tool which includes a tool for teachers to reflect and decide upon which assignments, including writing assignments, they will monitor and what they will look for within those assignments.  The Formative Assessment portion of this tool includes a section on scoring and responding to the Target Tasks as well as the Writing Assignments. For the Target Tasks, which are daily argumentative writing assignments for Grades 6–8, a rubric is included. For the Writing Assignments, some guidance on what to monitor is provided, as well as a link back to the Giving Writing Feedback tool. Each lesson plan includes the Enhanced Lesson Plan that provides many writing supports for teachers.

Materials include some writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • All units and lessons include opportunities for students to write in some form. Throughout each unit, each lesson plan begins with a writing prompt, though the prompt is intended to be answered by students at the end of the lesson. An educator could make the connection that the Close Reading and Discussion questions will assist students to successfully answer the prompt. The answers expected for each prompt vary in length, with all questions relating to the lesson texts. A smaller project incorporates writing within the first third of each unit. These are assignments such as analytical paragraphs or research presentations. At the end of each unit, students complete a full process writing assignment that spans multiple lessons. Students learn about the mode of writing being used and collect evidence, brainstorm, write a draft, edit, and publish their final papers. The materials almost always include sample answers and mentor texts as well as specific ways for teachers to address gaps in learning and rubrics to assist in grading and self-assessing. Although materials provide ample opportunities for students to practice writing, standards-aligned explicit instruction is largely absent.

  • In Unit 2, there are five lessons on informative writing, one of which focuses on a piece of literature and the others that help students prepare an informative digital presentation. First, students write an analytical piece about Night by Elie Wiesel to answer: “How does Eliezer feel about God and religion?” The teacher unpacks the prompt with students but does not model how to write an analytical paragraph. Later, students prepare a digital presentation about a group that suffers persecution today. Although the teacher reviews the Informational Writing: Presentation Rubric with students, the teacher does not provide explicit instruction on writing an informative piece. 

  • In Unit 3, there is one lesson on argumentative writing, and students practice taking a position on a topic. Students can write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence when they write a paragraph that “determines the mood of the performance” they view and analyze. The directions ask students to “Include a topic sentence, evidence from text, analysis, and conclusion in your argument.” The teacher reviews the function and purpose of the graphic organizer (8th Grade Unit 3 Lesson 26) and models using the graphic organizer to create a draft outline of the body paragraphs for the argumentative essay. The teacher reviews the function of an introduction in the next lesson but does not model writing an introduction or a conclusion. 

  • In Unit 4, there are two lessons on narrative writing. Students identify elements of narrative, add compelling dialogue, and write a strong conclusion. The teacher explains that the “informational writing assignment is asking students to emulate the techniques used in Persepolis to translate an important experience from their own personal lives,” prior to reading the Target Task prompt with students. The teacher introduces and models the components of the RAFT strategy and discusses “the features of a strong personal narrative with students.” For this task, students have the option of writing a personal narrative or making a comic. The teacher does not model how to write a personal narrative or make a comic. In the next lesson, the teacher reviews transitions with students and provides them with examples from the text, as well as a list of linking words/transitional phrases to use in their narratives. The teacher reviews conclusions with students and provides them “with an example of a strong concluding paragraph.” The teacher does not model who to write a conclusion or make a comic, although students are directed to “check their work for the requirements in Narrative Writing; Memoir Rubric and Narrative Writing: Comic Rubric, paying close attention to the transition.”  

Instructional materials include models and sufficient, specific, and well-designed guidance, protocols, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Target Task Writing Support (6–12), various instructional strategies are available to support students during the prewriting, drafting, and post-writing stages. In the prewriting stage, teacher guidance includes breaking down the prompt, providing sentence stems, and encouraging rereading. During writing time, the guidance includes giving batch feedback, chunking, independent time, and holding teacher conferences. The after-writing guidance includes having students reflect on their writing, using a rubric, and using a Show Call and Discourse routine. Also, in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction section, teachers can download an Editing Checklist (6–8.)

  • In the Teacher Tools, teachers are provided with five sections to use during instruction: Preparing for a Writing Lesson, Writing Structures and Frameworks, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8), Giving Writing Feedback, and Target Task Writing Support (6–12). These sections provide various guidance to support writing instruction, such as rubrics, sample feedback, and structures for using mentor texts.

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 7, students respond to a writing prompt question based on an excerpt of text from All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely. Teachers are able to have students annotate the text and use their annotations to support answering. Additional supports include a statement to the teacher: “Today’s Target Task requires that students think about a significant amount of text. If you think that students will struggle to review this amount of text in the allotted time, consider either asking students to annotate as they read the text for signs of Quinn’s internal conflict/ambivalence for the previous night’s homework, and/or point them toward specific pages to review during class: pp. 108–111; pp. 117–120.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 13, students unpack a Writing Prompt as a class and review discussions throughout the unit that lead up to writing. Students work in pairs to find evidence to support their topic sentences. Additional support is provided that guides students in the structure of an analytical paragraph. Teachers review the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Paragraph Rubric with the class before giving students 20 minutes to write. Teachers circulate through the class to provide feedback. Students then spend 10 minutes checking their writing against the requirements of the rubric including a provision for possible peer editing.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 8, students conduct a short research project in order to create an infographic on a specific aspect of propaganda. Instructions for students include: “In a small group, research aspects of propaganda and create an infographic to present findings.” A sample response is available as support. Additional teacher guidance includes: “Break students into groups of two to four, and assign each an exploration of propaganda from Propaganda Critic: 1) Bots; 2) Fake News and Social Media; 3) Trolls/Sock puppets; 4) Fighting Back; 5) Bias (for the most advanced group).”

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 21, the Enhanced Lesson Plan includes an introduction to the R-A-F-T strategy of interpreting writing prompts and then creating original personal writing. Students brainstorm incidents from their own lives. Students are provided with guidance in the best types of incidents to choose, one that is emotionally charged. Students discuss the three options with a partner who provides feedback on which to select. Students then map out the structure of the story using a story mountain or creating comics. Students share their outlines with a partner who provides feedback.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 18, students write a letter to Congress, “educating them on climate change and urging them to take action.” The lesson includes a list of requirements for students. A sample response is available as support, including a Works Cited.

Indicator 2F
02/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f. 

Materials include research projects to build knowledge; however, there is neither a clear progression of research skills in the assignments moving from providing more scaffolding to less scaffolding, nor an increase in rigor in the research-based assignments. While the Teacher Tools include some general information about teaching research-based assignments in the classroom, the lesson-specific information about how to teach individual lessons is lacking. Research projects are present in some units, but there is no explicit instruction around the research writing standards. Research projects follow a topic closely related to the overall unit theme but do not draw on texts in each unit in conjunction with outside sources. Throughout the year, students are guided in doing research that builds on the foundations provided in Grades 6 and 7. They are provided with opportunities to gather information from print and digital sources. The Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) explains the different structures and routines included in the writing lessons; one structure includes Researching/Gathering Evidence. 

Research projects are not sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • The Teacher Tools include a general suggestion in the Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) for students to cite research, sharing Citation Machine as a possible online citation builder. There are also suggestions for presenting examples and non-examples of credible sources to students. Materials address this standard, “Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation,” as a supporting standard in Unit 1, and as a core standard in Units 2, 3, 4, and 5. 

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lessons 20–21, students choose a community currently undergoing a genocide and research that group to create a digital presentation. As a part of this presentation, students need to include “accurate facts, statistics, and quotations” and “at least four photographs and a map or graph/chart.” While students are told they should “compile and evaluate research information,” sources are not provided, and no instructions are given on how or where they conduct research. While citation information is not specifically included, the sample response has a list of sources. There are no instructions for assessing the credibility of sources. 

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 17, materials address “Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation” as a core standard. Students “collect information on their representatives’ voting record on climate change” and write a letter to their representatives educating them on climate change and urging them to take action. The instructions state to “Include at least two facts or statistics on climate change, appropriately cited.” A Sample Response is available, including examples of in-text citations and an example of a Works Cited. There are no further explicit instructions in the lesson to ensure students assess the credibility of the sources or how to quote and paraphrase.

Materials sometimes support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, general guidance relating to Research/Gathering Evidence is provided: “There are many ways to approach research tasks depending on the main objective of the writing project. If the focus is on selecting, analyzing, and disseminating information, it can be helpful to provide students with the research to use. This process can be scaffolded, depending on student need and development, from using all instructor-selected research, to using provided research as a starting point, or to guiding students in the practice of finding their own research.” Other suggestions include annotating, using a graphic organizer to keep track of information, offering a mini-lesson on paraphrasing, supporting students in learning how to collaborate, evaluate sources, and cite research. The lessons lack sufficient explicit instruction of research skills to ensure student mastery of grade-level standards.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 9, students research a form of propaganda and create an infographic. This topic directly relates to propaganda used in the core texts of the unit. No further support is provided for how to help students gather relevant information from multiple sources to support the Writing standards listed in the lesson.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2, students begin a group research project to create a presentation based on a piece of Iranian history. Each possible topic is linked to another lesson in the unit in order to provide context and further knowledge. Teacher instructions are provided to help students conduct research in a group: “Break into groups to ask questions together. Follow the question formulation technique (adapted from the Right Question Institute): 

    • Review the rules for asking questions:

      • Ask as many questions as you can

      • Number your questions

      • Do not stop to answer, judge, or discuss

      • Write down every question exactly as stated

      • Change any statements into questions”

Materials provide some opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. 

  • Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 8, a short research project is a core standard, and students create an infographic on a specific aspect of propaganda. The Writing Prompt states: “In a small group, research aspects of propaganda and create an infographic to present findings.” A Sample Response is provided. There is no additional guidance in the lesson or explicit instruction around generating additional related, focused questions. Materials include “Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration” as a core standard in Units 2, 4, and 5.

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 2, students begin a research project to research different pieces of Iranian history. They will present their research projects to the class. Students generate their own questions about their topic in order to guide their research. As a part of this presentation, students need to include “accurate facts, statistics, and quotations,” “response or quotation from a witness and/or experts,” and “at least four images (photographs, maps, or graphs/charts) or video clips.” There are no specific guidelines or instructional practices included.

  • Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 11, the skill is a supporting standard as students explain how events in All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely “reveal and challenge characters’ racial biases.” The Writing Prompt requires text evidence from the reading, and a Sample Response is provided. Drawing evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research is listed as a supporting standard in all the other units in Grade 8.

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 14, students read part of Night by Elie Wiesel and answer a Writing Prompt to explain the different reactions to the news of the Red Army and what this shows about each person. Students use text evidence to support their claims. 

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

08/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

The grade 8 materials include instruction, tasks, and assessment questions in which the majority are aligned with grade-level standards. By the end of the school year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed by the program, although there are a couple of standards that are only covered once. While the materials generally adequately address reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards, the instructional support of the language standards, in particular, is lacking. 

Materials include multiple planning tools, including the Pacing Guide for 8th Grade English to plan for the whole school year. The implementation schedule provided in the materials may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.

Indicator 2G
04/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g. 

Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials outline how the year-long instructional plan aligns with grade-level Core Standards and Spiral Standards as indicated in the Standards Map and in each Unit Overview. At times, standards addressed in lessons are not listed on the Lesson Map; there are also instances where standards are included at the bottom of a lesson but there is no explicit instruction or connections to the standards present in the lesson. The instructional sequence is relatively consistent as students read core and supplemental texts connecting to a common topic or theme, answer Close Read Questions and Discussion Questions, and complete a Writing Prompt connecting to the assigned reading. Lessons include opportunities for the teacher to provide students with standards-aligned explicit instruction. The questions and tasks connect to the required grade level standards, including Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, and Language Standards, and they require students to include evidence from texts they are reading as they work on skills such as inferencing or analyzing certain aspects of texts. Opportunities to address language standards are present, though instructional support is lacking. Materials provide an answer key for each Content Assessment, which lists the standards addressed by each assessment item. There is a Standards Map and lesson plans reflect standards covered. 

Over the course of each unit, instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Course Summary includes a detailed description of what will be studied, including a rationale for the anchor texts, the enduring understanding focused on throughout the year and a Standards Map that outlines which standards are addressed in each unit. For example:

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 17, the lesson objective is as follows: “Explain how the pigs have betrayed the original principles of Animal Farm, and how their betrayal and manipulation of the other animals creates dramatic irony.” This objective aligns to RL.8.3, one of the core standards listed for the lesson. Prior to reading Chapter 8 of Animal Farm by George Orwell, the teacher explains, “Orwell represents the relationship between Stalin and Adolph Hitler through the characters of Napoleon and Frederick” and reminds students that “Orwell compresses huge historical events and time periods into single scenes or events.” The teacher reads the paragraph on page 11 before students independently write in response to the following the Target Task prompt: “Reread the top paragraph of page 11, where Old Major explains the principles that he believes the animals must adhere to if they wish to create a successful and just society. How have the pigs betrayed these principals? What are the consequences of their betrayal? Provide at least three examples from Chapter 8 to support your answer.” 

Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, different types of tasks align to standards. Close Read Questions require students to analyze complex text and respond to standards-aligned, text-based questions. Discussion Questions connect to the texts. Many questions and tasks, including the Writing Prompts, require students to use text-based evidence, which requires inferencing. For example: 

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 17, students read the preface to Night by Elie Wiesel. While reading the preface, students respond to the following Close Read questions: “What possible reasons for writing Night does Wiesel reference on page vii–viii? Summarize each in your own words. On page viii, Wiesel writes that he is ‘a witness who believes he has a moral obligation to try to prevent the enemy from enjoying one last victory by allowing his crimes to be erased from human memory.’ Explain what this sentence means, and what it reveals about Wiesel’s purpose in writing this book. What problem did Wiesel face as he began writing this book? Provide evidence from page ix to explain your answer. What fear does Wiesel have about his message? Why does he write, in spite of this fear? Provide evidence from pages ix–x to support your answer.” After reading the preface, students write in response to the following Target Task prompt: “What was Wiesel’s purpose when he wrote Night? What does he hope that his book will achieve? Provide two pieces of evidence from pages vii–x, and xv to support your answer.” Then, students participate in a class discussion of their responses to the following Discussion Question: “Why is it so important for Holocaust victims to share their stories? What impact does hearing these stories have on us as readers?” At the close of the lesson, students respond to the following Exit Ticket question: “Wiesel believes that he has a responsibility—a ‘moral obligation’—to share his story with the world. Do you think that we, the readers, have a responsibility to act now that we have read this text?” These questions and tasks align to the core standard listed for the lesson, RI.8.6: “Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints.”

Over the course of each unit, assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, materials provide an Assessment Answer Key for the end-of-unit Content Assessment. The Assessment Answer Key labels each question with the corresponding standard. For example: 

    • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Content Assessment Answer Key, during Question 10 in Part One: Vocabulary, Grammar, and Content Knowledge, students respond to the following prompt: “In 2–3 sentences, explain why Marji’s parents ultimately decided to send her away to school in Europe. Use the words bleak and repressive in your answer.” The answer key lists L.8.6 and L.8.1 as the corresponding standards. Materials also include a Criteria for Success rubric to evaluate students’ responses. Criteria include the following:

      • “Demonstrates understanding of the word ‘bleak’

      • Demonstrates understanding of the word ‘repressive’

      • Identifies that Marji’s parents did this in Marji’s best interest, as the current regime would not allow her the freedom she needed to succeed

      • Spelling and grammar is generally correct and does not impede the reader’s comprehension

This assessment item requires students to accurately use grade-appropriate vocabulary (L.8.6) and to demonstrate command of conventions in their written response (L.8.1).

By the end of the academic year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Standards Map notes that each unit is designed to deepen “student mastery of a set of grade-level standards. These are split into core standards (standards especially important for understanding the core text and knowledge of the unit) and spiral standards (standards that students repeatedly use as they engage with, discuss, or write about a text).” However, there are instances in which standards are addressed one time across the school year. For example:

    • The following standards do not repeat across units in the Standards Map for 8th Grade English and in the list of standards for each unit:

      • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, RL.8.7 is listed as a core standard. Materials address this standard in Lessons 21–23, but materials do not provide opportunities to address this standard in other units.

      • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fiction, RI.8.9 is listed as a supporting standard. Materials address this standard in Lesson 13, but materials do not provide opportunities to address this standard in other units. 

Indicator 2H
04/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h. 

Materials include multiple planning tools, including the Pacing Guide for 8th Grade English to plan for the whole school year. Each unit contains a separate implementation schedule and each lesson includes a pacing guide. The Standards Map shows how the Common Core State Standards are taught over the course of the year. The pacing guide allows teachers to add days to the units to cover the material appropriately for their students; however, no alternative schedules are provided. Additional guidance for planning is included in the Teacher Support tools, such as Preparing to Teach Fishtank ELA, Preparing to Teach an ELA Unit, Components of an ELA Lesson, and Planning for a Year of Fishtank ELA. The implementation schedule may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days giving teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others. Materials do not include optional tasks, only core materials and activities. The core materials provide opportunities to practice and reach mastery of most grade level standards, though grammar standards would need additional guidance. 

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Support, ELA Teacher Tools, Planning for a Year of Fishtank ELA, materials provide an implementation schedule with suggestions for teachers to address re-teaching and fit other assessments or school events into the lesson progression. 

  • Materials include five units with a total of 121 lessons over 126 instructional days. The Pacing Guide for 8th Grade English states, “Each unit includes a specific number of lessons, including writing lessons, Socratic Seminar lessons, and two days for assessment.” There are no alternative implementation schedules, though the program provides time for teachers to create assessments and make instructional decisions to support students. The Grade 8 Focus Area Overview provides details relating to each unit’s core standards and spiral standards. For example, in Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, Notes are available for the teacher: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion. Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”

Suggested implementation schedules may be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Pacing Guide for 8th Grade English, the implementation schedule states, “Our 8th Grade English units span 126 days. We intentionally did not account for all 180 school days to allow teachers to fit in additional review or extension, teacher-created assessments, and school-based events.” There is no alternative implementation schedule present. Similarly, each unit contains a separate implementation schedule. For example, in Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, there are 20 lessons to be taught with a suggested implementation time of 29 days. Two additional days are suggested for the Content Assessment. 

  • In each unit, each lesson includes multiple Close Read Questions, a Target Task Writing Prompt, and often Discussion Questions. Each lesson includes a pacing guide for teachers that presents how long they should spend on each of these tasks within the class period. Homework is listed for almost every day of the unit that students complete to stay on schedule with the pacing guide, typically reading, sometimes writing. In lessons with Socratic Seminars, the task can be completed in one class period.

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 9, students answer three Close Read Questions, one Discussion Question, and a Writing Prompt: “Consider the way that people responded to Moishe the Beadle’s warning and Mrs. Schäcter’s. What conclusions can you draw about human nature based on their response to both of these people? Support your answer with at least two pieces of specific evidence from the text.” In the Homework section of the lesson, students are assigned to read pages 34–47 of the memoir.

    • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 20, the objective states, “Outline the stages of genocide in preparation for creating a presentation.” The lesson does not include any homework relating to the presentation. As a part of that project, students “will learn about the pyramid of hate and stages of genocide,” which connects to the objective. The method by which students learn this information is not provided, but if they are conducting their own research, this could take more than one class period to complete. Teachers may choose to extend this lesson as needed.

Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No optional tasks are included.

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No optional tasks are included.

Overview of Gateway 3

Usability

The grade 8 materials do not meet expectations for usability. Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. 

The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level in both regular content and assessments. There are various types of assessments in the program, including unit content assessments, formative and summative assessments. While an answer key is provided for all assessments, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key. The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. 

Materials include general support throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students. Still, the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson, as the variation of the structure in lessons is limited.

The program does not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. 

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

08/09

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

The grade 8 materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. 

The materials also include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson for teacher use. Materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.

The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. The materials include a suggestion to inform parents about sensitive content in the unit; however, there is no letter template provided.

Indicator 3A
02/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a. 

The materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. In each unit, links in the Enhanced Lesson Plan allow teachers to download student materials for use in the lessons. These materials include a vocabulary package and the option to turn the Key Questions, Target Task, and Exit Ticket into student handouts. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also includes specific suggestions for how to incorporate materials within the lesson plan, including explanations for use, directions for how to frame and utilize supports, reminders, sentence stems, and key places to stop in texts for all sections of the lesson. These key stopping points include the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary, the Close Read, the Target Task, and the Class Discussion sections. Each lesson contains one or more Objectives for students to meet and a list of core and supporting Common Core Standards covered in the lesson.

Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a Unit Summary with explanations of how the anchor text was selected and how the supplemental texts support the anchor text and themes in the unit. Each modules includes a Unit Launch to help the teacher understand the unit. The Unit Launch includes five steps: Introduction, Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Key Writing Standards.

  • The lessons offer guidance for teachers to support all students by Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge, and guidance is available consistently around the Target Tasks across the grade level. An example of additional support is when the materials offer Sentence stems and Scaffolding Questions for teachers to utilize when following the Close Read procedures.

  • Each non-writing lesson includes a Comprehension and Vocabulary review at the onset of the lesson. This section includes specific teacher guidance on how to introduce vocabulary words, including the use of word walls, vocabulary logs, and vocabulary cards. Students review key vocabulary from the previous lesson. Materials provide links to specific strategies to teach vocabulary words. Materials also differentiate words into content-specific academic categories and provide guidance explaining the difference to students and the teaching of each. The Unit Summary includes a comprehensive list of the vocabulary for the unit, including part of speech and definition.

  • In the Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, the goal is to “build [teachers] understanding of how students might experience the unit text(s) based on these interconnected aspects of text complexity.” For example, Unit 2 includes the following subsections with descriptions, examples specific to the unit, and reflection questions for the teacher:

    • What Makes the Text Complex

    • Understanding the Supplemental Texts

    • Your Students and These Texts

    • Reflections on the Author

Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 17, the materials offer guidance for Supporting All Students in the form of a Close Read Procedure and include specific Key Moments to Analyze, connecting to the text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely: “‘This is a roll call! Sean Bell!’ Then she followed with, ‘Absent again today! Oscar Grant! Absent again today! Rekia Boyd! Absent again today!’ (p. 308).” There are Scaffolding Questions available to support students in providing specific evidence from the text to explain the impact of the use of repetition, such as “Whose names are they reading? What does ‘absent’ mean in this context, and how is it different from when they said that Rashad was ‘absent’?”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 4, students read the play, The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Materials contain a Key Understandings section that includes Skills and Strategies and Knowledge that will be gained in the lesson. Each section of the lesson includes directions on how to present the content. For example, in the Target Task section, teacher guidance is as follows: “Explain to students: ‘Direct address’ is a dramatic device in which a character appears to speak directly to the audience. In this play, direct address is done as a ‘monologue.’ A monologue is when a character gives a speech or otherwise speaks for an extended period of time without interruption. This is in contrast to ‘dialogue,’ where two or more characters speak to one another. With students, reread Anne’s monologue that begins halfway down page 26 and ends at the top of page 27. Make sure that students read the stage direction before the direct address begins so that they understand that this is done while Anne is sitting at her desk, writing in her diary. Have students reread the passages where the playwrights have used direct address monologues: pages 30 and 39. Then, give students approximately ten minutes to independently answer the Target Task question. Circulate to gauge student understanding. Consider a Show Call. Provide two examples: one that almost meets expectations and one that meets expectations. Have students assess the quality of the example or provide batch feedback based on observations and have students revise their work based on that feedback.” Additionally, directions for the teacher include having students reread Anne’s monologue, “making sure students read the stage directions” so that they understand a key point of the text, giving students time to independently answer the Target Task question and then referring them back to their editing checklist, and also considering a show call as an example of how to give and receive feedback on answers. Scaffolding questions, key moments to analyze, language supports in the form of sentence stems, and opportunities for enrichment are also included as options for the teacher to draw on. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 10, the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary section provides the following review question for teachers to pose to students: “Do the people of Iran think that their future is bleak at this point in the text? Explain your thinking.” Bleak is introduced as a vocabulary work through direct instruction in Lesson 9. A second question provides a guided question for reviewing the vocabulary word tumultuous taught in Lesson 1: “Rick Steves, whose video we watched in the first lesson, describes Iran’s history as ‘tumultuous.’ What events have we learned about so far that support this idea?” Within the same lesson, teachers are provided a link to specific guidance on explicit instruction of vocabulary to teach the word clandestine.

Indicator 3B
01/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3b. 

The materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. Each unit provides a Unit Prep section with Notes for Teachers that include some additional contextual background; however, it does not provide support in teaching grade-level concepts within the lesson plans. Explanations are included in the Teacher Tools of different aspects of the curriculum and teaching techniques or different strategies related to the knowledge demands of each unit. Still, they are not lesson- or text-specific. The explanations of the concepts are specific to the approaches taken by the materials and do not provide any additional opportunity for teachers to expand their understanding of a concept within the curriculum. Occasionally, teachers are directed to do their own research to understand information for a unit.

Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, multiple sections present specific information on how to prepare the unit, internalize a unit, and understand the different components of an ELA lesson. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Writing, there are specific full-length explanations of Learning to Write and Writing to Learn. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, there are explanations of Intellectually Preparing a Unit, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Scaffolds for English Learners, Engineering Texts, Oral Language Protocols, and Using Graphic Organizers as Scaffolds. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, there are explanations of Categories to Progress Monitor and Types of Assessment for Progress Monitoring, including Formative Assessments and Summative Assessments. 

  • In the Vocabulary section of the Teacher Tools, there is an explanation of how the vocabulary is built into the units and an explanation of how students build vocabulary through interacting with Tier II and Tier III words. There is then an in-depth explanation of how to teach the words within the text. There are no specific examples or modeling provided. There is further instruction for teachers on how to teach vocabulary through both an implicit and explicit approach with guidelines and strategies but no specific examples or modeling.

  • In the Teacher Tools, Providing Access to Complex Texts section, there are detailed explanations of what makes a text complex and how to provide access and support for more complex texts being used by students. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Routines for Active Reading, there is an explanation of what active reading is and then more in-depth explanations of various forms of active reading, including Interactive Read Aloud, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading, and Independent Reading. 

  • In the Unit Launch section of the curriculum, materials provide the teacher with an opportunity to internalize the essential questions of the unit. The teacher has opportunities to explore the questions as well as sample answers to the questions. In the section “Considering Who and Where You Are,” the teacher has an opportunity to reflect on biases or gaps in knowledge that might impact the teaching of the unit. 

Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Unit Summary, Notes for Teachers, the teacher is provided with additional resources to build background and engagement on the topic of racial injustice. The following note is included: “This unit is built on these premises: (a) your students are already aware of the conversation around racial justice/injustice taking place in our country; and (b) it is essential that students—regardless of their racial background—are having discussions about race and racial justice in their schools. A number of resources are listed below that provide guidance around having conversations about race with students.” Multiple articles are included for teachers to read as a starting point, including “How Should I Talk About Race in my Mostly White Classroom?” by ADL, “Uncomfortable Conversations: Talking About Race in the Classroom” by Elissa Nadworny (NPR), and “Facing Race” by Leah Shafer (Harvard Graduate School of Education.”

Indicator 3C
02/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c. 

The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson.

Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • For each unit, the Lesson Map table includes a list of addressed standards. At the beginning of each unit in the Unit Prep, there is also a section titled Common Core Standards, where the core and supporting standards are listed. 

  • The end of each lesson in every unit includes a list of Common Core Standards and Supporting Standards, which are defined as “Standards that are practiced daily but are not priority standards for the unit.” All are hyperlinked to a pop-up window with the full text of the standard.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 11, materials list Common Core Standards L.8.6, W.8.4, W.8.10, W.8.5, W.8.2.d, W.8.6, W.8.2.e, W.8.2.f.

Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit Launch section of the curriculum, materials provide an explanation for the key reading and writing standards. The teacher works through unpacking the essential standards by answering questions concerning the standard and how it connects to the unit. Questions include: “Why is this standard important for understanding the key ideas and themes of this unit’s core text(s)? What are students likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard?” Once the teacher enters a response, they are given the opportunity to view the publisher’s answer. The next step is to “Apply the Standard.” In this section, the teacher is provided with a set of tasks that are included in the unit and answers the question, “Reflect on how understanding this standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly answer the task.” In Step 3, “Define Mastery,” the teacher reflects on the skills that students must develop to answer the target tasks successfully. Each step in this internalization of the unit has publisher exemplar responses to help deepen understanding.

  • The Unit Launch for each unit includes a section entitled Unit Essential Content. Guidance notes, “The goal of this section is for you to review and fully understand the key content knowledge of a unit prior to teaching. Doing this work prior to teaching the unit will help you endure that students internalize the key content knowledge by the end of the unit.”

  • In the Unit Essential Content section, materials describe Key Reading Standards: “For each unit, we have identified the key reading standards of the unit. These key standards are among the most important in helping students understand this unit’s texts. These standards represent a subset of the reading standards covered in the unit and work in conjunction with the other standards noted at the unit level. For each standard, you will reflect on why the standard is particularly useful for making meaning of the unit’s core and supplemental texts. You will apply the standard to specific Target Tasks from this unit and analyze how the standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly complete the task. Finally, you will reflect on what students will ultimately need to know and be able to do to demonstrate mastery of this standard. This work will help you ensure that students are interacting with the texts and tasks at the right level of rigor and depth.” For each standard, teacher guidance includes the following prompts and materials provide a mastery response after submission:

    • Step 1: Unpack the Standard

      • Read and analyze the language of this key reading standard.

      • Considering the language of the standard above, answer the questions below and record your thoughts in the provided fields or in the provided note template:

        • Why is this standard important for understanding the key ideas and themes of this unit’s core text(s)? 

        • What are students likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard?

        • Teachers can then check their answers by expanding the “View Our Response” section in which they are provided with the curriculum writers’ rationale as to the importance of this standard and what students are likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard.

    • Step 2: Apply the Standard

      • Below are a set of tasks from this unit that require students to have a strong understanding of this key standard in order to answer each question correctly. Read each task, the appropriate section of the text, and our sample response. Then, reflect on how understanding this standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly answer the task.

      • After the task, a reflection question is provided.

        • Consider the question below and record your thoughts in the provided fields or in the provided note template:

          • How does applying this key standard help students better understand this section of text and correctly answer this Target Task?

          • Teachers can then check their answers by expanding the “View Our Response” section in which they are provided with the curriculum writers’ rationale on how this key standard helps students better understand this section of text and correctly answer this Target Task.

  • In the Unit Essential Content section, Key Writing Standards are described.“In this section, you will explore the key writing standards of this unit and what mastery of these standards looks like in the context of the unit. These standards represent a subset of writing standards covered in the unit and were selected because they are among the most important in helping students write in response to the text(s). First, you will closely read the language of the standards in tandem with the unit’s culminating writing task. Then, you will examine an exemplar response to the task and reflect on how the standards help students proficiently complete the writing task.”

    • Step 1: Unpack the standards

      • First, read and analyze the language of the key writing standards.

      • What are key understandings of these standards? What do they ask students to know and be able to do?

    • Step 2: Apply the Standards

      • Now, read this unit’s culminating writing task, followed by our example of an exemplar response. While reading the exemplar, notice and annotate for evidence of the standards.

      • Use the following questions to guide your annotations: 

        • How does this exemplar show mastery of the standards? 

        • What do students need to know and understand in order to complete the writing task?

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. The materials include a suggestion to inform parents about sensitive content in the unit; however, materials do not provide a letter template. Materials provide limited information to guide teachers relating to the content covered in each unit or lesson. Materials do not include information on how parents or caregivers can help students succeed in the program.  

Materials contain limited strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Unit Prep, Unit Summary, the Note for Teachers section states that Night by Elie Wiesel is an “intense, deeply troubling text….that may be upsetting to students.” The materials “highly recommend” educators “send a letter home to parents explaining the content area that will be discussed in this unit.” Materials do not provide additional guidance for teachers in creating this letter or notification.

Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3E
02/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e. 

The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program and include an annotated bibliography that references the research-based strategies. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. Materials provide a concise explanation of each ELA component and explain how the program is designed to teach the components to accomplish the stated goals. The Our Approach section emphasizes the flexibility of the program and its focus on being culturally relevant. 

Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In the Our Approach section, the materials explain the approach taken in general terms, including a focus on texts over skills, criteria for content selection, the foci for writing instruction, and approaches to discussion and word knowledge. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials provide an explanation of how the materials approach each ELA component:

    • In Writing, Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction, the explanation states: “Language and writing instruction are embedded within all Fishtank ELA units from K-12. Language instruction is a powerful tool to help students understand the decisions authors make and how they impact the effect their writing has on readers. Learning grammar and mechanics is about studying the intentional decisions authors make, noticing the power of different punctuation, sentence structures, and craft choices, and then trying out those strategies in their own writing. When learning different grammatical structures, students zoom in on sentences to notice the connection between mechanics, craft, style, and meaning. Language instruction isn’t separate from reading instruction because the connection between language and the author’s craft is integral. Because language instruction is so deeply connected to reading instruction, it should not be taught in isolation. And as far back as 1936, the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) found that formal teaching of grammar and mechanics had little effect on students’ writing and even had deleterious effects on student writing when it displaced writing time. Instead, language instruction should be organically embedded into all aspects of reading and writing so that students can authentically grapple with and understand how different structures impact meaning.”

    • In Reading Structures and Routines, the explanation states that the goal of the curriculum is to build independent and strategic learners. The approach is explained as providing students with multiple opportunities to interact with a wide variety of texts independently, with the goal of having students read the core texts independently with little support. 

    • In Vocabulary, the explanation states: “Vocabulary development is intentionally built within all Fishtank ELA units. Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic. Throughout the unit, students have multiple opportunities to engage with words orally or in writing. Depending on the word, vocabulary words are taught both directly or indirectly. Fishtank ELA does not rely on a single vocabulary instructional method; rather, instruction happens strategically within units so that students learn vocabulary indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines.”

    • In Writing, the explanation states: “Fishtank ELA includes opportunities for students to both learn to write and write to learn. Students will be immersed in reading, writing, discourse, and idea-generation cycles in each unit. There is no separate writing block and no separate writing curriculum; all writing instruction is embedded directly into lessons and units. Through embedded on-demand and process-writing assignments, students build powerful, evidence-based arguments and develop their voices in various genres. Because students need solid knowledge and understanding of a subject matter to write, all Fishtank ELA writing assignments are connected to a core text or ask students to write about content knowledge from the unit, ensuring that all students have equal access to the assignment.”

  • In the Fishtank guiding principles, materials provide the following information: “In Literature units from Kindergarten through 8th grade, students read texts that explore themes applicable to their lives while also building knowledge of historical events and time periods. Most of the literature units focus on developing identity, diversity, justice, and activism, which are key components of Learning for Justice’s Social Justice Standards. The content of all of our K–8 units, both Literature and Science & Social Studies, aim to provide students with windows and mirrors to ensure students see their own identities, experiences, and motivations in texts (mirrors) alongside texts that allow students to gain insight and build empathy for the identities, experiences, and motivations of others (windows) (Style, 1996). And, wherever possible, our units aim to engage students in discussions of current events. We also frequently update our units to incorporate articles and discussion topics that reflect current issues in the world around them.”

  • The Fishtank guiding principles also include the following reference: “Rather than organizing lessons around specific skills (e.g., how to find the main idea) and teaching these skills in isolation, we organize our curriculum around carefully-selected texts that will engage students and facilitate deep thinking and strategy development. The text, and the demands of the text, drive the focus of a particular unit or lesson. Text-dependent questions in each lesson are sequenced in order to build a deeper understanding of the key ideas and themes presented by the text. Units across the curriculum require students to read a combination of longer texts to build stamina and engage in discussions about the full text, as well as close readings of specific passages or excerpts. Text-dependent questions and close readings push students to pay close attention to the author’s craft and text structure, word choice, and challenging vocabulary and syntax (Coleman and Pimentel, 2012). All grade-level Common Core Standards are carefully woven into the units and lessons, introduced and reinforced through text-dependent questions and close reading moments, and work in service of deep understanding of the text.”

Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Teacher Tools, Writing, bibliographic references to multiple sources used in the development of their program include: 

    • Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov 

    • Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin

    • Writing for Understanding: Using Backwards design to help all students write effectively by J. Hawkins, E. Ginty, K. LeClaire Kurzman, D. Leddy, and J. Miller

    • The Writing Revolution: A Guide to Advancing Thinking Through Writing in All Subjects and Grades by Judith C. Hochman and Natalie Wexler  

  • In Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, bibliographic references to multiple research sources in the development of their program include: 

    • Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain: Prompting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students by Z. Hammond

    • Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov

    • Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understandings, by J. Zwiers and M. Crawford

    • Common Core Standards in Diverse Classrooms: Essential Practices for Developing Academic Language and Disciplinary Literacy by J. Zwiers, S. O’Hara, and R. Pritchard

  • In Teacher Tools, Text Selection, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:

    • Revised Publishers’ Criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, Grades 3–12 by D. Coleman and S. Pimentel 

    • “Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy,” by Gloria Ladson-Billings

    • Why Knowledge Matters by E.D. Hirsch, Jr. 

    • Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework and Historically Responsive Literary, Gholdy Muhammad, and “Curriculum as Window and Mirror” by Emily Style 

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines: Close Reading, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:

    • Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading by K. Beers and R.E. Probst

    • Text-Dependent Questions, Grades K-5: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading by D. Fischer and N. Frey

    • Close Reading: Lessons for Analyzing Texts--and Life by C. Lehman and K. Roberts 

  • In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners: Scaffolds for English Learners, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include “Essential Actions: A Handbook for Implementing WIDA’s Framework for English Language Development Standards” by Margo Gottlieb.

  • In Teacher Tools, Vocabulary, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction by Isabel Beck and Common Core Appendix A.

  • In Teacher Tools, the explanations of the Match Fishtank approach to writing, vocabulary development, and language and grammar instruction are followed by “resources referenced in the development of” each section.

  • Additional reference sections include Qualitative Complexity of Fiction Texts, Providing Supports for Text Complexity, How Texts are Selected in the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Close Reading, and Foundational Skills.

  • The Foundational Skills section and its subsections entitled Teaching Reading Fluency and Assessing Reading Fluency, as well as the subsections of Academic Discourse entitled Types of Academic Discourse and Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Subsections of Supporting English Learners entitled Scaffolds for English Learners and Oral Language Protocols, and the subsection of Progress Monitoring and Assessment entitled Formative Assessments include embedded footnotes with references.

Indicator 3F
01/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f. 

The materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit plan contains a list of the texts being read throughout the unit with hyperlinks to the texts (either for reading or for purchase). 

  • Each lesson folder contains all the handouts students will need for the lesson. 

    • For example, for Unit 1, lesson 1, the lesson folder contains separate student handouts for the key questions and target task.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

08/10

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

The grade 8 materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. The program includes unit content assessments that contain a variety of item types, including short and long-constructed responses, text-based discussions, written reflections, and essays. Each unit also includes standards-based formative and summative assessments. 

The materials provide an answer key for each assessment in the program with the corresponding assessed standards. While an answer key is provided, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key provided. In addition, the materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments.

Indicator 3I
02/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i. 

The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standards and practices for the grade level. Each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards the assessment addresses.

Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit contains an assessment that addresses the content covered during the unit. The answer key document includes a table that contains an answer key and the standards that each assessment question addresses. 

Indicator 3J
02/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3j. 

The materials include limited opportunities to determine students’ learning and insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key  provided. Most support occurs through a series of protocols and questions that teachers can use to respond to student data. 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and some guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit contains one formal assessment that covers the content of the unit. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Progress Monitoring and Assessments section includes a data analysis protocol. Materials provide probing questions for teachers to use to assist in discussing the assessment. Categories covered in this protocol include the Teacher Preparation Unit, Teacher Preparation Lessons, and Lesson Execution. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Summative Assessments section contains the Data Meeting Protocol Guide, which includes a step-by-step process on how to conduct a Data Meeting. The guide has two parts. Part 1 explains how to use  data to identify strengths and growth areas; Part 2 explains how to use data to reflect and plan next steps. 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and no suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Formative Assessment section provides several frameworks that teachers can use to monitor and respond to various types of student work. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Summative Assessment section provides a data meeting protocol that teachers can follow to identify instructional next steps.

  • While the Teacher Tools in the program provide a framework for teachers to use, materials do not include clear, codified suggestions for certain student misunderstandings.

Indicator 3K
04/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.

The materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. The materials include unit Content Assessments that contain a variety of item types, including short- and long-constructed responses, text-based discussion, written reflection, and essays. Each unit includes standards-based formative and summative assessments. Summative assessments include standards-based constructed responses aligned to culminating discussions, presentations, or on-demand writing. Each unit includes instruction and assessment opportunities aligned to anchor writing standards. Students write essays to inform or to express a claim, or they write narratives. When used as a summative assessment, students complete these on-demand writing tasks independently. 

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 24, the Content Assessment requires students to cold read a passage and answer multiple choice questions, including determining what the plot reveals about a character, how the text reveals the speaker’s perspective and the theme developed in the short story. Another question requires students to identify if sentences are written in active or passive voice. An additional task requires students to write an answer the prompt about how Nazis dehumanized Jewish prisoners in concentration camps. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 23, the Content Assessment requires students to cold read a passage and answer questions, including how images work to communicate the meaning of the text. Another section requires students to determine what aspects of a character are revealed by the passage. Another task requires students to define words based on context. An additional section requires students to write about the key idea of the passage.

  • Examples of formative assessments include:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 12, students answer: “Explain the ways that characters’ lives are shaped by race and racism in All American Boys.”

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 3, students answer: “Identify the events, ideas, and social conditions that led to the Russian Revolution, and explain Stalin’s role in the establishment of a new communist society and government.”

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 5, students respond to the Target Task question: “What tone does Jetñil-Kijiner develop in lines 60 through 88? Select at least three words and phrases that help develop tone and explain how this tone reinforces the overall message of her poem.”

  • Examples of summative assessments include:

    • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 21, students participate in a Socratic Seminar answering the following questions: “Who changes more over the course of the text: Quinn or Rashad? Are Quinn and Rashad equally responsible for standing up against injustice? How does race influence the way that people see others? How does this shape behavior? Do people have a responsibility to stand up when they see injustice occur? Is this true in all circumstances? Does protest divide or unite us? How does gender influence the movement for racial justice? What can individuals do to fight racism and stand up for racial justice? What is the relationship between race and fear in this country?”

    • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 28, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (L.8.6, L.8.1, RL.8.3, RI.8.1, RI.8.2, W.8.1, L.8.2, RL.8.6, RL.8.4, RL.8.2, RI.8.6, W.8.2).

    • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 20, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (L.8.6, L.8.2, RI.8.1, RI.8.5, RI.8.8, RI.8.9, RI.8.6, RL.8.4, RL.8.2, W.8.1).

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. The assessments are not designed so students can demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. To make the tests more accessible, such as text-to-speech or increasing the font size, teachers must download and edit the assessments. 

Materials do not offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Assessments are digital and housed on the website. Although assessments could be altered before printing, it would involve reformatting the answers.

Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

03/06

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

The grade 8 materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. While the materials include suggestions on how materials can be scaffolded for multi-lingual learners or for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English, these suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of these scaffolds to the teacher. The materials do include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. 

Throughout the program, there is limited variation in structure. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students, but the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson. 

The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts.

Indicator 3M
01/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3m. 

The materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. Materials include instances that provide opportunities for enrichment which “can be used with advanced students or students who have demonstrated readiness for enrichment as a way of exploring texts, topics, and more complex concepts in depth.” The Additional Supports section should assist students when working with grade-level content to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy; however, teachers will need to determine which supports to utilize specifically for special populations.

Materials provide limited strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit Summary consistently provides a general statement: “In order to ensure that all students are able to access the texts and tasks in this unit, it is incredibly important to intellectually prepare to teach the unit prior to launching the unit. Use the intellectual preparation protocol and the Unit Launch to determine which support students will need. To learn more, visit the Supporting all Students teacher tool.”

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 3, students answer the questions, “What does the incident with Peter’s shoes reveal about Anne? What does it reveal about Peter? What does it reveal about their relationship? Provide evidence from pages 18-19 to support your answer.” The Supporting All Students section identifies supports while Running the Close Read, such as Scaffolding Questions: “Why does Anne take Peter’s shoes? How does Peter respond to this? What is Anne’s tone in this scene? Read their conversation on page 18: Can it be interpreted as Peter being playful? Can it be interpreted as Peter being truly frustrated?” 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, the materials provide a Supporting All Students section that includes a question mark icon that populates the following guidance when clicked: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the demands of the text or the task. See Supporting All Students with Fishtank ELA for more guidance.” An example of general support includes Sentence frame(s) to assist with the task of identifying claims made in an informational article and assessing the relevance and sufficiency of evidence provided to support those claims in the text “As Rising Heat Bakes US Cities, The Poor Often Feel It Most” by Meg Anderson and Sean McMinn: “The writers of this article make the claim that low-income areas ________________. They support their claim with _____________________, which demonstrates _______________________. This evidence they provide [is/is not] sufficient because ___________________. It [is/is not] relevant because _________________.” The supports do not provide additional guidance for teachers to make decisions.

  • The Supporting All Students teacher tool provides general support scaffolds for supporting English language learners; however, these scaffolds are broad and not specific to any lesson or text. 

Indicator 3N
01/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n. 

The materials include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. The number of lessons that contain an “Opportunities for Enrichment” section is limited. Some of the lessons provide specific scaffolds intended to enhance lessons by providing additional depth through many activities for students, such as reading an extra text or portion of a text or completing an additional assignment for the text. 

Materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, 17 of 26 lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil, Night, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:

    • In Lesson 3, teacher guidance includes the following suggestion for enrichment: Ask students to think about the way that the inhabitants of the Secret Annex are affected by sounds—both inside and outside the annex. How does noise/sound control their lives and emotions?”

    • In Lesson 5, teacher guidance includes the following suggestion for enrichment: “Ask students: What do the red high heels represent for Anne? How has Anne’s relationship with her mother changed?” 

    • In Lesson 9, teacher guidance includes the following suggestion for enrichment: “Ask students: What motifs do you notice in today’s reading? Ex: Fire, speaking out, doubting messengers, insanity, silence, denial. Do you think that Mrs. Schäcter was just hallucinating? Or was she somehow seeing into the future?”

    • In Lesson 12, teacher guidance includes the following suggestion for enrichment: “Ask students: What do you think Wiesel means when he says that God is “hanging here from this gallows”? Is this a statement of despair? Anger? Or Hope? The word hunger begins to take on a new meaning. What does the word hunger mean to Eliezer? What other words have new meanings for him? Carefully explain your thinking.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, 16 of 28 lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:

    • In Lesson 2, enrichment opportunities include: “For additional practice with language usage, NoRedInk offers substantial digital activities for students to practice grammar fluently.”

    • In Lesson 5, enrichment opportunities include: “To extend the lesson, ask students to identify the type of shift present in the problem sentences above (tense, voice, or mood). Add: 4. Shifts in number: Using singular pronouns that connect to singular antecedents or using plural pronouns that connect to plural antecedents. 5. Shifts in person: There are three main points of view -- first person (I, me, my, mine, we, us, our, ours), second person (you, your, yours), and third person (he, him, his, she, her, hers, it, its, they, them, their).”

    • In Lesson 8, enrichment opportunities include: “Ask students: Do you think that adult Satrapi has a different perspective on the revolution than young Marji? How do you know?” 

    • In Lesson 18, enrichment opportunities include: “Read the following article and choose one woman to focus on. Why does this woman choose to wear a hijab? ‘Women discuss what it’s like to wear a hijab’ by Nara Schoenberg (The Detroit News).”

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Changes Facts and Fictions, six of twenty lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.

The materials provide some variety in how students demonstrate understanding. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. The non-writing day Enhanced Lesson Plans follow the same format for each lesson. Students regularly respond in the same ways. Each lesson begins with a Close Read, during which students read the assigned text and answer Close Reading Questions. Students answer questions orally by annotating the text, writing in the margins, or writing their answers. The Target Task Writing Prompt that follows requires students to write an answer using textual evidence to support ideas. The teacher provides feedback for a few examples, and students revise their work based on the feedback. Students participate in a class discussion focused on a given question. Students have one minute to jot down ideas, and two minutes to discuss in pairs or groups, before participating in a class discussion. Students complete an exit ticket to close the lesson. The repetitive nature of the lesson plan creates a system in which students repeatedly respond in the same manner to prompts. 

Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a limited variety of formats and methods. Examples include but are not limited to the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 7, students talk in pairs or small groups, and each has the opportunity to share their thoughts. Then, students engage in a whole-class discussion. During the Target Task portion, students turn and talk to a partner in order to summarize a piece of the text before independently answering questions in writing and engaging in a show call where students assess examples and give feedback before revising work. Most lessons include this opportunity.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change: Facts and Fictions, Lesson 2, students may choose the manner in which they respond to questions. Teacher guidance states: “Depending on student needs, students can answer the questions orally, annotate in the margins, or write their answer. While students are reading, circulate to gauge student understanding of the Close Read Questions. Provide additional supports where needed.” 

Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice, All American Boys, Lesson 5, after watching a video, the teacher poses the question, “What are your thoughts about this video? Did anything about it surprise you? Affect you? Challenge or confirm ideas you already had?” Students respond to the question independently, talk in pairs and small groups, and then share in a whole-class discussion.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 6, students express their thoughts in a class discussion to the prompt: “What are your reactions to the end of the play?” Students respond to the question independently, talk in pairs and small groups, and then share in a whole-class discussion. A suggestion is made to allow students 10 minutes to “speak openly about their reactions to the ending of the book” and give students time to reflect and write independently before answering.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 13, students express their thoughts when responding to the discussion question, “What are your reactions to the behavior and propaganda techniques used by the pigs in these chapters? Does it change your perspective of them?” Students respond to the question independently, talk in pairs and small groups, and then share in a whole-class discussion.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 7, the target task question is, “Although the author of this story does not explicitly mention climate change, how can the theme he develops in this story apply to the current climate crisis? Carefully explain your reasoning and what we can learn from this story today.” Students have 10 minutes to answer the question independently, and then teachers provide a Show Call.

Materials leverage the use of included formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 6, students create a list of the ways that Quinn and Rashad are similar and different. They list a minimum of five similarities and differences, considering such elements as the way they speak, their race and age, family structures, things they enjoy, their behavior, their friends, etc. Students answer the question, “How was the arrest at Mother’s different from what happened to Rashad? Why do you think that the authors included this scene in the book?” Students respond to the question independently, talk in pairs and small groups, and then share in a whole-class discussion.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 11, students respond to the Target Task with evidence, “How is the current farm system (pp. 7–8) that Old Major describes similar to capitalism?” Students refer back to prior work they have done while answering. Then, guidance suggests the teacher conduct a Show Call. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 8, students present to their classmates on the topic of Zarathustra/Zoroastrianism. Classmates fill out a notetaker as they listen to the presentation. 

  • In Unit 5,  Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 6, in the Target Task, students respond with their thoughts on the question “Based on what you have read in this article, take a position on the following statement: Climate change will affect all people equally.” Students then switch papers with a classmate and provide feedback on their evidence selection. 

Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:  

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 4, students respond to the following prompt, “Reflect on and then answer the first part of the question: How would Rashad’s father respond to Bisa’s statement?”In Lesson 21, after engaging in a Socratic Seminar, the teacher provides students with the reflection template that best fits the goals of the discussion.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 13, after students answer the Target Task, the teacher provides two examples of answers—one that meets expectations and one that does not. The teacher provides feedback, and then students have an opportunity to revise their answers. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 20, after participating in a Socratic Seminar, students are asked to “Self-reflect at the conclusion of the lesson (or after each question).” The teacher provides students with a reflection template that best fits the goals of the discussion. Materials provide the following documents: Self Reflection, Peer Feedback, and Whole-class reflection.

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 16, after engaging in a Socratic Seminar, the teacher provides students with the reflection template that best fits the goals of the discussion.

Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 24, before engaging in a Socratic Seminar, students review their self- and class reflections to identify one element of discussing they did well and to continue to build on it and one element that they needed to improve and to work to improve in this discussion. 

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

While materials provide opportunities for grouping students, the groupings do not vary in type and groupings take place in the same part of each lesson. Students do not have multiple opportunities to work in varied groups or different types of groupings. Materials do not provide specific guidance that explains how teachers should form groups or how teachers should incorporate protocols when grouping students. Materials also miss opportunities to provide suggestions for additional times when groupings could be used.

Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide limited types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, Lesson 16, activity instructions require “students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets to share their thoughts” for two minutes before engaging in a whole class discussion.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 4, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion. 

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 10, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 3, students conduct research. The expectations state, “Groups should find and evaluate information to answer questions and think about that information to draw conclusions. Suggest that students create a shared document with links to all of their articles so that they can find them easily. If necessary, review the characteristics of ‘reliable’ sources, and determine bias within the writing.” Further instructions are given to students as they collaborate, share responsibility, and work through the research process. 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, Lesson 15, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion.  

Materials provide limited guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse, the Providing Support During Discourse section provides some guidance for the teacher “to ensure that all students are able to effectively participate in academic discourse, provide the whole-class, small-groups, or individual students with the following supports—Strategically group students. If your class has a large number of English learners, group students who speak the same home language together. Allow them to complete the assignment in either English or in their own home language.”

  • In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Preparing for Academic Discourse section poses this question for teachers to consider: “What vocabulary do students need to know and understand? Do I need to plan for Turn and Talks or small-group work to help students process the content?”

  • In the Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Types of Academic Discourse section includes information regarding the types of academic discourse provided in Fishtank ELA lessons: whole-class discussions, small-group discourse, and partner discourse. “The type of discourse students participate in will depend on the task and the goals of the lesson. There are many situations where all three types, or a combination of them, would be appropriate to use; however, each one brings some of its own unique values or benefits. When intellectually preparing to teach a lesson, you should think about where in the lesson you can include opportunities for different types of academic discourse.”

    • Materials provide protocols for Whole Class Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the Protocol for Fishbowl includes the following guidance: “The inner circle discusses a question while the outer circle observes. Note: This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task—often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback. Otherwise, it can be challenging to keep students in the outer circle engaged. Rotate so that each group of students engages in discussion and observation.”

    • Materials provide protocols for Small Group Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the protocol for Numbered Heads Together includes the following guidance: “Numbered Heads Together holds all members of a group accountable for participating and clarifying understanding of a particular question or topic. Numbered Heads Together can be used with any discussion prompt, however, questions with multiple answers or nuanced answers lead to a more engaging discussion.”

    • Materials provide protocols for Partner Conversation and “provide all students with a scaffolded and structured opportunity to formulate and share ideas. Partner conversations are low-risk and allow all students a chance to participate in the lesson at the same time.”

  • While materials provide this guidance in Teacher Support, the lesson plans do not adequately reference this guidance. 

Indicator 3Q
01/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3q. 

The materials provide some language supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English; however, materials miss opportunities to label specific protocols for these learners. The included language supports provide support with meaning, context, and understanding. These supports are also helpful to students who speak, write, and/or speak languages other than English with accessing the text or responding to the text. Materials provide additional supports in Teacher Tools that provide general guidance in preparing lessons for multilingual learners; however, they are not lesson specific, are broad in application, and would require teachers to prepare materials for specific lessons within the curriculum.

Materials provide some strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Supporting All Students, the materials provide a question mark next to Language Support, which indicates the following: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the language demands of the text and the task. See the Supporting English Learners Teacher Tool for additional guidance.”

  • In Unit 1: Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, materials include two lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners. In Lesson 5, Language Supports, a specific notation states that figurative language may be especially challenging for multilingual learners. Teacher guidance provides a suggestion that students could be paired when working with figurative language to provide additional support.

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, materials include one lesson that specifically provides support for multilingual learners. In Lesson 10, Language Supports, guidance includes keeping the closed captions on during a video for students who struggle with auditory processing and multilingual learners. Guidance also suggests providing a transcript of the video for students who may benefit, including those who are multilingual learners. 

  • In Unit 5, Facing Calamity: Climate Change Facts and Fictions, materials do not include lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials include multiple folders providing guidance for teaching multilingual learners. They include guidance on providing scaffolds that are divided into areas of light support and heavier support. Suggestions include providing illustrations, images, photos, providing videos, films, or audio to support a lesson, using real-life or physical objects, text clues, various graphic scaffolds, and interactive scaffolds, including pairing and working with the student’s home language, and increasing supplemental texts and noticing cognates. These are explained and provided as general guidelines and are not lesson specific. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials provide suggestions on preparing lessons with multilingual learners in mind, including unpacking the units and texts with a look to analyzing language demands, knowing the language and content goals of the unit, planning for assessment and mastery, and taking ownership of teaching the unit with multilingual learners in mind. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on Engineering the Text that provides guidance on how to physically alter a text to make it more accessible to multilingual learners, including adding questions, proving genre tips, defining vocabulary, explaining key background knowledge, adding illustrations and headings, and including stop and jot questions. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on using oral language supports with multilingual learners. These include the use of various groupings to assist with comprehension and expressing ideas. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials provide teachers with general scaffolds for multilingual learners. These include: 

    • In the Sensory scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Light EL Support and Heavier EL support. For example, in illustrations, images, and photos light supports suggested are: “Add illustrations to literature texts that do not include illustrations. Illustrations could be used to break up long sections of text or to clarify tricky plot events.” Heavier supports include: “Strategically engineer the text to include illustrations that align with specific features of text complexity. Multiple illustrations could be added to make the text easier to digest. (For example, when reading the Brer Rabbit folktales about the well, include an illustration of a well.)

    • In Interactive Scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Pairs, Small Groups, Discussion, Cooperative Structures, and Home Language. For example, in Home Language, materials state: “For lighter EL support: Have students use translanguaging by using some words and phrases from their home language when discussing or writing about content. For heavier EL support: Have students have entire conversations in their home language or have students write answers in their home language. Provide additional instruction on a particular concept or idea in students’ home language. Provide students with texts and problems written in their home language. Have students write an answer in their home language. Then have students transfer their answers to English.”

    • In Additional Supports, materials provide the teacher with suggestions for “Supplemental Text” support and “Noticing Cognates.” In the “Noticing Cognates” support, materials provide the following: “For lighter EL support: Teach students strategies for identifying cognates and have students self-identify and interpret examples of cognates in texts and tasks. For heavier EL support: Before reading a text, find examples of cognates and have students break them down. Focus on the meaning and intonation of the words. Teach students Greek and Latin roots that are cognates in English and Spanish. Have students create cognate reference guides.”

  • In Oral Language Protocols, materials provide the teacher with protocols for the following: Turn and Talk, Think-Pair Share, Write-Pair Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share Revised, Partner A Partner B. An example of the “Think-Pair-Share Revised protocol states: “Students are given a chance to refine their thinking and ideas based on their partner’s ideas and discussion. The teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer. Students pair up. Students take turns sharing their answers. Students revise their original theories or ideas.”

  • In Engineering Texts, materials provide the teacher with a three-step guide to support planning. The explanation includes, “When you engineer a text, you add text supports to ensure all students have access. This does not mean changing the text or lowering the rigor of the task. An engineered text anticipates possible student misconceptions, gives vocabulary cues, provides additional background knowledge, scaffolds questions, and creates opportunities for discussion.”

  • In Graphic Organizer, for multilingual learner support, materials provide the teacher with “suggestions on how to adjust the organizers to provide light or heavy EL support.” Some examples include: 

    • Adjusting graphic organizers to provide light EL support: 

      • Provide blank templates for students to use when reading a text, brainstorming, or solving problems. 

    • Adjusting graphic organizers to provide heavy EL support: 

      • Provide students with partially filled-out graphic organizers. 

      • Provide guidance on where in the text, resources, or problem students can find a particular answer. (For example, if students are looking to describe a character, provide specific paragraph numbers where students can find key evidence.) 

      • Have students work in partners using an oral language protocol. 

      • If applicable, allow students to complete the graphic organizer in their home language. 

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

The Grade 8 materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts. The publishers state in the overview that they “seek to create curricular materials that center students, reflect multiple perspectives and experiences, and empower students to think critically about the world they live in.” The texts hold true to that standard as they contain characters from a broad spectrum of society. 

Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, a play that depicts the story of Anne Frank and her family's experience during WWII and Nazi Germany. The play provides positive examples of the Jewish culture and religion. 

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, students read the graphic memoir, Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, about coming of age during the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Simple black-and-white drawings belie the complexities of significant historical events through young Marji’s eyes, learning about the human impact of political upheaval and the ways that people resist repression in large and small ways. 

Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1: Facing Prejudice: All American Boys, students read the core text, All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, that details the same event from diverse perspectives. This unit provides an opportunity for students to evaluate the idea of social justice from multiple perspectives through reading the core text and supplemental texts.

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, students read Night by Elie Wiesel, an intense, deeply troubling text about the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis. Noted in the introduction is a statement, "There are many resources available to support teachers in talking with their students about the Holocaust and anti-Semitism."  

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, the radio segment "The Stolen Revolution: Iranian Women of 1979" by CBC Radio discusses the contentious issue of Muslim women’s headscarves, allowing students to learn about different ways that this article of clothing has become highly politicized.

Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2: Encountering Evil: Night, students read Night, the story of the author Elie Wiesel and his overcoming of the horrors of the Nazi prison camps.

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

The Teacher Tools provide some suggestions that scaffolds can be provided for students in their home language and that student conversations can be held in their home language. These suggestions are very general and leave the implementation and development of the specific scaffolds to the teacher. Materials include suggestions that teachers should consider students’ backgrounds when preparing a lesson, but materials do not provide specifics on how this should be done. The lesson plans include some scaffolds for multilingual learners but do not specifically address ways to use the home language to support learners that are lesson-specific. The Teacher Support section includes general guidance for supporting multilingual learners that relates to leveraging students’ home language through the use of translanguaging strategies.

Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, materials include a suggestion that when possible, teachers should show video adaptations of text in either English or the student’s native language. 

  • In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, when discussing creating graphs and charts to aid students in comprehending the text, materials include a provision to create the aids in the student’s home language. 

  • In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, Interactive Scaffolds, materials include provisions for incorporating the use of the student’s home language in discussions. Levels of support for students vary from translating phrases or words to allowing students to have complete conversations in their home language. 

  • In Teacher Tools, the Planning for English Learners section provides teachers with a step-by-step guide of questions to intellectually prepare the unit. In Step One, the teacher unpacks the unit texts and tasks. Directions state, “Teachers should analyze the text, materials, vocabulary, unit focus areas, and lessons to determine the language demands of the unit. Questions include: What makes the text and tasks linguistically complex? What key vocabulary do students need to know and understand to engage with discipline-specific knowledge? What key language use(s) are targeted in the unit? How are students developing their understanding and production of all the key uses of language? (recount, explain, argue, discuss)” In Step Two, the teacher sets a vision for mastery. Directions state, “​​Teachers should articulate the language and content goals of the unit. What are the driving language demands of the unit? What language should you see and hear from students as they engage in meaning-making? Based on the language demands of the unit, what are the overall language goals for the unit? What are the content goals for the unit? What should students know and understand about reading, writing, and language? What should students know and understand about the themes/subjects of the unit?” In Step Three, teachers plan for assessment and mastery. In Step Four, teachers take ownership. 

  • In Teacher Tools, English Learners, the Engineering Texts support provides teachers with a sample text. The example includes the following statements: “Let’s look at a before and after from a 5th-grade assignment from Science and Social Studies Unit 4: Exploring Mars, Lesson 19. In this lesson, students are reading a NASA press release for the first time. Here’s the original text, without text engineering, a press release from NASA: Mars Rovers Advance Understanding of the Red Planet As you can see, the text is complex for many reasons: Students may not be familiar with what a press release is, and the formal language used in a press release. Students may not have a strong grasp on knowledge from the unit so far, making it hard for them to understand key ideas from the press release. Students may not have a strong understanding of domain-specific vocabulary. Now, take a look at our Engineered Text Sample. This sample includes our meta-analysis of the purpose of each addition.”

  • In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, the materials include general guidance to use translanguaging strategies. Students can annotate and take notes in their home language and research in their home language.

Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

The materials include a support section in Teacher Tools that provides teachers with suggestions and methods for preparing lessons for multilingual learners. Materials provide multiple suggestions on how the lessons can be scaffolded for multilingual learners. These suggestions are general in nature and are not lesson-specific, leaving any scaffolding for lessons to be developed by the teacher. The Teacher Tool for Planning for English Learners provides further guidance that tells teachers to consider any connection between a lesson and students’ cultural backgrounds but the resource does not provide any specific guidance on how this should be done. Teachers must investigate and implement strategies on their own. Individual lessons include very limited scaffolding for multilingual learners, and none include connections to linguistics, culture, or conventions used in learning ELA. Suggested scaffolds include audio or visual representations of the text when available.

Materials make limited connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make limited connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Scaffolds for English Learners, the Additional Scaffolds section includes guidance on noticing cognates. Supports range from identifying and interpreting examples of cognates, teaching Greek and Latin roots, and creating cognate reference guides.

Materials include limited teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, during Step Four: Take Ownership of Planning for English Learners, guidance advises teachers to plan how they will consider students’ backgrounds when teaching a text. Suggestions include considering if connections can be made to students’ cultural traditions and considering what sociocultural context is relevant to the unit. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two includes planning for how students’ backgrounds will connect to the lesson, including planning for any language demands that will need to be met.  

Materials include limited equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two states, “Ensure accessibility: What supports will students with higher language proficiency need to access and understand the content? What scaffolds (sensory, graphic, or interactive) are needed?” The guidance also asks educators to consider medium and lower language proficiency needs.

Materials include limited opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages, such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, materials provide limited guidance on incorporating students’ holistic and cultural identities into the classroom, including learning about students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds, inviting family or community members into the classroom, choosing materials that authentically represent students’ language and culture, and using intellectual preparation to plan for including students’ cultural identifies.

Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

Read

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

The grade 8 materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. 

Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

The materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Teachers can access “ready-made slides and handouts which [they] can edit, download, print, or send to Google Classroom.” Students complete two digital presentations across the units. Materials do not include specific provisions for students to use digital technology in research or composing writing assignments. Materials do not include interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level standards. The digital platform is intended for teacher use.

Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools, are not available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Digital tools minimally support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Encountering Evil: Night, Lessons 21–22, students create and present a collaborative digital presentation on the dangers of indifference.

  • In Unit 4, Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lessons 5–6, students create and present a collaborative digital presentation on an aspect of Iranian culture. 

Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

The materials include limited attention to digital technology. The materials do require students to write and collaborate on their editing, but there is no provision to do this digitally. Materials provide few opportunities for students to complete activities digitally, limiting students’ opportunity to collaborate with their peers or teacher through digital technology. Materials do not provide specific guidance requiring students to collaborate digitally with peers or teachers on these projects. The presentations can be completed on a number of different platforms, including some that do not allow for digital collaboration.

Materials include limited references to digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2: Encountering Evil: Night, Lesson 21, students compile and evaluate research information into a digital presentation. In the Introduction, the materials state: “Have groups select a collaborative digital presentation tool, like PowerPoint, Google Slides, Padlet, or Coggle.”

  • In Unit 4: Surviving Repression: Persepolis, Lesson 5, students create a digital presentation to express their learning and appropriately cite sources. In the Introduction, the materials state: “Have groups select a collaborative digital presentation tool, like PowerPoint, Google Slides, Padlet, or Coggle.”

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

Student materials do not include images or graphics. The assessments and text-based student materials are easily read, and the structure is easily accessible to students. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter. Materials include PDF documents that are organized in an accessible way. Materials provide graphic organizers when needed to help students with organization. The use of typography, layout, and space is visually appealing, though there is little variance in color and no engaging images.

Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Student materials do not include images, graphics, or models. 

Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The vocabulary pages and task pages that can be created for students are consistent and maintain the same layout. The information is easily identifiable and supports student understanding of the materials. 

  • Throughout the curriculum, the teacher’s directions are consistent. Materials provide a PDF version of each lesson and a PDF of the Target Task and Exit Ticket. 

Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Student materials do not include organizational features. 

  • Each unit includes a lesson map. The layout is consistent across the curriculum.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.

The materials do not include embedded technology. Although teacher materials are digital, the use of technology is limited, and teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials do not provide specific lessons that incorporate teaching students how to use technology properly. Although materials include some general suggestions, such as instructing teachers that they should tell students to be certain that the resources they use are reliable, materials do not provide specifics on how to accomplish that task. Rather, teachers would have to develop guidelines and protocols for the use of technology independently. 

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found