About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: MathLinks | Math
Math 6-8
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6-8 vary in alignment scoring. Grade 6 materials do not devote a majority of time to the major work of this grade level. Much of the content in this grade level is devoted to review of previous grade level standards. Limited evidence is found of connections being made between mathematical topics in Grade 6. In Grades 7 and 8 materials are found to focus appropriately on the major work of the grade level and to include examples providing coherence between mathematical topics. Grades 7 and 8 were reviewed for rigor and MPs. Both grades include strong conceptual development and fluency practice. However, both Grades 7 and 8 are found to be disproportionately lacking in application work, therefore not providing a balance of rigor. The materials in Grades 7 and 8 partially meet the criterion of meaningfully connecting the MPs to the content standards. These materials are not strong in their prompting of MP3 for the teacher nor for the students. The materials in Grades 7 and 8 are noted to be strong in their utilization of the specialized language of mathematics.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.