High School - Gateway 2

Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.1. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Comprehension
Comprehension Through Texts, Questions, and Tasks| Score | |
|---|---|
| Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations | 83% |
| Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Text Complexity | 13 / 14 |
| Criterion 2.2: Knowledge Building Through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension | 34 / 42 |
The StudySync materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 2: Comprehension Through Texts, Questions, and Tasks. Across Grades 9–12, the program provides a range of high-quality, appropriately complex literary and informational texts representing varied genres, perspectives, and disciplines, organized into cohesive, knowledge-building units centered on meaningful themes and essential questions, although the distribution of literary and informational texts does not reflect the balance recommended by the standards. Comprehensive text complexity analyses and coherent instructional sequences support students in developing knowledge and comprehension through close reading, text-dependent questions, analysis, collaborative discussions, vocabulary development, and evidence-based writing. The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to engage in on-demand and process writing, with explicit instruction throughout the writing process and a distribution of writing types aligned with the standards, as well as opportunities to develop and apply independent word-learning strategies. Formative and summative assessments are aligned to instructional goals, with guidance for using assessment data to monitor student progress and inform instructional adjustments. However, teacher guidance for selecting, implementing, and adjusting scaffolds to meet individual student needs is inconsistent, and text-specific guidance for addressing sensitive content is limited. Additionally, teacher guidance for explicit vocabulary instruction, supporting the content development of students' contributions during discussions, and providing feedback on oral contributions lacks consistency or specificity. While students receive instruction and practice in sentence composition and research skills, these opportunities are relatively infrequent and concentrated within specific lessons and projects rather than distributed consistently throughout the year. Although the core instructional pathway is clearly defined, the volume of instructional content and limited guidance for prioritizing and integrating supplemental resources create challenges for pacing and implementation. Overall, the materials provide a coherent, text-centered approach to literacy instruction and knowledge building, with limitations in the consistency of teacher guidance, the frequency of sentence-composition and research opportunities, and support for implementing the instructional pathway.
Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Text Complexity
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include content-rich, engaging texts that meet the text complexity criteria for the grade level. Texts and text sets cohesively work together to build knowledge of specific topics and/or content themes.
The StudySync materials meet expectations for Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Complexity. Across Grades 9–12, the program includes a range of high-quality, appropriately complex literary and informational texts representing diverse genres, perspectives, and disciplines. Texts are intentionally selected and organized into cohesive, knowledge-building units centered on meaningful themes, essential questions, and genre studies, although the distribution of literary and informational texts does not reflect the balance recommended by the standards. Comprehensive quantitative and qualitative text complexity analyses, along with clear rationales for text selection and grade-level placement, support teachers in understanding the instructional purpose and demands of each text. Coherent instructional sequences integrate background knowledge, vocabulary development, close reading, discussion, writing, and culminating performance tasks to deepen students’ understanding of texts and unit topics, while independent reading opportunities promote student choice and further knowledge building. The materials also provide scaffolds before, during, and after reading to support students in accessing complex texts, including differentiated supports for English learners and students performing at varying proficiency levels. However, teacher guidance for selecting, implementing, and adjusting these scaffolds based on individual student needs is inconsistent, and some recommendations are available only in broader program resources rather than at the point of use. Additionally, while the materials include texts representing varied cultural, historical, and social experiences and provide general guidance for facilitating discussions of sensitive content, they offer limited text-specific guidance for addressing these topics. Overall, the materials provide a strong foundation of high-quality texts, appropriate complexity, and coherent text sets that support knowledge building and literacy development; however, teacher guidance for implementing scaffolds and addressing sensitive content is inconsistent and lacks specificity.
Indicator 2a
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading through content-rich and engaging texts.
The text quality in StudySync materials meets expectations for indicator 2a. The program includes a range of well-crafted, content-rich core and anchor texts across Grades 9-12 that are engaging and appropriate for students. Texts are organized around meaningful unit themes and selected for their quality, complexity, and opportunities for close analysis. Across grades 9–12, students engage with a variety of genres and subgenres—including short stories, poetry, drama, essays, speeches, memoirs, articles, and novel excerpts—that present age-appropriate themes and rich examples of author's craft. In grades 9–12, the reported distribution does not reflect the standards' recommended 70/30 informational-to-literary balance. Throughout the program, texts are intentionally selected to support unit themes, genre studies, knowledge building, and students' development of comprehension and analytical skills. In addition to the core texts, the program supports independent reading through Self-Selected Blasts, access to the StudySync digital library, and optional Novel Study units, with accompanying teacher guidance and accountability structures designed to promote sustained independent reading and student choice.
Materials include core/anchor texts that are well-crafted, content-rich, and engaging for students at their grade level.
The StudySync curriculum for Grades 9-12 includes well-crafted, content-rich texts that provide a mix of literary and informational works across various subgenres. Literary texts include short stories, poetry, dramas, and novel excerpts, while informational texts encompass articles, essays, speeches, and memoirs. The texts in the program present age-appropriate themes that engage students at each grade level. Texts are selected for their connection to unit themes, connection to the unit’s genre focus or content, and noteworthy elements of author’s craft. These factors make texts worthy of student study, enhancing students’ comprehension and analytical skills.
Grade 9 materials include texts on belonging, adventure, intelligence, the human experience, romance, and achieving goals that will engage 9th-grade students.
Grade 10 materials include texts on the power of words, culture, memories, human connection, and the human experience that will engage 10th-grade students.
Grade 11 materials include texts on independence in America, journeys and perspectives, individualism and collectivism, home, winning, and justice that will engage 11th-grade students.
Grade 12 materials include texts on the future, identity, leadership, the power of a story, alienation, and change that will engage 12th-grade students.
Throughout the materials, texts are content-rich, well-crafted, and worthy of student analysis.
In Grade 11, Unit 5, students read Othello by William Shakespeare, which features complex language, including archaic or unfamiliar syntax, figurative language, and dramatic irony, to explore multiple themes of the manipulation of trust, outsider status, love, and jealousy.
Note: As part of this review, the publisher submitted documentation detailing text characteristics, including genre and subgenre classifications and counts of full texts, excerpts, long-form texts, and short-form texts. The information below is presented as contextual evidence only and is not factored into the overall score or rating.
Materials reflect the balance of informational and literary texts required by the grade-level standards (70/30 in 9-12), including various subgenres. Materials include a range of full texts and excerpts, depending on their stated purpose. The materials only include short-form texts and do not include long-form texts. (The information below is presented as contextual evidence only and is not factored into the overall score or rating.)
In Grade 9, materials reflect a 52/38 balance between informational and literary texts, which does not meet the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 77 core texts, 40 informational and 37 literary.
Texts include the following subgenres: poetry, short story, essay, article, and speech.
The materials include 55 full texts and 22 excerpts.
The materials include 77 short-form texts and zero long-form texts.
In Grade 10, materials reflect a 51/49 balance between informational and literary texts, which does not meet the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 76 core texts, 39 informational and 37 literary.
Texts include the following subgenres: short story, poetry, novel excerpt, article, speech, essay, memoir, and drama.
The materials include 55 full texts and 21 excerpts.
The materials include 76 short-form texts and zero long-form texts.
In Grade 11, materials reflect a 49/51 balance between informational and literary texts, which does not meet the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 81 core texts, 40 informational and 41 literary.
Texts include the following subgenres: short story, poetry, essay, memoir, novel excerpt, article, speech, and drama.
The materials include 58 full texts and 23 excerpts.
The materials include 81 short-form texts and zero long-form texts.
In Grade 12, materials reflect a 53/47 balance between informational and literary texts, which does not meet the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 86 core texts, 46 informational and 40 literary.
Texts include the following subgenres: article, speech, novel excerpt, essay, poetry, drama, memoir, and short story.
The materials include 64 full texts and 22 excerpts.
The materials include 86 short-form texts and zero long-form texts.
The publisher provides a clear rationale for selecting each text for each unit.
Note: As part of this review, the publisher submitted documentation outlining text characteristics, including genre and subgenre designations and counts of full texts, excerpts, long-form texts, and short-form texts.
Materials include teacher guidance (including monitoring and feedback) and student accountability structures for independent reading (e.g., independent reading procedures; however, materials do not include a proposed independent reading schedule or a formal tracking system.) (The information below is presented as contextual evidence only and is not factored into the overall score or rating.)
The Program Guide provides guidance for developing a sustained independent reading program beyond the core curriculum. Students build independent reading habits through Independent Reads, Self-Selected Reading lessons, Blast research links, and selected Extended Writing Project research activities. Self-Selected Reading lessons teach strategies for choosing books based on personal interests and connect students to thematically related texts in the StudySync Library. The digital library supports independent reading through search filters, genre and topic tags, and access to contemporary and classic texts, each accompanied by Reading Quizzes, Thinks, and Prompts that provide accountability and enable teachers to monitor student progress. For students reading full-length texts, Novel Studies include instructional supports such as vocabulary instruction, reading quizzes, discussion prompts, and writing activities, allowing teachers to implement whole-class novel studies, literature circles, or individualized independent reading while differentiating instruction based on student interests and reading readiness.
At the end of each unit, students participate in a Self-Selected Blast and accompanying Self-Selected Response lesson to support independent reading and student choice. Self-Selected Blasts introduce students to a curated collection of texts from the StudySync digital library that are thematically, historically, or literarily connected, and explicitly teach strategies for selecting appropriate independent reading materials. Students then respond to their chosen text through a reflective or creative writing task, with opportunities for peer review and discussion. The Program Guide also provides recommendations for extending these lessons into a broader independent reading program.
The program includes optional Novel Study units that provide a complete instructional pathway for teaching full-length texts alongside the Core ELA curriculum. Each Novel Study includes both a Teacher Edition and Student Edition and provides approximately 30 days of integrated reading and writing instruction. Middle school units offer two to four novel study options, while high school units include three to five full-length text options. Each section of the novel includes vocabulary instruction, close reading questions, discussion prompts, reading quizzes, short written responses, and culminating writing activities. Novel Study lessons are intentionally paired with selected Core ELA texts and accompanying skill lessons, allowing students to compare the novel with literary and informational texts through comparative reading and writing activities. Additional comparative texts build background knowledge and support analysis across multiple texts, while the integrated instructional sequence helps students develop close reading, analytical writing, and stamina for extended texts. Teachers may choose to swap out novel study units for their respective core units.
The materials do not include proposed independent reading schedules. There is space in each unit for the Self-Selected Blasts. If teachers would like to use a Novel Study unit for independent reading, rather than replacing a core unit with it, fitting this into their schedules would depend on their personal constraints and teacher discretion.
Indicator 2b
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The text complexity analysis in the StudySync materials meets expectations for indicator 2b. The Grade-Level Overviews provide comprehensive analyses of text complexity and a clear rationale for each core text’s educational purpose and grade-level placement. For each core text, the materials include quantitative measures, such as Lexile levels and word counts, as well as qualitative information, including genre, publication date, and guidance on addressing each text’s most challenging features. The overviews also identify each text’s instructional purpose by describing the targeted skills and concepts, associated writing task, and connection to the unit’s essential question and culminating writing project. Course-level text complexity information and unit-level complexity summaries further support text selection and instructional planning. Across grades 9–12, quantitative measures span a wide range of Lexile levels, with texts both below and above the grade-band ranges, while qualitative analyses identify the majority of texts as moderately or very complex, with the proportion of very and exceedingly complex texts increasing in the upper grades. The publisher’s qualitative analyses, together with the associated reader tasks, demonstrate that the core texts are appropriately complex for their intended grade levels and instructional purposes.
Accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level accompany core/Anchor texts and a series of texts connected to them.
The Grade-Level Overviews provide comprehensive analyses of text complexity and explain each core text’s instructional purpose and grade-level placement. For each core text, the materials include quantitative measures, such as Lexile levels and word counts, as well as qualitative information, including genre, publication date, and guidance on addressing the text’s most challenging features. The overviews also describe each text’s instructional role by identifying the targeted skills and concepts, associated writing task, and connection to the unit’s essential question and culminating writing project. In addition, the Grade-Level Overviews include course-level text complexity information and unit-level summaries of text complexity for each instructional unit.
According to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to the associated student task, core/anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade.
Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity based on their text complexity analysis and the associated reader and task. For each core/anchor text in the program, the Grade Level overviews present the quantitative and qualitative complexity of each text. Throughout the program, tasks are appropriate for each grade level.
Note: For this review and norming to other reviews, the publisher submitted qualitative information on levels of meaning/purpose, text structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands for each text.
Grade 9
Quantitatively: Texts range from 740L-1450L
23 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade band
27 texts are in the Lexile range for the grade band
Five texts are above the Lexile range for the grade band
22 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: zero texts are slightly complex, 47 texts are moderately complex, 29 texts are very complex, and zero texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 10
Quantitatively: Texts range from 610L-1490L
15 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade band
27 texts are in the Lexile range for the grade band
Ten texts are above the Lexile range for the grade band
24 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Zero texts are slightly complex, 46 texts are moderately complex, 28 texts are very complex, and two texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 11
Quantitatively: Texts range from 550L -1810L
34 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade band
17 texts are in the Lexile range for the grade band
Nine texts are above the Lexile range for the grade band
21 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Two texts are slightly complex, 26 texts are moderately complex, 45 texts are very complex, and eight texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 12
Quantitatively: Texts range from 110L-1760L
29 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade band
29 texts are in the Lexile range for the grade band
Eight texts are above the Lexile range for the grade band
20 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Zero texts are slightly complex, 34 texts are moderately complex, 38 texts are very complex, and 14 texts are exceedingly complex.
Indicator 2c
Materials provide appropriate scaffolds for core/anchor texts that ensure all students can access the text and make meaning. Scaffolds align with the text’s qualitative analysis.
The scaffolding in StudySync materials partially meets expectations for indicator 2c. The materials provide scaffolds aligned to the qualitative complexity of texts and include supports before, during, and after reading to help students make meaning of complex texts. Teacher guidance identifies potential qualitative challenges through the Access Complex Text feature in every First Read and Independent Read lesson, highlighting considerations such as language demands, text structure, knowledge demands, levels of meaning, prior knowledge, vocabulary, genre, and organization. Embedded supports throughout First Read, Close Read, Reading Skill, and Independent Read lessons include background-building activities, vocabulary previews, purpose-setting, guided annotation, text-dependent questions, collaborative discussion, repeated reading, and writing tasks that deepen comprehension. The materials also provide differentiated student-facing scaffolds for English learners across multiple proficiency levels, as well as extension supports for students performing above grade level. However, teacher guidance for implementing scaffolds is inconsistent. While some supports include embedded implementation guidance alongside instructional tasks, many are simply identified by the intended student population without additional direction for teachers. Although these scaffolds are embedded in the student materials and ready to use, guidance on selecting, adapting, or adjusting supports to meet student needs is limited. The StudySync Help Center provides broad guidance for using the embedded scaffolds, including how teachers can preview available scaffolds, how the scaffolds function, how to assign scaffold levels within the digital platform, and the benefits of using the online scaffolds. However, this guidance does not explain how teachers should determine which students would benefit from each instructional level. The StudySync Program Guide provides additional recommendations for supporting diverse learners, but some guidance is available only in the Program Guide rather than in lesson plans at the point of use, requiring teachers to apply those recommendations independently. Additionally, teachers are responsible for determining English learner proficiency levels and deciding when to adjust scaffolds, with little embedded guidance to support those decisions. It should be noted that most of the scaffolds available throughout the program are for ELL students, and while the program includes different-level scaffolds to accommodate varying levels of proficiency, support for teachers in identifying each student's proficiency level and adjusting as needed is left entirely to the teacher’s discretion.
Scaffolds align with the qualitative complexity of the program’s texts to support students in making meaning of each text. Materials include scaffolds for before, during, and after engaging with a complex text.
Teacher guidance embeds scaffolds aligned to the qualitative complexity of texts throughout First Read, Close Read, Reading Skill, and Independent Read lessons in both the student materials and the accompanying Teacher Edition lesson plans. These supports are designed to help all students access complex texts through guided discussion, repeated reading, and opportunities to apply their understanding.
Lesson plans provide teacher guidance through the Access Complex Text feature, which identifies qualitative text challenges, including language demands, text structure, knowledge demands, and levels of meaning, in every First Read and Independent Read lesson. These notes focus on features such as Prior Knowledge, Specific Vocabulary, Sentence Structure, Purpose, Genre, Organization, and Connection of Ideas.
The materials provide embedded scaffolds before, during, and after reading throughout First Read, Close Read, Skill, and Independent Read lessons, supporting students at multiple points in the reading process. Teacher guidance embeds supports throughout the reading process. Before reading, lessons include activities that build background knowledge, preview vocabulary, and establish a purpose for reading. During reading, students engage with guided annotation, text-dependent questions, think-alouds, skill-focused prompts, and, when applicable, StudySyncTV discussions. After reading, lessons provide structured discussions, written responses, Writer’s Notebook activities, and synthesis writing tasks that deepen students’ understanding of the text.
Each lesson includes English Language Learner (ELL) scaffolds that vary based on the questions and tasks. In the digital student materials, teachers may select and print scaffolds for students based on their current proficiency level and adjust them as students improve. They can access these in the student materials. Levels include: Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Advanced High, Approaching, and Beyond.
An example of scaffolds available in a lesson is included below:
In Grade 12, Unit 5, students read “A Cup of Tea” by Katherine Mansfield. This text’s quantitative complexity places it below the grade band’s Lexile range, and it is qualitatively moderately complex. As part of the learning sequence, students participate in a First Read lesson. The lesson plan includes a section titled Access Complex Text which provides a summary of some of the qualitative features that may be challenging about the text. This section states, “The following aspects of the text may be challenging for students, particularly English Language Learners and Approaching grade-level readers.
Connection of Ideas
The narrator tells the story, but doesn't comment on the events.
Readers have to draw their own conclusions about the meaning. Remind them to connect ideas to help them infer information.
Prior Knowledge
The story is set in early 20th-century Britain and includes details that reflect differences between social classes.
To fully understand this class conflict, students may need to become familiar with the historical, social, and economic context of this setting.”
The above information can also be found in the Grade Level Overview information, which includes complexity information for each text. Throughout this lesson, students complete several activities including a vocabulary activity, reading, text talk, and think activity. The lesson plan includes guidance on scaffolds available to ELL students at varying levels for those activities, as well as two other student populations. For example, for the Text Talk activity, the lesson plan states the following scaffolds:
Beginning & Intermediate ELLs
Available scaffold:
speaking frames
Advanced & Advanced High ELLs
Available scaffolds:
speaking frames
paragraph guide
Approaching
Available scaffolds:
speaking frames
paragraph guide”
The following scaffold is available for Beyond students, which are students who are above grade-level.
“Beyond
Ask each Beyond grade level student to write one additional discussion question. Then, have one or two students facilitate a discussion, using their questions to guide the conversation.”
Teachers may access the scaffolds for these different student populations in the Student Edition and provide the correct scaffolds to each student.
While scaffolds are available throughout the program, accessing and implementing them may require teachers to navigate between multiple resources simultaneously. This can make point-of-use implementation less efficient, as teachers must locate and coordinate supports across different materials rather than accessing all relevant scaffolds within a single lesson resource.
Materials include some teacher guidance on how to enact each scaffold based on student needs.
Teacher guidance for implementing some scaffolds is embedded throughout the Teacher Edition lesson plans, with supports integrated alongside the corresponding student tasks. Because many scaffolds are already embedded within the student materials and ready for use, they may not require further teacher direction to be implemented effectively.
The Help Center includes broad guidance about using the scaffolds that are already embedded in the materials. This includes guidance on how to preview the scaffolds, how the scaffolds function, how to assign scaffold levels in the digital portal, and the benefits of the online scaffolds. While this guidance is provided, there is no guidance for how to determine which students would benefit from which instructional level.
The StudySync Program Guide also provides guidance on the purpose and implementation of instructional scaffolds by explaining the program’s instructional framework and expectations for supporting diverse learners throughout daily instruction. These include high-level explanations and lists of the types of scaffolds available throughout the program, as well as additional scaffolds that teachers can choose to implement based on student needs. However, it should be noted that for some populations, suggested scaffolds are not available in the lesson plans at the point of use, requiring teachers to thoroughly internalize the Program Guide. For example, for students with Memory and Cognitive Difficulties as Caused by an Intellectual Disability, Traumatic Brain Injury, or Autism, the Program Guide suggests strategies such as,
“Have students restate instruction back in their own words.
List instructions where students can review them.
Provide ample time for review and practice.”
Teachers must remember to implement these strategies in practice.
It should be noted that most of the scaffolds available throughout the program are for ELL students, and while the program includes different-level scaffolds to accommodate varying levels of proficiency, support for teachers in identifying each student's proficiency level and adjusting as needed is left entirely to the teacher’s discretion.
Indicator 2d
Text sets (e.g., unit, module) are organized around topic(s) or theme(s) to cohesively build student knowledge.
The text set organization in the StudySync materials meets expectations for indicator 2d. Text sets are cohesively organized around grade-appropriate unit focuses, essential questions, and genre studies, promoting sustained exploration of connected topics and themes throughout each unit. Each unit intentionally integrates literary and informational texts from multiple genres, along with knowledge-building topics drawn from literature, history, science, the arts, and other disciplines, enabling students to build content knowledge, academic vocabulary, and understanding of complex language structures. Learning progresses through a coherent sequence of background-building activities, explicit vocabulary and skill instruction, close reading, discussion, writing, and repeated engagement with texts, allowing students to deepen their understanding of the unit focus from multiple perspectives. Instruction culminates in authentic performance tasks, such as Extended Writing Projects or Extended Oral Projects, that require students to synthesize ideas across multiple texts, while Self-Selected Reading opportunities further extend students’ knowledge of the unit topic through independent reading. Each unit concludes with an End-of-Unit Assessment that measures students’ mastery of the reading, writing, and language standards addressed throughout the unit.
Text sets are organized around a grade-appropriate, tightly-connected topic or theme.
Each StudySync unit is organized by a grade-appropriate focus and an essential question. Each grade level consists of six units, with each unit including several texts across several genres. The bulk of each unit consists of the Integrated Reading and Writing section, where students read several texts and engage in reading, speaking, listening, vocabulary, grammar, and writing assignments as they work toward mastery of the ELA standards and explore the unit’s focus. Culminating tasks in most units include an Extended Writing Project, and for some units, an Extended Oral Project. At the end of the unit, students complete an End-of-Unit assessment in which they demonstrate their learning of the content and skills covered throughout the unit.
Grade 9:
Unit 1 Focus: Divided We Fall
Essential Question: Why do we feel the need to belong?
Genre Focus: Fiction
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Fiction (Fine Arts)
Short Stories (Fine Arts)
The History of the American Dream (Social Studies)
The Haitian Creole Language (Social Studies)
Unit 2 Focus: The Call to Adventure
Essential Question: What will you learn on your journey?
Genre Focus: Informational
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Informational Text (Fine Arts)
The Past and Future of Aviation (Science)
Famous Explorers (Social Studies)
Unit 3 Focus: Declaring Your Genius
Essential Question: How do you define intelligence?
Genre Focus: Argumentative
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Argumentative Text (Fine Arts)
The History of Artificial Intelligence (Technology)
Retelling Homer’s The Odyssey (Fine Arts)
Unit 4 Focus: The Art of Disguise
Essential Question: How do we perform for different audiences?
Genre Focus: Drama
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Drama (Fine Arts)
The Language of Shakespeare (Fine Arts)
A Biography of Mahatma Gandhi (Social Studies)
Unit 5 Focus: The Dance of Romance
Essential Question: When is love worth the fall?
Genre Focus: Poetry
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Poetry (Fine Arts)
The Origins of the Sonnet (Fine Arts)
United States Poet Laureates (Fine Arts)
Unit 6 Focus: Human Potential
Essential Question: How can you help others achieve their goals?
Genre Focus: Multigenre Text
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Myths and Folktales (Fine Arts)
Literature of the Classical Period (Fine Arts)
Satire in Writing (Fine Arts)
The History of Lift Every Voice and Sing (Social Studies)
Grade 10:
Unit 1 Focus: The Power of Communication
Essential Question: Why do words matter?
Literary Focus: Modernism and Postmodernism
Genre Focus: Fiction
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Fiction (Fine Arts)
Modernist and Contemporary Literature (Fine Arts)
Preserving Oral Traditions (Social Studies)
Interpreting Proverbs (Fine Arts)
Unit 2 Focus: Moving Forward
Essential Question: How does culture influence your goals?
Literary Focus: Ancient and Classical Literature
Genre Focus: Argumentative
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Argumentative Text (Fine Arts)
Literature of the Classical Period (Fine Arts)
Ancient Cultures (Social Studies)
The Writing of Elie Wiesel (Social Studies)
Unit 3 Focus: The Persistence of Memories
Essential Question: How does the past impact the future?
Literary Focus: The Contemporary Period - Surrealism
Genre Focus: Informational
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Informational Text (Fine Arts)
Writing from the Surrealist Period (Fine Arts)
The Art of Memoir (Fine Arts)
The Science of Lipreading (Science)
Unit 4 Focus: The Ties That Bind
Essential Question: What brings us back to one another?
Literary Focus: The Renaissance
Genre Focus: Drama
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Drama (Fine Arts)
Renaissance Literature (Fine Arts)
The Story of Antigone (Fine Arts)
Alice Dunbar-Nelson (Social Studies)
Unit 5 Focus: Chopped, Stirred, and Blended
Essential Question: What are the ingredients of culture?
Literary Focus: Cross-Cultural Texts
Genre Focus: Poetry
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Poetry (Fine Arts)
Cross-Cultural Literature of the Contemporary Period (Fine Arts)
Haiku Poetry (Fine Arts)
The History of Maple Sugaring (Social Studies)
Unit 6 Focus: Origin Stories
Essential Question: How does who we were guide who we will become?
Literary Focus: Magical Realism
Genre Focus: Multigenre Texts
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Magical Realist Literature (Fine Arts)
Classic TV Variety Shows (Fine Arts)
Vietnam in the 1970s (Social Studies)
Grade 11:
Unit 1 Focus: Breaking Away
Essential Question: How does independence define the American spirit?
Literary Focus: The Colonial and Early National Period
Genre Focus: Fiction
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Fiction (fine arts)
Early American Literature (Fine Arts)
The Iroquois Confederacy (Social Studies)
Life and Work in Nineteenth-Century New York (Social Studies)
Unit 2 Focus: The Highway
Essential Question: How do journeys influence perspective?
Literary Focus: Transcendentalism and Romanticism
Genre Focus: Informational
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Informational Text (Fine Arts)
Works of the Transcendentalist Period (Fine Arts)
History and Literature of the Classical Period (Fine Arts)
The Interstate Highway System (Social Studies)
Victor Hugo Green (Social Studies)
Unit 3 Focus: No Strangers Here
Essential Question: How does place shape the individual?
Literary Focus: The Realist and Naturalist Period - Regionalism
Genre Focus: Poetry
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Regionalist Literature of the Realist and Naturalist period (Fine Arts)
Conventions of Poetry (Fine Arts)
African Diaspora in Florida (Fine Arts)
The Mexican Revolution (Social Studies)
Unit 4 Focus: Living the Dream
Essential Question: What does home mean to you?
Literary Focus: The Modernist Period - The Harlem Renaissance
Genre Focus: Drama
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Drama (Fine Arts)
Literature of the Harlem Renaissance (Fine Arts)
Zora Neale Hurston (Social Studies)
The Horror Writing of Edgar Allan Poe (Fine Arts)
Unit 5 Focus: The Wars We Wage
Essential Question: What does it mean to win?
Literary Focus: American Modernism
Genre Focus: Argumentative
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Argumentative Text (Fine Arts)
American Modernist Literature (Fine Arts)
The Marshall Plan (Social Studies)
Brown v. Board of Education (Social Studies)
Unit 6 Focus: With Malice Toward None
Essential Question: How can we attain justice for all?
Literary Focus: Postmodernism
Genre Focus: Texts That Blend Genres
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Argumentative Text (Fine Arts)
Postmodernist Literature (Fine Arts)
Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address (Social Studies)
King’s Advocacy for Workers’ Rights (Social Studies)
Grade 12:
Unit 1 Focus: What’s Next?
Essential Question: How can we transform the future?
Literary Focus: N/A
Genre Focus: Informational
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Informational Texts (Fine Arts)
Planning for Life After High School (College and Career Planning)
Writing an Application (College and Career Planning)
Post-Secondary Decision Making (College and Career Planning)
Unit 2 Focus: Uncovering the Truth
Essential Question: How do challenges cause us to reveal our true selves?
Literary Focus: The Medieval Period and the English Renaissance
Genre Focus: Fiction
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Fiction (Fine Arts)
Medieval Literature (Fine Arts)v
Literature from the English Renaissance (Fine Arts)
Old English (Fine Arts)
Literary Criticism (Fine Arts)
Unit 3 Focus: Against the Wind
Essential Question: How do challenges cause us to reveal our true selves?
Literary Focus: The Medieval Period and the English Renaissance
Genre Focus: Fiction
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Fiction (Fine Arts)
Medieval Literature (Fine Arts)v
Literature from the English Renaissance (Fine Arts)
Old English (Fine Arts)
Literary Criticism (Fine Arts)
Unit 4 Focus: Sculpting Reality
Essential Question: What is the power of story?
Literary Focus: Romanticism and Victorianism
Genre Focus: Poetry
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Poetry (Fine Arts)
Literature of the Romantic Period (Fine Arts)
Victorian Literature (Fine Arts)
Ancient Greek Vases (Social Studies)
The Life and Literature of the Brontë Sisters (Fine Arts)
Unit 5 Focus: Fractured Selves
Essential Question: What causes individuals to feel alienated?
Literary Focus: Modernism
Genre Focus: Argumentative
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Argumentative Text (Fine Arts)
British Modernist Literature (Fine Arts)
The Life and Works of Virginia Woolf (Fine Arts)
The Jeju Haenyeo (Social Studies)
Unit 6 Focus: Times of Transition
Essential Question: How are we shaped by change?
Literary Focus: Postmodernism and Postcolonialism
Genre Focus: Fiction
Knowledge-Building Topics:
Conventions of Fiction (Fine Arts)
Postmodern and Postcolonial Literature (Fine Arts)
The Biafran War (Social Studies)
Generational Cohorts (Social Studies)
Text set organization provides opportunities for students to address facets of the same topic or theme over an extended period (e.g., a unit, module), enabling the development of deeper knowledge. Text sets cohesively build knowledge across various topics in social studies (including history), science, the arts, and literature, exposing students to academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax.
Each unit in the program is organized around a unit focus and an Essential Question that guides learning and connects all instructional tasks. The Grade Level Overview includes a section titled Unit Connection that explains how each text is connected to the unit’s essential question and end of unit project. At the beginning of the unit, students learn some background information on the unit focus, reflect on the Essential Question, and record their initial thinking in a Blast. They engage in some Skill lessons focused on content vocabulary, the unit’s genre focus, and some academic vocabulary. In the Integrated Reading and Writing section of the unit, students engage with a range of texts across genres, with each lesson targeting specific reading, writing, vocabulary, and language skills. Through each text, students build further knowledge on the unit’s focus. Skills lessons are spread out throughout the unit, where units enhance their skillset across research, speaking, listening, vocabulary, reading, writing, and grammar. For many texts, students read them several times for varying purposes, allowing them to dive deeply into the content. Learning builds toward the culminating task, typically an Extended Writing Project (in most units) or an Extended Oral Project (in one unit), both of which require students to synthesize ideas and learning from multiple texts. Toward the end of each unit, students engage in Self-Selected Reading, where they select texts of interest to further build their knowledge on the unit’s focus. Each unit concludes with an End-of-Unit Assessment that measures students’ mastery of the reading, writing, and language standards addressed throughout the unit.
In Grade 12, Unit 5, students study the unit Fractured Selves with the essential question, “What causes individuals to feel alienated?” Students explore the Modernist movement and examine how literature reflects the realities of modern life through the theme of alienation. Reading a range of poems, short stories, drama, memoir, speeches, and informational texts, students analyze how historical events, particularly World War I and World War II, shaped individuals’ experiences and influenced Modernist writers’ portrayals of isolation, identity, and the human condition. Across the unit, students consider multiple perspectives on alienation while analyzing literary elements and author’s craft. The unit culminates in an Extended Writing Project in which students synthesize their learning by writing a literary analysis essay that examines how the unit’s texts develop the theme of alienation.
Indicator 2e
Materials include a range of texts and provide teacher support in helping students learn about people who are similar to and different from them.
The StudySync materials include a broad range of texts featuring characters, historical figures, and authors from varied backgrounds, perspectives, and identities across grades 9-12, providing students with opportunities to engage with varied social, cultural, political, and historical experiences. Teacher guidance supports these experiences by providing background knowledge before reading and general guidance on facilitating discussions of sensitive content, as outlined in the Addressing Sensitive Content section of each Grade Level Overview. This guidance emphasizes teacher preparation, respectful, text-based dialogue, student reflection, and strategies for navigating emotionally or culturally sensitive topics. Additionally, some lessons identify texts containing sensitive content and direct teachers to this guidance. While this document provides a framework for addressing sensitive content with students, guidance on specific texts is more limited. The supports remain largely general rather than text-specific, leaving teachers to determine how to address the particular historical, cultural, or social issues presented in individual texts.
Materials include a range of texts that offer varied perspectives on the topic/theme of study, including characters and people of interest from various backgrounds and perspectives.
Across grades 9-12, materials include characters and people of interest from various backgrounds and perspectives. It should be noted that when texts include more than one main character/person of interest, each character/person of interest is counted individually in this report. When particular parts of a character’s/person of interest’s biography are unknown, that information is not included in the count.
In Grade 9, the core texts focused on people include 31 main characters/people of interest who are women or girls and 32 who are men or boys. The main characters/people of interest come from varying backgrounds: 24 are white, 13 are Black/African American, two are Asian/Pacific Islander, one is Native American, one is Multiracial, and three are Latinx/Hispanic.
In Grade 10, the core texts focused on people include 32 main characters/people of interest who are women or girls and 28 who are men or boys. The main characters/people of interest come from varying backgrounds: ten are white, one is Multiracial, two are Native American, seven are Asian/Pacific Islander, six are Black/African American, and seven are Latinx/Hispanic.
In Grade 11, the core texts focused on people include 34 main characters/people of interest who are women or girls and 34 who are men or boys. The main characters/people of interest come from varying backgrounds: 29 are white, four are Asian/Pacific Islander, four are Native American, 20 are Black/African American, and two are Latinx/Hispanic.
In Grade 12, the core texts focused on people include 26 main characters/people of interest who are women or girls and 29 who are men or boys. The main characters/people of interest come from varying backgrounds: 29 are white, six are Asian/Pacific Islander, two are Native American, and 12 are Black/African American.
Text sets include texts written by authors of varied backgrounds.
Across grades 9-12, texts are written by authors of varied backgrounds. It should be noted that when texts include more than one author, each author is counted individually in this report. When particular parts of an author’s biography is unknown, that information is not included in the count. If an author has more than one text included at a given grade level, each of those texts is counted separately.
In Grade 9, 32 men and 29 women are the authors of core texts. Of all authors, 32 are white, 13 are Black/African American, four are Latinx/Hispanic, six are Asian/Pacific Islander, two are Native American, and two are Multiracial.
In Grade 10, 30 men and 33 women are the authors of core texts. Of all authors, 21 are white, nine are Black/African American, eight are Latinx/Hispanic, two are Multiracial, five are Native American, and ten are Asian/Pacific Islander.
In Grade 11, 31 men and 33 women are the authors of core texts. Of all authors, 28 are white, 19 are Black/African American, two are Latinx/Hispanic, three are Native American, and four are Asian/Pacific Islander.
In Grade 12, 33 men and 31 women are the authors of core texts. Of all authors, 31 are white, ten are Black/African American, three are Multiracial, one is Latinx/Hispanic, two are Native American, and six are Asian/Pacific Islander.
Materials provide some teacher guidance when texts contain grade-appropriate topics that impact students. The materials provide some teacher support in helping students learn about people or characters similar to and different from them across social, cultural, political, and historical contexts rather than in superficial, oversimplified ways that perpetuate stereotypes.
Each Grade Level Overview includes a section titled Addressing Sensitive Content, which provides high-level facilitation guidance for how teachers should address sensitive content from texts with students. This section provides teachers with a structured framework for preparing for, facilitating, and following up on discussions of challenging or potentially objectionable material. It recommends that teachers preview texts, identify content that may be sensitive for their specific students, establish a clear purpose for discussion, and plan how to create a supportive environment before instruction begins. During class, teachers are encouraged to co-create discussion norms with students, emphasize the difference between intent and impact, require respectful listening, ground responses in textual evidence, avoid assumptions or generalizations, and ensure that students may choose not to speak. The guidance also includes practical, in-the-moment strategies for managing student discomfort, hesitation, strong emotional reactions, confusion, or difficulty expressing ideas. These include Fist-to-Five, Stop and Jot, Think-Pair-Share, circular response discussions, structured steps for restating and responding compassionately, and a Stoplight check to determine whether students are ready to move forward. After discussions, teachers are directed to use reflection questions, journaling, and an anonymous Critical Incident Questionnaire to help students process unresolved ideas, evaluate the effectiveness of the discussion norms, identify remaining questions, and provide feedback that can inform future conversations. Overall, the section emphasizes teacher preparation, student voice, respectful text-based dialogue, emotional awareness, and continued reflection when addressing sensitive content. While this document provides a framework for addressing sensitive content with students, guidance on specific texts is more limited.
For some texts with sensitive content, the Teacher Edition and lesson plans flag this for teachers and remind them to use the Addressing Sensitive Content section provided in the Grade Level Overviews. These sections are the same across grades 6-12.
In Grade 11, Unit 2, students read “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor. Before reading, the directions include the following guidance: “The text you are about to read contains offensive language. Remember to be mindful of the thoughts and feelings of your peers as you read and discuss this text. If needed, ask your teacher for additional guidance and support.” The following guidance is provided for teachers in the Teacher Edition and lesson plan: “This text contains racial epithets. To prepare for this lesson, please refer to the Addressing Sensitive Content section in the Grade 11 ELA Overview. It is strongly recommended that you develop a plan to address this topic with your students prior to assigning the text.” While the guidance flags sensitive content in the text, it does not provide teachers with text- and topic-specific information for navigating it. The planning is left to the teacher’s discretion.
Before reading texts, the Teacher Edition and lesson plan provide a Building Knowledge section in which teachers are to fluently read aloud information to support students in learning more about the topic(s) they will encounter in their reading.
In Grade 10, Unit 1, students read an excerpt from Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan state, “Conduct a fluent read-aloud of the following information on Modernist or Postmodernist literature:
Before the publication of Things Fall Apart, most of the books about Africa, such as Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, were written by European authors portraying African characters in an incomplete and unfavorable light. Achebe was one of the first African writers to counter this perspective. In Things Fall Apart, he portrays the complexity of Igbo culture.
In this early passage from Things Fall Apart, Achebe explores tribal life in the African village of Umuofia at the turn of the twentieth century. Despite his Nigerian roots, Achebe chose to write his novel in English; this later inspired many other African writers to follow suit and reclaim a colonial language as their own.
In later chapters, characters struggle with their identity and place in society as British colonialism threatens their way of life.
How does this information connect with what you learned in the unit’s Literary Focus lesson?”
Criterion 2.2: Knowledge Building Through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are meaningful, evidence-based, and support students in making meaning and building knowledge as they progress toward grade-level mastery of literacy skills.
Materials include clear, explicit instruction guidance for teachers across all literacy skills.
The StudySync materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 2.2: Knowledge-Building through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension. Across Grades 9–12, the program provides a coherent instructional pathway that integrates reading, writing, speaking, listening, vocabulary development, and assessment through consistent, research-based instructional routines. Students regularly engage in close reading, text-dependent questions, analysis, collaborative discussions, and evidence-based writing tasks that deepen comprehension and support understanding of complex texts and topics. The materials provide frequent opportunities for students to develop and apply vocabulary and independent word-learning strategies, although explicit teacher guidance for vocabulary instruction is not consistently comprehensive. Students also receive instruction and practice in sentence composition, but these opportunities are relatively infrequent and concentrated within Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lessons and Extended Writing Projects. Writing instruction is integrated throughout the program, with frequent on-demand and process writing opportunities, explicit guidance through all stages of the writing process, and sustained opportunities to develop evidence-based compositions across genres. The distribution of process writing opportunities aligns with the balance of writing types recommended by the standards. While the materials provide explicit instruction in research skills and opportunities for students to conduct research, these are primarily limited to one research-focused Extended Writing Project and one research-supported Extended Oral Project per grade level, restricting recurring opportunities to develop and apply research skills throughout the year. The program also includes frequent formative assessments, actionable teacher guidance for using assessment data to inform instructional adjustments, and coherent culminating tasks and summative assessments aligned to unit goals. However, teacher guidance for supporting the content development of students' contributions during discussions and providing feedback on their oral contributions is limited. Additionally, although the core instructional pathway is clearly defined, the volume of instructional content and reliance on teacher discretion when integrating supplemental resources create challenges for pacing and prioritization. Overall, the materials provide consistent opportunities for text-based analysis, discussion, writing, and assessment, while limitations remain in instructional guidance, the frequency of sentence-composition and research opportunities, and support for implementing the full instructional pathway.
Indicator 2f
Materials include a clear, research-based core instructional pathway with reasonable pacing throughout the year, which allows students to work towards grade-level proficiency.
The instructional pathway outlined in the StudySync materials partially meets expectations for indicator 2f. The materials clearly define the core instructional pathway and provide comprehensive guidance for implementing its primary instructional routines through the Program Guide, Teacher Edition lesson plans, and pacing resources. The program organizes instruction into six Core ELA units built around consistent research-based routines, including First Read, Skill, Close Read, and Independent Read lessons, that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening, vocabulary, collaboration, and formative assessment while emphasizing text complexity, close reading, spiraled standards instruction, knowledge building, and reading-writing integration. The materials also include numerous supplemental resources, such as Novel Study units, Project Based Learning projects, Developing Fluency units, the Word Study Lesson Suite, the Strategies Glossary, and Spotlight Skills reteaching lessons, with accompanying guidance that describes their purpose and, in some cases, provides recommendations for implementation. However, many supplemental resources are optional and rely on teacher discretion for integration into the core instructional sequence. The program provides 30-day unit pacing guides, lesson timing estimates, and Shortcuts recommendations to help teachers prioritize instruction when time is limited, but the amount of instructional time scheduled for many daily lessons frequently exceeds what is available in a typical class period. As a result, teachers and districts are likely to make substantial decisions about which lessons and activities to omit or modify in order to complete the curriculum within a school year. While some guidance is provided, explicit implementation guidance for identifying instructional priorities and making pacing adjustments while maintaining the coherence and essential learning of the core instructional pathway is limited.
Materials clearly outline the essential elements for the core instructional pathway. Materials clearly explain how to use and implement the core instructional pathway, which does not deviate from currently accepted research.
The StudySync Program Guide outlines the essential elements of the core instructional pathway in the Program Overview section. This section states that each grade level consists of six core units. Each unit is united by a focus and an essential question. Each Core ELA unit includes texts from multiple genres while emphasizing a designated genre as the instructional focus for the unit. Core ELA units are broken into six sections, which provide teachers with instructional support and planning resources:
Unit Overview
Integrated Reading and Writing
Extended Writing Project or Oral Project (in one unit)
ELL Resources
Novel Study
End-of-Unit Assessment
The Unit Overview section simply provides teachers with a bird's-eye view of the unit learning. Of these sections, the following are required components: Integrated Reading and Writing, Extended Writing Project or Oral Project (in one unit), and the End-of-Unit Assessment. Of these sections, the following are supplemental or to be used based on teacher’s discretion: ELL Resources and Novel Study.
The Instructional Routines section of the Program Guide outlines the structure followed in each unit’s Integrated Reading and Writing section, which is the bulk of each unit’s learning. The Integrated Reading and Writing section of each Core ELA unit features approximately ten texts representing a variety of genres and text types. This section begins with a Big Idea section in which students learn about the unit's focus, essential question, and featured genre. Each unit ends with a Self-Selected Reading section where students select a text for independent reading, learn strategies for selecting independent reading texts, choose from a curated collection of thematically related texts, and complete a written response that encourages reflection on their reading. In the bulk of the unit, students participate in different reading routine cycles. One of these cycles is present in the Independent Read Lessons:
Independent Read: Multiple Independent Read lessons in each unit provide students with recurring opportunities to independently apply previously learned reading skills as instructional supports are gradually reduced.
Collaborative Conversation: While opportunities for discussion occur across all lesson types, every Independent Read lesson includes a structured Collaborative Conversation activity. StudySyncTV episodes further support these discussions by modeling effective academic dialogue and collaborative learning behaviors.
Write and Peer Review: After participating in collaborative conversations, students write brief responses that apply the reading and writing skills developed throughout the lesson. Embedded standards-aligned rubrics support assessment, while the platform’s peer review tool allows teachers to facilitate anonymous peer feedback on student writing.
The Instructional Routines section continues by outlining the following instructional routines for the Learning Sequence that include multiple reads of texts:
First Read: First Read lessons introduce the close reading sequence by building foundational reading comprehension, vocabulary, and language skills. Multimedia previews, multilingual text summaries, reading quizzes, and Think questions support students' initial understanding of the text while providing teachers with opportunities to monitor comprehension.
Skill: Skill lessons follow First Read and use a gradual release model to build students' mastery of grade-level ELA standards. Concept Definition resources, SkillsTV videos, skill models, and checklists provide explicit instruction and guided application, while embedded auto-scored assessments give teachers immediate information about student progress.
Close Read: Close Read lessons conclude the reading sequence by having students demonstrate their understanding through writing tasks in a variety of genres. Students revisit key vocabulary and reread the text using standards-aligned focus questions that guide annotation and deepen analysis.
Collaborative Conversation: Collaborative discussion is integrated throughout the curriculum, with dedicated Collaborative Conversation activities included in every Close Read lesson. StudySyncTV segments model effective academic discussions and collaborative learning behaviors to support student participation.
Write and Peer Review: Following collaborative discussions, students apply the skills developed throughout the reading sequence to compose a short written response to the text. Standards-aligned rubrics support the evaluation of student writing, and the platform’s peer-review feature enables teachers to facilitate anonymous peer feedback on writing assignments.
The Program Guide states that “StudySync’s Core ELA units engage students in rigorous and meaningful learning through carefully designed instructional routines rooted in research-based best practices. The following five pedagogical principles drive student learning.” It continues to provide examples of how the program considers the following pedagogical principles in its design:
Text Complexity
Volume of Reading and Close Reading
Spiraling and Stacking of Standards-Aligned Instruction
Knowledge Building
Reading-Writing-Speaking Integration
It should be noted that for grades 11 and 12, materials provide an optional instructional pathway of teaching British and American Literature courses instead of the core units highlighted throughout this review. These are optional courses that organize instruction chronologically around major literary periods and emphasize canonical texts. These courses integrate StudySync's standards-aligned instructional routines and digital platform while providing a rigorous literature-focused option that can be used in place of or alongside the Core ELA curriculum to meet the needs of different classrooms and instructional goals.
When present, some supplemental materials are designed to work coherently with the core instructional pathway. Materials provide some explanations of when and how to use supplemental materials so that all students can access grade-level materials.
Some supplemental resources work coherently with the core instructional pathway. Supplemental resources are available for teacher use in the Additional Resources section of the platform, and explanations are provided in the program guide. While they are referenced and explained in the program guide and in their corresponding Teacher Guide, when to use these resources in a lesson sequence and how to make time for them in the core materials is left up to teacher’s discretion. Some resources will likely require additional time to implement, and guidance for how to do this while running the core lessons is not provided.
Supplemental materials in the program include:
Novel Study Options for Each Unit: Novel Study Units offer optional, standards-aligned alternatives to the Core ELA units, featuring full-length novels, dramas, and informational texts. Each Novel Study includes teacher and student editions, reading guides with close reading questions, vocabulary instruction, discussion prompts, reading quizzes, short writing responses, and culminating writing activities. Comparative reading selections paired with the novel encourage students to analyze connections across texts while building content knowledge, and integrated reading and writing instruction helps develop close reading, analytical writing, and stamina with extended texts.
Integrating Novels in 9-12: The Program Guide provides guidance on integrating Novel Study units into grades 9–12, explaining that each Novel Study is designed as a complete alternative to its corresponding Core ELA unit. Every unit offers at least three Novel Study options, each providing 30 days of standards-aligned reading, writing, grammar, and skills instruction that mirrors the Core ELA instructional sequence and culminates in the same End-of-Unit Assessment. Teachers may substitute Novel Study units for any Core ELA unit throughout the year while maintaining consistent coverage of standards and assessment expectations. Each Novel Study includes a Unit Overview; a Comparative Reading and Writing section that pairs novel excerpts with Core ELA selections for skills instruction and comparative analysis; a Culminating Writing Task aligned with the corresponding Extended Writing Project; dedicated English Learner Resources; and the shared End-of-Unit Assessment. The guide also recommends using Novel Studies as part of an outside independent reading program and notes that print editions of the full-length texts may be obtained through the program's bookseller partnerships.
Project Based Learning Options for Each Unit: The Project Based Learning/Community Action Handbook provides an optional end-of-unit project for every unit that encourages students to apply their learning to authentic community issues. Each project follows a structured four-step process—Investigate, Plan, Act, and Celebrate & Reflect—and is supported by teacher guidance, engagement and enrichment strategies, media integration suggestions, demonstration of mastery expectations, graphic organizers, handouts, and additional resources. These projects offer an optional extension that connects literacy instruction to real-world problem solving, collaboration, research, and civic engagement.
Fluency Units: The program includes optional Developing Fluency Units for grades 6-8 and 9-12 that provide explicit instruction in pronunciation, punctuation, phrasing, pacing, and expression using grade-band-appropriate texts with embedded audio models. Following the same instructional structure as other StudySync skill lessons, students progress from modeled fluent reading to guided partner practice, repeated reading, self-reflection, and a culminating performance task. Additional implementation support is provided through the Fluency Teacher Guide, including a scope and sequence, an explanation of lesson structure, scoring guidance for benchmarks, and a framework for instruction. For students requiring more intensive foundational reading support, the program also includes a supplemental Foundational Skills Teacher's Edition Handbook with diagnostic assessments, phonics and word study lessons, fluency routines, decodable passages, progress-monitoring tools, and guidance for supporting English learners and students reading below grade level.
Word Study Lesson Suite: The Word Study Lesson Suite provides a collection of more than 40 supplemental lessons designed to strengthen older students' decoding of multisyllabic words and improve reading comprehension. Organized into five topics—Introduction to Word Study, Prefixes, Suffixes, Syllabication, and Word Parts and Origins—the lessons support flexible whole-class or small-group instruction through explicit teaching, guided practice, and assessment. Each lesson follows a consistent instructional sequence with Define, Vocabulary, Model, and Your Turn activities, progressing from direct instruction and modeled application to increasingly rigorous independent practice. Additional implementation guidance is available in the Word Study Teacher Guide. This guide includes guiding questions and a protocol that teachers can use to decide which students to use these lessons with and which lessons to use. These lessons are recommended to be teacher-led and done in small groups.
Strategies Glossary: The optional Strategies Glossary is a supplemental teacher resource that compiles research-based instructional strategies to support diverse learners across the curriculum. Organized into five sections—Vocabulary, Speaking and Listening, Reading, Writing, and Formative Assessment—the glossary provides flexible, adaptable strategies that teachers can incorporate into a variety of lessons to differentiate instruction and support student learning. For each strategy, the guide explains the strategy's components. Implementing these strategies is entirely at the teacher’s discretion, and they are not listed as options in the core lesson plans.
Reteach Lessons: The program includes multiple supports for reteaching and remediation. Each Core ELA Skill lesson has a corresponding Spotlight Skills lesson that provides targeted, standards-aligned instruction to reteach specific skills without requiring students to complete additional reading. These lessons may be assigned at any point in the year, although the Program Guide recommends using them after reviewing end-of-unit assessment and progress-monitoring data. In addition, the Pacing Guide identifies corresponding reteaching lessons for each Core ELA lesson, helping teachers quickly locate targeted instructional resources to address unfinished learning and support mastery of standards.
Materials provide implementation schedules, including lesson-specific guidance, that are somewhat well paced, but may not be reasonably be completed in the school year, allowing students to dive deeply into content.
In the Unit Overview section of each unit, teachers can find a linked Unit Pacing Guide. Each unit encompasses 30 days of instruction. Timing guidance for each lesson is provided at the top of each lesson plan. Timing guidance for each individual activity in each lesson is not provided. In the first half of each unit, teachers focus solely on the instruction in the Integrated Reading and Writing section. Beginning in the second half of each unit, teachers focus on both the Integrated Reading and Writing section and the Extended Writing Project (or Oral Project in one unit). This means teachers should be teaching multiple lessons a day. It should be noted that, in many schools, the number of minutes of instruction for one day of learning largely exceeds what is likely available for ELA instruction in a school day. For example in Grade 9, Unit 1, students are to complete the Vocabulary Review (40 minutes, Self-Selected Reading (70 minutes), and a part of the Narrative Writing Process: Edit and Publish for the Extended Writing Project (at least 40 minutes) on day 26 of instruction. This totals to 150 instructional minutes for the day, likely more than is available for a typical school. While the materials pace each unit for 30 instructional days, which should equal 180 days of instruction, this may not be feasible for many schools and districts. The Unit Overview includes a Shortcuts section that outlines what teachers can omit if they are short on time to complete the unit. Sometimes this guidance is vague, however, and states that teachers should make content cuts and “Remember that this guide is only meant to help you plan your unit and visualize how the parts of a StudySync lesson fit together. Use it, adapt it, or change it to meet your needs!” Sometimes the guidance recommends specific assignments to cut, such as certain Skills lessons. However, cutting these few assignments may not give teachers enough time to complete all units in the program within a single school year. To implement this curriculum, given the amount of instruction to be covered each day, teachers and districts must make major instructional decisions about what to keep and what to cut from the program to fit their local needs. While some guidance is available for these decisions, the program would benefit from more.
Indicator 2g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-based, allowing students to demonstrate their thinking in various formats.
The questions, tasks, and assignments in StudySync materials meet expectations for indicator 2g. The materials provide consistent opportunities for students to make meaning of texts through text-based questions and tasks that require close reading, rereading, annotation, discussion, and written response. Across the StudySync program, the recurring First Read, Skill, and Close Read lesson structure supports students in engaging with texts multiple times and in varied formats. First Read lessons introduce students to the text through annotation, Text Talk discussions, comprehension checks, and Think questions that require evidence-based interpretation. Skill lessons prompt students to return to complex sections of the text to apply standards-based reading skills, analyze language and structure, and support responses with textual evidence. Close Read lessons extend this work by asking students to revisit key portions of texts, complete focused annotations, discuss interpretations with peers, and craft short written responses grounded in cited evidence. Through this repeated instructional sequence, students regularly use the text as the basis for speaking, writing, analysis, and interpretation, supporting deeper comprehension of the texts being studied.
Materials provide opportunities to support students in making meaning of the texts being studied through text-based questions and tasks that require students to answer in varying formats (e.g., speaking, writing, etc.).
Throughout the StudySync program, materials include three lesson types that support students in making meaning of the texts under study. These Lesson Types include First Read, Skill, and Close Read lessons. During First Read lessons, students engage with the text by annotating and answering written Think Questions that ask them to interpret ideas and support their responses with textual evidence. In Skill lessons, students return to the text to annotate, reread, and participate in discussions focused on specific standards-based skills. During Close Read lessons, students revisit the text to complete Skills Focus annotations, collaborate with peers to deepen their interpretations, and write brief evidence-based responses.
In Grade 9, Unit 2, students read “The Journey” by Mary Oliver. During the First Read lesson, students use the Make Connections to Personal Experiences reading strategy to deepen their understanding of the text. As they read, students annotate the text and may use the following provided sentence stems to generate their annotations:
“To make connections to personal experiences:
How does this relate to my life?
What were my thoughts and feelings when I read this?
To make connections to ideas in other texts:
How is this different from other texts I have read?
How is this similar to other texts I have read?
To make connections to society:
How does this relate to issues in society?
How is this similar to or different from things that happen in the real world?”
In a subsequent Skill lesson, teachers show students a model for analyzing poetic elements and structure. At the end of the lesson, students apply the skills from the model as they answer several multiple-choice questions, including “Which statement below provides the most accurate analysis about the use of structure and sound in the poems?” and “Which lines show the use of varied line length and enjambment to create emphasis?” Afterward, students complete another Skill lesson on this text's point of view. Later in the unit, students complete a Close Read lesson for this text, where they reread the text and ultimately write a short response to the question, “Compare and contrast the journeys in ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening,’ ‘12,’ and ‘The Journey’ analyzing as you do so how the poets’ use of structure, sound devices, and figurative language enhances the development of these journeys. Points of comparison-contrast might include the motivation for the journey, the type of journey taken, and the result of the journey.” Before writing, students engage in a class discussion to share their initial thoughts with peers.
Materials include text-based questions and tasks that require students to closely read and/or re-read complex parts of texts to deepen their analysis and understanding.
Across the program, First Read lessons promote repeated engagement with texts through whole-class Text Talk discussions, optional comprehension assessments, and Think questions that ask students to support their interpretations with textual evidence. In each Skill lesson, students independently revisit challenging portions of the text, annotate key passages, and apply the targeted literacy skill. During Close Read lessons, students return to selected sections of longer texts to examine central ideas, author’s craft, text structure, and supporting evidence in greater depth, culminating in a brief written response that cites relevant textual evidence.
In Grade 11, Unit 4, students read an excerpt from Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun. During the First Read lesson, after students read, they participate in Text Talk, where they discuss several questions, including:
“What plan have the Youngers made to improve their life?
What does Walter mean when he says he will ‘put on a show’?
How does Walter really feel about putting on a show?”
Students should return to different sections of the text to answer these questions and provide appropriate textual evidence in their responses. Later in the lesson, students complete the Think questions, which require written responses. Some of these questions include:
“Based on the text, what can you infer about Mr. Lindner’s motivations for paying Walter and his family not to move?
How does Walter define manhood? Cite specific quotes or passages from the text to support your answer.”
Students must revisit parts of the text to find appropriate textual evidence to analyze the text and support their thinking. In a subsequent Skill lesson, students learn about Dramatic Elements and Structure. At the end of the lesson, students practice this skill. In this practice, students must re-read and analyze the elements of a portion of the text to complete the activity. In a later Close Read lesson, students re-read the text, considering the following questions as they read,
“Highlight an exchange of dialogue between Beneatha and Walter that shows how Beneatha feels about the family’s dreams and Walter’s reaction. Analyze the relationship between plot and theme in these lines.
Identify a passage that includes dialogue and stage directions that show what Walter thinks it means to be a man. Analyze how these dramatic elements help advance the plot of the play.
Locate a passage that contains clues about the setting of A Raisin in the Sun. How does the setting affect the characters and influence the plot?
Identify dialogue between Beneatha and Mama near the end of the scene in which they discuss respect, dignity, and love. Analyze the relationship between characters and explain how their exchange reveals a theme of the play.
Why is owning a home so important to Mama? What makes a home so important to a family? Identify textual evidence to support your answer.”
After students re-analyze the text with these questions in mind, they later participate in a discussion and draft a constructed response that synthesizes all their learning.
Indicator 2h
Materials support students in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through opportunities to analyze and evaluate texts.
The analysis opportunities in StudySync materials meet expectations for indicator 2h. The program provides consistent opportunities for students to analyze and evaluate texts in ways that support comprehension of complex ideas within and across texts. Throughout the program, students engage with key ideas and details through standards-aligned Skill lessons, Knowledge Building Blast activities, and text-based tasks that require them to identify central ideas, summarize information, and analyze how details contribute to meaning. Students also examine craft and structure through lessons focused on elements such as word choice, language, text organization, and author’s techniques, helping them understand how these features shape meaning and tone. Additionally, the program includes opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas by comparing themes, perspectives, and information across paired and multiple texts. Through recurring opportunities to synthesize evidence, evaluate relationships among texts, and support their analyses with textual evidence, students deepen their understanding of both individual texts and broader topics of study.
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in making meaning.
In each unit, students have opportunities to analyze key ideas and details within texts through Skill lessons and Knowledge Building Blast lessons aligned to these skills. In each unit, students have opportunities to analyze key ideas and details across texts through Compare and Contrast Skill lessons aligned with these skills.
In Grade 10, Unit 4, students read an excerpt from William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. As part of the learning sequence, students complete a Skill lesson on Summarizing. At the end of the lesson, students practice the skill by answering multiple-choice questions on summaries about the text. The questions they complete are:
“Which detail from the text is the most important one to include in the summary?
What is the best summary of the events that occur in this section?”
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in making meaning.
In each unit, students have opportunities to analyze craft and structure within texts through Skills lessons aligned to these skills, as well as some First Read and Close Read lessons. In each unit, students have opportunities to analyze craft and structure across texts through Compare and Contrast Skill lessons aligned with these skills.
In Grade 12, Unit 2, students read an excerpt from The Canterbury Tales titled “The Prologue of the Pardoner’s Tale” by Geoffrey Chaucer. As part of the learning sequence, students complete a Skill lesson on Point of View. At the end of the lesson, students practice the skill by analyzing lines in the text that reveal point of view. The questions they complete are:
“The Pardoner uses figurative language when he states ‘To spice therewith a bit my sermoning / And stir men to devotion, marvelling…’ Why does the Pardoner use this metaphor?
Which of the following phrases make it clear that the Pardoner knows he is a liar?”
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in deepening their understanding on a topic.
In each unit, students have opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within texts through Skill lessons aligned to these skills and some Close Read lessons. In each unit, students have opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across texts through some lessons focused on paired text sets.
In Grade 11, Unit 6, students read an excerpt from “Gaman” by Christine Kitano and “Demeter’s Prayer to Hades” by Rita Dove. After reading and analyzing both texts, students complete a Close Read lesson for “Demeter’s Prayer to Hades.” At the end of the lesson, students draft a response to compare how the texts approach similar topics. The prompt states:
“LITERARY ANALYSIS: 'Demeter’s Prayer to Hades’ and ‘Gaman’ both implicitly address the subject of self-knowledge and self-reflection. Analyze how each text addresses this topic. What is each author’s message about self-knowledge or self-reflection? How do the poetic elements and structure of each poem help shape the author’s message? How does the figurative and descriptive language in each poem help reveal the message? Are the messages in the two texts similar or different? How so? Cite evidence from the text in your analysis.”
In Grade 11, Unit 5, students read an excerpt from the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education. In the learning sequence, students engage in a Close Read lesson on the text. At the end of the lesson, students must draft a response that analyzes the text’s claims and evaluates the quality of the evidence and reasoning. The prompt states:
“RHETORICAL ANALYSIS: The author of this text uses reasoning and evidence to support his claim reached in the resolution of this case. Identify the author’s claim. Then, evaluate how successful the author’s use of reasoning and evidence is in convincing his audience of this claim. Support your response with evidence from the text.”
Indicator 2i
Materials include structured protocols and teacher guidance that frequently allow students to engage in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The discussion protocols and teacher guidance in StudySync materials partially meet expectations for indicator 2i. The program includes structured protocols that support students in participating in a variety of discussion formats, including partner, small-group, and whole-class conversations. Across the program, recurring discussion routines such as Text Talk, Discuss, Turn and Talk, Collaborative Conversations, and StudySync TV provide opportunities for students to engage with texts, concepts, vocabulary, and writing prompts through oral language. Additional optional protocols, including Academic Conversations, Debate, Think-Pair-Share, Discussion Web, Philosophical Chairs, and Socratic Seminar, are available in teacher resources for flexible use. Teacher guidance includes some support for facilitating and monitoring discussions, such as directions for grouping students, reminders to use textual evidence and graphic organizers, sample student responses, Check for Success guidance, sentence frames, and differentiated scaffolds for multilingual learners and students needing support. However, while materials offer guidance during discussions, they provide limited direction for giving feedback after discussions or for supporting the content development of students’ responses.
Materials include structured protocols that support students in participating in various types of discussions.
The StudySync program includes protocols that support students in engaging in various types of discussions throughout the course. The program incorporates the following discussion formats:
Partner (including Turn-and-Talk)
Small Group
Whole Group Discussion
These formats are used throughout lesson protocols, including:
Talk Text: This protocol requires students to use teacher-guided prompts to cite textual evidence as a whole class. This protocol can be found in both First Read and Independent Read lessons.
StudySync TV: In these videos, students see models of academic discussions before participating in small-group discussions. This protocol is present in Close Read lessons.
Discuss: In Close Read and Independent Read lessons, students discuss the Write prompt, usually in pairs or small groups.
Turn and Talk: In this protocol, students discuss in pairs. This protocol can be found in Skill lessons, where students discuss concept definitions and the teacher’s modeling of the skill. These discussions are not necessarily focused on the texts under study but rather on the concepts under study.
Collaborative Conversations: This protocol occurs in pairs or small groups. Students read the prompt and brainstorm ideas before discussing. This protocol can be found in Vocabulary Review lessons.
Additionally, the Teacher materials include other discussion protocols that teachers can use flexibly throughout the program, if they choose to. These can be found in the Strategies Glossary, which teachers can find by navigating to Core ELA → Any Grade Level → Additional Resources → Strategies Glossary. include: Academic Conversations, Debate, Think-Pair-Share, Discussion Web, Philosophical Chairs, and Socratic Seminar.
An example of the type of discussion opportunities in the program is:
In Grade 10, Unit 3, students read “Rituals of Memory” by Kimberly Blaeser. As part of the learning sequence, students complete a first read of the text. After reading, students complete a Text Talk activity that includes a teacher-led discussion and answers to comprehension questions about the text. These questions include:
“What does the author mean by ‘Memory begins with various wonders’?
How does the ritual on Memorial Day unite many of the author’s cultures in one place at one time?
Why are memories of Memorial Day ‘watermarks’ in the author’s life?
How do the author’s memories support the idea that Native Americans ‘can hold more than one thing sacred’?
How do different aspects of the author’s education differ in terms of historical record?”
Speaking and listening instruction includes some facilitation, monitoring, and feedback guidance for teachers.
Teacher materials include some guidance on facilitating and monitoring student discussions about texts throughout the program. Teacher guidance can be found in the lesson plans and Teacher Edition. At the top of each lesson plan, the materials include a Suggested Grouping section that helps teachers identify how to group all the lesson’s activities, including discussions. This guidance varies depending on the discussion protocol. For Collaborative Discussions and Discuss activities, the lesson plan and Teacher Edition include Check for Success guidance and, sometimes, sentence frames. For Talk Text, the lesson plan and Teacher Edition include sample student responses. The lesson plan also reminds teachers of available scaffolds for each activity. These scaffolds can be found in the Student Edition by clicking Actions and selecting the desired Scaffold levels for English Language Learners (ELLs) in the lesson. Scaffolding levels include: Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Advanced-High, and Approaching. For some discussions, guidance on giving students feedback during discussions includes Check for Understanding guidance, however, guidance on giving students feedback after discussions is not provided. There is a rubric provided for giving students feedback on the written reflection they complete post discussion, but no rubric for giving students feedback on their participation in the discussion itself.
In Grade 11, Unit 4, students read “The Negro Speaks of Rivers” by Langston Hughes and “How it Feels to be Colored Me” by Zora Neale Hurston. During the learning sequence, students participate in a Close Read lesson. During this lesson, students participate in a Discuss activity in which they respond to the prompt, “How do Hurston and Hughes each use figurative language to convey the central ideas of their texts? Determine the central idea or ideas of each text and evaluate how well the author conveys these ideas. Then, describe to what extent figurative language strengthens central ideas, using relevant evidence from the text.” The lesson plan and Teacher Edition include the following guidance:
“Put students into small groups for discussion. Remind them to reference their graphic organizers for examples. Encourage students to pose questions and respond to each other’s ideas throughout the discussion.
Check for Success
Remind students to use unit vocabulary in their discussions:
In ‘How It Feels to Be Colored Me,’ Hurston develops the central idea that _________.
Hurston’s use of figurative language supports this central idea by _________.
Some examples of figurative language that supports Hurston’s central idea are _________.”
The lesson plan states that the following scaffolds are available for this activity:
“Beginning & Intermediate ELLs
Work directly with students, using the discussion guides and speaking frames to facilitate the discussion. Available scaffolds:
discussion guide
speaking frames
Advanced & Advanced High ELLs and Approaching
Create mixed-level groups of three to four students. Prompt students to take turns using the discussion guide to facilitate their conversations. Available scaffolds:
discussion guide
speaking frames”
Guidance for providing students with feedback after the discussion is not provided, other than feedback on their written discussion reflection. Additionally, no guidance is provided on the discussion’s content.
Indicator 2j
Materials include opportunities that frequently allow students to engage in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The evidence-based discussion opportunities in the StudySync materials meet expectations for indicator 2j. The program provides frequent opportunities for students to engage in collaborative, evidence-based conversations about the texts and topics they are studying. Across units, students participate in partner, small-group, and whole-class discussions through recurring activities such as Talk Text, Discuss, and Collaborative Conversations. These activities prompt students to use textual evidence, apply vocabulary, compare ideas across texts, and explain their thinking in response to complex questions. Discuss activities, in particular, require students to support their ideas with evidence from the texts under study, while Collaborative Conversation activities broaden discussion to include unit themes, essential questions, and key ideas. Through these recurring opportunities, students consider peers’ perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about texts, topics, and larger concepts developed across the unit. While the program includes frequent discussion opportunities in varied formats, extended seminar-style discussions are not a recurring component of instruction.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in collaborative conversations about the text being read, which require them to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Materials provide opportunities for students to consider others’ perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about texts and topics they are reading.
Throughout the StudySync units, students have many opportunities to engage in collaborative conversations about the texts they are reading. In each unit, students participate in partner and small-group discussions through Talk Text, Discuss, and Collaborative Conversations activities. Discuss activities, in particular, prompt students to cite evidence from the texts under study to support their ideas. Across both Discuss and Collaborative Conversations activities, students respond to complex questions that require them to consider multiple perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about texts and topics. Collaborative Conversation activities further extend students’ thinking by prompting them to discuss overarching themes, essential questions, and key ideas developed across the unit. While the program provides frequent opportunities for partner, small-group, and whole-class discussion, it does not include extended seminar-style discussions as a recurring component of instruction.
In Grade 9, Unit 6, students read an excerpt from Lumberjanes Vol. 1: Beware the Kitten Holy, by N.D. Stevenson. During the learning sequence, students participate in a Close Read lesson. During this lesson, students participate in a Discuss activity in which they respond to the prompt, “What makes the graphic novel format an effective medium for exploring the particular characters, setting, and themes in Lumberjanes?” As they discuss, students should consider others’ perspectives to strengthen their ideas before writing their answers to the prompt.
In Grade 12, Unit 4, students engage in a Vocabulary Review lesson. During this lesson, students engage in a Collaborative Conversation in small groups as they answer the prompt “In this unit, you learned about the literary movement of Romanticism, which originated in the early 19th century. However, the word ‘romantic’ or ‘romance’ usually makes people think of love and courtship. What do you think of first when you hear the word ‘romanticism’? How is your first association with the word similar to or different from the themes of the literary period? Do you think ‘Romanticism’ is a fitting name for the literary period, or, if you could rename it, what would you call it and why? Use as many literary period and academic vocabulary words in your discussion as you can.”
Indicator 2k
Materials include explicit instruction on independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words to build knowledge within and across texts.
The instruction on independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words in StudySync materials partially meets expectations for indicator 2k. The program provides some structured approaches to vocabulary development, including repeated exposure to academic and text-specific vocabulary throughout each unit. Students encounter key words before, during, and after reading through Big Idea lessons, vocabulary previews, First Read lessons, Close Read lessons, Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice lessons, and Vocabulary Review lessons. Vocabulary instruction incorporates strategies such as using context clues, analyzing roots and affixes, examining word relationships, and exploring multiple meanings and connotations. Students also have opportunities to apply newly learned vocabulary in speaking and writing tasks across the unit. While the program includes instruction in independent word-learning strategies (including projected models) and multiple opportunities for practice, teacher guidance is not consistently comprehensive. Many vocabulary activities rely on teacher-generated explanations, examples, and discussion questions, and several recommended word-study practices are presented as optional extensions rather than as embedded instructional routines. As a result, the materials provide meaningful vocabulary support, but the comprehensive instructional guidance varies across lessons.
Materials include some structured and explicit practices for introducing key vocabulary words and independent word-learning strategies within the context of the texts (analyzing morphemes, etymology, word maps, and discussion of word relationships/shades of meaning, dictionary skills, context clues). Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and high-utility academic words. Materials provide multiple exposures to key vocabulary within (i.e., before, during, after reading) and across texts.
In the Study Sync program, vocabulary instruction is embedded in every unit. Lesson Plans on the digital platform provide teacher guidance for executing these activities and lessons.
At the beginning of each unit, the materials include a Big Idea section in which students learn the unit's academic or content vocabulary.
In Grade 12, Unit 1, students engage in a Big Idea lesson on Academic Vocabulary. In this lesson, students learn the words advance, character, cultivate, direction, extension, mass, obscure, scratch, solemn, and trade. They view a list of words, their parts of speech, meanings, and other meanings (when appropriate). The teacher guidance provided in the lesson plan and Teacher’s Edition for this part of the lesson states, “Read the list of academic vocabulary and definitions, providing additional details or explanations as needed. In addition, explain to students that they will encounter some of these words again in the unit. They may come across a Close Read prompt that includes one of these words, and they will be encouraged to use the word when they write about and analyze texts.” In the next part of the lesson, teachers project the Model onto the board. For this lesson, students learn that “Academic vocabulary consists of words that are commonly used in academic texts, lectures, and discussions across a number of disciplines. Learning these words will help you expand your vocabulary and succeed in school and on standardized tests.” Then, they review a graphic organizer which presents the words in sentences in two different meanings, one column is for “meaning 1” and the other is for “meaning 2.” For each word, the graphic organizer presents sample sentences in different meanings. Teacher guidance in the lesson plan and Teacher Edition state that teachers should “Remind students of the definition of the first word. Then read aloud the first sentence: The troops will make an advance at 6 a.m. and won’t stop until they reach the town. Finally, ask questions that give students the opportunity to use the word.” A sample question is provided for the word advance. Sample questions are not provided for the remaining nine words; they are left to the teacher’s discretion. Later, in the lesson, students complete activities to practice their understanding of the words.
In First Read and Close Read lessons, students engage with the text’s vocabulary before and during reading.
In Grade 10, Unit 4, students read an excerpt from Funny in Farsi: A Memoir of Growing Up Iranian in America by Firoozeh Dumas. As part of the learning sequence, students engage in a First Read lesson. Before reading, teachers preview vocabulary with students. The lesson plan includes the following teacher guidance: “Preview the boldfaced vocabulary words on the Vocabulary tab before students start reading. These terms are challenging and/or important to comprehending the text. Tell students that the first boldface vocabulary word they will encounter in the text is coincidentally. The Vocabulary tab lists the boldface words in alphabetical order and provides the following information for each term:
its form or part of speech
a definition
a sample sentence
Read aloud each term as well as its form, definition, and sample sentence. After each word, ask student volunteers to share any of the following:
words they think might be synonyms of the vocabulary term
sentences they generate on their own that include the word
words that have similar word parts, such as shared roots or affixes
As students share, be sure to correct any misconceptions.” A list of potential misconceptions is not provided; it is left to the teacher’s discretion. The vocabulary words for this text are coincidentally, consult, facilitate, futile, and negate. Students encounter these words again in bold as they read. In the Think section of the lesson, students answer the following question on the vocabulary word facilitate: “The word facilitate in paragraph 3 is derived from the Latin word facilis, which means ‘easy.’ With this in mind and using context clues from words around it, write your best definition of facilitate here, and explain how its Latin origins relate to the word’s meaning.” In the Think section of the lesson, students also answer the following question on the vocabulary word negate: “The word negated comes from the Latin root negat-, which means ‘denied.’ Use this information to infer the meaning of negated as it is used in paragraph 10.” Later, as part of the learning sequence, students complete a Close Read lesson on the text. At the start of the lesson, students complete a vocabulary chart by dragging and dropping the definition to the correct word, then draft a sample sentence. The lesson plan includes the following guidance, “Check for Success: If students are struggling to write sentences about the text, model how to complete the first sentence using sentence starters: The narrator says her sorrow faded not coincidentally with receiving a package because __________.” As students read the text again, they encounter these words in bold.
Each unit also includes a Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice lesson, in which teachers present models of vocabulary word-learning strategies, and students practice.
In Grade 9, Unit 5, students participate in a Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice Lesson. At the start of the lesson, teachers review the list of content and vocabulary words that students have learned throughout the unit. The list includes the term, form (part of speech), definition, and a sample sentence. In the next part of the lesson, teachers model various independent strategies for learning words. The lesson plan and Teacher’s Edition includes the following teacher guidance: “Read aloud the beginning of the Skill Model or have students read it as a way to practice their oral reading fluency.” The skill model states, “To learn the meanings of new words we need to hear and read them used correctly. You’ve already had multiple opportunities to hear and read the vocabulary words for this unit in context: in previous vocabulary lessons, in the texts and prompts you’ve read, and in discussions with your teachers and peers. In this lesson, you will work with the vocabulary words for this unit in three different ways. This word work will help cement the meanings of the terms in your memory so that you can use these terms when you write about or discuss ideas related to this unit, future units, and in your daily life.” Then, students review the graphic organizer, which includes three columns: “Word Work Activity Type, Explanation, and Sample Student Thinking.” The lesson plan includes the following suggestions for teachers in this part of the lesson: “To support students’ internalization of the vocabulary words and provide examples beyond the sample student thinking consider the following activities:
Word Relationships - choose a word from the list and have the class generate synonyms, discuss the connotation of the word, or identify examples and nonexamples of the word.
Morphology - share with students the common roots and affixes present in the words in the list and discuss their possible meanings. Roots and affixes in this list include:
Roots: struct
Prefixes: im-, over-, pre-, con-
Suffixes: -al, -ation, -ion, -ly, -ure, -ous, -ing, -ize
A list of common roots and affixes and their meanings, which you can post in the classroom or distribute to students, can be found in the Word Study Teacher Guide at the bottom of your grade-level landing page.
Usage - choose a word from the list and have students generate sentences using the word, correcting and explaining improper usage as needed.”
While these suggestions are present, decisions are up to teacher's discretion.
Afterward, students complete the Your Turn part of the lesson, where they answer questions to practice these skills.
Toward the end of each unit, students participate in a Vocabulary Review lesson in which they review the meanings of content and academic vocabulary words, then practice using them in various contexts.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, students participate in a Vocabulary Review lesson. At the start of the lesson, teachers review the vocabulary list, the form (part of speech) and drag and drop the correct definition of each word. The lesson plan guidance states, “Review the list of vocabulary and definitions, providing additional details or explanations as needed.” These additional details or explanations are not provided in the lesson plan. Next, teachers project the model on the board. The model states, “The old adage ‘practice makes perfect’ is especially true for learning new vocabulary. Repeated application of vocabulary words—in different contexts and forms—can help with memorization and learning. However, repetition doesn’t have to be monotonous. Try some of the following strategies to mix up your vocabulary practice and deepen your understanding of the terms.
Think of examples of the word. With a partner or small group, take turns coming up with examples of each word. Grounding vocabulary in familiar examples can help you better remember meaning. (ex. Analogy: Texting is to novel writing what fast food is to a balanced meal—it’s about convenience rather than nourishment.)
Find connections between words. The words may be connected by a common word part, such as a suffix or base word, or by meaning, for example. Finding commonalities and differences between words can help you identify nuances in meaning. (ex. Both analogy and coincide share a common idea of ‘being side by side.’)
Draw a picture to help others guess the word. Visualizing a word”
The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance “Pause after the first vocabulary strategy to discuss the benefit of the activity and the sample provided. Then, ask students to generate their own examples using new words from the vocabulary review list.” While a sample is provided for the first activity, the last two are left up to teacher’s discretion. The lesson plan and Teacher Edition simply state “Repeat this process for all the remaining strategies in the model, using as many of the words from the vocabulary review list as possible.” Afterward, students practice some of these skills. At the end of the lesson, students discuss and write a short response where they should “use as many Big Idea and Academic Vocabulary words in your discussion as [they] can.”
Indicator 2l
Materials include opportunities for students to practice independent word-learning strategies, as well as newly taught vocabulary words.
The opportunities for students to practice independent word-learning strategies and newly taught vocabulary words in StudySync meet expectations for indicator 2l. The program provides students with opportunities to develop and apply independent word-learning strategies while building both academic and content-specific vocabulary. Throughout each unit, students engage with vocabulary instruction in multiple contexts, including Big Idea lessons, First Read and Close Read lessons, Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice lessons, Vocabulary Review lessons, and Extended Writing Project activities. Instruction and practice encourage students to use various word-learning strategies. Students also apply these strategies to text-specific vocabulary while reading and revisiting complex texts. Vocabulary learning is reinforced through repeated exposure and review, as students encounter words across multiple lessons, use them in discussions and writing tasks, and reflect on their vocabulary growth. This spiraled approach supports both vocabulary acquisition and the development of transferable word-learning skills that students can apply independently across texts and disciplines.
Materials include opportunities for students to use independent word-learning strategies to understand the meaning of challenging words (inferring from context, using morphological or etymological awareness).
Each unit also includes a Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice lesson, in which teachers present models of vocabulary-learning strategies and students practice these skills. Students practice the skills in the Your Turn portion of the lesson.
In Grade 9, Unit 3, students participate in a Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice Lesson. First, the review the words and their definitions. After reviewing the independent word-learning strategies of word relationships, morphology, and considering usage, students complete the Your Turn activity. In this activity, students practice each strategy. For example, to practice word relationships, they match the vocabulary word to its synonyms.
Materials include opportunities for students to use academic and content-specific vocabulary in various contexts.
At the beginning of each unit, the materials include a Big Idea section, where students learn the academic or content vocabulary of the unit. In First Read and Close Read lessons, students learn and practice content vocabulary specific to each text.
In Grade 10, Unit 4, students read “La Juanita” by Alice Dunbar-Nelson. As part of the learning sequence, students engage in a First Read lesson. During this lesson, students are introduced to the vocabulary words for the text through a graphic organizer that shows each word, its form (part of speech), definition, and a sample sentence. The words for this text are: demand, furtive, impudence, treacherous, and tumultuous. Students encounter these words again in bold as they read. In the Think section of the lesson, students answer the following question on the vocabulary word furitive: “The Latin word furtum means theft. Use this information and context clues from the text to determine the meaning of furtive. Write your definition of furtive here and explain how you arrived at it.” Students also answer a question on the vocabulary word impudence: “Use context clues to determine the meaning of the word impudence as it is used in ‘La Juanita.’ Write your definition of impudence here and explain how you figured it out.” Later, as part of the learning sequence, students complete a Close Read lesson on the text. At the start of the lesson, students complete a vocabulary chart by dragging and dropping definitions to the correct words, then draft a sample sentence. As students read the text again, they encounter these words in bold.
Toward the end of each unit, students participate in a Vocabulary Review lesson to review the meanings of content and academic vocabulary. At the end of these lessons, students discuss, then write a written response, and are encouraged to “use as many Big Idea and Academic Vocabulary words in [the] discussion as [they] can.”
In Grade 11, Unit 5, students participate in a Vocabulary review lesson. At the start of the lesson, students complete a vocabulary chart by dragging and dropping definitions to the correct words. Later in the lesson, students participate in a discussion on the prompt “In this unit, you have studied American Modernism and some of the literature that movement produced. Since that movement was a product of a terrible war, think about how war has spurred other movements throughout the past two centuries. What is the meaning of protest, waging war, and ‘winning’ in contemporary culture? How do the texts from this unit and any other texts, works or art, or personal experiences you have had influence or shape your perspective on war? Use as many Literary Focus and Academic Vocabulary words in your discussion as you can.” As they prepare for the discussion, the directions prompt students to “revisit the vocabulary review list to select useful and relevant terms.” Afterward, students reflect on the discussion and write a response to the prompt “After your discussion, reflect on your experience. How many vocabulary words were you able to incorporate? How comfortable did you feel recalling and using these words? What strategies were beneficial in learning these words, and what will you adjust in the future?”
At the end of each unit, students complete the Extended Writing Projects. Skills lessons in this part of the unit sometimes include opportunities for students to review vocabulary from the unit.
In Grade 12, Unit 1, students complete an extended writing project. As they complete the project, they complete several Skill lessons. Many of these skills lessons include a vocabulary component. For example, in the Revise section of the project, students complete a skill lesson on Precise Language. The lesson includes a vocabulary section in which students complete a vocabulary chart by dragging and dropping definitions to the correct vocabulary words.
Practice opportunities incorporate review of previously learned words based on their connection to the topic of study.
In First Read lessons, students are introduced to vocabulary words specific to that text for the first time. Students encounter these words again and get more practice with them in subsequent Close Read lessons for the same text. This spiraled nature of the lessons ensures that students review previously learned words.
Each unit also includes a Mid-Unit Vocabulary Practice lesson, in which students review the list of content and vocabulary words they have learned up to that point.
Toward the end of each unit, students participate in a Vocabulary Review lesson in which they review the meanings of content and academic vocabulary words, then practice using them in various contexts. At the end of these lessons, students discuss, then write a written response, and are encouraged to “use as many Big Idea and Academic Vocabulary words in [the] discussion as [they] can.”
Throughout the unit, students are prompted to use vocabulary in both discourse and writing activities.
Indicator 2m
Materials include explicit instruction on sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The explicit instruction for teaching sentence composition in StudySync partially meets expectations for indicator 2m. The program includes opportunities for students to develop sentence-composition skills through explicit instruction connected to the texts and writing tasks in each unit. The program provides Mid-Unit Sentence Composition Practice lessons in which teachers introduce, model, and provide guided practice with specific sentence-level skills using mentor sentences drawn from previously studied core texts. These lessons address concepts such as sentence combining, conjunctions, parallel structure, and sentence fluency while helping students analyze how authors use syntax to communicate meaning. Additional sentence-level instruction is embedded throughout the Extended Writing Projects, where students receive explicit instruction in writing conventions and composition skills such as transitions, punctuation, and avoiding run-on sentences during the revision and editing process. These lessons include teacher modeling, authentic examples, discussion prompts, and guided practice that support students in applying sentence-composition skills to their own writing. However, explicit sentence-composition instruction occurs relatively infrequently, with dedicated Mid-Unit sentence-composition lessons appearing only once per unit, and the Extended Writing project occurring at the end of each unit.
Materials include some explicit instruction in sentence-composition skills (use of punctuation, sentence elaboration, sentence combining using cohesive ties, sentence fluency), embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit. Materials utilize exemplar sentences from core and mentor texts that contain clear, varied, and rich examples of sentence structure.
In each unit, the program includes a Mid-Unit Sentence Composition Practice lesson where teachers introduce and model a sentence-composition skill. In these lessons, the program uses exemplar sentences from core and mentor texts. While these lessons are present in the materials, they are infrequent, occurring only once per unit. It should also be noted that the Define section of these lessons is the same for each skill across grade levels and units.
In Grade 10, Unit 2, students participate in a Mid-Unit Sentence Composition Practice lesson. At the start of the lesson, the materials include a definition for sentence composition. The lesson plan and Teacher’s Edition instruct teachers to introduce the skill by “read[ing] the definition or Sentence Composition.” Then, teachers should prompt a turn and talk and ask, “Have you ever read something where the writer kept using the same beat with their words or sentences? What did that make you stop and notice or feel more strongly? When you really want to make a point stick in your writing, what's a trick you use to grab your reader's attention?” Guidance prompts for teachers to “have students share their answers with the class.” In the next part of the lesson, teachers present a model to students. The guidance states to “Project the Skill Model onto the board. The Skill Model first builds students’ sentence awareness by having them study mentor sentences from the unit texts they have read, then provides explicit instruction, and finally invites students to practice sentence composition.” The model states that “Parallel structure is when a writer repeats a pattern of words to show that two or more ideas are equally important. Parallel structure gives writing a steady rhythm when read aloud. When a writer uses parallel structure to create a pattern that the reader can follow, it helps the reader connect ideas and understand the writer’s message more clearly.” Teachers read aloud a mentor sentences and sample student annotations “so students can hear a fluent reading of complex syntax.” The sample sentence comes from the texts “Valedictorian Address at Anacostia High School” by Rashema Melso and “The Gathering Place” by Amanda Gorman, which students read earlier in the unit. The first mentor sentence states, “Throughout my journey here, I have learned that time doesn’t wait, pity, or adjust for or to anyone, and life is not that fair.” The second mentor sentence states, “We strike our plans into the stone/and from this we build a summit worth climbing, / a goal worth reaching, / a world worth building.” Then, teachers review the “Learn” content of the lesson with students “to provide explicit instruction.” This content includes further analysis of the mentor sentences to identify what makes each sentence parallel and the parallel sentence frame.
Throughout the Extended Writing Project for each unit, students engage in several Skills lessons. Many of these skills lessons focus on sentence-composition skills. The lesson plans and Teacher Edition include teacher guidance on introducing or facilitating these skills with students.
In Grade 11, Unit 5, students complete an Extended Writing Project. During the Revise section of the project, students participate in a Skills lesson on transitions. At the beginning of the lesson, teachers introduce the skill. The lesson plan and Teacher Edition state that teachers should show the Concept Definition video and “read the definition for Transitions” to the class. Then, teachers prompt a turn and talk to the question, “Turn to your partner and discuss the last news article you read. What transitions could the author have used to make the article more coherent and easier for the audience to follow and understand?” Later in the lesson, teachers “project the model on the board” and “read aloud or call on students to read the Skill model.” This model includes prompting students to review a transitions checklist and then to analyze a sample student draft against it. The entire model is scripted for students to view. After the model, teachers lead students in a discussion about it. During the Edit and Publish section of the project, students complete a Skills lesson on run-on sentences. In the second part of the lesson, teachers “project the model on the board” and “call on a student to read the authentic text examples and explanations.” Students review a graphic organizer that includes a run-on sentence, its correction, and an example. As students engage with the model, they annotate it for “how the model uses authentic texts to explain the rules for run-on sentences” and “identify places where the model guides students on how to avoid run-on sentences when writing.” After the model, teachers lead students in a discussion about it. The lesson plan and Teacher Edition include the questions and sample student responses.
Indicator 2n
Materials include evidence-based opportunities for students to practice sentence composition and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level.
The sentence composition opportunities in StudySync partially meet expectations for indicator 2n. The program provides some opportunities for students to apply sentence-composition skills in authentic reading and writing contexts. Throughout each unit, students practice sentence-level skills by composing and revising sentences about texts they have read during Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lessons and by applying these skills to extended pieces of writing during the Extended Writing Project. Students revise and improve their own writing by incorporating newly learned sentence structures, punctuation, and elaboration techniques while reflecting on how these revisions improve clarity and meaning. The Extended Writing Projects also prompt students to revise their writing with audience and purpose in mind, encouraging them to make stylistic and language choices appropriate to different writing tasks and modes of communication. Although these opportunities connect sentence composition to students' reading and writing, they occur primarily during the Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lesson and the Extended Writing Project, which makes explicit practice relatively limited in each unit.
Materials include some opportunities for students to write sentences about the texts under study while practicing and applying sentence composition skills.
In every unit, students have opportunities to practice writing sentences about texts under study while practicing sentence composition skills in Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lessons and during the Extended Writing Project at the end of each unit. While these opportunities are present, they are infrequent since the Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lesson and the Extended Writing Project occur once per unit.
In Grade 12, Unit 2, students participate in a Mid-Unit Sentence Composition Practice lesson on punctuation. During the Your Turn activity, students review a section of William Shakespeare's Richard III from earlier in the unit. Then, they elaborate on the kernel sentence “The speaker laments his deformity” in three different ways, using a semicolon, a dash, and a colon.
Materials include some opportunities for students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their own writing.
In every unit, students have opportunities to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining and revising their own writing during Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lessons and the Extended Writing Project at the end of each unit. While these opportunities are present, they are infrequent since the Mid-Unit Sentence Composition lesson and the Extended Writing Project occur once per unit.
In Grade 9, Unit 4, students participate in a Mid-Unit Sentence Composition Practice lesson on appositives. At the end of the lesson, students complete a Write activity in which they “go back to a piece of writing [they] have produced in this unit. Pick two sentences that you want to combine, or one sentence that you want to expand using an appositive.” In their response, students must submit
“the original sentence;
a combined or expanded version of the sentence that uses an appositive; and
an explanation of how the appositive improves meaning for the person reading your writing.”
In Grade 11, Unit 5, students participate in an Extended Writing Project about the unit’s learning. During the Revise and the Edit and Publish steps of the project, students participate in several Skills lessons, some of which focus on sentence-composition skills. After all the Skills lessons, students revise, edit, and publish their essays, ensuring that they apply the Skills they focused on in each section to their longer piece of writing.
Materials include opportunities for students to adapt their language based on the intended audience and purpose.
In each Extended Writing Project, students have opportunities to practice adapting their language to the intended audience and purpose through Skills lessons during the Revise and Edit and Publish steps of these projects.
In Grade 10, Unit 4, students participate in an Extended Writing Project about the unit’s learning. In the Revise step of the project, students revise their oral presentation drafts. As part of this revision, students “consider how best to meet the needs of the audience, purpose, and occasion by considering the following:
“a clear point of view supported with reasons and evidence
rhetoric, including conventions of language
avoidance of fallacious reasoning or distorted evidence
speaking techniques such as eye contact, appropriate speaking rate and volume, enunciation, pauses for effect, purposeful gestures, confident and relaxed posture
strategic use of digital media to enhance understanding and add interest”
Indicator 2o
Materials include a mix of both on-demand and process writing opportunities that are appropriately-aligned in purpose, genre, and/or topic to the reading of that unit.
The on-demand and process writing opportunities in StudySync meet expectations for indicator 2o. The program provides a balance of on-demand and process writing opportunities aligned with the texts and instructional focus of each unit. Students regularly engage in on-demand writing through First Read Think Questions, Close Read Write prompts, and Independent Read writing tasks that require evidence-based responses to texts. In addition, most units culminate in an Extended Writing Project that guides students through a multi-step writing process to produce extended compositions in a variety of genres. These process writing tasks are directly connected to the unit's essential question, themes, and anchor texts, requiring students to synthesize their reading and support their ideas with textual evidence. In grades 9–12, the distribution aligns with the standards' expectations.
Materials include a mix of grade-appropriate on-demand and process writing.
The program offers students various grade-appropriate opportunities to engage in on-demand writing activities. These activities include First Read Think Questions, Close Read Write Prompts, and Independent Read Write Prompts.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, students read “Given to Rust” by Vievee Francis. As part of the learning sequence, students participate in a First Read lesson. At the end of this lesson, students answer several Think Questions on demand, including:
“According to the speaker, how has her voice changed over the course of her life? Use evidence from the poem to support your assertions.
What do you think the speaker means in the first line, ‘Every time I open my mouth my teeth reveal / more than I mean to?’ Explain how you came to your understanding, citing evidence from other lines of the poem if necessary.
What do you think is the significance or the meaning of the title, and how does it connect to the content of the poem? Be sure to cite textual evidence to help explain your answer.”
As part of the learning sequence, students participate in a Close Read lesson. At the end of this lesson, students answer the Write prompt: “LITERARY ANALYSIS: ‘Given to Rust,’ ‘South,’ and ‘N’em’ each present an individual navigating the connections between the past and the present. Compare and contrast how this idea is presented across each of the poems. Then, analyze how the use of figurative language in ‘Given to Rust’ emphasizes the author’s message regarding this theme. Support your analysis with evidence from the text and original commentary.”
At the end of most units, students have the opportunity to engage in process-based writing through the Extended Writing Project.
In Grade 12, Unit 5, students write a literary analysis as the Extended Writing Project to the prompt “Consider all the texts you have read in this unit, and reflect on how alienation impacts those who experience it. Then, select three characters or speakers from the texts. Write a literary analysis essay to examine how the authors explore the theme of alienation through these three characters or speakers. In your conclusion, synthesize the ideas in these texts about alienation in the modern world. Regardless of which selections you choose, be sure your literary analysis includes the following:
an introduction
a thesis statement
coherent body paragraphs
reasons and relevant evidence
a conclusion”
Materials reflect the distribution indicated by the standards for process writing (9-12 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience). (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring)
The process writing distribution in the StudySync program is as follows:
Grade 9: 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 10: 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 11: 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 12: 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience
StudySync materials reflect the distribution indicated by the standards in grades 9, 10, 11, and 12.
Writing opportunities are appropriately aligned to the purpose, genre, and/or topic of the unit’s reading.
Each Extended Writing Project is directly related to the unit’s purpose, genre, and/or topic of study. The Plan lesson for these projects directs the task to the unit’s essential question and anchor texts.
In Grade 10, Unit 5, students complete an Extended Writing Project in which they write an argumentative essay. The plan lesson introduces this task by first connecting it to the unit’s reading. This introduction to the task states, “Travel writer Deborah Cater once said, ‘You have to taste a culture to understand it.’ Similarly, according to novelist Jonathan Safran Foer, ‘Food is not just what we put in our mouths to fill up; it is culture and identity.’ Both writers are expressing the same idea—that one can get to know a particular culture or group of people through that group’s food.” The Extended Writing prompt states, “Reflect on how the texts you have read throughout this unit, as well as your own personal experiences, inform your perspective on this topic. Choose a position that expresses your stance on this question. Write an argumentative essay in which you state a clear claim and support it with reasons and evidence from at least two of the unit texts as well as your own experience.”
Indicator 2p
Materials include explicit instruction in varied writing processes, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The explicit instruction in varied writing processes in StudySync meets expectations for indicator 2p. The program provides explicit instruction in the writing process, integrated with the texts and topics students study throughout each unit. The program includes frequent opportunities for students to write in multiple genres through short constructed responses, text-dependent writing tasks, and Extended Writing Projects. The Extended Writing Projects guide students through each stage of the writing process—including planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing—with embedded skills lessons, teacher modeling, discussion prompts, and structured guidance for teaching specific writing skills. Students also analyze mentor texts and student exemplars to examine genre characteristics and effective writing techniques before applying those features in their own work. Teacher materials include writing rubrics, facilitation guidance, check-for-success prompts, peer review questions, and revision supports that help teachers provide ongoing feedback throughout the writing process. In addition, the platform's WritePrecise feature offers students immediate, individualized feedback on their writing, further supporting revision and improvement. Together, these resources provide a comprehensive framework for teaching writing while supporting students as they develop and refine their compositions.
Materials include explicit instruction in writing processes (paragraph and multi-paragraph construction for varying purposes), embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
Throughout the StudySync program, students have opportunities to practice writing for different purposes. At the end of most units, students complete the Extended Writing Project. These writing assignments are directly integrated with the reading students complete throughout each unit. Teacher guidance for these assignments is provided in the Teacher Edition and lesson plans. Each writing process step and lesson includes guidance on how teachers should facilitate.
In Grade 9, Unit 3, students write an argumentative writing essay to the prompt “Based on your reading in this unit and personal experience, identify at least two factors that you think an effective intelligence test should take into account and develop a strong argument in support of them. For example, should an intelligence test consider a person’s knowledge of the natural world, ability to communicate persuasively, creative potential, facility for learning languages, coordination, technological ability, capacity for making effective decisions under pressure, moral aptitude, or academic expertise? What should the ideal intelligence test, in your view, focus on and why? Remember to state a clear claim and to reinforce your claim with relevant details from the unit texts and your personal experience.” The Teacher Edition and lesson plans include teacher guidance for each step of the writing process.
In the planning step, students read and annotate the prompt and then review the Argumentative Rubric—Grade 9. For reviewing the rubric, the Teacher Edition states, “Have students examine the ‘Argumentative Rubric—Grade 9’ grading rubric. Inform students that this is the same rubric that will be used to evaluate their completed Argumentative Extended Writing Project.” Afterward, students review a student model. The teacher guidance includes a list of questions to ask students with sample student responses. The questions cover the following topics: purpose, focus, organization, evidence, elaboration, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions.
In the drafting step, students engage in several Skills lessons on the following skills: Thesis Statement, Organizing Argumentative Writing, and Reasons and Relevant Evidence. The Organizing Argumentative Writing teacher guidance includes directions on projecting and discussing the skill model. For introducing the model, guidance states, “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on students to read the Skill Model. Students should annotate to:
highlight key points.
ask questions.
identify places where the Skill Model applies the strategies laid out in the checklist.”
For discussing the skills model, guidance states, “After students read the Model, use these questions to help students understand how to develop their argumentative essay using an outline.” Questions and sample student responses are provided.
In the revise step, students engage in several Skills lessons on Introductions, Transitions, and Conclusions. The Transitions teacher guidance includes directions on projecting and discussing the skill model. For introducing the model, guidance states, “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on students to read the Skill Model. Students should annotate to:
highlight key points.
ask questions.
identify places where the Skill Model applies the strategies laid out in the checklist.”
For discussing the skills model, guidance states, “After students read the Skill Model, use these questions to help students understand how to develop their essay using transitions.” Questions and sample student responses are provided.
In the edit and publish step, students engage in several Skills lessons on the following skills: Style, Parallel Structure, Noun Clauses, and Semicolons. The Noun Clauses teacher guidance includes directions on projecting and discussing the skill model. For introducing the model, guidance states, “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on a student to read the authentic text examples and explanations. Students should annotate to:
analyze how the model uses authentic texts to explain the rules for noun clauses
ask questions about usage
identify places where the model guides students on when to use and when not to use noun clauses when writing.”
For discussing the skills model, questions and sample student responses are provided.
In each unit, students complete several written responses in First Read, Close Read, and Independent Read lessons. In the SyncStart part of unit 1, students engage in a Short Constructed Response lesson that walks them through the process of writing a constructed response. For lessons in which students write responses, the Teacher Guide and lesson plans include guidance on facilitation.
In Grade 10, Unit 1, students complete a Skills lesson on Short Constructed Responses. After teachers introduce the skill with a Concept Definition video, they present a skill model for breaking down a prompt, planning a constructed response, and writing a constructed response. The materials include the scripted model for teachers. Next, teachers facilitate a discussion on the model. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the questions and sample student responses.
In Grade 11, Unit 5, students read an excerpt from Othello by William Shakespeare. As part of the learning sequence, students participate in a Close Read lesson. At the end of the lesson, students must write a response to the prompt “LITERARY ANALYSIS: In Othello, the great Moroccan general Othello is brought down by lies. In The Moor’s Account, Estebanico, an enslaved Moroccan man, survives a dangerous trek through the unknown and eventually escapes to freedom. For both, their ability or inability to judge the people and situations around them causes a radical reversal of fortune. Analyze how each author’s word choice helps portray each man’s judgment in order to foreshadow the reversal of fortune. Support your response with evidence from the text.” The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance: “Ask students to complete the writing assignment using textual evidence to support their answers. Once they have completed their writing, they should click ‘Submit.’”Additional guidance for checking for success states, “Remind students to use unit vocabulary to help develop their response:
Othello’s resolution is foreshadowed by words like _____.
Estebanico’s reversal of fortune is foreshadowed by terms like _____.
One similarity between the two characters is _____.”
Furthermore, the lesson plan and Teacher Edition state to “Remind students that writing is a recursive process that involves collaboration and revision.
Provide students time to submit their response for an initial review with WritePrecise and revise their writing based on the feedback they have received.
Have students use the peer review questions to provide feedback for at least two peers.
Once students have completed peer reviews, provide time for them to reflect on and revise their responses based on the feedback they have received.”
Materials provide teachers with mentor texts and/or student exemplars to support students in examining how the genre works.
In the Big Ideas section of each unit, students examine the genre of writing that they will produce in the Extended Writing Project in the Skills lesson for Recognizing Genre. In this lesson, teachers present a model that focuses on the different types of writing within the genre, and students analyze some key components.
At the end of most units, students complete an Extended Writing Project, students examine a Student Model throughout the different parts of the writing process. They use the model to examine different components and consider how the writing develops from the initial draft to the final published piece.
In Grade 12, Unit 4, students write a research essay. In the Plan section of the writing process, students read the sample student model for the first time. The lesson plan and Teacher Edition include the following guidance: “As students read, have them use the annotation tool to identify and label the genre characteristics of informative writing, including:
thesis statement
supporting details
text structure
conclusion
works cited”
In the Draft section of the writing process, students engage with a student model for each separate skill, including planning research, evaluating sources, research and notetaking, and a model first draft. In the Revise section of the writing process, students engage with student models for each separate skill, including critiquing research, paraphrasing, sources and citations, and print and graphic features. In the Edit and Publish section of the writing process, students engage with the student model as an example for editing. For all these components, the Teacher’s Edition and lesson plans include guidance on facilitation.
Materials provide guidance and instruction to teachers on how to provide timely and constructive feedback on student writing.
As students complete the Extended Writing Task, the Teacher’s Edition includes guidance for teachers to facilitate each step of the writing process. In the Plan section of each task, students review and analyze the Rubric for the aligned writing genre and grade level. This rubric helps both teachers and students understand the expectations for each piece of writing. In lessons where students write their responses, the Teacher’s Edition includes guidance on teacher feedback and guiding questions for peer review.
In Grade 9, Unit 5, students write a literary analysis essay. In the Plan section of the project, students analyze the prompt, review the Literary Analysis Writing Rubric—Grade 9, and later review and analyze the student exemplar. Afterward, students write a one-paragraph summary which “should identify the texts you plan to write about and state at least one idea about how the characters, speakers, or authors of those texts support your ideas about the effects of romantic love.” The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following feedback guidance: “Check for Success: If students struggle to come up with answers for the questions in the lesson, work with students to provide an answer to one question and then help them build from there. For example, start by asking students, ‘In which unit texts is love presented as a blessing/curse?’ and ‘What makes love a blessing/curse in each text?’ Once students have answered one question, help them to work through a second question until they’ve begun to build some momentum. It may be helpful to start with a different question than the one that’s listed first in the lesson.” Peer Review Questions are provided, including:
“Does the writer identify three texts he or she is planning to write about?
Does the writer make a clear, arguable claim?
Are there any ideas that could be improved on? How so?”
At the end of the Draft step of the writing process, students write and submit their draft. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following feedback guidance: “Check for Success: If students struggle to begin drafting their literary analysis essays, ask them the following questions:
What is your claim?
What are your main ideas about the selections you chose to discuss? Are these ideas clearly connected to your claim?
What details and other textual evidence do you have to support your claim? Are your details and evidence relevant to your claim? Will they help readers understand and agree with it?
How will the organization of your literary analysis help readers understand and agree with your claim?”
Peer Review Questions are provided, including:
“What main ideas might be strengthened in order to better support the claim? How so?
What relevant textual evidence does the writer provide to support the main ideas and claim?
Where can the writer add more supporting details or textual evidence?
What suggestions can you make to help the writer improve the organization of his or her literary analysis?”
At the end of the Revise step of the writing process, students use a revision guide to revise their drafts. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following feedback guidance: “Check for Success: Circulate around the room to spend time with individual students. Ask:
What category are you working on?
Why are you revising this specific section?
How are you revising it?
How does this change support your purpose?
Does this change make your writing appropriate for your audience?
If students struggle while revising their drafts, choose an exemplary revision to share with the class while the student talks through the process. You could also invite a student to share a dilemma in the revision process and allow the class to offer feedback or suggestions.”
Peer Review Questions are provided, including:
“What do I know about the writer’s claim and evidence after reading the introduction?
Which areas of the body paragraphs require more textual evidence or explanation?
Are there ways in which the organization of ideas can be improved?
How does the conclusion wrap up the writer’s argument? How can it be improved?
Where can this writer continue to improve sentence effectiveness, including proper placement of phrases and dependent clauses?”
At the end of the Edit and Publish step of the writing process, students make final edits to and publish their final drafts. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following feedback guidance: “Check for Success: If students struggle to edit successfully, help them determine where edits are needed, and what changes need to be made. Direct students to the grammar lessons in this unit if they are uncertain about the rules for specific concepts.”
The Program Guide includes a synopsis of the Writing Rubrics provided in the program. The Program Guide explains that writing rubrics are embedded throughout the writing process to clarify expectations and support students as they develop and revise their writing. Rubrics evaluate core aspects of writing, including clarity, development of ideas, organization, and style. Teachers are encouraged to review the rubric before students begin writing so that expectations for the assignment are clear. Rubrics are integrated into Close Read lessons and Extended Writing Projects, guiding students' responses and supporting peer review activities. The materials state that rubrics help students monitor their own progress, provide meaningful feedback to peers, and strengthen their understanding of the writing process through reflection, collaboration, and revision.
The platform’s WritePrecise feature enables students to receive real-time feedback on their writing.
Indicator 2q
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice the writing processes using evidence-based strategies, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The opportunities for students to practice the writing processes using evidence-based strategies in StudySync meet expectations for indicator 2q. The program provides multiple opportunities for students to engage in all stages of the writing process through the program’s Extended Writing Projects. Students begin by planning their writing through activities such as annotating prompts, analyzing writing rubrics, examining student models, responding to guiding questions, and developing summaries or outlines of their ideas. Before drafting, students complete targeted skills lessons that build the knowledge needed for the writing task and then apply those skills as they compose their essays. Students also engage in structured revision and editing processes supported by revision guides, editing checklists, student models, and additional skills lessons focused on both composition and language conventions. Throughout these stages, students use technology to draft, revise, edit, and ultimately publish their writing by submitting final products through the StudySync digital platform, reinforcing writing as a recursive process supported by multiple tools and resources.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to plan writing (e.g., with graphic organizers).
Students have opportunities to plan their writing for each Extended Writing Project.
In Grade 9, Unit 2, students write an informative essay. As part of the writing process, they plan their writing. First, they read and annotate the prompt. Then, they review the Informative Writing Rubric—Grade 9. Next, students read and discuss a Student Model essay. Last, students use guiding questions to start planning their essay. They write a one-paragraph summary that describes what their essay will be about, focusing on the most important elements.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to draft their writing.
Students have opportunities to draft their writing for each Extended Writing Project.
In Grade 10, Unit 5, students write an argumentative essay. After planning, students draft their writing. First, they complete a sequence of Skills lessons on the following topics: Organizing Argumentative Writing and Thesis Statement. Then, they analyze a Student Model answering specific questions. Last, students draft their essays, using all the learning from this section of the project.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to revise and edit their writing with grade-appropriate strategies and tools. Materials include multiple opportunities for students to use technology to produce and publish writing.
Students have opportunities to revise and edit their writing for each Extended Writing Project. As part of the revision process, students complete several skills lessons before applying their learning to their drafts. As part of the editing process, students complete several skills lessons before applying their learning to their drafts. After revising and editing, students publish their writing by submitting their final version on the StudySync platform. As a Beyond scaffold in the lesson plans, additional publishing ideas are provided.
In Grade 11, Unit 4, students write a research essay. After planning and drafting, students revise their writing. First, they complete a sequence of Skills lessons on the following topics: Critiquing Research, Paraphrasing, Sources and Citations, and Print and Graphic Features. Next, they examine their draft and find places for revision, using a revision guide to support the process. Last, students revise their essays, using all the learning from this section of the project. In the next section of the project, students edit and publish their writing. First, they complete a sequence of Skills lessons on the following topics: Using A Style Guide, Contested Usage, and Hyphens. Next, students review the editing checklist and student model, analyzing how the student used the checklist to edit their draft. Lastly, they submit the final published essay on the StudySync platform. As a Beyond scaffold in the lesson plans, the following suggestion is provided for students to share their work: “Flip the Script
For argumentative: Have students assume an opposing position, then read and edit their work looking for gaps in logic or lack of focus.
For narrative: Have students assume the point of view of another character and analyze their story through that lens. Is there anything they want to change in their narrative after their analysis?
For informative: Give students a list of questions (for example, who, what, when, where, why, and how) and have them assume the perspective of someone who knows nothing about the topic. They should be able to answer all questions by the end of the essay. If they are unable to answer all those questions, what changes can they make to provide those answers?”
Indicator 2r
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit), citing textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly and implicitly.
The evidence-based writing opportunities in StudySync meet expectations for indicator 2r. The program provides frequent opportunities for students to produce evidence-based writing that requires close reading, analysis, and the integration of textual evidence. Throughout the program, students respond to text-dependent Think Questions in First Read lessons, compose analytical responses to Write prompts in Close Read lessons, and complete Extended Writing Projects that require sustained analysis of one or more texts. These writing tasks ask students to analyze explicit ideas and make inferences, develop claims, synthesize information across texts, and support their thinking with relevant textual evidence. Across these recurring instructional routines, students revisit texts, gather evidence, and construct written analyses that demonstrate their understanding of both individual texts and broader themes and concepts.
Materials provide writing opportunities that require students to cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Materials provide writing opportunities focused on students’ analyses and claims, which are developed by reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence.
The program includes many writing opportunities that require students to cite evidence and analyze texts closely through the following activities: First Read: Think Questions, Close Read: Write prompts, and Extended Writing prompts in the Extended Writing Project.
In Grade 9, Unit 3, students read an excerpt from Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi. As part of the learning sequence, students participate in a First Read lesson. At the end of the lesson, students answer five Think questions that require them to use textual evidence and draw inferences. These include:
“Why is Marji’s mother shocked at the price of jeans? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
After the missile attacks start, why does Marji’s family remain in Tehran? Support your answer using evidence from the text.
When Marji learns that the missile destroyed their neighbor’s house, why does her mother try to change the subject? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.”
Later in the learning sequence, students participate in a Close Read lesson. At the end of this lesson, students draft a response to the Write prompt, which states “LITERARY ANALYSIS: In The God of Small Things, Chacko says of Anglo-Indian history, ‘And we cannot understand the whispering, because our minds have been invaded by a war. A war that we have won and lost. The very worst sort of war. A war that captures dreams and re-dreams them.’ Explain how this quotation connects to the unique and shared experiences of the people or characters depicted in the graphic novel Persepolis, the memoir Rock, Ghost, Willow, Deer: A Story of Survival, and the novel The God of Small Things. Select ideas or evidence from the various texts to support your response.” To complete this activity, students must cite textual evidence, draw inferences from the texts, and read parts of each text closely to analyze the connections between them.
In Grade 12, Unit 5, students engage in an Extended Writing Project where they write a literary analysis to the prompt “Consider all the texts you have read in this unit, and reflect on how alienation impacts those who experience it. Then, select three characters or speakers from the texts. Write a literary analysis essay to examine how the authors explore the theme of alienation through these three characters or speakers. In your conclusion, synthesize the ideas in these texts about alienation in the modern world. Regardless of which selections you choose, be sure your literary analysis includes the following:
an introduction
a thesis statement
coherent body paragraphs
reasons and relevant evidence
a conclusion”
To complete this task, students must cite textual evidence and re-read closely to draw their own conclusions and support their analysis of several texts in the unit.
Indicator 2s
Materials include explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The explicit instruction of research skills in StudySync partially meets expectations for indicator 2s.The program provides some instruction in research skills through one Extended Writing Project and one research-supported Extended Oral Project at each grade level. Across these projects, students learn and apply key research processes, including developing research questions and plans, gathering and evaluating credible sources, taking notes, synthesizing information, paraphrasing, distinguishing among source types, citing evidence, avoiding plagiarism, and creating works cited pages. Skill lessons provide direct instruction through concept definitions, vocabulary, checklists, modeled think-alouds, guided discussion, sample responses, and opportunities for students to apply research skills to their own sources and projects. Students also use multiple sources and media to investigate topics and integrate their findings into written or oral products. However, these opportunities are infrequent: the one Extended Writing Project and one Extended Oral Project are the only sustained research projects or activities that students complete during the school year. As a result, while the materials provide some instruction and application of research skills within these projects, students have limited recurring opportunities to develop and independently apply those skills across units and throughout the year.
Materials include some research projects to build research skills that lead to mastery of the grade-level standards. Materials include some explicit instruction of research skills that encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
At each grade level, materials include one research project as an Extended Writing Project and a research component in another unit as part of the Extended Oral Project. For the Extended Writing Project, students complete all steps of the research process. In the Extended Oral Project, students plan a presentation, and research is a component of that process. While these two projects are available at each grade level, they are the only research projects or research activities that students complete throughout the school year.
The Teacher Edition and the lesson plans include teacher guidance for facilitating each step of these research projects found in the Extended Writing Project and Grammar section of one unit per grade level.
In Grade 9, Unit 4, students complete a research paper to answer the prompt “Select a historical figure from the unit whom you would like to know more about. Write a research paper explaining this person’s legacy as it relates to the way we read, think, communicate, or protest. As part of your research process, select a research question, develop a research plan, gather evidence from at least three reliable sources in addition to the unit text, and synthesize and present your research findings. Regardless of which historical figure you choose, be sure your research paper includes the following:
an engaging introduction
supporting details from at least three credible sources, in addition to the unit text
a clear text structure
a thought-provoking conclusion
citations for sources, including a works cited page”
As the first step of the writing process, students plan. First, they review a sample research paper. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance: “As students read, have them use the annotation tool to identify and label the genre characteristics and craft of informative research writing…When students finish reading, ask them to share their annotations in small groups.” Next, students preview the rubric for the assignment. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance: “Have students examine the ‘Informational Writing Rubric - Grade 9’ grading rubric. Inform students that this is the same rubric that will be used to evaluate their completed Research Extended Writing Project.” Afterward, teachers facilitate a discussion of the sample essay. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include a list of guiding questions and sample student responses for teachers to reference. At the end of the planning cycle, students “write a one-paragraph summary” describing their research plan and paper. In the next stage of the process, students move to draft their papers. As part of the learning sequence, students complete several skills lessons including: Planning Research, Evaluating Sources, and Research Notetaking, before drafting. In the Evaluating Sources skill lesson, teachers introduce the skill with a Concept Definition Video. After the video, the Teacher Edition and lesson plan prompt teachers to facilitate a turn and talk to the prompt “Use the following questions to discuss evaluating sources with your students:
When was the last time you read an article online?
How did you determine whether the information came from a reliable and credible source?
Have students share their answers with the class.” Next, students participate in a vocabulary activity on the words accurate source, credible source, discrepancy, and reliable source. Later, teachers present a model for evaluating sources. The model includes a Checklist for Evaluating Sources and a sample think-aloud for a student conducting research and evaluating several sources. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance: “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on students to read the student Skill Model. Students should annotate to
highlight key points
ask questions
identify places where the Skill Model applies the strategies laid out in the Checklist”
Then, students discuss the model. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include guiding questions with sample student responses. In the last section of the lesson, students practice the skill. First, they sort the factors that indicate whether a source is reliable. Then, students complete a chart for their own source. They answer questions to help them decide if their source is reliable, credible, unbiased, and sound in reasoning. As their final step, they evaluate whether to use this source in their paper. After completing all three skills lessons, students draft their essay. In the next stage of the project, students move to Revise. As part of the learning sequence, students complete several skills lessons, including Critiquing Research, Paraphrasing, Sources and Citations, and Print and Graphic Features. In the Sources and Citations skill lesson, teachers introduce the skill with a Concept Definition Video. After the video, the Teacher Edition and lesson plan prompt teachers to facilitate a turn and talk to the prompt “Use the following questions to discuss sources and citations with your students.
What information needs to be cited when writing?
How do citations help readers and writers?
Have students share their answers with the class.” Next, students participate in a vocabulary activity on the words bibliography, citation, endnote, footnote, parenthetical documentation, plagiarism, primary source, secondary source, source, and works cited. Later, teachers present a model on sources and citations. The model includes a Checklist for Sources and Citations and a sample think-aloud for a student who is completing research and evaluating their sources to create citations. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance: “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on students to read the student Skill Model. Students should annotate to
highlight key points
ask questions
identify places where the Skill Model applies the strategies laid out in the Checklist”
Then, students discuss the model. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include guiding questions with sample student responses. In the last sections of the lesson, students practice the skill. First, they answer multiple-choice questions, selecting accurate citations. Then, students use a checklist to revise their Works Cited list for their essays. In the final stage of the project, students Edit and Publish. As part of the learning sequence, students complete several skills lessons, including: Using a Style Guide, Conjunctive Adverbs, and Absolute Phrases. Afterward, students use their learning to edit and publish their final research essays.
The Teacher Edition and the lesson plans include teacher guidance for facilitating research projects for the Extended Oral Project and Grammar section of one unit per grade level.
In Grade 11, Unit 6, students complete an oral presentation to the prompt “How can we seek justice? ‘American Horse’ explores justice and injustice within the family; whereas, ‘The Color of an Awkward Conversation’ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 explore themes of justice on a national level. In each of these texts, individuals and groups advocate or yearn for a more just world. Think of a change, whether in your school or society, that you believe would result in a more just world. Then craft a thesis to argue why this change should be made, how it should be implemented, and why it would be beneficial. Be sure to include specific evidence from the text or outside research to support your argument. Then, consider how you might include visual aids to enhance comprehension or engagement. Additionally, use rhetorical devices in your presentation in order to persuade your audience. In order to prepare for your presentation, consider how best to meet the needs of the audience, purpose, and occasion by employing the following:
a logical structure, including smooth transitions
accurate evidence, well-chosen details, and rhetorical devices
speaking techniques such as eye contact, appropriate speaking rate and volume, enunciation, pauses for effect, purposeful gestures, confident and relaxed posture
visual aids that support information presented, including citations and a Works Cited list for any information obtained from outside sources”
In the Draft section of the project, students complete a Skills lesson on Evaluating Sources where they learn about reliable, credible, and accurate sources. In the Model section of the lesson, materials include a checklist for evaluating sources. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance for facilitating the model: “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on students to read the Skill Model. Students should annotate to:
highlight key points
ask questions
identify places where the Skill Model applies the strategies laid out in the Checklist”
Afterward, students discuss the model. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include questions and sample student responses for this discussion, such as “What are some examples of credible online sources?” and “What are some examples of non-credible online sources?” In the Revise section of the lesson, students complete a Skills lesson on Sources and Citations, in which they learn about primary and secondary sources, plagiarism, citations, footnotes, endnotes, and bibliographies. In the Model section of the lesson, materials include a checklist for Sources and Citations. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include the following guidance for facilitating the model: “Project the model on the board. Read aloud or call on students to read the student model. Students should annotate to:
highlight key points
ask questions
identify places where the Skill Model applies the strategies laid out in the checklist”
Afterward, students discuss the model. The Teacher Edition and lesson plan include questions and sample student responses that teachers should use for this discussion.
Indicator 2t
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic.
The opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic in StudySync partially meet expectations for indicator 2t. The program provides students with opportunities to conduct research, gather and evaluate information from multiple print and digital sources, and draw evidence from literary and informational texts; however, these opportunities are infrequent throughout the year. At each grade level, students complete one Extended Writing Project focused on research and one Extended Oral Project that incorporates research, with the Extended Writing Project providing the most sustained opportunity to develop a research question, gather evidence from multiple sources, evaluate sources for credibility and accuracy, synthesize and paraphrase information, avoid plagiarism, and use standard citation formats. Students also draw on unit texts and independently located sources to support analysis, reflection, and research. Additional short research opportunities appear in the optional Beyond the Book activities in some reading lessons, but because these activities are teacher-selected, they do not provide guaranteed opportunities for all students to practice these skills. As a result, although the included research projects address multiple grade-level research skills, students have limited recurring opportunities to conduct short research projects and to independently apply these skills across units and throughout the school year.
Materials include limited opportunities for students to apply research skills to short and sustained research projects by answering a given or self-generated question or solving a problem, narrowing or broadening the inquiry when appropriate, synthesizing multiple sources on the subject, and demonstrating knowledge of the subject under investigation.
At each grade level, materials include one research project as an Extended Writing Project and a research component in another unit as part of the Extended Oral Project. For the Extended Writing Project, students complete all steps of the research process. In the Extended Oral Project, students plan a presentation, and research is a component of that process. While these two projects are available at each grade level, they are the only research projects or research activities that students complete throughout the school year. Additional opportunities are present in the Beyond the Book section of some reading lessons; however, these opportunities are optional for teachers to prompt students to complete.
In Grade 10, Unit 6, students complete a research paper to the prompt: “Choose one origin story relating to a religion, culture, or nation that you would like to learn more about. Write a research paper explaining this origin story and how it has shaped a particular community. As part of your research process, select a research question, develop a research plan, gather and evaluate source materials, and synthesize and present your research findings. Regardless of which origin story you choose, be sure your research project includes the following:
an introduction
relevant information synthesized from at least three authoritative print and digital sources
a clear text structure
appropriate formatting, graphics, and multimedia, as needed
a conclusion
citations for sources
As you gather ideas and information from a variety of authoritative print and digital sources, be sure to:
use and cite evidence from multiple sources;
avoid plagiarism, or including source information without credit; and
avoid overly relying on one source.”
In order to complete this assignment, students must complete online research and gather information from multiple sources, including texts they already read in the unit.
Materials provide limited opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, use search terms effectively, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.
The materials provide opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple sources, use search terms effectively, and assess the credibility and accuracy of each source through the Extended Writing Project, which requires students to write research reports, and the Extended Oral Project, where students complete some research. While these tasks are present, they are limited to two tasks per grade level.
In Grade 11, Unit 4, students write a research report to the prompt “Choose one to two artists or writers, not included in this unit, from the Harlem Renaissance whom you would like to research. For example, you might research a writer who was born in the South but moved to a Northern city, such as Richard Wright. You might choose to focus on the early life of writer Claude McKay, the career of Paul Robeson, or the success of Ma Rainey. Research your chosen topic, and formulate a position on how your subjects' work contributed to gaining greater visibility for African-Americans in mainstream culture, how it impacted society, or how their life experiences impacted their work. Then, write an informative research essay, using textual evidence and source material to support your ideas. Be sure your informative research paper includes the following:
an introduction
supporting details from at least three credible sources
a clear text structure
a conclusion
a works cited page
As you gather ideas and information from the texts in the unit, be sure to:
use evidence from multiple sources; and
avoid overly relying on one source.”
In the Draft section of the task, students complete a Skills lesson on Evaluating Sources. At the end of the lesson, students must apply their learning to a source for their report ensuring that the source is reliable, credible, and unbiased. Students must also ensure that their source does not contain omissions of important information that support other perspectives and includes logical reasoning. They must answer targeted questions to help them determine this information. In the Revise section of the task, students complete a Skills lesson on Sources and Citations. At the end of the lesson, students must apply their learning to their essays, using a checklist and an MLA Handbook to draft or revise their in text citations and their Works Cited pages.
Materials provide limited opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
The materials provide opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research through the Extended Writing Task, which requires them to write research reports. While this task is present, it is limited to one task per grade level.
In Grade 12, Unit 4, students complete a research paper to the prompt: “Think of a daily behavior that the average person may not know is damaging to nature. For example, people may not think about reducing their use of plastic bags when cleaning up after their dogs or may not consider the consequences of constantly upgrading their phones and other technology. Research your topic and structure your essay to be clear, informative, and convincing. Then, write an informative research essay, using both informative text structures and source materials to support your claim and make your informative essay convincing. Be sure to include the following elements:
an introduction that clearly expresses your thesis on a topic related to daily behaviors and their impact on nature
a clear thesis statement that informs and engages the reader
a clear and logical informative text structure
a formal style with an appropriate register and purposeful vocabulary, tone, and voice
a conclusion that wraps up your ideas
a works cited page
As you gather ideas and information from the texts in the unit, be sure to:
use evidence from multiple sources, and
avoid overly relying on one source.”
As they answer this research question, students consider both literary and informational texts from the unit, as well as additional sources they find throughout the research process.
Indicator 2u
Materials include formative assessments and guidance that provide the teacher with information for instructional next steps.
The formative assessments and teacher guidance on formative assessments in StudySync meet expectations for indicator 2u. The program provides frequent formative assessment opportunities throughout daily instruction, including Reading Quizzes, Think Questions, Your Turn activities, written responses in Close Read and Independent Read lessons, and formative tasks throughout Extended Writing Projects. Many of these assessments are standards-aligned and generate reportable data in the digital Gradebook, allowing teachers to examine student performance at the standards, assignment, item, class, and individual levels and monitor progress over time. Lessons also include Check for Success stopping points that allow teachers to assess student understanding during instruction and provide specific guidance for making immediate instructional adjustments when students demonstrate difficulty, including additional modeling, guided practice, and targeted support. Standards-aligned rubrics further support teachers in evaluating constructed responses and identifying students' levels of proficiency. The Program Guide and Help Center provide additional guidance for using assessment data to identify student strengths and needs and make instructional adjustments, including scaffolding, remediation, enrichment, and flexible grouping. Teachers can use Gradebook reports and color-coded proficiency indicators to identify patterns in student performance and assign targeted Spotlight Skills reteaching lessons to individual students or the entire class based on identified needs. Together, these resources provide teachers with ongoing opportunities to determine students' current skills and understanding and use formative assessment results to make instructional adjustments that support student progress.
Materials include formative assessments and support for the teacher in determining students’ current skills/level of understanding. Materials include guidance that supports the teacher in making instructional adjustments to increase student progress.
In each lesson, the program provides several formative assessments that teachers can use to assess student learning. In First Read lessons, formative assessment opportunities include Reading Quizzes and Think Questions. The Reading Quizzes are captured in the Gradebook and teachers can view standards level data on these assessments. Your Turn practice activities embedded within Vocabulary, Sentence Composition, and Reading Skill lessons deliver immediate, standards-aligned feedback. These are also captured in the Gradebook. Close Read and Independent Read lessons include written responses that teachers can assess with standards-aligned rubrics. During the Extended Writing Project, teachers can assess student drafts, Your Turn, and Write tasks as additional formative assessments. When scored, all these assessments generate reportable data within the digital gradebook. Additionally, throughout lessons the materials include Check for Success stopping points. These can be found in:
Text Talk Discussions (First and Independent Read lessons)
Analyze Vocabulary
Develop Knowledge
Develop Fluency routines; Vocabulary Charts
Skills Focus annotations
Structured Discuss and Write moments
Teachers can view guidance for these checkpoints in the Teacher’s Edition and lesson plans.
In Grade 9, Unit 2, students read “Volar” by Judith Ortiz Cofer. During the First Read lesson, students complete a Reading Quiz in which they answer five multiple-choice, standards-aligned questions about the text. In the Think section of the lesson, students answer five short-response questions about the text. All questions are standards-aligned, and teachers can automatically see the scores and standards-level data captured in the gradebook for the Reading Quiz questions, and additional standards-level data once they score the Think questions. Decisions on what to do with this data are left up to the teacher’s discretion. Additionally, the teacher materials include a Check for Success stopping point for the Read section of the lesson. The Teacher’s Edition and lesson plan state, “Check for Success:
Ask small groups to provide examples of inferences they have made while reading the text. Project exemplar inferences as a model for students as they continue reading.
If students struggle to make inferences, show and discuss the following examples:
As I am reading, I notice that the narrator dreams of having X-ray vision and can see through walls into other people’s homes. I can infer that the narrator wishes she could know what other people’s lives are like and may feel isolated from others.
During reading, I can ask: How does the narrator feel about herself? I notice details such as she dreams of her arms and legs growing long and strong, and her hair turning straight and blonde. Then she seems disappointed when she wakes up unchanged. I can infer that the narrator is unhappy with the way she looks.”
In Grade 11, Unit 4, students read an excerpt from Lorraine Hansberry's play A Raisin in the Sun. At the end of the Close Read lesson, students complete a Write activity where they write a response to the prompt “LITERARY ANALYSIS: In both ‘The Old Cabin’ and A Raisin in the Sun, the historical setting plays an important role in the development of the texts’ themes. Identify the historical setting of each text. Then, analyze how the setting of each text impacts each text’s themes. Support your response with evidence from the text and your own analysis.” A rubric is provided for teachers to score the prompt. It states,
“Theme (CCSS: RL.11-12.1, RL.11-12.2)
Score 4: The writer clearly analyzes and explains how the historical setting impacts theme in both the play and the poem. The writer provides exemplary analysis, using relevant evidence from the text.
Score 3: The writer analyzes and explains how the historical setting impacts theme in both the play and the poem. The writer provides sufficient analysis, using relevant evidence from the text most of the time.
Score 2: The writer begins to analyze or explain how the historical setting impacts theme in both the play and the poem, but the analysis is incomplete. The writer uses relevant evidence from the text only some of the time.
Score 1: The writer attempts to analyze or explain how the historical setting impacts theme in both the play and the poem, but the analysis is not successful. The writer uses little or no relevant evidence from the text.
Score 0: The writer does not provide a relevant response to the prompt or does not provide a response at all.
Language and Conventions (CCSS: L11-12.1, L.11-12.2)
Score 4: The writer demonstrates a consistent command of grammar, punctuation, and usage conventions. Although minor errors may be evident, they do not detract from the fluency or the clarity of the writing.
Score 3: The writer demonstrates an adequate command of grammar, punctuation, and usage conventions. Although some errors may be evident, they create few (if any) disruptions in the fluency or the clarity of the writing.
Score 2: The writer demonstrates a partial command of grammar, punctuation, and usage conventions. Some distracting errors may be evident, at times creating minor disruptions in the fluency or clarity of the writing.
Score 1: The writer demonstrates little or no command of grammar, punctuation, and usage conventions. Serious and persistent errors create disruptions in the fluency of the writing and sometimes interfere with meaning.
Score 0: Serious and persistent errors overwhelm the writing and interfere with the meaning of the response as a whole, making the writer’s meaning impossible to understand.”
Teachers may use the StudySync gradebook to identify trends across standards and skills their students are struggling with and assign reteach lessons (Spotlight Skills lessons) on those skills. They can choose to assign reteach lessons to specific students or to the entire class. According to the Program Guide “Spotlight Skills are targeted lessons that provide resources to reteach and remediate without assigning additional readings.”
In the Help Center, teachers can access a section about assessments. The section on tracking data tools, with the guiding question “What data and tracking tools does StudySync provide for data-informed support?” includes the following teacher guidance on gradebooks and data tracking
“Data tracking and presentation tools help teachers use the results of assessments to identify which standards and skills present particular challenges for students, as well as where students are excelling and are ready for enrichment. Using the StudySync gradebook, teachers can effectively decide how to scaffold instruction and assign remediation support for individual students.
StudySync offers integrated data tracking and presentation tools that support ongoing progress monitoring, including:
standards-level reporting
assignment- and item-level reporting
raw score data
color-coded indicators of performance
class-level and individual-level data views
These tools allow teachers to monitor growth over time and tailor instruction to meet demonstrated needs.”
Indicator 2v
Materials include culminating tasks/summative assessments that require students to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, and listening).
The culminating/summative assessments in StudySync meet expectations for indicator 2v. The program includes coherent culminating tasks and summative assessments that align to each unit’s topic, essential question, and instructional goals. Most units conclude with an Extended Writing Project, while one unit per grade level features an Extended Oral Project, alongside a comprehensive End-of-Unit Assessment. Together, these assessments provide students with opportunities to demonstrate their learning through authentic performance tasks that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening, as well as through standards-aligned summative assessments that measure mastery of unit content and skills. Throughout each unit, instruction is intentionally sequenced to build the knowledge and skills needed for these culminating tasks, with unit overviews, pacing guides, and standards progressions supporting alignment between daily instruction and final assessments. Teacher guidance for evaluating student performance includes embedded standards-aligned rubrics, student writing models, answer keys, grading tools, and assessment reports that support consistent scoring, progress monitoring, and instructional decision-making.
Culminating tasks/summative assessments are evident in each unit/module and align to the unit’s/module’s topic or theme. Culminating tasks/summative assessments provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening).
In most units in the StudySync program, students complete an Extended Writing Project at the end of the unit. In one unit per grade level, students complete an Extended Oral Project. Additionally, each unit includes a formal End-of-Unit Assessment. Together, the Extended Writing Project/Extended Oral Project and the End-of-Unit Assessment provide complementary summative measures by allowing students to demonstrate learning through an authentic performance task and a comprehensive assessment of unit content and standards.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, students complete several End-of-Unit assessments.
For the Extended Writing Project, students write a nonfiction narrative to the prompt “From this unit or any other unit, reflect on texts that deal with the memories and dreams of individuals. Create an original narrative in which the protagonist is driven to action by the recurrence of a significant memory. Use what you have learned from these texts and your own prior knowledge to inform your writing. You may choose to write about an imagined character, or you may write a personal narrative reflecting your own experiences. Be sure to describe the memory and to make the connection between this memory and the primary conflict of your narrative.” Throughout this task, students integrate their reading, writing, and speaking and listening skills as they consider the unit's big themes and learning.
For the End-of-Unit Assessment, students answer 41 total questions, including multiple-choice, short-answer, and extended-response questions that cover the unit’s skills and standards.
Materials provide opportunities to support students in gaining the knowledge and skills needed to complete the culminating tasks/summative assessments.
Students gain the knowledge and skills throughout each unit to complete culminating tasks. The Scope and Sequence for each grade level includes a list of standards that students learn and practice in each unit. Each unit’s pacing guide lists the skills and standards that students engage in for each text or part of the unit. Each unit overview includes a clear summary of the unit, which synthesizes the unit title, essential question, and learning that students complete throughout. This summary also lists the different Reading, Grammar, Writing, and Speaking and Listening Skills covered throughout the unit. The End-of-Unit assessments require students to apply many of the skills and standards they learned and practiced earlier in the unit. The content of the Extended Writing Project/Extended Oral Project is directly related to the unit's big ideas and content.
In Grade 12, Unit 5, students complete the unit, Fractured Selves, with the essential question “What causes individuals to feel alienated?” The unit summary states,
“Most people love stories that end happily. The characters work out their differences, the hero saves the day, good defeats evil. But not all authors want to tell happy tales. Instead, they want literature and art to reflect real life more truthfully.
What does more realistic literature tell us about modern life? How did World War I and World War II change the way people viewed and experienced life? What causes individuals to feel alienated? How does Modernist art and literature explore the theme of alienation?
In this unit, students will think about the theme and essential question as they focus on Modernist art and literature. They will explore examples of Modernist poetry such as ‘The Great Figure’ and ‘The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.’ They will also read the Modernist short stories ‘A Cup of Tea’ and ‘The New Dress’ and an excerpt from the play The Glass Menagerie. Poems ‘miss rosie,’ ‘The Idler,’ ‘Hurricane Season,’ and ‘Pearl Divers’ Daughters’ allow students to consider how feelings of alienation can result from a variety of situations. Furthermore, the nonfiction texts A Room of One’s Own, ‘Be Ye Men of Valour,’ and ‘Shooting an Elephant’ encourage students to think about the power of the written word to reflect important historical events and the experience of alienation individuals experienced within them.
Students will begin this unit as readers, and they will finish as writers, as they apply what they have learned about story elements to their own literary analysis essays.”
At the end of the unit, students answer the following prompt for the Extended Writing Task: “Why is alienation such a common theme in Modernist literature? Consider all the texts you have read in this unit, and reflect on how alienation impacts those who experience it. Then, select three characters or speakers from the texts. Write a literary analysis essay to examine how the authors explore the theme of alienation through these three characters or speakers. In your conclusion, synthesize the ideas in these texts about alienation in the modern world.” This prompt requires them to apply some of the knowledge and skills that they’ve learned throughout the unit. Additionally, the End-of-Unit assessment covers the skills and standards students learned earlier in the unit.
Materials include broad guidance that supports the teacher in determining and evaluating student performance on the culminating tasks/summative assessments in the program.
The Program Guide explains that writing rubrics are embedded throughout the writing process to clarify expectations and support students' development in key areas of writing, including organization, development, clarity, style, and conventions. Teachers are encouraged to review rubrics before students begin writing to establish clear expectations and guide instruction. Rubrics are used across Close Read lessons and Extended Writing Projects and support peer review, self-assessment, discussion, and revision, helping students use feedback to strengthen their writing while promoting consistent, standards-based evaluation.
Extended Writing Projects include embedded standards-aligned rubrics within the Edit and Publish stage, with the same criteria reinforced throughout the Plan, Draft, Revise, and Edit/Publish phases of the writing process. Student writing models aligned to the rubric further support consistent, standards-based scoring and teacher calibration.
The Program Guide describes the End-of-Unit Assessment as a summative measure of student learning that evaluates students' understanding of unit content and their ability to write across multiple genres. Assessment results are intended to inform instructional planning, grouping decisions, reteaching, and intervention by providing standards-aligned data on student performance. The assessments also familiarize students with item types and question formats similar to those found on state assessments. Reporting tools provide information on students' skill strengths, areas for improvement, standards proficiency, and growth across units,
End-of-Unit Assessments include answer keys, standards alignments, and teacher grading tools. Constructed-response and writing tasks are accompanied by embedded rubrics within the Teacher Grading View, promoting consistent, standards-based scoring across student responses.
End-of-Unit Assessment answer keys provide sample answers for short responses, the correct answers for multiple-choice questions, and rubrics for oral-response questions.