2014

SpringBoard Middle

Publisher
College Board
Subject
Math
Grades
6-8
Report Release
01/22/2016
Review Tool Version
v1.0
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Does Not Meet Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
Not Eligible
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report for 6th Grade

Alignment Summary

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. In gateway 1, the instructional materials do not meet the expectations for focus on major work because they devote an insufficient amount of time to the major work of the grade, and the materials do not meet the expectations for coherence because they do not make sufficient connections between the standards. Since the materials do not meet expectations for focus and coherence in gateway 1, they were not reviewed for evidence of rigor and the mathematical practices in gateway 2.

6th Grade
Gateway 2

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
0
10
16
18
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Does Not Meet Expectations
Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated
Overview of Gateway 1

Focus & Coherence

The instructional materials reviewed for Course 1 do not meet the expectations for focus and coherence in the CCSSM. For focus, the instructional materials do not meet the criteria for the time devoted to the major work of the grade with only 54.6 percent of the days allocated in the timeline aligning to the major work including support from parts addressing non-major work. For coherence, supporting work is sometimes connected to the focus of the grade with some missed opportunities for natural connections to be made. The amount of content for one grade level is not viable for one school year, and the materials will not foster coherence between the grades. Content from prior or future grades is not clearly identified and materials that relate grade level concepts to prior knowledge from earlier grades is not explicit. Overall, the materials are shaped by the CCSSM and do incorporate some natural connections, but there are not enough connections to prepare a student for upcoming grades. The material also lacks some consistency for grade-to-grade progressions, and content that is not on grade level or supports on grade level learning is not explicit.

Criterion 1.1: Focus

02/02
Materials do not assess topics before the grade level in which the topic should be introduced.

The instructional materials reviewed for Course 1 do not meet the expectations for focus within the grade. The materials reviewed for Course 1 do assess mostly grade-level content with some above grade-level topics, but If the future grade content was removed, it would not change the underlying structure of the assessments. The instructional materials do not meet the expectations for majority of class time on the major clusters of this grade. Only 54.6 percent of the days are suggested in the materials for major work of this grade. Overall, the instructional materials meet the indicator for grade-level assessments, however it does not spend the majority of time in the major clusters of this grade.

Indicator 1A
02/02
The instructional material assesses the grade-level content and, if applicable, content from earlier grades. Content from future grades may be introduced but students should not be held accountable on assessments for future expectations.

The Assessments that are included in the web version of Springboard were reviewed for Course 1 and found to meet the expectations for instructional material that assesses the grade-level content and, if applicable, content from earlier grades. Content from future grades is sometimes introduced, but students should not be held accountable on assessments for those future expectations. If the future grade content was removed, it would not change the underlying structure of the assessments. Overall, the instructional material in the summative assessment items reviewed in Course I addressed the major areas of focus for this grade level in a challenging and effective manner with most units having few or no standards above grade level addressed.

Quality, on grade-level examples are:

  • Unit 2, question 9- Students show their knowledge of 6.NS.C.7.B by using inequalities to show the value of negative and positive numbers.
  • Unit 3, question 4- Students demonstrate their knowledge of 6.EE.A.2.A by creating an expression and determining the appropriate operation to represent the real world problem.
  • Unit 7, several of the problems address 6.NS.B.3 through the real world application of solving problems via using the four operations with decimals to solve. The problems in particular are problems 3-5, 7-9 and 11-14.

Areas of improvement are:

  • Unit 1, question 3- Uses a whole number (14) that exceeds the maximum value of 12, as stated in the standards for least common multiple problems - 6.NS.B.4.
  • Unit 2, questions 15-20, 22 and 24 have students operate on integers. Adding, subtracting, multiplying or dividing negative integers is not a Grade 6 standard. Instead, it is a Grade 7 standards that fits 7.NS.A.1 and 7.NS.A.2.
  • Unit 3, question 18- Students read and interpret a linear graph which is a Grade 7 standard, 7.RP.A.2.B.
  • Unit 4, question 20 addresses MP 1, requiring the student to make conclusions regarding a parallelogram given an angle and the length of one side. The standard addressed with this question is 7.G.B.5. Students need to have knowledge regarding supplementary, complementary, vertical and adjacent angles.

Criterion 1.2: Coherence

00/04
Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote the large majority of class time in each grade K-8 to the major work of the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Course 1 do not meet the expectations for focus within the grade. The materials reviewed for Course 1 do assess mostly grade-level content with some above grade-level topics, but If the future grade content was removed, it would not change the underlying structure of the assessments. The instructional materials do not meet the expectations for majority of class time on the major clusters of this grade. Only 54.6 percent of the days are suggested in the materials for major work of this grade. Overall, the instructional materials meet the indicator for grade-level assessments, however it does not spend the majority of time in the major clusters of this grade.

Indicator 1B
00/04
Instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major cluster of each grade.

The teacher edition and consumable student edition reviewed for Course 1 do not meet the expectations for spending the majority of class time on the major clusters of each grade. To determine this we evaluated three perspectives: 1) the number of activities devoted to major work, 2) the number of lessons devoted to major work, and 3) the number of days devoted to major work. Along with major work of the grade, parts of the materials addressing non-major work were also examined for increasing focus on major work through coherent connections. We decided that the number of days devoted to major work is the most reflective for this indicator because it specifically addresses the amount of class time spent on concepts and our conclusion was drawn through this data.

We determined our evidence from the Contents Page, pages v - ix and the number of days suggested in "Planning the Unit" found in the the teacher edition and written by the publisher.

  • Activities – 17 out of 31 activities which is 54.8 percent of time spent on major work.
  • Lessons – 47 out of 82 lessons which is 57.3 percent of time spent on major work.
  • Days – 77 out of 141 days which is 54.6 percent of time spent on major work.

Including Embedded Assessment Days:

  • Unit 1: 31 days, 19 days days on major work.
  • Unit 2: 16 days, only 7 days on major work
  • Unit 3: 29 days, all days on major work
  • Unit 4: 22 days, all days on major work
  • Unit 5: 0 days out of 20 days on major work of the grade level
  • Unit 6: 0 days out of 19 days on major work of the grade level
  • Unit 7: 0 days out of 4 days on major work of the grade level

This allows for 77 days out of 141, or 54.6 percent, to be spent on major work of Grade 6 including support from parts addressing non-major work.

Excluding Embedded Assessment Days:

  • 6.RP.A has 16 instructional days out of 125 total days (13 percent).
  • 6.NS.A and 6.NS.A.C has 23 instructional days out of 125 total days (18 percent).
  • 6.EE.A, 6.EE.B, 6.EE.C has 21 instructional days out of 125 total days are addressed (16.8 percent).

This allows for 60 days out of 124 which is 48 percent to be spent on major work of Grade 6 including support from parts addressing non-major work.

Criterion 1.3: Coherence

04/08
Coherence: Each grade's instructional materials are coherent and consistent with the Standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Course 1 do not meet the expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards. Supporting work is sometimes connected to the focus of the grade with some missed opportunities for natural connections to be made. The amount of content for one grade level is not viable for one school year, and the materials will not foster coherence between the grades. Content from prior or future grades is not clearly identified and materials that relate grade level concepts to prior knowledge from earlier grades is not explicit. Overall, the materials are shaped by the CCSSM and incorporate some natural connections that will prepare a student for upcoming grades. However, the material does lack some consistency for grade-to-grade progressions, and content that is not on grade level or supports on grade level learning is not explicit.

Indicator 1C
01/02
Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet expectations that supporting content enhances focus and coherence by engaging students in the major work of the grade. In some cases, the supporting work enhances and supports the major work of the grade level, and in others, it does not.

Examples where connections are present, but the connections to major work are not well explored and therefore support a partial rating include:

Non-Major Cluster: 6.G.A - solve real-world and mathematical problems involving area, surface area, and volume is in Unit 5.

  • Activity 23, pages 289-303, have students substitute numbers and determine if equations are true which supports 6.EE.
  • Activity 24, pages 305-314, have students substitute numbers and determine if equations are true which supports 6.EE and plot negative and positive numbers on a coordinate grid which supports 6.NS.C.
  • Activity 25, pages 317-329, have students solve equations to find surface area which supports 6.EE.
  • Activity 26, pages 331-341, have students solve equations to find volume which supports 6.EE.

Non-Major Cluster: 6.NS.B - Compute fluently with multi-digit numbers and find common factors and multiples is in Unit 1.

  • Activity 1, pages 3-24, has students working with decimal operations that will support solving expressions/equations/inequalities in 6.EE .
  • Activity 3, pages 35-43, has students find the GCF and LCM which will support 6.NS.A.

Examples where connections are missed:

  • Unit 6- Activity 28, pages 363-376, has students working with measures of center which could have some questions that lead to the major work in 6.EE.B.
  • Unit 7- Activity 31, pages 409-420, is about personal financial literacy and could be used to engage 6.NS.C and 6.EE. However, the publisher makes no connections to Grade 6 standards at all in this unit. The teacher would need to not only relate the unit to the standards, but also make connections to the major work.
Indicator 1D
01/02
The amount of content designated for one grade level is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for the amount of content designated for one grade level being viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades. With embedded assessment days not included there are approximately 124 days of lessons in the materials. There needs to be additional material, other than assessment days, to ensure a student grasps all of the major work at this grade level. Overall, the amount of content that is designated for this grade level is short of the amount of material needed to make it truly viable for one school year.

  • According to the pacing guide, each period is 45 minutes in length and there is a suggested 124 days of lessons.
  • When embedded assessments are also included in the pacing guide and if all are given during the course of the year the total would be 141 days.

The guiding focus taken for this indicator for our team was, "Will the non-major and major work of this material be enough to prepare a student for the next grade level?" With the amount of days, and with many of those days not focusing on major work and the non-major work days not often supporting the major work of the grade, it will require the teacher to make significant modifications to prepare the student for the next grade level and supports this indicator receiving a partially meets rating.

Indicator 1E
01/02
Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards i. Materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. If there is content from prior or future grades, that content is clearly identified and related to grade-level work ii. Materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems iii. Materials relate grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for the material to be consistent with the progressions in the standards. Content from prior and future grade levels are not clearly identified and a teacher will have to spend much time unpacking the activities to identify the non-grade level material. Also, materials do not always relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades within each lesson. Connections are not explicitly made to content in future grades. However, in general, the progressions of the standards are followed throughout this course.

Some examples of areas where identification of standards from lower/upper grades would be beneficial are:

  • Unit 1 Activity 1-1 compares whole numbers and decimals as foundational work for this unit. This activity addresses standards from Grade 5 (5.NBT). While this work is necessary for students to be successful, the publisher does not illustrate a direct relationship with current grade level clusters.
  • Unit 1 Activity 5 does not have a specific content standard listed. The work of this activity is from previous grade levels (5.NF).
  • Unit 1 Activity 6 lists 6.NS.A.1 as the standard for the activity, but the work discussed is from 5.NF.2.
  • Unit 2 Activity 7 addresses work from a major cluster 6.NS and transitions nicely to Activity 8. However, the work from Activity 8 addresses content from a major cluster from Grade 7 (7.NS). Additionally, Activity 10 addresses Grade 7 work (7.NS).

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectation of giving all students extensive work with grade-level problems. Overall, the materials do not consistently give students of varying abilities extensive work with grade-level problems.

For each activity, there is anywhere from one to seven standards attached, and there are two to five lessons based on that activity to extend and develop the understanding of the standards included in the activity. For struggling learners or those that need enrichment, the book does provide pointers interspersed throughout the units with ideas on how to differentiate or teach the topic in a different way.

Examples of this are:

  • When necessary, mini lessons are inserted to help remind students of the basic skills that are needed. For example, on page 4, there is a suggestion for a mini lesson on decimal place value.
  • On page 65, there is a side note box that provides an alternative way to teach the concept.
  • On page 183, the differentiating instruction box provides pointers on student pairings.

Some examples of the lessons that are not at the depth of knowledge needed to prepare a student for the next grade are:

  • Unit 1 Activity 4, Lesson 4-3 on mixed numbers is an example of a low depth of knowledge lesson.
  • Unit 3, Activity 11, Lesson 11-1 on order of operations is also very procedural and not at the level needed to prepare a student for the next grade level.

Examples of lessons that do give a student extensive work at the grade level and are real world application problems covering the major work of the grade are:

  • Unit 3, Activity 14, Lesson 14-3 on solving division equations
  • Unit 4, Activity 18, Lesson 18-1 on solving problems using ratios
  • Unit 4, Activity 21, Lesson 21-3 on finding the whole given a part and the percent

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectation of relating grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades. Overall, materials only generally relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.

Each unit begins with an overview that explains what earlier knowledge will be extended in the activities themselves and then each activity has an "Activity Standards Focus" section that will explain the connections between the previous grades and the new learning. This is rather a general overview and is never specific as to where the connections are actually happening and between which grades.

Example of the general overview:

  • Unit 3, Activity 14 begins with the "Activity Standards Focus" saying, "In previous grades students have solved multiplication and division problems." This is how each activity begins and then presents a slight change in what was solved based on what the new learning is.
Indicator 1F
01/02
Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards i. Materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. ii. Materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the standards. Overall, materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings.

  • The Unit titles are clearly labeled and aligned to the standards without a need for much interpretation.
    • Unit 1 - Number Concepts (6.NS)
    • Unit 2 - Integers (6.NS)
    • Unit 3 - Expressions & Equations (6.EE)

The instructional materials do include some problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain. They include a few problems and activities that connect two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important. However, overall the materials only partially foster coherence through connections in Course 1.

  • For the majority of the work, most standards were taught and covered within one lesson out of the entire series and not aligned with any other concept throughout the year.

Some examples of where connections were made and supported a partially meets rating are:

  • 6.NS.C.6
    • This standard is first taught in Unit 2, Activity 7.
    • It is reinforced in Unit 2, Activity 9, as well as being necessary background knowledge for Unit 5, Activity 24.
    • This standard is taught at the beginning of the school year in Unit 2 and then also reviewed months later when Unit 5 is covered.
  • 6.RP.A
    • This cluster first appears in Unit 4 Activity 17-1 and is addressed throughout Unit 4.
  • 6.EE.C
    • This standard first appears in Unit 3 Activity 16.
    • It also appears in Unit 3 Activity 18.
Overview of Gateway 2

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Materials were not reviewed for Gateway Two because materials did not meet or partially meet expectations for Gateway One

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.
Indicator 2A
00/02
Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.
Indicator 2B
00/02
Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.
Indicator 2C
00/02
Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade
Indicator 2D
00/02
Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice
Indicator 2E
00/02
The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.
Indicator 2F
00/02
Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard
Indicator 2G
Read
Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:
Indicator 2G.i
00/02
Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.
Indicator 2G.ii
00/02
Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.
Indicator 2G.iii
00/02
Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

Criterion 3.1: Use & Design

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Use and design facilitate student learning: Materials are well designed and take into account effective lesson structure and pacing.
Indicator 3A
00/02
The underlying design of the materials distinguishes between problems and exercises. In essence, the difference is that in solving problems, students learn new mathematics, whereas in working exercises, students apply what they have already learned to build mastery. Each problem or exercise has a purpose.
Indicator 3B
00/02
Design of assignments is not haphazard: exercises are given in intentional sequences.
Indicator 3C
00/02
There is variety in what students are asked to produce. For example, students are asked to produce answers and solutions, but also, in a grade-appropriate way, arguments and explanations, diagrams, mathematical models, etc.
Indicator 3D
00/02
Manipulatives are faithful representations of the mathematical objects they represent and when appropriate are connected to written methods.
Indicator 3E
Read
The visual design (whether in print or online) is not distracting or chaotic, but supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject.

Criterion 3.2: Teacher Planning

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Teacher Planning and Learning for Success with CCSS: Materials support teacher learning and understanding of the Standards.
Indicator 3F
00/02
Materials support teachers in planning and providing effective learning experiences by providing quality questions to help guide students' mathematical development.
Indicator 3G
00/02
Materials contain a teacher's edition with ample and useful annotations and suggestions on how to present the content in the student edition and in the ancillary materials. Where applicable, materials include teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning.
Indicator 3H
00/02
Materials contain a teacher's edition (in print or clearly distinguished/accessible as a teacher's edition in digital materials) that contains full, adult-level explanations and examples of the more advanced mathematics concepts in the lessons so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, as necessary.
Indicator 3I
00/02
Materials contain a teacher's edition (in print or clearly distinguished/accessible as a teacher's edition in digital materials) that explains the role of the specific grade-level mathematics in the context of the overall mathematics curriculum for kindergarten through grade twelve.
Indicator 3J
Read
Materials provide a list of lessons in the teacher's edition (in print or clearly distinguished/accessible as a teacher's edition in digital materials), cross-referencing the standards covered and providing an estimated instructional time for each lesson, chapter and unit (i.e., pacing guide).
Indicator 3K
Read
Materials contain strategies for informing parents or caregivers about the mathematics program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Indicator 3L
Read
Materials contain explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

Criterion 3.3: Assessment

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Assessment: Materials offer teachers resources and tools to collect ongoing data about student progress on the Standards.
Indicator 3M
00/02
Materials provide strategies for gathering information about students' prior knowledge within and across grade levels.
Indicator 3N
00/02
Materials provide strategies for teachers to identify and address common student errors and misconceptions.
Indicator 3O
00/02
Materials provide opportunities for ongoing review and practice, with feedback, for students in learning both concepts and skills.
Indicator 3P
Read
Materials offer ongoing formative and summative assessments:
Indicator 3P.i
00/02
Assessments clearly denote which standards are being emphasized.
Indicator 3P.ii
00/02
Assessments include aligned rubrics and scoring guidelines that provide sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
Indicator 3Q
Read
Materials encourage students to monitor their own progress.

Criterion 3.4: Differentiation

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Differentiated instruction: Materials support teachers in differentiating instruction for diverse learners within and across grades.
Indicator 3R
00/02
Materials provide strategies to help teachers sequence or scaffold lessons so that the content is accessible to all learners.
Indicator 3S
00/02
Materials provide teachers with strategies for meeting the needs of a range of learners.
Indicator 3T
00/02
Materials embed tasks with multiple entry-points that can be solved using a variety of solution strategies or representations.
Indicator 3U
00/02
Materials suggest support, accommodations, and modifications for English Language Learners and other special populations that will support their regular and active participation in learning mathematics (e.g., modifying vocabulary words within word problems).
Indicator 3V
00/02
Materials provide opportunities for advanced students to investigate mathematics content at greater depth.
Indicator 3W
00/02
Materials provide a balanced portrayal of various demographic and personal characteristics.
Indicator 3X
Read
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Indicator 3Y
Read
Materials encourage teachers to draw upon home language and culture to facilitate learning.

Criterion 3.5: Technology

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Effective technology use: Materials support effective use of technology to enhance student learning. Digital materials are accessible and available in multiple platforms.
Indicator 3AA
Read
Digital materials (either included as supplementary to a textbook or as part of a digital curriculum) are web-based and compatible with multiple internet browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer, Firefox, Google Chrome, etc.). In addition, materials are "platform neutral" (i.e., are compatible with multiple operating systems such as Windows and Apple and are not proprietary to any single platform) and allow the use of tablets and mobile devices.
Indicator 3AB
Read
Materials include opportunities to assess student mathematical understandings and knowledge of procedural skills using technology.
Indicator 3AC
Read
Materials can be easily customized for individual learners. i. Digital materials include opportunities for teachers to personalize learning for all students, using adaptive or other technological innovations. ii. Materials can be easily customized for local use. For example, materials may provide a range of lessons to draw from on a topic.
Indicator 3AD
Read
Materials include or reference technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other (e.g. websites, discussion groups, webinars, etc.).
Indicator 3Z
Read
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic mathematics software in ways that engage students in the Mathematical Practices.