About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Smithsonian Science for the Classroom | Science
Science K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems consistently drive learning and use of the three dimensions at both the learning sequence and learning opportunity levels.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for life science, physical science and earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the science and engineering practices at the grade band and all elements of the practices at grade level, with adequate opportunity for students to use practices repeatedly and in multiple contexts. The materials include all of the grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 2nd Grade
Alignment Summary
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems consistently drive learning and use of the three dimensions at both the learning sequence and learning opportunity level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for physical science; life science; earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the SEPs at the grade level and all of the SEPs across the grade band. The materials include all grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
2nd Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Designed for NGSS
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectation and Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning
Materials are designed for three-dimensional learning and assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Criterion 1a-1c: Three-Dimensional Learning. The materials consistently include integration of the three dimensions in at least one learning opportunity per learning sequence and nearly all learning sequences are meaningfully designed for student opportunity to engage in sensemaking with the three dimensions. The materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the chapter level that build towards the performance expectations for the larger unit, and consistently assess to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives. The units also include three-dimensional objectives and include corresponding assessments that consistently address the three dimensions of the objectives.
Indicator 1A
Materials are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning.
Indicator 1A.i
Materials consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning opportunities. Across all four units, the instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities. Within each learning sequence, most lessons include three dimensions and integrate SEPs, CCCs, and DCIs.
Examples where materials include three dimensions and integrate DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs into learning opportunities:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, students obtain information from a text and construct a claim about what tomato plants need in order to flower. Students ask questions (SEP-AQDP-P1) about why the plant flowered but did not produce tomatoes. Students then use observations of text and images to obtain information (SEP-INFO-P1) about plant structures and functions (DCI-LS2.A-P2, CCC-SF-P1). Students make a claim with evidence about why the plants did not produce tomatoes (SEP-ARG-P3).
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 7: Hitching A Ride, students use models to make observations of seed dispersal strategies and write a claim about how an acorn moved to a planter on a balcony. Students use models (SEP-MOD-P1) to make observations (SEP-DATA-P1) of seed dispersal strategies (DCI-LS2.A-P2, CCC-SF-P1). Students use their observations to write a claim with evidence (SEP-ARG-P6) to explain (SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-SF-P1) how the acorn was moved to the balcony (DCI-LS2.A-P2).
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 2: Properties of Pieces, students sort objects, use them to build a sculpture, and then revise their explanations for how an artist created a sculpture with different materials. Students make observations (SEP-DATA-P3) of patterns in the materials of a sculpture and construct an explanation of how an artist created that sculpture (DCI-PSI.A-P1). Students make predictions (SEP-INV-P6) about whether sorting the objects by properties (CCC-PAT-P1) will make building the sculpture easier or more difficult. Students build a sculpture (SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-EM-P1) and use their observations (SEP-DATA-P4, SEP-INV-P4) to revise their initial explanation of how the artist created the sculpture (DCI-PSI.A-P1).
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 5: Can We Make A Crayon?, students design a solution for making new crayons and investigate the melting and freezing of crayons. Students design an initial solution for how to use melted crayons to make new ones (SEP-CEDS-P1, DCI-PS1.B-P1, and CCC-EM-P1). Students make predictions (SEP-INV-P6) about whether the crayons will melt or freeze and work as intended (DCI-PS1.B-P1, CCC-EM-P1). Students collaboratively carry out an investigation by melting crayons and placing them in cold water (DCI-PS1.B-P1, SEP-INV-P2, SEP-DATA-P3, and CCC-PAT-P1). Students test the solid to see if it works as intended (CCC-PAT-P1, DCI-PS1.B-P1).
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, students observe images and carry out an investigation to determine what the white stuff is at the top of the mountain. Students observe an image of a mountain with white material at the top of the mountain. Students then collaboratively carry out an investigation (SEP-INV-P4) to collect data on the different properties of ice and water and use relative scales such as warm, cool, and cold (CCC-SPQ-P1) to describe the properties of ice and water (SEP-INV-P4, DCI-PS1.A-P1). Students use their observations and data to describe the relationship between ice and water and identify patterns in their observations to discuss whether the white stuff at the top of the mountain is solid or liquid water (SEP-DATA-P1, CCC-PAT-P1).
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 7: What Are the Patterns of Land and Water on Earth?, students use information from a reading to identify patterns in the shapes of land and water found on Earth. Students read a text about and view images of patterns (CCC-PAT-P1) in the shapes of water and land on Earth (DCI-ESS2.C-P1, SEP-INFO-P3). Students record the patterns they find and then draw pictures of two patterns they identified (SEP-INFO-P4). Students add the patterns they discovered from the reading to their own park models (SEP-MOD-P3).
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 3: Surface Erosion (A LIttle Off the Top), students conduct an investigation about the effects of wind and rain on sand to understand how changes in land surfaces occur. Students investigate the issue by researching, observing, and documenting the impact of wind and water on land surfaces over various timeframes (DCI-ESS2.A-P, DCI-ETS1.A-P2, and SEP-DATA-P3). Students select two wind and/or rain events they think caused the problem and then test their ideas using the land model (DCI-ETS1.A-P3, SEP-INV-P2, SEP-INV-P4, and CCC-CE-P1). Students record the varying rates at which water and wind can alter loose land surfaces. In a class discussion, students use observations as evidence to assert whether rain and wind can change the shape of the land and the speed at which the change happens (DCI-ESS1.C-P1, SEP-DATA-P1, and CCC-SC-P2).
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 8: Holding Back the Land, students brainstorm solutions for decreasing the movement of land by wind and water. Students address the problem that land transformation by wind and water can cause (CCC-CE-P1) mud to block a road (DCI-ESS2.A-P1). Students brainstorm ideas for solutions and read about, discuss, and share information regarding four methods for reducing land change. Each student proposes one way to use the methods to solve the class-defined problem (SEP-INFO-P1, SEP-INFO-P4). In pairs, students plan how to test their ideas about reducing the deposition of land material and then compare their solutions to identify those that will meet the objectives outlined (DCI-ETS1.C-P1, SEP-INV-P1, and SEP-CEDS-P3).
Indicator 1A.ii
Materials consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions. Learning sequences within the units vary in length between one and five lessons. Across all units and within every learning sequence, nearly all lessons meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions. Additionally, sensemaking occurs both at the lesson level and across the learning sequence. Student sensemaking is nearly always tied to explaining a phenomenon or solving a problem.
Examples where SEPs and CCCs meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions in the learning sequence:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lessons 7 and 8, students figure out how seeds can be dispersed and that different plants and animals live in different places. In Lesson 7, students investigate to determine if a fan and/or faux fur will help to spread three types of seeds. Using evidence from the data, students write a claim about how the structure of the seed impacted its movement (DCI-LS2.A-P2, SEP-CEDS-P1, SEP-MOD-P1, SEP-MOD-P2, SEP-DATA-P1, and CCC-SF-P1). In Lesson 8, students ask questions about how the acorn plant got onto the patio. Students use a simulation to discover patterns that plant and animal habitats need to overlap for them to work together and survive in nature (SEP-AQDP-P1, SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-SYS-P2, and CCC-PAT-P1).
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lessons 9 and 10, students figure out the best places to plant seeds in a schoolyard based on how they are dispersed and what they need to grow. Students determine the best area for each plant to grow by considering how the seeds are dispersed, what the plants need to grow, and what they need to reproduce (DCI-LS4.D-P1, DCI-LS2.A-P1, DCI-LS2.A-P2, SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-SYS-P2, and CCC-SF-P1). Students refute a claim about what seeds need and use evidence from their learning to explain why they disagree with the claim (SEP-ARG-P1, SEP-ARG-P2).
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lessons 1 and 2, students figure out how maps show where things are located as well as the shapes and kinds of land and water in an area. In Lesson 1, students observe images of Ada's park and draw their initial idea for a map of that area (SEP-AQDP-P1, SEP-MOD-P2). Students analyze maps to find similar patterns and use their observations to list the qualities of a good map (DCI-ESS2.B-P1, CCC-PAT-P1, and SEP-INFO-P2). In Lesson 2, students sort images of land features and describe the patterns they observe. Using the patterns, students engage in discussion to identify and label the kinds of land features observed in Ada's park images.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 10: A Map for Ada, Part 2, students create a map of the area they think Ada should visit to match their model. Students review a map from another group and match it to the three-dimensional model it represents (DCI-ESS2.B-P1). Students compare the map (SEP-MOD-P2) they are reviewing with their own map and decide if they need to add details to their own. Students also look for any patterns in the map (CCC-PAT-P1) that might suggest Ada would find snow or ice in that location (DCI-ESS2.C-P1, SEP-MOD-P3).
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lessons 3 and 8, students investigate how wind and water can contribute to land loss. In Lesson 3, students construct a model and test (SEP-INV-P2) how wind and water can change land features (DCI-ESS2.A-P1). Students make predictions and observe results (SEP-DATA-P1). Students note the relative time (DCI-ESS1.C-P1, CCC-SC-P2) it took for changes to occur and compare them to their predictions (DCI-ETS1.A-P3, SEP-INV-P4, and SEP-DATA-P4). Students note the cause and effects of wind and water (CCC-CE-P1) on the models and share results with the class to form a class chart of how wind and rain can change land (SEP-DATA-P3). In Lesson 8, students test their solution model and record their observations (DCI-ESS2.A-P1, SEP-DATA-P1, and SEP-CEDS-P2). Students analyze the data to compare the performance of their model to others in the class and to the class goals (SEP-INV-P5, SEP-DATA-P5, and DCI-ETS1.C-P1).
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lessons 9 and 10, students figure out how wind and/or water might have caused the land under beach stairs to change over time and compare solutions to the problem. In Lesson 9, students discuss and investigate how wind and/or water might have caused the land under the beach stairs to change over time (SEP-AQDP-P3, CCC-SC-P2, CCC-CE-P2, DCI-ETS1.A-P2, and DCI-ETS1.A-P3). Students then define a problem associated with the land change (SEP-AQDP-P3, CCC-SC-P2). In Lesson 10, students use models of the beach to test their solutions, observe and record results, and then analyze their results to determine if the solution meets the goals (SEP-INV-P1, SEP-INV-P5, and CCC-CE-P1). Students compare their solutions (DCI-ETS1.C-P1) and explain which provided the best protection from events that would change the land quickly (DCI-ESS1.C-P1, SEP-DATA-P3, SEP-CEDS-P3, and CCC-SC-P2).
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Liquids And Solids?, Lesson 5: Can We Make a Crayon?, students design a solution to make new crayons from ones that have melted together. Students design an initial solution for how to use the melted crayons to make new crayons (SEP-CEDS-P1, DCI-PS1.B-P1, and CCC-EM-P1). Students collaboratively carry out an investigation by melting crayons, placing them in cold water (DCI-PS1.B-P1, SEP-INV-P2, SEP-DATA-P3, and CCC-PAT-P1), and testing the solid to see if it works as intended (CCC-PAT-P1, DCI-PS1.B-P1).
Indicator 1B
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials.
The materials reviewed consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the lesson level which are found in the Assessment Map of the Curriculum Overview and at the beginning of every lesson. Materials include Pre-Assessments, Formative Assessments, and Checkpoint Assessments in every Module as part of the formative assessment system. Assessment tasks include peer-to-peer, small-group, and class discussions, as well as drawings, verbal responses, data collection, presentations and building and revising of models.
Except for the final learning sequence of each Module, every lesson includes one of the three types of assessments with a few lessons across the series having two types. Pre-Assessments occur in the beginning of learning sequences and when new content is presented mid-sequence. Formative Assessments are the most common. Checkpoint Assessments require three-dimensional understanding of a phenomenon or problem before moving to the next lesson. For teacher support, the Pre-Assessments include questions for teacher reflection to consider how students bring prior experiences into the formation of initial ideas. All Formative and Checkpoint Assessments include Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty for each assessed element to support teachers to evaluate student responses. They also include a Remediation section that provides the teacher with guidance on how to adjust instruction based on student responses.
Examples of lessons with a three-dimensional objective where the formative assessment task(s) assess student knowledge of all (three) dimensions in the learning objective and provide guidance to support the instructional process:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 1: Piece by Piece, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise five elements. In the Formative Assessment, students use small materials to build a sculpture containing multiple pieces and discuss how they could have rearranged individual pieces in the whole (DCI-PS1.A-P3, CCC-EM-P1). Students record the properties of their sculpture with the properties of another sculpture to make comparisons (DCI-PS1.A-P1, SEP-INV-P4, and SEP-DATA-P1). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, the three-dimensional learning objective comprises four elements. In the Formative Assessment, students use observations from an investigation of candles melting and cooling to revise their predictions of why crayons changed shape and combined into a single block (SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-PAT-P1). Students use the data to explain that heat caused the crayons to melt and that they then cooled and froze (DCI-PS1.B-P1, CCC-CE-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We FInd The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 3: Sunshine and Rain, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise three elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students make their claim and support it with evidence that radish seeds need both sunlight and water in order to survive (DCI-LS2.A-P1, SEP-CEDS-P1). Students use observations of which seeds grew/did not grow to explain a cause and effect pattern (CCC-CE-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We FInd The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise four elements. In the Formative Assessment, students record detailed drawings of a bee, explain what parts make it a good pollinator, and identify the material they will use to build a hand pollinator (DCI-LS2.A-P2). Students then discuss the shape of their design and describe how it mimics a bee (SEP-DATA-P1, SEP- DATA-P3, and CCC-SF-P1). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Grade 2, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 4: Ice Hunt, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise four elements. In the Formative Assessment, students obtain information from satellite images (SEP-INFO-P3) to determine the location of ice and snow on Earth (DCI-ESS2.C-P1). Students also use observations of satellite images and their observations of the properties of ice and water to describe patterns of temperature at higher elevations (SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-PAT-P1). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 3: Surface Erosion (a Little off the Top), the three-dimensional learning objective comprises six elements. In the Formative Assessment, students record and discuss the effects of water and blowing air on a model of dirt next to a road (DCI-ESS1.C-P1, SEP-DATA-P1, and SEP-INV-P4). Students also record and discuss how long different changes in the land model take (DCI-ESS2.A-P1) and how wind and rain can make land move if the land is dry (CCC-SC-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Indicators of Success and Indicators of Difficulty and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
Indicator 1C
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials.
Materials provide three-dimensional learning objectives tied to performance expectations for each Module. The Module Overview Assessment Map indicates the elements of the three dimensions addressed in the Module and summative assessments.
The summative assessments are designed to measure student achievement of the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives. Each Module in Grade 2 ends with a two to three-lesson long Science Challenge or Design Challenge intended as a summative assessment. The Science and Design Challenges present students with a problem or challenge and students work to explain and solve the problem. Within each assessment sequence, performance tasks include peer-to-peer, small-group, and class discussions, as well as drawings, verbal responses, data collection, presentations, and building and revising of models. Scoring rubrics are included with a scale for each element of the three dimensions being assessed in that Module.
Examples of lessons with a three-dimensional objective where the summative assessment task(s) assess student knowledge of all (three) dimensions in the learning objective, and provide guidance to support the instructional process:
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lessons 8, 9, and 10, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise 8 elements. In the Science Challenge, students work to solve the problem that a flight of stairs on a beach no longer reaches the ground. Students develop an initial explanation that wind and water are moving the sand away (DCI-ESS2.A-P1), describe how quickly the change happened (DCI-ESS1.C-P1, CCC-SC-P2), and define the problem (DCI-ETS1.A-P3, SEP-AQDP-P3). Students model the problem and make observations to inform their solutions (DCI-ETS1.A-P2), discuss possible solutions (DCI-ETS1.A-P1), develop their own solutions, test them, compare them with their peers to see if it meets their goals (DCI-ETS1.C-P1, SEP-CEDS-P3), and adjust their solutions. Students analyze their test results to see which solution provides better protection during quick events and which is better for the long term (CCC-SC-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with a scoring rubric to measure the three-dimensional elements of the objectives.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lessons 9 and 10, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise 8 elements. In the Science Challenge, students solve the challenge of determining where milkweed plants should be planted. Students write explanations of what plants need to live and reproduce and mark on a map where specific plants should be planted based on their needs and the available resources (DCI-LS2.A-P1, DCI-LS2.A-P2, and DCI-LS4.D-P1). Students describe patterns in their observations to (SEP-DATA-P3), engage in argument from evidence (SEP-ARG-P1), and evaluate an argument in a written passage on where to place the milkweed plant (SEP-ARG-P2). Students connect specific structures and functions of seeds to how they travel (CCC-SF-P1). Students also consider the parts of a habitat needed for the plants to survive (CCC-SYS-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with a scoring rubric to measure the three-dimensional elements of the objectives.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lessons 9 and 10, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise 12 elements. In the Science Challenge, students solve the challenge of selecting a material to put in a boo-boo pack (or cold pack). Students make predictions about what will happen to materials when they are frozen and, using the relative scales of colder and harder, compare and describe the pattern of change that occurs when a liquid and solid are frozen (CCC-CE-P2, CCC-PAT-P1, CCC-SPQ-P1, and DCI-PS1.A-P1). Students observe and test available materials to use for boo-boo packs (SEP-INV-P4, SEP-INV-P6). Students describe what happens to the observed material when it is cooled and then when it is warmed (CCC-CE-P1, DCI-PS1.B-P1). Students analyze data collected during their observations to construct a claim supporting the material that will make the best boo-boo pack (SEP-DATA-P5, SEP-ARG-P6, SEP-ARG-P7, and DCI-PS1.A-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with a scoring rubric to measure the three-dimensional elements of the objectives.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lessons 9 and 10, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Science Challenge, students solve the challenge to design a portable map. Students describe land and water in a natural park that cannot be seen from a certain vantage point and state whether the water is solid. Student pairs develop a map of a section of the park and compare their park models and maps. Students use observations to determine if solid water can be found in an area of the park (SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-PAT-P1, and DCI-ESS2.B-P1). Student pairs make a map of a section of the park and use symbols to show land and water patterns (SEP-MOD-P2, CCC-PAT-P1). Students match a map to the park model and identify common features and patterns (SEP-MOD-P3, CCC-PAT-P1, and DCI-ESS2.C-P1). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with a scoring rubric to measure the three-dimensional elements of the objectives.
Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning
Materials leverage science phenomena and engineering problems in the context of driving learning and student performance.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Criterion 1d-1i: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning. The materials include numerous phenomena and problems throughout the grade. Of those phenomena and problems, they consistently connect to grade-level appropriate DCIs and are consistently presented to students as directly as possible. Phenomena or problems consistently drive learning and engage students in the three dimensions in both learning sequences and learning opportunities. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. The materials consistently incorporate phenomena or problems to drive learning and use of the three dimensions across multiple chapters within each unit.
Indicator 1D
Phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs). Across the grade, the materials provide opportunities for students to build an understanding of grade-level DCIs through phenomena or problems. From two to eight lessons in length, learning sequences work to connect a single phenomenon or problem to corresponding DCIs.
Examples where phenomena or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, the problem is that tomato plants flowered but didn't grow fruit. Showing how plants depend on animals for pollination, students use observations of real dried bees and then design models of pollinators to show how the bristly hairs on the bees’ bodies pollinate flowers (DCI-LS2.A-P2).
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 7: Hitching a Ride, the phenomenon is that an oak seedling is growing out of a planter on a third-floor balcony with no trees around. Students use a model to investigate how seeds (including acorns) might move in the wind or by attaching to the fur of an animal. Students develop a claim with evidence for how acorns might be dispersed by wind or animal fur and then use a simulation to figure out how animals and plants interact in different habitats, including how animals support pollination or seed dispersal (DCI-LS2.A-P2).
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, the phenomenon is that there is snow on the top of mountains but nowhere else in the park. Students use observations of ice and water to compare and describe the properties and the relationship between ice and water (DCI-PS1.A-P1). Students then use a globe model and satellite images of the patterns of where ice and snow can be found on Earth. Students identify patterns in temperatures to explain why there is snow on the mountain, but nowhere else (DCI-ESS2.C-P1).
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 9: A Map for Ada, Part 1, the problem is that Ada needs a two-dimensional map of a three-dimensional relief map so that she can carry the map in her backpack. Students create a map key for the type of land or water found in the park. Students then compare maps to identify similarities in the landmarks on the maps they reviewed to the map they are creating (DCI-ESS2.B-P1).
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, the phenomenon is that crayons have changed into a new shape and mixed together when they were left out in the sun. Students observe a video of candles melting and use their observations as evidence to make a claim about what happened to the crayons (DCI-PS1.B-P1). Students investigate properties of liquid and solid sample materials (DCI-PS1.A-P1) and use their findings as evidence to make a final claim about what happened to the crayons.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 1: Late to School, the problem is that the road by Ada's school is completely blocked by mud. Students test the effects of wind and rain on land surfaces and the time it takes for changes to take place (DCI-ESS2.A-P1). Using pictures of construction sites and their previous knowledge of construction sites, students identify how long it takes for changes to occur to land and compare their ideas to the changes around Ada's school (DCI-ESS1.C-P1). Students read a story and document land changes that occurred in the story and relate them to how they think the changes in the story help to explain the changes in the land around Ada's school and the time it took for the changes to occur.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 9: Beach Erosion Problems, Part 1, the problem is that a flight of beach stairs no longer reaches the ground. Students observe videos and images of beach erosion and then make a claim about what happened to the beach. Students model wind and wave action on sandy beaches and use their observations as evidence to design a solution to the problem (DCI-ESS2.A-P1, DCI-ESS1.C-P1).
Indicator 1E
Phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible.
The instructional materials reviewed for Second Grade meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible. Across the grade level, materials consistently present phenomena and problems to students as directly as possible. With many accompanied by photographs, the majority of phenomena and problems are presented in a video with an animated character named Ada explaining the scenario. Opportunities for direct, first-hand experiences with phenomena and problems are occasionally included in the materials.
Examples where materials present phenomena and problems to students as directly as possible:
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, the phenomenon is that there is snow on the top of mountains but nowhere else in the park. Students view the image of snowy mountains set in a valley of green grass with a lake surrounded by flowers. The image of snow-capped mountains provides students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the phenomenon.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 1: Late to School, the problem is that the road by Ada's school is completely blocked by mud. Students watch a video where Ada explains the scenario and shows pictures of wet fields around the treehouse and mud blocking the road by the school. The video and still images provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the problem.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 1: Surprise Sprouts, the phenomenon is that radish seeds sprout in a backpack without light. Students watch a video of Ada explaining how seeds sprouted in a dark backpack. Using hand lenses, students observe live, sprouted radish seeds. The video and first-hand observations of sprouts provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the phenomenon.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, the problem is that tomato plants flowered but didn't grow fruit. Students watch a video of Ada explaining the scenario and look at pictures of parts of tomato plants. The video and images provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the phenomenon.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 9: Beach Erosion Problems, Part 1, the problem is that a flight of beach stairs no longer reaches the ground. Students watch a video of Ada describing the scenario where stairs to the beach can no longer be used. The video provides students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the phenomenon.
Indicator 1F
Phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions. In the majority of lessons where phenomena or problems are present, students work toward figuring out phenomena or solving problems. Students often engage with the same phenomenon or problem across multiple learning opportunities and the phenomenon or problem typically drives instruction in each of those opportunities. Across the four Modules, students consistently engage in three-dimensional lessons where two or more SEPs and at least one CCC are present.
Examples of lessons that are driven by phenomena or problems using elements of all three dimensions:
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 7: Holding Back The Land, the problem is that the road by Ada's school is completely blocked by mud. Students brainstorm ideas for solutions and read about, discuss, and share information about four methods for reducing land change (SEP-INFO-P1, DCI-ESS2.A-P1). Students suggest one way to use the methods to solve the class-defined problem (SEP-INFO-P4). Students plan how to test their ideas about whether a solution will prevent the land from washing away (DCI-ETS1.C-P1, CCC-CE-P1).
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, the phenomenon is that crayons have changed into a new shape and mixed together when they were left out in the sun. Students make predictions to explain what happened to melted crayons and use observations to describe patterns of changes in the wax (SEP-CEDS-P1). Students make an initial claim, list possible causes that generated a change in the wax of a burning candle, and list observable effects of those causes (DCI-PS1.B-P1, CCC-CE-P2, and SEP-DATA-P3). Students relate the pattern of the wax heating and its changes to the melted crayons since they are made of the same material.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 9: Boo Boo Pack, Part 1, the problem is to find the best material for filling a cold pack to help heal an injury. Students make a list of items they have used before as a boo-boo pack, look for similarities in what the packs are like (CCC-PAT-P1), and determine that most are cold and some are squishy (SEP-DATA-P3). Students then ask questions about the materials to determine which would be the best to use (SEP-AQDP-P2) and identify that the most important properties are that the packs are cold and take the shape of the hurt body part (DCI-ETS1.A-P3, DCI-PS1.A-P2). Students determine if the rice and salt are solids and then use the evidence to make a claim (SEP-ARG-P6) about rice and salt being a solid or liquid (SEP-INV-P4). Students use their evidence and predict whether liquids or solids will get colder when placed in a freezer (CCC-CE-P2, DCI-PS1.A-P1). Students then make predictions before testing materials for a boo boo pack such as modeling dough, oil, rice, salt, water, and wooden cubes (SEP-INV-P6, DCI-PS1.A-P1).
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, the problem is that tomato plants flowered but didn't grow fruit. After watching a video about the tomato plant, students list what they know about the tomato plant problem and what they need to know about tomato plants (DCI-ETS1.A-P2, SEP-ADQP-P1). Via reading text, students collect data on the appearance and function of roots, pollen, and fruit and compare that information to the problem presented (SEP-INFO-P3, SEP-INFO-P1, and CCC-SF-P1). Students explain what plant parts look like in relation to their function using information gathered (SEP-CEDS-P1) about tomatoes getting help from bumble bees or other pollinators. Using information about tomato plants needing pollinators to grow fruit, students make a claim as to why the tomato plants did not grow tomatoes (DCI-PS2.A-P2, SEP-ARG-P3).
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 7: Hitching a Ride, the phenomenon is that an oak seedling is growing out of a planter on a third-floor balcony with no trees around. Students predict how they think the plant got into the planter (DCI-LS2.A-P2, SEP-CEDS-P1). Students observe three kinds of seeds and a wooden ball that represents an acorn (SEP-MOD-P1) and document their size, shape, and texture (SEP-DATA-P1, CCC-SF-P1). To determine if shape and texture help the seeds to move in different ways, students use a fan to model wind moving the seed and record how far the seeds traveled (SEP-MOD-P2, CCC-SF-P1). Students swipe a piece of faux fur (SEP-MOD-P2) over the seeds and determine which seeds stick to the fur (CCC-SF-P1). Using evidence from their investigations, students write a claim (SEP-ARG-P6) to explain how the acorn seed was moved (SEP-CEDS-P1).
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 10: A Map for Ada, Part 2, the problem is that Ada needs a two-dimensional map of a three-dimensional relief map so that she can carry the map in her backpack. Students compare park models and paper maps to identify common features and differences between the models and the paper maps (SEP-MOD-P2) and try to match another group's map to the group's model. Students record data about the map and its picture source and cite patterns used to depict the unseen part of Ada's park, patterns in land and water, and hints of ice or snow (DCI-ESS2.B-P1, SEP-MOD-P1, and CCC-PAT-P1). Students use their observations and discussion to make modifications to their own map (SEP-MOD-P3).
Indicator 1G
Materials are designed to include both phenomena and problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Second Grade are designed to include both phenomena and problems. Across the four Modules, the materials include seven problems and five phenomena.
Each of the four Modules focus on a different science discipline: life, earth and space, physical, and engineering design. Thematic in nature, Modules consist of ten lessons that are grouped into learning sequences varying between one and eight lessons in length. Life, earth and space, and physical science Modules end with a two-lesson Science Challenge. The engineering design Module ends with a two-lesson Design Challenge.
Phenomena and problems are typically introduced in the first lesson of a learning sequence. Phenomena and problems within a Module share common topics that connect to the overall theme of the Module. For example, life-related phenomena or problems are introduced at the start of each learning sequence in the Module How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow? The engineering design Module How Can We Send A Message Using Sound? introduces only problems in its learning sequences.
Examples where materials are designed to include phenomena:
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, the phenomenon is that there is snow on the top of mountains but nowhere else in the park. Students compare temperature differences between water and ice, make predictions and observe where on earth they can find snow, and observe satellite imagery of snow across the globe. Students observe that the locations on the globe they identified are parts of tall mountain ranges like the mountains in Ada's park. Students explain that the top of the mountains are freezing where the snow is but the bottom of the mountain is warmer where there isn't any snow.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 1: Surprise Sprouts, the phenomenon is that radish seeds sprout in a backpack without light. Students observe the color, shape, and size of radish sprouts and identify the parts of the sprout (seeds, roots, and shoots). Students run experiments to test the effect of water versus light on radish seeds. Based on their data, they explain that seeds need water, not light, to grow, but light makes plants grow healthier.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, the phenomenon is that crayons have changed into a new shape and mixed together when they were left out in the sun. Observing a model of melted crayons, students make a prediction to explain what happened to the crayons and brainstorm other things that melt that they could test. Students watch a video of melting candles and create a cause-and-effect chart to determine that the flame caused the candle to melt which in turn caused the wax to move and change from a solid to a liquid. When the candle was blown out, the wax cooled and became solid again. Students use the observations of the candles as evidence to support their claims about what happened to the crayons since candles and crayons are made from similar materials.
Examples where materials are designed to include problems:
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 9: Beach Erosion Problems, Part 1, the problem is that a flight of beach stairs no longer reaches the ground. Students explore water and wind action that may have caused the land around the beach stairs to change. Students use a model to test solutions to the problem and identify the parts of each solution that would work well for short-term and long-term events.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 1: Late to School, the problem is that the road by Ada's school is completely blocked by mud. Students observe the land around their school and develop ideas about what may have happened with the muddy road. Students build, test, and make predictions with a model to learn more about how rain and wind may have moved land materials onto the road by Ada's school. After identifying a problem to solve near Ada’s school, students test solutions with a model made of sand. Students identify that a lack of wind and rain will limit or keep soil from moving and grass-like plants lessen soil loss.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 9: A Map for Ada, Part 1, the problem is that Ada needs a two-dimensional map of a three-dimensional relief map so that she can carry the map in her backpack. Students review a previously made map and determine the best qualities to include in their map. After creating a legend and symbols to represent land or water, students make a map of the section of Ada's Park model.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 9: Place that Plant!, Part 1, the problem is that a teacher needs to know where to plant a burdock and milkweed plant for a school garden. While analyzing the schoolyard map, students look for sunny and shady areas, where bees might be, and where it might be windy and wet. After determining what parts of the playground meet the needs of the plants, students create an argument for best placement and analyze claims based on the seeds’ need for light and water.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, the problem is that tomato plants flowered but didn't grow fruit. Students read about tomato plants, observe illustrations showing that pollination makes fruit, and record observations of how a dried bee makes a good pollinator. After discussing the parts a hand pollinator should have, students review criteria for creating a design solution, select three materials, and draw designs for a tool to use as an artificial pollinator. Students solve the problem by designing and testing a bee structure that functions as a pollinator to evaluate its effectiveness.
Indicator 1H
Materials intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet expectations that they intentionally elicit and leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems. Throughout the grade, the materials consistently elicit students’ prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems. This frequently happens when a phenomenon or problem is first introduced to students or when they develop initial explanations or solutions. When this occurs, the teacher generally explicitly asks students if they have seen or experienced the phenomenon or problem before and students have an opportunity to respond. In some cases, the character Ada, who introduces the phenomenon or problem in the Ada Asks videos, will ask if students have ever encountered the phenomenon or problem before.
The materials also provide opportunities to leverage students’ prior knowledge and experience as they explain and solve phenomena and problems, but do so less consistently. Students’ prior knowledge and experience are leveraged in several different ways. This includes prompting students to use their prior experience to support their thinking, using what students share to identify common patterns across a phenomenon, or applying previous experiences to engage with the phenomenon or problem. In all of these cases, the materials make the connection between students’ prior knowledge and experience and their application to the phenomenon or problem explicit.
The materials also include generic supports for the teacher to engage with students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena and problems. Each Pre-Assessment is accompanied by Questions for Teacher Reflection, which include a question about how students bring in their prior experiences and knowledge as they develop their initial explanation or solution. Lessons also occasionally include EL Strategy callout boxes that suggest, “Access students’ prior knowledge and experience.” Both of these supports are generalized and do not always include support specific to the lesson.
Example where the materials elicit and leverage prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, the phenomenon is that crayons have changed into a new shape and mixed together when they were left out in the sun. Students observe the phenomenon in the Ada Asks video and then make an initial prediction about the cause of the change. The teacher leverages students’ prior experience by, “Encourage[ing] them to use what they already know and consider any previous experience” as they support their initial claims. Later, the teacher again prompts them to apply prior knowledge and experience as they try to determine what caused the wax to harden.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 5: Can We Make a Crayon?, the problem is the crayons have all been melted together but need to be used again. The teacher elicits students’ experience related to the problem by asking “What properties have you observed in crayons that you have used before?” The teacher leverages those ideas to develop a list of properties that the crayons that the students will be making should have. In Lesson 7: Testing the Templates, students return to the list and use it to evaluate whether the template for their crayon meets their needs. In Lesson 8: Creating Our Crayons, students return a third time to decide if there are additional properties their crayon needs.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 7: Hitching a Ride, the phenomenon is that an oak seedling is growing out of a planter on the third-floor balcony with no trees around. After observing the phenomenon in the Ada Asks video, the teacher asks students if they have ever seen anything like this happen in their own lives. The materials leverage these experiences when students make their initial predictions about the planter and the teacher “Remind(s) students that they might get ideas from their own or their classmates’ similar experiences.”
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land and Water on Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, the phenomenon is that there is snow on the top of mountains but nowhere else in the park. After observing the phenomenon, the teacher asks students to share what they think is at the top of the mountain and is prompted to ask where they have seen something similar and what they know about it. The teacher then leverages these ideas when they are prompted to “Use these ideas to ask students to consider how they could do an investigation to learn more about the white stuff/snow.”
Examples where materials elicit but do not leverage prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 1: Piece by Piece, the phenomenon is that a sculpture is built with marine debris and it has a lot of different types of materials with different properties that come together to make a sculpture of a turtle. After viewing the sculpture in the Ada Asks video, students share their experiences building sculptures. Teachers are prompted to remind students that Ada mentioned that she had made sculptures using modeling dough and plastic building blocks. The materials miss the opportunity to leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, the problem is that tomato plants flowered but didn't grow fruit. After observing the problem in the Ada Asks video, the teacher prompts students to “think about whether anything like this has happened to them.” Students share their experiences, but the materials miss the opportunity to leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land and Water on Earth?, Lesson 9: A Map for Ada, Part 1, the problem is that Ada needs a version of the park model that will fit into her backpack. After being introduced to the problem, the teacher asks students to “think about the times that you needed to figure out more about what was around you.” Students share their experiences, but the materials miss the opportunity to leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences.
Indicator 1I
Materials embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions. The instructional materials consistently use phenomena or problems to drive student learning and to engage with all three dimensions as students engage in modeling, develop and revise explanations, and solve problems across most lesson sequences. Each unit consists of at least two lesson sequences which vary in the number of lessons included. In addition to driving learning across multiple lessons within a sequence, phenomena and problems within a single unit are often connected across learning sequences by a similar theme. For example, the Life Science unit focuses on relationships between plants and animals where students make sense of an ecosystem-related phenomenon or problem in each learning sequence. When phenomena and problems drive instruction across multiple learning opportunities, students consistently engage with all three dimensions as they make sense of or solve phenomena and problems. Students also have a variety of opportunities to revisit and revise their thinking through writing, drawing, and discussion.
Examples of phenomena and problems that drive students’ learning and use of the three dimensions across multiple lessons in the unit:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lessons 3 and 4, the phenomenon is that crayons have changed into a new shape and mixed together when they were left out in the sun. Students engage in two lessons to investigate the properties of crayons and explain why they changed shape and mixed together. In Lesson 3, students predict (SEP-INV-P6) what they think happened to cause the crayons to melt. Students use observations of melting candles to describe patterns in the melting and cooling wax (DCI-PS1.B-P1). In Lesson 4, students investigate (SEP-INV-P2) properties of solids and liquids and make comparisons (SEP-INV-P4) to describe patterns that account for why the crayons changed shape (SEP-CEDS-P1, SEP-DATA-P3, and CCC-PAT-P1). Based on their observations and investigations, students make a claim supported by evidence about what happened to the classroom crayons (SEP-INV-P4). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as writing claims, sharing ideas with a partner, engaging in class discussions, making observations, carrying out investigations, and updating their claims with a partner based on evidence.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lessons 1-8, the problem is that the road by Ada's school is completely blocked by mud. In Lesson 1, students record their ideas about things that might change over periods of time and use their observations from a video to support their explanations of how mud ended up on the road (DCI-ESS2.A-P1, DCI-ESS1.C-P1). In Lesson 2, students use prior experiences and ask questions to begin to plan an investigation to learn more about the problem (SEP-DATA-P1, SEP-CEDS-P1). In Lesson 3, students observe the effects of wind and water by using the land model to see that wind and water can cause sand to move quickly (CCC-SC-P2). In Lesson 4, students use observations from their land model and construction site images as evidence to describe what weather conditions might cause the land to change through soil movement (DCI-ESS2.A-P1). In Lesson 5, students read text to gather more information and coupled with their observations, explain that the rapid change of the land surface was caused by rain and/or wind (DCI-ESS2.A-P1, DCI-ESS1.C-P1, SEP-INFO-P1, and CCC-SC-P2). In Lesson 6, students define the problem specifically and determine exactly what their solutions need to accomplish. In Lesson 7, students suggest testable ideas and consider different timeframes. In Lesson 8, students generate and compare multiple solutions to preventing land from washing away and discuss if they prevent or reduce sand movement (DCI-ETS1.C-P1). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as writing initial explanations, sharing ideas in class discussions, gathering ideas in a class chart, discussing how their thinking changes with a partner, and brainstorming, testing, and evaluating solutions to the problem.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lessons 1-3, the phenomenon is that radish seeds sprout in a backpack without light. Students engage in a series of lessons to investigate and then explain that plants need water and light but seeds can sprout with only water. In Lesson 1, students make an initial claim of why they think the seeds sprouted (DCI-LS2.A-P1, SEP-CEDS-P1). Students record observations to collect data on the growing sprouts which includes labeling the parts of the sprout (SEP-DATA-P1). Using the observations, students explain observable patterns that the radish seeds sprouted in the backpack even though it was dark. Students look for similarities and differences in the sprouts (SEP-INV-P4) and predict the reason the seeds sprouted in the backpack based on previous experiences (SEP-INV-P6, CCC-CE-P1). In Lesson 2, students plan and conduct an investigation to determine if plants rely on the presence of both light and water for growth (DCI-LS2.A-P1, CCC-CE-P1). By examining media observations, students identify patterns and cause and effect relationships in the natural world (SEP-DATA-P3). In Lesson 3, students use their data (SEP-DATA-P3) and compare the plants that were given water and light to the plants that were just given light. Students then make a claim supported with evidence as to whether the plant needs water and light or just light to grow (DCI-LS2.A-P1, SEP-CEDS-P1, and CCC-PE-P1). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as sharing ideas with a partner, drawing observations, carrying out investigations, and analyzing and interpreting data collected.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lessons 4-6, the problem is that tomato plants flowered but didn't grow fruit. Students engage in a series of lessons to explain that plants need pollination and to design and build a model of hand pollinators that can solve the problem. In Lesson 4, students ask questions to learn more about the problem (DCI-LS2.A-P2, SEP-AQDP-P1) and then use text and media sources to gather information about plant parts and their function (CCC-SF-P1, SEP-INFO-P3, and SEP-INFO-P1). Using the evidence gathered, students construct an initial claim outlining why the plants don't grow tomatoes (DCI-ETS1.A-P2, SEP-CEDS-P1, and SEP-ARG-P3). In Lesson 5, after observing dried bees, students draw a diagram of the body parts of the bee and explain the structure and function for pollinating flowers (CCC-SYS-P2, CCC-SF-P1). Using information from their data (SEP-DATA-P3), students make a claim about why a bee is a good pollinator (DCI-LS2.A-P2), develop initial ideas of a tool that mimics the structure and function of bumble bees (DCI-ETS1.B-P1), and compare their designs to others in the class (SEP-ARG-P6, SEP-CEDS-P3). In Lesson 6, students design a model of a tool that mimics the structure and function of bumble bees (DCI-LS2.A-P2, CCC-SF-P1) and choose materials that fit the need of their tool (SEP-MOD-P4, SEP-CEDS-P2). Students test their tool for effectiveness and record their observations (SEP-DATA-P1). Students compare pollinators to decide which shapes and textures worked best and which did not (DCI-ETS1.C-P1, SEP-CEDS-P3). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as engaging in sharing ideas with a partner, class discussions, drawing and writing about bees and pollination, and designing and building models to solve a problem.
Overview of Gateway 2
Coherence & Scope
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence & Scope; Criterion 1: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions meets expectations.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions
Materials are coherent in design, scientifically accurate, and support grade-band endpoints of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for the Criterion 2a-2g: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions. The materials support students in understanding connections between units. The materials, and corresponding suggested sequence, reveal student tasks related to explaining phenomena or solving problems that increase in sophistication within each unit and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for physical science; life science; earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the SEPs at the grade level and all of the SEPs across the grade band. The materials include all grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Indicator 2A
Materials are designed for students to build and connect their knowledge and use of the three dimensions across the series.
Indicator 2A.i
Students understand how the materials connect the dimensions from unit to unit.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that students understand how the materials connect the dimensions from Module to Module. The materials include four Modules, each focused on a different discipline, that may be taught in any order: Earth and Space Science, Life Science, Physical Science, and Engineering Design. Within lessons, the materials frequently address what was covered in previous lessons and how it furthers the learning in current lessons. Each lesson builds to the next and includes prompts for the teacher to support students in making those connections. In addition, Series Connection call out boxes prompt the teacher to draw attention to connections to other grade level Modules or previous grade Modules if students have previously completed them.
Examples of student learning experiences that demonstrate connections across:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 1: Surprise Sprouts, students are introduced to the phenomena of radish seeds sprouting in a backpack and use what they have learned about what animals and plants need to survive. Students make observations of sprouted and unsprouted seeds to make comparisons. The Series Connection callout in this lesson prompts teachers to have students think about what they learned about plants’ needs in the module from Kindergarten, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 6: A Gardener’s Delight, students design and build a device to hand pollinate flowers. The Series Connection callout in this lesson prompts teachers to have students think about how recording designs was helpful in solving a problem in the How Can We Send a Message Using Sound? Module from Grade 1.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 2: Asking and Answering Questions, students consider a situation of land washing away and how they might find out more about the problem by asking questions. Students are asked to share what they know about how engineers solve problems. The Series Connection callout reminds students to think about how they learned more about a problem of a fruitless tomato plant in a previous Grade 2 module, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, students think about the properties of materials and changes in states of matter to figure out why snow and ice are on top of the mountain and not anywhere else in a natural park. Students investigate the physical properties of water and compare them using their senses. The Series Connection callout directs the students to describe how water changes states between solid and liquid and recall other types of matter they observed changing phases in the Grade 2 module, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?
Indicator 2A.ii
Materials have an intentional sequence where student tasks increase in sophistication.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten to Grade 2 meet expectations that they have an intentional sequence where student tasks increase in sophistication. Materials are designed with an intentional and suggested sequence across the series where grade specific units may be taught in any order. There is no specific increase in rigor within grade level units as rigor occurs across the grade band. Across the series, tasks increase in sophistication in a number of ways. From Kindergarten to Grade 2, many student supports are gradually faded out. For instance, in Kindergarten, students frequently develop ideas collaboratively in a whole group setting but by Grade 2, students do more work, like developing explanations, independently. Other supports, like sentence frames and graphic organizers, also occur less frequently in Grade 2. The complexity of tasks increases as students go through the grade band. In Kindergarten, students work with smaller data sets and may investigate only a single aspect of a phenomenon, whereas in Grade 2 they collect, analyze, and use larger bodies of evidence to support explanations and solve more complex problems. The increase in sophistication is consistent across the DCIs that students encounter, the SEPs that students engage in to make sense of phenomena and solve problems, and the CCCs that they apply.
Examples of student tasks increasing in sophistication across the grade band:
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students collect, communicate, and use information. In Kindergarten, the teacher provides significant support as students engage with scientific texts, including reading aloud to students and guiding them through comprehension strategies. By Grade 2, students engage with texts more independently and do more to summarize and synthesize what they read. For instance, in Kindergarten, Life Science, What do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 7: You Get What You Need, the teacher reads a story about habitats from the Smithsonian Stories Literacy Series Big Book: Wander and Wonder. In addition to reading the story for the students, the teacher rereads the story, pauses at each organism it discusses, asks students key questions about the information on what each organism needs, and then records student responses in a class chart. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When the Sky Will Be Dark?, Lesson 3: Oksana, Issa, and Layla, students read a story from the book Sky Patterns. As in Kindergarten, the teacher first reads the book aloud to students, and pauses to ask comprehension questions and point out important information. Students, however, are responsible for working with a partner to return to the story, reread it, and record important information in their journals. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, students read about the parts of a plant in a story from the book Blossoms, Bees, and Seeds. Students begin by previewing the book and looking at the headings and other text features for connections they make. The teacher reads the book aloud to the class once but does not pause to ask comprehension questions. The teacher then provides a purpose for reading the text, students read the text, independently share what they learned with a partner, and then record information they learned from the story in their journal on their own.
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students develop explanations of phenomena. In Kindergarten, the teacher provides sentence frames for students to state their explanations, uses guided questions to support students to develop explanations, and leads students to collectively develop explanations. By Grade 2, students develop explanations more independently, incorporate more evidence in their explanations, and assess how their explanations have changed. For example, in Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 3: Faster, Faster!, students investigate what makes objects move quickly. As students make sense of their observations, the teacher provides a sentence frame for students to use as they state their observations. The teacher records student responses on a class chart for them, and then guides students to use another sentence frame to state their conclusion. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When the Sky Will Be Dark?, Lesson 7: Mysterious Moon, students model the moon’s apparent change of shape. After making observations of their model, students discuss with a partner and then independently write or draw why they think the bright part of the model changed shape. The teacher then returns to the question of the actual moon appearing to change shape but does not provide students with sentence stems to state their ideas. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land from Washing Away?, Lesson 5: Change! Change! Read All about It!, students work independently with fewer supports to develop an explanation. After students read a text to collect information on what causes changes to the land, they are prompted to explain what caused the road behind Ada’s school to be covered in mud. Unlike in previous lessons, they develop their explanations independently, without discussing possible explanations as a class first. In addition, the student notebook provides fewer scaffolds for students to write their claims. The notebooks include basic prompts, like “This is my evidence,” but do not include sentence stems.
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students use models to explain phenomena and solve problems. As students progress through the band, the expectations for their models increase and by Grade 2 their models are based on larger bodies of evidence, include labels and explanations, are developed more independently, and include simulations. Expectations for student understanding of modeling as a practice also increase. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plan, Part 1, students model the habitats present on a schoolyard. The materials provide students with a template of the model and symbols of organisms to cut out and include in the model (e.g., caterpillar, tree). Students are further supported by the practice of discussing and refining their models with the entire class. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send a Message Using Sound?, Lesson 6: Drum Vibrations, students draw a model of a device that will make sound. Students now discuss their models in pairs, rather than as a full class, and their models must include labels identifying their proposed materials as well as a justification for why they selected the materials in their models. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 6: A Gardener’s Gadget, students make a device that can pollinate plants. Prior to building the device, students draw a detailed model that includes labels of each part and the material. In developing their model, students must also describe the shape or texture of each element and explain how it relates to the device’s function and its similarity to the bee that is being modeled.
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students construct and use arguments to support their explanations of phenomena or solutions to problems. In Kindergarten, students make and support claims, but are heavily supported by the teacher and do not typically analyze arguments. By Grade 2, students are expected to include multiple sources of evidence, explain how the evidence supports their claims, and analyze others’ oral and written arguments for validity or accuracy. For example, in Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 2: Move that Ball!, students investigate how to start a ball’s motion. Students conduct a simple investigation and use the results to make a claim about what made a hockey puck move. Students are given a sentence frame to help them state their claim and provide supporting evidence. In Grade 1, Life Science, How do Living Things Stay Safe and Grow?, Lesson 6: Penguin Protection, students use a greater range of sources as evidence for their arguments. Students collect evidence on penguin behaviors from a simulation and video of a young and adult penguin interacting. They discuss this evidence, along with evidence they collected from a book in a previous lesson, and explain how it can support their claim about a young penguin’s behavior. Students then take these multiple pieces of evidence and construct their own argument independently in their journal. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 6: Making a Mold, students continue using multiple sources of evidence to support their arguments but also engage in a discussion about one another’s arguments. Using evidence and information collected over multiple lessons, students make a claim about a container they can use to mold their own crayons. After sharing their plans, the teacher encourages students to “ask a question, challenge, and/or add to other students’ ideas.” The teacher supports students to engage with one another’s arguments by suggesting they refer to the evidence they collected.
Indicator 2B
Materials present Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) in a way that is scientifically accurate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they present disciplinary core ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts in a way that is scientifically accurate. Across the grade, the teacher materials, student materials, and assessments accurately represent the three dimensions and are free from scientific inaccuracies in each of the four units.
Indicator 2C
Materials do not inappropriately include scientific content and ideas outside of the grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they do not inappropriately include scientific content and ideas outside of the grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs). Across the grade, the materials consistently incorporate student learning opportunities to learn and use DCIs appropriate to the grade.
Indicator 2D
Materials incorporate all grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
Indicator 2D.i
Physical Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for physical sciences. Across the grade, the materials include all of the associated elements of the physical science DCIs.
Examples of grade-level physical science DCI elements present in the materials:
PS1.A-P1. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 5: Can We Make a Crayon?, students describe the properties of crayons, conduct an investigation of heating and cooling crayons, and explain that the crayon became liquid, or melted, when it was heated and then became solid again when it cooled.
PS1.A-P2. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 10: Boo Boo Pack Problems, Part 2, after investigating different types of materials for ice packs, students recommend which material is best suited for an ice pack based on the highest ratings of coldness and shape.
PS1.A-P3. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 7: Testing the Templates, students use different materials to build a template mold of something that is easy to write with and describe how they combined test materials to make this template.
PS1.B-P1. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 6: Making a Mold, students read a story about a silver necklace being made with a mold. Students discuss that the wax and silver used in the process underwent reversible changes but the changes to the clay were irreversible. In Lesson 9: Emergency Escape, Part 1, students choose from modeling dough, oil, rice, salt, water, and wooden cubes to determine what happens when they are frozen and describe their properties when they freeze. Students identify that liquids change state when frozen but solids will only change temperature.
Indicator 2D.ii
Life Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for life sciences. Across the grade, the materials include all of the associated components and elements of the life science DCIs.
Examples of the grade-level life science DCI elements present in the materials:
LS2.A-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 3: Sunshine and Rain, students investigate to compare seedlings that had water and no light, seedlings that had light and no water, and seedlings that had both water and light. Students make a claim and support it with evidence that plants need both sunlight and water in order to survive.
LS2.A-P2. In Grade 2, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow? Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, students record information from text that relates plant structures to their function to help them see how pollen moves, including bees that carry pollen from plant to plant. Students explain that pollen must be moved from flower to flower to help them reproduce and that fruit must be moved to help plants move seeds to make new plants.
LS4.D-P1. In Grade 2, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow? Lesson 8: Home on the Range, students use a simulation to gather information about where animals and plants live and how they overlap at times. Students explain that different plants and animals live in different habitats, how those plants and animals interact with each other, and identify patterns for animals and plants that work together when their ranges overlap.
Indicator 2D.iii
Earth and Space Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for earth and space sciences. Across the grade, the materials include all of the associated elements of the earth and space science DCIs.
Examples of the grade-level earth and space science DCI elements present in the materials:
ESS1.C-P1. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Keep Land And Water From Washing Away?, Lesson 5: Change! Change! Read All About It!, students read a non-fiction text and record information on slow and fast land changes. Students construct explanations of the relative amounts of time it takes for different land changes to occur.
ESS2.A-P1. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Keep Land And Water From Washing Away?, Lesson 3: Surface Erosion (a Little off the Top), students use a sand model to conduct an investigation on the effects of rain and wind on land surface. Students observe and record changes to the surface and compile group results to explain how wind and rain can cause land to change.
ESS2.B-P1. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 9: A Map for Ada, Part 1, students develop a finalized map of land and water features in a section of a park. Students select symbols for types of land and water features and match their shapes and locations in the map to the park models they constructed previously.
ESS2.C-P1. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 4: Ice Hunt, students use satellite images to identify where solid water is located on earth’s surface and use the results of previous investigations of liquid and solid water to explain that water freezes to form a solid at colder locations on earth. In Lesson 5: Kinds of Water, students use observations from images to define different types of water bodies on earth (including oceans, rivers, lakes, and ponds).
Indicator 2D.iv
Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-band and grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for engineering, technology, and applications of science (ETS) and all associated elements.
In Kindergarten, three performance expectations (PEs) are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. The materials include opportunities for students to engage with these ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of the Kindergarten grade-level ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.A-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 8: Carrying the Shade, Part 1, students represent (illustrate) the problem of sunlight shining on a girl and the girl feeling hot. Students discuss that she doesn’t want to feel hot in the sunlight and they can find a solution to the problem. Students read about how engineers designed a solution to keep zoo animals cool, then discuss what they should do to start designing a solution to the girl’s problem.
ETS1.A-P2. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder?, students ask questions about the problem of Ada’s hot playground, use their hands to make observations of warmer and cooler objects, and gather information from images to think about the problem.
ETS1.B-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 6: Design a Shade, students design a shade device for the playground. Students make a drawing, list materials, work in pairs to share their drawings and lists, and then generate a single design.
In Grade 1, no PEs are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. However, the materials do include opportunities for students to engage with ETS elements in this grade.
Example of the grade-band ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.A-P3. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send A Message Using Sound?, Lesson 1: Time to Go!, student pairs model a field trip situation in which students cannot hear their teacher’s voice from a distance. Students use their modeling activity to form a statement of the problem before designing a solution. In Lesson 9: River Crossing, Part 1, students discuss how they could make a version of a river crossing game to play in their classroom. Students use the class discussion to clearly define the problem (students playing the game need to know which way to move) before beginning to design a solution.
In Grade 2, two PEs are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. The materials include opportunities for students to engage with these ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of the Grade 2 grade-level ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.B-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, students investigate the role of bees in pollination and design a device that will pollinate a flower. After they draw and share their designs, students discuss how they used drawings and models to share ideas and other ways they could have shared their ideas.
ETS1.C-P1. In Grade 2, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 8: Test and Compare, students test their design solutions to determine if sand movement is reduced and record observations of the results. Students compare their solution models and testing results to the different models and testing results of other groups.
The Grades K-2 band includes one DCI PE that is designed to be taught at any point across the grade band. This PE includes five elements. The materials provide opportunities to engage with ETS DCIs and their elements in all three grades within this band.
Examples of grade-band ETS DCI elements present in the Grade K-2 materials:
ETS1.A-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 8: Carrying the Shade, Part 1, students represent (illustrate) the problem of sunlight shining on a girl and the girl feeling hot. Students discuss that she doesn’t want to feel hot in the sunlight and they can find a solution to the problem. Students read about how engineers designed a solution to keep zoo animals cool, then discuss what they should do to start designing a solution to the girl’s problem.
ETS1.A-P2. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder?, students ask questions about the problem of Ada’s hot playground, use their hands to make observations of warmer and cooler objects, and gather information from images to think about the problem.
ETS1.A-P3. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send A Message Using Sound?, Lesson 1: Time to Go!, student pairs model a field trip situation in which students cannot hear their teacher’s voice from a distance. Students use their modeling activity to form a statement of the problem before designing a solution. In Lesson 9: River Crossing, Part 1, students discuss how they could make a version of a river crossing game to play in their classroom. Students use the class discussion to clearly define the problem (students playing the game need to know which way to move) before beginning to design a solution.
ETS1.B-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, students investigate the role of bees in pollination and design a device that will pollinate a flower. After they draw and share their designs, students discuss how they used drawings and models to share ideas and other ways they could have shared their ideas.
ETS1.C-P1. In Grade 2, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 8: Test and Compare, students test their design solutions to determine if sand movement is reduced and record observations of the results. Students compare their solution models and testing results to the different models and testing results of other groups.
Indicator 2E
Materials incorporate all grade-level Science and Engineering Practices.
Indicator 2E.i
Materials incorporate grade-level appropriate SEPs within each grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level science and engineering practices and associated elements. The materials include all of the SEP elements associated with the performance expectations (PEs) for the grade level. These are found across all four units for this grade.
Examples of SEP elements associated with the grade-level performance expectations that are present in the materials:
MOD-P3. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 10: A Map for Ada, Part 2, students use what they have learned about maps to convert a 3-D map into a 2-D map with patterns of symbols and a legend. Students identify relationships between how land and water are represented across multiple maps and then provide evidence to support which 3-D map matches their 2-D map. Students compare the relative scales of land features in both maps and observe the patterns between them.
MOD-P4. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 6: A Gardener’s Gadget, after investigating how bees pollinate flowers, students draw a simple model of a hand pollinator that could be used when bees are not available. Students describe how the parts of their hand pollinator mimic bees’ structures and their functions. Students then create the hand pollinator using materials in class as a physical model of their drawings.
INV-P2. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 3: Surface Erosion (a Little off the Top), students discuss how to model a road covered in mud to better understand what happened. Students then plan explorations of how wind, rain, and a combination of the two could cause the road to become impassable. Students brainstorm ways to model wind moving sand in a tray, rain hitting sand in a tray, and the combination of the two and then physically model the situations.
INV-P4. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 9: Beach Erosion Problems, Part 1, students develop a solution to the problem that the land under beach stairs is being moved away. Students use models of the shore to simulate and compare two ways that water and/or wind can move the sand away.
DATA-P5. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 7: Testing the Templates, students analyze and test different crayon molds to determine which should be used to recreate melted crayons. Students conduct four tests to compare marker, glue stick, cotton swab, and pencil molds. Students combine the best features of the trial molds to create a final mold that they test for ease of writing and ease of holding.
CEDS-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 3: Sunshine and Rain, students make observations of seeds that were exposed to light and water, water only, or light only. Students use their observations as evidence in their explanation about what seeds need to grow.
CEDS-P3. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, using a dried bee glued to a popsicle stick, students explore how a bee pollinates flowers with its fuzzy body. Students create a tool that could pollinate flowers like a bee. Students draw their designs and share with others to compare designs.
ARG-P6. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 9: Boo-Boo Pack Problems, Part 1, students observe the properties of rice and salt to determine if they are solid or liquid. Students make a claim about the state of matter of rice and salt and support their claim with evidence. Students then discuss their claims and evidence for which materials make the best filling for a boo-boo pack.
INFO-P3. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, students collect evidence from a text by looking for titles, illustrations, and captions to solve the problem of tomato plants not flowering. Students then read the whole text as a class followed by working with a partner to find different parts of a plant and how the structures relate to their functions.
Indicator 2E.ii
Materials incorporate all SEPs across the grade band
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level science and engineering practices and associated elements across the grade band. The materials include all of the SEP elements associated with the performance expectations (PEs) for the grade band. Elements of the SEPs are found across all three grades within this grade band.
Examples of SEP elements associated with the grade-band performance expectations that are present in the materials:
AQDP-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 4: Snow, Snow, Go Away, based on their observations of the snowman melting in the sequencing activity, students turn to shoulder partners and come up with a question they need to answer to determine why the snow melts at some times but does not melt at other times.
MOD-P3. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 10: A Map for Ada, Part 2, students use what they have learned about maps to convert a 3-D map into a 2-D map with patterns of symbols and a legend. Students identify relationships between how land and water are represented across multiple maps and then provide evidence to support which 3-D map matches their 2-D map. Students compare the relative scales of land features in both maps and observe the patterns between them.
MOD-P4. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 6: A Gardener’s Gadget, after investigating how bees pollinate flowers, students draw a simple model of a hand pollinator that could be used when bees are not available. Students describe how the parts of their hand pollinator mimic bees’ structures and their functions. Students then create the hand pollinator using materials in class as a physical model of their drawings.
INV-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 7: Are You Keeping It Cool?, students collaborate on a plan to investigate the effectiveness of their devices that they designed to keep a surface from warming in lamplight.
INV-P2. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow?, Lesson 1: A Pair of Penguins, students investigate why the penguins in the Falkland/Malvinas Islands look different. Students collaborate with a partner to decide how to make and record observations of the penguins, carry out their investigations, and then use their data to add to their developing explanation.
INV-P3. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe and Grow?, Lesson 4: Like Parent, Like Offspring, students investigate the difference between young and adult plants. Prior to making their observations, the students discuss which senses would best help them to make observations useful to their investigation.
INV-P4. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send a Message Using Sound?, Lesson 4: Sound Test, students investigate sound using different devices: ruler on table, stretched rubber bands, tuning fork, and a class suggested device. Students record observations of what they felt, saw, and heard. With their observations, students engage in a class discussion about how the different devices are similar and different regarding if it makes sound, how loud it is, and how far away they could hear it.
DATA-P3. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plans, Part 1, students use observations of caterpillars, plants, and photographs of the schoolyard to identify what living things are in the schoolyard and what those living things need in order to survive.
DATA-P5. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 7: Testing the Templates, students analyze and test different crayon molds to determine which should be used to recreate melted crayons. Students conduct four tests to compare marker, glue stick, cotton swab, and pencil molds. Students combine the best features of the trial molds to create a final mold that they test for ease of writing and ease of holding.
CEDS-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 3: Sunshine and Rain, students make observations of seeds that were exposed to light and water, water only, or light only. Students use their observations as evidence in their explanation about what seeds need to grow.
CEDS-P2. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow?, Lesson 8: Mimic and Make, students first develop drawn models with a partner to solve the problem of scientists encountering difficult terrain for observing birds. Along with the models that mimic parts of living organisms, students list what materials they need to make a physical model of their solution. Student pairs build their models and share design solutions with other students.
ARG-P6. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 9: Boo-Boo Pack Problems, Part 1, students observe the properties of rice and salt to determine if they are solid or liquid. Students make a claim about the state of matter of rice and salt and support their claim with evidence. Students then discuss their claims and evidence for which materials make the best filling for a boo-boo pack.
INFO-P1. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 4: What’s on the Menu?, students collaboratively read the text “What’s on the Menu?” as they make observations and collect data on what coyotes, woodpeckers, and beavers need in order to live. Based on the data collected, students describe what they think caterpillars need to live.
INFO-P3. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow?, Lesson 5: Staying Alive, students construct an initial argument explaining the behavior of parents and offspring. Students read an informational text to collect evidence for their arguments. Prior to reading, the teacher previews the text features, including headings and bolded words, and discusses that, like scientists, they will use a book to collect information.
INFO-P4. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Do We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 6: Design a Shade, student teams share final drawings of their shade device plans which contain materials needed for the design. Students use a classroom response gesture to respond if they think their model will assemble as planned and block the light as intended. Students then share with a student from another group one concern they have about their design and listen to them for suggestions to their concern.
Indicator 2F
Materials incorporate all grade-band Crosscutting Concepts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level crosscutting concepts (CCCs) and associated elements across the grade band. The materials include all of the CCC elements associated with the performance expectations for the grade band. Elements of the CCCs are found across all three grades within this grade band. Materials do not include elements of the CCCs from above the grade band.
Examples of CCC elements associated with the grade-band performance expectations that are present in the materials:
CE-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion? Lesson 2: Move That Ball, students conduct a test to determine how many different ways they can start a ball’s motion using pushes and pulls with a tongue depressor, yarn, a straw, and tape.
CE-P2. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When The Sun Will Be Dark?, Lesson 3: Oksana Issa, and Layla, students read a story and collect data on the objects seen in the sky when it is bright and when it is dark. Students use this data to identify patterns of when the Sun, Moon, and stars are visible in the sky. Using these patterns, students explain that the sun causes the sky to be bright.
EM-P1. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 1: Piece by Piece, students view a sculpture made by an artist and explain how many different smaller pieces were put together to form the sculpture they observe. Students then build their own sculpture of an aquatic animal from multiple smaller pieces of plastic. Students lastly deconstruct their sculptures into smaller pieces.
PAT-P1. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When The Sky Will be Dark?, Lesson 4: Lydia and Shirley, students read a story to identify the pattern that the most amount of daylight occurs in the summer and the least amount occurs in the winter. Students use these seasonal patterns of daylight to explain that toys outside are more easily seen in the summer and not in the winter.
SC-P2. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 6: Choosing a Problem, students develop solutions to the problem of rain moving soil onto the road. Students consider different ranges of time in their solution requirements and address short term and long term changes to the soil. In Lesson 10: Beach Erosion Problems, Part 2, students use beach models to test causes of beach erosion. Students collect and analyze data to explain which solution provides better protection during a quick event that may cause land change and which solutions are better for long term protection.
SF-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 4: The Shade’s the Thing, students read a text to identify devices used at the zoo to protect animals from the sun. Students identify the parts of the devices and the purpose for each part such as its shape and structure that makes it stable and function as a sunshade.
SYS-P2. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 8: Home on the Range, students use a simulator to collect data on plants, animals, and habitats. Students use the data to explain how plants, animals, and habitats all have parts that work together in order for the plants and animals to survive.
Indicator 2G
Materials incorporate NGSS Connections to Nature of Science and Engineering.
The instructional materials reviewed for K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate NGSS connections to nature of science (NOS) and engineering (ENG). Materials incorporate grade-band NGSS connections to NOS and engineering within individual lessons across the series.
Examples of grade-band connections to NOS elements associated with SEPs present in the materials:
VOM-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 6: Outfits as Evidence, as students work to answer the question “Why did the snowman melt during the day but not at night?”, the teacher tells students that scientists answer questions using evidence and they too will use evidence to answer their question.
BEE-P1. In Grade 1, Physical Science, How Can We Light Our Way In The Dark?, Lesson 3: The Shadow Effect, students observe and record the differences in shadows made by moving a flashlight to different distances and angles. After measuring the length of shadows, the teacher tells students they can compare the results to look for shadows the way that scientists do.
ENP-P2. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, students investigate the causes and effects of lighting a candle. The teacher tells students that when scientists try to figure out why something has changed, they are looking for a cause creating that effect.
Examples of grade-band connections to NOS elements associated with CCCs present in the materials:
AOC-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 8: Design My Hockey Game, students test their design models for a hockey game wall. The teacher is directed to tell them that engineers test their designs so they can observe what works well and what does not work well and then they can make improvements that will make the design better.
HE-P2. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, students prepare to make observations about ice and water. The teacher tells students, “anyone can become a scientist, even though not all people have the same observation abilities…Working with other people during investigations to share work and ideas is one way that scientists who have different abilities may use to get more information.”
HE-P2. In Grade 1, Physical Science, How Can We Light Our Way in the Dark?, Lesson 1: Treasure Hunt, students prepare to make observations of gemstones hidden in a dark location. The teacher tells students that scientists make observations and “anyone can become a scientist, even though not all people have the same observation abilities”. The teacher continues with, “working with other people during investigations and discussing their observations….is one way scientists with different abilities conduct investigations.”
Examples of grade-band connections to ENG elements associated with CCCs present in the materials:
INTER-P2. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, students use a model of a bee to make observations of how bees help pollinate plants. Before making their model, students observe bees using a magnifying box. The teacher tells students that scientists use tools like hand lenses and magnifying boxes to help them see details they could not otherwise see.
INFLU-P1. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, students use candles to investigate the possible causes of crayons changing shape. The teacher tells students that both crayons and candles are made from wax, which can be a natural substance, and that engineers use natural materials and knowledge of the natural world to design and build the things people use.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for Gateway 3: Instructional Supports & Usability; Criterion 1: Teacher Supports meets expectations. Criterion 2: Assessment meets expectations. Criterion 3: Student Supports partially meets expectations. Criterion 4: Intentional Design incorporates evidence in narrative format.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for the Criterion 3a-3h: Teacher Supports. The materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for enacting the materials, contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts beyond the current grade so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series, provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies, and provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in figuring out phenomena and solving problems.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in figuring out phenomena and solving problems. The materials include teacher guidance at the beginning of each unit in the Curriculum Overview and Module Overview as well as guidance embedded in the lessons in the form of margin notes, callout boxes, and built-in guidance.
The Module Overview includes several sections that provide comprehensive guidance that supports implementation of the materials. These sections include: Phenomenon and Problems Storyline, the Module Alignment to NGSS, Assessment Map, Series Connections, Module Background Information, Common Naive Student Ideas, and Materials Management and Safety. These sections provide teachers with an overview of the module, how the module connects to the standards, how the module connects to other modules in the program, important science content information, and ideas about the science content that students may have.
Individual Lessons also include embedded guidance on a variety of elements for implementing the materials. The materials name the following types of margin notes, callout boxes, and lesson guidance: NGSS, Common Core, Good Thinking, Plan Ahead, Digital Resources, EL Strategies, Series Connections, Teacher Tips, Tech Tips, Guiding Questions, Safety Notes, and Class Period Breaks. These embedded supports provide teachers with things like guidance on what specific elements of the NGSS are being addressed, where students may have alternative ideas about the science content, how to accommodate for multilingual learners, safety considerations, and guiding questions that will help students make connections and understand content.
Example of a margin note providing embedded support:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 9: Boo-Boo Pack Problems, Part 1, the Getting Started procedure includes a Teacher Tip callout box. It advises, “Try to avoid using the term “cold pack” when referencing the boo-boo packs, until the students themselves identify the temperature needs for a boo-boo pack.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for containing adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
Support for teachers’ understanding of science content is found in the Module Background Information section of the Module Overview at the beginning of each unit. This section includes narrative information that explains the relevant DCIs in adult terms. These explanations go beyond the DCIs as written and provide additional context and content that can help teachers improve their own knowledge of the subject. This section also includes a deeper analysis of the SEPs and CCCs that are included in the module. These explanations describe the SEPs and CCCs in detail, how their scientific meaning is different from the everyday meaning of the word, and what ideas students may have about them.
Example of supports provided for teachers to develop their own understanding of more advanced, grade-level concepts and expected student practices:
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, the Background Module Information states, “Models are developed with a purpose, and only the features that are relevant to that purpose must be mimicked.”
Example of supports provided for teachers to develop their own understanding of concepts beyond the current course:
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, the Background Module Information states, “One method we can use to look into the past is through core samples. Scientists can use core samples, taken from drilling into Earth’s crust, to identify extensive periods of relative stability on Earth. Cores can also tell us about catastrophic events, periods of extreme volcanic activity, and details about massive extinction-related events. Scientists can analyze the radioactive decay within some of those rock layers to get a fairly accurate idea about how old those rocks are.”
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information, including connections to college- and career-ready ELA and mathematics standards, that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet expectations for including standards correlation information, including connections to college- and career-ready ELA and mathematics standards, that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials provide many explanations of the connections and correlations to the NGSS at the series level, unit level, and lesson level. However, connections to standards for ELA and mathematics are only present at the lesson level.
NGSS correlations are present in a variety of locations and explain connections at different levels. At the series level, the Curriculum Overview section provides a curriculum framework for the series that shows which performance expectations are addressed in each grade level and each unit for the grade band. At the unit level, the Module Overview section includes several places that explain the connection to the NGSS. The Module Alignment to NGSS provides the module objectives and the performance expectations, DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs connected to those objectives. At the lesson level, the Assessment Map in the Module Overview provides the assessment objectives and associated DCI, SEP, and CCC elements for each individual lesson. The Lesson Planner at the beginning of each module provides similar information but only names the larger SEP or CCC and not the specific element. Additionally, NGSS margin notes embedded in the lessons provide guidance on what DCIs, SEPs, or CCCs are connected to specific portions of each lesson.
Example of a Lesson-Level Connection to the NGSS:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 4: A Solid Explanation, the NGSS margin note states “Cause and effect: Students identify that the crayons melted when they were exposed to heat and solidified when the heat was removed or reduced.”
Lesson-level connections to ELA and mathematics are located in the Lesson Planner for each module and as embedded guidance in the lessons. The Lesson Planner includes an ELA and Math Connections column that cites the Common Core standard connected to each lesson (e.g., “Language, Vocabulary acquisition and use (L.1.6)”), where applicable. Individual lessons also include Common Core margin notes that connect specific portions of a lesson to components in the Common Core (e.g., comprehension and collaboration, presentation of knowledge and ideas). There is a missed opportunity to make series-level connections to standards in ELA or mathematics.
Example of a Lesson-Level Connection to ELA and Mathematics
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, step 15 of the Activity procedure “Decide together how to describe their observations, and then write or draw their results on Notebook Sheet B,” is accompanied by the margin note “Research to build and present knowledge.”
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content. Each module includes an accompanying Family Letter that is found in each module’s companion website. The letter provides the module title and information about the final module challenge, asks the family for feedback on the student experiences relevant to the module, and provides sample prompts family members can use to foster conversations at home about the module to provide student sensemaking. While the digital materials for Kindergarten also include a Family Letter translated into Spanish, there is a missed opportunity to include a translated letter in Grade 2.
Example of a Family Letter used to communicate to stakeholders:
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, parents are asked: “Is your child familiar with reading or using a map? Has your child ever visited a place with different kinds of land or water than we have in our region (e.g., mountains, islands, oceans, rivers)?” They are encouraged to ask some questions at home to help students make sense of what they are doing at school: “Do you remember a time when we went somewhere new together and had to figure out where we wanted to go (a park, a mall, a new town)? What did we do to figure out what was around us? What was important for us to know? Are you creating a model of Ada’s park? Tell me about how you are modeling the park. Is there a part of the park that you would most like to visit? What makes you say that? “
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The beginning of each Module includes the same curriculum overview that describes and explains the instructional approaches of the program. This includes sections titled: Curriculum Framework, Designed for the NGSS, A Coherent Storyline, Centered on Student Ideas, Group Work, Literacy Integration, Support for All Students, Assessment, Home Connections, and Support for Implementation. Each section describes how that component contributes to the program’s instructional approach. For instance, the section titled A Coherent Storyline explains that the program was developed using backward design and started with bundles of performance expectations as the goal. The Curriculum Overview also includes a References section, and cites the relevant research throughout all sections of the Curriculum Overview.
Examples of how the materials identify research-based strategies that are used in the design:
In the Curriculum Overview, the Literacy Integration section states “Through the use of a science notebook, students will engage in the writing process…and write for a variety of purposes,” and cites Bollinger et al., 2012, Teaching Elementary School Students to Be Effective Writers: A Practice Guide.
In the Curriculum Overview, the A Coherent Storyline section states “Multiple phenomena and problems are usually needed to fully cover the PEs in the bundle. Multiple phenomena and problems also spark the curiosity of a diverse group of students,” and cites Penuel, et al., 2017, Developing NGSS-Aligned Curriculum that Connects to Students' Interests and Experiences: Lessons Learned from a Co-design Partnership.
In the Curriculum overview, the Group Work section states “[Group work] can lessen individual competitiveness and develop problem solving skills,” and cites Lin, 2006, Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. The Module Overview at the beginning of each module includes a list of all the materials needed for the entire module based on a class of 24 students and notes the quantity of each item needed per lesson. A second materials list includes items not supplied in pre-packaged module kits (e.g. chart paper, tape, computers, water, etc.) and in which lesson they are used.
In addition, each lesson includes a list of materials needed for the lesson, with a reminder for materials that need advance preparation if needed (e.g., ice). Materials are listed as needed by the teacher, students, and/or groups of students.
Indicator 3G
Materials provide clear science safety guidelines for teachers and students across the instructional materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing clear science safety guidelines for teachers and students across the instructional materials. At the beginning of each unit, the Module Overview includes a Safety section that includes general guidelines for safety along with module specific considerations such as live materials handling, chemical information (with a QR code link to MSDS sheets), and a reproducible “Stay Safe! Contract” for students and parents to sign, committing to safe investigations.
When applicable, specific safety instructions are included at the lesson level within activity instructions in the printed teacher’s guide. These are in the form of a red call-out section labeled with a red exclamation bubble and “Safety”.
Example of a lesson-level Safety note:
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, after instructions for Activity Step 16, a safety call-out states “Tell students that if they spill the ice or water on the floor during the investigation, they should immediately alert the teacher and stay out of the area.”
Indicator 3H
Materials designated for each grade are feasible and flexible for one school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 are feasible and flexible for one school year but do not provide guidance for adjusting instruction and/or pacing based on local contexts.
There are four modules in the Grade 2 materials and each module consists of 10 lessons. Most lessons are estimated to take 30 minutes, but some lessons span two days. The materials list how many class periods comprise each lesson in the lesson planner, but do not include a comprehensive pacing guide that provides the total number of class periods and expected duration of each module at a glance. However, based on the lesson planner, Grade 2’s 56 anticipated class periods are feasible for a single year.
The materials do not contain any other pacing guidance or suggestions on how to modify instruction and/or pacing when there is not sufficient time to implement the full program.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for the Criterion 3i-3l: Assessment. The materials indicate which standards are assessed and include an assessment system that provides multiple opportunities throughout the courses to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance for teachers to interpret student performance and suggestions for follow-up. The materials also provide assessments that include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of course-level standards and practices.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing assessment information to indicate which standards are assessed. All of the assessments in the materials are clearly tied to NGSS standards and elements in a variety of locations. Each unit includes an Assessment Map that is part of the Module Overview. The Assessment Map is a table that includes the type of assessment, the assessment objective, and the specific elements of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs associated with the assessment. Each lesson also includes an assessment section that provides a table with the assessment objectives, suggested assessed tasks, the associated elements of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs, and descriptions of indicators of success and difficulty.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing an assessment system with multiple opportunities throughout the grade to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials provide multiple assessment opportunities per unit to assess student progression towards mastering the module objective. The assessment system includes four types of assessments: pre-assessments, checkpoint assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments. Each lesson has at least one assigned assessment along with embedded student self assessments. Pre-assessment opportunities are provided for the beginning of a module and when the content of the lesson changes. Checkpoint assessments require students to make sense of a phenomenon or solve a problem by using all three NGSS dimensions and assess student understanding of the phenomenon or problem. Formative assessments include tasks that require students to use their skills and knowledge in complex ways and the tasks involved incorporate at least two and most often three of the NGSS dimensions. At the end of the module, students complete a summative assessment in the form of a science challenge (Life, Physical, and Earth and Space Science) or design challenge (engineering modules).
Each assessment, except the pre-assessment, includes supports for evaluating student performance. Formative and checkpoint assessments provide a rubric with “indicators of success” and “indicators of difficulty.” Summative assessments come with a three point rubric for scoring. Both types of rubrics support teachers in evaluating student performance with individual DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs. The materials also provide sample student work to assist teachers’ evaluations. This includes examples of completed worksheets and possible responses to discussion questions.
All checkpoint and formative assessments include suggestions for remediation following the rubrics. The lesson procedures include the guidance to “Use the remediation strategy at the end of the lesson to provide additional support for students.” The remediation guidance provides specific ways to support students who struggled with the assessments. Remediation and follow-up guidance is not provided for summative assessments.
Example of Remediation Guidance:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 8: Creating Our Crayons, the remediation is “If students struggle to use their observations of crayons made by other pairs to draw comparisons with their own crayon, have them perform a direct comparison between their crayon and the test crayon at each step on Lesson 8 Notebook Sheet B. Encourage them to add a check mark, plus sign, or some other symbol next to any property that they think the test crayon did better than their own.”
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/grade-band standards and elements across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level standards and elements across the series. The assessment system consistently provides three-dimensional assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery in a variety of ways. Pre-assessments, formative assessments, and checkpoint assessments are typically integrated into lesson activities. Across the assessments, students provide verbal and written explanations, discuss in whole-class and small-group settings, and produce artifacts such as models and drawings. Summative assessments are made of performance tasks where students work individually and collaboratively to explain or solve a novel phenomenon or problem. The assessments consistently integrate the three dimensions by requiring students to use crosscutting concepts as they model, construct an argument, provide an explanation, ask questions, and design solutions connected to the DCIs.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 do not include assessments that offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. However, the program uses the universal design approach where assessments are offered in multiple modalities (e.g. drawings with verbal responses), use a large font, and provide picture-based or simple text. In addition, Spanish materials are available both in print and digitally. The materials miss the opportunity to provide specific examples for access or accommodation for the assessments for disabled students or multilingual learners beyond Spanish speakers.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet expectations for the Criterion 3m-3v: Student Supports. The materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level science. The materials also provide multiple extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage with grade-level science at higher levels of complexity. While suggestions for multilingual learners appear consistently across lessons, they do not consistently provide the support necessary for multilingual learners to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials include two main supports for students from special populations – suggestions for remediation after assessments and naive student ideas. Each formative and checkpoint assessment includes a suggestion for supporting students who struggle with the assessment. Each unit also includes a table of Common Student Naive Ideas in the Module Overview that lists possible misconceptions and things students may say that will help teachers identify the naive ideas. The majority of units cite Naive Ideas based on DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs. Naive ideas are also presented in the Lesson Planner at the beginning of each module, and embedded in individual lessons in Good Thinking callout boxes.
The materials also employ several strategies of universal design for learning to accommodate students’ individual needs, most typically for visually impaired students. This includes accommodations such as large, clear font and text-to-voice options for digital texts. There are also occasional Teacher Tip callout boxes that provide additional supports.
Examples of embedded support for students:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 4: A Solid Explanation, the materials include a Naive Idea where students may think that clay is neither a solid nor liquid. The teacher is prompted to show students how clay and wood have the same properties.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water on Earth?, Lesson 6: What a Relief!, a Teacher Tip suggests that students with sensory processing sensitivities handle dough as the teacher introduces the activity and before it is distributed to the class.
Indicator 3N
Materials provide extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering at greater depth.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet expectations for providing extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage in learning grade-level science and engineering at greater depth. Except for Summative Assessments, each assessment is followed by suggested Remediation and Enrichment activities for teachers to implement based on students’ performance. The enrichment activities typically require students to apply DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs in novel situations and engage students in new or more complex thinking related to the lesson content. None of the enrichment activities simply add on additional work for advanced students. The materials also provide Extension activities that connect lesson content to new contexts, such as math, arts, or ELA. These extension activities do not always require more complex science. However, they are not limited to advanced students but provide all students with extension opportunities at the teacher’s discretion.
Example of an enrichment activity:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, after students complete a lesson on how the structures of bees help them function as pollinators, materials include an enrichment activity: “Bees are very good at moving pollen, but they do other things as well. Ask students to think about things that bees do (e.g., eat pollen, drink nectar, fly, walk) and identify which structures, or parts help them do these things. Have students create a table in their STEM notebooks listing bee parts and how they relate to function, or how each part helps them do something.”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide multiple multi-modal approaches to presenting and engaging with the material throughout the grade. Students engage with content by reading, listening to reading, watching videos, and making first-hand observations. Students participate and respond through writing, discussion, oral presentation, drawing, and building models. The materials also utilize a variety of participation structures and students engage in whole-group instruction and discussions, small-group work, and partner work. For instance:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 6: Making a Mold, students listen to a story, “Fatima’s Silver Necklace,” and discuss the text. They talk to their shoulder partner about whether the way of making a necklace gives them any ideas about how to change the shape of crayons and then share their ideas. Students engage in a reading structure to reread the text and summarize their learning aloud with a partner using text-based evidence. Students work in pairs to cut out pictures to sequence the steps in the story. Students use what they have learned to work together to draw a solution idea for changing the shape of the crayons.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 7: What Are the Patterns of Land and Water on Earth?, students read the investigative question aloud and turn to partners and discuss how they could use the patterns the groups shared to figure out what kinds of land and water may be in the parts of Ada’s park that they cannot see. Students record their ideas and evidence for revising their park model.
The materials also provide students with multiple opportunities to share, revise, and reflect on their thinking. Instruction typically begins with a phenomenon or problem, and students share or record their initial thinking on the phenomenon. They often return to the phenomenon or problem multiple times and adjust their thinking based on new activities or instruction. For instance:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow?, Lesson 8: Home on the Range, students look back at Lesson 7 to share what they know from modeling wind and fur to add to the chart, “How it Got There” in the What We Know column. Students suggest ideas for what else they need to know that will help them figure out how the acorn got to the planter on the balcony. Students look at a map and share what they found out from the map on the chart. They use this information to revise and present their initial explanations.
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Throughout the modules, lessons include teacher directions to have students work independently, in pairs, in small groups, or to conduct lessons as a whole-class. Students frequently work with a partner for reading, turn-and-talks, brainstorming, conducting investigations, or designing solutions to problems. Examples include:
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 1: What Is a Map?, student responses are summarized by the teacher to build a class definition of the scenario presented.
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 7: Holding Back the Land, students are divided into four large groups to read from a text about a possible solution to a problem. In their large group, students discuss the possible solution and compare the reading to ideas that the class had previously brainstormed. Finally, they discuss if the solution the group read about would solve the class’ problem.
Rationale for increased pair collaboration in Grade 2 is provided in the front matter of each teacher guide in the Curriculum Overview: Group Work section, citing that paired collaboration increases engagement as well as vocabulary use and development. Teacher guides provide clear instructions for what type of grouping to use for each activity within the activity’s instructions. However, there is a missed opportunity to provide guidance for teachers about needs-based pairing or grouping, or to offer adaptations for different student needs. Examples include:
In Grade 2, the Curriculum Overview, Group Work, provides rationale for teachers about the importance of student group work. The rationale explains that scientists regularly work with others so engaging in structured collaboration is important for students. It explains that in lower elementary, students are often paired to provide increased opportunities for growth in communication skills and vocabulary use.
Teacher guidance is given to indicate when and how students should be grouped. This guidance comes throughout the lesson as applicable. Examples include:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 7: Hitching a ride, teacher guidance states, “Bring the class back together. Split groups of four students into pairs.”
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet expectations for providing strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering concepts/skills. Every lesson embeds support for multilingual learners with at least one EL Strategy callout box that provides guidance for multilingual learners. However, these strategies are typically generic and miss the opportunity to provide context-specific support.
EL Strategy callout boxes suggest a variety of strategies, including: using gestures, looking for verbal and non-verbal cues from EL students who have ideas to contribute, drawings, discussions in both home language and English, asking clarifying questions, visual instructions beyond written and oral, pairing bilingual students with English language learners, and grouping students with common home language. The EL Strategy callout boxes typically provide generic guidance that is repeated across lessons and do not provide strategies specific to the lesson. For instance, the wording of the suggested wait time strategy is the same each time it appears in the materials.
Examples of EL Strategy Callout Boxes:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 2: Properties of Pieces, the EL Strategy callout box prompts teachers to encourage students who are language learners to draw rather than write the property of the sorted materials. This strategy allows them to communicate and understand complex ideas if they cannot yet demonstrate them through writing or speaking.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 2: Plan it Out, the EL Strategy callout box suggests that the teacher increase their wait time and “get comfortable with silence, as it gives students time to think.”
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land and Water on Earth?, Lesson 5: Kinds of Water, the EL Strategy prompts teachers to pair bilingual students with English language learners or group students with a common home language.
The materials also include features that are designed to support all students, including those who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English. Sentence starters and sentence frames are provided for all students in multiple lessons across the series. The digital materials include vocabulary cards to support all students, including multilingual learners. The vocabulary cards include an image supporting the meaning of the word, and teachers are encouraged to use the cards to create a word wall as vocabulary is introduced and defined.
Examples of features designed to support all students, including multilingual learners:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 1: Piece by Piece, a Teacher Tip callout box tells teachers to, “Use the vocabulary cards included in the kit to create a module specific word wall.”
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 5: Can We Make a Crayon?, the Remediation section provides a sentence frame for students to use as they state what happens when substances are heated or cooled.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, a Teacher Tip callout box suggests teachers ask “students to use a highlighter pen to mark any evidence” as they collect information to support an explanation.
Overall, there are general supports for students who are performing on grade level, but there is a missed opportunity to provide supports for beyond grade level for those who may exceed grade-level understanding of content but who may have limited English proficiency. There are also missed opportunities to provide guidance for teachers to identify students at various levels of language acquisition and to provide specific supports for multilingual learners at differing levels of English language acquisition. As a result, while suggestions for multilingual learners appear consistently across lessons, they do not consistently provide the support necessary for multilingual learners to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics. The texts in the accompanying Smithsonian Science Stories include depictions from a range of ethnicities, genders, and demographics and content and stories connected to a range of cultures. This includes a range of people being positively depicted as scientists and engineers. There are also representations of a variety of family structures, including images of single-parent, two-parent, multi-generational, and multi-ethnic families. Examples include:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, the “Not So Fast, Newton” reading from the book Art in Science includes images of two female-presenting students successfully completing a class activity to use the same blocks to make different objects. The same reading includes an image of a child and an adult with different physical characteristics in an at-home setting.
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, the “Fatima’s Silver Necklace” reading from the book Art in Science is a story about Fatima from the Tuareg tribe in the Sahara Desert. In the story, Ibrahim is an artist who is an honored person in his tribe. He is making a necklace for Fatima that represents her home city. This story is incorporated into Lesson 6: Making A Mold.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials provide limited guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. With at least one instance found in each lesson across the units, various strategies are suggested including: discussions in both home language and English, pairing bilingual students with English language learners, and grouping students with a common home language. Examples include:
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 6: Choosing a Problem, the EL Strategy located in the callout box states, “Suggest students discuss content in both their native language and in English. This can help them become more familiar with the potential similarities between English and their native language.”
Additionally, for Spanish speakers, the digital materials include text and a text-to-speech reader in English and Spanish, Spanish versions of student-facing materials, and family letters for each unit. Vocabulary cards with images are also included to support English language learners. Translations are not available in other languages.
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include limited guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The materials primarily support teachers to draw upon students’ backgrounds and funds of knowledge through the Family Letters and when introducing phenomena and problems. The EL Strategy callout boxes also occasionally contain questions related to students’ cultural backgrounds. The materials do not provide overall guidance on drawing upon student cultural and social backgrounds.
Each module includes a Family Letter that is sent home at the beginning of the unit. The Family Letter gathers background experiences with the science content and phenomenon and/or problem and provides students the opportunity to share their personal and cultural experiences. For example:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, the Family Letter asks parents: “Is your child familiar with growing plants, gardening, or farming? If possible, please describe your child’s experiences. Is your child familiar with insects and how plants are pollinated? If possible, please describe your child’s experiences. Is your child familiar with natural habitats that are different from the one they live in? If possible, please describe your child’s experiences.”
The materials also typically ask for students’ experience when introducing phenomena and problems. Sometimes the teacher prompts students for their experience and at other times this is embedded in the Ada Asks video that introduces the phenomenon and/or problem. For example:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 1: Piece By Piece, students are asked to share experiences with building sculptures. They are prompted with the information that sometimes sculptures could be made from things like modeling dough or plastic building blocks.
The EL Strategy callout boxes also occasionally include guidance for teachers to draw upon students’ cultural backgrounds. While the materials target these prompts to multilingual learners, the guidance is applicable to students of all backgrounds. For example:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, in the EL strategy box, teachers are directed to invite students to share other times or places they use candles in their communities to connect students’ cultures to content.
There are also some instances where student activities and learning connect to traditions from non-dominant cultures. For example:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 6: Making a Mold, students learn about a method of wax casting from a North African Tuareg tribe. The object is made out of wax, and the wax is coated in clay, which hardens. The clay is heated to melt the wax inside. The melted wax is poured out and molten metal is poured into the mold. Students use this method to create a mold for their crayons.
Indicator 3U
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students. Reading is primarily included through Smithsonian Science Stories. Lexile levels are provided for each reading in the Table of Contents. The Curriculum Overview in the front matter of each unit describes that each reader is, “carefully calibrated to grade-level appropriate Lexile measurements according to Common Core text complexity guidelines.” The digital versions of the texts have a text-to-speech function. This function is automated, however, and headings and captions are read out of order and the reading sometimes lacks fluency.
The digital editions of the Smithsonian Science Stories are available both on-grade and below-grade level to ensure accessibility for all students. Options for above-grade readers are not offered in Grade 2.
As an additional support, vocabulary card sets are available for all units. They are explained in the Teacher’s Guide in the Curriculum Overview to be used in supporting vocabulary acquisition for multilingual learners and struggling readers. These cards can also be used to create a word wall in the classroom for student access.
The materials also embed strategies to support comprehension into the lessons themselves. Reading is supported throughout each module by scaffolding expectations for students using read-alouds, comprehension prompts, jigsaw activities, annotation, discussion, and other strategies. Examples include:
In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Liquids And Solids?, Lesson 8: Creating Our Crayons, students read “Creating Colors” from the Smithsonian Science Stories. A Teacher Tip is provided that if students are reading from a photocopy, they can use a highlighter or pen to mark evidence of how people once made different colors. This information is then transferred to Notebook Sheet A.
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, students work in pairs to collect evidence from a text to solve a problem. Each student receives a copy of the text. Before reading, students look through the titles, illustrations, and captions pointing out the different text features included. Students are asked if they have experienced these features before. The teacher reads the text aloud while students follow along. Pairs read the text again with their partner, focusing on different plant parts and their functions. Then, pairs discuss one thing they learned from the text and work together to fill out an evidence table about plant parts.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in Science.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology (when applicable) with guidance for teachers.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 have narrative evidence for Criterion 3w-3z: Intentional Design. The materials have limited technology integrations, such as interactive tools and/or dynamic software, that engages students in grade-band learning in Grade 2. The materials have a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic. The materials do not include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, as much of the collaboration is designed for in-person engagement.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate interactive tools and/or dynamic software in ways that support student engagement in the three dimensions, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 integrate limited interactive tools that support student engagement in the three dimensions when applicable. In a small number of lessons, students use digital simulations, interactive maps, or digital games to support sensemaking. Some of the interactive tools are used in the optional Extension activities. When digital tools are used, guidance for teachers is centered around the facilitation of the tools for students to use in context with the lesson. There are no options to customize simulations for local use. Examples include:
In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant To Grow, Lesson 8: Home on the Range, there is a simulation that allows students to explore where animals and plants live and where they overlap. They explore different habitats and the animals and plants that live there. They can display multiple ranges at once to see what they notice about the range of some plants and animals and why they are similar. They use this information to revise their explanation of how the acorn got into a planter on a balcony.
In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth, Lesson 8: Legendary Maps, there is an extension activity, The Glider Guide, that allows students to explore various kinds of land and water on Earth by using a simulation. In The Glider Guide, students act like explorers flying over three-dimensional landscapes. They view and analyze the kind of land and water they learned about in Lessons 2 and 5.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 do not include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. The materials are consistently designed for in-person student collaboration.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 include visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic. The printed student materials across the series are visually appealing and support thoughtful engagement in the subject. There are no distracting images or unnecessary designs. Color-coding is deliberate and helpful as are icons and call-out boxes that remain consistent across all modules.
Student materials are consistent in layout with minimal worksheets for each unit. They are clear with a title followed by instructions in a legible font. There is ample space for student work with boxes or other scaffolds drawn for student use. Where writing is necessary, wide-spaced lines are provided. Graphics and icons are bold and easily recognizable. However, the difference between Activity Sheets and Notebook Sheets is not clearly marked for student use.
Student digital resources are offered on a separate website that houses links for the lesson videos and PDFs for images. Videos are hosted through YouTube and are easy to navigate. Simulation links are also hosted on the separate website and are easy to find with directions that are clear and visually appealing. The student digital resources are not linked on the teacher digital resources page, they are a separate URL printed within the Teacher’s Guide.
The printed teacher guides are arranged uniformly across each module. Each guide includes: Curriculum Overview, Module Overview, Lesson Planner, Guide to Module Investigations, individual lesson plans, and blackline masters. Teacher guides consistently use clear, purposeful color coding and iconography.
Digital materials for Grade 2 are generally easy to navigate. However, some of the resources have inconsistent or unclear labeling and filtering. Additionally, the online teacher guide can be cumbersome to navigate because it lacks a clickable table of contents.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Every lesson contains a Preparation Section that tells teachers which digital resources should be used and how to prepare them for each lesson. There is also teacher guidance around using the simulations or videos and how to facilitate the related activities. It offers suggestions for how to assist students with the outcomes (making observations, asking questions, collecting data, discussions, etc). It also includes suggestions for how students should view the technology (as a class, in pairs, repeated viewings, when to stop the video, etc). Examples include:
In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 1: Late to School, the teacher shows the Ada video and stops it after Ada says, “Looking is one way I make observations.” Students think about different ways they make observations. Later in the lesson, the teacher is directed to share the rest of the video with the class from the beginning. Students reflect on the video and think quietly about what may have happened and why. Using evidence from the video, students write their initial explanations and the teacher is directed to replay the video for students who might benefit from rehearing Ada’s descriptions of her observations.