About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Smithsonian Science for the Classroom | Science
Science K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems consistently drive learning and use of the three dimensions at both the learning sequence and learning opportunity levels.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for life science, physical science and earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the science and engineering practices at the grade band and all elements of the practices at grade level, with adequate opportunity for students to use practices repeatedly and in multiple contexts. The materials include all of the grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for Kindergarten
Alignment Summary
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems consistently drive learning and use of the three dimensions at both the learning sequence and learning opportunity level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for physical science; life science; earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the SEPs at the grade level and all of the SEPs across the grade band. The materials include all grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Kindergarten
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Designed for NGSS
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectation and Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning
Materials are designed for three-dimensional learning and assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Criterion 1a-1c: Three-Dimensional Learning. The materials consistently include integration of the three dimensions in at least one learning opportunity per learning sequence and nearly all learning sequences are meaningfully designed for student opportunity to engage in sensemaking with the three dimensions. The materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the chapter level that build towards the performance expectations for the larger unit, and consistently assess to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives. The units also include three-dimensional objectives and include corresponding assessments that consistently address the three dimensions of the objectives.
Indicator 1A
Materials are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning.
Indicator 1A.i
Materials consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning opportunities. Across all four units, the instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities. Within each learning sequence, most lessons include three dimensions and integrate SEPs, CCCs, and DCIs.
Examples where materials include three dimensions and integrate DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs into learning opportunities:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 9: Mini Golf Mystery, Part 1, students use evidence to explain and develop a model to show how the direction of a ball’s motion can change. Students use observations as evidence to explain (SEP-CEDS-P1) how a collision inside a mini-golf feature caused a ball's direction of motion to change (CCC-CE-P1, DCI-PS2.B-P1, and DCI-PS2.A-P2). Students develop a model (SEP-MOD-P3) to show how one or more collisions caused a ball's direction of motion to change (CCC-CE-P1, DCI-PS2.B-P1, and DCI-PS2.A-P2).
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, students conduct an experiment to determine the most effective object to score a goal in a game. Students test the ability of three objects to move a tennis ball into the goal (DCI-PS2.A-P1, SEP-INV-P5). Students also observe the rate at which each object moves the ball, whether it is fast or slow (CCC-SPQ-P1). By collecting and analyzing data, students determine which of the objects would make the best paddle (SEP-DATA-P5).
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 4: Shade's the Thing!, students research and compare sunshade solutions to design stable shade structures. Students draw their own ideas for a potential solution to the problem (SEP-CEDS-P2) and then compare their ideas with their peers to get feedback for improvement. To help them identify the shapes and structures of sunshades and their functions, students read a text out loud (SEP-INFO-P4). Students analyze the shapes of sunshade designs to identify patterns and gain insights into what makes for an effective sunshade design. Finally, students brainstorm the materials they can use to create a model solution (DCI-PS3.B-P1, DCI-ETS1.B-P1, and DCI-ETS1.C- P1).
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 8: Carrying The Shade, Part 1, students define the problem of sunlight causing a person to feel warm and design a portable shade to solve the problem. Students define the problem that is presented to them through drawings to communicate their understanding of what is making the playground hot (SEP-INFO-P4, CCC-PE-P2). Students read about how engineers at the zoo keep too much sunlight from shining on a seal and sea lion exhibit (SEP-INFO-P1, DCI-PS3.B-P1) and then compare their own solutions to the shade problem with the engineers’ solutions at the zoo (DCI-ETS1.A-P1, DCI-ETS1.A-P2, and DCI-ETS1.A-P3).
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready for The Weather?, Lesson 1: Mysterious Moisture, students develop an initial explanation and a testable question about why a pole is wet on only one side. Students use observations to come up with initial explanations for the cause of a pole being wet on one side (SEP-CEDS-P1). Students then develop questions to help them figure out the reason behind this phenomenon (SEP-AQDP-P1). Students observe patterns in similar event images and construct an initial explanation (DCI-ESS2.D-P1, CCC-PAT-P1).
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready for The Weather?, Lesson 5: What Are You Wearing?, students use information from a text to identify patterns in the weather’s temperature in order to prepare for different combinations of weather. Students obtain information from images of different types of weather (DCI-ESS2.D-P1) to evaluate how people prepare to be outside for different temperatures (SEP-CEDS-P1). Students observe images of weather scenes, match clothing to the weather (SEP-INFO-P4), and identify patterns in the layers of clothing worn with the outside temperature (SEP-INFO-P1, (SEP-DATA-P3, and CCC-PAT-P1).
Indicator 1A.ii
Materials consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions. Learning sequences within the units vary in length between one and five lessons. Across all units and within every learning sequence, nearly all lessons meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions. Additionally, sensemaking occurs both at the lesson level and across the learning sequence. Student sensemaking is nearly always tied to explaining a phenomenon or solving a problem.
Examples where SEPs and CCCs meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions in the learning sequence:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lessons 5 and 6, students figure out how pushes and pulls move an air hockey puck into a goal. In Lesson 5, students develop a model (SEP-MOD-P3) and use observations as evidence to explain (SEP-CEDS-P1) that an object changes its direction of motion when it is pushed (DCI-PS2.A-P2, CCC-CE-P2). In Lesson 6, students make observations (SEP-INV-P4) of an air hockey puck colliding with a wall (CCC-CE-P2) and develop a model to explain what caused an air hockey puck to move into a goal (DCI-PS2.A-P2, DCI-PS2.B-P1). Students then share their thinking (SEP-DATA-P2) and revise their models (SEP-MOD-P3).
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lessons 9 and 10, students figure out how a golf ball moves into a mini golf feature and comes out of the mini golf feature moving in a different direction. In Lesson 9, students use observations as evidence to explain (SEP-CEDS-P1) how a collision inside a mini golf feature caused a ball's direction of motion to change (CCC-CE-P1, DCI-PS2.B-P1, and DCI-PS2.A-P2). Students develop a model (SEP-MOD-P3) to show how one or more collisions caused a ball's direction of motion to change (CCC-CE-P1, DCI-PS2.B-P1, and DCI-PS2.A-P2). In Lesson 10, students test and revise their mini golf feature (CCC-CE-P1, SEP-MOD-P3), and use evidence from their observations to explain (SEP-CEDS-P1) how collisions within their models changed the ball's direction of motion (DCI-PS2.B-P1, DCI-PS2.A-P2).
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lessons 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, students solve the problem of the playground being too hot to sit on by creating shade structures to block the sun. Students define and solve a problem caused by sunlight warming a playground surface (DCI-PS3.B-P1, DCI-ETS1.A-P3). In Lesson 1, students share their ideas about the cause of the hot playground (CCC-CE-P2) and then share how they could solve the problem (DCI-ETS1.A-P2, DCI-ETS1.B-P1). In Lesson 4, students think about a solution they could design for the problem. In Lesson 5, students explore the materials to be used in their design solution to ensure that the structure can function as needed (DCI-ETS1.B-P1, DCI-ETS1.C-P1, and CCC-SF-P1). In Lesson 6, students design, build, and test a prototype of their solution for stability and ability to block light (SEP-INV-P5). Students analyze the data to determine if it solves the problem and revise their models (SEP-DATA-P5). In Lesson 7, students analyze the data to ensure that it meets the set criteria and compare their models to the others in the class (SEP-CEDS-P3).
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lessons 2 and 3, students figure out what is causing the playground to be too hot to sit on. In Lesson 2, students conduct an investigation to understand the problem of how one surface is warmer than another (DCI-PS3.B-P1, DCI-ETS1.A-P3). Students categorize different images of warmer or colder scenarios (CCC-SPQ-P1, SEP-DATA-P1). Students evaluate which sense is best to determine whether an object is warmer than another. In Lesson 3, students use a model to investigate the warm playground phenomenon (SEP-MOD-P1, DCI-PS3.B-P1, and DCI-ETS1.A-P1) by testing the warming effect of a lamp on the model of a playground surface. Students analyze the data and share their results with the class (SEP-INV-P4, CCC-CE-P2).
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lessons 2 and 3, students use information from observations to construct an evidence-based claim to account for why a pole was wet on one side and not on the other. In Lesson 2, students investigate weather elements that might have caused the pole to be wet on only one side (SEP-INFO-P1, CCC-CE-P2) and use the evidence to revise their initial explanation. In Lesson 3, students use a model of the pole (SEP-MOD-P3) to investigate (SEP-INV-P2) the effects of wind and rain (DCI-ESS2.D-P1). Students use the data collected from the investigation to identify patterns (CCC-PAT-P1) to use as evidence to revise and share their final explanation (SEP-DATA-P2).
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 8: Stormy Weather, students work to help Ada prepare for severe weather so her friends can come and visit when it is safe. Students identify weather elements found in three different types of storms (DCI-ESS3.B-P1) and use a simulation (DCI-ETS1.A-P2) to obtain information on the types of hazards. Students use this information to identify patterns (SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-CE-P2) to determine how to prepare for storms in different regions and then draw and compare their examples of one way to prepare (SEP-INFO-P4, SEP-CEDS-P3).
In Kindergarten, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lessons 4 and 5, students figure out what caterpillars need to live and grow. In Lesson 4, students gather information from text to identify what plants and animals need to live (SEP-INFO-P1, DCI-LS1.C-P1, and DCI-ESS3.A-P1). In Lesson 5, students discuss their initial claims about what caterpillars need to live (SEP-ARG-P6). Students then observe caterpillar habitats and discuss their observations while looking for patterns of what caterpillars need (SEP-DATA-P1, CCC-PAT-P1). Students revise their claim regarding what caterpillars need to live and grow.
Indicator 1B
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials.
The materials reviewed consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the lesson level which are found in the Assessment Map of the Curriculum Overview and at the beginning of every lesson. Materials include Pre-Assessments, Formative Assessments, and Checkpoint Assessments in every Module as part of the formative assessment system. Assessment types include peer-to-peer, small-group, and class discussions, as well as drawings, verbal responses, data collection, presentations, and building and revising of models. The majority of assessments in Kindergarten call for verbal responses.
Except for the final learning sequence of each Module, every lesson includes one of the three types of assessments with a few lessons across the series having two types. Pre-Assessments occur in the beginning of learning sequences and when new content is presented mid-sequence. Formative Assessments are the most common. Checkpoint Assessments require three-dimensional understanding of a phenomenon or problem before moving to the next lesson. For teacher support, the Pre-Assessments include questions for teacher reflection to consider how students bring prior experiences into the formation of initial ideas. The Formative and Checkpoint Assessments have assessment tables designed for in-the-moment assessment and include Look For statements for each assessed element to support the teacher to evaluate student responses. All Formative and Checkpoint Assessments also include a Remediation section that provides the teacher with guidance on how to adjust instruction based on student responses.
Examples of lessons with a three-dimensional objective where the formative assessment task(s) assess student knowledge of all (three) dimensions in the learning objective and provide guidance to support the instructional process:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 7: You Get What You Need, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise four elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students individually draw how a caterpillar web connects to and works with parts of the natural world. In their drawn model, students identify that caterpillars need webs to help them get food, hold water, and provide shelter (DCI-ESS3.A-P1). Students share what is included in their models and explain how connecting lines drawn in the model represent the relationship between its parts (CCC-SYS-P2, SEP-MOD-P2, and SEP-MOD-P3). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Formative Assessment, students develop solutions that meet the needs of the tree and humans who are both part of the environment (DCI-ESS3.C-P1). Students observe in a picture that the sidewalk is broken (DCI-ESS2.E-P1, CCC-CE-P2), and draw a design of an initial solution that will help the tree and people (DCI-ETS1.B-P1). After explaining their ideas, students listen to a partner’s suggestions about what might improve the idea and revise their drawing/model of a solution (SEP-MOD-P2, SEP-MOD-P3). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 2: Move That Ball, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise five elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students draw a model of a ball in motion including arrows to show how the ball moves (DCI-PS2.A-P2, SEP-MOD-P3). Students then explain that a hockey puck was pushed before it moved into the goal (SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-CE-P1, and CCC-CE-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Formative Assessment, students engage with a partner and the class to discuss the effectiveness of objects used as paddles to push a ball into a goal. After testing the strength of three different paddles by pushing the ball (DCI-PS2.A-P1), students explain the speed at which the ball traveled for each (DCI-PS3.C-P1). Students analyze the data (SEP-DATA-P5), discuss results, and select the best material for the paddle (DCI-ETS1.C-P1). Students describe the speed at which the ball traveled (fast or slow) when each paddle was used as evidence to support their claim about the effectiveness of each (SEP-ARG-P7, CCC-SPQ-P1). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 3: Feeling Hot! Hot! Hot!, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students use their observations of the temperature of black foam to compare the effect of light on the surface (DCI-PS3.B-P1, DCI-ETS1.A-P2, SEP-DATA-P3, and CCC-CE-P2), draw a model to explain the playground problem (SEP-AQDP-P3, DCI-ETS1.A-P1), and discuss their findings as a class. All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 9: Planning a Visit, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise four elements. Students complete a Formative and Checkpoint assessment that include activity sheets and paired and group discussions about preparing for severe weather. Students record data from historical weather information to identify patterns in weather across three months (SEP-DATA-P1, CCC-PAT-P1). Obtaining information from digital resources (SEP-INFO-P1), students identify the types of storms that are most likely to occur in a specific location (DCI-ESS3.B-P1) and discuss their reasoning. Students ask questions (SEP-AQDP-P1) based on observations to decide which would be the best month for a visit to a specific location and discuss how to best prepare for possible severe weather (DCI-ETS1.A-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
Indicator 1C
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials.
The materials reviewed consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the lesson level which are found in the Assessment Map of the Curriculum Overview and at the beginning of every lesson. Materials include Pre-Assessments, Formative Assessments, and Checkpoint Assessments in every Module as part of the formative assessment system. Assessment types include peer-to-peer, small-group, and class discussions, as well as drawings, verbal responses, data collection, presentations, and building and revising of models. The majority of assessments in Kindergarten call for verbal responses.
Except for the final learning sequence of each Module, every lesson includes one of the three types of assessments with a few lessons across the series having two types. Pre-Assessments occur in the beginning of learning sequences and when new content is presented mid-sequence. Formative Assessments are the most common. Checkpoint Assessments require three-dimensional understanding of a phenomenon or problem before moving to the next lesson. For teacher support, the Pre-Assessments include questions for teacher reflection to consider how students bring prior experiences into the formation of initial ideas. The Formative and Checkpoint Assessments have assessment tables designed for in-the-moment assessment and include Look For statements for each assessed element to support the teacher to evaluate student responses. All Formative and Checkpoint Assessments also include a Remediation section that provides the teacher with guidance on how to adjust instruction based on student responses.
Examples of lessons with a three-dimensional objective where the formative assessment task(s) assess student knowledge of all (three) dimensions in the learning objective and provide guidance to support the instructional process:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 7: You Get What You Need, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise four elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students individually draw how a caterpillar web connects to and works with parts of the natural world. In their drawn model, students identify that caterpillars need webs to help them get food, hold water, and provide shelter (DCI-ESS3.A-P1). Students share what is included in their models and explain how connecting lines drawn in the model represent the relationship between its parts (CCC-SYS-P2, SEP-MOD-P2, and SEP-MOD-P3). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Formative Assessment, students develop solutions that meet the needs of the tree and humans who are both part of the environment (DCI-ESS3.C-P1). Students observe in a picture that the sidewalk is broken (DCI-ESS2.E-P1, CCC-CE-P2), and draw a design of an initial solution that will help the tree and people (DCI-ETS1.B-P1). After explaining their ideas, students listen to a partner’s suggestions about what might improve the idea and revise their drawing/model of a solution (SEP-MOD-P2, SEP-MOD-P3). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 2: Move That Ball, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise five elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students draw a model of a ball in motion including arrows to show how the ball moves (DCI-PS2.A-P2, SEP-MOD-P3). Students then explain that a hockey puck was pushed before it moved into the goal (SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-CE-P1, and CCC-CE-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Formative Assessment, students engage with a partner and the class to discuss the effectiveness of objects used as paddles to push a ball into a goal. After testing the strength of three different paddles by pushing the ball (DCI-PS2.A-P1), students explain the speed at which the ball traveled for each (DCI-PS3.C-P1). Students analyze the data (SEP-DATA-P5), discuss results, and select the best material for the paddle (DCI-ETS1.C-P1). Students describe the speed at which the ball traveled (fast or slow) when each paddle was used as evidence to support their claim about the effectiveness of each (SEP-ARG-P7, CCC-SPQ-P1). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 3: Feeling Hot! Hot! Hot!, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise six elements. In the Checkpoint Assessment, students use their observations of the temperature of black foam to compare the effect of light on the surface (DCI-PS3.B-P1, DCI-ETS1.A-P2, SEP-DATA-P3, and CCC-CE-P2), draw a model to explain the playground problem (SEP-AQDP-P3, DCI-ETS1.A-P1), and discuss their findings as a class. All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 9: Planning a Visit, the three-dimensional learning objectives comprise four elements. Students complete a Formative and Checkpoint assessment that include activity sheets and paired and group discussions about preparing for severe weather. Students record data from historical weather information to identify patterns in weather across three months (SEP-DATA-P1, CCC-PAT-P1). Obtaining information from digital resources (SEP-INFO-P1), students identify the types of storms that are most likely to occur in a specific location (DCI-ESS3.B-P1) and discuss their reasoning. Students ask questions (SEP-AQDP-P1) based on observations to decide which would be the best month for a visit to a specific location and discuss how to best prepare for possible severe weather (DCI-ETS1.A-P2). All elements of the learning objectives are assessed. Teachers are provided with Look Fors and remediation and enrichment activities to support the instructional process.
Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning
Materials leverage science phenomena and engineering problems in the context of driving learning and student performance.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Criterion 1d-1i: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning. The materials include numerous phenomena and problems throughout the grade. Of those phenomena and problems, they consistently connect to grade-level appropriate DCIs and are consistently presented to students as directly as possible. Phenomena or problems consistently drive learning and engage students in the three dimensions in both learning sequences and learning opportunities. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. The materials consistently incorporate phenomena or problems to drive learning and use of the three dimensions across multiple chapters within each unit.
Indicator 1D
Phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs). Across the grade, the materials provide opportunities for students to build an understanding of grade-level DCIs through phenomena or problems. From one to four lessons in length, learning sequences work to connect a single phenomenon or problem to corresponding DCIs.
Examples where phenomena or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas:
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 8: Carrying The Shade, Part 1, the problem is that Ada gets hot moving around in the sun. Students use what they have learned about the sun warming the Earth to design a solution to Ada's problem of getting hot while she is moving around in the sun (DCI-PS3.B-P1). Students define the problem and design and test solutions.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 1: Mysterious Moisture, the phenomenon is that a pole is wet on one side but not on the other. Students engage in a series of lessons to identify elements of weather that combine, like wind and rain (DCI-ESS2.D-P1), to explain why the pole is wet on one side. After reviewing additional images, students develop a model to investigate how the elements combined to cause the phenomenon.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 8: Stormy Weather, the problem is that Ada needs to prepare for severe weather so she and her friends can be safe playing in her tree house. Students learn about the locations and dangers of different types of storms in regions of the US (DCI-ESS2.D-P1). Students investigate the best way to prepare for these storms as they solve the problem of when Ada should invite her friends to her treehouse. Students note information on what the weather was like each day to look for patterns of weather each month in order to find the best time of year Ada's friends could be safe (DCI-ESS3.B-P1).
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 5: Hungry, Hungry Caterpillars, the phenomenon is that a painted lady caterpillar eats mallow plants. Students discuss with their partner a previous claim about what caterpillars need to grow and where they think animals get the food and water needed to live and grow (DCI-LS1.C-P1, DCI-ESS3.A-P1). Students watch a video of the caterpillars’ natural habitat to help them revise their ideas about what the caterpillars need to live and grow and consider where they think caterpillars get their water.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 6: World of Webs, the phenomenon is that caterpillars build webs in a human-made habitat. Students observe caterpillars in habitat cups and note that there is white stuff in the habitat cups and identify that the caterpillars are building webs (DCI-ESS2.E-P1).
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, the problem is that a sidewalk is broken and cracked where a tree is growing. Students make observations of a cracked sidewalk near a tree (DCI-ESS2.E-P1). Students consider the needs of people and trees (DCI-LS1.C-P1, DCI-ESS3.A-P1) as they design a solution to the problem.
Indicator 1E
Phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible. Across the grade level, materials consistently present phenomena and problems to students as directly as possible. With many accompanied by photographs, the majority of phenomena and problems are presented in a video with an animated character named Ada who directly describes the problems or phenomena for the students. Opportunities for direct, first-hand experiences with phenomena and problems are occasionally included in the materials.
Examples where materials present phenomena and problems to students as directly as possible:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 1: Mysterious Moisture, the phenomenon is that a telephone pole is wet on one side and not on the other. Students watch a video depicting a still image of a wooden pole near a school bus stop that appears wet on one side. Additionally, an image of the wet pole is available for display while students discuss the phenomenon after the video. The video and image provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the phenomenon.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 1: Mystery at School, the phenomenon is that a radish plant is beginning to look unhealthy. The phenomenon is presented through a video showing a picture of a healthy radish plant and a picture of the same plant after a while when it was unhealthy. Then, students observe live, unhealthy radish plants in the classroom. The video and first-hand observations provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the phenomenon.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the challenge is that Ada wants a hockey game that she can play at home or at school. Students watch a video where Ada presents materials that she believes can be utilized to construct a game to play at home. She explains she is unsure of which items she should use to create a game board and to push a ball. During the design activity, students have first-hand experience with the materials. The video and first-hand materials exploration provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the design challenge.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 1: What’s the Problem?, the problem is that it is too hot to sit on the playground. The problem is presented through a video of the sun shining on a playground made of pavement. In the video, Ada explains that it is too hot to sit on the playground. The video and narration provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the problem.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plan, Part 1, the challenge is to design a school’s play area that takes into consideration the plants and animals living in the area and their habitats. Students watch a video where Ada explains that they want to create a play area outside that is big enough for hopscotch, foursquare, and a basketball court. The challenge is to use the school maps to select the best location for this play area without disturbing the natural habitat. The video and narration provide students with a common experience and context to have a shared and direct understanding of the design challenge.
Indicator 1F
Phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions. In the majority of lessons where phenomena or problems are present, students work toward figuring out phenomena or solving problems. Students often engage with the same phenomenon or problem across multiple learning opportunities and the phenomenon or problem typically drives instruction in each of those opportunities. Across the four Modules, students consistently engage in three-dimensional lessons where two or more SEPs and at least one CCC are present.
Examples of lessons that are driven by phenomena or problems using elements of all three dimensions:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 1: Mysterious Moisture, the phenomenon is that a telephone pole is wet on one side and not on the other. Students observe images (SEP-DATA-P3) and construct initial explanations for what combinations of weather (DCI-ESS2.D-P1) could cause a pole to be wet on one side and dry on the other. They develop questions to help them figure out the cause of this weather phenomenon (SEP-AQDP-P1, CCC-CE-P2).
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 10: Let’s Hit The Trail, the problem is that Ada's class is taking a hike and needs to be prepared for the weather. Students identify what information they need to solve Ada’s problem (DCI-ETS1.A-P2). Students use weather forecasts and observations to gather evidence on weather hazards caused by location, time, and weather patterns (DCI-ESS3.B-P1, CCC-CE-P2). Students analyze and interpret temperature data to see what types of hazard might be encountered (SEP-DATA-P3, DCI-ESS2.D-P1) to develop a plan for what to include in Ada's backpack and the route to walk during the hike.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 1: Let’s Get Moving, the phenomenon is that an air hockey puck moves quickly into a goal. Students are asked what they think caused the puck to move (SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-CE-P1) and use previous experiences with similar types of games to create a drawing of what they think caused the puck to enter the goal (SEP-MOD-P3). Students then explore the results of pushing and pulling on various objects. Students use evidence collected from their investigation to determine that pushes and pulls can start an object's motion (SEP-CEDS-P1, DCI-PS2.A-P2).
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 1: Mystery at School, the phenomenon is that a radish plant is beginning to look unhealthy. Students make observations and discuss with their partner what makes a plant healthy orunhealthy. Students collect information regarding what the leaves, stems, and soil look like (SEP-DATA-P3, CCC-SYS-P1), draw observations of the unhealthy plant, and use their drawings to discuss what plants need to be healthy (DCI-LS1.C-P1). Students explain their reasoning for adding water and sun to their drawings and then add questions they still have to a class chart (SEP-AQDP-P1). Students then brainstorm with a partner their answers to whether plants need water, light, or water and light as they try to determine why the radish plant is unhealthy (CCC-CE-P2).
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 5: Hungry, Hungry Caterpillars, the phenomenon is that a painted lady caterpillar eats mallow plants. Students record information (SEP-DATA-P1) as they view caterpillars at three stations where painted lady caterpillars eat mallow plants (DCI-LS1.C-P1). Students then view videos of caterpillar habitats and record more observations (DCI-ESS3.A-P1). Using evidence of the observed patterns, students make a new claim (SEP-ARG-P6, CCC-PAT-P1) and draw a design of a caterpillar home that includes what caterpillars need to live and grow (SEP-INFO-P4).
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 3: Feeling Hot! Hot! Hot!, the problem is that it is too hot to sit on the playground. Before conducting an investigation, students predict which of the tested scenarios will lead to a warmer result (SEP-INV-P6). Students investigate the warming effect of lamplight on a model playground made of black foam (DCI-PS3.B-P1) and use the recorded data (SEP-INV-P4, SEP-MATH-P2) to explain that sunlight can cause a playground surface to warm up and that blocking sunlight, represented by cardboard in the model, can keep a playground from warming (DCI-ETS1.A-P1, SEP-MOD-P1). Students also discuss what they think caused the foam piece to become warmer and analyze the results to explain that sunlight can warm a playground surface which will make it too hot to sit on (SEP-DATA-P2).
Indicator 1G
Materials are designed to include both phenomena and problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten are designed to include both phenomena and problems. Across the four Modules, the materials include seven problems and seven phenomena.
Each of the four Modules focus on a different science discipline: life, earth and space, physical, and engineering design. Thematic in nature, Modules consist of ten lessons that are grouped into learning sequences varying between one and four lessons in length. Life, earth and space, and physical science Modules end with a Science Challenge either one, two, or three lessons in length. The engineering design Module ends with a three-lesson Design Challenge.
Phenomena and problems are typically introduced in the first lesson of a learning sequence with a few being addressed in more than one sequence. Phenomena and problems within a Module share common topics that connect to the overall theme of the Module. For example, weather-related phenomena or problems are introduced at the start of each learning sequence in the Module How Can We Be Ready For The Weather? The engineering design Module How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun? introduces only problems across its learning sequences.
Examples where materials are designed to include phenomena:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 1: Let’s Get Moving, the phenomenon is that an air hockey puck moves quickly into a goal. Students explore how to move different objects with pushes and pulls, develop a model to show how a ball starts to move when pushed or pulled, and investigate how to make objects go fast, slow, and in different directions. Students also investigate what happens to a ball when it collides with a wall and make a drawing to show how the direction of a push affects a ball’s motion. Students then revisit their ideas about what causes the puck to move into the goal and explain that when the puck is pushed hard, it quickly moves into a goal.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 8: Mini Golf Mystery, Part I, the phenomenon is that a golf ball moves into a mini-golf feature and comes out of the mini-golf feature moving in a different direction. Students make and test out a 3D model of the mini golf feature. Using evidence from testing the class model, students create and revise an explanation for what caused the ball to change direction and then revise or develop a new model of the mini golf feature. Students use the testing results to understand that the ball is hitting a wall inside the box that is changing the direction of its motion.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 1: Mysterious Moisture, the phenomenon is that a telephone pole is wet on one side and not on the other. After constructing an initial explanation, students discuss the different elements of and types of weather. Students create a model of the pole and test out different weather elements to figure out how the pole could be wet on one side. Students determine that the pole got wet on one side due to the wind blowing the rain from the other direction.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 4: Snow, Snow, Go Away, the phenomenon is that over a two-day period, a snowman melts at some times but not at other times. Students observe various scenarios where light impacts melting, such as ice under a lamp and icicles over the course of a day. Students also observe patterns in choice of clothing based on weather and time of day. Students use models to investigate why it is warmer during the day. Students explain that the shining sun is why it is warmer during the day than at night and the warmer temperatures cause the snowman to melt more quickly during the day than at night.
Examples where materials are designed to include problems:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the problem is that Ada wants a hockey game that she can play at home or at school. By applying force to a ball, students test out a pipe cleaner, a tongue depressor, and a piece of aluminum foil and analyze the results to find that the tongue depressor is best for moving the ball quickly. Students investigate different wall materials then design and build a wall for the hockey game where the wall keeps the ball in the game and allows for the ball to score a goal after collision with a side wall.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 8: Stormy Weather, the problem is that Ada needs to prepare for severe weather so she and her friends can be safe playing in her tree house. Through pictures and videos, students observe and describe different storms and where they most often occur. After predicting what types of danger each could cause, students choose the best ways to prepare. After identifying when and which types of storms are most likely to occur where Ada lives, students choose a month that would be least likely to have storms and draw how to stay safe in severe weather.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 10: Let’s Hit The Trail, the problem is that Ada's class is taking a hike and needs to be prepared for the weather. Students analyze and interpret data on the types of severe weather hazards they could encounter. Along with the weather forecast, students use observations of weather hazards, time of day, and weather patterns to develop a plan and decide what to bring in their backpacks.
Indicator 1H
Materials intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations that they intentionally elicit and leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems. Throughout the grade, the materials consistently elicit students’ prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems. This frequently happens when a phenomenon or problem is first introduced to students or when they develop initial explanations or solutions. When this occurs, the teacher generally explicitly asks students if they have seen or experienced the phenomenon or problem before, and students have an opportunity to respond. In some cases, the character Ada, who introduces the phenomenon or problem in the Ada Asks videos, will ask if students have ever encountered the phenomenon or problem before.
The materials also provide opportunities to leverage students’ prior knowledge and experience as they explain and solve phenomena and problems, but do so less consistently. Students’ prior knowledge and experience are leveraged in several different ways. This includes prompting students to use their prior experience to support their thinking, using what students share to identify common patterns across a phenomenon, or applying previous experiences to engage with the phenomenon or problem. In all of these cases, the materials make the connection between students’ prior knowledge and experience and their application to the phenomenon or problem explicit.
The materials also include generic supports for the teacher to engage with students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena and problems. Each Pre-Assessment is accompanied by Questions for Teacher Reflection, which includes a question about how students bring in their prior experiences and knowledge as they develop their initial explanation or solution. Lessons also occasionally include EL Strategy callout boxes that suggest, “Access students’ prior knowledge and experience.” Both of these supports are generalized and do not always include support specific to the lesson.
Examples where materials elicit and leverage prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready for the Weather?, Lesson 2: What Is Weather?, the phenomenon is that a pole is wet on one side but not the other side. After being introduced to the phenomenon in the previous lesson, the teacher tells students that their prior experience with weather will help them explain the phenomenon. Students share an experience they had with weather with each other and the teacher asks students to, “Think about a specific part of weather that was important in the experience they talked about.” As students share their experiences, the teacher collects the different parts of weather they discuss (e.g., temperature) on a chart called Weather Is. They use their collective experience to define what makes up weather and begin an investigation of each part.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready for the Weather?, Lesson 8: Stormy Weather, the challenge is that Ada needs to prepare for severe weather so she and her friends can be safe playing in her tree house. As students are introduced to the problem, the teacher asks them to share about a storm they are familiar with. They then begin to apply that experience to the problem when the teacher asks students to, “think about how they would protect things they want to keep safe in this storm.”
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder?, the problem is that it is too hot to sit on the playground. After watching the Ada Asks video introducing the phenomenon in the previous lesson, the teacher elicits prior experience by asking students to share problems they have experienced in their own recess space. Students then begin investigating the problem. The teacher asks students to share and discuss a time that “they observed or figured out how warm something was.” After students discuss their experiences, the class decides on touching as one way to measure temperature and use that in their investigation of temperature.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 9: Carrying the Shade, Part 2, the problem is that Ada gets hot moving around in the sun. After analyzing the problem and researching similar scenarios, the teacher asks, “What other experiences have you had that are similar to what Ada described?” The teacher then guides the students in a discussion about what shape to make the device and how to make it stable. As students share their ideas the teacher reminds them to use their “past experiences” to support their ideas.
Examples where materials elicit but do not leverage prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 1: Let’s Get Moving, the phenomenon is that an air hockey puck moves quickly into a goal. After viewing the phenomenon in the Ada Asks video, the teacher asks, “Have you ever seen a game like this? How did you play it?” The materials miss the opportunity to explicitly leverage these experiences.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 1: Mystery at School, the phenomenon is that a radish plant is beginning to look unhealthy. An Ada Asks video introduces the phenomenon and Ada asks, “Have you ever started a garden or grown plants?” and “Have you ever eaten a radish?” After the video, students make predictions about why the plant is unhealthy, but the materials miss the opportunity to leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, the problem is that a sidewalk is broken and cracked where a tree is growing. After introducing the problem, the teacher asks, “Have you ever seen this happen to a sidewalk before?” The students make predictions about why the sidewalk is cracked, but the materials miss the opportunity to explicitly leverage these experiences.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live? Lesson 9: Play Area Plan, Part, the design challenge is to design a play area behind the school that takes into consideration the plants and animals living in the area and their habitats. In the Ada Asks video that introduces the problem, Ada asks, “Do you play outside during your school day? What do you play?” The teacher pauses the video and collects students’ responses. The materials miss the opportunity to explicitly leverage these experiences.
Indicator 1I
Materials embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions. The instructional materials consistently use phenomena or problems to drive student learning and to engage with all three dimensions as students model, develop and revise explanations, and solve problems across most lesson sequences. Each unit consists of at least two lesson sequences which vary in the number of lessons included. In addition to driving learning across multiple lessons within a sequence, phenomena and problems within a single unit are often connected across learning sequences by a similar theme. For example, the Earth and Space Science unit focuses on weather where students make sense of a weather-related phenomenon or problem in each learning sequence. When phenomena and problems drive instruction across multiple learning opportunities, students consistently engage with all three dimensions as they make sense of or solve phenomena and problems. Students also have a variety of opportunities to revisit and revise their thinking through writing, drawing, and discussion.
Examples of phenomena and problems that drive students’ learning and use of the three dimensions across multiple lessons in the unit:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion, Lessons 1-3, the phenomenon is that an air hockey puck moves quickly into a goal. Students engage in a series of lessons to investigate and then explain how pushing or pulling on an object can change the speed or direction of its motion and can start or stop it (DCI-PS2.A-P2). In Lesson 1, students investigate and develop models of the causes and effects of pushing and pulling objects and construct initial explanations of the phenomenon (SEP-INV-P2, CCC-CE-P1). In Lesson 2, students draw models to show how the effects of pushing or pulling can put an object in motion (SEP-MOD-P3) and then explain that the puck was pushed before going into the goal. Lastly, in Lesson 3, students explain how bigger pushes and pulls cause objects to speed up more quickly and smaller pushes and pulls cause them to move more slowly (DCI-PS2.A-P2, SEP-CEDS-P1). Students use this to explain the phenomenon in that the puck moved quickly because it was pushed hard. Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as sharing ideas with a partner, drawing initial models, creating and revising a chart of ideas, and using sentence stems with a partner to use evidence in support of their explanations.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lessons 1,-3, the phenomenon is that a telephone pole is wet on one side and not on the other. Students engage in a series of lessons to gather information, model, investigate, and explain what type of weather caused the phenomenon of the wet pole. In Lesson 1, students draw an explanation of what they think caused (CCC-CE-P2) the pole to be wet on one side. In Lesson 2, students read about (SEP-INFO-P1) and observe different images to see the impact of weather patterns on the environment (CCC-PAT-P1, DCI-ESS2.D-P1). Students then add new ideas to their initial drawings and explain their revised thinking to a partner. In Lesson 3, students build and test two models (SEP-MOD-P3), one with rain and the other with wind and rain. After the investigation, students draw their final explanation of how weather impacted the pole to make it wet on one side. Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as carrying out investigations, sharing ideas with a partner, drawing models, and using evidence in support of their explanations.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lessons 4-7, the phenomenon is that over a two-day period, a snowman melts at some times but not at other times. Students engage in a series of lessons to observe, obtain information, investigate, model, and explain how a snowman melts more during the day than at night. In Lesson 4, students make observations in the data to identify a pattern of the snow melting and ask questions about the temperature changing over time (DCI-ESS2.D-P1, SEP-AQDP-P1, and CCC-PAT-P1). In Lesson 6, students record and analyze data to uncover a pattern in temperature changes over the days the snowman melted (SEP-DATA-P3). In Lesson 7, students use their observations of light melting ice to construct an evidence-based explanation that the sunlight's heat caused the snowman to melt faster in the sunlight than at night because the temperature is warmer during the day (CCC-CE-P2). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as sharing ideas with a partner, making observations, asking questions, and using models as evidence to support explanations.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lessons 1-3, the phenomenon is that a radish plant is beginning to look unhealthy. Students engage in a series of lessons to observe, investigate, and explain what plants need to be healthy. In Lesson 1, students observe and discuss healthy and unhealthy plants including specific plant parts (CCC-SYS-P1). Students draw pictures and include water and sun as what plants need to be healthy (DCI-LS1.C-P1, SEP-CEDS-P1). Students ask questions and also brainstorm if the plants need water, light, or water and light to live (SEP-AQDP-P1, CCC-CE-P2). In Lesson 2, students investigate what caused the radish plants to be unhealthy by testing three scenarios (SEP-INV-P2, CCC-CE-P2). Students make and share predictions to describe what will happen to the plant in each scenario (SEP-INV-P6) and then record their observations (SEP-DATA-P1). In Lesson 3, students share data and look for patterns of growth and survival of the radish plants (SEP-INV-P4). Students address the question regarding whether plants can live without water and light (DCI-LS1.C-P1, SEP-DATA-P3) and revisit the phenomenon to explain why the radish plants are unhealthy (SEP-CEDS-P1). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as sharing ideas with a partner, drawing models, investigating, and collecting and analyzing data.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lessons 6 and 7, the phenomenon is that caterpillars build webs in a human-made habitat. Students engage in a series of lessons to gather information, model, and explain how webbing fulfill essential needs for caterpillars. In Lesson 6, students record their observations from four different caterpillar habitat stations, draw observations of the habitats’ parts (DCI-ESS2.E-P1), and share with a partner how the parts are related to each other (SEP-MOD-P2, CCC-SYS-P2). In Lesson 7, students read text and view photos to collect evidence about caterpillar habitats and webs (SEP-INFO-P1). Students draw a model to show how the caterpillars’ webs help them get what they need (SEP-MOD-P2). Using the evidence from their drawing, students explain that the webs help the caterpillars get food and give them shelter (CCC-SYS-P2). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as sharing ideas with a partner, gathering information, making observations, and using models to support explanations.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lessons 1-7, the problem is that it is too hot to sit on the playground. Students engage in a series of lessons to define the problem, design, build, and test a prototype, and refine models to determine the best solution to the playground being too hot. In Lesson 1, students ask questions about what is happening on the playground (DCI-ETS1.A-P2, DCI-ETS1.A-P3, and SEP-AQDP-P1) and share their initial ideas about what causes the playground surface to get warm (DCI-PS3.B-P1, CCC-CE-P2). In Lesson 2, students investigate temperature differences to analyze data and make comparisons of temperature (SEP-DATA-P1, SEP-CEDS-P1, and SEP-INV-P4). In Lesson 3, students investigate the warming effect of lamplight on a model playground to explain that sunlight can cause a surface to warm up and blocking sunlight can keep a surface from warming (SEP-MOD-P1, SEP-INV-P4, and CCC-CE-P2). In Lesson 4, students begin modeling a solution to the problem (DCI-ETS1.A-P1, SEP-MOD-P4, and SEP-CEDS-P1). In Lesson 5, students explore properties to select a material for their solution (SEP-CEDS-P2, CCC-SF-P1). In Lesson 6, students build and test a prototype (SEP-CEDS-P2, CCC-SF-P1). In Lesson 7, students test their final models (CCC-CE-P1), collect data, discuss if their model solved the problem (SEP-INV-P5), and determine which solution worked best (SEP-CEDS-P3, CCC-CE-P2). Across the learning sequence, students engage in multiple opportunities to develop, revise, and evaluate their thinking such as sharing ideas with a partner, analyzing and comparing data from investigations on model prototypes, and designing, building, testing, and refining solutions.
Overview of Gateway 2
Coherence & Scope
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence & Scope; Criterion 1: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions meets expectations.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions
Materials are coherent in design, scientifically accurate, and support grade-band endpoints of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for the Criterion 2a-2g: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions. The materials support students in understanding connections between units. The materials, and corresponding suggested sequence, reveal student tasks related to explaining phenomena or solving problems that increase in sophistication within each unit and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for physical science; life science; earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the SEPs at the grade level and all of the SEPs across the grade band. The materials include all grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Indicator 2A
Materials are designed for students to build and connect their knowledge and use of the three dimensions across the series.
Indicator 2A.i
Students understand how the materials connect the dimensions from unit to unit.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that students understand how the materials connect the dimensions from unit to unit. The materials include four Modules, each focused on a different discipline, that may be taught in any order: Earth and Space Science, Life Science, Physical Science, and Engineering Design. Within lessons, the materials frequently address what was covered in previous lessons and how it furthers the learning in current lessons. Each lesson builds to the next and includes prompts for the teacher to support students in making those connections. In addition, Series Connection call out boxes prompt the teacher to draw attention to connections to other Kindergarten Modules if students have previously completed them.
Examples of student learning experiences that demonstrate connections:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion? Lesson 5: Let’s Change Our Direction, students draw a model that shows the direction and force needed to move a ball to a person in a group. A Teacher Tip callout box advises the teacher to “Tell students that the drawings they made in Lessons 1 and 2 are also examples of models.”
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, students draw a solution to the problem that a tree has caused the sidewalk to crack. The Series Connections callout box connects to another Module and suggests, “If your class has used the module How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun? ask them to think about how using drawings to communicate solutions fit in with that module.”
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 5: Picking Parts, students explore the properties of materials available to them and begin to select materials for a model shade device with consideration for the shapes and properties of the materials. The Series Connections callout box connects to another Module and suggests, “If your class has used the module How Can We Change an Object’s Motion? ask them to think about which materials they used for their paddles and walls and why.”
Indicator 2A.ii
Materials have an intentional sequence where student tasks increase in sophistication.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten to Grade 2 meet expectations that they have an intentional sequence where student tasks increase in sophistication. Materials are designed with an intentional and suggested sequence across the series where grade specific units may be taught in any order. There is no specific increase in rigor within grade level units as rigor occurs across the grade band. Across the series, tasks increase in sophistication in a number of ways. From Kindergarten to Grade 2, many student supports are gradually faded out. For instance, in Kindergarten, students frequently develop ideas collaboratively in a whole group setting but by Grade 2, students do more work, like developing explanations, independently. Other supports, like sentence frames and graphic organizers, also occur less frequently in Grade 2. The complexity of tasks increases as students go through the grade band. In Kindergarten, students work with smaller data sets and may investigate only a single aspect of a phenomenon, whereas in Grade 2 they collect, analyze, and use larger bodies of evidence to support explanations and solve more complex problems. The increase in sophistication is consistent across the DCIs that students encounter, the SEPs that students engage in to make sense of phenomena and solve problems, and the CCCs that they apply.
Examples of student tasks increasing in sophistication across the grade band:
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students collect, communicate, and use information. In Kindergarten, the teacher provides significant support as students engage with scientific texts, including reading aloud to students and guiding them through comprehension strategies. By Grade 2, students engage with texts more independently and do more to summarize and synthesize what they read. For instance, in Kindergarten, Life Science, What do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 7: You Get What You Need, the teacher reads a story about habitats from the Smithsonian Stories Literacy Series Big Book: Wander and Wonder. In addition to reading the story for the students, the teacher rereads the story, pauses at each organism it discusses, asks students key questions about the information on what each organism needs, and then records student responses in a class chart. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When the Sky Will Be Dark?, Lesson 3: Oksana, Issa, and Layla, students read a story from the book Sky Patterns. As in Kindergarten, the teacher first reads the book aloud to students, and pauses to ask comprehension questions and point out important information. Students, however, are responsible for working with a partner to return to the story, reread it, and record important information in their journals. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 4: Tomato Trouble, students read about the parts of a plant in a story from the book Blossoms, Bees, and Seeds. Students begin by previewing the book and looking at the headings and other text features for connections they make. The teacher reads the book aloud to the class once but does not pause to ask comprehension questions. The teacher then provides a purpose for reading the text, students read the text, independently share what they learned with a partner, and then record information they learned from the story in their journal on their own.
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students develop explanations of phenomena. In Kindergarten, the teacher provides sentence frames for students to state their explanations, uses guided questions to support students to develop explanations, and leads students to collectively develop explanations. By Grade 2, students develop explanations more independently, incorporate more evidence in their explanations, and assess how their explanations have changed. For example, in Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 3: Faster, Faster!, students investigate what makes objects move quickly. As students make sense of their observations, the teacher provides a sentence frame for students to use as they state their observations. The teacher records student responses on a class chart for them, and then guides students to use another sentence frame to state their conclusion. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When the Sky Will Be Dark?, Lesson 7: Mysterious Moon, students model the moon’s apparent change of shape. After making observations of their model, students discuss with a partner and then independently write or draw why they think the bright part of the model changed shape. The teacher then returns to the question of the actual moon appearing to change shape but does not provide students with sentence stems to state their ideas. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land from Washing Away?, Lesson 5: Change! Change! Read All about It!, students work independently with fewer supports to develop an explanation. After students read a text to collect information on what causes changes to the land, they are prompted to explain what caused the road behind Ada’s school to be covered in mud. Unlike in previous lessons, they develop their explanations independently, without discussing possible explanations as a class first. In addition, the student notebook provides fewer scaffolds for students to write their claims. The notebooks include basic prompts, like “This is my evidence,” but do not include sentence stems.
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students use models to explain phenomena and solve problems. As students progress through the band, the expectations for their models increase and by Grade 2 their models are based on larger bodies of evidence, include labels and explanations, are developed more independently, and include simulations. Expectations for student understanding of modeling as a practice also increase. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plan, Part 1, students model the habitats present on a schoolyard. The materials provide students with a template of the model and symbols of organisms to cut out and include in the model (e.g., caterpillar, tree). Students are further supported by the practice of discussing and refining their models with the entire class. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send a Message Using Sound?, Lesson 6: Drum Vibrations, students draw a model of a device that will make sound. Students now discuss their models in pairs, rather than as a full class, and their models must include labels identifying their proposed materials as well as a justification for why they selected the materials in their models. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 6: A Gardener’s Gadget, students make a device that can pollinate plants. Prior to building the device, students draw a detailed model that includes labels of each part and the material. In developing their model, students must also describe the shape or texture of each element and explain how it relates to the device’s function and its similarity to the bee that is being modeled.
Across the grade band, there is an increase in sophistication as students construct and use arguments to support their explanations of phenomena or solutions to problems. In Kindergarten, students make and support claims, but are heavily supported by the teacher and do not typically analyze arguments. By Grade 2, students are expected to include multiple sources of evidence, explain how the evidence supports their claims, and analyze others’ oral and written arguments for validity or accuracy. For example, in Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 2: Move that Ball!, students investigate how to start a ball’s motion. Students conduct a simple investigation and use the results to make a claim about what made a hockey puck move. Students are given a sentence frame to help them state their claim and provide supporting evidence. In Grade 1, Life Science, How do Living Things Stay Safe and Grow?, Lesson 6: Penguin Protection, students use a greater range of sources as evidence for their arguments. Students collect evidence on penguin behaviors from a simulation and video of a young and adult penguin interacting. They discuss this evidence, along with evidence they collected from a book in a previous lesson, and explain how it can support their claim about a young penguin’s behavior. Students then take these multiple pieces of evidence and construct their own argument independently in their journal. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids and Liquids?, Lesson 6: Making a Mold, students continue using multiple sources of evidence to support their arguments but also engage in a discussion about one another’s arguments. Using evidence and information collected over multiple lessons, students make a claim about a container they can use to mold their own crayons. After sharing their plans, the teacher encourages students to “ask a question, challenge, and/or add to other students’ ideas.” The teacher supports students to engage with one another’s arguments by suggesting they refer to the evidence they collected.
Indicator 2B
Materials present Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) in a way that is scientifically accurate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they present disciplinary core ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts in a way that is scientifically accurate. Across the grade, the teacher materials, student materials, and assessments accurately represent the three dimensions and are free from scientific inaccuracies in each of the four units.
Indicator 2C
Materials do not inappropriately include scientific content and ideas outside of the grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they do not inappropriately include scientific content and ideas outside of the grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs). Across the grade, the materials consistently incorporate student learning opportunities to learn and use DCIs appropriate to the grade.
Indicator 2D
Materials incorporate all grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
Indicator 2D.i
Physical Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for physical sciences. Across the grade, the materials include all of the associated elements of the physical science DCIs.
Examples of grade-level physical science DCI elements present in the materials:
PS2.A-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, students use pipe cleaners, tongue depressors, and aluminum foil to test out pushing a ball into a goal and discuss which one is best used to push a ball into the goal. Students then draw a model to compare the strength of the push made by each material and to show if the ball moved fast or slow.
PS2.A-P2. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 6: Collisions, students use a plastic tray to model the effect on a ball’s direction when it hits a wall. After drawing a model of the ball and tray, students then draw another model to show what happened to a puck before it went into a goal. They include an arrow to show the direction the puck was pushed and how it moved before and after colliding with a wall.
PS2.B-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 7: Wall Tests, students test six different wall materials to determine which is most effective for a game. Students analyze the results and describe how the ball changes motion after colliding with each of the different materials. Then, students use what they have learned about balls changing directions when they collide with a wall to explain that the speed of the ball also changes.
PS3.B-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 6: Outfits for Evidence, students look for evidence related to clothing worn outdoors at different times of the day. Students also observe that a snowman does not melt between the night and morning. Using this evidence, students determine there is a relationship between the sun being in the sky and a snowman melting.
PS3.C-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 3: Faster, Faster, students investigate ways to move objects with pushes and pulls. Students use the sentence stems; “ When I _____, the_______went slow,” and “When I _____ the_______went fast.” Students use their observations to say that objects move faster when they are pushed harder and objects move slower when they are pushed softer.
Indicator 2D.ii
Life Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for life sciences. Across the grade, the materials include the associated components and elements of the life science DCIs.
Example of the grade-level life science DCI element present in the materials:
LS1.C-P1. In Grade 1, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plan, students use observations to draw schoolyard models showing that plants and trees need water and light. Students’ models also show that caterpillars need plants for food and woodpeckers need insects, nuts, and/or berries from the trees.
Indicator 2D.iii
Earth and Space Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for earth and space sciences. Across the grade, the materials include all of the associated elements of the earth and space science DCIs.
Examples of the grade-level earth and space science DCI elements present in the materials:
ESS2.D-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 2: What is Weather?, students sort images to identify three forms of weather (rain, wind, and sunlight) and come up with different examples of each. Students consider and discuss what combination of weather forms can explain why a pole is wet on one side but not on the other.
ESS2.E-P1. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Animals And Plants Need To Live?, Lesson 6: World of Webs, students make observations and draw parts of caterpillar habitats. Students describe relationships within the habitat and construct an explanation for how caterpillars change the habitat to make webs. In Lesson 10: Play Area, Part 2, students use models of the relationships among animals and plants in the schoolyard to make a claim about which play area plan is best for the living things and to predict how the habitat will change over time.
ESS3.A-P1. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Animals And Plants Need To Live?, Lesson 7: You Get What You Need, students obtain information from a reading and discuss what living things (including people) need to live and grow: air, water, shelter, sunlight (plants), and other resources from their habitats. Students then make observations from images of caterpillars in their habitats to describe how caterpillar webs help them to get resources from their habitats.
ESS3.B-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 8: Stormy Weather, students use a simulation to obtain information on the types of storms likely to occur in different locations. Students observe videos of the hazards associated with different types of storms and select the best ways to stay safe from each hazard.
ESS3.C-P1. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Animals And Plants Need To Live?, Lesson 7: You Get What You Need, students work with a partner to brainstorm the ways that people change the environment to make themselves more comfortable or get what they need. The teacher then leads a discussion on the things that people need, how that affects the environment, and how students can make sure that plants and animals get the things they need from their habitats.
Indicator 2D.iv
Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-band and grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for engineering, technology, and applications of science (ETS) and all associated elements.
In Kindergarten, three performance expectations (PEs) are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. The materials include opportunities for students to engage with these ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of the Kindergarten grade-level ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.A-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 8: Carrying the Shade, Part 1, students represent (illustrate) the problem of sunlight shining on a girl and the girl feeling hot. Students discuss that she doesn’t want to feel hot in the sunlight and they can find a solution to the problem. Students read about how engineers designed a solution to keep zoo animals cool, then discuss what they should do to start designing a solution to the girl’s problem.
ETS1.A-P2. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder?, students ask questions about the problem of Ada’s hot playground, use their hands to make observations of warmer and cooler objects, and gather information from images to think about the problem.
ETS1.B-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 6: Design a Shade, students design a shade device for the playground. Students make a drawing, list materials, work in pairs to share their drawings and lists, and then generate a single design.
In Grade 1, no PEs are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. However, the materials do include opportunities for students to engage with ETS elements in this grade.
Example of the grade-band ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.A-P3. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send A Message Using Sound?, Lesson 1: Time to Go!, student pairs model a field trip situation in which students cannot hear their teacher’s voice from a distance. Students use their modeling activity to form a statement of the problem before designing a solution. In Lesson 9: River Crossing, Part 1, students discuss how they could make a version of a river crossing game to play in their classroom. Students use the class discussion to clearly define the problem (students playing the game need to know which way to move) before beginning to design a solution.
In Grade 2, two PEs are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. The materials include opportunities for students to engage with these ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of the Grade 2 grade-level ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.B-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, students investigate the role of bees in pollination and design a device that will pollinate a flower. After they draw and share their designs, students discuss how they used drawings and models to share ideas and other ways they could have shared their ideas.
ETS1.C-P1. In Grade 2, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 8: Test and Compare, students test their design solutions to determine if sand movement is reduced and record observations of the results. Students compare their solution models and testing results to the different models and testing results of other groups.
The Grades K-2 band includes one DCI PE that is designed to be taught at any point across the grade band. This PE includes five elements. The materials provide opportunities to engage with ETS DCIs and their elements in all three grades within this band.
Examples of grade-band ETS DCI elements present in the Grade K-2 materials:
ETS1.A-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 8: Carrying the Shade, Part 1, students represent (illustrate) the problem of sunlight shining on a girl and the girl feeling hot. Students discuss that she doesn’t want to feel hot in the sunlight and they can find a solution to the problem. Students read about how engineers designed a solution to keep zoo animals cool, then discuss what they should do to start designing a solution to the girl’s problem.
ETS1.A-P2. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder?, students ask questions about the problem of Ada’s hot playground, use their hands to make observations of warmer and cooler objects, and gather information from images to think about the problem.
ETS1.A-P3. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send A Message Using Sound?, Lesson 1: Time to Go!, student pairs model a field trip situation in which students cannot hear their teacher’s voice from a distance. Students use their modeling activity to form a statement of the problem before designing a solution. In Lesson 9: River Crossing, Part 1, students discuss how they could make a version of a river crossing game to play in their classroom. Students use the class discussion to clearly define the problem (students playing the game need to know which way to move) before beginning to design a solution.
ETS1.B-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find the Best Place for a Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, students investigate the role of bees in pollination and design a device that will pollinate a flower. After they draw and share their designs, students discuss how they used drawings and models to share ideas and other ways they could have shared their ideas.
ETS1.C-P1. In Grade 2, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 8: Test and Compare, students test their design solutions to determine if sand movement is reduced and record observations of the results. Students compare their solution models and testing results to the different models and testing results of other groups.
Indicator 2E
Materials incorporate all grade-level Science and Engineering Practices.
Indicator 2E.i
Materials incorporate grade-level appropriate SEPs within each grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level science and engineering practices and associated elements. The materials include all of the SEP elements associated with the performance expectations (PEs) for the grade level. These are found across all four units for this grade.
Examples of SEP elements associated with the grade-level performance expectations that are present in the materials:
AQDP-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 4: Snow, Snow, Go Away, based on their observations of the snowman melting in the sequencing activity, students turn to shoulder partners and come up with a question they need to answer to determine why the snow melts at some times but does not melt at other times.
MOD-P3. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 5: Let’s Change Our Direction, students draw a model using arrows to show the pattern they observed between the direction of a push on a ball and the direction of its motion.
INV-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 7: Are You Keeping It Cool?, students collaborate on a plan to investigate the effectiveness of their devices that they designed to keep a surface from warming in lamplight.
INV-P4. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 6: Outfits as Evidence, students view a video of a snowman melting and observe the types of clothes people wear to stay comfortable during the day and into the evening. Students use these observations to compare how to dress for different outdoor temperatures over 48 hours.
DATA-P3. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plans, Part 1, students use observations of caterpillars, plants, and photographs of the schoolyard to identify what living things are in the schoolyard and what those living things need in order to survive.
DATA-P5. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 7: Are You Keeping It Cool?, students test their shade devices and record their data. Students analyze the data collected by the class to find common characteristics and patterns of successful and unsuccessful designs and identify those designs that worked as intended.
CEDS-P2. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 5: Picking Parts, students design and build a device that will create shade. After planning their basic design, students select which materials to use and incorporate into their design.
ARG-P6. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 7: Wall Tests, students test six materials to determine their effectiveness as a sidewall for their hockey game. Students collect data from their test and use the sentence frame “The ___ is/is not a good material for the side wall because ___”, to make a claim about the effectiveness of each material as a sidewall and support their claim with evidence.
INFO-P1. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 4: What’s on the Menu?, students collaboratively read the text “What’s on the Menu?” as they make observations and collect data on what coyotes, woodpeckers, and beavers need in order to live. Based on the data collected, students describe what they think caterpillars need to live.
INFO-P4. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Do We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 6: Design a Shade, student teams share final drawings of their shade device plans which contain materials needed for the design. Students use a classroom response gesture to respond if they think their model will assemble as planned and block the light as intended. Students then share with a student from another group one concern they have about their design and listen to them for suggestions to their concern.
Indicator 2E.ii
Materials incorporate all SEPs across the grade band
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level science and engineering practices and associated elements across the grade band. The materials include all of the SEP elements associated with the performance expectations (PEs) for the grade band. Elements of the SEPs are found across all three grades within this grade band.
Examples of SEP elements associated with the grade-band performance expectations that are present in the materials:
AQDP-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 4: Snow, Snow, Go Away, based on their observations of the snowman melting in the sequencing activity, students turn to shoulder partners and come up with a question they need to answer to determine why the snow melts at some times but does not melt at other times.
MOD-P3. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 10: A Map for Ada, Part 2, students use what they have learned about maps to convert a 3-D map into a 2-D map with patterns of symbols and a legend. Students identify relationships between how land and water are represented across multiple maps and then provide evidence to support which 3-D map matches their 2-D map. Students compare the relative scales of land features in both maps and observe the patterns between them.
MOD-P4. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 6: A Gardener’s Gadget, after investigating how bees pollinate flowers, students draw a simple model of a hand pollinator that could be used when bees are not available. Students describe how the parts of their hand pollinator mimic bees’ structures and their functions. Students then create the hand pollinator using materials in class as a physical model of their drawings.
INV-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 7: Are You Keeping It Cool?, students collaborate on a plan to investigate the effectiveness of their devices that they designed to keep a surface from warming in lamplight.
INV-P2. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow?, Lesson 1: A Pair of Penguins, students investigate why the penguins in the Falkland/Malvinas Islands look different. Students collaborate with a partner to decide how to make and record observations of the penguins, carry out their investigations, and then use their data to add to their developing explanation.
INV-P3. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe and Grow?, Lesson 4: Like Parent, Like Offspring, students investigate the difference between young and adult plants. Prior to making their observations, the students discuss which senses would best help them to make observations useful to their investigation.
INV-P4. In Grade 1, Engineering Design, How Can We Send a Message Using Sound?, Lesson 4: Sound Test, students investigate sound using different devices: ruler on table, stretched rubber bands, tuning fork, and a class suggested device. Students record observations of what they felt, saw, and heard. With their observations, students engage in a class discussion about how the different devices are similar and different regarding if it makes sound, how loud it is, and how far away they could hear it.
DATA-P3. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 9: Play Area Plans, Part 1, students use observations of caterpillars, plants, and photographs of the schoolyard to identify what living things are in the schoolyard and what those living things need in order to survive.
DATA-P5. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 7: Testing the Templates, students analyze and test different crayon molds to determine which should be used to recreate melted crayons. Students conduct four tests to compare marker, glue stick, cotton swab, and pencil molds. Students combine the best features of the trial molds to create a final mold that they test for ease of writing and ease of holding.
CEDS-P1. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 3: Sunshine and Rain, students make observations of seeds that were exposed to light and water, water only, or light only. Students use their observations as evidence in their explanation about what seeds need to grow.
CEDS-P2. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow?, Lesson 8: Mimic and Make, students first develop drawn models with a partner to solve the problem of scientists encountering difficult terrain for observing birds. Along with the models that mimic parts of living organisms, students list what materials they need to make a physical model of their solution. Student pairs build their models and share design solutions with other students.
ARG-P6. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 9: Boo-Boo Pack Problems, Part 1, students observe the properties of rice and salt to determine if they are solid or liquid. Students make a claim about the state of matter of rice and salt and support their claim with evidence. Students then discuss their claims and evidence for which materials make the best filling for a boo-boo pack.
INFO-P1. In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 4: What’s on the Menu?, students collaboratively read the text “What’s on the Menu?” as they make observations and collect data on what coyotes, woodpeckers, and beavers need in order to live. Based on the data collected, students describe what they think caterpillars need to live.
INFO-P3. In Grade 1, Life Science, How Do Living Things Stay Safe And Grow?, Lesson 5: Staying Alive, students construct an initial argument explaining the behavior of parents and offspring. Students read an informational text to collect evidence for their arguments. Prior to reading, the teacher previews the text features, including headings and bolded words, and discusses that, like scientists, they will use a book to collect information.
INFO-P4. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Do We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 6: Design a Shade, student teams share final drawings of their shade device plans which contain materials needed for the design. Students use a classroom response gesture to respond if they think their model will assemble as planned and block the light as intended. Students then share with a student from another group one concern they have about their design and listen to them for suggestions to their concern.
Indicator 2F
Materials incorporate all grade-band Crosscutting Concepts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level crosscutting concepts (CCCs) and associated elements across the grade band. The materials include all of the CCC elements associated with the performance expectations for the grade band. Elements of the CCCs are found across all three grades within this grade band. Materials do not include elements of the CCCs from above the grade band.
Examples of CCC elements associated with the grade-band performance expectations that are present in the materials:
CE-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion? Lesson 2: Move That Ball, students conduct a test to determine how many different ways they can start a ball’s motion using pushes and pulls with a tongue depressor, yarn, a straw, and tape.
CE-P2. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When The Sun Will Be Dark?, Lesson 3: Oksana Issa, and Layla, students read a story and collect data on the objects seen in the sky when it is bright and when it is dark. Students use this data to identify patterns of when the Sun, Moon, and stars are visible in the sky. Using these patterns, students explain that the sun causes the sky to be bright.
EM-P1. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 1: Piece by Piece, students view a sculpture made by an artist and explain how many different smaller pieces were put together to form the sculpture they observe. Students then build their own sculpture of an aquatic animal from multiple smaller pieces of plastic. Students lastly deconstruct their sculptures into smaller pieces.
PAT-P1. In Grade 1, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Predict When The Sky Will be Dark?, Lesson 4: Lydia and Shirley, students read a story to identify the pattern that the most amount of daylight occurs in the summer and the least amount occurs in the winter. Students use these seasonal patterns of daylight to explain that toys outside are more easily seen in the summer and not in the winter.
SC-P2. In Grade 2, Engineering Design, How Can We Stop Land From Washing Away?, Lesson 6: Choosing a Problem, students develop solutions to the problem of rain moving soil onto the road. Students consider different ranges of time in their solution requirements and address short term and long term changes to the soil. In Lesson 10: Beach Erosion Problems, Part 2, students use beach models to test causes of beach erosion. Students collect and analyze data to explain which solution provides better protection during a quick event that may cause land change and which solutions are better for long term protection.
SF-P1. In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 4: The Shade’s the Thing, students read a text to identify devices used at the zoo to protect animals from the sun. Students identify the parts of the devices and the purpose for each part such as its shape and structure that makes it stable and function as a sunshade.
SYS-P2. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 8: Home on the Range, students use a simulator to collect data on plants, animals, and habitats. Students use the data to explain how plants, animals, and habitats all have parts that work together in order for the plants and animals to survive.
Indicator 2G
Materials incorporate NGSS Connections to Nature of Science and Engineering.
The instructional materials reviewed for K-2 meet expectations that they incorporate NGSS connections to nature of science (NOS) and engineering (ENG). Materials incorporate grade-band NGSS connections to NOS and engineering within individual lessons across the series.
Examples of grade-band connections to NOS elements associated with SEPs present in the materials:
VOM-P1. In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 6: Outfits as Evidence, as students work to answer the question “Why did the snowman melt during the day but not at night?”, the teacher tells students that scientists answer questions using evidence and they too will use evidence to answer their question.
BEE-P1. In Grade 1, Physical Science, How Can We Light Our Way In The Dark?, Lesson 3: The Shadow Effect, students observe and record the differences in shadows made by moving a flashlight to different distances and angles. After measuring the length of shadows, the teacher tells students they can compare the results to look for shadows the way that scientists do.
ENP-P2. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, students investigate the causes and effects of lighting a candle. The teacher tells students that when scientists try to figure out why something has changed, they are looking for a cause creating that effect.
Examples of grade-band connections to NOS elements associated with CCCs present in the materials:
AOC-P1. In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 8: Design My Hockey Game, students test their design models for a hockey game wall. The teacher is directed to tell them that engineers test their designs so they can observe what works well and what does not work well and then they can make improvements that will make the design better.
HE-P2. In Grade 2, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Map Land And Water On Earth?, Lesson 3: Ice Investigation, students prepare to make observations about ice and water. The teacher tells students, “anyone can become a scientist, even though not all people have the same observation abilities…Working with other people during investigations to share work and ideas is one way that scientists who have different abilities may use to get more information.”
HE-P2. In Grade 1, Physical Science, How Can We Light Our Way in the Dark?, Lesson 1: Treasure Hunt, students prepare to make observations of gemstones hidden in a dark location. The teacher tells students that scientists make observations and “anyone can become a scientist, even though not all people have the same observation abilities”. The teacher continues with, “working with other people during investigations and discussing their observations….is one way scientists with different abilities conduct investigations.”
Examples of grade-band connections to ENG elements associated with CCCs present in the materials:
INTER-P2. In Grade 2, Life Science, How Can We Find The Best Place For A Plant to Grow?, Lesson 5: Flower to Flower, students use a model of a bee to make observations of how bees help pollinate plants. Before making their model, students observe bees using a magnifying box. The teacher tells students that scientists use tools like hand lenses and magnifying boxes to help them see details they could not otherwise see.
INFLU-P1. In Grade 2, Physical Science, How Can We Change Solids And Liquids?, Lesson 3: What Happens to Wax?, students use candles to investigate the possible causes of crayons changing shape. The teacher tells students that both crayons and candles are made from wax, which can be a natural substance, and that engineers use natural materials and knowledge of the natural world to design and build the things people use.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for Gateway 3: Instructional Supports & Usability; Criterion 1: Teacher Supports meets expectations. Criterion 2: Assessment meets expectations. Criterion 3: Student Supports partially meets expectations. Criterion 4: Intentional Design incorporates evidence in narrative format.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for the Criterion 3a-3h: Teacher Supports. The materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for enacting the materials, contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts beyond the current grade so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series, provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies, and provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in figuring out phenomena and solving problems.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in figuring out phenomena and solving problems. The materials include teacher guidance at the beginning of each unit in the Curriculum Overview and Module Overview as well as guidance embedded in the lessons in the form of margin notes, callout boxes, and built-in guidance.
The Module Overview includes several sections that provide comprehensive guidance that supports implementation of the materials. These sections include: Phenomenon and Problems Storyline, the Module Alignment to NGSS, Assessment Map, Series Connections, Module Background Information, Common Naive Student Ideas, and Materials Management and Safety. These sections provide teachers with an overview of the module, how the module connects to the standards, how the module connects to other modules in the program, important science content information, and ideas about the science content that students may have.
Individual Lessons also include embedded guidance on a variety of elements for implementing the materials. The materials name the following types of margin notes, callout boxes, and lesson guidance: NGSS, Common Core, Good Thinking, Plan Ahead, Digital Resources, EL Strategies, Series Connections, Teacher Tips, Tech Tips, Guiding Questions, Safety Notes, and Class Period Breaks. These embedded supports provide teachers with things like guidance on what specific elements of the NGSS are being addressed, where students may have alternative ideas about the science content, how to accommodate for multilingual learners, safety considerations, and guiding questions that will help students make connections and understand content.
Example of a margin note providing embedded support:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 8: Stormy Weather, the activity sequence includes a Teacher Tip callout box that states, “Remind students who act out lightning that thunder is the sound of lightning. Suggest students who act out snow think about how cold snow is.”
The digital version of the Kindergarten materials also includes a Digital Resources section that provides additional support for teachers. This includes professional learning videos that provide instruction on topics like integrating diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion in the classroom, the materials’ three-dimensional assessment system, and using student notebooks. There are also Teacher Resource Videos that walk the user through each lesson in the module and include video instructions on setting up classroom activities, examples of classroom activities, explanations of what students should do, samples of student work, and what students should be able to understand and do after each lesson.
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for containing adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
Support for teachers’ understanding of science content is found in the Module Background Information section of the Module Overview at the beginning of each unit. This section includes narrative information that explains the relevant DCIs in adult terms. These explanations go beyond the DCIs as written and provide additional context and content that can help teachers improve their own knowledge of the subject. This section also includes a deeper analysis of the SEPs and CCCs that are included in the module. These explanations describe the SEPs and CCCs in detail, how their scientific meaning is different from the everyday meaning of the word, and what ideas students may have about them. The digital Kindergarten materials include the same information in the Module Background Information tab in the Module Overview tab of each module page.
Example of supports provided for teachers to develop their own understanding of more advanced, grade-level concepts and expected student practices:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, the Module Background Information states, “Identifying a pattern may help students explain a phenomenon such as going to bed when it is dark outside in the winter and light outside in the summer. As students get older, they may be able to identify a pattern in a set of data. For this reason, the crosscutting concept of patterns is often used together with the science and engineering practice of analyzing and interpreting data.”
Example of supports provided for teachers to develop their own understanding of concepts beyond the current course:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, the Module Background Information states, “Earth’s daily temperatures are controlled by energy from the Sun. During the day, the Sun’s radiation causes both Earth’s atmosphere and surface to heat up. When light of any sort is absorbed by an object, thermal energy is transferred from the light to the object.”
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information, including connections to college- and career-ready ELA and mathematics standards, that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations for including standards correlation information, including connections to college- and career-ready ELA and mathematics standards, that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials provide many explanations of the connections and correlations to the NGSS at the series level, unit level, and lesson level. However, connections to standards for ELA and mathematics are only present at the lesson level.
NGSS correlations are present in a variety of locations and explain connections at different levels. At the series level, the Curriculum Overview section provides a curriculum framework for the series that shows which performance expectations are addressed in each grade level and each unit for the grade band. At the unit level, the Module Overview section includes several places that explain the connection to the NGSS. The Module Alignment to NGSS provides the module objectives and the performance expectations, DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs connected to those objectives. At the lesson level, the Assessment Map in the Module Overview provides the assessment objectives and associated DCI, SEP, and CCC elements for each individual lesson. The Lesson Planner at the beginning of each module provides similar information but only names the larger SEP or CCC and not the specific element. Additionally, NGSS margin notes embedded in the lessons provide guidance on what DCIs, SEPs, or CCCs are connected to specific portions of each lesson.
Example of a Lesson-Level Connection to the NGSS:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion, Lesson 7: Wall Tests, the NGSS margin note states, “Carrying out investigations: Students make observations to collect data that will later be used to compare materials.”
Lesson-level connections to ELA and mathematics are located in the Lesson Planner for each module and as embedded guidance in the lessons. The Lesson Planner includes an ELA and Math Connections column that cites the Common Core standard connected to each lesson (e.g., “Language, Vocabulary acquisition and use (L.1.6)”), where applicable. Individual lessons also include Common Core margin notes that connect specific portions of a lesson to components in the Common Core (e.g., comprehension and collaboration, presentation of knowledge and ideas). There is a missed opportunity to make series-level connections to standards in ELA or mathematics.
Example of a Lesson-Level Connection to ELA and Mathematics
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 2: What Is Weather?, step 3 of the Getting Started procedure “Invite students to tell a shoulder partner about an experience they had with weather,” is accompanied by a “Presentation of knowledge and ideas” Margin Note.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content. Each module includes an accompanying Family Letter that is found in each module’s companion website. The letter provides the module title and information about the final module challenge, asks the family for feedback on the student experiences relevant to the module, and provides sample prompts family members can use to foster conversations at home about the module to provide student sensemaking. The digital materials for Kindergarten also include a Family Letter translated into Spanish.
Example of a Family Letter used to communicate to stakeholders:
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, parents are asked to list books students might know about engineers and to share a story about a hat that someone in the family wears in the sun. Questions are provided for parents to ask students during the module: “I hear you saw a video about a playground that was too hot to play on. Why did the playground get hot? How did you figure that out? Are you designing a solution for the hot playground problem? Tell me about your design. Why did you design it like that?”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The beginning of each Module includes the same curriculum overview that describes and explains the instructional approaches of the program. This includes sections titled: Curriculum Framework, Designed for the NGSS, A Coherent Storyline, Centered on Student Ideas, Group Work, Literacy Integration, Support for All Students, Assessment, Home Connections, and Support for Implementation. Each section describes how that component contributes to the program’s instructional approach. For instance, the section titled A Coherent Storyline explains that the program was developed using backward design and started with bundles of performance expectations as the goal. The Curriculum Overview also includes a References section, and cites the relevant research throughout all sections of the Curriculum Overview.
Examples of how the materials identify research-based strategies that are used in the design:
In the Curriculum Overview, the Literacy Integration section states “Through the use of a science notebook, students will engage in the writing process…and write for a variety of purposes,” and cites Bollinger et al., 2012, Teaching Elementary School Students to Be Effective Writers: A Practice Guide.
In the Curriculum Overview, the A Coherent Storyline section states “Multiple phenomena and problems are usually needed to fully cover the PEs in the bundle. Multiple phenomena and problems also spark the curiosity of a diverse group of students,” and cites Penuel, et al., 2017, Developing NGSS-Aligned Curriculum that Connects to Students' Interests and Experiences: Lessons Learned from a Co-design Partnership.
In the Curriculum overview, the Group Work section states “[Group work] can lessen individual competitiveness and develop problem solving skills,” and cites Lin, 2006, Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. The Module Overview at the beginning of each module includes a list of all the materials needed for the entire module based on a class of 24 students and notes the quantity of each item needed per lesson. A second materials list includes items not supplied in pre-packaged module kits (e.g. chart paper, tape, computers, water, etc.) and in which lesson they are used.
In addition, each lesson includes a list of materials needed for the lesson, with a reminder for materials that need advance preparation, if needed (e.g., ice). Materials are listed as needed by the teacher, students, and/or groups of students.
Indicator 3G
Materials provide clear science safety guidelines for teachers and students across the instructional materials.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing clear science safety guidelines for teachers and students across the instructional materials. At the beginning of each unit, the Module Overview includes a Safety section that includes general guidelines for safety along with module specific considerations such as live materials handling, chemical information (with a QR code link to MSDS sheets), and a reproducible “Stay Safe! Contract” for students and parents to sign. The digital version of the Kindergarten materials include this information in the Materials Management and Safety tab that is part of the Module Overview.
When applicable, specific safety instructions are included at the lesson level within activity instructions in the printed teacher’s guide. These are in the form of a red call-out section labeled with a red exclamation bubble and “Safety”. These callouts are not included in the digital version of the Kindergarten materials.
Example of a lesson-level Safety note:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 2: Move That Ball, after instructions for Activity Step 3, a call-out states “Students should not share straws. They should put their mouth on and touch only their own straw.”
Indicator 3H
Materials designated for each grade are feasible and flexible for one school year.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten are feasible and flexible for one school year but do not provide guidance for adjusting instruction and/or pacing based on local contexts.
There are four modules in the Kindergarten materials and each module consists of 10 lessons. Most lessons are estimated to take 30 minutes, but some lessons span two days. The materials list how many class periods comprise each lesson in the lesson planner, but do not include a comprehensive pacing guide that provides the total number of class periods and expected duration of each module at a glance. However, based on the lesson planner, Kindergarten’s 56 anticipated class periods are feasible for a single year.
The materials do not contain any other pacing guidance or suggestions on how to modify instruction and/or pacing when there is not sufficient time to implement the full program.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for the Criterion 3i-3l: Assessment. The materials indicate which standards are assessed and include an assessment system that provides multiple opportunities throughout the courses to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance for teachers to interpret student performance and suggestions for follow-up. The materials also provide assessments that include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of course-level standards and practices.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing assessment information to indicate which standards are assessed. All of the assessments in the materials are clearly tied to NGSS standards and elements in a variety of locations. Each unit includes an Assessment Map that is part of the Module Overview. The Assessment Map is a table that includes the type of assessment, the assessment objective, and the specific elements of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs associated with the assessment. Each lesson also includes an assessment section that provides a table with the assessment objectives, suggested assessed tasks, the associated elements of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs, and descriptions of indicators of success and difficulty.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing an assessment system with multiple opportunities throughout the grade to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials provide multiple assessment opportunities per unit to assess student progression towards mastering the module objective. The assessment system includes four types of assessments: pre-assessments, checkpoint assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments. Each lesson has at least one assigned assessment along with embedded student self assessments. Pre-assessment opportunities are provided for the beginning of a module and when the content of the lesson changes. Checkpoint assessments require students to make sense of a phenomenon or solve a problem by using all three NGSS dimensions and assess student understanding of the phenomenon or problem. Formative assessments include tasks that require students to use their skills and knowledge in complex ways and the tasks involved incorporate at least two and most often three of the NGSS dimensions. At the end of the module, students complete a summative assessment in the form of a science challenge (Life, Physical, and Earth and Space Science) or design challenge (engineering modules).
Each assessment, except the pre-assessment, includes supports for evaluating student performance. Formative, checkpoint, and summative assessments include a table with each assessed DCI, SEP, and CCC and a “look for” that teachers should see in student work to indicate their performance on the task.
All checkpoint and formative assessments include suggestions for remediation following the rubrics. The lesson procedures include the guidance to “Use the remediation strategy at the end of the lesson to provide additional support for students.” The remediation guidance provides specific ways to support students who struggled with the assessments. Remediation and follow-up guidance is not provided for summative assessments.
Example of Remediation Guidance:
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 6: Design a Shade, the remediation guidance for the formative assessment is “If you anticipate some students will have difficulty making their physical model, meet with the teams, or have a teaching assistant or volunteer meet with the teams, before Lesson 6. Ask the team members to use their drawings and materials tables and describe their design. Pre-build parts of their design for them so that they can tape or glue the sections together during the activity.”
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/grade-band standards and elements across the series.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level standards and elements across the series. The assessment system consistently provides three-dimensional assessments that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery in a variety of ways. Pre-assessments, formative assessments, and checkpoint assessments are typically integrated into lesson activities. Across the assessments, students provide verbal explanations, discuss in whole-class and small-group settings, and produce artifacts such as models and drawings. Summative assessments are made of performance tasks where students work individually and collaboratively to explain or solve a novel phenomenon or problem. The assessments consistently integrate the three dimensions by requiring students to use crosscutting concepts as they model, construct an argument, provide an explanation, ask questions, and design solutions connected to the DCIs.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not include assessments that offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. However, the program uses the universal design approach where assessments are offered in multiple modalities (e.g. drawings with verbal responses), use a large font, and provide picture-based or simple text. In addition, Spanish materials are available both in print and digitally. The materials miss the opportunity to provide specific examples for access or accommodation for the assessments for disabled students or multilingual learners beyond Spanish speakers.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations for the Criterion 3m-3v: Student Supports. The materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level science. The materials also provide multiple extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage with grade-level science at higher levels of complexity. While suggestions for multilingual learners appear consistently across lessons, they do not consistently provide the support necessary for multilingual learners to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials include two main supports for students from special populations – suggestions for remediation after assessments and naive student ideas. Each formative and checkpoint assessment includes a suggestion for supporting students who struggle with the assessment. Each unit also includes a table of Common Student Naive Ideas in the Module Overview that lists possible misconceptions and things students may say that will help teachers identify the naive ideas. The majority of units cite Naive Ideas based on DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs. Naive ideas are also presented in the Lesson Planner at the beginning of each module, and embedded in individual lessons in Good Thinking callout boxes.
The materials also employ several strategies of universal design for learning to accommodate students’ individual needs, most typically for visually impaired students. This includes accommodations such as large, clear font and text-to-voice options for digital texts. There are also occasional Teacher Tip callout boxes that provide additional supports.
Examples of embedded support for students:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, the materials include a Naive Idea where students may fixate on a single solution for the broken pavement and add on for teachers that students who are budding engineers will learn over time how to consider problems from different points of view.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder?, a Teacher Tip suggests the teacher carry materials to students who are unable to come to the materials station.
Indicator 3N
Materials provide extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering at greater depth.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations for providing extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage in learning grade-level science and engineering at greater depth. Except for Summative Assessments, each assessment is followed by suggested Remediation and Enrichment activities for teachers to implement based on students’ performance. The enrichment activities typically require students to apply DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs in novel situations and engage students in new or more complex thinking related to the lesson content. None of the enrichment activities simply add on additional work for advanced students. The materials also provide Extension activities that connect lesson content to new contexts, such as math, arts, or ELA. These extension activities do not always require more complex science. However, they are not limited to advanced students but provide all students with extension opportunities at the teacher’s discretion.
Example of an enrichment activity:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 2: Move That Ball, students develop models to show how the motion of a ball started with a push or pull. To further the lesson, the extension provided states ”Have students use a push or pull to start the ball’s motion. Then have them use a push or pull to try to stop or slow down the ball’s motion.”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide multiple multi-modal approaches to presenting and engaging with the material throughout the grade. Students engage with content by reading, listening to reading, watching videos, and making first-hand observations. Students participate and respond through writing, discussion, oral presentation, drawing, and building models. The materials also utilize a variety of participation structures and students engage in whole-group instruction and discussions, small-group work, and partner work. For instance:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 6: World of Webs, students observe a projection of a caterpillar web in a cup and discuss with a partner what they see. They share with the class what they heard their shoulder partner say and discuss what is happening in the photo. After viewing a live-view caterpillar cup, students draw the parts of the caterpillar’s habitat they can observe and label each part. Teachers facilitate a class discussion with guiding questions about what they have observed.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 3: Making Sense with Models, students come together and share what they found out during their water investigation using a model of rain and wind. Students use what they have learned to draw where they should stand in relation to a building if they want to stay dry.
The materials also provide students with multiple opportunities to share, revise, and reflect on their thinking. Instruction typically begins with a phenomenon or problem, and students share or record their initial thinking on the phenomenon. They often return to the phenomenon or problem multiple times and adjust their thinking based on new activities or instruction. For instance:
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 2: Warmer or Colder, students ask questions about the problem of it being too hot on the playground. After an investigation, students think back to the questions and take a class poll to decide how to determine how hot the playground is. In Lesson 3, after investigating how hot the playground is, students return to “Our Questions about the Problem Chart” and review the list to decide what to investigate next.
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Throughout the modules, lessons include teacher directions to have students work independently, in pairs, in small groups, or to conduct lessons as a whole class. Students frequently work with a partner for reading, turn-and-talks, brainstorming, conducting investigations, and designing solutions to problems. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 8: Sidewalk Solutions, from a whole-class setting, students turn and talk to their shoulder partner about their observations from a picture. Then, the lesson resumes as a whole-class discussion.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 8: Design My Hockey Game, students work with a partner to develop and test the walls for their new hockey game. Then, pairs of students join another pair to create a group of four students to tell each other about their games. They are given sentence frames to guide the discussion.
Rationale for increased pair collaboration in Kindergarten is provided in the front matter of each teacher guide in the Curriculum Overview, Group Work section, citing that pair collaboration increases engagement as well as vocabulary use and development. Teacher guides provide clear instructions for what type of grouping to use for each activity within the activity’s instructions. However, there is a missed opportunity to provide guidance for teachers about needs-based pairing or grouping, or to offer adaptations for different student needs. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, the Curriculum Overview, Group Work, provides rationale for teachers about the importance of student group work. The rationale explains that scientists regularly work with others so engaging in structured collaboration is important for students. It explains that in lower elementary, students are often paired to provide increased opportunities for growth in communication skills and vocabulary use.
Teacher guidance is given to indicate when and how students should be grouped. This guidance comes throughout the lesson as applicable. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 2: Making a Plant Plan, teacher guidance states, “Organize the class into groups of three.”
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations for providing strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering concepts/skills. Every lesson embeds support for multilingual learners with at least one EL Strategy callout box that provides guidance for multilingual learners. However, these strategies are typically generic and miss the opportunity to provide context-specific support.
EL Strategy callout boxes suggest a variety of strategies, including: using gestures, looking for verbal and non-verbal cues from EL students who have ideas to contribute, drawings, discussions in both home language and English, asking clarifying questions, visual instructions beyond written and oral, pairing bilingual students with English language learners, and grouping students with common home language. The EL Strategy callout boxes typically provide generic guidance that is repeated across lessons and do not provide strategies specific to the lesson. For instance, the wording of the suggested wait time strategy is the same each time it appears in the materials.
Examples of EL Strategy Callout Boxes:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the EL Strategy callout box prompts teachers to provide step-by-step visual supports of what students need to do in the activity in case they have difficulty following written or auditory instructions.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 4: Snow, Snow, Go Away, the EL Strategy prompts teachers to pair bilingual students with English language learners or group students with a common home language. As students sort images of a melting snowman from least melted to most melted, students are able to discuss the phenomenon in their own language before expressing their thoughts in English.
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 3: Plant Patterns, the EL Strategy prompts teachers to avoid correcting “poor English.” It suggests that teachers ask students to clarify what they said and have other students rephrase what they heard the EL student say.
The materials also include features that are designed to support all students, including those who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English. Sentence starters and sentence frames are provided for all students in multiple lessons across the series. The digital materials include vocabulary cards to support all students, including multilingual learners. The vocabulary cards include an image supporting the meaning of the word and teachers are encouraged to use the cards to create a word wall as vocabulary is introduced and defined.
Examples of features designed to support all students, including multilingual learners:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants and Animals Need to Live?, Lesson 6: World of Webs, students use sentence frames, including, “I think [one part] relates to [other part] .” to explain how different parts of a habitat are related to one another.
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready for the Weather?, Lesson 10: Let’s Hit the Trail, students use sentence frames including, “We decided to include in the backpack because ,” to explain their choice of supplies to include on a walk.
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool in the Sun?, Lesson 4: The Shade’s the Thing, a Teacher Tip callout box tells teachers to, “Add the shade device vocabulary cards to a word wall after this lesson.”
Overall, there are general supports for students who are performing on grade level, but there is a missed opportunity to provide supports for beyond grade level for those who may exceed grade-level understanding of content but who may have limited English proficiency. There are also missed opportunities to provide guidance for teachers to identify students at various levels of language acquisition and to provide specific supports for multilingual learners at differing levels of English language acquisition. As a result, while suggestions for multilingual learners appear consistently across lessons, they do not consistently provide the support necessary for multilingual learners to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics. The texts in the accompanying Smithsonian Science Stories include depictions from a range of ethnicities, genders, and demographics and content and stories connected to a range of cultures. This includes a range of people being positively depicted as scientists and engineers. There are also representations of a variety of family structures, including images of single-parent, two-parent, multi-generational, and multi-ethnic families. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 5: What are you Wearing?, the three readings from What’s the Weather? include images that depict groups of students of multiple ethnicities, genders, and ages.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the teacher reads aloud “Court Surface Test” from Tennis Tests. The story describes how a sports engineer designs tennis courts and prepares for any type of player and includes an image of a male-presenting player in a wheelchair hitting a tennis ball.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials provide limited guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. With at least one instance found in each lesson across the units, various strategies are suggested including: discussions in both home language and English, pairing bilingual students with English language learners, and grouping students with a common home language. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 7: Wall Tests, the EL Strategy located in the callout box states, “Suggest students discuss content in both their native language and in English. This can help them become more familiar with the potential similarities between English and their native language.”
Additionally, for Spanish speakers, the digital materials include text and a text-to-speech reader in English and Spanish, Spanish versions of student-facing materials, and family letters for each unit. Vocabulary cards with images are also included to support English language learners. Translations are not available in other languages.
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include limited guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. The materials primarily support teachers to draw upon students’ backgrounds and funds of knowledge through the Family Letters and when introducing phenomena and problems. The EL Strategy callout boxes also occasionally contain questions related to students’ cultural backgrounds. The materials do not provide overall guidance on drawing upon student cultural and social backgrounds.
Each module includes a Family Letter that is sent home at the beginning of the unit. The Family Letter is sent home and returned to gather background experiences with the science content and phenomenon and/or problem and provides students the opportunity to share their personal and cultural experiences. For example:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, the Family Letter asks parents: “Is your child familiar with plants and the things they need to live and grow? Does your family care for plants and/or pets at home? Has your child had direct experience in nature and with insects?”
The materials also typically ask for students’ experience when introducing phenomena and problems. Sometimes the teacher prompts students for their experience and at other times this is embedded in the Ada Asks video that introduces the phenomenon and/or problem. For example:
In Kindergarten, Engineering Design, How Can We Stay Cool In The Sun?, Lesson 1: What’s the Problem?, the teacher asks students if they have ever heard the words “engineer” or “engineering.” Students share experiences of where or when they may have heard those words. Responses from the Family Letters may also be included in the discussion.
The EL Strategy callout boxes also occasionally include guidance for teachers to draw upon students’ cultural backgrounds. While the materials target these prompts to multilingual learners, the guidance is applicable to students of all backgrounds. For example:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 2: What Is Weather?, the teacher invites students to, “tell a shoulder partner about an experience they had with weather” to activate prior knowledge and experience. This helps students activate memories and make sense of new information by seeing how it fits with what they already know.
Indicator 3U
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students. Reading is primarily included through Smithsonian Science Stories. Lexile levels are provided for each reading in the Table of Contents. The Curriculum Overview in the front matter of each unit describes that each reader is, “carefully calibrated to grade-level appropriate Lexile measurements according to Common Core text complexity guidelines.” The digital versions of the texts have a text-to-speech function. However, this function is automated, headings and captions are read out of order, and the reading sometimes lacks fluency. The texts for Kindergarten are not offered at different Lexile levels, but the texts are primarily used as read-alouds by the teacher.
As an additional support, vocabulary card sets are available for all units. They are explained in the Teacher’s Guide in the Curriculum Overview to be used in supporting vocabulary acquisition for multilingual learners and struggling readers. These cards can also be used to create a word wall in the classroom for student access.
The materials also embed strategies to support comprehension into the lessons themselves. Reading is supported throughout each module by scaffolding expectations for students using read-alouds, comprehension prompts, jigsaw activities, annotation, discussion, and other strategies. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 8, Activity Steps 2-4, the teacher reads a letter from Ada to the class. Then, the teacher re-reads the letter from the beginning. Students think about what Ada is asking in the letter and they turn and talk to a shoulder partner about what they remember.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change an Object’s Motion?, Lesson 4: Paddle Tests, the teacher reads a story called Tennis Tests about the best tennis racket. Students predict what makes the best racket during the reading and answer comprehension questions after the reading to recognize key ideas and details. Students then watch a video that shows the tennis racket testing machine that was described in the story.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in Science.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology (when applicable) with guidance for teachers.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten have narrative evidence for Criterion 3w-3z: Intentional Design. The materials have limited technology integrations, such as interactive tools and/or dynamic software, that engages students in grade-band learning in Kindergarten. The materials have a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic. The materials do not include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, as much of the collaboration is designed for in-person engagement.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate interactive tools and/or dynamic software in ways that support student engagement in the three dimensions, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten integrate limited interactive tools that support student engagement in the three dimensions when applicable. In a small number of lessons, students use digital simulations, interactive maps, or digital games to support sensemaking. Some of the interactive tools are used in the optional Extension activities. When digital tools are used, guidance for teachers is centered around the facilitation of the tools for students to use in context with the lesson. There are no options to customize simulations for local use. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Earth and Space Science, How Can We Be Ready For The Weather?, Lesson 9: Planning a Visit, students use a simulation that shows the hazards associated with different types of storms and provides options for how someone could prepare for each storm. Students use the Storm Sort simulation to identify the types of storms that might be likely where Ada lives.
In Kindergarten, Physical Science, How Can We Change An Object’s Motion?, Lesson 10: Mini Golf Mystery Part 2, there is an extension activity where student pairs use a computer game and place walls inside mini-golf features to cause a ball pushed into one part of the feature to come out of the feature and go into a hole. The first hole is similar to the science challenge completed during the module lessons.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. The materials are consistently designed for in-person student collaboration.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten include visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject and is neither distracting nor chaotic. The printed student materials across the series are visually appealing and support thoughtful engagement in the subject. There are no distracting images or unnecessary designs. Color-coding is deliberate and helpful as are icons and call-out boxes that remain consistent across all modules.
Student materials are consistent in layout with minimal worksheets for each unit. They are clear with a title followed by instructions in a legible font. There is ample space for student work with boxes or other scaffolds drawn for student use. Where writing is necessary, wide spaced lines are provided. Graphics and icons are bold and easily recognizable. However, the difference between Activity Sheets and Notebook Sheets is not clearly marked for student use.
Student digital resources are offered on a separate website that houses links for the lesson videos and PDFs of images. Videos are hosted through YouTube and are easy to navigate. Simulation links are also hosted on a separate website and are easy to find with directions that are clear and visually appealing. The student digital resources are not linked on the teacher digital resources page and instead are found in a separate URL printed within the Teacher’s Guide.
The printed teacher guides are arranged uniformly across each module. Each guide includes: Curriculum Overview, Module Overview, Lesson Planner, Guide to Module Investigations, individual lesson plans, and blackline masters. Teacher guides consistently use clear, purposeful color coding and iconography.
Digital materials for Kindergarten are generally easy to navigate and visually similar to print materials with the same symbols and color coding. However, navigating through the digital resources may pose challenges because of inconsistent or unclear labeling and filtering.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Every lesson contains a Preparation Section that tells teachers which digital resources should be used and how to prepare them for each lesson. There is also teacher guidance around using the simulations or videos and how to facilitate the related activities. It offers suggestions for how to assist students with the outcomes (making observations, asking questions, collecting data, discussions, etc). It also includes suggestions for how students should view the technology (as a class, in pairs, repeated viewings, when to stop the video, etc). Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Life Science, What Do Plants And Animals Need To Live?, Lesson 4: What’s on the Menu?, the teacher plays the Ada Asks Caterpillar video. The video is interrupted as soon as Ada begins to explain how to take care of the caterpillars. Teachers are directed to replay it multiple times until students realize the information they need is missing. This engages the students in figuring out what caterpillars need to live and grow in order to construct an argument using evidence to support a claim about what caterpillars need to live.