2018
Ready

7th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 7th Grade Overview
Cover for Ready
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations
88%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
7 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
9 / 10

The instructional materials for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectation for aligning with the CCSSM expectations for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials attend to each of the three aspects of rigor individually, and they also attend to the balance among the three aspects. The instructional materials emphasize mathematical reasoning, identify the Mathematical Practices (MPs), and partially attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

7 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectation for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application. The instructional materials partially develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, give attention throughout the year to procedural skill and fluency, spend sufficient time working with engaging applications, and reflects a balance in treating the three aspects of rigor separately and together.

Indicator 2a

1 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for Ready Grade 7 partially meet expectations that the materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings. While some lessons develop conceptual understanding, there were many instances where the materials miss opportunities to develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. Examples include:

  • Unit 3 Lesson 15 Writing Linear Expressions is composed of a hands-on activity to create expressions for perimeters of rectangles, but the hands-on activity does not enhance the understanding of expressions. Students use a string to model the perimeter of a desk and then use the length of that string as a measure against which to compare equivalent methods of finding perimeter. The algorithm is taught directly instead of a conceptual model. Conceptual understanding of how quantities are related is not developed in this lesson.
  • Unit 1 Lesson 2 Understand Subtractions of Positive and Negative Numbers shows moving from subtraction to adding the opposite but does not use properties of operations to help students see this connection. For example, students "Compare: How are the expressions 8 - 15 and 8 + (-15) alike?" However, the materials do not connect to the expression 15 + ? = 8 to further develop conceptual understanding of the additive inverse.
  • In Unit 2 Lesson 11 Equations for Proportional Relationships, students use multiple representations (tables, graphs, and equations) to model a proportional relationship. Students use the provided models in order to answer questions in regard to the proportional relationship by following a procedure to solve problems.

The materials include some problems and questions that develop conceptual understanding throughout the grade level. Examples include:

  • Concept Extension provides additional ways to support the development of conceptual understanding. In Unit 1 Lesson 7 Add and Subtract Rational Numbers, students model subtraction of positive and negative numbers with a number line.
  • Unit 4, Lesson 19, Understand Conditions for Drawing Triangles: In the Reason and Write section of the lesson, students create a triangle from specifically given conditions and solve for the third unknown angle. Students explain their reasoning and sketch and label two different triangles to justify their answer.
  • Unit 5, Lesson 26, Understand Random Samples: In the Reason and Write section of the lesson, students demonstrate their understanding of a random sample by selecting a topic and population from a given list. The directions state, “Describe the attributes of the people that should be represented in a random sample of your population. Then describe how you would create a random sample of the population to participate in the survey. Explain how you know that the sample is representative of the population.”

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectation for giving attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill.

The instructional materials attend to procedural skills in the following ways: lessons that address specific standards, activities, and problem sets. Many of these opportunities are provided by the Additional Fluency Practice book for Grade 7. In the Practice and Problem Solving book, the development of procedural skills happen daily. In addition, the resources include math games for centers, unit practice, skills practice, and fluency repeated reasoning practice are included in the units.

  • In Unit 3 Lesson 15 Writing Linear Expressions, students write linear expressions and apply operations to generate equivalent expressions (7.EE.1).
  • In Unit 4 Lesson 18 Problem Solving with Angles, students write equations to find unknown angle measures using properties of supplementary, complementary, vertical, and adjacent angles (7.EE.4a).
  • In Unit 1 Lesson 5 (7.NS.2d) Terminating and Repeating Decimals, there are problems included in the guided and independent practice that develop procedural skill. In these problems, students convert between decimals, fractions, and decimals and fractions.

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Mathematics Grade 7 meet the expectation that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of mathematics without losing focus on the major work of the grade. Overall, the materials have opportunities for students to apply mathematical knowledge and/or skills in a real-world context.

During Independent Practice students often engage with problems that include real-world context and present opportunities for application. The Practice and Problem Solving workbook contains additional routine application problems, and Mid-Unit, Interim, and Unit Assessments often include problems that are contextual. For example:

  • In Unit 1 Lesson 8 Independent Practice Problem 4 states, “Ally, Barbara, and Katherine will share the cost of a vacation rental for a week. Ally agrees to pay 30 percent of the cost. Barbara agrees to pay 0.45 of the cost. Katherine will pay the remaining balance. If the rental cost is $960, how much will Ally, Barbara, and Katherine each pay towards the week’s rent?” Students apply their knowledge of rational numbers to find the amount each person will pay of the total.
  • Unit 4 Lesson 20 Practice and Problem Solving Book Problem 6 presents a flag in a geometric pattern of triangles and rectangles in three colors. The problem states, “What percentage of the total area of the flag is white?” Students apply both geometric and ratio reasoning to find a solution to the problem.
  • The Unit 2 Performance Task begins, “You have been asked to make snack mix for a school event. Below are the main ingredients for two popular recipes. The amounts are for one serving.” Students are given two recipes and information on the cost of ingredients with several constraints. The task continues, “The total number of guests has not been determined, but you need to get some estimates of what the costs might be.” Students are given instruction on what to do, including choosing a recipe and explaining why it was chosen, finding the amounts of ingredients for different numbers of people, and making a shopping list for the maximum amount of people. Students are provided with some guidance to Reflect on Mathematical Practice, a Word Bank, and some Models.

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Mathematics Grade 7 meet the expectations for balance. Overall, the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.

In the Teacher Resource Book Program Overview Built for Rigor and Engagement outlines how the materials balance conceptual understanding, procedural skills and fluency, and application. The consistent structure of the lessons presents opportunities to “Understand,” where they develop conceptual understanding, followed by the sections Think It Through, Connect, and Apply, where they explore different procedural skills and application of the mathematics of the lesson. In addition, the Practice and Problem Solving book includes problems that present further opportunities to engage with the three aspects of rigor.

Students engage in the three aspects of rigor independent of each other. For example:

  • Unit 2 Lesson 10 Understand Proportional Relationships is designed to develop conceptual understanding. Lesson 10 develops this understanding by having students connect tables and graphs to proportional relationships.
  • In Unit 3 Lesson 15 Practice and Problem Solving Problem 3, students select all equivalent expressions to a given expression. Students use their understanding of equivalence and procedural skill to find all possible equivalent expressions.
  • Unit 5 Lesson 26 Practice and Problem Solving Problem 6 states: “Evan surveyed his classmates to make a prediction about seventh-grade students. Look at his results in the table. Write two statistical questions that Evan could have asked to get his survey results. Then explain why Evan could not have asked a non-statistical question to get his results.” Students apply their understanding of statistics and relationships between variables in a table to identify plausible questions that are answered by the data in the table.

Balance is displayed in each unit with multiple lessons where two or three aspects of rigor are interwoven.

  • In Unit 1 Lesson 3, students make connections between addition and subtraction of integers. Students solve contextual problems. At the end of this lesson, there is an opportunity for students to build fluency with integer operations as well as engage in contextual problems with integers.
  • Unit 3 Lesson Practice Problem 15 states: “Market and More is having a cereal sale. Every box of cereal is $0.60 off the regular price. Jane has $10, and she wants to buy four boxes of the same cereal. She uses the inequality below to determine the regular price of cereal that she can afford. Solve the inequality and explain what the solution means. 4(r - 0.6) ≤10.”
  • In Unit 4 Lesson 22, students apply their understanding of proportional relationships and scale drawings to determine the length of a boat. “Justin made a scale drawing of a sailboat he saw at a harbor. The length of the actual boat is 24 feet, and the mast is 20 feet high. In Justin’s sketch, the boat is 2 centimeters longer than the mast. What is the length of his sketch?”

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

9 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectation for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Overall, the materials identify and partially attend to the full meaning of the MPs, emphasize mathematical reasoning by prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others, assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others, and attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

2 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Grade 7 meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level.

The Teacher Resource Book identifies MPs the for each lesson in the Table of Contents and in the CCSS Focus section as part of the Lesson Overview. SMP TIPs are found in the Teacher Resource Book throughout the lessons, and these tips highlight the integration of particular MPs within the lessons. Some examples of where the MPs are identified and used to enrich the mathematics content include:

  • Unit 2 Lesson 9 Overview identifies MP 7. The SMP Tip for MP 7 states, “Students use structure when they explain how dividing 1 ½ by 2 is the same as multiplying 1 ½ by ½, because division by a number and multiplication by its reciprocal are equivalent operations.”
  • Unit 3 Lesson 20 Area of Composite Figures. The SMP Tip for MP 1 states, “The Try It problem provides an opportunity for students to persevere in solving a problem and to reason abstractly. They will need to use the given measures to establish the length and width of the rectangle and the base and height of the triangle. They will then need to decide how to use those measures to find the area of the figure. (SMP 1)"
  • In the Unit 1 End-of-Unit Performance Task, students model the mathematics of the task by using a number line to solve a multi-step problem that involves addition and subtraction of positive and negative numbers. (MP 4)

There are some instances where the MPs are overidentified. Unit 5 Lesson 29 Overview notes that MPs 1-7 are all present in the lesson. SMP2- Reason Abstractly and Quantitatively is identified in this lesson, but it is not evident where this practice occurs in the lesson. MP5 - Use appropriate tools strategically is also identified as being in the lesson, but there is no mention of mathematical tools in the lesson, and students are not directed to use or discuss them throughout the lesson.

The Mathematical Practices Handbook describes each of the MPs for students and provides students with questions to elicit thinking and discuss with a partner.

Indicator 2f

1 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Grade 7 partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. Overall, the materials attend to the full meaning of most of the MPs, but there are two MPs for which the full meaning is not addressed.

Examples where the full intent of an MP is met include:

  • MP 1: In Unit 3 Lesson 16, students solve problems using equations. The SMP Tip states: “As students solve a variety of problems, they develop skills in making sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Encourage them to read the problem carefully, list the information given, and state what they need to find out. Then help them decide how they can apply the math they already know to solve it. (SMP 1)”
  • MP 2: In Unit 2 Lesson 11, students represent proportional relationships between the number of cars on a rollercoaster and the number of people who can ride the rollercoaster, through graphs and equations. The SMP Tip states, “Students contextualize the equation y = 6x to understand that 6 represents 6 people per car. When working with the various models, reinforce this contextualization by asking students what different components represent in a problem. (SMP 2)”
  • MP 7: In Unit 5 Lesson 31, students complete trials of simple probabilities to develop an understanding of the structure of problems. The SMP Tip states, “Students use repeated trials to understand and explain simple probabilities. Allow time for students to repeat this and similar experiments to help them develop strong mental models for probability. (SMP 7)”
  • MP 8: In Unit 1 Lesson 1, students look for repeated reasoning when they use related addition problems to solve subtraction problems. In Unit 4 Lesson 24, students work with formulas to find surface areas and look for repeated reasoning when solving other surface area problems.

The instructional materials do not attend to the full meaning of MPs 4 and 5.

  • MP 4: The materials provide few opportunities for students to choose, construct, and implement models to enrich the mathematics. In Unit 1 Lesson 2, students work with subtracting and adding positive and negative numbers. The SMP Tip states: “Using a number line to model problems with mathematics helps students grasp the reason behind the rules. Throughout the lesson, help students see connections among the number lines, numerical expressions, and situations described in the problems. (SMP 4)” However, students do not choose the model, nor do they determine the labels of numbers on the given number line.
  • MP 5: The materials provide few opportunities for students to choose tools strategically and independently. The Ready Instruction Book states that SMP 5 is identified in Lessons 15 and 17 through 33. In Lessons 31, 32, and 33, there are no opportunities for students to engage with MP5. In Unit 5 Lesson 27, the SMP Tip states: “When students use dynamic graphing software of graphing calculators to create box plots, they are learning to use appropriate tools strategically. The tools allow them to focus on the distribution of data rather than the creation of box plots. (SMP 5)” However, students do not identify and choose tools to enrich the mathematics they are learning; the tool is given to them.

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

2 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectation for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others. Overall, the materials offer students multiple opportunities to construct viable arguments and/or analyze the arguments of others.

Examples where students are prompted to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others include:

  • In the Unit 2 Performance Task, students are shown the work of another student in order to identify the mistake made in the work. Later, students reflect on the mathematical practices: “Argue and Critique - How did you discover and explain Raj’s mistake?”
  • In Unit 3 Lesson 16, students construct viable arguments by refining a set of directions for solving two-step equations. The prompt states, “Talk about how you would find the correct answer, and then identify what Lonnie might have done incorrectly.”
  • In Unit 5 Lesson 26, students compare sampling methods, and create a plan of their own to gather a random sample. Students critique the reasoning of others as they note the good ideas as well as the problems with each plan presented. Students construct arguments as they defend their own plan for creating a random sample.

Indicator 2g.ii

2 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectation for assisting teachers to engage students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards. The materials provide teachers with SMP TIPs to help facilitate students to construct arguments and/or analyze the arguments of others.

Examples where teachers are supported to help students construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others include:

  • In Unit 1 Lesson 1, teachers are directed to have students explain solutions to problems. The SMP Tip states: “Asking students to share their thinking provides them with an opportunity to practice critiquing the reasoning of others by rephrasing, asking for clarification, or identifying misconceptions.”
  • In the Unit 4 Performance Task, teachers invite students to present solutions and choose a Reflect on Mathematical Practices question to answer. Teachers encourage students to explain how their solution is alike or different from other students’ solutions.
  • In Unit 5 Lesson 29, students compare two companies' data shown in both dot and box plots. Students give an explanation of which brand seems to be more consistent in its performance. The SMP Tip states, “Asking students to reason inductively about the data and make plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose develops their ability to justify conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. (SMP 3)”

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for Ready Grade 7 meet the expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics. Overall, the materials for both students and teachers have multiple ways for students to engage with the vocabulary of mathematics.

  • Lesson Vocabulary is identified at at the beginning of every lesson and used correctly to refer to mathematical terms and topics. For example, Unit 2 Lesson 9 includes a definition of a complex fraction in the teacher materials as well as the student materials. Complex fractions are defined as “a fraction where the numerator is a fraction, the denominator is a fraction, or both the numerator and the denominator are fractions.”
  • Each lesson has an English Language Learners section in the Teacher Resource Book that contains some ways to support vocabulary development for all students. Some examples are:
    • Unit 1 Lesson 1 directs teachers to use the number line to review and reinforce the meaning of the phrases, "opposite sides of the number line" and "distance from 0." Teachers review the meaning of "integer" and have students locate 3 to 4 integers and name their absolute values.
    • In Lesson 5, teachers discuss the meanings of terminating decimals and repeating decimals. Students describe the meaning of each term in their own words.
  • Teachers pose questions to students and attend to precision using appropriate terminology. For example, Unit 4 Lesson 22 teachers pose the following question, “Why do you multiply the numerator and denominator by 5?”
  • In the Teacher Instruction Book, mathematical vocabulary is defined in the Find Out More section.
  • Teachers are prompted in the Teacher Resource Book to have students use precise mathematical language. For example, in Lesson 17, the materials state, “In words, describe what the solution set is and what it means in context of the problem.”
  • In the Student Practice and Problem Solving Book, mathematical terms are defined, along with a picture example in small square sections labeled “Vocabulary."