2017
Pearson Literature

11th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 11th Grade Overview
Cover for Pearson Literature
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Building Knowledge

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Gateway 2 - Does Not Meet Expectations
25%
Criterion 2.1: Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
8 / 32

The instructional materials for Grade 11 do not meet the expectations of Gateway 2. Texts are partially around topics/themes but their sequencing is unclear. Materials contain few sets of questions and tasks that require students to analyze the language, key ideas, details, craft, and structure of individual texts. The materials do contain some sets of text-dependent questions and tasks that require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across both individual and multiple texts. Culminating tasks do not always promote the building of students’ knowledge of the theme/topic. The materials include a year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words across texts throughout the year, however, it is not cohesive and the vocabulary does not connect across texts. Materials include some writing instruction aligned to the standards and shifts for the grade level, although teachers may need to supplement and add more practice to ensure students are mastering standards. The materials include some focused research skills practice. The materials do not meet the expectations for materials providing a design, including accountability, for how students will regularly engage in a volume of independent reading either in or outside of class.

Criterion 2.1: Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

8 / 32

Indicator 2a

2 / 4

Texts are organized around a topic/topics or themes to build students' knowledge and their ability to comprehend and analyze complex texts proficiently.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 partially meet the criteria that texts are organized around a topic/topics to build students’ knowledge and their ability to read and comprehend complex texts proficiently. Texts are connected by a grade level appropriate topic and/or theme. In these materials, texts are grounded in 11th grade content, specifically, American history and literature. They are mostly compiled by time period or text type genre rather than a focused topic or theme. Texts do build some knowledge across the school year, though it is not clear that the collections of texts are carefully sequenced so that students’ will build knowledge about the world over the course of the year. This is because the topic of each unit, framed by an era of American history, is quite broad. As a result, the texts that are included in each unit are not focused enough to help students build knowledge on a single topic or theme. Since there is no clear, systematic, and sequenced set of texts in each grade level so it is difficult to identify to what extent students will be able to build the prerequisite knowledge and vocabulary to successfully access increasingly complex grade level text independently.

  • Texts are connected by a grade level appropriate topic or theme. Units 1 - 4 follow the pattern of an overall theme, an era, and sub-themes in parts 1-3. This is exemplified below:
    • Unit 1 Theme: A Gathering of Voices. Text selections are “Literature of Early America (beginnings to 1800). Each part of the unit has a sub-theme. Part 1 - “Meeting of Cultures”, Part 2 - “The Puritan Influence”, and Part 3 - “A Nation is Born”.
  • Unit 1: A Gathering of Voices has a wide collection of texts on the subject of early America (“Museum Indians” by Susan Power, excerpts of the Iroquis Constitution by Dekanawidah and Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards, and The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson.) Various parts in the unit are subdivided into text-type collections: Part 3 includes “Extended Study: Speeches”, “Comparing Literary Works” and “Comparing Autobiography Past and Present”.
  • Unit 3: Division, Reconciliation, and Expansion has a wide collection of texts about the US Civil War and the expansion of the American West (“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by Ambrose Bierce, from My Bondage and My Freedom by Frederick Douglass, “Letter to His Son” by Robert E. Lee, from Life on the Mississippi by Mark Twain, “I Will Fight No More Forever” by Chief Joseph). Various parts of the unit are subdivided into type-type connections: Part 1 includes: “Extended Study: Narrative Nonfiction”, “Comparing Humor Past and Present”.
  • Unit 5: Prosperity and Protest has a wide collection of texts either written during or on the subject of literature in the post-war era (1945-1970). Various subtopics provide further topical focus, for example - Part One: War Shock, Part Three Tex Set: Literature of Protest. However, on the whole the unit is not focused on a single topic or theme. The texts include: from Hiroshima by John Hersey, “Backing the Attack” by the editors of the New York Times, “Mirror” by Sylvia Plath, “The Purpose of Theater” by Arthur Miller, “Life in his Language” by Toni Morrison, “A Rock of the Modern Age, Arthur Miller is Everywhere"

Indicator 2b

2 / 4

Materials contain sets of coherently sequenced higher order thinking questions and tasks that require students to analyze the language (words/phrases), key ideas, details, craft, and structure of individual texts in order to make meaning and build understanding of texts and topics.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 partially meet the criteria that materials contain sets of coherently sequenced higher order thinking questions and tasks that require students to analyze the language (words/phrases), key ideas, details, craft, and structure of individual texts in order to make meaning and build understanding of texts and topics.

After each text or text set there are Critical Reading questions and Close Reading Activities which include key ideas and details, integration of knowledge and ideas, and craft and structure. All three types of questIons can also be found in the Extended Study questions. Students’ opportunities for analyzing language and author’s word choice are very limited. Questions and tasks within the parts provide evidence of student understanding of the definitions and concepts of the components identified in each unit. However, there are no culminating tasks at the end of each part for students to show their understanding of concepts. Also at the end of each unit there are no opportunities for students to show they are building understanding of topics. The tasks at the end of the unit are not necessarily related to key ideas and details or craft and structure, but are often centered around one or two of the Essential Questions of the textbook. The larger tasks do not build understanding of the texts.

  • There are few questions that support students in analyzing author’s language and word choice. Most of the questions focus on key ideas and details, structure, and craft. The questions that do focus on language or word choice do not support students to analyze its effect on the text. Unit 4, Close Reading Activities, There is an activity called Vocabulary Acquisition and Use, Vocabulary: Synonyms. Students are asked to “review the words from the vocabulary list on page 706. Then, choose the letter of the word that is the best synonym, or word with a similar meaning, for the first word. Explain your thinking”
  • Each text contains a Critical Reading section along with a Literary Analysis piece where students are asked questions such as Key Ideas and Details. In one of the first stories, When Grizzlies Walked Upright by Modoc, students are not asked any structure or craft questions. They are simply focused on details and key ideas.
  • In 11th grade each unit is centered around a topic. For example, Unit 1: A Gathering of Voices is based off of Literature of Early America (Beginnings to 1800), Unit 2: A Growing Nation is based off of Literature of the American Renaissance (1800 to 1870), Unit 3: Division, Reconciliation, and Expansionis based off of literature of the Civil War and the Frontier (1850 to 1914), Unit 4:Disillusion, Defiance, and Discontent is based off of Literature of the Modern Age (1914 to 1945), and Unit 5: Prosperity and Protest which is based off of Literature of the Post-War Era (!945 to 1970). Within each of these units are three different text sets centered around different topics. There is not one place specifically where the teacher knows whether students are making meaning or building understanding of the texts.
  • At the end of the unit there is a Research Task along with a Writing Workshop. In Unit 1 Writing Workshop it asks students to “Choose an event from your life that is meaningful to you, interesting to readers, and not awkward or painful to share”. This activity does not prove students have made meaning or have built understanding or knowledge of the texts and topics at hand.

Indicator 2c

2 / 4

Materials contain a coherently sequenced set of text-dependent and text-specific questions and tasks that require students to build knowledge and integrate ideas across both individual and multiple texts.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 partially meet the criteria that materials contain a coherently sequenced set of text-dependent and text-specific questions and tasks that require students to build knowledge and integrate ideas across both individual and multiple texts. The integration of knowledge and ideas does not change from the first to the last tasks in the materials.

Most questions support student analysis of a given text, but not often in the service of building knowledge and ideas about larger topics or themes. This is partially because there are not coherent topics or themes across the materials. There are answer keys for the Critical Reading and Close Reading Activity questions. These might help guide teachers to support students’ answers, though it is unclear in the materials how teacher should use these answers. There are process guidelines for multiple readings. Some questions are provided across texts, but these are often not well-aligned to the complexity, themes, language, etc. of the texts and so are not quality questions and tasks. None of the text sets listed in the table of contents have questions that bridge between all the texts in the set. Assessment questions at the end of each unit often require students to only choose one text to analyze.

  • Questions that build knowledge and ideas are found throughout the text selections. For example:
    • Unit 4, Part 2,Critical Reading, Key Ideas and Details, “(a) According to Faulkner, will humanity endure or prevail? (b) Define: In what ways does Faulkner define the difference between enduring and prevailing?”
    • Unit 6, Part 3, Integration of Knowledge and Ideas, “Based on these two memoirs, what does the idea of homeland mean? Use at least two of these Essential Question words: global, natural, formative, environment, exile.”
    • Unit 6, Part 3, Close Reading Activities, Key IDeas and Details, “(a) Identify two events that Momaday describes in this excerpt. (b) What connects these events to the cultural theme he introduces in the opening paragraph?”
  • The integration of knowledge and ideas does not change from the first to the last tasks in the materials. In fact, the integration of knowledge and ideas is present in the assessment tasks for unit 1 and not present for the assessment tasks in unit 6. For example: Unit 1, Performance Tasks, “Write an essay in which you analyze one of the Foundational U.S. documents that appears in this unit, identifying its theme, purpose, and key rhetorical features.” For the Unit 6 Performance Tasks, there are no questions that require students to integrate any specific information. Instead, each task is focused on a single text and asks students to analyze author's word choice and tone, author’s rhetoric, or the structure of a literary work.
  • Various sections of each unit pair one or more text into small sets and include questions that bridge these texts. For example:
    • Unit 4, part 1, there is a pair of E.E. Cummings poems preceded by informational text on the author. One task at the end of the set asks students to use information from 2 or 3 of these texts: Close Reading Activities, Writing to Sources - Informative Text “Imagine that E.E. Cummings will be giving a poetry reading at a bookstore in your town. As the organizer of the event, write an introduction that provides background about the poet and prepares the audience for the poetry they will hear. Select the most relevant and interesting facts about Cummings and include at least one eloquent quotation from the poet. Use a conversational style appropriate to the setting and purpose of the event. “
    • Unit 5, part 3, Comparing Literary Works: Rhetorical Devices pairs John F. Kennedy’s “Inaugural Address” with an excerpt of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail”. One question of the ten at the end of this set connects the two texts. Comparing Literary Works (a) Which text - Kennedy’s speech or King;s letter - makes more frequent use of parallelism and antithesis? (b) Explain why each author’s use of these devices is appropriate to the kind of document he is writing and to its method of deliver.
    • Unit 6, Close Reading Activities for Technical Report and Mission Statement,, Timed Writing, Argument (40 Minutes). “Both the Technical Report and Mission Statement touch on the idea of heritage. Names represent the heritage of families and ethnic groups, while museums preserve our shared historical and cultural heritage. Write an argumentative essay in which you discuss who should bear the most responsibility for preserving heritage sites. Consider the government, the general public, non-profit organizations, or another institution. Cite information from the Technical Report and Mission Statement to support your ideas.”
  • Text Sets listed in the Table of Contents for each unit (three sets for each unit) do not have questions that bridge between all the texts in the set at the end of each set. There are tasks under the ‘Text Set Workshop’ section at the end of each unit. Some of these tasks are text-dependent, yet none of them are text specific. Few are of the quality that support students to provide analysis across various texts.
    • Unit 5 Text Set Workshop, “Work with a partner to create documentary slide shows that present multimedia interpretations of literary works. Develop one presentation about one of the Anchor Text poems, and one about a Part 2 selection that you see as thematically related. Conduct research and analyze the texts to answer questions such as: What is the history of each work?; What does a close reading of each work reveal about its meaning? Gather video clips and images such as photograms, paintings, and illustrations. Use sound when possible. Embed the video files or links to videos in you slide show. Share your documentaries with your classmates.”
    • Unit 6, Text Set Workshop, “Develop and defend a claim about the ways in which one or more characters in this text, particularly in the Anchor Text, use the past to create a sense of identity. As a way of exploring this idea, consider how an everyday item, experience, or encounter connects a person to hise or her heritage. Use textual evidence and background information to support your claim.”
  • There are some questions that are labeled as bridging between texts that do not, in fact, require students to integrate information from multiple texts in the selection. For example, in Unit 6, Part 2, Close Reading Activities for “Traveling Through the Dark”, “The Secret”, and “The GIft”, question 7 ‘Integration of Knowledge and Ideas’: Follow these steps to interpret each of these lyrical poems: “a)Identify the central image or event in each poem. (b) List two pieces of new information you learned about this image over the course of the poem. (c) Explain how your understanding of the image changes. (d)Interpret the poem by telling what you think each central image means to the speaker.

Indicator 2d

0 / 4

The questions and tasks support students' ability to complete culminating tasks in which they demonstrate their knowledge of a topic through integrated skills (e.g. combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 do not meet the criteria that the questions and tasks support students’ ability to complete culminating tasks in which they demonstrate their knowledge of a topic through integrated skills (e.g. combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

Culminating tasks are not multifaceted. They do not provide students the opportunity to demonstrate comprehension and knowledge of a topic through integrated skills. Although there are a multitude of assessment opportunities at the end of each unit, many of them are optional. Assessments at the end of units are not integrated to combine reading, writing, speaking and listening. Assessments frequently only address two standards at a time, reading and writing. Earlier questions and tasks in the unit do not give the teacher information about students’ readiness to complete culminating tasks.

  • Most of the Assessment Workshop tasks only address one or two standards at a time. For example:
    • Unit 4, Assessment Workshop, Constructed Response, Writing, Task 3: Literature, Analyze Text Structure, Write an essay in which you analyze how an author’s choice of a particular structure adds to the overall meaning and impact of a story in this unit.
    • Unit 4, Assessment Workshop, Constructed Response, Speaking and Listening, Task 6: Literature/Informational Text, Analyze Author’s Styles, Participate in a discussion group in which you compare and contrast authors’ styles in a work of fiction and a work of nonfiction from this unit.
    • Unit 5, Assessment Workshop, Constructed Response Writing, Task 1: Literature, Analyze Word Choice, Write an essay in which you analyze the figurative and connotative language in a story or a poem from this unit.
    • Unit 6, Assessment Workshop, Constructed Response, Speaking and Listening, Task 4, Analyze Story Elements, Deliver an oral presentation in which you analyze the development of and relationship among elements of a work of fiction from this unit.
  • In the Assessment Workshop portion at the end of each unit, Writing and Speaking & Listening assessment tasks include prompts such as, “Analyze the development of two themes”, “Analyze how an author’s choice of a particular structure..”, “..discussion group in which you compare and contrast authors’ styles”. The essential questions, which might provide some element of topic focus for assessment, do frame some assessment questions. However, these are likewise based on analysis skills and not the building of knowledge. For example, in Unit 4, Assessment Workshop, there is a sidebar with the unit’s essential question, How does literature share or reflect society? The assignment reads: “Choose one Modernist work and one traditional work from this unit. Write a comparison-and-contrast essay about the challenges each work presents and the assumptions you feel each author makes about his or her readers.”
  • Assessment Workshop tasks, show little content or skill connection the the previous Writing prompts from throughout the unit. For example:
    • Unit 6 Assessment Workshop, Constructed Response, Writing Task 3: Informational Text, Analyze and Evaluate Rhetoric, Write an essay in which you analyze and evaluate the author’s rhetoric in a nonfiction work from this unit.There are no other Critical Reading or Close Reading Activity tasks that explicitly refer to author’s use of rhetoric. Some tasks do ask about craft and structure to create an effective argument such as Close Reading Activities 2. Craft and Structure. Questions include, “ (a) Locate two examples of scholarly diction Safire uses. (b) Locate two examples of folksy, or familiar diction. (c) In what ways does this mix of diction add to the effectiveness of the essay?)”, but nothing refers to rhetoric. How can students prepare for the final assessment task, and how will teachers know if they are prepared for this task, if they have never dealt with rhetoric in these texts?

Indicator 2e

2 / 4

Materials include a cohesive, consistent approach for students to regularly interact with word relationships and build academic vocabulary/ language in context.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 partially meet the criteria for providing a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts. Materials include a consistent approach for students to regularly interact with word relationships and build academic and figurative language in context.

Materials do not provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive, year-long vocabulary development component. Select words are listed before text sets and students or teacher are prompted to record the words, noting how well they know the words before and then after reading the text. These same words are defined in the margins of the text. Vocabulary tasks most often separate from these words are provided at end of text. The tasks that are embedded in the text do not enhance the understanding of the text itself (only of the listed terms). Words are not used across texts. Attention is not paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high value academic words. Few tasks require students to use certain words when writing or speaking, but those that do use words that are not from the text; it is unclear what is the purpose of using the words. It is also unclear that these tasks are sophisticated enough for 11th grade students. There are no tasks that require use of vocabulary in the assessments. There are no opportunities for students to learn, practice, apply and transfer words into familiar and new contexts.

Often, the vocabulary terms and tasks are not associated with a text. For example;

Unit 4, Part 1: Building Knowledge and Insight, Vocabulary, “You will encounter the words listed here in the text that follows. Copy the words into your notebook. Which words a verb? How can you tell? dispersal, plodding, embankment, frantic”. Also, in Close Reading Activities, Vocabulary: Word/phrase relationships, students are asked to “Use your knowledge of the words from the vocabulary list to determine whether the relationships between the italicized words below and the phrases that follow them are logical. Explain your reasoning. embankment - the bottom of a lake, plodding - tired during a hike, dispersal - collection of garbage, frantic - nerves before a test

In Unit 6, Part 3: Building Knowledge and Insight, Vocabulary, “The words below are important to understanding the text that follows. Copy the words into your notebook and note which words are nouns: mundane, induce, savagery, revelations, prosperity. Then, in Close Reading Activities, Vocabulary Acquisition and Use, students, “Use New Words, For each item below, write a sentence in which you use the word or word pair correctly. 1. mudane, 2. induce/savagery 3. revelation/prosperity”

Text embedded vocabulary tasks are often weak. For example:

Unit 5, Part 3, Close Reading Activities, Using Resources to Build Vocabulary, Theatrical Words: Words for Cueing Action, “In the stage directions, Miller includes modifiers to describe the way he envisions actions speaking, reacting, and moving on the stage. Here a few of them: suspiciously, instantly , prayerfully, politely, feverishly, hysterically. Review these words by rereading the relevant lines in them. Then, use a print or electronic thesaurus to find a synonym for each word. For example, a synonym for politely might be courteously. On your own paper, rewrite the stage directions in which the word appears, replacing the word with your own synonym. Reread the stage directions. In a few sentences, explain why Miller would choose vivid words to direct the speech and movement of actions.”

Indicator 2f

0 / 4

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan to support students' increasing writing skills over the course of the school year, building students' writing ability to demonstrate proficiency at grade level at the end of the school year.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 do not meet the criteria that materials contain a year long, cohesive plan of writing instruction and tasks which support students in building and communicating substantive understanding of topics and texts.

Writing prompts span the school year, but instruction is limited. Though prompts in Close Reading and Assessment sections have directions for students “brainstorm a list, use the rubric below, cite your sources” there is no opportunity for students to work on the drafting of a claim, selection of relevant vs. irrelevant evidence, guidance on how to make formal citation of sources in writing, frames for connecting claims, evidence, and reasoning, or otherwise. The writing instruction remains relatively the same throughout the school year. Supports do not build on one another from one unit to the next and the writing prompts in this section are divorced from any of the selection’s grade-level text.

The materials do include a mix of both on-demand and process writing, however, it not always clear with each writing task which one is required. There are not always clear guidelines in teachers materials or student prompts for which writing tasks are on-demand and which are process writing. There are opportunities for students to revise their writing, however there are limited opportunities to edit. In the writing to source tasks, students are guided each time to revise and are provided a focus for their revisions. The only time they are guided to edit their work is during the Writing Workshops found at the end of each unit, six times during the school year. The digital resources included are limited and not necessary for students to use in order to support their writing process or product. There are student and teacher resources available on-line. It is unclear if assignments are short or long. There are no clear parameters given for the length of the written product or the time students should spend on writing assignments (with the exception of the timed writings found in the material - 2 times per unit). Writing tasks and projects are sometimes aligned to the grade level standards being reviewed.

Writing tasks follow a similar pattern throughout the year. In the Close Reading Activities, students go through Prewriting and Planning, Drafting, Revising, Editing and Proofreading each time. Specific directions vary according to requirements of the task, but do not build from one to the next across the school year.

  • For many writing assignments, there is no clear instruction for students. For example in Unit 6, Part 3, Close Reading Activities, Writing to Sources, Drafting, directions state, “As you draft, use legal language…” Students may not be familiar with such language. They are also prompted to, “...present your arguments logically and persuasively….” There is no explanation for how to do this. Finally, they are directed to, “...establish cause-and-effect relationships…” Again, there no support for students, and it is assumed that they know how. There is no instruction on what cue words or sentence frames students might use.
  • Writing tasks have the same demands from the start to end of the year. They do not build on one another. For example, here are the Close Reading, Writing to Sources activities from Units 4-6:
  • Unit 4, Narrative Writing. “A monologue is a dramatic form in which only one person speaks. A stream-of-consciousness monologue is a type of interior monologue in that it takes place within the mind of a character. Choose a character from the story or make up a new one. Write a monologue in which you use stream of consciousness to portray the character’s thoughts.
  • Unit 5, Explanatory Text. “Both Hersey and Jarrell present powerful themes about war. Write an essay to compare and contrast these themes as they are expressed in Hiroshima and “The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner.”
  • Unit 6, Narrative Text. “In both literature and life, stories are shaped by the points of view of those who tell them. Write a new version of the story from the point of view of one of the men who changes Yolanda’s tire.”

Indicator 2g

0 / 4

Materials include a progression of focused, shared research and writing projects to encourage students to develop and synthesize knowledge and understanding of a topic using texts and other source materials.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 do not meet the criteria that materials include a progression of focused, shared research and writing projects to encourage students to synthesize knowledge and understanding of a topic using texts and other source materials.

Research prompts exist at end end of some unit parts but are not sequenced to build research skills. It is also unclear the scope (in terms of time, allocation of resources, and student product) of any of these research tasks. There are no research tasks in assessment tasks. Clear development of aspects of any given topic is only present in some Text Set Workshop research tasks, though these are often only vaguely related to previously developed ideas. Some research prompts explore tangential topics from provided texts and authors that do not follow any line or inquiry, theme or topic previously developed. Some questions/tasks take into account short sets of materials within unit parts. Few tasks are about a topic or across topics. They are more often about standards across topics. No questions clearly span multiple texts across a unit or across the year. Materials do not provide many opportunities for students to apply Reading, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language skills to synthesize and analyze multiple texts and source materials about a topic or topics. There is regularly a lack of clarity on length of projects.

Research prompts are not sequenced to build student independence. Below are research projects suggested for units 1, 3, and 5. The tasks are similar and do not get more challenging as the school year progresses.

  • Unit 1, Part 1, Close Reading Activities, Writing to Sources, Prewriting, “Reread the biography of Bradford on page 57 and the excerpt from his narrative. In a chart like the one show, record questions you still have about Bradford. Then, use both print and electronic sources to find answers to these questions. Document answers and sources in your chart.”
  • Unit 4, Part 3, Text Set Workshop, Part 2: From Every Corner of the Land, Research: Magazine Articles, Assignment: “Working in small groups, design and create a series of magazine articles that examine the idea of isolation in early twentieth-century America. Each person should first choose a selection from Part 2 and think about the lack of social connection apparent in the text. Conduct research on the historical context of the text’s setting - e.g. World War I, or the Great Depression - to help explain - the factors that kept people from connecting with each other. Include illustrations or photographs with each article, and model the layout on magazine pieces you have seen. Combine your group’s articles into a magazine to share with the class.”
  • Unit 6, Part 3, Close Reading Activities, Writing to Sources, Informative Text, “Choose a word or phrase in English you find interesting, odd, or funny. Research the history of the word: its first appearance in the language and changes in its meaning. In an informative essay, explain your research. Use a mix of scholarly diction, familiar diction, and idiomatic expressions.”

Many projects do not require the development of aspects of topic under consideration in texts. For example:

  • After a series of persuasive primary sources from WWII, Unit 5, Part 1, Common Core, Research Project, Research Task, “Create a computer slide show or poster presentation in which you analyze several editorial cartoons. Use historical or contemporary cartoons, and evaluate how messages in the cartoons present social and cultural views differently than do traditional written texts.”
  • Unit 6, Part 3, Text Set Workshop, Part 2, Contemporary Fiction, Assignment, “With a partner, research the literary history, major writers, and important words of two specific American cultural groups represented by the writers in Part 2. Include Yosef Komunyakaa’s group as one of your choices. Discuss the similarities and differences between the two groups. Present your research in a display for Literary Culture Fair, a celebration of American multicultural writing. Use a checklist like the one shown to help organize your research and your presentation.”
  • After a series of texts on events of 9-11, Unit 6, Part , Common Core Research Project, Research Task, Assignment, “Write a persuasive article that takes a stand on the value of a memorial. Conduct research that will allow you to provide an authoritative analysis of the subject. Use a variety of strategies to develop and support your opinion.”

Few specific resources for student research are suggested. There are prompts to “research the [topic]….”, “Use online and library searches…”, or “Consult your library for audio or video clips…”

Indicator 2h

0 / 4

Materials provide a design, including accountability, for how students will regularly engage in a volume of independent reading either in or outside of class.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 11 do not meet the criteria that materials provide a design, including accountability, for how students will regularly engage in a volume of independent reading either in or outside of class.

There is some organization built in that could foster independent reading, but instructions for implementation are not comprehensive. These include multi-draft reading instructions and a section in the Time and Resource Manager where teachers are to “Direct students to read the selection independently” and “Build knowledge of the topic by direction students to read the text independently”. However, it is unclear what students might do when encountering a text outside of the anthology’s selections. There are no procedures, such as a proposed schedule or accountability system organized for independent reading suggested in the lessons. The suggested texts for independent reading span a wide volume of texts at various readability levels. There is no clear guidance provided for what is read in and out of class.

Independent reading is only clear in Part 4 of each unit, not in the rest of lessons. In Part 4, which is 2 pages long, ‘Titles for Extended Reading’ are provided but not any expectations or timeline or further purpose. It is not clear which texts under consideration in Parts 1-3 of each unit are meant for group reading, whole class reading, independent reading, nor which are to be read in class and which are to be read outside of class.