5th Grade - Gateway 2
Back to 5th Grade OverviewNote on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Building Knowledge
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and TasksGateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations | 50% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1 | 12 / 24 |
Criterion 2.2: Coherence | 4 / 8 |
The Open Court Grade 5 materials include six units that are formed around a topic or theme related to the program theme, however not all units effectively build students’ knowledge on a topic. Within the lessons, students analyze the key ideas, details, craft and structure of the texts they are studying, including some analysis of knowledge and ideas within and across texts, however not all questions and tasks compel students to return to the text to support their contentions and conclusions.
Students engage in frequent writing tasks across the year however they may not achieve the full balance of writing genres outlined in the standards.
The Inquiry projects that serve as the final task for each unit provide research and extension opportunities but fall short of serving as a means for teachers to determine how well students can integrate the standards-aligned knowledge and skills gained from instruction. The option for research tasks to be completed as a group for every unit may not provide enough opportunity for students to build their individual research skills as required by the standards.
The materials provide coverage of the standards throughout all units and over the course of the year, however, the preponderance of repetitive, unaligned reading strategies throughout the program moves the focus of the instruction, questions, tasks, and assessments away from a tight focus on grade level standards alignment. The program also contains a large volume of material without a suggested daily schedule; therefore, a full and standards-aligned implementation could be challenging.
Criterion 2.1
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
The Open Court Grade 5 materials include six units that are formed around a topic or theme related to the program theme. Each unit includes a big idea and question that is aligned to a vertical thread that runs across each grade level in the program. However, not all units work toward building knowledge on a topic as some work toward a unifying theme.
Within each unit, the questions and tasks lead students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft and structure of the texts they are studying. Students also engage in some analysis of knowledge and ideas within and across texts, however not all questions and tasks compel students to return to the text to support their contentions and conclusions.
Students engage in daily writing tasks and have frequent opportunities to grow their writing skills throughout the year. However, the Grade 5 materials do not reflect the balance of writing genres called for in the standards.
While the Inquiry projects provide an opportunity for students to extend their learning about the topic or theme of each unit, these projects fail to consistently incorporate the knowledge and skills students gain throughout the unit nor do they require the students to incorporate and demonstrate the integration of the knowledge and skills that align to the standards. Since the projects may be done in a group for every unit, they may fail to build each individual student’s research skills as required by the standards.
Indicator 2a
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
The materials include six overarching program themes over the course of the year, including Character, Changes, Communities, Life Science, Government and Creativity for Grades K-5. Each grade-level unit focuses on a theme or topic connected to the overall program theme. The grade level-units contain a big idea, theme question, and inquiry. Grade 5 includes both themes and topics including Perseverance, Cycles, Celebrating World Communities, Our Planet, Our Home, Making a Nation and Art and Impact. The series of texts in each unit are mostly cohesive and relate to the overall program theme. All units provide essential questions and a theme connection question. Big Idea and concept boards are used to broaden student knowledge while engaging with complex texts. Each lesson within a unit contains anchor texts that help to build knowledge based on the topic or theme. There is vertical alignment across the program, so similar topics and themes are seen throughout the grades. Although there are connections to both the overarching program themes and vertical alignment within the materials, students are not always building knowledge towards a topic, often students are building knowledge around a theme.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic in some units. Some texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, texts are connected to the theme Perseverance. The following texts connect to the theme:
In Lesson 2, students read Queen of the Track: Alice Coachman, Olympic High-Jump Champion by Heather Lang (biography) and answer the Essential Questions, "How can overcoming obstacles make us better people? When have you had to overcome an obstacle?”
In Lesson 3, students read “One Small Step” by Vidas Barzdukas (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, "How can working as a team lead to great accomplishments? How can a supportive team make it easier to persevere?”
In Lesson 4, students read The Great Serum Race: Blazing the Iditarod Trail by Debbie S. Miller (narrative nonfiction) and answer the Essential Questions, "Have you ever had to persevere when helping somebody? Why was it worth it?”
In Lesson 5, students read an excerpt from Hatchet by Gary Paulsen (adventure tale) and answer the Essential Question, “When something does not work the first time, why is it important to keep trying?”
In Unit 2, texts are connected to the topic of Cycles. The following texts connect to the theme:
In Lesson 1, students read Monsoons: From Myth to Modern Science by Elaine David (myth and informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, "How do we depend on some cycles? How can other cycles endanger us?”
In Lesson 3, students read Ookpik: The Travels of a Snowy Owl by Bruce Hiscock (realistic fiction) and answer the Essential Question, "How do different plants and animals have their own unique cycles?”
In Lesson 5, students read A Year on Bowie Farm by Jen Russell (realistic fiction) and answer the Essential Questions, "How does your life change throughout the year? Do you look forward to a specific season? Why or why not?”
In Lesson 6, students read A Handful of Dirt by Raymond Bial (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, "How are different creatures connected together in natural cycles? How are you connected to those cycles?”
In Unit 3, texts are connected to the topic of Celebrating World Communities. The following texts connect to the theme:
In Lesson 1, students read Island Treasures: Growing Up in Cuba by Alma Flor Ada (autobiography) and answer the Essential Questions, "Have you been told stories about your ancestors or the people in your family? What lessons have you learned from these stories?”
In Lesson 2, students read The Pot That Juan Built by Nancy Andrews-Goebel (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, "How do people in your community celebrate art and culture? What inspires you about your community and culture?”
In Lesson 5, students read Just 17 Syllables! by Dennis Fertig (realistic fiction) and answer the Essential Questions, "How can art help us connect with people around the world?”
In Lesson 6, students read My Librarian is a Camel by Margriet Ruurs (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, "Why are books important? How can a love for reading bring people together?”
In Unit 4, texts are connected to the topic of Our Planet, Our Home. The big idea is “What is your relationship with nature?” The following texts connect to the theme:
In Lesson 3, students read John Muir: America’s Naturalist by Sarah Middleton (biography) and answer the Essential Questions, “What are the differences between preservation and conservation? How can you show an appreciation for the environment? How are national parks good for nature?”
In Lesson 4, students read Why is the World Green? by Susan Martins Miller (explanatory text) and answer the Essential Questions, “What impact do we have on the environment? How do we help the environment? How do we hurt it?”
In Lesson 5, students read The Mystery of Washington Park by Jorge Almazan (play) and answer the Essential Questions, “How is nature sometimes hidden? Where can you find nature in your everyday life?”
In Lesson 6, students read What’s the Buzz? Keeping Bees in Flight by Merrie-Ellen Wilcox (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, “Why is the natural world important to our survival? Why is it important to protect nature? What could happen if it is not protected?”
In Unit 6, texts are connected to the theme Art and Impact. The following texts connect to the theme:
In Lesson 2, students read The Storyteller adapted from a work by Saki (realistic fiction) and answer the Essential Questions, “What makes you interested when you listen to a story? What makes a story good?”
In Lesson 3, students read More Than Meets the Eye by Amanda Oldman (realistic fiction) and answer the Essential Questions, “How can art inspire us? How can that inspiration lead to acts of creativity?”
In Lesson 5, students read The Voice That Challenged a Nation: Marian Anderson and the Struggle for Equal Rights, Part 1 by Russell Freedman (biography) and answer the Essential Questions, “Where does discrimination appear in our lives? How do we fight back against discrimination?”
In Lesson 6, students read The Voice That Challenged a Nation: Marian Anderson and the Struggle for Equal Rights, Part 2 by Russell Freedman (biography) and answer the Essential Questions, “How can art change lives? When was art an important part of your life?”
Texts are connected by a theme in some units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, texts are connected to the theme Making a Nation. The following texts connect to the theme:
In Lesson 1, students read “The Starving Time: The Early Struggle to Survive in America” by Kristine Cruikshank (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, “What does it take to found a new country? What challenges have to be overcome?”
In Lesson 3, students read The Search for the Mysterious Patriot by Vidas Barzdukas (play) and answer the Essential Questions, “Why is sharing your opinion an important part of democracy? Why is it necessary for a healthy government?”
In Lesson 5, students read Abraham Lincoln & Frederick Douglass: The Story Behind an American Friendship by Russell Freedman (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, “Why is equality important to our society? Why can it be difficult to do the right thing?”
In Lesson 6, students read “The Transcontinental Railroad” by Samantha Paterson (informational text) and answer the Essential Questions, “How did the Transcontinental Railroad unite the country? What other feats of engineering have made America great?”
Indicator 2b
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.
The materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas, writer’s craft, and text structure. Each lesson provides opportunities through the Access Complex Text section in which students look at main ideas and/or various text structures. Writer’s craft is addressed with every text, typically on Day 4. The Teacher Edition provides prompts and modeling for the teacher to help address the key idea, structure, and craft. The Teacher Edition typically has the teacher model analyzing key details and structure in the first lessons, and later the teacher prompts students to find key details and structure. The Look Closer section at the end of each selection specifically asks students to analyze the key ideas and details, the writer’s craft, and the text structure of the selection. The type of questions asked in this section require students to delve deeper into the text to help them access the complex text and to make sense of the text.
While most questions and tasks are high-quality, provide a logical sequence, and build in rigor throughout the year, some questions engage students in practices that do not align to the grade-level standards. The teacher models tasks at the beginning of the year and gradually releases more of the task to the students.
For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details and craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials contain some coherently sequenced questions and tasks that address key ideas and details.
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read One Small Step by Vidas Barzdukas and “It Couldn’t Be Done” by Edgar Albert Guest. During Access Complex Text, students focus on determining fact and opinion and classifying and categorizing. Students answer questions, including, “What would be the benefit of entire Apollo teams working on only one thing at a time, such as a spacesuit or experiment design? Twice Neil Armstrong faced situations where things seemed to be going wrong during a space mission. What character qualities helped him survive?” The comprehension strategies used during Access Complex Text do not build toward helping students answer these questions, and many students could answer these questions without reading the texts.
In Unit 2, Lesson 4, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read the text, Critters Crossing by Nick D’Alto. Students refer to page 192 of the student anthology to answer Text Connection questions such as, “What predators do salmon face? In what season do salmon eggs hatch? How do you know? According to the life cycle section at the end of ‘Salmon Creek’, why do coho salmon have different colors and patterns at different life stages?”
In Unit 3, Lesson 3, Day 2, during Reading and Responding, students read Heading Home by Karen Martin. Under Access Complex Text, students focus on the idea of compare and contrast. The Teacher Edition states, “Have students stop reading at the end of page 267. Have students tell what they do when they compare things. Have students tell what they do when they contrast things. Work with students to make a list of key words in the text that signal compare and contrast, such as same, like, similar, different, but, except.”
In Unit 4, Lesson 4, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read Why is the World Green? by Susan Martins Miller and answer questions about the key ideas and details such as, “What is the main idea of the second paragraph on page 401? What details support that main idea? Let’s look more closely at pages 408–409. What two events are compared and contrasted? Why did Venezuela build the Guri Dam? When many plants died on the smaller islands the dam created, scientists wanted to figure out why. What was their hypothesis? What happened when the Guri Dam was built?”
In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Day 2, during Reading and Responding, students read the text The Starving Time: The Early Struggle to Survive in America by Kristine Cruikshank. After reading the students are asked to identify the main idea and supporting details of a paragraph on four consecutive pages. At this time, it appears the students are working independently with this task. This is an activity done as a discussion with the class. Students do have access to a main idea graphic organizer, if needed.
In Unit 6, Lesson 3, Day 1, during Reading and Responding students read More Than Meets the Eye by Amanda Oldman. During the first read, students work on the Comprehension Strategy Making Connections. The Teacher Edition provides the following prompt, “What connections can you make as you read?” The materials have previously taught the Making Connections comprehension strategy, and by Unit 6 the sophistication has not increased to help build knowledge.
The materials contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that address craft and structure. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, students are asked, “In the poem ‘Home’, the poet uses a house as a metaphor for democracy. Find a simile, or a comparison using like or as, in the poem. How does the simile connect to the metaphor of the house? Why do you think the poet chose to divide ‘Home’ into three stanzas? What is the role of each stanza?”
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 1, during Reading and Responding, students read The Storyteller by Saki and answer questions to reflect the craft and structure of the text selection including, “The word novelty appears on page 608, and is defined as “something that is new or unusual.” What in the story helps you understand the meaning of novelty? Remind students that a stanza is a collection of related lines in a poem that is designated with a space before and after. Have students look closely at the rhyming words in one stanza. Ask students to tell which lines rhyme. Have students look at the meaning in the lines of each stanza. Have students identify the lines of the stanza that express boredom.”
Indicator 2c
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.
The materials provide some questions and tasks that support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Within the Reading and Responding sections of the lesson such as: Access Context Text, Close Read, Writer’s Craft and Inquiry, Steps 1-6 are paired with Anchor Texts and supporting texts in both the Student Anthology and Science/Social Studies Connection Text. Students have the opportunity to analyze topics and integrate ideas in their discussions, comprehension and writing tasks. Often discussion questions and prompts posed by the teacher help to incorporate knowledge related to the topic or theme with the text being read during class. Some comprehension questions found in the Student Anthology require students to incorporate knowledge and ideas, although others comprehension questions are surface-level and do not always require the student to access the text. The materials also focus on comprehension strategies that are repeated throughout the course of the year. These comprehension strategies are often focused on helping students build knowledge.
Some sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read the poem “It Couldn’t Be Done” by Edgar Albert Guest. Under the Theme Connection, the Teacher Edition states, “Discuss with students what message the poet is trying to convey. Talk about how the author addresses how people in our lives say or think things are impossible or can’t be done. Ask students to explain what this poem says about perseverance.” This discussion links directly to the theme of perseverance.
In Unit 2, Lesson 6, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read A Handful of Dirt by Raymond Bial. Under the Text Connection section, students respond to comprehension questions. These questions are meant to build on one other, but some are surface-level or can be answered without reading the text. “Why would there be no life on Earth without soil? What can a single acre of land contain, according to the text? Why is it ‘best to stay away from mushrooms’ in the wild? What are the benefits of making compost yourself versus purchasing fertilizer in a store?”
In Unit 3, Lesson 6, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read My Librarian Is A Camel: How Books Are Brought to Children Around the World by Margriet Ruurs. Under the Text Connection section, students answer questions in the Student Anthology, such as, “Why do you think many mobile libraries provide computer and television access, as well as access to books? How does having library access change the lives of one town or group of people in ‘My Librarian Is a Camel’?”
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 2, during Reading and Responding, students read The Mystery of Washington Park by Jorge Almazan. In the Access Complex Text section, students focus on Fact and Opinion skills. The Teacher Edition provides the following prompt for teachers, “Have students reread page 414-415. Then have them identify each of these statements from page 415 as a fact or an opinion.” This discussion on fact and opinion emphasizes the comprehension strategy, but not analyzing the text to build knowledge.
In Unit 5, Lesson 4, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read Thomas Jefferson Grows a Nation by Peggy Thomas. During the Text Connection section, students answer questions in the Student Anthology such as, “In ‘The Starving Time,’ you read about the challenges that colonists faced when they tried farming. What farming challenges did Jefferson try to overcome in this selection? How do you think Jefferson’s emphasis on agriculture is still reflected in American society today?”
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students read the text The Storyteller by Saki by focusing on the Making Inferences skill and they answer questions such as, “Have students stop reading at the end of page 611. Discuss as follows: What inference can you make about why Bertha “began to wish that she had never been allowed to come into the park”?” During the Close Reading section, students use a “Clues, Prior Knowledge, and Inferences” chart to track their thinking as they read.
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 5, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, students read Hatchet by Gary Paulsen. In the Look Close section, students answer questions in the Student Anthology such as, “Brian in ‘Hatchet’ and Lupe in ‘The Marble Champ’ have to overcome very different obstacles, but they both persevere. Compare and contrast how the two stories approach the theme of perseverance.”
In Unit 3, Lesson 4, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, students read The House Baba Built: An Artist’s Childhood in China by Ed Young. In the Look Closer section, students respond to prompts in the Student Anthology such as, “Compare and contrast the lessons taught by Baba in ‘The House Baba Built’ and by Abuelito Modesto in ‘Island Treasures,’ and relate them to the shared topic of family.”
In Unit 5, Lesson 6, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, students read Building the Transcontinental Railroad by Samantha Paterson. In the Look Closer section, students answer the following question in their Student Anthology, “In ‘Thomas Jefferson Grows a Nation,’ you read about Lewis and Clark’s expedition into the Louisiana Territory. How did the Transcontinental Railroad eventually make travel through that part of the country easier? Support your answer with details from the text.”
In Unit 6, Lesson 5, Day 3, during Reading Response, students read the text, The Voice That Challenged a Nation by Marian Anderson and Art Works! By Dan Alvarez. Students are directed to answer the question, “In the story “Art Words” Jordan and Grace believe an arts center will make a positive difference in their community. How did Marian Adnerson make a difference with her voice?”
Indicator 2d
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 do not meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
All units conclude with an Inquiry Project that develops around a Unit Theme and Question Board that builds on student knowledge, understanding, and “wonderings” and questions throughout the Inquiry Process. Students learn about a topic that is integrated throughout with specific texts and text sets, including the Read-Aloud, Discussion Starters, Big Idea, Essential Questions accompanying each text, Theme Connection text, Science/Social Studies connection, and Concept Board. However, since students have so much choice in the topic of the Inquiry Project and how they complete the project, this may limit how much topical knowledge is demonstrated and how much reading and writing students complete during the process. The Inquiry Rubric is designed to assess speaking, listening, and research skills. It is not specifically designed to assess reading and writing. The Inquiry Projects process evolves and changes as the units progress, including the extent of teacher modeling, support provided, variations in project ideas, grouping of students, note-taking strategies, and presentation choices. Speaking and listening rubrics can also support the speaking and listening process as it is also used in the Handing-Off Routines. Additionally, students frequently complete the tasks in groups or pairs, therefore it may be difficult to truly determine each student’s knowledge and skills gained from the unit.
Culminating tasks are not evident across the year. While some Inquiry Projects are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate one or more standards at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening), the degree to which students are allowed to make choices about the tasks may not provide sufficient evidence for the teacher to assess their progress in relation to the grade-level expectations for reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Additionally, for units that are organized around a topic, the degree of choice left to students may limit the amount of topical knowledge measured in the inquiry tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Inquiry Projects at the end of each unit are related to the theme of the unit, but do not require students to demonstrate mastery of several standards. According to the Program Guide, the Inquiry Projects require students to “conduct an investigation into something related to the theme that interests them.” The Inquiry Projects follow the same process across all units.
In Unit 6, students work on an Inquiry Project that relates to the theme Art and Impact. The Big Idea from the unit, Art Can Change Lives, is a possible focus for the research questions students develop, however it could be answered without students completing the readings or engaging in any of the activities throughout the unit. Additionally, there is no requirement for students to demonstrate mastery and integration of the standards taught throughout the unit.
Indicator 2e
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.
The materials contain a variety of text types addressed over the course of the year, with instruction, guided practice, and independent work in the Language Arts section of the materials. The Scope and Sequence of the Teacher Edition lays out the year-long writing plan for the materials. The first three units have students practice a different type of writing for the full unit. These include persuasive/opinion, informational/explanatory, and narrative writing. These are distributed throughout the school year in later units also, as well as writing in a specific genre; however, they do not reflect the balance called for in the standards. Students write every day during the Language Arts section and the materials include sufficient writing opportunities for students. The materials create a gradual release model by beginning with more guided instruction, and releasing to more independent work as the year goes on. Each lesson includes sections organized into Instruct, Guided Practice, and Apply. Often during the Instruct or Guided Practice section, the materials provide an example text the teacher can use to model instruction. Procedures and routines are provided for the teacher regarding conferencing with students about their writing and modeling writing. The materials provide the teacher with instructional routines, checklists, student writing goals, rubrics, and detailed plans in the Language Arts Lesson Plan found in the Teacher’s Unit Lesson Plan. Editing, revising, and publishing checklists are provided for the students in the Skills Practice book.
Materials include writing instruction that partially aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, during the Language Arts section, students focus on opinion writing. Students complete four opinion pieces over the course of six weeks. The first piece is an opinion piece written as a class, then an opinion piece written with a partner. Later, students write two opinion pieces independently.
In Unit 3, during the Language Arts section, students write four narrative pieces over the six-week period. Students write a realistic fictional story, a tall tale, a personal narrative, and a fantasy. The realistic story is written as a class, then the tall tale, personal narrative, and fantasy are written independently.
In Unit 5, during the Language Arts section, students write five pieces. Students write a persuasive essay, a persuasive letter, response to literature, response to nonfiction, and a description of an event. Students write these pieces independently.
In the Look Closer section of the Student Anthology, students respond to an On-Demand writing prompt under the Write section. This typically happens on every Day 4 for every lesson in all the units.
Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Resource Library, the materials provide an Instructional Routine for Modeling Writing Strategies. The routine includes information such as, “Model how to use the strategy when writing by saying aloud your thoughts and by describing each thing you do. Provide students with assistance in applying the strategy until they can do it on their own.”
In the Resource LIbrary, the materials provide a Management Routine for Writing Conference. The routine includes these steps, “Review any feedback the student has received. Identify positive elements of the student’s writing.” Strategies to help with students' writing are provided as well as writing conference questions about the students’ ideas, organization, voice, and word choice.
Grade 5 students keep writing notebooks. Set-up directions for the writing notebook include a spiral-bound notebook or three-ring binder with four dividers. Each divider includes a Response Journal for students to write their thoughts about each selection as they read, a Vocabulary section for students to record vocabulary words and their definitions from each selection, an Inquiry section for students to organize ideas and record information they find as they research theme-related concepts, and a Writing Ideas section for students to note ideas they have for writing or ideas to improve or add to existing writing. During Workshop, students are able to practice and review what was taught in the lesson, read, work on writing activities, or work on Inquiry projects that relate to the unit theme. Materials include protocols for the Workshop, Modeling Writing Strategies, Presenting Writing, and Writing Conferences.
In Unit 2, Lesson 5, Day 4, during the Language Arts section, students work on a draft for their informational writing. During Guided Practice students will work in small groups to review their writing plans. The materials provide a management routine for the teacher, as well as suggestions for the small group work. For example, the materials state, “Organize the class into groups of three or four students apiece. Display the following questions. Does the plan clearly state a topic? Does the plan include a sufficient number of important details to justify a multi-paragraph text? Does the plan have an ending that sums up the topic?”
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, Day 3, during the Language Arts section, students begin planning their draft for explaining a scientific process. In the Instruct section, the teacher demonstrates how to create an outline. The materials provide an example text that the teacher can use as a model. The Language Arts Handbook provides more information for the students regarding how to create an outline. In Lesson 2, Day 5, Language Arts, the students publish their informational piece. The Teacher Edition states, “You will use the Writing Rubrics found in the Level Appendix to evaluate students’ explanations of a scientific process. You may use any of the rubrics for Genre, Writing Process, and Writing Traits. Share with students what you will be looking for when assessing their explanations of a scientific process.”
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 4, during the Language Arts section, students edit their historical fiction piece. During Guided Practice, students use the editing checklist from Skills Practice to edit their piece with a partner. The materials provide the following directions for the teacher, “As students have already done editing work on their narratives, it may be useful to direct their peer-editors to focus on certain areas of the editing and proofreading checklist where the writers believe they could use the most help. Students should instruct their peers to pay close attention to several self-selected checkboxes on the checklist.”
Writing Rubrics can be found at the end of each unit in the Appendix. Different sets of rubrics cover various elements of writing, including genre, writing process, and writing traits.The rubrics are intended to help teachers provide criteria and feedback to students. The program provides a four-point rubric in each of the four areas: 1 point: student is performing below basic level, 2-point: student abilities are emerging, 3-point: student work is adequate and achieving expectations; 4-point: student is exceeding writing expectations.
Writing rubrics align with the standards so teachers can monitor students' progress. For example, the materials provide Informative Writing Genres rubrics. One aspect where students may earn a four in the rubric states, “The writer clearly introduces a topic. Main ideas are supported by facts related to the topic. Linking words such as also, another, or but are used appropriately. A conclusion is clearly stated and supports the topic.”
Indicator 2f
Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
The materials include a year’s worth of research projects called Inquiry Projects. During Inquiry portions of the units, students learn more about the unit by investigating the theme or overarching idea. Inquiry begins in Units 1-2 as whole-class instruction. The teacher models the steps of the investigation for students, who apply the steps in future research. In Units 3-4, students work in small groups on investigations of interest to them. Students learn research skills including locating reliable Internet websites and sources for information, interviewing subject-matter experts, collecting information, taking notes, working collaboratively, and presenting information in a variety of ways. While students have opportunities to brainstorm questions, create a conjecture, and conduct research, the research skills remain static across the year and do not grow in sophistication. Inquiry begins with whole class inquiry and then transitions to group work. Over the course of the year, students do not conduct the inquiry process independently; therefore, students never demonstrate individual mastery of the research skills outlined in the standards. The materials provide numerous modeling prompts for the teacher to use, as well as graphic organizers and rubrics to help guide research. Students choose which resources they want to use for research, with a heavy emphasis on online content. Some guidance is provided to assure students are selecting appropriate and adequate resources for their projects. The Inquiry Projects serve as an extension of the unit and are not always tied to the unit texts.
Research projects are somewhat sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:
The Inquiry process has the same steps throughout the year: Step 1: Develop Questions, Step 2: Create Conjectures, Step 3: Collect Information, Step 4: Revise Conjectures, Step 5: Develop Presentations, and Step 6: Deliver Presentations.
In Unit 2, Lesson 5, Day 2, students complete Inquiry Step 5: Develop Presentations. A list of possible presentation ideas are provided, including, “Write a story. Perform a creative interpretation of a written piece or poem. Create a poster illustrating a process. Perform an experiment related to your research. Plan to create a web page. Stage a panel discussion with audience participation.” These presentation ideas could combine writing, speaking, and technology, but students may not necessarily incorporate all of them.
In Unit 4, Lesson 3, Day 2, students complete Inquiry Step 3: Collect Information. The lesson focuses on taking notes using note cards. The materials state, “Give students additional ideas for taking notes, such as printing out short articles and making annotations in the articles’ margins. Another suggestion is using sticky notes to annotate books they get from school or the library.”
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 4, students complete Inquiry Step 3: Collect Information. In this lesson, students create a plan to collect information. Students discuss what good research involves. The Teacher Edition states, “Remind students the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarism when using source materials by asking them to explain what each term means. Tell students they can avoid plagiarism by coming up with another way of saying what has already been said or by putting direct quotes in quotation marks and citing the source.”
Materials provide some support for teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, Day 4, the teacher is provided with a possible narrative to guide thinking and learning. Additional lists of questions also stimulate further discussion and to model how to generate questions and ideas for Step 1: Develop Questions. In Lesson 2, Day 3, the teacher displays a Questions and Conjectures organizer to discuss the sample conjectures for Inquiry Step 2. In Lesson 2, Day 4, students begin to do research and collect information for Inquiry Step 3. The teacher displays a list of possible ideas to discuss and other resources students might use, some provided in the Teacher Edition. In Lesson 3, Day 2, students are ready to begin collecting information and note-taking as a part of Step 3. The teacher continues to model strategies using the Combination Notes graphic organizer.
In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 2, students complete Inquiry Step 2: Create Conjectures. During this lesson students turn their questions into a conjecture. The Teacher Edition provides a model for the teacher to use during instruction. The materials state, “Model doing this by offering the sample question:’ Why are robotic probes more effective than piloted vehicles when studying the deepest parts of the ocean?’ Then say, ‘To make conjectures about this question, I would think about what I already know, or do a little preliminary research, and make an educated guess.”
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, Day 2, students complete Inquiry Step 5: Develop Presentations. The materials provide the following presentation examples for the teacher to suggest: “Produce a photo-essay about the concept. Create a slideshow presentation. Write a magazine article. Create an educational brochure. Write an opinion paper.” The teacher highlights creating an educational brochure and provides details on what a brochure should contain. The material also provides the Word Processing Tech Tutor video in the online resources.
Materials provide some opportunities for students to conduct research projects that synthesize and analyze content tied to the topics under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 3, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, as a part of Inquiry Step 3: Collect information, students organize information to see how it all relates and decide what other ideas they still need to explore. They learn that one way to compile research, especially research gathered through a survey, is by organizing it into a spreadsheet program on a computer. Students view the Spreadsheet Tech Tutor video, available in the online resources, to give them an overview of how a spreadsheet works. Students move through the process of creating a spreadsheet to synthesize their results.
In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 4, students explore another way to organize information by creating a list of subtopics. To model the idea of subtopics, the teacher considers the unit theme of Making a Nation, and writes it on the board beside the word Topic. Students identify and list the subtopics represented by selections, such as Early American Colonies for “The Starving Time,” The American Revolution for “A Spy by Chance,” and Federalists and Anti-Federalists for “The Search for the Mysterious Patriot.” Students assign each subtopic a letter and use it to label their notes. Once notes have been labeled with letters, students can also choose to put their notes into piles by subtopic. It is suggested to use this process with note cards, but it can be done with any type of notes.
In Unit 6, Lesson 4, Day 4, students complete Inquiry Step 4: Revise Conjectures. Students work with groups to organize all their information gathered from research. The Teacher Edition states, “Briefly conference with each group and discuss whether its conjecture should be revised again, based on all its research. Make sure students review the key ideas expressed and draw conclusions in light of whatever information is shared during the discussion.”
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
The materials provide coverage of the standards throughout all units and over the course of the year, however, the preponderance of repetitive, unaligned reading strategies throughout the program moves the focus of the instruction, questions, tasks, and assessments away from a tight focus on grade level standards alignment. The program also contains a large volume of material without a suggested daily schedule; therefore, a full and standards-aligned implementation could be challenging.
Indicator 2g
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.
Over the course of each unit, as some of the instruction, questions, tasks, and assessment questions align to grade level standards, a significant amount of time is spent on comprehension strategies that do not align to the standards. These comprehension strategies include predicting, cause and effect, making inferences, visualizing, and making connections. Over the course of the year, many of these strategies are repeated and do not support knowledge building and growth toward mastery of grade-level standards. The assessment components may help the teacher to confirm progress toward mastery of some standards; however, they may not provide a strong picture of the depth of the knowledge and skills built during the unit as many assessment questions focus on unaligned comprehension strategies. An intervention guide is provided to differentiate instruction for students, but most differentiated instruction uses the same materials with question or activity scaffolds. Some differentiated activities fall short of meeting the standards, particularly for students working below-level.
Over the course of each unit, some instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 2, Day 1, during Reading and Responding, the teacher models the use of the comprehension strategies, Summarizing and Clarifying, during the first read of Making Waves by Phil Moskowitz. Students stop periodically during the reading to summarize at the ends of paragraphs, chapters, or sections. Summarizing sentence stems may support students as they summarize. Students are also provided with Suggestions for Clarifying text. Students needing additional support may be directed by the teacher’s use of the Intervention Teacher’s Guide during Workshop to reteach the comprehension strategies Summarizing and Clarifying taught in this lesson. These strategies do not align to grade-level standards.
In Unit 3, Lesson 5, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students make text connections with six comprehension questions asked. These include, “Describe how Juan found ‘the finest clay he had ever seen.’ If this were a fable, what would be its moral?” These strategies do not align to grade-level standards.
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Day 3, during Reading and Responding, students work on making inferences. The Teacher Edition provides this prompt for the teacher, “When we make inferences, we connect what we know with what we read. The connections can be used to make statements about events, characters, and settings in the text. In the fourth paragraph on page 481, we learn that ‘An empty wagon would lead to too many questions.’ Why is Walter concerned about answering questions? We can make an inference. What clues in the text tell you Walter’s thoughts about getting through the checkpoint?” The materials provide possible answers. (RL.5.1)
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, Day 4, Language Arts, students focus on Grammar, Usage and Mechanics. A list of sentences is displayed to identify the conjunction in each sentence. Students are reminded that conjunctions are connecting words and are asked to identify the conjunctions in the sentences by type. In addition, students combine sentence pairs into a single sentence with a conjunction. (L.5.1a)
Over the course of each unit, some of the questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. However, some questions are focused on repeated rounds of comprehension strategies that do not build knowledge nor align to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Getting Started, Day 1, during Reading and Responding, prior to the read-aloud of “A Stormy Day” from Black Beauty by Anna Sewell, the teacher is reminded to teach the following comprehension strategies to students: Predicting, Asking and Answering Questions, Visualizing, Summarizing, Making Connections, and Clarifying on the board. Students tell what they know about each one. These strategies are not aligned to the standards for this grade level, however they form the foundation for roughly a quarter of the questions across the program.
In Unit 2, Lesson 5, Day 2, during Reading and Responding, students read A Year on Bowie Farm by Jen Russell. Under Access Complex Text, students are given the task of classifying and categorizing information. The Teacher Edition states, “Suggest to students that we classify and categorize the work on the farm by seasons to help understand the yearly cycle. Have students name the seasons on the farm. Display a four-column chart with the seasons as heading. Work with students to identify story details from the farm tasks on page 98-199. Record information in the Classify and Categorize graphic organizer.” This task does not require students to go beyond a surface-level understanding and does not build to grade-level mastery of the standard.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, materials include questions that do not align to grade-level standards such as, “What are two main ideas of Abuelito Modesto’s story, as Alma Flor Ada tells it? Explain how the details support them.”
In Unit 5, Lesson 3, Day 4, during Reading and Responding, materials include the questions, “How do the characters in ‘The Search for the Mysterious Patriot’ compare to the characters in ‘The Mystery of Washington Park’? How are their attempts to solve a mystery similar? How are their attempts different?” (RL.3.5)
Over the course of each unit, some of the assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. However, they may not address the depth and breadth of the standards nor the knowledge gained from the unit. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 1, during Reading and Responding, students analyze the selection and use text evidence for support. The materials ask, “Lupe was an excellent student, but she was not very good at sports. Why do you think she wanted to be good at sports? Do you think that all of her marble practice hurt her studies?” (RL.5.2)
In Unit 3, Lesson 4, Day 5, during Reading and Responding, students complete a Formal Assessment under the Monitor Progress section. The assessments include questions to assess student understanding of the topics from the lesson. The questions include, “Put these events from the story in the correct order” (events are listed). Who is telling this story, and how do you know? Why did the author mention the comparison of Japan and China to a silkworm and a mulberry leaf?” The first two questions do not align to grade-level standards. The third question aligns with RL.5.4.
In Unit 5 Assessment, the Opinion Writing Task says, “Scientists are talking about sending people to Mars. What is your opinion about this? Is it a good thing, or is it too dangerous and expensive? Imagine that you are writing a letter to a member of Congress. Explain your opinion about sending people to Mars.” (W.5.1, W.5.4)
By the end of the academic year, standards are addressed within and across units; however, the focus on unaligned strategies throughout may not allow students to fully master the depth and breadth of the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The majority of the RL and RI standards are covered in all units.
W.5.1 (including all substandards) are found primarily in Units 1 and 5 (including all substandards); however, they are only found a few places throughout the year. W.5.2 is found primarily in Units 1, 2, 4, and 5. W.5.2.e only appears a few times over the course of the year. W.5.3 (including all substandards) is found primarily in Units 3, 4, 5 and 6. W.5.4-8 are found across most units. W.5.9 appears primarily in Units 2-6, and sparsely within those units. W.4.10 appears in all units.
SL.5.1-6 appear in all units.
The majority of the language standards are found across the year; however, some language standards are found only a few times throughout the year.
Indicator 2h
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.
The materials are all grouped into six units over the course of the year. This program is designed for 36 weeks of instruction plus an additional Getting Started week-long lesson in Unit 1. Each lesson contains five days with activities for Foundational Skills, Reading and Responding, and Language Arts. The core instructional materials are all contained within those sections of the materials. While the materials do provide a scope and sequence to help teacher’s plan their year along with highly-structured lessons that follow a similar format week after week, the materials do not include a daily schedule or time allotment for each section of the lesson. The daily plans and instructional routines do not explicitly state a suggested time frame or estimated amount of time per activity. Without suggested times for the various activities, it would be a challenge to fit the activities within these three components into the daily schedule. Workshop Time is the only portion for which a suggested time frame of 15-30 minutes is provided. Within the Workshop Time, the materials suggest including decodables and leveled readers during Workshop Time, as well as providing time to work on the Inquiry project during Workshop. Optional materials do not distract from the core learning, although it can be unclear when optional activities should be incorporated.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials contain a scope and sequence for each unit. For example, in Unit 3 the materials state the theme, Celebrating World Communities, and then lay out the three components: foundational skills, reading and responding, and language arts. The materials presented in the scope and sequence follow core learning, but a suggested time frame is not provided.
An Intervention Teacher Guide is provided in the Resource Library. These materials provide lessons for all six units. The lessons in the Intervention Guide line up with the lessons in the traditional Teacher Edition, following the same path.
The Curriculum Overview states that Foundational Skills include Phonics and Word Analysis, Oral Language Activities, Reading the Decodables, and Reading Fluency Passages. Recommended time for instruction is not provided.
The Curriculum Overview states that during Reading and Responding, students read each selection twice: the first time to practice comprehension strategies, and the second to analyze complex text. Students work with vocabulary every day using the Selection Vocabulary Routine. Students read a science or social studies connection text toward the end of each week. Recommended time for instruction is not provided.
The Curriculum Overview states that during Language Arts, students work on the writing process daily during this block. Spelling and grammar are also included in the Language Arts block. Recommended time for instruction is not provided.
Suggested implementation times and schedules are not provided for most aspects of the program. The volume of materials may be more than can be completed within the scope of an average school week/year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Scope and Sequence provides a color-coded planner which includes Foundational Skills (green), Reading and Responding (red), and Language (blue) in that order. Each day begins with Foundation Skills lessons, then moves to the Reading and Responding lessons, ending with Language Arts. Recommended time for teaching and implementation of daily lessons is not provided.
The Workshop Overview states, “Workshop can be implemented during the reading/language arts timeframe in a flexible manner. This can come before the core instruction begins, sometimes in the middle of the reading/language block, or at the end of that time period. Workshop may last 15-30 minutes, depending on the needs of the classroom.” This is the only time frame mentioned in the materials.
There are six units included in the materials. Each unit is made up of six lessons, with each lesson containing five days. There is also a Getting Started lesson at the beginning of Unit 1.
Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Letter cards are provided to help students form letters. Penmanship videos are included to help students write cursive letters. The Program Overview suggests that the teacher should create a writing area for Workshop and, “The area should also have various Letter Cards and other handwriting models for those students who want to practice letter formation or handwriting.” These materials do not appear to have specific lessons, and are meant to supplement the materials.
The Social Emotional Learning Content Guide illustrates how Character Lab can integrate with Open Court Reading. The Teacher Tips guide states, “Incorporate the Playbook or SEL outcome as part of building background and discussing the selection around the Essential Question.”
Core and Practice Decodables: Pre-Decodables and Decodables give students practice reading at their own pace and allows them to listen to a fluent model of reading. Decodable Stories Takehome Books allow students to apply their knowledge of phonic elements to read. Each story supports instruction in a new phonic element and incorporates elements and words that have been learned earlier.
Genre Practice provides students with additional opportunities to read and respond to a variety of genres. Each activity contains one or two reading selections. Multiple-choice or written-response comprehension questions and a writing prompt follow the reading selection(s).
Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Challenge Novels are intended for beyond-level students and are suggested as additional reading to what students already complete with the normal lessons. The Challenge Novels focus around the unit theme. For example, the Unit 1 theme is Celebrating World Communities. Students read the Challenge Novel Hidden Figures. During Week 1 Think about It, students think about questions such as, “What motivates people to persevere? What makes you want to persevere?” The Challenge Novel also contains comprehension questions such as, “Why does the author think it is important to share these women’s stories? Quote accurately from the text to support your answer.’” There is not a clear expectation on when the students are expected to complete these additional questions.
The Visual Vocabulary provides a brief video for vocabulary words. These videos provide audio of the word, the definition, an example sentence, and a picture to help students better understand the vocabulary.
Technology and Digitally Enhanced Activities include, but are not limited to, the following:
ePresentation can be used during the lesson as a presentation tool of the elements within the lesson.
eGames provide students a way to practice skills learned in class from all key sections within the daily lesson including Foundational Skills, Reading and Responding, and Language Arts. These may be found in the Resource Library under “Games.”
eActivities give students additional practice with high frequency words, comprehension, grammar, spelling, and writing. These may be found in the Resource Library under “Activities.”