High School - Gateway 2
Back to High School Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Comprehension
Comprehension Through Texts, Questions, and TasksGateway 2 - Meets Expectations | 91% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Text Complexity | 14 / 14 |
Criterion 2.2: Knowledge Building Through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension | 37 / 42 |
The myPerspectives materials meet expectations for Gateway 2: Comprehension Through Texts, Questions, and Tasks. The curriculum offers engaging, content-rich texts across genres with appropriate complexity, supported by thorough analyses and scaffolds, and organized around coherent themes that build knowledge and culminate in Performance-Based Assessments. However, the imbalance between informational and literary texts and the emphasis on short-form texts limit sustained engagement, though most texts are presented in full. The instructional design is research-based and integrates reading, writing, speaking, and listening, with strong support for vocabulary, grammar, and evidence-based writing. Students regularly engage in writing and discussion tasks tied to texts. Writing process instruction at the paragraph level is lacking, outside of multi-paragraph assignments. While research tasks are present, explicit instruction in research skills is limited, and pacing guidance is insufficient given the volume of content. Formative and summative assessments are embedded, though teacher guidance on evaluating student work could be improved. Overall, the materials support literacy development but require stronger guidance in discussion facilitation, paragraph-level writing instruction, pacing, and research instruction.
Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Text Complexity
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include content-rich, engaging texts that meet the text complexity criteria for the grade level. Texts and text sets cohesively work together to build knowledge of specific topics and/or content themes.
The myPerspectives materials meet expectations for Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Complexity. The program features engaging and content-rich texts across various genres and themes, with structured support for independent reading and thematic book clubs. Core texts are appropriately complex for each grade level, supported by thorough quantitative and qualitative text complexity analyses and scaffolds aligned to each text’s specific challenges. Text sets are coherently organized around grade-appropriate themes that build knowledge across disciplines and culminate in Performance-Based Assessments. However, the informational-to-literary text ratio does not align with grade-level standards, and the overreliance on short-form and excerpted texts, especially in Grades 11–12, limits opportunities for sustained reading. Additionally, while the texts reflect diverse perspectives and encourage student connection, teacher guidance for facilitating discussions around complex topics is not consistently robust.
Indicator 2a
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading through content-rich and engaging texts.
The text quality and volume of reading in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2a. The program provides an engaging text selection with diverse subgenres and themes. However, the balance of informational to literary texts does not align with grade-level standards. While its short-form texts ensure a significant reading volume, the limited inclusion of long-form texts may restrict opportunities for deeper, sustained engagement. In grades 9 and 10, texts are taught in their entirety, with a few excerpts included throughout the program. In grades 11 and 12, about one-third of the texts are excerpts. The materials include an independent learning component in each unit, which provides students with choice in selecting, reading, and analyzing texts that are thematically and/or topically aligned to the unit. In addition, the program provides book club options with novels aligned to each unit, with built-in analysis questions for student accountability.
Materials do not reflect the balance of informational and literary texts required by the grade-level standards (70/30 in 9-12), including various subgenres. (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring) Materials include a range of full texts and excerpts (including long-form and short-form texts), depending on their stated purpose. (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring.)
In Grade 9, materials reflect a balance of 35/65, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 43 core texts, 15 of which are informational texts and 28 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: short story, essay, image gallery, novel, poetry, drama, article, graphic novel, interview, and video.
In Grade 9, materials include 37 full texts and six excerpts.
In Grade 9, materials include 42 short-form texts and one long-form text.
In Grade 10, materials reflect a balance of 41/59, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 44 core texts, 18 of which are informational texts and 26 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: short story, speech, poetry, article, essay, image gallery, video, novel, and drama.
In Grade 10, materials include 41 full texts and three excerpts.
In Grade 10, materials include 42 short-form texts and two long-form texts.
In Grade 11, materials reflect a balance of 45/55, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 58 core texts, 26 of which are informational texts and 32 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: poetry, graphic novel, foundational document, short story, memoir, speech, essay, book excerpt, video, public document, podcast episode, judicial opinion, drama, radio broadcast, and interview.
In Grade 11, materials include 40 full texts and 18 excerpts.
In Grade 11, materials include 56 short-form texts and 2 long-form texts.
In Grade 12, materials reflect a balance of 30/70, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 70/30 balance required by the grade-level standards.
Materials include 54 core texts, 16 of which are informational texts and 38 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: article, poetry, graphic novel, essay, short story, interview, drama, novel, film clip, image gallery, book excerpt, and radio broadcast.
In Grade 12, materials include 37 full texts and 17 excerpts.
In Grade 12, materials include 53 short-form texts and one long-form text.
The publisher provides a clear rationale for why each excerpted text was not selected in its entirety. For example, in grade 10, students read an excerpt from Franklin D. Roosevelt’s State of The Union Address in 1941, titled “The Four Freedoms Speech.” The publisher provides the following rationale for why the text was excerpted: “This original address is very long; it has been excerpted to ensure it fits within unit pacing. Roosevelt's essential message about the four freedoms is maintained.”
Materials include core/anchor texts that are well-crafted, content-rich, and engaging for students at their grade level.
The myPerspectives curriculum for Grades 9-12 features well-crafted, content-rich texts that provide a diverse mix of literary and informational works across multiple subgenres. Literary texts include short stories, poetry, dramas, novels, and graphic novels, while informational texts consist of articles, essays, speeches, and infographics focused on science, government, and history. The program incorporates widely respected authors and complex themes that align with students’ interests at each grade level. Texts are selected for their strong themes, varied structures, and character depth, with topics ranging from survival and freedom to individualism and self-discovery. The curriculum includes rich vocabulary and complex syntax, enhancing students’ comprehension and analytical skills.
Grade 9 materials include texts on survival, progress, love, human nature, and journeys, which will engage 9th-grade students.
Grade 10 materials include texts on government, freedom, power, fear, culture, vengeance, forgiveness, and greed, which will engage 10th-grade students.
Grade 11 materials include texts on American history, freedom, grit, leadership, individualism, society, othering, and change, which will engage 11th-grade students.
Grade 12 materials include texts on heroes, time, society, perception, self-discovery, and belonging, which will engage 12th-grade students.
Throughout the materials, texts are content-rich, well-crafted, and worthy of student analysis.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, which includes complex language with archaic or unfamiliar syntax (written in 1915 and translated from German), figurative language, and above-level vocabulary.
Materials include sufficient teacher guidance (including monitoring and feedback) and student accountability structures for independent reading (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring.)
Each unit includes an Independent Learning component. This part of the unit presents students with text selection choices as they read and analyze texts that are thematically and/or topically related to the unit’s learning.
The Savvas Realize platform includes a Digital Library. This library includes book club guides with texts aligned to each unit. The site provides the following description: “Book Club novels are optional and aligned to the grade-level units. The Study Guides include support for launching the Book Club, reading comprehension strategies, comprehension questions, discussion prompts, and projects. These resources must be assigned for students to access.”
Each Book Club Guide includes student-facing guidance on how to run their book club effectively, chunked reading assignments with guiding discussion questions for accountability, project ideas, and a book club reflection section. The Teacher-Facing Book Club guidance includes sample responses for all questions and tasks that students complete in each book club. There is no proposed book club schedule provided.
In addition to book clubs, the Savvas Realize Digital Library includes a Background Connections section, which provides short informational texts, over 100 digital novels, over 100 additional texts in the Extra Reads section, a Shakespeare Shelf, a Spanish Library, a World History Library, and Reading Guides for popular novels.
Indicator 2b
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The text complexity analysis in the myPerspectives materials meets expectations for indicator 2b. The curriculum provides comprehensive text complexity analysis for all core texts, including quantitative (Lexile and word count) and qualitative measures (meaning/purpose, text structure, language clarity, and knowledge demands). These qualitative measures are represented on a scale from slightly to exceedingly complex. Each Teacher Edition includes a rationale for educational purpose and grade-level placement. Core texts are appropriately complex for each grade, with scaffolding recommendations to support student comprehension. Across Grades 9-12, texts span a range of Lexile levels, including below, within, and above grade bands, as well as Non-Prose (NP) texts without Lexile measures. The majority of texts are moderately or very complex, ensuring rigorous engagement while allowing differentiation. Across the program, tasks are appropriate for each grade level.
Accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level accompany core/Anchor texts and a series of texts connected to them.
The materials include text complexity guidance in the Teacher Edition for all core texts in the program. This guidance includes a quantitative analysis, a qualitative analysis, a text summary, and a rationale for educational purpose and placement. The quantitative measures include Lexile and word count. The qualitative measures include levels of meaning/purpose, text structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands. These measures are represented on a scale from slightly to exceedingly complex.
According to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to the associated student task, core/anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade.
Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity based on their text complexity analysis and the associated reader and task. myPerspectives text complexity charts describe the unique qualitative features of each text across four categories: text structure, language features, knowledge demands, and purpose/meaning. The materials include different supports that students may need to fully comprehend different aspects of each text within these qualitative complexity measures and complete the tasks required. Across the program, tasks are appropriate for each grade level.
Grade 9
Quantitatively: Texts range from 720L- 1350L
11 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
10 texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
1 text is above the Lexile range for the grade-band
21 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Five texts are slightly complex, 16 texts are moderately complex, 15 texts are very complex, and seven texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 10
Quantitatively: Texts range from 810L- 1410L
Seven texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
14 texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
One text is above the Lexile range for the grade-band
22 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Nine texts are slightly complex, 16 texts are moderately complex, 13 texts are very complex, and six texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 11
Quantitatively: Texts range from 570L -1930L
16 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
Eight texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
Six texts are above the Lexile range for the grade-band
28 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Four texts are slightly complex, 35 texts are moderately complex, 19 texts are very complex, and zero texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 12
Quantitatively: Texts range from 830L- 1700L
15 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
Four texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
One text is above the Lexile range for the grade-band
34 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: One text is slightly complex, 37 texts are moderately complex, 13 texts are very complex, and three texts are exceedingly complex.
Indicator 2c
Materials provide appropriate scaffolds for core/anchor texts that ensure all students can access the text and make meaning. Scaffolds align with the text’s qualitative analysis.
The scaffolding in myPerspectives materials meets expectations for indicator 2c. The curriculum provides aligned scaffolds to support students in accessing complex texts before, during, and after reading. The Teacher Edition includes “prereading differentiation” scaffolds tailored to each text’s qualitative complexity in meaning, structure, language, and knowledge demands. Before reading, students engage with historical context, concept vocabulary, and reading strategies. During reading, comprehension checks, close reading annotations, and differentiated supports help students analyze the text. After reading, assignments deepen understanding with additional teacher guidance for differentiated instruction. The Teacher Edition offers structured support levels (substantial, moderate, light) for key reading strategies and analysis tasks, ensuring accessibility for all learners. Throughout the Teacher Edition, guidance on implementing scaffolds is sufficient.
Scaffolds align with the qualitative complexity of the program’s texts to support students in making meaning of each text.
The Teacher Edition provides potential scaffolds for each text based on their qualitative complexity across the four different measures: levels of meaning/purpose, text structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands. The materials refer to these scaffolds as “prereading differentiation.” These scaffolds directly align with the notes regarding the text’s complexity level related to each of these domains.
In Grade 12, students read an excerpt from Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. In The Structure section, the Teacher Edition states that this text “is an excerpt from a novel. It contains long, complex sentences.” Under Pre-reading guidance for Structure, the Teacher Edition includes the following, “If students are likely to need help to follow the narrative’s structure, then encourage them to summarize each section of the text as they read. You might model by reading aloud lines from the first paragraph (‘The first request I had made . . . strong towers at ten feet distance.’) and stating: The excerpt begins with Gulliver getting permission from the emperor to see the city of Mildendo. He gets permission, and the Lilliputians are told he will be walking around. Gulliver promises to be very careful to avoid harming the people or their homes.”
Materials include scaffolds for before, during, and after engaging with a complex text.
In addition to the “prereading differentiation” scaffolds, materials include a Preparing to Read section for each text. This section includes historical perspectives (when relevant), concept vocabulary, and a quick overview of the reading strategy focus. During a first read, materials provide comprehension checks, and students apply the reading strategy. During a second read, students complete close reading annotations and questions. After reading, materials provide several assignments that deepen student analysis and understanding of the text.
In Grade 10, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Bergeron. In addition to the “prereading differentiation” scaffolds, students learn concept vocabulary words like equality and are introduced to the reading strategy of creating mental images. During the first read, students complete comprehension check questions and apply the creating mental images reading strategy. The Teacher Edition includes differentiation support across varying levels of intervention (substantial and moderate) should students struggle to apply the strategy. During the second read, students annotate and answer the close reading questions. After reading, students complete various tasks to deepen their understanding and analysis. Before completing most of the after-reading tasks, a scaffold is provided for teachers to assess student readiness for the remainder of the lesson by checking student understanding of satire.
Materials include teacher guidance on how to enact each scaffold based on student needs.
The prereading differentiation guidance is separated by measures of qualitative complexity so that teachers can enact the right scaffolds based on student needs. The Teacher Edition provides notes for teachers on how to reinforce the reading strategy during the first read of each text. The notes include differentiation for students who need substantial support, moderate support, and light support. The Teacher Edition also provides additional notes for supporting students with the close reading annotations and questions during the second reading of each text. Lastly, the Teacher Edition provides additional notes on how to further differentiate some of the activities that students complete after reading, including checking for student readiness for the assignments and different supports for students who need substantial or moderate support.
In Grade 11, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson. The Teacher Edition includes notes on reinforcing the reading strategy of “evalut[ing] details” for the first read of the text. These notes include guidance on introducing the strategy and guidance on how to have students practice it during reading. This second set of guidance includes differentiation for students who need substantial support and moderate support. The moderate support notes state, “Once students have evaluated the details in paragraph 31, have them explain how those details support Jefferson’s central idea. Ask, Why didn’t Jefferson put paragraph 31 up front, at the very beginning?” A sample answer is provided for this question. An additional section labeled “Anticipate” includes guidance for the teacher on supporting students who struggle with understanding the persuasive appeals in the text. This section includes differentiation for students who need substantial support and moderate support. The Close-Read guidance includes notes on what to say to students during these parts of the lesson to help them complete the assignment.
Indicator 2c.MLL
The materials amplify rather than simplify texts while maintaining complexity to provide access for MLLs without watering down texts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of amplifying rather than simplifying texts while maintaining complexity to provide access for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) without watering down the content. Adapted versions of core texts are included to provide access to content; however, they are written in a combination of original and simplified, lower-level content, depriving students of authentic language. Other scaffolds and language supports assist students in making meaning of the texts, but they are applied inconsistently and rarely amplify English language functions and forms.
The materials include Bridge Texts, described as “adapted versions of the literary and informational texts in each unit and include vocabulary support and audio with word-by-word highlighting.” However, in adapting the texts, complexity is lost. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 1, the materials list the original text of “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” as having a Lexile Level of 1300L. The materials list the Bridge Text for “The ‘Four Freedoms’ Speech” as having a Lexile of 710L. Additionally, MLLs lose exposure to the authentic texts, and sometimes to Close Read activities, through the adaptations. In Grade 12, Unit 4, one of the Whole Class Close Read notes directs students to “Annotate: In paragraph 4, identify details that describe the issue between the two warring parties in Lilliput.” The Teacher Facing Note directs teachers to “Model the Close Read of paragraph 4 using the following think-aloud format,” which reads, “As I read paragraph 4, I notice details about why people in LIlliput are fighting. The animosity between the two parties seems to center on whether the heels of the shoes they wear are high or low.” The Bridge Text version, however, summarizes much of this paragraph, including the section noted in the Teacher Edition that includes the details to be annotated. In this case, using the Bridge Text might provide access to the broad strokes of the core text, but it limits MLLs’ ability to participate in the grade-level Close Read task and restricts access to authentic academic vocabulary. The Teachers Edition references the Bridge Texts in each Selection Overview, noting for teachers that “Students may benefit from: . . . Beginning with the Bridge Text version of the story and then transitioning to on-level version when ready.” However, no additional guidance is provided for teachers on when and how this transition should occur, increasing the likelihood that simplified texts may replace the authentic, grade-level materials.
The Teacher Edition provides a Selection Overview for each text, which includes a list of Prereading Differentiation scaffolds for all students tailored to each text’s qualitative complexity in meaning, structure, language, and knowledge demands (Refer to Indicator 2c in the full content report for additional details). This section also includes a How Can I Support Multilingual Learners section, with Lesson Preview suggestions, Vocabulary and Language Support, and Transition into English. These supports assist MLLs in making meaning of the texts, but only sometimes guide teachers to support MLLs through multiple modalities, methods, and representations, and rarely involve amplifying English Language structures and forms.
For example, in Grade 11, Unit 1, Whole Class Learning, students read The Declaration of Independence. The How Can I Support Multilingual Learners section in the Selection Overview reads:
“Lesson Preview:
Provide more background for students who are not familiar with American history. Help them understand that the Declaration of Independence signaled the start of the United States as its own country.
Invite students to describe for the class the foundational documents of their home countries. On what principles are those documents based?
Vocabulary and Language Support:
Point out the words unanimous, declaration, and dissolve in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration. Discuss the meaning of the words, and elicit synonyms from students’ home language(s).
Multilingual Learner notes in the Teacher’s Edition provide differentiated strategies for helping students read the selection and complete core tasks.
An additional Language Support lesson, which includes a suggested language target for this selection, is available on Realize.
Transition into English
Make a summary of the text available to students in their home language(s).
Assign the text in the Interactive Student Edition. There, students can use the eText Translation tool and receive translation support for more than 100 languages.”
Each of these suggestions supports some MLLs in making meaning of The Declaration of Independence. Previewing the text and providing translation options for those students who are literate in their home language are both helpful strategies, but do not amplify or enrich the text to provide greater depth, clarity, or complexity to support comprehension and language development. The Language Support Lesson, a supplementary lesson separate from core instruction and found on the Realize platform, most closely aligns with amplifying language structures and forms. In this lesson, students zoom in on three paragraphs to detect archaic diction, syntax, and punctuation using various strategies to comprehend the text. The strategies provided, however, rely mostly on teacher explanations of vocabulary, rather than other means of enhancing and enriching the text.
Additional supports are available for students using the digital Realize Reader, including audio, text translation, and the Language Coach. At the beginning of each text, teachers are guided to “Encourage students to use Language Coach in the Interactive Student Edition for point-of-use support with:
Word, sentence, and discourse levels of language
language comprehension development
knowledge building
These features provide some amplification of texts, but are often linguistically demanding themselves. For example, in Grade 9, Unit 2, students read Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. At the end of paragraph 2, the Language Coach provides the following information for students: “Sometimes writers use figurative language to make their writing vivid and memorable. In paragraph 2, Dr. King calls the Emancipation Proclamation a ‘great beacon light of hope.’ A beacon light is a signal that helps guide others, such as a lighthouse that guides ships safely to shore. To be ‘seared in flames’ means to be burned and withered, like meat. Here, Dr. King is showing the harsh, painful effects of injustice on enslaved people and the bright hope that the Emancipation Proclamation promised.” This explanation is followed by a paraphrased version of the paragraph. While the Language Coach provides valuable information unpacking the figurative language in this paragraph, this explanation may not be accessible to many MLLs, particularly those at lower proficiency levels, due to the length and linguistic complexity. Similarly, hyperlinked definitions for individual words may prove less supportive when the definitions are not student-friendly. For example, in the same text, in paragraph 14, the word “redemptive” is hyperlinked to the definition “serving to deliver from sorrow or to make amends.” Students do have the opportunity to translate these words and their definitions into fourteen different languages, providing an additional point of access for students literate in those languages. Definitions are also available in audio form in both English and Spanish. The interactive reader offers some instances of text amplification and support, but these benefits are limited to students who are able to access their linguistic complexity and have the necessary technology to use the Realize Reader instead of the student edition textbook.
While the materials provide some support to aid comprehension, they rarely enrich or amplify English language structures and forms. Bridge Texts and adapted materials often significantly reduce text complexity and limit exposure to authentic academic language. The engineering of the Bridge Texts sometimes inadvertently excludes MLLs from key instructional tasks like Close Reads. This approach reflects a missed opportunity to amplify grade-level texts through text engineering rather than simplify them. Overall, the materials provide only sporadic amplification of texts, missing opportunities to support language development through rigorous, scaffolded engagement with complex texts.
Indicator 2d
Text sets (e.g., unit, module) are organized around topic(s) or theme(s) to cohesively build student knowledge.
The text set organization in myPerspectives materials meets expectations for indicator 2d. The curriculum structures text sets around grade-appropriate themes and essential questions, ensuring a cohesive approach to knowledge building. Each unit spans multiple genres and incorporates academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax to deepen student understanding. The curriculum follows a structured progression from Whole-Class Learning to Peer-Group Learning and Independent Learning, allowing students to engage with texts in varied contexts. Throughout myPerspectives units, students address facets of the same topic or theme through various texts across multiple genres. This design encourages critical thinking and analysis by presenting multiple perspectives on a central theme, supporting cross-disciplinary connections in social studies, science, and literature. As students progress through each unit, they develop their own perspectives on the essential question by reading various perspectives on the topic or theme. All tasks throughout the unit lead to the Performance-Based Assessment, where students have the opportunity to show the culmination of their learning and present their response to the essential question.
Text sets are organized around a grade-appropriate, tightly-connected topic or theme.
Each myPerspectives unit is organized by a grade-appropriate topic or theme. The unit’s essential question also connects text sets. Students respond to the essential questions in the Unit Performance-Based Assessment of each unit.
Grade 9:
Unit 1 Focus: Survival. Essential Question: What qualities help us survive?
Unit 2 Focus: Promise and Progress. Essential Question: How can words inspire change?
Unit 3 Focus: Crazy, Stupid Love. Essential Question: What is true love?
Unit 4 Focus: Journeys of Transformation. Essential Question: How do we learn who we truly are?
Unit 5 Focus: The Things We Make. Essential Question: Which defines us more, nature or technology?
Grade 10:
Unit 1 Focus: Extending Freedom’s Reach. Essential Question: What is the relationship between power and freedom?
Unit 2 Focus: Inside the Nightmare. Essential Question: What is the allure of fear?
Unit 3 Focus: Outsiders and Outcasts. Essential Question: How important is it to belong?
Unit 4 Focus: Virtue and Vengeance. Essential Question: What motivates us to forgive?
Unit 5 Focus: All that Glitters. Essential Question: What do our possessions reveal about us?
Grade 11: American Literature
Unit 1 Focus: Writing Freedom: Words that Shaped a Nation. Essential Question: What makes a nation?
Unit 2 Focus: The Individual and Society: Fitting In, or Standing Out? Essential Question: Which matters more, individuality or community?
Unit 3 Focus: Leaders and Visionaries: Charting a New Path. Essential Question: How do words change the world?
Unit 4 Focus: Girt and Grandeur: The Importance of Place. Essential Question: How are we shaped by the places we experience?
Unit 5 Focus: The Threat of “The Other”: Facing Our Fears. Essential Question: How does fear drive decisions?
Unit 6 Focus: The Past Meets the Present: Navigating Change. Essential Question: How do we react when the world changes?
Grade 12: British Literature
Unit 1 Focus: Forging a Hero: Warriors and Leaders. Essential Question: What makes a hero?
Unit 2 Focus: Reflecting on Society: A Critical Lens. Essential Question: How valid are social roles?
Unit 3 Focus: The Trap of Time: Facing the Future, Confronting the Past. Essential Question: How much does the past determine the future?
Unit 4 Focus: Seeing Things New: Visionaries and Skeptics. Essential Question: What do we gain when we change our perceptions?
Unit 5 Focus: Discovering the Self: Individual, Nature, and Society. Essential Question: How do we define ourselves?
Unit 6 Focus: Exile and Belonging: Finding Home. Essential Question: What does it mean to call a place “home”?
Text set organization provides opportunities for students to address facets of the same topic or theme over an extended period (e.g., a unit, module), enabling the development of deeper knowledge. Text sets cohesively build knowledge across various topics in social studies (including history), science, the arts, and literature, exposing students to academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax.
myPerspectives units are structured so that students address facets of the same topic or theme through various texts. All units start with Whole-Class Learning, which is more teacher-supported. Then, units move into Peer-Group Learning, where learning is done in small groups. Lastly, units include Independent Learning, where students select text(s) they’d like to read and analyze to investigate the topic/theme further. In each of these unit components, students read various texts, and this structure supports students in building deep knowledge of the topics/themes of study.
myPerspectives unit text sets span varied genres throughout each unit; text sets cover topics and themes through multiple lenses across multiple genres. Through the text sets, the materials expose students to academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax.
In Grade 12, Unit 2, students study the unit Reflecting on Society: A Critical Lens, with the essential question, “How valid are social roles?” Throughout this unit, students focus on academic vocabulary words for explanatory texts, including annotation, theoretical, prescribe, conviction, and tenacious. As part of the Unit Introduction, they watch a short video, “Clean Streets,” where two sanitation workers discuss the important role they play in their communities. Then, they read a Mentor Text, “To Be or Not to Be…a Monarchy,” an explanatory text that presents arguments for and against the abolition of the monarchy and explains the United Kingdom’s government so that students can begin to consider “challenging accepted social practices.” Throughout this unit, students read texts in the disciplines of history, literature, and the arts. In Whole-Class Learning, students read a short historical text that provides context for the historical time period discussed throughout the unit. Next, students read three texts. First, they read The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, which presents critiques of social roles in medieval England. This text includes vocabulary and references that are unfamiliar to students and is written in “rhyming couplets in iambic pentameter.” Then, students read “The Prologue from the Canterbury Tales: The Remix” by Patience Agbabi, a spoken word poem that “helps students understand the context of the Canterbury Tales,” and “The Wife and Bath’s Tale” by Geoffrey Chaucer, where students learn about the gender expectations in medieval England. In the Peer-Group Learning portion of the unit, students read five texts, “Why Are There Stars?” by Megan Gerber, an article which explains how celebrities came to be described as stars so that students can reflect on how they view celebrities, the short story, “The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees” by E. Lily Yu, an allegory about the struggle for power between countries and societies, “Shakespeare’s Sister” by Virginia Woolf, which raises the question on the treatment of women throughout British history, and “On Seeing England for the First Time” by Jamaica Kincaid and “XXXII from Midsummer” by Derek Walcott, which both provide students “insights about the detrimental effects of British rule on people of color, both in England and in societies the British once colonized.” “Shakespeare’s Sister” includes “unconventional, fragmented sentences and some figurative language.” In the Independent Learning portion of the unit, students have a choice of reading five texts: an excerpt from “An Interview with Benjamin Zephaniah” where the poet discusses his identity and how British society views Black poetry, a poem “The British,” which discusses the diversity in British society, an excerpt from The Pillow Book where the author discusses their experiences, two poems, “The Widow at Windsor” by Rudyard Kipling and “From Lucy, Englan’ Lady” by James Berry, which illustrate Queen Victoria from two different lenses, and an excerpt from “Doubly Denied” by Cristina Henriquez, an essay where the author presents their experience with ambition. Throughout this text set, students have the opportunity to repeatedly consider the essential question and develop their own perspectives on social roles. At the end of the unit, students complete their Performance-Based Assessment, an explanatory essay on the essential question.
Indicator 2e
Materials include a range of texts and provide teacher support in helping students learn about people who are similar to and different from them.
Criterion 2.2: Knowledge Building Through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are meaningful, evidence-based, and support students in making meaning and building knowledge as they progress toward grade-level mastery of literacy skills.
Materials include clear, explicit instruction guidance for teachers across all literacy skills.
The myPerspectives materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 2.2: Knowledge-Building through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension. The instructional design is grounded in research-based practices and includes a consistent structure that integrates reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Although daily lessons are well-structured, the overall volume of instructional material exceeds the time available in a typical school year, and the materials do not include guidance on how teachers should adapt the amount of instructional material to fit their local needs. Materials offer a variety of text-based questions and assignments that promote deep analysis, including close reading and writing tasks that require textual evidence. Students regularly engage in collaborative and evidence-based conversations, although lesson-specific teacher guidance for discussions is absent. Vocabulary instruction is explicit and well-supported, with consistent opportunities for students to practice newly introduced words and apply independent word-learning strategies. Grammar and sentence composition instruction is embedded throughout units, with activities tied to texts and writing tasks. Students are given frequent opportunities to write both on-demand and through extended process writing, with clear connections to unit themes and genres. Instruction in writing processes partially meets expectations, with strong support for essay-level writing but limited emphasis on paragraph-level instruction and teacher use of rubrics. Students use graphic organizers, checklists, and digital tools to engage in structured writing processes, including planning, drafting, revising, and publishing. Frequent evidence-based writing tasks support students in developing claims and arguments grounded in texts. Research opportunities are consistently provided and connected to unit content, but explicit instruction in research skills is limited. Formative and summative assessments are well-integrated, with tools for tracking progress, though teacher guidance on using rubrics and evaluating projects is not always detailed.
Indicator 2f
Materials include a clear, research-based core instructional pathway with reasonable pacing throughout the year, which allows students to work towards grade-level proficiency.
The instructional pathway outlined in myPerspectives materials partially meets expectations for indicator 2f. The program is grounded in accepted research-based practices and features an integrated instructional design that builds literacy skills through a consistent structure across all units. Each unit follows a predictable sequence—including Whole-Class Learning, Peer-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance-Based Assessments—supporting skill development across reading, writing, speaking, and listening. The Teacher Edition provides detailed planning tools such as Unit at a Glance documents and lesson-specific pacing guides with standards, objectives, activities, and resource keys. The program also includes customization tools with targeted guidance and supplemental materials to support all learners. These resources help teachers adapt instruction based on student needs. While some guidance for supplemental materials is provided, additional supplemental materials do not include guidance, leaving their use up to the teacher's discretion. Although daily lessons are well-structured, the overall volume of instructional material exceeds the time available in a typical school year, depending on the school’s literacy block length. Additionally, the materials do not guide how teachers should adapt the amount of instructional material to fit their local needs.
Materials clearly outline the essential elements for the core instructional pathway. Materials clearly explain how to use and implement the core instructional pathway, which does not deviate from currently accepted research.
The front matter of the Teacher Edition details the program's core components. Each unit follows the same structure: Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning (culminating in the Writing Performance Task), Peer-Group Learning (culminating in the Speaking and Listening Performance Task), Independent Learning, Reflection and Response (where students complete the Unit Project and reflect), and Performance-Based Assessment.
The Teacher Edition includes a Unit at a Glance Document for each unit, which consists of a table that outlines the unit’s pacing, the genre and Lexile of each selection, the text elements the unit focuses on, the reading strategy for each selection, the vocabulary/word study focus for each selection, the author’s craft/conventions focus for each selection, and the writing/research/speaking & listening task for each selection, when applicable. Teachers should use the Unit at a Glance to “easily map the standards and skills in myPerspectives to [their] own curriculum.”
Each lesson overview page includes the “objectives, standards, pacing, and resources for instruction and assessment.” This document contains a Pacing at a Glance table, which lists the major components of each lesson and splits the lesson pacing into the number of 40-50-minute class periods needed to complete each component. Following the Pacing at a Glance table, the document lists all the activities (separated by program component) that students will complete within the lesson, in order (including any optional resources). An Additional Resources table is provided, which lists additional resources for both teacher and student use. Lastly, the document includes a Resources Key so that teachers can easily identify each component in a lesson. The key is separated into eight components: activities, books/readers, practice, video/audio, assessment, teacher support, presentations, and program resources.
Overall, most of the myPerspectives program's components align with current research, and the program follows an integrated instructional approach across all literacy components. Expert Perspectives notes throughout the Teacher Edition connect research/best practices from educational experts to the materials.
When present, some supplemental materials are designed to work coherently with the core instructional pathway. Materials provide some detailed explanations of when and how to use supplemental materials so that all students can access grade-level materials.
The Teacher Edition includes a Digital Resources to Customize document at the start of each unit. This document lists optional resources teachers can use to “activate learning, engage students, and customize lessons.” The document includes rhetorical guiding questions for teachers and supplemental materials in response to these questions.
“‘What if my students struggle with the on-level text? Bridge texts enable students to ramp up to on-level texts. The materials then list some of the bridge texts for the unit.
What if I want to use podcasts to provide background? Students can learn about what’s going on in the world while they develop listening comprehension skills. Listenwise unit-aligned podcasts [include]. The materials then list the podcasts available for the unit.
What if I want to use media to activate student interest in texts? The materials provide Hook & Inspire texts.
What if my students need background or independent reading opportunities? The materials list different strategies and resources available for the unit.
What if my students need more writing practice? The materials list the digital writing lessons that would be useful for students for the unit.
What if my students need more grammar practice? The materials list interactive grammar mini-lessons that would be useful for students for the unit.
What if I want to teach a different standard? The materials suggest teachers “use Standards Practice pages to reinforce a concept or teach a standard of [their] own choosing.”
What if I want to incorporate novels? The materials list optional novels (with their corresponding Book Club Guides) that are aligned to the unit.’”
While the materials include the above guidance for some of the supplemental materials for each unit, there are additional supplemental materials in the Skills Center that the Teacher Edition does not include guidance on when to use. Therefore, it is up to teachers to decide if and when to use those supplemental materials.
Materials provide implementation schedules, including lesson-specific guidance, that are well-paced, allowing students to dive deeply into content. However, the implementation schedule may not be reasonably be completed in the school year.
Each Unit Overview includes an overall Pacing Plan for the Unit, and each Lesson Overview includes a Pacing Plan for the lesson. Each day of instruction is considered to be one 40-50 minute instructional block. If each 40-50 minute block is a day of instruction:
Grade 9 materials include instruction for 208-218 instructional days
Grade 10 materials include instruction for 204-214 instructional days
Grade 11 materials include instruction for 260-270 instructional days
Grade 12 materials include instruction for 246-256 instructional days
While individual lessons appear well paced, given the amount of instructional material in the program, whether or not each grade level’s materials can be completed in one school year would depend on the school schedule, including more than 40-50 minutes of literacy instructional time per day.
The materials do not include guidance on how teachers should adapt the amount of instructional material to fit their local needs and number of instructional days. Given the amount of material in the program, teachers would have to decide what to cut from the program, which may change the instructional pathway.
Indicator 2g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-based, allowing students to demonstrate their thinking in various formats.
The questions, tasks, and assignments in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2g. The materials provide opportunities for students to engage deeply with texts through text-based questions. Each reading lesson includes Reading Strategy Questions, Comprehension Questions, and First Thoughts Questions that support students in making meaning of the text during their first read, as well as Close Read questions that support students in deepening their understanding of the text during and after their targeted second read. After reading, students complete various questions, tasks, and assignments that require them to answer in different formats, including speaking and listening activities, answering multiple-choice questions, and writing short and long-form responses.
Materials provide opportunities to support students in making meaning of the texts being studied through text-based questions and tasks that require students to answer in varying formats (e.g., speaking, writing, etc.).
myPerspectives materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions for students to complete during reading. During a first read, students read for enjoyment and general comprehension. Comprehension question types include Reading Strategy Questions and Comprehension Check Questions. After this first read, students complete a First Thoughts assignment where they answer one to two questions on the text in writing and then discuss it in small groups.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, Students read The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka. First, students read the text for comprehension and enjoyment. During this read, students answer Comprehension Check and Readon and Reread questions, which is the reading strategy for this text. Some of these questions are:
“Comprehension Check: Into what kind of creature has Gregor Kafka been transformed?
Read On and Reread: Re-read paragraphs 11-14. What is happening in these paragraphs?
Read On and Reread: Why is Gregor worried about the manager leaving? Identify details in paragraph 37 that clarify the situation.
Comprehension Check: What causes Gregor to feel physically well for the first time that day?
Read On and Reread: Reread paragraph 55. Prior to his transformation, how does Kafka help his family financially?
Read On and Reread: Reread paragraph 67 and consider Grete’s portrayal at the beginning of the story. How has she changed?”
After this first read, students answer one of the First Thoughts questions below and discuss them in small groups.
“What parts of the story surprised you most? Why?
How do you feel about the Samsa family treatment of Gregor? Explain.”
Throughout the program, students complete many tasks and assignments that require them to answer in various formats after completing their reading for the lesson and/or unit. These tasks focus on various parts of literacy components such as Vocabulary, Reading Analysis, Evidence Logs, Writing, Speaking & Listening, Inquiry and Research, and Language. Students answer in short or long-form writing, through various types of academic discussions, and by selecting multiple-choice answers.
Materials include text-based questions and tasks that require students to closely read and/or re-read complex parts of texts to deepen their analysis and understanding.
myPerspectives materials include Close-Read questions and tasks during and after reading. These questions help students deepen their analysis of the text under study. Students complete Close-Reading questions during and after their targeted second read of the text. The program also includes general Nonfiction and Fiction Close-Read Guides, which are graphic organizers that students can use to close-read texts depending on their genre.
In Grade 12, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read a poetry collection that includes the poems “Ode to a Nightingale” by John Keat, “Ode to the West Wind” by Percy Bysshe Shelley, and “Apostrophe to the Ocean” by Lord Byron. During their second read, students complete the following close reading questions:
“Close Reading: Annotate: In Stanza III, identify details that suggest negative aspects of human life. Question: Why might it be important to the speaker that the nightingale has ‘never known’ about those aspects of human life?
Close Reading: Annotate: Identify key details in stanza IV that refer to death. Question: What do these details reveal about the speaker’s attitude toward death?
Close Reading: Annotate: Identify the word that ends stanza VII and begins stanza VIII. Question: In what way does the repetition of this word help express a change in the speaker?
Close Reading: Annotate: Identify rhyming words at the end of lines in part III. Question: What pattern or rhyme is the poet using, and how does it add to the poem’s musical effect, power, and beauty?
Close Reading: Annotate: Identify details in part IV in which the speaker compares himself to something else. Question: What conclusion can you draw about the speaker, based on these comparisons?”
After reading, students complete the following multiple-choice close reading questions:
Close Read:
“Which answer best describes the structure of the poem?
Based on lines 43-56, the reader can logically infer that the speaker…
In line 22, zenith’s height most likely refers to…”
Indicator 2g.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in text-based questions, tasks, and assignments, as well as the demonstration of their thinking in various formats.
The instructional materials in Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in text-based questions, tasks, and assignments, as well as the demonstration of their thinking in various formats. While the materials include some targeted supports, such as differentiated strategies for students at light, moderate, or substantial levels of English proficiency, these supports often occur in isolation from core instruction and do not consistently align with the academic tasks assigned to the broader student group.
In many instances, MLL-specific activities differ significantly from those assigned to the rest of the class. As a result, MLLs have fewer opportunities to engage meaningfully with peers in shared academic discourse. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Metamorphosis,” by Franz Kafka. In the first read, students read the text for basic comprehension and enjoyment. Reading Strategy and Comprehension Check questions provide supports as they read.”However, the materials do not provide MLL-specific supports for these questions. One of the Read On and Reread questions, the reading strategy for this text, does include general differentiation suggestions in the Teacher Facing Notes; however, there are no linguistic scaffolds or other MLL strategies provided to meet the needs of linguistically diverse students. During the second read, students respond to the Close Read notes. The first Close Read note guides students to identify details that relate to Gregor’s physical transformation in paragraphs 3-5, and asks the question, “Why does Kafka devote so much more space to Gregor’s thoughts than to his physical change?” The Differentiation – Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Facing Notes on this page directs teachers to “Help students use prior experiences to understand the selection.” Each of the three levels of support focuses on helping students make personal connections to Gregor’s feelings and actions. However, the call-out box does not provide any support to help students answer the Close Read Question tied to core instruction. There are thirteen additional Close Read Questions throughout the remainder of the text, but none are accompanied by a Differentiation – Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Facing Notes.
Furthermore, the Differentiate – Multilingual Learners call-out boxes frequently suggest supports that do not align with what the rest of the class is working on, resulting in tasks for MLL students that are not only different but also disconnected from the main instructional flow. For example, in Grade 9, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Act III,” the Close Read Note for the second read instructs all students to annotate scene i, lines 90–101, identifying examples of Mercutio’s wordplay and jokes, and to respond to the question, “What emotional effects does Mercutio’s wordplay have in this speech?” The Differentiate – Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “have students demonstrate their comprehension by summarizing the text in their own words,” with a focus on lines 93–101. The leveled supports all assist students in summarizing the section that the rest of the class is analyzing for literary effect. While checking MLLs’ comprehension is important, these supports do not extend to helping students engage in the grade-level analytical work required by the Close Read question. These design choices can lead to different academic outcomes for different groups of students.
While the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes in the Teacher Facing Notes do address text-dependent questions, they do not provide supports that facilitate MLLs’ full and complete participation in answering the questions. For example, in Grade 11, Unit 3, Analyze and Interpret, Declaration of Sentiments, the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box guides teachers to “Help students read the text and answer the Close Read questions. Review ways students can get support: ask questions, respond to questions, discuss ideas in a text to clarify meaning, and ask about unfamiliar words.” The leveled supports focus on developing MLLs’ ability to ask for support, not their ability to read the text and answer the close read questions. For teachers to implement that aspect of the guidance, they would have to create those supports themselves.
Additionally, the materials provide support for comprehension, such as vocabulary glossaries or WIDA alignment references, but lack clear instructional guidance or integration into core lesson routines, including text-based questions, tasks, and assignments. Without consistent scaffolds that build toward grade-level work or help MLLs navigate and complete complex, text-dependent tasks, opportunities to demonstrate thinking across speaking, listening, reading, and writing are limited. As a result, although the materials do allow for some MLL engagement in some text-based questions and tasks, they fall short of ensuring full and complete participation alongside peers in rigorous, text-based academic work.
Indicator 2h
Materials support students in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through opportunities to analyze and evaluate texts.
The analysis opportunities in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2h. The materials provide numerous opportunities for students to analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure and the integration of knowledge and ideas within and across texts. Students engage with text-specific questions to examine texts for various layers of meaning. Lessons include tasks that require students to analyze how authors develop meaning, intentionally structure their texts, and draw connections to other media. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require students to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the written Performance-Based Assessment (a written task). These tasks promote comprehension by encouraging students to deepen their analysis consistently.
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in making meaning.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete various tasks and questions that prompt them to analyze key ideas and details to make meaning of the texts under study within individual texts and across multiple texts. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require them to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the Performance-Based Assessment.
In Grade 9, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students read a collection of poetry, including “I Am Offering This Poem” by Jimmy Santiago Baca, “The Forest for the Trees” by Reina Priest, and “blessing the boats” by Lucille Clifton. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the poems. One of these tasks requires students to analyze the poems in order for the development of themes. The “Development of Theme” task provides a definition of theme and three ways it can be developed in poetry. Then, the task requires students to answer the following questions:
(a) “In ‘I Am Offering this Poem,’ what statement does the poet repeat? (a) How does the imagery support this statement? (b) What theme does the repetition help to express?
(a) Summarize: In ‘The Forest for the Trees,’ each stanza describes a lesson the speaker learned from the trees. Summarize the lesson of each stanza. (b) Interpret: What overall lesson or theme does the poem express?
(a) Which words repeat in lines 6, 9, and 12 of ‘blessing the boat’? (b) Connect: How are these words a reflection of the poem’s title? (c) Interpret: What is the speaker hoping or gently commanding? What is one theme the poem expresses?
Interpret: Explain how the following elements function as symbols in two of the poems. What does each one represent, and how is that meaning related to the poem’s theme? (a) ‘The Forest for the Trees’: a bicycle, a street sign, and a chainsaw (b) ‘blessing the boats’: the water”
After this task, students participate in a group discussion where one of their prompt options is to compare these themes. The prompt states, “Compare and contrast what the three poems suggest about the qualities and skills one needs to thrive rather than just survive.”
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in making meaning.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete various tasks and questions that prompt them to analyze craft and structure to make meaning of the texts under study. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require them to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the written Performance-Based Assessment.
In Grade 10, Unit 5, Peer-Group Learning, students read “In La Rinconada, Peru, Searching for Beauty in Ugliness” by Marie Arana. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the story. One of these tasks requires students to analyze the imagery in the text. The “Author’s Style: Imagery” task provides a definition of imagery with examples from the text. Then, the task requires students to work independently and
“Choose examples of imagery in the article. Identify the senses in which each example appeals and explain how it helps to develop Arana’s ideas. Gather as a group to discuss your responses.”
In Grade 11, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from “Life on the Mississippi” by Mark Twain. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the text. One of these tasks require students to analyze the author’s purpose. The “Author’s Purpose” task provides a definition of the author’s purpose, anecdotes, humorous descriptions, and social commentary, as well as a summary of how these facets exist in Twain’s text. Then, the task require students to answer the following questions:
“(a) Distinguish: In paragraph 3, does Twain describe the town and steamboat neutrally, humorously, or with a mixture of plain fact and humor? Explain. (b) Analyze: What purpose or purposes does the description serve?
Interpret: What social comment about the values of the town’s boys does Twain offer in paragraph 4?
Analyze: Record examples of humorous descriptions from the text. Explain the informative purpose each example serves.
Interpret: What larger social comment or point of view about human nature do the passages you recorded in item 3 help Twain express? Explain.”
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in deepening their understanding on a topic.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete various tasks and questions that prompt them to analyze the integration of knowledge and to make meaning of the texts under study. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require them to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the Performance-Based Assessment.
In Grade 12, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Macbeth and listen to both L.A. Theater Works’ and LibriVox’s performances of Act V, Scene I. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the play. One of these tasks require students to analyze multiple interpretations of the drama. The “Analysis” task requires students to compare the performances. Students answer the following questions:
(a) Compare and Contrast: What is the major difference between the pacing of the LibriVox and the L.A. Theater Works recordings? (b) Evaluate: What effect does this difference have on your understanding of the scene?
(a) Interpret: Which of these recordings, if either, evokes more sympathy for Lady Macbeth? Explain. (b) Analyze: What aspects of the performance evoke an emotional response in the listener?
Compare and Contrast: What was different about listening to the lines compared to reading them? Consider the use of sound effects, editing, and pacing in your answer.”
Indicator 2h.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through their full and complete participation in opportunities to analyze and evaluate texts.
The instructional materials reviewed for grades 9–12 of myPerspectives partially meet the expectations for providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through their full and complete participation in opportunities to analyze and evaluate text. While supports for MLLs are present in some units and lessons, they are inconsistently applied across grade levels and are often limited to surface-level language access rather than deeply supporting students’ full and complete participation in analyzing and evaluating complex texts.
The materials provide occasional language support for MLLs through vocabulary previewing, word study, differentiated instructions, and translation tools. However, these supports are not systematically embedded throughout the program and often fail to connect language scaffolding with the deeper comprehension and analysis required by grade-level texts and tasks. The Teacher Edition includes differentiated supports across three levels—substantial, moderate, and light. While these scaffolds help MLL students access key vocabulary and meaning, they sometimes occur in isolation from the core task, which may lead to a fragmented experience rather than full integration.
At the beginning of each unit, in the Unit Introduction, the materials provide teachers with a Language Checkpoint - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition. These Language Checkpoint call-out boxes provide options for matching MLLs to supports for each language domain (reading, listening, writing, and speaking) throughout the unit. Based on their performance on the QuickWrites and Icebreakers in the Unit Introduction, teachers are guided to match students with substantial, moderate, or light supports found in the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes in the Teacher Edition. The guidance for teachers provided often helps MLL students access key vocabulary and meaning, which sometimes supports their analysis of the text. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 1, “Harrison Bergeron,” students complete their first read of the text “for basic comprehension and enjoyment,” do a close read for the second read, and respond to the Close Read notes. The readings are followed by a “Build Insight” activity, including a peer discussion of First Thoughts, summarizing for a comprehension check, and answering analysis questions. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition is connected with the Build Insight activity guides teachers to “Support students in demonstrating comprehension of the story as they respond to the Build Insight questions.” The differentiated supports for the Substantial level focus on basic comprehension support: paraphrasing questions and explaining vocabulary like state or circumstances. Moderate/Light Support suggests that MLL students work in pairs as they read and respond to the questions and look up any unfamiliar words. Meanwhile, the analysis questions in the Build Insight activity ask all students to analyze societal themes and make inferences, neither of which is directly facilitated by the comprehension supports provided for MLLs.
Mentor texts and differentiated support boxes offer scaffolds like sentence frames or paraphrasing strategies for reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks. For example, in Grade 12, Unit 4, students read a novel excerpt from Gulliver’s Travels. The Speaking and Listening Assignment connected to this reading is for all students to “Write and present a persuasive speech about the power of satire. Develop a claim addressing these questions: Can satire contribute to social change? Are any of its powers dangerous? Should satire be unchecked, or should it be regulated? Support your claim with valid reasoning and evidence.” The first step for students is to “Conduct Research: Review examples of recent and historical satire (You may find examples of modern-day satire in sketch comedy, which often holds up people, events, and institutions to ridicule.) Determine the target of the satire and whether it led to actual social change.” Students then formulate their claims, organize and write their speeches, and rehearse and deliver them. In preparation for this presentation, the Differentiate – Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “Support students as they plan their speeches. Help them to include specificity and detail in their arguments.” Both the Substantial and Moderate level supports suggest providing the sentence frame “In my view, _____. I think this because _____.” Light support has students work in pairs to discuss specific details. While this guidance supports learning language forms and structure, it is not clearly tied to core opportunities to analyze or evaluate satirical texts.
Similarly, the Bridge Texts provide simplified and shortened versions of the core texts with vocabulary and audio support to help MLLs better understand the material. They serve as a helpful tool for accessibility, especially for SIFE/SLIFE students or those at lower proficiency levels. However, these texts are largely summarized, limiting MLL students’ exposure to rich academic language structures and nuanced ideas present in the original texts. The abridged nature and limited rigor of the Bridge Texts may compromise opportunities for deeper analysis of original texts.
While some units include differentiated supports that scaffold student understanding toward grade-level expectations (e.g., sentence frames, partner discussions, word walls), these strategies are not always embedded within the core academic tasks. Instead, they may redirect MLLs into alternate activities or simplified content, which can hinder their full and complete participation. For example, in Grade 9, Unit 2, all students read “I Have a Dream” first for basic comprehension and enjoyment, and then complete a close read. One Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box accompanies this selection. It includes guidance for teachers to help students identify the present perfect tense across three levels of support. However, the materials do not help students connect the grammatical form to King’s rhetorical message, which is a focus of the core instruction, missing a critical opportunity to link language structure to textual meaning, which is central to text analysis.
Similarly, Bridge Texts—summarized or simplified versions of core readings—offer audio and translation features, allowing students to highlight and annotate texts. While these are helpful for initial comprehension, the simplified nature of the Bridge Texts can limit MLLs’ exposure to authentic complex language, reducing opportunities to engage with nuanced ideas or literary analysis.
Throughout the materials, MLL students are provided with opportunities to engage in structured academic discourse. However, even when academic discourse is explicitly encouraged, the supports provided are often limited to helping students ask clarification questions, rather than fully participating in analytical dialogue about the text’s themes or arguments. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 1, Peer Group Learning, after reading “Harrison Bergeron,” the task is to discuss the following question: “In what ways do laws both protect and limit personal freedom?” The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “Help students seek clarification of spoken language during the group discussion. Explain that if students do not understand something they hear, they can ask questions, ask a speaker to repeat a statement, or ask a speaker to speak more slowly.” The recommendations that follow for Substantial, Moderate, and Light support all focus on clarifying meaning rather than analysis related to the question under discussion.
Although the materials do not consistently provide strategies and supports, they offer some opportunities and guidance for MLLs to develop their ability to comprehend complex ideas and analyze texts. Support is differentiated through a three-tiered structure (Substantial, Moderate, Light) based on language proficiency. Vocabulary instruction incorporates varied approaches, including home language connections, visual support, and context-based analysis. MLLs regularly engage in reading, writing, and discussion, especially in reflection and narrative tasks. While MLL support is not fully integrated into every lesson, the materials include thoughtful scaffolds that promote content access. These reflect a growing awareness of MLL needs but would benefit from greater consistency and stronger alignment with rigorous tasks. Additionally, the simplified format of the Bridge Texts limits opportunities for MLLs to engage in deeper analysis of complex texts.
Indicator 2i
Materials include structured protocols and teacher guidance that frequently allow students to engage in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The discussion protocols and teacher guidance in myPerspectives materials partially meet expectations for indicator 2i. The program includes various types of discussion types, allowing students to use background knowledge, textual evidence, and ideas to deepen their thinking. While text-based discussions are present throughout the program, the program only includes a few structured, repeated protocols. While the platform provides resources for Speaking and Listening activities, these resources are not consistently reinforced in the Teacher Editions and rely on teacher discretion for implementation. Although the Teacher Edition offers general guidance on setting up discussions, it lacks lesson-specific guidance for monitoring and providing feedback, which may limit teachers’ ability to facilitate and support meaningful discussions effectively.
Materials include some structured protocols that support students in participating in various types of discussions.
The myPerspectives program includes opportunities for students to engage in various types of discussions throughout the course. The discussions require students to use evidence, background knowledge, and their ideas to propel their thinking. The types of discussions included in the program are:
Partner Discussions
Group Discussions
Class Discussions
Discussion Boards
Debates
The Build Insight activities that follow reading in the program, the Teacher Edition references a Discussion Routine that includes three steps. Teachers are to encourage students to follow this routine during any discussion. The routine states, “Expand on peers’ comments, building on ideas and details. Summarize peers’ comments to clarify ideas. Ask questions to deepen the discussion.”
In all Speaking and Listening activities, materials provide instructions to students on how the activity will work and general tips for speaking effectively. In addition, the Teacher Edition includes guidance for teachers on how to set students up for each discussion.
Some examples of the type of discussion opportunities in the program are:
In Grade 9, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. After reading Act IV, they complete various tasks, including a debate. For this debate, students pair up and plan their arguments using logical reasoning and textual evidence to defend their claims and challenge counterclaims. Then, students debate another pair of students. They must evaluate each speaker’s reasoning. Before the debate, teachers provide guidance on how to debate appropriately, including the following reminder in the materials: “Communicate Effectively: As you deliver your argument, speak at a comfortable pace, neither too fast or too slow. Likewise, use natural gestures to reflect your emotions or to emphasize ideas.” After the debate, students complete an evaluation guide where they rate debaters’ skills on statements like “Debaters supported their point of view with strong reasoning and relevant evidence. They did not use logical fallacies.”
In Grade 12, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read Megan Garber’s “Why Are They ‘Stars’?” After reading, they complete various tasks, including a group research-based discussion. Students work with their groups to engage in a research-based discussion using both the text and brief informal research, drawing on knowledge and evidence from both. Before the discussion, teachers provide students with guidance, including: “Prepare: Prompt students to organize their talking points in an order that makes sense to them.” After the discussion, students cement their learning by summarizing the conversation and restating the new ideas they gained.
In the Peer-Group Learning component for each unit, materials include Accountable Talk suggestions that students should use while working with their peers. These suggestions are:
“Remember to… Ask clarifying questions. Which sounds like…
Can you please repeat what you said?
Would you give me an example?
I think you said ____. Did I understand you correctly?
Remember to… Explain your thinking. Which sounds like…
I believe ______ is true because _______.
I feel _______ because _______.
Remember to…Build on the ideas of others. Which sounds like…
When _______ said _______, it made me think of ________.”
On the Savvas Realize platform, in the Getting Started section, materials include a training link that includes a document titled “Routines to Support Teaching and Learning.” This document includes speaking and listening routines. However, these routines are not referenced in the Teacher Edition for any specific lesson. Teachers would need to use discretion on when to implement each routine.
On the Savvas Realize platform, the Skills Centers link includes a Speaking and Listening Center. This resource provides assignable mini-lessons on various speaking and listening activities such as debates, interviews, and group discussions. In addition to the Speaking and Listening Center, there is a Collaboration Center that includes videos teachers can use to support students in working together on skills like “Build on the Ideas of Others.” While these resources are present, they are not referenced in the Teacher Edition. Therefore, teachers need to use discretion on when to implement each mini-lesson or video.
Speaking and listening instruction includes some facilitation, monitoring, and feedback guidance for teachers.
The myPerspectives materials include Class-Learning strategies for Whole-Class and Peer-Group Learning that teachers can use to support learning and discussions. For example, the strategies for Whole-Class learning for Grade 11, Unit 2 are “Listen Actively, Clarify by Asking Questions, Monitor Understanding, [and] Interact and Share Ideas.” The Teacher Edition includes a table that includes actions students should take to exhibit these strategies. The Guidance also suggests that teachers lead a class discussion on these strategies and elicit input from students on other actions they can take.
The Teacher Edition includes some facilitation, monitoring, and feedback guidance throughout the program. While the steps teachers should take to set up discussions throughout the program are clear, the guidance for monitoring and feedback is not specific to each lesson’s discussion, which limits teachers’ ability to engage in robust monitoring and feedback.
In Grade 10, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read a collection of poems, including “beware: do not read this poem” by Ishmael Reed, “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe, and “Windigo” by Louise Erdrich. After reading, they complete various tasks, including a panel discussion. The following teacher guidance is provided:
“Panel Discussion: Point out that a panel discussion is a more formal type of discussion in that speakers come prepared with relevant points they want to make.
Develop Your Ideas: Explain to students that in order to formulate a theme about transformation, they must be able to describe it in detail, analyzing both implicit and explicit information from the poem. Their paragraph should include a statement describing their proposed theme.
Conduct the Panel Discussion: Explain to students that while they listen to another speaker, they can jot down words or short phrases to help them remember the point they want to make after the speaker has finished. When it’s their turn to speak, they can develop these notes into sentences that express their complete thoughts.”
The Teacher Edition includes the following guidance regarding monitoring and feedback for the discussion:
“Monitor and Adjust: If students have difficulty listening closely to other speakers, then review listening strategies.”
There is no other guidance on giving feedback to students or monitoring the discussion.
In Grade 11, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Crucible by Arthur Miller. After reading Act II, they complete various tasks, including a partner discussion. The following teacher guidance is provided:
“Discussion: Remind students that a discussion is a give-and-take situation. Both students must participate equally in the discussion to be productive. A discussion won’t be successful if only one person talks or shares ideas.
Prepare for the Discussion: Have students work independently to gather information that they will share in their discussions. Encourage them to make connections between people and events in the play and their own experiences and observations in society today.
Hold the Discussion: Give students strategies for keeping the discussion moving. One person should speak at a time. Both participants should have opportunities to voice their opinions and respond to their partner’s ideas.
Prepare and Present Your Summary: Have partners note the points on which they agree and disagree. Then, encourage them to find evidence to resolve important points of disagreement. Have them review their notes and come to a conclusion about which elements of their discussion they will summarize and share.”
The Teacher Edition includes the following guidance regarding monitoring and feedback for the discussion:
“Monitor and Adjust: If students have difficulty citing evidence during the discussion, then remind them to support their ideas with specific details from the text and events in society.”
There is no other guidance on giving feedback to students or monitoring the discussion.
Indicator 2j
Materials include opportunities that frequently allow students to engage in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The evidence-based discussion opportunities in the myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2j. The curriculum provides frequent opportunities for collaborative conversations about texts, requiring students to use, apply, and incorporate textual evidence. Students engage in discussions after first and second reads, participate in Peer-Group Learning, and complete speaking and listening tasks. While most discussions are informal, structured discussions such as panel discussions and partner debates encourage students to analyze texts deeply. The curriculum also includes prompts for students to consider different perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse, though formal guidance for structured discussions is less frequent. These collaborative activities help students develop critical thinking and textual analysis skills while refining their ability to articulate and support their interpretations.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in collaborative conversations about the text being read, which require them to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources.
Throughout the myPerspectives units, students have many opportunities to engage in collaborative conversations about the texts being read. After completing each first read of the texts, students complete the First Thoughts Activity and then discuss their answers in groups. After completing a second read of each text, students complete several tasks to deepen their understanding and analysis. Some texts provide optional Sharing Perspectives tasks, where teachers can facilitate additional short discussion prompts. Many of the tasks in the materials require students to engage in collaborative conversations in pairs, groups, or as a whole class. While these tasks are present, most of these conversations are informal.
During the Peer-Group Learning parts of each unit, students work with their groups almost the entire time. This peer group structure requires students to engage in collaborative discussions frequently throughout each unit. Before beginning the peer group component of each unit, students go over peer-group learning strategies, such as “support others” and “clarify.” As students dive into the unit, they complete many text-specific tasks that require them to utilize, apply, and incorporate text evidence. These tasks include summaries, short responses to text-based questions, speaking and listening activities, and writing activities.
In Grade 10, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read a collection of poems, including “beware: do not read this poem” by Ishmael Reed, “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe, and “Windigo” by Louise Erdrich. After reading, students engage in a panel discussion where they answer one of the following prompts:
“‘beware: do not read this poem’: Discuss the various transformations the poem describes and consider their connections.
‘The Raven’: Discuss the speaker’s transformation over the course of the poem. Consider whether the speaker is describing actual events or is descending into madness.
‘Windingo’: Discuss the nature of the speaker’s transformation and whether the child, too, undergoes a transformation of some sort.”
Before the panel discussion, students develop their interpretations in their groups and draft paragraph responses. Students must use evidence from the poem to support their responses. During the discussion, students use this textual evidence.
Materials provide opportunities for students to consider others’ perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about texts and topics they are reading.
myPerspectives materials provide opportunities for students to consider others’ perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about the texts and topics of study. While students engage in many discussions as they work through tasks throughout the program, formal discussions with more intentional guidance that ensures students consider others’ perspectives are less frequent.
In Grade 9, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection that includes the poems “Praise Song for a Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, “There Are Birds Here” by Jamaal May, “Who Burns for the Perfection of Paper” by Martin Espada, and “A Center” by Ha Jin. After reading, students participate in a panel discussion to one of three provided prompts. As students hold the discussion, they are to “clarify [their] understandings of each other’s ideas by posing questions [and] responding thoughtfully to questions [they] are asked.” Students are also to “Check [their] understanding of others’ ideas by pausing periodically to summarize the discussion. Then, suggest new connections or conclusions.” By doing these things, the materials guide students to consider others’ perspectives as they engage in conversations about the texts under study.
In Grade 11, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Mark Twain’s Life on the Mississippi. After reading, they participate in a partner discussion on the question, “To which part of the United States does Mark Twains most ‘belong?’” As they discuss, they can reference tips in the materials on how to collaborate effectively, including “sharing their] ideas, findings, and conclusions with each other. Consider each other’s perspectives and assess the strengths and weaknesses of each other’s evidence. Then, resolve any differences and decide [their] agreed-upon answer.” Their goal in this discussion is to deepen their understanding and try to convince their partners.
Indicator 2j.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of consistently providing strategies and supports for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) to fully and completely participate in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading. The materials directly support MLLs in some text-based discussions, but not others.
In some cases, the materials support MLLs in part, but not all, of a text-based discussion. In Grade 10, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read a collection of poems. After reading, students engage in a panel discussion where they answer a prompt about transformation as it is expressed in one of the poems, chosen by the class. The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box supports students’ listening comprehension, but not the linguistic demands of an evidence-based discussion. The call-out box directs teachers to “help students prepare to demonstrate listening comprehension as they respond to questions and requests from the class,” followed by leveled supports:
Substantial: As a class, choose one of the assignment options. Allow students to rehearse responses to questions about their ideas. Ask questions that require single-word or yes/no answers, such as: Is the speaker’s transformation in ‘Windigo’ good or bad? Do you agree?
Moderate: As a class, choose one of the assignment options. Display these questions: Do you agree? Why, or why not? Have small groups of students use these questions to ask about each other’s ideas. Encourage students to answer in complete sentences. Support students as needed by providing sentence starters.
Light: Have students work in small groups to share their opinions about the assignment and consider questions that listeners are likely to ask. Have them prepare responses to these questions.
While these leveled supports touch on some of the language MLLs might need for this discussion, they fail to address the questions posed to all students to support them in developing their own interpretation of the poem, which they then use to draft their opening statement:
Is the transformation physical, emotional, or both?
Is the transformation positive, negative, or neutral?
Which details support your interpretation?
The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box also lacks support for two key conversation moves that the materials highlight for all students for collaborating effectively: Build on Others’ Ideas and Contribute Relevant Information. By targeting only a limited aspect of the discussion, the supports fall short of enabling MLLs’ full and meaningful participation in evidence-based discourse.
In other places, the materials provide no MLL supports at all for evidence-based discussions. For example, in Grade 11, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Mark Twain’s “Life on the Mississippi.” After reading, they participate in a partner discussion on the question, “To which part of the United States does Mark Twain most ‘belong?’” The materials do not provide any guidance for differentiation in general or for MLLs for this activity.
While some lessons include leveled supports that address aspects of academic discourse, such as listening comprehension and simple responses, these supports often do not extend to the full demands of the task, such as interpreting texts, constructing arguments, or using key conversation moves. In other cases, no MLL-specific supports are provided, resulting in inconsistent opportunities for meaningful participation in evidence-based discussions.
Indicator 2k
Materials include explicit instruction on independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words to build knowledge within and across texts.
The instruction on independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2k. The curriculum provides structured, explicit vocabulary practice before, during, and after reading. Each unit begins with introducing academic vocabulary tied to the writing focus, where students predict meanings, analyze roots, and review mentor sentences. Before reading, Concept Vocabulary tasks introduce words through definitions, sentence writing, and dictionary use. Teachers may also introduce high-utility words, which vary per text. During reading, bolded words link to student-friendly definitions. After reading, students engage in Concept Vocabulary and Word Study tasks on word structure, connotations, and affixes, reinforcing vocabulary through writing and analysis. Word walls are used throughout the unit, expanding with each text. Teacher guidance includes pre-reading differentiation to support students with challenging vocabulary, guidance on facilitating the various tasks, and student sample responses to all vocabulary tasks. This consistent, structured approach ensures multiple exposures to key words across texts.
Materials include structured and explicit practices for introducing key vocabulary words and independent word-learning strategies within the context of the texts (analyzing morphemes, etymology, word maps, and discussion of word relationships/shades of meaning, dictionary skills, context clues). Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and high-utility academic words. Materials provide multiple exposures to key vocabulary within (i.e., before, during, after reading) and across texts.
myPerspectives materials include an academic vocabulary component at the start of each unit. The academic vocabulary is directly related to the unit’s writing focus. Teachers introduce these words at the beginning of each unit and prompt students to review each word, predict the meaning, and list at least two related words. To support students, the roots of the words with their definitions are provided, in addition to two mentor sentences that use the word. The Teacher Edition prompts teachers to “point out that the root of each word provides a clue to its meaning” and “discuss the mentor sentences to ensure students understand the word’s usage.” This is a repetitive, structured practice in the program.
Teachers introduce the unit’s word wall at the start of the unit. Throughout a unit, students complete word walls connected to the unit’s topic or theme. They begin by completing the word wall with the Mentor Text and continue to add to it throughout the unit. This is a consistent, structured practice in the program. The Teacher Edition prompts teachers to “Tell students that they can fill in the Word Wall as they read the texts in the unit, or they can record the words elsewhere and add them later. Point out that there will be no right or wrong choice of words for their Word Walls. Each student’s will be unique.” Additional Guidance prompts that teachers should “Consider creating a classroom Word Wall and invite students to contribute to it as they finish their readings.” The Expert’s Perspective note on Word Walls in the Teacher Editions states how Word Walls support student’s vocabulary development. Some of this guidance states, “Vocabulary Word Walls enable students to learn, use, and retain a large number of useful words related to a particular concept…Using Vocabulary Word Walls also helps students choose more precise words when they write or edit. Finally, forging connections among related words, as opposed to learning words individually, allows students to approach new words with confidence and knowledge.”
myPerspectives materials include guidance and tasks that expose students to key vocabulary before, during, and after reading. These exposures are part of the program’s structured practices for introducing key vocabulary words and word-learning strategies to students.
The text complexity information in the Teacher Edition for each text provides a “pre-reading differentiation” section. For most texts, the language conventionality and clarity component provides teachers with vocabulary words they should pre-teach if students are likely to need help with the text’s vocabulary.
The Teacher Edition provides High-Utility Words for each text. The guidance includes the words, where they are referenced in the text, and how each word should be introduced to students. The strategy teachers should use to introduce high-utility words varies based on the text.
The Teacher Edition provides Content Vocabulary words for some texts. These words are genre-related. The guidance includes the words and how they should be introduced to students, including discussion questions teachers should use with students.
Before reading each text, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task. While this task varies in what it asks students to complete, it presents students with several vocabulary words from the text. Some of the tasks are using the definition to write a sample sentence, using a print dictionary to determine the meaning, pronunciation, and parts of speech, setting expectations about the text based on vocabulary words and definitions provided, writing a short story or paragraph using the vocabulary words and the definitions provided, etc. When definitions are provided in the materials, they are student-friendly. The Teacher Edition includes some guidance on facilitating this task.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, before reading an excerpt from Fredrick Douglass’ “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?,” students complete a Concept Vocabulary Task. Teacher Guidance states, “Read the concept vocabulary words aloud and provide context sentences, as needed, to clarify word meanings. Then, call on volunteers to share their sentences.”
When the task requires students to infer from context as they read a text, the Teacher Edition includes additional guidance on what to do if students struggle to understand each word. This guidance often includes differentiation for students who need substantial, moderate, or light support.
As students read, myPerspectives materials bold and underline vocabulary words. Students may click the words to see their parts of speech and definitions, which are student-friendly. These words are the same as those completed in the previous Concept Vocabulary task before reading.
After reading each text, materials include a Concept Vocabulary task. The words are the same ones students saw in the Concept Vocabulary task before reading the text. These tasks include using the vocabulary words to complete a short writing task, finding more words in the text that fit similar concepts to the vocabulary words listed, answering questions about the vocabulary words, determining the connections between words, etc. The Teacher Edition provides sample student responses for these activities.
After reading each text, materials include a Word Study task. These tasks include practice with connotation and denotation, types of words (like compound words), synonyms and antonyms, prefixes and suffixes, Latin phrases, etc. The Teacher Edition provides sample student responses for these activities.
After reading each text, students return to adding to their word walls for the unit. This is a consistent, structured practice in the program.
Indicator 2k.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words to build knowledge within and across texts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for supporting Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary to build knowledge within and across texts. Vocabulary is routinely presented in lessons, and some supports, such as glossaries, word banks, and pronunciation guidance, are included. However, these supports are not consistently aligned with the words all students are studying, nor are they embedded in instructional routines in ways that allow MLLs to engage with peers or participate in whole-class learning.
In many instances, vocabulary instruction for MLLs appears in separate call-out boxes or teacher-facing notes, suggesting implementation alongside rather than within the core instruction. While these supports may be considered embedded based on their placement on the page, their separation from the primary student tasks can make them feel more like standalone elements, which may reduce their effectiveness in fostering authentic integration. For example, in Grade 11, Unit 3, after reading “I Make Video Games, I Won’t Let My Daughters Play Them,” students complete a Study Language and Craft activity including Concept Vocabulary. There is a Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition on this page. Although the differentiation box is present, it does not include targeted scaffolds or routines that would help MLLs access and apply key vocabulary within the lesson. The support is limited to a generalized suggestion to “Continue to help students build their English vocabulary by reviewing the concept vocabulary words and providing additional opportunities for students to practice using them.” For Substantial support, materials guide teachers to “Reteach the words, as needed, pointing out a base word, root, or other word part within the longer word. Then, ask students to explain the meanings or functions of those word parts.” The materials guide teachers to move those students into the activity for the Moderate/Light support group: “Confirm understanding of the words disorder and impairment by having students use both words in sentences. Then, help students find additional words that fit the concept.” While these supports facilitate student understanding of the Concept Vocabulary words, it is unclear how MLLs are meant to fully participate in the whole-class Concept Vocabulary activity. This includes tasks such as answering questions about how the vocabulary words help you understand the negative effects of playing video games, finding antonyms for some of the vocabulary words, and writing a sentence with two of the words that a veterinarian might put into medical notes after examining a pet dog. Without direct scaffolds and supports provided for MLLs for the Concept Vocabulary activity, MLLs cannot fully participate in that portion of the vocabulary instructional routine. In addition, without support provided or other prompts to do so, teachers who are new to instructing MLLs may not realize that students should participate in grade-level vocabulary instruction and may instead supplant that instruction with what is in the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box.
In other instances, no linguistic supports are provided for MLLs. In Grade 9, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, before reading “Through the Tunnel,” students complete the Concept Vocabulary task. Teacher Guidance states, “Read the concept vocabulary words aloud and provide context sentences, as needed, to clarify word meanings. Then, call on volunteers to share their predictions about what the story might be about, based on the concept words.” There are no supports provided for MLLs for this activity.
Many selections (most of those designed for Whole-Class Learning and for Peer-Group Learning, but none designed for Independent Learning) include a Language Support Lesson available on the Realize platform only. Teachers must find the reference in the “How Can I Support Multilingual Learners?” section of the Selection Overview and find the lessons associated with the selection title on the Realize Platform. The first page of each Language Support Lesson includes an overview of the MLL supports provided within the Teacher Edition, Student Edition, and digital course for the selection. The second section supports students in a Language Target focused on the text, but otherwise unrelated to what the whole class is learning. Frequently, the focus includes vocabulary, but never supports MLLs’ full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary to build knowledge within and across texts within core, grade-level instruction.
In summary, while the materials offer some tools to support vocabulary development for MLLs, these supports are often peripheral rather than fully integrated into core instruction. The separation of MLL guidance from primary lesson activities, inconsistent scaffolding, and limited alignment with whole-class tasks hinder MLLs’ full participation in vocabulary instruction. Additionally, the reliance on separate Language Support Lessons—often located on a different platform and disconnected from the main instructional flow—further fragments access. As a result, the materials fall short of providing MLLs with consistent, explicit, and integrated vocabulary instruction needed to build deep, transferable word knowledge across disciplines.
Indicator 2l
Materials include opportunities for students to practice independent word-learning strategies, as well as newly taught vocabulary words.
The opportunities for students to practice independent word-learning strategies and newly taught vocabulary words in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2l. The curriculum provides structured opportunities for students to develop independent word-learning strategies such as inferring meaning from context, morphological analysis, and etymological awareness. At the start of each unit, students engage in Academic Vocabulary tasks, where they analyze root words and examine mentor sentences. Students use these components to predict the meaning of the vocabulary words. Before and after reading, students complete Concept Vocabulary tasks, which include using context clues, dictionary skills, and writing exercises to reinforce vocabulary acquisition. Additionally, Word Study tasks provide explicit instruction on prefixes, suffixes, connotation, denotation, and word relationships. Students consistently apply newly learned vocabulary in discussions, writing assignments, and Performance Tasks, ensuring multiple exposures to key words. Word Walls further support vocabulary retention by allowing students to track and revisit important words throughout the unit, strengthening their understanding through continuous practice.
Materials include opportunities for students to use independent word-learning strategies to understand the meaning of challenging words (inferring from context, using morphological or etymological awareness).
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete vocabulary tasks that require them to practice using independent word-learning strategies. These strategies include inferring from context, dictionary skills, and using morphological and etymological awareness.
At the start of each unit, students complete an Academic Vocabulary task. Students are given the definitions of root words and sample sentences; using what is provided, students practice inferring the meaning of the vocabulary words.
In Grade 10, Unit 4, the academic vocabulary words are focused on arguments. The words are allusion, articulate, contentious, vehement, and tolerate. For the word contentious, the Latin root, -tend-/-tens- meaning “stretch” and “strain” is provided. Materials include the following mentor sentences: “1. Can’t we disagree without being contentious? 2. A diplomat’s approach to conflict is not contentious.” Students use the Latin root definition and sample sentences to infer the meaning of the word.
Before and after reading each text, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task. While these tasks vary, some of them require that students practice using a dictionary to figure out a word’s definition, pronunciation, and part of speech.
In Grade 11, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task before reading a poetry collection, including “Old South Meeting House” by January Gill O’Neil and “The Continental Army” by Marilyn Nelson. The task requires students to use context clues as they read to determine the meaning of the words plight, dissent, and commotion. Students must “confirm those meanings by checking in a print or digital dictionary.”
After reading each text, students complete a Word Study task. These tasks help students develop word knowledge, including etymological and morphological awareness. They include practice with suffixes, prefixes, roots, types of words (like compound words), connotation, and denotation.
In Grade 9, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Act IV by William Shakespeare. After reading, students complete the Word Study task. In this task, students learn about the Latin Root -stress-, and the roots -strict- and -strain-. These roots all come from the Latin word “stingere” which means “to draw tight.” Then, they see the roots used in words from the text, distressed, constrict, and constrain. Last, they find several other words that contain these same roots and note them and their meaning.
Materials include opportunities for students to use academic and content-specific vocabulary in various contexts.
During each Performance Task, students are challenged to “use one or more of the unit’s academic vocabulary.”
During many Concept Vocabulary Tasks, students practice using vocabulary words in a sentence or short written assignments, allowing students to practice newly learned vocabulary in a different context (from the text).
In Grade 9, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task after reading “The Friendship Bench” by Yvette Lisa Ndlovu. After determining what the words have in common with their groups, students “Write a scene in which a character travels in a time machine.” They must use all three vocabulary words in the scene: undulating, dazzling, and receding.
Practice opportunities incorporate review of previously learned words based on their connection to the topic of study.
In each unit, students complete a Word Wall related to the unit’s topic or theme. As students progress through the unit’s text set, they refer back to and add to their word walls. This practice allows students to refer back to words they learned in the unit.
In Grade 12, Unit 4, the theme is “Seeing Things New.” As they read the Mentor Text, students complete a word wall that requires them to “identify words related to seeing things in new ways…Continue to add words as you complete the unit.” Each word wall document gives students a starting point, which includes three vocabulary words from the Mentor Text. In this unit, the words are reaction, notices, and realizes. As students continue to read the texts in this unit, they add to their Word Walls.
The Concept Vocabulary activities students complete before and after reading each text include the same words. This practice allows students to return to words multiple times across the learning process.
At the beginning of each unit, students learn new Academic Vocabulary relevant to the unit. During this task, students must note at least two related words to each academic term.
At the beginning of each unit, students set goals. One of these goals is based on the statement “I can understand and use academic vocabulary related to” the writing focus of the unit. Students evaluate their progress during the unit and introduction and the unit reflection.
Indicator 2l.MLL
Materials provide supports for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the practice of independent word-learning strategies, as well as newly taught vocabulary words.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9–12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the practice of independent word-learning strategies, and newly taught vocabulary words. The materials provide support for MLLs for some practice of word-learning strategies and newly taught vocabulary words. However, these supports are inconsistently employed across units and do not consistently ensure full and complete participation by MLL students in core vocabulary-related tasks.
The materials provide explicit support for MLLs to develop and apply independent word-learning strategies and to engage meaningfully with newly taught vocabulary in places. Some lessons include scaffolds and differentiated guidance at varying proficiency levels; however, these supports are not consistently embedded across all units, and supports for MLLs to independently practice word-learning strategies are limited. For example, each Whole-Class and Peer-Group Learning Selection Overview includes a section entitled “How Can I Support Multilingual Learners?” The section includes a subsection for Vocabulary and Language Support, as well as Lesson Preview notes for teachers and guidance for Transition into English. In the “How Can I Support Multilingual Learners?” section, in Grade 12, Unit 5, for Poetry Collection 1, the materials direct teachers to help students build a word wall, use home language synonyms, and preview unknown vocabulary. These supports help students familiarize themselves with new vocabulary before engaging with the reading selection. By asking students to identify unfamiliar words, define them, and find a synonym from their home language, the materials foster both vocabulary awareness and cross-linguistic connections.
The materials also include guidance around vocabulary acquisition and practice for MLLs within lessons, but they often fall short of providing enough support for MLLs to fully and completely participate in grade-level learning. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 5, during the Whole-Class Learning close read of “The Necklace,” there is a Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition. This box contains tiered support for the word resplendent found in the text. At the substantial level, teachers model the word’s use and provide sentence frames (e.g., “I saw resplendent jewelry at the art gallery”) for practice. Students are guided to use the word in connection with personal experience, encouraging meaningful use of newly introduced vocabulary. Students needing moderate and light levels of support engage in group discussion and share personal examples, reinforcing word knowledge in context. While this example shows one way that materials provide MLLs with tools to engage with new vocabulary, it is not directly connected to a vocabulary practice activity for the whole class, but rather an additional lesson provided specifically for MLLs’ deeper comprehension of one of the six concept vocabulary words for this selection. A Concept Vocabulary activity follows the reading, including all six Concept Vocabulary words, but no additional support for MLLs.
The materials offer limited support for MLLs in developing independent word-learning strategies. While vocabulary supports provide accessible entry points, they rely heavily on teacher-led instruction with minimal emphasis on student-driven or sustained independent learning. Tasks such as Academic Vocabulary and Word Study offer some practice for all students, including MLLs, but appear inconsistently. Some tools, such as translation features in mentor and bridge texts, support comprehension by allowing students to access vocabulary in their home language. These features offer some opportunities for independent learning, but consistent routines for building word-learning strategies are lacking.
Although the materials include occasional supports for MLLs to independently practice vocabulary, these are inconsistently applied, sometimes simplified, and not well integrated into the core instructional sequence. This limits their effectiveness in supporting MLLs’ full participation in grade-level tasks.
Indicator 2m
Materials include explicit instruction on sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The explicit instruction for teaching sentence composition in myPerspectives meets expectations for indicator 2m. Grammar instruction is integrated into each unit, with activities that require students to analyze and revise sentences based on mentor texts, core texts, and their own writing. The Teacher Edition includes modeling, differentiation strategies, and checks for understanding before students complete grammar exercises. Throughout the writing process, students engage in drafting, revision and editing, using mentor texts as models and revision checklists to refine their work. Specific teacher guidance and Quick Conference questions support students in improving sentence clarity, structure, and flow. Additionally, grammar activities incorporate authentic text-based examples, requiring students to edit or analyze sentences from core readings. This structured approach ensures students receive explicit instruction and practice opportunities to enhance their sentence-composition skills.
Materials include explicit instruction in sentence-composition skills (use of punctuation, sentence elaboration, sentence combining using cohesive ties, sentence fluency), embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
After reading each text, students complete several activities. For many texts, this includes a grammar and usage component. For some of these activities, students write sentences. The Teacher Edition includes guidance on checking students’ level of understanding of the grammar concept before they begin the activity with an example. After this check for understanding, the Teacher Edition presents differentiation options for remediating the concept based on the level of student support, often substantial or moderate. Then, students complete the grammar activity.
In Grade 12, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel. After reading, students complete a syntax activity on apposition and diazeugma, which can be used to ensure sentence variety. The Teacher Edition includes guidance for checking students’ understanding first. This guidance states, “Place students in pairs and have them describe their partner in heroic terms, using these sentence frames: Apposition: The legendary hero,
, inspired my friend. Diazeugma: Displaying their heroic qualities, my friend , , and . Circulate and assess lesson readiness as student pairs discuss. Then, differentiate as needed, using the support notes below.” After this check for understanding, there are two differentiation options in the Teacher Edition if students need support. The guidance for substantial support states, “Before teaching the concepts of apposition and diazeugma, reinforce the idea that syntax can be used to create particular effects or highlight ideas. Ask students to share how their descriptions created particular effects or highlighted ideas. Then, work through instruction on apposition and diazeugma with students, providing examples as needed. The guidance for moderate support states, “Reinforce students’ understanding of apposition and diazeugma by discussing the work students did in pairs. Say, The use of apposition in epic poetry helps readers remember people, places, and things. The use of diazeugma enhances the action and helps to build suspense.” Last, students complete the activity, which requires them to learn about apposition and diazeugma, analyze parts of the text, as well as interpret and evaluate the effects on the text.
Students write a longer piece of work for each unit’s written Performance Task. As part of the writing process, there is time for drafting, revision, and editing. During these activities, students return to the unit’s Mentor Text and are prompted to analyze and discuss it and “Read Like a Writer.” The Teacher Edition includes notes on facilitating and Quick Conference questions that they can use to support each student.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, students write an argumentative essay as the unit’s written Performance Task.
After planning and prewriting, students move to drafting. First, students analyze paragraphs 1 and 2 of a model draft from the Mentor Text with specific annotations, considering how the writer uses both their claim and counterclaim. Then, students complete a Coherence and Craft activity where they work on sentence variety. Teacher guidance is focused on highlighting the essential point that “In a coherent essay, ideas flow smoothly from one to the next, making it easy for readers to navigate. One way to create coherence is to skillfully use variety in sentence lengths and beginnings.” The guidance includes directions for the teachers on how to facilitate the Coherence and Craft activity, where students compare a choppy paragraph to a varied paragraph. Differentiation guidance is provided for teachers to use with students who may need substantial or moderate support with this activity.
After revising, students move to editing, focusing on run-on sentences and comma splices. Teacher Edition includes guidance on launching the task, including “Tell students that a paper may have brilliant ideas to convey, but if it is full of grammatical errors, readers may be confused or distracted or may question the accuracy of the writer’s ideas.” For this part of the writing process, students practice “Reading Like a Writer” by re-examining the unit’s mentor texts with correction notes. Teacher guidance for this section states, “Walk them through the corrections the author of the Mentor Text made. Then, have them complete the activity.” For the activity, students learn about run-on sentences and comma splices; then, they practice correcting sentences with these errors. Sample responses are provided for the teacher. Teacher Guidance for this activity states, “Explain to students that run-on sentences can throw off a reader’s rhythm or make readers pause and reread sections to see if they missed a word. Review these three strategies for fixing run-ons and comma splices: Add a coordinating or subordinating conjunction; replace the comma with a semicolon; or break the run-on into separate sentences.” After the activity, students apply this learning to their own essays. Teacher Guidance also includes Quick Conference questions to use with students individually. For this task, these questions are: “Are any of your sentences run-ons? How do you intend to fix them? Have you capitalized all proper nouns, including acronyms? Can you show me where you corrected a punctuation error?”
Materials utilize exemplar sentences from core and mentor texts that contain clear, varied, and rich examples of sentence structure.
Each unit begins with reading a Mentor Text, which allows students to learn about the genre of writing aligned to the written Performance Task. Students return to this Mentor Text while drafting, revising, and editing their written Performance Task.
The Grammar Activities throughout each unit include sentences that are either about the text or from the text.
In Grade 9, Unit 4, Peer-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from “The Hero’s Adventure” by Joseph Campbell and Bill Moyers. After reading, students complete a grammar activity about commas. As part of the activity, students read sentences from the text and explain the comma’s use. The sentences in the assignment are:
“It’s usually a cycle, a going and a returning.
He is out there in the world, and the woman is in the home.
Not only that, you’ve got a life job ahead of you.
If you want to put it in terms of intentions, the trials are designed to see to it that the intending hero should really be a hero.”
Next, students edit a passage about the text for correct comma use.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from “Team of Rivals” by Doris Kearns Goodwin. After reading, students complete a style activity on varying syntax. As part of the activity, students are to read and identify types of phrases or clauses that begin each sentence from the text. The sentences in the assignment are:
“As he looked at the new Chief Justice, Douglass recollected the “early anti-slavery days” of their first acquaintance.
Pivoting to face the Supreme Court, he reminded them that they also derived their ‘power from the people.’
His address completed, the president turned to Chief Justice Salmon Chase, who administered the oath of office.”
Indicator 2m.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards, embedded in what students are studying in the unit. The materials provide supports in some instruction of sentence composition, but not others.
In some sentence composition lessons, the materials provide MLL supports that directly connect to the sentence composition instruction. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 3, students write an argumentative essay as the unit’s written Performance Task. As part of this task, students complete a Coherence and Craft activity where they work on sentence variety. The materials provide a Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box that guides teachers to “Help students learn to write using a variety of sentence lengths. After students have drafted their paragraphs, point out the examples in the box under Vary Sentence Lengths. Explain that variety in sentence lengths is a feature of effective writing.” Differentiated supports follow:
Substantial: Display two short sentences, such as: Pedro moved here last year. He felt like an outsider. Model combining the sentences into a compound sentence using and. Have students copy the new sentence. Review other conjunctions used to make compound sentences. Point out where students can combine sentences in their drafts.
Moderate: Model combining sentences to form either a compound sentence or a complex sentence. Help students find sentences in their drafts to combine into compound or complex sentences.
Light: Have pairs review the sentences in their drafts. Challenging them to create a variety of sentence lengths by combining shorter sentences. Provide assistance as needed.
This targeted guidance helps MLLs build coherence in their writing by providing accessible, scaffolded practice aligned to the lesson’s sentence composition goals.
Other lessons, however, provide no MLL supports for sentence composition instruction. For example, in Grade 9, Unit 4, Peer-Group Learning, students read an excerpt from “The Hero’s Adventure.” After reading, students complete a grammar activity about commas. The materials provide no MLL supports for this lesson. They do provide Teacher Facing Notes, prompting teachers to 1. Check for Readiness, 2. Differentiate, and 3. Monitor Progress. None of these three prompts includes guidance on supporting students with different language proficiencies. The Differentiate step suggests teachers reinforce how commas indicate pausing for both the Substantial and Moderate support levels, which is not sufficient to ensure MLLs can fully and completely participate in this grade-level sentence composition activity.
In some lessons, materials include targeted, leveled scaffolds that align with the sentence composition instruction. However, other lessons lack MLL-specific supports altogether, and general differentiation guidance does not address varied language proficiency levels. This inconsistency limits MLLs’ access to grade-level sentence composition instruction across the program.
Indicator 2n
Materials include evidence-based opportunities for students to practice sentence composition and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level.
The sentence composition opportunities in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2n. The curriculum provides opportunities for students to write sentences about texts while practicing sentence composition skills. After reading, students complete grammar and language activities that require them to write sentences using specific structures related to the text. During written Performance Tasks, students revise and edit their writing with a focus on sentence clarity, structure, and style, using Mentor Texts as models. The curriculum also guides students to adapt their language based on audience and purpose, reinforcing precise word choice, sentence complexity, and formal writing conventions. These structured activities ensure students apply and refine their sentence composition skills throughout the writing process.
Materials include opportunities for students to write sentences about the texts under study while practicing and applying sentence composition skills.
After reading each text, students complete various activities. Some of these activities require them to consider grammar, usage, and language, and some prompt students to produce sentence-level writing about the texts under study.
In Grade 10, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from the “Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. After reading, they complete a Study Language and Craft activity on two types of phrases: noun phrases and verb phrases. After learning about both, students practice labeling noun phrases and verb phrases in sentences from Roosevelt’s speech. Then, students edit three simple sentences about the content of the speech, “us[ing] noun and verb phrases to add detail and depth to each” sentence. The simple sentences that students revise are:
“The United States had not declared war.
Roosevelt’s program called for jobs.
The program increases insurance coverage.”
Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their own writing.
During each written Performance Task, students complete editing activities as part of the writing process. These activities allow students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their drafts with a particular instructional focus and revising sentences to make improvements.
In Grade 12, Unit 5, students write a Personal Essay as the unit’s written Performance Task. During the editing process, students re-analyze a section of the unit’s Mentor Text with a sentence focus on pronoun-antecedent agreement. After learning that “pronouns refer to nouns or other pronouns used previously” and being “caution[ed] that if two women, for example, have been mentioned in the same sentence or paragraph, using she to refer to either of them might be confusing,” they practice rewriting provided sentences to “fix errors in pronoun-antecedent agreement.” After practicing with these provided sentences, students examine their own drafts and edit their sentences to ensure that they are using accurate pronoun-antecedent agreement throughout their personal essays.
Materials include opportunities for students to adapt their language based on the intended audience and purpose.
Some of the assignments that students complete after reading texts prompt them to adapt their language based on their intended audience.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, students read an excerpt from “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” by Frederick Douglass. After reading, they complete several tasks, including writing a report in response to the prompt: “In this speech, Douglass mentions laws that made it a criminal offense to teach an enslaved person to read and write. Briefly research how some enslaved people, including Douglass, learned to read. Then, write two one-page research reports crafted for two different audiences or readers:
your peers and adult readers
younger, elementary-level readers
Make sure both versions of your report are organized and presented in a way that is appropriate to each audience.”
During each written Performance Task, students edit and revise as part of the writing process using the unit’s Mentor Text as a guide. During revision, they consider the clarity, development, style, organization, and tone of their writing. During editing, they consider the reader of their work and make changes to their writing to strengthen it and meet its intended purpose. Teachers remind students of the importance of the editing process and remind students of the purpose of the genre of writing they are working with, and how lack of revision can hinder their writing.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, students write a research report as the written Performance Task for the Unit. During revision, students complete a checklist; part of this checklist requires students to evaluate style and tone. The guiding questions on this part of the checklist are: “Are my style and tone suitably formal and objective? Have I defined words readers may not know, especially terms that pertain to my subject matter?” Before editing, teachers are to remind students that “if readers stumble over errors or get confused by sloppy writing, they are likely to assume that the report’s content is suspect.” During the editing process, they re-analyze a section of the unit’s Mentor Text with a sentence focus on active vs. passive voice. The Mentor Text includes annotations and changes that the writer made to strengthen their writing. One of these notes states, “The writer broke up an overly long sentence and clarified a term that would be unfamiliar to many readers. The edit also corrects an ineffective use of passive voice.” Following this analysis, students complete a short activity, where they revise a provided paragraph to shift passive voice to active voice. Then, they rewrite or edit their own sentences in their report to fix any passive voice to active voice.
Indicator 2n.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in sentence composition practice and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for supporting Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in evidence-based opportunities for sentence composition practice and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level. The materials provide supports and strategies for MLLs for sentence-composition activities; however, they are not consistently integrated or clearly aligned with the core writing instruction provided to the entire class.
In some instances, such as during a whole-class review of an argumentative writing checklist, the support for MLLs is directly connected to the core task for all students. For example, in Grade 12, Unit 2, Writer’s Handbook, all students are directed to “Use the strategies in the Revision Checklist to focus on each element of your essay.” The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition provides the following guidance: “As students revise their drafts using the Revision Checklist, help them learn to write using a variety of sentence lengths.” The Substantial and Moderate levels of support focus on supporting students in combining sentences. The Light support challenges students to “create a variety of sentence lengths by splitting longer sentences or combining shorter sentences.” One of the points for evaluation in the Revision Checklist for Explanatory Essay used by all students is “Sentence Variety: Review the lengths and types of sentences you’ve used in each paragraph.” The MLL differentiation guidance provides direct support for this task. However, these moments of alignment are infrequent, and there is a general lack of clarity about how and when to implement MLL-specific strategies, particularly for teachers new to teaching MLLs.
The materials include some responsive supports designed to target student needs, which could benefit MLLs. However, these supports are not clearly designated for MLLs nor differentiated by language proficiency level. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from the “Four Freedoms’ Speech” by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. After reading, they complete a Study Language and Craft activity on two types of phrases: noun phrases and verb phrases. After learning about both, students practice labeling noun phrases and verb phrases in sentences from Roosevelt’s speech. Then, students edit three simple sentences about the content of the speech, “us[ing] noun and verb phrases to add detail and depth to each” sentence. There is no specified MLL support in the Teacher Edition, but there are prompts to “1. Check for Student Readiness, 2. Differentiate,” the latter of which includes Substantial and Moderate supports. While some MLLs may benefit from these general supports, the lack of specific linguistic scaffolds and differentiation by language proficiency requires teachers to either omit these supports or develop them independently.
Furthermore, in many cases, the differentiation tasks designed for MLLs are separate from what their peers were doing, with no clear explanation of when or how teachers should implement those activities within the flow of whole-class instruction. For example, in Grade 11, Unit 4, for the written Performance Task, students write an Explanatory Essay. All students are prompted to consider their audience from the beginning of the task. Students receive concrete prompts as part of their essay planning to “keep your audience, or readers, in mind when you write,” along with specific tips and questions to consider their audience for the essay. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition directs teachers to “help students generate examples of memorable places with specificity and detail as they begin writing their essays.” While this is an important support for MLLs to complete the essay task, it does not address the grade-level expectation that “students focus on what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience.” All students continue to consider their audience as they plan in the pre-writing and planning activity and in the Revision Checklist for Explanatory Essay. The MLL supports provided for these two tasks focus on the transfer of home language and revision for sentence lengths, with no mention of the audience. This lack of connection between MLL-specific supports and core academic tasks leaves MLLs without entry points to the grade-level activity.
Additionally, while the materials include supports encouraging students to draft or brainstorm in their home language before rewriting in English, there is no guidance provided on how to scaffold this practice, especially for students who are not literate in their home language. The materials provide no additional guidance for teachers as to how to use home language to support their completion of editing activities as part of the writing process (for more information home language use in the materials, see Indicator 3.2.MLL-1). These activities allow students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their drafts with a particular instructional focus and revising sentences to make improvements. Leveraging students’ home languages as a bridge to learning is a valuable strategy; however, its effectiveness is limited by the lack of integration throughout the writing process. Without clear teacher guidance as to how to match students appropriately with this support, this strategy is impractical and inequitable in all classrooms and for all MLL profiles, such as Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE) or long-term MLLs.
In conclusion, while the materials include some supports for sentence composition and editing, they fall short of ensuring MLLs can fully and completely engage in these writing activities alongside their peers. Supports are inconsistently integrated and are frequently disconnected from core instruction. Without clear guidance for implementation, teachers are left to create additional resources on their own.
Indicator 2o
Materials include a mix of both on-demand and process writing opportunities that are appropriately-aligned in purpose, genre, and/or topic to the reading of that unit.
The on-demand and process writing opportunities in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2o. The curriculum includes a mix of on-demand and process writing tasks. Each unit begins with Quick Writes and summary activities, followed by on-demand writing prompts after reading texts, which vary in length and complexity. Students also engage in process writing through Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments, which align with the unit’s Mentor Text and require them to synthesize information and ideas from their reading. This consistent connection between reading and writing fosters deeper understanding. While Grades 9-10 align with standard writing distributions (40/40/20), Grades 11-12 place equal emphasis on all three modes (33.3/33.3/33.3), slightly diverging from recommended standards. Writing tasks are closely tied to the themes, topics, and genres of the readings, reinforcing students’ ability to write purposefully and analytically.
Materials include a mix of grade-appropriate on-demand and process writing.
myPerspectives materials include various on-demand and process writing tasks.
At the start of each unit, students read a Mentor Text and complete a Summary and a Quick Write response, where they draft their initial thinking on the unit’s essential question.
After reading each text, students complete various activities. Many of these activities require on-demand written responses that vary in length (from sentence to paragraph to multiple paragraphs).
In Grade 10, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read “House Taken Over” by Julio Cortazar. After reading, students complete an assignment that includes various short response prompts, including “(a) Describe: What are the characters like at the beginning of each story? Cite evidence that supports your descriptions. (b) Compare and Contrast: Do the characters change as the plots unfold in one story, in both stories, or in neither story? Explain your views. (c) Analyze: What themes are suggested by the characters’ situations at the end of each story?”
In Grade 11, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Mark Twain’s Life on The Mississippi. After reading, they complete an on-demand essay task to the prompt, “Write a personal essay about someone you once idolized in a way that was similar to Twain’s admiration for the steamboat apprentice. Use a narrative, or storytelling structure, as your basic organization. Then, integrate other types of structures to add interest and information. Use narrative techniques–the ingredients of vivid storytelling–to bring your experience to life for your readers. For example, incorporate dialogue that will let your readers ‘hear’ characters speaking and interacting.”
Each unit includes various performance tasks and a performance-based assessment. Most of these require students to complete a process-writing assignment.
In Grade 12, Unit 4, one of the two Performance Tasks and the Performance-Based Assessment require students to write a short story.
The Performance Task prompt states, “Use the short story form to explore new or different ways of perceiving. Choose one of these options, or come up with an idea you prefer.
Science Fiction: A character’s memory has been stolen. In what ways do the character’s perceptions change as a result?
Realistic Fiction: A character is forced to move after the sale of a beloved family home. How does this shift change the character’s view of the world?
Your story should be well structured and cohesive and build toward a satisfying outcome. Use the elements of short stories in your writing.” In order to complete this task, students engage in the complete writing process, including prewriting, planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing.
The Performance-Based Assessment prompt states, “In this unit, you have read literary works that challenge readers to perceive things in new ways. You have also practiced writing a short story. Now, apply what you have learned. Write a short story in which you synthesize the information you learned in this unit with your own ideas to respond to the Essential Question: What do we gain when we change our perceptions?” In order to complete this assignment, students must plan, draft, review, and edit their short stories.
Materials reflect the distribution indicated by the standards for process writing (9-12 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience). (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring)
The process writing distribution in the myPerspectives program is as follows:
Grade 9: 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 10: 40/40/20 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 11: 33.3/33.3/33.3 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 12: 33.3/33.3/33.3 persuade/explain/convey experience
Generally, myPerspectives materials meet the distribution indicated by the standards across process writing opportunities in grades 9 and 10 but do not meet the distribution in grades 11 and 12.
Writing opportunities are appropriately aligned to the purpose, genre, and/or topic of the unit’s reading.
Each written Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessment requires students to synthesize learning from the unit’s reading. The genre of each unit’s written Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments is directly aligned to each unit’s Mentor Text.
Most of the unit’s designated Writing assignments directly align with the genre of writing that students examine in the Mentor Text and target in the written Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessments.
In Grade 9, Unit 1, students complete a unit titled Survival. The Mentor Text, written Performance Task, and Performance-Based assessments are argumentative essays. Other designated writing assignments and lessons include a comparison-and-contrast essay, an encyclopedia entry, an argumentative essay, and a lesson on authors’ claims and ideas. Most of these writing assignments and lessons support students in completing their Performance-Based Assessment to the prompt “In this unit, you read about survival in literature. You also practiced writing arguments. Now, apply what you have learned. Write an argumentative essay in which you synthesize the information you learned in this unit with your own ideas to respond to the essential question, What qualities help us survive?” While the essay is argumentative, students are expected to use strong evidence, such as facts, statistics, and anecdotes, to support their positions. The informational writing assignments throughout the unit, like the encyclopedia entry, require practice with anecdotes and factual evidence. For this reason, previous assignments on informational writing align with this culminating prompt.
Indicator 2p
Materials include explicit instruction in varied writing processes, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The explicit instruction in varied writing processes in myPerspectives partially meets expectations for indicator 2p. The curriculum provides some explicit instruction in writing processes, particularly for multi-paragraph writing across genres, embedded within the unit structure. Writing assignments are integrated with texts students read, and Mentor Texts serve as models for genre-specific writing. Throughout the curriculum, students analyze mentor texts to understand writing structures, apply techniques to their own work, and receive teacher guidance for feedback and revision to improve coherence and clarity. Materials guide students through each stage of the writing process for each Performance Task—planning, drafting, revising, and editing—with support through checklists, guiding questions, and Quick Conferences. While instruction on essay structure and development is strong, there is limited focus on paragraph-level writing, outside of multi-paragraph assignments. Teachers are supported with rubrics, sample responses, differentiation support, and Quick Conference questions, though guidance for using rubrics and encouraging student reflection is minimal. Overall, writing tasks are aligned to unit themes and help students apply reading knowledge to their own compositions.
Materials include some explicit instruction in writing processes (multi-paragraph construction for varying purposes), embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit. While materials include some instruction in multi-paragraph construction, there is limited instruction on paragraph-level writing, outside of multi-paragraph assignments.
Throughout the myPerspectives curriculum, students have opportunities to practice writing for different purposes. Writing assignments are directly integrated with the reading students complete throughout each unit. Teacher Guidance for these assignments is provided in the Teacher Edition at the point of use.
After students read texts throughout the units, some of the tasks that follow are writing tasks. These tasks include clear instructions with checklists and tips. The Teacher Edition provides general guidance on how to support students with completing these tasks.
In Grade 12, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift. After reading, they complete various activities, including a Writing task. The Writing task requires students to write “a rhetorical analysis of the work as a whole in which you analyze and evaluate its elements, structure, and central ideas.” The assignment includes guidelines for students as they plan, draft, polish, and publish, such as “Take notes on the effectiveness of the author’s use of purpose and central idea” and “Generate a clear, precise claim that you will support with valid evidence.” The Teacher Editions include general facilitation guidance, such as “Explain that time spent working with an organizational (and visual) tool before beginning to write can be immensely helpful in sorting the parts of an essay and placing them whether they will have the most impact and effectiveness for their arguments.”
In each unit, students complete a written Performance Task. Across the curriculum, these tasks vary in their genre and purpose. The Teacher Edition includes guidance for facilitating each part of the writing process. While there is no direct instruction, the Mentor Text serves as a model writing assignment for students, and the materials include guiding questions and annotations that support students in learning about and implementing writing strategies and processes.
While the materials include various opportunities for students to receive guidance on multi-paragraph writing, they provide limited instruction on paragraph-level writing. While students have opportunities to write paragraphs during the activities they complete after reading, there is no specific writing instruction for these written assignments.
Materials provide teachers with mentor texts and/or student exemplars to support students in examining how the genre works.
Each unit begins with a Mentor Text, which aligns with the unit’s theme/topic and genre of writing students complete in the written Performance Task and the Performance-Based Assessment. Students read and summarize each Mentor Text during their first encounter with it. Teacher notes include guidance they should provide students during this first read, such as noting the text’s structure. During each written Performance Task, the materials prompt students to return to the Mentor Text several times as a sample of writing for the genre. For various parts of the writing process, students analyze parts of the Mentor Text to learn more about the genre of writing.
In Grade 11, Unit 5, the Mentor Text is titled “Science Fiction: A Mirror of Our Fears” and serves as an exemplar of a literary analysis. Teacher Guidance as students first read this text includes “Remind students that a literary analysis is a kind of argument. The author’s thesis is usually apparent in the first paragraph and is often reinforced in the conclusion.” Students revisit this Mentor Text during their written Performance Task literary analysis essays later in the unit. First, they refer to the listed elements of literary analysis and apply them to the Mentor Text. Teacher guidance states, “Direct students to find and mark each of the Elements of Literary Analysis within the Mentor Text. If students are unable to find an element, have them take note of that. Then, lead a brief class discussion about literary analysis and what makes it interesting and effective.” Students refer back to the Mentor Text again during the drafting, revision, and editing parts of the writing process, where they practice “Read[ing] Like a Writer” by analyzing various parts of the Mentor Text with guiding annotations and questions. Teacher guidance supports teachers in facilitating these parts of the learning.
Materials provide some guidance and instruction to teachers on how to provide timely and constructive feedback on student writing.
The Teacher Edition includes “Quick Conference” questions for each written Performance Task that teachers should use with each student at different parts of the writing process. These questions directly connect to the writing step and/or the particular writing focus that students are working on during the process. Additional teacher guidance includes clear essential points with differentiation support notes provided for students who may need substantial or moderate levels of support.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, students complete a research report as the written Performance Task.
During the “Take a Closer Look at the Assignment” part of the writing process, the Quick Conference Questions provided for the teacher to use are: “Is your purpose for writing focused and specific? What types of evidence will you definitely include in your essay? Which sources will you rely on for facts? For examples? For expert opinions? How can you best organize your ideas?
During the Pre-Writing and Planning part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “What claim, or position, do you want to share with your readers? In your introduction, how will you engage your readers and pull them into your argument? What order will you use to present your ideas and evidence? What counterclaims have you considered, and how do you plan to rebut them? What ideas do you have for creating a compelling conclusion?”
During the Pre-Writing and Planning part of the writing process, materials also include an essential point for teachers to drive students toward: “When planning your argumentative essay, it’s important to identify and commit to your position. This will make writing a claim and finding supporting evidence much easier.” The Teacher Edition includes guidance for teachers on what to do should students need differentiation support for pre-writing and planning, including guidance for students who need substantial or moderate levels of support. Guidance is also provided for extending learning.
During the Drafting part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “What statement or question will you use to draw in your readers? Where will you first introduce your claim? What details will you include to keep readers interested? Where can you find relevant examples to support your argument? Have you included your own ideas? What original thoughts support your argument?”
During the Drafting part of the writing process, materials also include an essential point for teachers to drive students toward: “In a coherent essay, ideas flow smoothly from one to the next, making it easy for readers to navigate. One way to create coherence is to skillfully use sentence variety in sentence lengths and beginnings.” The Teacher Edition includes guidance for teachers on what to do should students need differentiation support for drafting, including guidance for students who need substantial or moderate levels of support. Guidance is also provided for extending learning.
During the Revision part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “What elements of your essay do you think revision could strengthen the most? Can you show me where you revised your draft? How could you improve the precision of your claim? How could you improve the precision of your counterclaim? Where could you add more sufficient and varied evidence? How could you reorganize these paragraphs so that your ideas flow more logically? Which ideas could be restated for better cohesiveness? Can you replace any words to be more specific and formal?”
During the Editing part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “Are any of your sentences run-ons? How do you intend to fix them? Have you capitalized all proper nouns, including acronyms? Can you show me where you corrected a punctuation error?”
The Savvas Realize platform includes rubrics by writing genre (argumentative, informative/explanatory, narrative, and research) in the Writing and Research Center that teachers can use to evaluate Performance Tasks. However, additional guidance on how to use rubrics or have students reflect on their writing after it is scored is not provided.
Indicator 2p.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in all instruction of varied writing processes.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9–12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in all instruction of varied writing processes. While the materials incorporate writing instruction across multiple genres and emphasize the use of the writing process—prewriting, drafting, revising, and editing—the supports for MLLs are inconsistent, occasionally underdeveloped, and not always aligned with the academic and linguistic demands of the writing tasks.
For example, in Grade 9, Unit 2, during a writing lesson that compares Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech and “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” the materials offer some general guidance on how to support students in the Teacher Edition. This guidance provides tips for each step of the assignment, including to “Monitor and Adjust if students need assistance with choosing an organizing structure, then work individually with them to determine which best supports their purpose.” The Teacher Edition includes a Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box for this assignment. This call-out box suggests supporting MLLs with reviewing and editing for pronoun-antecedent agreement. At the Substantial level, students underline pronouns in the drafts and draw an arrow to the antecedent, and then read the sentence aloud to listen for agreement. At the Moderate support level, students read their drafts independently, underlining each pronoun and its antecedent to check for agreement. At the Light support level, students are encouraged to read drafts in pairs and listen for agreement errors. These three levels of support are not tailored to the writing task itself. This grammatical focus does not directly support students in understanding or producing the higher-level analytical language necessary for a comparative literary analysis. These omissions limit the effectiveness of support, particularly for students developing academic writing in a second language.
This lack of directly connected support for writing skills also occurs during the written Performance Tasks. In Grade 10, Unit 1, the Performance Task assigns students to “write a focused, well-structured, and coherent explanatory essay.” Yet, the materials lack specific supports for MLLs to understand and produce explanatory essays. There is guidance for MLLs provided alongside this task, including writing drafts in their home language, emphasis on the importance of considering your audience, and revision supports for coherence and adjective clauses. While supports for the writing assignment retain appropriate rigor, the instructional materials offer minimal guidance to scaffold language development around organizing ideas logically, using relevant evidence, or developing a clear thesis—key skills that MLLs must master to fully engage in explanatory writing. The materials sometimes suggest associated peer or group work but do not include embedded language development goals or structured opportunities to practice relevant language in speaking and writing.
The instructional design assumes that all students, including MLLs, can access writing tasks without a consistent, intentional approach to language scaffolding. The few supports that do exist are often general (e.g., sentence starters) and are not clearly aligned to the grade-level writing demands, such as building claims in argument writing or integrating text evidence in analysis. The lack of more advanced scaffolds limits students’ ability to internalize and replicate complex academic writing structures.
The materials consistently expect students to follow a structured writing process (prewriting, drafting, revising, and editing). However, the accompanying language support for MLLs during these stages is inconsistent. In some cases, teachers are encouraged to monitor student understanding or clarify instructions, but explicit guidance on how to scaffold grammar, syntax, or genre-specific discourse to support full MLL participation is uneven. As a result, students may struggle to understand the expectations of writing tasks or lack the academic language needed to successfully complete them. These missed opportunities undermine the goal of equitable access to writing tasks.
While the materials include some attempts to support MLLs during writing instruction, these supports are often too general, inconsistently applied, and insufficiently aligned to the specific demands of grade-level writing tasks. The lack of targeted language scaffolds—particularly those embedded within each stage of the writing process—limits MLLs’ ability to fully engage in and succeed with complex academic writing.
Indicator 2q
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice the writing processes using evidence-based strategies, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The opportunities for students to practice the writing processes using evidence-based strategies in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2q. The curriculum provides multiple opportunities for students to plan, draft, revise, edit, and publish their writing, all directly tied to the texts and themes they study throughout each unit. Each Performance Task includes a structured pre-writing and planning phase, often incorporating graphic organizers to help students develop their ideas. Students engage in drafting while revisiting Mentor Texts with guiding annotations. The curriculum includes intentional revision and editing steps, where students refine their work using checklists and targeted grammar lessons. Additionally, students use technology to produce and publish their writing, with options such as digital anthologies to present their work. All Performance Tasks in the materials are completed over several instructional days, ensuring that students have ample time to complete all stages of the writing process. This structured writing process ensures students develop grade-appropriate writing strategies across various genres.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to plan writing (e.g., with graphic organizers).
Students have the opportunity to plan their writing for each written performance task and performance-based assessment in the myPerspectives curriculum. While students have opportunities to plan for both types of assignments, they follow a more intentional planning process for Performance Tasks since the Performance-Based Assessment is an assessment.
In Grade 9, Unit 1, students write an argumentative essay to the prompt “To what extent should people in life-or-death situations be held accountable for their actions?” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of argumentative essays, referring back to the Mentor Text, and taking a close look at the assignment, students complete their pre-writing and planning. First, students complete a graphic organizer where they clarify their ideas, write a claim, and draft a counterclaim. Then, they complete an essay outline organizer, where they jot down their supporting ideas, supporting evidence, and conclusion ideas.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to draft their writing.
For each written Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessment in the myPerspectives curriculum, students have the opportunity to draft their writing.
In Grade 10, Unit 2, students write a short story to the prompt “What can happen when imagination overcomes reason?” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of short stories, referring back to the Mentor Text, taking a close look at the assignment, and completing the pre-writing and planning, students begin to draft their short stories. As part of the drafting process, students review and discuss the Mentor Text again with guiding annotations and questions. Then, students begin to write the opening scene of their stories. Embedded in the materials is a Coherence and Craft portion of the drafting assignment. For this task, students learn about coherent writing and how sentence fragments and run-on sentences inhibit coherence. Then, they continue drafting, applying sentence variety to their narratives.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to revise and edit their writing with grade-appropriate strategies and tools.
Students have the opportunity to revise and edit their writing for each written performance task and performance-based assessment in the myPerspectives curriculum. While students have opportunities to revise and edit for both types of assignments, they follow a more intentional revision process for Performance Tasks since the Performance-Based Assessment is an assessment.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, students write a research report to the prompt “Write a focused, well-structured, and cohesive research report in which you explore a research question related to the unit focus on the power of language to effect change. Consider one of the following general topics to begin your inquiry: a historic figure who prompted a positive change in the world, a work of literature that inspired change, or a topic of your own choosing” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of research writing, referring back to the Mentor Text, taking a close look at the assignment, completing the pre-writing and planning, and drafting their papers, students complete the revision step. During this step, students review and discuss the Mentor Text again with guiding annotations and questions in an activity titled “Read Like a Writer.” Then, students use a checklist to revise their drafts. After revision, students move to the editing step. During this step, students review and discuss the Mentor Text again with guiding annotations and questions, this time focusing on sentence-level writing. For this assignment, students learn about active and passive voice, practice fixing passive voice in a sample paragraph, and then edit their own sentences in their research paper drafts.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to use technology to produce and publish writing.
For each written Performance Task in the myPerspectives curriculum, students have the opportunity to use technology to produce and publish their writing.
In Grade 12, Unit 2, students write an explanatory essay to the prompt “If you had the power to redesign society, what changes would you make?” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of explanatory essays, referring back to the Mentor Text, taking a close look at the assignment, completing the pre-writing and planning, drafting their papers, and revising and editing their essays, students complete the publishing and presenting step. Students are presented with two options:
“Option 1: Work with your classmates to publish your essays in a digital anthology. Include visuals, formatting, and graphics—such as headings, diagrams, maps, or captioned images–to emphasize important points.
Option 2: With a classmate, produce a radio feature. Record yourselves introducing, reading, and discussing your essays. Include background music or other sound effects to add interest.”
While these opportunities are present for all written performance tasks, the Teacher Edition does not provide sufficient instructional guidance on how to support students in completing them, some of which require specific technological knowledge. The Media Studio section of the Savvas Realize platform includes mini-lessons on technology to complete various assignments. The use of these mini-lessons is up to the teacher's discretion.
Indicator 2q.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities to practice the writing process using evidence-based strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in opportunities to practice the writing process using evidence-based strategies, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit. The materials provide some strategies to support MLLs during writing instruction; however, these supports are limited and inconsistent. Throughout the writing process, the materials provide five Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes in the Teacher Edition.
Some lessons include MLL supports directly related to the step in the writing process that all students are working on. For example, in Grade 10, Unit 1, all students complete an explanatory essay as their written Performance Task. During Drafting, the lesson on Coherence and Craft for all students focuses on transitional words and phrases and conjunctive adverbs to create smooth transitions. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition provides differentiated support for transitions. These supports, at the Substantial, Moderate, and Light levels, guide students to write using a variety of connecting words to combine phrases, clauses, and sentences. These supports represent one of several strong examples of how the materials support MLLs in practicing the writing process; however, such supports are not consistently embedded across all writing activities.
Across the writing process, MLL supports appear intermittently. For example, in Grade 12, Unit 1, the written Performance Task assigns students to: “Write a focused, well-structured, and cohesive argumentative essay. Throughout the writing process, the materials provide five Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes in the Teacher Edition. One focuses solely on vocabulary unconnected to the task all students engage in at the beginning of the writing process: Take a Closer Look at the Assignment. The other four Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes directly support the steps of the writing process in which they are embedded. However, key steps in the writing process—such as prewriting and planning, organizing an argument, and publishing or presenting—remain unsupported. Without guidance for these essential phases, MLLs cannot fully and effectively participate in the complete writing process.
While the materials include some instructional supports for MLLs within the writing process, they are limited in scope and inconsistently applied across writing tasks. In some cases, the materials provide differentiated guidance for a few steps in the writing process, but lack supports throughout the full writing process. As a result, MLLs do not receive the comprehensive scaffolds needed to practice the writing process from start to finish successfully.
Indicator 2r
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit), citing textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly and implicitly.
The evidence-based writing opportunities in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2r. The materials provide frequent and varied writing opportunities that require students to cite textual evidence to support both explicit analysis and inferences. After each text, students engage in a range of tasks—such as writing assignments, analysis activities, and language and craft work—that ask them to make and support claims using textual details. Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments in explanatory and argumentative genres further strengthen these skills by guiding students to develop central ideas and support them with relevant evidence and thoughtful analysis.
Materials provide frequent writing opportunities that require students to cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Materials provide frequent writing opportunities focused on students’ analyses and claims, which are developed by reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students regularly engage in activities that build their ability to cite textual evidence, make inferences, and construct and support original claims. After each text, students complete a range of tasks—including analysis and interpretation activities, language and craft analysis, and writing assignments—that require them to analyze the text, cite evidence, and apply evidence-based reasoning. Additionally, Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments in explanatory and argumentative writing further reinforce these skills, guiding students to develop clear claims, integrate relevant textual evidence, and strengthen their arguments through thoughtful analysis.
In Grade 9, Unit 2, students complete a Performance-Based Assessment in which they write an Informative Essay responding to the prompt, “Write an informative essay in which you synthesize the information you learned in this unit with your own ideas to respond to the Essential question: How can words inspire change?” In order to complete this assignment, students are required to develop a “clear thesis or central idea” and support it with “relevant and sufficient evidence, including facts and examples.”
In Grade 10, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare. After reading Act V, students complete a Writing activity where they write an interpretative essay to the prompt “Write an interpretative essay in which you analyze “The Tempest’s uneasy ending. Remember that this is a romance, in which a happy ending comes only after characters have faced daunting challenges. In your essay, consider how one of these two elements of discord complicates the harmony of the resolution:
Prospero is giving up his powers. See the ‘farewell to magic’ speech (Act V, Scene i, lines 33-57)
Prospero ‘forgives’ Antonio, while reminding him of his treachery. See their exchange. (Act V, Scene i, lines 129-141)
In your essay, use specific literary terms, such as couplet or epilogue. Likewise, use text evidence to support your analysis and interpretation.” Students are instructed to plan their essays, chart their evidence, develop their claims, and connect their ideas to the evidence.
In Grade 11, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from “America’s Constitution: A Biography” by Akhil Reed Amar. After reading, students complete various tasks where they are required to use evidence, make inferences, and draw their own analysis. First, they complete an analysis activity, where they answer several questions, including “Analyze: Reread paragraphs 3-4. What kind of document was the Constitution in the summer of 1787? Explain. Make Inferences: What does this suggest about the power of ‘We the People?’ Cite reasons that support your inference.” Later, students complete an Analyze and Interpret activity where they think about historical writing and commentary. After analyzing the types of evidence Amar uses in his writing, students answer the following question: “Connect: What is Amar’s thesis? Explain…Make a Judgment: Do you find Amar’s thesis convincing? Why, or why not? Explain, citing specific details.” Last, students complete a Language and Craft activity where they consider the rhetorical device of analogy. This activity includes three parts. First, students re-read specific paragraphs, identify the analogy, and explain how the analogy affects their understanding of the author’s ideas. Next, they analyze Amar’s “use of the phrases ‘I do’ and ‘we do’ throughout the text” and consider “how these phrases develop the analogy?” Students use this response to make an inference about the concept the analogy clarifies and then evaluate how the analogy affects their “understanding of Amar’s thesis.” Students are required to explain their responses with evidence. Last, students answer the question “Make a Judgment: Do you think analogies are an effective way to make complex information accessible to readers? Explain, citing examples from Amar’s text to support your thinking.”
Indicator 2r.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit), citing textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly and implicitly.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9-12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria that materials consistently provide strategies and supports for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) to fully and completely participate in opportunities to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit) to explain what the text says explicitly and implicitly. While materials include opportunities for students to engage in various modes of writing, including research and analytical writing, the supports provided do not consistently ensure that MLL students can fully and meaningfully participate in these writing tasks alongside their peers.
Some strategies, supports, and accommodations support MLLs’ regular and active participation in speaking, listening, reading, and writing. These include general references to bilingual glossaries, suggestions for extended time, and options for multimodal responses. Additionally, some writing activities provide differentiated supports specifically for MLLs, like targeted grammar instruction and graphic organizers.
For example, in Grade 10, Unit 4, after reading The Tempest, Act V, all students write an interpretive essay in which they “analyze The Tempest’s uneasy ending.” The assignment calls for students to “consider how one of these two elements of discord complicates the harmony of the resolution,” to “use specific literary terms,” and to “Use text evidence to support your analysis and interpretation.” The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to help students edit for subject-verb agreement across all three levels of support. While the materials provide this grammatical support for MLLs as part of the revision process for this argument writing task, this task lacks any support for MLLs to cite textual evidence to support their analysis or to craft strong claims. The supports provided help build grammatical skills, but they are not fully aligned to the academic writing demands of the task, and thus do not fully support MLL students’ access to or engagement in evidence-based writing.
The materials provide some strategies to support all students, including MLLs, in engaging with grade-level content. However, these supports tend to be generic in nature and often appear at the beginning of units as suggested practices for all lessons. These include general scaffolds such as extended time, peer support, and the use of visual aids. While these supports have the potential to provide access, they require significant teacher customization to align with the specific writing tasks and do not consistently help MLLs understand the task, navigate the academic content, or demonstrate their learning through writing.
The materials do not consistently go beyond vocabulary and grammar to address language functions and disciplinary practices tied to evidence-based writing. Most of the supports focus heavily on vocabulary development, such as bilingual glossaries, word translation tools, and vocabulary graphic organizers like the Frayer Model. While these can assist with word-level comprehension, they do not provide the functional language or structured opportunities needed for students to engage in making claims, citing evidence, or explaining inferences from texts.
In summary, while the materials include some intentional supports, they do not consistently support MLLs’ full and complete participation in evidence-based writing tasks. The materials place disproportionate emphasis on vocabulary, with insufficient attention to the specific language demands required for students to successfully complete grade-level writing tasks. As a result, MLLs cannot fully and completely participate in evidence-based writing practice as outlined in the materials.
Indicator 2s
Materials include explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The explicit instruction of research skills in myPerspectives partially meets expectations for indicator 2s. The curriculum includes frequent opportunities for research, such as Inquiry and Research tasks, Build Knowledge activities, and longer Research assignments that are connected to the texts students read. While these tasks engage students in researching and analyzing information from multiple sources, the materials provide limited explicit instruction in core research skills. Teacher guidance focuses more on facilitating activities than on teaching research skills. Some Performance Tasks require students to write research papers, and include some targeted instruction and differentiation support. Although the Savvas Realize platform includes optional mini-lessons and student-facing documents on research skills, these resources are still optional and up to the teacher’s discretion.
Materials include research projects to build research skills that lead to mastery of the grade-level standards. Materials include limited instruction of research skills that encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
After reading each text, students complete several tasks. One of these tasks in the myPerspectives program is called Inquiry and Research. This short task requires students to apply the grade-level standards that are related to research skills. Inquiry and Research tasks in the program are directly related to the texts under study, but are not available for every text; however, there are several tasks in each unit. In myPerspectives materials, many of the texts include additional activities titled Build Knowledge and Digital Perspectives. These activities often provide teachers with guidance on how they can support students in facilitating further learning related to the text under study across different topics such as science, social studies, and history. Often, these activities include a research component. The Teacher Edition includes teacher guidance on how to facilitate inquiry and research activities, build knowledge activities, and digital perspectives activities. However, there is limited guidance for specifically teaching students the skills in the standards cited for these activities.
In Grade 9, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Through the Tunnel” by Doris Lessing. The Build Knowledge activity included as an option during reading states: “Science: After intense breath training and hours spent swimming, Jerry starts having nosebleeds. Explain that nosebleeds can be a common occurrence for competitive swimmers. Though nosebleeds are not life-threatening, they can cause dizziness and blood loss if frequent or severe. Have students research common causes and treatments for nosebleeds. Instruct them to take notes on their findings. Give volunteers an opportunity to share their information with the class.”
In Grade 10, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka. After reading, students complete several activities, including an Inquiry and Research activity. For this activity, students research the question “What kind of bug does Gregor become?,” consulting a variety of sources. Then, they synthesize the information they found. Teacher guidance states to “Explain to students that synthesizing information involves more than simply compiling the information or ideas presented in multiple sources. Rather, students should analyze the information they have gathered and combine the results of their analysis into a unified whole.” While the following standard is cited as related to this activity: “Conduct short as well more sustained research projects to answer a question or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation,” there is limited guidance or explicit instruction on synthesis skills or the other skills listed in the standard. The Grouping Strategy box in the Teacher Edition provides teachers with options on how to appropriately group students to complete this activity, including small groups, pairs, and independently. The overall guidance for the activity states, “Guide students in writing with the appropriate level of specificity and detail as they craft paraphrases for the Inquiry and Research activity.” Under each type of grouping, the guide provides general guidance on how the teacher should support students. For example, for pairs, guidance states, “Have students work in pairs to research, select a source, note the citation, and write two paraphrased sentences. Then, have pairs write a sentence comparing the information with what happened in the story.”
Another task students complete after reading a few of the texts is called Research. This task is longer than the Inquiry and Research task. For Research tasks, the program requires students to complete research activities such as a research report, etc. Research tasks are present in some units throughout the program. Additionally, some of the Writing Performance Tasks in the program are Research reports or Research papers. For the Research activities and Performance Tasks, the Teacher Edition includes some explicit instruction on research skills. While present, the instruction is limited.
In Unit 3, Peer-Group Learning, students read three poems by Langston Hughes, “The Negro Speaks of Rivers,” “I, Too,” and “Refugee in America.” After reading, students complete several activities, including a Research activity that requires them to prepare and deliver a formal presentation on Langston Hughes’ life and his work. Students choose from two options or can select a topic of their own. While the assignment includes helpful information for students, such as what to capture from different types of sources, teacher guidance does not include explicit instruction on research skills and includes the following: “As groups begin researching and preparing their presentations, have them go over the details and evidence they plan to use. Remind them to be sure that their information supports their ideas.” Additional guidance is about facilitating the activity and reminders to provide for students, such as a reminder that “a thesis is a concise statement of their central idea, which they will support with details and evidence.” There is no further teacher guidance on instruction on explicitly teaching students how to conduct research.
Students complete a Research Report or Paper as the Writing Performance Task in the following units: Grade 9, Unit 2; Grade 10, Unit 5; Grade 11, Unit 3; Grade 12, Unit 6
In Grade 12, Unit 6, students write a research report as the written Performance task on the prompt “Write a focused, well-structured, and cohesive research report in which you explore a research question related to the concept of finding home, as expressed in literature in the 20th and 21st centuries.” To answer the prompt, students consider the works of several of the writers from the unit. The Teacher Edition includes some research and writing guidance throughout the writing process, including references to skills videos from the Skills Center of the platform, which may be helpful to share with students, such as: Develop and Revise a Research Plan, Track and Organize Sources, and Use Source Material Ethically.
For Prewriting and Planning, teacher guidance starts with a focus on the essential point: “Generating questions is a way to quickly capture some interesting ideas you might like to research. Don’t stop to consider whether each question is perfect for now. You can narrow the list later.” The guidance includes differentiation considerations for students who may need different levels of support, including substantial, moderate, and light. For moderate support, the guidance states, “Encourage students to think outside the box as they develop their questions. For example, is there something they were able to read between the lines in the work of the writers listed in the prompt? Have students think about how the writers explore the theme of home in their writing and how that might open some doors for inquiry.” As students refine their research question, they use a checklist to evaluate its complexity, significance, and scope. Next, students use a graphic organizer to locate sources and evaluate information. Teacher guidance states, “Explain to students that the information they use to conduct their research is the raw material of their reports, so it is critical that they use appropriate sources. Walk students through the information on the student page to ensure that they have a strong understanding of strategies for finding and using the right type of sources.” As students move into organizing their reports, teacher guidance provides teachers with assistance in facilitating the tasks of synthesizing their thinking, writing their theses, choosing a report structure, collecting evidence, and planning their outlines. Limited instruction is present in the guidance regarding students clarifying their responses. Teacher guidance states, “Review the main steps of clarifying a response with students. Discuss how initial ideas and impressions will naturally evolve throughout the research process, and this should be expected. Explain to students that this does not mean that their initial ideas or thoughts were wrong in any way, but the new material has enriched what they already knew.” While facilitation guidance and student handouts, including steps, are present, there is no additional explicit instruction on organizing research reports.
On the Savvas Realize Platform, mini-lessons on research skills and documents on research topics (such as Conducting Research, Reviewing Research Findings, Incorporating Research Into Writing, and MLA Style for Listing Sources) for student use are included in the Writing and Research Center, found in the Skills Center. Teacher Edition provides some guidance on when and how to use them in collaboration with each unit’s specific learning. The Digital Resources to Customize section at the beginning of each unit lists optional resources that teachers may use throughout the unit to support student learning. At times, research mini-lessons and videos are referenced there. These resources are still optional and up to the teacher’s discretion.
Indicator 2s.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9–12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to develop students’ knowledge using multiple texts and source materials. The materials include opportunities for students to engage in research and writing tasks using multiple sources, but the specific supports and scaffolds necessary to ensure full and complete participation by MLLs are inconsistently present and not sufficiently developed across the program.
The materials offer some models and protocols for research instruction; however, they do not consistently consider the specific scaffolds needed by MLLs. Teachers are given general guidance for facilitating research projects and assignments, such as steps for inquiry, organizing evidence, and developing presentations. In some cases, students are directed to use digital tools and graphic organizers to plan their research. However, the teacher-facing materials rarely include language-specific strategies or structured support plans tailored for MLLs, such as differentiated sentence frames, research vocabulary supports, or culturally responsive approaches to research content. This makes it difficult for educators to implement research instruction in a way that promotes full MLL participation without developing their own extensive modifications.
For example, in Grade 12, Unit 6, students write a research report as the written Performance task on the prompt “Write a focused, well-structured, and cohesive research report in which you explore a research question related to the concept of finding home, as expressed in literature in the 20th and 21st centuries.” To answer the prompt, students consider the works of several of the writers from the unit. The Teacher Edition breaks down the research and writing process into multiple steps, including general differentiation for all students and supports designed explicitly for MLLs. Some of this guidance directly supports MLLs’ full and complete participation in writing their research papers. For example, in Prewriting and Planning, for the Organize Your Report: Make a Plan activity, the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “Help students explain their theses with increasing specificity and detail as they outline their research reports.” Detailed guidance on Substantial, Moderate, and Light supports for outlining follows. However, the other MLL support for this performance task provides guidance for teachers to differentiate the Focus on Sentences activity during editing. The other steps in the writing process, including Write and Refine Your Research Question, Locate Sources and Evaluate Information, and Drafting, lack any MLL-specific supports. The general supports provided are limited to helping struggling students determine relevant sources and do not include any linguistic scaffolding or other guidance for teachers on supporting students who understand the concepts but may not be able to access the material. In this example and throughout grades and units, only some MLL supports focus on those skills essential to reaching grade-level research standards by addressing the language functions required to complete the assignment.
In addition, many of the texts include additional activities titled Build Knowledge. These activities often provide teachers with guidance on how they can support students in facilitating further learning related to the text under study across different topics such as science, social studies, and history. However, this guidance never mentions MLLs, effectively limiting their access to this activity.
The materials include multiple writing and research-based tasks throughout the program. For instance, the Writing and Research Center offers mini-lessons on grammar and writing-related topics such as active vs. passive voice and argumentative writing skills. These lessons include closed-captioned videos and multiple-choice comprehension checks. While these tools can support general writing development, they do not include language-specific scaffolds or differentiated instruction to meet the varying needs of MLLs. For example, when the materials direct students to identify strong claims or revise sentences, there is limited explicit instruction on how to use academic language or sentence structures to support research-based writing. The focus remains on general language development rather than the specific demands of research.
Where supports are present, they do not go far enough in assisting students in producing the language needed to demonstrate their understanding. There is minimal use of language models or frames that would help MLLs construct research questions, summarize evidence, or write findings using the appropriate academic register. Supports tend to be general, often focused on reading comprehension or writing mechanics rather than on discipline-specific language needed for research synthesis and communication. They are not consistently aligned with the linguistic functions required to conduct and present research, such as arguing a claim, citing sources, or evaluating the credibility of information. Additionally, the materials do not adequately integrate opportunities for students to develop language across all four domains—speaking, listening, reading, and writing—during the research process. While students do engage in writing and sometimes present findings, there are few explicit supports to help MLLs listen for, talk through, or read complex research-related content with appropriate scaffolding. Opportunities to use language collaboratively or reflect on and revise language choices are especially limited.
There are missed opportunities to help students build on new learning through structured revisions of their research and writing. Though research projects often include drafting and editing stages, the materials do not guide teachers in providing feedback that addresses both content understanding and language use for MLLs. Nor are there language-specific checkpoints or strategies to help MLLs monitor their use of academic vocabulary, syntax, or text structure over multiple drafts.
This partial implementation results in a missed opportunity to fully support MLLs in accessing and producing the language needed for research writing. While all students are expected to complete research-based tasks with academic rigor, the absence of systematic and intentional scaffolds undermines full participation for MLLs. The tasks are not oversimplified or watered down, but they do not adequately support students in building the language skills necessary to meet the academic expectations.
While the materials offer multiple opportunities for students to learn research skills, they lack the consistent, targeted scaffolding needed for MLLs to fully engage in and demonstrate understanding through integrated speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The absence of explicit support for language production and the coordinated use of all four language domains limits MLLs’ ability to access and benefit from research instruction on par with their peers.
Indicator 2t
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic. r.
The opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2t. The curriculum provides multiple research opportunities that are closely connected to the texts and topics of study within each unit. Through Inquiry and Research tasks, students explore related themes by generating questions, narrowing or broadening their inquiry, gathering information from multiple sources, and refining their research focus. These tasks deepen students’ understanding of unit content while reinforcing research skills such as evaluating sources, using search terms effectively, and citing evidence. While not included after every text, these tasks occur regularly. Various tasks guide students to use search terms effectively, evaluate the credibility of sources, and cite evidence properly, including Research Reports and some Performance Tasks. Additionally, while all skills are present throughout the curriculum, some skills are covered more than others. Some research assignments also encourage students to draw on both literary and informational texts to support analysis and reflection aligned to the unit’s essential questions and themes. This integrated approach helps students build meaningful research skills while engaging with the curriculum’s core topics.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to apply research skills to short and sustained research projects by answering a given or self-generated question or solving a problem, narrowing or broadening the inquiry when appropriate, synthesizing multiple sources on the subject, and demonstrating knowledge of the subject under investigation.
The Inquiry and Research activities that students complete after reading some texts provide opportunities for students to apply research skills to research projects by answering and generating questions, synthesizing several sources, and demonstrating knowledge of a topic.
In Grade 9, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Seventh Man” by Haruki Murakami. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states, “Tsunamis like the one in this story threaten Japan and many other island nations in a variety of ways. Write two questions to guide a short research project about the effects of tsunamis on Japan. Make sure your questions focus on specific aspects of the broader topic.” Next, students conduct research and write an explanation of their findings.
In Grade 10, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Tempest by William Shakespeare. After reading Act V, students complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task requires students to write a research report. The task states, “The magical island is an archetype, or concept that is found in the literature and folklore of all cultures. Conduct research into the magical island archetype as it appears in works other than The Tempest. Create a research plan.” The research plan students produce must include three steps: generate a question, list possible sources, and set a schedule. The task provides students with guiding questions they should ask themselves to refine their research as they go, such as “Do you need to narrow or broaden your question? Are you able to draw connections and synthesize information in meaningful ways?” After researching, students write a brief report of their findings.
Materials provide opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, use search terms effectively, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.
Some of the Research and Inquiry activities that students complete after reading some texts provide opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple sources, use search terms effectively, paraphrase, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and practice academic citations.
In Grade 9, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s I Have a Dream” speech. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states, “Deepen your understanding of this speech by conducting research on the 1963 March on Washington. Write a brief report of your findings. As you review sources, be on the alert for bias, which is a prejudice either for or against something. A biased writer or speaker attempts to manipulate their audience by presenting a false view of reality and playing on fear or other emotions.” The assignment outlines elements to look out for that may signal bias.
In Grade 10, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states to “Research Kurt Vonnegut’s theory about the ‘shapes of stories,’ including how this idea was received, both when he first presented it and later in his career. Then, write an explanation of your findings. Use advanced searches to locate two reliable sources, one print and one digital.” The assignment includes written guidance for students on how to use effective search terms.
The Research Essays and Reports that students complete as written Performance Tasks in a unit in the program provide students with the opportunity to assess the credibility of sources, quote and paraphrase, avoid plagiarism, and use proper citations. Additional longer Research activities that students complete after reading a few texts in the materials also provide them with opportunities to practice some of these skills.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, Peer-Group Learning, students read “Encountering the Other: The Challenge of the 21st Century” by Ryszard Kapucinski. After reading, they complete several tasks, including a Research task. For this task, students must complete a research report about one of the cultures Kapucinski mentions in the lecture. To complete the report, students must gather information from sources and evaluate sources for credibility, ensuring that their sources are free of bias.
In Grade 11, Unit 3, students write a research report on the broad unit focus on power and language to effect change as the unit’s written Performance Task. In order to successfully complete this task, students write and refine a research question, use advanced searches to identify and gather a variety of sources, and must evaluate those sources for credibility and reliability. After drafting, materials remind students about when a citation is (direct quote, paraphrase, or summary of someone else’s idea) and is not needed (common knowledge, one’s own ideas). After editing, students must create a works cited list using MLA style.
Materials provide opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Some of the Research and Inquiry activities that students complete after reading some texts provide opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. These opportunities allow students to build more knowledge of the topics of study in the unit. Additional, longer Research activities that students complete after reading a few texts in the materials also provide them with opportunities to practice some of these skills.
In Grade 12, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection of four poems, including “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, “The Song of the Mud” by Mary Borden, “Thanks” by Yusef Komunyakaa, and “Thoughts on Hanoi” by Nguyen Thi Vinh. After reading, they complete several tasks, including a Research task. For this task, students must complete a research report about “warfare during World War I or the Vietnam War.” To be successful in this task, students must “make connections between some of the historical realities of the war and the poems in this collection.”
Some research-based Performance Tasks in the program require students to use the texts from the unit, including informational texts, to complete a research-based task.
In Grade 11, Unit 6, students work in groups to create and deliver a multimedia presentation in response to the question “What qualities or strategies help us navigate change successfully?” as one of the unit’s Performance tasks. In order to complete this activity, students must locate secondary sources and find information “from experts, such as social scientists or psychologists” that speaks to their topic, in addition to the selections they already read throughout the unit.
In Grade 12, Unit 2, students use the texts from the unit and additional sources from their own research to write an explanatory essay to the prompt “If you had the power to redesign society, what changes would you make?” as the unit’s written Performance Task. The texts in this unit include narrative poems and a spoken word poem.
Indicator 2t.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of topics.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 9–12 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in opportunities to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic. The materials include lessons and tasks that ask students to apply their research skills, but support for MLLs is limited and inconsistently applied, limiting MLLs’ opportunities to apply research skills to develop their knowledge of topics.
In the places where the materials provide MLL supports for participation in applying research skills, they do not sufficiently support students in completing the full scope of the task. For example, in Grade 11, Unit 3, students write a research report on the broad unit focus on power and language to effect change as the unit’s written Performance Task. The materials guide students through the steps in the research process, which include:
Completing the “Am I ready to write?” checklist
Prewriting and Planning with the substeps: Write to Refine Your Research Question, Locate Sources and Evaluate Information, Clarify Your Response, and Organize Your Report: Make a Plan
Drafting
Revising
Editing
Publishing and Presenting
The materials only include MLL supports for the “Am I ready to write?” checklist, Editing, and Publishing and Presenting. While some scaffolds built into core instruction, like graphic organizers, support MLLs’ participation in tasks like creating a research report outline, the absence of targeted linguistic supports limits the ability of MLLs at different language proficiencies to complete this performance task in its entirety.
Furthermore, many of the texts in the program include additional activities titled Build Knowledge. These activities often provide teachers with guidance on how they can support students in facilitating further learning related to the text under study across different topics such as science, social studies, and history. However, this guidance never includes differentiation considerations, nor does it mention MLLs.
While the program includes research tasks and some supports for background knowledge, support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities to apply research skills to develop their knowledge of topics is limited and inconsistently applied.
Indicator 2u
Materials include formative assessments and guidance that provide the teacher with information for instructional next steps.
The formative assessments and teacher guidance on formative assessments in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2u. The myPerspectives curriculum includes frequent formative assessments and support for teachers in monitoring student progress and skill development. During and after reading, students complete tasks such as Comprehension Checks, Reading Strategy questions, Close-Read responses, and Build Insight questions, all of which function as formative assessments. The Teacher Edition provides sample responses, allowing teachers to assess student understanding in real time. Additional formative assessments include Selection Tests and Exit Tickets. Data from these assessments populate reports that help teachers track mastery by standard and make instructional adjustments. Reteach and Practice resources are also available and aligned to Exit Tickets, offering targeted support with answer keys and sample responses, enabling teachers to address skill gaps effectively.
Materials include formative assessments and support for the teacher in determining students’ current skills/level of understanding.
Most of the tasks students complete throughout the myPerspectives program serve as formative assessments, allowing the teacher to determine students’ current level of skills or understanding.
During reading, Comprehension Checks, Reading Strategy questions, and Close-Read Response questions allow teachers to assess how well students understand each core text. The Teacher Edition provides sample responses to these questions.
After reading, other tasks, including Build Insight Questions (including First Thoughts, Summary, and Analysis), provide more opportunities to assess student understanding and skills. The Teacher Edition includes sample responses for analysis questions.
Selection Tests for each text provide an additional opportunity for teachers to determine student understanding and skills. These tests are multiple-choice and consist of Comprehension questions, Vocabulary Questions, and analyze-the-text questions. Each Selection Test answer key provides the teachers with the objective of the question.
In Grade 11, Unit 6, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Man to Send Rain Clouds” by Leslie Marmon Silko. After reading, they complete several tasks, including a Selection Test consisting of eight multiple-choice questions, such as the Concept Vocabulary Question “In which type of environment would tumbleweeds most likely be observed?” and the Analyze the Text Question “Read this excerpt from ‘The Man to Send Rain Clouds’...If Leon believes that the Christian ritual is unnecessary, what is most likely the reason that he asks Father Paul to sprinkle holy water on Teofilio’s grave?” The Answer key provides the answers.
After reading, each text in the program includes multiple exit tickets so that teachers can assess student skills. Exit tickets are quick skills assessments in a multiple-choice format. They are present following some of the tasks included after each text and vary in focus, including assessing a general concept, word knowledge, and grammar skills. Each Teacher Resource provided for each Exit Ticket includes a PowerPoint presentation.
In Grade, Unit 6, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Back to My Home Country: An Essay” by Andrea Levy. After reading, students complete various tasks and materials, including three exit tickets connected to the concepts and skills covered in some of these tasks. Exit Tickets include an Exit Ticket on Point of View and Purpose, an Exit Ticket on Contested Usage, and an Exit Ticket on Diction and Syntax.
Materials include guidance that supports the teacher in making instructional adjustments to increase student progress.
Student responses on Selection Tests and Exit Tickets populate the Data section, which teachers can use to monitor student progress and growth. Reports include class mastery by standard, student mastery, average mastery, standard item analysis, student progress, and usage by student.
Teacher Resources for Exit Tickets include a Reteach and Practice assignment that teachers can assign to students who need more practice. These assignments include isolated skills practice. Each Reteach and Practice assignment includes an Answer Key.
In Grade 9, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read “There Will Come Soft Rains” by Ray Bradbury. After reading, students complete various tasks, including an Exit Ticket on Linear Plot Development. A Reteach and Practice assignment is included that teachers can use with students who need more practice based on the Exit Ticket results. The reteach assignment includes information on linear plot development (including definition and example of key literary terms), an excerpt from a story, and five questions (four short-response and one multiple-choice), including “Is the story an example of linear plot development? Explain.” The Teacher Resource includes sample student responses to all questions.
Indicator 2v
Materials include culminating tasks/summative assessments that require students to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, and listening).
The culminating/summative assessments in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2v. The program includes multiple culminating tasks and summative assessments in each unit aligned to the unit’s topic/theme or essential question. These include Performance Tasks, Unit Projects, Performance-Based Assessments, and Unit Tests, each offering students opportunities to demonstrate the knowledge and skills developed throughout the unit. Performance Tasks integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills, while Unit Projects encourage creative application of learning, and Unit Tests assess ELA concepts and standards. Written Tasks are scaffolded and supported throughout the unit with instruction, skill development, and the use of Mentor Texts, preparing students for success. While the program includes progress monitoring tools and genre-specific rubrics for writing tasks, it offers limited rubric-based guidance for evaluating Unit Projects. The teacher guidance for determining and evaluating student performance on summative assessments is generally broad. While tools are provided for most assessments, the materials do not provide guidance on effectively using these tools.
Culminating tasks/summative assessments are evident in each unit/module and align to the unit’s/module’s topic or theme. Culminating tasks/summative assessments provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening).
Each unit in the myPerspectives program contains several culminating tasks/summative assessments. Culminating tasks include two Performance Tasks, a Unit Project, and a Performance-Based Assessment, and summative assessments include Unit Tests. Performance Tasks, Unit Projects, and Performance-Based Assessments align with each unit's topic or theme and are designed for students to exhibit both the knowledge and skills they’ve gained throughout the unit. Unit Tests solely align with the unit’s skills and ELA concepts.
The design of the culminating tasks/assessments in the program varies. Performance Tasks follow the end of Whole-Class Learning and Peer-Group Learning, respectively. While the first Performance Task in a unit is a written process-based writing piece, the second is a Speaking and listening activity completed in groups. Performance-based assessments are independently completed process-based writing pieces focused on each unit’s essential question. Unit Projects provide students with choices and, therefore, vary in their structure. Unit Tests are multiple-choice assessments focused on ELA concepts and skills like reading comprehension, word study, and conventions.
In Grade 9, students complete Unit 3, Crazy, Stupid Love, with the essential question “What is true love?” Throughout the Whole-Class Learning portion of the unit, students read William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. Following Whole-Class Learning, students complete the written Performance Task where they are to write a literary analysis essay to the prompt, “Write a literary analysis essay about a literary work you recently read. The work you choose should have sparked a strong reaction in you–you may have loved it, disliked it, or been troubled by it in some way. Include the elements of literary analysis in your essay.” To complete this task, students must integrate both reading and writing skills. For Peer-Group Learning, students read three texts/text sets (two literary criticisms, a short story, and a poetry collection of three poems). Following Peer-Group Learning, students complete the Speaking and Listening Performance Task to the prompt, “With your group, develop an advertisement in which you use at least one rhetorical device and one logical fallacy. Write an explanation of your process, which includes the purpose of the rhetorical device and the effects of the logical fallacy. Then, present your advertisement to the class.” To complete this task, students must integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. For Independent Learning, students must choose one of three texts and text-set options to read and analyze. Following Independent Learning, students develop their Unit Project. The Unit Project for this unit presents students with the option of writing an advice column, creating a collage, or holding a group discussion. All three options require that students focus on the selections from the unit. After completing the Unit Project, students complete the Performance-Based Assessment to the prompt, “Write an argumentative essay in which you use textual evidence as your personal experiences and observations to respond to the essential question: What is true love?” To complete this task, students must integrate both reading and writing skills. After completing the Performance-Based Assessment, students complete the Unit Test, which includes 25 multiple-choice questions focused on various skills and concepts students learned throughout the unit, such as poetic structure, argumentation, context clues, rhetorical devices, and logical fallacies.
Additional assessments in the myPerspectives program include multiple-choice assessments at the beginning, middle, and end of the year. These tests assess reading comprehension, vocabulary, and conventions skills.
Materials provide opportunities to support students in gaining the knowledge and skills needed to complete the culminating tasks/summative assessments.
Students gain the knowledge and skills throughout each unit to complete culminating tasks/summative assessments.
The materials chunk the assignment into parts for each Performance Task, including instruction and guidance on completing each component.
In Grade 10, Unit 3, students complete a written Performance Task after the Whole-Class Learning component, which involves examining a fine art gallery and a video and reading Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis. For this task, students must “Write a well-structured and cohesive argumentative essay in which you state and defend a position on the following question: Is the experience of being an outsider universal? Support your ideas with evidence from your reading, personal experience, and any research you conduct.” The task is chunked into sections comprising the writing process, including planning, prewriting, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing. For each component, materials include instruction, guidance, and reference the unit’s Mentor Text. To complete this assignment, students must grapple with a major focus from the unit reading, being an outsider or outcast, which is most embodied by Gregor Samsa’s character. Students must also use the academic vocabulary they learned earlier in the unit.
To complete each Performance-Based Assessment, students must consider the knowledge they gained from the selections throughout the unit and solidify their own perspectives on the unit’s essential question.
In Grade 12, Unit 2, the Performance-Based Assessment requires students to write “an explanatory essay in which you synthesize information you learned in this unit with your own ideas to respond to the Essential Question: How valid are social roles?” Students should use the Evidence Logs they completed after reading each text to help them complete this task. Students should apply the skills they learned in the unit’s written Performance Task, where they also wrote an explanatory essay.
To complete each Unit Test, students must apply the reading comprehension, word study, vocabulary, and conventions skills they developed throughout the unit.
To complete each Unit Project, students must consider all the learning from the unit and apply it in a creative context.
Materials include broad guidance that supports the teacher in determining and evaluating student performance on the culminating tasks/summative assessments in the program.
The Data section on the Savvas Realize platform populates with Unit Tests and beginning, mid, and end-of-year assessments, which teachers can use to monitor student progress and growth. Reports include class mastery by standard, student mastery, average mastery, standard item analysis, student progress, and usage by student.
Each Unit Test and beginning, mid, and end-of-year assessment includes a Reinforcement Resource for the Teacher. This resource “lists the Student Edition page on which the skill assessed is taught, as well as supporting reinforcement resources.” This resource provides the following guidance to teachers: “As warranted by student results, you may wish to revisit the Student Edition lesson or assign the reinforcement resource(s) listed.” For students who take Unit Tests online, Reinforcement is automatically assigned based on their results.
The Writing and Research Center on the platform includes rubrics by writing genre (argumentative, informative/explanatory, narrative, and research) that teachers can use to evaluate Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments. However, additional guidance on using rubrics or having students reflect on their writing after it is scored is not provided.
Unit Projects do not include rubrics to support the teacher in determining and evaluating student performance. Instead, the Teacher Edition includes the following guidance for teachers for unit projects: “You may want to co-author rubrics with students to ensure that their work meets expectations.”