3rd-5th Grade - Gateway 2
Back to 3rd-5th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Rigor and Mathematical Practices
| Score | |
|---|---|
Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations | 100% |
Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance | 8 / 8 |
Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices | 8 / 8 |
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for rigor and balance and mathematical practices. The materials help students develop procedural skills, fluency, and application. The materials also make meaningful connections between the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).
Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations by giving appropriate attention to: developing students’ conceptual understanding; procedural skill and fluency; and engaging applications.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for rigor. The materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, give attention throughout the year to procedural skill and fluency, and spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of mathematics. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade.
Indicator 2a
Materials support the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Multiple conceptual understanding problems are embedded throughout the grade level within the Investigate, Discussions, In-class examples and Big Ideas Tasks. Students have opportunities to engage with these problems both independently and with teacher support.
According to the Implementation Handbook, Foundational Beliefs, “Each lesson begins with opportunities for students to engage in investigation resulting in observations, conjectures, and discovery of informal strategies. These opportunities support students in developing an understanding of the mathematical concepts grounded in meaningful experience and connected to prior learning, building a sturdy conceptual foundation. From here, the focus turns to formalizing these ideas through explicit instruction of new mathematical terminology, formal strategies, and key concepts, while connecting back to students’ experiences during their investigation.”
Examples include:
Grade 3, Chapter 4, Practice Workbook, Operations and Algebraic Thinking: Relate Multiplication and Division, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they find the missing factor in multiplication equations. Exercise 4 states, “Which equation has the same unknown value as 63\div7=___?” Answer choices include, “A. 63=7\times___, B. 63=___\times7, C. ___ \div7=63, D. 7= ___ \div63.” (3.OA.6)
Grade 4, Chapter 1, Lesson 1, In-Class Practice, students develop conceptual understanding as they generalize place value understanding for multi-digit whole numbers and establish a foundational understanding that supports strategies for computing products and quotients of multi-digit whole numbers throughout the grade. In Exercises 2-13, students identify the value of an underlined digit in a multi-digit number. For example the materials state, “Exercise 2. 93,517,” with the 5 underlined. In-Class Practice 14, students compare the values of two identical digits in a multi-digit number. A Supporting Learners note provides teachers with guidance to support students by using an anchor chart that includes the standard, word, and expanded forms of a six-digit number to help students think about numbers in various ways. The note also suggests that students continue using base-ten blocks, quick sketches, and Place Value Mats. For Exercise 14, the Supporting Learners note recommends that students write the value of each digit to make the pattern visible. (4.NBT.A)
Grade 5, Chapter 13, Lesson 1, Practice Workbook, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they explain how shapes with different dimensions can have the same volume. Exercise 11 states, “Your friend says the two figures have the same volume. Is your friend correct? Explain.” The first figure is a rectangular prism made of six cubes. It measures 3 inches long, 2 inches high, and 1 inch wide. The second figure is a rectangular prism made of six cubes arranged in a single row. It measures 6 centimeters long, 1 centimeter high, and 1 centimeter wide. (5.MD.C)
Indicator 2a.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. The materials provide opportunities for students to explore and make sense of mathematical ideas while engaging with multiple representations to formalize procedures, supporting conceptual understanding. To do this, the materials provide students with the opportunity to apply prior knowledge to new tasks, inviting students to find relationships within and between concrete representations, visual representations, and abstract written strategies. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 5, Chapter 5, Multiply Decimals, Lesson 5.3, where students draw to model multiplying decimals and whole numbers (5.NBT.7). The WIDA English Language Development [ELD] Standards are as follows: “Interpret mathematical explanations by evaluating a pattern or structure that follows a given rule. Construct mathematical explanations that share a solution with others.” In the first Key Concept, students participate in a whole-class, guided modeling by the teacher of how to shade a hundreds grid to represent a multiplication expression. The lesson facilitation states, “Require students to use precise vocabulary demonstrating place value. Students should say ‘twenty-three hundredths’ instead of ‘point two three’ or ‘point twenty-three’.” There are no language supports provided for MLLs to use and apply precise vocabulary. The Key Concept continues with students building conceptual understanding as they complete several problems similar to the guided example, with teacher prompts for the whole class to compare examples to look for a pattern or structure. The English Learner Support Box includes targeted scaffolds that connect language to the mathematical task by having students use the terms shade and shaded to describe their work, supporting meaning-making of vocabulary in context. Visual modeling and guided questioning provide opportunities for listening, speaking, and demonstrating understanding through actions. However, the scaffolds are primarily limited to short, teacher-directed exchanges and do not consistently support independent language production. Additionally, the supports are not aligned to the language demands of the task of interpreting mathematical explanations by evaluating a pattern or structure. As a result, while the materials provide meaningful strategies that support access to conceptual understanding, they do not consistently ensure full and complete participation for all MLLs as it relates to the tagged WIDA standards.
In contrast, MLLs are fully supported in Grade 3, Chapter 6, Relate Area to Multiplication, Lesson 6.3, where students compare two rectangles to connect physical dimensions to unit squares and interpret the meaning of factors and products in an area model (3.MD.5a, 5b, 7a). The WIDA ELD Standards are as follows: “Construct mathematical explanations that describe a solution and steps used to solve a problem with others. Construct mathematical arguments that justify conclusion steps and strategies in simple patterns.” In the first Key Concept, students use visual array models, with and without unit squares, to explain how multiplication and repeated addition both represent the total number of unit squares, reinforcing conceptual understanding of area. Students work with partners to interpret and label rows, columns, and areas using standard units while determining the area of rectangles. The English Learner Support note guides MLLs to interpret and label the units of the dimensions and the total area through structured sentence frames and teacher prompts such as, “What unit of length is used in the dimensions of the rectangle?” These scaffolds support across proficiency levels for MLLs explaining their reasoning and constructing mathematical explanations, which is directly aligned to the academic task and the tagged WIDA ELD Standards.
Indicator 2b
Materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for providing intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Multiple procedural skill and fluency problems are embedded throughout the grade levels within In-Class Practice, which extends their learning from the Key Concept. The formal assessments offered at the lesson, chapter, multi-chapter, and course levels provide opportunities for students to independently demonstrate their procedural skills and fluency.
According to the Implementation Handbook, Foundational Beliefs, “Students have opportunities to develop procedural fluency through targeted practice supported by question prompts designed to encourage reflection on the accuracy and efficiency of their strategy. Practice opportunities support students in solving tasks that incorporate procedures with connections, requiring students to think meaningfully about which strategies they are using and how they apply in the problem context, and to reason about the meaning of the resulting solution. Students regularly apply their learning in new real-world or mathematical contexts, focusing on how strategies extend to these contexts and interpreting the meaning of the solution in light of the situational context.”
Examples include:
Grade 3, Chapter 7, Lesson 7, Practice Workbook, students demonstrate procedural skills and fluency as they add three numbers within 100. Exercise 10 states, “Which problem can you solve without regrouping?” Four problems are written vertically for students to solve, “282 + 274 + 260 = ___, 141 + 155 + 399 = ___, 195 + 300 + 315 = ___, 261 + 215 + 323 = ___” (3.NBT.2)
Grade 4, Chapter 2, Lesson 6, Practice, students demonstrate procedural skills and fluency as they solve subtraction problems using the standard algorithm and check for accuracy using addition. Exercise 1 states, “Find the difference. Use addition to check your answer. 3,473 - 2,760.”(4.NBT.4)
Grade 5, Chapter 4, Lesson 5, In-Class Practice, students develop procedural skill and fluency as they solve in-class practice problems. In the Teacher Guide, Guiding Student Learning notes support teachers in helping students compare and reflect on strategies, building fluency throughout the lesson. The materials state, “Exercises 1–3: Have students solve using an area model and then solve using partial products with regrouping. ‘Which strategy is more efficient? Which strategy makes more sense?’ Exercises 4–6: Monitor as students practice independently. Which students are using the area model efficiently? Which students can regroup and calculate accurately?” Student Edition, Exercise 1 states, “402\times221” is written vertically.” (5.NBT.5)
Indicator 2b.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in developing procedural skills and fluencies. The materials offer opportunities for students to encounter sequenced tasks that emphasize flexible strategies and efficient procedures alongside occasional student-to-student discourse. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 5, Chapter 4, Multiply Whole Numbers, Lesson 4.6, where students multiply multi-digit whole numbers (5.NBT.5). The WIDA English Language Development [ELD] Standards are as follows: “Interpret mathematical explanations by analyzing problem-solving steps. Construct mathematical explanations that share a solution with others.” During the In-Class Practice, students build towards procedural skills and fluency when they independently solve problems involving multi-digit multiplication using self-selected solution strategies. The English Learner Support note includes scaffolded questioning and sentence frames across proficiency levels, guiding students to compare the equations in the solution strategy with a partner. However, these supports offer minimal opportunities for MLLs to understand the steps to multiply multi-digit numbers or independently generate explanations of the procedural steps. As a result, the materials do not consistently ensure MLLs’ full and complete participation while developing procedural skills and fluency.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 3, Chapter 4, Division Facts and Strategies, Lesson 4.8, where students divide using strategies such as the relationship between multiplication and division or properties of operations (3.OA.7). The WIDA ELD Standard is as follows: “Construct mathematical explanations that describe a solution and steps used to solve a problem with others.” During the In-Class Practice, students build towards procedural skills and fluency when they independently solve problems involving division using self-selected solution strategies. The English Learner Support note includes scaffolded questioning and sentence frames across proficiency levels, guiding students to describe the steps they used to solve the problem, check their answer by working backward, and connect division and multiplication procedures. This allows MLLs to engage in procedural practice that is intertwined with reasoning, discussion, and reflection, which aligns with the tagged WIDA ELD Standard for this lesson.
Indicator 2c
Materials support the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Multiple routine and non-routine applications of mathematics are included throughout the grade level, with single and multi-step application problems embedded within lessons, including Investigate and Connecting to Real Life. Students engage with these applications both with teacher support and independently through Examples and Practice. Materials are designed to provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their understanding of grade-level mathematics when appropriate.
Examples include:
Grade 3, Chapter 4, Performance Task: Career - Protected by Landscaping, students apply their understanding by using multiplication and division to solve a multi-step, real-world problem involving water use. Exercise 2 states, “On Monday, a 100-gallon rain barrel was half full when it started raining. The barrel collected 16 more gallons of rain water. A landscaper uses 8 gallons of water every 2 days to water the shrubs and other plants. How much water will be left in the rain barrel after 2 weeks without any rain? Show how you know.” Nick’s Notes Performance Task, Group Engagement states, “Ask students to imagine that they are a landscape architect. ‘What important information does a landscape architect need to consider when designing a landscape?’ Exercise 2: Students may be overwhelmed by the amount of information given in this problem. Suggest that they first find the number of gallons of water in the rain barrel after the rain. Ask guiding questions, ‘How many gallons can the rain barrel hold?’ 100 ‘How can you find half of that amount?’ Sample answer: 50 + 50 = 100, so half of 100 is 50. ‘How many gallons of water are in the rain barrel after it collects 16 more gallons or rain water?’ 66.” (3.OA.3)
Grade 4, Chapter 3, Big Ideas Task, students apply their understanding as they use the four operations with whole numbers to solve problems. Students use multiplicative comparisons and the four operations to find and compare the amount of food eaten relative to body weight for various animals, including an animal of their choice. Exercise 1 states, "A hummingbird weighs 18 grams and eats 36 grams of nectar every day. A pygmy shrew weighs grams and eats 12 grams of food every day. a. Your friend says that a hummingbird eats 3 times as much as its body weight every day. Use a model to tell whether your friend is correct. Explain your choice of model. b. Which animal eats more food relative to its body weight? Use a model to explain. c. Choose an animal of your choice and research its average weight. If the animal ate 3 times as much as its body weight, how much food would this be? d. Research how much food the animal in part (c) actually eats every day. Does it eat more than or less than 3 times as much as its body weight every day? Explain how you know." (4.OA.1)
Grade 5, Chapter 8, Lesson 5, Practice, students apply their understanding as they add and compare fractions. Exercise 10 states, "Compare the sum of the weights of two rock sparrows and the sum of the weights of two yellow-throated sparrows. Show your work." Students are provided with data showing the fractional weights of various sparrows in a table. (5.NF.2)
Indicator 2c.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in utilizing mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications. The materials engage students in applying mathematics in routine and non-routine contexts, including single- and multi-step problems. These applications provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their ability to transfer and apply mathematical concepts and skills. However, the materials inconsistently offer language supports necessary for MLLs to fully access the linguistic demands of solving routine and non-routine application problems. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 4, Chapter 3, Multiply by One-Digit Numbers, Lesson 3.8, where students solve multi-step multiplication word problems (4.OA.3). The WIDA English Language Development [ELD] Standards are as follows: “Interpret mathematical explanations by identifying a concept or an entity. Construct mathematical explanations that describe data and/or steps to solve a problem.” During the In-Class Practice, students work independently to solve application problems. An English Learner Support note provides suggested scaffolds for one exercise of the In-Class Practice, amplifying language around the multiple uses of the word that in the word problem and clarifying what the word is referencing each time. While this language support provides MLLs with access to beginning to solve one word problems, the materials do not provide linguistic scaffolds for MLLs’ full and complete participation in solving the other application problems in the lesson, nor do they provide supports for the language demands outlined in the tagged WIDA ELD Standards of interpreting and constructing mathematical explanations.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in the Performance Task for Grade 3, Chapter 10, Understand Time and Measurement, where students apply their understanding of time and measurement to solve problems relating to a real-world situation (3.MD.1, 2, 3.OA.8). The English Learner Support note suggests that the teacher pairs MLLs with home language peers instead of working independently. Scaffolded supports across proficiency levels align language to the language demands of the task by prompting MLLs to critically examine which units of measure they should be working in given the information provided and the real-world situation. Together, these linguistic scaffolds support MLLs in using prior knowledge to solve application problems.
Indicator 2d
The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations in that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.
Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously across the materials to develop students' mathematical understanding of individual lessons. Each lesson within the curriculum supports a variety of instructional approaches that incorporate conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application in a balanced way.
For Example:
Grade 3, Chapter 13, Practice Workbook, Lesson Extra Practice, 13.2, students develop conceptual understanding and application as they solve area and perimeter word problems. Exercise 11 states, “You put painter’s tape around two rectangular windows. The windows are each 47 inches long and 32 inches wide. How much painter’s tape do you need?” (3.MD.8)
Grade 4, Chapter 3, Lesson 8, In-Class Practice, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency and application as they apply a problem-solving plan to understand and solve a problem about spending a budget on equipment for a science lab. Exercise 2 states, “You are restocking the science lab at your school. You have 4,500 to spend on microscopes and balances. You bought 3 microscopes that each cost 889 and 6 balances that each cost $236. How much do you have left to spend?” Nick’s Notes, In-Class Practice states, “As different contexts are presented, can students successfully implement the problem-solving plan? Can they identify the known information? Can students identify other quantities they need to find before they can answer the actual question? Are students applying multiplication strategies efficiently? Can they determine whether an answer is reasonable?” (4.OA.3)
Grade 5, Chapter 9, Lesson 5, In-Class Practice, students develop all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application as they solve a problem about winning dogs at a dog show. Exercise 24 states, “One-half of the sporting and working dogs in the dog show won awards. What fraction of the dogs at the event were winning sporting or working dogs?” Students work to understand the context and the information provided in the table. Students develop conceptual understanding of fraction multiplication as they identify the meaning of the fractions in the table, representing the fraction of dogs at the event that were a certain type of dog, and then multiply the sporting and working fractions by \frac{1}{2} to find the fraction of dogs at the event that were winning sporting or working dogs. Procedural skill and fluency are demonstrated as students use a rule to multiply the fractions. Teacher Edition, Talk About It states, "Exercise 24: 'What information is shown in the data table?’(fractions of different types of dogs at a dog show) ‘What mathematical questions might you ask about the data?' Allow students time to share their initial thoughts." (5.NF.4)
Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for mathematical practices. The materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).
Indicator 2e
Materials support the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP1 throughout the year. MP1 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in open-ended tasks that support key components of MP1, including sense-making, strategy development, and perseverance. These tasks prompt them to make sense of mathematical situations, develop and revise strategies, and persist through challenges. They are encouraged to analyze problems by engaging with the information and questions presented, use strategies that make sense to them, monitor and evaluate their progress, determine whether their answers are reasonable, reflect on and revise their approaches, and increasingly devise strategies independently.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 4, Lesson 8, Student Edition, students interpret relative distances between towns, represent the situation to determine how far Benbow is from the halfway point, and explain their reasoning to justify the solution. Students must make sense of the information and decide on a strategy to solve it. Practice Exercise 6 states, “You are halfway between Cooks Valley and Phillipsville. How far are you away from Benbow? Explain.” Teacher Edition states, “How can you make sense of this problem? What can you do to represent the given information?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “In this lesson, students have additional opportunity to apply division facts from the chapter to solve real-life problems. To begin the lesson, students review the problem-solving plan. Then as students independently practice problem solving, students engage in SMP.1 by persevering to make sense of problems on their own and determine what they already know and what they need to find out.”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 9, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students use a feeding table to determine how many days two cats can be fed from a given bag of food. Students are provided with a table that shows various weights of a cat and a fractional amount of food they each will eat daily. Students will need to select a strategy that makes sense to use in solving the problem as well as checking their solution to be sure it makes sense in the context of the problem. In-Class Practice Exercise 5 states, “You have a 6-pound cat and a 9-pound cat. You have a 34-cup bag of cat food. The cats eat the recommended amounts of food each day. What is the greatest number of days you can feed the cats from the bag? Show your work.” Teacher Edition, Talk About It, “What do you know? What do you need to find? What are some strategies you could try to find the solution? Have students share and discuss with the whole class. Which strategy made the most sense to you?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students are given real-life scenarios that require them to solve multi-step word problems involving multiplying a fraction by a whole number. There are opportunities for students to engage in SMP.1 as they think about what the questions are asking them to do and persevere to find tools and strategies to solve them.”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 4, Lesson 1, Student Edition, Students apply multiplication strategies to understand and solve two problems about orange orchards, deciding how to mathematically model the scenario and decide on a strategy that makes sense for solving. Practice Exercise 6 states, “You have an orange orchard that has 4 rows with 7 trees in each row. Each tree produces 250 oranges. If you sold each orange for $2, how much money would you make? 7. You decide to sell the oranges in bags of 8 oranges each. You sell 875 bags at $8 each. How much more money would you have made if you sold all the oranges individually” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “The lesson provides ample problem-solving opportunities for students to apply appropriate multiplication strategies to solve real-world problems. Enable SMP.1 by providing time for understanding of problems and persevering in finding a solution pathway. After students have solved Practice Exercises 6 and 7, have them discuss their problem-solving approaches. Suggested prompts: Describe in your own words what the problems are asking. How does the solution to Exercise 6 help you with Exercise 7? How can a model help you to solve each problem? What does each part of your model represent in the context of the problem? Is your answer reasonable mathematically? Explain why it makes sense in the context of the situation. How can you check for reasonableness?”
Indicator 2e.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Grade 3, Chapter 10, Understand Time and Measurement, Lesson 10.4, where students make sense of problems and persevere in solving them when they use the problem-solving plan to solve time interval problems. Students are asked to think about what the question is asking them and consider possible solution paths. In Exercise 3 of the In-Class Practice, if students are having trouble making sense of a problem, teacher guidance states, “... allow them to engage in productive struggle. ‘What are some strategies you could try to find the solution?’ Encourage students to use what they know about the relationship between addition and subtraction to check their answers.” The English Learner Support box includes additional guidance for MLLs by directing teachers to, “Have EL students work with a partner to solve Exercise 3. After reading the problem, have students make a sketch to show what the bee did. Have them label the sketch with the given times. Mention that hives are places where bees live. Allow EL students to use a translation tool to interpret the problem… After they make their sketch, ask, ‘What do you know? What do you need to find?’ Have EL students answer in phrases as they refer to their sketches.” While this guidance supports sense-making through sketches, a translation tool, and probing questions, it undermines the full development of MP1, such as allowing students to devise strategies independently, monitor their progress in solving problems, or determine if their answer makes sense. Additionally, the language support is the responsibility of the student as they need to sketch, label, translate, and answer in phrases, without teacher guidance about how to support students in doing those things.
Indicator 2f
Materials support the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP2 throughout the year. MP2 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP2, including reasoning with quantities, representing situations symbolically, and interpreting the meaning of numbers and symbols in context. These tasks encourage students to consider the units involved in a problem, analyze the relationships between quantities, and connect real-world scenarios to mathematical representations. Teachers are guided to support this development by modeling the use of mathematical notation, asking clarifying and probing questions, and facilitating conversations that help students make connections between multiple representations.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 10, Lesson 8, Student Edition, students reason abstractly to find the mass of rolls of nickels and quarters. To solve the problem, they must distinguish between the dollar value of the rolls and the number of coins in each roll. In-Class Practice Exercise 12 states, “A nickel has a mass of 5 grams. A quarter has a mass of about 6 grams. Find the mass of a roll of nickels and a roll of quarters. Roll of nickels: ____, Rolls of quarters: ____” Students are shown an image of a roll of nickels valued at $2.00 and a roll of quarters valued at $10.00. Teaching Edition, Talk About It states, “SMP.2 How many nickels are in $2? How many quarters are in $10? How does this help you find which roll has the greater mass?” Students engage in MP2 by reasoning quantitatively about the relationship between the value and mass of coins, using the given values of $2.00 for a roll of nickels and $10.00 for a roll of quarters to determine how many of each coin are in a roll and compare their total masses.
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 9, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students use models to explain their reasoning when solving problems involving the multiplication of whole numbers and fractions. In-Class Practice Exercise 20 states, “You spend \frac{5}{4} hours each day for 7 days feeding the birds. How many hours do you spend feeding the birds in all? Use a model to check your answer.” Teaching Edition, Talk About It states, “‘Tell your partner what the problem is about.’ After students share with their partner, discuss the context with the whole class. ‘On your whiteboard, draw a model of \frac{5}{4}.’ Monitor students as they work. ‘Show your partner your model and explain to them how you know your model is correct.’ Check that students use two wholes to model \frac{5}{4}.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “Students will engage in SMP.2 as they use the models to explain how each of the quantities in the equations are represented, and when problem solving, to make meaning of the quantities in the mathematical and real-world contexts. For In-Class Practice Exercise 20, allow students to turn and talk to articulate the quantitative relationships in the problem and contextualize their answer in the real-life context. Suggested prompts: Tell your partner what the problem is about. Can you draw a model to represent the problem? What does the shaded portion of your model represent in the real-life context? Once you compute to find an answer, what are the units for that quantity? Use a complete sentence to answer the problem.”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students determine how much each person pays when six friends equally share the total cost of a water taxi ride that includes a per-mile charge and a tip. In-Class Practice Exercise 1 states, “1. You and 5 friends equally share the cost of taking a water taxi to an island. The charge is $10.35 per mile. You travel 8.4 miles and tip the captain $15. How much do each of you pay?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students will solve word problems involving decimals. Students will reason abstractly and quantitatively (SMP.2), making sense of the quantities and their relationship in problem situations, taking quantities out of the problems to work with (decontextualize), and then contextualize the quantities to interpret their answer in the situation. Encourage the flexible use of properties and solution strategies within the class when solving problems. Use In-Class Practice Exercises 1-5 to remind students they are reasoning abstractly and quantitatively. Suggested prompts: As you read each problem, what does each quantity represent in the context? How are the quantities related? What operations will you perform? How will your answer help you to solve the problem? What are the units? How does your answer make sense in the problem context?”
Indicator 2f.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively. The materials employ representations moving from concrete to representational to abstract, giving MLLs accessible entry points into the mathematical task and support MLLs with access to abstract symbols. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in reasoning abstractly and quantitatively. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 3, Chapter 6, Relate Area to Multiplication, Big Idea Tasks #2, students are asked to find an area by multiplying. This task asks students to find the area of a rectangle, explain whether there is more than one possibility for the area measure, and show thinking. Additionally, students are expected to engage with MP2 when asked to determine whether there are multiple possible area measures for a rectangular garden with a perimeter of 40 feet, and explain their thinking. The Big Idea Tasks do not provide support to assist MLLs in producing the language to demonstrate their understanding of reasoning abstractly and quantitatively, such as encouraging students to consider units involved in a problem, attending to the meaning of quantities, representing situations symbolically, or explaining what the numbers in an equation means.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 4, Chapter 5, Divide Multi-Digit Numbers by One-Digit Numbers, Lesson 5.4, where students reason abstractly and quantitatively when they use models to find quotients and remainders. In this lesson, students are asked to consider what the numbers in the models and corresponding equations represent for each division problem. In Investigate, students work with whole number quotients and remainders and learn how to write the results, as due to the context of a problem, the remainder will be interpreted differently. The English Learner Support note provides linguistic support for MLLs to develop MP2 by directing teachers to, “Explain that the phrase left over means ‘still there.’ Have students use the phrase as they discuss the models they are creating in the Look Ahead. Support EL students in the following ways: Entering–Emerging: Help students describe each model by providing the sentence frames ‘I have blocks. I make equal groups. There are __ blocks left over.’... ” This guidance supports MLLs by explaining what the numbers in an equation represent and making sense of the relationship between problem scenarios and mathematical representations. Students apply this understanding in Exercise 15 of the In-Class Practice, where students independently solve a division problem and make sense of the remainder. The Talk About It guides teachers to write the corresponding equation to the problem scenario after students have solved the problem, prompting partners to discuss how the equation and remainder are related to the problem. This partner discourse provides MLLs with another opportunity to reason abstractly and quantitatively as they discuss what the numbers in an equation represent based on the problem scenario.
Indicator 2g
Materials support the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP3 throughout the year. MP3 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 3, Lesson 1, Student Edition, students solve problems involving multiplication by 3 and then reflect on and critique the strategies their peers used to find solutions. In-Class Practice Exercise 2 states, “Find the product. 3\times6= .” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Throughout the lesson students should share their ideas and strategies with their classmates. Encourage SMP.3 by asking them to compare their strategies with their classmates and consider which strategy they prefer and why. In Class Practice Exercise 2 asks students to find the product 3\times6. Ask students to share their thinking and listen to the ideas of others. Suggested prompts: How did you find 3\times6? Explain to the person sitting next to you. Did your partner solve 3\times6 the same way or a different way than you? What questions do you have about your partner’s explanation? Talk with your partner about which strategy you prefer, and why.”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students explain and show their reasoning when comparing two fractions, and they critique their partner’s thinking. In-Class Practice Exercises 1, 2, and 4, state, “Compare using <, >, or =. 1. \frac{7}{8}__\frac{3}{4} 2. \frac{6}{10}__\frac{4}{5} 4. \frac{8}{10}__\frac{4}{5}.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting The Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “As students are learning to compare fractions throughout the lesson, take opportunities to encourage SMP. 3 by asking students to explain and justify their thinking and actively listen to the reasoning of their peers. In-Class Practice Exercises 1-6 ask students to compare two fractions. Ask students to justify their reasoning to a partner. Suggested prompts: How do you know that six-twelfths is greater than one-third? Explain or show your thinking to your partner. Listening partners: Does your partner’s explanation make sense? Why or why not? How did you compare three-eighths and two-fifths? Did you compare it the same way as your partner or a different way? Do you agree with your partner? Why or why not?”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 9, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students critique the work of a peer who multiplies two mixed numbers using an area model. The model shown has \frac{5}{3} shaded from top to bottom and \frac{5}{2} shaded from left to right. In-Class Practice Exercise 9 states, “Your friend uses the model to find 2\frac{1}{2}\times1\frac{2}{3}. Is your friend correct? Explain.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students should be able to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (SMP.3). The You Be the Teacher problem can be an excellent springboard for classroom discourse; have students work in pairs to critique the mathematical thinking represented by the student work. In the In-Class Practice Exercise 9, place students in groups to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. Suggested prompts: Is the student’s work correct? What part(s) of their work represent correct mathematical thinking? What part(s) represent erroneous thinking? Explain. What advice can you give to this student when using a model to multiply mixed numbers?’”
Indicator 2g.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. The materials invite students to use and develop language when constructing viable arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others throughout practice problems and with the occasional student-to-student discussion. As stated in the report for 1d.MLL, the program’s English Learner Support notes generally align to the WIDA key language uses of explain, inform, or argue; the language functions explain and argue align with the language demands of MP3. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in MP3. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 3, Chapter 6, Relate Area to Multiplication, Lesson 6.1, where students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others when they apply measurement skills when counting tiles to find area of a shape. Exercise 9 of the In-Class Practice asks students, “You Be the Teacher: Your friend uses 4 color tiles to cover the rectangle and says the area is 4 square units. Is your friend correct? Explain.” The Talk About It includes a teacher prompt aligned to MP3: “What questions can you ask your friend to help them understand their mistake?“ While the English Learner Support note provides linguistic support for MLLs by directing teachers to model the meanings of “gap” and “overlap” using tiles, this guidance does not support full and complete participation in Exercise 9 as it does not provide language support for MLLs to critique the reasoning of others. These supports do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students in the development of MP3.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 5, Chapter 2, Numerical Expressions, Lesson 2.5, where students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others when they write a number as a product of its prime factors and use mathematical terms, representations, and concepts in their justifications. On the Support for All Learners page, the English Learner Support note provides linguistic support for MLLs to construct viable arguments by directing teachers to first review the meanings of the math vocabulary applied throughout the lesson: factor, prime factor, tree, and factor tree. Then, the note suggests that the teacher guide students to apply that vocabulary as they make a factor tree for the number 60 and to construct an argument for why the factor tree is accurate. The linguistic supports across proficiency levels provide suggested sentence frames to support MLLs with describing the prime factors of 60. This guidance provides strategies and support for MLLs to participate in the development of MP3 through support of mathematical terms, representations (factor trees), and sentence frames for their justification.
Indicator 2h
Materials support the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP4: Model with Mathematics, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP4 throughout the year. MP4 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support the intentional development of MP4, including putting problems or situations in their own words and identifying important information, using the math they know to solve problems and everyday situations, modeling the situation with appropriate representations and strategies, describing how their model relates to the problem situation, and checking whether their answer makes sense, revising the model when necessary.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 7, Student Edition, students use multiplication to solve real-world word problems and show the models they used to find the product. Practice Exercise 7 states, “You and your friend want to buy 2 amusement park tickets that cost 30 each. You save 2 each week. Your friend saves $4 each week. If you combine your money, how long will it take you and your friend to save enough money to buy the tickets?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Throughout the lesson, students have several opportunities to solve two-step story problems involving multiplication and division that can be represented in many ways. Encourage SMP.4 by asking students to create a model (can include arrays, drawings, and/or equations) to represent the problem scenario and use the model to solve the problem. Practice Exercise 7 involves a complex scenario; deciding how to model the problem is essential in solving it. Suggested prompts: How will you create a model to represent each person’s savings? Allow students to be creative in how they model the mathematics in this problem and allow them to choose independently. How will you use your model to find the answer? How will you know when both people have saved enough? Can you solve another way to check your answer?”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 3, Lesson 7, Teacher Edition, students consider different models for multiplication to help them determine the solution. Nick’s Notes-Dig In states, “Goal: Students will compare multiplication expressions and identify different ways to find products. Distribute a whiteboard and marker to each student. Write the equations 4\times17=68 and 2\times2\times17= on the board. ‘Find the missing product with your partner.’ Some students may begin to multiply on their whiteboards, while others may recognize that the equations have the same product. ‘Did anyone find the answer quickly? Explain.’ ‘If the equation was written as 2\times17\times2 , would the product still be 68? Explain.’ Yes, the order of the factors does not affect the product. Students may be able to apply the Commutative Property of Multiplication but not recall the name. Write the expression 2\times(50\times4) on the board. ‘Which factors should you multiply first?’ Write three more expressions on the board: (2\times50)\times4, (2\times4)\times50, 4\times(2\times50). ‘Compare the four expressions. How are they alike?’ All the expressions have the same three factors and the same product. ‘How are they different?’ The order of the factors and the placement of the parentheses are different. Write the following expressions on the board: 3\times54\times2, 4\times2\times98, and 2\times125\times4. Turn and Talk: ‘How would you find each product? Would you keep the order the same? Would you rearrange the factors?’ Talk About It, ‘Properties of operations allow you to work flexibly with multiplication. Today you will apply different properties to find products. How can properties of multiplication help you when using mental mat.’” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “At different times in the lesson, students may struggle to make sense of the properties. Have students engage in SMP.4 by asking them to use an area model or base ten blocks to model the problem and help them identify which property they can use to multiply each expression. In the Dig In, students will compare multiplication expressions and identify different ways to find products. Students can use models to help them understand the connections between the expressions. Suggested prompts: Can you use an area model to help you find the product? How does a model help you understand why 4\times17=2\times2\times17? Turn and talk with your partner. Could you use an area model to check your work?”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 3, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students use multiplication models with decimals to solve a real-world word problem involving money. Practice Exercise 5 states, “You buy one of each item. You pay with five 5 bills and receive 0.77 in change. What is the price of the glowing liquid kit?” Students are shown a table with the following information: Beaker – 7.99, Ultraviolet Light – 13.29, Glowing Liquid Kit – ? Teacher Edition states, “How can you use the information in the table? Write an equation to find the price of the glowing liquid kit. How can you represent the amount paid and the unknown price of the glowing liquid kit in your equation?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students will model with mathematics (SMP.4). Students will develop a model for solving real-life problems by using expressions and equations. These models will help students attend to the relationships between quantities. It is important that students use their model to interpret the results and check for reasonableness. Use real-life contexts to help students represent multi-step word problems. When solving Practice Exercise 5, encourage students to think about the stages of modeling with mathematics. Suggested prompts: How are the quantities from the table related? How can you create a model to represent the quantities and the problem? How can you use your model to draw conclusions about the situation? What does your numeric answer mean in the context? How can you check the reasonableness of your answer?”
Indicator 2h.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics. The materials engage students in tasks that support MP4 by reasoning with quantities, representing situations symbolically, and interpreting numbers and symbols in context to connect real-world scenarios with mathematical representations. However, the materials do not consistently provide the explicit language supports necessary for MLLs’ full participation in MP4. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 3, Chapter 1, Understand Multiplication and Division, Lesson 1.3, where students model with mathematics when they use an array and equal groups to multiply. In this lesson, students use counters to build equal rows, make a model of their choice to represent a situation, describe the model, and then write an equation to match their model. In Exercise 20 of the In-Class Practice, students are given a word problem and asked, “What are some models you can use to visually represent this problem? How can you use each of these models to write an equation?” An English Learner Support note earlier in the lesson provides support for MLLs to understand what an array is, stating, “When describing an array, lay a pencil horizontally across the counters to show each row. Similarly, lay a pencil vertically to show each column. Remind EL students that each row has the same number of objects.” However, this support lacks detailed linguistic scaffolds for developing MP4, such as MLLs describing what they can do with models and how a model relates to the problem situation, as asked in In-Class Practice Exercise 20.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 5, Chapter 10, Divide Fractions, Lesson 10.3, where students model with mathematics when they develop a model for solving real-life problems by writing division expressions and equations that explain situations. In Problem 11 of Practice, students are asked to engage in modeling with mathematics with the problem: “Connect to Real Life: You need one-half pound of clay to make a pinch pot. Use a model to find how many pinch pots you can make with 12 pounds of clay?” The materials further prompt MP4 engagement with the teacher prompt: “What division equation models this situation? What multiplication equation models this situation?”An English Learner Support note directs the teacher to remind MLLs that they can use multiplication to check division, and to connect multiplication equations with division equations. The note provides further supports for MLLs with language supports across proficiency bands, such as, “Developing–Expanding: ‘What do you multiply to check your answer? Explain.’ Provide sentence frames: The division equation is___ . So, I multiply ___ and ___ , and check that the product is ___.” These linguistic supports provide language for MLLs to interpret the results and check to see whether their answer makes sense while using real-life contexts to help students represent problems.
Indicator 2i
Materials support the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP5: Use appropriate tools strategically, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP5 throughout the year. MP5 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP5. These include selecting and using appropriate tools and strategies to explore mathematical ideas, solve problems, and communicate their thinking. Students are encouraged to consider the advantages and limitations of various tools such as manipulatives, drawings, measuring devices, and digital technologies, and to choose tools that best support their understanding and reasoning. They have opportunities to use tools flexibly for investigation, calculation, representation, and sense-making. Teachers are guided to support this development by making a variety of tools available, modeling their effective use, and encouraging students to make strategic decisions about when and how to use tools. Teacher materials prompt opportunities for student choice in tool selection, promote discussion around tool effectiveness, and support the comparison of multiple tools or representations. Teachers are also encouraged to highlight how different tools can yield different insights and to help students reflect on their tool choices as part of the problem-solving process.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 10, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students find elapsed time and determine whether a number line is a useful tool for solving the problem. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 states, “Find the elapsed time. Start: 5:15 P.M. End: 5:41 P.M.” Students are provided with a number line to use in solving the problem. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “As the lesson progresses, students will also learn to use number lines to find elapsed time. Encourage SMP.5 by having students think about the different tools and models they can use to find elapsed time. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 asks students to find the elapsed time. Ask students to think about how different tools can help them find the elapsed time. Suggested prompts: ‘How can a number line be a useful tool for finding elapsed time?’ ‘What other tools might help you find the elapsed time?’ ‘What would modeling the times on a clock show you that a number line would not? Which tool do you prefer for finding elapsed time? Why?’”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 9, Lesson 3, Student Edition, students find the missing number to solve multiplication problems with whole numbers and fractions. They determine which tools and strategies will best support their solutions. In-Class Practice Exercise 7-9 states, “Find the missing number. Use a model to help. 7. \square\times\frac{3}{8}=\frac{18}{8}. 8. 5\times\frac{?}{5}=\frac{15}{5}.”9. 7\times\frac{8}{?}=\frac{56}{3}.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Throughout the lesson, you can encourage SMP.5 by asking students to consider which tools or strategies they can use to help them solve the problems and to strategically choose the tools that will be most useful. In-Class Practice Exercises 7 through 9 ask students to use a model to find the missing number in an equation. Encourage students to consider the different tools that could help them. Suggested prompts: ‘What tools could you use to model these equations?’ (number line, area model, fraction tiles) ‘How did using the tool help you to solve the problem?’ ‘Find a partner who used a different tool to solve the problem. Compare their model to yours. How are they similar and different?’”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 14, Lesson 1, Student Edition, students decide which tools to use in order to solve geometry problems. In-Class Practice Exercise 10 and 12 states, “10. Draw one triangle for each category. Acute Triangle, Obtuse Triangle, Right Triangle. 12. Find the angle measures of each triangle. What do you notice about the sum of the angle measures of a triangle?” Teaching Edition, Talk About It states, “Exercise 10: “What tool can help you draw the triangles? Explain.’ Sample answer: I can use a protractor to draw 3 acute angles, 1 obtuse angle, or 1 right angle” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students will classify triangles by their angles and their sides and draw triangles to meet certain classification categories. As always, continue to affirm that students should make independent strategic choices about the tools they use (SMP.5) as they identify and draw triangles. Tools in this lesson might include rulers, protractors, and geometric drawing software. Students should be able to explain the benefits and limitations of the math tool they use. In the In-Class Practice Exercises 10 and 12 students will use appropriate tools strategically. Suggested prompts: ‘In Exercise 10, what tool can help you to draw each triangle? What aspect of the tool will help you to draw the characteristics for each category?’ ‘In Exercise 12, can you name different tools that could help you find the angle measures?’ (protractor or pattern blocks) ‘Explain how you will use the tool for each triangle. How many angles do you need to measure?’”
Indicator 2i.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose appropriate tools strategically.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Grade 5, Chapter 14, Classify Two-Dimensional Shapes, Lesson 14.1, where students are expected to classify triangles by their angles and their sides. In this lesson students classify triangles by their angles and their sides and draw triangles to meet certain classification categories. Students make independent strategic choices about the tools (rulers, protractors, geometric drawing software) they use as they identify and draw triangles and explain the benefits and limitations of the math tool they use. In the Investigate section, students are given a ruler and protractor and asked to draw and label a triangle and asked to talk about it, “In the Investigate, you drew several triangles with specific types of angles and specific types of sides. Which triangles were easy to draw? Were any triangles challenging to draw? Explain.” While the materials provide vocabulary support within the English Learner Support box, “Help EL students understand the directions in the Look Ahead. Explain that the word meets has different meanings. ‘You can meet, or find, a friend at a place. The word meet also means ‘match.’” that supports making sense of the problem, they lack linguistic support to recognize both the insight to be gained from different tools and their limitations for full and complete participation of MLLs. Teacher guidance is focused on supporting understanding of directions and attributes of triangles. No guidance was found on supporting MLLs with the development of MP5.
Additionally, MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 3, Chapter 13, Find Area and Perimeter, Lesson 13.1, where students learn to measure perimeter using various standard units. They engage in choosing appropriate tools strategically when they count the number of units around the figure or use a ruler to find the perimeter and are asked to consider the tools and strategies they are using. In Practice Exercise 13 and 15, students measure to find the perimeter of shapes with straight and curved sides, the teacher guidance in the Talk About It states, “Which information tells you what tool you need to measure the side lengths?” and, “How might you find the length of the curved side?“ There are no linguistic supports for MLLs’ full and complete participation in discussing appropriate tool and strategy choices and their limitations.
Indicator 2j
Materials support the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP6 throughout the year. MP6 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP6. These include formulating clear explanations, using grade-level appropriate vocabulary and conventions, applying definitions and symbols accurately, calculating efficiently, and specifying units of measure. Students are also expected to label tables, graphs, and other representations appropriately, and to use precise language and notation when presenting mathematical ideas. Teachers support this development by modeling accurate mathematical language, ensuring students understand and apply precise definitions, and providing feedback on usage. Lessons include opportunities for students to clarify the meaning of symbols, evaluate the accuracy of their own and others’ work, and refine their communication. Teachers are encouraged to facilitate discussions and structure tasks that promote attention to detail in both reasoning and representation.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 4, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students determine the correct operation (multiplication or division) to complete a problem and precisely justify their choice. In-Class Practice Exercise 11 and 12 state, “Complete each equation using \times or \div . 11. 6\bigcirc2=3, 12. 6\bigcirc2=12.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “The lesson focuses on students using their knowledge of fact families to help them complete multiplication and division equations. Encourage SMP.6 by asking students to compare their work with others and explain mathematically how they know their answer is accurate. In-Class Practice Exercises 11 and 12 ask students to complete the equation using \times or \div . Encourage students to compare their answers and explain how they know they are accurate. Suggested prompts: ‘Compare your answers to your partner’s answers. Do you agree or disagree?’ ‘Can you explain using math language how you knew what symbol to put in the equation?’ ‘Can you prove your equation is accurate with a picture or a model?’”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 3, Student Edition, students compare the factors and multiples of a number to explore the relationship between them. In-Class Practice Exercise 11 and 12 states, “Complete the Venn diagram.” Students see two Venn diagrams. In Exercise 11, the circles are labeled Factors of 40 and First Six Multiples of 5. In Exercise 12, the circles are labeled Factors of 32 and First Six Multiples of 4. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students build an understanding of the relationship between factors and multiples. Throughout the lesson, encourage students to engage in SMP.6 by using precise math language. As students build understanding of factors and multiples, they should use those terms while communicating with one another. Students also engage in precision when considering how they know they have found all the factors of a number. In-Class Practice Exercise 11 asks students to complete a Venn diagram comparing factors of 40 and multiples of 5. Encourage students to communicate precisely using clear math language with one another and calculate accurately and efficiently. Suggested prompts: ‘Turn and talk to your partner about the Venn diagram. What is a factor and what is a multiple?’ ‘How will you know if you have found all of the factors of 40? Is there anything you know about the number 40 that can help you find the factors?’”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 3, Lesson 1, Student Edition, students solve addition and subtraction problems with decimals in order to complete a puzzle. In-Class Practice Exercise 13 states, “Estimate the sums and differences to answer the question. What did 0 say to 8?” Students see four addition and four subtraction problems with decimals. Examples include: 78.98 - 27.19 and 257.9+106.17. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students will attend to precision (SMP.6) throughout this section. They need to be able to articulate and apply strategies to estimate accurately. Encourage the use of accurate and precise mathematical language recognizing the words roughly, approximately, or about as clues that an estimate is acceptable over an exact answer. Use In-Class Practice Exercise 13 to discuss precision. Suggested prompts: ‘What do you notice about the expressions in Exercise 13? How are they similar? How are they different?’ (they are all decimals; they involve addition and subtraction) ‘What do you notice about the letter values (in purple)?’ (they are whole numbers) ‘Explain how this will impact how you choose to estimate the sum or difference of the decimals.’”
Indicator 2j.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision. The materials provide teacher guidance for explicit instruction for students to communicate using grade-level appropriate vocabulary with accurate definitions. However, there is limited teacher guidance around supporting MLLs to formulate clear explanations, state the meaning of symbols, calculate accurately and efficiently, or use precise labels. Therefore, language supports are inconsistently applied for MLLs to engage in MP6. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 3, Chapter 13, Find Area to Multiplication, Big Idea Tasks #3, where students communicate with precision when they find an area by multiplying. This task asks students to draw two different rectangles that have a perimeter of 30 inches and find the areas. Students are asked to explain whether it is precise to say that the two rectangles are the same size. The Big Idea Tasks do not provide support to assist MLLs in producing the language to communicate precisely to explain whether the rectangles are the same size, calculate areas accurately, or use appropriate units to label area and perimeter.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 4, Chapter 10, Relate Fractions and Decimals, Lesson 10.1, where students attend to precision when they write a fraction or mixed number involving tenths as a decimal. In the Key Concept, the teacher provides explicit instruction on the new vocabulary terms tenth, decimal, decimal point, and tenths place using the chapter’s vocabulary cards, verbal descriptions, written definitions, and visual representations such as a place value chart and a base ten model. In Exercise 15 of the In-Class Practice, students apply the meaning of these definitions when they are asked to provide a written explanation describing if 0.5 and 5.0 have the same value. The materials support students, including MLLs, in communicating using grade-level vocabulary through a teacher prompt that invites students to first use a base ten model to represent each value, then talk with a partner about whether the numbers have the same value before students independently write a response. Additionally, the materials invite teachers to listen for students to apply the new vocabulary terms of the lesson. In addition, the English Learner Support box on the Support for All Learners page, provides support for MLLs to understand the difference in meaning between tens and tenths through engaging with a place value chart, chorally repeating decimal numbers, and writing decimal numbers as fractions.
Indicator 2k
Materials support the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP7: look for and make use of structure, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP7 throughout the year. MP7 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP7. These include looking for and describing patterns, identifying structure within mathematical representations, and decomposing complex problems into simpler, more manageable parts. Students are encouraged to analyze problems for underlying structure and to consider multiple solution strategies. They make generalizations based on repeated reasoning and use those generalizations to solve problems efficiently. Teachers support this development by selecting tasks that highlight mathematical structure and by prompting students to attend to and describe patterns they notice. Lessons provide opportunities for students to compare approaches, justify their reasoning, and reflect on how structure helps deepen their understanding. Teachers are encouraged to facilitate discussions and structure lessons in ways that promote the recognition and use of patterns and structure in problem-solving.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 7, Student Edition, students look for friendly numbers and apply strategies to solve addition problems with a max of four numbers. Investigate states, “Reorder the addends so the addition is easier. 8+5+2=, 48+85+52= . Reorder the addends so the addition is easier. 348+285+152= .” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students will add three or more multi-digit numbers by adding like place values. To begin, students review basic addition facts and think about how they can reorder addends to efficiently add three numbers by making a ten. SMP.7 will come into play here and throughout the lesson as students recognize what numbers they can use to make a ten and then apply that to multi-digit numbers as well. In the Investigate, students will reorder addends to efficiently add three numbers. Suggested prompts: ‘Look at the equation in the Look Back. Which addends did you add first to find the sum? Why?’ ‘How is the equation in the Look Back related to the equation in the Look Ahead? Which addends did you add first in the Look Ahead?’ ‘Why can you change the order of the addends and still get the same sum? Which addition property are you using?’”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 5, Lesson 3, Student Edition, students solve division problems by using place value to decompose more complex numbers. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 states, “Find the quotient. 72\div4= .” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Throughout the lesson, students will use the models to see the way they can break numbers into smaller parts so that they can divide. SMP.7 will come into play when using place value blocks and quick sketches helps them see the structure of the numbers and how they can be decomposed to find the quotient. During In-Class Practice Exercise 4, students are asked to find the quotient. Encourage students to use their understanding of place value to decompose the numbers to divide. Suggested prompts: ‘Make a quick sketch of 72. How many tens are there? How many ones?’ ‘How many tens can you put in each group? What could you do with the remaining tens?’ ‘Why was it necessary to trade some tens in for ones? Can you think of another problem that would require you to do this?’”
An example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 9, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students use the structure of the area model to solve multiplication problems involving mixed numbers and fractions. Investigation states, “Look Back, Shade and label the model to represent \frac{3}{2}\times\frac{5}{2}. Then find the product. Look Ahead, Shade and label the model to represent 1\frac{1}{2}\times2\frac{1}{2}. Then find the product.” For both problems, students use an area model to support solving the multiplication problem. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students continue using the structure of area models (SMP.7) to understand aspects of fraction multiplication, this time with mixed numbers. Allow the meaning of the area models to sink in for students to feel confident in the methods for computing the products. Provide sense-making experiences for students to find the structure and patterns as they rewrite mixed numbers as improper fractions to multiply. Use the Investigate to help students use the structure of an area model to grasp the concept of multiplying mixed numbers. Suggested prompts: ‘What do the products in the Look Back and the Look Ahead have in common? What is the same about the area models? What is different?’ ‘How do the models show how multiplying mixed numbers is related to multiplying improper fractions?’”
Indicator 2k.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Grade 3, Chapter 5, Patterns and Fluency, Lesson 5.3, where students look for and make use of structure when they complete a multiplication table. In Investigate, students use products and factors to find missing values in the tables, considering the structure of various parts of the multiplication table to find missing products and factors. Nick’s Note includes teacher guidance with prompts for students to consider what strategy they will use to find the missing factors. The note then states, "Encourage students to use mathematical language, such as factor and product, in their explanations.” There are no linguistic scaffolds for MLLs to fully participate in the whole-class discussion where they describe their strategy and apply mathematical language. Then, the materials ask students to explain their strategy in writing. An English Learner Support note provides suggestions to support MLLs with explaining their strategy that focus on equations with missing factors; the note does not provide linguistic scaffolds for MLLs to analyze the structure of a multiplication table to determine missing factors or products, to leverage patterns to make generalizations to determining the missing numbers, nor to do either of those things in writing.
Indicator 2l
Materials support the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades 3 through Grade 5 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the 3-5 grade band engage with MP8 throughout the year. MP8 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.’
Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP8. These include notice and use repeated reasoning to make sense of problems, recognize patterns, and develop efficient, mathematically sound strategies. Students are encouraged to create, describe, and explain general methods, formulas, or processes based on patterns they identify. Lessons provide opportunities for students to evaluate the reasonableness of their answers and refine their approaches through discussion and reflection. Teachers support this development by structuring tasks that highlight repeated reasoning, prompting students to make generalizations, and guiding them to build conceptual understanding, distinct from relying on memorized tricks. Instructional guidance also encourages teachers to model and elicit strategies that build toward formal algorithms or representations through consistent reasoning.
An example in Grade 3 includes:
Chapter 13, Lesson 5, Student Edition, students compare and calculate the area and perimeter of a rectangle. Investigate states, “Look Ahead, Find the perimeter of each rectangle. Are the perimeters the same? Perimeter of Rectangle 1: ____units, Perimeter of Rectangle 2: ____units. Can you draw a third different rectangle with an area of 18 square units? If so, what is the perimeter?” Teacher Edition, Nick’s Notes-Investigate states, “‘What do you notice about the perimeters of the rectangles?’ they are different ‘As the perimeter increases and the area stays the same, what do you notice about the shape of the rectangle?’ The rectangle becomes longer or narrower, stretched out, and less like a square” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students focus on rectangles with the same area and compare their perimeters. To begin the lesson, students will use toothpicks and square tiles to make rectangles that have the same perimeter. SMP.8 will come into play as you ask students to make observations about the rectangles and use those observations to make predictions and generalizations. In the Investigate, encourage students make predictions and generalizations based on the observations they make. Suggested prompts: ‘What do you notice about the perimeters of the rectangles?’ ‘What generalizations can you make about what happens as the perimeter of a rectangle increases, but the area stays the same?’ (After students draw their third rectangle with an area of 18) ‘Before calculating the perimeter of the rectangle, do you predict that it will be more or less than the perimeter of the first two rectangles? Explain.’”
An example in Grade 4 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students identify multiples of 3 and 9 and analyze patterns to develop divisibility rules. Investigate states, “Look Back, A multiple is the product of a number and any other counting number. Shade all the multiples of 3. Shade all the multiples of 9. Look Ahead, What do you notice about the sum of the digits in each multiple of 3? What do you notice about the sum of the digits in each multiple of 9?” Students see two multiplication tables up to 50 that they will use for shading. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students will use division to find factor pairs. To begin the lesson, SMP.8 comes into play as students notice patterns to help them discover the divisibility rules for 3 and 9. As the lesson progresses, students will be introduced to more divisibility rules. In the Investigate, students will shade multiples of 3 and 9 to develop understanding of the divisibility rules for 3 and 9. Ask students to look for patterns to help them discover the rules. Suggested prompts: ‘Look at the numbers that you shaded in the table. What do you notice? What do you wonder?’ ‘Why do you think there are more multiples of 3 shaded than 9?’ ‘How do you know if a number is a multiple of 3? Can you write a rule for it?’”
An Example in Grade 5 includes:
Chapter 1, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students use repeated reasoning to write multi-digit numbers in different forms and compare the value of the digits. Investigation states, “Look Back, Use base ten blocks to model 4,442. Draw your model. Then write the values. Look Ahead, Write the value of each digit. Use the pattern to help you write the value of the digits.” In the Look Back, students draw base-ten blocks to represent the number. In the Look Ahead, students use place value to represent the number. Teacher Edition, Nick’s Notes-Investigate states, “In the Look Ahead, how might you describe the 4s digits in the hundreds and tens place by using the relationship between place value positions? Describe the relationship between the 4s in the thousands and tens place positions. Will this strategy work to compare the 4s in the thousands and hundreds place positions? Discuss your thinking with a partner.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students will look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning (SMP.8) as they work to develop generalizations with place value positions to understand the relationship between each place. Allow students to do the work of finding the patterns between the place value positions. Provide ample sense making experiences for students to explore numbers in the place value position. In the Investigate, students will use repeated reasoning. Suggested prompts: ‘How might you describe the 4’s digit in the hundreds and tens place by using the relationship between place value positions? What about the 4’s in the thousands and tens place positions?’ ‘Will this strategy work to compare the 4’s in the thousands and hundreds place position? Discuss.’ ‘How can you prove your strategy? Will it always work?’”
Indicator 2l.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. The materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning through Key Concept whole-group discussions and In-Class Practice. However, language supports are inconsistently applied for MLLs to engage in MP8. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 3, Chapter 13, Find Area and Perimeter, Lesson 13.3, where students extend their knowledge of perimeter to finding an unknown side length and consider how finding the missing side length of a rectangle will help them find the missing sides of other quadrilaterals in future problems. During Investigate, Talk About It provides teacher prompts to engage students with repeated reasoning: “The perimeter of another map is also 20 feet, but it is in the shape of a square. How might you adjust your strategy to find the unknown side length? Pair-share and discuss your reasoning.“ An English Learner Support note provides linguistic scaffolds for MLLs to find the missing side length of the map example by encouraging MLLs to compare pairs of opposite sides and complete sentence frames such as, “I know that the map is a ___. The lengths of two opposite sides are ____ and ____. The length of the other side is ____. So, the missing side length is ____ feet.” This support does not make a direct connection to the repeated calculations needed to understand and make a generalization and develop MP8.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 5, Chapter 13, Understand Volume, Lesson 13.4, where students look for patterns when trying to understand the relationship between length, width, and height, and the volume to calculate unknown dimensions. In Exercise #6 of the Practice, students determine the side lengths of a cube given the volume. The materials provide teacher prompts to engage students with noticing when calculations are repeated to understand formulas: “What do you notice about the figure? How will that affect the volume equation?” The English Learner Support box on the Support for All Learners page provides support developing the mathematical practice through linguistic scaffolds for using sequencing language to describe the process of finding unknown dimensions. The note directs teachers to write mathematical phrases such as related division equation, unknown values, and volume formula on the board and encourages MLLs to use the language as they complete sequencing sentence frames such as, “First, I write the ____. Then I write the ____. Next, I ____ and write the ____. Finally, I ____ to find the ____.” These linguistic scaffolds support MLLs with noticing repeated calculations to understand algorithms and use repeated reasoning as a tool to find unknown dimensions.