2019
Imagine Learning EL Education K-5 Language Arts

3rd Grade - Gateway 1

Back to 3rd Grade Overview
Cover for Imagine Learning EL Education K-5 Language Arts
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Text Complexity and Quality

Text Quality & Complexity
Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations
92%
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality & Complexity
19 / 20
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
16 / 16
Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development
4 / 6

Materials meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading. Text complexity analyses and rationales are not provided for every required trade book and article. The materials meet the criteria for text complexity and for support materials for the core text(s) provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year. Materials include both text-dependent and text-specific questions and tasks that help prepare students for the each unit’s Extended Writing Task, which integrates writing, speaking, or both. The materials include frequent opportunities for different genres and modes of writing. Materials meet the expectations for materials including explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.

Materials contain minimal evidence of explicit instruction of phonics and word recognition consistently over the course of the year. Materials provide limited opportunities to apply word analysis skills to connected texts. There are limited opportunities to practice speaking and receive feedback on fluency.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality & Complexity

19 / 20

Texts are worthy of students' time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students' advancing toward independent reading.

Materials meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading. Students engage in a range and volume of reading in service of grade level reading proficiency, and consistent opportunities are provided for textual analysis. Text complexity analyses and rationales are not provided for every required trade book and article. The materials meet the criteria for text complexity and for support materials for the core text(s) provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year.

Indicator 1a

4 / 4

Anchor texts are of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.

The texts provide content that is relevant and interesting to students. The literary texts portray fascinating stories through vivid illustrations that would be of interest to students. The texts cover a variety a cultures and concepts including science.

Anchor texts in the majority of chapters/units and across the yearlong curriculum are of publishable quality. Anchor texts consider a range of student interests and are well-crafted and content rich, engaging students at their grade level. Examples include:

  • Module 1:
    • My Librarian is a Camel by Margriet Ruurs shares stories from around the world of how books are delivered to children. This story is engaging, has clear photos that support the text, and has academic vocabulary that is appropriate for students in Grade 3.
    • Nasreen's Secret School by Jeanette Winter contains illustrations with acrylic, framed paintings that portray simplicity and drama. The text has purposeful adverbs such as “luckily,” “quickly,” and “lightly.”
  • Module 2:
    • Bullfrog at Magnolia Circle by Deborah Dennard has active verbs such as “zigzags,” “emerges,” and “struggles,” as well as descriptive adjectives such as “bulging,” “unsuspecting,” and “sticky.” The two-page illustration spreads include zoomed in images of nature and frogs.
  • Module 3:
    • Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie is a retelling and contains descriptive adjectives and verbs such as “newfangled,” “dramatic,” “dilly-dallied,” and “ablaze.” The dialogue between characters is engaging as characters shout and huff at one other.
  • Module 4:
    • Water Dance by Thomas Locker contains beautiful illustrations and creative adjectives to depict the path that a raindrop takes through the mountains, into the ocean, and back into the clouds. It is a creative narrative to teach the water cycle. Students will enjoy the realistic painted illustrations throughout this book.
    • The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer has a two-page spread of detailed illustrations that emphasize foreground and background. The text contains powerful descriptions such as “Malawi began to starve” and “like spirits along the roads.”


Indicator 1b

4 / 4

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials reflecting the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

Grade 3 students have the opportunity to read a mix of informational and literary texts. Genres include poetry, classic literature, informational articles, and myths. There are no opportunities for students to read drama or plays.

The following are examples of informational texts included within the materials:

  • Module 1: My Librarian is a Camel by Margriet Ruurs
  • Module 2: Everything You Need to Know about Frogs and Other Slippery Creatures by DK Publishing
  • Module 3: “Peter Pan: The Author and Historical Context”
  • Module 4: “Dry Days in Australia” by Ann Well

The following are examples of literary texts included within the materials:

  • Module 1: Thank You, Mr. Falker by Patricia Polacco
  • Module 2: “Why the Frog Has a Long Tongue”
  • Module 3: Peter Pan (Classic Starts) by J.M. Barrie
  • Module 4: The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer


Indicator 1c

4 / 4

Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for texts having the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.

Most texts reviewed at Grade 3 have Lexile scores above the Grade 2-3 band; however, the texts have qualitative features such as pictures or illustrations to help support student comprehension. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Anchor texts are placed at the appropriate grade level. Examples include:

  • Module 1:
    • Rain School by James Rumford falls in the 2-3 complexity band and has a Lexile of 420. According to the publisher materials, meaning and purpose, text structure, and knowledge demands are moderately complex, while language features are slightly complex. The basic storyline, chronological structure, and simple language used in this text make it an appropriate text early in the Grade 3 year of introducing abstract content and skills central to the module.The language is straightforward and easy to understand. The text is written mainly in simple sentences and most words used are familiar.
    • My Librarian is a Camel: How Books Are Brought to Children Around the World by Margriet Ruurs has a Lexile of 980. Meaning, purpose, and text structure are slightly complex. The purpose is explicitly stated in the title, and the text is divided into 13 two-page spreads. The language features and knowledge demands are moderately complex. The text includes many academic vocabulary words and focuses on geographic areas that are different from most students'.
  • Module 2:
    • Lizards, Frogs, and Polliwogs by Douglas Florian is poetry. The meaning is moderately complex with poems that contain concrete visual descriptions. The text structure is moderately complex with 9-12 lines in a poem. There is predictable rhyming and rhythm. The language features are moderately complex with familiar and contemporary words, although there are some nonsense words with “-sicle” and a few unfamiliar words. The knowledge demands are slightly complex since the content is about science concepts.
    • Everything You Need to Know about Frogs and Other Slippery Creatures by DK Publishing has a Lexile of 1040. The text structure is moderately complex. Captioned photographs, diagrams, key words, and phrases printed in bold, and italics are used in the text. The language features of the text are very complex, but students can use the glossary, context clues or word parts to understand academic vocabulary used throughout the text. The knowledge demands of the text are moderately complex, and students need some background knowledge about animals and their habitats to understand the text. The meaning and purpose of the text are moderately complex. Students can use headings, subheadings, context and visuals throughout the text to understand the purpose.
  • Module 3:
    • Peter Pan retold from the J.M. Barrie Original by Tania Zamorsky does not have a Lexile provided. The meaning and purpose are very complex since the text contains multiple levels of meaning that are difficult to identify. The text structure is very complex because there are subplots and time shifts. The language features are moderately complex with conversational dialogue that expresses abstract, imaginative ideas. The knowledge demands are slightly complex since the text is imaginative.
  • Module 4:
    • One Well: The Story of Water on Earth by Rochelle Strauss has a Lexile of 960. The meaning and purpose of the text are moderately complex as the purpose is implied but easy to identify based on content. The main idea that water around the globe is interconnected, runs through all sections of the book. The text structure is very complex as the first half of the text describes the water cycle, and the second half builds on the scientific understanding to explain problems with access to enough safe water around the globe and suggests actions we can take to help solve those problems. The language features are moderately complex with language that is largely explicit and easy to understand but offers some occasions for more complex meaning. The vocabulary is mostly familiar but includes some academic and domain specific words that may be new to students. The knowledge demands are moderately complex since the text primarily uses a mix of simple and more complicated, abstract ideas.


Indicator 1d

4 / 4

Materials support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)

As the year progresses, questions and tasks build literacy skills and student independence. Lessons contain scaffolding and Universal Design for Learning to support students’ increasing literacy skills. Throughout the modules, the teacher reads aloud each of the complex texts. Students reread sections of the texts. There are few opportunities for students to read the grade level complex texts in the Modules independently without a prior teacher read aloud.

  • In Module 1, Unit 1, students are read aloud and reread literary texts for the following skills: gist, answering text-dependent questions, and writing short constructed responses. While reading in Unit 2, students focus on the learning targets of determining main idea, referring explicitly to the text to ask and answer questions, and determining meaning of unknown words. Students use their knowledge from Unit 1 to analyze how people in different parts of the world overcome challenges. In Unit 3, students hear and reread a text titled, More than Anything Else, learning about Booker T. Washington. No context about the text is provided. Instead context is provided as students complete the Recounting the Story note-catcher with another short text to help students understand the text. Students analyze the text for theme and how someone overcomes challenges. Students are asked “What challenge did Booker face? How was the challenge overcome? What did Booker do in More Than Anything Else to be an effective learner?”
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, students hear Lizards, Frogs and Polliwogs and then students are guided by the teacher through a Close Read for poems from the text. In Unit 2, students read the informational text, Everything You Need to Know about Frogs and Other Slippery Creatures. This text is a higher grade band and is more complex due to the language features being highly complex because there are many academic and domain specific vocabulary words and phrases throughout the text. During close reading instruction, students are provided support for the language features and use of the text as an informational resource for their research project about frogs. For assessment, students independently read a section of Everything You Need to Know about Frogs and Slippery Creatures and answer text-dependent questions to determine the meaning of unknown words, to read for details, and to use the text features.
  • In Module 3, the focus is on close reading and comparing two literary works on the same topic, Peter Pan. Unit 1 starts with students hearing the literary text, Peter Pan, read aloud by the teacher. Students are guided through analyzing the character development of Peter Pan. In Unit 2, students hear an additional text with the topic of Peter Pan, titled, Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. This text is within the grade band and has a highly complex meaning and purpose. However, with the moderate to slight complexity in other areas and teacher support, students can access this text to compare and contrast the two texts comparing chapters of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens with Peter Pan and answering questions such as, “What is the central message of a story?”
  • In Module 4, students hear the informational text, One Well: The Story of Water on Earth, Access to Freshwater. Students work on determining the main idea and supporting details and developing domain-specific vocabulary with teacher support. Students develop an understanding of the issues using the graphics in the book and make connections between human actions and the consequences of those actions, thinking about the author’s point of view related to challenges people face with water (connecting back to Module 1), and comparing it to their own point of view.


Indicator 1e

1 / 2

Anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria that anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.

Text complexity analyses and rationales are included in the program in the Curriculum Tools. The text complexity guides include a rationale for why they were placed in that grade at that particular place, alongside an explanation of how the book can be used to enhance student understanding. However, text complexity analyses and rationales are not provided for every required trade book and article.

Most anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale. Examples include:

  • In Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens (excerpt) by J.M. Barrie, the analysis includes text description, placement, quantitative measures, qualitative measures, considerations for reader and task, and rationale. The analysis includes a summary of the text within the text description. Within the placement, the analysis includes the following information: “Both the quantitative and qualitative complexity of this text falls solidly within a third grade level.” The quantitative measures for this text are 780L (Chapter 2 excerpt) and the associated band level 2-3. The qualitative measures include meaning/purpose, text structure, language features, and knowledge demands. The following guidance is provided for considerations for the reader and task: “Although this text is complex; it can be interpreted and enjoyed on a number of levels. Throughout the module, students are supported in navigating the text’s complexity through close reads and other activities. Work with the novel, Peter Pan, also builds a knowledge base that supports comprehension.” This provides students an opportunity to work with both stories when speaking about texts.
  • In One Well: The Story of Water on Earth by Rochelle Strauss, the analysis includes text description, placement, quantitative measures, qualitative measures, considerations for reader and task, and rationale. The analysis includes a summary of the text within the text description. Within the placement, the analysis includes the following information: “Multiple readings, related to discussions and teacher guidance make this text appropriate for third graders.” The quantitative measures for this text are 960L and the associated band level 4-5. The qualitative measures include meaning/purpose, text structure, language features, and knowledge demands. The following guidance is provided for considerations for the reader and task: “This text is read closely with teacher guidance and used as a base for a number of reading, writing, listening and speaking activities.” The rationale states that this text helps students understand the need for clean water. The text builds background knowledge about the water cycle.
  • In Nasreen’s Secret School by Janette Winter, the analysis includes text description, placement, quantitative measures, qualitative measures, considerations for reader and task, and rationale. As communicated within the text description, this story explores the value of education on a deeper level than previous texts. The unique perspective of the narrator as an educated woman who watches her granddaughter lose the right to go to school offers insight into many of the larger personal and cultural benefits of literacy and learning about the world. Within the placement, the analysis includes the following information: “Despite its lower quantitative measure, this book is most appropriate for students grades 3-5 because of its sensitive content, layers of meaning and heavy use of metaphor.” The quantitative measures for this text are 603L and the associated grade band level is 2-3. The qualitative measures include meaning/purpose, text structure, language features, and knowledge demands. The following guidance is provided for considerations for the reader and task: “Historical and cultural differences may make understanding this text challenging for some students…. This book talks about the realities of war and repression that will require sensitive discussion.”


Indicator 1f

2 / 2

Anchor text(s), including support materials, provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria that anchor and supporting texts provide opportunities for students to engage in a broad range of text types and disciplines as well as a volume of reading to achieve grade level reading proficiency.

In the Grade 3 materials, students access a variety and volume of texts that support students’ ability to read at grade level. There is a Required Trade Book Procurement List and a Recommended Texts and Other Resources List. These lists contain a range and volume of informational and literary texts that students reading during Module lessons. Opportunities include close reading strategies to support student learning. During the Module lessons, students can participate in Accountable Independent Reading as part of homework and during ALL Block, students participate in a rotation of Independent Reading for 20 minutes. There are Independent Reading Sample Plans found in Module 1 Appendix.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of texts to become independent readers and/or comprehenders and a volume of reading as students grow toward reading independence at the grade level. Examples include:

  • In Module lessons, students participate in Close Reading, which provides students with the opportunity to read complex texts. For example:
    • In Module 2, students practice their close reading skills by reading frog poems that focus on vocabulary and structure of poetry.
    • In Module 3, students complete a close read (teacher guided and independent) of most chapters in Peter Pan in order to analyze the characters’ traits, motivations, actions, and points of view.
  • During the ALL Block, students read 20 minutes. The purpose of their reading alternates each week with one week being focused on research reading and the following week being focused on reading for pleasure.
  • In Module 1, students learn about Accountable Independent Reading. Students are taught the structures of Accountable Independent Reading. Independent Reading is assigned for homework most nights. Teachers and students work together to set an independent reading goal. The teacher will check in once or twice a week to see how the student is progressing with their goal.


Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

16 / 16

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

Materials meet expectations for alignment to the standards with tasks and questions grounded in evidence. Materials include both text-dependent and text-specific questions and tasks that help prepare students for the each unit’s Extended Writing Task, which integrates writing, speaking, or both. The instructional materials provide multiple opportunities for evidence-based discussion that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and support student listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching. The materials include frequent opportunities for different genres and modes of writing. Materials meet the expectations for materials including explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context. Materials reviewed provide many tasks and opportunities for evidence-based discussions and writing using evidence from texts to build strong literacy skills.

Indicator 1g

2 / 2

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria that most questions, tasks, and assignments are text dependent/specific, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

Each module includes a set of trade books that students use throughout the lessons. Materials for the lessons and ALL Block provide graphic organizers and support tasks for students to engage with the text and to collect textual evidence, building toward a performance task. Students are directed to make connections not only across texts, but also across units and lessons. Texts are used significantly during lessons focused primarily on writing. While most questions, tasks, and assignments draw the reader back into the text and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year, there are some questions, tasks, and assignments can be accomplished without use of the text.

The materials include graphic organizers that assist students in Close Reads of their text and citing evidence for specific questions or tasks they are asked to complete. Tasks for various lessons within each unit include teacher-led close reading of content-based text and text-dependent questions along with a focus question to drive a series of sessions on a complex text. Examples include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 4, the teaching notes set the purpose that students are going to read Rain School. Students use or refer to texts as a tool for analysis and take what they discover to apply to their own writing. During the Opening portion of the lesson, students read Rain School and answer questions, such as “What do you notice about the size of Chad in relation to the rest of the continent?” As students read, they look for evidence for the central message or lesson. During the Work Time portion of the lesson, students revisit Rain School to complete the “Reading for Gist and Recounting the Story” graphic organizer. Students work with peers to reread the text.
  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 10, students write a constructed response identifying the central message or lesson of a text titled Nasreen’s Secret School. In the Opening portion of the lesson, the teacher directs students to refer back the “Reading for Gist” graphic organizer previously completed for Nasreen’s Secret School to use as an additional resource. During the lesson, the teacher asks questions, such as “In Nasreen’s Secret School, what is the central message or lesson and how is it conveyed through details in the text?”
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Lesson 3 Close Reading of the text, “The Poison-Dart Frogs,” students answer text-dependent questions, such as “What is unique about the appearance of poison-dart frogs? Why are poison-dart frogs called ‘Masters of Fine Art’?” For each question, students must refer back to the text to support their response.
  • In Module 2, Unit 2, Lesson 4, students fill out the graphic organizer “Finding the Gist” and Unfamiliar Vocabulary Note-catcher: “The Glass Frog” on pp.32-34. Students are given specific text and respond to what the gist is of the passage, any unfamiliar words in the passage, and the meaning of the words.
  • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lesson 2, students read “Peter Pan: The Author and Historical Context.” The purpose of the reading and the lesson is for students to understand the historical context in which Peter Pan was written. The teacher poses the following questions: “This book was written a long time ago and is set in different country. What differences do you notice between how things are in this country now and how things were in that country then? What can we learn from reading literary classics?” Students are directed to read the text in a triad, focusing on the gist of the text and determining unfamiliar vocabulary. After reading, the teacher asks, “Having read about the time Peter Pan was written in, what do you think we might learn from reading this literary classic?” Students share out responses and discuss.
  • In Module 3, Unit 2, Lesson 5, students find the similarities and differences between two texts, Peter Pan and Chapter 5 of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. As students read, the teacher asks, “Based on what you know from reading the chapter, what do you think will happen next and why?” The teacher works with students to complete the Analyzing Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens anchor chart. In the “Closing and Assessment” portion of the lesson, students are provided with the “Comparing Chapter 5 of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens with Peter Pan” graphic organizer and complete it using the reference materials (glossary) and anchor charts.
  • In Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 2, students are introduced to the anchor text One Well: The Story of Water on Earth. Students listen as pages 4–5 are read aloud. The purpose of the read-aloud is for students to practice finding the main idea and supporting details of a text read aloud. The teacher does this by posing questions, such as: “What is the main idea of a text? What are the supporting details? The main ideas are the big points the author wants you to understand from reading. You might not understand all of the words you heard, but having listened once, what do you think the main ideas of pages 4–5 are?” Students are provided a main idea note-catcher to complete. First, students work on completing the main idea section. Then, they re-read the text with a purpose of locating details that would support the main idea. Students are asked, “Did you find details to support the main idea(s) you recorded in the first box?”
  • In Module 4, Unit 3, Lesson 1, the lesson directly connects to the summative task that students are required to complete, creating a Public Service Announcement (PSA) about water. Students are asked, “What are you going to be doing for this performance task?” Students watch and analyze a model PSA in order to generate an effective criteria for creating a PSA. Students are asked, “What is this PSA about? What is the purpose of this PSA? What do you like about this PSA? What makes you want to watch it?” Students are provided the Video PSA Presentation Process note-catcher to start generating the steps and criteria needed to create an effective PSA.


Indicator 1h

2 / 2

Sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for having sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent/specific questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).

Materials contain sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and activities that build to a culminating task which integrates skills to demonstrate understanding. Culminating tasks require students to gather details or information using text-dependent questions, anchor charts, and graphic organizers to write a specific genre of writing at the end of each module. Each Module has a final Performance Task. Performance Tasks are designed to help students synthesize and apply their learning from the unit in an engaging and authentic way. Culminating tasks are rich and provide opportunities for students to demonstrate what they know and are able to do using speaking and writing. Examples include:

  • The Module 1 Performance Task requires students to utilize their newfound knowledge regarding reading challenges and strategies to overcome those reading challenges to create an eye-catching bookmark that lists the strategies. This culminating task includes supporting visuals. Lessons throughout the Module prepare students to complete the culminating task. In Unit 1, students read and analyze the themes for three literary texts: Waiting for the Biblioburro, Rain School, and Nasreen’s Secret School. In addition to determining theme within each text, students examine the challenges that occur and how the challenges are overcome. The teacher guides students through this analysis by giving targets such as, “I can determine the gist of Waiting for the Biblioburro. I can identify the central message, lesson, or moral of Waiting for the Biblioburro.” In Unit 3, students closely read an excerpt from More Than Anything Else to identify the text’s message along with how the author utilized details within the text to convey the message. In Unit 3, Lesson 11, students consider what would make a bookmark “eye-catching” and begin to draft sketches of their bookmark design.
  • The Module 2 Performance Task requires students to create a writing piece that will be added to a “Freaky Frog Book” to be shared with students in Grades 2 and 3. This culminating task includes a Pourquoi narrative regarding the characteristics of frogs, informational writing, and a trading card which highlights information and integrates visuals. Lessons throughout the Module prepare students to complete the culminating task. In Unit 3, Lesson 2, students learn about the features of narrative texts, complete a close read of example texts, and answer text-dependent questions. Students complete a Close Reading of The Polliwogs and a shared reading of Why the Frog Has a Long Tongue. Students answer text-dependent questions such as, “What makes ‘Why the Frog Has a Long Tongue’ a Pourquoi tale?” In Unit 1 mid-unit assessment, students apply what they have learned about reading poems and folktales to read a new poem and Pourquoi tale about frogs and demonstrate their ability to identify key ideas and details as well as analyze the story’s structure.
  • In Module 3, during the first half of Unit 3, students write a revised scene of Peter Pan. Students apply what they learned and independently write a new, revised scene. Throughout the second half of the unit, students prepare a presentation to read aloud the revised scene and provide the rationale behind their revisions. In Lesson 8, students are asked, “Why and how have you revised your scene of Peter Pan?” as they begin to plan for their presentations for the performance task. First, students analyze the structure of a model presentation. Then, students focus on planning the structural outline of their own presentations. In Lesson 9, students add key points to their prompt cards for their presentations. Unit 1 begins with students reading the literary text Peter Pan. Students analyze the character development of Peter Pan and answer questions such as, “What connections can you make between the first chapter of Peter Pan and what you read about the context in the previous Lesson? What are some of your own character traits, both positive and negative?” In Unit 2, students read an additional text, Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. Students compare and contrast the two texts using a graphic organizer. Students then write a book review recommending or not recommending the text to peers.
  • In Module 4, students study the impact of water on the lives of individuals around the world. In Unit 1, students read informational texts about the importance of water and human interaction with water, such as One Well: The Story of Water on Earth, Access to Freshwater, and Population Growth. While reading, students determine the main idea and supporting details through answering questions such as, “What is freshwater? What did you learn about water from the book? Remember that the central message is a big idea the author wants you to understand and take away from reading this book. What do you think the central message of the book is?” This understanding of human interaction with water builds the background knowledge for Unit 2, where students read a new text to determine the gist, think about the author’s point of view related to challenges people face with water, and compare it to their own point of view through answering questions such as, “What are the authors trying to tell the reader about water? What is the purpose of The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind? What are William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer trying to answer, explain, or describe? How does our discussion add to your understanding of the authors’ point of view?” Students then write an opinion piece about water pollution. In the Unit 2 end of unit assessment, students use information gathered from multiple sources, including Real Lives: Angola, Africa, to draft an opinion essay regarding human involvement in water conservation. Within the essay, students will apply their knowledge about linking words, along with forming and using regular and irregular plural nouns to revise and edit the essay.


Indicator 1i

2 / 2

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidencebased discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. (May be small group and all-class.)

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials providing frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions (small groups, peer-to-peer, whole class) that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax.

The materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols throughout modules and within lesson components for evidence-based discussions such as Turn-and-Talk, Think-Pair-Share and text-based discussions such as Socratic Seminars and Collaborative Discussions that support academic vocabulary and syntax. In the supporting materials, graphic organizers such as Academic Vocabulary Form and Domain-Specific Vocabulary Form and an Affix List are provided for students to use in their writing and speaking activities. Units include practices that encourage the building and application of academic vocabulary and syntax including total participation routines and Think-Pair-Share. Teacher materials support implementation of these standards in a clear and direct manner. Examples include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 4, students turn their attention to the Overcoming Learning Challenges chart and engage in a Turn-and-Talk routine regarding the following questions: “What challenge did Thomas face? How was the challenge overcome?” Students share with the class and the teacher uses the Goal 1 Conversation Cue to encourage students to clarify the conversation about the message and the details that convey it, using academic vocabulary.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Lesson 1, the teacher uses a total participation technique for students to answer the following questions: “How do you feel about books? How do you feel about reading? Are books and reading important? Why or why not?” Later in the lesson, in reference to My Librarian is a Camel, students Turn-and-Talk to discuss “What is one interesting photograph or idea you saw in the text?” The teacher asks for students to share out responses. In the closing portion of the lesson, the teacher directs class discussion through a Think-Pair-Share technique, in order to discuss “What is one thing you have learned about some libraries in Kenya after reading this excerpt?”
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Lesson 3, students analyze the anchor poem, “The Poison-Dart Frog,” during the Language Dive. The Teacher Guide states these conversations allow students to “develop the habits of mind and character they need to approach other complex texts and to develop their own academic writing skills. In addition, students have the opportunity to test their oral language skills, confirming their successful communication or ‘repairing’ communication that is not understood by other students. These oral processing sessions are critical for language development.”
  • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 2, students follow the Back-to-Back and Face-to-Face protocol. They find a partner and stand back-to-back with him or her. They are instructed, “When you say, ‘Face-to-Face,’ they should turn around and show their partner a ‘freeze frame’ of their frog’s adaptation. The partner should try to guess the adaptation based on the ‘freeze frame.’ Then they will switch roles.”
  • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lessons 1-3, the lessons include direct instruction for the use of Goal 4 Conversation Cues. The purpose of Goal 4 Conversation Cues is to encourage productive and equitable conversation within the class. Conversation Cues are questions that teachers can ask students to help achieve four goals: (Goal 1) Encourage all students to talk and be understood; (Goal 2) Listen carefully to one another and seek to understand; (Goal 3) Deepen thinking; and (Goal 4) Think with others to expand the conversation. In Lesson 1, the teacher uses the conversation cue that prompts students to compare in order for students to compare inferences: “How is what _____said the same as/different from what _____ said?” In Lesson 2, the Goal 4 Conversation Cue is used to encourage students to explain others' ideas: “Who can explain why your classmate came up with that response? I’ll give you time to think and write.” In Lesson 3, the Goal 4 Conversation Cue is used to encourage students to agree or disagree and explain why: “Do you agree or disagree with what your classmate said? Why?”
  • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lesson 1, students practice recounting a text, specifically in this lesson, Chapter 1 of Peter Pan. Students recount the text in triads following the protocol – Partner C goes first and has 45 seconds to recount the chapter, then Partner B goes second and has 30 seconds to recount, and, finally, Partner A goes third and has 15 seconds to recount.
  • In Module 4, Unit 2, Lesson 1, Posterwalk Protocol, students participate in a posterwalk to find details in the images that tell them something about each of the challenges relating to water. Students use the posterwalk protocol to discuss the following questions: “Which challenge related to having clean water can be seen in this image/text? What issues related to water have we been learning about so far in this module? What does demand mean? What does pollution mean? What does access mean?”
  • In Module 4, Unit 3, Lesson 3, students participate in a peer critique of their PSA Script. Students find a partner and label themselves A and B. The teacher and students review the Criteria for an Effective Video PSA anchor chart with the understanding that they are looking for this criteria in their partner’s work. As the students critique, they capture the feedback on sticky notes to be reviewed later as a whole group.


Indicator 1j

2 / 2

Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.

The individual lessons throughout the module units support students’ speaking and listening about what they are reading and researching. Each module overview outlines the Speaking and Listening standards that will be targeted throughout the unit, and each lesson contains techniques or protocols to engage students in speaking and listening. Unit lessons require students to share out their reflections and engage in follow-up questioning. Collaborative routines are included in the daily lessons along with protocol explanations and discussion structures described in the lesson section titled Teaching Notes. Examples include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 2 of the Teacher Guide, students choose independent research books and discuss why they chose a particular book in small groups, targeting Speaking and Listening Standards 3.1 and 3.6.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Lesson 7, students use the materials from My Librarian is a Camel and Close Read Note-catcher: Expert Group My Librarian is a Camel to plan their informative paragraphs. Students are “to work as a group to reread their group’s excerpt aloud, for example with each student reading a different paragraph or chorally reading the excerpt. Direct students’ attention to the research question and the words “focus statement” at the top of the note-catcher. Invite students to turn and talk in their expert groups, then select volunteers to share with the whole group: “Think of a way to answer the research question: ‘What are the challenges people face when learning, and how are they overcome?’”
  • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 1, students conduct a Poster Walk, use the Poster Walk protocol, and engage in a follow-up discussion in response to the following question: “What patterns or themes did you notice in all of the Poster Walk posters?” Students explain what they should be thinking about, what they notice, and what they wonder about what other have written on their posters.
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Lesson 1, students participate in the “Infer the Topic” protocol to familiarize themselves with the module topic. Students review information from the texts that they will read throughout the module to infer what the topic of the module will be. “What do you think you will be learning about in this module?” Students use the “I wonder/I notice” note-catcher to capture the information they observe in the texts and pictures. Students work in triads to share what they wrote on their note-catcher. The teacher brings the triads back together as a whole group and poses the following question: “Now that you have looked at some resources, what do you think this module might be about? Can you say more about that?”
  • In Module 3, Unit 2, Lesson 13, students participate in a text-based discussion about whether or not they would recommend Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens to a friend. The teacher reminds students of the discussion norms and that the purpose of the discussion is for them to talk to each other and learn more about the opinions that each of them has about the story and why. Students receive a copy of the discussion notes handout and are directed to complete the top box with any questions that they have as the discussion occurs. Students are divided into groups and groups are paired off. Each group is labeled A or B. The B groups have their discussion first while sitting in a circle, and the A groups sit around the outside and observe the discussion. Students have sticky notes for examples of discussion norms occurring. The group is able to discuss for approximately 8 minutes. After this discussion, students give a “star and step” (positive and negative) regarding the discussion. Then, the groups switch and the process is repeated. After both groups have discussed the topic, students are asked to silently reflect on their role and work within the discussion and make a goal for themselves for the next discussion.
  • In Module 4, Unit 2, Lesson 12, students participate in peer critique with a focus on using linking words and phrases and forming and using plural nouns. The teacher and students review the Regular Plural Nouns and Irregular Plural Nouns anchor charts and the opinion writing checklist. Students use this information to review the opinion essay of a peer. Students do this by marking the text in color and writing feedback on sticky notes. Students share with each the critique following the protocol for peer critique and the opinion writing checklist.
  • In Module 4, Unit 3, Lesson 1, students analyze a model of a PSA and what about the PSA makes it effective. Students create their own PSA using the information gathered on the water issues note-catcher. Students “Think-Pair-Share” in order to answer the following questions: “What makes this model an effective PSA? How does it encourage people to do something or to change the way they do something to help a cause?” During Closing and Assessment, students choose one issue from their water issue note-catcher that they want to create a PSA around. Students find a partner or small group that has a shared interest and form a group to create the PSA. The group discusses the issue and ideas for the PSA.


Indicator 1k

2 / 2

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials including a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

There are opportunities for on-demand writing, process writing, and short, focused projects through a variety of instructional tasks. Students develop drafts for each individual paragraph or portion of a writing product over the course of several lessons. Students also spend time on self-revisions, targeted peer-critiques, and publishing of their work using digital resources and technology. The teacher provides direct instruction to guide students through the writing process, requiring them to analyze good writing models from the text sets they read. The writing lessons included in each module are based on text(s).

On-demand writing occurs each day when students write to what they have read in various formats. Intentional instruction (focus statement, checklist, etc.) is included to support students in writing to meet the criteria. Materials include both short and longer writing tasks and projects and are aligned to the grade-level standards being reviewed. Examples of writing include note-catchers, graphic organizers, short constructed response, and paragraph construction.

Examples of writing include, but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 6, students review the parts of a sentence and participate in a mini-lesson about writing short constructed responses. During the mini lesson, they write a short constructed response to answer the question “In Rain School, what was the lesson and how was it conveyed through details in the text?” based on their close read in the previous lesson. In Lesson 10, students again practice writing a short constructed response identifying the central message or lesson in Nasreen’s Secret School and explaining how it is conveyed through details in the text. The mini-lesson and writing practice help prepare students for the End of Unit 1 assessment, in which they will answer short constructed response questions about a new text.
  • In Module 1, Unit 3, Lesson 12, students participate in mini lessons about linking words and phrases and will use this knowledge in a peer review. Students then complete “Part II of the End of Unit 3 Assessment, where they revise their reading contracts based on peer and teacher feedback.” Students reflect on their learning using the Tracking Progress: Informative Writing recording form. Students then will “revise their reading contract to write a final draft incorporating teacher feedback and what they learned about linking words and phrases, and spelling, punctuation, and capitalization during the peer review.”
  • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 2, students chose a frog to write about from the text, “Freaky Frog." Students then used a note-catcher to research facts and information about the frog they have chosen. In Lesson 4, students take the research from the note-catcher and begin to draft their informational essays by writing the introduction paragraph. Students review the introduction of the Poison Dart Frog Model. In Lesson 5, students begin drafting their paragraphs referring to the model writing and the informative writing checklist. Lesson 6 is the mid-assessment, with the first part asking students to write short constructed responses to what they have read and the second part asking students to write a second paragraph about the unique abilities of the frog for their frog essay. For Lesson 7, students write a conclusion for their informative essay about a “freaky” frog. Then they generate a contents page for their Freaky Frog book based on their writing. Finally, in Lesson 8, students work in pairs to revise their informative essay to add linking words and phrases, domain-specific and academic vocabulary, and correct capitalization, spelling, and punctuation.
  • In Module 3, the Mid-Unit 3 Assessment, students are asked to apply the narrative writing skills throughout the unit to complete an on-demand narrative writing by revising a scene from Peter Pan, using a complete Narrative Planning graphic organizer. The objective of the assessment is to write a draft of the scene with a focus on purpose, organization, elaboration, and evidence. The assessment is not focused on conventions.
  • In Module 3, In Unit 2, Lessons 8-12 students complete a process writing opinion piece. In Lesson 8, students are taught the format and purpose of a “Painted Essay.” The “Painted Essay” guides students to code each section of their essay a different color to understand each part, the purpose of each part, and how the different parts connect. Students will use this understanding moving forward to complete their own writing of each part of the essay. In Lesson 9, students write the introductory paragraph for their opinion essay. Students work on this paragraph as a group since the information within the paragraph will be similar for most students. In Lesson 10 and 11, students write the proof paragraphs of their opinion book reviews using evidence and details from the text resources. In Lesson 12, students write the concluding paragraph for the opinion book review. In the conclusion, students are restating the facts, evidence, and opinion.
  • In Module 4, in the End of Unit 1 Assessment, students read a new informational text and compare the main ideas and key details with pages 24–25 of the text, “One Well,” that students have previously read. Students answer short constructed response questions.
  • In Module 4, in Part I of the the End of Unit 2 Assessment, students use information gathered from multiple resources to write an opinion essay explaining “why we should get involved in water conservation.” In Part II, students apply their knowledge about linking words and using regular and irregular plural nouns to revise and edit the opinion essay they just drafted. In the third optional part, students answer selected response questions about forming and using regular and irregular plural nouns.
  • In Module 4, Unit 2, Lessons 7-11, students complete a process writing piece. It begins in Lesson 7, with students planning their opinion essays about why it is important to conserve water. The teacher first models and gives students an opportunity to practice as a class by analyzing the Model Opinion Essay: Access to Water and using color-coding on the research Note-catcher: Access to Water. Students then repeat this process on their own by color-coding their Research Note-catcher: Water Pollution. In Lesson 8, students write the introductory paragraph for their essays. Students first analyze the introduction of the model essay. They then use their planning from Lesson 7 to draft their own introductions. In Lesson 9, students write the first proof paragraph for their essay. Students begin by analyzing the model opinion essay, looking at both proof paragraphs and comparing them. Students then use their planning from Lesson 7 to draft their Proof Paragraph 1. Students write the second proof paragraph in Lesson 10, again comparing and analyzing the proof paragraphs from the model and putting more of a focus on the linking words and phrases. In Lesson 11, students write the concluding paragraph of their essay. They review and analyze the model essay and summarize the information and evidence used in the proof paragraphs.


Indicator 1l

2 / 2

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials providing opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Each module includes writing lessons, and students engage with multiple genres and modes of writing. Throughout the modules, students learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Throughout the modules, there are lessons that focus on developing the skills for producing a particular text type of writing, as well as experiences in writing across different genres with narrative and informative writing, as well as opinion writing. Opportunities to address text types of writing that reflect the distribution by the standards, include but are not limited to:

  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 6, Work Time A, students review the components of a sentence and participate in a mini-lesson about writing short constructed responses, during which they write a short constructed response to answer a question about Rain School, based on the close read. In Lesson 10, Work Time A, students write a short constructed response identifying the central message or lesson in Nasreen’s Secret School and explaining how it is conveyed through details in the text.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Lesson 2, Main Idea handout, the handout provides instructions on how to determine the main idea of a passage. On the bottom of the Close Read Note-catcher, students write the main idea of the text, My Librarian is a Camel.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Lessons 7-9, Work Time B, students plan an informative paragraph. In Lesson 8, students draft an informative paragraph. In Lesson 9, during the Closing and Assessment, students annotate draft writing for revisions. The instruction in this sequence of lessons focuses on the structure of informative writing—an introduction to give background information and a focus statement telling the focus of the writing; facts, and details to support and explain the topic; and a conclusion that restates the focus. In Lesson 9, students write feedback on sticky notes on informational writing.
  • The Module 2, Unit 1, Lessons 2-6 provide students opportunities to address writing narrative texts.
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Week 2, in the ALL Block, students write a narrative poem about a frog.
  • In the Module 2 Performance Task, students generate writing to include in a Freaky Frog book. The book will contain a Pourquoi narrative written in Unit 1.
  • In the Module 2 Performance Task, students generate writing to include in a Freaky Frog book. The book will contain: an informational writing from Unit 2, end of Unit 2 assessment writing, an informational essay from Unit 3 and a Freaky Frog trading card from Unit 3 that contains basic facts about the frog collected through research. In Module 3, Unit 2, Lessons 8-12, students write an opinion book review, discussing whether they would or would not recommend others read Peter Pan. In Lesson 8, students analyze a model of a book review for the text they read during Lesson 7, Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. Students are asked to consider the following questions: “Would the author of this text recommend it to a friend? Why would he/she recommend the story?” In Lesson 9, students begin drafting the introduction paragraph for their book review, during Work Time A they draft their opinion use sentence starters such as “Would recommend, Would recommend with some cautions, Would not recommend,” and in Work Time B, they are introduced to the Opinion Writing Checklist. Since this is the first time students are working with the Opinion Writing Checklist, they are only working on four criteria. In Lessons 10 and 11, students draft the body paragraphs of the book review with an emphasis on stating evidence and reasons to support the opinion.
  • In Module 3, Unit 3, Lessons 1-7, students revise a narrative excerpt of Peter Pan. Students use a narrative planning graphic organizer to draft a revised scene.
  • In Module 4, Unit 2, Lessons 5-14, students plan and compose an opinion essay about becoming involved in water conservation. The lessons include instruction on the following components: an introductory paragraph, a focus statement of two points, the body paragraphs, and a concluding paragraphs.


Indicator 1m

2 / 2

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials including frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information appropriate for the grade level.

Writing opportunities are focused around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with sources. Materials provide opportunities that build students' writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include:

  • In Module 1, Unit 1. Lesson 4, the teaching notes set the purpose that students are going to be reading from the text, Rain School. During the Opening part of the lesson, students are engaged in reading Rain School and are asked questions such as: “What do you notice about the size of Chad in relation to the rest of the continent?” As students read, they are looking for evidence for the central message or lesson.
  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 10, students are asked to focus on the following question, “In Nasreen’s Secret School, what is the central message or lesson and how is it conveyed through details in the text?” Teachers direct the students to use the Short Constructed Response: Lesson/Message in Nasreen’s Secret School graphic organizer to help them write their responses.
  • In Module 2, Unit 2, Lesson 8, students reread excerpts of “Everything You Need to Know about Frogs and Other Slippery Creatures” that were read closely earlier in this unit. Students analyze the connections between sentences and paragraphs in the same excerpt. They then use the texts to answer a questions: “How does where a frog lives affect how it looks and/or acts?”
  • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lessons 1-12, students read Peter Pan and write short constructed responses to text-dependent questions for each chapter, focusing on character traits and citing evidence from the core text to support their responses. For example, in Lesson 5, students read Chapter 4 of Peter Pan, answer selected response questions, and write short constructed responses to answer questions about the text. They will cite evidence from the text to answer the short constructed responses.
  • In Module 3, the Mid-unit 2 Assessment, students recall and recount the plot of Peter Pan by identifying events from the story and placing them in the order in which they occurred. Students then compare the two Peter Pan stories they have read by completing a chart. Finally, students show their understanding of the central message of each text by answering selected response questions.
  • Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 3, students answer text-dependent questions on pages 4-5 of One Well: The Story of Water on Earth, citing claims and appropriate, well-defended evidence.
  • Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 12, students must compare and contrast the main ideas and supporting details on pages 24-25 of One Well with Water Pollution, stating claims and citing evidence.


Indicator 1n

2 / 2

Materials include explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for materials including explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.

Opportunities to learn language standards are in the Module Lessons including Language Dives and lessons in the ALL Block. Materials include instruction of all grammar and conventions standards for the grade level. Examples of each language standard include:

  • L.3.1a
    • In Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 3, students explain the function of nouns through the Language Dive Sentence Strip Chunks and the Language Dive Note-catcher: One Well: Nouns. Homework practice is available in Lesson 6.
    • In Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 4, students explain the function of pronouns through the Language Dive Sentence Strip Chunks and the Language Dive Note-catcher: One Well: Pronouns.
    • In Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 6, students explain the function of adjectives through the Language Dive Sentence Strip Chunks and the Language Dive Note-catcher: One Well: Adjectives. Homework practice is available in Lesson 9.
    • In Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 7, students explain the function of verbs through the Language Dive Sentence Strip Chunks and the Language Dive Note-catcher: One Well: Verbs. Homework practice is available in Lesson 10.
    • In Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 9, students explain the function of adverbs through the Language Dive Sentence Strip Chunks and the Language Dive Note-catcher: One Well: Adverbs. Homework practice is available in Lesson 11.
  • L.3.1b
    • In Module 4, Unit 2, Lesson 5, in Work Time B, students analyze the noun people in a sentence. In Lesson 8, there is direct instruction on different types of plural nouns using the Regular Plural Nouns Anchor Chart. In Lesson 11, there is instruction about irregular plural nouns.
  • L.3.1c
    • In Module 4, Unit 3, Lessons 5-7, students use abstract nouns. Students learn that pride and excitement are abstract nouns because they are names of emotions that cannot be physically touched.
  • L.3.1d
    • In Module 2, Unit 2, Lesson 3, Work Time B, students learn about verb tense. Students analyze how regular verbs change from past, present, and future. In Lesson 6, Work Time B, students learn how to form and use have and be.
  • L.3.1e
    • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lessons 2 and 6, students form verb tenses. In Lesson 2, students analyze sentences for verb tense. In Lesson 4, students play a game to practice forming and using verbs in different tenses.
  • L.3.1f
    • In Module 1, Lesson 9, ALL Block, Week 2, Day 4, the teacher guides students through the use of Subject/Predicate sentence strips.
  • L.3.1g
    • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lesson 11, students learn comparative and superlative adjectives. The teacher uses the Comparative and Superlative Adjectives and Adverbs handout.
    • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lesson 12, students learn comparative and superlative adverbs. The teacher asks, “So if you were using the adverb fast to describe the speed of the frog with the arrow is hopping compared to the other, what comparative adverb might you use? The frog with the arrow is hopping ___.”
  • L.3.1h
    • In Module 2, Unit 3, ALL Block, Week 1, Days 2 and 4, small group instruction includes work with conjunctions.
    • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 10, students review compound and complex sentences for coordinating conjunctions and subordinating conjunctions.
  • L.3.1i
    • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 10, Work Time A, students use different-colored markers to color code sentence as simple, compound, or complex.
  • L.3.2a
    • In Module 3, Unit 3, Lesson 3, Work Time B, the students focus on the title Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens, and the teacher asks “What do you notice?” The teacher shares the Capitalizing Appropriate Words in Titles handout to read the criteria
  • L.3.2b
    • In Module 4, Unit 3, Letter 5, the teacher and students analyze a model of the address on an effective invitational letter. Students learn to put a comma after the city and before the state.
  • L.3.2c
    • In Module 3, Unit 3, Lesson 5, Work Time B, students view a model dialogue sentence from the anchor text: “Why, that is a fine nightgown you are wearing there, young Peter,” he said admiringly. Students discuss what they notice about the punctuation.
  • L.3.2d
    • In Module 3, Unit 3, Lesson 4, there is a Language Dive about Possessives. Students study the following sentence: “Then, with a wrinkled brow he studied Soloman’s feathers thoughtfully, before looking back down at his nightgown again.”
  • L.3.2e
    • In Module 3, Unit 2, Lesson 14, students are to focus on “L.3.2: My spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are correct.” Explicit directions to students as to how to use conventional spellings are not clear.
  • L.3.2f
    • In Module 3, Unit 2, Lesson 14, students are to focus on “L.3.2: My spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are correct.” Explicit directions to students as to how to use spelling patterns and generalizations.
  • L.3.2g
    • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 10, students learn about strategies to check their spelling which includes using a dictionary.
  • L.3.3a
    • In Module 2, Unit 1, Lesson 10, students learn to use temporal words and phrases. Students learn to use time words and phrases in their narrative.
  • L.3.3b
    • In Module 3, Unit 2, Lesson 13, students participate in a text-based discussion about the differences between written and spoken English. The teacher distributes Spoken Compared to Written English.


Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development

4 / 6

This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.

Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.

Materials contain minimal evidence of explicit instruction of phonics and word recognition consistently over the course of the year. Materials provide limited opportunities to apply word analysis skills to connected texts. There are limited opportunities to practice speaking and receive feedback on fluency.

Indicator 1o

1 / 2

Materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills by providing explicit instruction and assessment in phonics and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria that materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills by providing explicit instruction and assessment in phonics and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.

According to information in the Appendix, foundational skills are integrated through Modules 1-4, yet explicit instruction in how to decode multisyllabic words is not explicitly and systematically taught. Teachers are informed during the Reading Foundational Skills assessment (found in the Appendix) that, “If, during this assessment, it is evident that students are unable to meet the grade-level expectations and require additional support with learning to read, consider using and/or adapting EL Education’s K–2 Reading Foundational Skills Block.” If a student receives EL Education as their primary core instruction prior to Grade 3 and is lacking in foundational skills in Grade 3, they will have already received the K-2 Foundational Skills Block instruction. There is no explicit instruction in phonics, since the ALL Block focuses on additional time to work with texts, ideas, and skills that are initially introduced in the Module Lessons (EL Education Your Curriculum Companion, p. 83). Some prefixes and suffixes are explicitly taught in Module lessons and during the ALL Block, but a systematic sequence of teaching decoding of Latin suffixes, multisyllable words, and irregularly spelled words is not present in the materials.

Materials contain minimal evidence of explicit instruction of Grade 3 phonics and word recognition consistently over the course of the year. Examples include:

  • The EL Education Your Curriculum Companion states that their method of teaching phonics is structured phonics -- teaching spelling-sound patterns in a clear sequence based on the Alphabetic Principle (p. 201). However, the EL Education Your Curriculum Companion also states that in Grades 3-5, their materials focus more on a contextualized approach to teaching phonics and word recognition (p. 85).
  • Opportunities provided to practice phonics, syllabication, spelling patterns, and morphology throughout the year are through vocabulary games, vocabulary squares, and Frayer models (p. 85). However, these opportunities are not consistent over the course of the year.
  • The ALL Block suggests that students who need remediation in Reading Foundations get resources from the K-2 Reading Foundations Skills materials which contains below grade level phonics and word recognition lessons.

Some tasks and questions are sequenced to application of grade-level work (e.g., application of prefixes at the end of the unit/year; decoding multi-syllable words). Examples include:

  • In the modules, there is word study with an emphasis on morphology, syllabication, and vocabulary protocols, routines, and tools to figure out meaning of new words (p. 87).
    • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 5, contains an opening review of affixes, in which students look at the word explicitly to determine its root word. As a class, students begin a Prefix, Root, Suffix charts for prefixes, roots, and suffixes.
      • Students complete Prefix, Root, Suffix charts for two homework assignments.
    • In Module 1, Unit 2, Lesson 4, students discuss the root and suffix meanings for the word collaboration and determine the meaning of -tion.
    • In Module 2, Unit 2, Lesson 1, students help determine the meaning of the prefix un-.
    • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 6, students determine the meaning of the prefix re-.
    • In Module 3, Unit 3, Lesson 10, students discuss the root and suffix in the word effectively. (This word is used in the learning target for the day, “I can effectively perform my presentation.”)
  • The ALL Block lists 2 teacher-guided sessions in Week 2 and 2 rotation sessions for Word Study and Vocabulary (p. Xiii, Teacher Guide).
    • In Module 1, Unit 3, Week 2 of Word Study and Vocabulary, students analyze the meaning of the prefix over- and the suffix -ies.
    • In Module 2, Unit 2, Week 2, students learn the meaning of the suffixes -y and -ly.
    • In Module 2, Unit 3, Week 2, students learn the meaning of the suffixes in- and im-.
    • In Module 3, Unit 1, Week 2, students learn the meaning of the suffix -ion and the prefix re-.
    • In Module 3, Unit 2, Week 2, students learn the meaning of the prefix pre- and the suffix -ed.
    • In Module 3, Unit 3, Week 2, students learn the prefix dis-.
    • In Module 4, Unit 1, Week 2, students learn the meaning of the suffixes -less, -ful, and -ism.
    • In Module 4, Unit 2, Week 2, students learn the suffixes -ible and -able.
    • In Module 4, Unit 3, Week 2, students learn common prefixes that mean “not.”

Minimal assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year to inform instructional adjustments of phonics and word recognition to help students make progress toward mastery. Examples include:

  • There is a phonics assessment for foundational skills from the K-2 Foundational Skills Block that could be used with Grade 3 students, but program did not contain explicit assessments for foundational phonics skills. Reading: Foundational Skills Informal Assessment: Phonics and Word Recognition Checklist (Grade 3) is the only assessment. This is not an ongoing assessment.
  • In the ALL Block, students work on Word Study and Vocabulary, in which they practice sorting words into academic and domain-specific vocabulary to be able to record words in the appropriate place in their vocabulary log. The ALL Block contains no formal assessments of students’ learning of the identifying and knowing the meaning of words with prefixes and suffixes.

Materials contain some explicit instruction of word solving strategies (graphophonic and syntactic) to decode unfamiliar words. Examples include:

  • A “Close Readers Do These Things” Anchor chart is referenced throughout the modules and is used to guide students in finding the meanings of unfamiliar words. For example, in Module 3, Unit 1, Lesson 7, the teacher is instructed to, “Invite students to use Vocabulary strategies recorded on the Close Readers Do These Things anchor chart to determine the meaning of the word 'racist'.”
  • In Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 5, the learning target for the day is, “I can refer to the text explicitly to answer questions about Rain School.” The class then discusses how to figure out the meaning of the word explicitly. The teacher is also instructed to “Ensure students understand that they can use affixes and roots to determine the meaning of unfamiliar words. Explain what affixes are (letters added to the beginning or end of a word that affect the meaning).”


Indicator 1p

2 / 2

Materials, lessons, and questions provide instruction in and practice of word analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria that materials, lessons, and questions provide instruction in and practice of word analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.

Grade 3 materials include instruction and practice in Word Study and Vocabulary that occur as a component of the five components in the ALL Block. During each two-cycle, students have two teacher guided sessions and two independent heterogeneous grouping sessions, which provides students the opportunity to participate in 20 minutes of Word Study and Vocabulary four times a week every other week. The emphasis of Word Study and Vocabulary is context-driven word study. The EL Your Curriculum Companion states that “readers in intermediate grades benefit from a more contextualized approach to teaching phonics and word recognition (p. 85). There is an increased focus on morphology of words related to word meaning. The EL Your Curriculum Companion describes Word Study and Vocabulary as working with words from complex texts and use of vocabulary protocols, routines, and tools to figure out meaning of new words (p. 87). The vocabulary trees are used in the ALL Block in Modules 3 and 4, but were not used in Modules 1 and 2. When these trees were used, they provide an opportunity for students to analyze the prefix, root, and suffix of academic vocabulary words in a connected text and to use those words and words like them in their own sentences. In the Modules, there are some opportunities for students to analyze words when words are being added to the Academic Word Wall.

Varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to learn, practice, and apply word analysis skills in connected texts and tasks. Examples include:

  • In Module 1, Unit 3, Week 2, Day 4, students use a Vocabulary Grid to understand the word overcome based on the sentence: “You have written a reading contract describing two particular reading challenges that you face and strategies for overcoming them.”
  • In Module 2, Unit 3, Lesson 6, students learn that their conclusion paragraph will include a restated focus statement. The teacher writes the word "restate" on the board and points to the prefix "re-." The teacher asks students to popcorn read other words with the prefix "re-." The teacher asks: “What do you think re-means based on how it is used in each of these words?”
  • In Module 3, Lesson 8, ALL Block, students use a Vocabulary Tree to analyze the meaning of the academic vocabulary word explanation with a focus on the suffix "-ion."
  • In Module 3, Unit 2, Week 2, Day 2, ALL Block, students use a vocabulary tree to analyze the word “prevented” from the text Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens.
  • In Module 4, Unit 1, Days 4, ALL Block, students use a vocabulary tree to analyze the word "organism" from the text, One Well: The Story of Water on Earth. The vocabulary tree routine consists of a chart for students to fill in with the word’s prefix, root, suffix and definition of affix. Students fill in a tree with the sentence from the text where the word was used, a sentence of their own using the vocabulary word, words in the same affix or root family, and their own sentence using a related word.
  • In Module 4, Unit 2, Week 2, Days 2 and 4, ALL Block, students use a vocabulary tree to analyze the words “drinkable” and “constructing” from the text, Real Lives: Angola, Africa.


Indicator 1q

1 / 2

Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading, that is, to read on-level prose and poetry with accuracy, rate appropriate to the text, and expression.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria that instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading, that is, to read on-level prose and poetry with accuracy, rate appropriate to the text, and expression.

Grade 3 materials provide opportunities to practice fluent reading over the course of the school year during Module lessons and the ALL Block (starting in Module 1, Unit 2). During some weeks in the ALL Block, Reading and Speaking Fluency/GUM, students are provided a grade-level poem or complex text excerpt for the week, and students self-assess their work to determine their fluency, or students have a peer assess their fluency. Students read with a partner and utilize sentence stems in order to discuss how they have improved their fluency.

There are limited opportunities for the teacher to listen to each student read orally and provide fluency feedback and instruction since fluency is not a consistent focus every week. Opportunities are missed to provide teachers with oral reading fluency assessment materials such as running records or miscue analysis to drive individualized fluency instruction. Teacher assessment materials consist of checklists such as the End of Unit 3 Assessment: Reading a New Text Aloud for Fluency and Reading Fluency Checklist. Further guidance as to what needs to happen next for teaching fluency with each student is not provided. According to EL Education, “Reading fluency is best practiced on text that is at or below the independent reading level. For students whose independent reading levels are below this excerpt, allow them to use an excerpt from their independent reading book to practice fluency.” For differentiation, a teacher must find texts outside of EL Education materials to help students reading below grade level improve in fluency. If a student is below grade level in fluency, EL Education states: “Consider using the Reading: Foundational Skills Informal Assessment: Reading Fluency Checklist to gather baseline reading fluency data from students’ independent reading books in Closing and Assessment A (see Module 1 Appendix).” In Module 1, the EL Education Teacher Guides states, “For students who may need additional support with reading fluency: Pair these students with a highly fluent reader such as a peer model and have them chorally read together.”

Opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy and fluency in oral and silent reading. Examples include:

  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Lesson 1, students practice their silent reading fluency by following along as the teacher reads excerpts from My Librarian is a Camel.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Day 1, ALL Block, students work on fluent reading by practicing an excerpt from My Librarian is a Camel. Students listen to the excerpt read aloud, practice reading it on their own and then practice with a partner. Students practice reading in robot and bear voices with their partner. (This activity is done in small groups, and based on the ability level of the group, some groups read a longer or shorter portion of the text.)
  • In Module 2, Unit 3, Week 1, Days 1 and 3, ALL Block, students practice fluent reading of an excerpt from the text Everything You Need to Know About Frogs and Other Slippery Creatures. The lessons include teacher modeling, choral reading, a student self-assessment, independent practice, and partner practice.
  • In Module 3, Unit 1, Lesson 1, students practice their silent reading fluency by following along as the teacher reads Chapter 1 of Peter Pan.

Materials support reading of prose and poetry with attention to rate, accuracy, and expression, as well as direction for students to apply reading skills when productive struggle is necessary. Examples include:

  • In Module 1, Unit 2, ALL Block, students read an excerpt from My Librarian is a Camel for fluency and accuracy. The teacher models, the students read silently, and then with partners.
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Week 2, Day 1, students practice reading the poem, The Red-Eyed Tree Frog. The lesson starts by having the students silently read the poem. The teacher then reads the poem aloud followed by a class choral reading of the poem. The class then completes another choral reading with clapping to the rhythm of the poem.
  • In Module 3, Unit 1, ALL Block, invite students to highlight the following focus criteria for this week:
    • “I can correct myself and reread when what I read was wrong or didn’t make sense.”
    • “I can read my text at a speed that is appropriate for the piece.”
    • “I can notice and read punctuation.”
    • “I can use the appropriate volume and change volume naturally as if I am talking to a friend.”

Materials support students’ fluency development of reading skills (e.g., self-correction of word recognition and/or for understanding, focus on rereading) over the course of the year (to get to the end of the grade-level band). Examples include:

  • The Your Curriculum Companion describes how the EL materials support the development of fluency, by decoding with automaticity, following along in the text while a fluent reader is reading, and reading the same text multiple times. They learn specific criteria for fluent reading and receive peer or teacher critique on their reading.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, ALL Block, students read with a partner who notes each time reader self-corrects.
  • In Module 1, Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, the class focuses on self-correcting when reading a passage from the text, My Librarian is a Camel. The class discusses and gives examples of what it means to self-correct. During small group instruction, the teacher models self-correcting by doing the following: “Miss a word in the first sentence. Once it is clear from the context that this doesn’t make sense, go back to read it correctly. Misread a word in the second sentence. Once it is clear from the context that this doesn’t make sense, go back to read it correctly.”
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Week 1 Day 1, ALL Block, students again fill out the fluency self-assessment after reading an excerpt from the text, Bullfrog at Magnolia Circle, during Small Group Instruction time. During this lesson, the teacher also models fluent reading by reading the text aloud in the following three ways, “First read: quickly, making and ignoring mistakes and not attending to punctuation. Second read: slowly, word by word, sounding out every fifth word or so, again ignoring mistakes and not attending to punctuation. Third read: at an “appropriate rate.” Make a mistake or two, but show how fluent readers would self-correct. Match your facial expression and body language to the piece. Change your rate, volume, pitch, and tone to reflect an understanding of the author’s intended message.”

Some assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current fluency skills and provide teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery of fluency. While self-assessment is a regular part of fluency lessons over the course of the school year, opportunities for teachers to use a comprehensive, explicit rubric for assessing students’ fluency and how to help individual students make growth in fluency are missing. Examples include:

  • In Module 1, Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the Learning Target for the day is “I can evaluate my own fluency strengths.” During small group time, the teacher reads aloud a portion of the text, More Than Anything Else. Students then read the text through one time. Afterwards, students fill out the Fluency Self-Assessment Checklist. The teacher also tells students that over the next few days, students will focus on these skills, “I can correct myself and reread when what I read was wrong or didn’t make sense. I can read my text at a speed that is appropriate for the piece.”
  • In Module 1, Unit 3, Lesson 3, students practice fluency by reading excerpts to each other from one of the two selected stories. Students are able to choose which story they want to read for the assessment, and Lesson 3 provides a first practice of reading aloud and hearing others read aloud.
  • In Module 2, Unit 1, Day 1 and Day 3, ALL Block, students self-assess their reading fluency of Bullfrog at Magnolia Circle fluency passage using the Fluency Self-Assessment Checklist.
  • In Module 3, Unit 3, End-of-Unit Assessment: Reading a New Text Aloud for Fluency, students read an excerpt from Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. The teacher uses the Reading Fluency Checklist to assess the students’ fluency. The teacher is to provide the student with immediate feedback.
  • In Module 4, Unit 2, Day 3, ALL Block, students read a passage from “Real Lives: Angola, Africa.” Students highlight the focus criteria on the Fluency Self-Assessment Checklist criteria.