2nd Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Focus & Coherence
Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations | 92% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Focus | 2 / 2 |
Criterion 1.2: Coherence | 4 / 4 |
Criterion 1.3: Coherence | 7 / 8 |
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations for Gateway 1, focus and coherence. The instructional materials meet the expectations for focus by assessing grade-level content and spending at least 65% of instructional time on the major work of the grade, and they also meet expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards.
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations for not assessing topics before the grade level in which the topic should be introduced.
Indicator 1a
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations for assessing grade-level content. Above-grade-level assessment questions are present and could be modified or omitted without a significant impact on the underlying structure of the instructional materials.
The series is divided into ten units, and each unit contains a Unit Assessment available online in the Unit Overview document and can also be printed for students. Each unit has a Pre- and Post-Unit Assessment. However, the Pre-Assessments do not identify the standards being pre-assessed.
Examples of assessment questions aligned to grade-level standards include:
- In Unit 2, Addition & Subtraction to 100 Unit Assessment, Question 1b states, “$$89 - 52 =$$ _____.” (2.NBT.5)
- In Unit 3, Story Problems Unit Assessment, Question 3 states, “Some cookies are on the plate. Leann ate 19 cookies. Now there are 12 cookies on the plate. How many cookies were on the plate before?” (2.OA.1)
- In Unit 6, Three Digit Numbers Unit Assessment, Question 13 states, “_____ $$- 100 = 280$$.” (2.NBT.8)
- In Unit 9, Fractions Unit Assessment, Question 3 states, “Use lines to partition the rectangles into fourths in different ways:” Below the question are three rectangles of equal size. (2.G.3)
There are off-grade-level assessment items included in the Unit Assessments that can be modified or omitted without impacting the underlying structure of the materials. For example:
- In Unit 4, Data Unit Assessment, Question 5, which is identified at 2.MD.10, states, “How many more students own pets with 4 legs than students who own pets with fewer than 4 legs?” Students are given a bar graph with the categories of rabbit, dog, cat, and goldfish and solve a multi-step word problem. Question 5 is more accurately aligned to 3.MD.3 (Draw a scaled picture graph and a scaled bar graph to represent data with several categories. Solve one- and two-step “how many more” and “how many less” problems using information presented in scaled bar graphs.)
- In Unit 5, Length, Money, Graphing and Time Unit Assessment, Question 5, which is identified as 2.MD.8, states, “A. Kelly has 1 five dollar bill, 3 quarters, 2 nickels, and 3 pennies. She wants to buy something that costs $5.95. Can she afford it? Why or why not? B. How much more does she need?” Question 5 is more accurately aligned to 4.MD.2 (Use the four operations to solve word problems involving distances, intervals of time, liquid volumes, masses of objects, and money, including simple fractions or decimals.)
- In Unit 8, Arrays Unit Assessment, Question 5, which is identified as 2.OA.3, states, “Alex says that if he adds 5 to any odd number his answer will be an even number. Do you agree with him? Explain your thinking using pictures and words.” Question 5 is more accurately aligned to 3.OA.9 (Identify arithmetic patterns (including patterns in the addition table or multiplication table, and explain them using properties of operations.)
- In Unit 9, Fractions Unit Assessment, Question 8, which is identified as 2.G.3, states, “A.J., Jorge, and Jack were at a birthday party. AJ ate half of the birthday cake. Jorge ate one-fourth of the cake. Jack ate one-fourth of the cake. Show how the cake below could be divided so that each person gets the amount they ate. Clearly label each person’s piece of cake.” Question 8 is more accurately aligned to 3.NF.1 (Understand a fraction $$\frac{1}{b}$$ as the quantity formed by 1 part when a whole is partitioned into b equal parts; understand a fraction $$\frac{a}{b}$$ as the quantity formed by a parts of size $$\frac{1}{b}$$.)
- In Unit 10, Shapes Unit Assessment, Question 6, which is identified as 2.G.1, states, “Why is a square always a rectangle but a rectangle is not always a square?” Question 6 is more accurately aligned 3.G.1 (Understand that shapes in different categories (e.g., rhombuses, rectangles, and others) may share attributes (e.g., having four sides), and that the shared attributes can define a larger category (e.g., quadrilaterals)).
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote the large majority of class time in each grade K-8 to the major work of the grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2, when used as designed, spend approximately 73% of instructional time on the major work of the grade, or supporting work connected to major work of the grade.
Indicator 1b
Instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major cluster of each grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations for spending a majority of instructional time on major work of the grade.
- The approximate number of units devoted to major work of the grade, including assessments and supporting work connected to the major work, is 6.5 out of 10, which is approximately 65%.
- The number of lessons devoted to major work of the grade, including assessments and supporting work connected to the major work, is approximately 100 out of 141, which is approximately 71%.
- The instructional block includes a math lesson, cumulative review, math stories, and math practice components. The non-major component minutes were deducted from the total instructional minutes resulting in 9,320 major work minutes left out of 12,690 total instructional minutes. As a result of dividing the major work minutes by the total minutes, approximately 73% of the instructional materials focus on major work of the grade.
A minute-level analysis is most representative of the instructional materials because the minutes consider all components included during math instructional time. As a result, approximately 73% of the instructional materials focus on major work of the grade.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
Coherence: Each grade's instructional materials are coherent and consistent with the Standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards. The instructional materials have supporting content that engages students in the major work of the grade and content designated for one grade level that is viable for one school year. The materials also foster coherence through connections at a single grade.
Indicator 1c
Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations that supporting work enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.
The publishers identify connections between supporting content and major work within the lesson plan in the “Standards in Lesson” section, as well as in the Guide to Implementing AF Math: Grade 2. Additional connections exist within the materials, although not always stated by the publisher. For example, in Unit 4, Lesson 6, 2.MD.D, represent and interpret data, is listed as the cluster in the unit. However, 2.OA.A, represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction, is connected to Lesson 6 in Unit 4. Examples of the connections between supporting work and major work include the following:
- In Unit 4, Lesson 6, Independent Practice, students engage with the supporting work of 2.MD.10, compare problems using information presented in a bar graph, and the major work of 2.OA.1, use addition and subtraction within 100 to solve one- and two-step word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing with unknowns in all positions. Problem 3 states, “11 of the kids who own pets are boys. The rest are girls. How many girls own pets?” In order to solve, students would need to first add all of the students represented on the table to find out how many total students own pets $$(4 + 7 + 1 + 8 + 4 = 24)$$, then subtract the 11 boys to solve for girls $$(24 - 11 = 13.)$$
- In Unit 5, Lesson 1, Independent Practice Worksheet, students engage with the supporting work of 2.MD.8, solve word problems involving dollar bills, quarters, dimes, nickels, and pennies, and the major work of 2.OA.1, use addition and subtraction within 100 to solve one-and two-step word problems while students find the value of groups of coins solve related word problems. Problem 12 states, ”Jenny has 2 quarters, 1 dime, 3 nickels, and 2 pennies. a) Draw and label Jenny’s coins. b) How much money does Jenny have in all? c) Jenny finds 1 dime, 2 nickels, and 3 pennies. How much money does Jenny have now?”
- In Unit 5, Lesson 11, Workshop worksheet, students engage with the supporting work of 2.MD.9, generate measurement data by measuring lengths of several objects to the nearest whole unit and show the measurements by making a line plot, and the major work of 2.MD.1, measure the length of an object by selecting and using appropriate tools while students measure several lines provided, create a line plot from the data, analyze the data to answer questions. Problem 4 states, “Kaylee was measuring string for an art project and she needs to find out how many pieces she has that are greater than 5 cm. Measure the strings below to the nearest centimeter. Then create a line plot to help her answer the question...How many pieces of string are longer than 5 cm?”
- In Unit 5, Lesson 13, Introduction, students engage with the supporting work of 2.MD.7, learn to tell time to the nearest five minutes, and with the major work of 2.NBT.2, count by 5s. Students are shown a clock with 1:45 displayed. The teacher asks, “What time does this clock show? How did you figure it out?” The sample student response is, “The clock shows the time 1:45. I figured it out by looking at the hands on the clock. The little hand is between the 1 and the 2, but hasn’t passed the 2 yet so it’s 1 o’clock, and the big hand is on the 9 to show the minutes. If we count them by 5s and start at the 12, which is 0 minutes, we get 45 so it’s 1:45.”
- In Unit 10, Lesson 5, Workshop worksheet, students engage with the supporting work of 2.G.1, recognize and draw shapes having specified attributes, and the major work of 2.OA.1, use addition and subtraction within 100 to solve one-and two-step word problems while students solve word problems related to the defining properties of polygons. Problem 1 states, “Ava, Chris, and Natalie are making polygons using gumdrops and pasta. They use a gumdrop for a vertex. They use pasta for a side. Ava makes three quadrilaterals using pasta and gumdrops. Chris makes three pentagons using pasta and gumdrops. Natalie makes two hexagons using pasta and gumdrops. Ava says they will each use the same number of gumdrops and pasta to make their shapes. Natalie says Chris will use more. Who is correct, Ava or Natalie?”
- Practice Workbook C, students engage with the supporting work of 2.MD.10, solve simple put-together problems using information presented in a bar graph and also addresses, although not stated, the major work of 2.NBT.5, fluently add and subtract within 100. Problem 3 states, “Use the Animal Habitats table to answer the following questions.” Tally marks are used to record data for Forest, Wetlands, and Grasslands. Problem 3d states, “How many total animal habitats were used to create this table?”
Indicator 1d
The amount of content designated for one grade level is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations that the amount of content designated for one grade-level is viable for one school year. The Guide to Implementing AF, Grade 2 includes a scope and sequence which states, “Not every lesson is entirely focused on grade level standards, and, therefore, some lessons can be used for either remediation or enrichment. As designed, the instructional materials can be completed in 141 days. One day is provided for each lesson and one day is allotted for each unit assessment.
- Ten units with 131 lessons in total.
- The Guide identifies lessons as either R (remediation), O (on grade level), or E (enrichment). There are 0 lessons identified as E (enrichment), 4 identified as R (remediation), and 127 identified as O (on grade level).
- Ten days for unit assessments.
- Unit 1 has an instructional day listed as a “flex day.” However, as there are no materials identified for instruction on the flex day, the flex day was not included in the count for the review.
When reviewing the materials for Achievement First, Grade 2, a difference in the number of total instructional days was found. Although the publisher states the curriculum will encompass 140 days, there are 141 days of lessons and unit assessments. The Unit 6 Overview allocates 18 days of instruction to the unit. However, the Guide to Implementing AF, Grade 2 and the Unit 6 Overview lesson breakdown allocates 19 days of instruction. In addition, the Grade 2 Unit Overview for Unit 8 shows 10 days for the unit while the Guide to Implementing AF, Grade 2 provides 11 days for the unit. The unit has 11 lessons including the unit assessment. The Unit 10 Overview states that five days of instruction are needed for the unit and does not include a day for assessment in the breakdown. A Unit Assessment is included as a resource in the Unit Overview document. The Guide to Implementing AF, Grade 2 provided six days for Unit 10.
The publisher recommends 90 minutes of mathematics instruction daily.
- There are three lesson types, Game Introduction Lesson, Exercise Based Lesson, or Task Based Lesson. Each lesson is designed for 55 minutes.
- Math stories are designed for 25 minutes on Monday-Thursday.
- Cumulative review is designed for 25 minutes.
- Practice is designed for 10 minutes.
Indicator 1e
Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards i. Materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. If there is content from prior or future grades, that content is clearly identified and related to grade-level work ii. Materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems iii. Materials relate grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 partially meet expectations for being consistent with the progressions in the Standards. Overall, the materials do not provide all students with extensive work on grade-level problems. The instructional materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. Content from future grades are not clearly identified and does not relate to the grade-level work. The instructional materials relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier units. Within the overview for each unit, there is “Identify the Narrative,” which provides a description of connections to concepts in prior and future grade levels.
The lessons follow a workshop model, including a math lesson, math stories, and calendar/fluency. Most lessons do not provide enough opportunity or resources for students to independently demonstrate mastery. The lessons include teacher-directed problems that the class solves together. Math stories are intended to occur every day there is a lesson; however there are insufficient math stories for each lesson day. In addition, many practice workbook pages are repeated across multiple units.
The materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. The Unit Overview documents contain an Identify the Narrative component that looks back at previous content or grade level standards and looks ahead to content taught in future grades. In addition, the Linking section includes connections taught in future grades, units, or lessons. Evidence of prior and future grade-level work supporting the progressions in the standards is identified. Examples include:
- In Unit 2, Addition and Subtraction to 100 Unit Overview, Identify The Narrative, Linking states, “Looking ahead to 3rd and 4th grade, 2nd grade mastery of this unit is vital considering 3rd math has a small amount of time dedicated to addition and subtraction where they are meant to build stronger fluency. This is also means 2nd grade success here is very important for the 4th grade math. Expanded notation sets up scholars to use the standard algorithm with ease.”
- In Unit 3, Story Problem Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative, Linking states, “Scholars need to master the addition and subtraction story problem types with 2 steps to be ready for third grade where they represent and solve story problems with multiplication, division, elapsed time, and rounding. Additionally, students need to be proficient in independently going through the story problem protocol so that they are able to make sense of all story problem types. The work students do in this unit will carry over into math stories in second grade as they continue to practice all addition and subtraction problem types, including 2-step, and begin to explore problems with equal groups. In third grade, scholars begin multiplication and division, and they continue to solve equal groups/array story problems within 100. Scholars also do 2-step story problems with all four operations. By the end of fourth grade, scholars have mastered all addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division story problem types (including multiplicative compare) with all whole numbers for addition and subtraction and two-digit multipliers and one-digit divisors for multiplication and division. Furthermore, they master multi-step problems with mixed operations, including measurement contexts.”
- In Unit 4, Data Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative, Linking states, “In 3rd grade, students draw a scaled picture graph and a scaled bar graph to represent a data set with several categories. In 2nd grade, each picture on a pictograph or square on a bar graph stood for one object/item. In 3rd grade, students will draw pictographs and bar graphs where the picture/square stands for more than one object.”
- In Unit 7, Addition and Subtraction within 1000 Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative, Linking states, “In third grade, students are no longer using flats, sticks, and dots or place value blocks as a strategy to solve. Students are exclusively using the more abstract place value strategies to solve 3-digit addition and subtraction. Students are fluently using expanded notation, number line and other strategies to solve. This is all done in preparation for the standard algorithm which is taught in fourth grade.”
- In Unit 9, Geometry--Fractions Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative, Linking states, “In 3rd grade, students work with fractions that have numerators that are more than one. They also work with simple equivalent fractions and comparing fractions with the same numerator or same denominator. When the fractions have the same numerator we can think about the size of the unit fraction. For example, $$\frac{2}{3}$$ is bigger than $$\frac{2}{6}$$ because as the denominator gets bigger, the size of the part/fraction gets smaller. 2 pieces of an object partitioned into thirds are larger than 2 pieces of a same-sized object partitioned into sixths because the whole is divided into fewer pieces.”
Overall, the materials do not provide all students with extensive work on grade-level problems. The majority of the lessons implement 45 minutes of math workshop with a whole group introduction, workshop in pairs or small groups, mid-workshop interruption, whole group discussion, and closing with an exit slip. As it is unclear if students are working together or individually, workshop lessons may not provide enough opportunity for students to independently demonstrate mastery. The Guide to Implementing AF, Grade 2, describes the workshop component as, “Collaborative processing time to continue to develop understanding of prioritized concept and strategy.” The lessons include a teacher-directed introduction to the workshop “game” and follows up with students tasked to participate in the “game.” Most lessons include an exit ticket with one or two questions for the students to complete individually and some lessons include Independent Practice problems.
Beyond the lesson component of the math time, the Guide to Implementing AF Math, Grade 2 suggests 15 minutes of daily calendar and practice. Each unit indicates the Grade 2 Practice Workbook pages to be implemented during this time. However, the practice workbook pages contain a limited number of practice items and are recommended to be used repeatedly in different units. On Fridays, students have 25 minutes of Cumulative Review problems “to facilitate the making of connections and build fluency or solidify understandings of the skills and concepts students have acquired throughout the week and to strategically review concepts.” Exit Tickets, Independent Practice, and Cumulative Review provide limited independent practice on some grade level standards. As a result of the limited number of opportunities to practice grade-level standards, the materials do not give students extensive work with grade-level problems.
Examples where the full intent of a standard is not met and/or extensive work is not provided include:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 13, Exit Ticket, students engage in 2.MD.2 as they measure the length of an object twice, using length units of different lengths for two measurements. This standard is only addressed in this lesson and extensive practice is not given. Problem 1 states, “Measure the length of the book to the nearest inch and to the nearest centimeter.”
- In Unit 1, Lesson 14, Workshop Worksheet, students engage with 2.MD.6 as they represent whole numbers on a number line and solve addition and subtraction equations within 100 on a number line diagram. The full intent of this standard is not met as students measure the lengths of objects using a ruler and are not provided the opportunity to create their own ruler. In addition, this standard is only addressed in this lesson. Problem 2 states, “Peter was measuring his shoe using the centimeter ruler below. About how long is Peter’s shoe?” Students are given a picture of a shoe and a centimeter ruler.
- In Units 4 and 5, Practice Workbook B, students engage in 2.NBT.6 where they add up to four two-digit numbers. However, there are no lessons or instruction addressing 2.NBT.6, and, therefore, the full intent of the standard is not met as they are not provided instruction on using strategies based on place value and properties of operations as the standard requires. Students are not provided with extensive work as the only materials provided for 2.NBT.6 are 24 Practice Workbook problems and six Cumulative Review problems. Problem 19 states, “What are two ways that you can make a total of 50 using 3 addends?”
- In Unit 8, Lesson 6, Workshop and Exit Ticket, students engage with the standard 2.MD.3 by the use of mental benchmarks of a meter and a centimeter to estimate objects in the classroom. As this is the only lesson addressing 2.MD.3 where they are expected to estimate using the units of inches, feet, centimeters, and meters, the full intent of the standard is not met since students do not estimate using the units of inches and feet, nor do students have the opportunity to engage in the extensive work with the standard. During Workshop, they are given a worksheet with a variety of estimation problems to solve. To close the lesson, the students are given an Exit Ticket with two problems. Exit Ticket Problem 1 states, “Circle the most reasonable estimate for each object. a. Length of an eraser - 5 cm or 1 m.”
- In Unit 10, Lesson 2, Workshop and Independent Practice Worksheet, students engage with 2.G.1 as they recognize and draw shapes having specified attributes such as a given number of angles or a given number of equal faces. Identify triangles, quadrilaterals, hexagons, and cubes. The full intent of this standard is not met as none of the lessons addressing 2.G.1 include a cube, as required by the standard. During Workshop, students are given a description of shape attributes and asked to draw and name the shape. Independent Practice Problem 1 states, “A flat closed shape with 6 sides and 6 angles. What shape did you build?”
The instructional materials do not clearly identify content from prior and future grade-levels, and, as a result, do not give students extensive work with grade level standards. Examples include:
- In Unit 5, Lesson 2, Independent Practice Worksheet aligns with the intent to engage students with 2.MD.8 as they solve word problems involving dollar bills, quarters, nickels, and pennies, using $ and $$\cancel{C}$$ symbols appropriately. However, as this lesson requires subtraction of decimals, it is more accurately aligned to 4.MD.2 where students use the four operations to solve word problems involving distances, intervals of time, liquid volume, masses of objects, and money, including problems involving simple fractions or decimals. Problem 9 states, “Jordan emptied his pocket and found this: (Images of bills and coins adding to $22.87 are shown) a. How much money does Jordan have? b. Jordan wants to buy a toy that costs $23.50. Can he afford it? Why or why not?”
- In Unit 6, Lesson 7, Independent Practice Worksheet aligns with the intent to engage students with 2.NBT.1 as they are to understand that the three digits of a three-digit number represent amounts of hundreds, tens, and ones, 2.NBT.2 as they count within 1000; skip-count by 5s, 10s, and 100s, and 2.NBT.3 as they read and write numbers to 1000 using base-ten numerals, number names, and expanded form. However, this is more accurately aligned to 4.NBT.1 where students are to recognize that in a multi-digit whole number, a digit in one place represents ten times what it represents in the place to its right. Problem 3 states, “Julisa says that 4 hundreds, 13 tens and 15 ones is the same as 5 hundreds, 4 tens and 5 ones. Is she correct? Why or why not? Use the space in the box to prove your thinking.”
- In Unit 8, Lesson 9, Independent Practice aligns with the intent to engage students with 2.OA.3 where students determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members (e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2s) and write an equation to express an even number as a sum of two equal addends. Of the 26 Independent Practice problems provided in Unit 8, 23 are above 20. In addition, the Practice Workbook contains 33 problems, 18 of which extend beyond 20. None of the problems within the Independent Practice or the Practice Workbook require that students write an equation to express an even number as a sum of two equal addends. As it extends beyond 20 and requires addition beyond two equal addends, it is more accurately aligned to 3.OA.9 where students are to identify arithmetic patterns (including patterns in the addition table or multiplication table) and explain them using properties of operations. Problem 1 states, “Jezdon has 17 cards. Angel has 12 pokemon cards. Jezdon says if they put them together they will have an even number of pokemon cards. Is he right? How do you know? Draw a picture and use words to explain your thinking.”
- In Unit 9, Lesson 2, Workshop Worksheet aligns with the intent to engage students with 2.G.3 as they are to partition circles and rectangles into two, three, or four equal shares. On the Workshop Worksheet, students are provided a table with the headings: “Shape to Make,” “Equal Parts,” and “Build & Record.” While the standard, 2.G.3, states that students are to partition circles and rectangles into two, three, or four equal shares, the table includes a hexagon, trapezoid, and rhombus to partition into halves and thirds.
- In Unit 9, Lesson 8, Independent Practice Worksheet aligns with the intent to engage students with 2.G.3 as they are to partition circles and rectangles into two, three, or four equal shares; describe the shares using the words halves, thirds, half of, a third of, etc.; describe the whole as two halves, three thirds, or four fourths; and recognize that equal shares of identical wholes need not have the same shape. The lesson content is more accurately aligned to 3.NF.3d where students are to compare two fractions with the same numerator or the same denominator by reasoning about their size. Problem 2 states, “Enrique cut his pie in half and ate one piece. Melvin cut his pie into fourths and ate one piece. A. Show each pie. Shade the fraction each boy ate. B. Enrique says he ate more pie than Melvin. Is he correct? Why or why not?”
The Unit Overview supports the progression of Second Grade standards by explicitly stating connections between prior grades and current grade level work. Each Unit Overview contains an Identify the Narrative component that identifies connections to what students learned before this Second Grade Unit and/or concepts previously learned in previous grade levels. Each Unit Overview also contains an Identify Desired Results: Identify the Standards section that makes connections to supporting standards learned prior to the unit. In addition, some lessons make connections to previous grade-level learning in the Narrative section. Examples include:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 2, Identify the Narrative, How does the learning connect to previous lessons? What do students have to get better at today? states, “In the previous lesson, scholars reviewed measurement strategies they learned in first grade. They measured the length of items using nonstandard units (linking cubes) and focused on precision going endpoint to endpoint without gaps or overlaps. In this lesson, students will move to using centimeter cubes. They will focus on precision in measuring and also accuracy in labeling their measurement using units.”
- In Unit 2, Addition and Subtraction to 100 Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative states, “Next, students move into addition of two-digit numbers. Scholars were exposed to two-digit addition with regrouping at the end of first grade.”
- In Unit 4, Data Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative states, “Unit 4 opens with students representing and interpreting categorical data. In Grade 1, students learned to organize and represent data with up to three categories. Now, in Grade 2, students build upon this understanding by drawing both picture and bar graphs with up to four categories.”
- In Unit 6, Place Value - Three Digit Numbers Unit Overview, Identify the Standards, the materials identify 2.NBT.1 (Understand that the three digits of a three-digit number represent amounts of hundreds, tens, and ones; e.g., 706 equals 7 hundreds, 0 tens, and 6 ones), 2.NBT.2 (Count within 1000; skip-count by 5s, 10s, and 100s), 2.NBT.3 (Read and write numbers to 1000 using base-ten numerals, number names, and expanded form), and 2.NBT.4 (Compare two three-digit numbers based on meanings of the hundreds, tens, and ones digits, using >, =, and < symbols to record the results of comparisons.) as standards being addressed in the unit. Identify the Standards also shows 1.NBT.2 (Understand that the two digits of a two-digit number represent amounts of tens and ones) and 1.NBT.3 (Compare two two-digit numbers based on meanings of the tens and ones digits, recording the results of comparisons with the symbols >, =, <) as a “Previous Grade Level Standard/ Previously Taught & Related Standard.”
- In Unit 10, Geometry- Shapes Unit Overview, Identify the Narrative states, “In Unit 10, scholars continue to develop their geometric thinking from Grade 1, progressing from a descriptive to an analytic level of thinking, where they can recognize and characterize shapes by their attributes and properties.”
Indicator 1f
Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards i. Materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. ii. Materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.
The instructional materials reviewed for Achievement First Mathematics Grade 2 meet expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards.
The materials include learning objectives, or Aims, that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. Examples include:
- In Unit 2, Lesson 5, Aim is shaped by 2.OA.B, add and subtract within 20. The materials state, “SWBAT use doubles to solve addition and subtraction problems.”
- In Unit 3, Lesson 3, Aim is shaped by 2.OA.A, represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction. The materials state, “SWBAT represent and solve C-DU-M, C-BU-M, and C-SU-F story problems by following the story problem protocol and using a strategy that makes sense to them.”
- In Unit 8, Lesson 3, Aim is shaped by 2.OA.C, work with equal groups to gain foundation for multiplication. The materials state, “SWBAT compose arrays to show equal group situations by representing the groups with the rows and the amount in each group with the columns.”
- In Unit 9, Lesson 3, Aim is shaped by 2.G.A, reason with shapes and their attributes. The materials state, “SWBAT interpret equal shares in composite shapes as halves, thirds, and fourths.”
- In Unit 10, Lesson 2, Aim is shaped by 2.G.A, reason with shapes and their attributes. The materials state, “SWBAT describe, build, identify, and analyze two-dimensional shapes with specified attributes.”
Materials include problems and activities that connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important. Examples of connections include:
- In Unit 3, Lesson 5, Independent Practice, students engage with 2.MD.B, relate addition and subtraction to length, and 2.OA.A, represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction, as they solve a story problem in a five-step process provided. Problem 5 states, “Jasmine has a jump rope that is 84 inches long. Marie’s is 13 inches shorter than Jasmine’s. What is the length of Marie’s jump rope?” A visual is provided in the answer space with the following steps to complete the word problem: visualize, represent, retell, solve, and finish the story.
- In Unit 7, Lesson 1, Exit Ticket, students engage with 2.OA.B, add and subtract within 20, and 2.NBT.B, use place value understanding and properties of operations to add and subtract by adding with expanded notation, as they solve an expression using expanded notation. Problem 1 states, “Solve using expanded notation. $$362+427$$”
- In Unit 8, Lesson 5, Independent Practice, students engage with 2.OA.C, work with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication, and 2.G.A, reason with shapes and their attributes, as they use a grid to draw arrays of squares and use repeated addition to determine the total number of squares. Problem 7 states, “Draw a rectangular array with 4 rows of 3. Write a repeated addition sentence to match. ______rows of _______ squares = ________in all.”
- Practice Workbook F, students engage with 2.OA.C, work with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication, and, although not stated, 2.G.A, reason with shapes and their attributes, as they create arrays to solve an equation. Problem 4 states, “Create a rectangular array using circles to solve the equation below. $$4 + 4 + 4 + 4 + 4 =$$ _____.”