High School - Gateway 3

Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Teacher & Student Supports
| Score | |
|---|---|
| Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 100% |
| Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports | 10 / 10 |
| Criterion 3.2: Student Supports | 6 / 6 |
| Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design |
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for Teacher & Student Supports. The materials meet expectations for Criterion 1, Teacher Supports, Criterion 2, Student Supports and Criterion 3, Intentional Design
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize with integrity to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for Teacher Supports. The materials provide clear guidance through useful annotations and suggestions for enacting both student and ancillary materials. They include explanations and examples of course-level concepts and standards, along with how these connect to prior and future course/grade levels, supporting teacher content knowledge. A year-long scope and sequence is provided, along with standards correlation information. The materials offer strategies for communicating with stakeholders and suggestions to support student progress. Additionally, they explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and clarify the role of the standards. A comprehensive list of required supplies is included, as well as multiple opportunities for assessing student learning, guidance for interpreting performance, and suggestions for follow-up instruction.
Indicator 3a
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students to guide their mathematical development.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in order to guide their mathematical development.
The Course Overview contains sections titled What’s in an IM Lesson, Key Structures in This Course, and Scope and Sequence. Within the Scope and Sequence, there are Pacing Guides and a Dependency Diagram. The sections within the Course Guide provide instructional guidance related to the use of student and ancillary materials.
Examples include:
The Course Overview, Scope and Sequence lists each of the units, explains connections to prior learning, and describes the progression of learning throughout each unit.
The Course Overview, Scope and Sequence, Pacing Guides, and Dependency Diagrams show the interconnectedness among lessons and units within the series (Integrated Math 1, Integrated Math 2, and Integrated Math 3), as well as how the series connects to Grades 6-8.
Course Overview, What’s in an IM Lesson, Narratives Tell The Story states, “The story of each grade is told across the units in the narratives. Each unit has a narrative that describes the mathematical work that will unfold in that unit. Each section within a unit has a narrative that describes the mathematical work in the section. Each lesson and each activity in a unit also has narratives. The Lesson Narrative explains: The mathematical content of the lesson and its place in the learning sequence. The meaning of any new terms introduced in the lesson. How the mathematical practices come into play, as appropriate. The Activity Narrative explains the mathematical purpose of the activity and its place in the learning sequence. What students are doing during the activity. What to look for, while students are working on an activity to orchestrate an effective Activity Synthesis. Connections to the mathematical practices, when appropriate.”
Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Design Principles–Coherent Progression states, “Each unit starts with an invitation to the mathematics. The first few lessons provide an accessible entry point for all students and offer the opportunity to observe students’ prior understandings. Each lesson starts with a Warm-up to activate students’ prior knowledge and to set up the work of the day. This is followed by instructional activities in which students are introduced to new concepts, procedures, contexts, or representations, or make connections between them. The Lesson Synthesis at the end consolidates understanding and makes the learning goals of the lesson explicit. In the Cool-down that follows, students apply what they learned. Each activity starts with a Launch that gives all students access to the task. Independent work time follows, allowing them to grapple with problems individually before working in small groups. In the Activity Synthesis at the end, students consolidate their learning by making connections between their work and the mathematical goals. Each activity includes carefully chosen contexts and numbers that support the coherent sequence of learning goals in the lesson.”
Course Guide, Key Structures in This Course, Using the 5 Practices For Orchestrating Productive Discussions states, "Promoting productive and meaningful conversations between students and teachers is essential to success in a problem-based classroom. To facilitate these conversations, the IM curriculum incorporates the framework presented in 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions (Smith & Stein, 2011). The 5 Practices are: anticipate, monitor, select, sequence, and make connections between students’ responses. All IM lessons support the practices of anticipating, monitoring, and selecting students’ work to share during whole-group discussions. In lessons in which students make connections between representations, strategies, concepts, and procedures, the Lesson Narrative and the Activity Narrative support the practices of sequencing and connecting as well, and the lesson is tagged so that these opportunities are easily identifiable. For additional opportunities to connect students’ work, look for activities tagged with MLR7 Compare and Connect. Similar to the 5 Practices routine, Compare and Connect supports the practices of monitoring, selecting, and making connections. In curriculum workshops and PLCs, rehearse and reflect on enacting the 5 Practices."
The Glossary provides a visual glossary for teachers that includes both definitions and illustrations.
The materials include annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. Within each lesson or activity, the implementation guidance includes a rationale for each strategy or activity. Presentation slides accompany each lesson and provide visual support for student engagement by organizing lesson content into a series of slides. The slides include teacher notes drawn from the Lesson Narrative, Activity Narrative, Launch, and Activity Synthesis.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 4, Unit Narrative states, “In this unit, students examine solving and graphing linear equations and systems of linear equations. The unit builds on learning from middle school when students used variables to write equations, manipulated equations using valid moves such as the distributive property, and solved basic systems of linear equations using graphs and substitution. In the first section, students recall writing equations to represent situations. In the second section, they use valid moves to write equivalent equations that can be used to solve for unknown values or to isolate variables. The third section examines solving systems of equations using graphs, substitution for variables, and elimination of variables. Students use their understanding of writing equivalent equations to understand why each of the methods works for finding the solution.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 2, Section A, Lesson 4, Activity 4.2, Activity Synthesis states, “The goal of the synthesis is for students to understand the connection between the process of dilating points on a line and dilating the line itself. Specifically, what happens if the line goes through the center of the dilation? Invite students to share how the definition of dilation can help them answer these questions. Students should have the opportunity to hear and articulate that because dilations, by definition, take points along rays through the center; dilating a line through the center will take all the points to points on that same line, so the line doesn’t move. It may be hard for students to put into words that the points are dilated, but due to the nature of infinity, the line is not changed, so invite several students to put their explanation into their own words. In a later activity, students will state and record a theorem about lines that do and do not pass through the center of the dilation, so it’s useful for students to be clear about why this is true.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 3, Section B, Lesson 7, Activity 7.3, Narrative states, “The purpose of this activity is for students to practice solving rational equations and identifying extraneous solutions, if they exist. Students are expected to use algebraic methods to solve the equations and should be discouraged from using graphing technology.” The Launch provides additional teacher guidance and states, “Arrange students in groups of 2. Tell students to complete the first problem individually and then check their work with their partner before completing the following problems together.”
Indicator 3b
Materials contain explanations and examples of grade-level/course-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade/course levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for containing explanations and examples of grade-level/course-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade/course levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. At the lesson level, the materials identify vertical alignment. Standards addressed in the lesson are listed as “Building On,” “Addressing,” and “Building Towards.” Unit Narratives, Lesson Narratives, and Activity Synthesis sections throughout the materials provide explanations and examples of how course-level concepts connect to prior grade-level and course-level content and support progression to subsequent units and courses.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 6, Section A, Lesson 1, Warm-up, Activity Synthesis clarifies the meaning of variables and categorical variables by directing teachers to “Point out that a variable is a characteristic that can take on different values and a categorical variable represents data which can be divided into groups or categories.” An example follows, and question prompts are provided for the teacher. Materials state, “Ask students: ‘Why is this table an effective method for solving this question?’ (It is effective because it keeps track of all the information we know and don’t know in a way that is organized to show the relationship between each piece of information.) ‘Was using a table the only way to solve the questions?’ (No, there are other methods to arrive at a good solution. Reasoning from the original statements, drawing a representation of the situation, or other similar methods are also good ways to approach the problem.) ‘What does the word ‘two’ in a two-way table refer to? How is it seen in the example from the task?’ (It refers to the number of categorical variables, not the number of categories for each variable. In this example, the two variables are writing utensil preference and paper preference.) Summarize by stating: ‘A two-way table can be used to organize data from two different categorical variables.’”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 3, Overview, Unit Narrative states, “In this unit students build an understanding of ratios in right triangles, which leads to naming cosine, sine, and tangent as trigonometric ratios. Prior to beginning this unit, students will have considerable familiarity with right triangles and similarity. They learned to identify right triangles in grade 4. Students studied the Pythagorean Theorem in grade 8, and used similar right triangles to build the idea of slope. This unit builds on this extensive experience and grounds trigonometric ratios in familiar contexts. Several concepts build throughout the unit. Students begin by using similar triangles to create a table of ratios of the side lengths in right triangles. At first, their table includes only the bottom rows of the table shown here. Taking the time to both build and use the table helps students construct a solid foundation before they learn the names of trigonometric ratios.” An example of the sine, cosine, and tangent ratio for a 25^\circ and 65^\circ degree angle is provided. The Unit Narrative goes on to state, “Students notice patterns between the columns for cosine and sine before they first hear the terms ‘cosine’ and ‘sine.’ In a subsequent lesson, they investigate that relationship, proving the two ratios are equal for complementary angles. Finding the measures of acute angles in a right triangle follows a similar arc, where students first use the table to estimate and then, in a subsequent lesson, learn how to calculate an angle measure given the side measures by using arcsine, arccosine, and arctangent. As students measure side lengths and compute ratios, there is an opportunity to discuss precision. In this unit, students will round side lengths to the nearest tenth and angle measures to the nearest degree in most cases. When students solve problems in context, they grapple with whether or not their answer is reasonable, as well as the appropriate degree of precision to report. Students will continue to use and add to their reference charts. The completed reference chart for this unit is provided for teacher reference.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Section B, Lesson 5, Lesson Narrative states, “Students investigate the connection between the factors of a polynomial, its zeros, and the horizontal intercepts of its graph. Students were introduced to these ideas with quadratics in a previous course. In this lesson, they extend that thinking into higher-degree polynomials, using structure to make connections between points on graphs and solutions on equations (MP7). Since these connections are more difficult to see from the standard form, students work primarily with the factored form in this lesson. Students begin by noticing patterns, given equations of cubic polynomials written in factored form and their graphs. They reason about the zeros of a function and the horizontal intercepts of its graph, and also use the zero product property to infer zeros from factors from its zeros until the Remainder Theorem is proved in a later lesson, but students can begin to see connections between factors and zeros here. The students strengthen their understanding by matching equations with graphs or descriptions of graphs, using intercepts and other features such as input-output pairs.”
The materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. The Course Overview includes a “Further Reading” section that connects mathematical research and pedagogy to course content. Articles extend teacher content knowledge beyond grade-level expectations and clarify mathematical concepts in greater depth. Information regarding professional development is available through the “Professional Learning” link on the webpage.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Course Overview, Further Reading, Mathematics 1, Unit 4, Extraneous and Lost Roots states, “In this essay…McCallum characterizes solving an equation as applying a function to each side of the equation, and the conditions that result in extraneous roots.”
Integrated Math 2, Course Overview, Further Reading, Mathematics 2, Unit 3, Making Sense of Distance in the Coordinate Plane states, “In this post, Richard shows how the distance formula is connected to an equation of a circle, which is the topic of a later unit in this course.”
Integrated Math 3, Course Overview, Further Reading, Mathematics 3, Entire Course, Different Uses of Letters and Types of Representations in Algebra states, “In this essay…Oehrtman and Shultz explore the uses of letters (variables, constants, parameters) in high school mathematics and beyond.”
Indicator 3c
Materials include a year-long scope and sequence with standards correlation information.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for including a year-long scope and sequence with standards correlation information.
The Course Overview includes multiple components that support planning and understanding of the program’s structure and standards alignment. The Scope and Sequence section narratively outlines unit content, prior knowledge, future learning, and terminology. Lessons by Standard provides a table that shows each content standard for the course and the lessons in which it appears. Standards by Lesson provides a table listing the standards covered within each lesson. Course Overview, Standards for Mathematical Practice, aligns math practice standards (MPs) to lessons. The Pacing Guide and Dependency Diagram outline the number of lessons and suggested teaching days per unit. Each lesson references the standards addressed as "Building On,” "Addressing," or “Building Toward.”
Examples:
Integrated Math 1, Course Overview, Scope and Sequence narratively outlines unit content, prior knowledge, future learning, and terminology. The Course Overview states, “The course begins with students using a compass and a straightedge to improve their logical-reasoning skills in a geometric setting. Students gradually build a toolkit of constructions that lead to rigid transformations and showing congruence of figures. In particular, they examine conditions needed to guarantee triangle congruence. Students describe the shape of data distributions, using measures of center and variability. This leads them to model how multiple variables are related, using linear equations and systems of linear equations. Students write, evaluate, graph, and solve equations, explaining and validating their reasoning with increased precision. By examining how transformations affect graphs, students connect their geometric understanding of rigid transformations to their understanding of linear equations on a coordinate plane. These insights lead into a unit on two-variable statistics in which students examine relationships between variables, using two-way tables, scatter plots, and linear models. Students continue their exploration of graphs by solving linear inequalities and systems of linear inequalities to represent constraints in situations. Shifting focus, students deepen their understanding of functions by representing, interpreting, and communicating about them, using function notation, domain and range, average rate of change, and features of graphs. They also see categories of functions, starting with linear functions (including their inverses) and piecewise-defined functions (including absolute-value functions), followed by exponential functions. For each function type, students investigate real-world contexts, look closely at the structural attributes of the function, and analyze how these attributes are expressed in different representations. Within the classroom activities, students have opportunities to engage in aspects of mathematical modeling. Additionally, modeling prompts are provided for use throughout the course, offering opportunities for students to engage in the full modeling cycle. Implement these in a variety of ways. Please see the Mathematics Modeling Prompts section of this Course Guide for a more detailed explanation.”
Integrated Math 1, Course Overview, Standards by Lesson, Unit 1, Lesson 2 identifies G-CO.1, G-CO.12, and G-CO.13.
Integrated Math 1, Course Overview, Standards for Mathematical Practice, identifies MP1 as being present in Unit 1 Lessons 4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 14, and 18.
Integrated Math 1, Course Overview, Lessons by Standard, G-CO.7 is identified in Unit 2, Lesson 3.
Integrated Math 1, Unit 6, Section B, Lesson 4 (on the landing page) identifies Addressing standards S-ID.6, S-ID.6a, S-ID.7, Building On standards 8.SP.1, S-ID.6, and Building Toward standards S-ID.6c, S-ID.7.
Integrated Math 2, Course Overview, Scope and Sequence narratively outlines unit content, prior knowledge, future learning, and terminology. The Course Overview states, “Students begin the course making observations about triangles. Building from these observations, students gather experimental information, develop conjectures, write informal justifications, and then progress to writing formal proofs using definitions, assertions, and theorems developed in Math 1. Using transformation-based definitions of congruence and similarity allows students to rigorously prove triangle similarity theorems. Students apply theorems to prove results about quadrilaterals and other figures. Students extend their understanding of similarity to right triangle trigonometry in this course and to periodic functions in future courses. Students then begin their study of quadratic functions. Students investigate real-world contexts, look closely at the structural attributes of a quadratic function, and analyze how these attributes are expressed in different representations. The unit concludes with a study of the geometry of parabolas. Next, students engage with quadratic equations. Through reasoning, writing equivalent equations, and applying the quadratic formula, students extend their ability to use equations to model relationships and solve problems. Along the way students encounter rational and irrational solutions, deepening their understanding of the real-number system. This work leads to students developing an understanding of complex numbers and solving quadratic equations that include non-real solutions. The idea of a number whose square is -1 expands the number system to include complex numbers. Nearing the end of the course, students analyze relationships between segments and angles in circles and develop the concept of radian measure for angles, which will be built upon in subsequent courses. Students close the year by extending what they learned about probability in grade 7 to consider probabilities of combined events and to identify when events are independent. Within the classroom activities, students have opportunities to engage in aspects of mathematical modeling. Additionally, modeling prompts are provided for use throughout the course, offering opportunities for students to engage in the full modeling cycle. Implement these in a variety of ways. Please see the Mathematics Modeling Prompts section of this Course Guide for a more detailed explanation.”
Integrated Math 2, Course Overview, Standards by Lesson, Unit 4, Lesson 3 identifies A-SSE.1, F-BF.1a, and F-IF.2.
Integrated Math 2, Course Overview, Standards for Mathematical Practice, identifies MP7 in Unit 3, Lessons 2, 3, 5, and 11.
Integrated Math 2, Course Overview, Lessons by Standard, A-REI.7 is identified in Unit 5, Lesson 24, and in Unit 7, Lesson 4.
Integrated Math 2, Unit 3, Section A, Lesson 1 (on the landing page) identifies Addressing standards N-Q.2, G-SRT.5, G-MG.1, G-MG.3, Building On standards G-SRT.3, 8.G.7, and Building Toward standards G-SRT.6, G-SRT.8.
Integrated Math 3, Course Overview, Scope and Sequence narratively outlines unit content, prior knowledge, future learning, and terminology. The Course Overview states, “Students begin the course with a study of solid geometry. They examine cross-sections of solids and make connections between cross-sections and dilations. Students also use square root and cube root graphs to illustrate the relationship between scale factors and scaled area and volume. This work is an opportunity to revisit functions and how they can be represented in a variety of ways. This work leads students to analyze situations that are well modeled by polynomial functions before pivoting to study the structure of polynomial graphs and equations. Students do arithmetic on polynomial and rational functions and use different forms of the functions to identify asymptotes and end behavior. Students solve rational and radical equations and learn to recognize when the steps used to solve these types of equations result in solutions that are not solutions to the original equation. Students also study polynomial identities and use some key identities to establish the formula for the sum of the first n terms of a geometric sequence. Students then return to their study of exponential functions and establish that the property of growth by equal factors over equal intervals holds even when the interval has non-integer length. Students use logarithms to solve for unknown exponents and are introduced to the number e and its use in modeling continuous growth. Logarithm functions and some situations they model well are also briefly addressed. Students learn to transform functions graphically and algebraically. In previous courses and units, students adjusted the parameters of particular types of models to fit data. In this part of the course, students consolidate and generalize this understanding. This work is useful in the study of periodic functions that come next. Students work with the unit circle to make sense of trigonometric functions, and then students use trigonometric functions to model periodic relationships. The last unit, on statistical inference, focuses on analyzing experimental data modeled by normal distributions. Students learn to use sampling and simulations to account for variability in data and estimate population mean, margin of error, and proportions. Students develop skepticism about news stories that summarize data inappropriately. Modeling prompts are provided for use throughout the course. While students have opportunities to engage in aspects of mathematical modeling during class activities, modeling prompts allow students to engage in the full modeling cycle. Modeling prompts can be implemented in various ways. Please see the Mathematics Modeling Prompts section of this Course Guide for a more detailed explanation.”
Integrated Math 3, Course Overview, Standards by Lesson, Unit 5, Lesson 8 identifies F-BF.3, F-IF.7c, and S-ID.6a.
Integrated Math 3, Course Overview, Standards for Mathematical Practice, identifies MP2 for Unit 7, Lessons 1, 6, 10, 13, and 15.
Integrated Math 3, Course Overview, Lessons by Standard, A-APR.1 is identified in Unit 2, Lessons 2, 4, and 6.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 4, Section A, Lesson 2 (on the landing page) identifies Addressing standards A-SSE.1, F-LE.2, F-LE.5 and Building On standards F-IF.4.
Indicator 3d
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers, about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Course Overview, Information for Families, provides an overview of the problem-based curriculum and describes features such as collaboration, critical thinking, and resources described as supporting student learning. Materials state, “Students frequently collaborate with their classmates - they talk about math, listen to each other’s ideas, justify their thinking, and critique the reasoning of others. They communicate their ideas both verbally and in writing, developing skills that will serve them well throughout their lives. This kind of instruction may look different from what you experienced in your own math education. Current research demonstrates that students need to think flexibly in order to use their mathematical skills in real life (and on the types of tests they will encounter throughout their schooling).” The Information for Families describes available supports and provides tips for parents. For example, “If you’re not sure how to get started on a problem, that’s okay! What can you try? Can you make a guess? Can you describe an answer that’s definitely wrong? Can you draw a diagram or a representation? If you’re feeling stuck, write down what you notice and what you wonder, or a question you have, and then share that when it’s time to work with others or discuss. Your job when working on problems in class is to come up with rough-draft ideas and share them. You don’t have to be right or confident at first, but sharing your thinking will help everyone learn. If that feels hard or scary, it’s okay to say, ‘This is just a rough draft . . .’ or ‘I’m not really sure, but I think . . .’ Whether you feel stuck or confident with the material, listen to your classmates and ask them about their ideas. Learning happens when you compare your ideas to those of other people, just like you learn history by reading about the same events from different perspectives. At the end of class, or when you are studying, take time to write some notes. Ask yourself, ‘Do I understand the lesson summary? Do the learning targets describe me?’ If not, write a sentence such as, ‘I understand _____, but I don’t understand why _____.’ Share it with a classmate, teacher, or other resource who can help you better understand.”
Each unit includes Family Support Materials that summarize the math content of the unit and provide an example with a worked solution for families to review with students. The publisher provides Family Support Materials in English and Spanish.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, Family Support Materials state, “In this unit, your student will be learning about analyzing data. Statistics can help us recognize trends in what is typical, as well as how far from typical something needs to be before we look into reasons why.” The materials state, “Here is a task to try with your student: A football coach is considering adding one of two running backs to the team. Some statistics for the number of yards gained on each run for each player are given. Which player should the coach choose? Explain your reasoning. Running back A: Mean (average): 5.4 yards Standard deviation: 2.41 yards Running back B: Mean (average): 4.2 yards Standard deviation: 0.32 yards. Solution: Either running back can be a good choice for the team, depending on what the coach is looking for. Running Back A gets more yards per run on average, but the average run distance is a lot more variable (based on the standard deviation). This means that Running Back A sometimes has really long runs and sometimes very short (or even negative) runs. Running back A will likely be more exciting to watch, but could also be frustrating to watch when the needed yards aren’t gained. Running Back B gets fewer yards per run on average, but the average run distance is a lot less variable (based on the standard deviation). This means that Running Back B is more consistent and gets close to 4 yards on every play when allowed to run. Running Back B will likely be less exciting to watch, but can be relied on to get consistent gains.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 1, Family Support Materials state, “In this unit, your student will continue learning about triangles and proof. Triangles are the building blocks of geometric figures. Once students understand triangles, they can apply their understanding to quadrilaterals and other shapes.” The materials state, “Here is a task to try with your student: 1. Andre is trying to build a triangle with side lengths 2 centimeters, 8 centimeters, and 10 centimeters. Kiran says that those side lengths will not form a triangle. Do you agree or disagree with Kiran? Explain your reseating. 2. Here is a figure with two triangles formed with intersecting lines. 1. What is the longest side in triangle AED? Explain your reasoning. 2. What is the smallest angle in triangle CEB? Explain your reasoning. Solution: 1. Agree. Sample reasoning: The 2-centimeter and 8-centimeter sides would have to lie flat to reach the endpoints of the 10-centimeter side. If all three segments lie flat, they create a straight line, onto a triangle. 2. 1. AD. Sample reasoning: Using vertical angles, angle AED is a right angle and the largest in the triangle, so side AD must be the longest. 2. Angles C and B are both the smallest. Sample reasoning: Since CE and EB are the same length, the angles across from them in the same triangle must be the same size. If the angles weren’t the same size, then one angle would have to be bigger. If one angle were bigger, then the side opposite that angle would have to be longer than the other.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 5, Family Support Materials state, “In this unit, your student will move graphs of functions around the plane and figure out how to write new functions representing these graphs. Many professions use functions to model real-world relationships. For example, an economist might study the relationship between price and revenue. An engineer might study the relationship between temperature and efficiency of an engine. A psychologist might study the relationship between screen time and anxiety. Analyzing changes to a graph representing a relationship can help people understand changes in the real-world relationship that is being modeled.” The materials state, “Here is a task to try with your student: Let’s look again at the diver’s height represented by the equation h=10+22t-32t^2. 1. If the diver were to make the same jump starting at the level of the water, what equation would give her height? 2. Sketch a graph representing your equation, either by hand or using technology. 3. Use your graph to estimate when the diver would hit the water. 4. When does the diver reach the highest point in the dive? How does this time compare to the time of the high point in the dive when the diver jumps from 10 or 15 feet above the water? 5. Here is the graph of the equation h=10+22t-32t^2, labeled Dive 1, and a second graph for a different dive, labeled Dive 2. How do these two dives compare? Dive 1 is sketched in blue and Dive 2 is in red. It goes on to state “Solution: 1. h=22t-32t^2 2. (graph is provided) 3. After about \frac{2}{3} of a second 4. Between \frac{1}{4} and \frac{1}{2} second, or about \frac{1}{3} of a second. This is the same time the diver was at the highest point in the other graphs too: the shape of the graph is the same, just shifted vertically. 5. For each of the two dives, the diver starts from 10 feet and reaches a maximum height of close to 14 feet. In the second dive, the diver leaves the diving board a half-second later than the diver in the first dive did.”
The publisher provides Family Support Materials as the only resources for communicating with parents and caregivers.
Indicator 3e
Materials explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and explain the role of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for explaining the program’s instructional approaches, identifying research-based strategies, and explaining the role of the standards.
Examples include:
Course Overview, Problem-Based Teaching and Learning states, “Illustrative Mathematics is a problem-based curriculum that fosters the development of mathematics learning communities in classrooms, gives students access to the mathematics through a coherent progression, and provides teachers the opportunity to deepen their knowledge of mathematics, students’ thinking, and their own teaching practice. The curriculum and the professional-learning materials are designed to support students’ and teachers’ learning. This document defines the principles that guide IM’s approach to mathematics teaching and learning. It then outlines how each component of the curriculum supports teaching and learning, based on these principles.”
Course Overview, Problem-Based Teaching and Learning, Learning Mathematics by Doing Mathematics states, “‘Students learn mathematics as a result of solving problems. Mathematical ideas are the outcomes of the problem-solving experience rather than the elements that must be taught before problem solving’ (Hiebert et al., 1996). A problem-based instructional framework supports teachers in structuring lessons so students are the problem solvers learning the mathematics.”
Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Design Principles, Coherent Progression states, “The basic architecture of the materials supports all learners through a coherent progression of the mathematics, based both on the standards and on research-based learning trajectories. Activities and lessons are parts of a mathematical story that spans units and grade levels. This coherence allows students to view mathematics as a connected set of ideas that makes sense.”
Course Overview, What’s in an IM Lesson, Instructional Routines, describes Instructional Routines (IRs) as “designs for interaction that invite all students to engage in the mathematics of each lesson.” The materials describe IRs as structured opportunities for students to connect personal experience and mathematical understanding through discussion, questioning, justification, and reasoning. The materials state that IRs “have a predictable structure and flow” and are intended to provide consistent support for both teachers and students. The curriculum uses a finite set of routines across lessons to support pacing, reduce repeated explanation of directions, and increase time spent on mathematical learning. Some IRs, identified as Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs), were developed by the Stanford University UL/SCALE team. MLRs are integrated into lessons either as embedded components or as optional supports for English Learners. The first instance of each routine includes detailed guidance for implementation, while subsequent instances offer abbreviated reminders. The materials also include Digital Routines (DRs), which identify required or suggested uses of technology. These routines are flagged within activities to support lesson planning and professional development.
Indicator 3e.MLL
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs and the identification of the research-based strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet the expectations for providing detailed explanations of instructional approaches for MLLs and identifying research-based strategies. The materials frame their approach as an "interwoven" model where language development and mathematical sense-making happen concurrently to ensure all students reach grade-level standards.
As outlined in the Course Overview, Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for English Learners, the program is grounded in a "theory of action" adapted from Stanford University’s research. This framework is based on four research-based design principles: Support Sense-Making, Optimize Output, Cultivate Conversation, and Maximize Meta-Awareness. The materials provide support for language development at three distinct levels of instructional planning:
Course:
Foundation of curriculum: theory of action and design principles that drive a continuous focus on language development
Student glossary of terms
Lesson:
Language goals, embedded in learning goals, describe the language demands of the lesson
Definitions of new glossary terms
Activity:
Strategies to support access for English learners, based on the language demands of the activity
Math language routines
The instructional core of the program for MLLs consists of eight Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs). These are structured classroom protocols that provide a predictable structure for how students interact, allowing MLLs to focus their cognitive energy on mathematical content rather than the mechanics of the interaction.
To further amplify language, the curriculum explicitly teaches disciplinary language functions (such as justifying, critiquing, and generalizing) through Sentence Frames. The materials state that "helpful sentence frames are open-ended to amplify language production rather than constrain it," ensuring that MLLs can engage in high-level academic discourse regardless of their current English proficiency level.
In the Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, the materials emphasize the social nature of learning. Citing Vygotsky (1978), the materials note that "community is central to learning and identity development... within this collective learning." By establishing a "Math Community" with explicit norms and exercises, the program builds the psychological safety needed for MLLs to speak and take the linguistic risks necessary for language acquisition.
The materials further support MLLs through Mathematical Modeling Prompts that frame mathematics as a “tool for understanding the world” rather than “disconnected rules.” By providing multiple versions of tasks with varying levels of lift and emphasizing that modeling is “not a solitary activity”, the curriculum ensures MLLs can participate in the full modeling cycle (NGA & CCSSO, 2010). This approach allows MLLs to leverage their lived experiences to interpret ambiguous situations and use multimodal reporting (slides, posters, mockups) to communicate their mathematical reasoning.
The program utilizes Purposeful Representations to bridge the gap between concrete and abstract ideas. Citing Bruner (1966), the overview explains that the power of a representation lies in its "capacity, in the hands of a learner, to connect matters that, on the surface, seem quite separate." For MLLs, these representations (such as tape diagrams, area models, and graphs) provide essential non-linguistic cues that make abstract mathematical concepts "visible" and comprehensible before formal academic language is fully mastered.
Furthermore, the Course Overview, Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners section contains a resource called the High School Spanish Cognate Toolkit, meant to support teachers in instructing MLLs whose home language is Spanish. The Spanish Cognate Toolkit begins with a section titled Research & Design Overview that outlines the research base of the strategies and supports in the Toolkit. It states, “The benefits of cognate instruction extend beyond vocabulary expansion, aiding in the development of bilingual students' metalinguistic awareness and their ability to navigate between languages (Vogel & García, 2017)”. The toolkit then introduces four strategies with teacher moves and student expectations of various English proficiency levels, along with the Spanish cognates for Algebra 1 only, and not for any Integrated courses.
The High School materials consistently provide research-validated strategies—ranging from the Stanford UL/SCALE routines to Vygotskian social learning theories—that allow MLLs to access rigorous content. The explicit inclusion of language goals, MLRs, and sentence frames ensures that teachers have the tools necessary to support MLLs in reaching grade-level standards.
Indicator 3f
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The Course Overview includes a comprehensive Required Materials list detailing all materials needed for the grade-level content. The Unit at a Glance, located in the Unit Downloads section of each unit, provides a table that includes any required materials for each lesson within the unit. The Preparation section for each lesson lists Required Materials and Required Preparation for specific activities. Each activity specifies Materials To Gather; if an activity does not require materials, this section will be blank or state "none."
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Course Overview, lists the following as required materials: “1-inch strips cut from card stock with evenly spaced holes. A collection of balls that bounce, Blank paper, Chart paper, Colored pencils, Four-function calculators, Glue or glue sticks, Graphing technology, Graph paper, Internet-enabled device, Math Community Chart, Measuring tapes, Rulers, Scientific calculators, Scissors, Spreadsheet technology, Statistical technology, Sticky notes, and Tools for creating a visual display.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 7, Section C, Lesson 8, Required Materials lists the following as materials: “Geometry toolkits (HS): Activity 1, Activity 3, Colored pencils: Activity 2, Scientific calculators: Activity 2. ”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 6, Section A, Lesson 3, Required Materials lists the following as materials: “Circular objects of different sizes: Activity 3, Ribbon or string: Activity 3.” Required Preparation states, “Activity 3: Acquire 1 round object per student. Activity 4: For the digital version of Are You Ready for More?, acquire devices that can run the applet. Lesson: Be prepared to display an applet during the Lesson Synthesis.”
Indicator 3g
The assessment system provides consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for providing consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
The assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the course to determine student learning throughout the school year. This includes:
Every unit begins with a Check Your Readiness diagnostic assessment.
Most lessons end with a Cool-down formative assessment.
Each section ends with a Checkpoint of 1-3 problems that assess learning goals.
Each unit ends with an End-of-Unit Assessment.
Longer units have a Mid-Unit Assessment.
The Course Overview, Assessment Guidance states, "Assessment guidance focuses on what can be clearly observed and uses asset-based language to focus on what students understand about particular math concepts and what they show they can do as it relates to procedural skills, fluency, and application…The guidance also encourages reliance on the coherence of the math in the curriculum when considering how to address any unfinished learning.”
The materials provide assessment guidance at the lesson, section, and unit levels throughout the course. Each End-of-Unit Assessment and the Mid-Unit Assessment includes answer keys and standards alignment to support teachers in interpreting student understanding. According to the Course Overview and Assessment Guidance, “All summative assessment problems include a complete solution and standards alignment. Multiple-choice and multiple-response problems often include a reason for each potential error that a student might make. Restricted constructed-response and extended-response items include a rubric. Unlike formative assessments, problems on summative assessments generally do not prescribe a method of solution.”
Examples Include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, End-of-Unit Assessment, students create a box plot to represent data and determine which measure of center and variability is most appropriate to describe the data set. Question 5 states, “The chess club at a school has 15 members. The number of games won in tournament play this season by each member is listed. {6, 6, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14, 15, 16, 18, 18, 30} Part A: What measure of center is most appropriate to use to describe a typical value for the data in this distribution? Explain your reasoning. Part B: Add the appropriate measure of center to this box plot. Part C: What measure of variability is most appropriate for describing variability in this data distribution?” Teacher Note states, “Minimal Tier 1 response: Work is complete and correct. Sample: a. See box plot. b. Median, because the data are more spread out on one side. c. Interquartile range. Tier 2 response: Work shows good conceptual understanding and mastery, with either minor errors or correct work with insufficient explanation or justification. Sample errors: One or two of the 5 values in the box plot are incorrect; missing or incorrect answers to Parts b and/or c; answer to Part b is correct, but work does not refer in some way to the shape of the distribution. Tier 3 response: Significant errors in work demonstrate lack of conceptual understanding or mastery. Sample errors: Two or more of the 5 values in the box plot are incorrect; two or more Tier 2 error types.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 3, End-of-Unit Assessment, students identify trigonometric ratios for a right triangle. Question 2 states, “Select all of the true equations based on the figure. A. xos(42)=\frac{b}{c} B. cos(48)=\frac{b}{c} C. sin(42)=\frac{b}{c} D. sin(48)=\frac{b}{c} E. tan(42)=\frac{b}{a} F. tan(48)=\frac{a}{b}“ The task includes an image of triangle \triangle ABC with angle A labeled 48^\circ and corresponding sides, a, b, c. Narrative for Question 2 states, “A student who does not select choice B or choice F may be confused about the roles that the hypotenuse, adjacent side, and opposite side play in determining trigonometric ratios. Students who do not select choice C or choice E may not recognize 42 degrees as the complement of 48 degrees. A student may select choice D if they mistake sine and cosine. A student may select choice A if they are not paying attention to the angle.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 4, End-of-Unit Assessment, students compare properties of two graphs showing exponential decay. Question 7 states, “Here are graphs of the area covered by two different types of mold d days after they were first measured. Part A: What are the approximate coordinates of the point of intersection of the two graphs? What does this mean in terms of the two mold populations? Part B: The area of Mold A is given by the function A(d)=100\cdot e^{0.25d}. When will this mold cover 1000 square millimeters? Explain your reasoning.” Teacher Note states, “Minimal Tier 1 response: Work is complete and correct, with complete explanation or justification. Sample: 1. (4.5, 310) (or comparable values): The two molds cover the same area at this time. 2. \frac{ln(10)}{0.25} Uses equation 100\cdot e^{0.25d}=1000, and solves correctly with the natural logarithm. Tier 2 response: Work shows good conceptual understanding and mastery, with either minor errors or correct work with insufficient explanation or justification. Sample errors: Answer to part a is reasonable, but no explanation of what the point means is provided, or the answer is not reasonable but is correctly interpreted in context; solves correct equation in part b but does not explain why we are solving 100\cdot e^{0.25d}=1000; explains why the solution to 100\cdot e^{0.25d}=1000 is relevant and makes some relevant calculations but does not find the correct expression for d. Tier 3 response: Work shows a developing but incomplete conceptual understanding, with significant errors. Sample errors: Answer to part a is incorrect with a Tier 2 error type in part b; explanation in part b contains some true statements, such as setting up the right equation or rewriting using the natural logarithm, but does not connect the equation to the context or does not solve the equation correctly. Tier 4 response: Work includes major errors or omissions that demonstrate a lack of conceptual understanding and mastery. Sample errors: Answer to part a is incorrect, and explanation in part b does not use logarithms.”
Materials also provide teachers with structured guidance following formative assessments. Check Your Readiness serves as a pre-unit diagnostic formative assessment that identifies students who need additional support with prerequisite skills and highlights topics to address during the unit. Assessment Guidance highlights certain lessons and/or activities to slow down and spend extra time to ensure student understanding of the mathematical concepts. Most lessons conclude with Cool-downs that assess student thinking in relation to the lesson’s learning goal. At the conclusion of lesson sections within a unit, Checkpoints include one to three problems that assess section learning goals. According to the Course Overview, Assessment Guidance, assessment guidance for Cool-downs and Checkpoints falls into three categories with suggestions for next steps if most students struggle: “More Chances” which signals students will revisit the concept without altering instruction; “Points to Emphasize,” which recommends minor instructional adjustments; and “Press Pause,” which suggests more time is needed before advancing.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 9, Check Your Readiness, students interpret features of a discrete graph and make sense of statements given in function notation in terms of a real-life situation. Question 9 states, “The function g represents the temperature in a city, in degrees Fahrenheit, h hours after 8:00 a.m. The graph plots some values of g (the task includes a graph of a function g with “temperature in F^\circ” on the y-axis and “hours after 8 a.m.” on the x-axis). Select all statements that must be true about the situation. A. g(0)=50; B. g(12) represents the temperature at noon; C. The maximum temperature shown on the graph happens at 3:00 p.m.; D. g(11)<g(8); E. The temperature increased about 10 degrees Fahrenheit between 8:00 am and 1:00 p.m.” Narrative for Question 9 states, “Students interpret features of a discrete graph and make sense of statements given in function notation in terms of the situations they represent. Students may select B if they do not read carefully that the x-axis shows hours after 8:00 a.m. rather than hours on the clock. This same error could lead them to disregard A, C, D, or E. If most students struggle with this item, use Lesson 9 Activity 2 to show that f(9) represents an output and, because this is a function of time f(t), then t is the input. It is important to help students interpret correctly that t is ‘time since 1977,’ very similar to this item (time since 8 a.m.).”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 2, Section B, Lesson 8, Cool-down, students prove theorems about triangles and other figures using similarity. The Student Task Statement states, "Noah has a conjecture about rhombi with certain properties always being similar. 1. What would you need to do to show that the conjecture is incorrect? 2. What would you need to do to show that the conjecture is true?” Responding to Student Thinking states, “Press Pause: By this point in the unit, there should be some student mastery of sufficient and necessary conditions for similarity. If most students struggle, make time to revisit related work in the practice problems referred to here (identifies Integrated Math 2, Unit 2, Lesson 8, Problem 3 and Integrated Math 2, Unit 2, Lesson 18, Problem 9 as resources).”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Section A Checkpoint, students explain that the sum of two polynomials is a polynomial. Question 2 states, “Two polynomial expressions are added together to get x+4x^2-3+7x^3. Is the sum a polynomial? Explain your reasoning.” Responding to Student Thinking states, “Points to Emphasize: If most students struggle with the definition of a polynomial, focus on this as opportunities arise in the next several lessons. For example, in the Synthesis of the activity (Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Lesson 5, Activity 1), ask students whether these are polynomial functions and to explain how they know.”
Indicator 3h
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Indicator 3i
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials are designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for Student Supports. The materials provide strategies to ensure that students in special populations can access course-level content and meet or exceed course-level standards. They offer regular extensions and opportunities for advanced students to engage with mathematics at greater depth. Across the series, the materials include varied approaches to learning tasks and offer multiple ways for students to demonstrate their understanding, along with opportunities for self-monitoring. Teachers are supported with strategies for using varied grouping methods, and assessments include accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge without altering the content. Supports are included for varying reading levels to ensure accessibility, and manipulatives, both virtual and physical, accurately represent mathematical concepts and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods. The materials partially provide a range of representation of people and include detailed instructions and support for educators to effectively incorporate and draw upon students’ different cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3j
Materials provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for providing strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
The Course Overview includes overarching guidance on strategies and accommodations for special populations in Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities.
Examples include:
Course Overview, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, Access for Students with Disabilities states, “Supplemental instructional strategies, labeled Access for Students with Disabilities, are included in each lesson. They are designed to help meet the individual needs of a diverse group of learners. Each support is aligned to one of the three principles of Universal Design for Learning, to provide multiple means of engagement, representation, or action and expression, and includes a suggested strategy to increase access and eliminate barriers. Use these lesson-specific supports, as needed, to help students succeed with a specific activity, without reducing the mathematical demands of the task. Phase them out as students gain understanding and fluency.”
Course Guide, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, Accessibility for Students with Visual Impairments states, “For students with visual impairments, digital accessibility features are built into the materials: 1. A palette of colors distinguishable to people with the most common types of color blindness. 2. Tasks and problems are designed so that success does not depend on the ability to distinguish between colors. 3. Mathematical diagrams, presented in scalable vector graphic (SVG) format, can be magnified, without loss of resolution, and rendered in Braille. 4. Where possible, text associated with images is not part of the image file, but rather included as an image caption accessible to screen readers. 5. Alt text on all images makes interpretation easier for users accessing the materials, with a screen reader. If students with visual impairments are accessing the materials, using a screen reader, it is important to understand: All images in the curriculum have alt text: a very short indication of the image’s contents, so that the screen reader doesn’t skip over as if nothing is there. Some images have a longer description to help students with visual impairments recreate the image in their mind. Understand that students with visual impairments likely will need help accessing images in lesson activities and assessments. Prepare appropriate accommodations. Accessibility experts, who reviewed this curriculum, recommended that eligible students have access to a Braille version of the curriculum materials, because a verbal description of many of the complex mathematical diagrams is inadequate to support their learning.”
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 7, Section C, Lesson 8, Activity 8.2, Access for Students with Disabilities states, “Action and Expression: Internalize Executive Function. Invite students to plan a strategy, including the tools that they will use, for checking if points are a solution. If time allows, invite students to share their plan with a partner before they begin. Recommend to students that they start with the step of plotting the point on their graph. Support them in articulating criteria that address evaluating shaded regions and boundary lines. Check for understanding by inviting students to rephrase directions in their own words. Consider keeping the display of directions visible throughout the activity. Supports accessibility for: Attention, Social-Emotional Functioning.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 1, Section B, Lesson 7, Activity 7.3, Access for Students with Disabilities states, “Representation: Internalize Comprehension. Use color coding and annotations to highlight connections between representations in a problem. For example, color code pairs of congruent angles and corresponding variables or expressions. Supports accessibility for: Visual-Spatial Processing.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 5, Section A, Lesson 5, Activity 5.2, Access for Students with Disabilities states, “Engagement: Develop Effort and Persistence. Chunk this task into more manageable parts. Give students a subset of the cards to start with and introduce the remaining cards once students have completed their initial set of matches. Supports accessibility for: Conceptual Processing, Organization, Memory.”
Indicator 3k
Materials regularly provide extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level/course-level mathematics at greater depth.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for regularly providing extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level mathematics at greater depth.
Are You Ready for More? activities available in some lessons offer extension opportunities for advanced students to engage with course content at a higher level. Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Are You Ready For More?, states, “Select classroom activities offer differentiation for students ready for a greater challenge…Every extension problem is made available to all students, with the heading Are You Ready for More? These problems go deeper into grade-level mathematics, and often make connections between the topic at hand and other concepts. Some problems extend the work of the associated activity, while others involve work from prior grades, prior units in the course, or reflect work that is related to the K–12 curriculum but is a type of problem not required by the standards. The problems are not routine or procedural, and they are not just ‘the same thing again but with harder numbers.’ They are intended for use on an opt-in basis by students—if they finish the main class activity early or want to do more mathematics on their own. It is not expected that an entire class engages in Are You Ready for More? problems, and it is not expected that any single student works on all of them.”
Building on Student Thinking guidance embedded in the Teacher Guide provides teachers with ways to deepen student understanding as they engage with course materials. Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Teacher Learning through Curriculum, Building on Student Thinking states, “Certain activities within each lesson plan include ways to provide guidance, based on students’ understandings and ideas. Building on Student Thinking offers look-fors and questions to support students as they engage in an activity…Building on Student Thinking section provides questions that advance students’ understanding of mathematical concepts, strategies, or connections between representations.”
Throughout the series, there are many lessons and/or activities that the materials identify as optional. The materials do not indicate that advanced students are required to complete additional assignments beyond those assigned to their classmates.
Modeling Prompts available in each course include tasks that allow students to engage in grade-level mathematics at varying levels of depth. The materials provide multiple entry points while maintaining grade-level expectations.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 8, Section A, Lesson 5, Activity 5.2, students use rules to evaluate functions, interpret the input and output values within the context of the price for two different video game consoles, and solve for an unknown input value. Building on Student Thinking states, “Students may question if A is a function at all because, unlike B or other function rules they have seen so far, A(x) is defined with a constant instead of an expression containing the dependent variable. Or they may wonder why A(x) has the same value no matter what the input value is. Ask students to recall the definition of function and to consider whether each input value gives only one output value. Because it does, even though it is always the same output value, A is still a function.” Are You Ready for More? states, “Describe an option that, for any amount of time used, would cost no more than one of the given options and no less than the other given option. Explain or show how you know this option would meet these requirements.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 4, Section E, Lesson 17, Designing a Fountain, students create a two-dimensional model of the path of water in a fountain based on characteristics of its layout. The materials provide three modeling task options with varying degrees of scaffolding and open-endedness. Modeling Task 1 states, “A nearby park has a decorative pool. The board of commissioners of the park is considering installing water jets in the pool to make it into a fountain. They have asked you to design the water jets. Here is a diagram of the pool from above: Statues A and B are 4 feet tall each. Statues C and D are wider and 5.5 feet tall each. Statue E is 8 feet tall, with a vase on top. The diagram is drawn to scale, and the pool is 15 feet wide. The jets are at water level. You need to figure out the number of jets, where they should go, and what path the water should make. Your design needs to meet these criteria: The jets are placed only around the edge of the pool. There are at least two jets. The water doesn't hit any of the statues. Some water goes into the vase. The water doesn't go higher than 10 feet. When you have your final design, create a presentation to explain it to the commissioners. The presentation should show the paths of the water and include your mathematical descriptions of the paths.” Modeling Task 2 states, “A nearby park has a decorative pool. The board of commissioners of the park is considering installing water jets in the pool to make it into a fountain. They have asked you to design the water jets. Here is a diagram of the pool from above: Statues A and B are 4 feet tall each. Statues C and D are wider and 5.5 feet tall each. Statue E is 8 feet tall, with a vase on top. The diagram is drawn to scale, and the pool is 15 feet wide. The dots along the edge show where to place the jets. You don’t have to put jets in all five places. The jets are at water level. You need to figure out the number of jets, where they should go, and what path the water should make. Your design needs to meet these criteria: The jets are only in the places indicated by the dots. There are at least two jets. The water doesn’t hit any of the statues. Some water goes into the vase. The water doesn’t go higher than 10 feet. When you have your final design, create a presentation to explain it to the commissioners. The presentation should show the paths of the water and include your mathematical descriptions of the paths. Before you begin your design, sketch a side view of the pool, showing the heights of the statues and the vase. This will help you figure out the paths of the water.” Modeling Task 3 states, “A nearby park has a decorative pool. The board of commissioners of the park is considering installing water jets in the pool to make it into a fountain. They have asked you to design the water jets. Here is a diagram of the pool from above: Statues A and B are 4 feet tall each. Statue C is wider and 5.5 feet tall. Statue D is 8 feet tall, with a vase on top. The diagram is drawn to scale, and the pool is 15 feet wide. The dots along the edge show where to place the jets. You don’t have to put jets in all four places. The jets are at water level. You will need to figure out the number of jets, where they should go, and what path the water should make. Your design needs to meet these criteria: The jets are only in the places indicated by the dots. There are at least two jets. The water doesn’t hit any of the statues. Some water goes into the vase. The water doesn’t go higher than 12 feet. When you have your final design, create a presentation to explain it to the commissioners. The presentation should show the paths of the water and include your mathematical descriptions of the paths. Before you begin your design, sketch what the pool would look like from each side. Make sure to show the heights of the statues and the vase. This will help you figure out the paths of the water. To help you get started, here is part of one sketch, showing the widths of Statues A, B, and D. It shows what the pool would look like if you were standing near the bottom of the diagram that shows the pool from above. It also shows the jet locations next to Statues A and B. Figure out the heights of Statues A, B, and D, according to the scale of this sketch, and then finish the sketch by representing the heights. Make your own sketches for the other sides of the pool.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 4, Section F, Lesson 23 is identified as optional and allows students to extend their understanding of logarithmic functions as they encounter real-world applications. Lesson Narrative, Learning Goal states, “Use logarithmic relationships to solve problems about acidity and earthquakes.”
Indicator 3l
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning, with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Each lesson consists of four phases: Warm-up, Instructional Activities, Lesson Synthesis, and Cool-down, during which students engage with problem-solving in a variety of ways. According to the Course Overview, What’s in an IM Lesson, Instructional Activities, “After the Warm-up, lessons consist of a sequence of 1–3 instructional activities. The activities are the heart of the mathematical experience and make up the majority of the time spent in class. An activity can serve one or more purposes: Provide experience with a new context. Introduce a new concept and associated language. Introduce a new representation. Formalize the definition of a term for an idea previously encountered informally. Identify and resolve common mistakes and misconceptions that people make. Practice using mathematical language. Work toward mastery of a concept or a procedure. Provide an opportunity to apply mathematics to an open-ended problem, such as modeling. The purpose of each activity is described in its Activity Narrative. Each instructional activity has three phases: Launch: During the Launch, make sure that students understand the context of the given problem (if there is a context) and what the problem is asking them to do. This is not the same as making sure students know how to do the problem—part of the work that students should do for themselves is to figure out how to solve the problem. The Launch invites students into the lesson and helps them connect to contexts with which they are unfamiliar. Student Work Time: The Launch of an activity frequently includes suggestions for grouping students. At different times, students are given opportunities to work individually, with a partner, and in small groups. Activity Synthesis: During the Activity Synthesis, allow time for students to incorporate and make connections to what they have learned. This time ensures that all students have an opportunity to understand the mathematical punch line of the activity and to situate the new learning within their previous understanding.”
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 4, Section A, Lesson 3, Activity 3.2, students engage in the instructional routine Critique, Correct, Clarify. Launch states, “After students have had a chance to read the prompts, use Critique, Correct, Clarify to give students an opportunity to improve a sample written response by correcting errors, clarifying meaning, and adding details.” Activity Synthesis states, “Invite previously identified students to share how they thought about one of the relationships in the first question. Start with students who reasoned only in terms of numerical operations, and move toward those who interpreted the quantities in context (as shown in the Activity Narrative). If possible, record and display their descriptions for all to see, and highlight the connections between the different responses. Discuss with students whether or how their ways of thinking about each relationship affected the work of matching the tables and equations. If not brought up in students' comments, point out that some ways of describing a relationship could make it easier to identify or write a corresponding equation. To really understand what's happening in the situation, however, often requires carefully interpreting the operations that relate the two quantities.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 5, Section E, Lesson 22, Activity 22.4, students engage in the instructional routine Information Gap Cards. Activity Narrative states, “This activity gives students an opportunity to determine and request the information needed to write expressions that define quadratic functions with certain graphical features. The Information Gap structure requires students to make sense of problems by determining what information is necessary, and then to ask for information they need to solve it. This may take several rounds of discussion if their first requests do not yield the information they need (MP1). It also allows them to refine the language they use and ask increasingly more precise questions until they get the information they need (MP6).” Activity Synthesis states, “After students have completed their work, discuss the correct answers to the questions and any difficulties that came up. Highlight for students that different forms of quadratic expressions are useful in different ways, so it helps to be able to move flexibly between forms.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 1, Section A, Lesson 2, Warm-up, students engage in the instructional routine Which Three Go Together? Activity Narrative states, “This Warm-up prompts students to compare four images. It gives students a reason to use language precisely (MP6). It gives the teacher an opportunity to hear how students use terminology and talk about characteristics of the items in comparison to one another.” Question 1 states, “Which three go together? Why do they go together?” Activity Synthesis states, “Invite each group to share one reason why a particular set of three goes together. Record and display the responses for all to see. After each response, ask the class if they agree or disagree. Since there is no single correct answer to the question of which three go together, attend to students’ explanations, and ensure the reasons given are correct.”
Indicator 3m
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The Launch section of each activity provides suggested grouping strategies, including whole groups, small groups, pairs, and individual configurations. The Course Overview, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, outlines how an individual-to-partner or small-group to whole-class progression allows students to activate prior knowledge and build understanding collaboratively.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 1, Section A, Lesson 7, Warm-up, suggests that teachers arrange students in groups of 2-4. Activity 7.3 suggests that teachers have students work individually before bringing them together for whole-class discussion. Launch states, “Give students 5 minutes to answer questions about square ABCD, and then pause the class for a brief, whole-class discussion.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 5, Section A, Lesson 1, Activity 1.3, suggests teachers arrange students to work in pairs. Launch states, “Consider arranging students in groups of 2 and asking them to think quietly about the questions before conferring with their partner.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 1, Section D, Lesson 14, Activity 14.2, suggests teachers arrange students to work in pairs. Launch states, “Arrange students in groups of 2 and distribute pre-cut cards…When they sort the solids, they should work with their partner to come up with categories.”
Indicator 3m.MLL
Materials include guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for MLLs to ensure equitable participation.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The Launch section of each activity provides suggested grouping strategies, including whole groups, small groups, pairs, and individual configurations. The Course Overview, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, outlines how an individual-to-partner or small-group to whole-class progression allows students to activate prior knowledge and build understanding collaboratively.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 1, Section A, Lesson 7, Warm-up, suggests that teachers arrange students in groups of 2-4. Activity 7.3 suggests that teachers have students work individually before bringing them together for whole-class discussion. Launch states, “Give students 5 minutes to answer questions about square ABCD, and then pause the class for a brief, whole-class discussion.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 5, Section A, Lesson 1, Activity 1.3, suggests teachers arrange students to work in pairs. Launch states, “Consider arranging students in groups of 2 and asking them to think quietly about the questions before conferring with their partner.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 1, Section D, Lesson 14, Activity 14.2, suggests teachers arrange students to work in pairs. Launch states, “Arrange students in groups of 2 and distribute pre-cut cards…When they sort the solids, they should work with their partner to come up with categories.”
Indicator 3n
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. These suggestions are provided within the Course Overview in a section called Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, and within Assessment Guidance. As such, they are included at the program level and not specific to each assessment.
Examples include:
Course Overview, Assessment Guidance, Diagnostic Assessments provides teacher guidance on accommodating students during assessments. The materials state that students who demonstrate gaps on diagnostic assessments can continue to engage with grade-level tasks using appropriate supports: “Address below-grade skills while continuing to work through the on-grade tasks and concepts of each unit, instead of abandoning the current work in favor of material that addresses only below-grade skills. Look for opportunities within the upcoming unit to address the target skill in context.”
Course Overview, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, Access for Students with Disabilities states, “Supplemental instructional strategies, labeled Access for Students with Disabilities, are included in each lesson. They are designed to help meet the individual needs of a diverse group of learners. Each support is aligned to one of the three principles of Universal Design for Learning, to provide multiple means of engagement, representation, or action and expression, and includes a suggested strategy to increase access and eliminate barriers. Use these lesson-specific supports, as needed, to help students succeed with a specific activity, without reducing the mathematical demands of the task. Phase them out as students gain understanding and fluency. The following areas of cognitive functioning are integral to learning mathematics (Brodesky et al., 2002), and are indicated in each access support so that teachers can leverage students’ strengths to address potential barriers or challenges that exist in the learning environment. Conceptual Processing includes perceptual reasoning, problem-solving, and metacognition. Language includes auditory and visual processing and expression of language. Visual-Spatial Processing includes processing visual information and understanding relation in space of visual mathematical representations and geometric concepts. Organization includes organizational skills, attention, and focus. Memory includes working memory and short-term memory. Attention includes paying attention to details, maintaining focus, and filtering out extraneous information. Social-Emotional Functioning includes interpersonal skills and the cognitive comfort and safety required in order to take risks and make mistakes. Fine-Motor Skills include tasks that require small-muscle movement and coordination, such as manipulating objects (graphing, cutting with scissors, writing). The additional supports for students with disabilities were designed using the Universal Design for Learning Guidelines (http://udlguidelines.cast.org). Each support aligns to one of the three principles of UDL: engagement, representation, or action and expression.”
Course Overview, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, Accessibility for Students with Visual Impairments states, “For students with visual impairments, accessibility features are built into the materials: 1. A palette of colors distinguishable to people with the most common types of color blindness. 2. Tasks and problems designed so that success does not depend on the ability to distinguish between colors. 3. Mathematical diagrams, presented in scalable vector graphic (SVG) format, can be magnified, without loss of resolution, and rendered in Braille. 4. Where possible, text associated with images is not part of the image file, but rather included as an image caption accessible to screen readers. 5. Alt text on all images makes interpretation easier for users accessing the materials with a screen reader. If students with visual impairments are accessing the materials, using a screen reader, it is important to understand: All images in the curriculum have alt text: a very short indication of the image’s contents, so that the screen reader doesn’t skip over as if nothing is there. Some images have a longer description to help a student with a visual impairment recreate the image in their mind. Understand that students with visual impairments likely will need help accessing images in lesson activities and assessments. Prepare appropriate accommodations. Accessibility experts, who reviewed this curriculum, recommended that eligible students have access to a Braille version of the curriculum materials, because a verbal description of many of the complex mathematical diagrams is inadequate for supporting their learning.”
Indicator 3n.MLL
Assessments offer accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math do not meet the criteria of providing accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. The materials do not provide guidance for teachers to account for varied levels of English language proficiency without changing the content of the assessment, yet still allowing MLLs to show grade-level mastery regardless of language ability.
As found in the Core Math 3n report, the Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math platform includes features that allow for personalization of assessments, such as audio or visual support. Digital tools such as drawing, use of digital manipulatives, and video recording allow all students to demonstrate mathematical understanding in a multimodal manner without changing the content of the assessment.
End-of-Unit Assessments and section Checkpoints are provided and used to evaluate student learning. Each unit includes a Spanish version of the assessment. While the inclusion of Spanish-language assessments may support students whose primary language is Spanish, it does not constitute a full range of accommodations for the broader population of MLLs with diverse linguistic backgrounds.
Indicator 3o
Materials provide a range of representation of people and include detailed instructions and support for educators to effectively incorporate and draw upon students’ different cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math partially provide a range of representations of people and incorporate guidance and structures that reference students’ cultural, social, and community backgrounds.
Student-facing materials include multicultural names such as Priya, Han, Mai, and Diego. The materials illustrate characters within mathematical tasks and depict them engaging in varied contexts, including rural, urban, and international settings. For example, in Integrated Math 2, Unit 8, Section A, Lesson 2, Warm-up, students draw slips of paper with names on them out of a bag, record their observations, and then predict the probability of selecting a certain name. The names reflect a range of genders and cultural backgrounds: Clare, Mai, Priya, Elena, Jada, Han, Andre, Diego, Noah. The materials present characters in roles that do not align with traditional gender stereotypes. For example, in Integrated Math 1, Unit 4, Section B, Lesson 6, Activity 6.3, Noah uses a coupon when shopping for clothing. In Integrated Math 1, Unit 7, Section A, Lesson 3, Student Lesson Summary, Clare considers purchasing a video game system.
Lesson contexts include examples that reference cultural and community practices. For example, Integrated Math 1, Unit 7, Section C, Lesson 7, Activity 7.2, Launch states, “‘Do you or your family have a quilt? Is there a story about why that quilt is important to you? Do the shapes or patterns have an important meaning?’” These questions prompt students to reflect on personal or family experiences related to quilts and their cultural or personal significance. In Integrated Math 3, Unit 7, Section A, Lesson 2, Activity 2.2, students consider contexts such as voter issues, driving and accidents, strawberry production in a greenhouse, sports and school, and chewing gum and studying when determining whether data would be most appropriate to collect using a survey, observational study, or experiment.
Course Overview, Problem-Based Teaching and Learning, Principles for Mathematics Teaching and Learning states, “Teachers should build on what students know: New mathematical ideas are built on what students already know about mathematics and the world. As they learn new ideas, students need to make connections between them (NRC, 2001). In order to do this, teachers need to understand what knowledge students bring to the classroom and monitor what they do and do not understand as they are learning. Teachers must themselves know how the mathematical ideas connect in order to mediate students’ learning.” Course Overview, Problem-Based Teaching and Learning, All Students are Capable Learners of Mathematics states, “It is through these classroom structures that teachers have daily opportunities to learn about and leverage students’ understandings and experiences, and to position each student as a capable learner of mathematics.”
Course Overview, Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners, outlines strategies for supporting English learners in mathematics instruction. Advancing Mathematical Language and Access for Multilingual Learners states, “In a problem-based mathematics classroom, sense-making and language are interwoven. Mathematics classrooms are language-rich—and therefore language-demanding—learning environments for every student. The linguistic demands of doing mathematics include reading, writing, speaking, listening, conversing, and representing (Aguirre & Bunch, 2012).” The curriculum integrates Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs), described as structured and adaptable routines designed to address mathematical language use and development. Mathematical Language Routines are “...particularly well-suited to meet the needs of linguistically and culturally diverse students, who are learning mathematics while concurrently acquiring English.”
Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Student Journal Prompts describe ways to connect students’ lived experiences to mathematics. Student Journal Prompts states, “John Dewey (1933) asserted that students make sense of the world through metacognition, making connections between their lived experiences and their knowledge base, and argued that education should offer students opportunities to make connections between school and their lived experiences in the world. Ladson-Billings encourages the idea that teachers must help students effectively connect their culturally- and community-based knowledge to the learning experiences taking place in the classroom.”
While the materials include representation of people from varied cultural and gender backgrounds, they do not provide explicit instructions for teachers to incorporate and draw upon students’ cultural, social, and community backgrounds within lesson implementation.
Indicator 3p
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
Course Overview, Universal Design for Learning and Access for Students with Disabilities, Access for Students with Disabilities, Representation states, “Reduce barriers and leverage students’ individual strengths by inviting students to engage with the same content in different ways. Supports that provide multiple means of representation include suggestions for offering alternatives to the ways information is presented or displayed, for developing students’ understanding and use of mathematical language and symbols, and for describing organizational methods and approaches designed to help students internalize learning.”
Course Overview, What’s in an IM Lesson, Instructional Routines, MLR6: Three Reads states, “What: The Three Reads ensure that students know what they are asked to do, and create an opportunity for students to reflect on the ways mathematical questions are presented, and equip students with the tools to actively make sense of mathematical situations and information (Kelemanik, Lucenta, & Creighton, 2016). Students take time to understand mathematical situations and story problems, and plan their strategies before finding solutions. Why: This routine supports reading comprehension, sense-making of problems and meta-awareness of mathematical language. How It Happens: In this routine, students are supported in reading, three times, a mathematical text, a situation, or a word problem, each time with a particular focus. The intended question or main prompt is intentionally withheld until the third read so that students can concentrate on making sense of what is happening in the text before rushing to a solution or method.” This routine structures repeated readings of mathematical text and provides guided entry points for engaging with grade-level problems.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 8, Section A, Lesson 1, Activity 1.2 incorporates the Math Language Routine MLR 6: Three Reads. Launch states, “Use Three Reads to support reading comprehension and sense-making about this problem. Display only the problem stem and the bulleted information, without revealing the questions. For the first read, read the problem aloud, then ask, ‘What is this situation about?’ (how a dog moves around a post). Listen for and clarify any questions about the context. After the second read, ask students to list any quantities that can be counted or measured. (the distance from the post at certain times). After the third read, reveal the question: ‘Sketch a graph that could represent the dog’s distance from the post, in feet, as a function of time, in seconds, since the owner left,’ and ask, ‘What are some ways we might get started on this?’ Invite students to name some possible starting points, referencing quantities from the second read (start with two points representing the numerical information given and connect them so that the story makes sense).”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 8, Section A, Lesson 6, Activity 6.2 incorporates the Math Language Routine MLR6: Three Reads. Launch states, “Use Three Reads to support reading comprehension and sense-making about this problem. Display only the problem stem and the diagram, without revealing the questions. For the first read, read Jada’s method, her equation, and the description of the table aloud, and then ask, ‘What is this situation about?’ (Jada came up with a rule for determining the probability of a random outcome being in event A or B. A table of data summarizes information about the United States from a census.) Listen for and clarify any questions about the context. After the second read, ask students to list any quantities that can be counted or measured. (Each state has a population greater than or less than 4 million people. Each state begins with A to M or N to Z.) After the third read, reveal the bulleted information and this statement: ‘For each event, write which of the four states listed here is an outcome in that event.’ Then ask, ‘What are some ways we might get started on this?’ Invite students to name some possible starting points, referring to quantities from the second read. (We could highlight the row and column corresponding to the events A and B, and then focus on the 4 states and where they fit.)”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Section A, Lesson 2, Activity 2.3 incorporates the Math Language Routine MLR6: Three Reads, Launch states, “Use Three Reads to support reading comprehension and sense-making about this problem. Display only the problem stem without revealing the questions. For the first read, read the problem aloud, and then ask, ‘What is this situation about?’ (Clare’s aunt is investing money. The first deposit is $300, and the money earns interest each year.) Listen for and clarify any questions about the context. After the second read, ask students to list any quantities that can be counted or measured (dollars deposited into the account; the annual interest rate of the account; the growth factor; total value of the account; years after graduation). After the third read, reveal the first two questions on writing an expression for the total value after graduation in terms of x and ask, ‘What are some ways we might get started on this?’ Invite students to name some possible starting points, referencing quantities from the second read. (I would try to figure out the total value after three years. I would make a table.).”
Indicator 3q
Manipulatives, both virtual and physical, are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they represent and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math meet expectations for providing manipulatives, both virtual and physical, that are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they represent and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Purposeful Representations states, “Several considerations guide the choice of representations, the timing of their introduction, and the sequence in which they are presented, such as the extent to which they: Serve the mathematical learning goals; help to build conceptual understanding; support a coherent progression of mathematical ideas; are relevant across cases and contexts. The principle of ‘concrete before abstract’ also guides the use of representations. This principle comes into play in two ways: First, more concrete representations are introduced before those that are more abstract. For example, to develop an understanding of ratios, students first use physical objects to represent quantities related by a ratio. Next, they create discrete diagrams to represent such quantities, followed by double-number-line diagrams and tables of equivalent ratios. This thinking eventually bridges into representing non-proportional linear relationships and the multiple ways to represent functions that start in IM Grade 8 and continue throughout high school. Each representation is less concrete, more abstract, and offers greater flexibility and efficiency than the one before it. Second, a representation can show concrete concepts and numbers in earlier courses, and abstract ideas and quantities in later courses. For example, starting in IM Grade 3, students use rectangular diagrams to represent the multiplication of whole numbers. In IM Grade 6, they use such diagrams to represent the product of multi-digit decimals. In these early uses, students relate the discrete factors and product to concrete attributes of the rectangle: its side lengths and area. Later, students use rectangles to represent the multiplication of expressions that include variables, such as 5\cdot(3x+8) and a(2b+c). The same diagram is now used in a more abstract sense: to represent and organize decomposable factors and their partial products. In high school, students use the same diagram to reason about the multiplication and division of binomials and higher-degree polynomials.”
The Course Overview, Required Materials section lists the manipulatives needed for the course, and the Required Materials section of each lesson identifies the suggested manipulatives needed for that lesson. Lessons include links to digital applets that support student engagement with course content. The materials embed GeoGebra as graphing technology to support students in accurately constructing mathematical representations of their thinking. For Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math 1 and Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math 2, the materials recommend that students use a geometry toolkit throughout the course that includes index cards or straightedges, compasses, tracing paper, blank paper, colored pencils, and scissors.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 1, Section A, Lesson 5, Activity 5.2, students use a straightedge and compass to construct a line perpendicular to a given line through a point on the line. Narrative states, “This activity invites students to play with straightedge and compass moves to construct a line perpendicular to a given line through a point on the given line. Making dynamic geometry software available gives students an opportunity to choose appropriate tools strategically (MP5).” Student Task Statement states, “Here is a line l with a point labeled C.” Question 1 states, “Use straightedge and compass moves to construct a line perpendicular to l that goes through C.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 4, Section C, Lessons 8 and 9 build on students’ use of the area model to represent the distributive property and multiply binomials. Lesson 8, Lesson Narrative states, “In this lesson, students begin connecting different forms of quadratics by representing multiplication as an area. Students make use of this structure to write equivalent equations in expanded form (MP7), and then make the connection to the abstract distributive property to multiply factors (MP2).” Warm-up states, “1. Explain why the diagram shows that 6(3+4)=6\cdot3+6\cdot4. 2. Draw a diagram to show that 5(x+2)=5x+10.” The task includes an image of a rectangle partitioned into two smaller rectangles. Students use the area model to represent multiplication of polynomials. Lesson 9, Activity 9.2, Question 1 states, “Show that (x-1)(x-1) and x^2-2x+1 are equivalent expressions by drawing a diagram or applying the distributive property.” Students can show their reasoning using one of the following available embedded tools: Draw, Write, Photo, Audio, and Video.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Section A, Lesson 1, Activity 1.2, students use scissors and paper to construct a box and write expressions representing its volume. Narrative states, “This activity offers a hands-on introduction to the mathematical work of modeling the volume of a box using a polynomial function. Students do not need to develop an equation with variables for the volume of the box or identify the greatest possible volume at this time, as that is the focus of the following activity.” Launch states, “Demonstrate how to construct a box from an 8.5-inch by 11-inch sheet of paper by cutting out identical squares, with a side length of 1 inch, from each corner. Then measure to fill in the length, width, and height columns of the table. Calculate the volume of the box and add a point, to the displayed axes, that represents the relationship between the side length of the cutout square and the volume of the box. Assign each group a side length between 0.5 inch and 4 inches, in half-inch increments. Adjust these side lengths as needed if using different-sized paper. Tell groups to construct a box by cutting squares out of each corner using their assigned side length, and then to add a point to the graph representing their box.”
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design
Materials include a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic mathematics software in ways that engage students in the course-level standards; have a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject that is neither distracting nor chaotic; and provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning. The materials include or reference some digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other.
Indicator 3r
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic mathematics software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Students interact with content using integrated technology, including assignable virtual manipulatives and tools that allow them to complete and manipulate work online. The materials embed GeoGebra as an available graphing tool for constructing mathematical representations.
According to the Course Overview, How to Use This Course Guide, “Teachers and students can access the curriculum in either print or digital format. Students can work solely with printed workbooks or PDFs. Alternatively, if all students have access to an appropriate device, then they can look at the task statements on that device and write their responses in a notebook. If students access the materials this way, support them in keeping the notebook carefully organized so that they can revisit their work later.”
Additionally, the Course Overview, What's in an IM Lesson, Instructional Activities states, “Some activities have two versions: print and digital. An activity with a digital version is identified in the print version, at the start of the Activity Narrative. Choosing which version to use with students depends on device availability, students’ needs, and mathematical goals. For example, digital versions of activities may reduce barriers for students who either need support with fine-motor skills or benefit from extra processing time, or they may help students see relationships in dynamic ways.” Lesson Narratives provide guidance on how technology can be used to address the lesson standards and any Mathematical Practices (MPs) identified as a lesson focus.
Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, Section D, Lesson 10, Activity 10.2, students use a digital applet to visualize data, perform calculations, and analyze how changes to a data set affect the distribution’s shape and measures of center. Student Task Statement states, “1. Use the applet to create a dot plot that represents the distribution of the data, then describe the shape of the distribution. 2. Find the mean and median of the data. 3. Find the mean and median of the data with 2 additional values included as described. Part A: Add 2 values to the original data set that are greater than 14. Part B: Add 2 values to the original data set that are less than 6. Part C: Add 1 value that is greater than 14 and 1 value that is less than 6 to the original data set. Part D: Add the two values, 50 and 100, to the original data set. 4. Share your work with your group. What do you notice is happening with the mean and median based on the additional values? 5. Change the values so the distribution fits the description given to you by your teacher, then find the mean and median. 6. Find another group that created a distribution with a different description. Explain your work and listen to their explanation, then compare your measures of center.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 1, Section A, Lesson 4, students use a digital applet to adjust an angle between two segments to see how the opposite side is affected. Student Task Statement states, “1. Complete the table for 5 different triangles in which AC and BC are fixed lengths. Include triangles in which angle C (the angle between sides AC and BC) is acute, obtuse, and right. 2. What do you notice about the relationship between the length of AB and the measure of angle C?”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 4, Section A, Lesson 5, Lesson Narrative provides teacher guidance on the use of technology to address the targeted content standards and Mathematical Practices. Lesson Narrative states, “Technology isn't required for this lesson, but there are opportunities for students to choose to use appropriate technology to solve problems. We recommend making technology available.” Activity 5.2, Narrative states, “Making spreadsheet technology available gives students an opportunity to choose appropriate tools strategically (MP5).”
There are instances in which the materials do not provide clear instructions for teacher or student use of digital tools. In addition, the materials reference mathematical tools as being available on the digital platform that were unable to locate, which may affect the integration of digital tools into classroom instruction. Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, Section C, Lesson 6, Activity 6.2, students experiment with an applet to discover formulas within spreadsheet cells in this optional lesson. Narrative states, “In the digital version of the activity, students use an applet to discover the formulas within spreadsheet cells. The applet allows students to work with a Geogebra spreadsheet directly. Use the digital version if it is available so that students are more familiar with Geogebra.” However, the spreadsheet applet referenced in the Narrative is not available within the teacher or student digital materials for this lesson.
Integrated Math 1, Unit 4, Section A, Lesson 5, Activity 5.3, students use graphing technology to represent a linear equation showing how much money a student has in her savings account. Required Preparation states, “Acquire devices that can run Desmos (recommended) or other graphing technology. Ideally, each student has an individual device. (If students typically access the digital version of the materials, Desmos is always available under Math Tools.)” Although the materials state, “Desmos is always available under Math Tools,” However, the Math Tools referenced in the Required Preparation are not available within the teacher or student digital materials.
Integrated Math 2, Unit 2, Section D, Lesson 18, Activity 18.2, students use an applet to see the relationship between the angle of incidence and angle of reflection. Narrative states, “The applet allows students to guess where the cue ball should bounce off the side wall, to see segment distances and angles, and then to check their guesses against the actual path. The digital version helps students see the relationship in a dynamic way.” However, the applet referenced in the Narrative is not available within the teacher or student digital materials for this lesson.
Integrated Math 2, Unit 4, Section D, Lesson 14, Activity 14.2, students use graphing technology to model the path of a catapulted pumpkin and answer questions about the scenario. Required Preparation states, “Acquire devices that can run Desmos (recommended) or other graphing technology. (Desmos is available under Math Tools.)”However, the Math Tools referenced in the Required Preparation are not available within the teacher or student digital materials.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Section C, Lesson 11, Activity 11.3, students use graphing technology to solve a system of equations consisting of polynomial functions. Required Materials states, “Examples of graphing technology are a handheld graphing calculator, a computer with a graphing calculator application installed, and an internet-enabled device with access to a site like desmos.com/calculator or geogebra.org/graphing. For students using the digital materials, a separate graphing calculator tool isn't necessary—interactive applets are embedded throughout, and a graphing calculator tool is accessible on the student digital toolkit page.” However, the embedded graphing applet and graphing calculator tool referenced in the Required Materials are not available within the teacher or student digital materials.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 5, Section D, Lesson 15, Activity 15.2, students model the temperature of a bottle of water after it has been removed from the refrigerator by applying different transformations to two possible functions. Narrative states, “In the digital version of the activity, students use an applet to graph their functions. The applet allows students to quickly adjust the parameters of their functions. The digital version may be helpful if there are time constraints or if students would benefit from seeing the function changes in a dynamic way.” The teacher and student digital materials for this lesson do not include the applet referenced in the Narrative.
Indicator 3s
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math include some digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials incorporate technology within lessons. However, the digital components do not include opportunities or teacher guidance for student collaboration.
According to the Course Guide, Key Structures in This Course, Developing a Math Community states, “Secondary students arrive in math class with experience and beliefs about what a math classroom looks and sounds like. Community building is an opportunity to establish how this classroom will flourish. Classroom environments that foster a sense of community that encourages the expression of mathematical ideas—together with norms for students to communicate their mathematical thinking, both orally and in writing, to their peers and their teacher, using the language of mathematics—positively affect participation and engagement among all students (NCTM, 2014).” While the materials embed opportunities for mathematical community building through student task structures and discourse, they do not reference digital technology to support student-to-student collaboration. Although the Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, references curriculum workshops and PLCs, it does not provide additional guidance about how these structures promote collaboration or when they should occur.
The materials provide opportunities for teacher-to-student communication through technology, such as the Assignment Feedback and Question Feedback features available when teachers grade assignments. Within digital activities, students can record audio to explain their thinking or provide explanations. Students can also upload images or drag and drop files to communicate their mathematical thinking.
Indicator 3t
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math have a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement and communicate information or support student understanding. Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, Section B, Lesson 4, Warm-up, includes four dotplots with varying shapes that students determine which three go together and why.
Integrated Math 2, Unit 5, Section A, Lesson 1, Activity 1.3, includes an image of a photograph in a frame that students use to write equations representing the area of the picture and the combined area of the picture and frame.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 5, Section C, Lesson 11, Student Lesson Summary, includes graphs of parent functions and their transformations that illustrate changes in function form.
The teacher and student materials follow a consistent layout and structure across lessons and units, including repeated phases such as Warm-up, Instructional Activities, Lesson Synthesis, and Cool-down. Instructional elements are labeled and sequenced in the same order throughout the materials.
Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Design Principles - Coherent Progression states, “Every unit, lesson, and activity has the same overarching design structure: The learning begins with an invitation to the mathematics, is followed by a deep study of concepts and procedures, and concludes with an opportunity to consolidate understanding of mathematical ideas.”
Narratives throughout the materials help guide the teacher's understanding and maintain coherence.
Course Overview, What’s in an IM Lesson, Narratives Tell The Story states, “The story of each grade is told across the units in the narratives. Each unit has a narrative that describes the mathematical work that will unfold in that unit. Each section within a unit has a narrative that describes the mathematical work in the section. Each lesson and each activity in a unit also have narratives. The Lesson Narrative explains: The mathematical content of the lesson and its place in the learning sequence. The meaning of any new terms introduced in the lesson. How the mathematical practices come into play, as appropriate. The Activity Narrative explains: The mathematical purpose of the activity and its place in the learning sequence. What students are doing during the activity. What to look for, while students are working on an activity to orchestrate an effective Activity Synthesis. Connections to the mathematical practices, when appropriate.”
Teacher and student materials in printed, consumable format use a consistent font size, clear instructions, and organized content placement. They provide space for students to show their mathematical thinking on the page. The teacher's digital format includes clearly labeled navigation tools and organized lesson components. Organizational features, such as a table of contents, are clearly labeled and support navigation across units and lessons. A course search bar allows users to navigate by searching for a unit, lesson, activity, or keyword.
Indicator 3u
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Kiddom IM® v.360 Integrated Math provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
Course Overview, Key Structures in This Course, Use of Digital Tools states, “Lessons are written with four anticipated levels of digital interaction: some activities require digital tools, some activities suggest digital tools, some activities allow digital tools, and in a few cases, activities may prohibit digital tools if they interfere with concept development. In most cases, instead of exploring a pre-made applet, students access a suite of linked applications, such as graphing tools, synthetic and analytic geometry tools, and spreadsheets. Students (and teachers) are taught how to use the tools, but not always told when to use them, and students’ choice in the problem-solving approach is valued.” Lessons with embedded applets include teacher-facing guidance in the Narrative and/or Launch and label the availability of a digital version within the lesson.
Examples that illustrate this guidance, including suggestions for different access scenarios, include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, Section D, Lesson 12, Activity 12.3, students investigate how the standard deviation and other measures of variability change when you add, change, or remove values in a data set. Launch states, “Open the Spreadsheet & Statistics tool from Math Tools, or navigate to https://www.geogebra.org/classic/spreadsheet. Demonstrate how to add, change, and remove data points from a data set using technology. Provide access to statistical technology. Give students time to work through the questions, and then pause for a brief whole-class discussion.”
Integrated Math 2, Unit 4, Overview, Unit Narrative, provides detailed guidance for teachers on the use of graphing technology within this unit. Unit Narrative states, “Note on materials: Access to graphing technology is necessary for many activities. Examples of graphing technology are: a handheld graphing calculator, a computer with a graphing calculator application installed, and an internet-enabled device with access to a site like desmos.com/calculator or geogebra.org/graphing. For students using the digital version of these materials, a separate graphing calculator tool isn’t necessary. Interactive applets are embedded throughout, and a graphing calculator tool is accessible in the student math tools.”
Integrated Math 3, Unit 1, Section A, Lesson 2, Activity 2.2, students use an embedded applet to explore solids formed by rotating figures around different axes. Activity Narrative states, “In the digital version of the activity, students use an applet to check their predictions for the solids that result from rotating figures around different axes. The applet allows students to observe solids get traced out and to see the solids from different perspectives. Use the digital version if students would benefit from using a dynamic visual to see the solids traced out by a shape. If students don’t have individual access, projecting the applet would be helpful during the Activity Synthesis.” Activity Synthesis states, “Display the applet and check only box 1. Drag the slider to 360 degrees and explain that the triangle has now completed a full rotation around the y-axis, the axis of rotation for this solid.”
The materials provide an AI-enhanced search feature that allows teachers to search and filter content by assessment, activity, lesson, or unit. Teachers have access to Kiddom Assistant, an AI tool that supports lesson preparation. The tool provides suggested prompts and allows teachers to enter their own questions.
Teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials reference mathematical tools as being available in a Math Tools menu; however, no Math Tools menu is available on the digital platform. As a result, the teacher guidance is unclear. Examples include:
Integrated Math 1, Unit 3, Section D, Lesson 9, Warm-up, students enter data into a spreadsheet. Launch states, “Arrange students in groups of 2. If students are using the digital version of the materials, show them how to open the GeoGebra spreadsheet app in the math tools. If students are using the print version of the materials, they can access the GeoGebra spreadsheet app at www.geogebra.org/spreadsheet. If students will be using statistical technology other than GeoGebra for this activity, prepare alternate instructions.” Although the materials state that the GeoGebra spreadsheet app is available in Math Tools, no Math Tools menu is available on the digital platform.
Integrated Math 1, Unit 9, Section E, Lesson 19, Activity 19.3, students compare the growth of linear and exponential functions. Required Preparation states, “Acquire devices that can run Desmos (recommended) or other graphing technology. It is ideal if each student has their own device. (Desmos is available under Math Tools.) Be prepared to display a graph for all to see using the embedded Desmos applet or other graphing technology.” Although the materials state, “Desmos is always available under Math Tools,” no Math Tools menu is available on the digital platform.
Integrated Math 2, Unit 4, Section D, Lesson 13, Activity 13.3, students write equations of graphed quadratic functions. Required Materials states, “Examples of graphing technology are a handheld graphing calculator, a computer with a graphing calculator application installed, and an internet-enabled device with access to a site like desmos.com/calculator or geogebra.org/graphing. For students using the digital materials, a separate graphing calculator tool isn't necessary—interactive applets are embedded throughout, and a graphing calculator tool is accessible on the student digital toolkit page.” The materials reference a student digital toolkit page for accessing a graphing calculator tool; however, no student digital toolkit page is available on the digital platform.
Integrated Math 2, Unit 7, Section C, Lesson 10, Activity 10.2, students demonstrate that a point lies on an angle bisector if and only if it is equidistant from the rays that form the angle. Narrative states “The digital version of this activity includes an applet that may be helpful to display for the class during the Launch.” No applet for the Launch is available within the teacher or student materials.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 1, Section E, Lesson 20, Activity 20.3, students use an applet to analyze the graphs of two equations relating volume and scale factor. They move a horizontal line to identify intersections and draw conclusions about the corresponding cube-root functions. Required Preparation states, “For the digital version of the activity, acquire devices that can run Desmos (recommended) or other graphing technology. It is ideal if each student has individual access to a device. (Desmos is available under Math Tools.) The digital version is recommended for all classes, over the paper and pencil version.” The digital version is recommended for all classes over the paper and pencil version.” No applet for the activity is available within the teacher or student materials. Although the materials state, “Desmos is always available under Math Tools,” no Math Tools menu is available on the digital platform.
Integrated Math 3, Unit 2, Section A, Lesson 3, Activity 3.3, students use graphing technology to construct equations for polynomial functions whose graphs have specified characteristics. Required Materials states, “Examples of graphing technology are a handheld graphing calculator, a computer with a graphing calculator application installed, and an internet-enabled device with access to a site like desmos.com/calculator or geogebra.org/graphing. For students using the digital materials, a separate graphing calculator tool isn't necessary—interactive applets are embedded throughout, and a graphing calculator tool is accessible on the student digital toolkit page.” The materials reference a student digital toolkit page for accessing a graphing calculator tool; however, no student digital toolkit page is available on the digital platform.