3rd Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 3rd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Text Complexity and Quality
Text Quality & Complexity| Score | |
|---|---|
Gateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations | 64% |
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality & Complexity | 16 / 20 |
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence | 7 / 16 |
Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development | 4 / 6 |
The Grade 3 materials partially meet the expectations for text quality and complexity and alignment to the standards. While some ltexts included in materials are of quality, informational texts are often short and lack engaging, content-area vocabulary. Though there are text dependent questions to accompany each anchor and supporting text, students are seldom asked to draw their own conclusions or inferences. Culminating tasks are present, but often are not supported by the unit texts. Writing support meets the requirements of the standards, with students practicing multiple modes and genres over the course of the school year. Writing process materials are present throughout the school year. Grammar and conventions lessons and practice are often not aligned to grade level standards.
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality & Complexity
Texts are worthy of students' time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students' advancing toward independent reading.
Instructional materials for Grade 3 reviewed partially meet the expectations for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading. Many of the literary texts are published texts which provide opportunities for students to engage in especially careful reading, are on topics of interest to Grade 3 students, and include rich, captivating language. Many informational texts are very short and lack engaging, content-area vocabulary. Texts do meet the expectations for reflecting the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Each lesson has a paired set of texts which often include both a literary text and a paired informational text. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task and partially meet the expectation of supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. While the anchor texts and paired selections typically fall within the grade band, the scaffolding of each text for reader and task is similar and comparable for each text regardless of complexity and demands of each text. This may not ensure students are supported to access and comprehend complex grade-level texts independently at the end of the year. Anchor texts and the series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a and rationale and text complexity analysis for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
Indicator 1a
Anchor texts are of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations of indicator 1a. Many of the literary texts are published texts which provide opportunities for students to engage in especially careful reading, are on topics of interest to Grade 3 students, and include rich, captivating language. Most of the informational texts were written for the series and are not works published outside the program, and many of these are brief and lack content-area vocabulary and well-crafted language.
The anchor texts for Grade 3 include texts created by award-winning authors and illustrators, such as Patricia MacLachlan, Peter Reynolds, Susan E. Goodman, and Kathleen Kudlinski and cover topics of interest to Grade 3 students in a variety of genres, including historical fiction, narrative nonfiction, biographies, and science fiction. Some examples of quality texts include but are not limited to:
- Unit 1, Lesson 1, A Fine, Fine School by Sharon Creech - This is a text that is easily relatable for Grade 3 students since the setting is a school. During this humorous fiction narrative, the principal learns that some important lessons are learned and taught outside the school. The author uses creative word repetition and the illustrations contain fascinating details.
- Unit 2, Lesson 5, Bat Loves the Night by Nicola Davies - This text is a narrative nonfiction account from an award-winning author and scientific researcher of a mother bat’s nocturnal activities. It includes rich, captivating language such as, “Gliding and fluttering back and forth, she shouts her torch of sounds among the trees.” The text also includes lifelike illustrations, interesting facts about bats at the bottom of each page, related to the vocabulary-laden (e.g., echolocation, nocturnal, batlings) narrative text on the top or middle of each page.
- Unit 3, Lesson 12, Tops & Bottoms, a Newberry Award winning text by Janet Stevens - This text is a trickster tale that tells the story of a cunning rabbit who tricks a bear into doing all of the work of planting a garden while the rabbit reaps the rewards of the harvest. It includes rich, colorful illustrations, and an engaging storyline.
- Unit 4, Lesson 16, Judy Moody Saves the World! by Megan McDonald - In this humorous fiction text it is easy to relate to Judy’s frustration with trying to do something that seems like an insurmountable task. This text contains engaging dialogue between relatable characters who are also Grade 3 students.
- Unit 5, Lesson 21, Sarah, Plain and Tall by Patricia MacLachlan - This historical fiction text has spectacular adjectives such as “slick,” “wild-eyed,” and “smoothest,” and vivid verbs such as “whooped,” “leaned,” and “clattered.”
- Unit 6, Lesson 26,The Foot Race Across America by Rob Hale - This narrative nonfiction includes engaging elements such as dialogue and photographs from the time period that include photos from the race.
While there are a variety of topics and a range of student interests addressed throughout the year, many texts that have been created for the series are brief and lack engagement for Grade 3 students. Examples include but are not limited to:
- Unit 3, Lesson 14, Kids and Critters is a very short text with large pictures and a fake announcement which overwhelms the pages limiting what students get to read.
- In Unit 5, Lesson 23, Moving the U.S. Mail is a short text with short, simple sentences which do not go into the detail that would interest students nor build their comprehension of the work. For example, “Transportation has improved,”“people rushed west,” and “The mail moved faster than ever.”
- In Unit 6, Lesson 30, Acting Across Generations is a brief text with just six paragraphs, and, while the text is intended to function like a news article, the text lacks a byline. Few academic words are included.
Indicator 1b
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations for reflecting the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. There is a mix between literary and informational text. Each lesson has a paired set of texts which often include both a literary text and a paired informational text.
The anchor literary texts represent a variety of text types and genres including but not limited to humorous fiction, myth, plays, historical fiction, fantasy, realistic fiction, poetry, folktales, fables and legends.
- The Trial of Cardigan Jones by Tim Egan, fantasy
- “Baseball Poems”, poetry
- Bat Loves the Night by Nicola Davies, narrative nonfiction
- Tops and Bottoms by Janet Stevens, trickster tale
- Judy Moody Saves the World by Megan McDonald, humorous fiction
- Sarah, Plain and Tall by Patricia MacLachlan, historical fiction
- “The Raven: An Inuit Myth”, myth
- “The Big Clean Up”, play
The anchor informational texts represent a variety of text types and genres including but not limited to technology, science, social studies & biographies. Informational texts include news articles, journal entries, biographies, and photo essays.
- One Room Schoolhouses, informational text
- Bridges, informational text
- Young Thomas Edison by Michael Dooling, biography
- Aero and Officer Mike by Joan Plummer Russell, informational text
- Mountains: Surviving on Mt. Everest by Michael Sandler, article
Indicator 1c
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectation that texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
Most texts have the appropriate level of complexity for Grade 3 students. Examples of texts with appropriate text complexity include:
- Unit 1, Lesson 4: Pop’s Bridge by Eve Bunting
- Quantitative: 610 Lexile
- Qualitative: The text has a single level of meaning, but includes two different storylines. The language is familiar with a few idiomatic expressions. The text contains references to unfamiliar experiences.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to have students who are interested in bridges tell what they like about bridges. The teacher can use a Language Support Card. Students can share with a partner what they know about teamwork. The tasks include: comparing and contrasting characters in the story and analyzing the text for story structure.
- Unit 3, Lesson 11: Technology Wins the Game by Mark Andrews
- Quantitative: 760 Lexile
- Qualitative: The purpose of the text is implied. The text has some unfamiliar features as it is a technical text, but the text includes steps. The vocabulary has unfamiliar domain words. Specialized knowledge is needed to understand the text.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to ask students to read the text to learn how technology helps athletes win. The teacher can use a Language Support Card. Students can share with a partner the tools needed to play their favorite sports. The tasks include: determining sequence of events and analyzing the text and graphic features.
- Unit 5, Lesson 21: Sarah, Plain and Tall by Patricia MacLachlan
- Quantitative: 480 Lexile
- Qualitative: The text has multiple levels of meaning. It uses foreshadowing to expand understanding of characters and what their future as a family will look like.The text includes more complex descriptions that may require students to unpack meaning.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to have students who enjoy reading historical fiction to share what they hope to learn from the selection. The teacher can use a Language Support Card. Students can share with a partner the types of activities adults and children do on farms. The tasks include: looking for text evidence for story structure and determining if in agreement with the character’s point-of-view.
- Unit 6, Lesson 27 The Power of Magnets by Barbara A. Donovan
- Quantitative: 690 Lexile
- Qualitative: The text has an explicitly stated purpose or main idea. It uses cause and effect structure to explain scientific information. The headings in the text make clear what material will be covered in each section. The text mixes formal languages with informational tone that appears when the text addresses the reader directly or poses questions. Although readers may have prior experience with magnets, the text provides specialized information about electromagnets.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to ask students to read to find out about magnets and their power. The teacher can use a Language Support Card. The teacher can also remind students about the lesson’s Preview the Topic and have students tell a partner about physical science or magnets. The tasks include: analyzing the text for cause and effect and summarizing the text.
- Unit 6, Lesson 30 Saving Buster by Barbara A. Donovan
- Quantitative: 550 Lexile
- Qualitative: Saving Buster: The text has a single level of meaning with slightly complex theme. It presents events in chronological order summarizing at the start of the story events that took place before the story began. The text uses third-person limited narration. It uses familiar, standard English along with a few idioms. The text deals with a moderately familiar life experience.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to ask students to read to find out how a community comes together to save Buster. The teacher can use a Language Support Card. The teacher can also remind students about the lesson’s Preview the Topic and have students tell a partner one thing they know about working together. The tasks include: analyzing the text for making conclusions and forming questions based on the text.
A few anchor texts have text complexity features that are above the Grade 3 text complexity. Examples include:
- Unit 4, Lesson 20: Life on the Ice by Susan E. Goodman
- Quantitative: 890 Lexile
- Qualitative: The purpose of the text is implied, but easy to infer from the context. The text is organized by main ideas and details. There are many unfamiliar domain-specific vocabulary words. To understand the text, specialized knowledge is needed.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to ask students who have visited areas that get a lot of snow to share. The teacher can use a Language Support Card. The teacher can also remind students about the lesson’s Preview the Topic and have students share with a partner what they know about extreme places. The tasks include: analyzing the text for main ideas and details and figuring out literal and nonliteral meanings
- Unit 5, Lesson 22: The Journey: Stories of Migration by Cynthia Rylant
- Quantitative: 920 Lexile
- Qualitative: The purpose of the text is implied, but can be inferred from context. The author uses a compare-and-contrast text structure to present complex science concepts about two migratory animals. The text contains sophisticated descriptions and unfamiliar domain-specific vocabulary. In order to understand the text, students need specialized knowledge.
- Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to ask students who enjoy reading about animals to share what they hope to learn. The teacher can use a Language Support Card and have students share with a partner what they know about animal migration. The tasks include: analyzing the text to compare and contrast whales and locusts and analyze author’s word choice.
Indicator 1d
Materials support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectation of supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. While the anchor texts and paired selections typically fall within the grade band, the scaffolding of each text for reader and task is similar and comparable for each text regardless of complexity and demands of each text. This may not ensure students are supported to access and comprehend complex grade-level texts independently at the end of the year.
As the year progresses, students read texts at a variety of complexity levels. For each text, the routine for reading and analyzing the text is similar and does not change based on text complexity. Examples of the similar and comparable scaffolding for each text regardless of complexity include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, most of the anchor texts have Lexiles ranging from 600-960 with slightly complex qualitative features. Two texts, Destiny’s Gift and Roberto Clemente: Pride of the Pittsburgh Pirates, are above the grade level band, but contain reader and task scaffolding similar to texts with less complexity. For example, in Lesson 1, for A Fine, Fine School, which is less complex than Destiny’s Gift, the teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students to read to find out what makes the school a fine, fine school. To help foster independence, the teacher is directed to have motivated readers read the story together. In Lesson 3, for Destiny’s Gift, the scaffolding of reader and task of a more complex text than A Fine, Fine School, directs the teacher to motivate students by asking students to read to find out what Destiny’s gift is. To help foster independence, the teacher is directed to have motivated readers read the story together. The lesson plans include three days of reading A Fine, Fine Day as well as three days to read a more complex text, Destiny’s Gift. On day 1 of both texts, students complete a guided retelling. On day 2 of the reading of the text, students complete a performance task to state their opinion. On day 3 of the reading of the text, students read the text independently and complete two pages in the Reader’s Notebook.
- In Unit 5, Lesson 22, students read the most complex anchor text, The Journey: Stories of Migration, in the materials. The text contains very complex text structure (compare-and-contrast text structure to present science concepts about two migratory animals) and very complex language features with sophisticated descriptions of unfamiliar domain-specific vocabulary. For reader and task considerations, the teacher is directed to use similar scaffolding of less complex texts, such as A Fine, Fine Day in Unit 1, Lesson 1. The plans direct the teacher to motivate students by asking students who enjoy reading about animals to share what they hope to learn from the selection. To foster independence, the teacher is directed to have motivated readers read the text together. Three days of reading are allotted to the reading of The Journey: Stories of Migration, which is the same number of days allotted to reading a less complex text. Students complete a guided retelling. On day 2, students state their opinion as part of the performance task. On day 3, students independently read the text and complete two pages of the Reader’s Notebook.
Although texts in Grade 3 increase in complexity, the scaffolding across texts remains constant and the same level of support is recommended across the units, which may not support students' abilities to access increasingly rigorous text over the course of the school year.
Indicator 1e
Anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectation that anchor texts and the series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a and rationale and text complexity analysis for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The teacher's edition contains Prepare for Complex Text which includes both the rationale and text complexity analysis for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
- Why this Text? is provided for each anchor text. This gives the rationale for educational purpose and placement as well as key learning objectives. For example, in Unit 2, lesson 6, for the text Bat Loves the Night by Nicola Davies,the Why this Text? states, “Students regularly encounter narrative nonfiction in textbooks, anthologies, and their own independent reading. This text tells the story of Bat as she hunts for food. The text features, rich domain-specific language to describe Bat’s journey.” The key learning objectives for the text are to analyze sequence of events and understand domain-specific vocabulary.
- The Text Complexity Rubric explains the text complexity attributes of each whole class text, the Lexile and Guided Reading Levels of the texts, and the places within the lesson that will help the teacher determine if the text is appropriate in terms of reader and task. For example, in Unit 4, lesson 16 students read Judy Moody Saves the World! by Megan McDonald. The Text Complexity Rubric gives the quantitative, qualitative and reader and task measures.
- Quantitative: 520 Lexile, N Guided Reading Measurement
- Qualitative:
- Meaning and Purpose/Density and Complexity:The text has multiple levels of meaning or multiple themes.
- Text Structure/Organization:The text is organized by chapters and includes some unconventional story structure elements.
- Language Features/Sentence Structure: The text includes more complex sentence structures.
- Knowledge Demands/ Life Experiences/Background Knowledge: The text has a fairly complex theme.
- Reader/Task Considerations: Determine using the professional judgment of the teacher. This varies by individual reader, type of text, and the purpose and complexity of particular tasks. See Reader and Task Considerations on p.T23 for Anchor Text Support.
Reader and Task Considerations on p. T23 give additional support for the text Judy Moody Saves the World!
Indicator 1f
Anchor text(s), including support materials, provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations of support materials for the core texts to provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading proficiency.
Students explore a range of topics including, but not limited to: history, sports, animals, careers, science, native american culture, inventions, agriculture, cooking, natural wonders, heroes, and conservation.
In each lesson, students interact with texts during a teacher read-aloud, anchor text first read, anchor text reread with small group or partner, anchor text independent read with Reader’s Guide, a self-selected text reading, a whole group paired-text read, and an optional second read of paired-text. Leveled readers and vocabulary readers are also provided for small group, differentiated instruction.
Leveled reader lessons are provided for small group instruction. Formative assessment suggestions are given in each lesson for the Vocabulary Reader. Each level of student understanding is provided with strategic scaffolding to support students in acquiring general academic and domain specific vocabulary. Teacher support is also provided for each Vocabulary Reader. For example, in Unit 4, Lesson 17 (page T89), struggling students are directed to read the Vocabulary Reader, Animals Helping People.
At the beginning of each unit in the Teacher Edition, Independent Literacy Center directions provide guidance for the types of activities to use such as independent reading. For example, in Unit 4, Lesson 17, managing independent activities directions can be found on pages T101-T102 in the Teacher Edition. Students are encouraged to use a reading log from the Grab-and-Go! Additional Resources to track progress and thoughts about the book in order to participate in book talks, book reviews, book sharing, partner reading, and discussion circles.
Extended Reading Trade Books are also listed in the materials in Units 2, 4,and 6. The Extended Reading Trade Books include a weekly planner and lessons for extended reading throughout the unit. Grade 3 extended reading texts include: Amos and Bons by William Steig, Boy, Were We Wrong about Dinosaurs! by Kathleen V. Kudlinski, Donavan’s Word Jar by Monalisa DeGross, Jake Drake Know-It-All by Andrew Clements,and Capoeira by George Ancona.
There is also a Reading Adventure Magazine that provides additional texts across a range of topics.
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The materials for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations that students will have opportunities for rich, rigorous discussions and writing tasks that are evidence based. Though there are text dependent questions to accompany each anchor and supporting text, students are seldom asked to draw their own conclusions or inferences. Inferences are often given with students having to find evidence to support the already stated inference. The text dependent questions provided are not adequate to support students' mastering of this skill. Some performance tasks can be completed by students without the use of the units texts, while other tasks cannot be completed with the information provided in the assigned texts. There are not high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and activities that build to the performance task. Opportunities for discussion are provided but are often not evidence-based and do not encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. Materials partially meet expectations for supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching and meet the expectation of materials including a mix of on-demand and process writing and short, focused projects incorporating digital resources where necessary. Materials address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. There are some opportunities that engage students in practicing argument/opinion, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing, however, the writing tasks do not increase in rigor over the course of the year. Lessons and assessment items aligned to grammar and conventions standards often address below grade-level standards. Lesson and assessment items also address above grade-level standards.
Indicator 1g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations for text dependent questions, tasks, and assignments requiring students to engage directly with the text and to draw on textual evidence to support what is explicit as well as valid inferences. Though there are text dependent questions to accompany each anchor and supporting text, students are seldom asked to draw their own conclusions or inferences. Inferences are often given with students having to find evidence to support the already stated inference. The text dependent questions provided are not adequate to support students mastering of this skill.
Students are asked text-dependent questions throughout the daily lessons. These questions are included in the Teacher Read Aloud, Read the Anchor Text, Guided Retelling, Dig Deeper second read of the anchor text, Your Turn discussion, Independent Reading Reader’s Guide, Connect to the Topic, Compare Texts, and Small Group Instruction. Answering text-dependent questions is modeled throughout instruction.
Examples of text-dependent questions found throughout the units include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 2 students are asked, “What conclusion can you draw about Sequoyah's beliefs about written language? A written language is very important because it allows people to send messages over long distances, to keep records of trades, and to pass down their history and culture.”
- In Unit 2, Lesson 9 students are asked, “How does Baachan feel about Jiichan going on his rounds? She is worried that it might be too much for him, but she realizes it is important to him. How do you know this? Baachan shows she is reluctant when she says, “I don’t know” and “I suppose.” But then she offers to make candies for his rounds.”
Examples of text-dependent questions found that illustrate how inferences are often given with students having to find evidence to support the already stated inference include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 3, Lesson 15 students are asked, “Which sentence from the story shows that, at first, Ramona doesn’t care if dinner turns out badly? “It would serve them right if it tasted awful.” Why does Beezus decide that she and her sister should try to cook a good meal? She realizes that they will have to eat whatever they cook.”
- In Unit 4, Lesson 20 students discuss the sun, “Think about why the sun is important to the scientists in Life on the Ice and to the people in The Raven. In a small group, use text evidence to discuss and explain your ideas. Listen carefully to each other. Ask questions if you are not sure about something.”
- In Unit 5, Lesson 21 students are asked, “How does the illustration on page 219 help you to understand the mood at the dinner table? Everyone is smiling and enjoying being together, even Sal. Papa is taking another helping of Sarah’s stew. Everyone looks interested as Sarah talks.”
- In Unit 6, Lesson 29 students are asked, “What details support the idea that a spelling bee champion must be hardworking and able to handle pressure? A spelling bee champion has to win several smaller spelling bees before getting to the national spelling bee. He or she has to practice each day and learn how to spell words most adults don’t even know in front of large groups of people.”
Examples of text-dependent tasks and assignments found throughout the units include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 2, Lesson 10 students reread Young Thomas Edison independently and complete the Reader’s Notebook task exploring Thomas Edison’s early life by looking at objects as a tour guide for a museum. Students explain why each of the items has been placed in the museum using information from the text.
- In Unit 4, Lesson 18 students are asked to have a classroom conversation. “Have students continue the discussion of A Tree Is Growing by explaining their answer to the three questions. Remind students to explicitly draw from the text, as well as the text and graphic features, when explaining their own ideas about the first two questions. See Interactive Lesson:Speaking Constructively.” The three questions are: Why is it difficult to tell the age of a tree in the tropical rain forest? Why do some trees look dead in the winter? What is really happening to these trees? What kinds of trees grow where you live? What do you know about those trees?
- In Unit 5, Lesson 22 students reread The Journey:Stories of Migration independently and complete the Reader’s Notebook task of conducting an interview with Locust and Whale answering questions such as: What makes you migrate? What do you do on your migration that is similar to what locusts do? When spring comes, why do you migrate again?
There are also “Text to Self” and “Text to World” questions that are not always text-dependent but relate to the theme or topic of the text being read. An example is found in Unit 3, lesson 15 after reading the text Imagine a Recipe, students are asked to perform a short skit that shows what happened when they made something in the kitchen. Students are also asked to use the internet to find a recipe for a food from another country. Students are to copy the ingredients and directions, print out a picture, and put the recipe in a class cookbook.
Indicator 1h
Sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 do not meet the expectation for materials containing sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and activities that build to a culminating task. The culminating task for each unit comes in the form of a performance task that is introduced at the beginning of the unit. All performance tasks are grounded in writing tasks, although there is a presentation piece at the end of each task in which students may choose a way to share their essay with their classmates. The task directions state which texts students should use, and not all texts work with the tasks. Some tasks can be completed by students without the use of the units texts, while other tasks cannot be completed using only the information provided in the assigned texts.
An example of a performance task that can be completed without the use of the unit’s texts can be found in Unit 1: Good Citizens. The performance task is introduced at the beginning of the unit as, “At the end of this unit, you will think about two of the texts you have read. Then you will write a story about making a difference in your community.”
- Unit 1’s performance task topic is, “In Roberto Clemente: Pride of the Pittsburgh Pirates, you read a biography about Roberto Clemente and the things he did that made him a hero. In ‘Kids Making a Difference,’ you read an informational text about how kids help serve their communities. Look back at the texts. Find examples of how Roberto Clemente and the kids helped serve a community. Then choose one of those examples to write a story about making a difference in your community.”
- The first text that is connected to the performance task, Roberto Clemente: Pride of the Pittsburgh Pirates, is an anchor text. The majority of questions do not build to the culminating task. The text is about a Puerto Rican baseball player who plays for Pittsburgh and has to overcome being different. There is one paragraph that mentions how he helped his community when he brought supplies to them after an earthquake. Students answer two questions that are connected to making a difference in the community. These questions are:
- “Clemente plans to bring supplies to earthquake victims on New Year’s Eve. What does that tell you about him?”
- “What does the author mean when he writes that ‘Roberto’s spirit is still growing’?”
- “What details help clarify his meaning?”
- The second text that is connected to the performance task, “Making a Difference”, is not an anchor text and is not read until Day 4 of the week. Students do not reread the text. There is one text-dependent question in the lesson, “How does the map on page 115 help you understand the information in ‘Texas Kids Help Out’?” Students then answer a text to text question, “Think about the ways people help others in ‘Destiny’s Gift’ and ‘Kids Making a Difference’. Do children and adults help in different ways? What reasons do people have for helping?” These questions will not build students’ knowledge and ability to complete the culminating performance task at the end of the unit.
- The first text that is connected to the performance task, Roberto Clemente: Pride of the Pittsburgh Pirates, is an anchor text. The majority of questions do not build to the culminating task. The text is about a Puerto Rican baseball player who plays for Pittsburgh and has to overcome being different. There is one paragraph that mentions how he helped his community when he brought supplies to them after an earthquake. Students answer two questions that are connected to making a difference in the community. These questions are:
Students could write a story about making a difference in their community without reading the unit texts. Roberto Clemente brings supplies to earthquake victims to help his community, but this is only mentioned briefly at the end of the story. The informational text does mention ways to help a community, but it is mostly about people who painted murals. The text is three paragraphs long and does not provide many examples. Students would only have a few examples of helping a community to choose from and did not need to read the unit texts to be able to complete the task.
An example of a performance task that doesn't require use of the unit’s texts can be found in Unit 4, Natural Wonders. The performance task is introduced at the beginning of the unit as, “At the end of this unit, you will think about two of the texts you have read. Then you will write an opinion essay about the importance of scientific research.”
- Unit 4’s topic is: “In The Albertosaurus Mystery, you read about scientists who study dinosaur fossils. Then in Life on the Ice, you read about scientists who conduct research in the icy climates of the Arctic and Antarctica. What kind of research do you think is more important to future generations? Do you think that studying fossils will provide valuable information about Earth to people in the future? Or do you think it is more important to study the clues about Earth’s climate hidden deep in ice? Write an opinion essay to persuade your readers to support one of these types of research.”
- The first text that is connected to the performance task, Albertosaurus Mystery, is an anchor text. This text is about the life and discoveries of the scientist Philip Currie. The text does discuss finding fossils but does not provide why it would be important to research fossils. There are no text-dependent questions to build students knowledge or ability to form an opinion about if studying fossils would be important to the future.
- The second text that is connected to the performance task, Life on Ice, is also an anchor text. This text is about how scientists live in places such as Antarctica. The text provides minimal information on climate research in icy climates. The text mentions studying the snow and ice to measure air pollution, study ice ages, and look for meteorites. Studying the climate has three sentences in the text. There are no text-dependent questions that build a student’s knowledge about climate research or their ability to complete the culminating task.
Students could not complete the opinion writing using only the texts that are provided. Students are asked to give persuasive reasons for their opinion using details and examples from the text. The texts, text-dependent questions, and unit tasks provided do not give enough information to complete this task. Students would have to rely on prior knowledge or go to additional texts to complete the task. Guidance for teachers to support all students through these exercises is limited.
Indicator 1i
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidencebased discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. (May be small group and all-class.)
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for providing frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. Opportunities for discussion are provided but are often not evidence-based and do not encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. There is not a year-long approach available to developing skills over the course of they year. There is minimal teacher direction given to support teachers in conducting evidence-based discussions that model the use of academic vocabulary and syntax.
There are both evidence-based and non evidence-based discussions and modeling throughout materials. The anchor text and supporting texts provide text-based questions and sample answers for discussion, but do not give protocol or direction for conducting the discussions. Academic vocabulary is introduced at the beginning of each lesson through Vocabulary in Context Cards. Students participate in Talk About Over activities with the cards. These words are highlighted in the lessons texts and are also revisited in the Vocabulary Reader.
Examples of evidence-based discussions and modeling include but are not limited to:
Unit 1, Lesson 2, Teacher Think Aloud
- The teacher models discussion by stating, “From the beginning, Ms. Brown thought Cardigan stole her pie even though other people were there when it disappeared. I can infer that she is quick to judge people she doesn't know.”
Unit 3, Lesson 12, Collaborative Conversation
- Students are directed to, “Continue your discussion of Tops and Bottoms by using text evidence to explain your answers to these questions: What type of character is Bear? What type of character is Hare? How does the author let you know that Hare intends to trick Bear? Do you think Bear deserves to be tricked? Why or why not?”
Unit 5, Lesson 25, Teacher Think Aloud
- The teacher models discussion by stating, “Informational texts give facts about a topic. I see a photograph of a mountain on pages 346 and 347, and there are headings throughout the text. The headings tell me what each section is about. I think this selection is an informational text.”
Unit 6, Lesson 26, Compare Texts, Text to Text
- Students are directed to, “Have students use details from the texts in this lesson to support their responses to the following questions: What problems do The Foot Race Across America and Paca and the Beetle explore? In what way do Andy, Beetle, and the speaker of “Fast Track” have the same goal?”
Examples of discussions and modeling that are not evidence-based and do not encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax are:
Unit 1, Lesson 2, Talk About It
- Teachers are directed to, “Read the collaborative discussion prompt with students. Remind students to follow discussion rules as they share their knowledge of courtroom trials. Students are asked to discuss, “What do you know about courtroom trials? What would you like to know? Share your ideas with your classmates. What did you learn from others? Listen carefully, ask questions, and take turns speaking.”
Unit 2, Lesson 8, Day 5 Speaking and Listening lesson
- Students practice telling a story. Students are directed to work individually to write a story using descriptive words and phrases to add effect to their story. Students then organize in small groups where students take turns to tell their stories and ask each other questions.
Unit 3, Lesson 11, Talk about It
- Teachers are directed to, “Read the collaborative discussion prompt with students. Remind students to follow discussion rules as they use their drawings to describe sports equipment to a partner. Students are asked to discuss, “Think about a sport you play or watch. What types of equipment do the players use? Sketch your ideas. Include a caption explaining the equipment’s purpose. Share your ideas with your classmates.”
Unit 5, Lesson 23, Day 5 Speaking and Listening lesson
- Students discuss how to recount an experience and review speaking and listening tips such as “Choose interesting facts and descriptive details to accurately recount your experience. Use words, such as first, next, last, after, and before to help listeners understand the order of events. Speak clearly and at an understandable pace. Be prepared to answer questions about your experience.” Students then share an interesting experience they have had and answer questions about this experience.
Interactive Listening and Speaking Lessons for discussion are also provided. These lessons are not evidence-based and do not connect to texts. Sentence starters are provided for English Language Learners.
Indicator 1j
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet expectations for supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
Protocols and routines for speaking and listening are presented in the Interactive Lessons. These lessons include rules for a good discussion, speaking constructively, listening and responding, giving a presentation, and using media in a presentation. These protocols are not located in the Student Edition.
Students practice listening comprehension during the weekly read aloud. Students are asked follow-up questions during the read aloud. Students read and respond to questions during the reading of the anchor texts and supporting text in whole class discussion and partner talk.
Each lesson includes teacher think alouds and a Speaking and Listening lesson on Day 5. The Speaking and Listening lessons do not always connect to the text or texts being read, do not always support what students are reading and researching, and do not always include relevant follow-up questions. There is limited instruction to support students mastering these presentation skills. For example:
- In Unit 3, Lesson 11, day 5 students are asked to discuss information presented quantitatively. Students are directed to break into small groups to conduct a short research project. The direction given states, “Ask each group to consider what they would like to know about a sport. Then have them choose a topic related to sports that they would like to research. Explain to students that the topic should be one for which they can find information through charts or graphs.”
- In Unit 5, Lesson 22, day 5 students select a poem or story that they have read to create an audio recording. Students are to page through selections in their student book or choose from the class library. Students then practice, create an audio recording, and share with the class.
Indicator 1k
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectation of materials including a mix of on-demand and process writing and short, focused projects incorporating digital resources where necessary.
Students write on demand after each anchor text during the Write to Reading. This provides a limited amount of practice with on-demand writing prompts.. These prompts are short text-based writing prompts with little direction for the students and/or teacher.
- In Unit 4, Lesson 17, students are asked to respond to the prompt, “Phillip Currie found Barnum Brown’s bone bed after the rest of the team had gone back to camp. What do you think might have happened if Philip had returned with the rest of his team? Would he have found the bone bed? Use text evidence to support your answer.” There is a Writing Tip box for students: “As you write, check that you use the correct verb tense to tell about action that happened in the past.” There is an additional support box on one page of the teacher’s edition for teachers to use during instruction to help students answer the prompt and an Interactive Lesson link is provided.
Students focus on one mode of writing across each unit. These modes include narratives, informational essays, and opinions. After each lesson, there is a writing lesson which includes a model writing. During the last two weeks of a unit, students follow the steps of the writing process through publishing. There is a limited amount of practice with the writing mode when students are working through the lessons. In the first lessons, students do not write, but rather read about writing and look at model writings. The first time students are writing independently is during the end of unit performance task. This provides limited practice of process writing.
- In Unit 2: Look and Listen, the mode of writing taught is an opinion essay. In lessons 6-9, students are reading examples of a response paragraph, an opinion piece, a multiple paragraph response, and then a prewrite for a response to literature. After the final lesson of the unit, lesson 10, the students go through the entire writing process for the opinion essay unit performance task.
Indicator 1l
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations for providing opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Students focus on one type of writing per unit. Students study model writings, write, revise, and edit a writing in the last two weeks of the unit, and then complete a writing performance task.
Process writing text types found within each unit:
- Unit 1, Personal Narrative
- Unit 2, Opinion (Response to Literature)
- Unit 3, Explanatory Essay
- Unit 4, Persuasive Essay
- Unit 5, Fictional Narrative
- Unit 6, Research Report
On demand prompts and quick writes include opportunities for students to address different types of writing. A Writing Traits Scoring Rubric for each mode of writing guides is available for teachers. Writing Resources are provided such as the Common Core Writing Handbook, graphic organizers, proofreading marks, a proofreading checklist, reproducible writing rubrics, and writing conference forms. Interactive Lessons provide digital practice. There are also Interactive Whiteboard Lessons that could supplement print instruction in opinion, informative, and narrative writing modes.
Indicator 1m
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations of materials providing frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information. Most tasks are independent of the main selection texts, and they do not build over the course of the year. Performance Task writings can often be answered without the use of the texts or cannot be answered with the information provided by the texts. There are some opportunities that engage students in practicing argument/opinion, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing; however, the writing tasks do not increase in rigor over the course of the year.
Examples of writing that does not require students to use evidence from the text include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 2, “Prompt: Write a dialogue in which two characters make a plan for an empty lot in their community” (Projectable 2.7).
- In Unit 6, Lesson 28, “Prompt: Write a paragraph explaining how to do an activity you enjoy” (Projectable 28.6).
Additional instructional supports are needed for teachers to guide students’ understanding of developing ideas, building components of structured writing, and integrating evidence from texts and other sources. Students are asked to use text evidence, but there is little guidance to the teacher on how to teach students to use text evidence. Most questions are preceded by or followed by the prompt “Cite Text Evidence,” however, students are not instructed on how to find or cite evidence from the text. Students are provided with a writing tip that is sometimes related to the text evidence and other times, the tip is related to grammar or other writing aspects.
Indicator 1n
Materials include explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 do not meet expectations for explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of the context. Lessons and assessment items aligned to Grade 3 grammar and conventions standards often address below grade-level standards. Lesson and assessment items also address above grade-level standards. From the beginning of the year, students encounter both below-level and above-level lessons and assessment items.
Some lessons address below grade-level grammar and conventions standards. Examples include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 1, day 4, students correct the end punctuation of several sentences. Standards-Based Weekly Test lesson 1, questions 8-10 require students to use end punctuation for sentences (L.1.2b).
- In Unit 1, Lesson 4, day 3, students are taught that proper nouns should begin with capital letters. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 4, questions 7 and 8 require students to capitalize names of people (L.1.2a).
- In Unit 2, Lesson 8, day 1, students work with commas in a series of nouns, and in Unit 2 lesson 8 day 2, students work with commas in a series of verbs. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 8 question 7 is aligned to L.3.2b (Use commas in addresses), but the item requires students to correctly use commas to separate single words in a series (L.1.2c).
- Articles are included in Unit 2, lesson 16, day 3. The Teacher Edition includes the following direction: “(e)xplain that a, an, and the are a kind of adjective called articles.” Although students are introduced to articles in Grade 1, this topic is treated as if it is a new topic. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 16 question 9 requires students to correctly use articles (L.1.1h).
Some lessons address above grade-level grammar and conventions standards. Examples include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, lesson 1, day 5, students identify whether “sentences” are fragments. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 1, questions 7 and 8 require students to recognize fragments (L.4.1f).
- In Unit 6, lesson 30, days 1 and 3, students are working with the pronouns “I” and “me.” Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 30, question 7 requires students to ensure that pronouns are in the proper case (L.6.1a).
Some assessments and lessons address grade-level grammar and conventions standards. Examples include but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, Lesson 3, students create compound sentences. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 3, questions 7-9 require students to produce compound sentences (L.3.1i).
- Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 4, question 9 requires students to capitalize appropriate words in titles (L.3.2a).
- In Unit 2, Lesson 8, day 3, students use commas in addresses. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 8 question 8 requires students to use commas in addresses (L.3.2b).
- Unit 2, Lesson 10, day 3, Grammar focuses on pronouns and antecedents. In Reader’s Notebook Volume 1 page 135, students complete each sentence by writing the pronoun that agrees with the underlined antecedent.
Although some attention is given to grade-level grammar and convention standards, materials that are below grade-level and above grade-level are included throughout the year, and as a result, the materials would require significant revision.
Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development
This criterion is non-negotiable. Materials must achieve a specified minimum score in this criterion to advance to the next gateway.
Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectation that materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills to build comprehension by providing instruction in phonics, word recognition, vocabulary, and reading fluency in a research-based and transparent progression. Materials partially meet the expectation that materials, questions, and tasks guide students to read with purpose and understanding and help them to make frequent connections between acquisition of foundational skills and making meaning from reading. Most practice opportunities to read text that uses the phonics pattern is limited to cloze sentence activities and searching for the pattern in texts. Materials provide instructional opportunities for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading.
Indicator 1o
Materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills by providing explicit instruction and assessment in phonics and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectation that materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level CCSS for foundational skills to build comprehension by providing instruction in phonics, word recognition, vocabulary, and reading fluency in a research-based and transparent progression.
Materials provide review lessons of Grade 2 and Grade 1 phonics standards in Units 1, 2, and 3. If a teacher is unable get to Units 4, 5, and 6, Grade 3 students miss out on consistent grade-level standards for phonics and word recognition standards. For example, in Unit 1, for 5 weeks, phonics lessons include studying words with the following patterns: VCCV, VCe, diphthongs, long o, and long i. These patterns correspond to the spelling of each week. In Unit 2, phonics lessons including studying words with VCV, three-letter clusters, silent letters, and vowel diphthongs. These patterns correspond to the spelling of each week. In Unit 3, the materials contain phonics lessons based on Grade 2 language standards for contractions.
Common prefixes, a Grade 3 Foundational Skills standard, are taught starting in Unit 1, Week 5, during vocabulary instruction. The first prefix taught is mis-. The next common prefixes taught are in Unit 3, Lesson 14 with in- and im-. In Unit 4, Lesson 19 during vocabulary instruction, students learn three prefixes in one week (pre-, re-, and bi-). In Unit 5, Lesson 21, students learn non- during vocabulary instruction. In Unit 5, Lesson 24, students learn re- and un- in the spelling instruction and relearn pre-, re-, and bi- during phonics instruction. In Unit 6, Lesson 29, students learn un- and dis- during vocabulary instruction. A sequence of instruction for teaching prefixes is not consistent and coherent.
Latin suffixes, a Grade 3 standard, are taught starting in Unit 2, Week 6 in vocabulary instruction. Students learn -able and -ible. In Unit 3, Lesson 11, during vocabulary instruction, students are taught three suffixes in one week: -less, -ful, and -ous. In Unit 4, Lesson 17, during vocabulary instruction, students are taught -ly. In Unit 5, Lesson 23, students learn -er and -est and during phonics instruction, students are taught -ful, -y, -ous, -ly, and -er. The spelling during that lesson is focused on -ful, -ly, and -er. In Unit 5, Lesson 25, students are taught -less, -ness, and -able, and the spelling focuses on -less and -ness. In Unit 6, Lesson 26, students are taught -ion during vocabulary instruction, and, during phonics instruction, students are taught -tion, -sion, and -ture as part of syllable instruction. A sequence of instruction for teaching suffixes is not consistent and coherent.
Instruction for decoding multisyllable words begins in Unit 1, Lesson 1 and continues through Unit 3 with below grade level phonics. Other phonics lessons include teaching how to decode syllables such as in Unit 1, Lesson 5, Day 1: “I’ll look at the first syllable. I think the igh will have a long i sound: /f/ /i/ /t/, fight. I’ll look at the second syllable. I decode the syllable: /ar/, er. I put the two syllables together: fighter” (p. T390). Students then practice blending the sounds rather than putting two syllables together. During Daily Phonics, there are some opportunities for students to identify syllables such as in Unit 1, Lesson 2: “Say the following words and have students clap the number of syllables: envelope, valentine, homework, dynamite, and snowflake” (p. T137). Unit 4 emphasizes syllables in the phonics lessons about VCCCV word patterns. In Unit 5, the materials include suffix syllable learning opportunities such as learning how the suffix -ly adds another syllable. In Unit 6, there is an emphasis on common final syllables (-tion, -sion, and -ture) and two syllable decoding (Lesson 28 and Lesson 29).
The materials contain opportunities for students to practice reading aloud grade-level text fluently with accuracy, stress, appropriate pace/rate, expression/intonation, attention to punctuation and appropriate phrasing. Fluency is emphasized daily.
Indicator 1p
Materials, lessons, and questions provide instruction in and practice of word analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectation that materials, questions, and tasks guide students to read with purpose and understanding and help them to make frequent connections between acquisition of foundational skills and making meaning from reading.
The instructional materials contain directions to the teacher to set the purpose for the reading of each anchor text. For example, in Unit 4, Lesson 19, the teacher sets the purpose: “Tell the students that good readers use what they learn from previewing the selection, what they already know about the genre, and what they want to learn from reading the selection to set a purpose for reading” (p. T305). Then students are to set their own purpose for reading the text. There is a missed opportunity for students to set their own purpose for reading the anchor text without hearing the teacher model setting the purpose.
During vocabulary instruction of each lesson, there is a lesson called Vocabulary in Context, which provides students the opportunity to learn eight vocabulary words in context prior to reading the anchor text.
- On Day 1, anchor text vocabulary is introduced with the use of Context Cards.The cards contain images of the word and a sentence with the word in it. The teacher provides the definition of each vocabulary word. Students are asked to use the Talk It Over activities on those cards.
- During the reading of the anchor text, there may be text-dependent questions referring to the vocabulary that was learned in the Vocabulary in Context lesson. For example, in Unit 1, Lesson 4, students are asked about one vocabulary word in the context of the anchor text: “Why would the opening of the bridge cause such excitement?” (p. T308).
- Day 2 contains Daily Vocabulary Boost, which has students review the anchor text vocabulary words with the Context Cards and students participate in the Talk It Over activity.
- On Day 3, the teacher reviews the anchor text vocabulary (and some newly added vocabulary words) and then students connect the vocabulary words and their use. Also,during the Daily Vocabulary Boost students are to answer some questions to help them connect vocabulary words from the anchor text.
- On Day 4, students practice anchor text vocabulary by discussing the vocabulary words based on questions. Also on Day 4, students learn a vocabulary strategy to help students understand some of the weekly vocabulary terms. For example, in Unit 1, Lesson 4, students are taught about Word Families and adding prefixes or suffixes to the anchor text vocabulary. The student practice is for students to create a list of words with affixes and endings from the anchor text and then apply the vocabulary strategy to figure out the meaning of the words.
- On Day 5, the Opening Routines, students practice a vocabulary strategy. During Daily Vocabulary Boost, students practice reviewing the anchor text vocabulary meanings. Also on Day 5, students are taught domain-specific vocabulary.
While students practice word analysis skills with the anchor text vocabulary and the Day 4 Vocabulary Strategy lesson, opportunities to practice other word analysis skills in text are limited to specific tasks that do not connect with the anchor text or paired text. For example, in Unit 2, Lesson 8, students are taught the phonics pattern kn- and wr-. During Day 1, students practice reading words with the spelling patterns and write a dictated sentence. In Apply, students pick two words to write into a sentence and then students practice writing kn- and wr- words in a cloze activity. On Day 2, the phonics patterns are practiced in the Opening Routines. In Day 3, students practice the patterns with a cloze activity. On Day 4, students use their independent reading text to find words that begin with the pattern. Most practice opportunities to read text that uses the phonics pattern is limited to cloze sentence activities and searching for the pattern in texts.
Indicator 1q
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading, that is, to read on-level prose and poetry with accuracy, rate appropriate to the text, and expression.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectation that instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in oral and silent reading, that is, to read on-level prose and poetry with accuracy, at a rate appropriate to the text, and with expression.
Students are able to demonstrate and develop fluency with short sections or paragraphs every day. Opportunities to practice reading aloud longer sections of text and to gain fluency stamina are limited.
Each lesson has an overall fluency component and then students practice the fluency component over the week. Fluency components are expression, intonation, adjust rate for purpose, phrasing for punctuation, stress, accuracy and self correction, rate, phrasing for pauses.
The fluency activities included in the text are identified and routine. The routines are the same through each lesson of the units. Fluency practice includes:
- Teacher models the fluency component for the week with a projectable document after explaining the value of the fluency component. Students practice the fluency component by choral reading the text as a whole class.
- During the Opening Routines of Day 2, students can read aloud from the anchor text with a partner and students focus on the fluency component of the week.
- On Day 3, the teacher models the fluency component and students practice the fluency component with a partner using a section of the anchor text.
- On Day 4 of the Opening Routines, students read aloud with a partner
- Progress monitoring with fluency tests from Grab n Go resource and if students are below grade level, the teacher is directed to provide additional fluency practice from the Student Book, the Cold Reads, and the Leveled Readers.
- Students practice fluency by reading the Leveled Readers on Day 3.
The materials contain opportunities for students to practice reading poetry fluently. In Unit 1, Lesson 5, students practice fluency by reading a Jack Prelutsky poem about baseball. In Unit 6, Lesson 29, students practice the fluency component (expression) with a poem called “Spellbound” by Sara Holbrook.
There are lessons about teaching students to use context clues to figure out unknown words. During independent reading time, students are taught self-correction strategies. In Unit 5, Lesson 24, the directions the teacher are: “Have students keep a list of unfamiliar words they find in their independent reading selections. Tell them to sound each word and to use context clues to help them recognize the word or figure out its meaning” (p. T325).
The Test of Silent Contextual Reading Fluency (TOSCRF-2) is in the materials. This test assesses the silent reading ability of students. It is a group-administered test which measures the ability to use syntactic and morphological cues to facilitate comprehension of sentences and passages. The TOSCRF-2 can be used for identification, universal screening, diagnostic assessments, and progress monitoring.