2017
Journeys

6th Grade - Gateway 1

Back to 6th Grade Overview
Cover for Journeys
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Text Quality

Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to Standards Components
Score
Gateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations
58%
Criterion 1.1: Text Complexity and Quality
14 / 20
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
7 / 16

The Grade 6 materials partially meet the expectations for text quality and complexity and alignment to the standards. While some texts included in materials are of quality, informational texts are often short and lack engaging, content-area vocabulary. Although anchor texts and paired selection typically fall within the grade band, the scaffolding of the texts and the tasks required of students do not ensure students are supported to access and comprehend grade-level texts independently at the end of the year. there are text dependent questions to accompany each anchor and supporting text, students are seldom asked to draw their own conclusions or inferences. Culminating tasks are present, but often are not supported by the unit texts. Writing support meets the requirements of the standards, with students practicing multiple modes and genres over the course of the school year. Writing process materials are present throughout the school year. Grammar and conventions lessons and practice are often not aligned to grade level standards.

Criterion 1.1: Text Complexity and Quality

14 / 20

Texts are worthy of students' time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students' advancing toward independent reading.

Instructional materials reviewed partially meet the expectations for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading. Many of the literary texts are published texts which provide opportunities for students to engage in especially careful reading, are on topics of interest to Grade 6 students, and include rich, captivating language. Many informational texts are very short and lack engaging, content-area vocabulary. Texts do meet the expectations for reflecting the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Each lesson has a paired set of texts which often include both a literary text and a paired informational text. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task but do not meet the expectation of supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. Some anchor texts and paired selection typically fall within the grade band, the scaffolding of the texts and the tasks required of students do not ensure students are supported to access and comprehend grade-level texts independently at the end of the year. While the anchor texts and paired selections typically fall within the grade band, the scaffolding of each text for reader and task is similar and comparable for each text regardless of complexity and demands of each text. This may not ensure students are supported to access and comprehend complex grade-level texts independently at the end of the year. Anchor texts and the series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a and rationale and text complexity analysis for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

Indicator 1a

2 / 4

Anchor texts are of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations of indicator 1a. Although many texts are excerpts, a good number of the literary texts are published texts which provide opportunities for students to engage in especially careful reading. Some texts are on topics of interest to Grade 6 students, and include rich, captivating language. Most of the informational texts were written for the series and are not works published outside the program. Many of them are brief, and lacking in content-area vocabulary and well-crafted language.

The anchor texts for Grade 6 include texts created by award-winning authors and illustrators, including Andrew Clements, Robert Byrd, Lynne Rae Perkins, and Lois Lowry, and cover topics of interest to Grade 6 students in a variety of genres, including poetry, realistic fiction, biography, and historical fiction. Some examples of quality texts include but are not limited to:

  • Unit 1, Lesson 1, The School Story by Andrew Clements - This excerpt is relatable for students since the setting is a school. The excerpt contains a lot of engaging and conversational dialogue.
  • Unit 2, Lesson 6, The Boy Who Saved Baseball by John H. Ritter - This excerpt is relatable to readers, because it is about playing a sport and being good friends. The text has vibrant verbs such as “growled,” “lingered,” and “descended."
  • Unit 3, Lesson 11, The Great Fire by Jim Murphy - This informational excerpt contains descriptive wording such as “gusting wildly,” “fiercely intense,” and “soggy marshland.” The text is well-crafted and suspenseful.
  • Unit 4, Lesson 16,The Real Vikings: Craftsmen, Traders, and Fearsome Raiders by Melvin Berger and Gilda Berger - This excerpt is an engaging topic for Grade 6 students. The text contains illustrations and photographs to show Viking examples to students. The text contains Tier 3 vocabulary such as “Hedeby,” “wattle-and-daub huts,” and “merils.”
  • Unit 5, Lesson 23, Number the Stars by Lois Lowry - This excerpt is engaging because readers meet the main character in the middle of disagreement with another character. The author uses well-crafted language such as “exasperated,” “glistened,” and “irritated snorts.”

While there are a variety of topics and a range of student interests addressed throughout the year, many of the texts created for the series lack engaging text for Grade 6 students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Unit 3, Lesson 11, Fire Friend or Enemy? by Gerardo Benavides is a short text about fire. There are large photos and text features on the first and third pages, but the piece does not contain much text for students to read about fire.
  • Unit 4, Lesson 17, Ancient China Visual Arts (no author cited) is a short informational text about different Chinese dynasties. The text does not go into enough detail to interest students. For example, the text states that burial sites and buildings are excavated, but few details are given on the excavations.
  • Unit 6, Lesson 30, “Storm Chasers” (no author cited) is a short informational text that has an engaging start, but the rest of the text lacks engaging language, description, and photos that connect with the Lesson. For example, on page 68, there is a picture of an opened car door, yet the question from the teacher has nothing to do with a car door.

Indicator 1b

4 / 4

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations for reflecting the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. There is a mix between literary and informational text. Each lesson has a paired set of texts which often include both a literary text and a paired informational text.

The anchor literary texts represent a variety of text types and genres including, but not limited to, realistic fiction, short stories, poetry, science fiction, reader’s theater, historical fiction, fantasy, plays, and myths.

  • The School Story by Andrew Clements, realistic fiction
  • “Sporty Poetry,” poetry
  • Airborn by Kenneth Oppel, fantasy
  • The Hero and the Minotaur by Robert Byrd, myth
  • Number the Stars by Lois Lowry, historical fiction

The anchor informational texts represent a variety of text types and genres including, but not limited to, technology, science, social studies and biographies. Informational texts include autobiographies, informational texts, biographies, memoirs, literary nonfiction, newspaper articles, and an opinion essay.

  • Knots in My Yo-Yo String by Jerry Spinelli, autobiography
  • “Do Knot Enter” from Math Trek: Adventures in the Math Zone by Ivars Peterson and Nancy Henderson, informational text
  • The Pole! By Matthew Henson, memoir
  • The Great Fire by Jim Murphy, literary nonfiction
  • Onward:A Photobiography by Dolores Johnson, biography
  • Robotics by Helena Domaine, informational text

Indicator 1c

4 / 4

Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectation that texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.

Most of the texts in the materials are in the low end of the band for text complexity. Examples of texts with appropriate text complexity include:

  • Unit 1, Lesson 2: Knots in My Yo-Yo String by Jerry Spinelli
    • Quantitative: 960 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The theme in the text is a single level. The genre is familiar, but has shifts in chronology. The language is familiar with some sophisticated descriptions. The text requires specialized knowledge, but has familiar speech patterns.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to assist students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students who enjoy reading about authors to share with their peers. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can also have students refer to the lesson’s Preview the Topic section. The tasks include: determining author’s purpose and analyzing figurative language and point-of-view.
  • Unit 2, Lesson 10: Children of the Midnight Sun: Young Native Voices of Alaska by Tricia Brown
    • Quantitative: 1030 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The text contains multiple levels of meaning. The text has an unconventional structure for comparing and contrasting two cultures. The text uses unfamiliar language and contains experiences which may be unfamiliar to the reader.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students who enjoy reading about Native American traditions to share with their peers. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can also have students refer to the lesson’s Preview a Topic section. The tasks for students include: compare and contrasting two portraits of Native American children in Alaska, looking for author’s claims and evidence to support the claims, and figuring out author’s purpose.
  • Unit 5, Lesson 22: First to Fly by Peter Busby
    • Quantitative: 980 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The purpose is implied but easy to identify from context. The text uses a chronological sequence and includes somewhat complex science concepts. The text is written from the third-person point of view. The texts uses an increasing number of unfamiliar and domain-specific words as well as more complex sentence structures. The text requires specialized knowledge and includes few cultural references.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students who enjoy air travel to share with their peers. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can also have students to refer to the lesson’s Preview the Topic section. The tasks include: reading for text evidence and analyzing text structure, personification, and text cohesion.

Several of the anchor texts have text complexity features that do not fully support Grade 6 students according to the demands of the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:

  • In Unit 1, Lesson 1 is The School Story by Andrew Clements. This text is below the complexity level for Grade 6 students with a low Lexile and only slightly complex text features. The Reader and Task Suggestions do not increase the complexity.
    • Quantitative: 750 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The text has a single theme with a sequential plot. It contains a third-person point-of-view, which provides students with a clear view of all the story characters. The text has familiar settings, characters, and language. The text has familiar speech patterns and cultural references.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students who enjoy realistic fiction stories to share. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can also have students refer to the lesson’s Preview the Topic section. The tasks include analysis of the characters, dialogue, and similes.
  • In Unit 2, Lesson 8 is Science Fiction by David Lubar. This text is below the complexity level for Grade 6 students with a low Lexile and slightly complex text features. The Reader and Task Suggestions do not increase the complexity.
    • Quantitative: 510 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The text has a single theme with a familiar narrative structure. The text contains first-person narration. The language is familiar and descriptive. Readers will be familiar with story experiences, but the theme is moderately complex.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students access the text. The teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students to read to learn how the science and critical thinking are illustrated in the story. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can also have students make connections between the events in “Science Fiction” and what they might learn in a science lesson about mold growth. The tasks include: making generalizations about the character, Amanda, analyzing connotation and denotation, and figuring out character motivations.
  • In Unit 3, Lesson 14 is Any Small Goodness by Tony Johnston. This text is below the complexity level for Grade 6 students with a low Lexile and only slightly complex text features. The Reader and Task Suggestions do not increase the complexity.
    • Quantitative: 580 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The text has a single level of meaning and is mainly chronological with occasional flashbacks. The text contains a first-person point-of-view and uses figurative, symbolic language. The text includes situations familiar to most students, but some cultural knowledge would be useful.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to have students think about what they know about community helpers. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can remind students of the Preview the Topic section and share experiences they have had with community helpers. The tasks include: figuring out theme or central idea, using text clues to figure out hyperboles, and analyzing author’s word choice.
  • In Unit 6, Lesson 27 is Denali Dog Sled Journal by Terry Miller Shannon. This text is below the complexity level for Grade 6 students with a low Lexile and only slightly complex text features. The Reader and Task Suggestions do not increase the complexity.
    • Quantitative: 800 Lexile
    • Qualitative: The text has a single theme with events presented in chronological order, but references both future and past events. Photographs and a map bring the setting of the journal to life. The text is composed of both simple and complex sentences. The text uses a direct presentation in the first person. The setting of the journal may be unfamiliar, but descriptions and images supplement understanding.
    • Reader and Task: Suggestions are provided in order to help students in accessing the text. The teacher is directed to have students who enjoy reading realistic fiction share. The teacher can use a Language Support Card to provide additional scaffolding for English language learners and students who need additional instruction. The teacher can remind students the topic of the week is extreme climates and then students share with a partner what they know about extreme climates. The tasks include: making conclusions and generalizations and summarizing.

Indicator 1d

0 / 4

Materials support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectation of supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. Although anchor texts and paired selection typically fall within the grade band, the scaffolding of the texts and the tasks required of students do not ensure students are supported to access and comprehend grade-level texts independently at the end of the year. There is minimal guidance for the teacher to support students as they prepare to transition into more rigorous texts at the end of the school year.

Examples of the complexity levels falling outside the grade band and thus not supporting access for students to access grade-level texts independently at the end of the year include, but are not limited to:

  • Unit 2 contains ten texts (five anchor and five paired selections). Half of the texts are below the text complexity requirements of the standards. For example, in Lesson 8, students read Science Fiction, which has a Lexile of 510 and moderately complex qualitative features. The paired selection has a Lexile of 740 and mainly moderately complex qualitative features. With this low text complexity unit, students will not have opportunities to grow their literacy skills to prepare for Grade 7.
  • In Unit 1, Lesson 2, there are two texts for the lesson, Knots in My Yo-Yo String (960 Lexile) and “Sporty Poetry” (NP). The qualitative rubric for Knots In My Yo-Yo String states shifts in chronology are used in the text; however, there are not any questions which leverage this feature. Additionally, the comparing of texts compares two poems which could provide for a rich dialogue; however, those features of the poems are not analyzed. Instead the poems are contrasted by topic (Which poem is about not giving up? and How does each poem tell about a sporting event?).
  • Additionally, in Unit 1, Lesson 1, students read The School Story, which has a Lexile of 750 and slightly to moderately complex qualitative features. On day one, students read the text and think through the text. On day two, students read and analyze the text. On day three, students independently read the text and complete two pages in the Reader’s Notebook. In Unit 3, Lesson 11, students read The Great Fire, which has a Lexile of 1020 and very complex to exceedingly complex qualitative features. This is one of the most complex texts in the materials. On day one, students read the text and think through the text. On day two, students read and analyze the text. On day three, students independently read the text and complete two pages in the Reader’s Notebook. These two texts have very different text complexities, yet the same amount of time is dedicated to reading each text. The reader and task considerations are similar. For The School Story, the teacher is directed to motivate students by asking students who enjoy reading realistic fiction to share what they hope to learn from the selection. For The Great Fire, the teacher is directed to motivate students by having them share what they hope to learn from the selection.

Indicator 1e

2 / 2

Anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectation that anchor texts and the series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The Teacher Edition contains Prepare for Complex Text which includes both the text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

  • Why this Text? is provided for each anchor text. This gives the rationale for educational purpose and placement as well as key learning objectives. For example, in Unit 1, Lesson 5, for the text The Myers Family by Leonard S. Marcus the Why this Text? states, “Students encounter biographies in literature anthologies, textbooks, and in books they choose for independent reading. This text explores the lives of acclaimed author Walter Myers and his son, Christopher Myers, a renowned illustrator. The text includes descriptive biographical information.” The key learning objectives are to distinguish between fact and opinion, identify the author’s purpose for writing, and analyze the significance of biographical events.
  • The Text Complexity Rubric explains the text complexity attributes of each whole class text, the Lexile and Guided Reading Levels of the texts, and the places within the lesson that will help the teacher determine if the text is appropriate in terms of reader and task.

An example of how this is prepared for teachers is found in Unit 4, Lesson 18 students read The Hero and the Minotaur by Robert Byrd and the Text Complexity Rubric gives the quantitative, qualitative, and reader and task measures.

  • Quantitative: 990 Lexile, W Guided Reading Measurement
  • Qualitative:
    • Meaning and Purpose/Density and Complexity: The text has multiple levels of meaning.
    • Text Structure/Organization: The text follows a familiar narrative structure with a well-developed problem and resolution.
    • Text Structure/Narration: The text is narrated in the third person and has a credible voice.
    • Language Features/Sentence Structure: The text contains longer, descriptive sentences.
    • Language Features/Vocabulary: The text contains literary language that may require use of context clues.
    • Knowledge Demands/ Subject Matter Knowledge/Prior Knowledge: Readers may not be familiar with some story concepts.
  • Reader/Task Considerations: Determine using the professional judgment of the teacher. This varies by individual reader, type of text, and the purpose and complexity of particular tasks. See Reader and Task Considerations on page T167 for Anchor Text Support.

Reader and Task Considerations on page T167 give additional support for the text The Hero and the Minotaur.

Indicator 1f

2 / 2

Anchor text(s), including support materials, provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations of support materials for the core texts to provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading proficiency.

Students explore a range of topics including, but not limited to: sports, books, animals, Ancient China, Ancient Egypt, volcanoes, science, history, nature, World War II, Civil Rights, and robots.

In each lesson, students interact with text during a teacher read-aloud, anchor text first read, anchor text reread with small group or partner, anchor text independent read with Reader’s Guide, a self-selected text reading, a whole group paired-text read, and an optional second read of paired-text. Leveled readers and vocabulary readers are also provided for small group, differentiated instruction.

Leveled reader lessons are provided for small group instruction. Formative assessment suggestions are given in each lesson for the Vocabulary Reader. Each level of student understanding is provided with strategic scaffolding to support students in acquiring general academic and domain specific vocabulary. Teacher support is also given for each Vocabulary Reader, for example in Unit 1, Lesson 21 (page T212), struggling students are directed to read the Vocabulary Reader Lights, Camera, Action!

At the beginning of each unit in the Teacher Edition, Independent Literacy Center directions provide guidance for the types of activities to use such as independent reading. For example, in Unit 4, Lesson 19, managing independent activities directions can be found on pages T230-T231 in the Teacher Edition. Students are encouraged to use a reading log from the Grab-and-Go! Additional Resources to track progress and thoughts about the book to participate in book talks, book reviews, book sharing, partner reading, and discussion circles.

Extended Reading Trade Books are also listed in the materials in Units 2, 4, and 6. These texts include a weekly planner and lessons for extended reading throughout the unit. Grade 6 extended reading texts include: Freedom Walkers by Russell Freedman, A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle, Esperanza Rising by Pam Munoz Ryan, Brian’s Winter by Gary Paulsen, and Tracking Trash by Loree Griffin Burns.

There is also a Reading Adventure Magazine that provides additional texts across a range of topics.

Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

7 / 16

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The materials for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations that students will have opportunities for rich, rigorous discussions and writing tasks that are evidence based. Though there are text dependent questions to accompany each anchor and supporting text, students are seldom asked to draw their own conclusions or inferences. Inferences are often given with students having to find evidence to support the already stated inference. The text dependent questions provided are not adequate to support students' mastering of this skill. Some performance tasks can be completed by students without the use of the units texts, while other tasks cannot be completed with the information provided in the assigned texts. There are not high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and activities that build to the performance task. Opportunities for discussion are provided but are often not evidence-based and do not encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. Materials partially meet expectations for supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching and meet the expectation of materials including a mix of on-demand and process writing and short, focused projects incorporating digital resources where necessary. Materials address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. There are some opportunities that engage students in practicing argument/opinion, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing, however, the writing tasks do not increase in rigor over the course of the year. Lessons and assessment items aligned to grammar and conventions standards often address below grade-level standards. Lesson and assessment items also address above grade-level standards.

Indicator 1g

1 / 2

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for text dependent questions, tasks, and assignments requiring students to engage directly with the text and to draw on textual evidence to support what is explicit as well as valid inferences. Though there are text dependent questions to accompany each anchor and supporting text, students are seldom asked to draw their own conclusions or inferences. Inferences are often given with students having to find evidence to support the already stated inference. The text dependent questions provided are not adequate to support students mastering of this skill.

Students are asked text-dependent questions throughout the daily lessons. These questions are included in the Teacher Read Aloud, Read the Anchor Text, Guided Retelling, Dig Deeper second read of the anchor text, Your Turn discussion, Independent Reading Reader’s Guide, Connect to the Topic, Compare Texts, and Small Group Instruction. Answering text-dependent questions is modeled throughout instruction.

Examples of text-dependent questions found throughout the units:

  • In Unit 1, Lesson 4, students are asked, “How do you think Martin feels about Mrs. DeSalvio? What evidence from the text supports your answer? Martin is a bit afraid of Mrs. DeSalvio. I can tell because he edges away from her on the bench.”
  • In Unit 2, Lesson 10, students are asked, “How does the information in these two paragraphs contribute to the ideas in the text? It shows the Haidas’ continuing connections to nature and their traditional way of life.”
  • In Unit 5, Lesson 25, students are asked, “How has Dr. Sneed’s attitude about sharing his top-secret project changed throughout the play? Support your answer with evidence. At first, he says it’s impossible to tell Dr. aWatkins and Dr. Garcia about his project, and then he is embarrassed when Same shoes up. But at the end, he shows he doesn’t care what they think when he shrugs and smiles.”

Examples of text-dependent questions found that illustrate how inferences are often given with students having to find evidence to support the already stated inference include, but are not limited to the following examples:

  • In Unit 3, Lesson 12, students are asked, “Why is Matt 'best suited' for the job of attempting the rescue? What text evidences supports this? Matt says that he knows the captain chose him for the job because he weighs less than any other crewman, and weight will be a factor in the rescue. He is also the only crew member who isn't afraid of hanging out the bottom of an airship. He also feels that the captain trusts him to do a good job.”
  • In Unit 4, Lesson 18, students are asked, “Why is the paragraph that tells about Talus guarding the entrance important to the story? If Theseus has to get past Talus in order to enter the island, he is going to have to get past Talus if he wants to escape the island.”
  • In Unit 6, students are asked, “What text clues show what “keen observational skills” are? Justin says he needs Tia to be his eyes. Tia is saying she is good at studying things to figure them out. Students are also asked How does this phrase help you understand the story? It shows why Justin wants Tia to come to the farm: not just to help her with her science project, but because he thinks she can figure out what’s going on.”

Examples of text-dependent tasks and assignments found throughout the units:

  • In Unit 1, Lesson 3, students are asked to use a graphic organizer to keep track of the sequence of events of the text “The Making of a Book.”
  • In Unit 3, Lesson 11, students write a paragraph to describe how the author introduces Sullivan after reading “The Great Fire” using evidence from the text.
  • In Unit 6, Lesson 26, students design a poster after reading “Space Trash” to advertise about a conference being held to discuss the issue of space trash.

There are also “Text to Self” and “Text to World” questions that are not always text-dependent but relate to the theme or topic of the text being read such as in Unit 1, Lesson 5 when students are asked to draw a picture and write a story about a food they do not like after reading “The Myers Family.” Students also research careers that use artistic talents.

Indicator 1h

0 / 2

Sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectation for materials containing sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and activities that build to a culminating task. The culminating task for each unit comes in the form of a performance task that is introduced at the beginning of the unit. All performance tasks are grounded in writing tasks. There is a presentation piece at the end of each task in which students may choose a way to share their essay with their classmates. Not all unit texts are required to complete each performance task. The task directions indicate which texts students should use. Some tasks can be completed by students without the use of the unit texts, while other tasks cannot be completed using only information provided in the assigned texts.

An example of a performance task that can be completed without the use of the unit’s texts can be found in Unit 1: Cultural Connections. The performance task is introduced at the beginning of the unit as, “At the end of this unit, you will think about the texts that you have read. Then you will write a narrative that uses information and ideas from at least two of the texts in the unit.”

  • Unit 1’s performance task topic is, “In ‘The Making of a Book’ you read about the many tasks involved in the publishing process, from writing through manufacturing. The selection “History of the Book” discusses ways that people have recorded written words from ancient times to present. It includes a timeline showing when specific forms of publishing were introduced. Instructions include, "Reread these two texts and look for important details about how books are created and published. Think about the great influence that writing and books have had on the world’s cultures. Now, write a narrative about someone involved in the book industry, such as an author, artist, printer or bookseller. Your setting can be in the past, present, or future. Use ideas from 'The Making of a Book' and 'History of the Book' in your narrative.” Both texts attached to this performance task are in Lesson 3.
    • “The Making of a Book” is an informational anchor text that describes the jobs found in bookmaking.
    • The selection “History of the Book” is an informational supporting text. This short informational piece gives a brief history of how books have evolved through history.

There are no text-dependent questions or tasks that would build to students' understanding about choosing a character and writing a narrative. Little knowledge is gained from the texts and text-dependent questions that would build to the performance task. Students could write the narrative without the use of the texts.

An example of a performance task that doesn't require use of the unit’s texts can be found in Unit 2, Finding Your Voice. The performance task is introduced at the beginning of the unit as, “At the end of this unit, you will think about the texts that you have read. Then you will write an opinion essay that expresses and supports an opinion.”

Unit 4’s topic is: “In this unit you’ve read texts that express a variety of ideas and a variety of voices. In your opinion, which selection was best? Which was least successful? Review all the texts and choose two: the one that you think is best and the one that you think is the worst in the unit. Reread these selections and find text evidence, such as quotes and details, that supports your opinion. Then write an opinion essay that expresses your claim and persuades others to agree with your viewpoint.” Students could not complete the opinion writing using only the text that are provided. Students are asked to give persuasive reasons for their opinion using details and examples from the text. There are no questions or tasks that would help students develop criteria for best and least successful. The texts, text-dependent questions, and tasks provided do not give enough information to complete this task.

Indicator 1i

1 / 2

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidencebased discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. (May be small group and all-class.)

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for providing frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. Opportunities and protocols for discussion are provided but are often not evidence-based and do not encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. There is not a year-long approach available to developing skills over the course of they year. There is minimal teacher direction given to support teachers in conducting evidence-based discussions that model the use of academic vocabulary and syntax.

There are both evidence-based and non evidence-based discussions and modeling throughout materials. The anchor texts and supporting texts provide text-based questions and sample answers for discussion, but do not give protocols or directions for conducting the discussions.

Examples of evidence-based discussions and modeling include but are not limited to the following. Note the questions do not come with comprehensive support /protocols for the teacher to build students' skills through these discussion activities.

Unit 1, Lesson 3, Your Turn, Classroom Conversation

  • Students are directed to, “Continue your discussion of ‘The Making of a Book’ by explaining your answers to these questions: Based on the selection, why do you think people save and collect old books? It takes people, machines, and time to make books. How has the computer affected the book-publishing process? In what ways must people collaborate or work together, to make a book?”

Unit 2, Lesson 10, Compare Texts, Text to Text

  • Teachers are directed to, “Have students write a list of details for each text that shows how the author tells about Native American traditions and culture. Ask students to note similarities and differences between the texts based on their lists of evidence.”

Unit 4, Lesson 10, Think Aloud

  • The teacher models discussion by stating, “ I want to know more about how a myth is different from other stories. From the illustrations, I know that myths have characters and settings that are not realistic. I’ll read this myth to look for ways the characters differ from realistic fiction.”

Unit 6, Lesson 26, Speaking and Listening

  • Teachers are directed to, “ Have each student read aloud his or her folktale to the group. Then have the group hold a discussion in which students make connections between ‘How the Milky Way Came to Be’ and the different folktales they shared. Tell them to compare and contrast the folktales and the cultures from with they came. Display and discuss the Tips for Listening.”

Examples of discussions and modeling that are not evidence-based and do not encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax include but are not limited to:

Unit 1, Lesson 1, Talk About It

  • Students are directed to discuss, “What do you know about publishing a book? What would you like to know about this form of expression? Share your ideas with your classmates. Listen carefully to what others say and support their ideas with your own. What did you learn from others?”

Unit 3, Lesson 14, Think-Pair-Share

  • Students are directed to, “Think about a time when you helped someone. Where were you? Whom did you help? How did you help? Share your story with a partner. Then, discuss how your stories are alike and different.”

Unit 5, Lesson 24, Compare Text, Text to Self

  • Teacher are directed to, “Ask students the following questions to help them brainstorm ideas: What are some times when you received help? Who helped you? How did receiving help make you feel better? Take notes on the board during the discussion and then have students choose one memory to write about. Suggest that they use a Word Web to gather specific details about their memory to use in their paragraph.”

Unit 6, Lesson 28, Speaking and Listening

  • Students participate in a debate about a problem in nature. Students choose a problem, brainstorm solutions, divide into two teams, and debate. The information from the debate comes solely from students' prior knowledge.

Interactive Listening and Speaking Lessons are also provided. These lessons are not consistently connected to texts. Sentence starters are provided for English Language Learners.

Indicator 1j

1 / 2

Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet expectations for supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

Protocols and routines for speaking and listening are presented in the Interactive Lessons. These lessons include rules for a good discussion, speaking constructively, listening and responding, giving a presentation, and using media in a presentation. These protocols are not located in the Student Edition.

Students practice listening comprehension during the weekly read aloud. Students are asked follow-up questions during the read aloud. Students read and respond to questions during the reading of the anchor texts and supporting text in whole class discussion and partner talk.

Each lesson includes teacher think alouds and a Speaking and Listening lesson on day five. The Speaking and Listening lessons do not always connect to the text or texts being read, do not always support what students are reading and researching, and do not always include relevant follow-up questions. There is limited instruction to support students in mastering these presentation skills. For example:

  • In Unit 3, Lesson 14, Day 5, students are asked to participate in a debate. Students are directed to select a two-sided issue to debate based on the text or its overall themes, such as whether Coach Tree is only coaching for the money. Students are divided into two groups and assigned a side in the debate.
  • In Unit 5, Lesson 18, Day 5, students are told that they will create, write, and tell their own pourquoi tales, describing how and why an everyday object came to be. Students will choose a common object that can be displayed during tehir presentation. Students are told they can use diverse formats. The Teacher Edition states, " Lead studetns in a discussion about how to present their tale in diverse formats: a written story accompanied by visuals, a concrete objec, and and audio recording of the tale. Allow time for studetns to prepare written copies of their pourqui tale for each audience member, visuals, and an audio recording of the story."

Indicator 1k

1 / 2

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectation of materials including a mix of on-demand and process writing and short, focused projects incorporating digital resources where necessary.

Students write on demand after each anchor text during the Write to Reading. These prompts are short text-based writing prompts with little direction for the students and/or teacher. While the implementation of these writing prompts are systematic, guidance for the teacher to support students as they build skills is limited. There is little explicit instruction for the students and teachers to ensure the interrelated nature of writing assignments with reading.

  • In Unit 3, Lesson 11, students are asked to respond to the prompt: “Author Jim Murphy introduces Daniel Sullivan with an anecdote. An anecdote is a short account of some event. Write a paragraph to describe how the author introduces Sullivan. What do you learn about Sullivan from this anecdote? Include text evidence that supports your response.” There is an additional support box on one page of the Teacher Edition for teachers to use during instruction to help students answer the prompt and an Interactive Lesson link is provided.

Students focus on one mode of writing across each unit. These modes include narratives, informational essays, and arguments. After each lesson, there is a writing lesson which includes a model writing. During the last two weeks of a unit, students follow the steps of the writing process through publishing. There is a limited amount of practice with the writing mode when students are working through the lessons. Within the first lessons, students do not produce written work, but rather read about writing and look at model writings. The first time students are writing independently is during the end of unit performance task. This provides limited practice of process writing.

  • For example, in Unit 5: Taking Risks, the mode of writing taught is an argument writing. Students read examples of writing an opinion essay, problem-solution essay, and a persuasive letter. After the last lesson of the unit, they then prewrite, draft, revise, edit, and publish an argument essay. The performance task for the unit is to write an argument essay.

Indicator 1l

2 / 2

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations for providing opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Students focus on one type of writing per unit. Students study model writings, write, revise, and edit a writing in the last two weeks of the unit, and then complete a writing performance task.

Process writing text types found within each unit:

  • Unit 1, Fictional narrative
  • Unit 2, Argumentative Essay
  • Unit 3, Informational Essay
  • Unit 4, Research Report
  • Unit 5, Argumentative Essay
  • Unit 6, Personal Narrative

On demand prompts and quick writes include opportunities for students to address different types of writing. A Writing Traits Scoring Rubric for each mode of writing guides is available for teachers. Writing Resources are provided such as the Common Core Writing Handbook, graphic organizers, proofreading marks, a proofreading checklist, reproducible writing rubrics, and writing conference forms. Interactive Lessons provide digital practice. There are also Interactive Whiteboard Lessons that could supplement print instruction in opinion, informative, and narrative writing modes.

Indicator 1m

1 / 2

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations of materials providing frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information. Most tasks are independent of the main selection texts, and they do not build over the course of the year. Performance Task writings can often be answered without the use of the texts or can not be answered with the information provided by the texts. There are some experiences that engage students in practicing argument/opinion, informative/explanatory, and narrative writing; however, the writing tasks do not increase in rigor over the course of the year.

Examples of writing that does not require students to use evidence from the text include but are not limited to:

  • In Unit 5, Lesson 22, “First to Fly”, students craft an argumentative essay, which is directly aligned to the grade level standard. However, students respond to the prompt “Traffic congestion is a huge problem in today’s cities. Propose an invention that would take the place of cars. Support your solution with reasons and evidence.”
  • In Unit 5, Lesson 23, “Number the Stars”, students write a letter persuading a director to film “Number the Stars.”

Additional instructional supports are needed for teachers to guide students’ understanding of developing ideas, building components of structured writing, and integrating evidence from texts and other sources. Students are asked to use text evidence, but there is little guidance to the teacher on how to teach students to use text evidence. Most questions are preceded by or followed by the prompt “Cite Text Evidence,” however, students are not instructed on how to find or cite evidence from the text. Students are provided with a writing tip that is sometimes related to the text evidence, and other times related to grammar or other writing aspects.

Indicator 1n

0 / 2

Materials include explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet expectations for explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of the context. Lessons and assessment items aligned to Grade 6 grammar and conventions standards often address below grade-level standards. From the beginning of the year, students encounter below-level language lessons and assessment items.

Some lessons address below grade-level grammar and conventions standards. Examples include but are not limited to:

  • In Unit 1, Lesson 1, on day one, students identify the subjects and predicates of sentences, on day 2 students review complete subjects and complete predicates, on day 3 students review fragments and run-on sentences, on days 4 and 5 students continue to identify and correct fragments and run-on sentences. Standards-Based Weekly Test, Lesson 1, questions 8 and 9, require students to identify run-on sentences and sentence fragments. (L.2.1f)
  • In Unit 2, Lesson 8, students are provided the definition of coordinating conjunctions and compound sentences. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 8, question 9, requires students to choose sentences that best corrects the compound sentence by replacing the word or with the word but. (L.3.1h)
  • In Unit 3, Lesson 11, students learn the definition of pronoun, subject pronoun, object pronoun, antecedent, and vague pronoun. Students name the correct subject and object pronouns to complete a sentence. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 11, questions 8 and 9, require students to find the sentence with a subject or object pronoun grammar usage error. (L.3.1f)
  • In Unit 5, Lesson 21, students define progressive verb tenses. Students change verbs to past progressive, past perfect progressive, present progressive, and future progressive verb tense. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 21, questions 8 and 9, require students to find the sentence with a verb tense error. (L.4.1b)
  • In Unit 6, Lesson 27, students address writing with direct and indirect quotations. Standards-Based Weekly Test, Lesson 27, questions 8 and 9, require students to identify which sentence is written correctly using quotations in dialogue. (L.3.2c)

Some assessments and lessons address grade-level grammar and conventions standards. Examples include but are not limited to:

  • In Unit 4, Lesson 19, students review commas, parentheses, and dashes. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 11, questions 8 and 9, require students to find errors in punctuation that include parentheses. (L.6.2a)
  • In Unit 5, Lesson 22, students review personification. Standards-Based Weekly Test Lesson 22, question 2 requires students to match underline phrases with their meaning. Each of the phrases is a personification. (L.6.5a)

Although some attention is given to grade-level grammar and convention standards, materials that are below grade-level and above grade-level are included throughout the year, and as a result, the materials would require significant revision.