3rd Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 3rd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Focus & Coherence
Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations | 100% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Focus | 2 / 2 |
Criterion 1.2: Coherence | 4 / 4 |
Criterion 1.3: Coherence | 8 / 8 |
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for Gateway 1, focus and coherence. The instructional materials meet the expectations for focusing on the major work of the grade, and they also meet expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards.
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for not assessing topics before the grade level in which the topic should be introduced. The materials assess grade-level content and, if applicable, content from earlier grades.
Indicator 1a
The instructional materials for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for assessing grade-level content. An Assessment Guide, included in the materials, contains two parallel versions of each Module assessment, and the assessments include a variety of question types. In addition, there is a Performance Task for each Unit, and there are Beginning, Middle, and End-of-Year Interim Growth assessments.
Examples of assessment items aligned to grade-level standards include:
- Module 4, Form A, Question 9, students write a multiplication expression to complete the equations ____ = 28 and ____ = 18. (3.OA.1.4)
- Unit 5, Performance Task, students draw a picture graph to represent the drinks sold at a coffee shop. “Mario collects information about the drinks sold today. Use the data to make a picture graph. Include a key” (3.MD.2.3). Students also measure a picture of a given spoon (3.MD.2.4). “Mario buys a box to hold his measuring spoons. The box holds spoons that are up to 4$$\frac{1}{2}$$ inches long. Use a ruler to decide if this spoon will fit. Explain your answer.”
- Module 9, Form A, students solve, “Roman has 293 snap blocks. He uses 69 of the snap blocks to make an airplane and 32 to make a car. About how many snap blocks does Roman have left?” (3.NBT.1.1)
- Module 16, Form B, Question 4, students identify equivalent fractions by matching pairs of differently-partitioned and shaded rectangles. (3.NF.1.3a)
- End-Of-Year Test, Question 10, students, given a perimeter and area of a rectangle, determine possible side lengths (3.MD.4.8). This standard is also assessed in Module 11, Test Form A, Question 4. Students are given a crayon box that is six inches long and five inches wide and find the width of another crayon box with the same perimeter that has a length of nine.
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote the large majority of class time in each grade K-8 to the major work of the grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for students and teachers using the materials as designed devoting the large majority of class time to the major work of the grade. The instructional materials devote at least 65 percent of instructional time to the major clusters of the grade.
Indicator 1b
Instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major cluster of each grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for spending a majority of instructional time on major work of grade.
- The number of Modules devoted to major work of the grade is 14 out of 20, which is approximately 70%.
- The number of Lessons devoted to major work of the grade (including supporting work connected to the major work) is 72 out of 100, which is approximately 72%.
- The number of days devoted to major work of the grade (including assessments and supporting work connected to the major work) is 118 out of 170 days, which is approximately 69%.
A lesson-level analysis is most representative of the instructional materials because this calculation includes all lessons with connections to major work and isn’t dependent on pacing suggestions. As a result, approximately 72% of the instructional materials focus on major work of the grade.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
Coherence: Each grade's instructional materials are coherent and consistent with the Standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards. The instructional materials have supporting content that engages students in the major work of the grade and content designated for one grade level that is viable for one school year. The instructional materials are also consistent with the progressions in the standards and foster coherence through connections at a single grade.
Indicator 1c
Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations that supporting work enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.
Examples of how the materials connect supporting standards to the major work of the grade include:
- Module 10, Lesson 5, Check Understanding, Question 2, 3.NBT.1.2 supports the major work of 3.OA.4.8 when students solve two step word problems with the four operations. For example, “Kai has 65 stamps. He buys 7 more stamps. He uses all of the stamps to make 9 equal pages. How many stamps are on each page?”
- Module 13, Lesson 2, On My Own, Question 8, 3.G.1.2 supports the major work of 3.NF.1.1 when students partition shapes into parts with equal areas and represent those parts as fractional values. For example, a square divided into two parts is given. Students, “Write a fraction to name the blue part of the whole or the group.”
- Module 14, Lesson 1, Teacher Manual, Question 3, 3.G.1.2 supports 3.MD.3.5. Students are asked to examine a rectangle divided into four shaded parts and determine if the parts are the same shape. Then students determine if the shapes have the same area by counting unit squares.
- Module 14, Lesson 3, Check Understanding, Question 2, 3.G.1.2 supports the major work of 3.NF.1.1. Students partition shapes into parts with equal areas and represent those parts as fractional values. For example, “Divide the shape into 3 equal areas. What unit fraction names each equal part of the shape?”
- Module 18, Teacher Manual, Lessons 1-4 align to 3.MD.2.3 and 3.OA.1.3. For example, Lesson 2, Question 1, students choose a scale amount for their picture graph. They then divide the quantities in the data table by their chosen scale amount to determine how many representative pictures to draw. Students use subtraction to solve the remaining questions.
Indicator 1d
The amount of content designated for one grade level is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.
The instructional materials for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations that the amount of content designated for one grade-level is viable for one year. The suggested amount of time and expectations for teachers and students of the materials are viable for one school year as written and would not require significant modifications. As designed, the instructional materials can be completed in 170 days, 121 days for lessons and 49 days for assessments.
- The Planning and Pacing Guide and Planning pages at the beginning of each module in the Teacher's Edition provide the same pacing information.
- Grade 3 has 6 Units, with 20 Modules containing 100 lessons.
- The pacing guide designates 15 lessons as two-day lessons and 85 as one-day lessons, leading to a total of 115 days. The materials do not define the number of minutes in a lesson or instructional day.
- Each Unit includes a Unit Opener, there are six Openers for Grade 3 (six days).
- Each lesson includes a variety of supplemental instruction such as: reteaching lessons, Flipbook lessons, etc. There is no guidance around building in days for differentiation, therefore no additional days were added.
- This is a total of 121 lesson days.
Assessments include:
- The Planning and Pacing Guide indicating a Beginning, Middle, and End of Year Interim Growth assessment requiring one day each (three days).
- Each Unit includes a Performance Task, which indicates an expected time frame ranging from 25-45 minutes. There are six Performance Tasks for Grade 3 (six days).
- Each Module has both a review and an assessment. There are 20 Modules equating 40 days. Based on this, 49 assessment days can be added.
Indicator 1e
Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards i. Materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. If there is content from prior or future grades, that content is clearly identified and related to grade-level work ii. Materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems iii. Materials relate grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.
The instructional materials for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for the materials being consistent with the progressions in the Standards. In general, the materials identify content from prior and future grade-levels, as well as relating grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades. In addition, the instructional materials attend to the full intent of the grade-level standards by giving all students extensive work with grade-level problems.
The introduction for every Module in the Teacher Edition includes "Mathematical Progressions Across the Grades" identifying standards under the areas of Prior Learning, for Current Development, and Future Connections, as well as clarifying student learning statements in these categories. For example, before Lesson 3.1, Multiply with 2 and 4, Prior Learning is identifies as, “counted objects by 2s, wrote equations to represent the sum of equal addends, and worked with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication.” (2.OA.3.3 and 2.OA.3.4) Future Connections identify, “will solve multi-step word problems” and “will write equations with one variable to represent multi step word problems.” (4.OA.3.3) Additional features of the materials further support the progressions of the standards. These include:
- The beginning of each module includes a diagnostic assessment, Are You Ready?, explicitly identifying prior knowledge needed for the current module. For example, Module 4 links prior learning to Grade 2, Lesson 2.3 Count Equal Groups (2.OA.3.4).
- In each lesson the standard of focus is explicitly connected to future work. For example, Lesson 6.1 states the lesson focuses on standard 3.OA.3.3. This work will continue in 4th grade with a focus on standards 4.OA.2.2 and 4.NBT.2.6 during Lessons 6.1-6.6 and 7.1-7.4.
The materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems. The lesson structure includes Spark You Learning, Build Understanding, and Step It Out where “students connect important processes and procedures to mathematical concepts;” Independent Practice; and Math Center Activities. For example:
- Lesson 2.3, Build Understanding, students relate area to addition and multiplication (3.MD.3.7a). Students find the area of a card two ways, using both multiplication and addition. During Step It Out and On My Own, students complete problems to “Find the area of the figure. Show repeated addition. Show multiplication.”
- Lesson 7.1, Build Understanding, students relate multiplication and division (3.OA.2.6). Question 1, “Jackson plants pepper plants in 3 equal rows. He plants 18 plants. How many plants are in each row?” Students write both multiplication and division equations for the problem, and explain how the equations are the same and different.
- Lesson 15.3, Build Understanding, students compare fractions with the same numerator using drawings, number lines, and by reasoning about the number and size of the parts (3.NF.1.3d).
The materials explicitly relate grade level concepts to prior knowledge from earlier grades in the "Mathematical Progressions Across the Grade" which links explicitly to standards. In addition, the materials include options for the lesson warm-ups to Activate Prior Knowledge to, “Use these activities to quickly assess and activate prior knowledge…,” however, no standards are identified for these activities. For example:
- Lesson 3.3, Multiply with 3 and 6, Activate Prior Knowledge, Problem of the Day, “April and 5 of her friends each made 5 friendship bracelets. Write an equation to show the total number of friendship bracelets April and her friends made.” Based on students responses, teachers can use an Interactive Reteach from Lesson 3.2 or complete a prerequisite skills activity, “Brienne has 7 bags of shells. There are 5 shells in each bag. How many shells does Brienne have?"
- Lesson 6.2, Separate Objects into Equal Groups, Activate Prior Knowledge, Problem of the Day, “Draw Arrays: Use 12 tiles. Make as many different arrays as you can using all 12 tiles.” Based on student’s responses teachers can use an Interactive Reteach from Grade 3, Lesson 1.3 or complete an additional Prerequisite Skills Activity.
- Lesson 12.2 builds on this knowledge to introduce fractions as partitioned areas of a shape. For example, Question 1 asks students to draw a model of a fence that is divided into fourths and one of the fourths painted. Then asks students to identify how many equal parts in the whole fence, how many parts are being counted and then relates that to writing a fraction as $$\frac{1}{4}$$ (3.G.1.2).
Indicator 1f
Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards i. Materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. ii. Materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.
The instructional materials reviewed for Into Math Florida Grade 3 meet expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards.
The materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings, for example:
- Lesson 2.3, the learning objective, “Relate finding area to using an array to find a product,” is shaped by 3.MD.3, Geometric measurement: understand concepts of area and relate area to multiplication and addition,
- Lesson 8.4, the learning objective, “Develop strategies and use reasoning to represent and solve two-step word problems,” is shaped by 3.OA.4: Solve problems involving the four operations, and identify and explain patterns in arithmetic.
- Lesson 10.2, the learning objective, “Use place value strategies to add 2- and 3- digit numbers,” is shaped by 3.NBT.1: Use place value understanding and properties of operations to perform multi-digit arithmetic.
- Lesson 12.1, the learning objective, “Read, write, and tell time on analog and digital clocks to the nearest minute,” is shaped by 3.MD.1: Solve problems involving measurement and estimation of intervals of time, liquid volumes, and masses of objects.
The materials include problems and activities connecting two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important. For example:
- Lesson 4.4 connects 3.OA.1 with 3.OA.3 as students multiply with 7s. Students use multiplication to solve word problems and fluently multiply within 100.
- Lesson 18.1 connects 3.NBT.1 with 3.MD.2 as students use scaled graphs to answer questions about how many more and how many less, fluently adding and subtracting within 1000.