2015
Go Math

7th Grade - Gateway 1

Back to 7th Grade Overview
Cover for Go Math
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Focus & Coherence

Gateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations
57%
Criterion 1.1: Focus
2 / 2
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
0 / 4
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
6 / 8

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. For focus, the Grade 7 materials reviewed meet the expectations for assessing grade-level content but did not meet the criteria for the time devoted to the major work of the grade. For coherence, supporting work is clearly connected to the focus of the grade and is done so in a meaningful way. Coherence is also evident in the instructional materials. This includes problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain and that connect two or more domains in a grade. On the other hand the instructional materials only partially meets the expectations for viability and consistency with the progressions in the standards. Overall the Grade 7 materials partially meet the quality expectations for focus on major work and coherence.

Criterion 1.1: Focus

2 / 2
Materials do not assess topics before the grade level in which the topic should be introduced.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for assessing grade-level content. In each of the assessments included in each unit, only Grade 7 content is assessed. Prerequisite skills from previous grades are assessed in the "Are you Ready" assessments. However content from future grades is not assessed. Overall, the instructional materials for Grade 7 meet the criterion for assessing grade level content.

Indicator 1a

2 / 2
The instructional material assesses the grade-level content and, if applicable, content from earlier grades. Content from future grades may be introduced but students should not be held accountable on assessments for future expectations.

The Grade 7 materials reviewed meet the expectations for assessing grade-level content. The materials also have assessment items for previously learned content to determine if students have the needed prerequisite skills.

  • Module quizzes, assessment readiness review, end-of-unit review and a performance task are included in each unit. In all of these assessment materials, only Grade 7 material was assessed.
  • Each module has an "Are You Ready" assessment. This looks at skills from previous grades that will be needed in order to complete the module successfully.

Criterion 1.2: Coherence

0 / 4

Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote the large majority of class time in each grade K-8 to the major work of the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 do not meet the expectations for having the large majority of class time being devoted to the major work of the grade. For example, only 53% of the lessons and only 51% of the teaching days address the major work of the grade. Overall, the instructional materials for Grade 7 do not meet the criterion for designating the large majority of class time to the major work of the grade.

Indicator 1b

0 / 4

Instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major cluster of each grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 do not meet the expectations for students and teachers using the materials as designed to devote the large majority of class time to the major work of the grade. Based on the pacing guides in the teacher edition, about 75 of the 148 teaching days, or about 51%, are devoted to major work.  Of the 49 lessons in Grade 7, 26 are focused on the major clusters (53%).

Criterion 1.3: Coherence

6 / 8

Coherence: Each grade's instructional materials are coherent and consistent with the Standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for coherence and consistency with the CCSSM. The supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade. Coherence is evident both in addressing connections at the Grade 7 level and in the instructional materials. This includes problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain and that connect two or more domains in a grade. The weak aspects of the materials were that it only partially meets the expectations for viability and consistency with the progressions in the standards. Overall the instructional materials at the Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for the coherence.

Indicator 1c

2 / 2

Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for the supporting content enhancing focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.

The following examples demonstrate how supporting and additional clusters in geometry and statistics support the major work of proportional relationships.

  • Unit 4 is the geometry unit and supports 7.G.A; unit 5 is the statistics unit and supports 7.SP.B. Both require the students to use proportions to solve problems.
  • Unit 4 also teaches 7.G.B and this supports the major cluster 7.NS.A.
  • Unit 6 (probability) addresses the supporting cluster 7.SP.C. It supports the major cluster 7.NS by working with rational numbers, specifically by writing probability as fractions, decimals and percents.
  • Unit 6 also supports the major cluster 7.RP by using proportions to find information about populations.

Indicator 1d

1 / 2

The amount of content designated for one grade level is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 do not meet the expectations for the amount of content designated for one grade level being viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades. With only 149 days of lessons accounted for, there need to be additional review days and summative assessment days as well as additional material other than unit tests to ensure sufficient instruction. Overall, the amount of content that is designated for this grade level is short of the amount of material needed to make it truly viable for one school year. According to the pacing guide, there is a suggested 149 days of lessons for 45-minute classes. There is guided practice and independent practice for each lesson. There is also a quiz and a formative assessment check for each module. All of this is included in the pacing guide.

A summative end of the unit test is not included in the pacing guide. Adding one day per unit would bring the total to 154 days.

There are many references in the teacher's guide to online resources that provide more practice opportunities, however it is not accessible in the basic program.

Indicator 1e

1 / 2

Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards i. Materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. If there is content from prior or future grades, that content is clearly identified and related to grade-level work ii. Materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems iii. Materials relate grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for the material to be consistent with the progressions in the standards. The strongest point is that at the beginning of each module there is a section called "Unpacking the Standards." Although there is a page with progressions, there are no references to other grades' standards anywhere within the lessons. Overall, the materials in Go Math-Grade 7 to some extent identify the progressions from prior grades in the standards.

  • In the beginning of each module there is a section called "Unpacking the Standards." This puts the standards into student-friendly language and provides examples of what students will be learning.
  • This section aligns with the standards and then demonstrates that students will be working only within grade-level expectations.
  • There were no references to other grades within the lessons.
  • There is a page with progressions that shows Grade 6, 7 and 8 progressions.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectation of giving all students extensive work with grade-level problems. Overall, the materials give students of varying abilities some, but not extensive work with grade-level problems.

  • The lessons are broken down into five sections: Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate and Evaluate. There are also tips and ideas for differentiating and extending the material.
  • The teacher edition includes references to online additional resources, including Math on the Spot, a video available by scanning the QR code in the student edition. Although the teacher edition does not contain all of these resources, access to some of them are available without any separate purchase.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectation of relating grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades. Overall, materials only generally relate grade level concepts to prior knowledge from earlier grades.

  • There is a chart at the beginning of each unit and module that relates new content to previously taught content, either earlier in the grade or from previous grades.
  • The charts have column headings labeled "Before this Unit," "In this Unit" and "After this Unit" and "Before this Module," "In this Module" and "After this Module" but do not specify standards.
  • Students are assessed on prior knowledge at the beginning of each module.
  • Unit 3, pages 167E-167F, gives the background resources for mathematics. On page 168, it restates what students should know before in this unit and after this unit.

Indicator 1f

2 / 2

Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards i. Materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. ii. Materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the standards. Overall, materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings.

  • The standards are referenced all throughout the book.
  • Each lesson has an essential question aligned with the cluster headings.
  • Mathematical practices are clearly explained along with the domains and strands of the focus work.
  • There are also specific "cluster connection" identifiers in the teacher edition.

The instructional materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain. They include problems and activities that connect two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important. Overall the materials foster coherence through connections at the Grade 7.

  • Unit 3 connects 7.EE.1 to 7.NS.  Operations with rational numbers are used to solve real world application problems.

  • The major work of proportional relationships is used throughout Units 4, 5, and 6 and connected to the work of those units especially within the EE domain.  

Indicator evidence updated 11/02/16