2016
Glencoe Math

8th Grade - Gateway 1

Back to 8th Grade Overview
Cover for Glencoe Math
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Focus & Coherence

Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations
92%
Criterion 1.1: Focus
2 / 2
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
4 / 4
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
7 / 8

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for focus and coherence with the CCSSM. For focus, the instructional materials meet the criteria for the time devoted to the major work of the grade. Even though above grade-level topics are included in the assessment, they do not impact the structure of the materials. For coherence, the materials are explicitly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings and there are aspects of coherence in the materials that are exceptional, but there is a lack of clear grade-to-grade progressions . Overall, the materials meet the requirements for focus and coherence.

Criterion 1.1: Focus

2 / 2
Materials do not assess topics before the grade level in which the topic should be introduced.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for focus within assessment. Above grade-level topics are included on the assessments, but there is minimal impact to the underlying structure of the materials. Most notably, the assessments include high school level work on functions. Overall, the materials reviewed for Grade 8 include a few above grade-level questions that can be modified or skipped without impacting the structure of the materials.

Indicator 1a

2 / 2
The instructional material assesses the grade-level content and, if applicable, content from earlier grades. Content from future grades may be introduced but students should not be held accountable on assessments for future expectations.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for assessment because above grade-level assessment items, and their accompanying lessons could be modified or skipped without impacting the underlying structure of the instructional materials. For this indicator, the four quarterly benchmark tests were reviewed first, then for a more in-depth look at each CCSSM indicator, the chapter tests, extended response tests, and performance tasks were examined.

  • The instructional materials offer multiple tiers of assessment on their ConnectEd website. These include pretests, diagnostic tests, chapter quizzes, chapter tests, performance tasks, extended response tests, quarterly benchmark tests, standardized test practice as well as SBAC and PARCC practice test question. Furthermore, a test generator is included so that educators can create their own assessments to suit their needs.
  • The first quarterly benchmark test assesses the following Grade 8 standards 8.NS.1, 8.NS.2, 8.EE.1, 8.EE.2, 8.EE.3, 8.EE.4 and 8.EE.7. These standards are primarily covered in chapters 1-2. The listed CCSSM are covered on the assessments with no above grade-level items.
  • The second quarterly benchmark test assesses the following Grade 8 standards. 8.EE.5, 8.EE.6, 8.EE.8, 8.F.1, 8.F.2, 8.F.3, 8.F.4 and 8.F.5. These standards are primarily covered in chapters 3-4. The listed CCSSM are covered on the assessments. The second quarterly benchmark test and chapter 4 assessments have some above grade-level topics. Question 10 asks about domain. This is high school standard F.IF.A.1, which states, "Understand that a function from one set (called the domain) to another set (called the range) assigns to each element of the domain exactly one element of the range. If f is a function and x is an element of its domain, then f(x) denotes the output of f corresponding to the input x. The graph of f is the graph of the equation y = f(x)." This vocabulary is included in lesson 2 which primarily has students represent relations using tables and graphs. This topic is only briefly covered in lesson 3. Question 7 requires students to match a graph to a quadratic function. The standard 8.F. 5 states “Describe qualitatively the functional relationship between two quantities by analyzing a graph (e.g., where the function is increasing or decreasing, linear or nonlinear). Sketch a graph that exhibits the qualitative features of a function that has been described verbally.” It is expected that students be able to identify a nonlinear graphs; however, on both the benchmark and chapter test students are expected to graph quadratic functions which is not expected of students until high school. Lesson 7 covers 8.F.5 nicely, but lesson 8, which covers graphing quadratic functions is above grade level. Lesson 8 could be skipped without impacting the materials.
  • The third quarterly benchmark test assesses the following Grade 8 standards 8.G.1, 8.G.2, 8.G.3, 8.G.3, 8.G.5, 8.G.6, 8.G.7 and 8.G.8. These standards are primarily covered in chapters 5-6. The listed CCSSM are covered on the assessments with no above grade-level items.
  • The end of year benchmark test assesses some of the previously covered standards and 8.G.4, 8.G.9, 8.SP.1, 8.SP.2, 8.SP.3 and 8.SP.4. These standards are primarily covered in chapters 7-9. The listed CCSSM are covered on the assessments.The chapter 9 chapter tests include questions on standard deviation. The concept of standard deviation is covered in the high school standard HSS.ID.A4, "Use the mean and standard deviation of a data set to fit it to a normal distribution and to estimate population percentages. Recognize that there are data sets for which such a procedure is not appropriate. Use calculators, spreadsheets, and tables to estimate areas under the normal curve." In the textbook, standard deviation is covered in lesson 5, "Measures of Variation." An educator could skip this lesson without skipping any of the intended Grade 8 standards and create an assessment using the test generator.

Criterion 1.2: Coherence

4 / 4

Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote the large majority of class time in each grade K-8 to the major work of the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation that the majority of class time is spent on the major work of the grade. The materials spend about 76 percent of class time on major work. Even when the lessons primarily focus on supporting clusters they incorporate major work standards. Overall, the instructional materials meet the expectation that materials spend a majority of class time on major work.

Indicator 1b

4 / 4

Instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major cluster of each grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for focus by spending a majority of class time on the major clusters of the grade. To determine this, three perspectives were evaluated: 1) the number of chapters devoted to major work, 2) the number of lessons devoted to major work, and 3) the number of days devoted to major work. The number of days devoted to major work is the most reflective for this indicator because it specifically addresses the amount of class time spent on concepts. Overall, the materials spend 76 percent of instructional time on the major clusters of the grade. The Grade 8 materials have 9 chapters that contain 62 lessons. (The inquiry labs were considered as part of the lesson that they proceeded.) A total 152 days (optional projects not included) of class time was scheduled for the lessons.

  • 5 out of 9 chapters (56 percent) focus exclusively on the major clusters of Grade 8, while the other 4 chapters have a mix of major and supporting clusters.
  • Each chapter is made up of lessons, when examining the individual lesson 73 percent of class time is spent on the major clusters of the grade. The lesson breakdown is as follows:
    • Chapter 1 has 10 lesson; Lessons 2 – 8 focus on the major clusters (8.EE.1, 8.EE.2, 8.EE.3, and 8.EE.4), while lessons 1, 9 and 10 are focused on supporting clusters (8.NS.1, and 8.NS.2). Seven out of 10 lessons in chapter 1 are on major work.
    • Chapter 2: Five out of five of the lessons are on the major cluster (8.EE.7).
    • Chapter 3: Eight out of eight of the lessons are on the major clusters (8.EE.5, 8.EE.6, 8.EE.8, 8.F.2, 8.F.3, and 8.F.4).
    • Chapter 4 has 9 lessons: Lessons 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 focus on the major clusters (8.F.1, 8.F.2, 8.F.3, 8.F.4, and 8.F.5), while lessons 3 and 8 are above grade level. Lesson 2 has an above grade-level component, but it was still deemed to focus on a majority of the major clusters. Seven out of nine lessons are on the major clusters.
    • Chapter 5: Seven out of seven lessons are on the major clusters (8.G.5, 8.G.6, 8.G.7 and 8.G.8).
    • Chapter 6: Four out of four lessons are on the major clusters (8.G.1 and 8.G.3).
    • Chapter 7: Seven out of seven lessons are on the major clusters (8.G.1, 8.G.2, 8.G.4, 8.G.5 and 8.EE.6).
    • Chapter 8: Six out of six lessons are on the supporting clusters (8.G.9).
    • Chapter 9: Lessons 1, 2 and 3 are on the supporting clusters (8.SP.1, 8.SP.2, 8.SP.3 and 8.SP.4). Lessons 4-6 are on off grade-level topics.
  • A pacing guide is provided with the materials and gives the number of days each chapter should take. When calculating the number of days, 76 percent of the class time is spent on the major clusters, 16 percent of the class time is spent on supporting clusters. The remainder of the class time is spent on off grade-level work. The breakdown of the number of days spent on the major cluster of the grade are as follows:
    • Chapter 1: Ten lessons should take 18 days, seven of the lessons are major clusters, which should take approximately 15 days.
    • Chapter 2: Five lessons should take 13 days.
    • Chapter 3: Eight lessons should take 20 days.
    • Chapter 4: Nine lessons should take 19 days, seven of the lesson are major clusters, which should take approximately 16 days.
    • Chapter 5: Seven lessons should take 19 days.
    • Chapter 6: Four lessons should take 13 days.
    • Chapter 7: Seven lessons should take 17 days.
    • Chapter 8: Six lessons should take 15 days. However, lesson 6 incorporates similarity (8.G.4) into the concept of volume (8.G.9), so one day of this lesson would be spent on a major cluster.
    • Chapter 9: Six lessons should take 18 days. However, in addition to interpreting graphs, lesson 2 requires students to write an equations of a line of best fit (8.EE.3), so one and a half days are spent on a major cluster.

Criterion 1.3: Coherence

7 / 8

Coherence: Each grade's instructional materials are coherent and consistent with the Standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for being coherent and consistent with the standards. The materials include content that is shaped by the CCSSM clusters with enough work to be viable for one school year. All students engage in extensive practice with grade-level problems with supporting content that engages students in the major work of the grade. Natural connections are made between clusters and domains. However, the materials fail to note the grade to grade progressions. Overall the materials meet the expectation for being coherent and consistent with the standards.

Indicator 1c

2 / 2

Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation that supporting content enhance focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade. Overall, the lessons that focus on supporting content also engage students in major work where natural and appropriate.

  • Chapter 1, lesson 9, focuses on estimating roots. In doing this students are both using rational number approximations 8.NS.2 and using square root and cube roots 8.EE.2.
  • Chapter 9, lesson 2, focuses on 8.SP.A - Investigate patterns of bivariate data. In completing this lesson, students will analyze scatter plot and write the lines of best fit, this supports major work 8.F.3.

Indicator 1d

2 / 2

The amount of content designated for one grade level is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for the amount of content designated for one grade level being viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades. The instructional material are designed to take 152 – 162 days. Many additional resources can be found on the accompanying website. Overall, the amount of content that is designated for this grade level is viable for one school year.

  • Included in the materials is a yearlong pacing guide. According to that pacing guide, completing the work in the student edition would take 152 days. That includes time for a chapter opener, a mid-chapter quiz, a chapter review, and a chapter test. Ten extra days could be spent on the five unit projects.
  • · All of the CCSSM were developed to give students the practice they need to be prepared for Grade 9.
  • There is guided practice, independent practice and common core spiral review for each lesson. Also included in the lessons are Real-World Link, H.O.T. Higher Order Thinking, and Power-up Common Core Test Practice which are more rigorous than the independent practices.

Indicator 1e

1 / 2

Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards i. Materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. If there is content from prior or future grades, that content is clearly identified and related to grade-level work ii. Materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems iii. Materials relate grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 partially meet the expectation for the materials to be consistent with the progressions in the standards. The materials give all students extensive work on grade-level problems. Content from prior and future grades is identified but not explicitly stated and what is below grade level and at grade level is sometimes confusing. The materials attempt to relate grade-level problems to prior knowledge but they fail to mention grade-to-grade progressions. Overall the instructional materials partially meets the expectation to be consistent with the progressions in the standards.

  • The materials do an excellent job of giving all ability levels an opportunity for learning grade-level standards. The materials provide exercises for all levels of complexity and recommended homework options that are organized for students who are approaching, on level, or beyond level. The materials connect classwork to the homework assignments for all ability levels. For example, the materials use a variety of practice with “Power Up” activities for performance task problems and common core test practice for a challenging review structure. The materials suggests that students from all three levels are encouraged to try these higher order thinking problems, so students who need interventions still get to engage with the full depth of the grade-level standards.
  • Below grade-level work is seemingly listed as preparation for a standard. However, this statement is confusing in some of the lessons that are listed as preparation. For example, chapter 3, lesson 1 is titled "Constant Rate of Change" and it is listed in the materials as preparation for 8.EE.5. 8.EE.5 calls for a connection to be made between unit rate and slope and this lesson makes that connections so it is unclear why it is listed as preparation. Moreover, constant rate of change is better spelled out in 8.F.4, "Construct a function to model a linear relationship between two quantities. Determine the rate of change and initial value of the function from a description of a relationship or from two (x, y) values, including reading these from a table or from a graph. Interpret the rate of change and initial value of a linear function in terms of the situation it models, and in terms of its graph or a table of values." The content in this lesson is well done, however, it is unclear why it is listed as preparation for 8.EE.5 and not just listed as 8.EE.5 or 8.F.4.
  • Lessons that are above grade-level are identified as extensions to Grade 8 standards or preparation for high-school standards. Some examples include, chapter 5, lesson 4 is labeled as an extension of 8.G.5. The topic of this lesson is angles and polygons, it is an extension of the standard and therefore it is correctly identified. Chapter 7, lesson 7 is labeled as an extension of 8.G.4. the topic explores finding the area and perimeter of similar figures, it is an extension of the standard and correctly identified. The final two lessons in chapter 9 identify the lessons as prep for high school standards S.ID.1, S.ID.2 and S.ID.3. Because these are extension of the Grade 8 statistics standards they are correctly labeled and relate to grade-level work.
  • In the teachers edition a graphic is presented under coherence. It show previous, now and next. "Previous" lists what topics students learned that lead up to the current topic. "Now" lists what topics the students are learning now. "Next" lists what related topics the students will be learning. Although, there is an attempt to be Coherent across the grade levels there are no references to other grades' standards within the materials.

Indicator 1f

2 / 2

Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards i. Materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. ii. Materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 8 meet the expectation for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade. The materials include learning objectives that are clearly shaped by the CCSSM clusters, and the materials incorporate natural connections between clusters and domains, where those connections are natural and important.

  • At the beginning of the teachers edition, there is an index of the CCSSM and the corresponding chapters and lesson where those standards can be found.
  • Each unit in the materials correlates to a Grade 8 CCSSM domain. The units are broken into chapters that focus on standards in that domain. The chapters are broken into lessons that incorporate aspects of each standard. As a result, each lesson's title, objective, and essential question is clearly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings.
  • The student edition gives a table of the Grade 8 CCSSM and students are given the chance to track their knowledge of the CCSSM throughout the year.
  • One example of connecting two or more clusters in a domain is chapter 4, lesson 4. This lesson connects 8.F.A and 8.F.B, where students construct functions to model linear relationships while they are comparing properties of functions that are represented in different ways.
  • In addition to the connections noted in criteria 1c, there are several examples of connecting two or more domains in Grade 8. These examples include:
    • Chapter 3, lesson 4 connects 8.EE and 8.F where students connect functions and their graph to equations in the form y = mx + b.
    • Chapter 5, lesson 5 connects 8.G and 8.EE when students connect the use of square roots to the understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem.