About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Everyday Mathematics 4 | Math
Math K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for Everyday Mathematics 4, Kindergarten through Grade 2, partially meet expectations for alignment. The assessments for Kindergarten through Grade 2 address grade-level standards, and the materials devote at least 65% of class time to major clusters of the grade. The materials are also consistent and coherent with the progressions in the Standards. The materials for Kindergarten through Grade 2 partially meet expectations for Gateway 2, rigor and mathematical practices. The lessons attend to conceptual understanding and procedural skills, and there is balance among the three aspects of rigor. The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are identified and used to enrich the mathematics content, but the materials do not present students with opportunities to engage with the full intent of MP5, choose tools strategically.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 3-5
The instructional materials reviewed for Everyday Mathematics 4, Grade 3 through Grade 6, partially meet the expectations for alignment. The assessments for Grades 3 through 5 address grade-level standards, the materials for Grades 3 through 5 devote at least 65% of class time to major clusters of the grade. The materials for Grades 3 through 6 are coherent and consistent with the progressions in the Standards. The materials for Grade 3 through Grade 6 partially meet expectations for Gateway 2, rigor and mathematical practices. The lessons include conceptual understanding and procedural skills and fluency, and there is balance among the three aspects of rigor. The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are identified and used to enrich the mathematics content, but the materials do not present students with opportunities to engage with the full intent of MP5, choose tools strategically.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 6-8
The instructional materials reviewed for Everyday Mathematics 4, Grade 3 through Grade 6, partially meet the expectations for alignment. The assessments for Grades 3 through 5 address grade-level standards, the materials for Grades 3 through 5 devote at least 65% of class time to major clusters of the grade. The materials for Grades 3 through 6 are coherent and consistent with the progressions in the Standards. The materials for Grade 3 through Grade 6 partially meet expectations for Gateway 2, rigor and mathematical practices. The lessons include conceptual understanding and procedural skills and fluency, and there is balance among the three aspects of rigor. The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are identified and used to enrich the mathematics content, but the materials do not present students with opportunities to engage with the full intent of MP5, choose tools strategically.