2018
Eureka Math

4th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 4th Grade Overview
Cover for Eureka Math
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations
88%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
8 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
8 / 10

The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 meet the expectation for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials attend to each of the three aspects of rigor individually, and they also attend to the balance among the three aspects. The instructional materials emphasize mathematical reasoning, partially identify the Mathematical Practices (MPs), and partially attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

8 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 meet the expectation for reflecting the balances in the Standards and helping students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application. The instructional materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, give attention throughout the year to procedural skill and fluency, spend sufficient time working with engaging applications, and do not always treat the three aspects of rigor together or separately.

Indicator 2a

2 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations for developing conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The materials include problems and questions that develop conceptual understanding throughout the grade level. For example:

  • In Module 1, Lesson 1, students develop conceptual understanding of a multiplication equation as a comparison. The teacher is prompted to facilitate student discussion by saying, “T: Discuss the patterns you have noticed with your partner. S: 10 ones make 1 ten. 10 tens make 1 hundred. 10 hundreds make 1 thousand. Every time we get 10, we bundle and make a bigger unit. We copy a unit 10 times to make the next larger unit. If we take any of the place value units, the next unit on the left is ten times as many.” (4.NBT.A)
  • In Module 1, Lesson 8, students develop conceptual understanding of rounding to a place value. A vertical number line is used to model rounding to a place value. Problem Set Question 1 states, “Complete each statement by rounding the number to the given place value. Use the number line to show your work. 1a. 53,000 rounded to the nearest ten thousand is _______.” (4.NBT.3)
  • In Module 3, Lesson 16, students develop conceptual understanding of division with a remainder. Students use place-value disks to solve two-digit dividend division problems with a remainder in the ones place. The teacher is prompted to facilitate student discussion by saying, “T: (Point to the place value chart.) We divided 6 ones and have no ones remaining. 6 ones minus 6 ones equals 0 ones. (Write the subtraction line.) What does this zero mean? S: There is no remainder. All the ones were divided with none left over. We subtracted the total number distributed from the total number of ones. T: We can see the 3 groups of 2 both in our model and in our numbers and know our answer is correct since 3 times 2 equals 6.” (4.NBT.B)

The materials provide opportunities for students to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade. For example:

  • In Module 1, Lesson 15, students independently demonstrate conceptual understanding of place value. Students use tape diagrams to demonstrate conceptual understanding of place value to solve word problems. Problem Set Question 2 states, “Use tape diagrams and the standard algorithm to solve the problems below. Check your answers. 2. David is flying from Hong Kong to Buenos Aires. The total flight distance is 11,472 miles. If the plane has 7,793 miles left to travel, how far has it already traveled?” (4.NBT.4)
  • In Module 4, Lesson 6, students independently demonstrate conceptual understanding of fractions. Students relate fractions as division to fraction of a set. The teacher is prompted to facilitate student discussion by saying, “T: Make an array with 6 counters turned to the red side, and use your straws to divide your array into 3 equal parts. T: Write a division sentence for what you just did. S: 6 ÷ 3 = 2. T: Rewrite your division sentence as a fraction, and say it aloud as you write it. S: (Write 6/3=2.) 6 divided by 3 equals 2. T: If I want to show 1 third of this set, how many counters should I turn over to yellow? Turn and talk.” (4.NF.B)
  • In Module 5, Lesson 20, students independently demonstrate conceptual understanding of fractions. Students use tape diagrams when adding fractions. Problem Set Question 1 states, “Use a tape diagram to represent each addend. Decompose one of the tape diagrams to make like units. Then, write the complete number sentence.” (4.NF.3)

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations that they attend to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

In A Story of Units Curriculum Overview, 4.NBT.4 (fluently add and subtract multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm), is addressed explicitly in Module 1. For example:

  • The Lesson 11 Problem Set students gain procedural skills with multi-digit addition problems using the standard algorithm.
  • In Lesson 13, students develop procedural skill and fluency of subtraction of multi-digit whole numbers.
  • In Lesson 16, students solve two-step word problems using the standard algorithm. Problem Set problem #2, “A gas station has two pumps. Pump A dispensed 241,752 gallons. Pump B dispensed 113,916 more gallons than Pump A. a. About how many gallons did both pumps dispense? Estimate by rounding each value to the nearest hundred thousand and then compute. b. Exactly how many gallons did both pumps dispense? C. Assess the reasonableness of you answer in (b). Use you estimate from (a) to explain.”

The instructional materials provide opportunities to independently demonstrate procedural skill and fluency throughout the grade-level. For example:

  • In Module 1, Lesson 5 students build fluency of multiplication by 4 during the Sprint.
  • In Module 5, Lesson 6 Sprint students build fluency with addition of whole numbers and unit fractions, and multiplication of unit fractions by whole numbers.
  • In Module 6, Lesson 13, students engage in Fluency Practice ordering decimal numbers, and writing in decimal and fraction notation.

    Indicator 2c

    2 / 2

    Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

    The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations that the materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics. Engaging applications include single and multi-step problems, routine and non-routine, presented in a context in which the mathematics is applied.

    The instructional materials include multiple opportunities for students to engage in routine and non-routine application of mathematical skills and knowledge of the grade level. For example:

    • In Module 1, Lesson 18, students engage in grade-level mathematics when using subtraction to solve a word problem. The Application Problem states, “In all, 30,436 people went skiing in February and January. 16,009 went skiing in February. How many fewer people went skiing in January than in February?” (4.NBT.4)
    • In Module 2, Lesson 3, students engage in grade-level mathematics when solving a word problem involving conversion of measurements and subtraction. The Application Problem states, “A liter of water weighs 1 kilogram. The Lee family took 3 liters of water with them on a hike. At the end of the hike, they had 290 grams of water left. How much water did they drink? Draw a tape diagram, and solve using an algorithm or a simplifying strategy.” (4.MD.2)
    • In Module 5, Lesson 13, students engage in grade-level mathematics when using equivalent fraction knowledge to solve word problems. The Application Problem states, “Mr. and Mrs. Reynolds went for a run. Mr. Reynolds ran for 6/10 mile. Mrs. Reynolds ran for 2/5 mile. Who ran farther? Explain how you know. Use the benchmarks 0, 1/2 , and 1 to explain your answer.” (4.NF.2)

    The instructional materials provide opportunities for students to demonstrate independently the use of mathematics flexibly in a variety of contexts. For example:

    • In Module 3, Lesson 2, students independently demonstrate the use of mathematics by applying knowledge of area and perimeter to solve multiplicative comparison word problems. Problem Set Question 4 states, “The area of Betsey’s rectangular sandbox is 20 square feet. The longer side measures 5 feet. The sandbox at the park is twice as long and twice as wide as Betsy’s. a. Draw and label a diagram of Betsy’s sandbox. What is its perimeter? b. Draw and label a diagram of the sandbox at the park. What is its perimeter?” (4.OA.3)
    • In Module 5, Lesson 19, students independently demonstrate the use of mathematics by applying understanding of addition and subtraction of fractions to solve word problems. Problem Set Question 1 states, “Sue ran 9/10 mile on Monday and 7/10 mile on Tuesday. How many miles did Sue run in the 2 days?” (4.NF.3d)
    • In Module 5, Lesson 40, students independently demonstrate the use of mathematics by applying their knowledge of multiplication and fractions to solve real-world problems. Problem Set Question 3 states, “Six of the players on the team weigh over 300 pounds. Doctors recommend that players of this weight drink at least 3 3/4 quarts of water each day. At least how much water should be consumed per day by all 6 players?” (4.NF.4c)

    Indicator 2d

    2 / 2

    Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

    The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. The lessons include components such as: Fluency Practice, Concept Development, and Application Problems. Conceptual understanding is addressed in Concept Development. During this time, the teacher guides students through a new concept or an extension of the previous day’s learning. Students engage in practicing procedures and fact fluency while modeling and solving these concepts. Fluency is also addressed as an independent component within most lessons. Lessons may contain an Application Problem which serves as an anticipatory set for the concept or standard that is the focus of the lesson. This Application Problem connects previous learning to what students are learning for the day. The program balances all three aspects of rigor in every lesson.

    All three aspects of rigor are present independently throughout the program materials. For example:

    • In Module 3, Lesson 7, students practice fluency of multi-digit multiplication. Sprint Question 5 states, “2 x 3,000 = ____”
    • In Module 5, Lesson 5, students develop conceptual understanding of equivalent fractions by decomposing rectangles. Problem Set Question 1 states, “Draw horizontal lines to decompose each rectangle into the number of rows indicated. Use the model to give the shaded area as both a sum of unit fractions and as a multiplication sentence. 2 rows. 1/4 = 2/__, 1/4 = 1/8 + ___ = ___, 1/4 = 2 x ___ = ___.”
    • In Module 7, Lesson 4, students engage in the application of mathematics by solving word problems involving multiplicative comparison of measurement units. Problem Set Question 1 states, “Beth is allowed 2 hours of TV time each week. Her sister is allowed 2 times as much. How many minutes of TV can Beth’s sister watch?”

    Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single topic/unit of study throughout the materials. For example:

    • In Module 1, Lesson 10, students develop conceptual understanding of place value by solving real-world problems. Problem Set Question 3 states, “Empire Elementary School needs to purchase water bottles for field day. There are 2,142 students. Principal Vadar rounded to the nearest hundred to estimate how many water bottles to order. Will there be enough water bottles for everyone? Explain.”
    • In Module 3, Lesson 11, students develop conceptual understanding and practice fluency of multi-digit multiplication by using partial products and the area model to solve problems. Problem Set Question 1a states, “Solve the following expressions using the standard algorithm, the partial products method, and the area model. 425 x 4, 4 (400 + 20 + 5), (4 x ___) + (4 x ___) + (4 x ___).”
    • In Module 3, Lesson 32, students practice fluency of division by solving real-world problems. Problem Set Question 1 states, “A concert hall contains 8 sections of seats with the same number of seats in each section. If there are 248 seats, how many seats are in each section?”

    Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

    8 / 10

    Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

    The instructional materials for Eureka Grade 4 partially meet the expectation for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Overall, the materials emphasize mathematical reasoning by prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others, assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others, and attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

    Narrative Only

    Indicator 2e

    1 / 2

    The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

    The instructional materials reviewed for Eureka Grade 4 partially meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level.

    All of the eight MPs are identified within the grade-level materials. The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified at the beginning of each module under the Module Standards. The tab named “Highlighted Standards for Mathematical Practice” lists all of the MPs that are focused on in the module. Each MP is linked to the definition of the practice as well as in which lessons throughout the series that practice can be found.

    Each Module Overview contains a section titled, “Focus Standard for Mathematical Practice." Every practice that is identified in the module has a written explanation with specific examples of how each practice is being used to enrich the content of the module. For example:

    • In Module 6, the explanation for MP 8 states, “Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. As they progress through this module, students have multiple opportunities to explore the relationships between and among units of ones, tenths, and hundredths. Relationships between adjacent place values, for example, are the same on the right side of the decimal point as they are on the left side, and students investigate this fact working with tenths and hundredths. Further, adding tenths and hundredths requires finding like units just as it does with whole numbers, such as when adding centimeters and meters. Students come to understand equivalence, conversions, comparisons, and addition involving decimal fractions.”

    Each lesson specifically identifies where MPs are located, usually within the margins of the teacher edition. However, there is no additional teacher guidance or explanation as to how the practice enriches the content specifically within that lesson. This is evident in all modules within the series.

    Indicator 2f

    1 / 2

    Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

    The instructional materials reviewed for Eureka Grade 4 partially meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. Examples of where the instructional materials attend to each of the MPs include:

    • In Module 1, Lesson 2, MP 1 is identified in the teacher edition and attends to the full meaning of the practice where students reason abstractly about place value and division to solve division problems.
    • In Module 3, Lesson 14, MP 4 is identified in the teacher edition and attends to the full meaning of the practice where students use tape diagrams to model their thinking while finding the solution to word problems involving division.
    • In Module 6, Lesson 12, MP 6 is identified in the teacher edition and attends to the full meaning of the practice where students are adding tenths and hundredths with sums greater than 1. Students attend to precision when converting tenths to hundredths. “T: Solve, and then explain your solution to your partner. (Two solution strategies are pictured below.) S: I changed 6 tenths to 60 hundredths and then made 1 by adding 50 hundredths, which I took out of each addend. That meant 10 hundredths and 7 hundredths were left to be added. The sum is 1 17/100. I just added 60 hundredths and 57 hundredths to get 117 hundredths and then decomposed to get 100 hundredths and 17 hundredths. I converted 6 tenths to 60 hundredths and then took out 40 hundredths from 57 hundredths to make 1 and added on the leftover 17 hundredths.”

    There are a few instances where the materials do not attend to the full meaning of one or two MPs. For example:

    • In Module 3, Lesson 11, MP 5 is identified in the teacher edition where the students solve a multiplication problem. “T: “Solve 316 times 4 using the standard algorithm, and compare your answer to the area model. S: 316 times 4 is 1,264. I got that answer using both methods. The area model doesn’t let me show how to regroup 24 ones for 2 tens 4 ones, but the algorithm does. I can regroup in the area model. I can draw an arrow to regroup 20 ones as 2 tens. Now, my area model looks like a place-value chart because I regrouped to show 6 tens. The area model aligns better to the partial products method, but the algorithm is still the quickest way for me to solve!” This is an example of not attending to the full practice as students are told what strategy to use rather than selecting a strategy to solve a multiplication problem.
    • In Module 2, Lesson 3, MP 1 is identified in the teacher edition where the students solve an addition measurement problem. Students are told to use a tape diagram. Also, the teacher offers two ways of solving the problem, as stated:“T: Work with your partner to solve. Will you use a simplifying strategy or an algorithm? S: A simplifying strategy. I know that 300 milliliters + 700 milliliters is 1,000 milliliters. That brings us to 2 liters. Then, all I need to do is add 170 milliliters more. 700 mL + 170 mL = 870 mL.” This is an example of not attending to the full practice as students are given two choices of strategies to solve the problem. Students do not independently persevere in solving the problem.

    Indicator 2g

    Narrative Only

    Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

    Indicator 2g.i

    2 / 2

    Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

    The instructional materials reviewed for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

    Student materials consistently prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others. For example:

    • In Module 1, Lesson 4, the materials prompt students to determine which multi-digit number is written in word form correctly and explain their analysis for their choice. Problem Set Question 4 states, “Black rhinos are endangered, with only 4,400 left in the world. Timothy read that number as “four thousand, four hundred.” His father read the number as “44 hundred.” Who read the number correctly? Use pictures, numbers, or words to explain your answer.”
    • In Module 1, Lesson 10, the materials prompt students to construct an argument stating why an answer can be the same when rounding a number to different place values. Exit Ticket Question 1 states, “There are 598,500 Apple employees in the United States. Round the number of employees to the given place value. Thousand: ___, ten thousand: ___, hundred thousand: ___. Explain why two of your answer are the same.”
    • In Module 4, Lesson 4, the materials prompt students to determine whether a statement about the attributes of a triangle is correct and construct a viable argument for their thinking. Problem Set Question 5 states, “True or false? A triangle cannot have sides that are parallel. Explain your thinking.”
    • In Module 5, Lesson 18, the materials prompt students to analyze two different strategies to add fractions and explain which strategy they like best. Problem Set Question 2 states, “Monica and Stuart used different strategies to solve 5/8 + 2/8 + 5/8. Whose strategy do you like best? Why?”

    Indicator 2g.ii

    2 / 2

    Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

    The instructional materials reviewed for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

    Teacher materials assist teachers in engaging students in both constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others, frequently throughout the program. The teacher materials consistently provide teachers with question prompts for student discussion and possible student responses to support that discussion. For example:

    • In Module 4, Lesson 4, teachers are prompted to engage students in constructing an argument by asking students about the properties of a rectangle. “What do you notice about sides of a rectangle and parallel lines? Is this true for all rectangles? Does the length of the opposite sides of a rectangle change the fact that they are parallel?”
    • In Module 7, Lesson 5, teachers are prompted to encourage students to critique a partner's work. “T: Work with a partner to complete the Problem Set. When you are finished solving and creating a word problem to go along with each diagram, turn to your partner and share. Use the peer share and critique form to take notes about your work and your partner’s work.”
    • In Module 7, Lesson 12, teachers are prompted to engage students in constructing an argument by asking students to explain their alternative solution of finding an equivalent fraction other than using a tape diagram. “Talk to your partner. Instead of just using the tape diagram, how can we use what we know about finding equivalent fractions to find the number of twelfths equal to 1/2 foot? Again, how many inches are equal to 1/2 or 6/12 foot? Work with your partner to find how many inches are equal to 1/4 foot. (Allow students time to work.) How did you figure it out?”

    Indicator 2g.iii

    2 / 2

    Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

    The instructional materials reviewed for Eureka Grade 4 meet expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

    In each module, the instructional materials provide new or recently-introduced mathematical terms that will be used throughout the module. A compiled list of the terms along with their definitions is found in the Terminology tab at the beginning of each module. Each mathematical term that is introduced has an explanation, and some terms are supported with an example.

    The mathematical terms that are the focus of the module are highlighted for students throughout the lessons and are reiterated at the end of most lessons. The terminology that is used in the modules is consistent with the terms in the standards.

    The materials provide explicit instruction in how to communicate mathematical thinking using words, diagrams and symbols. For example:

    • In Module 5, Lesson 9, the Notes on Multiple Means of Expression states, “As the conceptual foundation for simplification is being set, the word simplify is initially avoided with students as they compose higher-value units. The process is rather referred to as composition, the opposite of decomposition, which relates directly to their drawing, work throughout the last two lessons, and work with whole numbers. When working numerically, the process is referred to at times as renaming, again in an effort to relate to whole number work.”
    • In Module 6, Lesson 9, the Notes on Terminology state, “Mass is a fundamental measure of the amount of matter in an object. While weight is a measurement that depends upon the force of gravity (one would weigh less on the moon than one does on Earth), mass does not depend upon the force of gravity. Both words are used here, but it is not important for students to recognize the distinction in mathematics at this time.”

    The materials use precise and accurate terminology and definitions when describing mathematics and support students in using them. For example:

    • In Module 2, Lesson 1, the mathematical term kilometer is in bold writing within a question listed in the Student Debrief section. These questions guide teachers in leading a class discussion. “What pattern did you notice in the equivalences for Problems 1 and 2 of the Problem Set? How did converting 1 kilometer to 1,000 meters in Problem 1(a) help you to solve Problem 2(a)?”
    • In Module 3, Lesson 22, the materials use accurate terminology and support students in using the term factor pairs. Problem Set Question 4 states, “Sheila has 28 stickers to divide evenly among 3 friends. She thinks there will be no leftovers. Use what you know about factor pairs to explain if Sheila is correct.”