2015
Eureka Math

6th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 6th Grade Overview
Cover for Eureka Math
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations
88%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
8 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
8 / 10

The instructional material for the Grade 6 meets the expectation for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional material meets the expectations for the criterion of rigor and balance with a perfect rating. Within the concept-development sections of each lesson, the mathematical topic is developed through understanding as indicated by the standards and cluster headings. Procedural skill and fluency is most evident in modules 2, 3 and 4, with an abundance of examples and computation activities that stress fluency in conjunction with the skill. Application of the mathematical concepts is abundant throughout each module. In the instructional materials, the three aspects are balanced within lessons and modules. The instructional materials also meet the expectations for the criterion of practice-content connections. They meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The instructional materials are strong in rigor and in regard to emphasis on supporting the standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning. However, improvements should be made in fully attending to the MPs being identified and used to enrich mathematics content and materials and attending to the full meaning of each practice standard. Overall the Instructional materials meet the quality expectations for Gateway 2 in rigor and mathematical practices.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

8 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations for this criterion by providing a balance of all three aspects of rigor throughout the lessons.

Within the concept development sections of each lesson, the mathematical topic is developed through understanding as indicated by the standards and cluster headings. In Grade 6 Procedural skill and fluency is most evident in module 2, 3, and 4, which cover 6.NS and 6.EE. Application of the mathematical concepts is abundant throughout each module. Overall, introduction of new concepts is done through examples that involve applications, and lessons often follow that are application reinforcements of the skills. The three aspects are balanced within the lessons and modules. Overall, the Grade 6 materials meet the criteria for rigor and balance.

Indicator 2a

2 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The materials reviewed in Grade 6 for this indicator meet the expectations by attending to conceptual understanding within the lesson.

  • Module 1 assesses all of the specific content in 6.RP in various questions. Students were required to create and explain visual models (i.e., fraction models, ratio models, etc.) as part of their understanding on a regular basis.
  • In Eureka-Grade 6, the development of division of fractions is structured in a way that includes several high-quality conceptual problems that allow students to work with several models, when applicable, and engage in discussion about the representations.
  • The lessons are scaffolded in a way that gradually builds on and expands concepts from previous lessons.
  • The lessons also structure the language of division in a way that helps transition students from the conceptual development to building fluency with the procedures.

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The materials reviewed in Grade 6 for this indicator meet the expectations by attending to fluency and procedural work within the lessons.

  • Procedural skill and fluency is most evident in modules 2, 3 and 4, which cover 6.NS and 6.EE. In addition to an abundance of examples throughout the lessons, there are also specific computation activities that provide practice with procedural skill designed to build fluency.
  • Similarly, small-group and whole-class activities are sometimes included as opening or closing activities stressing the importance of procedural skill and fluency to the development of a concept, like simplifying ratios (e.g., module 1, lesson 12).
  • Within the module on division of fractions, the review team identified the development of procedural fluency to be rushed. The unit spends a tremendous amount of time building conceptual understanding, but it is difficult to determine if there is sufficient time for students to gain fluency with the operations. Additionally, fluency in division of fractions is not assessed.
  • However, the materials do continue to spiral back to previous concepts throughout the next lessons and modules.

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The materials reviewed in Grade 6 for this indicator meet the expectations by attending to application within the lessons.

  • Application of the mathematical concepts is abundant throughout each module. Overall, the introduction of new concepts is done through examples that involve applications, and lessons often follow that reinforce application skills.
  • For example, module 1 uses application to develop 6.RP and the transition from ratios to tables to equations to graphs.
  • Similarly, as students solve equations in module 4 (6.EE), they must develop the equation based on given information and then solve.
  • In module 2, most of the problems are presented within a real-world context so that students can see the application of the math (division) to contextual situation.
  • Students are also asked to apply mathematics to solve problems.
  • There is a balance of introducing the concepts using real-world situation and also having students apply their understanding in order to solve application problems.

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The materials reviewed in Grade 6 for this indicator meet the expectations by providing a balance of rigor. The three aspects are not always combined together nor are they always separate.

  • Conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application are integrated into each module as needed. When needed, separate fluency activities are included in the series. At other times, the procedural skill are part of application and conceptual understanding exercises.
  • In module 1, lessons 1, 2, 10, 14, 15, 16 and 17 spend the majority of the time developing the concepts of ratios and unit rates.
  • Lessons 8, 12, 13 and 18 continue to develop the concepts, but also require work finding equivalent ratios and rates using specific procedure to compute.
  • The remaining lessons, as well as those already mentioned, give the students ample practice using ratios and unit rates in real-world application problems.
  • There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor in included assessments.

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

8 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criterion of meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The latter are often identified and used to enrich mathematical content. However, there are missed opportunities for identifying MPs in the materials. Materials sometimes attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. Throughout the lessons, the materials prompt students in constructing viable arguments concerning grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards. Students are also directed to explain responses in practice sets and exit ticket questions. Occasionally, the materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others. On the other hand, materials very explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics. Correct mathematical terminology is always used, enforced and reinforced. Overall, the materials meet the expectations for the practice-content connections Criterion.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

2 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs) are identified and used to enrich mathematics content.

  • All modules at the Grade 6 level list the focus MPs in the module overview and expand on each practice's connection to the module.
  • The summary in the overview is helpful because they specifically explain how the practice relates to the particular math concepts and lessons within the modules.
  • For example, MP1, MP3, MP4 and MP6 are all called out in module 5 (page 7) and include some specific explanation of how they connect to the content in the module.
  • The modules do not all find ways to address every practice standard, which is more realistic than forcing all of the practice standards into each module.
  • Within the teacher lesson notes for each lesson, the mathematical practices are again called out when appropriate, sometimes several times throughout the lesson when practices are emphasized throughout the lesson. These notes assist teachers in understanding what students should be doing to engage with the practice standard.

Indicator 2f

1 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

Materials sometimes attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

  • On page 14 of module 1 (MP6), students are asked to use terminology appropriately and accurately and are pushed to be accurate and precise in their descriptions.
  • On page 19 (MP.6) students are again asked to use precise language to answer questions.
  • Furthermore they are given specific questions using mathematical terminology to determine if they understand the language with precision.
  • Module 2, page 19 (MP 1, 2, 3, and 5) is a good example of representing a problem with a model and creating the quantitative equations. It also allows students to choose the model, although SMP.5 is not listed. The task indirectly asks students to evaluate each other's work (MP3), but this standard is not listed. Referencing the MP is often not done when it could be.
  • Page 40 is labeled MP5, which is not fully aligned to the standard since the practice problem led students through the lesson using a tape diagram. Students would likely then also use a tape diagram in example 2, which does not support them in independently choosing the appropriate tool.
  • Page 64 (MP7) opens by saying teacher should "continue to guide students to create the table shown." Depending on how much guidance is given this practice standard may not be met.

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

2 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

Materials frequently prompt students to construct viable arguments concerning grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards. Occasionally materials prompt students to analyze the arguments of others.

Throughout the discussion portion of each lesson, students are expected to explain the mathematics leading to understanding content and solving problems.

Students are also directed to explain responses in problem-set and exit ticket questions.

There are examples of students being asked to analyze the arguments of others in the lesson material or practice exercises.

Indicator 2g.ii

1 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

Materials are limited in assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

The teacher material frequently provides quality questions the teacher can pose to students to elicit their reasoning, but it falls short in providing teachers directions to then have students critique the reasoning of others.

It is not until module 3 that students and teachers are given the opportunity to reach the full meaning of MP3 with explicit mention to the educator. Even here, on page 81, teachers are not given a great deal of information to help facilitate this.

Pages 7 and 8 of module 5 give some help to educators regarding MP3.

MP3 was not identified as a focus MP until modules 5 and 6.

In module 2, MP3 is identified for teacher reference a very limited number of times. However, it was not it a focus in teacher-student discussion and instruction.

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

Materials very explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

  • Correct mathematical terminology is always used, enforced and reinforced.
  • At the beginning of each module, terminology that is new or recent is specifically highlighted and defined (and examples provided in some cases) for teachers as are terms that should be more familiar.
  • Explicit detail is always used in student-teacher discussion and explanation of process.
  • The terminology that is used in the modules is consistent with the terms in the standards.
  • Furthermore, relevant vocabulary is highlighted for students throughout the lessons and is reiterated at the end of each lesson (when relevant). This allows students to use their own resources in future lessons to review the relevant vocabulary and/or equations associated with such terms as "area" or "pi."