2018
enVisionMATH California Common Core

2nd Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 2nd Grade Overview
Cover for enVisionMATH California Common Core
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Does Not Meet Expectations
55%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
6 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
4 / 10

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 do meet expectations for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for rigor by meeting expectations on giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. The instructional materials do not meet the expectations for practice-content connections by meeting expectations on explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics and partially or not meeting expectations for the remainder of the indicators in the criterion.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

6 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 partially meet expectations for rigor and balance. The instructional materials meet expectations for giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. However, the instructional materials partially meet expectations for giving attention to conceptual understanding and applications.

Indicator 2a

1 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 partially meet expectations that the materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials present a Problem-Based Interactive Learning activity (PBIL) and a Visual Learning Bridge (VLB) within each lesson to develop conceptual understanding. However, the PBIL and VLB are teacher-directed and do not offer students the opportunity to practice conceptual understanding independently through the use of pictures, manipulatives, and models.

Overall, the instructional materials do not consistently provide students opportunities to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-4, the Overview of the PBIL states, “In this activity, children use connecting cubes to model adding two two-digit numbers and then record the sum. They will decide if regrouping is needed.” The Independent Practice directions state, “Use connecting cubes and your workmat. Add. Did you need to regroup? Circle yes or no.” There are four problems within the Independent Practice that has students using cubes to demonstrate conceptual understanding independently.
  • In Topic 10 Lesson 10-2, the Overview of the PBIL states, “Children will use place-value models to represent numbers up to 1,000. The Independent Practice directions state, “Write the numbers. Use models and your workmat if needed.” Students do not use place-value models independently to represent numbers as the pictures are given for the numbers and are shown in the exact same order of hundreds, tens, and then ones for all problems. Students can count the pictures and place the corresponding number in the chart.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-4, the Overview of the PBIL states, “In this activity, children will use place-value blocks to add three-digit numbers.” The Independent Practice directions state, “Add. Regroup if needed. Use models and your workmat to help you.” Students do not demonstrate adding three-digit numbers independently using place-value blocks as they fill in a template of a given problem.

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 meet expectations for attending to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials provide regular opportunities for students to attend to the standards 2.OA.2 and 2.NBT.5, Fluently add/subtract single digits and add/subtract within 100.

The instructional materials develop procedural skill and fluency throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 4 Lesson 4-3, students use a picture to create an array to represent repeated addition. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice repeated addition by creating arrays to represent the given story problem.
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-2, students use counters on a place-value chart to show regrouping when adding two-digit numbers. The Guided Practice includes four opportunities for students to practice regrouping.
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-7, students add three two-digit numbers. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice adding two numbers in the ones place first and then adding the last number in the ones place to find the sum of the ones place. Students decide if they need to regroup to find the solution.

The instructional materials provide opportunities to demonstrate procedural skill and fluency independently throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-5, students use a place value chart to find sums. The Independent Practice includes six opportunities for students to demonstrate regrouping independently when adding two-digit numbers.
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-5, students use a place value chart to find differences. The Independent Practice includes eight opportunities for students to demonstrate regrouping independently when subtracting two-digit numbers.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-10, students find differences of three-digit numbers. The Independent Practice includes opportunities for students to demonstrate regrouping independently when subtracting three-digit numbers.

Indicator 2c

1 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 partially meet expectations for being designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics. Engaging applications include single and multi-step problems, routine and non-routine, presented in a context in which the mathematics is applied.

Each topic includes at least one Problem Solving lesson that can be found at the end of the topic. These lessons offer students opportunities to integrate and apply concepts and skills learned from earlier lessons. Within each individual lesson, there is a section titled, Problem Solving, where students practice the application of the mathematical concept of the lesson.

However, the instructional materials provide opportunities for working with the applications of mathematics through routine problems within the Problem Solving lessons and the Problem Solving section within all lessons.

The instructional materials have few opportunities for students to engage in non-routine application throughout the grade level. Examples of routine applications, where a solution path is readily available, are:

  • In Topic 4 Lesson 1-4, students write an addition number sentence to represent a story problem. Independent Practice problem 4 states, “There are 4 children with balloons. If each has 3 balloons, how many balloons are there in all?” The problem has a blank repeated addition number sentence below the story problem. The students fill in the blanks with the numbers.
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-9, students write an addition number sentence to represent a story problem. Independent Practice problem 4 states, “Tina picks 39 blueberries. She picks 14 strawberries. How many pieces of fruit does Tina pick?” The problem has a blank addition number sentence below the story problem. The students fill in the blanks with the numbers.
  • In Topic 11 lesson 11-9, students write a subtraction problem in a place-value template to solve a story problem. Problem Solving problem 6 states, “Jeff has 517 baseball cards. He has 263 football cards. How many more baseball cards than football cards does he have?” The problem has a blank place value template with a subtraction symbol next to the story problem. The students fill in the blanks with the numbers.

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.

Lessons included components such as Daily Common Core Review, Problem-Based Interactive Learning, Develop the Concept: Visual, Guided and Independent Practice, and Problem Solving. These components are designed to develop conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and application skills.

All three aspects of rigor are present independently throughout each topic in the materials. For example in Topic 9:

  • In Lesson 9-2, students develop conceptual understanding of regrouping in subtraction when using a place value template to solve a subtraction problem.
  • In Lesson 9-3, students practice fluency of subtracting within 100 when solving subtraction problems.
  • In Lesson 9-6, students apply knowledge of subtraction while using a number line to solve a story problem.

Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single topic/unit of study throughout the materials.

  • In Topic 15 Lesson 15-2, students develop conceptual understanding of the length of an inch by using a ruler while applying that knowledge to solve the story problem.
  • In Topic 10 Lesson 10-3, students develop conceptual understanding of place value when working with place-value models, while practicing the procedural skill of addition when solving the equation.
  • In Topic 7 Lesson 7-2, students practice procedural skill of subtraction within a 100 while writing a number sentence to solve a story problem.

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

4 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 do not meet expectations for practice-content connections. The instructional materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics, but they partially or do not meet expectations for the remainder of the indicators in this criterion. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for identifying and using the mathematical practices to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade and assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

1 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 partially meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level. Overall, the MPs are identified and used in connection to the content standards, but the materials do not always use the MPs to enrich the mathematics content. In the materials, the connections between the MPs and the content standards are not always clear.

  • There are multiple places for finding the MPs in the materials: Content Guide in the Program Resources Tab, the beginning of each Topic, sometimes in the Math Background section within each Topic, and at the beginning of each lesson.
  • Within each lesson there is a check list of MPs, but not all of the checked MPs are explicitly labeled within the lesson itself.
  • In the Content Guide and the check lists, the MPs are labeled and addressed. Within enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 lessons, the MP is abbreviated.
    • MP1 - Make Sense of Problems (no perseverance)
    • MP2 - Reason Quantitatively or Reason Abstractly (treated separately)
    • MP3 - Communicate or Critique the Reasoning of Others (treated separately)
    • MP4 - Model with Mathematics
    • MP5 - Use Appropriate Tools
    • MP6 - Attend to Precision
    • MP7 - Use Structure
    • MP8 - Check for Reasonableness or Make Generalizations (treated separately)
  • In Math Background (page 1D) for Topic 1, the teacher note states, “Mathematical Practices: Make Sense of Problems - Remind children to first read a story problem in its entirety at least once, and then to think about it one sentence at a time.” The portion of MP1 about perseverance is not addressed.
  • In Lesson 11-2, MPs 1 and 5 are listed. MP1 is identified in the lesson (page 394, item 15), but MP5 is not identified. Even though MP5 is not explicitly identified, there is a note for teachers that states, “How do the blocks help you understand the number 243? How can you show 200 using place-value blocks?”
  • In Lesson 16-1, MP7 is on the check list but not explicitly denoted within the lesson. In the Topic 14 Overview, MP7 is checked, but no lesson identifies the MP as being used in teaching. In Lesson 15-5, MP7 is checked, but nowhere in the lesson is the MP explicitly taught.

Indicator 2f

0 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 do not meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

The materials do not attend to the full meaning of three or more MPs. Examples include:

  • MP1: In Lesson 4-1 exercise 12, the teacher note states, “Make Sense of Problems: Encourage children to eliminate incorrect answers. Remember that repeated addition sentences always have equal addends. Which addition sentences do not have equal addends?” Students do not make sense of the problem and persevere in solving it as the teacher leads them to a specific answer. In Lesson 8-1 exercise 13, the teacher’s note states, “Make Sense of Problems: Encourage children to look for important words such as more and in all that give clues about whether to add or subtract.” Students do not make sense of the problem on their own due to the reminders provided by the teacher.
  • MP4: In :esson 7-1, the teacher note states, “MP4 Model with Mathematics: Using little ten frames helps children see that subtracting tens is similar to subtracting ones.” Students fill in the numbers in subtraction equations provided for the students, and the suggested use of ten frames is a tool for helping student find the solution to the subtraction equation.
  • MP5: In Lesson 3-1, the teacher note states, “MP5 Use Appropriate Tools: Connecting cubes will help children understand the concepts of 0-less-than, 1-less-than, and 2-less-than.” Students do not get to choose which tool to use. In Topics 4 and 5, students use tools chosen by the materials (part-part-whole mats, two-colored counters, and base-ten blocks).
  • MP8: In Lesson 8-5, the teacher note states, “Repeated Reasoning: Ask how many children plan to write 25 first in the frame and how many plan to write 27 first. Discuss why the sum will be the same regardless of the order.” In this exercise, students make use of structure (MP7), not MP8. In the CCSSM, part of MP7 states, “Young students, for example, might notice that three and seven more is the same amount as seven and three more, ….”

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

0 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 do not meet expectations for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

Materials have few, if any, prompts for students to both construct viable arguments and/or analyze the arguments of others. Students are not given problems that are conducive to public explanations of their solutions. Students are given guided practice to follow steps and then given individual work that imitates the guided-practice problems. On occasion, there is a whole group discussion, but students do not critique the reasoning of others during the discussion. Examples include:

  • In Lesson 5-7, MP3 is cited; “Communicate: Children explain the correspondence between verbal descriptions and the data from the chart.” However, students do not critique the reasoning of others.
  • In Lesson 8-1, Visual Learning presents the problem, “What is the sum of 37 + 6?” The answer that students are expected to give is 43 based on the Place Value Mat of 4 tens and 3 ones. There is a teacher note on “Prevent Misconceptions: Some children may think that adding two-digit numbers will always require regrouping. Talk about how the example would have been different if the number sentence was 37 + 2 = __.” This is a missed opportunity for student to share the strategies they used, the answers they got, and critique the reasoning of others.
  • In Lesson 11-3 Quick Check exercise 5, page 346A, students circle a three-digit number in each box, estimate the sum of the numbers and tell if the sum is more than or less than 500, explaining how they know. The explanation is for the teacher as there are no directions to share strategies and critique others’ reasoning once the teacher has evaluated the Quick Check.
  • In Lesson 13-1 Small Group Interaction, page 419, students work in pairs. One partner takes five coins and places them on the workmat. Each person adds the value of the collection and records the answer on their worksheet. Partners then repeat together taking five coins and placing them on the workmat. Four pulls need to be made. Students are given no direction to share strategies and critique others’ reasoning while they are doing this activity.
  • In Lesson 16-3 Quick Check Master, question 4 is identified as MP3 Writing to Explain. Students are to “Look at the calendar. Choose a date and write it on the line. Write a story problem about a special day that is after this date.” This is a missed opportunity to get to the full depth of MP3 as students do not share their reasoning with classmates and critique the given reasoning.

Indicator 2g.ii

1 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 partially meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

The Teacher Edition contains a Mathematical Practice Handbook which defines each math practice and includes question stems for each MP to help the teacher engage students. MP3 offers the following questions stems: “How can I use math to explain why my work is right?” “How can I use math to explain why other people’s work is right or wrong?” and “What questions can I ask to understand other people’s thinking?”

The materials label multiple questions throughout the material as MP3 or parts of MP3; however, those labeled have little information assisting teachers to engage students in constructing viable arguments or to critique the reasoning of others. The information that the materials provide is not specific and are often hints or reminders to give students while they are solving a problem.

Materials provide little assistance to teachers in engaging students in both constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

  • Lesson 4-1 exercise 2, page 102, is an Error Intervention. “If children have difficulty seeing that repeated addition sentences have equal groups, then have them model the sentences with counters on the page.” This is a missed opportunity for teachers to use MP3 to share strategies and critique other’s thinking about addition in relation to equal groups.
  • In Lesson 6-1 page 157, “Critique the Reasoning of Others: Encourage students to examine if their partner’s reasoning makes sense.” In the Small Group Interaction, one partner is to think of a two-digit number and build that number using base-10 blocks. Students are to then add a multiple of ten to the number created. Children record their answer on the worksheet. There are no directions for teachers to encourage children to give the partner feedback or ask how they know if the answer given is correct.
  • In Lesson 8-2 exercise 5, page 220A, teacher directions for Quick Check Master state, “Writing to Explain: Children should write a two-digit number and a one-digit number on the table in the appropriate places. They should write an explanation of how they found the sum.” No direction for teachers to have students share their explanations and critique others is given for MP3.
  • In Lesson 10-3 page 305, the teacher note for MP3 states, “By listening and reacting to volunteers, students will understand the different forms and how the forms are similar.” The teacher is to Pose the Problem: “What are three different ways to write the number 519? Lead a class discussion, inviting children to share their answers.” This is a missed opportunity for teachers to have students share their answers as well as the reasoning used to arrive at the answer and what other students think of the given reason.
  • In Topic 12 Math Background, the following explanation on how to use MP3 within the topic is provided, “Mathematical Practices: Communicate - Encourage children to share their observations about shapes with one another. By describing what they see, they will be identifying the various properties of the shapes.” Critiquing others’ reasoning is not mentioned.

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 2 meet expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

  • Each lesson includes a list of vocabulary in the Lesson Overview, at the beginning of each lesson. The identified vocabulary words appear at times within the blue script that teachers may use and the words are highlighted in the student book.
  • Each Topic includes two-sided vocabulary cards in the Teacher Edition in the Printable Resources section. Each card has a word on one side and its definition and/or representation on the other. The Teacher Edition includes vocabulary activities at the start of each topic. For example, in Topic 11 in Math Background Vocabulary Activities, page 333D says, “Trading Places: Write three digits from 0 to 9 on the board. Have children arrange the 3 digits to make as many numbers as possible. Ask them if the order of the digits makes a difference and have them explain their reasoning. Then have them determine the greatest and least numbers in the group. Ask them to explain how they know which is the greatest and which is the least. Model the use of place-value vocabulary throughout the discussion.”
  • Each Topic Opener has My New Math Words followed by a Vocabulary Cards activity. In Topic 6 Mental Addition, the Topic Opener on page 155 lists My New Math Words as mental math, tens digit,and next ten with their definitions. On page 156 in Topic 6, the Vocabulary Cards activity directions state, “Cards can always be used as flashcards and for playing the matching game. Have children create large vocabulary cards with visuals to add to the classroom word wall.”
  • Correct vocabulary is sometimes not used. Examples include, use of number sentence instead of using equation, and bar graphs on page 258A are represented by histograms.