2018
enVisionMATH California Common Core

1st Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 1st Grade Overview
Cover for enVisionMATH California Common Core
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Does Not Meet Expectations
55%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
6 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
4 / 10

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 do meet expectations for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for rigor by meeting expectations on giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. The instructional materials do not meet the expectations for practice-content connections by meeting expectations on explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics and partially or not meeting expectations for the remainder of the indicators in the criterion.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

6 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 partially meet expectations for rigor and balance. The instructional materials meet expectations for giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. However, the instructional materials partially meet expectations for giving attention to conceptual understanding and applications.

Indicator 2a

1 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 partially meet expectations that the materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials present a Problem-Based Interactive Learning activity (PBIL) and a Visual Learning Bridge (VLB) within each lesson to develop conceptual understanding. However, the PBIL and VLB are teacher-directed and do not offer students the opportunity to practice conceptual understanding independently through the use of pictures, manipulatives, and models.

Overall, the instructional materials do not consistently provide students opportunities to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 7 Lesson 7-3, the Overview of the PBIL states, “In this activity, children count groups of 10, record the numeral, and write how many 10s.” The Guided Practice directions state, “Count by 10s. Then write the numbers.” There is a picture number line as well as the three different ways to write that number above the Guided Practice problems for the students to reference. The Independent Practice directions state, “Count by 10s. Then write the numbers.” The picture number line continues above the Independent Practice problems for the students to reference. Students do not count independently, write how many 10s, or record the numeral of a given set of objects as they can copy the answers from the reference above.
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-3, the Overview of the PBIL states, “In this activity, children will learn how to compare two-digit numbers using concrete materials.” The Independent Practice directions state, “Write the number of cubes. Circle is greater than or is less than.” Students do not compare two-digit numbers independently as the pictures are given for the numbers.
  • In Topic 10 Lesson 101, the Overview of the PBIL states, “In this activity, children will use tens models to find sums of multiples of 10 up to 100.” The Independent Practice directions state, “Write the numbers to complete each number sentence.” Students do not use tens models independently to find sums of multiples of 10 as the pictures are given for the number sentences.

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 meet expectations for attending to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials provide regular opportunities for students to attend to the standard 1.OA.6, Fluently add and subtract within 10.

The instructional materials develop procedural skill and fluency throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 2 Lesson 2-4, students use a picture to find the difference. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice subtraction within 10 by using pictures of cubes to represent the given problem.
  • In Topic 3 Lesson 3-4, students use a ten frame to show ways to make 10. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice using different-colored counters on a ten frame to represent ways to make 10.
  • In Topic 5 Lesson 5-8, students add three single-digit numbers. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice adding two numbers first and then adding the last number to the sum to find the solution.

The instructional materials provide opportunities to demonstrate procedural skill and fluency independently throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 2 Lesson 2-9, students use a picture to find sums and differences. The Independent Practice includes opportunities for students to demonstrate addition and subtraction independently within 10 by writing addition and subtraction number sentences for a given model.
  • In Topic 4 Lesson 4-4, students use a ten frame to find sums within 10. The Independent Practice includes opportunities for students to demonstrate addition within 10 independently by writing addition number sentences for a given model.
  • In Topic 6 Lesson 6-6, students find the difference. The Independent Practice includes opportunities for students to demonstrate subtraction independently when finding the difference of several subtraction problems within 20.

Indicator 2c

1 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 partially meet expectations for being designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics. Engaging applications include single and multi-step problems, routine and non-routine, presented in a context in which the mathematics is applied.

Each topic includes at least one Problem Solving lesson that can be found at the end of the topic. These lessons offer students opportunities to integrate and apply concepts and skills learned from earlier lessons. Within each individual lesson, there is a section titled, Problem Solving, where students practice the application of the mathematical concept of the lesson.

However, the instructional materials provide opportunities for working with the applications of mathematics through routine problems within the Problem Solving lessons and the Problem Solving section within all lessons.

The instructional materials have few opportunities for students to engage in non-routine application throughout the grade level. Examples of routine applications, where a solution path is readily available, are:

  • In Topic 4 Lesson 4-10, students write a number sentence using addition or subtraction. Independent Practice problem 3 states, “Twan picks 9 berries. Then he picks 3 more. How many berries does Twan pick?”
  • In Topic 6 Lesson 6-7, students write a number sentence using addition or subtraction. Independent Practice problem 4 states, “Dana won 12 spinning tops at the fair. She gave 6 of them to her friend. How many spinning tops does Dana have left?”
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-5, students draw a picture to solve and write a subtraction sentence. Independent Practice problem 5 states, “A store had 70 toy cars. It sold 40 cars. How many cars does the store have left?” The problem has a blank subtraction number sentence below the story problem. The students fill in the blanks with the numbers.

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.

Lessons included components such as Daily Common Core Review, Problem-Based Interactive Learning, Develop the Concept: Visual, Guided and Independent Practice, and Problem Solving. These components are designed to develop conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and application skills.

All three aspects of rigor are present independently throughout each topic in the materials. For example, in Topic 4:

  • In Lesson 4-1, students develop conceptual understanding of addition when using pictures of object to represent an addition equation.
  • In Lesson 4-3, students practice fluency of addition within 10 when solving addition problems.
  • In Lesson 4-9, students apply knowledge of subtraction when writing number sentences to solve story problems.

Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single topic/unit of study throughout the materials.

  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-1, students develop conceptual understanding of place value by drawing a picture while applying that knowledge to solve the story problem.
  • In Topic 6 Lesson 6-2, students develop conceptual understanding of subtraction when working with a ten frame to represent the problem, while practicing the procedural skill of subtraction when writing the number sentence to solve.
  • In Topic 5 Lesson 6-9, students practice procedural skill of adding three addends while writing a number sentence to solve a story problem.

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

4 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 do not meet expectations for practice-content connections. The instructional materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics, but they do not meet expectations for any other indicators in this criterion. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for identifying and using the mathematical practices to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade and assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

1 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 partially meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level. Overall, the MPs are identified and used in connection to the content standards, but the materials do not always use the MPs to enrich the mathematics content. In the materials, the connections between the MPs and the content standards are not always clear.

  • There are multiple places for finding the MPs in the materials: Content Guide in the Program Resources Tab, the beginning of each Topic, sometimes in the Math Background section within each Topic, and at the beginning of each lesson.
  • Within each lesson there is a check list of MPs, but not all of the checked MPs are explicitly labeled within the lesson itself.
  • In the Content Guide and the check lists, the MPs are labeled and addressed. Within enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 lessons, the MP is abbreviated.
    • MP1 - Make Sense of Problems (no perseverance)
    • MP2 - Reason Quantitatively or Reason Abstractly (treated separately)
    • MP3 - Communicate or Critique the Reasoning of Others (treated separately)
    • MP4 - Model with Mathematics
    • MP5 - Use Appropriate Tools
    • MP6 - Attend to Precision
    • MP7 - Use Structure
    • MP8 - Check for Reasonableness or Make Generalizations (treated separately)
  • In Math Background (page 1D) for Topic 1, the teachers note states, “Mathematical Practices Attend to Precision: To learn how to represent addition, children need many experiences moving among real-world addition stories, counters or pictures, and the symbols for addition.” This explanation is MP2 Reason Abstractly and Quantitatively, not MP6 Attend to Precision.
  • In Lesson 10-3, there is a discussion and activity built around MP2 when adding 10, yet that MP is not identified. In the Visual Learning section, students answer, “How do you add 3 tens to 28 without seeing 28 cubes?” Followed by, “Why does the tens digit change? What digit stays the same? Explain.”
  • In Lesson 12-3, MPs 2, 6, and 8 are identified. Within the lesson, there is a discussion and activity built around MP5."Should teacher steps be used to measure a pencil? What should the teacher use?" Yet that MP is not identified.

Indicator 2f

0 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 do not meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

The materials do not attend to the full meaning of three or more MPs. Examples include:

  • MP1: In Lesson 2-11, students solve the problem: “There are 9 children playing inside. Three of them go outside. How many children are left inside?” The teacher note states, “MP1 Make Sense of Problems: Ask children what they know about the story problem. What type of number sentence do you need to use to solve the problem? Why?” No perseverance is required by students in this lesson as part of MP1. In Lesson 11-1, the teacher note states, “MP1 Make Sense of Problems: Remind children to make sure that they understand what is happening in the problem. What does it mean for the teddy bears to be sold? Does this mean more bears are added or bears are taken away?” No perseverance is required by students in this lesson as part of MP1.
  • MP4: In Lesson 11-2 page 359, the teacher note states, “MP4 Model with Mathematics: Have children tell which direction they would move on a hundred chart to subtract 30 from 50.” Students do not create equations that represent the subtraction problem. Also, there is no context in which modeling with mathematics can be used.
  • MP5: In Lesson 3-2, the teacher note states, “MP5 Use Appropriate Tools: Look for children to use a ten frame to represent numbers up to 10. Ask children how they can recognize a number on a ten frame without counting every counter.” Students do not get to choose which tool to use. In lesson 15-2, the teacher notes states, “Ask children how they can use an organized list to find out all the ways pattern blocks are used to make a shape.” Students are told which to tool to use.
  • MP7: In Lesson 8-6 exercise 6, the teacher note states, “Encourage children to gather information from the table. 'Look at the Tens column. Do you see a pattern? How can it help you find the missing number of tens?'” The teacher is instructed to repeat for finding the missing number of 1s. Rather than students looking for and making use of patterns in the table, they are led step-by-step through the exercise.

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

0 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 do not meet expectations for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

Materials have few, if any, prompts for students to both construct viable arguments and/or analyze the arguments of others. Students are not given problems that are conducive to public explanations of their solutions. Students are given guided practice to follow steps and then given individual work that imitates the guided-practice problems. On occasion, there is a whole-group discussion, but students do not critique the reasoning of others during the discussion. Examples include:

  • In Topic 2, MP3 is listed in Lesson 2-4, but there is no evidence that student materials include questions or problems where students evaluate someone else’s explanation, work, or thinking.
  • The Lesson 2-7 Communicate says, “Read the problem aloud. Ask children to explain what number they are supposed to find. [The number of blue fish.] Model solving the problem on a part-part-whole mat with connecting cubes.” Students are not constructing a viable argument or critiquing the reasoning of others.
  • In the Visual Learning Lesson 14-1, page 434, students are asked, “Do you think we could arrange the counters differently to make counting them easier?” It is followed with a direction to consider all responses. The students do not critique each other’s reasoning.
  • In Lesson 2-4 Quick Check, MP3 is cited for the following example: “Write a story about the ladybugs. Use words and numbers. Then write a subtraction sentence to show how many are left.” Students do not analyze the arguments of others; they explain their own thinking. In Lesson 5-1: " Encourage children to use examples as they discuss why some numbers are doubles and some are not.” In Lesson 5-3: “Ask children to explain how they used the strategy of adding two to a doubles fact to solve the equations.” MP3 is cited; however, in both lessons, students do not create an argument or critique the arguments of others.
  • In Lesson 4-10 page 154, teachers are instructed how to prevent errors in Error Intervention. "If students add 7 and 4 instead of subtracting 4 from 7, ... ask them what they would find if they added. Would that help find how many more stars Charlie drew than Luz? What kind of number sentence should you write? Why?” An opportunity to use MP3 to critique the reasoning of others is missed.
  • In Topic 7 page 259, Problem Solving: Looking for a Pattern. In the Pose the Problem section, the following problem is given: “There are 6 people. Each person is wearing 2 shoes. How could you find how many shoes they are wearing in all? You may use your counters to help you solve.” The next direction is for the teacher to allow time for the students to solve. This is a missed opportunity to have children share their thoughts before solving the problem or asking children once they’ve solved the problem, how they did so, then critique each other’s reasoning.
  • In Lesson 16-3 page 521, students are given a square and asked, “How could a square be folded in halves or fourths? Give children time to look at their squares and discuss in pairs.” The lesson continues to have students fold exactly how the teacher folds. This is a missed opportunity to have students fold their own paper into halves and discuss what they did, then critique what others did with their squares.

Indicator 2g.ii

1 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 partially meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

The Teacher Edition contains a Mathematical Practice Handbook which defines each math practice and includes question stems for each MP to help the teacher engage students. MP3 offers the following questions stems: “How can I use math to explain why my work is right?” “How can I use math to explain why other people’s work is right or wrong?” and “What questions can I ask to understand other people’s thinking?”

The materials label multiple questions throughout the material as MP3 or parts of MP3; however, those labeled have little information assisting teachers to engage students in constructing viable arguments or to critique the reasoning of others. The information that the materials provide is not specific and are often hints or reminders to give students while they are solving a problem.

Materials provide little assistance to teachers in engaging students in both constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

  • In Lesson 1-5 there is little supporting commentary or questioning to assist teachers in helping students form or develop an explanation. For example, the prompt states, “As children say the sentences, have children ask their partner to check and see if they agree. If there is not agreement, have children discuss their opinions, talking about the workmat, the cubes, and the sentences to support their view.” This tag is in the Problem-Based Interactive Learning section. How students engage in deep mathematical conversation if they do agree is not explained further. When students disagree, only then critiquing others is encouraged.
  • In Lesson 2-6 Extend, students explore the classroom looking for items to compare, “such as board erasers and erasable markers for the board or doors and windows. Encourage discussion.” Teachers are not given further direction as to whether students talk to each other or bring back their findings for a whole-group debrief.
  • Topic 5 Communicate, page 163, states, "Encourage children to use examples as they discuss why some numbers are doubles and some are not.” There is no explicit mention of having children make sense of one another’s argument.
  • In Lesson 6-2 Prevent Misconceptions, page 211, the teacher note says, "Children may think that the number they subtract to make 10 is the answer. Emphasize that they have to subtract a total of 6 counters, not 4, to find the answer to the problem.” This is a missed opportunity to get students in a discussion about subtraction strategies and critiquing others' reasoning when solving subtraction problems.
  • In Lesson 11-5, pages 373-74, students are to solve the problem: “Jack took 50 berries from the basket. There are 40 berries left in the basket. How many berries were in the basket to begin with?” Teacher is directed that the “Drawing should show 8 boxes with 6 10-boxes underneath.” The teacher note for Constructing Arguments exercise 6, says: "Have children explain how they knew where to write the numbers in the subtraction sentence. Compare children’s drawings and have them explain how their drawing represents the problem.” This is a missed opportunity for students to share strategies used and for their classmates to critique their reasoning.
  • In Topic 12 Math Background, the following explanation on how to use MP3 within the topic is provided: “Mathematical Practices: Communicate - Use language such as ‘This football is 2 straws long’ to emphasize that measurement is approximate.” The Topic 14 Math Background states, “Mathematical Practices: Communicate - To help children understand the meaning of graphs, emphasize making a class graph of favorite shoe colors shows which colors the class likes more or likes less. It is not about which color ‘wins’ or ‘loses.’” Critiquing others' arguments is not mentioned in either topic.

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 meet the expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

  • Each lesson includes a list of vocabulary in the Lesson Overview at the beginning of each lesson. The identified vocabulary words appear at times within the blue script that teachers may use, and the words are highlighted in the student edition.
  • Each Topic includes two-sided vocabulary cards in the Teacher Edition in the Printable Resources section. Each card has a word on one side and its definition and/or representation on the other. The Teacher Edition includes vocabulary activities at the start of each topic. For example, in Topic 5 in Math Background Vocabulary Activities, page 161D, “Double Up: Write an addition fact on each of three index cards. Include a doubles fact, a doubles-plus-1 fact, and a doubles-plus-2 fact. Put the cards on a table along with vocabulary cards for doubles, doubles-plus-1, and doubles-plus-2. Have children find an addition fact to go with each vocabulary card. Repeat the activity on a different day with a different set of addition facts.”
  • Each Topic Opener has My New Math Word followed by a Vocabulary Cards activity. In Topic 4 Addition and Subtraction Facts to 12, the Topic Opener on page 115 lists My New Math Words as near double and 1 less than along their definitions. On page 238 in Topic 4, the Vocabulary Cards activity directions state, “Cards can always be used as flashcards. Have children create large vocabulary cards with visuals to add to the classroom word wall.”
  • In Lesson 15-3 page 476, enVisions California Edition uses the combination of straight sides and curved shapes to ask if both have straight sides. There is a call to prevent misconceptions: “Some children may mistake a curve for a side. Tell children that side means straight side.” There is another misconception in the line of questioning about the blue shape. “How do you know it’s a square?” Expected student response is “It has 4 sides.” “The pink shape has 4 sides also. Why is that a square?” Expected student response is, “All four sides of a square are the same.” This leaves a possibility for a misconception because a non-square rhombus also has all four sides the same. A more precise response attends to the corners of a square all being the same as well.
  • In Lesson 15-4, students use pattern blocks to compose shapes. The shapes are referred to by their color rather than their specific name. In Grade 1, students are to learn about trapezoids. This is a missed opportunity to take students away from “non-defining attributes (e.g., color)” and work on precise vocabulary.