2018
enVisionMATH California Common Core

5th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 5th Grade Overview
Cover for enVisionMATH California Common Core
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations
66%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
6 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
6 / 10

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 partially meet expectations for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for rigor by meeting expectations on giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. The instructional materials also partially meet the expectations for practice-content connections by meeting expectations on explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics and prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

6 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 partially meet expectations for rigor and balance. The instructional materials meet expectations for giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. However, the instructional materials partially meet expectations for giving attention to conceptual understanding and applications.

Indicator 2a

1 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 partially meet expectations that the materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials present a Problem-Based Interactive Learning activity (PBIL) and a Visual Learning Bridge (VLB) within each lesson to develop conceptual understanding. However, the PBIL and VLB are teacher-directed and do not offer students the opportunity to practice conceptual understanding independently through the use of pictures, manipulatives, and models.

Overall, the instructional materials do not consistently provide students opportunities to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 1 Lesson 1-5, the Overview of PBIL states, “Students will learn to compare decimals through the thousandths place.” In the teacher-directed PBIL activity, students use a place-value chart to compare decimals to the thousandths place. The Develop the Concept: Visual section of the lesson shows three separate steps to compare decimals without place-value charts. Step 1 states, “Write the numbers, lining up the decimal points. Start at the left. Compare digits of the same place value.” The directions for the Independent Practice state, “Copy and complete. Write $$\gt$$, $$\lt$$, or = for each circle.” Students do not demonstrate the conceptual understanding of comparing decimals to the thousandths place independently as $$\gt$$, $$\lt$$, and = are shown as sample answers in the 12 problems in the Independent Practice.
  • In Topic 3 Lesson 3-3, the Overview of PBIL states, “Students extend the addition of partial products to the standard algorithm to multiply two-digit numbers by multiples of ten.” In the teacher-directed PBIL activity, students use the area model to represent the product of 90 x 23. The directions for the Independent Practice state, “In 10 through 30, multiply to find each product.” Students do not demonstrate the conceptual understanding of multiplying two-digit numbers independently as products are shown as sample answers in the 21 problems in the Independent Practice.
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-5, the Overview of PBIL states, “Students formulate a method for adding fractions with unlike denominators.” In the teacher-directed PBIL activity, students use tape diagrams to represent the sum of 1/4 and 3/8. The directions for the Independent Practice state, “In 7 through 22, find each sum. Simplify, if necessary.” Students do not demonstrate the conceptual understanding of adding fractions with unlike denominators independently as sums are shown as sample answers in the 16 problems in the Independent Practice.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-4, the Overview of PBIL states, “Students find a fraction of a fraction.” In the teacher-directed PBIL activity, students fold paper to demonstrate finding 1/4 of 1/2. The Develop the Concept: Visual section of the lesson describes the procedural steps of multiplying fractions. The directions for the Independent Practice state, “In 7 through 31, find each product. Simplify if necessary.” Students do not demonstrate the conceptual understanding of multiplying fractions independently as products are shown as sample answers in the 25 problems in the Independent Practice.

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 meet expectations for attending to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials provide regular opportunities for students to attend to the standard 5.NBT.5, Fluently multiply multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm.

The instructional materials develop procedural skill and fluency throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 3 Lesson 3-4, the Develop the Concept: Visual section of the lesson develops procedural skill when modeling the standard algorithm for multiplication of a two-digit number by a two-digit number in three separate steps. Step 2 states, “Multiply by the tens. Regroup. 38 x 12” The Independent Practice section includes a template for filling in the numbers to the partial products when practicing the standard algorithm for multiplication.
  • In Topic 12 Lesson 12-3, the Develop the Concept: Visual section of the lesson models finding the combined volume of non-overlapping right rectangular prisms. The materials develop procedural skill when students multiply multi-digit numbers in the formula for volume.
  • In Topic 13 Lesson 13-3, students develop procedural skill and fluency when using the standard algorithm for multiplication when converting units of weight. Problem Solving problem 1 states, “The world’s heaviest lobster weighted 44 pounds, 6 ounces. How many ounces did the lobster weigh? Describe the steps you took to find your answer?”

The instructional materials provide opportunities to demonstrate procedural skill and fluency independently throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 3 Lesson 3-5, the Independent Practice section of the lesson provides multi-digit multiplication practice problems for students to demonstrate knowledge of procedural skill. Problem 24 states, “35 x 515”
  • In Topic 4 Lesson 4-1, the Common Core Review provides students with a multi-digit multiplication word problem. Problem 2 states, “Meg buys 12 bags of sunflower seeds. Each bag has 58 seeds. How many seeds does Meg buy?”
  • In Topic 4 Lesson 4-7, the Common Core Review provides students with a multi-digit multiplication word problem. Problem 4 states, “Kevin buys a car. His car payment is $248 per month. After 55 payments, how much has Kevin paid?”

Indicator 2c

1 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 partially meet expectations for being designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics. Engaging applications include single and multi-step problems, routine and non-routine, presented in a context in which the mathematics is applied.

Each topic includes at least one Problem Solving lesson that can be found at the end of the topic. These lessons offer students opportunities to integrate and apply concepts and skills learned from earlier lessons. Within each individual lesson, there is a section titled, Problem Solving, where students practice the application of the mathematical concept of the lesson. However, the applications of mathematics in Problem Solving are routine problems.

The instructional materials have few opportunities for students to engage in non-routine application throughout the grade level. Examples of routine applications, where a solution path is readily available, are:

  • In Topic 2 Lesson 2-7, students use addition and subtraction to solve a multi-step word problem. Independent Practice problem 4 states, “Elias saved $30 in July, $21.50 in August, and $50 in September. He spent $18 on movies and $26.83 on gas. How much money does Elias have left?”
  • In Topic 4, Stop and Practice, students determine if a statement involving decimals is true or false and explain their reasoning. Number Sense problem 24 states, “The difference of 15.9 and 4.2 is closer to 11 than 12.”
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-7, students solve word problems involving addition and subtraction of fractions with unlike denominators. Problem Solving problem 26 states, “Tara made a snack mix with 3/4 cup of rice crackers and 2/3 cup of pretzels. She then ate 5/8 cup of the mix for lunch. How much snack mix is left?”
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-6, students solve real-world problems involving multiplication of fractions and mixed numbers. Problem Solving problem 25 states, “The city plans to extend the Wildflower Trail 2 1/2 times its current length in the next 5 years. How long will the Wildflower Trail be at the end of 5 years?”
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-12, students use multiplication of mixed numbers to solve a word problem. Independent Practice problem 7 states, “Tina is making a sign to advertise the school play. The width of the sign is 2 2/3 feet. If the length is 4 1/2 times as much, then what is the length of the sign?”
  • In Topic 14 Lesson 14-5, students use division and addition to solve a multi-step word problem. Independent Practice problem 14 states, “Students at Gifford Elementary collected stamps from various countries. The students collected 546 stamps from Africa, 132 from Europe, and 321 from North and South America. If a stamp album can hold 24 stamps on each page, how many pages will the stamps completely fill?”

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.

Lessons include components that serve to develop the three aspects of rigor. These include a Daily Common Core Review, Problem-Based Interactive Learning, Develop the Concept: Visual, Guided and Independent Practice, and Problem Solving. All three aspects of rigor are present independently throughout each topic in the materials. For example, in Topic 11:

  • In Lesson 11-5, students develop conceptual understanding of multiplying fractions when creating area models to model the solution.
  • In Lesson 11-10, students practice the procedural skill of multiplying by a reciprocal to find a quotient. Independent Practice problem 12 states, “In 12 through 16, use multiplication to find each quotient. 3 divided by 1/5”
  • In Lesson 11-11, students apply knowledge of dividing unit fractions by a non-zero whole number to solve word problems. Problem Solving problem 11 states, “Sue has 1/2 gallon of milk. She needs to pour 4 glasses of milk. What fraction of a gallon should she put in each glass?”

Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single topic/unit of study throughout the materials.

  • In Topic 2 Lesson 2-4, students develop conceptual understanding of adding and subtracting decimals while practicing the procedural skill of the standard algorithm of addition and subtraction of decimals when using hundredths grids to solve a problem. Independent Practice problem 9 states, “In 9 through 18, add or subtract. Use hundredths grids to help. 0.1 + 0.73”
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 8-3, students practice procedural skill of following the order of operations to solve a word problem. Problem Solving problem 19 states, “Soledad solves the problem below and thinks that the answer is 92.3. Jill solves the same problem, but thinks that the answer is 67.5. Who is correct? [(65 + 28.2) - (7.8 + 5.5)] = 12.4”
  • In Topic 14 Lesson 14-3, students develop conceptual understanding of creating line plots displaying a set of fractional measurements and use information on the line plot to solve word problems. Problem Solving problems 10-13 state, “For 10-13, use the data set at the right. Marvin’s Tree Service purchased several spruce tree saplings. The saplings had the heights listed in the table. 10. Draw a table to organize the data. 11. What is the height of the shortest sapling? 12. How many saplings are 27 1/4 tall? 13. Draw a line plot of the data.”

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

6 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 partially meet expectations for practice-content connections. The instructional materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics and prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for identifying and using the mathematical practices to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade and assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

1 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVision Grade 5 partially meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level.

Mathematical Practice standards are identified in three places within the Teacher Edition: Problem Based Interactive Learning activity, Guided Practice exercises, and Problem-Solving exercises. Throughout the teacher and student editions, there is a symbol that indicates that one or more MP is being used. Key phrases such as “Look for Patterns,” “Use Tools,” and “Reason” identify which practice is being highlighted. At the beginning of each lesson, all eight mathematical practices are listed. A check mark is placed beside each practice that is to be addressed within the lesson.

An example of an MP that is identified but does not enrich the mathematical content includes:

  • In Topic 7 Lesson 7-1, MP1 is identified with the icon and the key word “Persevere." Question 8 states, “If Shandra wanted to cut the cloth into 100 strips, how wide would each strip be?”

An example of MPs that are identified and enrich the mathematical content include:

  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-1, MP6 is identified with the icon and the key word “Be Precise.” Question 22 states, “Which is a prime number?” Four answer choices are given for the students. Teachers are given information that reads, “Remind students to review the definition of a prime number.”
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-2, MP4 is identified with the icon and the key word “Model.” Question 26 states, “Draw a diagram that could be used to build a cube.” Teachers are given information that reads, “Remind students that, when looking at the cube in Exercise 26, there are faces that they cannot see in the drawing.”

An example where the MPs are incorrectly labeled:

  • In Topic 9 Lesson 9-6, MP7 is identified with the icon and the key word “Use Structure.” Question 26 states, “ Find the perimeter of the figure below.” A triangle with side lengths is shown.

Overall, all eight math practices are included within the curriculum and are not treated as separate standards. However, the standards are not used to enrich the content. They are aligned to some of the problems as an explanation to what math practice students might need to use to solve the problem.

Indicator 2f

0 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 do not meet expectations for carefully attending to the full meaning of each practice standard.

The materials do not attend to the full meaning of each of the eight MPs. The MPs are defined in both the topic and lesson narratives, as appropriate, but are not fully attended to when students interact with the aligned problems in the materials.

The materials do not attend to the full meaning of three or more MPs. Examples that demonstrate this include:

MP1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.

  • In Topic 12 Lesson 12-3, MP1 is identified for question 12 in the Problem Solving section. Question 12 states, “A carpenter is cutting out wooden blocks in the shape shown below. How much wood is needed for one block?” It is a multiple-choice question, and the teacher is given information on how to make sense of the problems by reminding students to use problem-solving skills and strategies.
  • In Topic 14 Lesson 14-4, MP1 is identified in the PBIL section. Students use organized data on a line plot to find solutions to questions such as, “What was the difference between the greatest amount of rain in a day and the least amount of rain in a day?” This requires the subtraction of like denominators and does not require perseverance to solve.

MP4 Model with mathematics.

  • In Topic 13 Lesson 13-2, MP4 is identified for question 28 in the Problem Solving section. Question 28 states, “One tablespoon (tbsp) equals 3 teaspoons (tsp) and 1 fluid ounce equals 2 tablespoons. A recipe calls for 3 tablespoons of pineapple juice. A jar of pineapple juice has 12 fluid ounces. How many teaspoons of juice are in the jar?” The teacher is told to “encourage students to draw a picture to help them solve this problem.”
  • In Topic 14 Lesson 14-5, MP4 is identified for question 12 in the Problem Solving section. Question 12 states, “Write and solve an equation to find the total number of hours, h, astronauts spent in space during the Gemini and Apollo space programs combined.” There is a chart given for this problem. The teacher is prompted to question the students about the chart to guide them as they answer this question.

MP5 Use appropriate tools strategically.

  • In Topic 12 Lesson 12-3, MP5 is identified for question 9 in the Problem Solving section. Question 9 states, “Sarah is wrapping a gift for her friend and uses a ribbon to tie both boxes together. What is the volume of the combined boxes?” Two pictures of boxes are given with dimensions. Students do not use or choose a tool to solve the problem.
  • In Topic 13 Lesson 13-4, MP5 is identified for question 19 in the Problem Solving section. Question 19 states, “What is the equivalent length of the bumblebee bat in centimeters?” A labeled picture with the measurement of the bat given in millimeters is included. This is a multiple-choice question, and students do not use or choose a tool to solve the problem.

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

2 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 meet expectations for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

Students justify their work and explain their thinking; however, evaluating and critiquing the work of others are found less often in the materials. Students critique the reasoning of in problems that ask them if they agree or disagree with a statement or solution.

Student materials prompt students to both construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others. Examples that demonstrate this include:

  • In Topic 6 Lesson 6-1, Problem Solving Question 40 states, “Construct Arguments. Marcia and David each multiplied 5.6 x 10 and 7.21 x 100. Marcia got 0.56 and 0.721 for her products. David got 56 and 721 for his products. Which student multiplied correctly? How do you know?”
  • In Topic 10 Lesson 10-3, Guided Practice Question 6 states, “Construct Arguments. Kyle used 9 as an estimate for 3 1/6 plus 5 7/8. He added and got 9 1/24 for the actual sum. Is his answer reasonable?”
  • In Topic 15 Lesson 15-2, Guided Practice Question 3 states, “Construct Arguments. Can a right triangle have an obtuse angle in it? Why or Why not?”

Examples where there are missed opportunities to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others include:

  • In Topic 1 Lesson 1-3, Problem Solving Question 30 states, “Frank reasoned that in the number 0.558, the value of the 5 in the hundredths place is ten times as great as the 5 in the tenths place. Is this correct? If not, justify your reasoning.” Students only justify their answer if they disagree with the claim.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 11-1, Problem Solving Question 21 states, “Jo said that when you multiply a nonzero whole number by a fraction less than 1, the product is always less than the whole number. Do you agree?” Students critique the reasoning of others; however, they are not asked to justify their conclusion.

Indicator 2g.ii

1 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 partially meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

The Teacher Edition contains a Mathematical Practice Handbook which defines each math practice and includes question stems for each MP to help the teacher engage students. MP3 offers the following questions stems: “How can I use math to explain why my work is right?”, “How can I use math to explain why other people’s work is right or wrong?”, and “What questions can I ask to understand other people’s thinking?”

The materials label multiple questions as MP3 or parts of MP3; however, those labeled have little information assisting teachers to engage students in constructing viable arguments or to critique the reasoning of others. The information that the materials provide is not specific and are often hints or reminders to give students while they are solving a problem.

There are some missed opportunities where the materials could assist teachers in engaging students in both constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others. For example:

  • In Topic 1 Lesson 1-1, Problem Solving Question 31 states, “Critique Reasoning. Paul says that in the number 6,367, one 6 is 10 times as great as the other 6. Is he correct? Explain why or why not.” No teacher guidance is given for this question.

Examples where teachers are supported, although generally, to assist students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others include:

  • In Topic 2 Lesson 2-5, Problem Solving Question 28 “Critique Reasoning. Juan adds 3.8 + 4.6 and gets a sum of 84. Is his answer correct? Tell how you know.” Teacher guidance for this MP is “If students have difficulty understanding how Juan’s answer is not correct, ask: If you add two numbers less than 5, will their sum be greater than 80?”
  • In Topic 6 Lesson 6-6, Problem Solving Question 33 “Construct Arguments. Mary Ann ordered 3 pens and a box of paper on the Internet. Each pen cost $1.65 and the paper cost $3.95 per box. How much did she spend?” Teacher guidance for this MP is “Remind students that they may need to obtain information that is not given explicitly in the problem.”

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 5 meet expectations for attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

The materials provide explicit instruction in how to communicate mathematical thinking using words, diagrams, and symbols.

  • Within the Yearlong Curriculum Guide, a list is provided for the Key Math Terms that are used each month of the school year.
  • The teacher and student editions include a Review What You Know section at the beginning of every topic. This section reviews vocabulary used in prior topics along with introducing the vocabulary in the current topic. Students complete this activity by inserting the correct vocabulary word into a sentence to correctly identify its definition.
  • Within Review What You Know, the new vocabulary listed for Topic 7 includes: dividend, decimal, divisor, and quotient.

The materials use precise and accurate terminology and definitions when describing mathematics and support students in using them.

  • In the Student Edition, vocabulary terms can be found highlighted in yellow within the Visual Learning Bridge across the top of the pages. A definition in context is provided for each term and is used in context during instruction, practice, and assessment.
  • In the Implementation Guide, Teacher Edition, as well as the Student Edition, a complete Glossary is included and can be referred to at any time.
  • No examples of incorrect use of vocabulary, symbols, or numbers were found within the materials.

Overall, the materials for both students and teachers have multiple ways for students to engage with the vocabulary of Mathematics.