About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Connecting Math Concepts - Elementary | Math
Math K-2
The instructional materials reviewed in Grades K-2 do not meet expectations for focus nor for coherence. Each grade level includes many instances of assessing topics above grade level. Grades K-2 do not devote sufficient time to the major work of the grade level standards. There are a few instances in each grade of supporting work continuing the learning in major work clusters. The materials do not meet other indicators of coherence, including attending to the progressions, connecting mathematical topics, and providing adequate lessons and activities to support a full year of learning.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 3-5
The instructional materials reviewed in Grades 3-5 do not meet expectations for focus nor for coherence. Each grade level includes many instances of assessing topics above grade level. Grades 3-5 do not devote sufficient time to the major work of the grade level standards. There are a few instances in each grade of supporting work continuing the learning in major work clusters. The materials do not meet other indicators of coherence, including attending to the progressions, connecting mathematical topics, and providing adequate lessons and activities to support a full year of learning.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 5th Grade
Alignment Summary
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 do not meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. In Gateway 1, the instructional materials do not meet the expectations for focus on major work because of assessing too many above, grade-level topics and devoting an insufficient amount of time to the major work of the grade. The materials also do not meet the expectations for coherence because they do not make sufficient connections between the standards. Since the materials do not meet expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1, they were not reviewed for evidence of rigor and the mathematical practices in Gateway 2.
5th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
The materials for Grade 5 did not meet expectations for focus and coherence. They also did not meet the criteria for indicators 1a and 1b. Connecting Math Concepts assesses future grade level content (ratios, finding the area of triangles, circles and parallelograms, solving equations with multiple variables, calculating volume of cylinders, understanding place value beyond hundredths, converting decimals and fractions to percents, finding averages and determining probability). Additionally, the instructional materials only devote 60 percent of class time to major work of the grade. The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 do not meet the expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards. In some cases, the supporting work enhances and supports the major work of the grade level, and in others, it does not. There are several missed opportunities to connect supporting work to major work. The amount of time needed to complete the lessons is appropriate for a school year of approximately 140-190 days, however there are many major modifications that need to be made in order to teach at the depth required for students to master all grade level standards. The instructional materials do not: identify or connect prior or future grade-level work to Grade 5 work, provide students with extensive work with Grade 5 level work, or relate Grade 5 level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades. The materials do not include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings. Materials rarely connect two or more clusters in a domain or two or more domains in a grade when appropriate. Overall, the Grade 5 materials do not support coherence and are not consistent with the progressions in the standards.
Gateway 1
v1.0
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The materials for Grade 5 did not meet the criteria for focus. A positive of the assessment program is the formative assessments (mastery tests), which are aligned with a specific remedy section for repeated practice of concepts students have not mastered. Unfortunately, the following above grade level topics are assessed: ratios, finding the area of triangles, circles and parallelograms, solving equations with multiple variables, calculating volume of cylinders, understanding place value beyond thousandths, converting decimals and fractions to percents, finding averages and determining probability. Overall, the instructional materials assess numerous topics before they should be introduced. The materials only devote 60 percent of class time to major work of the grade. A larger percentage of major work is presented in Book 2, which is toward the end of the instructional year, and may not allow enough time for students to develop mastery. Overall, the instructional materials allocate too much instructional time to clusters of standards that are not major work of Grade 5.
Indicator 1A
The instructional materials reviewed for Connecting Math Concepts Level F (Grade 5) do not meet the expectations for focus within assessment. For this indicator, the review team examined all mastery tests and both cumulative tests. Overall, the instructional material assesses content from future grades within the majority of the summative assessments. The assessments would not be viable if the above grade level material was omitted, as there are too many assessment questions within the series that are above grade level.
Review Team note: The Level F (Grade 5) Teacher Guide identifies the cumulative tests as “optional” in two places (pages 3-4); however, the publisher orientation session identified these assessments as a required component of the grade level program. Therefore, the cumulative tests are included in this review.
Mastery Test 1: All items align or partially align to grade-level standards.
Mastery Test 2: All items align or partially align to grade-level standards.
Mastery Test 3: All items align or partially align to grade-level standards.
Mastery Test 4:
- Items in part 1 assess writing ratio fractions and using ratios to solve problems which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 7 assess writing the reciprocal of a fraction which aligns to standards within 6.NS.A.
- Items in part 12 assess determining the value of a variable in an equation which aligns to standards within 6.EE.B.
Mastery Test 5:
- Items in part 4 assess finding the area of triangles and parallelograms which aligns to standards within 6.G.A.
- Items in part 8 assess determining the value of a variable in an equation which aligns to standards within 6.EE.B.
Mastery Test 6:
- Items in part 1 assess writing ratio fractions and using ratios to solve problems which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 7 assess finding the area of triangles and parallelograms which aligns to standards within 6.G.A.
Mastery Test 7:
- Items in part 6 assess finding equivalent ratio fractions and graphing their ordered pairs which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
Mastery Test 8:
- Items in part 8 assess writing ratio fractions and using ratios to solve problems which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 9 assess finding the area of circles which aligns to standards within 7.G.B.
- Items in part 12 assess finding the volume of a cylinder which aligns to standards within 8.G.C.
Mastery Test 9:
- Items in part 5 assess finding averages which aligns to standards within 6.SP.B.
- Items in part 1 assess finding equivalent ratio fractions and graphing their ordered pairs which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 2 assess writing equations with variables which aligns to standards within 6.EE.C.
- Items in part 3 assess solving with variables which aligns to standards within 6.EE.A.
Mastery Test 10:
- Items in parts 4 and 11 assess finding averages which aligns to standards within 6.SP.B.
- Items in part 3 assess solving problems involving probability which aligns to standards within 7.SP.C.
Mastery Test 11:
- Items in part 10 assess finding averages which aligns to standards within 6.SP.B.
- Items in part 6 assess solving problems involving probability which aligns to standards within 7.SP.C.
Mastery Test 12:
- Items in part 4b assess finding averages which aligns to standards within 6.SP.B.
- Items in part 7 assess solving problems involving probability which aligns to standards within 7.SP.C.
- Items in part 1 assess writing equations with variables which aligns to standards within 6.EE.C.
Mastery Test 13: All items align or partially align to grade level standards.
Cumulative Test 1:
- Items in part 5 assess writing ratio fractions and using ratios to solve problems which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 1 assess finding the area of triangles and parallelograms which aligns to standards within 6.G.A.
- Items in part 7 assess determining the value of a variable in an equation which aligns to standards within 6.EE.B.
Cumulative Test 2:
- Items in parts 12 and 17b assess finding averages which aligns to standards within 6.SP.B.
- Items in part 10 assess writing ratio fractions and using ratios to solve problems which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 4 assess finding the area of circles which aligns to standards within 7.G.B
- Items in part 24 assess solving problems involving probability which aligns to standards within 7.SP.C.
- Items in part 9 assess finding the volume of a cylinder which aligns to standards within 8.G.C.
- Items in parts 5 and 10 assess finding equivalent ratio fractions and graphing their ordered pairs which aligns to standards within 6.RP.A.
- Items in part 21 assess solving with variables which aligns to standards within 6.EE.A.
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
The materials for Grade 5 did not meet the criteria for focus. A positive of the assessment program is the formative assessments (mastery tests), which are aligned with a specific remedy section for repeated practice of concepts students have not mastered. Unfortunately, the following above grade level topics are assessed: ratios, finding the area of triangles, circles and parallelograms, solving equations with multiple variables, calculating volume of cylinders, understanding place value beyond thousandths, converting decimals and fractions to percents, finding averages and determining probability. Overall, the instructional materials assess numerous topics before they should be introduced. The materials only devote 60 percent of class time to major work of the grade. A larger percentage of major work is presented in Book 2, which is toward the end of the instructional year, and may not allow enough time for students to develop mastery. Overall, the instructional materials allocate too much instructional time to clusters of standards that are not major work of Grade 5.
Indicator 1B
The instructional materials reviewed for Connecting Math Concepts Level F (Grade 5) do not meet the expectations for spending the majority of class time on the major clusters of the grade. Overall, the instructional materials allocate too much instructional time to clusters of standards that are not major work of Grade 5.
To determine this, two perspectives were evaluated: 1) the number of lessons aligned to major work by cluster and/or standard. and 2) the number of exercises aligned to major work (based on reviewer analysis). The review team found the second perspective to be the most accurate, as it indicates an amount of class time devoted to major work each day. A third perspective was not evaluated because the materials spiral and are not organized into units or chapters.
The percent of lessons aligned to major work clusters according to “Level F Correlation to Grade 5 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics” document in Presentation Book 1, pages 437-445, and Presentation Book 2, pages 469-479:
- The percentage of lessons aligned to 5.NBT.A is 64 percent.
- The percentage of lessons aligned to 5.NBT.B is 100 percent.
- The percentage of lessons aligned to 5.NF.A is 58 percent.
- The percentage of lessons aligned to 5.NF.B is 94 percent.
- The percentage of lessons aligned to 5.MD.C is 19 percent.
In book one, there are 232 out of 451 exercises, about 51 percent, that focus on major work. In book two, there are 302 out of 440 exercises, or about 69 percent, that focus on major work. This is 534 out of 891 total exercises, about 60 percent..
- Book one has much less work focusing on major work of grade. This leaves the majority of major work toward the end of year, which may lead to not enough time to develop mastery.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 do not meet the expectations for being coherent and consistent with the standards. In some cases, the supporting work enhances and supports the major work of the grade level, and in others, it does not. There are several missed opportunities to connect supporting work to major work. The amount of time needed to complete the lessons is appropriate for a school year of approximately 140-190 days, however there are many major modifications that need to be made in order to teach at the depth required for students to master all grade level standards. The instructional materials do not: identify or connect prior or future grade-level work to Grade 5 work, provide students with extensive work with Grade 5 work, or relate Grade 5 concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades. The materials do not include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings. Materials rarely connect two or more clusters in a domain or two or more domains in a grade when appropriate. Overall, the Grade 5 materials do not support coherence and are not consistent with the progressions in the standards.
Indicator 1C
The instructional materials reviewed for Connecting Math Concepts Level F (Grade 5) partially meet expectations that supporting content enhances focus and coherence by engaging students in the major work of the grade. In some cases, the supporting work enhances and supports the major work of the grade level, and in others, it does not. There are several missed opportunities to connect supporting work to major work.
Connections between CCSS Supporting Work and Major Work Math Standards are never identified in the Teacher Presentation Books or the Teacher Guide. Connecting Math Concepts is a “direct instruction” program, where teachers are encouraged to use instructional materials as written, with little to no deviation from the prescribed presentation script. The Teacher Guide states: “The script indicates the wording you use in presenting the material and correcting student errors. Once you are familiar with the program, you may deviate some of the exact wording; however, until you know why things are phrased as they are, you should follow the exact wording." (page 9). This structured presentation discourages teachers from making missed connections explicit for students.
Connections between Supporting and Major Work:
- Lessons 112-120 has students representing and interpreting data (5.MD.B). An explicit connection is made in the standards to multiplication and division with fractions (5.NF.2). Each exercise does involve students using addition and multiplication to create subtotals and totals from a line plot. Students also apply division to find the average. Although meaningful contexts for the data or a meaningful context for creating an average are not found in these lessons, students do apply and connect multiplication and division of fractions. There is no further exploration of the connections between the two standards.
- Lessons 90-116 has students converting like measurements (5.MD.A). Although there are some exercises where the result is a fraction this connection is not very strong. Students work with numbers that are in the Grade 4 range for most problems when they are multiplying and dividing (5.NF.B).
Missed Connections between Supporting and Major Work:
- Lessons 90-116 has students converting like measurements (5.MD.A). They teach unit comparison and do not enhance the major work of the grade using operations with decimals and hundredths (5.NBT.B). Instead the curriculum focuses on converting units like yards to inches, hours to minutes, days to hours, years to months, days to weeks, etc.
- Lessons 112-120 has students representing and interpreting data (5.MD.B). These lessons teach probability and line plots, which do not enhance the major work of fraction clusters (5.NF.A).
Indicator 1D
The instructional materials reviewed for Connecting Math Concepts Level F (Grade 5) do not meet the expectations for having an amount of content designated for one grade level as viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades. Overall, the amount of time needed to complete the lessons is appropriate for a school year of approximately 140-190 days; however, due to the large amount of content that is not aligned to the grade level, there is not enough instruction at the depth required to prepare students for learning in future grades.
- The curriculum supplies 120 lessons, 12 mastery tests, and 2 cumulative tests. Although remedial worksheets are provided to support students struggling on concepts after each mastery test, these do not comprise the same amount of material as is contained in each lesson. These materials, if each mastery test is conducted in one lesson period (45-60 minutes) would be completed over 134 instructional days.
- A substantial number of unaligned exercises focus on skills and understandings not included in CCSSM and/or mastery of above-level standards from Grade 6 and beyond (see report for Indicator 1b); this focus on above grade-level objectives takes time and focus away from foundational grade level understandings. Teachers using this program would need to make significant modifications to the daily lessons and/or omissions that would affect the integrity of the grade level program.
- Measuring volume, 5.MD.4, which is part of a major cluster, appears in only two exercises (lessons 68.3, 69.6).
- Understanding the concept of volume measurement, 5.MD.3, which is part of a major cluster, appears only in two exercises (lessons 68.3, 69.6).
- Generating two numerical patterns using two given rules, 5.OA.3, appears in only three exercises (lessons 118.2, 119.2, 120.1).
Indicator 1E
The instructional materials reviewed for Connecting Math Concepts Level F (Grade 5) do not meet the expectations for materials being consistent with the progressions in the standards. Overall, the instructional materials do not: identify or connect prior or future grade-level work to Grade 5 level work, provide students with extensive work with grade-level problems, or relate Grade 5 concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.
i. Materials do not develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions. Prior or future content is not clearly identified.
- Only 60 percent of the exercises address major work of Grade 5.
- Prior grade-level topics taught and not identified include: 3.NBT.A, place value and rounding (lessons 1-80), 2.NBT.B, addition/subtraction number families (Lessons 1-116), 3.NBT.A, mental math (Lessons 11-106), 4.MD.B, line plots (lessons 103-117), 4.MD.A, area and perimeter (lessons 40-112), 4.MD.C, angles (lessons 54-112), 3.OA.C, multiply and divide within 100 (lesson 1, exercise 4), 2.NBT.A, expanded notation (lessons 1-6), 4.NF.B.C, add and subtract fractions with like denominators (lessons 4-6) and 3.NF.A, recognizing and generating simple equivalent fractions (lesson 11).
- Future grade level topics taught and not identified include: 6.RP.A, percent values (lessons 35-106), 6.RP.A, ratio and proportion (lessons 19-75), 6.EE.A, expressions with variables (begins lesson 35), 6.SP.A, probability (lessons 95-116), 6.EE.C, graphing ratios (lesson 69-120), 6.SP.B, finding averages (lessons 82-117), 6.G.A, finding surface area (lessons 106-112), 7.G.B, finding area of circles (lessons 72- 75) and 8.G.C, solve real-world and mathematical problems involving volume of cylinders, cones, and spheres (lessons 76-80).
ii. Materials do not give students extensive work with grade-level problems.
- Lessons 112-120 are not taught or practiced to the full depth of the standard (MD.B.2).
- Lessons 68 and 69 contain one exercise each that addresses the concept of relating volume to multiplication and addition (MD.C.3 and MD.C.4).
- Lessons 61-120 provide limited work with writing and interpreting numerical expressions (5.OA.1). Students learn "the parentheses are a times sign." Students are not taught how and why parentheses are used and are not introduced to brackets or braces.
- Lessons 90-116 provide limited work with unit conversion (MD.A.1). Students are not given the chance to apply unit conversion to the metric system, which is not only a missed connection, it holds students back from the progression expected to work with decimals and scientific notation in later grades.
- Lessons 62, 102, 104 and 106 provide limited work with line plots (MD.B.2). Students do not make their own measurements or work independently to create a line plot.
- The major work of 5.MD.3 is only addressed in two exercises, or about 20 minutes in the entire school year. This is not enough time for students to understand concepts of volume measurement.
- The major work of 5.MD.4 is only addressed in two exercises or about 20 minutes in the entire school year. This is not enough time for students to master measuring volumes.
- The work of 5.OA.3 is only addressed in three exercises, or about 30 minutes in the entire school year. This is not enough time for students to master generating two numerical patterns using two given rules.
- Students who fail parts of the mastery test can be assigned Remedies aligned to standards below the current grade level to complete during independent practice, so these students would not be working with grade-level problems. Opportunities for enrichment of grade-level work do not exist in the program.
iii. Most materials do not explicitly relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.
- "Coherence in connecting prior work in multiplication to multiplication of fractions or fractions and whole numbers," (5.NF.B ) is not made. For example, in lesson 9, exercise 5, the lesson focuses students on ideas like "the bottom numbers do not have to be the same" and "when you multiply fractions, you don't copy any numbers." No connections are made to previous reasoning or learning with multiplication. Students are not asked to consider or reason about the size of the product relative to the factors.
- When exercises do occur over subsequent lessons, little of the teacher script connects back to a previous day’s learning or understanding.
- Opportunities to extend previous understanding are not made because lessons provide isolated practice of the standards.
- Many of the lessons provide isolated exercises that do not explicitly connect to prior knowledge.
Indicator 1F
The instructional materials reviewed for Connecting Math Concepts Level F (Grade 5) do not meet the expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade level.
The materials do not include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings.
- Lessons are composed of exercises that are unrelated. In cases where there could be connections made, they are still treated as separate exercises.
- Lessons and exercises are not marked with CCSSM.
- Page 12-13 provides a chart with the Lessons and the CCSSM for Level F.
- Teacher Guide, pages 145-149, shows how the CCSSM are presented in sample lessons.
- A comprehensive listing of the CCSSM and the correlating exercises are found in the backs of Presentation Book 1 and Presentation Book 2.
- CCSSM aligned exercises do not meet the true intent of the standard:
- 5.OA.A - Students are seldom asked to solve numerical expressions and never asked to write them.
- 5.MD.C - Students use the formula to calculate volume without having to demonstrate conceptual understanding by counting unit cubes
Materials rarely connect two or more clusters in a domain or two or more domains in a grade when appropriate.
- Student work with multiplying fractions (5.NF.B) does not extend their understanding of the operation of multiplication (5.NBT.B.5).
- Student work with converting units within the metric system is not connected to their work with place value (5.NBT.A.1)