2016
Bridges in Mathematics

3rd Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 3rd Grade Overview
Cover for Bridges in Mathematics
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations
88%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
8 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
8 / 10

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations for Gateway 2, Rigor and Mathematical Practices. All three of the aspects of rigor are present and focused on in the materials. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade, specifically where the standards set explicit expectations for conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency and application. All eight MPs are included in a way that connects logically to the mathematical content. However, the MPs are not always identified correctly and/or the full meaning of the MPs is sometimes missed. The materials set up opportunities for students to engage in mathematical reasoning and somewhat support teachers in assisting students in reasoning, however there are missed opportunities to assist teachers in supporting students to critique the arguments of others. The materials attend to the specialized language of mathematics and provide explicit instruction in how to communicate mathematical reasoning using words, diagrams and symbols. Overall, the materials for Grade 3 meet the expectations for rigor and MPs.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

8 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectation for this criterion by providing a balance of all three aspects of rigor throughout the materials. Within the Bridges sessions and Number Corners, key concepts related to the major work of the grade are developed with a variety of conceptual questions, different concrete and pictorial representations and student explanations. In Grade 3, fluency and procedural work includes 3.OA.C.7 (fluently multiply and divide within 100) and 3.NBT.A.2 (addition and subtraction within 1,000). Application problems occur regularly throughout both the Bridges sessions and the Number Corner activities.

Indicator 2a

2 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations by attending to conceptual understanding. Overall, the instructional materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

  • Problem strings are used throughout the year to provide a conceptual understanding approach to teaching procedural skills and computational fluency with an emphasis on making connections across representations, including number lines, arrays, and equations.
  • A mathematics forum structure is used throughout the units, which allows students to share their thinking, ask questions, and explore key concepts. For example, Unit 5, Module 2, Session 2 is a forum where students work on their knowledge of the differences between sharing and grouping in division (3.OA.A.2).
  • The Bridges Introduction pages of the Teacher Manual outline a variety of models that students access throughout the school year in order to demonstrate their understanding. In Unit 2, in the teacher directions and the introduction to the unit (pages ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii and viii), there is information about the conceptual development of multiplication. Information on concepts, the properties of multiplication, strategies and models can be found and are explained for the teacher.
  • Many representations are used throughout the sessions. For example, Unit 2, Module 1, Session 3 has students using arrays of stamps to determine the total cost of the stamps. The materials continue to focus on grouping to solve. In Unit 2, Module 1, session 4, in the Problems & Investigations, the students work with number line puzzles to solidify their efficiency and use of strategy to solve multiplication problems (3.OA.A.1).
  • In Unit 4, Module 3, Session 1, students explore fractions with paper folding. Teacher direction 6 says, “Work with the class to compare non-congruent halves, and help them understand that pieces don’t need to be congruent to be equivalent.” (page 5.)
  • In Unit 4, Module 3, Sessions 1 and 3, students use paper and pattern blocks to explore fractions, and then in sessions 4 and 5, they use a number line to explore “Fractions as Distances.”

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations by attending to procedural skill and fluency. Overall, the instructional materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

  • Problem Strings within the sessions provide fluency practice built from conceptual understanding. In Unit 2, Module 1, Session 2, the assessment is a problem string involving rows/arrays of stamps where students work with doubling strategies to find the totals of the arrays (3.OA.C). In Module 1, Session 3, students work again with groups of stamps to determine the total cost of the stamps. They are laid out in arrays using the digits 4, 5 and 2 (3.OA.C.7). Module 1, session 3 also has a problem string for practice connected to the work during the session (3.OA.C.7).
  • Students build fluency with multiplication facts in Unit 2, Module 3, Sessions 3 and 4, “Multiplication Strategies, Parts 1 and 2.” Students look at the multiplication table and explore strategies such as double facts and double-plus-one facts.
  • Students participate in “Work Place” activities throughout the sessions, which are “engaging, developmentally appropriate math stations that offer ongoing practice with key skills.” (Introduction to Bridges). In Unit 4, Module 3, Session 5, the Work Place activity has students engage with a spinner game called “2D Doubles Help” where they take turns spinning to generate a multiplication problem involving 3 or 4, and then they record the doubles fact that they can use to solve the problem.
  • The Number Corner component of the Bridges curriculum "engages students and contributes to a math-rich classroom environment that promotes both procedural fluency and conceptual understanding." (Bridges Introduction).
    • The Computational Fluency component of Number Corner focuses on "activities, games, and practice pages designed to develop and maintain fluency," (page v, Teacher Manual), like Frog Jump Multiplication in October and Array Race in November. In December through March, students are focusing on multiplication facts starting with zero, one, and two, going to five and ten the next month, and then moving up through the other single-digit numbers.
    • In Number Corners, each month contains a number line component that focuses on procedural skills, for example: Rounding to the Nearest Ten in November, Comparing Fractions in February, and Put it on the Line in April.

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations by attending to application. Overall, the instructional materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade.

  • In the Solving Problems component of the Bridges Number Corner, students spend time working on application problems. "Often the problems connect to another workout in the same month, which enables students to apply skills they learned elsewhere to a problem-solving context." (page vi, Number Corner Volume 1). In Number Corners, each month contains a problem solving component that focuses on application, for example: Multi-Step Problems and Equations in January, Data Problems in February, and Area and Perimeter Problems in March.
  • Teachers pose contextual Problem Strings and Problems & Investigations throughout the Bridges curriculum that are grounded in real-world application in which students model, discuss, reason, and defend their thinking.
    • Within the materials, there are multiple sessions where a problem and investigation of a real-world scenario is paired with a forum for discussion and exploration of the problem solving strategies. For example, Unit 5, Module 3, session 1 has students writing their own story problems for given equations with and unknown quantity (7x5=m). Students are asked to create more than one operation in their problems. Then in Session 2, they have a forum to discuss their work (3.OA.D.8).
  • Unit 4, Module 4 is an application-based exploration of fractions with the context of creating and measuring bean stalks. Students gather data with fractions and create a line plot of their beanstalk data.
  • Unit 8 is a complete project-based application unit around the task of bridge design and construction. Standards involving fractions, measurement and data, and geometry are applied throughout the unit in real-world, problem-solving tasks.
  • Reviewers note that many student pages and sessions throughout the materials contain application problems aligned to major work of the grade, however most of the multi-step, non-routine problems are at the end of the pages and labeled "Challenge."

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations for balancing the three aspects of rigor. Overall, within the instructional materials the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.

  • The Problems & Investigations within the sessions call for students to apply procedural skill and fluency and conceptual understanding to solve application problems.
  • Application problems often call for students to model their thinking through the use of area models, number lines, ratio tables, etc.
  • Procedural skill and fluency is often noted side-by-side as students are working in conceptual models.
  • Problem strings target procedural skill and fluency by targeting opportunistic strategies. Teachers represent student thinking with a variety of conceptual models. "Each time, students solve the problem independently using any strategy they like, and then the teacher uses a specific model (an array or a number line, for example) to represent students' strategies." (Teachers Manual Unit 1, Introducing Bridges Mathematics).
  • Application is the focus in Unit 8, when students are designing bridges.
  • Procedural skill and fluency is attended to separately in the Number Corner component "Computational Fluency."

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

8 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for practice-content connections. The MPs are identified and used to enrich mathematics content. However, the MPs are misidentified in some instances. The materials often attend to the full meaning of each practice; however, there are instances where the students are not using the practices as written. The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially attend to the standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning. Overall, students are prompted to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others. However, there are missed opportunities to assist teachers in helping students to critique the arguments of others. The materials attend to the specialized language of mathematics and provide explicit instruction in how to communicate mathematical reasoning using words, diagrams and symbols. Overall, the materials partially meet the criteria for practice-content connections.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

2 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations for the MPs being identified and used to enrich the mathematics content within and throughout the grade. The instructional materials identify two to four MPs for each Bridges session and Number Corner activity. There are a few Bridges sessions that only identify MPs and no content Standards within those sessions. However, students using the materials as intended will engage in the MPs along with the content standards for the grade.

  • The Introduction to Bridges Grade 3 includes a table describing what the MPs look like for students in Grade 3 for each practice.
  • All eight MPs are identified throughout the curricular materials.
  • The Bridges overall Scope & Sequence for Units does not note the practice standards, however, between two and four MPs are identified in the “Skills and Concepts” section at the beginning of every Bridges session.
  • There are several Bridges sessions that identify only MPs and no content standards:
    • Unit 1, Module 1, Sessions 1 and 2 list 4 MPs in each session, with no content Standards.
    • Unit 8, Module 1, Session 1 lists 4 MPs, with no content Standards.
    • Unit 8, Module 1, Session 3 lists 2 MPs with no content Standards.
    • Unit 8, Module 4, Session 1 lists 4 MPs, with no content Standards.
  • "Math Practices in Action" is located in the margin of the teacher notes within the Bridges sessions. They identify how the students engage with the MPs along with the content standards. For example:
    • In Unit 2, Module 1, Session 6, "Math Practices in Action" explains that teachers facilitate students engaging in MP2: "During this forum, you'll connect the symbolic notation (abstract) to the context of the problems (quantitative)."
    • In Unit 4, Module 3, Session 2, "Math Practices in Action" explains that students engage in MP8, "While repeating the process of dividing the rectangle into equal pieces and removing one of them, students will make use of the regularity they see in their reasoning to make sense of unit fractions. The repetition, and the patterns that emerge, help them develop a stronger understanding of unit fractions."
  • The MPs are identified in the “Target Skills” section at the beginning of every Number Corner month and within the "Skills and Concepts" section at the beginning of the Number Corner activity types. There is a "Math Practices & the Number Corner Learning Community" section at the beginning of the first Number Corner binder, which describes how students engage with the MPs during Number Corners.

Indicator 2f

1 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations for carefully attending to the full meaning of each MP. Overall, the materials often attend to the full meaning of each MP, but there are instances where the students are not using the MPs as written.

  • "Math Practices in Action" is located in the margin of the teacher notes within the Bridges sessions. They call the teacher’s attention to how the activities within the Bridges sessions engage students with a particular MP.
  • In many cases, the materials attend to the full meaning of the MPs:
    • In Unit 5, Module 2, Session 4, "Math Practices in Action" explains how students engage in MP3, "Students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others when they discuss whether or not each equation is true."
    • In Unit 6, Module 2, Session 3, "Math Practices in Action" explains MP7 as, "Students look for and make use of structure within and among the quadrilaterals as they sort them. During this process, they are taking into consideration the different attributes of the figures and categorizing them accordingly."
    • In Unit 8, Module 3, Session 3, "Math Practices in Action" explains how students engage in MP4, "As they explore different ways to graph similar data, students are modeling the situations with mathematics."
  • There is ambiguity over whether "model" means to draw a picture representing the problem or whether "model" means to create a mathematical representation. For example, in Unit 7, Module 3, session 3, the "Math Practices in Action" states, "In this module, students model with mathematics using the number line and egg cartons. These models, and the connections between them, deepen students' understanding of equivalent fractions." Within this lesson, and other lessons in the module, students are representing fractions on number lines and in egg carton drawings, and there is not a contextual situation involved.
  • In some cases, when MP1 is identified, students are not engaging in the full meaning of the MP. For example, "Math Practices in Action" in Unit 3, Module 3, Session 1 explains, "Games can be a rich opportunity for students to make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Students have many chances to play the game, which gives them the opportunity to persist in their efforts and further develop their rounding and computation skills." This does not attend to the full meaning of MP1.
  • The use of the "Math Forum" structure throughout the Bridges program is a missed opportunity to fully attend to MP3. Although there are many opportunities for students to share their strategies for how they got their answers, there is often no mention of students justifying their thinking or questioning their peers. All of the questions are posed by the teacher. Opportunities are missed in that the teacher notes do not provide information on how to facilitate a discussion in which students justify their thinking and critique the reasoning of each other.
  • Taken as a whole, "Math Practices in Action" that explain MP6 only attend to a portion of the MP. The "Math Practices in Action" on MP6 explain precision and accuracy with measurement and calculation, however they do not address precise communication. For example, "Math Practices in Action" in Unit 4, Module 1, Session 6, says, "When measuring the mass of these objects, students must attend to precision because any imprecision will be magnified later when students use these objects to measure more massive objects." and the "Math Practices in Action" in Unit 6, Module 1, Session 4, says "They must make those folds carefully, because they will use the tangrams to explore relationships among figures, and those relationships depend upon precision."

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

2 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the expectations for prompting students to reason by constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others. The students’ materials in both Bridges and Number Corner provided opportunities throughout the year for students to reason by both constructing viable arguments and analyzing the reasoning of others, however, while the students materials often prompt students to reason by constructing viable arguments, there is less consistency and opportunities for students to analyze the arguments of others, which leads to a lack of balance. More opportunities could be provided in the student materials, other than formative and summative assessments, to engage in analyzing the arguments of others.

  • In Unit 1, Module 1, Session 2, question 4 says, "How many people did Sophia and Samir survey? How do you know?"
  • In Unit 1, Module 1, Session 4, question 5 says, "Is the sum of 0 and any number always even, always odd, or sometimes even and sometimes odd? Explain."
  • In the Unit 1 Post-Assessment, question 11 says, "Josh says that all the Doubles facts (6 + 6) have even sums. Do you agree with Josh? Why or why not?" Question 12 says "Explain how you can use a Make Ten Fact to solve 9 + 6. Include the answer to 9 + 6 in your explanation."
  • In the Unit 4 Post-Assessment, question 13 says, "Is the statement true or false? Make a sketch to prove you're correct. You can use your pattern blocks to help if you like."
  • In the Unit 6, Polygons & Quadrilaterals Checkpoint, question 4 says, "Damon says that this figure is not a polygon. Do you agree with him? Why or why not? Give two different reasons."
  • "Math Forums, which occur a few times in most units, are a more formal and structured time for students to share and discuss their work. Students who are not sharing their own work are expected to listen carefully, compare their classmates’ work to their own, and ask questions to better understand each students’ ideas.” For example, in Unit 3, Module 2, Session 5, “Subtraction Strategies Forum,” the teacher directions say, “Invite students to present their work one student or student pair at a time. After each presentation, invite the rest of the class to ask questions, and have the presenters respond to those questions. After each student or student pair finishes, ask the students if they understood what the students did and whether anyone else used the same or similar approach. If a student shares something similar that elevates the level of discussion, model what that student did with sketches, numbers, and words." The focus in the forum seems to be on the strategies used, however that misses an opportunity to justify the strategy or even critique each others' reasoning.
  • Within Bridges sessions, there are many prompts for students to explain how they got their answers or show their work, but there are missed opportunities to evaluate the thinking of others. In most of the problems or assignments, the directions say, "Show your work" or "Use numbers, labels, models or words to show your thinking." For example:
    • In Unit 2, Module 3, Session 2, question 2, says "If you paid $16.50 for rabbit food, how many pounds did you buy? Show your thinking."
    • In Unit 5, Module 1, Session 4, questions 1, 2, and 3 say, "Show all your work."
    • In Unit 1, Module 2, Session 1, question 5 says, "Show all your work using numbers, words, or labeled sketches."
    • In Unit 1, Module 2, Session 2, student page question 4 says, "Show all your work using numbers, words, or labeled sketches."
  • In Number Corner activities, students are asked to "Use the space to solve the problem and record your thinking with numbers, words, equations, or models."

Indicator 2g.ii

1 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others. Overall, there is assistance for teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments, however there is minimal assistance for teachers in supporting their students in analyzing the arguments of others.

  • Throughout the Bridges curriculum, sample dialogue and teacher directions are provided to assist the teacher in engaging students in constructing viable arguments. For example:
    • In Unit 2, Module 1,Session 1, teacher direction 11 says, "Invite the first pair to share. Have them show their work where everyone can see it." "After the first pair has presented their work, ask the audience to raise their hands if they understand the strategy presented." "Then, ask the students if they have any questions and have the presenters answer them."
    • In Unit 4, Module 3, Session 3, teacher direction 5 says, "Invite volunteers to the front of the class to share their solutions and explain their reasoning."
    • In Unit 3, Module 4, Session 2, teacher direction 7 says, "Encourage students to debate and discuss the strategies they're choosing." Teacher direction 12 says, " When they are done, have them share and compare their work with the people sitting next to them to be sure they have the correct answers." Teacher direction 13 says, "Then talk with the class about their strategies. Which seemed easier? Which seemed more efficient? Why? As students share their strategies, record their work where everyone can see."
  • In the Bridges Number Corner, the September Solving Problems (Adding Two & Three Digit Numbers) has a “Math Practice in Action” on the side of the teacher directions explaining that “when students evaluate other answers and think about whether their answer is correct, you are setting the stage for authentic communication.” The April Number Line (Put it on the Line) has a game where students use the “thumbs up/thumbs down” method to evaluate each other during the game. In the March Solving Problems (Area and Perimeter Puzzles) in Activity 1, direction 5 says, “Share with the whole class, turn and talk,” in which more assistance is needed to support teachers in guiding their students through critiquing the reasoning of others.
  • MP3 is mentioned specifically seven times throughout the Bridges sessions in the "Math Practices in Action," which support teachers in understanding how the MP is applied in the sessions. Despite the "Math Practices in Action," more assistance is needed to support teachers in guiding their students through critiquing the reasoning of others. For example, the Unit 1, Module 4, Session 2, "Math Practices in Action" says, "By creating a chart of strategies, you invite students to make sense of and critique the reasoning of others. When students closely examine a variety of approaches to the same problem and draw connections among them, they build a strong sense of numbers and expand their repertoire of computational strategies." This is vague guidance about how the teacher is to facilitate student reasoning.

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3 meets the expectations for the materials explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics. Overall, the materials provide some instruction in how to communicate mathematical reasoning using words, diagrams and symbols, however more explicit instruction related to precise communication is needed. There are instances in the materials that introduce vocabulary that is not grade appropriate and in basic, incomplete ways.

  • In the introduction to the series, “The curriculum includes a set of Word Resource Cards for every classroom. Each card features a mathematical term accompanied by illustrations, with a definition on the back. The cards are integrated into lessons and displayed in the classroom to support students’ acquisition and use of precise mathematical language.”
  • In Section 3 of the Assessment Guide, Assessing Math Practices, an app called Math Vocabulary Cards, which included the same illustrated terms and illustrations as the Word Resource Cards, is also available to serve as a compact and convenient math dictionary.
  • At the beginning of the sessions, a sidebar lists the vocabulary for the lesson, with an asterisk that identifies "those terms for which Word Resource Cards are available." Sessions contain directions for use of the cards. For example, in Unit 6, Module 4, Session 3, teacher direction 6 says, "Display the Word Resource Card for equivalent fractions, and review the meaning of fraction equivalency."
  • Students are often supported to show their mathematical reasoning using words, diagrams and symbols. For example:
    • Unit 3, Module 1, Session 5, in the Problems & Investigations, the teacher directions say, "Remind students that they will have a chance to use some of the strategies that they generated a couple of months ago, or come up with new ideas, as they work with a partner on a new collection of story problem." and "Remind students to check the reasonableness of their work; ask them to make sure their strategies and their answers make sense." Also, the teacher directions say, "Make sure students have access to base ten pieces or other manipulatives, but don't suggest their use as sometimes students will employ a less sophisticated method if they think that is what you want." and "Let students know that both students in each partnership need to show their work in their journals."
    • In Unit 1, Module 2, Session 3, the student page, problems 2a and 2b, says, "Show all your work using numbers, words, or labeled sketches." Also, the student page, problem 3, says, "Record your work in your math journal, using numbers, words, or labeled sketches."
    • In the December Number Corner Problem String, the Key Questions in the sidebar prompt teachers to ask, "What strategy could you use?" "How can you show your thinking?" and "What model could you use to show your thinking?" Also, the "Big Idea" listed in the first string is, "When multiplying, you can think about equal groups or repeated jumps on a number line."
  • "Math Practices in Action" that identify MP6 nearly all give direction to the teacher about accuracy with calculation or measurement, not precise communication. For example, in Unit 3, Module 3, session 3, the "Math Practices in Action - MP6" says, "It is important for students to decide when they need to attend to precision and when a mathematical question can be answered without an exact calculation. In this case, an exact answer is necessary, but the inexact estimates students have made can help them confirm whether their calculations make good sense."
  • Unit 2, Module 3, Session 2 lists "ratio table" as a vocabulary word, and there is a Word Resource Card for it. Within the lesson, the teacher directions only refer to them as "tables". Teacher direction 1 says, "and letting them know they will be doing more work with tables." However, providing a word resource card for a concept beyond Grade 3 content may prompt teachers to teach this word to students.
  • Unit 6, Module 4, Session 1 lists the vocabulary word "congruent", and there is a Word Resource Card for it. Teacher direction 7 says, "Work with the class to compare non-congruent halves, and help them understand that pieces do not need to be congruent (exactly the same shape and size) to be equivalent (the same amount)." This concept is beyond Grade 3 and a an imprecise definition.