2nd Grade - Gateway 3
Back to 2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Usability
| Score | |
|---|---|
Gateway 3 - | |
Criterion 3.1: Use & Design | 8 / 8 |
Criterion 3.2: Teacher Planning | 6 / 8 |
Criterion 3.3: Assessment | 7 / 8 |
Criterion 3.4: Differentiation | 8 / 10 |
Criterion 3.5: Technology Use |
This material was not reviewed for Gateway Three because it did not meet expectations for Gateways One and Two
Criterion 3.1: Use & Design
Materials are well designed and take into account effective lesson structure and pacing.
Indicator 3a
Materials are well-designed and take into account effective lesson structure and pacing.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials are well-designed and take into account effective lesson structure and pacing.
The lessons and pacing throughout the program are both academically and developmentally appropriate. Students are given multiple opportunities to engage with a text, discuss with peers and teachers, learn new vocabulary words, and improve their writing. Opportunities for reteaching are also included. In the program, there are three 45-minute blocks of instruction. One block is used for whole-class shared reading. Students spend 5-10 minutes of word study or sharing written response from the previous day before beginning 25-30 minutes of shared reading which includes vocabulary instruction, setting a purpose for reading, choral or echo reading, and revisiting the purpose. The final 10 minutes of the block involves a comprehension discussion, updating the anchor chart, or assigning written response prompts. The second block is used for English Language Arts instruction, where students either engage in an interactive read-aloud or process writing. During interactive read-alouds, students work on summarizing, updating the anchor chart, sentence composing, and/or written response. During process writing, there is direct instruction, followed by work time, and time to share. The third block is used for differentiated instruction to develop foundational skills based on data. The program allows for three groups to meet with the teacher for 15 minutes a day, while engaging in word study, written responses, or self-selected independent reading.
Indicator 3b
The teacher and student can reasonably complete the content within a regular school year, and the pacing allows for maximum student understanding.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet, partially meet, do not meet) the criteria that the teacher and student can reasonably complete the content within a regular school year, and the pacing allows for maximum student understanding.
The Bookworms materials for both Shared Reading and English Language Arts is broken into 36 weeks and five lessons a week, which equals exactly 180 days. In addition, because the differentiated period can be used for reteaching, review, extension work, and additional exposure to print through independent reading time, the pacing allows for maximum student understanding. While this material covers the entire course of a typical school year, it is important to note that if schools have interruptions to a typical learning day or do not start the lessons on day 1 of school, then teachers will not finish the entire program.
Indicator 3c
The student resources include ample review and practice resources, clear directions, and explanation, and correct labeling of reference aids (e.g., visuals, maps, etc.).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that the student resources include ample review and practice resources, clear directions, and explanation, and correct labeling of reference aids (eg. visuals, maps, etc.).
The student resources included in the program include clear directions and explanations and correct labeling of reference aids. However, it is important to note that there are very few student resources included because schools need to purchase the texts separately. The materials that are available include graphic organizers, descriptive writing, narrative, book review, opinion and editing checklists, book review text(s), and book review checklists. Not all of the downloads have a set of directions, but they are easy to interpret, well-labeled, and explained in the lesson plans on how to use. Student workbooks are also included for foundational skills. These include the labeling of text titles and days of the week.
Indicator 3d
Materials include publisher-produced alignment documentation of the standards addressed by specific questions, tasks, and assessment items.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials include publisher-produced alignment documentation of the standards addressed by specific questions, tasks, and assessment items.
The publisher provides Common Core Standards alignment tables that are organized by Shared Reading and English Language Arts lessons by week. There is also a standards alignment document for Word Study and Shared Reading written responses. Furthermore, standards alignment is included for the Fluency Measure and Informal Decoding Inventory found in Unit 1, the Holistic Assessment found in Unit 2, and the Oral Reading Fluency Measure found in Unit 3 and 4. In addition, in each lesson plan, each portion of the lesson identifies the related standards alignment.
Indicator 3e
The visual design (whether in print or digital) is not distracting or chaotic, but supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that the visual design (whether in print or digital) is not distracting or chaotic, but supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject.
The materials that are included with the program have a visual design that is not distracting and is engaging for students. The Grade 2 curriculum includes two Reading and Writing student response workbooks. They are used for word study and written responses to Shared Reading. The design is simple and supports students with the curriculum. There is ample space for writing and drawing, plus they are labeled clearly so the students can easily follow along. In addition, the curriculum also includes a variety of checklists that are used by the teacher and students during the planning stages of writing. These checklists incorporate student-friendly language and support the writing process. These are the only materials included in the program because the texts that students listen to are published books and need to be purchased separately or projected using technology.
Criterion 3.2: Teacher Planning
Materials support teacher learning and understanding of the Standards.
Indicator 3f
Materials contain a teacher's edition with ample and useful annotations and suggestions on how to present the content in the student edition and in the ancillary materials. Where applicable, materials include teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials contain a teacher’s edition with ample and useful annotations and suggestions on how to present the content in the student edition and in the ancillary materials. Where applicable, materials include teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning.
The materials contain a Teacher Manual for each grade level that provides information on the rationale behind each instructional method, the purpose of the design of the curriculum, and a breakdown of each lesson in English Language Arts, Shared Reading, and Differentiated Instruction. Lessons are written in first person. The design of the program is intentionally structured with repetitive routines to make it easier to use in real time, according to the publisher. The daily lesson plans include information on the Common Core State Standards being addressed, the texts being used, and plannings notes that offer suggestions on how to use additional resources to enhance lessons. For example:
- In Week 17 of ELA, after reading Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, teachers have the option of showing the movie or YouTube clips. Each lesson provides a script for the teacher to follow in order to lead students in their learning. In addition, there is guidance on which sections to review, how to design charts and model responses.
Indicator 3g
Materials contain a teacher's edition that contains full, adult-level explanations and examples of the more advanced literacy concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, as necessary.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria that materials contain a teacher’s edition that contains full, adult-level explanations and examples of the more advanced literacy concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, as necessary.
While the Teacher Manual provides some adult-level explanations and some example of more advanced literacy concepts for teachers to improve their knowledge, a majority of the explanations refer to resources not included with the materials, and instead as a reference teachers can access on their own.
Examples of referring to resources that teachers can access on their own time include:
- Suggesting that teachers would benefit from a book study on Words Their Way even though the program uses Word Study as grade-level instruction instead of differentiated instruction in Words Their Way.
- For vocabulary, two words per session are introduced using a procedure by Isabel Beck and her colleagues and teachers can refer to her book Creating Robust Vocabulary: Frequently Asked Questions and Extended Examples. Teachers are also told to look at Teaching Vocabulary in all Classrooms to learn about vocabulary instruction of content words.
- For better understanding fluency, teachers should read Developing Fluent Readers: Teaching Fluency as a Foundational Skill according to the publisher.
- In order to understand the comprehension approaches used in this program, it is recommended that teachers read Explaining Reading: A Resource for Explicit Teaching of the Common Core Standards.
- The program makes extensive use of the why-questions because of their established effectiveness listed in the article Elaborative Interrogation: Using ‘why’ Questions to Enhance the Learning from Text and Elaborative Interrogation Effectiveness on Children’s Learning of Factual Content.
Indicator 3h
Materials contain a teacher's edition that explains the role of the specific ELA/literacy standards in the context of the overall curriculum.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria that materials contain a teacher’s edition that explains the role of the specific ELA/literacy standards in the context of the overall curriculum.
The Teacher Manual does not appear to have information regarding the ELA/Literacy Standards with the exception of the Standards Alignment Document, found in supplemental materials, and listing the specific standards being addressed in each individual lesson. Bookworms does not state that their design is built around the standards, and instead states that it is built around literacy research and evidence-based pedagogy. The Teacher Manual includes a myriad of studies on word study, fluency, and comprehension, but there is no framework of the role of the specific standards. The Teacher Manual does state the high volume design of Bookworms Reading and Writing produces daily opportunities for addressing multiple standards. In addition, because of the research and the standards, the program indicates the material is repetitive and consistent in order to provide a high volume of practice opportunities, without giving specific assignments to demonstrate mastery of standards in any one marking period.
Indicator 3i
Materials contain explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials contain explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research based strategies.
The materials include a Teacher Manual that breaks down the Literacy block into Shared Reading, English Language Arts, and Differentiated Instruction. Within each section, there are explicit explanations and guidance for each method that is mentioned, ranging from word study, fluency, comprehension, writing, and vocabulary. The Teacher Manual explains the process involved for every section and often details why approach was included in the program. The identification of research-based strategies are present, and books and articles are referred to for teachers to learn more about the specific approaches and strategies.
Some specific explanations and research-based practices include:
- The Teacher Manual states why they chose a specific writing prompt. It states that the prompt is the most important kind of writing students will do, is closely tied to the comprehension strategies of determining the relative importance of ideas, and provides a sharing activity that sets up the new days’ text segment by reviewing recent events.
- The Teacher Manual states that the goal for the fluency portion of the Shared Reading routine is to build the skills for students to move from a teacher-supported choral reading to an independent partner reading.
- For vocabulary, the Teacher Manual explains that while there are many evidence-based routines for vocabulary instruction, they have chosen just a few to make sure teachers and students are accustomed to the routines.
- The Teacher Manual encourages teachers to engage in a Semantic Feature Analysis in Shared Reading and in interactive read-alouds, whenever new concepts are a part of a larger overarching category, and can be compared and contrasted on the basis of a set of features.
Indicator 3j
Materials contain strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA/literacy program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials contain strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents or caregivers about the ELA/literacy program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
In the Teacher Manual, there is a section called Family Connections, which offers a letter home outlining the literacy program and includes the components of the program, the teaching approaches used, as well as recommendations for how to support the student at home in regard to reading with them and asking them what they are reading and learning in school. For example, it tells families that the best thing to do at home is to read to and with their child everyday. It also says that the text chosen does not matter and students are encouraged to read a range of texts including magazines, books, newspapers, blogs, informative texts, and even cookbooks. There is also a Word Study Parent Letter that explains the phonics and spelling routines. For both letters, the program recommends customizing the letters so they reflect the school’s norms and traditions.
Criterion 3.3: Assessment
Materials offer teachers resources and tools to collect ongoing data about student progress on the Standards.
Indicator 3k
Materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that genuinely measure student progress.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials regularly and systematically offer assessment opportunities that genuinely measure student progress.
The Grade 2 materials include weekly Word Study tests, bi-weekly on-demand written responses to assess comprehension, and longer fully processed writing tasks to assess composition and mechanics. Standards-based rubrics are included to assess these compositions.
The Teacher Manual also states that there are fluency assessments available with clear interpretive guidance for free or low cost. The Bookworms K-5 Reading and Writing diagnostic assessment for phonics knowledge as been provided free by the publisher in Appendix F.
In addition, Bookworms recommends assessing student progress in external transfer tasks using periodic holistic assessments, though these assessments are not included within the Bookworms curriculum. For example, it recommends two specific Achieve the Core, Grade 2 writing performance assessments.
Indicator 3l
The purpose/use of each assessment is clear:
Indicator 3l.i
Assessments clearly denote which standards are being emphasized.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that assessments clearly denote which standards are being emphasized.
The evaluation enhancements section of the Bookworms Curriculum, "Evaluating Student Progress", includes a summary of all Grade 2 assessment opportunities within each unit as well as the standard alignment. The assessments are in decoding, fluency, genre writing, and shared reading.
Indicator 3l.ii
Assessments provide sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria that assessments provide sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow up.
In the Bookworms program, there is minimal guidance to teachers on interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow up. The program recommends discussions with peers to learn from each other and to build a community of teachers who support one another’s work instead of providing guidance on follow-up. The conventions and genre rubrics are used to evaluate student writing, which informs the teachers of important components of the writing task. Teachers can use the rubrics to analyze student performance and determine necessary follow-up; however, the program itself does not provide this guidance. The program suggests teachers bring student writing to professional learning community meetings to make informed decisions about instruction, though there is no guidance for this. Sample student written responses are provided to model a progression of skills to help teachers see the increase in writing throughout Grade 2.
Additionally, there are checklists used three times a year for speaking and listening. Teachers can determine when to use the checklists and how to use the data. Similar to the rubrics, teachers can determine which skills need additional instruction based on the checklist, no specific guidance is provided for follow-up.
In addition, there is no guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow - up included in the materials in terms of Word Study. In order to take advantage of the Informal Decoding Inventory diagnostic data, schools need to purchase the 2017 edition of the book How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources of K-3 by Sharon Walpole (author of Bookworms) and Michael C. McKenna.
Indicator 3m
Materials should include routines and guidance that point out opportunities to monitor student progress.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials should include routines and guidance that point out opportunities to monitor student progress.
Within the program, the publisher includes an "Evaluating Student Progress" document consisting of a summary of all Grade 2 assessment opportunities within each unit, along with each assessment’s standards alignment. This is a separate document though, and not in the Teacher Manual. Within the Word Study and Shared Reading lesson plans, assessment opportunities are indicated with a green box in the Teacher Manual to highlight the opportunity for assessment. Genre writing assessments are not highlighted in the same manner, and teachers need to refer to this separate document.
Indicator 3n
Materials indicate how students are accountable for independent reading based on student choice and interest to build stamina, confidence, and motivation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 do not meet the criteria that materials indicate how students are accountable for independent reading based on student choice and interest to build stamina, confidence, and motivation.
The materials in Grade 2 include a proposed schedule during the Differentiation block that includes time for independent reading. Students must complete handwriting practice and a written response before engaging in independent reading though. However, there is no tracking system provided for students to log independent reading in the classroom or at home. There are suggestions that students read at home, but no accountability system is indicated nor is it required.
Criterion 3.4: Differentiation
Materials provide teachers with strategies for meeting the needs of a range of learners so that they demonstrate independent ability with grade-level standards.
Indicator 3o
Materials provide teachers with strategies for meeting the needs of a range of learners so the content is accessible to all learners and supports them in meeting or exceeding the grade-level standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials provide teachers with strategies for meeting the needs of range of learners so the content is accessible to all learners and supports them in meeting or exceeding the grade-level standards.
In the program, one of the three blocks of instruction is the Differentiation block that offers instruction to different small groups of learners. This time allows the teacher to instruct and monitor students to ensure they are understanding the content, while offering opportunities for reteaching, practice, review, and other scaffolding techniques, based on the students’ need.
The program does not create small group instruction based on reading levels, but instead uses diagnostic data to place students in groups, which is outlined in the book How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction (sold separately). This Tier II instruction is designed to target skill deficits. In addition, the publisher reports that there is an opportunity for more intensive instruction during this block if students need it, which prevents them from missing Shared Reading and English Language Arts instruction. Each of the groups engage in three-week or six-week cycles, with progress-monitoring assessments used to help teachers know when to reteach the lessons, move to the next set of lessons, or regroup students. When students are not working with the teacher during this time, they are engaged in a written response from Shared Reading or engaged in self-selected reading.
In addition, differentiation is recommended for in-class and push-in supports during Shared Reading and English Language Arts instruction. Some examples of in-class supports include allowing students to track print rather than read it and engaging in choral reading instead of partner reading, using sentence frames for students who struggle to complete sentence, and allowing less details in a sentence. Examples of push-in support include conducting parallel discussions in order to allow more students to participate and receive scaffolding, and allowing the use of dictation or assistive technology for students with disabilities.
Differentiation is provided for both weak readers and strong readers. For weaker readers, it is recommended that teachers provide oral sentence frames. For weaker writers, students should be giving graphic organizers and monitoring should be provided. It is recommended that high-achieving students are paired together so they can challenge each other’s comprehension or students do not have to participate in partner reading, and can read independently instead.
Indicator 3p
Materials regularly provide all students, including those who read, write, speak, or listen below grade level, or in a language other than English, with extensive opportunities to work with grade level text and meet or exceed grade-level standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials regularly provide all students, including those who read, write, speak, or listen below grade level, or in a language other than English, with extensive opportunities to work with grade level text and meet or exceed grade-level standards.
The Teacher Manual has a section that addresses English Language Learners. It provides a routine with built-in supports for English Language Learners in a traditional classroom setting, and they also identify additional supports that could be added to a classroom for more assistance in accessing the curriculum. In addition, the Differentiation section provides different levels of scaffolding that an English Language Learner may need, and it offers recommendations depending on the specific needs of the students. It is recommended that English Language Learners always meet with the teacher for 15 minutes a day during this block of time. The Teacher Manual also gives suggestions such as replacing English Language Arts if students require more intensive speaking and listening instruction in English.
Some examples of built-in English Language Learner supports include:
- Words are presented with their syllables physically identified and then transformed into different parts of speech by adding prefixes, suffixes, and inflectional endings
- Using pictures to support meaning
- Using super sentence webs to use vocabulary words in sentence contexts
Some examples of additional supports include:
- Listening and tracking print rather than reading chorally
- Displaying a set of sentence starts that students can use
- Adding sentence frames to support answers to text-based writing
Indicator 3q
Materials regularly include extensions and/or more advanced opportunities for students who read, write, speak, or listen above grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials regularly include extensions and/or more advanced opportunities for students who read, write, speak, or listen above grade level.
Bookworms provides extension tasks, scaffolding, and explicit instruction for teachers on how to teach their above grade level students. Bookworms identifies the need for teachers to identify the strengths of the strong students and to scaffold their learning so that the content is meaningful and engaging. During the Differentiation block, all students receive differentiated content based on the assessment data collected throughout the year. Additionally, Bookworms provides a chart for teachers of ways to add more advanced opportunities in Shared Reading and English Language Arts.
Specific opportunities for extensions for above grade level students include:
- Silently reading instead of participating in choral reading
- Working with another high-achieving student to have a discussion about the text
- Asking the student to help with the whole class summary of the text
- Being given a specific sentence frame, instead of giving them a choice for vocabulary development
Indicator 3r
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials provide a guideline for 45 minutes of Differentiated Instruction per day, which allows for a variety of group work for students that includes reaching, review, and practice of concepts that they may be struggling with. Students are placed into one of three groups during this time. Students meet with the teacher for 15 minutes, and then spend 30 minutes completing their written response to Shared Reading, and engaging in self-selected reading. During Shared Reading, students often partner read or chorally read as a whole class, and during English Language Arts, students often share responses with peers.
- During Week 6, ELA, students work in partners or small groups with a pre-selected text set. Students work together to take notes on what they read with a focus on the similarities among the texts.
- During Week 20, Shared Reading, students turn and talk to their partner about how they think being judged makes someone feel.
- During Week 24, ELA, students work on creating their opinion graphic organizer near peters that they feel comfortable sharing their with opinion with in order to get feedback and support as needed.
- During Week 28, Shared Reading, students practice their word study test with a partner.
Criterion 3.5: Technology Use
Materials support effective use of technology to enhance student learning. Digital materials are accessible and available in multiple platforms.
Indicator 3s
Digital materials (either included as supplementary to a textbook or as part of a digital curriculum) are web-based, compatible with multiple Internet browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer, Firefox, Google Chrome, etc.), "platform neutral" (i.e., are compatible with multiple operating systems such as Windows and Apple and are not proprietary to any single platform), follow universal programming style, and allow the use of tablets and mobile devices.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria that digital materials (either included as supplementary to a textbook or as part of a digital curriculum) are web-based, compatible with multiple internet browsers (eg. Internet Explorer, Firefox, Google Chrome, etc.), “platform neutral” (ie., Windows and Apple and are not proprietary to any single platform), follow universal programming style, and allow the use of tablets and mobile devices.
The publisher provides both a web-based and a print format for teachers. The Grade 2 material is accessible on any device via a web browser and is compatible with all recent versions of Safari, Firefox, Chrome, and Internet Explorer, etc. Additionally, the Bookworms curriculum can be used on both Windows and Apple devices, including tablets and mobile devices.
Indicator 3t
Materials support effective use of technology to enhance student learning, drawing attention to evidence and texts as appropriate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria that materials support effective use of technology to enhance student learning, drawing attention to evidence and texts as appropriate.
The Teacher Manual is digital; however, there is not a digital component for students. The Grade 2 materials suggest that students use a word processor for drafting and revising if necessary. The curriculum also includes a few research projects in which students find and synthesize information and can do so online. However, this is the only technology incorporated in the Grade 2 curriculum.
Indicator 3u
Materials can be easily customized for individual learners.
Indicator 3u.i
Digital materials include opportunities for teachers to personalize learning for all students, using adaptive or other technological innovations.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 do not meet the criteria that digital materials include opportunities for teachers to personalize learning for all students, using adaptive or other technological innovations.
Digital materials do not include opportunities for teachers to personalize learning for all students using adaptive or other technological innovations. The only digital available is the opportunity to use a word processor or the internet for research.
Indicator 3u.ii
Materials can be easily customized for local use.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 do not meet the criteria that materials can be easily customized for local use.
Because of the lack of technology in the program, the materials cannot be easily customized for local use.
Indicator 3v
Materials include or reference technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other (e.g. websites, discussion groups, webinars, etc.).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 2 do not meet the criteria that materials include or reference technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other (e.g. websites, discussion groups, webinars, etc.).
There are no opportunities found within the program for the teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other. One culminating project does provide an opportunity for students to utilize technology to make a Book Review commercial that they can share with students in another grade; however, the technology does not provide an opportunity for collaboration such as a webinar or website.