2017
Bookworms

5th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 5th Grade Overview
Cover for Bookworms
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Building Knowledge

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations
62%
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
20 / 32

The Bookworms Grade 5 instructional materials partially meet the expectations of Gateway 2. The materials support students’ growing literacy skills through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language through coherently and clear work around building academic vocabulary and studying texts to understand craft and style. Some text sets are organized around topics to grow students’ knowledge, while other texts sets are less-strongly connected. Students have ample practice learning the component parts of research as they read and work within texts. The materials do not include a plan for independent reading nor a wholly comprehensive writing plan to cover the whole school year, although there are suggestions to support teachers as they identify these pieces outside the materials.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

20 / 32

Indicator 2a

4 / 4

Texts are organized around a topic/topics (or, for grades 6-8, topics and/or themes) to build students' ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for texts organized around topics to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The instructional materials for grade 5 fully meet the expectations of indicator 2a. Materials are organized to build students’ knowledge through topic-focused texts. There are many topics explored over the school year, spanning topics such as Native American culture, to the United States in the 1930’s and the Depression, to study of animals.

For example, in grade 5 during the second nine weeks, the topic centers around planet Earth and earth science. Samples of texts include the following titles:

  • The Sun (nonfiction)
  • Volcano (nonfiction)
  • Oceans (nonfiction)

In grade 5, the first nine weeks, the topic focuses on informational texts, two of the informational texts are:

  • Plant Cells (nonfiction)
  • Animal Cells.(nonfiction) While reading Animal Cells, students work independently to synthesize information, listing and describing the events that happen as you eat food and it becomes cells. Students write a brief description in their own words.

Indicator 2b

4 / 4

Materials contain sets of coherently sequenced questions and tasks that require students to analyze the language, key ideas, details, craft, and structure of individual texts.

The Grade 5 instructional materials meet expectations that the materials contain sets of coherently sequenced questions and tasks that require students to analyze the language, key ideas, details, craft, and structure of individual texts. Through the Comprehension Discussion Questions, Model Comprehension Strategies and Ask Questions During Reading, and Written Responses (in some places called Written Follow-Up) students address facets of this indicator with nearly every text. As students read and engage in large class, small group, and individual work, they engage in study of words and components of texts.

The following examples demonstrate how students analyze author’s craft and language:

  • Students analyze author’s craft and language in the First Nine Weeks of Shared Reading in Week 1, Day 1 of Walk Two Moons: Why do you think the author compares the story to a plaster wall? How does that use of language serve the author's purpose? (p. 3)
  • Students analyze author’s craft in the Second Nine Weeks of Interactive Read-Aloud in Day 2 of The Flu of 1918: So is this a mistake, or did the author mean something else? What do you think she might have meant? (p. 6)
  • Students analyze author’s craft and language in the Third Nine Weeks of Reading Reading in Week 1, Day 4 of Bud, Not Buddy: What does the author mean to say Bud’s mother was like a tornado? Use context to understand the figurative language here (p. 7)

These demonstrate a few of the frequent opportunities for students to analyze key ideas, details, and structure are also part of daily analysis. For example:

  • In the Second Nine Weeks of Shared Reading, Week 1, Day 2 students read Volcano and students respond to the following discussion questions: “Why would an earthquake trigger an avalanche? Why would a steam explosion be so dangerous? What actually caused all of the trees to be flattened? What was the difference between the stone wind and the avalanche? Why were the pumice and ash dangerous?” (p. 4)
  • In the Third Nine Weeks of Interactive Reading, Day 3, students read The Boy Who Loved Words and students respond to the following discussion questions: How have people's opinion of Selig changed, now that he has found his purpose? How does Selig feel now? And please use a word other than lonely or solo! (p. 6)
  • In the Fourth Nine Weeks of Shared Reading, Week 1, Day 1, students read The Mostly True Adventures of Homer P. Figg and respond to the following discussion questions: Why does Squint lie about Harold's age? Does Squinton Leach actually sell Harold to the army? Use evidence from the text (p. 2).

Indicator 2c

4 / 4

Materials contain a coherently sequenced set of text-dependent questions and tasks that require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across both individual and multiple texts.

The instructional materials for Grade 5 meet expectations that materials contain a coherently sequenced set of text-dependent questions and tasks that require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across both individual and multiple texts.

The majority of the questions and tasks are coherently sequenced to support students’ analysis and integration of knowledge and ideas. On page 17 of the teacher’s manual, it is stated: “Nearly all questions provided for in shared reading are inferential, meaning that students have to combine information from within the text, or between the text and prior knowledge to answer.” And on page 18: “Students will have the opportunity to complete one text-based written response per day.” This relates to standards RI.5.1 and RL.5.1.

Students are often asked to examine and analyze details and key ideas to integrate their knowledge and ideas. Students will have to take earlier learning and synthesize it into the new task to complete the questions and analyses below.

  • In the first few days of the text Walk Two Moons (First Nine Weeks Shared Reading), students are asked 5-6 comprehension questions in most lessons, which help students examine and analyze details in the story.
  • In The Mostly True Adventures of Homer P. Figg (Fourth Nine Weeks Shared Reading), students are instructed to pay attention to details of setting to focus in on key ideas to help them make sense in regard to time and place in the story: “This book is a narrative. The events are in time order. So we’ll often stop to review what’s occurred. What are the main events that have happened so far in the story?” (p. 3)
  • In the first lesson, students respond to: “The author hints that Phoebe is going to be an important character. What do you think the relationship between Phoebe and Sal might be? How could she be important?” (p. 3).
  • In the second lesson, students respond to: “What do we learn about Phoebe in these chapters? What sort of character do you think she is going to turn out to be?” (p. 4).
  • In the ninth lesson, students are asked to ponder: “Think about what we are learning about Phoebe’s family” (p. 13).

Students are asked integrate knowledge and ideas from multiple texts:

  • In both The Mostly True Adventures of Homer P. Figg (Day 1, Day 2, Day 9, Day 11, Day 15) and The Thief (Day 29, Day 38), many of the writing activities instruct students to write from a certain character’s point-of-view. A student would certainly need to analyze details to be able to successfully do this.
  • In the Third Nine Weeks Interactive Read-Aloud, students compare The Boy Who Loved Words to the story of Johnny Appleseed. “Write two paragraphs. In the first, tell how the two stories are similar. In the second, write about how they are different. So, in the first paragraph students compare the two stories. In the second paragraph you’ll contrast them (p. 7).

Indicator 2d

0 / 4

The questions and tasks support students' ability to complete culminating tasks in which they demonstrate their knowledge of a topic (or, for grades 6-8, a theme) through integrated skills (e.g. combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The instructional materials for Grade 5 do not meet expectations that the questions and tasks support students’ ability to complete culminating tasks in which they demonstrate their knowledge of a topic through integrated skills (e.g. combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

Culminating tasks are not included in this curriculum. While there are daily writing and discussion prompts of very high quality, there are no multi-faceted culminating tasks in either interactive or shared reading that extend beyond the day to day smaller tasks.

Indicator 2e

4 / 4

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The instructional materials for Grade 5 fully meet the expectations of this indicator, with a year-long plan to build academic vocabulary. For these materials, academic vocabulary is defined as words that are traditionally used in academic dialogue and text. Specifically, it refers to words that are not necessarily common or frequently encountered in informal conversation.

Academic vocabulary practice is embedded throughout the fifth grade materials, mostly supported in the Interactive Reading lessons, under the headings “Model a Comprehension Strategy and Ask Questions During Reading.” For example, in the third nine week unit, when reading The Boy Who Loved Words, the following is included:

  • “As we finish our book today, think about how it is similar to the story of Johnny Appleseed, and also how it is different. Later I will ask you to write two paragraphs, one comparing the two books and the other contrasting them. So be thinking about similarities and differences as I read today.”
  • “So what exactly is Selig’s [the author’s] purpose? Talk it over with your partner.”
  • “If you look closely at these two pictures you will see that they are the same people. It looks to me like the first page is all about negative words, and the second page is all about positive words. Let’s look closely so that we can compare and contrast. [If you can project the illustrations, point out a few of the differences, window by window.]”

Academic vocabulary can also be found (and is explicitly defined) in the Word Study Scope and Sequence amongst Tier 2 vocabulary words. For example, in the fourth week of the second unit under “Meaning and Spelling Vocabulary,” the following is included in the lesson plan:

  • “Mo tive (open, closed) is a noun that means a reason to do something. For someone to kill someone else, there has to be a strong motive. The verb form is motivate. A motive motivates someone to do something.”

Similarly, in the fourth nine week unit of Word Study, the following is included in the lesson plan:

  • “In quir ies (closed, vce, vowel team) is a noun that means questions one might ask to find out particular information. Professor Fleabottom has been making inquiries about the movement of the troops. The verb form is inquire.”

Indicator 2f

2 / 4

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan to support students' increasing writing skills over the course of the school year, building students' writing ability to demonstrate proficiency at grade level at the end of the school year.

The instructional materials for Grade 5 partially meet expectations that materials support students’ increasing writing skills over the course of the school year, building students’ writing ability to demonstrate proficiency at grade level at the end of the school year. There is consistent, daily time for writing practice over the course of the year. During the differentiation block, students have as many as 30 minutes each day to complete text-based writing tasks.

While prompts are tied to texts of gradually increasing rigor (all within the grade level), there is minimal explicit support for students to practice revision, editing, and for moving from single parts to comprehensive written pieces. Writing tasks at the end of the year are very similar to the beginning of the year. Rubrics are available to support teachers as they determine students’ writing level and assess growth. Additionally, there are 90 45-minute blocks built into the year plan for which no interactive read-alouds are planned, providing opportunities for teachers to support more writing instruction and practice.

In the Grade 5 Teacher’s manual (p. 11), it states, “You will see that there are not as many interactive read-aloud lesson plans as there are shared reading lesson plans. This difference is deliberate. Nearly half of the 45-minute time segments for interactives must be reserved for process writing so that students learn to compose, revise, and edit their own writing pieces. We have not designed this portion of the curriculum. Teachers should work together to use consistent process writing procedures and language and to sequence the three writing genres (narrative, informative, and persuasive/argumentative) across the school year. In the materials, writing tasks are all on-demand and are text-dependent, which is a strength.

However, there is no plan for modeling or support materials for a writing process present in materials. For example, on page 47 the Teacher’s Manual states, “Model for students at the beginning of the year to establish norms for length and quality," but no models are provided in the instructional materials.

Many writing prompts ask students to use the skill of summarization or to write summaries, models of summaries, or protocols for how to write a summary are not included. Teachers would need to find or develop their own lessons, models, or protocols of how to write a summary. For example, during the Second Nine Weeks of Interactive Read-Aloud, Day 1, A Single Shard, the following task is included: “Write a summary of how Tree-ear spent his day.”

Writing topics chosen are appropriate and engaging for the grade level in which they are presented and varied in type of writing asked to do.

Examples of the writing tasks present (which include the protocol of including text evidence) for Grade 5 students include the following:

  • In the First Nine Weeks of Interactive Read-Aloud, Day 8 of Tuck Everlasting: “Draw a map of the places we have been reading about. Include Treegap, Charleytown, the Tucks’ house, the road, and the pond. Of course, you can’t draw an exact map, but use your knowledge of the story as evidence. Be sure to label the map.”
  • In the Second Nine Weeks, Week 2, Day 8 of Oceans: “Pretend you’re a member of Congress. Someone has proposed that money be spent on predicting the next El Niño. Others say it would be a waste of money because we can’t change the weather anyway. Write a paragraph arguing that predicting the next El Niño would be a good idea. Make your claim and then give your reasons.”
  • In the Third Nine Weeks of Interactive Read-Aloud of Underground Railroad: “One day, President Lincoln met Harriet Beecher Stowe. Write a conversation between the two of them. [Point out later what Lincoln actually said to her: “So you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!”]”
  • In the Fourth Nine Weeks of Sharing Reading, Week 1, Day 4 of The Mostly True Adventures of Homer P. Figg: “Compare and contrast Reed and Brewster to Stink and Smelt. How are they similar and different?”

If teachers would like to incorporate the writing process into lessons (in order to meet the standards), they would need to generate their own materials and allocate more time than originally budgeted by the curriculum. It is noted there are suggested external resources within the program to achieve this.

Indicator 2g

2 / 4

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The instructional materials for Grade 5 partially meet expectations that materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials. Students engage with components of the research process over the course of the year and complete short projects. There are minimal opportunities for students to complete full research projects that have gone through a process of revision. The component pieces included, however, do support students in getting ready for that kind of work. Teachers will have to identify outside materials for students to complete full research projects.

Students at the 5th grade level are asked daily to meet the some of the research standards using print materials (although the curriculum occasionally incorporates digital sources). Students are offered the opportunity to read, reflect, re-read, and synthesize what they have read to draw conclusions to share with others.

The research tasks for 5th grade are in labeled in the lessons as “Follow Up” for Shared Reading and “Written Response” for Interactive Reading. Students have opportunities to summarize, paraphrase, or analyze daily in both shared and interactive reading with these short research tasks; however, explicit instruction in how to summarize, paraphrase or analyze are not evident. In the teacher materials, the design of the sequence of instruction can build towards independence and allows students chances to apply familiar skills to new contexts.

Examples of some of the short research projects are as follows:

In the 1st nine weeks students write to the following prompt after reading the text The Porcupine Year (Interactive Read-Alouds, Day 4)

  • What advice would you give the group about where to go? Should they try to find their relatives up north or should they wait for the government to make a place for them? Tell why?

In the 2nd nine week unit of the Shared Reading component, the teacher guide reads as follows for day 1 of Volcano:

  • “We are going to read about the eruption of a volcano in 1980 in the state of Washington. We can see what happened during the eruption and some of what happened later in this video.” Students watch a video clip, read the text, as well as engage with comprehension questions, text structure and vocabulary instruction. Then students are then given the following prompt: “Make a brief timeline of the events leading up to the eruption of Mt. St. Helen beginning in March, 1980.”

In the 3rd nine weeks student write to the following prompt after reading Wright Bros (Interactive Read-Alouds, Day 4).

  • Write a short paragraph about the four forces at work as an airplane flies. Your paragraph should have five sentences: a topic sentence stating that there are four forces, and then one sentence for each force. Use the diagram to help you as you write.

In the 4th nine weeks students write to the following prompt after reading The Mostly True Adventures of Homer P. Figg. (Shared Reading, Week 3)

  • Write a journal entry describing the Caravan of Miracles. Include the most important facts and details. Then make up a description of The Amazing Pig Boy.

Research projects that extend across texts and use various sources would need be developed by the teacher. No research guidelines such as summarizing or paraphrasing information in notes or providing sources is evident. (W.5.8) Teachers would need to develop organizational tools and research protocols to assist students with more in-depth research projects that span across texts or sources as well as to assist in investigation of different aspects of a topic. (W.5.7)

It is also noted that there are few opportunities to research using digital sources (W.5.8), so teachers would need to be supplement this component in order to fully support students’ success with the research standards.

Indicator 2h

0 / 4

Materials provide a design, including accountability, for how students will regularly engage in a volume of independent reading either in or outside of class.

The instructional materials for Grade 5 do not fully meet expectations that materials provide a design, including accountability, for how students will regularly engage in a volume of independent reading either in or outside of class. There is some guidance for the teacher to engage a program of independent reading. For example, in the Fifth-grade Manual, page 49: "The most beneficial homework may be wide reading. Teachers may opt to adopt a reading log for homework, provided that books from the library are sent home with all children." It is also noted in the Fifth Grade manual that students first work on their on-demand writing, and then engage in self-selected reading with a reading log (page 10).

The Literacy Block consists of three 45 minute blocks.

  • Interactive Read Aloud Block
  • Shared Reading Block
  • Differentiation Block (Students are divided into 3 groups. One group meets with the teacher while other students are engaged in writing and self-selected reading). (Teacher’s Manual, pg.8)

The Grades 3-5 Teacher's’ Manual states that the three 45 minutes blocks offer time in the schedule for self-selected reading and indicates that students should use their reading logs. Materials will need to be developed by the teacher for supports/scaffolds to foster independent reading.