2026
Amplify Desmos Math

6th to 8th Grade - Gateway 2

Back to 6th to 8th Grade Overview
Cover for Amplify Desmos Math
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor and Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations
100%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance
8 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices
8 / 8

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for rigor and balance and mathematical practices. The materials help students develop procedural skills, fluency, and application. The materials also make meaningful connections between the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).

Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance

8 / 8

Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion

For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.

While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.

To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.

Materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations by giving appropriate attention to: developing students’ conceptual understanding; procedural skill and fluency; and engaging applications.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for rigor. The materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, give attention throughout the year to procedural skill and fluency, and spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of mathematics. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade.

Indicator 2a

2 / 2

Materials support the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters. The curriculum is structured to systematically build students' conceptual understanding by introducing problems that allow for multiple approaches, which are then guided toward a more formal understanding.

As stated in the Program Guide, Curriculum, page 27 of the PD Library, “Lessons develop students’ conceptual understanding by inviting them into familiar or accessible contexts and asking them for their own ideas before presenting more formal mathematics.” This approach is reflected throughout the curriculum, where students engage with problems and questions that promote conceptual development across the grade level.

The Math of the Unit sections provide a clear explanation of how conceptual understanding is developed throughout each unit. Lessons present various representations and contexts, offering students opportunities to choose strategies that align with their understanding. Daily independent practice problems give students the chance to independently demonstrate their conceptual understanding.

Teacher guidance in each lesson is designed to facilitate discussions that connect representations and concepts, further supporting students’ understanding. These components align with the goal of providing students opportunities to develop and independently demonstrate their conceptual understanding across the grade level.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 2: Introducing Ratios, Lesson 4, Screen 7, Balancing Act, students develop conceptual understanding as they learn the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe the relationship between two quantities. The materials state, “The table shows some ratios of limes to lychees that balance the scale. Dyani says 22 limes will balance with 55 lychees. Will the 22:55 ratio balance?” A table is provided with the headings Limes and Lychees. The Limes column contains 2 and 20. The Lychees column contains 5 and 50. (6.RP.3)

  • Grade 7, Unit 5: Operations With Positive and Negative Numbers, Lesson 2, Screen 6, Decide and Defend, students develop conceptual understanding as they use a vertical number line to apply and extend their previous knowledge of addition and subtraction to add and subtract rational numbers. The materials state, “Marc and Naoki are trying to evaluate 3-(-2). Marc says, This is like adding 2 anchors, so the submarine goes down to 1. Naoki claims, This is like removing 2 anchors, so the submarine goes up to 5. Whose thinking is correct?” Choices include: Marc (1), Naoki (5), Both, or Neither. An image of a submarine in water, with a vertical number line next to it, is provided. The submarine is placed at 3 on the number line, with a point labeled Naoki at 5 and a point labeled Marc at 1. (7.NS.1)

  • Grade 8, Unit 3: Proportional and Linear Relationships, Sub-Unit Quiz, Screen 5, Problem 3, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they interpret diagrams or graphs that represent proportional relationships in context. Problem 3 states, “The graph shows the cost vs. weight relationship for two types of rice that can be bought at a bulk food store. Select all of the true statements. The cost as a unit rate for conventional rice is 1.50 per pound. The cost vs. weight relationships for both organic and conventional rice are proportional relationships. Conventional rice costs twice as much per pound as organic rice. It costs 8 to buy 12 pounds of conventional rice. The relationship between cost, c, and weight, w, for organic rice can be represented by the equation c=3w.” Two lines are provided showing both organic rice and conventional rice graphed comparing the cost (dollars) to weight (lb). (8.EE.5 & 8.EE.6)

Indicator 2a.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. The materials provide embedded, intentional supports that promote conceptual understanding of grade-level mathematics through activating prior knowledge, pairing concrete, visual, and abstract representations, and engaging students in scaffolded tasks that are aligned with the depth and intent of the standards.

In every unit, the materials consistently provide opportunities for students to explore and make sense of mathematical ideas before engaging with multiple representations to formalize procedures, supporting conceptual understanding. To do this, the materials embed various representations, structured discourse, and Mathematical Language Routines [MLRs] to promote deep conceptual understanding. For example:

  • Concrete and visual representations and virtual manipulatives such as ratio tables, graphs, and algebra tiles are used alongside MLRs to solidify understanding of grade-level mathematics.

  • Sentence frames and starters encourage students to explain their reasoning, compare strategies, and make sense of concrete and visual representations.

  • Activities and tasks require students to use and develop language when moving between representations (concrete, visual, and abstract), aligning with the standards’ call for conceptual understanding.

  • The MLD Resources provide a strong and explicit structure for teachers to support MLLs’ full participation in one Activity per lesson, including a summary of the language demands of the Activity, Spanish cognates, teacher prompts paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging, and a student-facing page frequently containing sentence frames and starters, graphic organizers, and/or bilingual English-Spanish word banks.

For example, in Grade 6, Unit 2, Introducing Ratios, Lesson 4, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they learn the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe ratio relationships using the scenario of balancing a scale (6.RP.3). In the Warm-Up, students explore combinations of fruits that balance a virtual scale, and the digital platform records their findings in a table. Then, the materials direct the teacher to co-create a class definition for the term table using students’ language and the glossary. An ML/EL Support invites MLLs to engage with other definitions of the homonym, clarifying which meaning they will use for the remainder of the unit. The materials support MLLs’ full and complete participation in the Warm-Up through interacting with the virtual manipulatives, paired with the abstract table, and the two-fold vocabulary support for the term table. In Activity 1, partners analyze equivalent ratios using the virtual scale and the Notice and Wonder Instructional Routine. Then, partners use the virtual scale to generate different combinations of equivalent ratios. This work continues in Activity 2, where partners explore equivalent ratios to ultimately determine whether two ratios are equivalent. The MLD Resources for this lesson are for Activity 2, and they support MLLs by participating in the student-to-student discourse while they work in partners to determine whether new ratios are equivalent to a given ratio. The student page of the MLD Resources contains printed sentence frames such as, “The 16:2 ratio ____(will/will not) balance the scale because…” alongside a bilingual English-Spanish word bank. The MLD Resources also provide teacher prompts that are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from crafting their explanation in their home language to encouraging MLLs to draw the increase in fruit, connecting the visual representation with the abstract values in the table. The lesson concludes with the materials supporting MLLs’ full and complete participation in the Synthesis with MLR2: Collect and Display, stating, “Use this routine to formalize strategies for creating equivalent ratios using students’ language. Display any new language, examples, or diagrams for students to reference later.” In summary, the lessons’ embedded features such as the virtual manipulatives, the ML/EL Support, and the MLD Resources paired with many opportunities for students to use and develop language provide MLLs with full and complete participation in the lesson.

The materials fully support MLLs with the language needed to engage in conceptual understanding by providing structured opportunities for students to explain their thinking, compare strategies, and use precise mathematical vocabulary. Across all units, concrete, visual, and abstract representations are intentionally connected through MLRs and language supports that deepen understanding and encourage reasoning. Embedded supports such as virtual manipulatives, the MLRs, sentence frames, and the MLD Resources ensure MLLs can access, use, and develop the disciplinary language necessary for full participation in building conceptual understanding.

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for providing intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluency, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters. The curriculum is designed to systematically build procedural fluency by offering multiple opportunities for students to practice and apply skills in a variety of contexts.

As noted in the Amplify Desmos Math PD Library, Getting Started, Grades 6-A1, Program Guide, Curriculum, page 23, "Procedural fluency is embedded throughout activities and in daily lesson practice." The curriculum includes structures that support procedural fluency development, such as Repeated Challenges, where students engage with a series of problems on the same topic, and Challenge Creators, which encourage students to create and solve challenges based on learned concepts. These activities provide repeated practice of procedural skills and help students connect conceptual understanding to fluency, reinforcing mastery.

The Math of the Unit sections explain how procedural skills and fluency are developed across each unit. Lessons incorporate Warm-Ups and Instructional Routines that regularly support procedural fluency in whole-group settings. Lesson Activities align with grade-level standards, further reinforcing procedural skills and fluency.

Students independently reinforce procedural fluency through daily practice problems, including spiral reviews, available both digitally and in print. Fluency is supported through collaborative learning structures, practice days before quizzes and assessments, and personalized, adaptive exercises focusing on fact families, mental calculations, and number sense for whole numbers and fractions. Fluency cards from earlier grades are also included to support fluency standards from prior levels, ensuring the continued development of foundational skills.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 5: Decimal Arithmetic, Lesson 5, Screen 9, Repeated Challenges, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency as they multiply multi-digit decimals using the standard algorithm. The materials state, “There are many challenge problems on this screen!.” Teachers instruct students “to solve as many problems as they have time for.” Some expressions include: (0.04)\\sdot(0.6), (0.03)\\sdot(0.02), (0.2)\\sdot(0.007). (6.NS.3)

  • Grade 7, Unit 6: Expressions, Equations, and Inequalities, Lesson 7, Lesson Practice, Screen 5, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency as they solve equations that involve positive and negative numbers in the form of px+q=r or p(x+q)=r. The materials state, “Solve each equation. Problem 4. -4x=-28. Problem 5. -4(x+1)=-28. Problem 6. x-(-7)=-1. Problem 7. -3x+7=-1.” (7.EE.4a) 

  • Grade 8, Unit 4: Linear Equations and Linear Systems, Lesson 4, Screen 2, Activity 1 Launch, students develop procedural skill and fluency as they solve a linear equation in one variable. Activity 1 states, “Sadia and Amir started solving the same equation. Discuss: What was the first step each person took?” Teacher Moves states, “Launch: Consider asking: ‘How is the structure of this equation different from equations we’ve seen before?’ Responses vary. This equation has two terms in parentheses multiplied by a factor. ‘Did both Sadia’s and Amir’s first steps keep the equation balanced? How do you know?’ Discuss the distributive property if it does not come up naturally.” (8.EE.7)

Indicator 2b.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in developing procedural skills and fluencies. The materials feature embedded, intentional language supports that support MLLs with systematically building procedural fluency and provide MLLs with the opportunity to use and develop language related to explanation, justification, and synthesis.

In every unit, the materials consistently provide opportunities for MLLs to use and develop the language needed to engage with procedural skills and fluencies as called upon in the standards. To do this, the materials contain various instructional design features that support MLLs’ productive language, or speaking or writing, specifically where lessons require students to explain or justify their thinking or synthesize their learning related to developing procedural skills. For example:

  • The digital Fluency Practice cards feature dynamic visual representations that support MLLs' understanding of abstract expressions. As MLLs practice using these cards, the adaptive technology slowly removes the interactive representations as students need the scaffolds less.

  • Daily Lesson Practice and Additional Practice feature fluency practice and spiral review with language and visual representations similar to those students previously experienced within lessons, providing MLLs with coherent practice towards mastery. 

  • Within lessons, sentence frames and starters encourage students to explain their reasoning and synthesize their learning related to developing procedural skills and fluencies.

  • The Math Language Development [MLD] Resources provide a strong and explicit structure for teachers to support MLLs’ full participation in one Activity per lesson, including a summary of the language demands of the Activity, Spanish cognates, teacher prompts paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging, and a student-facing page frequently containing sentence frames and starters, graphic organizers, and/or bilingual English-Spanish word banks.

For example, in Grade 8, Unit 4, Linear Equations and Linear Systems, Lesson 4, Screen 2, students continue work from the previous lessons to develop fluency with solving linear equations as they discover and connect three main ideas related to solving equations (8.EE.7). The Warm-Up activates background knowledge from the previous lessons, moving students towards independence by encouraging them to draw a hanger diagram to represent one of the given equations instead of providing the hanger diagram. In Activity 1, the teacher invites partners to analyze two fictional students’ work in order to understand different steps that could be used to solve the same equation. MLLs are supported in participating in Activity 1 through Math Language Routine [MLR] 7: Compare and Connect, which states, “Invite students to analyze and compare each strategy, and then connect to previous equations they have solved.” The materials further support MLLs with participating in the whole-class synthesis of Activity 1 through MLR3: Critique, Correct, Clarify, in which MLLs identify strengths, errors, and ambiguities in the fictional students’ work in order to apply their learnings to their own solution strategies when solving equations. The MLD Resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, and they support MLLs in participating in the student-to-student discourse while they work in partners to identify the different steps each student took to solve the same equation. The student page of the MLD Resources contains printed sentence frames such as, “Both students… Sadia started by…. Amir started by…” alongside a bilingual English-Spanish word bank. The MLD Resources also provide teacher prompts that are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from crafting the steps in their home language to encouraging MLLs to annotate parts of the equations to help them make sense of them. These supports help move MLLs towards independently demonstrating an understanding of selecting and applying steps to solve equations, which they do in Activity 2. The lesson concludes with the materials supporting MLLs’ full and complete participation in the Synthesis with MLR2: Collect and Display, stating, “Use this routine to revisit students’ strategies for solving equations. Add using the distributive property, combining like terms, and any others to the display for students to reference for the rest of the unit.” In summary, the lessons’ embedded features such as the MLRs and the MLD Resources paired with many opportunities for students to use and develop language provide MLLs with full and complete participation in the lesson.

In every unit, the materials consistently provide opportunities for MLLs to use and develop the language needed to engage with procedural skills and fluencies as called for in the standards. The materials embed structured supports such as MLRs, sentence frames, and the MLD Resources to promote productive language use when explaining reasoning, justifying steps, and synthesizing learning related to procedures. These features, along with coherent visual and linguistic supports in daily and digital practice, move MLLs toward independently demonstrating procedural fluency. 

Indicator 2c

2 / 2

Materials support the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for providing intentional opportunities for students to develop and apply mathematical concepts and skills in both routine and non-routine applications. The curriculum is structured to build students' abilities by introducing problems that allow for multiple approaches and guide students toward problem-solving strategies.

As stated in the Amplify Desmos Math PD Library, Getting Started, Grades 6-A1, Program Guide, Curriculum, page 23, “Students also have opportunities to apply what they have learned to new mathematical or real-world contexts. Concepts are often introduced in context and most units end by inviting students to apply their learning…” This approach is reflected throughout the curriculum, where students engage with both routine and non-routine problems that promote mathematical application in real-world contexts and abstract scenarios.

The Math of the Unit sections provide clear explanations of how mathematical application is developed throughout each unit. Students are given opportunities to apply their learning to new contexts. Routine and non-routine application problems appear throughout the materials, particularly in the final lessons of each unit, which invite students to apply their learning to real-world scenarios.

The materials support students' procedural fluency through routine problems, including multi-step exercises, and encourage strategic thinking with non-routine problems. In Challenge Creators, students design problems for themselves and their classmates, incorporating both routine and non-routine applications. The Make My Challenge activity also allows students to create and solve challenges, reinforcing both types of applications.

Throughout the curriculum, students are provided with opportunities to independently demonstrate their ability to apply mathematical concepts and skills, both routinely and non-routinely, across the grade level.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 3: Unit Rates and Percentages, Lesson 10, Screen 12, Show What You Know, students engage in a routine application problem as they solve problems involving percentages. The materials state, “Callen bought new sneakers for $60. Miko bought sneakers that cost 80% of that price. How much did Miko pay for his sneakers?” (6.RP.3)

  • Grade 7, Unit 4: Proportional Relationships and Percentages, Lesson 11, Screen 6, Sheets of Stickers, students independently engage in a non-routine application problem as they compute unit rates with ratios of fractions. The materials state,  “Alex is thinking about buying stickers by the sheet. Four sheets cost $14. How much would 11\\frac{1}{2} sheets cost?” (7.RP.A)

  • Grade 8, Unit 5, Functions and Volume, Lesson 6, Screen 3, Tyler on the Slide, students engage in a non-routine application problem sketch a graph of a function based on a qualitative situation. The materials state, “Sketch a graph representing the relationship between Tyler's waist height and time.” Students are provided with a video clip showing Tyler moving around at the playground and an interactive graph for them to sketch their representation. (8.F.5)

Indicator 2c.MLL

2 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in utilizing mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications. The materials feature embedded, intentional language supports that support MLLs with engaging in applying mathematical concepts and skills in routine and non-routine tasks as well as partner and whole-class discourse focusing on mathematical reasoning. 

In every unit, the materials consistently provide opportunities for MLLs to use and develop language when making sense of and solving application problems. To do this, lessons frequently invite students to choose and apply their own solution strategy while engaging in real-world and mathematical application tasks. The materials often introduce concepts using real-world scenarios, self-select prescribed or unique solution strategies, and invite students to synthesize and apply their learning to new contexts. The Math Language Development [MLD] Resources provide a strong and explicit structure for teachers to support MLLs’ full participation in one Activity per lesson, including a summary of the language demands of the Activity, Spanish cognates, teacher prompts paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging, and a student-facing page frequently containing sentence frames and starters, graphic organizers, and/or bilingual English-Spanish word banks.

For example, in Grade 6, Unit 3, Unit Rates and Percentages, Lesson 10, students engage in routine application problems involving percentages (6.RP.3). The Warm-Up activates background knowledge around the real-world scenario of riding a bike and interpreting a progress bar. The Warm-Up purpose states that students use a tape diagram to determine the rider’s goal distance from the given benchmark percentage. In the Warm-Up, the teacher is directed to play a digital animation showing a person riding a bike with a progress bar ending at a distance of 15.0 km which is 25% of the rider’s goal. The materials invite partners to discuss and then calculate the rider’s goal distance using prior mathematical knowledge, then to type their explanations. An ML/EL Support provides a suggested language support for MLLs to participate fully in the productive language demands of the Warm-Up, stating, “Invite students to talk through their thinking with a partner before writing it down. (Writing and Speaking)” In Activity 1, students continue engaging with the bike riding scenario as they extrapolate a double number line model from the progress bar. In addition to the newly introduced double number line, the materials invite partners to use self-selected solution strategies to solve problems involving percentages. As partners work, the materials direct the teacher to facilitate a whole-class discussion to compare a double number line solution strategy with a solution strategy utilizing a table. The materials support MLLs by participating in the whole-class discussion through Math Language Routine [MLR] 7: Compare and Connect, which states, “Invite students to analyze and compare each strategy, and then connect to their strategy or previous strategies.” The materials further support MLLs by engaging in comparing solution strategies in this routine application problem through the MLD Resources for this lesson, which are for Activity 1. The student page of the MLD Resources contains a Venn diagram with printed sentence frames such as, “Melissa used… Darryl used…. I see ____ in both strategies." alongside a bilingual English-Spanish word bank. The MLD Resources also provide teacher prompts that are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that focus on writing solution strategy steps in their home language to co-construct the Venn diagram. As the lesson continues, students work with partners to engage with and connect several other solution strategies for solving routine application problems up until the Synthesis. The lesson concludes with the materials supporting MLLs’ full and complete participation in the Synthesis with MLR2: Collect and Display, stating, “Use this routine to formalize the strategies for solving percentage problems using students’ language. Display any new language, examples, or diagrams for students to reference later.” These language supports help MLLs make sense of various solution strategies to solve routine application problems before being asked to self-select and independently apply one solution strategy on the Show What You Know for this lesson. In summary, the lessons’ embedded features such as the MLRs and the MLD Resources paired with many opportunities for students to use and develop language provide MLLs with full and complete participation in the lesson.

The materials consistently provide opportunities for MLLs to use and develop the language needed to make sense of and solve application problems. Lessons embed structured supports such as MLRs, sentence frames, and the MLD Resources to promote productive language use when explaining solution strategies, comparing approaches, and applying mathematical approaches to routine and non-routine problems. These design features, along with opportunities for self-selected strategies and discourse-rich discussions, move MLLs toward independently applying mathematical reasoning to new situations. 

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations in that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards. 

Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously across the materials to develop students' mathematical understanding of individual topics or units. Each unit within the curriculum supports a variety of instructional approaches that incorporate conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application in a balanced way.

The Math of the Unit sections outline how the three aspects of rigor are balanced throughout each unit, indicating which lessons address each aspect independently and which combine them. The Math that Matters Most pages for each sub-unit detail how strategies, skills, and language related to the topic are developed, ensuring that rigor is present in both isolated and integrated forms. The Lesson Overview pages for each lesson describe how the rigor within the lesson connects to prior and future learning, reinforcing the coherence and balance of rigor across the grade level.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 4: Dividing Fractions, Lesson 3, Screen 10, Synthesis, students demonstrate conceptual understanding and apply it while interpreting and computing quotients of fractions. The materials state, “How can you use an equation or a diagram to figure out how many \\frac{1}{2}-cup scoops you need to make 6 cups?” A diagram is included which shows four cards one with 6\\div\\frac{1}{2}=?, \\frac{1}{2}\\times?=6, a picture of six measuring cups with a line through the half and a tape diagram with 12 equal parts each labeled \\frac{1}{2} and the entire diagram measures 6. (6.NS.1)

  • Grade 7, Unit 2: Introducing Proportional Relationships, Lesson 9, Screen 7, Lesson Synthesis, students engage in all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application as they distinguish between proportional and non-proportional relationships, write equations that represent each type, and explain the reasoning behind their choices. The materials state, “Write two equations: one that represents a proportional relationship and one that does not. Describe how you know whether an equation represents a proportional relationship.” (7.RP.2)

  • Grade 8, Unit 3: Proportional and Linear Relationships, Lesson 7, Screen 2-3, Gather Data & Double the Cups, Double the Height?, students engage in all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application as they make connections between proportional relationships and linear equations). The materials state, “Let’s look at different stacks of cups. Drag the movable point to adjust the number of cups. Record at least two data points. Sylvia found that a stack of 5 cups has a height of 15 centimeters. She thinks that a stack of 10 cups will have a height of 30 centimeters. Is she correct? Yes or No.” Students are given a stack of three cups, which measures 12.2 cm. (8.EE.B)

Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices

8 / 8

Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion

For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.

While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.

To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.

Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for mathematical practices. The materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).

Indicator 2e

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP1 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson. Additionally, a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students engage in open-ended tasks that support key components of MP1, including sense-making, strategy development, and perseverance. These tasks prompt them to make sense of mathematical situations, develop and revise strategies, and persist through challenges. They are encouraged to analyze problems by engaging with the information and questions presented, use strategies that make sense to them, monitor and evaluate their progress, determine whether their answers are reasonable, reflect on and revise their approaches, and increasingly devise strategies independently. 

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 4: Dividing Fractions, Lesson 4, Screen 4, Two-Thirds of a Planter, students make sense of division problems by using a variety of strategies to make sense of the problem. The materials state, “Brianna also put flowers in a big planter. 12 flowers fill \\frac{2}{3} of a big planter. How many flowers fill 1 big planter?” The Teacher Moves, Monitor states: “Look for a variety of student strategies as they make sense of the problem. (MP1)” Students make sense of the problems and persevere in solving them as they analyze the relationship between the part (12 flowers), the fractional portion of the planter \\frac{2}{3}, and the whole (1 full planter), using strategies such as unit rates, visual models, equations, or logical reasoning to determine how many flowers would fill the entire planter.

  • Grade 7, Unit 8: Probability and Sampling, Lesson 10, Screen 7, See Some Samples, students use a slider to examine the relationship between the sample mean and population mean. The materials state, “Drag the point to collect crabs and see the mean width for the sample. Discuss: What are advantages and disadvantages of using a large sample.” The Teacher Moves, Purpose states: “Students analyze how sample size can affect the quality of the data we collect. (MP1)” Connect, Consider asking: “What happened to the sample mean as the sample size increased?  Why might it be challenging in real life to use a large sample? What other questions might you be interested in asking where surveying the whole population would be challenging?” Students make sense of the relationship between the sample mean and the population mean as they think about the advantages and disadvantages of using a large sample, as well as the role of randomness in sampling.

  • Grade 8, Unit 5: Functions and Volume, Lesson 6, Screen 6, Water in the Bowl, students apply previous strategies to draw a graph of a function. Teacher’s Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students draw graphs of functions based on short videos they watch of real-world situations, identifying important features to consider when modeling a situation with a graph. They consider the qualitative features of a function, such as whether it is increasing, decreasing, linear, or non-linear, and interpret specific points in context. Students make sense of different strategies to support graphing functions to represent different events in a story. (MP1, MP4)” Screen 6 states, “Sketch a graph representing the relationship between the volume of water in the 5-liter bowl and time.” The Teacher Moves, Launch states: “Invite students to think about the new context involving a volume of water poured into a bowl. Pause briefly to play the video for the whole class. Use the Notice and Wonder routine to promote curiosity and help students make sense of water poured into a bowl. See the Routine Facilitation Guide for more information. (MP1)” Students make sense of how real-world events unfold over time by analyzing key features of a scenario and use that understanding to represent the situation with a graph, considering how volume relates to time and how the shape of the graph reflects whether the function is increasing steadily, slowing down, or leveling off.

Indicator 2e.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. The materials provide some strategies and supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of MP1, but they are not employed consistently throughout the program.

The materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when making sense of problems through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as an ML/EL Support. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation is the Instructional Routines. Specifically, in the PD Library on the digital platform, the Routine Facilitate Guides for 6-A1 describes how the Instructional Routine Notice and Wonder supports MP1: “This routine helps students make sense of a math representation or context (MP1) before they investigate it more deeply. This routine often appears as a Warm-Up or in the launch of an activity.” While there are other Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines that support the language needed to engage in MP1, Notice and Wonder is the only routine the materials identify as supporting MP1. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity of how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP1.

The materials invite students to use and develop language when making sense of problems through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk as students work to understand the information in the problem and the questions asked, determine if their answer makes sense, and reflect on and revise their solution strategy. The materials provide digital interactives, real-world videos, and animated videos that activate background knowledge while supporting students with understanding the information in the problem and the question asked. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 6, Unit 2, Introducing Ratios, Lesson 7, Activity 2, where students determine the least common multiple of two numbers through annotating a virtual hundreds grid. The materials invite students to apply solution strategies independently and check with their partner after determining the least common multiple of each set of numbers. There are no language supports for MLLs to make sense of and apply solution strategies independently.  No supports are provided for MLLs to fully participate in the partner discussion checking their answers. The Activity continues with the teacher presenting a real-world scenario involving desserts, where partners work together to apply the concept of least common multiple. The materials invite the teacher to support partners with prompts such as, “How does this situation compare to the Warm Up’s situation?” The materials do not provide linguistic support for MLLs to fully participate in the partner discussion of analyzing and making sense of the problem as it relates to finding the least common multiple. Additionally, the Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 1.  

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 6, Unit 5, Decimal Arithmetic, Lesson 5, Activity 1, where students use area and fraction multiplication to make sense of multiplying decimals with one non-zero digit. After participating in the Warm-Up where teachers activate background knowledge about calculating area of rectangles with decimal numbers as side lengths, students use area models to decide whether a multiplication equation with decimal numbers is true. The materials direct partners to use the area model to show or explain why the product makes sense, and to type their response in the digital platform. The ML/EL Support offers a suggested language support for MLLs engaging in the writing portion of this activity, stating, “Invite students to talk through their thinking with a partner before writing it down.” This oral rehearsal supports MLLs with full engagement in the task by integrating speaking and writing, providing a low-risk environment to make sense of the product before constructing a written response. The Activity continues with partners solving new multiplication expressions given corresponding area models, using a variety of solution strategies and discussing similarities and differences in their solution strategies using the area models as a reference. The Activity concludes with partners examining a fictional student, Jayden’s, solution strategy, where the materials direct students to show or explain how they would use the solution strategy to solve a new multiplication expression. The MLD Resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, and they provide teacher guidance to support MLLs with using and developing the language needed to sequence their explanation. Specifically, the MLD Resources offer teacher prompts such as, “What was Jayden’s first step? Second step? Third step?” These prompts are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from leveraging home language to encouraging MLLs to use the provided sentence frames and starters. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP1 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they are not employed consistently throughout the program. They are not consistent in supporting MLLs with the language demands of making sense of problems. At times, the ML/EL Supports and the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP1.

Indicator 2f

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP2 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP2, including reasoning with quantities, representing situations symbolically, and interpreting the meaning of numbers and symbols in context. These tasks encourage students to consider the units involved in a problem, analyze the relationships between quantities, and connect real-world scenarios to mathematical representations. Teachers are guided to support this development by modeling the use of mathematical notation, asking clarifying and probing questions, and facilitating conversations that help students make connections between multiple representations. 

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 2: Introducing Ratios, Lesson 9, Screen 6, A Darker Red, students use strategies to compare two ratios in context. The materials state, “Here is your ratio from the previous screen: 1 ounce red : 2 gallons white. Drag the points to create a new ratio. a. Can you find two different ways to make a darker red? b. Can you find two different ways to make a lighter red?” The Teacher Moves, Monitor states: “Invite students to adjust the amount of white paint and colored tint and share what they notice with a partner. Note: This screen will use the same color the student selected in Screen 5. Pause briefly to discuss multiple strategies for creating a darker color. If it doesn’t come up naturally, consider asking: ‘What happens if you keep the tint the same and change the amount of white paint?’ (MP2) ‘How can we change our ratio to create a darker color? A lighter color?’ (MP2) ‘How could I make a larger quantity of the same color?’ Use ratios equivalent to 1:2 such as 2:4, 3:6, 4:8 etc.” Students reason quantitatively as they compare the ratios using equivalent ratios and other strategies.

  • Grade 7, Unit 1: Scale Drawings, Lesson 7, Screens 2 and 3, Activity 1 Launch & Connect, students use the measurements of a scale drawing to calculate the actual dimensions of a figure. Screen 2 states, “Karima heard from students that they would like a basketball court in their community park. When Karima presented the idea to the park’s board of directors, they approved building the court in a 20-by-20-meter area of the park. Make a prediction: Will the basketball court fit in the designated area?” The Teacher Moves, Purpose states: “ Students analyze a scale drawing to determine whether a basketball court will fit in a location. (MP2)” Screen 3, states, “Will Karima’s court fit in the 20-by-20-meter square area the park directors designated for the court?” Students find the scale and actual measurements of the Length of the Court, L, the Width of the Court, W, the Hoop to 3-Point Line, H, and the 3-Point Line to the Side Line, S. Students reason abstractly and quantitatively as they find the measurement of the scale drawing and convert to the dimensions of the actual court. 

  • Grade 8, Unit 4: Linear Equations and Linear Systems, Lesson 8, Screen 2, Distance and Time, students write an equation with one variable to show when two quantities are the same in a given situation. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “In this lesson, students apply their knowledge of solving equations by considering two vehicles moving on a road. Using the rate of speed and the initial position of the vehicles, they are asked to determine when the vehicles will meet. Students recognize that they can create two expressions and set them equal, solve the equation for the unknown, and interpret their solution in the context of the situation. (MP2)” Screen 2 states, “The table shows each vehicle's position at certain times. The vehicles are moving at a constant rate. Fill in the missing information in the table.” A table is provided that shows time (in seconds) at intervals of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …, and t. It includes the truck’s position (in meters) as 0, 15, 30, and the car’s position (in meters) as 18, 29, 40. The Teacher Moves, Purpose: “Students reason abstractly to generate expressions representing the position of two vehicles for a given time and determine when they will meet. (MP2) Launch: Display the table and invite students to describe how it connects with the animation in the Warm-Up. Consider asking, ‘How can we see the constant rate in the table?’ Note: Ensure students understand that when two vehicles meet, the front of each vehicle will be in the same position. Encourage students to use paper or their Student Edition to help them show their thinking. Consider asking, ‘What will it look like in the table when the vehicles meet?’” Students reason abstractly and quantitatively as they represent each vehicle’s position with an expression and solve for when the positions are equal.

Indicator 2f.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively. The materials provide some strategies and supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of MP2, but they are not employed consistently throughout the program.

The materials frequently provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when reasoning abstractly and quantitatively through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk as students consider the units involved in a problem or the meaning of the quantities, analyze the relationships between quantities, and connect real-world scenarios to mathematical representations. There are Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines that support the language needed to engage in MP2, but the materials do not call out any specific routine as supporting MP2. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity about how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP2. Additionally, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 8, Unit 4, Linear Equations and Linear Systems, Lesson 8, Activity 1, where students reason abstractly and quantitatively to generate expressions representing the position of two vehicles and determine when they will meet. First, students engage with a distance and time table, describing how it connects with an animation of vehicles moving on a road from the Warm-Up. The teacher asks students, “How can we see the constant rate in the table?” and “What will it look like in the table when the vehicles meet?” These prompts engage students with MP2 by asking students to attend to the meaning of quantities. The materials do not provide linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the whole-class discussion. Then, students work individually to determine missing values in the table using self-selected strategies, on paper or by entering them into the digital platform. Then, the Activity concludes with a whole-class discussion where the teacher discusses the variety of students’ self-selected strategies. The materials do not provide linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in choosing and communicating about their self-selected strategy, or to participate in the whole-class discussion. Additionally, the Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 2. 

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 7, Unit 4, Proportional Relationships and Percentages, Lesson 2, where students solve problems involving percent increase and percent decrease using tape diagrams and tables. The Warm-Up activates background knowledge about tape diagrams, and the language needed to discuss them through the instructional routine, Which One Doesn’t Belong? The ML/EL Support suggests that the teacher invites MLLs to orally rehearse their ideas before sharing whole-class, supporting MLLs’ full and complete participation in the task. In Activity 2, students engage in a card sort activity where students match word problems to tape diagrams, working with a partner to come to consensus on whether situations represent percent increase or decrease. The materials direct the teacher to highlight language that helps students distinguish between equations for percent increase and decrease. The MLD Resources for this lesson are for Activity 2, and they provide teacher guidance to support MLLs with using and developing the language needed to distinguish between percent increase and decrease. Specifically, the MLD Resources offer teacher prompts such as, “Which tape diagram shows an increase? A decrease?” and “In this situation, is there more or less fruit than last year?” These prompts are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from leveraging home language to encouraging MLLs to use the provided sentence frames and starters, to directing MLLs to annotate words or numbers that suggest a percent increase or decrease. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP2 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they are not employed consistently throughout the program. They are not consistent in supporting MLLs with the language demands of reasoning abstractly and quantitatively. At times, the ML/EL Supports and the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP2.

Indicator 2g

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP3 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP3. These include constructing mathematical arguments, analyzing errors in sample student work, and explaining or justifying their thinking orally or in writing using concrete models, drawings, numbers, or actions. Students are encouraged to listen to or read the arguments of others, evaluate their reasoning, and ask clarifying questions to strengthen or improve the argument. They also have opportunities to make and test conjectures as they solve problems. Teachers are guided to support this development providing opportunities for students to engage in mathematical discourse, set clear expectations for explanation and justification, and compare different strategies or solutions. Teachers are prompted to ask clarifying and probing questions, support students in presenting their solutions as arguments, and facilitate discussions that help students reflect on and refine their reasoning.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 7: Positive and Negative Numbers, Lesson 11, Screen 6, Decide and Defend, students place points with both positive and negative numbers on coordinate grids that use different scales. In the Teacher Edition, Today’s Goal states, “Students practice plotting points in all four quadrants of the coordinate plane within the context of solving mazes. They are introduced to grids that use different scales for the axes and use structure to identify patterns in coordinates that differ only by the sign. Students should gain confidence in identifying coordinates with positive and negative numbers and be able to critique the reasoning of others’ claims about the location of points when reflected across one or both axes. (MP3, MP7)” Screen 6 states, “Trinidad and Annika were working on the previous maze. Trinidad says: The star's coordinates are (1, -2). Annika says: The coordinates are (1,-10). Whose claim is correct?” The Teacher Moves, Connect states: “Key Takeaway: Sometimes axes have a scale that is not equal to 1. In these cases, the interval is still consistent (e.g., goes by 2s). It can be helpful to look at the axis scale before plotting any points. Display the distribution of responses using the dashboard’s Teacher View. Use the Decide and Defend routine to support students in making arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others. (MP3) Invite students who made different choices to use reasoning to convince their classmates. Consider asking: ‘What reasoning or evidence supports your claim?’ ‘What evidence or language was most convincing to you?’” Students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others as they analyze the placement of points on coordinate grids with varying scales and use mathematical evidence to justify which coordinates are correct. 

  • Grade 7, Unit 4: Proportional Relationships and Percentages, Lesson 7, Screen 6, Decide and Defend, students solve multistep percent problems in a common context such as sales tax and tip. The materials state, “Kiran and Ava had a bill for $100. The tax rate is 5% and they want to tip 20%. Kiran calculates the tip after tax is added to the bill. Ava calculates the tip before tax is added to the bill. Whose strategy would result in a greater tip? Kiran’s, Ava’s, or They’re the same.” The Teacher Moves, Monitor states: “Invite students to spend 1–2 minutes thinking independently about the problem before discussing it with a partner. Display the distribution of responses using the dashboard’s Teacher View. Use the Decide and Defend routine to support students in making arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others. (MP3) Consider asking, ‘Why does the order we calculate tax and tip matter for the total bill?’” Students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, as they analyze different strategies for calculating percent increases and explain how the order of operations affects the total cost.

  • Grade 8, Unit 8: The Pythagorean Theorem and Irrational Numbers, Lesson 4, Screen 4, Reflection students identify the two whole number values that a square root is between and explain the reasoning. The materials state, “Esi thinks that the description ‘The value of z when z^2=80does not belong in either category. a. What two whole numbers is the value of z between? A. 4 and 5. B. 6 and 7. C. 7 and 8. D. 8 and 9.” Students are given a visual of three cards: one between 7 and 8, one between 4 and 5, and one the value of z^2=80. “b. Of those two numbers, which would z be closer to? Explain your thinking.” The activity continues on screen 5 and 6. Screen 6 states, “The numbers x and y are positive.  x^2=3 and y^2=35. a. Plot x and y on the number line. b. Discuss: How did you decide to plot each point?” The Teacher Moves, Connect states: “Key Takeaway: A square root represents the exact solution to an equation in the form x^2=p. Using square roots of perfect squares helps identify the two whole numbers a square root is between.  Display the captured student responses. Invite students to share their thinking and critique the reasoning of others. (MP3) To surface the Key Takeaway, consider asking: ‘How can we determine the solution to an equation in the form x^2=p?’ ‘What is helpful to remember when comparing the values of square roots and plotting them on a number line?’” Students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, as they estimate the value of square roots, justify which two whole numbers the root falls between, and explain their reasoning using perfect squares and number line placement.

Indicator 2g.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. The materials provide some strategies and supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of MP3, but they are not employed consistently throughout the program.

The materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when constructing arguments and critiquing others through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as an ML/EL Support. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation is the Instructional Routines. Specifically, in the PD Library on the digital platform, the Routine Facilitate Guides for 6-A1 describes how the Instructional Routine Decide and Defend supports MP3: “This routine is intended to support students in strengthening their ability to make arguments and to critique the reasoning of others (MP3). In this routine, students make sense of someone else’s line of mathematical reasoning, decide if they agree with that reasoning, and then draft an argument defending their decision. This includes situations where students are making sense of two students’ different ideas about a situation (Settle a Dispute).” While there are other Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines that support the language needed to engage in MP3, Decide and Defend is the only routine the materials state as supporting MP3. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity about how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP3.

The materials invite students to use and develop language when constructing viable arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk when explaining their strategies, performing error analysis of students’ work, listening to the arguments of others to determine if they make sense, and creating their own conjectures. The materials provide point-of-use sentence frames, often in the Synthesis, that specifically support students with constructing viable arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 6, Unit 2, Introducing Ratios, Lesson 1, Activity 1, where students work in partners to develop ratio thinking to orally justify reasoning about a real-world scenario involving pizzas and pizza toppings. The Activity begins with a digital interactive which activates background knowledge about pizzas and pizza toppings. Then, partners create their own pizzas and apply ratio thinking as they calculate the amount of different toppings, in ounces, for various numbers of additional pizzas. Partners justify, orally and in writing, the oven temperature to bake four pizzas. The materials do not provide language supports for MLLs to fully participate in the partner discussion and written response. The Activity concludes with a whole-class discussion in which the teacher invites students to justify ratio reasoning around the amount of toppings when doubling the number of pizzas. The materials do not provide language supports for MLLs to fully participate in this whole-group discussion. Additionally, the Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 2.  

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 8, Unit 5, Functions and Volume, Lesson 14, Activity 3, where partners calculate the volume of popcorn containers and justify their reasoning. As partners are working, the ML/EL Support suggests that teachers provide the following sentence frame to support MLLs with explaining their choice orally or in writing: “The ___ is the better deal because ___.” Then, the class engages with the Decide and Defend routine in which the teacher invites students who made different choices to use reasoning to convince their classmates. The MLD Resources for this lesson are for Activity 3, and they provide teacher guidance to support MLLs with using and developing the language needed to create their own conjectures orally and in writing using diagrams and numbers. Specifically, the MLD Resources offer a graphic organizer to support MLLs with organizing their thinking and calculations, and teacher prompts such as, “What is the radius for each container?” These prompts are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from annotating the terms, diameter and height, on the diagram, supporting MLLs in applying the use of additional sentence frames with the bilingual English-Spanish word bank, and orally rehearsing with a partner before putting their arguments in writing. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP3 in this lesson.

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they are not employed consistently throughout the program.  They are not consistent in supporting MLLs with the language demands of constructing viable arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others. At times, the ML/EL Supports and the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP3.

Indicator 2h

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP4 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP4, including putting problems or situations in their own words and identifying important information, using the math they know to solve problems and everyday situations, modeling the situation with appropriate representations and strategies, describing how their model relates to the problem situation, and checking whether their answer makes sense, revising the model when necessary.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 1: Area and Surface Area, Lesson 14, Activity 2, students apply their understanding of surface area to design three-dimensional to-go containers. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students design a three-dimensional container to hold one item at a fictional restaurant, draw a two-dimensional pattern for their container, and then calculate how much material they will need to create their container. They conclude by making their own model of the to-go container. (MP1, MP4)” Student Edition states, “Problem 7. Share your design with a partner. Discuss how you might improve your design and write down what adjustments you want to make. Problem 8. Draw your revised pattern on blank paper using the measurements you designed. Problem 9. Cut out and fold your pattern to create your container.” Screen 5, The Teachers Moves, Monitor states: “To support students getting started, consider asking, ‘What revisions are you making to your design? How do these revisions make your container better?’  Math Identity and Community: Listen for students who identify a variety of considerations for their design and celebrate them as thinking like a ‘math modeler.’ Consider sharing the importance of this way of thinking for solving complex problems. (MP4)” Students model with mathematics as they apply their understanding of surface area to design, revise, and construct a functional three-dimensional container, using measurements and calculations to determine how much material is needed.

  • Grade 7, Unit 8: Probability and Sampling, Lesson 7, Screen 9, Challenge #1, students estimate the probability of a compound event using a simulation. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states,“Students apply what they have learned about probability tools and repeated experiments to simulate compound real-world events. They use spinners and blocks in bags to model and simulate the chances that (MP4)“ Screen 9 states, “Try to make a simulation for a forecast that meets this criteria: The chance that it rains all three days is between 50% and 75%. Press ‘Simulate’ to check your work.” The Teachers Moves, Purpose states: “Students make connections between real-world situations and probability tools that could be used to model and simulate those situations. (MP4) Launch:  Share that this activity provides the opportunity to practice designing simulations and interpreting the results. Encourage students to experiment by pressing the ‘Simulate’ button to see their results. Students using print will need access to the digital simulation. Consider pairing these students with a student using digital or conducting the simulations as a class. Connect: Display unique or creative simulations using the dashboard’s Teacher View. Invite students to share their strategy for choosing the probabilities for each day to model the given criteria. (MP4)” Students model with mathematics as they design and run simulations to estimate the probability of a compound event, using tools like spinners or bags of blocks to represent and analyze real-world scenarios.

  • Grade 8, Unit 2: Dilations, Similarity, and Slope, Lesson 8, Activity 2, students use real-world measurements in triangles to model with mathematics. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals, “Students discover that similar triangles share common proportions between and among their corresponding side lengths and use these ratios to solve for missing side lengths. They apply their knowledge of similarity to reason abstractly about similar triangles in the context of shadows for different real life objects. Students use their knowledge of similar triangles to create models that help determine missing side lengths. (MP2, MP4)” Student Edition, Problem 7 states, “a. Determine all the side lengths using as few hints as you can. You can ask for the measure of up to two side lengths, if needed. b. What was your strategy?” The Teachers Moves, Purpose states: “Students build fluency with using relevant expressions to model and solve for missing side lengths of similar triangles. (MP4)” Students model with mathematics as they apply proportional reasoning and properties of similar triangles to determine missing side lengths using real-world measurements, such as the lengths of shadows.

Indicator 2h.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics. The materials provide linguistic supports for MLLs to participate in the intentional development of MP4, but these supports do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. 

The materials frequently provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when modeling with mathematics through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk when identifying important information in the problem, modeling the problem with a mathematical representation, and describing how to use the mathematical model. There are Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines that support the language needed to engage in MP4, but the materials do not designate any specific routine as supporting MP4. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity of how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP4. Additionally, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 8, Unit 5, Functions and Volume, Lesson 6, where students draw graphs of functions based on videos of real-world scenarios and make sense of different strategies to support graphing functions that represent those events. In Activity 2, students watch a real-world video of water being poured into a bowl, and then they engage in the Notice and Wonder routine to help them make sense of the scenario and identify the important information needed to construct a graph that models the situation. Then, the teacher directs partners to sketch a graph representing the relationship between the volume of water in the bowl and time, requiring students to create a mathematical model of the situation. The ML/EL Support suggests that teachers encourage MLLs to paraphrase their partner’s ideas, yet the ML/EL Support does not offer clear, explicit guidance to support MLLs with this paraphrasing. Also, the ML/EL Support does not offer a suggestion to support the language needed to engage with MP4, such as describing how their graph represents the scenario or explaining what each part of the graph means in the context of the video. The materials tell the teacher to monitor for students attending to specific estimates of water volume at different time points in the graph, yet the materials do not offer language supports for MLLs to produce the language needed to identify important information from the video. The activity concludes with the teacher facilitating a whole-class discussion to support students with making connections between the real-world scenario and the graph with prompts such as, “Why is the rate of change greater in the middle section of the graph?” The materials do not offer language supports for MLLs to fully participate in the whole-class discussion or to evaluate whether their graph is reasonable and revise their model, if needed. Additionally, the Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 3. 

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 6, Unit 2, Introducing Ratios, Lesson 10, where students analyze tables of equivalent ratios representing a real-world scenario, determining unknown values in a ratio table and deciding how they might use the ratio table to make decisions about the future. After the teacher activates background knowledge around the real-world scenario of preparing for a natural disaster, students calculate the recommended amount of specific items to hand on hand. In Activity 2, students work in small groups to make a poster that communicates their recommended number of items to prepare for a natural disaster. They describe how the mathematical model of the ratio table relates to the problem situation and use math they know to solve problems arising in everyday situations. The MLD Resources for this lesson are for Activity 2, and they provide teacher guidance to support MLLs with using and developing the language needed to analyze a worked example in which they check to see whether the answers make sense and determine if they need to change an answer. Specifically, the MLD Resources offer teacher prompts such as, “Does this seem like the right number of paper towel rolls? Why?” and “How would you change the recommended ratio to make this number more reasonable?” These prompts are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from encouraging MLLs to apply the provided sentence frames and starters, to directing MLLs to use the English-Spanish word bank containing everyday terms such as bed and cotton balls. These everyday terms are featured within the lesson facilitation and slides with drawn visual images, providing linguistic support for MLLs. After small groups create their posters and participate in a Gallery Tour routine, the materials direct the teacher to facilitate Math Language Routine 7: Compare and Connect, where students analyze and compare each other’s strategies in a whole-class discussion. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP4 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. At times, the ML/EL Supports and the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP4. 

Indicator 2i

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP5: Use appropriate tools strategically, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP5 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP5. These include selecting and using appropriate tools and strategies to explore mathematical ideas, solve problems, and communicate their thinking. Students are encouraged to consider the advantages and limitations of various tools such as manipulatives, drawings, measuring devices, and digital technologies, and to choose tools that best support their understanding and reasoning. They have opportunities to use tools flexibly for investigation, calculation, representation, and sense making. Teachers are guided to support this development by making a variety of tools available, modeling their effective use, and encouraging students to make strategic decisions about when and how to use tools. Teacher materials prompt opportunities for student choice in tool selection, promote discussion around tool effectiveness, and support the comparison of multiple tools or representations. Teachers are also encouraged to highlight how different tools can yield different insights and to help students reflect on their tool choices as part of the problem solving process.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 6: Expressions and Equations, Lesson 4, Activity 3, students build fluency in solving equations with decimals and fractions by using strategies such as inverse operations, reasoning about solutions, and connecting equations to visual models like balanced hangers and tape diagrams. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students develop fluency with solving equations, particularly equations that include decimals and fractions. They revisit connections between equations, balanced hangers, and tape diagrams, they consider strategies like reasoning about what number makes an equation true and using inverse operations to solve equations. Students use a variety of tools, including strategies with and without diagrams, to solve equations. (MP5)” Student Edition Problem 12 states, “Decide with your partner who will complete Column A and who will complete Column B. • The solutions in each row should be the same. Compare your solutions, then discuss and resolve any differences. • Solve as many equations as you have time for. Sense-making is more important than speed. Column A: a. 36=4x, b. 13=x+5, c. \\frac{1}{3}=2x, d. x+6.17=9 e. x+1.8=1.7, f. \\frac{1}{2}x=16, g. \\frac{7}{8}=x+\\frac{1}{4}. Column B: a. 7x=63, b. 21=x+13, c. 3x=\\frac{1}{2}, d. 12.22=x+9.39, e. x+5.3=18.2, f. 4=\\frac{1}{8}x, g. x+\\frac{1}{16}=\\frac{1}{16}.” Teachers Edition, Monitor, “Invite students using print to solve problems in any order or to choose any four problems to solve. Differentiation, Use a variety of strategies like: Creating a tape diagram. Using number sense. Using inverse operations. (MP5)” Students use appropriate tools strategically as they select and apply methods such as tape diagrams, number sense, and inverse operations to solve equations involving decimals and fractions, and verify their solutions through comparison and discussion.

  • Grade 7, Unit 3: Measuring Circles, Lesson 3, Activity 1, students use a variety of tools to measure the circumference of circular objects and discover a proportional relationship between a circle’s diameter and its circumference. Student Edition, Problem 2 states, “Measure the diameter and circumference of at least three circular objects. Record your results in the table.” An image shows “Three Ways to Measure the Circumference, String, Tape Measure, Roll.” A table is provided for students to record their three objects, diameter (cm) and circumference (cm). Teacher Edition, Launch states, “Demonstrate measuring a circular object using each of the methods shown in the image. Consider asking: ‘Why might you get two different answers for the diameter of the same object? What should you do if that happens?’ Encourage students to consider the limitations and advantages of each method. (MP5) Distribute the circular objects, measuring tools, and string to each pair. Monitor: Encourage students to measure each object using two different methods and come to consensus about which measurement to record. (MP5)” Students use appropriate tools strategically as they select and compare different methods for measuring the circumference and diameter of circular objects, evaluate the accuracy of their measurements, and determine which tools yield the most reliable results.

  • Grade 8, Unit 1: Rigid Transformations and Congruence, Lesson 4, Activity 1, students use tools to translate figures on the coordinate plane. Student Edition states, “Perform each transformation. Then label the points in the image to correspond with the points in the pre-image. Problem 2. Translate Figure ABC 3 units right and 1 unit down.” Teacher Edition, Launch states, “Distribute geometry tools for students to choose from, including tracing paper and straightedges. (MP5) Monitor: Look for a variety of strategies to share during the Connect. Use a variety of strategies such as: Using tracing paper. Using a ruler to measure distance between corresponding points. Using the grid to help decide where to draw the transformed figures.” Students use appropriate tools strategically as they choose methods such as tracing paper, rulers, or the coordinate grid to accurately perform and represent translations on the coordinate plane.

Indicator 2i.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Use appropriate tools strategically. The materials provide some strategies and supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of MP5, but they are not employed consistently throughout the program.

The materials frequently provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when using tools through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk when choosing appropriate tools, recognizing insights and limitations of different tools, and knowing how to use a variety of tools. There are Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines that support the language needed to engage in MP5, but the materials do not provide any specific routine as supporting MP5. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity about how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP5. Additionally, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 7, Unit 3, Measuring Circles, Lesson 3, Activity 1, where partners use three methods–using string, using tape, or by rolling–to measure round objects and determine the relationship between circumference and diameter. The Launch directs the teacher to demonstrate measuring a circular object using those three methods, which are supported by images for students. Then, the teacher facilitates a whole-class discussion which engages students with MP5 using the prompt, “Why might you get two different answers for the diameter of the same object?” The materials then direct the teacher to encourage students to consider the limitations and advantages of each method of measuring. The Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for this Activity, yet they do not provide linguistic support for MLLs to engage with the whole-class discussion around the limitations and advantages of each method of measuring. Instead, the MLD Resources focus linguistic supports on MLLs using and applying the concept of proportionality through describing the relationship of the circumference and diameter of a circle.

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 6, Unit 5, Decimal Arithmetic, Lesson 8, Activity 1, where partners use area models and vertical calculations to solve a decimal multiplication problem using place value reasoning. The Activity begins with a whole-class discussion where students examine two different solution strategies for multiplying decimal numbers using Math Language Routine [MLR] 7: Compare and Connect. MLR7 supports MLLs with using and applying the language needed to engage with MP5 by encouraging them to analyze and compare the two different solution strategies. The teacher prompts in this activity explicitly focus on strategic strategy use and the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy: “How are their strategies alike? How are they different?” and “What are some advantages of using Kwame’s strategy? Tiara’s strategy?”. The Activity closes with a whole-class discussion where the teacher asks students to consider how to decide which strategy to use. The MLD resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, and they further amplify language access by providing a Venn diagram, with sentence starters, for comparing the two solution strategies. The MLD Resources also provide teacher prompts that are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from explaining the strategies in their home language to using the bilingual English-Spanish word bank to revise and refine their explanations in English from the sentence starters. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP5 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they are not employed throughout the program, but these supports do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. At times, the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP5. 

Indicator 2j

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP6 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP6. These include formulating clear explanations, using grade-level appropriate vocabulary and conventions, applying definitions and symbols accurately, calculating efficiently, and specifying units of measure. Students are also expected to label tables, graphs, and other representations appropriately, and to use precise language and notation when presenting mathematical ideas. Teachers support this development by modeling accurate mathematical language, ensuring students understand and apply precise definitions, and providing feedback on usage. Lessons include opportunities for students to clarify the meaning of symbols, evaluate the accuracy of their own and others’ work, and refine their communication. Teachers are encouraged to facilitate discussions and structure tasks that promote attention to detail in both reasoning and representation.

Examples include:

  • Grade 6, Unit 3: Unit Rates and Percentages, Lesson 14, Screen 2, Indonesia’s Population states, “The population of Indonesia was about 272 million people in 2020. How many people in Indonesia had each of these characteristics?” Students are shown cards with the following information: Population of Indonesia: 272 million, 2 out of 25 people own a car., 54% have access to the internet., 71 million people are under 15 years old., 39 out of 100 people speak Javanese.” Students use this information to fill out a table and convert the information to the number of people in the millions. Teacher Edition, Activity 1 Monitor states, “Look and listen for a variety of strategies. Consider sharing that the number of people is measured in millions and practice interpreting some values like 0.1, 1, and 100. (MP6) Invite students to use a ratio table or draw a double number line to visualize their thinking. (MP6)” Students attend to precision as they solve problems involving finding the whole, given a part and the percent.

  • Grade 7, Unit 1: Scale Drawings, Lesson 11, Activity 2, students create logos and apply a scale factor to produce an accurate resized version that fits a specific object. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students work in teams to create a logo and a precise scaled copy of their logo, then consider how to scale it to fit in a much larger space. This lesson combines personal expression with the skills and understandings gained throughout the unit. (MP6)” Student Edition states, "Imagine that you decide to print your team logo on a sticker that measures 9 centimeters by 12 centimeters. You need to scale the logo to make sure it is a good size for the sticker. Problem 6. Discuss: What is a scale factor that would make your drawing too large to fit on the sticker? What is a scale factor that would make your drawing too small for the sticker? Problem 7. What is a scale factor that would make your drawing just right for the sticker? Explain your thinking. Problem 8. Use the scale factor you chose to draw a scaled copy of your logo within the 9-by-12 centimeter space below. (Each grid line is \\frac{1}{2} centimeter.) Label your logo’s height and width.” Teacher Edition, Purpose states , “Students discuss how to use scale factor to resize their logo and draw a precise copy to fit on a specific object. (MP6) Monitor: Listen for student ideas to highlight during the Connect, such as: Counting grid units, then using multiplication or division to identify a scale factor that is too large. Naming that scale factors less than 1 will result in a lot of blank space on the sticker. Rotating their logo or sticker for a better fit.” Students attend to precision as they create a scaled drawing accurately.

  • Grade 8, Unit 3: Proportional and Linear Relationships, Lesson 10, Activity 2, students write equations of horizontal and vertical lines. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students look for and make use of the structure of points to write the equations of vertical and horizontal lines. They attend to precision as they write equations of lines with different slopes to capture coins on a coordinate plane, and they justify whether horizontal or vertical lines have a slope of zero. (MP3, MP6, MP7)”  Student Edition states, "Problem 6, a. Draw lines through the coins to ‘capture’ them. Try to draw as few lines as possible. b. Write an equation for each line you drew. Problem 7. Create your own Coin Capture challenge! a. Make It! Use the Activity 2 Sheet to create your challenge. b. Solve It! On this page, write equations for the lines you would use to capture all the coins in your challenge. Try to use as few lines as you can. c. Swap It! Trade graphs with a partner and solve each other’s challenges.” Teacher Edition Purpose states, “Students attend to precision when writing equations of lines in challenges designed by their classmates. (MP6) Connect: Display different challenges and invite students to make sense of strategies that helped them complete these challenges. Consider asking: ‘How did you approach solving different challenges?’ ‘When did it make sense to use horizontal lines? Vertical lines? Diagonal lines?’” Students attend to precision as they write accurate equations for horizontal and vertical lines to capture points on a coordinate grid, justify their choices using slope and structure, and clearly communicate their reasoning when solving and creating challenges.

Indicator 2j.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision. The materials provide linguistic supports for MLLs to participate in the intentional development of MP6, but these supports do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. 

The materials frequently provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when attending to precision through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk when communicating using appropriate vocabulary, labeling tables and graphs appropriately, and stating the meaning of symbols. Often, the materials provide point-of-use sentence frames and bilingual English-Spanish word banks in the Math Language Development [MLD] Resources that specifically support students with using precise vocabulary when formulating explanations. Generally, the materials invite students to engage with a mathematical concept, both through speaking and listening during mathematical discourse and through the use of visuals or manipulatives, before attaching a precise new vocabulary term to the concept. The materials support teachers with anticipating the vocabulary demands of the unit with the Language Development section of the Overview for each Unit. This section outlines the new vocabulary and contextual vocabulary of the Unit, including lesson tags, and also provides a list of review vocabulary. 

There are Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines [MLRs] that support the language needed to engage in MP6, but the materials do not provide any specific routine as supporting MP6. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity about how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP6. The materials offer point-of-use linguistic supports that do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 6, Unit 5, Decimal Arithmetic, Lesson 2, Activity 1, where the materials encourage students to read decimals aloud using place-value terms, such as “two hundred seventy-one thousandths.” ML/EL Support states, “Consider creating or reviewing an anchor chart about how to read decimals using place value to support their mathematical understanding. (Reading and Speaking)” However, the materials do not provide a model anchor chart or guidance about what to include in the anchor chart to support MLLs with participating fully in the task. Additionally, the Activity continues with the teacher facilitating the Decide and Defend routine in which students respond to prompts such as, “What evidence or language was most convincing to you?” The materials do not provide guidance on how teachers can support MLLs with using and applying the language from the anchor chart during the Decide and Defend routine in order to formulate a clear explanation. The Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, but they focus linguistic supports on justifying opinions, reading closely, and writing to describe, rather than on using and applying precise place value vocabulary. The materials do not provide specific guidance about how teachers can utilize the listed Spanish cognates, the bilingual English-Spanish word bank, or the suggested anchor chart to support MLLs with communicating using precise vocabulary during the Decide and Defend routine. 

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in participating in Grade 6, Unit 2, Introducing Ratios, Lesson 2, in which students are introduced to the term ratios and learn how to describe them. In the Warm-Up, students engage with multiplicative thinking during a Number Talk that’s structured with a string of four related multiplication expressions. In Activity 1, the materials activate background knowledge about a real-world scenario involving pizzas. The teacher prompts students to experience the concept of a ratio before introducing the term, stating, “The ratio of tomato to pepperoni is 3 to 4. What do you think the word ratio means?” The materials invite the teacher to co-create a class definition of the term ratio using students’ language and the glossary. The MLR Resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, and they center around supporting MLLs with fully and completely participating in co-creating a class definition. Specifically, the MLD Resources offer linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that involve MLLs completing a Frayer model graphic organizer to define the term ratio. The suggestions include inviting MLLs to work with a partner to write a definition in their own words in their home language to co-creating examples and non-examples of ratios. As the Activity progresses, the materials invite the teacher to listen for students using ratio language while working in partners to complete ratio problems. The ML/EL Support states, “Encourage students to paraphrase each other’s ideas to help make connections and incorporate ratio language.” The Activity ends with the teacher facilitating MLR2: Collect and Display in which the teacher guides students to refine the class definition of ratio using students’ language from throughout the activity. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP6 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. At times, the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP6. 

Indicator 2k

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP7 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP7. These include looking for and describing patterns, identifying structure within mathematical representations, and decomposing complex problems into simpler, more manageable parts. Students are encouraged to analyze problems for underlying structure and to consider multiple solution strategies. They make generalizations based on repeated reasoning and use those generalizations to solve problems efficiently. Teachers support this development by selecting tasks that highlight mathematical structure and by prompting students to attend to and describe patterns they notice. Lessons provide opportunities for students to compare approaches, justify their reasoning, and reflect on how structure helps deepen their understanding. Teachers are encouraged to facilitate discussions and structure lessons in ways that promote the recognition and use of patterns and structure in problem solving.

  • Grade 6, Unit 7: Positive and Negative Numbers, Lesson 10, Activity 3, students use their knowledge of coordinate signs and quadrant locations to identify points on various planes, including those without visible gridlines. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students develop an understanding of negative numbers on the coordinate plane and use the context of searching for sand dollars to move between locations and identify the coordinates. Students also use structure to construct an argument for the location of a point on the coordinate plane using the signs of its coordinates. (MP3, MP7)” Student Edition states, “You will use support cards for this activity. Problem 7. Round 1: There is a sand dollar on each of these islands. When it is your turn to find the sand dollar, label each guess and the feedback you get until you find all three sand dollars. Problem 8. Round 2: Here are three new islands. Label each guess and the feedback you get until you find all three sand dollars. Problem 9.Which of these could be the location of the sand dollar? A. (4, 6) B. (4, ‐6) C. (‐6, ‐4) D. (‐6, 4) Explain your thinking.” Screen 9, The Teachers Moves, Connect: “Invite students to share what is alike and different about each of the ordered pairs. Display the distribution of responses. Consider asking, ‘Based on where we see the sand dollar, what do you know about the sign of the x-coordinate? The y-coordinate?’ To surface the Key Takeaway, consider asking, ‘How does the structure of the ordered pair help us determine which quadrant the point is in?’” Students look for and make use of structure as they analyze the signs of coordinates to determine the quadrant in which a point lies, justify their reasoning using quadrant structure, and apply that understanding to locate points on coordinate planes with and without gridlines.

  • Grade 7, Unit 2: Introducing Proportional Relationships, Lesson 7, Screen 3, Are They Proportional?, students decide if equations represent proportional relationships. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goal states, “Students return to comparing proportional and non-proportional relationships, focusing on the connection between the structure of the equation and the type of relationship it represents (MP7)” Screen 3 states, “Here are the equations that represent the four stories. a. Select all the equations that represent a proportional relationship. b. Explain one way to decide if an equation represents a proportional relationship.” The screen contains 4 equations: y=12x, y=500+35x, y=\\frac{1}{2}x, y=x^2. Screen 3, The Teachers Moves, Monitor states: “Invite students to return to the digital student screens to share their thinking after comparing with a partner. Capture student explanations to highlight during the Connect, such as: Identifying the constant of proportionality. Looking at the equation and making generalizations about the structure (e.g., ‘It has the form y=(something)x.’). (MP7)Connect: Key Takeaway: If an equation represents a proportional relationship, then one variable is multiplied or divided by the constant of proportionality. Share the captured student explanations to highlight different strategies for deciding if an equation represents a proportional relationship. To surface the Key Takeaway, consider asking: ‘How can you tell from the equation if a relationship is proportional?’ ‘Where can you see the constant of proportionality in the equation?’ ‘What does the constant of proportionality tell us about the story?’ (MP7)” Students look for and make use of structure to generalize which types of equations do or do not represent proportional relationships.

  • Grade 8, Unit 8: The Pythagorean Theorem and Irrational Numbers, Lesson 12, Activity 2 Connect, students use long division to convert unit fractions to decimals, determine whether the decimal representation terminates or repeats, and develop fluency in writing unit fractions as decimals. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students look for and make use of structure to explore connections between unit fractions and their decimal representations. They use long division to write unit fractions as decimals and determine whether the decimal representation terminates, repeats, or neither. (MP7)” Student Edition, Problem 8 states, “How can you predict whether a unit fraction will terminate, repeat, or neither when written as a decimal?” Teacher Edition Connect states, “Invite students to share their strategies for Problem 8, highlighting those that are similar to the given sample responses. Note: If it does not come up naturally, consider sharing that long division can be used to predict whether a unit fraction will terminate, repeat, or neither. If long division results in a 0, the decimal terminates, but if it does not result in 0, the decimal repeats. Key Takeaway: Long division is a strategy that is used to determine the decimal representation of any fraction. When converting a fraction to its decimal representation, make use of the structure of the denominator to predict if the decimal will terminate, repeat, or neither.” Students look for and make use of structure as they analyze the relationship between the denominator of a unit fraction and its decimal representation to determine whether the decimal will terminate or repeat.

Indicator 2k.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure. The materials provide some strategies and supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of MP7, but they are not employed consistently throughout the program.

The materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when looking for and making use of structure through features embedded within the lesson facilitation or as an ML/EL Support. An example of a feature embedded within the lesson facilitation is the Instructional Routines. Specifically, in the PD Library on the digital platform, the Routine Facilitation Guides for 6-A1 describes how the Instructional Routines Number Talks and Which One Doesn’t Belong support MP7: “Number Talks: This routine encourages students to look for and make use of structure in expressions to calculate their values (MP7). Which One Doesn’t Belong: This routine supports students in looking for and making use of structure (MP7). Students use their existing ideas and language to decide which of four mathematical objects is different from the others. All sets of objects are designed so that each of the objects ‘doesn’t belong’ in some way, which helps students focus on their reasoning and communication rather than their answer.” While there are other Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines [MLRs] that support the language needed to engage in MP7, Number Talks and Which One Doesn’t Belong are the only routines the materials specify as supporting MP7. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity about how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP7.

The materials invite students to use and develop language when looking for and making use of structure through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk when looking for patterns or structures to solve problems, analyzing a problem to look for more than one approach, and decomposing complex problems into simpler, more manageable parts. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 7, Unit 2, Introducing Proportional Relationships, Lesson 7, Activity 1, where students decide if equations represent proportional relationships. Individually, students read two real-world scenarios, complete a table, write an equation, determine if the relationship is a proportional relationship, and write to explain their thinking. The materials suggest an optional application of MLR6: Three Reads, where students individually read each story three times with a different lens each time. While MLR6: Three Reads supports MLLs with independently making sense of the real-world scenario, the individual application of the MLR reduces opportunities for MLLs to make meaning of the relationship represented in the scenario through student-to-student discourse. Additionally, there are no language supports provided for students to determine if the relationship is a proportional relationship or to write to explain their thinking. As the Activity progresses, the teacher invites students to engage with MP7 with whole-group discourse focusing on prompts such as, “What does the constant of proportionality tell us about the story?” The materials do not provide linguistic support for MLLs to participate fully in the whole-group discussion where students look for and make use of structure to generalize which types of equations do or do not represent proportional relationships. Also, the Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 2.  

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 6, Unit 6, Expressions and Equations, Lesson 7, Activity 1, in which partners describe, compare, and make generalizations from various strategies for determining the number of border tiles for a square. Partners examine three fictional students’ strategies for counting and writing expressions representing the number of border tiles for a seven-by-seven square. The materials prompt students to discuss how each of their expressions are alike. To support MLLs with fully participating in the student-to-student discourse to notice when calculations are repeated, the materials direct the teacher to facilitate MLR7: Compare and Connect. This MLR engages MLLs with the language needed to engage with MP7, such as, “Where do we see the same information in Lucia’s expression? Kyrie’s? Manuel’s?” The MLD resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, and they further support MLLs’ full and complete participation with MP7 with sentence frames for comparing and making generalizations from the three solution strategies, such as, “I see _____ in both _____’s and ____’s work.” and “All three students used…” The MLD Resources also provide teacher prompts that are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from gesturing to the perimeter of the square to using the bilingual English-Spanish word bank to fill in the sentence frames. The activity concludes with a whole-class discussion in which the teacher connects students’ generalizations from examining the three fictional students’ expressions to an expression with variables that represents the number of border tiles for any square. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP7 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they are not employed throughout the program.  These supports do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. At times, the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP7. 

Indicator 2l

1 / 1

Materials support the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The materials reviewed for Amplify Desmos Math Grades 6 through Grade 8 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

Students across the 6–8 grade band engage with MP8 throughout the year. It is explicitly identified for teachers in the Unit Teacher Edition. The Math of the Unit, Focus identifies the MP standards used and describes how students will engage with the standards. The Math Practices are also identified with a description of how the practice standard is developed in Focus and Coherence, Today’s Goal’s for each lesson with development identified within Warm-Ups and Activities. Course Overview, Grade Overview lists math practices correlated to each lesson.  Additionally a Standards for Mathematical Practice correlation chart is provided at the end of each Course Overview.

Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP8. These include noticing and using repeated reasoning to make sense of problems, recognize patterns, and develop efficient, mathematically sound strategies. Students are encouraged to create, describe, and explain general methods, formulas, or processes based on patterns they identify. Lessons provide opportunities for students to evaluate the reasonableness of their answers and refine their approaches through discussion and reflection. Teachers support this development by structuring tasks that highlight repeated reasoning, prompting students to make generalizations, and guiding them to build conceptual understanding, distinct from relying on memorized tricks. Instructional guidance also encourages teachers to model and elicit strategies that build toward formal algorithms or representations through consistent reasoning.

  • Grade 6, Unit 8: Describing Data, Lesson 7, Activity 1, students are introduced to the concept of mean as the average, understood as distributing a total equally among a group. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goals states, “Students are introduced to the mean of a data set as the amount each member of the set gets if everything is distributed equally. Students determine the mean by calculating the (arithmetic) average of the data set and explore the mean as a statistic that summarizes the data set using a single number. Students also make a connection between the mean and the idea of ‘typical,’ or the center of a distribution, and make sense of why it is called a measure of center for a distribution. (MP8)” Student Edition states, “Problem 2. 4 friends played this game at the arcade. Here are the tickets each friend won. They decided to share the tickets equally. How many tickets should each friend get? Explain your thinking. Problem 3. Here is Ava’s work for determining how many tickets each friend gets. 4+2+1+5=12. 12\\div4. Discuss: What was Ava’s strategy? Problem 4. The mean, or average, is the number of tickets each friend gets if the tickets are distributed equally. Here are the tickets that 6 other friends won. Calculate the mean number of tickets.” Teachers Edition, Connect states: “Discuss Ava’s strategy. Consider asking, ‘Why did Ava add all the tickets? Why did Ava divide by 4?’ Share captured strategies for calculating the mean. Invite students to describe a general strategy for determining the mean no matter how many tickets or players there are. (MP8)” Students look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning as they recognize a general process for finding the mean and apply this reasoning across different data sets.

  • Grade 7, Unit 7: Angles, Triangles, and Prisms, Lesson 5, Screen 2, Make a Prediction, students reason about the conditions under which three segment lengths can form a triangle, investigating how changes to a third segment affect the possibility of triangle construction when two segment lengths are fixed. Screen 2 states, “Will these three line segments form a triangle? Yes, No, I’m not sure.” Students are provided three lines with the numbers 3, 4, and 8. The Teacher Moves, Purpose states: “Students explore different combinations of segment lengths, then use repeated reasoning to describe the conditions under which a triangle is formed. (MP8) Launch: Share that in this activity students will develop a strategy for how to determine whether three line segments create a triangle. Distribute the Line Segments Sheet and rulers to students using print. Students can use linkage strips if they are available.” Students look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning as they test combinations of segment lengths and develop a general rule for determining when three lengths can or cannot form a triangle.

  • Grade 8, Unit 7: Exponents and Scientific Notation, Lesson 6, Activity 2, students generalize the properties of exponents as they write rules for how exponents work. Teacher Edition, Today’s Goal states, “Students generalize properties of exponents they explored in prior lessons. They develop rules for rewriting exponential expressions. Students examine patterns, draft rules, revise their rules, and use mathematical reasoning to explain how they know these rules will always work. (MP3, MP8)” Student Edition states, “Problem 4. You will use the cards from the Warm-Up and the instructions on the screen to create your own rules for three more exponent situations.” Examples include: 3^{-6}=\\frac{1}{3^{6}}for Negative Exponents. 7^{3}\\cdot3^{3}=21^{3}for Powers With Different Bases. 10^{0}=1for Zero Exponents. “Problem 5. Choose any one of the three rules. Show or explain how you know the rule always works. Problem 6. Describe how exponent rules can help you rewrite exponential expressions.” Teacher Edition, Purpose states: “Students work together and use patterns to write descriptions of the properties of negative and zero exponents and the ‘Powers With Different Bases’ rule.” Students look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning as they identify patterns in exponent operations, develop general rules, and explain why those rules hold true in all cases.

Indicator 2l.MLL

1 / 2

Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of Amplify Desmos Math partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. The materials provide some strategies and supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of MP8, but they are not employed consistently throughout the program.

The materials frequently provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning through whole-group and student-to-student discourse. For example, the materials often direct the teacher to invite students to think-pair-share or turn and talk as they create or describe a general process or algorithm, use repeated reasoning as a tool, or notice when calculations repeat. There are Instructional Routines and Math Language Routines [MLRs] that support the language needed to engage in MP8, but the materials do not provide any specific routine as supporting MP8. This lack of explicit teacher guidance reduces clarity about how the routines support MLLs’ full and complete participation in MP8. Additionally, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the language-rich discussions. For example:

  • MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 6, Unit 8, Describing Data, Lesson 7, where students are introduced to the concept of mean as the average. The Warm-Up activates background knowledge on a real-world scenario involving arcade games with an ML/EL Support that states, “Invite students to share what they know about arcade games and tickets to increase access to the task. (Reading and Listening)” Then, in Activity 1, partners engage with digital manipulatives to interpret the concept of mean as distributing a total equally among a group. The Activity concludes with the materials directing the teacher to facilitate a whole-class discussion, stating, “Discuss Ava’s strategy. Consider asking, ‘Why did Ava add all the tickets? Why did Ava divide by 4?’ Share captured strategies for calculating the mean. Invite students to describe a general strategy for determining the mean no matter how many tickets or players there are. (MP8)” The materials do not provide language supports for MLLs to recognize a general process for finding the mean and apply this reasoning across different data sets. The Math Language Development [MLD] Resources for this lesson are for Activity 1, but they focus linguistic supports on understanding the new term mean. The materials do not provide specific guidance about how teachers can support MLLs with creating, describing, or explaining the general process for finding the mean of a data set.

  • In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 8, Unit 7, Exponents and Scientific Notation, Lesson 6, Activity 2, where students generalize the properties of exponents as they write rules for how exponents work. Small groups build off of a card sort from the Warm-Up to co-create their own rules for three situations involving exponents. MLLs are supported in co-creating exponent rules by the teacher facilitating MLR1: Stronger and Clearer Each Time, which states, “Consider continuing to use this routine by inviting students to write a first draft and use feedback to make their thinking stronger and clearer. (optional)” Although the MLR is listed as optional, the student print edition is formatted with locations for students’ first draft rule and second draft rule. As small groups co-create and co-write exponent rules, MLLs are supported with an ML/EL Support that states, “Encourage students to paraphrase each other’s ideas to help them make connections and incorporate vocabulary from the unit. (Speaking and Listening)” The MLD resources for this lesson are for Activity 2. They further support MLLs’ full and complete participation with sentence frames and a bilingual English-Spanish word bank to help MLLs co-create exponent rules, such as, “I think the rule might be….” and “The rule would be clearer if we…” The MLD Resources also provide teacher prompts that are paired with linguistic supports categorized into Emerging/Expanding/Bridging that range from color-coding similarities between examples and annotating patterns they notice. The MLD Resources paired with the language-rich lesson provide MLLs with full and complete participation in MP8 in this lesson. 

In summary, while language supports are present in the materials, they are not employed throughout the program, but these supports do not consistently provide for full and complete participation by MLL students. At times, the MLD Resources do not support the language needed for MLLs to engage with MP8.