7th Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 7th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Focus & Coherence
Gateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations | 78% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Focus | 2 / 2 |
Criterion 1.2: Coherence | 4 / 4 |
Criterion 1.3: Coherence | 5 / 8 |
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for focus and coherence in the CCSSM. For focus, the instructional materials meet the criteria for the time devoted to the major work of the grade. Of the days allocated in the timeline, 64 percent align to the major work of this grade. For coherence, supporting work is rarely connected to the focus of the grade. Coherence is evident in the instructional materials including problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain and that connect two or more domains in a grade. Overall, the Grade 7 materials are partially coherent and consistent with the standards.
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for focus on both assessment and major clusters. The summative assessment of each packet assesses topics at this grade level without assessing any content from future grades. The materials suggest 64 percent of the days for major work of the grade, and there is support from content in the non-major clusters that directly reinforces major work. Overall, the instructional materials meet the criteria for grade-level assessment as well as spending the majority of class time on the major clusters of the grade.
Indicator 1a
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for focus within assessment. Overall, the instructional material does not assess any content from future grades within the summative assessment sections of each packet.
For this indicator the summative test for each packet was considered.
- All assessments and topics relate to Grade 7 standards or below.
- No content above grade level was assessed on the packet summative test.
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote the large majority of class time in each grade K-8 to the major work of the grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for focus on both assessment and major clusters. The summative assessment of each packet assesses topics at this grade level without assessing any content from future grades. The materials suggest 64 percent of the days for major work of the grade, and there is support from content in the non-major clusters that directly reinforces major work. Overall, the instructional materials meet the criteria for grade-level assessment as well as spending the majority of class time on the major clusters of the grade.
Indicator 1b
Instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major cluster of each grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for focus within major clusters. Overall, the instructional material spends the majority of class time on the major clusters of each grade.
To determine this, three perspectives were evaluated: 1) the number of units/packets devoted to major work, 2) the number of lessons devoted to major work, and 3) the number of days devoted to major work. The number of days devoted to major work is the most reflective for this indicator because it specifically addresses the amount of class time spent on concepts. The conclusion is based on that data.
The number of days suggested by the publisher for the “enriched” pacing option is the one most dedicated to grade-level work with the least review.
- Units/Packets – percentage of time spent on major work is 74 percent.
- Lessons – percentage of time spent on major work is 64 percent.
- Days – the percentage of time spent on major work is 64 percent.
- Also the non-major clusters were evaluated to determine if they could count due to how strongly they support major work of the grade. Some evidence, such as Packet 16: Plane and Solid Figures, does a significant amount of work with formulas which supports 7.EE: Expressions and Equations.
- While 64 percent is just short of the 65 percent - 85 percent standard, the support in the non-major clusters strengthens Grade 7 so that the majority of time is spent on major work.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
Coherence: Each grade's instructional materials are coherent and consistent with the Standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for coherence and consistency with the CCSSM. There is limited evidence of supporting content enhancing coherence by reinforcing the major work of the grade because so much of the content is stand-alone.
The Grade 7 materials provide a list of previous skills/knowledge that is foundational for the current work, but they don’t explicitly tie the list to lessons. The materials include lessons that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade. The materials also develop by the grade-by-grade progressions in the standards. However, most of the lessons take a surface approach to standards – they meet the standard, but without developing the depth of understanding that allows students to apply and transfer the learning.
Overall, the Grade 7 materials partially address the key aspects of coherence and consistency within the standards.
Indicator 1c
Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for the supporting content enhancing focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade. To determine this, the connections that the teacher guide stated were considered, and the student lessons were reviewed to validate the connections from the teacher guide as well as determine if there were missed opportunities to make strong connections.
Some examples include:
- The strongest support comes from geometry and statistics supporting the major work of Expressions and Equations. Units 14 (Angles), 15 (Scale Factor), and 16 (Surface Area) support 7.EE.A and 7.EE.B. All of these require the students to use formulas/equations to solve problems.
- Unit 15 also has a strong connection to computation concepts (7.NS.A).
- There were instances where the supporting work missed opportunities to connect to major work such as Unit 15, which could have developed the connection to Ratios/Proportions related to the scale factors.
- In Packet 13, Lesson 3, standards 7.RP.A, 7.SP.A, and 7.SP.B are connected as students make inferences about populations of fish in a lake after a sampling experiment. Four days are allotted for this lesson. However the connection does not extend beyond the “fish in a lake” example and there is concern that students would not be able to transfer the learning just from one specific problem.
- In Packet 7, all seven days of the unit are devoted to supporting work (7.SP.C), but on only three out of seven of those days (in Lesson 3) are students engaged in connecting the supporting work to the major work of the grade level.
- Many of the packets contain below grade-level content, which limits the opportunity for supporting content to enhance the major work of the grade.
Indicator 1d
The amount of content designated for one grade level is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for the amount of content designated for one grade level being viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades.
The Teacher’s Guide offers six different pacing plans –
- Three for traditional schedules.
- Three for block schedules.
- Each has the Modified Plan for students who require extensive review.
- The Basic Plan for students who require some review.
- The Enriched Plan for students who only need minimal review.
- All of them plan for 32 weeks of instruction.
For the report the Traditional Enriched Plan was used because it best represented a focus on grade-level work.
The pacing provided by the publisher is reasonable for lessons to be completed in the time suggested.
- Lessons plus a catch-up day (built into each unit) and the assessment day equal 155.5 days
- Falls within the 140-190 range suggested
- According to the Scope and Sequence, all Grade 7 standards are included.
However, there are concerns:
- There is concern that the depth of learning would not adequately prepare students for the next grade level.
- The packets take a surface approach to standards – they meet the standard, but without developing the depth of understanding that allows students to apply and transfer the learning.
- In addition, there is concern about the three pacing suggestions.
- Students needing more review early in the year spend equal or less time on units later in the year, which is new material.
- It is not clear how students who need Modified Plan A could finish all packets in the same amount of time as students on Enriched Plan C, though there are suggestions about items that could be omitted.
Overall, the number of days suggested is viable, but the depth and pacing creates cause for concern.
Indicator 1e
Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards i. Materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. If there is content from prior or future grades, that content is clearly identified and related to grade-level work ii. Materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems iii. Materials relate grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectations for the material to be consistent with the progressions in the CCSSM. Content from prior grades is clearly identified, although materials do not always relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades within each lesson. Connections are not made to content in future grades. Overall, the materials in Grade 7 identify the progressions from prior grades in the standards.
- The teacher guide includes a page delineating how the major work standards for Grade 7 intersect with major clusters in grades 5-8.
- Each packet lists an overview of standards being addressed including foundational standards that have been taught and learned previously.
- In general, lessons are taught as a series of three, where each builds or connects to the one before.
· Teachers are provided with sufficient information to help see the connections in the standards, tasks, packets and lessons.
· There are standards where the materials are only partially representative of the progressions. For example: 7.RP is included in four units (Units 6, 11, 12, and 13). In Units 11 and 12, 7.RP is addressed with 7.NS, 7.EE and 6.RP as students use proportional reasoning to solve a variety of problems. The work with ratios and proportional reasoning is very specific to certain tasks throughout the units. Overall understanding of the concept of proportionality as a whole and representation of proportionality in various forms is limited because of lack of depth.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectation of giving all students extensive work with grade-level problems. Overall, the materials do not consistently give students of varying abilities extensive work with grade-level problems.
- Not all students have the opportunity to engage deeply with problems related to grade-level standards as the material is not as rigorous as needed and doesn't have the depth that is needed to truly master the standards.
- Each packet primarily contains problem sets designed to help develop students' procedural skill/fluency.
- Some of the performance tasks and proficiency assessments do allow for more application and rigorous engagement with the standards.
- It is recommended in the teachers guide that struggling students spend the majority of time on basic lessons, skill builders and review and to avoid extensions and more challenging questions. This is limiting their interaction and mastery of grade-level standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the expectation of relating grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades. Overall, materials only generally relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.
- Each module lists the foundational standards at the beginning of the module to explicitly connect prior learning to current learning.
- It is more beneficial to see these connections listed in the lessons as they occur.
- Connections to lessons and/or topics from previous grade levels that will be helpful in upcoming lessons are frequently reviewed in the “warm-up” at the beginning of a given topic, though no explicit connections are made for the students.
Indicator 1f
Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the Standards i. Materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings. ii. Materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the standards. Overall, materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings.
- Each packet lists the lessons with the student outcomes clearly stated, which are easily aligned to CCSSM standards and cluster headings.
- In general, lessons and tasks require students to demonstrate the standards. However, they rarely connect these concepts beyond what naturally occurs with lessons following one another.
- The teacher guide provides a page of content emphasis by cluster.
- Each packet identifies the standards addressed and bolds the major cluster.
- Occasionally a lesson title will not have a clear connection – such as “Fish in a Lake” – however the learning objective clarifies the connection.
The instructional materials include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain. They include problems and activities that connect two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important. Overall the materials foster coherence through connections at the Grade 7.
- In packets 6, 8, 9 and 12, students are provided the opportunity to engage in proportional reasoning, while focusing on expressions and equations across the full range of rational numbers. (7.RP.A, 7.NS.A, 7.EE.B)
- However, in general, there is limited focus on writing expressions and equations.
- There are other natural connections evident such as using formulas to solve problems (7.EE.B, 7.G.B) and students using properties of operations to write equivalent equations and use the equations to look at the problem from a different view (7.NS.A, 7.EE.A).