About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Holt McDougal Mathematics | Math
Math 6-8
The materials reviewed do not meet the expectations for alignment to the Common Core State Standards. The materials assess minimal grade appropriate topics. Approximately 20% of the content focuses on the major work. There is minimal supporting work enhancing the understanding of the major work in the standards. It would take more than 190 days to complete each course. The mathematics progression for the series is based on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Curriculum Focal Points instead of the CCSSM. Since the material does not meet the alignment standards for focus or coherence, it was not reviewed for rigor and the math practices.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 6th Grade
Alignment Summary
While Course 1 does address major coursework of Grade 6, future grade level work is taught and assessed. Chapter 7 addresses major work with ratios. However, the material often uses the term “proportion” and asks students to solve for them. This is not wording taken from the standard as students in Grade 6 do not directly solve proportions. Another example of this is seen in Chapter 13 where the material uses the term “function.” This terminology isn’t used until Grade 8. By changing these two terms, the problems on these chapter assessments would more closely align to the Grade 6 standards. Since these materials do not meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM for focus or coherence, they were not reviewed for rigor or the math practices.
6th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for Gateway 1. While there are lessons in which the supporting work enhances the understanding of the major work of Grade 6, approximately 12 percent of time is dedicated to major work for Grade 6. This number was found by dividing the number of instructional days dedicated to major work (22 days) by the total number of days to complete the entire course (180 days). Less than 50 percent of the resource assesses Grade 6 standards. This number was found by finding the average percent of questions on grade level within each unit assessment.
Gateway 1
v1.0
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for assessing materials at the Grade 6 level. Overall, there were too many assessment items that most closely aligned to standards above Grade 6. Examples of these occurrences can be found in chapters 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.
Indicator 1A
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for appropriately assessing grade-level standards. Overall, the materials assess topics from future grades in such a way that the modification or omission of the assessment items aligned to the above grade-level topics, and the accompanying lessons, would significantly impact the underlying structure of the materials for the grade. A list of the above, grade-level topics and the chapters in which they occur follow.
- In Chapter 3, there are assessment items that address scientific notation (8.EE.A.4).
- In Chapter 7, there are assessment items that address working with scale drawings (7.G.A.1).
- In Chapter 8, there are assessment items that address angle relationships, which most closely align to 7.G.B.5, and transformations, which most closely align to 8.G.A.
- In Chapter 9, there are assessment items that address parts of circles and the circumference of circles, which most closely aligns to 7.G.B.4.
- In Chapter 10, there are assessment items that address the area of circles (7.G.B.4), the volume of triangular prisms (7.G.B.6), and the volume of cylinders (8.G.C.9).
- In Chapter 11, there are assessment items that address transformations on the coordinate plane, which align to 8.G.A, operations with negative, rational numbers, which align to 7.NS.A, and solving equations involving negative, rational numbers, which align to 7.EE.B.
- In Chapter 12, the vast majority of the assessment items address probability, which aligns to 7.SP.C.
- In Chapter 13, there are assessment items that address writing functions in two variables, which aligns to 8.F.B.4, and solving multi-step equations and inequalities, which aligns to 7.EE.B.
*Evidence updated 10/27/15
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for the majority of class time being spent on the major work for Grade 6. Course 1 of the Holt McDougall series has approximately 25% of its content focused on the major work. The major work of Grade 6 is understanding ratio concepts (6.RP.A); applying and extending previous understandings of multiplication and division to divide fractions by fractions (6.NS.A); applying and extending previous understanding of numbers to the system of rational numbers (6.NS.C); applying and extending previous understanding of arithmetic to algebraic expressions (6.EE.A); and representing and analyzing quantitative relationships between dependent and independent variables (6.EE.C).
Indicator 1B
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the majority of class time spent on the major work of Grade 6. The major work of Grade 6 is:
- understanding ratio concepts (6.RP.A);
- applying and extending previous understandings of multiplication and division to divide fractions by fractions (6.NS.A);
- applying and extending previous understanding of numbers to the system of rational numbers (6.NS.C);
- applying and extending previous understanding of arithmetic to algebraic expressions (6.EE.A); and,
- representing and analyzing quantitative relationships between dependent and independent variables (6.EE.C).
Course 1 of the Holt McDougal series has approximately 25% of its content focused on the major work of the grade.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for coherence. There were a few places where the supporting work enhances the understanding of the major work of Grade 6. It would take more than 190 days to complete Course 1 and the course addresses less than a third of the Grade 6 standards. The mathematics progression for course 1 is based on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Curriculum Focal Points instead of the CCSS.
Indicator 1C
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for supporting content enhancing the major work for Grade 6.
- There were a few places where the supporting work enhances the understanding of the major work of Grade 6. It was less than 10% of the work in Course 1 of the Holt McDougal Series.
- There is evidence that in a few lessons in chapters 3-6 and 10 that students compute fluently with multi-digit numbers and find common factors and multiples (6.NS.B) to support the major work of 6.EE.A.
- The work of solving real-world and mathematical problems involving area, surface area and volume (6.G.A) is used to support the major work of reasoning about and solving one-variable equations. Lessons supporting standard 6.EE.B are in chapter 10.
Indicator 1D
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 do not meet the expectations for being able to complete Course 1 in a school year.
- Using the 45-minute lesson planning guide, it would take more than 190 days to complete this course.
- These concepts in the lessons would cover less than a third of the Grade 6 CCSS.
Indicator 1E
The instructional materials for Grade 6 do not meet expectations for being consistent with the progression in the standards.
- The mathematics progression for Course 1 is based on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Curriculum Focal Points instead of the Common Core State Standards, thus the grade-by-grade progression of the CCSSM is not reflected in these materials.
- The materials have a Reaching all Learners section at the beginning of each chapter but it does not give specific support for teachers on how to differentiate in each lesson. There are pretests for each chapter but in order to use the data to make instructional decisions a teacher would need to have the supplemental materials.
- The materials do not explicitly relate grade level material to prior knowledge from earlier grades. The same exact lesson is in each of the Grade 6 through Grade 8 texts, but there is no indicator in the materials that this lesson will repeat in future grades.
- There is a mathematics background section for each chapter for the teacher. It gives a general overview of connections between grade levels.
Indicator 1F
The instructional materials for Grade 6 do not meet expectations for fostering coherence.
- The mathematics progression is based on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Curriculum Focal Points instead of the CCSS, thus the learning objectives are not visibly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings.
- The mathematics taught in this series is done in isolation without connections between clusters.
- There is repetitive work across the grade levels. For example, chapter 7 course 1 and chapter 4 course 2 cover almost identical material on ratios, rates and proportions. Chapter 8 in both course 1 and 2 include practically the same geometry information on lines and angles and transformations.