About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Stanford NGSS Integrated Curriculum - An Exploration of a Multidimensional World | Science
Science 6-8
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 do not meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning does not meet expectations. The materials include some three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions, but not consistently. Opportunities for student sensemaking are present for the CCCs and SEPs, but the materials miss the opportunity to consistently engage students in three-dimensional sensemaking. The task and learning sequence objectives are three dimensional and there is a missed opportunity for the corresponding formative and summative assessments to measure the three dimensions for the objectives. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning partially meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present and connect to grade-band appropriate DCIs. Of the phenomena and problems present, about half are presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena or problems, but provide few instances to leverage it in subsequent learning opportunities. The materials include phenomena or problems that drive student learning and use of the three dimensions within multiple tasks and within multiple units, but not consistently for either the tasks or units.
6th to 8th
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.